From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Oct 26 12:18:01 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA18416 for hardware-outgoing; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 12:18:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from mail.aloha.com (volack@leahi.aloha.com [206.127.224.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA18388 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 12:17:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from volack@mail.aloha.com) Received: (from volack@localhost) by mail.aloha.com (8.8.7/8.8.7/PIXI-5.2) id KAA29391; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 10:17:37 -1000 (HST) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 10:17:36 -1000 (HST) From: Joseph J Volack PE To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: CD-WRITERS Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Has anyone successfully used an HP 6020 CD Writer with FreeBSD? I'm looking to buy a CD-Writer, but I can't find anyone who has the 4020's any more. From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Oct 26 12:40:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA19508 for hardware-outgoing; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 12:40:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA19500 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 12:40:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA14416; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 21:38:08 +0100 (CET) To: Joseph J Volack PE cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CD-WRITERS In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Oct 1997 10:17:36 -1000." Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 21:38:07 +0100 Message-ID: <14414.877898287@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Joseph J Volack PE writes: > Has anyone successfully used an HP 6020 CD Writer with FreeBSD? >I'm looking to buy a CD-Writer, but I can't find anyone who has the >4020's any more. Got one here, Works fine. worm0 at scbus0 target 4 lun 0 worm0: type 5 removable SCSI 2 worm0: Write-Once -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Oct 26 13:03:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA20469 for hardware-outgoing; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 13:03:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from gvr.gvr.org (root@gvr.gvr.org [194.151.74.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA20460 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 13:03:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from guido@gvr.org) Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.gvr.org (8.8.6/8.8.5) id WAA15516; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 22:03:02 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij Message-Id: <199710262103.WAA15516@gvr.gvr.org> Subject: Re: CD-WRITERS In-Reply-To: from Joseph J Volack PE at "Oct 26, 97 10:17:36 am" To: volack@aloha.com (Joseph J Volack PE) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 22:03:02 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Joseph J Volack PE wrote: > Has anyone successfully used an HP 6020 CD Writer with FreeBSD? > I'm looking to buy a CD-Writer, but I can't find anyone who has the > 4020's any more. > The Philips cdd2000 are the same. Perhaps you can find that one? Otherwise get a CDD2600; it's double speed. -Guido From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Oct 26 14:08:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA23623 for hardware-outgoing; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 14:08:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA23615 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 14:08:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA06719; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 14:08:16 -0800 (PST) To: Joseph J Volack PE cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CD-WRITERS In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Oct 1997 10:17:36 -1000." Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 14:08:16 -0800 Message-ID: <6716.877903696@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I use one of these all the time and used it, in fact, to make the FreeBSD 2.2.5 set. Jordan > Has anyone successfully used an HP 6020 CD Writer with FreeBSD? > I'm looking to buy a CD-Writer, but I can't find anyone who has the > 4020's any more. > From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Oct 26 18:10:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA06104 for hardware-outgoing; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 18:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from fly.HiWAAY.net (root@fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA06099 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 18:10:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt2-249.HiWAAY.net [208.147.148.249]) by fly.HiWAAY.net (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA32353 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 20:10:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id TAA11696 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 19:52:38 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199710270152.TAA11696@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG From: dkelly@hiwaay.net Subject: Re: CD-WRITERS In-reply-to: Message from "Jordan K. Hubbard" of "Sun, 26 Oct 1997 14:08:16 PST." <6716.877903696@time.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 19:52:38 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I use one of these all the time and used it, in fact, to make > the FreeBSD 2.2.5 set. > > Jordan > > > Has anyone successfully used an HP 6020 CD Writer with FreeBSD? > > I'm looking to buy a CD-Writer, but I can't find anyone who has the > > 4020's any more. Jordan, did the 6020 require custom hacking of /usr/src/sys/scsi/worm.c? "man wormcontrol" says: By now, the vendor/model names of ``PLASMON'' / ``RF4100'', ``PHILIPS'' / ``CDD2000'', and ``HP'' / ``4020i'' are known. and /usr/src/sys/scsi/worm.c appears to agree. I have access to a Yamaha CDR100 and have had mixed success without altering my kernel. The cd-write port is able to read data images from the worm device, but unable to write. Compiled the non-port cdrecord 1.5 and have been able to create a bootable FreeBSD 2.2.5. Wouldn't say the Yamaha was perfect under FreeBSD, not by a long shot. Several times I managed to get it in a state that required its power to be cycled before it was usable again. Any patches or suggestions to make the Yamaha work right? I too was shopping for CD-R's this past week and found Philips CDD2600 and HP 6020's widely available but not the 4020 which is sorta endorsed in /usr/share/examples/worm/*. Any available supported 4x writers? -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Oct 26 19:22:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA09078 for hardware-outgoing; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 19:22:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA09066 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 19:22:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA01049; Sun, 26 Oct 1997 19:22:45 -0800 (PST) To: dkelly@hiwaay.net cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CD-WRITERS In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Oct 1997 19:52:38 CST." <199710270152.TAA11696@nospam.hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 19:22:45 -0800 Message-ID: <1046.877922565@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I made no changes to get the HP6020i to work, it works out of the box with 2.2.x Jordan > > I use one of these all the time and used it, in fact, to make > > the FreeBSD 2.2.5 set. > > > > Jordan > > > > > Has anyone successfully used an HP 6020 CD Writer with FreeBSD? > > > I'm looking to buy a CD-Writer, but I can't find anyone who has the > > > 4020's any more. > > Jordan, did the 6020 require custom hacking of /usr/src/sys/scsi/worm.c? > > "man wormcontrol" says: > > By now, the vendor/model names of ``PLASMON'' / ``RF4100'', > ``PHILIPS'' / ``CDD2000'', and ``HP'' / ``4020i'' are known. > > and /usr/src/sys/scsi/worm.c appears to agree. > > I have access to a Yamaha CDR100 and have had mixed success without > altering my kernel. The cd-write port is able to read data images from > the worm device, but unable to write. Compiled the non-port cdrecord > 1.5 and have been able to create a bootable FreeBSD 2.2.5. Wouldn't say > the Yamaha was perfect under FreeBSD, not by a long shot. Several times > I managed to get it in a state that required its power to be cycled > before it was usable again. > > Any patches or suggestions to make the Yamaha work right? > > I too was shopping for CD-R's this past week and found Philips CDD2600 > and HP 6020's widely available but not the 4020 which is sorta endorsed > in /usr/share/examples/worm/*. Any available supported 4x writers? > -- > David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net > ===================================================================== > The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its > capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. > > From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Oct 27 12:19:35 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA21459 for hardware-outgoing; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 12:19:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk (bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.5.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA21248; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 12:17:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from L.Vicisano@cs.ucl.ac.uk) Received: from thud.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id ; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 20:17:32 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG cc: L.Vicisano@cs.ucl.ac.uk Subject: Hayes ACCURA 336 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 20:17:30 +0000 Message-ID: <4010.877983450@cs.ucl.ac.uk> From: Lorenzo VICISANO Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I'm trying to make an Hayes ACCURA 336 PCMCIA modem work with my laptop (it runs 2.2.2R + PAO stuff), but I'm not having any success. Looks like that the problem is in the sio driver (sioprobe fails in almost all the tests). I don't think the problem is the pcmcia stuff, and I noticed that Patrick_Gardella has had the same problems mounts ago with a k56flex internal modem (b.t.w. windows uses the same driver for both). Any suggestions? Thanks, Lorenzo Vicisano (please cc to me) *--------------------*----------------------------------------------* / Lorenzo Vicisano \ http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/L.Vicisano / / Dept. of Computer Science \ E-mail L.Vicisano@cs.ucl.ac.uk / / University College London \ Tel +44 171 419 3670 / / Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK \ Fax +44 171 387 1397 / *----------------------------------------*--------------------------* > I searched the archives and found that one person has reportred trying to > k56flex modems. He says he hasn't found one that works yet (hasn't tried > many either). > > So I'll ask the question, does anyone have a K56flex modem working on > FreeBSD 2.2.1 or later? > > I'm looking at internal modems not external. > > My only experience is with a Hayes Accura 56. I got the probe test 3 > error I reported last week. Adding DELAY=10000 and/or commenting the > error check did not work with sio.c. From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Oct 27 15:13:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA04457 for hardware-outgoing; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:13:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from roguetrader.com (brandon@cold.org [206.81.134.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA04445 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:13:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brandon@roguetrader.com) Received: from localhost (brandon@localhost) by roguetrader.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA11879 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 16:12:36 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 16:12:35 -0700 (MST) From: Brandon Gillespie To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: 3COM 590 warning in vx driver Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Just curious, I could not find any documentation on the warning given when I boot from a 3COM 590 Driver. Even in the mail archives I see the question asked, but I couldn't find an answer.. Basically, when I boot I see: vx0 <3COM 3C590 Etherlink III PCI> rev 0 int a irq 9 on pci0:20 utp/aui/bnc[*utp*] address x:x..hardware addr.. Warning! Defective early revision adapter! OK, so its an defective adapter.. what does this mean? Is it a hardware problem, and i'm just SOL, or can I get an upgrade for it? I searched 3com's site as well, and coudln't find anything about it... -Brandon Gillespie From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Oct 27 15:43:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA06379 for hardware-outgoing; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:43:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from lafcol (lafcol.lafayette.edu [139.147.8.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA06365 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:43:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from knollm@lafcol.lafayette.edu) Received: from bishop by lafcol (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id SAA20796; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 18:42:13 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19971027183611.00982930@lafcol.lafayette.edu> X-Sender: knollm@lafcol.lafayette.edu X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 18:42:52 -0500 To: cgull+usenet-877838850@smoke.marlboro.vt.us (john hood), hardware@freebsd.org From: Babumpabajard Subject: Re: Harddrive powerdowns Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 12:09 AM 10/26/97 -0400, you wrote: >Mike Smith writes: > > The wd driver times the operation out and retries it. AFAIR most > > operations are tried at least 3 times before giving up. > >And in -current, the driver now waits longer (10s) before the first >retry, eliminating those nattering errors. I can not figure out why my HD is spinning up so frequently. I set the time down to 1 minute, with no one logged in, only process other than defualt but sshd, and the system still reads. There's 48megs of RAM, so I can't immagine it needs to swap. Is there a way to determine what is using my harddrive? Michael From owner-freebsd-hardware Mon Oct 27 19:06:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA18990 for hardware-outgoing; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 19:06:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from smoke.marlboro.vt.us (smoke.marlboro.vt.us [198.206.215.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA18983 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 19:06:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cgull@smoke.marlboro.vt.us) Received: (from cgull@localhost) by smoke.marlboro.vt.us (8.8.7/8.8.7/cgull) id WAA17311; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 22:06:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 22:06:42 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199710280306.WAA17311@smoke.marlboro.vt.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: cgull+usenet-878007340@smoke.marlboro.vt.us (john hood) To: Babumpabajard Cc: cgull+usenet-877838850@smoke.marlboro.vt.us (john hood), hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Harddrive powerdowns In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19971027183611.00982930@lafcol.lafayette.edu> References: <3.0.32.19971027183611.00982930@lafcol.lafayette.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under Emacs 19.34.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Babumpabajard writes: > At 12:09 AM 10/26/97 -0400, you wrote: > >Mike Smith writes: > > > The wd driver times the operation out and retries it. AFAIR most > > > operations are tried at least 3 times before giving up. > > > >And in -current, the driver now waits longer (10s) before the first > >retry, eliminating those nattering errors. > > I can not figure out why my HD is spinning up so frequently. I set the > time down to 1 minute, with no one logged in, only process other than > defualt but sshd, and the system still reads. There's 48megs of RAM, so I > can't immagine it needs to swap. > > Is there a way to determine what is using my harddrive? I'd run top and see what's in a disk wait while the disk is spinning up. My wild guess is cron writing its log file everytime atrun is run every 5 minutes. --jh -- Mr. Belliveau said, "the difference was the wise, John Hood, cgull intelligent look on the face of the cow." He was @ *so* right. --Ofer Inbar smoke.marlboro.vt.us From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Oct 28 00:25:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA07205 for hardware-outgoing; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:25:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from schizo.dk.tfs.com (mail.trw.dk [195.8.133.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA07198 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:25:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.dk.tfs.com [140.145.230.252]) by schizo.dk.tfs.com (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA27279; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 09:24:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA00290; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 08:33:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Babumpabajard cc: cgull+usenet-877838850@smoke.marlboro.vt.us (john hood), hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Harddrive powerdowns In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 27 Oct 1997 18:42:52 EST." <3.0.32.19971027183611.00982930@lafcol.lafayette.edu> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 08:33:06 +0100 Message-ID: <288.878023986@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <3.0.32.19971027183611.00982930@lafcol.lafayette.edu>, Babumpabajard writes: >At 12:09 AM 10/26/97 -0400, you wrote: >>Mike Smith writes: >> > The wd driver times the operation out and retries it. AFAIR most >> > operations are tried at least 3 times before giving up. >> >>And in -current, the driver now waits longer (10s) before the first >>retry, eliminating those nattering errors. > >I can not figure out why my HD is spinning up so frequently. I set the >time down to 1 minute, with no one logged in, only process other than >defualt but sshd, and the system still reads. There's 48megs of RAM, so I >can't immagine it needs to swap. > >Is there a way to determine what is using my harddrive? You have set the update timer, right ? printout the blocknumber that fails because of the drive sleeping, learn about UFS on-disk-structures and work your way backwards... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Oct 28 01:45:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA10981 for hardware-outgoing; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 01:45:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from bsd7.cs.sunysb.edu (bsd7.cs.sunysb.edu [130.245.1.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA10960 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 01:44:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gene@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by bsd7.cs.sunysb.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id EAA04630; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 04:44:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gene@localhost) by starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) id VAA03050; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 21:21:34 -0500 (EST) To: Babumpabajard Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Harddrive powerdowns References: <633cb8$2bo@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu> From: Gene Stark Date: 27 Oct 1997 21:21:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: Babumpabajard's message of Mon, 27 Oct 1997 18:42:52 -0500 Message-ID: <87yb3e7hld.fsf@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu> Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Babumpabajard writes: > I can not figure out why my HD is spinning up so frequently. I set the > time down to 1 minute, with no one logged in, only process other than > defualt but sshd, and the system still reads. There's 48megs of RAM, so I > can't immagine it needs to swap. > > Is there a way to determine what is using my harddrive? The update process (syncs the disk every 30 seconds)? There is a sysctl variable to change the default interval. - Gene Stark From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Oct 28 16:02:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA02235 for hardware-outgoing; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 16:02:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from kelly.prima.de (root@kelly.prima.de [141.39.232.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA02223 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 16:02:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chokepnt@prima.ruhr.de) Received: from chokepnt.uni-bonn.de (rhrz-ts2-p7.rhrz.uni-bonn.de [131.220.225.157]) by kelly.prima.de (8.8.7/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA16694; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 01:02:05 +0100 Message-ID: <345232CC.41C67EA6@prima.ruhr.de> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 19:56:28 +0200 From: Philipp Reichmuth X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Jackson CC: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: K6 Update & AMD Statement References: <342A79F5.41C67EA6@prima.ruhr.de> <19970929005835.01396@my.domain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Tom Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 25, 1997 at 04:49:25PM +0200, Philipp Reichmuth wrote: > > Hi folks! > > > > Good news for the K6: I just got mine swapped by my dealer; it was a > > revision 9721 chip, and he swapped it for a 9735 chip. It now works > > fine. I'll redo the make world for a couple of times the next weeks and > > see what I'll get. > > > > Second good news: I wrote to AMD about it, and they seem genuinely > > concerned with it, or so I gather from their mail. Here's what they > > wrote (follows) > > > > Philipp > > > > ==================> begin AMD mail <============ > > (lots of mail) > > =========================> End AMD Stuff <========================= > > > > (but please don't post all this into the wide world - it's a bit touchy > > with personal email) > > > > Have you ask him to contact David G to get a replacement to him so the > evaluation results can be known to all of us? > > Tom I have to apologize for being unable to read and write mail for the last few weeks or so. Actually, my posting was the very last I was able to do because of serious trouble with both the ISP I am working with and my computer (mostly due to my own stupidity). This is why I haven't been able to ask anybody anything. My #9735 chip is working fine, though, so AMD seem to have got rid of it. I wonder if it makes sense to ask them this late. Philipp From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Oct 29 01:52:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA05450 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 01:52:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from mama.vcommunities.com (mama.vcommunities.com [207.207.69.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id BAA05416 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 01:52:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin@mama.vcommunities.com) From: admin@mama.vcommunities.com Received: (qmail 28145 invoked by uid 200); 29 Oct 1997 09:49:28 -0000 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 01:49:28 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Help! Network Hanging w/ 2940UW and 2.1.7.1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello! I'm having some severe problems with hanging during ftp transfers, telnet sessions, and other network connections on a system with an Adaptec 2940 ultra-wide controller and an Atlas 3 GB drive. The system completely freezes and has to be power cycled. I'm using FreeBSD 2.1.7.1-RELEASE. I've never had this problem with narrow 2940 controllers or narrow drives. Has anyone experienced this, and does anyone have any suggestions as to how to fix it? Thank you! S. Taylor, VCI Admin From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Oct 29 02:38:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA07936 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 02:38:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from florence.pavilion.net (florence.pavilion.net [194.242.128.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA07930 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 02:38:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@florence.pavilion.net) Received: (from joe@localhost) by florence.pavilion.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA07710; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:37:29 GMT Message-ID: <19971029103729.08926@pavilion.net> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 10:37:29 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser To: admin@mama.vcommunities.com Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Help! Network Hanging w/ 2940UW and 2.1.7.1 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.81 In-Reply-To: ; from admin@mama.vcommunities.com on Wed, Oct 29, 1997 at 01:49:28AM -0800 X-NCC-RegID: uk.pavilion Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, Oct 29, 1997 at 01:49:28AM -0800, admin@mama.vcommunities.com wrote: > > Hello! I'm having some severe problems with hanging during ftp > transfers, telnet sessions, and other network connections on a > system with an Adaptec 2940 ultra-wide controller and an Atlas 3 GB drive. > The system completely freezes and has to be power cycled. I'm using > FreeBSD 2.1.7.1-RELEASE. I've never had this problem with narrow 2940 > controllers or narrow drives. Has anyone experienced this, and does > anyone have any suggestions as to how to fix it? Thank you! > > S. Taylor, > VCI Admin Upgrade to 2.2.5. There are many many scsi fixes in this system. Joe -- Josef Karthauser Technical Manager Email: joe@pavilion.net Pavilion Internet plc. [Tel: +44 1273 607072 Fax: +44 1273 607073] From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Oct 29 08:47:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA26650 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 08:47:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from bb.cc.wa.us (root@[208.8.136.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA26644 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 08:46:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@bb.cc.wa.us) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by bb.cc.wa.us (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA07184; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 08:40:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 08:40:04 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Coleman X-Sender: chris@bb.cc.wa.us To: admin@mama.vcommunities.com cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Help! Network Hanging w/ 2940UW and 2.1.7.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I had a very similar problem with a 2940W (UW?) and 2.1.7.1. I was using a SeaGate Barracuda 2.1G drive and added a Quantum 4.1G Drive. It would install, but as soon as the machine got up and running and the drive really got used it would lock up and die. I ended up replacing the drive with another Seagate 4.1G drive and have lived happily ever after. Its still on 2.1.7.1. Christopher J. Coleman (chris@bb.cc.wa.us) Computer Support Analyst I (509)-766-8873 FreeBSD Book Project: http://www.vmunix.com/fbsd-book/ On Wed, 29 Oct 1997 admin@mama.vcommunities.com wrote: > > Hello! I'm having some severe problems with hanging during ftp > transfers, telnet sessions, and other network connections on a > system with an Adaptec 2940 ultra-wide controller and an Atlas 3 GB drive. > The system completely freezes and has to be power cycled. I'm using > FreeBSD 2.1.7.1-RELEASE. I've never had this problem with narrow 2940 > controllers or narrow drives. Has anyone experienced this, and does > anyone have any suggestions as to how to fix it? Thank you! > > S. Taylor, > VCI Admin > > From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Oct 29 15:11:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA23445 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:11:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA23425 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:11:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA16687; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:11:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:11:07 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: admin@mama.vcommunities.com cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Help! Network Hanging w/ 2940UW and 2.1.7.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 29 Oct 1997 admin@mama.vcommunities.com wrote: > > Hello! I'm having some severe problems with hanging during ftp > transfers, telnet sessions, and other network connections on a > system with an Adaptec 2940 ultra-wide controller and an Atlas 3 GB drive. The obvious thing to say would be `interrupt conflict' so check the resources of your network interfaces and the SCSI controller. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Oct 30 00:09:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA23402 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 00:09:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from madoka.hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (madoka.hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.98.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA23396 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 00:09:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pasqual@hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp) Received: from hitomi.hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (hitomi.hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.98.148]) by madoka.hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (8.8.7/3.5Wpl2/HALmailhost/97020422) with ESMTP id RAA24764 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 17:09:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp by hitomi.hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp (8.8.5+2.7Wbeta5/3.2W5/HAL) with ESMTP id RAA02010; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 17:09:32 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199710300809.RAA02010@hitomi.hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: IBM IDE DHEA-34330 HDD X-Mailer: Mew version 1.70 on Emacs 19.28.1 / Mule 2.3 X-PGP-fingerprint: 5A A1 E6 D0 FF 96 FB F8 DE 23 EF 06 A1 76 94 E9 X-PGP-Public-Key-Location: finger -l pasqual@hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp or Home Page X-URL: http://www.hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~pasqual Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 17:09:32 +0900 From: Ajith Pasqual Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi!, I'm looking for a IDE disk for a FreeBSD workstation (there won't be any heavy loads on it) and performance is not critical) and came across these IBM drives. IBM DHEA-34330 Ultra ATA and IBM DCAA34300 (http://www.storage.ibm.com/storage/oem/data/desk4.htm) Specs seems OK. Heard may good things about IBM SCSI drives. Does any one have any experience with the above drives (with FreeBSD)? (seems lost in this SCSI world :-)) If the above drives are BAD, recommendations for any good IDE drives will be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards, Ajith. From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Oct 30 01:48:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA28538 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 01:48:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from DonaldBurr.dyn.ml.org (root@199-170-160-227.la.inreach.net [199.107.160.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA28492 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 01:47:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dburr@POBoxes.com) Received: from DonaldBurr.dyn.ml.org (dburr@DonaldBurr.DonaldBurr.dyn.ml.org [192.160.60.1]) by DonaldBurr.dyn.ml.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA19731; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 01:49:22 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.1 [p0] on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <199710300809.RAA02010@hitomi.hal.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 01:42:36 -0800 (PST) Organization: Starfleet Command From: Donald Burr To: Ajith Pasqual Subject: RE: IBM IDE DHEA-34330 HDD Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- My secret spy satellite informs me that on 30-Oct-97, Ajith Pasqual wrote: >If the above drives are BAD, recommendations for any good IDE drives will >be >much appreciated. well, to add my $0.02... YOu can't go wrong with Western Digital. I've been banging away on my Western Digital Caviar 1.08 GB for several years now, and it hasn't complained or done anything weird even once. My roommate just installed their 2.1 GB drive, and my friend has been running their 3.6 drive heavily for about 6 months now, and all reports are A-OK. I'm very impressed with their drives, they run fast, they run pretty cool, and they even sound neat (the 2.1 and 3.6 drives are REALLY QUIET, which is nice when you sleep in the same room as your machine like my roommate does :) ). These are the drives I put into the FreeBSD boxes I build for clients who don't want SCSI. - --- Donald Burr - Ask me for my PGP key | PGP: Your WWW HomePage: http://DonaldBurr.base.org/ ICQ #1347455 | right to Address: P.O. Box 91212, Santa Barbara, CA 93190-1212 | 'Net privacy. Phone: (805) 957-9666 FAX: (800) 492-5954 | USE IT. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNFhXNPjpixuAwagxAQFXTQQAkAQPa31pP46aQ6mhZDIKrH1T99lyuUUq H2BSxboK9CgViqMifxfdMjECdXvYDjMXjIvldrrmJpwXWN4XbBTWx0BiCSoxgMwI YIS2+e1FLs5UrBiioeiBjT0kn0P2dlWfNMgvNVCH6ka8B0OGOfd1MGPqn0ucDro+ +R4l16KeE9I= =T++y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Oct 30 09:14:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA21891 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:14:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from piggy.mdstud.chalmers.se (root@piggy.mdstud.chalmers.se [129.16.234.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA21886 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:14:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from md6tommy@mdstud.chalmers.se) Received: from hallgren.se (ip181098.student.gu.se [130.241.181.98]) by piggy.mdstud.chalmers.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA10474; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:13:41 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3458C003.167EB0E7@mdstud.chalmers.se> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:12:35 +0100 From: Tommy Hallgren Organization: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.1-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org CC: md6tommy@mdstud.chalmers.se Subject: VIA VP2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi! If I buy a motherboard with the VT82C590 Apollo VP2/97 chipset, will I be able to use those fancy DMA and UDMA transfer modes with FreeBSD(3.0)? http://www.via.com.tw/vp-2.htm The motherboard in question is FIC PA-2007, which seems to be a very good buy. Maybe someone here has experience with this board? regards, Tommy(md6tommy@mdstud.chalmers.se) From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Oct 30 11:59:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA05066 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 11:59:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from monk.via.net (monk.via.net [140.174.204.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA05061 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 11:59:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@via.net) Received: (from joe@localhost) by monk.via.net (8.6.11/8.6.12) id LAA27586 for hardware@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 11:48:56 -0800 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 11:48:56 -0800 From: Joe McGuckin Message-Id: <199710301948.LAA27586@monk.via.net> To: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: TYAN DUAL Pentium II board X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm about to purchase one of these. Has anybody anything good or bad to say about this board? -joe From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Oct 30 12:01:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA05344 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 12:01:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from IBM.rhrz.uni-bonn.de (ibm.rhrz.uni-bonn.de [131.220.236.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA05332 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 12:01:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from uzsv2k@IBM.rhrz.uni-bonn.de) Received: from chokepnt.uni-bonn.de by IBM.rhrz.uni-bonn.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP; Thu, 30 Oct 97 21:00:17 MEZ Message-ID: <3458F038.41C67EA6@uni-bonn.de> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 21:38:16 +0100 From: Philipp Reichmuth X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: admin@mama.vcommunities.com CC: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Help! Network Hanging w/ 2940UW and 2.1.7.1 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk admin@mama.vcommunities.com wrote: > > Hello! I'm having some severe problems with hanging during ftp > transfers, telnet sessions, and other network connections on a > system with an Adaptec 2940 ultra-wide controller and an Atlas 3 GB drive. > The system completely freezes and has to be power cycled. I'm using > FreeBSD 2.1.7.1-RELEASE. I've never had this problem with narrow 2940 > controllers or narrow drives. Has anyone experienced this, and does > anyone have any suggestions as to how to fix it? Thank you! > > S. Taylor, > VCI Admin I've had the same problem with a Quantum Fireball 3200U and an Adaptec 2940U (and more besides) on FreeBSD 2.1.7.1-RELEASE. I ended up disabling the ultra negotiation. Upgrading to 2.2.5-STABLE should be a good idea. Philipp -- > =========================================================================== > formerly - now > =========================================================================== From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Oct 30 14:32:35 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA16080 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:32:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from citrine.cyberstation.net (hannibal@citrine.cyberstation.net [205.167.0.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA16065 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:32:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hannibal@cyberstation.net) Received: from localhost (hannibal@localhost) by citrine.cyberstation.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA16501 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 16:32:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 16:32:28 -0600 (CST) From: Dan Walters To: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Motorola Bitsurfer - extremely slow... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Is anyone successfully running a motorola bitsurfer under FreeBSD? I got it connecting with both B channels with usermode ppp, but I'm getting about 2.1K/s throughput, which is of course a little too slow. I've tried it on a couple different systems (both running 2.2 stable) with the same results. Seems to work just fine in Windows though (of course). There's no IRQ conflicts, I'm not sure what else to look for. Any suggestions? ====================================================================== Dan Walters hannibal@cyberstation.net ====================================================================== From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Oct 30 14:32:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA16112 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:32:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from ns1.hiper.net (ns1.hiper.net [207.137.172.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA16103 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:32:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randyk@ccsales.com) Received: from ntrkcasa (pool38.hiper.net [207.137.172.38]) by ns1.hiper.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA02588 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 16:11:02 GMT Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19971030143030.00b8ae60@ccsales.com> X-Sender: randyk@ccsales.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:30:30 -0800 To: hardware@freebsd.org From: "Randy A. Katz" Subject: WHERE TO BUY - SDL Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Where is everyone buying the SDL RISCom adapters? Thanx, Randy Katz From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 00:05:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA20166 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:05:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from gate.mgt.msk.ru (mgtrep.24h.dialup.ru [194.87.18.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA20160; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:05:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru) Received: from asteroid.mgt.msk.ru (asteroid.mgt.msk.ru [192.168.133.145]) by gate.mgt.msk.ru (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA02308; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 11:06:11 +0300 (MSK) Received: from asteroid.mgt.msk.ru (localhost.mgt.msk.ru [127.0.0.1]) by asteroid.mgt.msk.ru (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA06528; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 11:04:26 +0300 (MSK) Message-Id: <199710310804.LAA06528@asteroid.mgt.msk.ru> To: hardware@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru Subject: fxp0 and full duplex Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 11:04:24 +0300 From: "Alexander B. Povolotsky" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello! Can I somehow set fxp0 rev 1 int a irq 11 on pci0:16 mapreg[10] type=0 addr=ffaff000 size=1000. mapreg[14] type=1 addr=0000ef80 size=0020. mapreg[18] type=0 addr=fea00000 size=100000. reg16: virtual=0xf5529000 physical=0xffaff000 size=0x1000 running under FreeBSD cypres.mgt.msk.ru 2.2-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2-STABLE #0: Fri Oct 31 10:03:10 MSK 1997 tarkhil@cypres.mgt.msk.ru:/mnt/src1/sys/compile/CYPRES i386 tu full-duplex mode? Alex. From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 00:49:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA22236 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:49:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA22216; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:49:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA17074; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:50:20 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199710310850.AAA17074@implode.root.com> To: tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 31 Oct 1997 11:04:24 +0300." <199710310804.LAA06528@asteroid.mgt.msk.ru> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:50:20 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Can I somehow set >fxp0 rev 1 int a irq 11 on pci0:16 > mapreg[10] type=0 addr=ffaff000 size=1000. > mapreg[14] type=1 addr=0000ef80 size=0020. > mapreg[18] type=0 addr=fea00000 size=100000. > reg16: virtual=0xf5529000 physical=0xffaff000 size=0x1000 >running under >FreeBSD cypres.mgt.msk.ru 2.2-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2-STABLE #0: Fri Oct 31 10:03:10 MSK 1997 tarkhil@cypres.mgt.msk.ru:/mnt/src1/sys/compile/CYPRES i386 > >tu full-duplex mode? If it is connected to a switch that does NWAY negotiation, then it will automatically set full-duplex. Otherwise, use: ifconfig fxp0 media 100basetx mediaopt full-duplex -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 16:32:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA15870 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:32:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite.sentex.ca [199.212.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA15865 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:32:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from gravel-remote.sentex.ca (gravel-remote.sentex.ca [209.112.4.181]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA20003; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 19:42:57 -0500 (EST) From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) To: dg@root.com Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex Date: Sat, 01 Nov 1997 00:27:04 GMT Message-ID: <345a7507.1170071313@mail.sentex.net> References: <199710310850.AAA17074@implode.root.com> In-Reply-To: <199710310850.AAA17074@implode.root.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99e/32.227 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:50:20 -0800, in sentex.lists.freebsd.misc you wrote: >> >>tu full-duplex mode? > > If it is connected to a switch that does NWAY negotiation, then it will >automatically set full-duplex. Otherwise, use: > >ifconfig fxp0 media 100basetx mediaopt full-duplex Is there any way to tell after the fact if the card is in full duplex mode ? From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 16:35:30 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA16015 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:35:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA16007 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:35:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA25210; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:36:32 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711010036.QAA25210@implode.root.com> To: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Nov 1997 00:27:04 GMT." <345a7507.1170071313@mail.sentex.net> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:36:32 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >On Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:50:20 -0800, in sentex.lists.freebsd.misc you >wrote: > >>> >>>tu full-duplex mode? >> >> If it is connected to a switch that does NWAY negotiation, then it will >>automatically set full-duplex. Otherwise, use: >> >>ifconfig fxp0 media 100basetx mediaopt full-duplex > >Is there any way to tell after the fact if the card is in full duplex >mode ? No, but trust me. :-) Seriously, there really should be a way to sense the mode when it is in "autoselect" so that it can be displayed with ifconfig. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 16:43:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA16602 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:43:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite.sentex.ca [199.212.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA16597 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:43:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from gravel-remote (gravel-remote.sentex.ca [209.112.4.181]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA21626; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 19:54:14 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.19971031193820.0266e950@sentex.net> X-Sender: mdtancsa@sentex.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.2 (32) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 19:38:20 -0500 To: dg@root.com From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199711010036.QAA25210@implode.root.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 04:36 PM 10/31/97 -0800, David Greenman wrote: >>On Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:50:20 -0800, in sentex.lists.freebsd.misc you >>wrote: >> >>>> >>>>tu full-duplex mode? >>> >>> If it is connected to a switch that does NWAY negotiation, then it will >>>automatically set full-duplex. Otherwise, use: >>> >>>ifconfig fxp0 media 100basetx mediaopt full-duplex >> >>Is there any way to tell after the fact if the card is in full duplex >>mode ? > > No, but trust me. :-) > Seriously, there really should be a way to sense the mode when it is in >"autoselect" so that it can be displayed with ifconfig. Wow! Thanks for the quick response... I have a feeling the card is in half duplex since I am getting a steady stream of collisions (.4%) ... Its connected to a Cisco 4700 FastE port via cross over cable taking a 5Mbit ATM feed. I would have thought the collisions would almost be nonexistant.... ---Mike ********************************************************************** Mike Tancsa (mike@sentex.net) * To do is to be -- Nietzsche Sentex Communications Corp, * To be is to do -- Sartre Cambridge, Ontario * Do be do be do -- Sinatra (http://www.sentex.net/~mdtancsa) * From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 16:47:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA16823 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:47:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA16813 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:47:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA25357; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:47:58 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711010047.QAA25357@implode.root.com> To: Mike Tancsa cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 31 Oct 1997 19:38:20 EST." <3.0.2.32.19971031193820.0266e950@sentex.net> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:47:58 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> No, but trust me. :-) >> Seriously, there really should be a way to sense the mode when it is in >>"autoselect" so that it can be displayed with ifconfig. > >Wow! Thanks for the quick response... I have a feeling the card is in half >duplex since I am getting a steady stream of collisions (.4%) ... Its >connected to a Cisco 4700 FastE port via cross over cable taking a 5Mbit >ATM feed. I would have thought the collisions would almost be nonexistant.... Cisco's don't support NWAY, so you'll have to set the Cisco switch port to full duplex as well as the fxp. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 18:25:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA22348 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 18:25:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA22338 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 18:25:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stillman@ntplx.net) Received: from stillman.ntplx.net (p61-5.hftd.dialin.ntplx.com [204.213.188.184]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.8.7/NETPLEX) with SMTP id VAA25186 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 21:25:34 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Alex Stillman" To: Subject: FreeBSD installation not detecting Quantum Ultra-ATA HD Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 21:23:27 -0500 Message-ID: <01bce66d$237ab7c0$b8bcd5cc@stillman.ntplx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0036_01BCE643.3AA4AFC0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01BCE643.3AA4AFC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey everyone. I have a system with a Quantum Fireball ST 3.2 Gig = Ultra-ATA hard drive. I've been booting my system with the boot floppy I = made and have been reaching the configuration menu where I've disabled = all the SCSI/network cards I don't need so that there are no conflicts. = I've left enabled the regular IDE controller on wcd0, but at the = hardware probe between the configuration mode and the setup program, the = system can't find my hard drive. The IDE_CONF.EXE program also tells me = that I have a=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01BCE643.3AA4AFC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey everyone. I have a system with a = Quantum=20 Fireball ST 3.2 Gig Ultra-ATA hard drive. I've been booting my system = with the=20 boot floppy I made and have been reaching the configuration menu where = I've=20 disabled all the SCSI/network cards I don't need so that there are no = conflicts.=20 I've left enabled the regular IDE controller on wcd0, but at the = hardware probe=20 between the configuration mode and the setup program, the system can't = find my=20 hard drive. The IDE_CONF.EXE program also tells me that I have a=20
------=_NextPart_000_0036_01BCE643.3AA4AFC0-- From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 18:30:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA22682 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 18:30:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA22669 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 18:30:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stillman@ntplx.net) Received: from stillman.ntplx.net (p61-5.hftd.dialin.ntplx.com [204.213.188.184]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.8.7/NETPLEX) with SMTP id VAA25421 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 21:30:34 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Alex Stillman" To: Subject: FreeBSD installation not detecting Quantum Ultra-ATA HD - the real message Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 21:28:28 -0500 Message-ID: <01bce66d$d675cf40$b8bcd5cc@stillman.ntplx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0047_01BCE643.ED9FC740" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0047_01BCE643.ED9FC740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry about that last message, I hit send by accident before I was = finished. As I was saying: Hey everyone. I have a system with a Quantum Fireball ST 3.2 Gig = Ultra-ATA hard drive. I've been booting my system with the boot floppy I = made and have been reaching the configuration menu where I've disabled = all the SCSI/network cards I don't need so that there are no conflicts. = I've left enabled the regular IDE controller on wcd0, but at the = hardware probe between the configuration mode and the setup program, the = system can't find my hard drive. The IDE_CONF.EXE program also tells me = that I have a "Non-compatible or missing Hard Disk Controller!" = Ultra-ATA is completely backwards-compatible, so this is basically just = an ATA drive and should work fine with the built-in ATA support. So, any = ideas? - Dan Stillman ------=_NextPart_000_0047_01BCE643.ED9FC740 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry about that last message, I hit = send by=20 accident before I was finished. As I was saying:
 
Hey everyone. I have a system with a = Quantum=20 Fireball ST 3.2 Gig Ultra-ATA hard drive. I've been booting my system = with the=20 boot floppy I made and have been reaching the configuration menu where = I've=20 disabled all the SCSI/network cards I don't need so that there are no = conflicts.=20 I've left enabled the regular IDE controller on wcd0, but at the = hardware probe=20 between the configuration mode and the setup program, the system can't = find my=20 hard drive. The IDE_CONF.EXE program also tells me that I have a=20 "Non-compatible or missing Hard Disk Controller!" Ultra-ATA is = completely backwards-compatible, so this is basically just an ATA drive = and=20 should work fine with the built-in ATA support. So, any = ideas?
 
- Dan = Stillman
------=_NextPart_000_0047_01BCE643.ED9FC740-- From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 20:15:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA27967 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:15:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id UAA27950 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:15:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1) id 0xRUvm-0002yZ-00; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:13:02 -0800 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:12:38 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: David Greenman cc: Mike Tancsa , hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex In-Reply-To: <199711010047.QAA25357@implode.root.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, David Greenman wrote: > >> No, but trust me. :-) > >> Seriously, there really should be a way to sense the mode when it is in > >>"autoselect" so that it can be displayed with ifconfig. > > > >Wow! Thanks for the quick response... I have a feeling the card is in half > >duplex since I am getting a steady stream of collisions (.4%) ... Its > >connected to a Cisco 4700 FastE port via cross over cable taking a 5Mbit > >ATM feed. I would have thought the collisions would almost be nonexistant.... > > Cisco's don't support NWAY, so you'll have to set the Cisco switch port to > full duplex as well as the fxp. The 4700 is router, not a switch. And yes, you will have to switch it full duplex. > -DG > > David Greenman > Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project Tom (who is constanting annoyed that all 6 of the 10BT ports on the 4500 here are half-duplex only) From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 22:14:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA03334 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 22:14:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from srv.net (snake.srv.net [199.104.81.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA03329; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 22:14:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cmott@srv.net) Received: from darkstar.home (ras591.srv.net [205.180.127.91]) by srv.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA18780; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:14:24 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:13:51 -0700 (MST) From: Charles Mott X-Sender: cmott@darkstar.home To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Booting off PCMCIA Flash EEProm Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk What is the possibility of getting a PC (either a laptop or conventional chassis) to boot off of a PCMCIA card? The first problem that is apparent is that the rom bios looks to a conventional hard drive or floppy for the boot record. How feasible is it to hack a bios, or are there new bios implementations which will boot off of an flash ATA virtual hard drive? This business of getting PCs away from moving media mechanical drives for embedded applications seems increasingly important. Charles Mott From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 22:53:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA04484 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 22:53:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from sendero-ppp.i-connect.net (sendero-ppp.i-Connect.Net [206.190.143.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA04475 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 22:53:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shimon@sendero-ppp.i-connect.net) Received: (qmail 24223 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Nov 1997 06:53:33 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2-beta-103097 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 22:53:33 -0800 (PST) Organization: Atlas Telecom From: Simon Shapiro To: Charles Mott Subject: RE: Booting off PCMCIA Flash EEProm Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi Charles Mott; On 01-Nov-97 you wrote: > What is the possibility of getting a PC (either > a laptop or conventional chassis) to boot off of > a PCMCIA card? > > The first problem that is apparent is that the > rom bios looks to a conventional hard drive or > floppy for the boot record. How feasible is it > to hack a bios, or are there new bios implementations > which will boot off of an flash ATA virtual hard > drive? That is already available, from various vendors. Popular thing amoung industrial computers people (noise, dust, vibrations, corosives, you know... An EXPENSIVE source for these is ICS (Industrial Computer Source) form San Diego, CA. they have few which look like IDE drives, few that look like floppies, etc. If I remember right (wrote a couple of drivers...), most PCMCIA FLASH disks can be had either as memory or as IDE. Some are pretty clever about write operations, so flash ``wear'' is not as bad. --- If Microsoft Built Cars: Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you'd have to buy a new car. Sincerely Yours, Simon Shapiro Atlas Telecom Senior Architect 14355 SW Allen Blvd., Suite 130 Beaverton OR 97005 Shimon@i-Connect.Net Voice: 503.799.2313 From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Oct 31 23:20:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA05140 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:20:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA05132 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:20:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA28842; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:21:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711010721.XAA28842@implode.root.com> To: Tom cc: Mike Tancsa , hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:12:38 PST." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:21:02 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> Cisco's don't support NWAY, so you'll have to set the Cisco switch port to >> full duplex as well as the fxp. > > The 4700 is router, not a switch. And yes, you will have to switch it >full duplex. My understanding is that the ethernet interface on the 4700 is 'switched' in hardware - are you saying that this is not true? -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Nov 1 00:04:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA06818 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 00:04:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from silver.sms.fi (silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA06811 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 00:04:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pete@silver.sms.fi) Received: (from pete@localhost) by silver.sms.fi (8.8.7/8.7.3) id KAA14082; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 10:03:51 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 10:03:51 +0200 (EET) Message-Id: <199711010803.KAA14082@silver.sms.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Petri Helenius To: Mike Tancsa Cc: dg@root.com, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex In-Reply-To: <3.0.2.32.19971031193820.0266e950@sentex.net> References: <199711010036.QAA25210@implode.root.com> <3.0.2.32.19971031193820.0266e950@sentex.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15p7 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Mike Tancsa writes: > > > > No, but trust me. :-) > > Seriously, there really should be a way to sense the mode when it is in > >"autoselect" so that it can be displayed with ifconfig. > > Wow! Thanks for the quick response... I have a feeling the card is in half > duplex since I am getting a steady stream of collisions (.4%) ... Its > connected to a Cisco 4700 FastE port via cross over cable taking a 5Mbit > ATM feed. I would have thought the collisions would almost be nonexistant.... > With OS's with good IP stacks, like FreeBSD and some of the other unixen, you usually hit the second packet in a window coming in with first reply packet. That accounts for about 1% collisions even with fairly low speeds. Downgrading to any M$ OS would "fix" the problem. Pete From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Nov 1 00:35:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA08147 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 00:35:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from MindBender.serv.net (root@mindbender.serv.net [205.153.153.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA08137 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 00:35:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelv@MindBender.serv.net) Received: from localhost.HeadCandy.com (michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1]) by MindBender.serv.net (8.8.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA08688; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 00:35:19 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199711010835.AAA08688@MindBender.serv.net> X-Authentication-Warning: MindBender.serv.net: michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Petri Helenius cc: Mike Tancsa , dg@root.com, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 01 Nov 97 10:03:51 +0200. <199711010803.KAA14082@silver.sms.fi> Date: Sat, 01 Nov 1997 00:35:19 -0800 From: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Mike Tancsa writes: > > > No, but trust me. :-) > > > Seriously, there really should be a way to sense the mode when it is in > > >"autoselect" so that it can be displayed with ifconfig. > > Wow! Thanks for the quick response... I have a feeling the card is in half > > duplex since I am getting a steady stream of collisions (.4%) ... Its > > connected to a Cisco 4700 FastE port via cross over cable taking a 5Mbit > > ATM feed. I would have thought the collisions would almost be nonexistant.... >With OS's with good IP stacks, like FreeBSD and some of the other >unixen, you usually hit the second packet in a window coming in with >first reply packet. That accounts for about 1% collisions even with >fairly low speeds. Downgrading to any M$ OS would "fix" the problem. Do you know, for a fact, that MS IP stacks (from Win95 thru NT Server) are significantly less efficient than the BSD variety? Or are you just slamming MS for the hell of it? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@MindBender.serv.net Contract software development for Windows NT, Windows 95 and Unix. Windows NT and Unix server development in C++ and C. --< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >-- NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3, Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32... NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Nov 1 00:37:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA08239 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 00:37:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id AAA08232 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 00:37:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1) id 0xRZ1r-00036r-00; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 00:35:35 -0800 Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 00:35:34 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: David Greenman cc: Mike Tancsa , hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex In-Reply-To: <199711010721.XAA28842@implode.root.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, David Greenman wrote: > >> Cisco's don't support NWAY, so you'll have to set the Cisco switch port to > >> full duplex as well as the fxp. > > > > The 4700 is router, not a switch. And yes, you will have to switch it > >full duplex. > > My understanding is that the ethernet interface on the 4700 is 'switched' > in hardware - are you saying that this is not true? Switched in hardware? I don't quite know what that means. The 4700 is just a basic modular router chasiss (3 slots). The 4500 uses the same interface modules as the 4700. I've got a 4500 with a 6 10BT module in it, and am considering adding the single fast ethernet module soon. The Cisco 4000 series in one of Cisco's most reliable router lines, but getting a little long in the tooth these days (ie. modules aren't hot plug). > -DG > > David Greenman > Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project Tom From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Nov 1 09:58:24 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA28960 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 09:58:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (SRI-56K-FR.mt.net [206.127.65.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA28953 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 09:58:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA01771; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 10:58:03 -0700 (MST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA29782; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 10:58:01 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 10:58:01 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199711011758.KAA29782@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" Cc: Petri Helenius , Mike Tancsa , dg@root.com, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex In-Reply-To: <199711010835.AAA08688@MindBender.serv.net> References: <199711010803.KAA14082@silver.sms.fi> <199711010835.AAA08688@MindBender.serv.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Do you know, for a fact, that MS IP stacks (from Win95 thru NT Server) > are significantly less efficient than the BSD variety? Yes, on *exactly* the same hardware, Win95 networking is about half again as slow as FreeBSD networking. (In case you missed the point, this is *exactly* the same, meaning nothing has changed, disk, card, etc..) This can be demonstrated on *many* different machines in my office, all of which are configured differently, from laptops to desktops. Nate From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Nov 1 10:35:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA01000 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 10:35:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from silver.sms.fi (silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA00990 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 10:35:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pete@silver.sms.fi) Received: (from pete@localhost) by silver.sms.fi (8.8.7/8.7.3) id UAA00692; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 20:33:28 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 20:33:28 +0200 (EET) Message-Id: <199711011833.UAA00692@silver.sms.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Petri Helenius To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" Cc: Mike Tancsa , dg@root.com, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0 and full duplex In-Reply-To: <199711010835.AAA08688@MindBender.serv.net> References: <199711010803.KAA14082@silver.sms.fi> <199711010835.AAA08688@MindBender.serv.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15p7 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com writes: > > >With OS's with good IP stacks, like FreeBSD and some of the other > >unixen, you usually hit the second packet in a window coming in with > >first reply packet. That accounts for about 1% collisions even with > >fairly low speeds. Downgrading to any M$ OS would "fix" the problem. > > Do you know, for a fact, that MS IP stacks (from Win95 thru NT Server) > are significantly less efficient than the BSD variety? Or are you > just slamming MS for the hell of it? > While FreeBSD with P166 can easily fill a 100Mbps pipe, same hardware running NT or 95 comes up to around 30-45Mbps. There are multiple independent studies available on the web to confirm this story, with FreeBSD, Solaris x86, etc... Pete From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Nov 1 12:23:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA05620 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 12:23:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from andrew.cmu.edu (ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA05615 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 12:23:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tk2x+@andrew.cmu.edu) Received: (from postman@localhost) by andrew.cmu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.2) id PAA14469 for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 15:23:39 -0500 (EST) Received: via switchmail; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 15:23:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from unix21.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 15:22:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from unix21.andrew.cmu.edu via qmail ID ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 15:22:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from BatMail.robin.v2.14.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.unix21.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4x.55 via MS.5.6.unix21.andrew.cmu.edu.sun4_51; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 15:22:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 15:22:12 -0500 (EST) From: Timothy J Kniveton To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: WaveLAN tuning Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Can people share how they tune their waveLAN drivers? I have played with machdep.wl_xmit_delay (in sysctl) and find that with my AMD K6/200MHz machine it is best at about 600-750 us. However, with my point-point link (I am using two directional antennae over a distance), I am dropping about 8-10% of packets. This causes erratic behavior, presumably because of TCP backoff. What is the best way to tune this so that you get optimal performance? Any other tips? From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Nov 1 12:39:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA06472 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 12:39:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from isgate.is (isgate.is [193.4.58.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA06460 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 12:39:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from totii@est.is) Received: from eh.est.is (eh.est.is [194.144.208.34]) by isgate.is (8.7.5-M/) with ESMTP id UAA26766 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 20:39:36 GMT Received: from didda.est.is (totii@ppp-22.est.is [194.144.208.122]) by eh.est.is (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA12719 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 20:37:55 GMT Message-ID: <345B9382.167EB0E7@est.is> Date: Sat, 01 Nov 1997 20:39:30 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DEor=F0ur?= Ivarsson X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Does ATX shut down? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have ATX motherboard in my FreeBSD box and would like to turn the power off with the reboot(8) -p but that does not work. Does it work or not? Thordur Ivarsson From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Nov 1 22:02:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA02097 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 22:02:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from word.smith.net.au ([202.0.75.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA02091 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 22:01:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA00345; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 16:28:13 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199711020558.QAA00345@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Timothy J Kniveton cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, wavelan@smith.net.au Subject: Re: WaveLAN tuning In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Nov 1997 15:22:12 CDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 02 Nov 1997 16:28:13 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Can people share how they tune their waveLAN drivers? I have played > with machdep.wl_xmit_delay (in sysctl) and find that with my AMD > K6/200MHz machine it is best at about 600-750 us. Increase it until you don't get any interrupt timeouts. Stop there. 8) > However, with my point-point link (I am using two directional antennae > over a distance), I am dropping about 8-10% of packets. This causes > erratic behavior, presumably because of TCP backoff. What is the best > way to tune this so that you get optimal performance? Any other tips? Have you run ptpdiag over the link to check the basic characteristics therof? It sounds like you're suffering from some 'real' link quality problems that no amount of tuning can help you with. Are there other units in the vicinity? mike From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Nov 1 22:35:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA03493 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 22:35:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from srv.net (snake.srv.net [199.104.81.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA03488 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 22:35:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cmott@srv.net) Received: from darkstar.home (dialin1.anlw.anl.gov [141.221.254.101]) by srv.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA17356 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 23:35:35 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 23:35:00 -0700 (MST) From: Charles Mott X-Sender: cmott@darkstar.home To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WaveLAN tuning In-Reply-To: <199711020558.QAA00345@word.smith.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > However, with my point-point link (I am using two directional antennae > > over a distance), I am dropping about 8-10% of packets. This causes > > erratic behavior, presumably because of TCP backoff. What is the best > > way to tune this so that you get optimal performance? Any other tips? > > Have you run ptpdiag over the link to check the basic characteristics > therof? It sounds like you're suffering from some 'real' link quality > problems that no amount of tuning can help you with. Are there other > units in the vicinity? > > mike > What and where is ptpdiag? It sounds interesting, but I can't locate it on the FreeBSD 2.2.2 distribution CD. Charles Mott