From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 06:42:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C13F16A41A; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 06:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B4B13C46C; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 06:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 28EBBA83; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:16:25 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:16:25 -0500 To: matusita@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20070722061625.GD4336@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: are the vmware3* ports still needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 06:42:28 -0000 These ports depends on misc/compat3x, which has long-known security problems. Is there any reason to keep the vmware3* ports around now? I realize that there may be people with older licenses, but don't most people have vmware4* licenses or above now? mcl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 10:52:56 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7284F16A417 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [IPv6:2001:218:422:1::15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11D713C457 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:52:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id l6MAqdB79743; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:52:42 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <46A336F6.6040103@jp.FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:52:38 +0900 From: Makoto Matsushita User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <20070722061625.GD4336@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20070722061625.GD4336@soaustin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: are the vmware3* ports still needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:52:56 -0000 (put my "emulations/vmware-{tools,guestd}3 MAINTAINER" hat on) > These ports depends on misc/compat3x, which has long-known security > problems. Is there any reason to keep the vmware3* ports around now? Maybe no reason to keep them (except for users who still use VMware Workstation 3, already unsupported product by VMware.) However, there's less reason to remove them and that's why these ports still there. Since misc/compat3x security vulnerability is hard to fix, it's the time to remove emulations/vmware-{tools,guestd}3. -- Makoto `MAR' Matsushita From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 11:34:20 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F61716A41B; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:34:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E20613C461; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:34:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A561BA.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.97.186]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE3F2E0EE; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:34:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from deskjail (deskjail.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.109]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E735B547D; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:31:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:35:53 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20070722133553.619a5eab@deskjail> In-Reply-To: <200707201317.32746@aldan> References: <200707192341.59940@aldan> <200707201013.13391@aldan> <20070720183925.540b7654@deskjail> <200707201317.32746@aldan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.9, required 8, BAYES_00 -15.00, DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, scf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: something wrong with Linux on 6.2-stable/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:34:20 -0000 Quoting Mikhail Teterin (Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:17:= 32 -0400): > On =D0=BF'=D1=8F=D1=82=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=86=D1=8F 20 =D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=BF=D0= =B5=D0=BD=D1=8C 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > =3D Additional to what I told you in the last mail regarding reverting so= me > =3D MFCs: I have a patch which is at > =3D http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/linuxolator/mfc/07_rest.diff >=20 > ... > -------------------------- > |diff -ruh sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master > |--- sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master Wed Jul 4 11:47:57 2007 > |+++ sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master Tue Jun 26 12:57:36 2007 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 68. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 83. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 139. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 158. > Hunk #5 succeeded at 172. > Hunk #6 failed at 223. > Hunk #7 succeeded at 280. > Hunk #8 succeeded at 308. > Hunk #9 succeeded at 418. > ... >=20 > Attaching the syscalls.master.rej -- it seems, I already have this change= =20 > (mprotect to linux_mprotect) applied. Ok, I removed this part from the patch... did you test the above regardless of the failed hunk? If not, please do. > =3D You are the one with the problem at hand, and I'm the one with not > =3D enough time ATM... >=20 > A very regrettable attitude... I do appreciate, that despite expressing i= t,=20 > you are still trying to help me, but fixing/investigating bugs is not the= =20 > user's responsibility... Lack of a small test which exhibits it and no intent on my side to break the law by acquiring a copy of a commercial game from you makes this way of handling it necessary. I also don't have a -stable system on which I can test this. And investigating bugs to some extend is the users responsibility. You (as a developer) can not reproduce everything in an open source project yourself, so you need feedback from users which cooperate. Bye, Alexander. --=20 A little suffering is good for the soul. -- Kirk, "The Corbomite Maneuver", stardate 1514.0 http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 15:27:48 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD1B16A419 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518D313C46E for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6MFRgpT005430; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:27:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:26:55 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20070722061625.GD4336@soaustin.net> <46A336F6.6040103@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <46A336F6.6040103@jp.FreeBSD.org> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Makoto Matsushita , Mark Linimon Subject: Re: are the vmware3* ports still needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:27:48 -0000 On Sunday 22 July 2007, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > (put my "emulations/vmware-{tools,guestd}3 MAINTAINER" hat on) > > > These ports depends on misc/compat3x, which has long-known security > > problems. Is there any reason to keep the vmware3* ports around now? > > Maybe no reason to keep them (except for users who still use VMware > Workstation 3, already unsupported product by VMware.) However, there's > less reason to remove them and that's why these ports still there. > > Since misc/compat3x security vulnerability is hard to fix, it's the time > to remove emulations/vmware-{tools,guestd}3. Unfortunately, VMware Workstation 3.x is the most recent Workstation that works (or sort of works, or used to work) on FreeBSD. Definitely not supported by VMware any longer and in fact impossible to get licenses for, but I know that there are people still using it. There have been various threads in the past few months about what needs to happen to get recent versions of VMware Server or Workstation working under FreeBSD. Most notably, rsync.net is sponsoring a code bounty to get VMware Workstation 5.5 (or possibly 6.0 now) working under FreeBSD (this went out on -announce). The bounty page is below. Although it hasn't been updated, I believe the bounty _has_ been claimed (and I actually sent a Workstation 6 license key that I'm not using to rsync.net to aid the process) and is now being worked on. I don't have any more details than that, however. http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/2007cb.html Anyway, I think that the emulators/vmware3 port should remain at least until a usable replacement appears. If there _is_ a compelling argument to axe it, a heads-up should probably go to a wider audience than -emulation, possibly including one or more of -ports, -questions and -stable. JN From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 18:16:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FAF16A418 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E50913C458 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id E4C24EC3; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:16:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:16:26 -0500 To: John Nielsen Message-ID: <20070722181626.GA30771@soaustin.net> References: <20070722061625.GD4336@soaustin.net> <46A336F6.6040103@jp.FreeBSD.org> <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Makoto Matsushita , Mark Linimon , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: are the vmware3* ports still needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:16:30 -0000 On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 11:26:55AM -0400, John Nielsen wrote: > Anyway, I think that the emulators/vmware3 port should remain at least until > a usable replacement appears. Fair enough. Really what I'm trying to do is garbage-collect dependent ports of misc/compat3x. Nuking the antique JDKs will get most of them. mcl From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 05:38:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D3D16A417 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [IPv6:2001:218:422:1::15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0218D13C47E for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.120.243] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6p2+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet id l6N5Z0B42570; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:35:00 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <46A43DFE.1020505@jp.FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:34:54 +0900 From: Makoto Matsushita User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Nielsen References: <20070722061625.GD4336@soaustin.net> <46A336F6.6040103@jp.FreeBSD.org> <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: are the vmware3* ports still needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:38:51 -0000 > Unfortunately, VMware Workstation 3.x is the most recent Workstation that > works (or sort of works, or used to work) on FreeBSD. Ah, that's right. As linimon said, it would be a fair reason to keep. IIRC, the problem in question is compat3x (not VMware Tools), so simply remove LIB_DEPENDS line and add some warning message if libc.so.3 is not installed to the running box. I'll try it tonight. -- Makoto `MAR' Matsushita From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 11:08:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE63C16A475 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E3813C458 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6NB8Gwx045284 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:08:16 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l6NB8FFU045280 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:08:15 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:08:15 GMT Message-Id: <200707231108.l6NB8FFU045280@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:08:16 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/21463 emulation [linux] Linux compatability mode should not allow setu o kern/77710 emulation [linux] Linux page fault sigcontext information is wro o kern/97326 emulation [linux] file descriptor leakage in linux emulation o kern/101453 emulation [linux] [patch] linprocfs disallows non-zero file offs o kern/102956 emulation [linux] [patch] Add partial support for SO_PEERCRED in 5 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 o kern/29698 emulation [linux] [patch] linux ipcs doesn'work o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/41543 emulation [patch] feature request: easier wine/w23 support o kern/55835 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux IPC emulation missing SETALL sys a kern/72920 emulation [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain s o kern/73777 emulation [linux] [patch] linux emulation: root dir special hand o kern/91293 emulation [svr4] [patch] *Experimental* Update to the SVR4 emula o ports/112355 emulation [PATCH] emulators/vmware3: cleanup non-supported FreeB f ports/114405 emulation emulators/linux_base-fc4 - glibc-common-2.3.6-3.i386.r 10 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 11:17:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D4916A480 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B5E13C480 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1300334wxd for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:17:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=gaYYt0SbvaguQ0e8nmXxJZESPylKHruIVPQB7hJOQzxIC8viqe5cMMGlFBnerjPUKcmATIQ7VlqgXpm/E9Tp2iG9PMKPxxL3urNuBdK+yIjG2Z8SO/34qGLXYQdqPSlHf/PHgxP+NVBTGW8ekdVP1Sv9WLUr5FC2vNVR/iKSdsM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=Qqwe5tz0iJwuYzX44DvnF0A+5K2+Mt96DmEQItGLxgYEYsh4SOFrCxCiOhxy8d2h+9Ujw3e5NVBcXbMMjMVbb8f8za1UF1u7XhceRTwR3HHXjc4MGYYkiPvNPEuybtWoQZaei+SLD0y+LqSlU6pz27fP9+BQ226u8ADgAHGt6uI= Received: by 10.78.178.5 with SMTP id a5mr731750huf.1185188004427; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:53:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.31.5.25? ( [89.97.252.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm3183784hue.2007.07.23.03.53.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46A48870.2080202@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:52:32 +0200 From: Attilio Rao User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060526) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Teufel References: <200707131834.27131.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> <4697CCEB.9080707@FreeBSD.org> <200707132155.43783.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> <4698E7C4.9080001@FreeBSD.org> <469B3491.2000402@kuehlbox.de> In-Reply-To: <469B3491.2000402@kuehlbox.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Attilio Rao Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kqemu crash (page fault) with -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: attilio@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:17:40 -0000 Teufel wrote: > Hi Attilio, > > well, I am not Harry, but I have downloaded also your patch and compiled > it with yesterdays CURRENT CVS, launched a portsnap fetch update and > build kqemu + qemu from the ports without any changes to the default > system. > Loaded kqemu.ko, and started a win2k3 image with qemu -kernel-kqemu. It > runs now for about 10 hours. No crashes so far. But I did not try a > unpatched kernel.previously. > Just wanted to let you know that here is a 7-CURRENT running from > yesterday with kqemu in kernel and usermode under SMP. Any tests I > should do? Ok, so a fix for this (even if slightly different from what you have tested) has been committed yesterday night. Now kqemu should not care if kernel is compiled or not with KSE and can be compiled cleanly with or without KSE. As an addictional note, I can say I think SMP breakage for kqemu is due to the option SMP not passed as compilation directive since SMP offers another compile time discriminant for the ABI. In particular, if a module is compiled without SMP on a SMP kernel it will use racy synchronization primitives. This means we should force at least modules compilation to always use SMP (I'm not sure if it alredy happens honestly, I just hope so). Thanks, Attilio From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 15:02:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281D316A46C for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.farley.org (farley.org [67.64.95.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D8913C483 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:02:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from thor.farley.org (thor.farley.org [192.168.1.5]) by mail.farley.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6NEPj2v073256; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:25:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:25:45 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" To: John Nielsen In-Reply-To: <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net> Message-ID: <20070723092248.J9030@thor.farley.org> References: <20070722061625.GD4336@soaustin.net> <46A336F6.6040103@jp.FreeBSD.org> <200707221126.57742.lists@jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on mail.farley.org Cc: Makoto Matsushita , Mark Linimon , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: are the vmware3* ports still needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:02:53 -0000 On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, John Nielsen wrote: *snip* > Anyway, I think that the emulators/vmware3 port should remain at least > until a usable replacement appears. If there _is_ a compelling > argument to axe it, a heads-up should probably go to a wider audience > than -emulation, possibly including one or more of -ports, -questions > and -stable. I saw this changeset[1] for VirtualBox recently. It offers a little hope for another alternative. Obviously, it is not complete, yet the UI supposedly builds already on FreeBSD. Sean 1. http://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/3680 -- scf@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 24 19:46:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E3A16A417 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F07613C45E for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6OJkSpT018090 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:46:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:45:58 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*. X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: linux ioctls not implemented - advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:46:30 -0000 I'm trying to get the latest Linux remote agent for Backup Exec to run on a FreeBSD-amd64 machine. The exact version is RALUS-11d.7170.2, although I suspect any 10d or 11d version would be the same. After trying a few things (including installing on a real Linux host) I was able to identify and extract the files containing the two rpm's that are actually installed. I ran those through rpm2cpio and got a simple directory layout. I duplicated the directory structure and config file from the Linux host and ran the main executable. (The init script tries (and fails, even after I fixed all the hardcoded paths) to do some housekeeping, but none of it is necessary for the thing to actually run.) The executable seems to run okay and the host even shows up as a Unix target on the (Windows) Backup Exec server, but I'm unable to authenticate or do any backups. Looking through the system messages I saw these: linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8938 ('\M^I',56) is not implemented linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8938 ('\M^I',56) is not implemented linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8933 ('\M^I',51) is not implemented linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8933 ('\M^I',51) is not implemented linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8933 ('\M^I',51) is not implemented linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8933 ('\M^I',51) is not implemented Two attempts to use ioctl 0x8938 and four attempts to use ioctl 0x8933 every time I start the executable (regardless of login attempts). The message is fairly explanatory; my question is what can I do about it? Is there a canonical list of Linux ioctls anywhere that would tell me what this binary is trying to do? From the behavior I'm seeing and from looking at linux_ioctl.h I suspect that they belong in the "socket" category, but that's as far as I've gotten. Thanks for any tips, etc. JN From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 24 20:14:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AE816A418 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3652913C481 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i23so1270461wra for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:14:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nmjRktvlWIgwAELf8qj48im5k/i9RR3JuQPS/sO+RK1Jtv9sJkGV+OMVCXyDXhakBOI+K5IMLlXXDm3sqHcunLSUXCQ9iisskA5UXwRQq3MEYoehndKqv29zq1o3LesWWIaWGuBFRNVemqHH1WpcjTJx2RWL1gNu77nyPisvHrc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sdmLySj6Rb2bd4g5wGHAzN5bd6WCYhynlUaFq13cTZ/+fYx4D28QbWPrrRos1olrkeikKydDJ9un0YeWJasi7iIFhOCfi2d2dvYxwYwkfDYNXlyiJS2eg4AP0J52Q3GdVGwV6v3to+sk7KDrqkLG69EYaHOecBpOrlHFNSCTtJ0= Received: by 10.90.74.1 with SMTP id w1mr3736452aga.1185306563929; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.12.8? ( [72.189.172.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o27sm7486692ele.2007.07.24.12.49.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46A657B5.40900@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:49:09 -0400 From: Sten Daniel Soersdal User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Need to rewrite FreeBSD based database-centric app under VMware server 1.0.2, advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:14:53 -0000 For a period of time i need to run FreeBSD 6 or 7 as a PostgreSQL server w/Apache (PHP) to emulate one of our servers - to rewrite a very database-centric management application. The application wont be due until sometime late this year (Christmas). I thought it would be wise to ask you (pioneers of emulation) for advice. My Dell Inspiron 9400 has 2ghz Core2Due with 4m cache, 2 GB of dual channel memory and a rather slow 5400 rpm "PATA" emulated SATA hard drive. It runs Windows XP Pro SP2. The emulated server ( PE2850 2x2 core Intel, 4 GB memory, RAID 1+0 on battery backed SCSI (mpt)) runs 32bit FBSD 6.1 today but could run 64bit version on application release (reinstall either way necessary). The applications it runs today are PostgreSQL (old), Java (old), Apache 1.3, PHP 5 something, FreeRADIUS (old), PowerDNS (old) My questions are at least four fold; - 64 bit or 32 bit, now or then? - Any suggestions on which of the FreeBSD versions i should base myself on? I'm thinking 7 but if that is known to be impossible then i should perhaps delay this choice? - Are there any gotcha's that i need to address to get an emulated (32bit or 64bit, FBSD 6 or 7, etc) off the ground at all? - Would VMware server 1.0.2 cause many emulation problems running 32bit or 64bit on single or dual core? - I need only serving performance for my personal use only are there any settings i should specifically look into? - Recommendations and experiences are very welcome!! -- Sten Daniel Soersdal From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 24 20:19:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5168116A417 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E04613C45B for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1D38C034A; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:19:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fC4kT1fmyBD5; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:19:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121338BF8F7; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:19:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l6OKJOvf029986; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:19:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:19:24 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: John Nielsen Message-ID: <20070724201924.GA29874@freebsd.org> References: <200707241545.59049.lists@jnielsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707241545.59049.lists@jnielsen.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux ioctls not implemented - advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:19:30 -0000 > Two attempts to use ioctl 0x8938 and four attempts to use ioctl 0x8933 every > time I start the executable (regardless of login attempts). > > The message is fairly explanatory; my question is what can I do about it? Is > there a canonical list of Linux ioctls anywhere that would tell me what this > binary is trying to do? From the behavior I'm seeing and from looking at > linux_ioctl.h I suspect that they belong in the "socket" category, but that's > as far as I've gotten. #define SIOCGIFINDEX 0x8933 /* name -> if_index mapping */ #define SIOCGIFCOUNT 0x8938 /* get number of devices */ I might look at at. should not be that hard to implement those. are you willing to test patches? roman From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 24 20:39:37 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449CE16A418 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDC913C480 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6OKdZpT041923 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:39:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:39:05 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200707241545.59049.lists@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <200707241545.59049.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707241639.05232.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: linux ioctls not implemented - advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:39:37 -0000 On Tuesday 24 July 2007 03:45:58 pm John Nielsen wrote: > I'm trying to get the latest Linux remote agent for Backup Exec to run on a > FreeBSD-amd64 machine. The exact version is RALUS-11d.7170.2, although I > suspect any 10d or 11d version would be the same. > > After trying a few things (including installing on a real Linux host) I was > able to identify and extract the files containing the two rpm's that are > actually installed. I ran those through rpm2cpio and got a simple directory > layout. I duplicated the directory structure and config file from the Linux > host and ran the main executable. (The init script tries (and fails, even > after I fixed all the hardcoded paths) to do some housekeeping, but none of > it is necessary for the thing to actually run.) > > The executable seems to run okay and the host even shows up as a Unix > target on the (Windows) Backup Exec server, but I'm unable to authenticate > or do any backups. Looking through the system messages I saw these: > > linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8938 ('\M^I',56) is not > implemented > linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8938 ('\M^I',56) is not > implemented > linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8933 ('\M^I',51) is not > implemented > linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8933 ('\M^I',51) is not > implemented > linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8933 ('\M^I',51) is not > implemented > linux: pid 4080 (beremote): ioctl fd=6, cmd=0x8933 ('\M^I',51) is not > implemented > > Two attempts to use ioctl 0x8938 and four attempts to use ioctl 0x8933 > every time I start the executable (regardless of login attempts). > > The message is fairly explanatory; my question is what can I do about it? > Is there a canonical list of Linux ioctls anywhere that would tell me what > this binary is trying to do? From the behavior I'm seeing and from looking > at linux_ioctl.h I suspect that they belong in the "socket" category, but > that's as far as I've gotten. > > Thanks for any tips, etc. Digging a little deeper, it looks like 0x8933 translates to SIOCGIFINDEX. There is a ready-made (at least it looks that way to me) patch in kern/99068, which apparently has only not been committed because the debug output uses the wrong function. I'll play around with that and perhaps comment on the PR if I make any headway. The 0x8938 ioctl appears to translate to SIOCGIFCOUNT. Can anyone point me in the right direction for creating a linux_ifcount function for linux_ioctl.c? I have some C experience but little to no kernel experience. However the PR above and the existing code provide a pretty good template for me to follow. Would getting the value of net.link.generic.system.ifcount be an appropriate action? If so, what would that reference look like in C appropriate for linux_ioctl.c? Thanks! JN From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 24 20:41:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E961216A420 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A463113C46A for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4B88C041F; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:41:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pp8mjsRLTyAY; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:41:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A10F8C0417; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:41:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l6OKf525030472; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:41:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:41:05 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: John Nielsen Message-ID: <20070724204105.GA30450@freebsd.org> References: <200707241545.59049.lists@jnielsen.net> <20070724201924.GA29874@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070724201924.GA29874@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: [PATCH]: linux ioctls not implemented - advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:41:08 -0000 On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:19:24PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > Two attempts to use ioctl 0x8938 and four attempts to use ioctl 0x8933 every > > time I start the executable (regardless of login attempts). > > > > The message is fairly explanatory; my question is what can I do about it? Is > > there a canonical list of Linux ioctls anywhere that would tell me what this > > binary is trying to do? From the behavior I'm seeing and from looking at > > linux_ioctl.h I suspect that they belong in the "socket" category, but that's > > as far as I've gotten. > > #define SIOCGIFINDEX 0x8933 /* name -> if_index mapping */ > #define SIOCGIFCOUNT 0x8938 /* get number of devices */ > > I might look at at. should not be that hard to implement those. are you willing to test > patches? www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/linux_socket.patch please report back... also.. it would be nice if this patch does not work that you can provide me strace from real linux. the second ioctl is not implemented on linux and I am not sure how to fake that.. thnx From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 02:38:31 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE0A16A419; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B921B13C46B; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6P2cTO2001477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:38:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l6P2cTAJ001476; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:38:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Alexander Leidinger Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:38:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200707192341.59940@aldan> <200707201317.32746@aldan> <20070722133553.619a5eab@deskjail> In-Reply-To: <20070722133553.619a5eab@deskjail> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, scf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: something wrong with Linux on 6.2-stable/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:38:31 -0000 On нед╕ля 22 липень 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote: = Ok, I removed this part from the patch... did you test the above = regardless of the failed hunk? If not, please do. Just rebooted -- same problem... :( I wish, Linux was available as a module on amd64 -- at least, I would not have to reboot to try every little patch. = Lack of a small test which exhibits it and no intent on my side to = break the law by acquiring a copy of a commercial game from you makes = this way of handling it necessary. You would not be breaking a law by downloading a game for testing purposes. This is also why I did not just post a link to it, but offered you to contact me privately. (Not to mention, the game's publisher -- Loki -- has gone out of business about 5 years ago.) = I also don't have a -stable system on which I can test this. You could test on -current, just to see, if the problem is fixed there -- it is (far) easier for you to do that, than for me to upgrade my only system to (the half-baked) -current. = And investigating bugs to some extend is the users responsibility. You = (as a developer) can not reproduce everything in an open source project = yourself, so you need feedback from users which cooperate. Of course. And I provided plenty of feedback. But you are asking me to rebuild the kernel and reboot (my main system) several times, which is a rather burdensome excercise. It is far easier you to download the program and try it. Yours, -mi From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 20:25:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755A416A419 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from cg-p07-fb.rzone.de (cg-p07-fb.rzone.de [81.169.146.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDE113C46C for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mrclete-mo-p07-ob.mail [192.168.63.176]) by charnel-fb-03.store (RZmta 10.2) with ESMTP id i03682j6PImuOW for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:54:23 +0200 (MEST) Received: from athena.laverenz.de (p5480E1D3.dip.t-dialin.net [84.128.225.211]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo18) (RZmta 10.3) with ESMTP id 507228j6PJRP5c for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2189BE0AA2BB for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from athena.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athena [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18667-02 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix, from userid 2000) id E344FE0AA2BA; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:52:41 +0200 From: Uwe Laverenz To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070725195241.GA18577@laverenz.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <46A657B5.40900@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46A657B5.40900@gmail.com> Organization: private site Sender: uwe@laverenz.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at laverenz.de X-RZG-AUTH: l30WrtbrzmfyRJtZ7/TtK2qIdZIgjE9K4Q55TXGhenj8TX5ShWTsXpHkgB7/P9voqQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 Subject: Re: Need to rewrite FreeBSD based database-centric app under VMware server 1.0.2, advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:25:13 -0000 On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 03:49:09PM -0400, Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote: > My Dell Inspiron 9400 has 2ghz Core2Due with 4m cache, 2 GB of dual > channel memory and a rather slow 5400 rpm "PATA" emulated SATA hard > drive. It runs Windows XP Pro SP2. I've never used XP as host OS for VMware server, but I have several FreeBSD guests on VMware server 1.0.3 (RHEL 4.x host) and ESX 3.x. FreeBSD 6.x runs fine as guest OS with one problem: SMP does not work with FreeBSD i386 guests. It does work well with am64 though. I have no experiences with 7.0 yet. > - 64 bit or 32 bit, now or then? I would prefer amd64 for servers. > - Any suggestions on which of the FreeBSD versions i should base myself > on? I'm thinking 7 but if that is known to be impossible then i should > perhaps delay this choice? For now I would suggest to start with 6.x and upgrade to 7.x when the time is right. :) > - Are there any gotcha's that i need to address to get an emulated > (32bit or 64bit, FBSD 6 or 7, etc) off the ground at all? No gotchas, it works except for the i386/SMP problem. Just a few tips: - use le(4) for the network interface instead of lnc(4) if you decide to use i386 (amd64 will get em(4), which works good) - set kern.hz="100" in your /boot/loader.conf - install VMware tools that are shipped with VMware server - after installing VMware tools move /boot/kernel/vmmemctl.ko to /boot/modules/ to avoid reinstalling the module after each kernel build - if you want to use both of your CPU-cores with 6.x, use amd64 - disk I/O will be slower in VMware server guests, but that's the case for every guest OS > - Would VMware server 1.0.2 cause many emulation problems running 32bit > or 64bit on single or dual core? No, just the annoying i386/SMP bug. Uwe From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 26 00:49:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F02716A417 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADF213C48E for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so290560wxd for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:49:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jHd1XtqgqFWoaekv0ckC85XNk6D9J/UX8CCiAPmcBaabL3WET9REo7RsDGP/3p23hz3GXgquaR3CosIdsjAr9OR10izXhFpHjstA4VDR0RaSozGYQATdePqaK59KEwRVx7B69yguwOb4/a+NQm1Lzw++yEmYcY8AcNFUuUOYrnY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JYrxr58SQbxEw8sk5+Ivl/5H8xeccs15SweAoqyjK39FTkvb3MdGDgvqZYHNpQDRF0ovVbL5rrpHlLveOhwyUh4rHZJqqPtgim/O09Gx0YvC1dxjzIxqOfpirzY9ZlUUwE5lH1Y+FcjC+hJuCtQ+jnQr0hw1znzuPk3+4ncwMRE= Received: by 10.70.57.8 with SMTP id f8mr2056406wxa.1185410978523; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:49:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.12.8? ( [72.189.172.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m33sm812946ele.2007.07.25.17.49.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46A7EF9A.5040907@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:49:30 -0400 From: Sten Daniel Soersdal User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <46A657B5.40900@gmail.com> <20070725195241.GA18577@laverenz.de> In-Reply-To: <20070725195241.GA18577@laverenz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Need to rewrite FreeBSD based database-centric app under VMware server 1.0.2, advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:49:39 -0000 Uwe Laverenz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 03:49:09PM -0400, Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote: > >> My Dell Inspiron 9400 has 2ghz Core2Due with 4m cache, 2 GB of dual >> channel memory and a rather slow 5400 rpm "PATA" emulated SATA hard >> drive. It runs Windows XP Pro SP2. > > I've never used XP as host OS for VMware server, but I have several > FreeBSD guests on VMware server 1.0.3 (RHEL 4.x host) and ESX 3.x. > > FreeBSD 6.x runs fine as guest OS with one problem: SMP does not work > with FreeBSD i386 guests. It does work well with am64 though. I have no > experiences with 7.0 yet. > >> - 64 bit or 32 bit, now or then? > > I would prefer amd64 for servers. > >> - Any suggestions on which of the FreeBSD versions i should base myself >> on? I'm thinking 7 but if that is known to be impossible then i should >> perhaps delay this choice? > > For now I would suggest to start with 6.x and upgrade to 7.x when the > time is right. :) > >> - Are there any gotcha's that i need to address to get an emulated >> (32bit or 64bit, FBSD 6 or 7, etc) off the ground at all? > > No gotchas, it works except for the i386/SMP problem. Just a few tips: > > - use le(4) for the network interface instead of lnc(4) if you > decide to use i386 (amd64 will get em(4), which works good) > - set kern.hz="100" in your /boot/loader.conf > - install VMware tools that are shipped with VMware server > - after installing VMware tools move /boot/kernel/vmmemctl.ko to > /boot/modules/ to avoid reinstalling the module after each kernel > build > - if you want to use both of your CPU-cores with 6.x, use amd64 > - disk I/O will be slower in VMware server guests, but that's the > case for every guest OS > >> - Would VMware server 1.0.2 cause many emulation problems running 32bit >> or 64bit on single or dual core? > > No, just the annoying i386/SMP bug. > Thank you! I'm recompiling to use le instead of lnc now (both were compiled into kernel and I'm not sure how to disable one). In the mean time (mailinglist held my e-mail for at least 24hrs) i upgraded to 1.0.3 and i can confirm that SMP wont utilize my two cores more than around 30% of total 100% (two cores) when compiling kernel. Thank you for the kern.hz hint, it did help quite a bit. I'm still amazed at how fast this works under XP. I'm surprised to find that VMware does not utilize both cores when running on a single core host, i guess i expected that the process would hop around on the two cores like any normal process. But then again, VMware Server 1.0.3 is probably not a normal application. I haven't found a way to install the VMware tools and the help file is giving me no clue. If i simply tell it to install the VMware tools at the login prompt from the menu then all it does is sit there and do nothing (except i get the ability to cancel the installation). Now i admit i haven't given this point the attention it deserves. Perhaps, none the less, you have a hint? I will certainly copy the vmmemctl.ko over to the folder, very appreciative of this advice. I suspect there will be more recompiles after this. For now i installed i386 but i will install AMD64 tomorrow morning. It is much closer to what i want. -- Sten Daniel Soersdal From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 26 08:57:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFBF16A41A for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:57:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from cg-p07-fb.rzone.de (cg-p07-fb.rzone.de [81.169.146.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270C313C45D for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mrclete-mo-p07-ob.mail [192.168.63.176]) by gibbsson-fb-08.store (RZmta 10.2) with ESMTP id V068dbj6Q7Hlvi for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:27:08 +0200 (MEST) Received: from athena.laverenz.de (p5480E1D3.dip.t-dialin.net [84.128.225.211]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo29) (RZmta 10.3) with ESMTP id u07268j6Q76gQG for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:26:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F88E0AA2BB for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:26:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from athena.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athena [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32248-06 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:26:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix, from userid 2000) id B9CF3E0AA2BA; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:26:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:26:02 +0200 From: Uwe Laverenz To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070726082602.GA1051@laverenz.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <46A657B5.40900@gmail.com> <20070725195241.GA18577@laverenz.de> <46A7EF9A.5040907@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46A7EF9A.5040907@gmail.com> Organization: private site Sender: uwe@laverenz.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at laverenz.de X-RZG-AUTH: l30WrtbrzmfyRJtZ7/TtK2qIdZIgjE9K4Q55TXGhenj8TX5ShWTsXpHkgB7/P9voqQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 Subject: Re: Need to rewrite FreeBSD based database-centric app under VMware server 1.0.2, advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:57:17 -0000 On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:49:30PM -0400, Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote: > I haven't found a way to install the VMware tools and the help file is > giving me no clue. If i simply tell it to install the VMware tools at > the login prompt from the menu then all it does is sit there and do > nothing (except i get the ability to cancel the installation). > Now i admit i haven't given this point the attention it deserves. > Perhaps, none the less, you have a hint? Sure: - select "VM -> Install VMware Tools..." - login into your guest and mount your cdrom drive - copy and extract "vmware-freebsd-tools.tar.gz" from the cdrom - cd into "vmware-tools-distrib" and start installation with "./vmware-install.pl" (perl has to be installed already) - umount cdrom and select "VM -> Cancel VMware Tools Install..." in the menu If anyone wants to run FreeBSD as guest under VMware ESX: the Tools delivered with VMware server also work in ESX-Guests. Uwe From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 27 23:45:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EEE16A41F for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpeter@melbpc.org.au) Received: from vscan01.westnet.com.au (vscan01.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27E513C45E for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:45:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpeter@melbpc.org.au) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE09D7611E1 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 07:18:58 +0800 (WST) Received: from vscan01.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vscan01.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26482-14 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 07:18:58 +0800 (WST) Received: from baron.from.hell (dsl-124-150-121-3.vic.westnet.com.au [124.150.121.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vscan01.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31719762170 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 07:18:58 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <46AA7D4B.2000202@melbpc.org.au> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:18:35 +1000 From: Peter Kostouros Organization: Melbourne PC User Group User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: re: [PATCH]: linux ioctls not implemented - advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kpeter@melbpc.org.au List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:45:54 -0000 Hi I applied the patch on a recent current (27JUL2007) but unfortunately I still see the ioctl is not implemented message on the console. A simple java application that identifies the problem is: package hell.from.baron.test; import java.net.InetAddress; import java.net.NetworkInterface; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.Enumeration; import java.util.List; public class TestUtil { /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub try { String[] ips = TestUtil.getHostAddresses(); for (int i = 0; i < ips.length; i++) System.out.println("IP[" + Integer.toString(i) + "]" + " : " + ips[i]); } catch (Exception ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); } } public static String[] getHostAddresses() throws Exception { List hostIps = new ArrayList(); Enumeration nifs = NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces(); while (nifs.hasMoreElements()) { NetworkInterface nif = (NetworkInterface)nifs.nextElement(); Enumeration ips = nif.getInetAddresses(); while (ips.hasMoreElements()) { InetAddress ip = (InetAddress)ips.nextElement(); hostIps.add(ip.getHostAddress()); } } return (String[])hostIps.toArray(new String[0]); } } Running this application under (Linux) Java SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_02-b05) I get the following output: java.net.SocketException: Cannot assign requested address at java.net.NetworkInterface.getAll(Native Method) at java.net.NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces(NetworkInterface.java:281) at hell.from.baron.test.TestUtil.getHostAddresses(TestUtil.java:29) at hell.from.baron.test.TestUtil.main(TestUtil.java:17) and on the console linux: pid 1497 (java): ioctl fd=5, cmd=0x8933 ('\M^I',51) is not implemented whereas under Java 2 Runtime Environment (build 1.5.0_11-p5_15_jun_2007_15_10) I get: IP[0] : 127.0.0.1 IP[1] : 192.168.0.2 I grep'ed through the JDK source code and found SIOCGIFINDEX referenced in file jdk/j2se/src/solaris/native/java/net/NetworkInterface.c. I am trying to locate where the error is raised to provide further information, but thus far have been unsuccessful. Note I am running with compat.linux.osrelease=2.4.2. -- Regards Peter As always the organisation disavows knowledge of this email From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 28 22:32:19 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A1D16A421; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE5913C4B5; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (pav@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6SMWIda004209; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:32:18 GMT (envelope-from pav@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l6SMWIjf004205; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:32:18 GMT (envelope-from pav) Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:32:18 GMT Message-Id: <200707282232.l6SMWIjf004205@freefall.freebsd.org> To: henrik@cheat-project.com, pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/114405: emulators/linux_base-fc4 - glibc-common-2.3.6-3.i386.rpm can not be found on the mirrors X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:32:19 -0000 Synopsis: emulators/linux_base-fc4 - glibc-common-2.3.6-3.i386.rpm can not be found on the mirrors State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: pav State-Changed-When: Sat Jul 28 22:31:58 UTC 2007 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout; I can download it from mirrors.kernel.org myself. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=114405