From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 14 00:04:19 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3D616A412
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:04:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org)
Received: from straycat.dhs.org (c-24-63-86-11.hsd1.ma.comcast.net
	[24.63.86.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07C613C469
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:04:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org)
Received: from [192.168.1.127] (bofh.straycat.dhs.org [192.168.1.127])
	by straycat.dhs.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0DNexOv004438;
	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:41:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Tom McLaughlin <tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org>
To: Joe Holden <joe@joeholden.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <45A8CEB2.8060905@joeholden.co.uk>
References: <45A8CEB2.8060905@joeholden.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:40:59 -0500
Message-Id: <1168731659.91224.17.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Thoughts: Potential new port(s)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:04:19 -0000

On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 12:21 +0000, Joe Holden wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm creating a port for OpenPBX, however it requires a recent SpanDSP, 
> so I have created spandsp-current to keep inline with development, as 
> Asterisk for one, relies on the patched version of spandsp that is in 
> the ports tree.
> 
> The port has been tested and checks out fine with portlint etc.
> 
> Feedback much appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Joe

If Asterisk can only work with a specific version of spandsp then maybe
there needs to be an asterisk specific port of comms/spandsp so other
spandsp consumer ports, such as openpbx, can use the latest version via
comms/spandsp.  Also, the patches in the current version of the spandsp
just appear to be build fixes.

Take it up with the asterisk maintainer.

tom

-- 
| tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org             tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org |
| FreeBSD                                   http://www.FreeBSD.org |
| BSD#                    http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:FreeBSD |