From owner-freebsd-net Mon Dec 21 18:34:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA04842 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 18:34:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.1.39.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA04835 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 18:34:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Message-Id: <199812220234.SAA04835@hub.freebsd.org> Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA055944072; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 21:34:32 -0500 Subject: ipfw NAT rule help please To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 21:34:31 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am trying to set up a machine using NAT and 2 ehternet cards to connect my home network to the internet via a cable modem. I have the NAT working, but am having trouble getting my firewall rules correct. I keep geting message about nat being unable to return packets. What I think I need is a rule like: ipfw add allow all from any to any natd But this is not allowd. How can I make this work? Or am I looking at it incoreclty? -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 770-996-6955 Factory Automation Systems Atlanta Ga. -- Windows 98: n. minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1998 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Dec 21 20:14:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA19118 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 20:14:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.pinboard.com (mail.pinboard.com [194.209.195.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA19112 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 20:14:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Kurt@pinboard.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.pinboard.com (8.9.1/8.9.1/19980920-01/KK) with UUCP id FAA29054 for net@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 05:14:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from: Kurt@pinboard.com) Received: from beaver.pbdhome.pinboard.com ([192.168.0.7]) by squirrel.pbdhome.pinboard.com (8.9.1/8.9.1-19980817-01/KK) with SMTP id XAA01540 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 23:00:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from: Kurt@pinboard.com) Message-Id: <3.0.5.16.19981221225911.439f4d8a@pop.pbdhome.pinboard.com> Organization: PINBOARD - http://www.pinboard.com/ X-Sender: kurt@pop.pbdhome.pinboard.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (16) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 22:59:11 To: net@FreeBSD.ORG From: Kurt Keller Subject: IP aliases Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id UAA19114 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On my FreeBSD 2.2.5 server I need to assign at least one more IP address to the ethernet card (only one, not even a slot free for an additional card). So I did ifconfig ed1 inet 192.168.0.8 alias ifconfig -a shows the additional address together with the already assigned one (192.168.0.1) and from other stations, I can also access it. However, on the server itself no route is created (netstat -nr) for this new virtual interface, neither can the server access itself (ping, telnet or anything) on this virtual address. Both addresses, .1 and .8 are on the same subnet. Did I miss something or is this the way FreeBSD is supposed to behave? I often do this kind of stuff on Solaris because there are not enough sbus slots for the number of token ring interfaces required. On Solaris the new virtual interface gets a name of its own (tr0 for the physical interface, tr0:1, tr0:2, tr0:3 etc. for the added virtual ones) and also the route entries are created accordingly. Kurt -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- ¦ Kurt@pinboard.com http://www.pinboard.com/ business ¦ ¦ http://www.pinboard.com/kurt/ private ¦ ¦--------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ Unix and Internet Specialist ¦ -------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Dec 21 23:13:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA10553 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 23:13:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from obie.softweyr.com ([204.68.178.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA10546 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 23:13:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.com (zaphod.softweyr.com [204.68.178.35]) by obie.softweyr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA29802; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:13:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Message-ID: <367F469C.E57CD5C2@softweyr.com> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:13:32 -0700 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr llc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.0-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Keller CC: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IP aliases References: <3.0.5.16.19981221225911.439f4d8a@pop.pbdhome.pinboard.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kurt Keller wrote: > > On my FreeBSD 2.2.5 server I need to assign at least one more IP > address to the ethernet card (only one, not even a slot free for an > additional card). So I did > > ifconfig ed1 inet 192.168.0.8 alias > > ifconfig -a shows the additional address together with the already > assigned one (192.168.0.1) and from other stations, I can also access > it. However, on the server itself no route is created (netstat -nr) for > this new virtual interface, neither can the server access itself (ping, > telnet or anything) on this virtual address. Both addresses, .1 and .8 > are on the same subnet. > > Did I miss something or is this the way FreeBSD is supposed to behave? > I often do this kind of stuff on Solaris because there are not enough > sbus slots for the number of token ring interfaces required. On Solaris > the new virtual interface gets a name of its own (tr0 for the physical > interface, tr0:1, tr0:2, tr0:3 etc. for the added virtual ones) and > also the route entries are created accordingly. I believe you need to add "netmask 255.255.255.255" to the end of the "ifconfig alias" command. Checking... Yup, that's it. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Dec 21 23:14:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA10643 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 23:14:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from summer.kumagai.nf (kenny42.zip.com.au [61.8.18.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA10594 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 1998 23:13:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shigetoh@zip.com.au) Received: from localhost (shigetoh@localhost) by summer.kumagai.nf (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA00586; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 18:13:24 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from shigetoh@zip.com.au) X-Authentication-Warning: summer.kumagai.nf: shigetoh owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 18:13:23 +1100 (EST) From: Shigetoh Kumagai X-Sender: shigetoh@summer.kumagai.nf To: Kurt Keller cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IP aliases In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.16.19981221225911.439f4d8a@pop.pbdhome.pinboard.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id XAA10634 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kurt, Have you looked at /etc/rc.conf file? There is a sample setting for network alias. ------> Sail OZ Shigetoh Kumagai On Mon, 21 Dec 1998, Kurt Keller wrote: > On my FreeBSD 2.2.5 server I need to assign at least one more IP > address to the ethernet card (only one, not even a slot free for an > additional card). So I did > > ifconfig ed1 inet 192.168.0.8 alias > > ifconfig -a shows the additional address together with the already > assigned one (192.168.0.1) and from other stations, I can also access > it. However, on the server itself no route is created (netstat -nr) for > this new virtual interface, neither can the server access itself (ping, > telnet or anything) on this virtual address. Both addresses, .1 and .8 > are on the same subnet. > > Did I miss something or is this the way FreeBSD is supposed to behave? > I often do this kind of stuff on Solaris because there are not enough > sbus slots for the number of token ring interfaces required. On Solaris > the new virtual interface gets a name of its own (tr0 for the physical > interface, tr0:1, tr0:2, tr0:3 etc. for the added virtual ones) and > also the route entries are created accordingly. > > Kurt > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > ¦ Kurt@pinboard.com http://www.pinboard.com/ business ¦ > ¦ http://www.pinboard.com/kurt/ private ¦ > ¦--------------------------------------------------------------------¦ > ¦ Unix and Internet Specialist ¦ > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Dec 22 09:23:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA19801 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 09:23:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.1.39.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA19777 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 09:23:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Message-Id: <199812221723.JAA19777@hub.freebsd.org> Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA097797393; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:23:13 -0500 Subject: Help with NAT, and a firewall To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 12:23:13 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am trying to set up a FFreebSD 2.2.6 machine to server as a communication gateway for my local network. I have a canle modem which is conected to the FreebSD box using a second ethernet card. I am using NAT to allow the other machines on my network to access the outside world. All this works fine, using the ipfw rules sugested in the NAt man page. However since this is a full time connections, with a fixed IP address, I am feeeling a bit paranoid. I would like to set up a reasonable set of firewall rules for ipfw. I started witht eh default /etc/rc.firewall, but it was not very usefeul. I think I have worked through most of what I need, but I am having problems with NAT being denied permission to write back packets it has translated. Could someone sugest a rule to allow NAT to work with a firewalled system? I would alos be interested in seeing other peoples firewall rules for similat systesm. No sense in being hacked, because I am unwilling to lear from others experience, is there? Any advice welcom. -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 770-996-6955 Factory Automation Systems Atlanta Ga. -- Windows 98: n. minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1998 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Dec 22 14:22:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA24598 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:22:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.pinboard.com (mail.pinboard.com [194.209.195.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA24519 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:22:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Kurt@pinboard.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.pinboard.com (8.9.1/8.9.1/19980920-01/KK) with UUCP id XAA00344; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 23:22:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from: Kurt@pinboard.com) Received: from beaver.pbdhome.pinboard.com ([192.168.0.7]) by squirrel.pbdhome.pinboard.com (8.9.1/8.9.1-19980817-01/KK) with SMTP id XAA03332; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 23:18:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from: Kurt@pinboard.com) Message-Id: <3.0.5.16.19981222225958.44879f9a@pop.pbdhome.pinboard.com> Organization: PINBOARD - http://www.pinboard.com/ X-Sender: kurt@pop.pbdhome.pinboard.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (16) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 22:59:58 To: net@FreeBSD.ORG From: Kurt Keller Subject: Re: IP aliases Cc: wes@softweyr.com, shigetoh@zip.com.au In-Reply-To: <367F469C.E57CD5C2@softweyr.com> References: <3.0.5.16.19981221225911.439f4d8a@pop.pbdhome.pinboard.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id OAA24555 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thanks for your help. I actually had a look in rc.conf as well, but was sure the netmask of 255.255.255.255 was wrong. Actually it does work fine that way. Still, I can't imagine why the netmask on this virtual interface should have all bits set. This would mean, that FreeBSD won't let me simulate subnets on one adapter card. Even though physically such networks would not be separated, the pure logical separation can be handy for testing routing stuff. For example something like 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.192 192.168.1.64/255.255.255.240 192.168.1.96/255.255.255.248 172.17.32.0/255.255.0.0 on one single adapter card can be very handy for simulations. Which makes me wonder whether FreeBSD supports variable length subnet masks. Kurt >Have you looked at /etc/rc.conf file? There is a sample setting for >network alias. >I believe you need to add "netmask 255.255.255.255" to the end of the >"ifconfig alias" command. Checking... >> On my FreeBSD 2.2.5 server I need to assign at least one more IP >> address to the ethernet card (only one, not even a slot free for an >> additional card). So I did >> >> ifconfig ed1 inet 192.168.0.8 alias -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- ¦ Kurt@pinboard.com http://www.pinboard.com/ business ¦ ¦ http://www.pinboard.com/kurt/ private ¦ ¦--------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ Unix and Internet Specialist ¦ -------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Dec 22 14:56:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA21133 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:56:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hotmail.com (law-f47.hotmail.com [209.185.131.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA21078 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:56:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from racklin@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 23404 invoked by uid 0); 22 Dec 1998 22:56:27 -0000 Message-ID: <19981222225627.23403.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 202.52.64.176 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:56:27 PST X-Originating-IP: [202.52.64.176] From: "Ching Chung Lin" To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: about 3com Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:56:27 PST Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Dec 22 15:05:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA00708 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 15:05:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail-out2.apple.com (mail-out2.apple.com [17.254.0.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA00648 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 15:05:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from justin@scv2.apple.com) Received: from mailgate.apple.com (A17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out2.apple.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA39168 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:54:43 -0800 Received: from scv2.apple.com (scv2.apple.com) by mailgate.apple.com (mailgate.apple.com - SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:54:35 -0800 Received: from localhost (grinch.apple.com [17.202.43.163]) by scv2.apple.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA07406; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:54:33 -0800 Received: (from justin@localhost) by localhost (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA06077; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:46:15 -0800 Message-Id: <19981222144615.I5684@apple.com> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:46:15 -0800 From: "Justin C. Walker" To: Kurt Keller , net@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: wes@softweyr.com, shigetoh@zip.com.au Subject: Re: IP aliases Reply-To: justin@apple.com References: <3.0.5.16.19981221225911.439f4d8a@pop.pbdhome.pinboard.com> <367F469C.E57CD5C2@softweyr.com> <3.0.5.16.19981222225958.44879f9a@pop.pbdhome.pinboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.16.19981222225958.44879f9a@pop.pbdhome.pinboard.com>; from Kurt Keller on Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 10:59:58PM +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 10:59:58PM +0000, Kurt Keller wrote: > Thanks for your help. > > I actually had a look in rc.conf as well, but was sure the netmask of > 255.255.255.255 was wrong. Actually it does work fine that way. Still, > I can't imagine why the netmask on this virtual interface should have > all bits set. See http://www.cypher.net/~black/ipalias.html (linked from the tutorial page on the FreeBSD site). This doesn't really explain at a deep level why this netmask makes things work, but will give you a warm fuzzy feeling :-} > This would mean, that FreeBSD won't let me simulate subnets on one > adapter card. Even though physically such networks would not be > separated, the pure logical separation can be handy for testing routing > stuff. > For example something like > > 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.192 > 192.168.1.64/255.255.255.240 > 192.168.1.96/255.255.255.248 > 172.17.32.0/255.255.0.0 > > on one single adapter card can be very handy for simulations. Which > makes me wonder whether FreeBSD supports variable length subnet masks. If I understand what you're getting at, the funky netmask is only needed if you are adding an alias that is on the same subnet as an existing address assigned to the interface. This basically avoids the EEXISTS response, and adds a route for you. If you want to use the "real netmask", the 'ifconfig' actually succeeds, but you have to add the route by hand. For "new" subnets, use the correct netmask. At least, that's the way things work for our (Rhapsody) systems. Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large * Institute for General Semantics | Manager, CoreOS Networking | Men are from Earth. Apple Computer, Inc. | Women are from Earth. 2 Infinite Loop | Deal with it. Cupertino, CA 95014 | *---------------------------------------*------------------------------------* To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Dec 24 04:00:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA21344 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 24 Dec 1998 04:00:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.adinet.com.uy (mail.adinet.com.uy [206.99.44.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA21338 for ; Thu, 24 Dec 1998 04:00:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ang@adinet.com.uy) Received: from adinet.com.uy (tc2-137.w3.com.uy [207.3.118.137]) by mail.adinet.com.uy (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id IAA03317 for ; Thu, 24 Dec 1998 08:59:55 -0300 (GMT) Message-ID: <36822CF5.1C997AFE@adinet.com.uy> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 09:00:53 -0300 From: Angelo Nardone X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Marry Chirismas !!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I know tht is not the apropiate place for thist, but anyway. Marry Chirismas for all FreeBSD users, and thank for all of you that make possible find a solution for other's problems. Angelo. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message