From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 11:38:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12098106566C for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from y2s1982@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89F48FC14 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so4428669vws.13 for ; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 03:38:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oV/jQw64XebWTLY2qHCSNdbs0hegm70uPRZGmJvOos0=; b=yDDh/NfOQmt0bpcyXEo4QiwKUJivYT6ah2mc7UFpiXDqmYTXuKMhgLKZ+8oW6R9ZA5 KWPP4o5KPwd//apebHuAOhtZt8KeBJgfCzgHGum1b2lConieZX27uRbe84/AxBtzh0Ne nAfZANdJ3hjm5kv3jiZUugO8WOXROy+NCkjWw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=qadYxvVxBINwBhY5I5/dHgmxcGh6LOFtAAD/iuz0NS0ntNbkTRJ0nZXLgMkGPpFwBK BNHUMTPWtIcfX5YVrZSxpmPj9jdU4ghPPF9JozbEhPaDfWp5LkI9BvH9YMx2KFA2JfE3 yuyfq5yIlszgQZ4jcsNLFatJVPNInijJ7UTIE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.98.210 with SMTP id r18mr1110124vcn.107.1291547454494; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 03:10:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.200.129 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Dec 2010 03:10:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 20:10:54 +0900 Message-ID: From: Tony Sim To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: questions about updates to linux-f10-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 11:38:48 -0000 It seems that in September, somebody had taken the initiative to build an rpm of pango based on fedora 10. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=17745 I was wondering why the port has not been updated with the new rpm. Is the package considered unusable or otherwise invalid?