From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 01:19:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00AC37B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 01:19:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunfire.lclark.edu (lewis.lclark.edu [149.175.1.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AEB243F75 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 01:19:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by sunfire.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.1.45) with SMTP id M2003040601193015525 ; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 01:19:30 -0800 From: Eric Anholt To: Craig Boston In-Reply-To: <1049467676.66527.2.camel@owen1492.uf.corelab.com> References: <1047429424.8471.40.camel@leguin> <20030314074826.GB38481@hal9000.halplant.com> <20030317032428.GB9944@praxis.lunabase.org> <1049428097.609.46.camel@leguin> <1049467676.66527.2.camel@owen1492.uf.corelab.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1049621073.613.3.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 06 Apr 2003 01:24:33 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 11 on X server startup (Was: HEADSUP: XFree86 4.3.0 update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 09:19:49 -0000 On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 06:47, Craig Boston wrote: > On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 21:48, Eric Anholt wrote: > > Could you try adding the following file to > > x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server/files and adding the filename to the list > > after PATCHDIR in the Makefile, then recompiling? It was committed to > > XFree86 recently with a log message that sounds related. > > I'll give it a try -- about to start the compile and I'll post when it's > finished. > > Gotta remember to pkg_create -b the xfree86 stuff this time just in case > :) It was reported that the patch fixed it, so I've committed it. Now in XFree86-Server-4.3.0_3. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 01:21:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4776637B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 01:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunfire.lclark.edu (lclark.edu [149.175.1.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B965D43FBF for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 01:21:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by sunfire.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.1.45) with SMTP id M2003040601203509507 ; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 01:20:35 -0800 From: Eric Anholt To: Paul Boehmer In-Reply-To: <1047947841.613.10.camel@leguin> References: <20030313113235.Y77941@netfoo.net> <1047947841.613.10.camel@leguin> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1049621139.613.6.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 06 Apr 2003 01:25:39 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86 4.3.0 Matrox/MultiHead (Long!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 09:21:17 -0000 On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 16:37, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:10, Paul Boehmer wrote: > > I have a test box that had been running X 4.2 in a multihead config for a > > while now (1 Nvidia TNT2 AGP, and 2 Matrox Millennium/Mystique PCI Cards). > > I upgraded yesterday to 4.3.0 only to find out that any attempts to run X > > result in a complete console lockup (still have access via ssh). Since > > the box was running 5.0, I loaded 4.8-RC from scratch this morning only to > > find the same problem. > > > > Using a 4.2.x standby XF86Config, X works fine when running a single card > > (either TNT or Matrox). I get console lockups when attempting to run > > multiple cards. > > > > I experience the same problem when attempting to run xf86cfg. > > Just a heads up on this one: It's a problem in the generic int10 > module. Linux folks haven't noticed it because by they use a > linux-specific int10 module by default. One of the XFree86 developers > has reproduced it, hopefully it will be fixed soon. It should be fixed now in XFree86 CVS and in the ports tree, XFree86-Server-4.3.0_3 -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 01:44:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A2C37B401; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 01:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunfire.lclark.edu (lewis.lclark.edu [149.175.1.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFF0B43F85; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 01:44:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by sunfire.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.1.45) with SMTP id M2003040601444327986 ; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 01:44:43 -0800 From: Eric Anholt To: Steve O'Hara-Smith In-Reply-To: <20030315125906.1ffa136d.steve@sohara.org> References: <1047429424.8471.40.camel@leguin> <20030315125906.1ffa136d.steve@sohara.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1049622586.613.18.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 06 Apr 2003 01:49:46 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADSUP: XFree86 4.3.0 update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 09:44:49 -0000 On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 03:59, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On 11 Mar 2003 16:37:04 -0800 > Eric Anholt wrote: > > EA> I've committed the update of XFree86 to 4.3.0 to ports. I think I've > EA> cleaned up after my mess at this point, but there may still be issues. > EA> > EA> Please report to me if you have any problems with the new ports or any > EA> issues with XFree86 that you didn't have in 4.2.0. > > I've just installed 4.3.0 (via portupgrade) including the diffs > for the DRM modules. Everything seems to be working well (including DRI > and XVideo) apart from the -inroot option in xlock which reports: > > X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) > Major opcode of failed request: 1 (X_CreateWindow) > Serial number of failed request: 132 > Current serial number in output stream: 139 > > The video card is an ATI Radeon 7500 All In Wonder. > > Mplayer is quite happy to use the root window. I think this is the same issue that came up on the dri lists. In the new release, the visuals associated with the root window changed. Both of the sets of visuals are legal. The conclusion the discussion came to was that it's not necessary to change it back, but it might be nice if someone tracked it down. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 05:22:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5FC37B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 05:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta07.mail.mel.aone.net.au (mta07.mail.au.uu.net [203.2.192.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E0A43FBD for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 05:22:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rbyrnes@ozemail.com.au) Received: from pootah.ozemail.com.au ([63.34.228.119]) by mta10.mail.mel.aone.net.au with ESMTP <20030406121041.YFYJ3544.mta10.mail.mel.aone.net.au@pootah.ozemail.com.au>; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 22:10:41 +1000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030406220358.00aaa600@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: rbyrnes@pop.ozemail.com.au@127.0.0.1 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 22:04:56 +1000 To: Brooks Davis From: Rob B In-Reply-To: <20030405100005.A9478@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030405171534.02638010@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.2.20030405171534.02638010@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: green_saver source missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 12:22:33 -0000 At 04:00 AM 6/04/03, Brooks Davis sent this up the stick: >On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 05:23:38PM +1000, Rob B wrote: > > Trying to build a fresh kernel, have already done a buildworld with > sources > > updated as at 8:20am UTC >... > > Where'd it all go? /usr/src/sys/modules/syscons/green exists, should > this > > be being used? > >Yes. Thought so, but why is it not being used automatically? There is no mechanism to tell the buildkernel process the location of files that it should know about. Rob -- If you are what you eat, I could be you by morning. This is random quote 664 of 1254. Distance from the centre of the brewing universe [15200.8 km (8207.8 mi), 262.8 deg](Apparent) Rennerian Public Key fingerprint = 6219 33BD A37B 368D 29F5 19FB 945D C4D7 1F66 D9C5 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 07:07:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AE437B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 07:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from abc.com (bb220-255-81-81.singnet.com.sg [220.255.81.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EB243FD7 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 07:07:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from abc@abc.com) From: "James" To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 22:03:56 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] Message-Id: <20030406140745.D3EB243FD7@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: Supply laser markers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: abc@abc.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 14:07:48 -0000 Manufacturer of Nd:YAG & CO2 laser marking, welding, engraving, drilling & cutting machine, mirror, Q-switch, fiber, scanning lens, focusing lens, chiller, flashlamp, crystal, bean expander, energy/power meter, laser diodes, safety goggles. For more information, please visit http://www.SintecOptronics.com or e-mail to sales@SintecOptronics.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 09:29:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D236937B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 09:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netmint.com (netmint.com [207.106.21.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AF043FBD for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 09:29:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from support@netmint.com) Received: from netmint.com (localhost.netmint.com [127.0.0.1]) by netmint.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h36GTOp7013141 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:29:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from support@netmint.com) Received: from localhost (support@localhost) by netmint.com (8.12.6/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id h36GTO6h013138 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:29:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:29:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Support To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030406120112.I11095-100000@netmint.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: load testing and tuning a 4GB RAM server X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 16:29:27 -0000 Hello everyone, First of all, great job on the 4.8-R. We have been a long standing user of FreeBSD and are very happy with everything. Now my question. I am trying to stress test a new Dell PowerEdge server and find the limits of its hardware and my tuning. Here are the server stats: * 2x Xeon 2.8 with SMP compiled, hyperthreading NOT compiled in kernel * 4 GB of RAM, 8 GB of swap on Raid 1 (15K RPM drives) for speed * User Data is on Raid 5 in a detached PowerVault Contents of /boot/loader.conf: kern.ipc.maxsockets=32768 kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768 kern.ipc.nmbufs=131072 kern.ipc.nsfbufs=6656 kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 kern.maxfiles=32768 kern.maxproc=8192 kern.maxswzone=33554432 kern.nbuf=16384 kern.ncallout=32768 kern.vm.kmem.size=268435456 kern.vm.pmap.shpgperproc=2048 net.inet.tcp.tcbhashsize=16384 Contents of /etc/sysctl.conf: kern.ip.somaxconn=4096 vm.v_free_min=131072 vm.v_free_target=262144 vm.f_free_reserved=32768 vm.v_free_severe=65536 kern.ps_showallprocs=0 Some info from kernel config: maxusers 0 options KVA_PAGES=512 options NSWAPDEV=1 (the rest is pretty much my hardware, firewall and other irrelevant stuff) This has been copied by hand as the machine is not networked yet, so please excuse any possible typos. The system does a make -j8 world in about 15 minutes. Make -j500 buildworld takes about an hour or less, and the server load skyrockets to 200 or so. Now here's the kicker. I started 7,500 (yes 7.5 K :) lynx processes to eat up available memory and started doing the -j500 buildworld. The machine went into swap about a gig but everything completed fine. It didn't even seem sluggish in controls. I feel I am not pushing it enough. Unfortunately, setting -j over 500 doesn't add any load. If I randomly kill and start 1000s of processes at once, with the total running hovering around 8000 at all times, I can push the "load" on this machine to ridiculous numbers like 700. It can do that while doing a stressful buildworld. I guess the good thing is this machine safely goes into swap when exhausting its 4 gigs and that tells me everything is OKay. sysctl -a |grep kvm shows about 2 GB of memory allocated to kernel and somewhere between 0.7 GB to 0.9 GB free depending on whether the system just booted or is running 8000 processes. Any ideas? Comments? Is my tuning decent, or would you change anything else? This server is to be a very loaded web/database server. I will be happy to hear your thoughts. Please cc: me on all messages because I am not presently subscribed to the list. Thanks again guys, Andrew NetMint, LLC From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 10:47:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A180837B401; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out001.verizon.net (out001pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BF943FBD; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:47:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([129.44.43.88]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with ESMTP id <20030406174726.LQJG19613.out001.verizon.net@mac.com>; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:47:26 -0500 Message-ID: <3E906828.8060001@mac.com> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 13:47:20 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <20030406120112.I11095-100000@netmint.com> In-Reply-To: <20030406120112.I11095-100000@netmint.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.74.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [129.44.43.88] at Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:47:25 -0500 cc: Support cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: load testing and tuning a 4GB RAM server X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 17:47:31 -0000 Support wrote: [ ... ] > Now my question. I am trying to stress test a new Dell PowerEdge server > and find the limits of its hardware and my tuning. Here are the server > stats: > > * 2x Xeon 2.8 with SMP compiled, hyperthreading NOT compiled in kernel > * 4 GB of RAM, 8 GB of swap on Raid 1 (15K RPM drives) for speed > * User Data is on Raid 5 in a detached PowerVault Given your planned usage, and the type of hardware you've got, I'd like to redirect this thread to freebsd-isp as being more appropriate. Also, your configuration is suited for where the users will be doing mostly reads and not a lot of writes. If the users might be doing a lot of writes, you should use RAID-1,0 instead of RAID-5. > Contents of /boot/loader.conf: > > kern.ipc.maxsockets=32768 > kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768 > kern.ipc.nmbufs=131072 > kern.ipc.nsfbufs=6656 > kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 > kern.maxfiles=32768 > kern.maxproc=8192 > kern.maxswzone=33554432 > kern.nbuf=16384 > kern.ncallout=32768 > kern.vm.kmem.size=268435456 > kern.vm.pmap.shpgperproc=2048 > net.inet.tcp.tcbhashsize=16384 > > Contents of /etc/sysctl.conf: > > kern.ip.somaxconn=4096 > vm.v_free_min=131072 > vm.v_free_target=262144 > vm.f_free_reserved=32768 > vm.v_free_severe=65536 > kern.ps_showallprocs=0 Given the amount of memory you have, things like ipc.shm_use_phys and vfs.vmiodirenable are a good idea. If this machine is primarily using the network for web traffic, see the section in "man tuning" about net.inet.tcp.sendspace and net.inet.tcp.recvspace in particular. However, I wouldn't change the vm sysctl settings blindly-- the VM system in FreeBSD does a really good job of self-tuning. > Some info from kernel config: > > maxusers 0 > options KVA_PAGES=512 > options NSWAPDEV=1 > (the rest is pretty much my hardware, firewall and other irrelevant stuff) However, possibly with a degree of self-contradictory advice :-), I'd set maxusers to a specific value like 256 or so. The notion of tuning kernel variables to the amount of memory on the _build_ system-- which is not always the same as the system which will be running the kernel-- doesn't strike me as the right thing to do, so I tend to set this to 64 or so by default, and then change it on a case-by-case basis as the need arises. Also, increase NSWAPDEV to at least two, so you at least have a possibility of adding more swap to a running system or for adding some in order to take down the primary swap area for some reason. [ ... ] > Any ideas? Comments? Is my tuning decent, or would you change anything > else? This server is to be a very loaded web/database server. How many simultaneous users do you expect? WWW hits per day, or pageviews (if you can distinguish)? Are you going to be using SSL, lots of virtual domains, any special apache modules? Logfile analysis needs? Also, what are you doing with the database; that is to say, which DB software are you going to use, and what is the DB to be used for? Is the data sensitive or important? If so, having a seperate DB server which is not Internet accessible but on a small local subnet (talking to a second NIC in the WWW server) would significantly improve the security aspects, and would also help balance site load in several regards. Specificly, disk I/O contention is likely to happen if the DB is expected to see any significant usage while the drives are busy serving up user files. That's aside from the fact that you really don't want to keep database files on RAID-5 storage in the first place, either-- keep the DB on RAID-1 or RAID-1,0 if you can: use some of that 15K swapspace if you need to. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 12:43:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E989737B401; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mother.ludd.luth.se (mother.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E728943F85; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:43:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pantzer@ludd.luth.se) Received: from ludd.luth.se (skalman.campus.luth.se [130.240.197.52]) by mother.ludd.luth.se (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h36JhR817723; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:43:27 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <3E90835F.9020104@ludd.luth.se> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 21:43:27 +0200 From: Mattias Pantzare User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <20030406120112.I11095-100000@netmint.com> <3E906828.8060001@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <3E906828.8060001@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: Support cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: load testing and tuning a 4GB RAM server X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 19:43:40 -0000 > The notion of tuning kernel variables to the amount of memory on the > _build_ system-- which is not always the same as the system which will > be running the kernel-- doesn't strike me as the right thing to do, so I > tend to set this to 64 or so by default, and then change it on a > case-by-case basis as the need arises. That is why maxusers 0 will auto-size when the kernel _boots_. Not at buildtime. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 14:19:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9E537B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web9903.mail.yahoo.com (web9903.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1F4943F93 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:19:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tweaky_81@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030406211955.28426.qmail@web9903.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [198.16.16.99] by web9903.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 14:19:55 PDT Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:19:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Georgi Hristov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3E90835F.9020104@ludd.luth.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Weird boot loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 21:19:56 -0000 I have a question .... When I boot my system it does not boot automatically, but instead presents me with a choice of FreeBSD and Disk1 .... i don't have anything bootable on disk1 .. that's my home directory ... I just don't get it ... why does it do this ...it did not use to do it with 4.7 but now after the upgrade [I did a fresh install] it presents me with this option.... This is kind of a problem to me, because I cannot restart the system over the network, since it waits on somebody to push F1 [for FreeBSD] or F5[for Disc1]. When I push F1 everything after that loads automatically .. :(((( Is this some kind of bootloader that has been installed. I don't need bootloaders ... i have 3 disks and all of them a dedicated to FreeBSD, the only OS on this server. How can I get rid of that booloader or whatever it is. I want to boot directly from the MBR of Disc0. Thanks in advance. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 14:24:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCB237B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blue.icn.pl (blue.icn.pl [212.182.96.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA1B343FBD for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from n0n4m3@blue.icn.pl) Received: (qmail 198 invoked by uid 2074); 6 Apr 2003 21:24:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Apr 2003 21:24:15 -0000 Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:24:15 +0200 (CEST) From: n0n4m3 To: Murray Stokely In-Reply-To: <20030404111959.J43794@freebsdmall.com> Message-ID: <20030406232357.B99901@blue.icn.pl> References: <20030403002325.GA28117@intruder.bmah.org><20030404020106.76478.qmail@web9904.mail.yahoo.com> <20030404111959.J43794@freebsdmall.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.8-RELEASE status X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 21:24:14 -0000 what about freebsd.pl.freebsd.org ? On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Murray Stokely wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:01:10PM -0500, Ken Mays wrote: > > guess people want to know which mirrors are holding the OFFICIAL ISO > > releases before they spend the time downloading them. > > Please ready my message sent to announce@FreeBSD.org, which > specifically says: > > "images, but they will at least be available from: > > ftp.FreeBSD.org > ftp12.FreeBSD.org > ftp14.FreeBSD.org > ftp.au.FreeBSD.org > ftp.es.FreeBSD.org > ftp2.de.FreeBSD.org > ftp4.de.FreeBSD.org > ftp7.de.FreeBSD.org > ftp.tw.FreeBSD.org > ftp6.tw.FreeBSD.org" > > Those mirror operators were the first ones to confirm to me that they > had the correct updated ISO images. That is how I always do the > announce messages -- I send out a message to hubs@ asking for the > mirror ops to mail me privately when they've finished transferring the > release, and I include the first 10 or so in my message. > > > Thanks again. Please announce which mirrors carry the official release of > > v4.8 (ftp1-14.freebsd.org). If you did already and I missed it, then > > thanks! ;o) > > Yes, you missed it. See the announce message. > > - Murray > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 14:56:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF3237B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h1.liquidneon.com (h1.liquidneon.com [66.252.192.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7677943FA3 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:56:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com) Received: (qmail 8840 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2003 21:56:10 -0000 Received: from h1.liquidneon.com (HELO so14k.com) (66.252.192.116) by h1.liquidneon.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2003 21:56:10 -0000 Received: from 199.201.236.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user so14k@so14k.com) by mail.so14k.com with HTTP; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:56:10 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <36974.199.201.236.2.1049666170.squirrel@mail.so14k.com> Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:56:10 -0600 (MDT) From: To: In-Reply-To: <20030406211955.28426.qmail@web9903.mail.yahoo.com> References: <3E90835F.9020104@ludd.luth.se> <20030406211955.28426.qmail@web9903.mail.yahoo.com> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird boot loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 21:56:12 -0000 Georgi, It should automatically boot the last partition you selected to boot (after a few seconds). You have to have a bootloader to take the next step in starting your computer (loading the OS). Brad > I have a question .... > When I boot my system it does not boot automatically, > but instead presents me with a choice of FreeBSD and > Disk1 .... i don't have anything bootable on disk1 .. > that's my home directory ... I just don't get it ... > why does it do this ...it did not use to do it with > 4.7 but now after the upgrade [I did a fresh install] > it presents me with this option.... > > This is kind of a problem to me, because I cannot > restart the system over the network, since it waits on > somebody to push F1 [for FreeBSD] or F5[for Disc1]. > When I push F1 everything after that loads > automatically .. :(((( > > Is this some kind of bootloader that has been > installed. I don't need bootloaders ... i have 3 disks > and all of them a dedicated to FreeBSD, the only OS on > this server. How can I get rid of that booloader or > whatever it is. I want to boot directly from the MBR > of Disc0. > > Thanks in advance. > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more > http://tax.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 15:20:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E67D37B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp2.Stanford.EDU (smtp2.Stanford.EDU [171.64.14.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14BD43FB1 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:20:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from richw@jessejames.stanford.edu) Received: from jessejames.stanford.edu (jessejames.Stanford.EDU [171.64.180.173]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h36MJvWk012486 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jessejames.stanford.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h36MJ5co015114; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:19:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Rich Wales To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030406215744.A14514.richw@jessejames.stanford.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Weird boot loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 22:20:01 -0000 Georgi Hristov wrote: > > When I boot my system it does not boot automatically, > > but instead presents me with a choice of FreeBSD and > > Disk1 . . . . This is kind of a problem to me, because > > I cannot restart the system over the network, since it > > waits on somebody to push F1 . . . . "Brad" replied: > It should automatically boot the last partition you > selected to boot (after a few seconds). Specifically, it will boot on its own after 10 seconds (unless you changed the "ticks" setting via the "boot0cfg" command). See "man boot0cfg" for more details. > You have to have a bootloader to take the next step > in starting your computer (loading the OS). True, but if a system will only be running FreeBSD (and only from a single partition), there are a few ways to reduce or eliminate the opening menu and its 10-second delay: (1) Reduce the delay by using the "-t" option in "boot0cfg". The default delay is 182 clock ticks (10 seconds), but you could change it to 1 tick (or perhaps even 0, though I haven't tried this myself). or (2) Replace the regular FreeBSD boot manager with a "standard" master boot record (MBR) that goes straight to the first partition on the first drive. (a) You can do this while you're setting up a new system by specifying the "Standard" MBR on a disk. (b) Or, after a system has already been set up, you can use /stand/sysinstall, select your first disk for partitioning, type "W" (without changing the existing partitioning!), confirm that you do want to write changes immediately, and then choose "Standard" in the boot manager dialogue. I've done this on a FreeBSD-only server at home, and it seems to work fine. Rich Wales richw@richw.org http://www.richw.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 18:02:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A405537B401; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from visar.norris-net.com (adsl-81-141-31.asm.bellsouth.net [65.81.141.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831CC43F75; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:02:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from derrick@visar.norris-net.com) Received: from visar.norris-net.com (derrick@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h3712BaL006757; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:02:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from derrick@visar.norris-net.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by visar.norris-net.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h3712BZp006756; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:02:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Derrick Norris Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:02:11 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200304062102.11187.derrick@norris-net.com> Subject: Re: 4.8R and $FreeBSD$ version tag expansion X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: derrick@norris-net.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 01:02:13 -0000 >>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce A Mah writes: Bruce> If memory serves me right, Julian Stacey wrote: >> > From: "David A. Gobeille" Date: >> > Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:21:00 -0600 Message-id: >> > <3E8E216C.2060009@earthlink.net> >> >> "David A. Gobeille" wrote: >> > I noticed that there were quite a few files with version ids >> > of '$FreeBSD$' when I ran mergemaster after an install of >> > 4.8R. This isn't >> >> I read tags were reworked. Prob. you'r working from old >> sources, & It'll rectify if you wait a day & then { refresh >> your CVS tree & re-export src/ } or { if src/ from a .iso, >> check your MD5, & refetch from local mirror if old }, then >> remake. Bruce> I think I explained this in a prior posting to this list, but what happened was that the $FreeBSD$ CVS keywords didn't get expanded the first time we tried to build a release. mergemaster hates this, as the original poster discovered. For this and other reasons, we considered this a showstopper and rebuilt the release; when we did, we also needed to modify one file and slide its CVS tag. Bruce> Users updating from sources (e.g. using cvsup or anon CVS) were probably not affected by this. In confirmation, I updated from source on Apr 4 ~2pm EST and haven't seen any $FreeBSD$ ids in /etc/... ========== I noticed when I built release 4.8 from source (using the RELENG_4_8 tag) that I had many files in src/etc (and many other parts of src) with $FreeBSD$ ids. After reading this thread, I thought maybe there was bad timing with my cvsup, so I cvsupped again and checked just before sending this message. On my system, in both the RELENG_4_8 and RELENG_4_8_0_RELEASE tags, many of the files have the bad ids. Do I need to blow away my cvsupped src tree and bring it down again from scratch? --Derrick Norris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 18:21:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA4B37B401; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE5C43FAF; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:21:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org (12-240-204-110.client.attbi.com[12.240.204.110]) by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with ESMTP id <2003040701210900300p9ei3e>; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 01:21:09 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h371L8s0034502; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:21:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h371L8aa034501; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:21:08 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Derrick Norris Message-ID: <20030407012108.GA34313@intruder.bmah.org> References: <200304062102.11187.derrick@norris-net.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304062102.11187.derrick@norris-net.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.8R and $FreeBSD$ version tag expansion X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 01:21:11 -0000 --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Derrick Norris wrote: > I noticed when I built release 4.8 from source (using the RELENG_4_8=20 > tag) that I had many files in src/etc (and many other parts of src)=20 > with $FreeBSD$ ids. After reading this thread, I thought maybe there=20 > was bad timing with my cvsup, so I cvsupped again and checked just=20 > before sending this message. On my system, in both the RELENG_4_8=20 > and RELENG_4_8_0_RELEASE tags, many of the files have the bad ids. >=20 > Do I need to blow away my cvsupped src tree and bring it down again=20 > from scratch? Hi Derrick-- You're using cvsup to maintain a local repository, right? If so, you need to add cvsroot-all to the set of collections you're pulling down. After that, checkouts from your local repository should have their $FreeBSD$ ids expanded correctly. It sounds like somebody needs to write up a FAQ on this...I'll put it on my list of things to do but if someone else does it first, they'll get no complaints from me. Bruce. --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+kNKD2MoxcVugUsMRAqOLAJ9zJqdwfPckeYh57anjPJ24PXl3qwCgq6k9 aZzh3Z7e5Nfe1SO3WEsK5a4= =dlBu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 23:24:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E373837B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate.raffles-it.com (raffles.demon.co.uk [62.49.18.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB4343FBD for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:24:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dpd@raffles-it.com) Received: from arrow.lan.raffles-it.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gate.raffles-it.com (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h376IcYE002167 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:18:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dpd@lan.raffles-it.com) Received: (from dpd@localhost) by arrow.lan.raffles-it.com (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h376IckH002166; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:18:38 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:18:32 +0100 From: David Dooley To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030407071832.78c1f438.dpd@raffles-it.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.7) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.L7BI'69hK:w5ry" Subject: Broken NIC in 4.8 Stable - reposted here as original was in -questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:24:23 -0000 --=.L7BI'69hK:w5ry Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Apparently I should of posted this here instead of in -questions, so here goes:- Hi I cvsup'ed the latest source on Saturday night at 9pm as I do every night onto my dev box this was then extracted in to my source tree and a new world built and new kernels for all my systems. On Sunday I performed a "make installkernel" followed by a "make installworld" and finally a mergemaster. This worked fine in my "gate" system and it is now running # uname -a FreeBSD gate.lan.raffles-it.com 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Sat Apr 5 02:02:36 BST 2003 root@dev.lan.raffles-it.com:/usr/build/obj.stable/usr/build/src.stable/sys/GATE i386 and all is working fine when I performed the same steps on my "dev" box all appeared to be OK until I rebooted when it failed to probe correctly my network card. Below is the output of my "/var/log/messages file for the old 4.7 working kernel followed closely by the output from the 4.8 kernel. 4.7 Apr 6 23:02:12 dev /kernel.keep: pci2: on pcib2 Apr 6 23:02:12 dev /kernel.keep: pci2: at 1.0 Apr 6 23:02:12 dev /kernel.keep: de0: port 0xc400-0xc47f mem 0xe5010000-0xe501007f irq 11 at device 5.0 on pci2 Apr 6 23:02:12 dev /kernel.keep: de0: DEC DE500-AA 21140A [10-100Mb/s] pass 2.0 Apr 6 23:02:12 dev /kernel.keep: de0: address 00:00:f8:02:fc:b2 Apr 6 23:02:12 dev /kernel.keep: isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 Apr 6 23:02:12 dev /kernel.keep: isa0: on isab0 4.8 Apr 6 23:00:39 dev /kernel: pci2: on pcib2 Apr 6 23:00:39 dev /kernel: pci2: at 1.0 Apr 6 23:00:39 dev /kernel: pci2: (vendor=0x1011, dev=0x0009) at 5.0 irq 11 Apr 6 23:00:39 dev /kernel: isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 Apr 6 23:00:39 dev /kernel: isa0: on isab0 Not being someone that is terribly up with the inner workings of the kernel, can any one provide any guidance as to where to look. I have looked through /usr/src/UPDATING and LINT and cannot see any changes like the inclusion of "miibus" that may be required. I know this problem appeared a while back for me and it took about a week to ten days of cvsupping and rebuilding kernels before it all magically started working again. Any one know what might of changed? Thanks for any assistance as I have 4 machines with the exact same network card that I would like to upgrade some time soon. David. -- David Dooley dpd@raffles-it.com --=.L7BI'69hK:w5ry Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+kRg+iTCzTVFwd6wRAvOTAKDxC46nw6Nji7BBCO02BSAQKLIR6QCfe7J4 CYKklOh+Nn1+fQg+PhhD+Kg= =+sNR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.L7BI'69hK:w5ry-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 23:47:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF4137B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.itga.com.au (ns1.itga.com.au [202.53.40.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6D543F3F for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:47:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns1.itga.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h376lUm2023024; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:47:31 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16049; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:47:30 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <200304070647.QAA16049@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Gregory Bond To: David Dooley In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 07 Apr 2003 07:18:32 +0100. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 16:47:30 +1000 Sender: gnb@itga.com.au cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broken NIC in 4.8 Stable - reposted here as original was in -questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:47:38 -0000 dpd@raffles-it.com said: > Any one know what might of changed? The if_de code hasn't changed in years... Are you triple-sure you've got de in the kernel you're booting? Can you try loading the if_de kernel module? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 23:47:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A262E37B413; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BEC43FB1; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:47:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8371672E7C; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8201672E74; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:47:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Mattias Pantzare In-Reply-To: <3E90835F.9020104@ludd.luth.se> Message-ID: <20030406234549.C54715@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20030406120112.I11095-100000@netmint.com> <3E906828.8060001@mac.com> <3E90835F.9020104@ludd.luth.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: Support cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: load testing and tuning a 4GB RAM server X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:47:56 -0000 On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, Mattias Pantzare wrote: > > > The notion of tuning kernel variables to the amount of memory on the > > _build_ system-- which is not always the same as the system which will > > be running the kernel-- doesn't strike me as the right thing to do, so I > > tend to set this to 64 or so by default, and then change it on a > > case-by-case basis as the need arises. > > That is why maxusers 0 will auto-size when the kernel _boots_. Not at > buildtime. .. unfortunately 'maxusers 0' on >2GB systems causes the tables to get *too* big, and you can easily deplete KVM in this instance. Check the archives for the discussion-of-the-month about this. I'd suggest maxusers 128 and tune other items as needed, particuarly the tunables kern.ipc.nmbclusters and kern.ipc.nmbufs. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 00:52:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E33D37B401; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 00:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from park.rambler.ru (park.rambler.ru [81.19.64.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194F843FB1; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 00:52:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from is.park.rambler.ru (is.park.rambler.ru [81.19.64.102]) by park.rambler.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h377qjmF023717; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:52:45 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:52:45 +0400 (MSD) From: Igor Sysoev X-Sender: is@is To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Tor Egge Subject: MFC: Sync new socket nonblocking/async state with file flags in accept() X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 07:52:48 -0000 Is this MFC needed in RELENG_4 ? ----- tegge 2003/04/04 09:11:16 PST FreeBSD src repository Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) sys/kern uipc_syscalls.c Log: MFC: Sync new socket nonblocking/async state with file flags in accept(). PR: 1775 Revision Changes Path 1.65.2.17 +7 -0 src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c ----- I ran the PR 1775 test program on FreeBSD 3.4, 4.2, 4.3, 4.7 with the same result: ----- Socket fcntl options are: 6 O_NONBLOCK = 1 O_APPEND = 0 O_ASYNC = 0 ----- Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 04:36:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE00D37B401 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 04:36:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CF643F75 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 04:36:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 73B675308; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:36:06 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Georgi Hristov From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 13:36:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030406211955.28426.qmail@web9903.mail.yahoo.com> (Georgi Hristov's message of "Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:19:55 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 References: <20030406211955.28426.qmail@web9903.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird boot loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 11:36:09 -0000 Georgi Hristov writes: > When I boot my system it does not boot automatically, > but instead presents me with a choice of FreeBSD and > Disk1 .... i don't have anything bootable on disk1 .. > that's my home directory ... I just don't get it ... > why does it do this ...it did not use to do it with > 4.7 but now after the upgrade [I did a fresh install] > it presents me with this option.... You selected "BootMgr" instead of "Standard" during installation. > This is kind of a problem to me, because I cannot > restart the system over the network, since it waits on > somebody to push F1 [for FreeBSD] or F5[for Disc1]. It should automatically boot from the last-used disk after a few seconds. You can adjust the timeout with boot0cfg(8), or install a "standard" MBR with fdisk(8). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 06:46:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4047F37B401 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 06:46:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hal.kabsi.at (charme.kabsi.at [195.202.128.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68FC43F93 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 06:46:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert.hutterer@univie.ac.at) Received: from p4 (h062040150223.kob.cm.kabsi.at [62.40.150.223]) by hal.kabsi.at (8.11.1/) with ESMTP id h37DjY90002443679 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:45:34 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hutterer" To: Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:46:04 +0200 Message-ID: <017601c2fd0c$08b575e0$0800a8c0@p4> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: make buildworld: inconsistent operator for ftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 13:46:10 -0000 AFTER "make buildworld" I GET THIS ERROR: ===> usr.bin "/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk", line 60: Inconsistent operator for ftp make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. SO HOW TO FIX THIS Robert ''*********************************** CONTENT OF etc/make.conf IS ************************************ NOGAMES= true BOOTWAIT=15000 MASTER_SITE_BACKUP?= \ file://ftp.at.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/${DIST_SUBDIR}/ MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE?= ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP} MASTER_SORT_REGEX?= ^file: ^ftp://ftp\.FreeBSD\.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/ ://[^/]*\.de/ ://[^/]*\.de\. SUP_UPDATE= yes SUP= /usr/local/bin/cvsup SUPFLAGS= -g -L 2 SUPHOST= cvsup.at.FreeBSD.org SUPFILE= /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile PORTSSUPFILE= /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile DOCSUPFILE= /usr/share/examples/cvsup/doc-supfile **************************************+ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 07:01:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EE537B401 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:01:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E969C43FCB for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:01:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from timothy@voidnet.com) Received: from repose (12-210-146-224.client.attbi.com[12.210.146.224]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with SMTP id <20030407140117002004l5q8e>; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:01:17 +0000 From: Eric Timme (by way of Eric Timme ) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:01:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304070901.20557.timothy@voidnet.com> Subject: 4-stable and C rand()? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 14:01:20 -0000 Hi everyone, sorry if this has been answered before - I caught a whiff of a discussion about c's rand() function in a mailing list archive, but couldn't find a definitive answer. I'm trying to do a simple CS project on my machine where I generate two sets of values in parallel using rand() and am running into infinite loops of values, and couldn't figure out why, so I wrote a test program: #include #include #include int main() { int a, b; srand((unsigned)time(0)); for (int i=0 ; i < 50 ; i++) cout << rand() % 32 << " " << rand() % 4 << endl; return 0; } No matter how many times I run this it seems to alternate between generating two different but non-unique sets of values, depending on whether time(0) is even or odd..and I can't understand why (values at the end of this message). My uname -a is: FreeBSD repose 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #0: Mon Mar 24 09:13:35 CST 2003 timothy@repose:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Repose i386 It seems like the consensus on the thread I read was to use /dev/random or /dev/urandom..but this isn't really an option for a CS project a TA has to grade, so I've had to SSH out to finish the project. I just want to know what I'm doing wrong, and why I can't do this on my FreeBSD machine =\ The two value loops are: 22 1 4 3 2 1 16 3 14 1 28 3 26 1 8 3 6 1 20 3 18 1 0 3 30 1 12 3 10 1 24 3 22 1 4 3 2 1 16 3 14 1 28 3 26 1 8 3 6 1 20 3 18 1 0 3 and 19 2 9 0 15 2 5 0 11 2 1 0 7 2 29 0 3 2 25 0 31 2 21 0 27 2 17 0 23 2 13 0 19 2 9 0 15 2 5 0 11 2 1 0 7 2 29 0 3 2 25 0 31 2 21 0 27 2 17 0 23 2 13 0 19 2 Thanks for any insight you can lend. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 07:12:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101FF37B401 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta05-svc.ntlworld.com (mta05-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18CB43FBF for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:12:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([81.103.196.4]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20030407141227.JYWY311.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk>; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:12:27 +0100 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20030407150811.01dcf008@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:12:26 +0100 To: Eric Timme From: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <200304070901.20557.timothy@voidnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4-stable and C rand()? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 14:12:31 -0000 At 09:01 07/04/2003 -0500, Eric Timme wrote: >No matter how many times I run this it seems to alternate between generating >two different but non-unique sets of values, depending on whether time(0) is >even or odd..and I can't understand why (values at the end of this message). >[...] I just want to know >what I'm doing wrong, and why I can't do this on my FreeBSD machine =\ $ man rand RAND(3) FreeBSD Library Functions Manual RAND(3) NAME rand, srand, rand_r - bad random number generator ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You're not doing anything wrong; rand(3) is explicitly defined to be a bad random number generator. If you want a slightly better random number generator for non-cryptographic purposes, you could use random(3). Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 07:16:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B7137B401 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4558F43F85 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:16:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 7 Apr 2003 15:16:06 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:16:03 +0100 From: David Malone To: Eric Timme Message-ID: <20030407141603.GA96746@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <200304070901.20557.timothy@voidnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304070901.20557.timothy@voidnet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4-stable and C rand()? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 14:16:09 -0000 On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 09:01:20AM -0500, Eric Timme wrote: > No matter how many times I run this it seems to alternate between generating > two different but non-unique sets of values, depending on whether time(0) is > even or odd..and I can't understand why (values at the end of this message). In each case you are only looking at the low order bits of the number, which will always be particularly bad. The simple linear congruence generators used for rand have the form: seed = seed * 1103515245 + 12345 return seed % (RAND_MAX+1) where RAND_MAX+1 is a power of two. Since you're looking at this mod 32 (and mod 4) it becomes somthing like: seed = seed * 13 + 25 return seed % 32 where seed is effectively now a number between 0 and 31. This can't have a period of longer than 32 calls. Rather than use rand()%32 you might want to use something like (rand()+RAND_MAX/64)/(RAND_MAX/32) - using the high order bits means that you are not effectively reducing the side of the state space. David. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 08:22:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD1737B401 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C25543FD7 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:22:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h37FM2LA004605; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:22:02 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.8/8.12.3/Submit) id h37FM246004604; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:22:02 -0700 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:22:02 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Rob B Message-ID: <20030407082202.B9478@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030405171534.02638010@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.2.20030405171534.02638010@127.0.0.1> <20030405100005.A9478@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <5.2.0.9.2.20030406220358.00aaa600@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030406220358.00aaa600@127.0.0.1>; from rbyrnes@ozemail.com.au on Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 10:04:56PM +1000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: Brooks Davis cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: green_saver source missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:22:05 -0000 --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 10:04:56PM +1000, Rob B wrote: > Thought so, but why is it not being used automatically? There is no=20 > mechanism to tell the buildkernel process the location of files that it= =20 > should know about. The green saver is build automaticly when you build modules. If you specify a list of modules to build using MODULES_OVERRIDE you need to specify syscons/green as the module name. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+kZeZXY6L6fI4GtQRAvVeAKDXvJj9q0eWj+IxyT/38/ld9ZqtWACg0mwT r5dqYmQk7UnEGa+ZGrDbKlc= =+Ym/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 08:23:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7804B37B401 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B57643FBF for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:23:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h37FNuvf093119 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:23:56 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:23:56 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030407190411.R88648@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: strange crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:23:59 -0000 Dear collagues, could someone sched me a light about the following crash (I'm almost sure about hardware, temperature, etc...) Machine is fairly stable; however, there are occational crashes, similar to this one; backtraces are almost always single-step. It's 4.8-R, dmesg and gdb -k output follows ==================================================================================== Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #2: Tue Apr 1 21:06:23 MSD 2003 marck@kucha.rinet.ru:/usr/obj/FreeBSD/src.stable-48/sys/relay Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 851938704 Hz CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (851.94-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x642 Stepping = 2 Features=0x183f9ff AMD Features=0xc0440000 real memory = 259981312 (253888K bytes) avail memory = 249024512 (243188K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0295000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled Using $PIR table, 6 entries at 0xc00fde70 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xe000-0xe00f at device 7.1 on pci0 atapci0: Correcting VIA config for southbridge data corruption bug ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: (vendor=0x1106, dev=0x3057) at 7.4 fxp0: port 0xec00-0xec1f mem 0xd8000000-0xd80fffff,0xd8100000-0xd8100fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:04:ac:a6:e7:3c inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto orm0: