From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 02:49:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D97F638 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 02:49:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDB18FC14 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 02:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id qBU2peSM082660; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:51:40 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:51:40 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201212300251.qBU2peSM082660@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig In-Reply-To: <50DF7847.5010603@a1poweruser.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 02:49:13 -0000 > Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:09:59 -0500 > From: Fbsd8 > Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig > > But lets not get side tracked by something the question is not asking > about. Please Focus on the part of the post you cut out which is asking > about static ip addressees. The short answer is 'have the "company" _pay_ someone (who knows what they're doing) set it up for them'. To be blunt you lack the required knowlege of essential concepts and routine network configuration practices to either 'do it yourself' -or- to describe the _entire_ configuration environment with sufficient precision for anyone else to give you the 'simple' answer you require. The answer to your original queston, AS ASKED, is: the ifconfig output will depend on how the network admin set tbings up, and -nobody- can guarantee what he did. I'm not trying to be hostile or condescending, but you cannot do advanced things when you lack the fundamentals. I can produce an ifconfig output for a single interface, showing 4 different 'public' addressees and 6 'private' ones and *nobody* except the network admin for that box can tell which were staticly configured and which were issued via DHCP. When you figure out 'why not' enlightenment will follow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 03:28:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387C48F6 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:28:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA5F8FC14 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 30 Dec 2012 13:58:36 +1030 Message-ID: <50DFB4C0.7080701@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:58:00 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig References: "\"<50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com>" <20121229124207.110dca60@europa>" <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> <29b73b32ef10a5f868eb1e3bbc6a0a95@dweimer.net> <50DF5D99.9020206@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50DF5D99.9020206@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:28:46 -0000 On 30/12/2012 07:46, Fbsd8 wrote: > The rc.config statement ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" on that PC would function as > exspected? DHCP doesn't actually mean that the address will be dynamic - DHCP can give you the same ip address every time it is requested. It simply moves the details of configuration from you to your ISP. You probably want to talk with your ISP about this - I would expect you to get one IP assigned to your connection that is expected to be your routers IP address and then it is up to you to take care of routing your subnet to your internal network. You may assign all address to the one machine but only one address will get the traffic to be routed to the other addresses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 09:35:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D932B1BA for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 09:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A1C8FC0A for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 09:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hn17so8893805wib.12 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 01:35:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RnJDRa+P/uN4RRR+PApUbxA0tPQJbDIyUwoO/5uk4BU=; b=IknrrdPafnIIPqv3HHWpHt8ucN2IHGa+HufO2h1FG346AuCI6q8kaF5huBSifyNTXl 3ClT4AqL8RIDtzDX5Tbt7e+4eLvf8mxkHcjAmHuc7BKJcOjzTQXv70QUCVJ980iD0yWx sgqCybZ+a6omrZ+bMUHHAOg7Mt26DTwUwz3vrZQpDSQgdmGp71jm9Xout43FbtDPgA0n Woem+TGtTtMGbcKGaQGxPZKphuKcRTzC8SSxVTKtE+GWwawaCJ2LRtM3QxRUUtic0DOy tEaIna8jFweq1ovD/FFRfKi2kU+Vv8d6PLFVWs2K88fFoAcjNRh7qn2v+q2OvZ/uqjKv F0XA== X-Received: by 10.180.20.109 with SMTP id m13mr59038019wie.16.1356860102362; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 01:35:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (110.89.123.78.rev.sfr.net. [78.123.89.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g2sm63541037wiy.0.2012.12.30.01.35.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Dec 2012 01:35:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E00ABB.9080200@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 10:34:51 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition References: <50DF6401.50001@martinlaabs.de> <20121229235319.2ee5cb85.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20121229235319.2ee5cb85.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 09:35:03 -0000 On 29/12/2012 23:53, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:43:29 +0100, Martin Laabs wrote: >> So from the security point of view it might be a good choice to have a >> unencrypted and (hardware) readonly boot partition. > > To prevent unintended modification by of the > boot process's components, an option would be to have the > system boot from a R/O media (SD card, USB stick or USB > "card in stick") and then _remove_ this media when the > system has been booted. Of course this requires physical > presence of some kind of operator who is confirmed to > handle this specific media. The rest of the system on > disk and the data may be encrypted now, and if (physically) > stolen, the disks are useless. I agree that such kind of > security isn't possible everywhere, especially not if > you cannot physically access your server. > > To prevent further "bad things" (like someone steals > this "boot stick"), manually entering a passphrase in > combination with the keys on the stick could be required. > Of course a strong passphrase would have to be chosen, > and not written on the USB stick. :-) > > The options has on a _running_ system with > encrypted components is a completely different topic. > > > I think a good idea would be to store the key directly in the bootloader, but that needs a large enough partition scheme that can store the bootloader (boot0 or boot1) plus the encryption key. However this needs to add support for that in both boot files and will be bigger. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 09:39:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F3C26F for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 09:39:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com (mail-we0-f173.google.com [74.125.82.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C8B8FC0A for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 09:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z2so5329660wey.4 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 01:38:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aJBYk/3wgu3+Y789Drz4yVYtd7fiC/N21ud/8MrVHxk=; b=aeHRX9jpsRc9wLEVjS1eeobLcM9LxxIKJsIx/Gmb2GpVMxzO1GVCSczIFA6QD8oHqQ aPdZIP/ud9Sde4yM9FPNWQraGbDE78lkCz/Ya8SpJzHF7qFHdtwlO0dHVMrgEsHIT66m NtO9nuWmxV6fXUP5X5+7BOdDPW1+AnbejW/Bxdqc54XY8/FsobW/I2AT3oOyvQr+g9Rs 3eyg9gCvkgtqnA3rIekvG2+z6o+JRf70H/N5hM0imfSTd+MbiCE3VddGRHcbXed65X3C aP/feFFafRtrB+/LPqJm0NaJni1u2Yx6rjiI8ZrOJQd/5Dq4v5rR0ZEOzQtupX+ZDrFW TNFQ== X-Received: by 10.180.108.236 with SMTP id hn12mr58391258wib.6.1356859870199; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 01:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (110.89.123.78.rev.sfr.net. [78.123.89.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g2sm63523274wiy.0.2012.12.30.01.31.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Dec 2012 01:31:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E009D3.5080202@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 10:30:59 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition References: <9295e7e163201a1fa49bf67543c7304d.squirrel@webmail.319.ch> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 09:39:06 -0000 On 28/12/2012 12:29, mhca12 wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:33 AM, C-S wrote: >> >>> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:18:40 +0100 >>> From: mhca12 >>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition >>> Message-ID: >>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:17 PM, mhca12 wrote: >>>> Are there any plans or is there already support for full >>>> disk encryption without the need for a root partition? >>> >>> I am sorry, I certainly meant to write "boot partition". >>> >> >> >> Yes, it is possible to use GELI for example to do a full disk encryption >> and have the boot partition on a USB stick. > > That would still keep the boot partition as unencrypted, wouldn't it? Yes, how would you use your key if the partition is encrypted too? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 12:40:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F85D71 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (mail-ob0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900B28FC0C for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id dn14so10910900obc.30 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:40:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=u5bEnmIyxJg8Wz4D7JCZkY0SNWxAyx03avvcH1ba4TY=; b=YQuTO/Lwx5ZZfCGDrDMGeqf9LABABIXbIhmUUgBIIVfcvJ6AnhnBQTgrHBeUgVYpc3 1S/gRdBSvgB/0LHZU5e5yl9UrO/FPmEbSo/+M9BnSXvOpxcnk1Ywu7GKP1yOV82i7u2k Du62/07upqr1bJB0rISSmM+hpNu+C8Mmnur8XYGxDNE0WLw/Jt2QH4/x7AVBXaTdrP6Q 2S9FH0GmELFSMSJQSavFu4hOwM1Er5WNldiVrZfg9nHkV/pgANkgnxdllGQtq7Gj4OQU SuYTCb+DKct5kqRpluuBsRjVX6UflbUFCMa+8CS1blZEDJm5Wfui1OnadoTUsHjIKrZf T3uQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.177.72 with SMTP id co8mr32018937obc.53.1356871202936; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:40:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:40:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50E009D3.5080202@gmail.com> References: <9295e7e163201a1fa49bf67543c7304d.squirrel@webmail.319.ch> <50E009D3.5080202@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:40:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition From: mhca12 To: David Demelier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:40:09 -0000 On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:30 AM, David Demelier wrote: > On 28/12/2012 12:29, mhca12 wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:33 AM, C-S wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:18:40 +0100 >>>> From: mhca12 >>>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>> Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition >>>> Message-ID: >>>> >>>> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:17 PM, mhca12 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Are there any plans or is there already support for full >>>>> disk encryption without the need for a root partition? >>>> >>>> >>>> I am sorry, I certainly meant to write "boot partition". >>>> >>> >>> >>> Yes, it is possible to use GELI for example to do a full disk encryption >>> and have the boot partition on a USB stick. >> >> >> That would still keep the boot partition as unencrypted, wouldn't it? > > > Yes, how would you use your key if the partition is encrypted too? Either use a usb medium with the key on it or enter a passphrase at an interactive prompt. I got interested in this because of OpenBSD's recent bootloader changes gaining the ability to avoid an unencrypted boot partition. On Linux systems I have a similar complaint that I have to use an initramfs (initial ramdisk with the required userland to unlock the crypt volume). All the crypto code is in the linux kernel and presumably also in the BSD's case but the volume header detection/verification/unlock code seems to be relegated to userland tools which make it impossible to have just the kernel do the required work. Ultimately I'm gathering the state of art in the BSDs and Linux to get a full picture. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 12:51:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDA0E5 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from z3r03nna@antiniveau.dyndns.org) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B9C8FC14 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from antiniveau.dyndns.org (dslb-188-102-148-071.pools.arcor-ip.net [188.102.148.71]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MY28S-1TTJWB1niC-00VWGw; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:50:55 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.11] by antiniveau.dyndns.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1TpIKZ-0005cX-UR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:49:31 +0100 Message-ID: <50E038C2.3060007@antiniveau.dyndns.org> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:51:14 +0100 From: Alexander Lindemann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Strange mouse behavior in Gnome2 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:XI+Ivalg0gxj2/6G3ZwQGms5W2NgPWHPBaska+2kPfH XBz6PhAG8ZXHHipbmfOcM0jYc1PVwFFn+gIva58ms8sWKtAiSG RceQWqpyvxaOrDE/JLYOB60vEdjoX3vY71v7FR2ECLPv5t493r +3rvV2mUF9OsMEBjcqOYh9sniY0uT8erEUe863cA+i4LclvQtU G3qv9PV6Qv5QfsBxMwzrxd0EQgfesK7ifrfnRCz50Uysl4gVXQ P+LjylSzLYQ6eDhLJlwFrIinKByQCnxDvUbE9z/H20FjZVWNbI jl+TXpaOUPLXgJxEn/HUixED911uB3RzSn5l6uGjO0pTXv6k1C Op8hLoltjhhC1xAyHDb3GriQcFyoDh0Wu4EeqmLOiH/7fQOemf nivWG6sq4oXpg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:51:02 -0000 Hi, I have a strange problem with my mouse while using Gnome2 (same problem with KDE) on FreeBSD 9: mouseclicks aren't working if I open another window, my testcase is opening the keyboard-settings and trying to add another Layout, but its the same with other windows. I can't even open an terminal without loosing control of the panel and the other windows. I can close and manipulate the windows with my keyboard. I tried everything I could find about HAL and X, but nothing helped. I hope you can help me. Alexander Lindemann From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 12:55:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8C21AD for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0115A8FC08 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hm9so6634972wib.14 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:55:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wrTfXXMNChCeph7Z6qLOHFrltbJ/dDcxNX2e+9CpHXg=; b=rZ5jrXTQ9Vpdn9Fll/Vzc7Htw4dClTyzxlFBjYLnYwDknl8x357hLQqjhbi2ADMyEA GfEZ6StrK3lYE6u7F/w/9ACummVQ3sPYzQXF1U2LsmaUpqceQ3BKsI8FmPSHA1gnWcwP Abbg8ywHyVtFDrc3A0O89/4uq51nZZyXL9isyeIpuMtjpTl0nHlf+Qm3TZN9OZSOruA/ fYsQyIDY7CFhiRCtx2v8NilaOJ+QNiu3DHDkQGRRVxg7DmTspkkgLK+getm9pqVrBT1z 6ppVJ3CroRord3RBv8s3CkeN120A8vXh1LT0bDcTyhofXTR5YRHGcCgoF3OdTYklCcts hBcQ== X-Received: by 10.194.58.13 with SMTP id m13mr42452550wjq.18.1356872131090; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:55:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eo10sm64438372wib.9.2012.12.30.04.55.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:55:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:55:25 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition Message-ID: <20121230125525.06cceb65@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <50E00ABB.9080200@gmail.com> References: <50DF6401.50001@martinlaabs.de> <20121229235319.2ee5cb85.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E00ABB.9080200@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:55:38 -0000 On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 10:34:51 +0100 David Demelier wrote: > I think a good idea would be to store the key directly in the > bootloader, but that needs a large enough partition scheme that can > store the bootloader (boot0 or boot1) plus the encryption key. > However this needs to add support for that in both boot files and > will be bigger. I'm not sure what you are trying to say, but the master key is already in the metadata and putting user keys on the disk would render the encryption pointless. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 20:03:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B520AE0F for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from celso.vianna@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com (mail-oa0-f46.google.com [209.85.219.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742858FC16 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id h16so11326468oag.33 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:03:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=4syw7E5U6YdoiEplPF/V5EbCsKuTaOG/Kh+s4J3C4uE=; b=etK2uPRFJ2GDKriGxSvR/+XPjDXrLu0Mmva4j42jPShPY2szs5/4dzae1WU0qnlAdo RMNDCKM0G3fQDRdgFggFm2VU+OXUIfpvRYjM6JlJRm1zmLC7msOR8AKfymzj4I0wW0Yh 1GzuLIrHfFy8gZv2upFpS6xYQRDWotBADibI1/BQBQH8G1AEr+ky9WpO3aVnXlAfx74X gDMpbOehWqgfVhV+aZzoBSsmwckRb9pA1tM4CxTvb0fBOV6MEhGoI7VM2vZGim9RmwPE Pj5Nt5yay/8gBAojfjoPHCAjtkF9vVY6nkCmlEASSVOGX3Z87BysUkNPN03hmCRgJJtt 1u9A== Received: by 10.60.30.42 with SMTP id p10mr20564051oeh.59.1356897830269; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:03:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.14.202 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:03:30 -0800 (PST) From: Celso Viana Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:03:30 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: SaMBa 4 - man pages To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:03:56 -0000 Hi all, When installing Samba4 on FreeBSD 9.1, the man pages are not installed. Does anyone know why this happens? Thanks!! -- Celso Vianna BSD User: 51318 http://www.bsdcounter.org Palmas/TO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 22:27:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB0CD80 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:27:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216218FC08 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 30 Dec 2012 17:27:52 -0500 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id CDW10178; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:27:51 -0500 X-Auth-ID: roberthuff Received: from 209-6-85-139.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO [192.168.1.101]) ([209.6.85.139]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 30 Dec 2012 17:27:51 -0500 Message-ID: <50E0BFA0.6070702@rcn.com> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:26:40 -0500 From: Robert Huff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: problem after installkernel going from 9.0 to CURRENT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:27:52 -0000 Situation: One of my boxes failed, and for various reasons it became easier to just scrub and rebuild it. 1) Using BSDinstall, I created the first disk: ada0p1 freebsd-boot 128k ada0p2 freebsd-swap 4g ada0p3 freebsd-ufs 25g 2) Installed off the CD, got it up and running, everything was good. 3) Like it's predecessor, this wants to run CURRENT. Used csup (tag=.) to update the source tree as of midnight last night. 4) Built world - OK. Build kernel - OK. Ran mergemaster - OK. Installed kernel - OK. 5) On rebooting, the loader(??) claims to not be able to find a bootable partition - i.e. I get a screen that ends in "mountpoint > ". Providing the presumptive value by hand returns "error 19". 6) Boot using installation CD and use "gpart show" to double check device names and partitions; everything looks good. 7) Try normal booting again, no go. This is my first time installing to a GPT partitioned system, and I have (obviously) failed to grok something. I checked src/UPDATING and found nothing which covered this. What is it, and how do I fix it? Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 23:24:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9710ED08 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:24:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511558FC08 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7713CBF1; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:24:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qBUNOIDq003156; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:24:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:24:18 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Robert Huff Subject: Re: problem after installkernel going from 9.0 to CURRENT Message-Id: <20121231002418.726f7ca2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50E0BFA0.6070702@rcn.com> References: <50E0BFA0.6070702@rcn.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:24:23 -0000 On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:26:40 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > Used csup (tag=.) to update the source tree as of midnight last night. This seems to be discouraged today. Instead svn should be used. > 5) On rebooting, the loader(??) claims to not be able to find a > bootable partition - i.e. I get a screen that ends in "mountpoint > ". Are you sure this isn't the "mountroot>" prompt? It indicates that the / partition cannot be mounted to continue booting. Maybe you can interrupt at the boot loader and examine the mount source for /, or manually set it to be ada0p1? > Providing the presumptive value by hand returns "error 19". No root partition, probably. :-) > This is my first time installing to a GPT partitioned system, and I > have (obviously) failed to grok something. I checked src/UPDATING and > found nothing which covered this. That's why _I_ prefer old-fashioned MBR partitioning with sysinstall which has never failed me. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 00:13:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB8857F for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3728FC16 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 30 Dec 2012 19:13:09 -0500 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BWA15350; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:13:08 -0500 X-Auth-ID: roberthuff Received: from 209-6-85-139.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO [192.168.1.101]) ([209.6.85.139]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 30 Dec 2012 19:13:08 -0500 Message-ID: <50E0D83E.7080205@rcn.com> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:11:42 -0500 From: Robert Huff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: problem after installkernel going from 9.0 to CURRENT References: <50E0BFA0.6070702@rcn.com> <20121231002418.726f7ca2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20121231002418.726f7ca2.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Robert Huff X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:13:09 -0000 On 12/30/2012 6:24 PM, Polytropon wrote: >> Used csup (tag=.) to update the source tree as of midnight last night. > > This seems to be discouraged today. Instead svn should be used. I'm using this for ports, will convert for source ... probably in the next round after I deal with this. >> 5) On rebooting, the loader(??) claims to not be able to find a >> bootable partition - i.e. I get a screen that ends in "mountpoint > ". > > Are you sure this isn't the "mountroot>" prompt? Right you are; sorry, typing from memory on a different system. > It indicates > that the / partition cannot be mounted to continue booting. > Maybe you can interrupt at the boot loader and examine the > mount source for /, or manually set it to be ada0p1? I'll try that. >> Providing the presumptive value by hand returns "error 19". > > No root partition, probably. :-) Duh. :-) > That's why _I_ prefer old-fashioned MBR partitioning with > sysinstall which has never failed me. :-) There's something to be said for that. On the other hand, GPT is the rising tide and one has to learn to swim sometimes. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 00:58:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6851FF8F for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14FA8FC0C for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 31 Dec 2012 11:28:52 +1030 Message-ID: <50E0E327.9090705@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:28:15 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Lindemann Subject: Re: Strange mouse behavior in Gnome2 References: <50E038C2.3060007@antiniveau.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <50E038C2.3060007@antiniveau.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:58:54 -0000 On 30/12/2012 23:21, Alexander Lindemann wrote: > Hi, > > I have a strange problem with my mouse while using Gnome2 (same > problem with KDE) on FreeBSD 9: > > mouseclicks aren't working if I open another window, my testcase is > opening the keyboard-settings and trying to add another Layout, but > its the same with other windows. I can't even open an terminal > without loosing control of the panel and the other windows. I can > close and manipulate the windows with my keyboard. > > I tried everything I could find about HAL and X, but nothing helped. > > I hope you can help me. > Start with the basics - is one mouse and keyboard the only input devices you have? Are they plugged straight into the motherboard sockets? I ask this as I have just tried running the mouse through a usb hub that turned out to be flaky causing it to have erratic behaviour. I have also seen a second mouse and a wacom tablet interfere with a mouse. The two mice came from a wireless keyboard/mouse combo where the mouse was useless (actually it was a logitech wireless combo, the mouse was going to sleep even as I was using it) - the wireless transceiver always responded as a mouse and keyboard even if the mouse had no battery to respond. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 03:41:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E731C4 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:41:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f51.google.com (mail-vb0-f51.google.com [209.85.212.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09CD8FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fq11so12626137vbb.10 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:41:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=es63EEtIFa8weryFSi31Pa4cMXhveERSluUb/g207z4=; b=vp3YP8tysuvP+A5ZfmHYATeuFETR2gO4AH/9eY3MFwGTweP/3yZAcYJIeUCSDlrIKe k5b8h9xfRLysoWZXZwjlHH70005YTaugdz29D4rTtMg5MEqwUbnDcX+OMTd9xelPl8x3 ddS7AkdS7wXazGq6gvy+YRnybrdbPPydej3Sq2hmUxGI/xnlKDeIfG5EGBwAok3/Q/SB 1URTQ2E0mdWZ/uDnhoonDNODroCckGuQW4pcdeoxXTCiCtLUzcZFMblEGF4lypRFuA2t UbubA0T+yPXCZ27VIR8ZW50OGqZAJGMKWoZrrRWX/AHkscKRU1dm/vrhHnuiVMzjXMze 81Qg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.20.50 with SMTP id k18mr54701034vde.91.1356925309688; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:41:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.219.4 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 19:41:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:41:49 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Bad gpg signature on 9.1 announcement mail? From: grarpamp To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:41:57 -0000 Anyone else having trouble verifying the signature on the announcement mail? If your's works, can you inline a base64 encoded version of the verified message text so I can see what's wrong with my verifier? Thanks. gpg --verify msg.txt.asc msg.txt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 08:42:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E03C790 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989928FC0A for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan (a83-160-85-125.adsl.xs4all.nl [83.160.85.125]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBV8g3RO091573 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:42:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBV8g3b5003279 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:42:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:42:03 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen Sender: marco@yokozuna.lan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: following 9-STABLE but getting 9.1-PRERELEASE Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:42:12 -0000 Hi, I'm following the 9-STABLE branch with svn and just updated my system. But after booting I noticed that my system is still at 9.1-PRERELEASE, and not 9.1-STABLE or 9-STABLE. Does someone know what happened? Thanks in advance. Regards, Marco -- To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 09:13:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAFAC6F for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hskuhra@eumx.net) Received: from eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E058FC18 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:13:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=vyO+hDoRvIh1kKeLSSLbuX gdotI=; b=tUxvugiDfBOMcIq55Gz0E/JUBCPWTlpQLxxm/dP8C4CUh0WmoC/S3O xikyWTSBbyKMOYmZlmlPvygI4DSG01Z6DtzjT/SzEiDMc8/4o+brjTCEFNFh7xPF FxwRp/RGNR8qJ6JETvVVrWgDDij6h29OZEqgTMySe1c5ngX4X3EO4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eumx.net; h=date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=EXQ5nLuZMzguh6OxKknjDa6INiUOu V0ZWShgK23tkrICT0FVafChHcgVbh+6vTOWe1r4DDVwwxfInLj75ecDGBF54Oel4 Co4iKSCt4fPumxy6gtgVFFbn43NALo0PRfN2R1bw5pTd6AcTXDHooflhoEfqrlKm RBUwcWCBbPi8OI= Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:13:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87k3ry60us.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: following 9-STABLE but getting 9.1-PRERELEASE In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Marco Beishuizen X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:13:25 -0000 On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:42:03 +0100 (CET) Marco Beishuizen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm following the 9-STABLE branch with svn and just updated my > system. But after booting I noticed that my system is still at > 9.1-PRERELEASE, and not 9.1-STABLE or 9-STABLE. > > Does someone know what happened? Yeah, sys/conf/newvers.sh in stable/9 has not been updated yet. It will happen... -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 09:57:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1576F99 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C898FC0A for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id qBV9xid4001856 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:59:44 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:59:44 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201212310959.qBV9xid4001856@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: following 9-STABLE but getting 9.1-PRERELEASE In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:57:12 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 31 02:45:09 2012 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:42:03 +0100 (CET) > From: Marco Beishuizen > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: following 9-STABLE but getting 9.1-PRERELEASE > > Hi, > > I'm following the 9-STABLE branch with svn and just updated my system. But > after booting I noticed that my system is still at 9.1-PRERELEASE, and not > 9.1-STABLE or 9-STABLE. > Surely you're not suggesting someone forgot to lock the horse after the stable escaped? *groan* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 10:11:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0549C1E6 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AB98FC0C for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u3so5687239wey.2 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:11:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=IOA757cSmbY1xbRLxGBqe4BSSP18+5ugXiPf1oJigWQ=; b=XMOeON+UG0LboHYdSBj28k5fyBElWbE5gwoXJdOUDVM/wTBgNnlXelpwh6nbya2ZAz Zv8W2qbDF/ZcL4jO1XpSUmJyijUJd908shFE4/DSDOh6pws6suBfuaGCj5BkgbfIO+JB 8ja/PMx/q666ESxLSt4lamW9TovoypkwqjaZOgna1rhG0gXrwFZLa4i26s9xt7AiHRQw kgW+HUsIgh99BTIv1RIPo18WxVrBOjXt7/jreT9XaEgzwO+NMMgYJnKEZ5hxIF/9mw00 Tj/jyWMVRpmZHyIu5+RP2y85FMDH2gJL2tx+x/ZPdsb8Jr9OlQfDx7WVr7U2VzxXklth gfvA== Received: by 10.194.58.13 with SMTP id m13mr45306899wjq.18.1356948684096; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:11:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.47.71 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:11:04 -0800 (PST) From: Jov Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:11:04 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: buffalo wli-uc-gn wireless card sometimes unusable and emit "run0: wcid=xx out of range" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:11:26 -0000 hi experts: I think the hardware is ok because I can use it in Win7. And in Freebsd 9.1,it works for sometime,but sometimes after system reboot or I plug out & plug in the card it my unusable.on the console it emmit: "run0: wcid=xx out of range" where xx is 91,87 and etc. it seams the wifi is connected because ifconfig wlan0 cmd shows the right ssid and bssid ,but inet addr is always 0.0.0.0 would you please help me? -- jov blog: http:amutu.com/blog From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 10:26:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826C64AA for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanglei.fage@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com (mail-bk0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118A38FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id jm19so5381054bkc.22 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:26:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=61nsvk2pZcTMxlWBLoXllZNWnNoc9aKOLXsOEni+/pU=; b=gTahCcpI/kQuByCLGNZqt2eLbnhKtv4pYwCr3ezgTKVXiidfsW+nYX8l1CHFWzW6k0 f+4uL49zwESQsW11eX7ItRFokzqKb5mm2igF5tv3JAaqj2RpmufrnONBmrP4ZqfPNE6x QQnrx7tGgiG6BB/8fRJz8okGf0cD8nSrGbL9BjMar3GymVHPf1ad+BWxiJu3bCN0majw nmDraU+m8ctOIWUpmQvuAQMDu3/8vurpMYkoYtxT1j0yFk/OaxGxAWWiXazR40LhBuYz qISv/tZNY++98Qr2e0QNynvIoMOj2d38FzFj14JQhY8fhs3kG64QTttH/aLbupaUVAOo mUMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.9.22 with SMTP id j22mr18913162bkj.114.1356949607571; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:26:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.11.86 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:26:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:26:47 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: what's wrong with the openbsd-netcat? From: lei yang To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ericj@monkey.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:26:54 -0000 Hi experts On my OS, I run kvm with below comand to do the migrate: it meet below error 1) #qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -smp 2 -m 512 -net nic,model=e1000 -net tap,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -hda /boot/guest_img.raw -kernel /boot/bzImage -append "root=/dev/hda rw console=ttyS0,115200 ip=dhcp selinux=0" -nographic -incoming "exec:nc -l 5200" it print: nc: Protocol not available load of migration failed 2)Then I copy the "nc" binary from redhat, then it works well can you please help me about this issue? Lei From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 10:35:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EC257F for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanglei.fage@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com (mail-bk0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB30B8FC14 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id jg9so5412121bkc.28 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:35:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=yWF/l00sBWONzLDZtRxHJsP8J3zCkrd/drwVNjepEIU=; b=FZlvLVmNwsclySArANFE8IRsB5F1css1YLr7ZaAXTIK3IZRoP88Yi/SAqUu+0VauMc 6LzcAWZg309GRceeWEHxKpWLqX4Dif1JsXDQkvQOLZ7kkEdeWS3HvPZ+0VPrmHJjacDs jkpHCpROGI55ulBakElIb2eBtk2Z/tHmIsZRopQsOCccZAAAAgxdQ8JIzuUIjRbBANcC cx9j53fHGvb5sA5DSpQI3FQNfDqBEIyenZI/HzUeAma7bI/DCLYsG88I+ltnQYn3pSsV tJW42Q4F2puNi/AFm6n42LAjBXlzgpuV1A+7UvRWXxHHm496eoU7kB0R8zkki5NXboBT S1NQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.147.135 with SMTP id l7mr19656876bkv.119.1356950099967; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:34:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.11.86 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:34:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:34:59 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: what's wrong with the openbsd-netcat? From: lei yang To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ericj@monkey.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:35:07 -0000 Forget to say, My netcat from http://code.google.com/p/openbsd-netcat/source/checkout On 12/31/12, lei yang wrote: > Hi experts > > On my OS, I run kvm with below comand to do the migrate: it meet below > error > 1) > #qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -smp 2 -m 512 -net nic,model=e1000 > -net tap,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -hda /boot/guest_img.raw -kernel > /boot/bzImage -append "root=/dev/hda rw console=ttyS0,115200 ip=dhcp > selinux=0" -nographic -incoming "exec:nc -l 5200" > it print: > nc: Protocol not available > load of migration failed > > 2)Then I copy the "nc" binary from redhat, then it works well > > can you please help me about this issue? > > Lei > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 10:42:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B002068E for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ashkan82r@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f50.google.com (mail-qa0-f50.google.com [209.85.216.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673268FC0A for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id cr7so7888520qab.9 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:42:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9CwrVTm7cFNhgvBIeq3te2jUQGEas3EtC/g4INfHe8g=; b=dCZ0SBKeN6FZCje6ZdrIe0oALpdOepBLMYLF0RfixUPv7vc0zU985eZKbtQRPR+ARf rKnTTFgpwVFbkZdP7E93HQ6hYBy+GGFVJ8NOxXR8LzktAG0+oZt7uxFCDhjbLxJSfrxu 7H0b0Mpqloz5gdOyXeyt2AlOjigQYwk2CYkEl9ayi6wL1mQmET3qtpQ1GgICgZacHzCA +05b8Eno5pNefUa9FUYuVNMyoMfq/F5NURUwtX6KsgGk8Ba+urjUY4oiv87tDxg+IowG mMXh7nTfYL9D4mGEiGwm6oqCU5OY0nWJZwbMlNpTMx9iikzSmmmgh8irUREEkV7Cmeec IL0A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.62.39 with SMTP id v7mr21532144qer.15.1356948953136; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:15:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.139.139 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 02:15:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:45:52 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: Optimus VGA support in new release 9.1 From: Ashkan Rahmani To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:42:23 -0000 hi, I really want to migrate to FreeBSD for daily usages, Bu my main issue is my vga card on my notebook, this is optimus. any body knows is it supported in this new release? -- King Regards, Ashkan R < ashkan82r@gmail.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 10:56:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB248B6 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:56:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75A48FC0C for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBVAu2V1013316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:56:03 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qBVAu2V1013316 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qBVAu2V1013316; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50E16F39.70403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:55:53 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optimus VGA support in new release 9.1 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2DB70253F3D68ADE10286591" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:56:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2DB70253F3D68ADE10286591 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 31/12/2012 10:15, Ashkan Rahmani wrote: > I really want to migrate to FreeBSD for daily usages, Bu my main issue = is > my > vga card on my notebook, this is optimus. >=20 > any body knows is it supported in this new release? That's an nVidia card. The FreeBSD version is pretty much irrelevant here. What you need to ask "is my nVidia card supported by the x11/nvidia-driver port, or failing that the built-in Xorg nv driver?" If you want 3-D acceleration and all that stuff, then you'll need the x11/nvidia-driver. Check the "supported products" tab on this page: http://www.nvidia.com/object/freebsd-x86-310.19-driver.html If your video card isn't there, or you can't recognise it from the part number, then I'm afraid you're out of luck[*]. Your best resource there is to ask on one of the nVidia forums. Cheers, Matthew [*] There are other drivers available for various legacy cards: finding information about these is left as an exercise for the student. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig2DB70253F3D68ADE10286591 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDhb0IACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxV2gCgjtF7YbyXkBTu/r71bB4VPhK3 ttQAn3uEtvxUg5vkh1crnVIv6pR6tj+7 =JeYa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2DB70253F3D68ADE10286591-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 10:58:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56AD96D for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mk@acc.umu.se) Received: from mail.acc.umu.se (mail.acc.umu.se [130.239.18.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590408FC0A for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by amavisd-new (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EADA1BF for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:39:29 +0100 (MET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at acc.umu.se Received: from acc.umu.se (kennedy.acc.umu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:e:2018::157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mk) by mail.acc.umu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6A331BE for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:39:28 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:39:27 +0100 From: Marcus Karlsson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Using the new C++11 stack on 9.1 Message-ID: <20121231103927.GB5525@acc.umu.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:58:57 -0000 Hello. I was very happy when I received the 9.1 announcement in my mailbox, especially when I read about the inclusion of the new C++11 stack including LLVM libc++ and libcxxrt. So I decided to test it on a 9.1 system: clang++ foo.cc -stdlib=libc++ However, the compilation fails: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc++ It's available in the source tree for 9.1, my assumption is that it's just not installed by default. What should I do in order to use it? I have not found much documentation on it other than it will be the default in 10. Marcus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 11:09:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1704C496 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hskuhra@eumx.net) Received: from eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5688FC13 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:09:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=RP88GBoyvxoFvpCSy9kqHK dLIp4=; b=qT9L4uAMznvhwdOdI0Szb5SpJjXPbTK8LP0LFLNl8C54x3Os3MUrK7 wGpvXsnie3U/oWndqDY2uV6vdDMvKGqr7y0kiWRbFZ31R2MssU8ydDPRTEl0euk6 bVYRNmQt/OSrn73M8DEAVnmTSIG+Ph9D8prsyP7xtQXXwjgy7Jy1U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eumx.net; h=date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=P8PZkPLv/wWmqVde6IdVWiriCO+oD 6N2XZCsR1PeIWL3wFdmEhVOfVlb0y1W6gb0O3f/8mVAFbSrrc7ADAG0K4ZRMIIyk PDC+ffsZYbDEZyM/Nufiqda0mXLVd4Qqv4ltMrq19plIMkNHXAZg/04paRXzzYX4 wuDYV3GH45zk2c= Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:09:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87han28olk.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: Marcus Karlsson Subject: Re: Using the new C++11 stack on 9.1 In-Reply-To: <20121231103927.GB5525@acc.umu.se> References: <20121231103927.GB5525@acc.umu.se> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:09:47 -0000 On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:39:27 +0100 Marcus Karlsson wrote: > Hello. > > I was very happy when I received the 9.1 announcement in my mailbox, > especially when I read about the inclusion of the new C++11 stack > including LLVM libc++ and libcxxrt. So I decided to test it on a 9.1 > system: > > clang++ foo.cc -stdlib=libc++ > > However, the compilation fails: > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc++ > > It's available in the source tree for 9.1, my assumption is that it's > just not installed by default. # echo "WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=" >> /etc/src.conf And rebuilding world/clang. -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 12:14:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15BE53F for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6DC8FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hq7so6217231wib.3 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:14:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:x-operating-system:user-agent; bh=vn6bdQsyWkxtfky9paVOo+jp+TcgYliT8nVCzPKBaQY=; b=lIUSnk2AmYHM/eCHd9JryO7mRXG1fEAU0v6td8KxoHAhmgLUmJC9xi3kBBuJTjleDf JKE/n6XfjF0TFwyVLZwyoarA+Frk/3zo8kkGCgyCn07r/HkNCmtvTFgZ3bUTaomYQMyU LNP/rRALqI5Qxqb05dnt27k8uTj0PdZx/MIa8K7Vu2fHPLS7XZ+1+tkkVYA/fiA8yfdQ +rGBa2FC7fDJs/ujm52ptD9VUaA6UxXpDTyOPpR/PG+lcUYi80bipkt90c0KD1NWylqS ilQKVll0gSME+qjXp2PyTw3PQ+DxwwK/LDtBuRadLf6NC6hIhsUI6bjq9hn9HBqN0W2i US+A== X-Received: by 10.194.86.40 with SMTP id m8mr63952272wjz.24.1356956041213; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:14:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from banach (117.Red-83-36-19.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [83.36.19.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bz12sm69426704wib.5.2012.12.31.04.13.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:14:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:13:51 +0100 From: Jose Garcia Juanino To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Newbie question about freebsd-update: single user mode is not needed anymore? Message-ID: <20121231121350.GA5026@banach> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:14:02 -0000 --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I am planning to upgrade from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE to FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE. With upgrade source method, it is always needed to do the "make installworld" step in single user mode. But it seems to be that single user is not required with freebsd-update method, in the second "freebsd-update install". Someone could explain the reason? Am I misunderstanding something? Can I run the upgrade enterely by mean a ssh connection in a safe way, or will I need a serial console? Best regards, and excuse my poor english. --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlDhgX4ACgkQFOo0zaS9RnJMpACgkgJbI3Rc8X2f4XE9pJ315Kw/ xSEAn29Uwtnjh4UErlLdGW7ratrxSlmY =kZBI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 12:47:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEEAE7 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from z3r03nna@antiniveau.dyndns.org) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9858FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from antiniveau.dyndns.org (dslb-188-102-148-071.pools.arcor-ip.net [188.102.148.71]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MHrNV-1Tsg1j2hED-003OKQ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:42:06 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.11] by antiniveau.dyndns.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpefa-0006Ko-Fx; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:40:42 +0100 Message-ID: <50E18833.5080704@antiniveau.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:42:27 +0100 From: Alexander Lindemann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shane Ambler Subject: Re: Strange mouse behavior in Gnome2 References: <50E038C2.3060007@antiniveau.dyndns.org> <50E0E327.9090705@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <50E0E327.9090705@ShaneWare.Biz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:9dLWaFmHX91sFqSEdb/0bOmjyH4fv/iD9kvwErTUwus IK8gkwJ9gSB+mm0fvZ3zZvipjSCPudLSYNKyqSS4Ycw1yJqdMg UCW/miMBDkEVM4PS9MlSBbOxr3/xMNI3vh+jOv3O+jgVqONevM +O5Yx7VO73i75e1eMnyNoeF/mOPicoyI2UZeUOu9YsQw7BLhEr nyqNLSsctMpRTb3ExXefNV1wMwQwFR+kOk1Lw1SrNxrLU5B4c5 qXb6gKfwLsVD5D8m+weM6LiP0jaGnz16QC4H7uY/3LHdMO7y3V rf4lSo+ECg+QFf1NTO+2wzaFq0oipd8/m2PKEXITxuBtOhRvWP 6IrvJ1yCNqz57NY98hz8M4RVJXfgfg7tF91nSuJVWe3pG5sVfR GwVWuuwMgI5+A== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:47:18 -0000 On 12/31/2012 01:58 AM, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 30/12/2012 23:21, Alexander Lindemann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a strange problem with my mouse while using Gnome2 (same >> problem with KDE) on FreeBSD 9: >> >> mouseclicks aren't working if I open another window, my testcase is >> opening the keyboard-settings and trying to add another Layout, but >> its the same with other windows. I can't even open an terminal >> without loosing control of the panel and the other windows. I can >> close and manipulate the windows with my keyboard. >> >> I tried everything I could find about HAL and X, but nothing helped. >> >> I hope you can help me. >> > > Start with the basics - is one mouse and keyboard the only input devices > you have? Are they plugged straight into the motherboard sockets? > > I ask this as I have just tried running the mouse through a usb hub that > turned out to be flaky causing it to have erratic behaviour. I have also > seen a second mouse and a wacom tablet interfere with a mouse. The two > mice came from a wireless keyboard/mouse combo where the mouse was > useless (actually it was a logitech wireless combo, the mouse was going > to sleep even as I was using it) - the wireless transceiver always > responded as a mouse and keyboard even if the mouse had no battery to > respond. > My (usb-)mouse is directly plugged into a port on my mainboard. The keyboard is plugged into the PS/2 Port. No other periphials are connected. My mouse works in other OSses (Windows, Linux). I also tried a different usb-mouse, but it didnt work too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 13:29:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8D99A8 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@d2ux.net) Received: from mail.s1.d2ux.org (static.209.96.9.5.clients.your-server.de [5.9.96.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8C68FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.s1.d2ux.org (mail [10.0.0.3]) by mail.s1.d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61FA84F2CD9 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:23:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.s1.d2ux.org ([10.0.0.3]) by mail.s1.d2ux.org (mail.s1.d2ux.org [10.0.0.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9-dQ1J2KPqIs for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:23:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.s1.d2ux.org (unknown [10.0.0.4]) by mail.s1.d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48EF84F2588 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:23:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from p579D3B73.dip.t-dialin.net (p579D3B73.dip.t-dialin.net [87.157.59.115]) by d2ux.org (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:23:10 +0100 Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:23:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20121231142310.Horde.t5bR3qFBSm7dGT163eNU-Q1@d2ux.org> From: Matthias Petermann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: How to handle parallel versions of maintained port? User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.0.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:29:20 -0000 Hello, Tryton is a three tier business application framework, consisting of a common server component (finance/trytond), a client (finance/tryton) and a large number of modules (finance/trytond_*) which add support for specific business cases to it. At the time it was introduced to the ports, version 2.4 was the latest major version. Now version 2.6 is available. I am going to continue maintaining version 2.4 as well as willing to introduce 2.6. The following discussion is a request for recommendation how to scale this up to supporting more versions of Tryton in parallel. Current: finance/tryton (2.4.x) finance/trytond (2.4.x) finance/trytond_account (2.4.x) .... [~40 more] ..... (2.4.x) finance/trytond_account_statement (2.4.x) Following the scheme of e.g. the mysql port, I would like to rename all the current tryton ports like this: finance/tryton24 (2.4.x) finance/trytond24 (2.4.x) finance/trytond_account24 (2.4.x) .... [~40 more] ..... (2.4.x) finance/trytond_account_statement24 (2.4.x) The 2.6 series will then be introduced in this schema: finance/tryton26 (2.6.x) finance/trytond26 (2.6.x) finance/trytond_account26 (2.6.x) .... [~40 more] ..... (2.6.x) finance/trytond_account_statement26 (2.6.x) This leads to the two questions I have: 1) How will the renaming of the existing tryton ports to tryton24 handled properly? Just submit a PR "Please replace finance/tryton with finance/tryton24" for each port? 2) Expecting more versions in the future, this will increase the amount of ports (especially the finance/trytond_* modules) by almost 50 modules in the finance category per version. Would this be an issue? Kind regards Matthias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 15:23:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A9165C for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@aboutsupport.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB248FC0C for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hq12so6313690wib.2 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 07:23:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=mPy1GwYSsJfohtPPACB2+sRU6EerI39CEZ8a1VXUc50=; b=M+SUpvnim/y0XaqduVlHuX+iTdCH6YqwoBe9gQPmQPZvcmWFwdOszevzcqgtqIigys OwpAPSU54K9090jLgtfS84vIhZATndgM15fY8P6G7ibD0a8KlQI7tAg7Tm8ZmFH3CH9w Lm2hx00eDgjbfAEUqxQ4bQodQxbx4ek7Eg6YR1nZ5u88/UQvHPHeHZPl5gAC7dICv9FO 1m1011dBPaEeWAq4jwC/ho41dlxBw8hcpHXmGV5ggAcFpzPuFbSKzFRDk9IjpVMuOkUT IGms1sGYkZvhlps3FLvFvEiwXRGGXpW0uDcdDtH3VcR6MCbTW2ZeQEl/HxBYxqR6YczH csjg== X-Received: by 10.194.119.33 with SMTP id kr1mr65286824wjb.4.1356967387132; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 07:23:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.30.106] ([95.87.236.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm70237705wic.7.2012.12.31.07.23.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 07:23:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E1ADD7.7060702@aboutsupport.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:23:03 +0200 From: "Zyumbilev, Peter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newbie question about freebsd-update: single user mode is not needed anymore? References: <20121231121350.GA5026@banach> In-Reply-To: <20121231121350.GA5026@banach> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9QTyChWEiqQZ5pawx0+oMkafikWtWWM5Aa2BthkRHiOFW/68OwcOSlAJpl3+j75j4CL4I X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:23:08 -0000 On 31/12/2012 14:13, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to upgrade from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE to > FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE. With upgrade source method, it is always needed to > do the "make installworld" step in single user mode. But it seems to > be that single user is not required with freebsd-update method, in the > second "freebsd-update install". Someone could explain the reason? Am I > misunderstanding something? Can I run the upgrade enterely by mean a ssh > connection in a safe way, or will I need a serial console? > > Best regards, and excuse my poor english. > Hi, Although in the books it says singe user, I always do source upgrade via ssh - so far(8 years) no problems :-) Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 15:50:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F42ED4 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:50:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048288FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id dr12so5710944wgb.23 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 07:50:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :x-operating-system:user-agent; bh=996rTfgaFf++0uiZBVPU0wIo3aGXjrn6roVsTnFfDjE=; b=StRFhzJorab6rTYTZeGck/ABnGJiZEW3aqDQ0d37RQFna/qtGrc8OHEclNhuN8wC1X cZQZQjxwMAjx9l0ele0AdiD/U10AZ4kJZoDyftyeyKC87FPc0Y4gBq9H7fLFEbBPn83j dRkIg/PLdHSKvXrTn4WtlHKGJypchqfHNcmzvIO2qA5d7z7YY1V4caapf0BrkzlJnUUL yLRftDI+nN5E9Exb+OBR1PakYFBhrYxbx0j4FqbMu6krBAgeey/cY6OyfY927J7ti1Lq hKkbfx+eHfbAXr92m5AryOn0GNXW2qofSKlygKVO5LtDk50+wEMz+3SdC+dOCBVsOB44 Zp+Q== X-Received: by 10.180.73.202 with SMTP id n10mr63377930wiv.17.1356969027570; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 07:50:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from banach (117.Red-83-36-19.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [83.36.19.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bw9sm49566999wib.5.2012.12.31.07.50.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 07:50:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:50:21 +0100 From: Jose Garcia Juanino To: ASV Subject: Re: Newbie question about freebsd-update: single user mode is not needed anymore? Message-ID: <20121231155020.GA13656@banach> References: <20121231121350.GA5026@banach> <1356967664.2050.9.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1356967664.2050.9.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:50:29 -0000 --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lunes 31 de diciembre a las 16:27:44 CET, ASV escribi=F3: > Hi Jose, >=20 > with the freebsd-update method you don't need to pass through the "make > installworld" as it's a binary patch/upgrade system. > Using "freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE" for example allows you to > get your system patched directly without recompiling the kernel and the > userland but getting binary patches from the repo and applying these > directly on your system. > Check the following page for a more detailed explanation and be aware > that upgrading your ports/packages is required every time you upgrade > your kernel to a major version (which would be your case). >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrad= ing-freebsdupdate.html >=20 > Happy new year. Thanks for your response. The freebsd-update upgrade method is: 1- freebsd-update install # will install a new kernel and modules 2- reboot in multi user 3- freebsd-update install # will install new userland 4- reboot in multi user The src upgrade method is: 1- make installkernel # will install a new kernel 2- reboot in single user 3- make installworld # will install a new userland 4- reboot in multiuser I think that the third step is essentially the same in both methods: it will install a new userland. But the second one require to be ran in single user, and the first one does not. Why? My unique concern is that step 2 in "freebsd-update" method goes smootly: it will boot kernel in 9.1-RELEASE but userland in 9.0-RELEASE. If the system hangs giving up the net or other essential service, I will not be able to reach the computer via ssh. Regards --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlDhtDwACgkQFOo0zaS9RnKJeACeO6iJF5KLaNJ9yHYwhYOR3m2q NSAAoJ8zgJY2NlTCvqmqLYeLIRGvPFL4 =cyVW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 16:16:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAED2C0 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:16:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7019B8FC0A for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBVGGAwA018956; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:16:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id qBVGGAOX018953; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:16:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:16:10 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Ashkan Rahmani Subject: Re: Optimus VGA support in new release 9.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:16:10 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:16:17 -0000 On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Ashkan Rahmani wrote: > hi, > I really want to migrate to FreeBSD for daily usages, Bu my main issue is > my > vga card on my notebook, this is optimus. > > any body knows is it supported in this new release? If the BIOS allows turning off the NVidia graphics, FreeBSD 9.1 has a KMS driver that will support the Intel graphics. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 16:25:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C210623 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCEA8FC13 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:25:38 -0800 Message-ID: <50E1BC82.8060403@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:25:38 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: changing prompt for user in jail Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Dec 2012 16:25:38.0128 (UTC) FILETIME=[77D47500:01CDE773] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:25:43 -0000 When I change the prompt for root's .cshrc file in the jail it works as expected. if ($?prompt) then # An interactive shell -- set some stuff up set prompt = "# %/ >" set filec set history = 100 set savehist = 100 set mail = (/var/mail/$USER) if ( $?tcsh ) then bindkey "^W" backward-delete-word bindkey -k up history-search-backward bindkey -k down history-search-forward endif endif But when I start the jail and login to the jails host console and issue "pw adduser test -c jail-user -m -g wheel -w yes" the user does get created ok. Now when I login to the jail over remote ssh to the just created user account I get the % prompt, then su to root and get the set prompt = "# %/ >". I want that same prompt for all user I create in the jail. I tried putting the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail user account /home/test/.cshrc file log out and back in to no effect. Them I put the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail's /usr/share/skel/.cshrc and created a different user account using the same pw command, still no joy. Then I just added the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail's /etc/csh.cshrc and created new jail user account and still no joy. I even tried putting the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement as the last line in the files so it was out side of any if statements with no joy. No matter what I do to the config of the jail files it makes no difference when I use ssh to login to the jail user account. Anyone have any idea what I any doing wrong? Or is this just now jails work? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 16:37:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C294AB97 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:37:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam.gh1986@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CD48FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fy27so13030834vcb.13 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:37:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QKfAUsm9kH4hfXtJ4mnb+8BxjxDByYntwv3+4kIlsHA=; b=EynOrTALq9wy7xxbJG0fc6qiXBiRxDAqZWG338VcVMXdA5E78wcRgkrKsEoGCeUU+B LXCOzYQj3O5e57HdPz7N5c43z22B3GqlAvq84o7UuaMtD+eMx0uypYVPKam5uNjyarvl kDwVjgsFGlIL1u9nBxoR4qM1uPYhKbNMoesC0FPzHNY48roHCJfzYURhBYagGrKwM+hg dR0lG9dNx7n1g3YpLM/96RIfhhnN1Cc/E8ARRZ47PReN5O9Fy2rwltdKWVNWA+iXL0MO vG5i3y851xPJ7JdWTQwgaWApEX2EbCCZd1PqjcDTgJ8H4M3ssu4KqvLB3Nt7HW2L4Mhm cI6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.2.226 with SMTP id 2mr65395274vex.53.1356971829237; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:37:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.245.104 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:37:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:07:08 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: Re: plink can not work with serial port From: s m To: saeedeh motlagh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:37:10 -0000 hello SAM you mean plink works with all ports except modem? can you tell more information to us such as your modem model? On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:47 PM, saeedeh motlagh wrote: > hello guys > > i have a problem with putty and plink. i want to connect to a modem via > serial port by putty. when i run the below command, every thing is ok and > modem responds me. > > putty -v -serial -sercfg 8,1,115200,n,R /dev/ttyu2 > > but when i run the below command modem doesn't respond to me. > > plink -v -serial -sercfg 8,1,115200,n,R /dev/ttyu2 > > i check it by another com port instead of modem. i mean i connect two > freebsd boxes by com port and run above command but nothing happened > either. > > i have to work with plink beacuse i have no graphic and when i installed > putty without GTK, just plink is installed and there is no putty command. > > please let me know what i'm doing wrong. any comments or hints are really > appreciated. > thanks > *Sa.M* > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 16:39:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F9EC36 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6088FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TpiA6-0002TL-8u for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:24:26 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:24:26 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:24:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: Another question about pkgng Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <50B1422A.7070902@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:39:23 -0000 On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:02:51 +0000, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote: >>> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote >>> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the >>> remote repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite. >>> >>> That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg update' first? >> >> That would be consistent with the way 'pkg upgrade' and 'pkg install' >> behave, so personally I think that would be a yes. >> >> Can you open an issue on Github so this point does not get forgotten >> please? >> >> https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues >> > Thanks, Matthew. Done - Issue #396 > Sterling work, Matthew*; thanks for all your efforts. (* It's fixed in 1.1) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 17:15:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788F78F2 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:15:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from graudeejs@yandex.ru) Received: from forward4h.mail.yandex.net (forward4h.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D108FC13 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web17h.yandex.ru (web17h.yandex.ru [84.201.186.46]) by forward4h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 626F71B21175; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:15:32 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web17h.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id D85386EC8046; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:15:31 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1356974132; bh=/Ck2bNM6MP2+WfeODxx/bOgFINUaUexmgnje/uZGg+I=; h=From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=a5DT/zihHZWmZJf0ZPJuFGa1Tocn3sDu55VPSXkuXdmRBHL1pG9zC4pXjrefDl7vb OXMOTr4KygIghZ5DQaP5ZySEqtaiZpV/7ouCDdjOue487yxhMmhzazC+fEIc8PG8qg hzoXklxhUpNaDD6LGkyp7o2lvJirPImMy6omx2d0= Received: from mpe-11-155.mpe.lv (mpe-11-155.mpe.lv [83.241.11.155]) by web17h.yandex.ru with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:15:31 +0400 From: Aldis Berjoza Envelope-From: graudeejs@yandex.ru To: Fbsd8 , FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <50E1BC82.8060403@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E1BC82.8060403@a1poweruser.com> Subject: Re: changing prompt for user in jail MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <2851771356974131@web17h.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:15:31 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:15:34 -0000 31.12.2012, 18:26, "Fbsd8" : > Them I put the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail's > /usr/share/skel/.cshrc and created a different user account > using the same pw command, still no joy. Shouldn't that be /etc/skel/.cshrc ? -- Aldis Berjoza FreeBSD addict From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 17:19:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C0C9B5 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f52.google.com (mail-vb0-f52.google.com [209.85.212.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC88A8FC12 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ez10so12727309vbb.25 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:19:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FzjGA8dWTENH3UA2A/D/SJdOs2jczlMCR35PKcnKLdo=; b=O75KDkH1sMF2VssMNjPzuxP2gTtoai6bknZkqukas4HohuIn8KC45hVPaYMaWxbXuY 6QyV3/ShU468O+531zooIi6bkiYUqAuyc0md/8u92ACdPHClVaHQxExmLsJywB1mqiqk U2UV96bWDz7+YSNuGxN12jF0fUxrbl4fIIhsn8wnQ6clZvU8vHRIaPJ7aIdJw6eg9vaj 8pC8B9eLlBFgPPVdemfcdhIChPDHa709pkUw/5aWTxetFBx9lgLCkytfw8ZU3oPAsTND 2EVnE9UyNWWTZ1DmvpXql9zyyyvV9JtW0kaGbLRf/QavybJ1r+NorLjw0IzYdFnnfHF2 dtew== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.123.1 with SMTP id lw1mr3198225vdb.107.1356974344227; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:19:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.219.4 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:19:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:19:04 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bad gpg signature on 9.1 announcement mail? From: grarpamp To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:19:11 -0000 This was a local mailer issue. The sig on the release announcement is fine. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 17:29:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6791AD18 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:29:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B918FC12 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 31 Dec 2012 12:27:52 -0500 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id CDW73611; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:27:50 -0500 X-Auth-ID: roberthuff Received: from 209-6-85-139.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO [192.168.1.101]) ([209.6.85.139]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 31 Dec 2012 12:27:50 -0500 Message-ID: <50E1CAB8.6080502@rcn.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:26:16 -0500 From: Robert Huff User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff Subject: Re: problem after installkernel going from 9.0 to CURRENT References: <50E0BFA0.6070702@rcn.com> <20121231002418.726f7ca2.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E0D83E.7080205@rcn.com> In-Reply-To: <50E0D83E.7080205@rcn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Polytropon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:29:01 -0000 On 12/30/2012 7:11 PM, Robert Huff wrote: >> It indicates >> that the / partition cannot be mounted to continue booting. >> Maybe you can interrupt at the boot loader and examine the >> mount source for /, or manually set it to be ada0p1? > > I'll try that. OK - I'm at the part of loader2(?) where it shows: OK and wants something of the form However, the sample format for the partition is 0:ad(0,a) How do I specify a GPT partition? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 17:29:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1C3DB1 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC0C8FC0A for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:29:48 -0800 Message-ID: <50E1CB88.6040906@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:29:44 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aldis Berjoza Subject: Re: changing prompt for user in jail References: <50E1BC82.8060403@a1poweruser.com> <2851771356974131@web17h.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <2851771356974131@web17h.yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Dec 2012 17:29:48.0454 (UTC) FILETIME=[6ECD9460:01CDE77C] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:29:47 -0000 Aldis Berjoza wrote: > > 31.12.2012, 18:26, "Fbsd8" : > >> Them I put the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail's >> /usr/share/skel/.cshrc and created a different user account >> using the same pw command, still no joy. > > Shouldn't that be /etc/skel/.cshrc ? > Nope, no such directory as /etc/skel as part of base release. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 17:33:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0E6F53 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:33:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-f169.google.com (mail-ea0-f169.google.com [209.85.215.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADE18FC12 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f169.google.com with SMTP id a12so5395413eaa.28 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:32:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=iyfclD5qneRz3sCIqx3C7EXnEKQvChi2xBVBo5uk0xg=; b=CoqBKESL1Gf18r0riuEGKCoQwhzu82ajh6qrm2XTR3k8QX4XIB8m2sEK7oX6a28CUY 37AstNJJoXy+4XRL4x+sXFvQy+n2ckFaY/6VZ/yjih0GwTI58VRn/BBiafxFrDAjl/e6 hy7+BL9iy5U3CJDTZgtRIkqkx6yYugUM7zNg4E1RiOpEiyK6K9VJtLRKWh/3j9CBCwlc HwZ+ZY5/7lMgfT/x5qwEaGYnNhjWpjlMhLh2yy6+AzZBETuQ9RnjdMwaHgsT9OVFXN2o Bqh7R7K5LsuSR+gLYNPa4k8r2t6jSDKRSs0VHz2iJgU5ZYbxZFSkUfZ407+RPTXtREc/ gj6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.177.1 with SMTP id c1mr111515632eem.8.1356975178268; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:32:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.127.201 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:32:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:32:58 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Optimus VGA support in new release 9.1 From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ashkan Rahmani X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:33:06 -0000 > If the BIOS allows turning off the NVidia graphics, FreeBSD 9.1 has a KMS > driver that will support the Intel graphics. You don't even need bios to support turning off the nvidia card.. im using a Asus N53SV-XR1 it has a nvidia optimus GT540M.. KMS works for the intel video card. so long as you dont use packages... you have to compile xorg with a few settings in your /etc/make.conf as well as use the xorg intel driver, the vesa driver doesn't work and will hard lock your system. these settings go in /etc/make.conf WITH_NEW_XORG=YES WITH_KMS=YES here is my xorg.conf cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Not X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Synaptics_Touchpad" "AlwaysCore" EndSection Section "Files" ModulePath "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Droid/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Liberation/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/terminus-font/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/LinLibertineG/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/anonymous-pro/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/GentiumBasic/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "dri" Load "freetype" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "type1" Load "synaptics" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Synaptics_Touchpad" Driver "Synaptics" Option "UseShm" "true" Option "SHMConfig" "on" Option "Protocol" "psm" Option "Device" "/dev/psm0" Option "SendCoreEvents" "true" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" Option "FingerLow" "26" Option "FingerHigh" "51" Option "FingerPress" "254" Option "HorizEdgeScroll" "1" Option "MinSpeed" "0.10" Option "MaxSpeed" "0.20" Option "RTCornerButton" "2" Option "RBCornerButton" "3" Option "TapButton2" "2" Option "TapButton3" "3" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Card0" Driver "intel" VendorName "Intel Corporation" BoardName "Intel nVidia Thingy" BusID "PCI:0:2:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" SubSection "Display" Modes "1366x768" Virtual 1366 768 EndSubSection EndSection Sam Fourman Jr.