From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon May 26 19:20:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA21509 for mobile-outgoing; Mon, 26 May 1997 19:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.calweb.com (mail.calweb.com [208.131.56.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA21497 for ; Mon, 26 May 1997 19:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.calweb.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA04852 for ; Mon, 26 May 1997 19:20:39 -0700 (PDT) X-SMTP: hello web1.calweb.com from cslye@calweb.com server cslye@web1.calweb.com ip 208.131.56.51 Received: (from cslye@localhost) by web1.calweb.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA13502 for freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 May 1997 19:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199705270220.TAA13502@web1.calweb.com> Subject: Fujitsu's To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 19:20:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "Cameron Slye" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-mobile@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I am about to buy a Fujitsu 530t or a 531t (as soon as I can find out that the diffrence is :( I know the 531 has a Chips&Tech video chipset, the 530 I dont now yet.. I am planning on installing freebsd on this.. I would need a PCMCIA ethernet card, the one I am looking at is the Intel EtherExpress 10/100, they seem to do fine on our PC's, and I am guessing it uses the same chipset.. Anyone got one of these to work ? Also, see if anyone has got the pointing device on the Fujitsu to work with X. Anyways, any info you can give would be great... (Or if you know anything bad about the Fujitsu, or something better in it's price range) Thanks! From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue May 27 11:07:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA25608 for mobile-outgoing; Tue, 27 May 1997 11:07:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rmsq.com (rmsq.com [204.133.95.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA25603 for ; Tue, 27 May 1997 11:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from baldrick@localhost) by rmsq.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA07937; Tue, 27 May 1997 12:05:36 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 12:05:36 -0600 (MDT) From: Just Baldrick Message-Id: <199705271805.MAA07937@rmsq.com> To: cslye@calweb.com, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fujitsu's Sender: owner-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello, I don't know anything about the Fujitsu but we have a laptop with a Chips&Tech 65545 chipset and X works fine at 800x600. The ethernet card is a 3Com 3C589c and that also works well. FYI, the laptop is made by BIT Computers who advertize in Computer Shopper. Regards, Geoff Martindale From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed May 28 06:01:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA10125 for mobile-outgoing; Wed, 28 May 1997 06:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from endo.BBN.COM (ENDO.BBN.COM [128.89.10.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA10120 for ; Wed, 28 May 1997 06:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (gdt@localhost) by endo.BBN.COM (8.6.10/8.6.5) id JAA27994; Wed, 28 May 1997 09:00:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 09:00:54 -0400 Message-Id: <199705281300.JAA27994@endo.BBN.COM> From: Greg Troxel To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: hints for CVS with PAO and non-PAO? Sender: owner-mobile@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm involved in a project with Mobile IP and IPSEC, using FreeBSD as the base. Normally I'd just import FreeBSD sources from 2.2.2 along the vendor branch, and hack away locally. But I'd also like to have the PAO code in my repository, sort of as a sub-vendor branch. Since we don't need to stay on the bleeding edge of 2.2, I'm inclined to import 2.2.x+PAO as the vendor branch. That is, unpack the pure 2.2.2 sources, apply the appropriate PAO patch, and then import. Then, any diffs will be relative to 2.2.2+PAO. I'd be interested in any comments on this scheme, and especially in any hints about how to do this better.