From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 19 09:10:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C1828B for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 09:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA3AADFD for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 09:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so65981470wid.0 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 02:10:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=jGf6EJebwz2ND6YXXKVas8GEARpT2ZW2sgqU85dzA2U=; b=VmL0//eKiIwYnFby8pyQyL5syY6DPJyIKtNiL1IS6H3A/s0U6hWZl61VjCE1M+STrP QAGeH9sbxi2ThXavxdMhEi9A7qUu23Dn3eoItGfSmbLTNdre3ERZKnHYbrHTdqB3eC3h 3See6NajWbnuH66XH4SAG4NYnjnaGyBZ2k6OM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=jGf6EJebwz2ND6YXXKVas8GEARpT2ZW2sgqU85dzA2U=; b=RIrbnPtGqZ4GOVIrd6KZ3a0jzP+P14633xte0i9BOg0a8Nwa2W8ahSBrvT6XdrH02p c/NFAkg910bn+tVHS4j7C/kJKr2urV1HdnqJjaYQ1Qk+mofl7LZKDsNpDjx6qdlXxGjL 0E3mvcdWPRf3eSm/MaSueBMdl5z2YX877SjTqeDTdLmG6xDgwLZ0PDIxRq4sv8UPhGNP EUzAFIEcUFfLx3Yr6bIi3FIMyAhg02MLBVDsiC/Dj8jUjf/G/q/EKTLvl58WgzImdPc+ IsYidDUPAqBzMVhKUa1Ijf1Rq0igooRH/YtFuq6mJskI60KOHklws8KEAoffakudbjXh bgkg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmSZISOTizOiodK+GuxPXdt9UD0d3eAlkInU5yigoGwbzSBtJPxaPHemg0jyc4gCgqtJ0Cc X-Received: by 10.194.237.34 with SMTP id uz2mr20632972wjc.157.1429434647286; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 02:10:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.211.135 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 02:10:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 02:10:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Request for Help] Reducing gcc 4.9 compilation warnings To: Craig Rodrigues Cc: freebsd-current Current , "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Toolchain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 09:10:49 -0000 " On 18 April 2015 at 11:12, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Hi, > > After the latest commits by members of freebsd-toolchain@ , > I have managed to compile latest CURRENT world and GENERIC > kernel on amd64 with an gcc 4.9 external toolchain by doing: > > pkg install devel/amd64-xtoolchain-gcc > cd /usr/src > sed -i "" -e 's/boot2//' sys/boot/i386/Makefile > make buildworld CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=amd64-gcc NO_WERROR=yes WERROR= > make buildkernel CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=amd64-gcc NO_WERROR=yes WERROR= > > > It was necessary to skip boot2 from building because of errors > reported here: > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2015-April/001658.html > > The boot2 compilation errors still need to be worked on. > > However, most other things compile with warnings. If folks are > interested in looking at the warnings, you can see them here: > > https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/warnings17 > > Please look at these warnings, and if you see places to > patch the code to eliminate the warnings, please submit patches > and commit them if you can. Some time ago I tried to do something similar, but with gcc4.6 instead of gcc4.9. The vast majority of warnings (1548) are "unused-but-set-variable" and it may be worthwhile to just silence this warning, at least at low WARNS levels. It has caught real errors but is quite noisy and can cause quite a bit of churn. "inline" (count 515) is generally pure noise, and I think we should disable it. It can be helpful to find certain types of performance optimizations, but it should be opt-in. "strict-aliasing" (154) are likely all real bugs of some form. Very few exist in contrib code, and it would be good to fix them. "Warning" (111) seem to be a mix of warnings, but mostly in contrib code. "maybe-uninitialized" (111) is often noisy, and in a spot check were all false positives. "deprecated-declarations" (22) is all in contrib code Many of these are useful though and I've already fixed a few of the bugs reported. Perhaps it would be useful to do a second run of this, but with a modified share/mk to silence the most useless of these warnings? -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 19 14:47:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB21A254; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw (FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw [140.113.17.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8446832D; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw (Postfix, from userid 1058) id 326092F36; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 22:47:41 +0800 (CST) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 22:47:41 +0800 From: Li-Wen Hsu To: Pedro Giffuni Cc: "freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Everything down? Message-ID: <20150419144741.GA45897@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> References: <5527EE72.3070604@FreeBSD.org> <580867E3-19FB-4E25-9DE2-3CD52D8A489E@gmail.com> <553137C0.8000902@FreeBSD.org> <20150417170921.GA97307@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> <55314DD5.7080804@FreeBSD.org> <20150418201533.GA92581@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> <5532BF95.50406@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5532BF95.50406@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:47:42 -0000 On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 15:33:25 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > On 04/18/15 15:15, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > > Reduce it? Don't you want to see the report more quickly? I will > > reduce it when there is no enough computing power :) > > No need ... save the planet, etc ... ;). Sounds reasonable, I've tuned it to run weekly. > > I would say that currently the thing we need more is man power. :) > > That always happens yes, but you guys seems to have it under control. > I saw you also have gcc build now !! No, this is never enough :) GCC build is Criag's work, thanks to him! > >> FWIW, and while I am making wishes that are turning into reality ;) it > >> would be nice to > >> have an i386 build: last week the i386 was broken and it almost went > >> unnoticed. > > I just built a quick one: > > > > https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/ > > > > Also only runs build world/kernel only. #1 build is running, I would > > set it to mail related lists after seeing this job work. Other branches > > will be available later. > > That was really fast! I am curious, is this a 386 VM or a crossbuild? It is an i386 VM, see node07 in https://wiki.freebsd.org/Jenkins/MachineList I like to have native build if possible. -stable builds are just added: https://jenkins.freebsd.org/view/FreeBSD_src_stable/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_10-i386/ https://jenkins.freebsd.org/view/FreeBSD_src_stable/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_9-i386/ https://jenkins.freebsd.org/view/FreeBSD_src_stable/job/FreeBSD_STABLE_8-i386/ And will config to mail results to -stable@ and -i386@ after seeing these job work as image. Li-Wen -- Li-Wen Hsu http://lwhsu.org From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 19 15:19:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 855EC847; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E42C80B; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbhj9 with SMTP id hj9so43507055igb.1; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:19:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MlxL5kvb8OhxHBeLDUfegcL4jFp5Llf5rOxVfrrsh1k=; b=Hin6jQNXkDncUwYMT9Wwhypo092j+S0yqgvo5BJy/5/O733iFrq6FrPmGS0iXxloCn ZureQBJZitaxrSUiKkHbVqeFOxbKsrjM5Rmhd5STWxfITryZKQfPbl+i5FRlOQZLlrSp Sy9Nv9aBMXN1OYFA6icFLnq16K5eIHkM10UHXpF6CqxJjzhA78C6qkopiaYpHCG5HHNM HfkxdIxgZC5hNVH1kGT2B250gAIx14+jJMVJL67QCQDaeaL3O1Bfwvlk0v/t4eSySWtt xr0alirS/oEMrXB7EiYvhakZvezHZDoKWpXAbvF5HNBJ0axQtiengdfVKOvzqpxf8qcw S9VA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.137.202 with SMTP id z10mr14162619ict.37.1429456770652; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.17.194 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:19:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 08:19:30 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6h0qlEIN0qAEhgNNivNX9lp3JT8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Request for Help] Reducing gcc 4.9 compilation warnings From: Adrian Chadd To: Eitan Adler Cc: Craig Rodrigues , freebsd-current Current , "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Toolchain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:19:31 -0000 On 19 April 2015 at 02:10, Eitan Adler wrote: > " > > On 18 April 2015 at 11:12, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After the latest commits by members of freebsd-toolchain@ , >> I have managed to compile latest CURRENT world and GENERIC >> kernel on amd64 with an gcc 4.9 external toolchain by doing: >> >> pkg install devel/amd64-xtoolchain-gcc >> cd /usr/src >> sed -i "" -e 's/boot2//' sys/boot/i386/Makefile >> make buildworld CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=amd64-gcc NO_WERROR=yes WERROR= >> make buildkernel CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=amd64-gcc NO_WERROR=yes WERROR= >> >> >> It was necessary to skip boot2 from building because of errors >> reported here: >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2015-April/001658.html >> >> The boot2 compilation errors still need to be worked on. >> >> However, most other things compile with warnings. If folks are >> interested in looking at the warnings, you can see them here: >> >> https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/warnings17 >> >> Please look at these warnings, and if you see places to >> patch the code to eliminate the warnings, please submit patches >> and commit them if you can. > > Some time ago I tried to do something similar, but with gcc4.6 instead > of gcc4.9. > > The vast majority of warnings (1548) are "unused-but-set-variable" and > it may be worthwhile to just silence this warning, at least at low > WARNS levels. It has caught real errors but is quite noisy and can > cause quite a bit of churn. > > "inline" (count 515) is generally pure noise, and I think we should > disable it. It can be helpful to find certain types of performance > optimizations, but it should be opt-in. > > "strict-aliasing" (154) are likely all real bugs of some form. Very > few exist in contrib code, and it would be good to fix them. > > "Warning" (111) seem to be a mix of warnings, but mostly in contrib code. > > "maybe-uninitialized" (111) is often noisy, and in a spot check were > all false positives. > > "deprecated-declarations" (22) is all in contrib code > > Many of these are useful though and I've already fixed a few of the > bugs reported. > > Perhaps it would be useful to do a second run of this, but with a > modified share/mk to silence the most useless of these warnings? I just got a booting mips32 kernel using gcc-4.9.2, and boy are there a lot of warnings. I'm going to start fixing the ones I find - cleaner code is better code. Mostly. (I'd be happy with -Wall -Werror.) -adrian From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 20 16:46:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2EEA324; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu [18.9.25.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E145DDD2; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:46:41 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 1209190d-f79676d000000da0-49-55352d691540 Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id E5.7A.03488.A6D25355; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:46:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id t3KGkWMK010733; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:46:33 -0400 Received: from multics.mit.edu (system-low-sipb.mit.edu [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id t3KGkUXR000539 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:46:31 -0400 Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id t3KGkToZ011605; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:46:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:46:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk X-X-Sender: kaduk@multics.mit.edu To: Adrian Chadd cc: Eitan Adler , Craig Rodrigues , freebsd-current Current , "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Toolchain Subject: Re: [Request for Help] Reducing gcc 4.9 compilation warnings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprOKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrJulaxpqcH8Di8XerduZLOa8+cBk 0T2lk83i19djjBaLTrQzWezt7WFzYPOYtvkgm8eMT/NZApiiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDKuTvnH XrCdpWJq4xKWBsYDzF2MnBwSAiYS2/6fYoSwxSQu3FvPBmILCSxmkvj0pKCLkQvI3sgo0Xt1 PiOEc4hJ4t3hmSwQTgOjRNv00+wgLSwC2hJf/2wBs9kE1CQe721mhRirKLH51CSgdRwcIgKq Ep3znUHCzAL9TBLfboaB2MICrhL/7iwEK+cUCJTou3mbFaScV8BR4vjxWIiDbjFKrLuiC2KL CuhIrN4/hQXE5hUQlDg58wkLxEgtieXTt7FMYBSahSQ1C0lqASPTKkbZlNwq3dzEzJzi1GTd 4uTEvLzUIl0jvdzMEr3UlNJNjOAwl+TdwfjuoNIhRgEORiUeXglDk1Ah1sSy4srcQ4ySHExK orxztU1DhfiS8lMqMxKLM+KLSnNSiw8xSnAwK4nwCrID5XhTEiurUovyYVLSHCxK4rybfvCF CAmkJ5akZqemFqQWwWRlODiUJHiNdIAaBYtS01Mr0jJzShDSTBycIMN5gIZHgdTwFhck5hZn pkPkTzHqctyZ8n8RkxBLXn5eqpQ4rzVIkQBIUUZpHtwcWHp6xSgO9JYw73SQKh5gaoOb9Apo CRPQkrhtJiBLShIRUlINjHE7XdYE1yXd7v7feCf7t2CNZXLl9Cl2zPrS23Pm+HaU/Co/wiF+ bvbOyd2x1koBqdGybZfsXubfLJ1WIVy66PEmL5V5VZ/NSk/Vz0vzrUz5L77yuLLfAs3bwu3u 6r3OfTf/xcRUnaljudx9Jkb8mRHPmZ9THVc7nTv7+VyDudnqMFXzK3YLlViKMxINtZiLihMB Tvoi8CoDAAA= X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:46:42 -0000 On Sun, 19 Apr 2015, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I just got a booting mips32 kernel using gcc-4.9.2, and boy are there > a lot of warnings. I'm going to start fixing the ones I find - cleaner > code is better code. Mostly. > > (I'd be happy with -Wall -Werror.) I thought that -Wall was a fixed set of warnings nowhere close to all of them (to avoid breaking peoples' builds as new warnings are introduced), and a larger set would be better. (Things like -Wmaybe-uninitialized have too many false positives to be a desirable -Werror target, though.) -Ben From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 20 18:09:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E650850; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB9CFA34; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbqq2 with SMTP id qq2so136999725lbb.3; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:09:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BwYe0a/lHGeVQc1OIKATxTmD2ANZNbAdUqR3e0/M9oc=; b=VEO5tFU8r7qH+PwiIauJ4D02PvmkyJ4a2xfGs1CY7VhJ2SntPwK325sZV4JQMNtptW AaW16qg103Y6MB/uZkqaXBoZUgqZcyHtC8wC/zpzN2PsHTQVvN9vJNqrvkIZfpuAY5LC yw0nhZmqKO7Zx2CVSu01wcIXpgkHmq3IJbCm5Ebh+fhYXgF1WGEdxvl0WqvQNO+/hduH mWUG6qiW/csONyY0WHWqFBIDZCp5hjOb+dzqye3pvDrEejd5UTqmgsvjs+sw5QhnqCUH GRHf+GwroxQV3ow9WOGqYyN1P3qhNI6n55qQfQkZSuJTWtJJZbERBU0jyyy69Wdy89q4 LL2Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.120.163 with SMTP id ld3mr16921654lab.59.1429553384754; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.164.38 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:09:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:09:44 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kcv7M7sj21mCbHnZAgkZ-K9drG0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Request for Help] Reducing gcc 4.9 compilation warnings From: Craig Rodrigues To: Eitan Adler Cc: freebsd-current Current , "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Toolchain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:09:47 -0000 On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > > Perhaps it would be useful to do a second run of this, but with a > modified share/mk to silence the most useless of these warnings? > > Sure, that's fine. Can you provide a modified share/mk which you think does the right thing? We can try it. -- Craig From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 22 18:52:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 539DE2A8 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E86167E for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3MIqBwJ006752 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:52:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 197060] Test failure: local.atf.atf-sh.atf_check_test.flush_stdout_on_timeout Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:52:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: ngie@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:52:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197060 --- Comment #4 from Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 --- Ok, I'll look at bringing this change in. There have been a LOT of errors lately on Jenkins related to this testcase, which is generating a lot of failure spam email. https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/964/testReport/junit/libexec.atf.atf-sh/atf_check_test/flush_stdout_on_timeout/ , etc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 25 18:56:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4855DE; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 18:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BE221F00; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 18:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labbd9 with SMTP id bd9so55588000lab.2; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 11:56:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZdL92ig3RYsg7igr/tXne808kPa4Qc0wOd/YOALXhOk=; b=v8J4ILEhB1ddnT6fQZ2JJnygq++rhAT8/Nru2jOlb8j2zH/yC2jfX9SDqwTdOyKgjV S8Gmo2j0HKsmD7o/WfpaV9DeNeGPFLn5e6H6Fe+b/2zV4obiyC2wTm/XB74Oapev62jT Dc1jmm86/I3zBgs/8ZbGavdmfWijPei0qa/FA1hWJnMOcVRXt/bVSJjY16+XVYRABT/C yuii5K7c+48xa8n4NtSIL20v7zRQvOUw+MIaqjSSfZygRcL2sahMQPMw5AWT0oUdL3Hv HBg8j19eG0eBGhIgfjnb84DgVgFkIUKNGrkjXYPkZcb/wNW3anMrMdd/tpsXwttG9vit cs/Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.135.131 with SMTP id ps3mr3666654lbb.84.1429988162200; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 11:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.164.38 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Apr 2015 11:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 11:56:02 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e_5Z2dNIU7rIUpA5ELOsHNJeWDc Message-ID: Subject: Jenkins clang-scan-build plugin From: Craig Rodrigues To: Li-Wen Hsu Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 18:56:04 -0000 Hi, I have recently become a comitter to the Jenkins clang-scan-build plugin ( https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Clang+Scan-Build+Plugin ) and have committed a bunch of fixes to it. The test results are incorporated directly into Jenkins, which is very useful. For example here is a sample test that I did: https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/scan_build_test/2/clangScanBuildBugs/ Can you convert our scan-build job of FreeBSD to use this plugin? Thanks. -- Craig