From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 0:25:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from emmi.physik.TU-Berlin.DE (emmi.physik.TU-Berlin.DE [130.149.160.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436AF37B408 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 00:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jschlesn@localhost) by emmi.physik.TU-Berlin.DE (8.11.4/8.11.6) id f8G7P6X38073 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:25:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jschlesn) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:25:05 +0200 From: Jan Schlesner To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.4 installword fails on libcom_err_p.a Message-ID: <20010916092505.A37879@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from doug@safeport.com on Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:00:34AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Have you build the system on an other computer or habe you change the file /etc/make.conf? Try to set "NOPROFILE = true" in the file /etc/make.conf. Jan On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:00:34AM -0400, doug@safeport.com wrote: > > libcom_err_p.a is missing from ../src/lib/libcom_err. > -- It's better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 0:27:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from poontang.schulte.org (poontang.schulte.org [209.134.156.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CDB37B408; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 00:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tarmap.schulte.org (tarmap.schulte.org [209.134.156.198]) by poontang.schulte.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878EAD144D; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 02:27:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010916022609.02172758@pop.schulte.org> X-Sender: schulte@pop.schulte.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 02:27:27 -0500 To: "alexus" , From: Christopher Schulte Subject: Re: upgrading FreeBSD-4.3STABLE(4.4RC) to FreeBSD-4.4STABLE Cc: In-Reply-To: <002301c13e6d$d5e13c70$0100a8c0@alexus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 01:09 AM 9/16/2001 -0400, alexus wrote: >cd /usr/src;make world;make kernel;mergemaster;reboot If you want to do that all one on a single command line, I suggest you use something more like: `cd /usr/src && make world && make kernel && mergemaster` Which will check that each step is completed successfully before the next one starts. One possibility is you have kern.securelevel set to a level that would prevent the new kernel from being properly installed. Since you used ';' to separate those install commands, the system would silently go on to the next step even if the new kernel was not installed. If you have any doubts that your source was not updated, look at /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh and search for 'BRANCH' and 'REVISION' If it indeed says STABLE and 4.4, then I'd see why your compiled kernel is not being installed correctly after being built. -- Christopher Schulte christopher@schulte.org http://noc.schulte.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 3: 7:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from office-plovdiv.digsys.bg (pdtest.pip.digsys.bg [193.68.2.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CD137B405 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from digsys.bg (localhost.digsys.bg [127.0.0.1]) by office-plovdiv.digsys.bg (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8FMtOV66951 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 01:55:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from mishinev@digsys.bg) Message-ID: <3BA3DC5A.C2B09920@digsys.bg> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 01:55:22 +0300 From: Stoian Mishinev X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: bg, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: make release Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I've build a couple releases but I'm not sure if I wrong or this is the way to make release. The problem is that make release brake. If I first buildworld and buildkernel then cd to release directory and then make release it works. So my question is is there any way to make release from clean source tree without making world first. Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 4: 0:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285AD37B401 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 04:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA21021; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:00:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:00:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109161100.NAA21021@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make release In-Reply-To: <3BA3DC5A.C2B09920@digsys.bg> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.1-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Stoian Mishinev wrote: > The problem is that make release brake. If I first buildworld and > buildkernel then cd to release directory and then make release it works. > > So my question is is there any way to make release from clean source > tree without making world first. No, you're supposed to perform at least a "make buildworld" before you can do a "make release", because you need to have a populated object tree (one of the first things that the release makefile does is a "make installworld"). I think this is documented pretty clearly. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 5:47:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8FF37B40B for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 05:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sobek.lan ([62.252.8.133]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010916124731.QCOR15984.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@sobek.lan>; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:47:31 +0100 Received: (from greid@localhost) by sobek.lan (8.11.5/8.11.5) id f8GClUE63607; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:47:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from greid@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: sobek.lan: greid set sender to greid@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:47:29 +0100 From: George Reid To: Stoian Mishinev Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make release Message-ID: <20010916134729.A63573@FreeBSD.org> References: <3BA3DC5A.C2B09920@digsys.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BA3DC5A.C2B09920@digsys.bg>; from mishinev@digsys.bg on Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:55:22AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:55:22AM +0300, Stoian Mishinev wrote: > So my question is is there any way to make release from clean source > tree without making world first. No; you need a populated /usr/obj. -- +-------------------+---------------------+ | George Reid | FreeBSD Committer | | +44 7740 197460 | greid@FreeBSD.org | +-------------------+---------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 9: 3:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9BE37B405 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8GG3Gn03746; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:03:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f8GG3EW22329; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:03:14 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109161603.f8GG3EW22329@harmony.village.org> To: Doug Denault Subject: Re: Make buildworld compile errors Cc: Kris Kennaway , todorov@space.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Sep 2001 01:57:31 EDT." References: Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:03:14 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Doug Denault writes: : > FAQ: source upgrades from 4.1-R do not work. : : This must mean specifically 4.1 --> 4.4. I have done this many times : updating to 4.[23] It has broken somewhere between 4.3 and 4.4. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 9: 7: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286E337B408 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:07:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id f8GG5Of46264; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 12:05:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 12:05:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Doug Denault X-Sender: doug@fledge.watson.org To: Jan Schlesner Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.4 installword fails on libcom_err_p.a In-Reply-To: <20010916092505.A37879@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Exactly correct - thanks On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Jan Schlesner wrote: > > Have you build the system on an other computer or habe you change the file > /etc/make.conf? Try to set "NOPROFILE = true" in the file /etc/make.conf. > > Jan > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:00:34AM -0400, doug@safeport.com wrote: > > > > libcom_err_p.a is missing from ../src/lib/libcom_err. > > > > -- > It's better to reign in hell, > than to serve in heaven... > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 9:20:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.du.gtn.com (mail.du.gtn.com [194.77.9.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562A337B40A for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.du.gtn.com (8.11.0.Beta3/8.11.0.Beta3) id f8GGK3914228; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:20:03 +0200 (MET DST) >Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id f8G9dEi02239; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:39:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:39:13 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-print@bostonradio.org Subject: Re: small bug in lpc's interactive mode when performing "restart all" Message-ID: <20010916113913.A1971@titan.klemm.gtn.com> References: <20010915124611.A6536@titan.klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from drosih@rpi.edu on Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 08:43:05PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-RC SMP X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 08:43:05PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > [...] > I have a fix to lpc/lpc.c which adds a call to cgetset(NULL) after the > call to el_source(...), and this fixes the problem you're seeing, and > does not seem to break anything in interactive processing. I will > commit this to current soon, unless someone knows of a reason I should > not do that... Thanks for your quick response. Andreas /// --=20 Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/ Songs from our band >> 64Bits << http://hometown.aol.com/II64BitsII --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7pHNBd3o+lGxvbLoRAqG0AJ9Co4vrrMAXB1SCReUwdtG0tIRujACguXd3 /qvRBdmJDmSJh98ovrQFNJA= =MQxZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 9:49: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net (mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF54637B401 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netcom1.netcom.com (user-38ldmkm.dialup.mindspring.com [209.86.218.150]) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA19991 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 12:49:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by netcom1.netcom.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2498C1313C; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:48:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Harding To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: ld-elf.so.1 not updated? Message-Id: <20010916164859.2498C1313C@netcom1.netcom.com> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just did a buildworld and /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 does not have an updated install time - the directory looks like... ... -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 68716 Sep 16 09:40 ftpd -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6336 Sep 16 09:40 getNAME -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21256 Sep 16 09:40 getty -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 76264 Aug 17 07:54 ld-elf.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 69632 Sep 16 09:38 ld.so -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 123652 Sep 16 09:42 lint1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 26696 Sep 16 09:42 lint2 ... does this mean that the linker is not being updated? - Mike H. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 10:27:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailb.telia.com (mailb.telia.com [194.22.194.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5AE37B408 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d1o913.telia.com (d1o913.telia.com [195.252.44.241]) by mailb.telia.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8GHR3K14073 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:27:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ertr1013.student.uu.se (h185n2fls20o913.telia.com [212.181.163.185]) by d1o913.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA20448 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:27:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 58789 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Sep 2001 17:27:00 -0000 Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:27:00 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ld-elf.so.1 not updated? Message-ID: <20010916192659.A49939@student.uu.se> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <20010916164859.2498C1313C@netcom1.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010916164859.2498C1313C@netcom1.netcom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 09:48:59AM -0700, Mike Harding wrote: > > I just did a buildworld and /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 does not have an > updated install time - the directory looks like... > > ... > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 68716 Sep 16 09:40 ftpd > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6336 Sep 16 09:40 getNAME > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21256 Sep 16 09:40 getty > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 76264 Aug 17 07:54 ld-elf.so.1 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 69632 Sep 16 09:38 ld.so > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 123652 Sep 16 09:42 lint1 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 26696 Sep 16 09:42 lint2 > ... > > does this mean that the linker is not being updated? That is normal. That file is only updated if the newly built file is different from the old one. In this case the old version was apparently identical to the new one and therefore wasn't changed. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 10:29:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gravy.kishka.net (pool-151-197-8-33.phil.east.verizon.net [151.197.8.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42E437B408 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gravy.kishka.net (gravy.kishka.net [192.168.1.2]) by gravy.kishka.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8GHT7600795; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:29:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bleez@bellatlantic.net) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:29:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Bryan Liesner X-X-Sender: To: Mike Harding Cc: Subject: Re: ld-elf.so.1 not updated? In-Reply-To: <20010916164859.2498C1313C@netcom1.netcom.com> Message-ID: <20010916131944.D776-100000@gravy.kishka.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Mike Harding wrote: > >I just did a buildworld and /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 does not have an >updated install time - the directory looks like... > >... > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 68716 Sep 16 09:40 ftpd > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6336 Sep 16 09:40 getNAME > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21256 Sep 16 09:40 getty > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 76264 Aug 17 07:54 ld-elf.so.1 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 69632 Sep 16 09:38 ld.so > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 123652 Sep 16 09:42 lint1 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 26696 Sep 16 09:42 lint2 >... > >does this mean that the linker is not being updated? > No, it means that one of the install flags for ld-elf.so.1 is -C. From the man page: -C Copy the file. If the target file already exists and the files are the same, then don't change the modification time of the tar- get ========================================================== = Bryan D. Liesner LeezSoft Communications, Inc. = = A subsidiary of LeezSoft Inc. = = bleez@bellatlantic.net Home of the Gipper = ========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 10:51:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from catastrophe.net (ictus.catastrophe.net [207.227.243.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A729337B409 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 69658 invoked by uid 1002); 16 Sep 2001 17:51:30 -0000 Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 12:51:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Reply-To: To: Subject: Re: $MANPATH problem. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: http://users.catastrophe.net/~eric Legal-Notice: Copyright 2001 eric@catastrophe.net. The contents of this transmission and any forementioned sections stated by eric@catastrophe.net remain property of eric@catastrophe.net. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello - It looks like I've found what my real problem is here. The problem is that $MANPATH needs the following... 1. For any directories to retain permissions of 0755 or 0750 2. For any man pages to be at least 0400 (obviously) It seems, to me, that #1 can be considered a questionable "feature", and lends `man` under FreeBSD to be a bit inflexible when a user wants to keep man pages under their home directory. Why would a user want to do this? Say the user does a CVS checkout of a directory called $HOME/Toolkit each time they log into a machine. The CVS checkout is smart enough to do it "per platform", therefore keeping various binaries in a central repository. Under $HOME/Toolkit is the standard set of subdirectories... bin sbin lib man share Fortunately this user is smart and works with a home directory of 0700. You get the drift..... So, by my judgement, this appears to be a bug. However, I still can't find contact information for the actual `man' distribution under FreeBSD. If anyone feels differently about the above, or has contact information for the `man' developers (core team?) please let me know. Thanks. - #0 On or about Sep 15, 2001 at 17:32 [-0500] uid0@catastrophe.net proclaimed: ; I decided to build a toolkit for myself that I'd be able to port around ; to various boxes. In doing so, I'd also like to port my man pages around ; as well. ; ; However, I noticed a problem here under 4.3-RELEASE. It follows... ; ; $ echo $MANPATH ; /path/to/alternate/man: ; ; $ man -d foo ; ctype locale env: Invalid argument ; ; using less as pager ; ; using i386 architecture ; found mandatory man directory /usr/share/man ; found mandatory man directory /usr/share/perl/man ; found optional man directory /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00503/man ; found manpath map /usr/bin --> /usr/share/man ; found manpath map /usr/local/bin --> /usr/local/man ; found manpath map /usr/X11R6/bin --> /usr/X11R6/man ; ; search path for pages determined by manpath is ; /path/to/alternate/man ; ; Warning: couldn't stat file /path/to/alternate/man! ; Warning: couldn't stat file ! ; No manual entry for foo ; ; $ man -v ; man: illegal option -- v ; man, version 1.1 ; [snip] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 11:26:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A89A37B406 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:26:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8GIQXg43588 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:26:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@wall.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id f8GIQXu77119; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:26:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200109161826.f8GIQXu77119@vashon.polstra.com> To: stable@freebsd.org From: John Polstra Subject: Re: sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c bugfix In-Reply-To: <200109151906.f8FJ6Kk74842@vashon.polstra.com> References: <20010905160610.U1222-100000@earth.serd.org> <200109151906.f8FJ6Kk74842@vashon.polstra.com> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <200109151906.f8FJ6Kk74842@vashon.polstra.com>, John Polstra wrote: > > About your patch: I made a different version which I think is slightly > better, because it specifies the memory clobbers more specifically. > It's simpler, too. I checked the compiler's assembly language output, > and it looks like it's doing the right thing. Could you please give > it a try? Note, I removed the clobber of "cc" because the Intel > book says that no flags are affected by the CPUID instruction. > > This is relative to today's -stable: > > Index: identcpu.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c,v > retrieving revision 1.80.2.6 > diff -c -r1.80.2.6 identcpu.c > *** identcpu.c 2001/07/19 09:12:07 1.80.2.6 > --- identcpu.c 2001/09/15 19:04:23 > *************** > *** 114,127 **** > do_cpuid(u_int ax, u_int *p) > { > __asm __volatile( > ! ".byte 0x0f, 0xa2;" > ! "movl %%eax, (%2);" > ! "movl %%ebx, 4(%2);" > ! "movl %%ecx, 8(%2);" > ! "movl %%edx, 12(%2);" > ! : "=a" (ax) > : "0" (ax), "S" (p) > - : "bx", "cx", "dx" > ); > } > > --- 114,122 ---- > do_cpuid(u_int ax, u_int *p) > { > __asm __volatile( > ! ".byte 0x0f, 0xa2" > ! : "=a" (p[0]), "=b" (p[1]), "=c" (p[2]), "=d" (p[3]) > : "0" (ax), "S" (p) > ); > } > Oops, this can be simplified further, because it is no longer necessary to specify %esi as an input. Here's a new patch: Index: identcpu.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/identcpu.c,v retrieving revision 1.80.2.6 diff -c -r1.80.2.6 identcpu.c *** identcpu.c 2001/07/19 09:12:07 1.80.2.6 --- identcpu.c 2001/09/16 18:25:00 *************** *** 114,127 **** do_cpuid(u_int ax, u_int *p) { __asm __volatile( ! ".byte 0x0f, 0xa2;" ! "movl %%eax, (%2);" ! "movl %%ebx, 4(%2);" ! "movl %%ecx, 8(%2);" ! "movl %%edx, 12(%2);" ! : "=a" (ax) ! : "0" (ax), "S" (p) ! : "bx", "cx", "dx" ); } --- 114,122 ---- do_cpuid(u_int ax, u_int *p) { __asm __volatile( ! ".byte 0x0f, 0xa2" ! : "=a" (p[0]), "=b" (p[1]), "=c" (p[2]), "=d" (p[3]) ! : "0" (ax) ); } John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 11:47:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freenix.no (atreides.freenix.no [217.68.117.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C2B37B409 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from morten@localhost) by freenix.no (8.11.6/8.11.1) id f8GIlfW29368 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:47:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from morten) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:47:41 +0200 From: "Morten A . Middelthon" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: sshd generating _alot_ of errormessages Message-ID: <20010916204741.A29322@freenix.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-PGP-Key: http://freenix.no/~morten/pgp.txt X-PGP-Key-FingerPrint: 20 40 7A 47 1E A0 BF CF 61 BB CD 9D B3 AD CF E2 D4 90 C3 8D X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE X-Warning: So cunning you could brush your teeth with it. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG For the last two days sshd has been spitting out _tons_ of these: Sep 16 20:41:49 XXXX sshd[849]: error: channel 1017: internal error: we do not read, but chan_read_failed for istate 4 and there was an sshd-process using 100% cputime Afair I haven't seen these before. The box in question is running FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE, and OpenSSH version SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_2.3.0 green@FreeBSD.org 20010321 Anyone know what could cause this? -- Morten A. Middelthon Freenix Norge http://www.freenix.no/ -- 75% of the Earth is covered by water, Jeeps cover the rest. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 12:43:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tholian.securitydynamics.com (mail.rsasecurity.com [204.167.112.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E69437B401 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 12:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sdtihq24.securitydynamics.com by tholian.securitydynamics.com via smtpd (for hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) with SMTP; 16 Sep 2001 19:40:19 UT Received: from spirit.dynas.se (ebola.securid.com [192.168.7.4]) by sdtihq24.securid.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA28172 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 17870 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2001 19:42:59 -0000 Received: from explorer.rsa.com (10.81.217.59) by spirit.dynas.se with SMTP; 16 Sep 2001 19:42:59 -0000 Received: (from mikko@localhost) by explorer.rsa.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id f8GJguM01641; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 12:42:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikko) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 12:42:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Mikko Tyolajarvi Message-Id: <200109161942.f8GJguM01641@explorer.rsa.com> To: aurelien.nephtali@wanadoo.fr Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIA problem (sound) ON LAPTOP Newsgroups: local.freebsd.stable References: <20010915213347.A1824@mars.wanadoo.fr>; from aurelien.nephtali@wanadoo.fr on Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 09:33:47PM +0200 <20010915224844.A407@mars.wanadoo.fr> X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.6 (NOV) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In local.freebsd.stable you write: >i'm sorry but i didn't mention that i'm on a laptop and i cannot modify >anything in my bios :( That is not necessarily a property of all laptops. On my vaio it was not immediately obvious that I could enter the bios configuration by holding down F2 (I think) during boot. Try sitting on the keyboard when you restart :-) $.02, /Mikko -- Mikko Työläjärvi_______________________________________mikko@rsasecurity.com RSA Security To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 13:49:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.clickarray.com (dune.clickarray.com [209.10.62.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2507637B411; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vader.clickarray.com (nattedaddress.clickarray.com [10.2.1.199]) by mail.clickarray.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057EB5EF01; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.clickarray.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f8GKnHP27556; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:49:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: vader.clickarray.com: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org Cc: john_m_cooper@yahoo.com, gnome@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bugbuddy build failure References: From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.7 - "Awazu") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 16 Sep 2001 13:49:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Maxim Sobolev's message of "Sat, 15 Sep 2001 08:04:18 +0400") Message-ID: Lines: 58 User-Agent: T-gnus/6.14.5 (based on Gnus v5.8.7) (revision 06) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/20.7 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0 =?ISO-2022-JP?B?KBskQjJWMWMbKEIp?= Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * From: Maxim Sobolev * Umm, no, bugbuddy already receives oaf dependency through USE_GNOME knob. From * what I saw in the log I can tell that to me it looks like there is some more * fundamental problem with bento itself, because it tries to build bugbuddy * even though one of the packages it depends upon is missed (see piece of log * below). I have no idea why it may be happening, though. As I reported before, it is sshd that is misbehaving. The package building scripts are fine -- they have been handling dependencies the exact same way for several years now. It's this piece of code that's failing. === while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do if ssh -a ${master} [ -f ${packages}/All/$1 ]; then if [ ! -f ${chroot}/tmp/depends/$1 ]; then echo "copying package $1 for ${pkgname}" scp -p $master:${packages}/All/$1 ${chroot}/tmp/depends fi else echo "skipping package $1 for ${pkgname} since it is missing" fi shift done === If the "ssh" command fails, it will not copy the necessary package. The package *is* on the master when this happens. For instance, I just got an error saying libiconv is missing, but it was built two days ago according to the timestamp so there is no race condition. I have seen similar errors before, when Paul Saab told me that it was ConnectionsPerPeriod in /etc/ssh/sshd_config that needed to be tweaked to allow a very high access rate like the package cluster master. However, that knob has gone away, (apparently) replaced by MaxStartups. I changed it to 200:5:300 as shown below but the problem still persists. === # ConnectionsPerPeriod has been deprecated completely # After 10 unauthenticated connections, refuse 30% of the new ones, and # refuse any more than 60 total. MaxStartups 200:5:300 === I just noticed that there ase some of these messages: === rresvport: af=2 Resource temporarily unavailable === printed out when I try to build the packages by hand. I am not sure if they are related. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 13:50:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C825F37B403 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by pemaquid.safeport.com (8.11.5/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8GKaDf66864 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 16:36:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 16:36:12 -0400 (EDT) From: To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: mergemaster question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I was looking at /var/tmp/temproot after running mergemaster to see what was in /etc that was not in ..temproot/etc. The only files I could not identify: pim6dd.conf pim6sd.conf after rooting (no pun) around for a bit I know what they are. My question is, if/when these files change will the process automatically include them for merging or should they be listed in /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist? _____ Douglas Denault doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 13:55:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A728337B408 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7CE1510F4C1; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:55:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:55:37 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: doug@safeport.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mergemaster question Message-ID: <20010916155537.B76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: doug@safeport.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-RC i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 04:36:12PM -0400, doug@safeport.com wrote: > I was looking at /var/tmp/temproot after running mergemaster to see what was in > /etc that was not in ..temproot/etc. The only files I could not identify: > > pim6dd.conf > pim6sd.conf > pim6[s,d]d has been moved out of the base system and into the ports system, all instances of them in /etc and /usr/sbin or /usr/bin can be erased if you have the port installed or don't use pim -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 13:56:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADCE37B407 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id DC4A0481; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:55:41 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:55:41 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser To: doug@safeport.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mergemaster question Message-ID: <20010916215541.F23685@tao.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser , doug@safeport.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from doug@safeport.com on Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 04:36:12PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 04:36:12PM -0400, doug@safeport.com wrote: > I was looking at /var/tmp/temproot after running mergemaster to see what = was in > /etc that was not in ..temproot/etc. The only files I could not identify: >=20 > pim6dd.conf > pim6sd.conf >=20 > after rooting (no pun) around for a bit I know what they are. >=20 > My question is, if/when these files change will the process automatically > include them for merging or should they be listed in=20 > /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist? They shouldn't be there at all. pim6Xd was removed to the ports. Joe --MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjulEc0ACgkQXVIcjOaxUBY56gCfQAUU5GNyCNhvWs0JDmJEyzhS 1FQAnAwP/mZkC8UvBecNWnfhQK3w4Tss =3UNN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 13:59:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au (sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au [130.220.227.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4987937B401 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 13:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (sayersjm@localhost) by sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f8GKx9w19197 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:29:10 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from Jarrod.Sayers@unisa.edu.au) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:29:09 +0930 (CST) From: Jarrod Sayers X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Building x11/gnome from ports Message-ID: <20010917062243.V16003-100000@sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG While trying to install x11/gnome from the ports tree, one of its runtime dependancies is x11-toolkits/guile-gnome which fails to build. It dies with the following: ----- ===> Building for guile-gnome-0.20_3 make all-recursive Making all in guile-gnome Making all in zvt Making all in bonobo Making all in gtkhtml guile -l ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm -s ./../../guile-gtk/build-guile-gtk -I ../../guile-gtk glue ./gtkhtml.defs > .tmpg && mv .tmpg gtkhtml-glue.c ERROR: In procedure open-file: ERROR: No such file or directory: "../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm" *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/guile-gnome/work/gnome-guile-0.20/guile-gnome/gtkhtml. *** Error code 1 ----- There is still an open PR ports/29463 but thats a compilation problem. This seems to be parsing a file called ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm which doesn't exist, ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm.in exists though and if you try to use it, errors, ERROR: Unbound variable: @USING_LTDL_SCM@ appear. Any ideas? The ports tree is cvsupped off RELEASE_4_4_0 yesterday. TIA, Jarrod Sayers Information Technologist School of Communication, Information and New Media University of South Australia, Magill Campus. Phone: +61 8 83024045 Fax: +61 8 83024745 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 14:17:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0952737B405 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 14:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by pemaquid.safeport.com (8.11.5/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8GLH6j66926 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 17:17:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 17:17:06 -0400 (EDT) From: To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mergemaster question In-Reply-To: <20010916155537.B76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ah - thanks I found the references in the release notes. Should cvsup have removed man files and binaries? On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 04:36:12PM -0400, doug@safeport.com wrote: > > I was looking at /var/tmp/temproot after running mergemaster to see what was in > > /etc that was not in ..temproot/etc. The only files I could not identify: > > > > pim6dd.conf > > pim6sd.conf > > > pim6[s,d]d has been moved out of the base system and into the ports > system, all instances of them in /etc and /usr/sbin or /usr/bin can > be erased if you have the port installed or don't use pim > > -- > David W. Chapman Jr. > dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. > dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer > _____ Douglas Denault doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 14:38:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73AE37B40A; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 14:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA22202; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 14:38:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 14:38:03 -0700 From: "Chad R. Larson" To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Update on 4.4 release date Message-ID: <20010916143803.A22183@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <20010915184404Y.jkh@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010915184404Y.jkh@freebsd.org>; from jkh@FreeBSD.ORG on Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 06:44:04PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 06:44:04PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > o We're very close to being ready with the RELENG_4_4 branch (AKA > 4.4.0-STABLE)... Is this to imply we're going back to point releases rather than patches along the "very stable" branch? That is, would we have a "4.4.6-STABLE" rather than "4.4-STABLE-p6"? If so, I approve. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 15: 6:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B0B37B401 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id f8GM69S49557 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:06:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:06:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Doug Denault X-Sender: doug@fledge.watson.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mergemaster question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG never mind - I found refs and got an answer here (which was nop an operator function) thanks for your help On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 doug@safeport.com wrote: > ah - thanks I found the references in the release notes. Should cvsup have > removed man files and binaries? > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 04:36:12PM -0400, doug@safeport.com wrote: > > > I was looking at /var/tmp/temproot after running mergemaster to see what was in > > > /etc that was not in ..temproot/etc. The only files I could not identify: > > > > > > pim6dd.conf > > > pim6sd.conf > > > > > pim6[s,d]d has been moved out of the base system and into the ports > > system, all instances of them in /etc and /usr/sbin or /usr/bin can > > be erased if you have the port installed or don't use pim > > > > -- > > David W. Chapman Jr. > > dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. > > dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer > > > > _____ > Douglas Denault > doug@safeport.com > Voice: 301-469-8766 > Fax: 301-469-0601 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 15:38: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from finch-post-10.mail.demon.net (finch-post-10.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C747537B436 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:38:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com ([62.49.246.82] helo=topdeck) by finch-post-10.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15ikY5-0000qW-0A for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:38:01 +0000 Received: from phil by topdeck with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15ikBs-00089U-00; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:15:04 +0100 Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:15:04 +0100 From: Phil Reynolds To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: make installworld fails: install: mbr: no such file or directory Message-ID: <20010916231504.A31337@tinsleyviaduct.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On trying to make installworld for 4.4-STABLE, I get the following error: ===> sys/boot/i386/mbr install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 mbr /boot install: mbr: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 The installworld therefore fails. All other steps up to this point worked perfectly. Can anyone advise what is wrong and what I need to do in order to fix it? -- Phil Reynolds o ____ Internet: phil@tinsleyviaduct.com |L_ \ / Web: http://www.tinsleyviaduct.com/phil/ (_)- \/ Waltham 67, Emley Moor 69, Droitwich 79, Windows 95 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 17: 6:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D4537B408 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 17:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8879210F4C1; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:06:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:06:40 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: doug@safeport.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mergemaster question Message-ID: <20010916190640.F76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: doug@safeport.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20010916155537.B76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-RC i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 05:17:06PM -0400, doug@safeport.com wrote: > ah - thanks I found the references in the release notes. Should cvsup have > removed man files and binaries? > Not if it didn't originally install the sources to the man and binaries. If you are tralking about the binaries and man pages created after a make world, definitely not. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 17: 9:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.noos.fr (camus.noos.net [212.198.2.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D342D37B408 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 17:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 62769961 invoked by uid 0); 17 Sep 2001 00:09:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gits.dyndns.org) ([212.198.231.187]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.70 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 17 Sep 2001 00:09:35 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by gits.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f8H09Y921584; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 02:09:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from root) Message-Id: <200109170009.f8H09Y921584@gits.dyndns.org> Subject: Re: make -j4 vs -j8... 4 works, but 8 does not In-Reply-To: <20010916003359.A48953@student.uu.se> To: Erik Trulsson Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 02:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: clefevre@citeweb.net From: Cyrille Lefevre Organization: ACME X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[<97Zd*>^#%Y5Cxv;%Y[PT-LW3;A:fRrJ8+^k"e7@+30g0YD0*^^3jgyShN7o?a]C la*Zv'5NA,=963bM%J^o]C X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 06:06:10PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > [aside on those multiple builds that I did: It was interesting that > > even though it was on a dual-processor system, there was not much of > > a speed improvement (on 4.3-stable) when going from -j4 to -j10. Big > > improvement going from -j1 to -j4, but after that it didn't help much] > > That sounds exactly like what I would expect. More than 2 (or maybe 3) > jobs per CPU is normally not going to make things go faster but might > actually slow it down. I'm not right w/ you. let's try : # setup a reusable environment cd /sys/compile/MYKERNEL make depend make # run the jobs for i in 1 2 4 8; do (date;touch opt_global.h;time make -j$i all;date) >| .j$i 2>&1 done results are (on my old P200 processor) : j1 12:36 j2 12:46 j4 11:36 j8 11:21 so, for a 12 min job, you could win 1 min using -j4, which may gives you 1 hour for a 12 hours job (such as buildworld :). ok, it's not so many, but that may help a lot. for instace, I currently use -j4 since -j8 is too CPU and memory intensive (the machine slow down significally). PS : I'm using SCSI disks. using IDE disks probably gives you different results. I/O are very differents between the two. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 17:12:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1D737B409 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 17:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 67C3B10F4C1; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:12:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:12:20 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Cyrille Lefevre Cc: Erik Trulsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make -j4 vs -j8... 4 works, but 8 does not Message-ID: <20010916191219.H76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: Cyrille Lefevre , Erik Trulsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010916003359.A48953@student.uu.se> <200109170009.f8H09Y921584@gits.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200109170009.f8H09Y921584@gits.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-RC i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:09:34AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > j1 12:36 > j2 12:46 > j4 11:36 > j8 11:21 > > so, for a 12 min job, you could win 1 min using -j4, which may gives > you 1 hour for a 12 hours job (such as buildworld :). ok, it's not so > many, but that may help a lot. for instace, I currently use -j4 since > -j8 is too CPU and memory intensive (the machine slow down significally). > > PS : I'm using SCSI disks. using IDE disks probably gives you different > results. I/O are very differents between the two. > On my IBM IDE drives with softupdates, tags and write cache enabled, on my thunderbird 1100 with 256mb ram, I only do -j5 or -j6 at most. I can't seem to get my buildworlds lower than 40 mins. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 17:41:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dc-mx04.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx04.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEEE37B418 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 17:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.217.157.157] (HELO there) by dc-mx04.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with SMTP id 29926100; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:47:53 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Dave Uhring To: "David W. Chapman Jr." , Cyrille Lefevre Subject: Re: make -j4 vs -j8... 4 works, but 8 does not Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:41:42 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] Cc: Erik Trulsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010916003359.A48953@student.uu.se> <200109170009.f8H09Y921584@gits.dyndns.org> <20010916191219.H76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> In-Reply-To: <20010916191219.H76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday 16 September 2001 07:12 pm, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:09:34AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > j1 12:36 > > j2 12:46 > > j4 11:36 > > j8 11:21 > > > > so, for a 12 min job, you could win 1 min using -j4, which may gives > > you 1 hour for a 12 hours job (such as buildworld :). ok, it's not so > > many, but that may help a lot. for instace, I currently use -j4 since > > -j8 is too CPU and memory intensive (the machine slow down > > significally). > > > > PS : I'm using SCSI disks. using IDE disks probably gives you different > > results. I/O are very differents between the two. > > On my IBM IDE drives with softupdates, tags and write cache enabled, > on my thunderbird 1100 with 256mb ram, I only do -j5 or -j6 at most. > I can't seem to get my buildworlds lower than 40 mins. With a T-Bird 850 and 512MB, IBM-DTLA drive, softupdates, no tags or write cache enabled, and no -j option the buildworld takes 47-48 min. while using the machine for other things also. /etc/defaults/make.conf unchanged from last build. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 17:43: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CF637B407 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 17:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3720310F4C1; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:43:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:43:05 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Dave Uhring Cc: "David W. Chapman Jr." , Cyrille Lefevre , Erik Trulsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make -j4 vs -j8... 4 works, but 8 does not Message-ID: <20010916194305.J76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: Dave Uhring , "David W. Chapman Jr." , Cyrille Lefevre , Erik Trulsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010916003359.A48953@student.uu.se> <200109170009.f8H09Y921584@gits.dyndns.org> <20010916191219.H76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-RC i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 07:41:42PM -0500, Dave Uhring wrote: > With a T-Bird 850 and 512MB, IBM-DTLA drive, softupdates, no tags or write > cache enabled, and no -j option the buildworld takes 47-48 min. while using > the machine for other things also. /etc/defaults/make.conf unchanged from Besides the slower processor, no tags or wc, the setup appears to be almost identical to mine. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 18: 9:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from web10907.mail.yahoo.com (web10907.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13E0A37B40A for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010917010940.66086.qmail@web10907.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.61.155.10] by web10907.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:09:40 PDT Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:09:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Gozdzicki Subject: 4.4-RC5 boot floppies To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freeebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! I am unable to install 4.4-RC5 because the boot floppies do not detect my IDE controller and also there are problems loading *.ko files. My motherboard is ASUS P4T-M. By the way, the boot floppies from 4.3-RELEASE were ok. Regards, Chris __________________________________________________ Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 18:15:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mango.gaultopia.org (mango.gaultopia.org [161.58.160.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9A537B405 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gaultopia.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mango.gaultopia.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BCBD1F01A; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:15:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 64.164.130.170 (SquirrelMail authenticated user egault) by www.gaultopia.org with HTTP; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:15:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49180.64.164.130.170.1000689340.squirrel@www.gaultopia.org> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:15:40 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Building x11/gnome from ports From: "Erik Gault" To: In-Reply-To: <20010917062243.V16003-100000@sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au> References: <20010917062243.V16003-100000@sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au> Cc: X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.0 [rc1]) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG i was able to get it to build a few weeks ago by independently building the guile-gnome package and then installing x11/gnome. i may have done some other minor fiddling, i can't remember exactly, but i was able to get it to build. sorry i don't have more detailed information... erik > While trying to install x11/gnome from the ports tree, one of its > runtime dependancies is x11-toolkits/guile-gnome which fails to build. > It dies with the following: > > ----- > ===> Building for guile-gnome-0.20_3 > make all-recursive > Making all in guile-gnome > Making all in zvt > Making all in bonobo > Making all in gtkhtml > guile -l ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm -s > ./../../guile-gtk/build-guile-gtk -I ../../guile-gtk glue > ./gtkhtml.defs > .tmpg && mv .tmpg gtkhtml-glue.c > ERROR: In procedure open-file: > ERROR: No such file or directory: "../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm" *** > Error code 2 > > Stop in > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/guile-gnome/work/gnome-guile-0.20/guile-gno me/gtkhtml. > *** Error code 1 > ----- > > There is still an open PR ports/29463 but thats a compilation problem. > > This seems to be parsing a file called ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm > which doesn't exist, ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm.in exists though > and if you try to use it, errors, ERROR: Unbound variable: > @USING_LTDL_SCM@ appear. > > Any ideas? The ports tree is cvsupped off RELEASE_4_4_0 yesterday. > > TIA, > > Jarrod Sayers > Information Technologist > School of Communication, Information and New Media > University of South Australia, Magill Campus. > Phone: +61 8 83024045 > Fax: +61 8 83024745 > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 18:44: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (law2-f67.hotmail.com [216.32.181.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6AD37B408 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:43:58 -0700 Received: from 24.159.98.80 by lw2fd.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 01:43:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.159.98.80] From: "Kenneth Mays" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.4RC5: kldunload crashes with custom kernel Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:43:58 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Sep 2001 01:43:58.0993 (UTC) FILETIME=[3855C810:01C13F1A] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG 1. Recompile kernel implementing "device pcm, device sbc0..." change 2. Reboot and log on as root. 3. Type "startx" to go into KDE. Wait till hear music from KDE successfully starting (shows main GUI screen). 4. Open up a console windows and type "kldload snd". Wait till the snd modules load. 5. Type "kldunload". See if it cleanly unloads the snd modules or crashes your system. I originally did this test with the GENERIC kernel without recompiling. The test completed successfully. I recompiled my kernel to get the sound working like I always do - nothing different. I tried the test again and when I typed kldunload the system locked up and rebooted. I was rebooted the second time I tried to start KDE after the first reboot. The third time I restarted KDE, I could get into KDE successfully. Don't do this at home, kids. Ken 4.4RC5 _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 18:51:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508AD37B414 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B343910F4C1; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:51:27 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:51:27 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Dave Uhring Cc: "David W. Chapman Jr." , Cyrille Lefevre , Erik Trulsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make -j4 vs -j8... 4 works, but 8 does not Message-ID: <20010916205127.L76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: Dave Uhring , "David W. Chapman Jr." , Cyrille Lefevre , Erik Trulsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010916003359.A48953@student.uu.se> <20010916194305.J76323@leviathan.inethouston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-RC i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Then except for a few minutes of compile time, what good is -j on > a single processor machine? I've heard 4-6 is good depenging on disk i/o limitions and cpu. > > And why does this discussion arise about every 2 months? Not sure -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 18:59:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.bmi.net (smtp.bmi.net [204.57.191.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4677C37B408 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from johncoop.MSHOME (drumheller-router.bmi.net [206.63.201.3] (may be forged)) by smtp.bmi.net (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA27538 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 02:06:57 -0700 Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:59:39 -0700 From: John Merryweather Cooper To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Seg Faults running Balsa, Pan, and Mozilla under latest GNOME, but KDE2.2 works fine Message-ID: <20010916185939.C24051@johncoop.MSHOME> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.7 Lines: 18 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't know whether this is a kernel issue, a kernel/GNOME issue, or just GNOME, but in the past week I've been experiencing rather common Seg Faults running Balsa, Pan, and Mozilla. Balsa Seg faults any time it: 1) gets lots of mail in a folder; 2) attempts to process HTML mail. Pan Seg Faults trying to download a news server groups list. And Mozilla dies on graphics-intensive pages. However, these applications run fine (and do not seg fault under any of the abovbe conditiosn) under the latest KDE. Weird. -- jmc MacroHard -- the perfection of form over substance, marketing over performance, and greed over design . . . To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 19:40:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBA937B407 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by pemaquid.safeport.com (8.11.5/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8H2eBD67495 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:40:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:40:11 -0400 (EDT) From: To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: pccard does not work with Cirrus Logic CL-PD6730, 2.01 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-2056722099-1000694411=:7651" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-2056722099-1000694411=:7651 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cvsup from Sep 15 20:14 pciconf -l chip0@pci0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x12358086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 chip1@pci0:1:0: class=0x068000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x12348086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 none0@pci0:2:0: class=0x030000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x000310c8 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 pcic0@pci0:4:0: class=0x060500 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11001013 rev=0xee hdr=0x00 pciconf -r pci0:4:0: 0:xff 0x11001013 The above does not seem correct but that's what I did last time. I have attached the full dmesg. Basically it boots but does not recognize that a card is present. poping the card in and has no effect. This is FYI or if I can provide further information, please ask. I do not need this to run on 4.4. _____ Douglas Denault doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 --0-2056722099-1000694411=:7651 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="boot.zeus" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: boot -v Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="boot.zeus" Q29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAxOTkyLTIwMDEgVGhlIEZyZWVCU0QgUHJvamVjdC4N CkNvcHlyaWdodCAoYykgMTk3OSwgMTk4MCwgMTk4MywgMTk4NiwgMTk4OCwg MTk4OSwgMTk5MSwgMTk5MiwgMTk5MywgMTk5NA0KCVRoZSBSZWdlbnRzIG9m IHRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIENhbGlmb3JuaWEuIEFsbCByaWdodHMgcmVz ZXJ2ZWQuDQpGcmVlQlNEIDQuNC1TVEFCTEUgIzA6IFN1biBTZXAgMTYgMDI6 MzY6NDkgRURUIDIwMDENCiAgICBkb3VnQHBlbWFxdWlkLnNhZmVwb3J0LmNv bTovdXNyL29iai91c3IvaG9tZS9mYnNkL3N0YWJsZS9zcmMvc3lzL1pFVVMN CkNhbGlicmF0aW5nIGNsb2NrKHMpIC4uLiBUU0MgY2xvY2s6IDE2NzA0NTMx OCBIeiwgaTgyNTQgY2xvY2s6IDExOTMxODIgSHoNCkNMS19VU0VfSTgyNTRf Q0FMSUJSQVRJT04gbm90IHNwZWNpZmllZCAtIHVzaW5nIGRlZmF1bHQgZnJl cXVlbmN5DQpUaW1lY291bnRlciAiaTgyNTQiICBmcmVxdWVuY3kgMTE5MzE4 MiBIeg0KQ0xLX1VTRV9UU0NfQ0FMSUJSQVRJT04gbm90IHNwZWNpZmllZCAt IHVzaW5nIG9sZCBjYWxpYnJhdGlvbiBtZXRob2QNCkNQVTogUGVudGl1bS9Q NTVDICgxNjcuMDUtTUh6IDU4Ni1jbGFzcyBDUFUpDQogIE9yaWdpbiA9ICJH ZW51aW5lSW50ZWwiICBJZCA9IDB4NTQzICBTdGVwcGluZyA9IDMNCiAgRmVh dHVyZXM9MHg4MDAxYmY8RlBVLFZNRSxERSxQU0UsVFNDLE1TUixNQ0UsQ1g4 LE1NWD4NCnJlYWwgbWVtb3J5ICA9IDQxOTQzMDQwICg0MDk2MEsgYnl0ZXMp DQpQaHlzaWNhbCBtZW1vcnkgY2h1bmsocyk6DQoweDAwMDAxMDAwIC0gMHgw MDA5ZWZmZiwgNjQ3MTY4IGJ5dGVzICgxNTggcGFnZXMpDQoweDAwNGEyMDAw IC0gMHgwMjdmN2ZmZiwgMzcwNTI0MTYgYnl0ZXMgKDkwNDYgcGFnZXMpDQph dmFpbCBtZW1vcnkgPSAzNjMwMjg0OCAoMzU0NTJLIGJ5dGVzKQ0KYmlvczMy OiBGb3VuZCBCSU9TMzIgU2VydmljZSBEaXJlY3RvcnkgaGVhZGVyIGF0IDB4 YzAwZjU2NjANCmJpb3MzMjogRW50cnkgPSAweGZkMjM5IChjMDBmZDIzOSkg IFJldiA9IDAgIExlbiA9IDENCnBjaWJpb3M6IFBDSSBCSU9TIGVudHJ5IGF0 IDB4MjEzDQpwbnBiaW9zOiBGb3VuZCBQblAgQklPUyBkYXRhIGF0IDB4YzAw ZjU0YTANCnBucGJpb3M6IEVudHJ5ID0gZjAwMDA6YjZmMiAgUmV2ID0gMS4w DQpwbnBiaW9zOiBFdmVudCBmbGFnIGF0IGY5NTRmDQpPdGhlciBCSU9TIHNp Z25hdHVyZXMgZm91bmQ6DQpBQ1BJOiAwMDAwMDAwMA0KUHJlbG9hZGVkIGVs ZiBrZXJuZWwgImtlcm5lbCIgYXQgMHhjMDQ3YzAwMC4NCkludGVsIFBlbnRp dW0gZGV0ZWN0ZWQsIGluc3RhbGxpbmcgd29ya2Fyb3VuZCBmb3IgRjAwRiBi dWcNCm1kMDogTWFsbG9jIGRpc2sNCkNyZWF0aW5nIERJU0sgbWQwDQpNYXRo IGVtdWxhdG9yIHByZXNlbnQNCnBjaV9vcGVuKDEpOgltb2RlIDEgYWRkciBw b3J0ICgweDBjZjgpIGlzIDB4ODAwMDA4ZDQNCnBjaV9vcGVuKDFhKToJbW9k ZTFyZXM9MHg4MDAwMDAwMCAoMHg4MDAwMDAwMCkNCnBjaV9jZmdjaGVjazoJ ZGV2aWNlIDAgW2NsYXNzPTA2MDAwMF0gW2hkcj0wMF0gaXMgdGhlcmUgKGlk PTEyMzU4MDg2KQ0KYXBtMDogPEFQTSBCSU9TPiBvbiBtb3RoZXJib2FyZA0K YXBtOiBmb3VuZCBBUE0gQklPUyB2MS4xLCBjb25uZWN0ZWQgYXQgdjEuMQ0K bnB4MDogPG1hdGggcHJvY2Vzc29yPiBvbiBtb3RoZXJib2FyZA0KbnB4MDog SU5UIDE2IGludGVyZmFjZQ0KaTU4Nl9iemVybygpIGJhbmR3aWR0aCA9IDEy ODkzMjQzOSBieXRlcy9zZWMNCmJ6ZXJvKCkgYmFuZHdpZHRoID0gMTgxODE4 MTgxIGJ5dGVzL3NlYw0KcGNpYjA6IDxIb3N0IHRvIFBDSSBicmlkZ2U+IG9u IG1vdGhlcmJvYXJkDQpmb3VuZC0+CXZlbmRvcj0weDgwODYsIGRldj0weDEy MzUsIHJldmlkPTB4MDINCgljbGFzcz0wNi0wMC0wMCwgaGRydHlwZT0weDAw LCBtZmRldj0wDQoJc3Vib3JkaW5hdGVidXM9MCAJc2Vjb25kYXJ5YnVzPTAN CmZvdW5kLT4JdmVuZG9yPTB4ODA4NiwgZGV2PTB4MTIzNCwgcmV2aWQ9MHgw Mw0KCWNsYXNzPTA2LTgwLTAwLCBoZHJ0eXBlPTB4MDAsIG1mZGV2PTANCglz dWJvcmRpbmF0ZWJ1cz0wIAlzZWNvbmRhcnlidXM9MA0KZm91bmQtPgl2ZW5k b3I9MHgxMGM4LCBkZXY9MHgwMDAzLCByZXZpZD0weDAyDQoJY2xhc3M9MDMt MDAtMDAsIGhkcnR5cGU9MHgwMCwgbWZkZXY9MA0KCXN1Ym9yZGluYXRlYnVz PTAgCXNlY29uZGFyeWJ1cz0wDQoJaW50cGluPWEsIGlycT0yNTUNCgltYXBb MTBdOiB0eXBlIDEsIHJhbmdlIDMyLCBiYXNlIDNmYzAwMDAwLCBzaXplIDIy DQpmb3VuZC0+CXZlbmRvcj0weDEwMTMsIGRldj0weDExMDAsIHJldmlkPTB4 ZWUNCgljbGFzcz0wNi0wNS0wMCwgaGRydHlwZT0weDAwLCBtZmRldj0wDQoJ c3Vib3JkaW5hdGVidXM9MCAJc2Vjb25kYXJ5YnVzPTANCglpbnRwaW49YSwg aXJxPTI1NQ0KCW1hcFsxMF06IHR5cGUgMSwgcmFuZ2UgMzIsIGJhc2UgMDAw MDAzZTAsIHNpemUgIDINCnBjaTA6IDxQQ0kgYnVzPiBvbiBwY2liMA0KY2hp cDE6IDxQQ0kgdG8gT3RoZXIgYnJpZGdlICh2ZW5kb3I9ODA4NiBkZXZpY2U9 MTIzNCk+IGF0IGRldmljZSAxLjAgb24gcGNpMA0KcGNpMDogPE5lb01hZ2lj IE1hZ2ljR3JhcGggMTI4WlYgU1ZHQSBjb250cm9sbGVyPiAodmVuZG9yPTB4 MTBjOCwgZGV2PTB4MDAwMykgYXQgMi4wDQpwY2ljMDogPENpcnJ1cyBMb2dp YyBQRDY3MjkvNjczMCBQQy1DYXJkIENvbnRyb2xsZXI+IHBvcnQgMHgzZTAt MHgzZTMgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDQuMCBvbiBwY2kwDQpJRCBpcyAweDgyDQpJRCBp cyAweDgyDQpwY2ljMDogUG9sbGluZyBtb2RlDQpwY2NhcmQwOiA8UEMgQ2Fy ZCBidXMgKGNsYXNzaWMpPiBvbiBwY2ljMA0KcGNjYXJkMTogPFBDIENhcmQg YnVzIChjbGFzc2ljKT4gb24gcGNpYzANCmlzYTA6IDxJU0EgYnVzPiBvbiBt b3RoZXJib2FyZA0KZXhfaXNhX2lkZW50aWZ5KCkNCnBjaWMtOiBwY2ljMCBl eGlzdHMsIHVzaW5nIG5leHQgYXZhaWxhYmxlIHVuaXQgbnVtYmVyDQpwY2lj LTogcGNpYzEgZXhpc3RzLCB1c2luZyBuZXh0IGF2YWlsYWJsZSB1bml0IG51 bWJlcg0KVHJ5aW5nIFJlYWRfUG9ydCBhdCAyMDMNClRyeWluZyBSZWFkX1Bv cnQgYXQgMjQzDQpUcnlpbmcgUmVhZF9Qb3J0IGF0IDI4Mw0KVHJ5aW5nIFJl YWRfUG9ydCBhdCAyYzMNClRyeWluZyBSZWFkX1BvcnQgYXQgMzAzDQpUcnlp bmcgUmVhZF9Qb3J0IGF0IDM0Mw0KVHJ5aW5nIFJlYWRfUG9ydCBhdCAzODMN ClRyeWluZyBSZWFkX1BvcnQgYXQgM2MzDQppc2FfcHJvYmVfY2hpbGRyZW46 IGRpc2FibGluZyBQblAgZGV2aWNlcw0KaXNhX3Byb2JlX2NoaWxkcmVuOiBw cm9iaW5nIG5vbi1QblAgZGV2aWNlcw0Kb3JtMDogPE9wdGlvbiBST00+IGF0 IGlvbWVtIDB4YzAwMDAtMHhjOWZmZiBvbiBpc2EwDQpmZGMwOiA8TkVDIDcy MDY1QiBvciBjbG9uZT4gYXQgcG9ydCAweDNmMC0weDNmNSwweDNmNyBpcnEg NiBkcnEgMiBvbiBpc2EwDQpmZGMwOiBGSUZPIGVuYWJsZWQsIDggYnl0ZXMg dGhyZXNob2xkDQpmZDA6IDwxNDQwLUtCIDMuNSIgZHJpdmU+IG9uIGZkYzAg ZHJpdmUgMA0KYXRhMDogaW9iYXNlPTB4MDFmMCBhbHRpb2Jhc2U9MHgwM2Y2 IGJtYWRkcj0weDAwMDANCmF0YTA6IG1hc2s9MDMgc3RhdHVzMD01MCBzdGF0 dXMxPTAwDQphdGEwOiBtYXNrPTAzIG9zdGF0MD01MCBvc3RhdDI9MDANCmF0 YTAtbWFzdGVyOiBBVEFQSSBwcm9iZSBhPTAwIGI9MDANCmF0YTAtc2xhdmU6 IEFUQVBJIHByb2JlIGE9MTQgYj1lYg0KYXRhMDogbWFzaz0wMyBzdGF0dXMw PTUwIHN0YXR1czE9MDANCmF0YTAtbWFzdGVyOiBBVEEgcHJvYmUgYT0wMSBi PWE1DQphdGEwOiBkZXZpY2VzPTA5DQphdGEwIGF0IHBvcnQgMHgxZjAtMHgx ZjcsMHgzZjYgaXJxIDE0IG9uIGlzYTANCmF0YTE6IGlvYmFzZT0weDAxNzAg YWx0aW9iYXNlPTB4MDM3NiBibWFkZHI9MHgwMDAwDQphdGExOiBtYXNrPTAw IHN0YXR1czA9ZmYgc3RhdHVzMT1mZg0KYXRhMTogcHJvYmUgYWxsb2NhdGlv biBmYWlsZWQNCmF0YTEgZmFpbGVkIHRvIHByb2JlIGF0IHBvcnQgMHgxNzAt MHgxNzcsMHgzNzYgaXJxIDE1IG9uIGlzYTANCmFkdjAgZmFpbGVkIHRvIHBy b2JlIG9uIGlzYTANCmJ0MDogRmFpbGVkIFN0YXR1cyBSZWcgVGVzdCAtIGZm DQpidF9pc2FfcHJvYmU6IFByb2JlIGZhaWxlZCBhdCAweDMzMA0KYnQwOiBG YWlsZWQgU3RhdHVzIFJlZyBUZXN0IC0gZmYNCmJ0X2lzYV9wcm9iZTogUHJv YmUgZmFpbGVkIGF0IDB4MzM0DQpidDA6IEZhaWxlZCBTdGF0dXMgUmVnIFRl c3QgLSBmZg0KYnRfaXNhX3Byb2JlOiBQcm9iZSBmYWlsZWQgYXQgMHgyMzAN CmJ0MDogRmFpbGVkIFN0YXR1cyBSZWcgVGVzdCAtIGZmDQpidF9pc2FfcHJv YmU6IFByb2JlIGZhaWxlZCBhdCAweDIzNA0KYnQwOiBGYWlsZWQgU3RhdHVz IFJlZyBUZXN0IC0gZmYNCmJ0X2lzYV9wcm9iZTogUHJvYmUgZmFpbGVkIGF0 IDB4MTMwDQpidDA6IEZhaWxlZCBTdGF0dXMgUmVnIFRlc3QgLSBmZg0KYnRf aXNhX3Byb2JlOiBQcm9iZSBmYWlsZWQgYXQgMHgxMzQNCmJ0MCBmYWlsZWQg dG8gcHJvYmUgYXQgcG9ydCAweDEzNC0weDEzNyBvbiBpc2EwDQphaGEwOiBz dGF0dXMgcmVnIHRlc3QgZmFpbGVkIGZmDQphaGEwOiBzdGF0dXMgcmVnIHRl c3QgZmFpbGVkIGZmDQphaGEwOiBzdGF0dXMgcmVnIHRlc3QgZmFpbGVkIGZm DQphaGEwOiBzdGF0dXMgcmVnIHRlc3QgZmFpbGVkIGZmDQphaGEwOiBzdGF0 dXMgcmVnIHRlc3QgZmFpbGVkIGZmDQphaGEwOiBzdGF0dXMgcmVnIHRlc3Qg ZmFpbGVkIGZmDQphaGEwIGZhaWxlZCB0byBwcm9iZSBhdCBwb3J0IDB4MTM0 LTB4MTM3IG9uIGlzYTANCmFpYzAgZmFpbGVkIHRvIHByb2JlIGF0IHBvcnQg MHgxNDAtMHgxNWYgb24gaXNhMA0KYXRrYmRjMDogPEtleWJvYXJkIGNvbnRy b2xsZXIgKGk4MDQyKT4gYXQgcG9ydCAweDYwLDB4NjQgb24gaXNhMA0KYXRr YmQwOiA8QVQgS2V5Ym9hcmQ+IGZsYWdzIDB4MSBpcnEgMSBvbiBhdGtiZGMw DQphdGtiZDogdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQga2JkIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgY29tbWFuZCBi eXRlIDAwNjcNCmF0a2JkOiBrZXlib2FyZCBJRCAweDQxYWIgKDIpDQprYmQw IGF0IGF0a2JkMA0Ka2JkMDogYXRrYmQwLCBBVCAxMDEvMTAyICgyKSwgY29u ZmlnOjB4MSwgZmxhZ3M6MHgzZDAwMDANCnBzbTA6IGN1cnJlbnQgY29tbWFu ZCBieXRlOjAwNjcNCnBzbTA6IDxQUy8yIE1vdXNlPiBpcnEgMTIgb24gYXRr YmRjMA0KcHNtMDogbW9kZWwgR2VuZXJpYyBQUy8yIG1vdXNlLCBkZXZpY2Ug SUQgMC0wMCwgMiBidXR0b25zDQpwc20wOiBjb25maWc6MDAwMDAwMDAsIGZs YWdzOjAwMDAwMDAwLCBwYWNrZXQgc2l6ZTozDQpwc20wOiBzeW5jbWFzazpj MCwgc3luY2JpdHM6MDANCnZnYTA6IDxHZW5lcmljIElTQSBWR0E+IGF0IHBv cnQgMHgzYzAtMHgzZGYgaW9tZW0gMHhhMDAwMC0weGJmZmZmIG9uIGlzYTAN CmZiMDogdmdhMCwgdmdhLCB0eXBlOlZHQSAoNSksIGZsYWdzOjB4NzAwN2YN CmZiMDogcG9ydDoweDNjMC0weDNkZiwgY3J0YzoweDNkNCwgbWVtOjB4YTAw MDAgMHgyMDAwMA0KZmIwOiBpbml0IG1vZGU6MjQsIGJpb3MgbW9kZTozLCBj dXJyZW50IG1vZGU6MjQNCmZiMDogd2luZG93OjB4YzAwYjgwMDAgc2l6ZToz MmsgZ3JhbjozMmssIGJ1ZjowIHNpemU6MzJrDQpWR0EgcGFyYW1ldGVycyB1 cG9uIHBvd2VyLXVwDQo1MCAxOCAxMCAwMCAwMCAwMCAwMyAwMCAwMiA2NyA1 ZiA0ZiA1MCA4MiA1NSA4MSANCmJmIDFmIDAwIDRmIDBkIDBlIDAwIDAwIDA3 IDgwIDljIDhlIDhmIDI4IDFmIDk2IA0KYjkgYTMgZmYgMDAgMDEgMDIgMDMg MDQgMDUgMTQgMDcgMzggMzkgM2EgM2IgM2MgDQozZCAzZSAzZiAwYyAwMCAw ZiAwOCAwMCAwMCAwMCAwMCAwMCAxMCAwZSAwMCBmZiANClZHQSBwYXJhbWV0 ZXJzIGluIEJJT1MgZm9yIG1vZGUgMjQNCjUwIDE4IDEwIDAwIDEwIDAwIDAz IDAwIDAyIDY3IDVmIDRmIDUwIDgyIDU1IDgxIA0KYmYgMWYgMDAgNGYgMGQg MGUgMDAgMDAgMDAgMDAgOWMgOGUgOGYgMjggMWYgOTYgDQpiOSBhMyBmZiAw MCAwMSAwMiAwMyAwNCAwNSAxNCAwNyAzOCAzOSAzYSAzYiAzYyANCjNkIDNl IDNmIDBjIDAwIDBmIDA4IDAwIDAwIDAwIDAwIDAwIDEwIDBlIDAwIGZmIA0K RUdBL1ZHQSBwYXJhbWV0ZXJzIHRvIGJlIHVzZWQgZm9yIG1vZGUgMjQNCjUw IDE4IDEwIDAwIDEwIDAwIDAzIDAwIDAyIDY3IDVmIDRmIDUwIDgyIDU1IDgx IA0KYmYgMWYgMDAgNGYgMGQgMGUgMDAgMDAgMDAgMDAgOWMgOGUgOGYgMjgg MWYgOTYgDQpiOSBhMyBmZiAwMCAwMSAwMiAwMyAwNCAwNSAxNCAwNyAzOCAz OSAzYSAzYiAzYyANCjNkIDNlIDNmIDBjIDAwIDBmIDA4IDAwIDAwIDAwIDAw IDAwIDEwIDBlIDAwIGZmIA0Kc2MwOiA8U3lzdGVtIGNvbnNvbGU+IGF0IGZs YWdzIDB4MTAwIG9uIGlzYTANCnNjMDogVkdBIDwxNiB2aXJ0dWFsIGNvbnNv bGVzLCBmbGFncz0weDMwMD4NCnNjMDogZmIwLCBrYmQwLCB0ZXJtaW5hbCBl bXVsYXRvcjogc2MgKHN5c2NvbnMgdGVybWluYWwpDQpwY2ljMTogQ2Fubm90 IGdldCBJL08gcmFuZ2UNCnBjaWMxIGZhaWxlZCB0byBwcm9iZSBhdCBwb3J0 IDB4M2UwIGlvbWVtIDB4ZDAwMDAgb24gaXNhMA0KcGNpYzI6IG5vdCBwcm9i ZWQgKGRpc2FibGVkKQ0Kc2lvMDogaXJxIG1hcHM6IDB4NDEgMHg1MSAweDQx IDB4NDENCnNpbzAgYXQgcG9ydCAweDNmOC0weDNmZiBpcnEgNCBmbGFncyAw eDEwIG9uIGlzYTANCnNpbzA6IHR5cGUgMTY1NTBBDQpzaW8xOiBjb25maWd1 cmVkIGlycSAzIG5vdCBpbiBiaXRtYXAgb2YgcHJvYmVkIGlycXMgMA0Kc2lv MTogaXJxIG1hcHM6IDB4NDEgMHg0MSAweDQxIDB4NDENCnNpbzE6IHByb2Jl IGZhaWxlZCB0ZXN0KHMpOiAwIDEgMiA0IDYgNyA5DQpzaW8xIGZhaWxlZCB0 byBwcm9iZSBhdCBwb3J0IDB4MmY4LTB4MmZmIGlycSAzIG9uIGlzYTANCnNp bzI6IG5vdCBwcm9iZWQgKGRpc2FibGVkKQ0Kc2lvMzogbm90IHByb2JlZCAo ZGlzYWJsZWQpDQpwcGMwOiBwYXJhbGxlbCBwb3J0IGZvdW5kIGF0IDB4Mzc4 DQpwcGMwOiB1c2luZyBleHRlbmRlZCBJL08gcG9ydCByYW5nZQ0KcHBjMDog RUNQIFNQUCBFQ1ArRVBQIFNQUA0KcHBjMDogPFBhcmFsbGVsIHBvcnQ+IGF0 IHBvcnQgMHgzNzgtMHgzN2YgaXJxIDcgb24gaXNhMA0KcHBjMDogU01DLWxp a2UgY2hpcHNldCAoRUNQL0VQUC9QUzIvTklCQkxFKSBpbiBDT01QQVRJQkxF IG1vZGUNCnBwYzA6IEZJRk8gd2l0aCAxNi8xNi8xNSBieXRlcyB0aHJlc2hv bGQNCnBsaXAwOiA8UExJUCBuZXR3b3JrIGludGVyZmFjZT4gb24gcHBidXMw DQpicGY6IGxwMCBhdHRhY2hlZA0KbHB0MDogPFByaW50ZXI+IG9uIHBwYnVz MA0KbHB0MDogSW50ZXJydXB0LWRyaXZlbiBwb3J0DQpwcGkwOiA8UGFyYWxs ZWwgSS9PPiBvbiBwcGJ1czANCmVkMCBmYWlsZWQgdG8gcHJvYmUgYXQgcG9y dCAweDI4MC0weDI5ZiBpb21lbSAweGQ4MDAwIGlycSAxMCBvbiBpc2EwDQpm ZTAgZmFpbGVkIHRvIHByb2JlIGF0IHBvcnQgMHgzMDAtMHgzMWYgb24gaXNh MA0KaWUwIGZhaWxlZCB0byBwcm9iZSBhdCBwb3J0IDB4MzAwIGlvbWVtIDB4 ZDAwMDAgaXJxIDEwIG9uIGlzYTANCmxuYzAgZmFpbGVkIHRvIHByb2JlIGF0 IHBvcnQgMHgyODAgaXJxIDEwIGRycSAwIG9uIGlzYTANCmNzMCBmYWlsZWQg dG8gcHJvYmUgYXQgcG9ydCAweDMwMC0weDMxZiBvbiBpc2EwDQpzbjAgZmFp bGVkIHRvIHByb2JlIGF0IHBvcnQgMHgzMDAtMHgzMGYgaXJxIDEwIG9uIGlz YTANCmlzYV9wcm9iZV9jaGlsZHJlbjogcHJvYmluZyBQblAgZGV2aWNlcw0K QklPUyBHZW9tZXRyaWVzOg0KIDA6MDMxMjNmM2YgMC4uNzg2PTc4NyBjeWxp bmRlcnMsIDAuLjYzPTY0IGhlYWRzLCAxLi42Mz02MyBzZWN0b3JzDQogMCBh Y2NvdW50ZWQgZm9yDQpEZXZpY2UgY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiBmaW5pc2hlZC4N CmJwZjogbG8wIGF0dGFjaGVkDQpicGY6IHBwcDAgYXR0YWNoZWQNCm5ldyBt YXNrczogYmlvIDY4NDA0MCwgdHR5IDYzMTA5MiwgbmV0IDY3MTA5Mg0KYnBm OiBzbDAgYXR0YWNoZWQNCmJwZjogZmFpdGgwIGF0dGFjaGVkDQpDcmVhdGlu ZyBESVNLIGFkMA0KYWQwOiA8SUJNLURETEEtMjE2MjAvQTIwRzQwPiBBVEEt MyBkaXNrIGF0IGF0YTAtbWFzdGVyDQphZDA6IDE1NTFNQiAoMzE3NzIxNiBz ZWN0b3JzKSwgMzE1MiBjeWxzLCAxNiBoZWFkcywgNjMgUy9ULCA1MTIgQi9T DQphZDA6IDE2IHNlY3MvaW50LCAxIGRlcHRoIHF1ZXVlLCBCSU9TUElPDQph ZDA6IHBpb21vZGU9NCBkbWFtb2RlPTIgdWRtYW1vZGU9LTEgY2JsaWQ9MA0K YWQwOiAxNTUxTUIgPElCTS1ERExBLTIxNjIwPiBbMzE1Mi8xNi82M10gYXQg YXRhMC1tYXN0ZXIgQklPU1BJTw0KYXRhMC1zbGF2ZTogcGlvbW9kZT0zIGRt YW1vZGU9MSB1ZG1hbW9kZT0tMSBkbWFmbGFnPTENCmFjZDA6IDxDRC1ST00g Q0RSX04xMTAvMS4wOD4gQ0RST00gZHJpdmUgYXQgYXRhMCBhcyBzbGF2ZQ0K YWNkMDogcmVhZCAxNzIyS0IvcyAoNTcwMDVLQi9zKSwgMTI4S0IgYnVmZmVy LCBCSU9TUElPDQphY2QwOiBSZWFkczogQ0QtREENCmFjZDA6IEF1ZGlvOiBw bGF5LCAyNTYgdm9sdW1lIGxldmVscw0KYWNkMDogTWVjaGFuaXNtOiBlamVj dGFibGUgdHJheQ0KYWNkMDogTWVkaXVtOiBuby9ibGFuayBkaXNjIGluc2lk ZSwgdW5sb2NrZWQNCk1vdW50aW5nIHJvb3QgZnJvbSB1ZnM6L2Rldi9hZDBz MWENCmFkMHMxOiB0eXBlIDB4YTUsIHN0YXJ0IDYzLCBlbmQgPSAzMTc3MjE1 LCBzaXplIDMxNzcxNTMgOiBPSw0Kc3RhcnRfaW5pdDogdHJ5aW5nIC9zYmlu L2luaXQNCkxpbnV4LUVMRiBleGVjIGhhbmRsZXIgaW5zdGFsbGVkDQo= --0-2056722099-1000694411=:7651-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 19:47:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nero.lastamericanempire.com (con-64-133-48-46-CHE.sprinthome.com [64.133.48.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE2837B409 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nero.lastamericanempire.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3D54EF801; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:45:48 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:45:48 -0600 From: z thompson To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: installworld error Message-ID: <20010916204548.A52652@nero.nero.lastamericanempire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm getting the following error with make installworld: if [ -h /usr/include/ufs/ffs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/ufs/ffs; fi if [ -h /usr/include/ufs/mfs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/ufs/mfs; fi if [ -h /usr/include/ufs/ufs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/ufs/ufs; fi if [ -h /usr/include/dev/ppbus ]; then rm -f /usr/include/dev/ppbus; fi if [ -h /usr/include/dev/usb ]; then rm -f /usr/include/dev/usb; fi if [ -h /usr/include/machine ]; then rm -f /usr/include/machine; fi mtree -deU -f /usr/src/include/../etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 cam/*.h /usr/include/cam install: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/src/include. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Any ideas? I cvsupped early on 8/16. Cheers, Zach Thompson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 19:59:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-28-046.nc.rr.com [66.57.28.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F56C37B40C for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:59:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8H2vV502123; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:57:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from localhost (marcus@localhost) by shumai.marcuscom.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8H2xL366697; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:59:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shumai.marcuscom.com: marcus owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:59:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Joe Clarke To: Kenneth Mays Cc: Subject: Re: 4.4RC5: kldunload crashes with custom kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20010916225819.P66653-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Why are you compiling sound into your kernel, then loading it again via kldload? This just seems like a bad thing to do anyway. Joe On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Kenneth Mays wrote: > 1. Recompile kernel implementing "device pcm, device sbc0..." change > 2. Reboot and log on as root. > 3. Type "startx" to go into KDE. Wait till hear music from KDE successfully > starting (shows main GUI screen). > 4. Open up a console windows and type "kldload snd". Wait till the snd > modules load. > 5. Type "kldunload". See if it cleanly unloads the snd modules or crashes > your system. > > I originally did this test with the GENERIC kernel without recompiling. The > test completed successfully. I recompiled my kernel to get the sound working > like I always do - nothing different. I tried the test again and when I > typed kldunload the system locked up and rebooted. I was rebooted the second > time I tried to start KDE after the first reboot. The third time I restarted > KDE, I could get into KDE successfully. > > Don't do this at home, kids. > > Ken > 4.4RC5 > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 20:39:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.freebsd.org (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42ECC37B406 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8H3dEl36083; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:39:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@freebsd.org) To: chad@DCFinc.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update on 4.4 release date In-Reply-To: <20010916143803.A22183@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <20010915184404Y.jkh@freebsd.org> <20010916143803.A22183@freeway.dcfinc.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010916203914Y.jkh@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:39:14 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 21 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG No, this doesn't imply anything like that. From: "Chad R. Larson" Subject: Re: Update on 4.4 release date Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 14:38:03 -0700 > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 06:44:04PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > o We're very close to being ready with the RELENG_4_4 branch (AKA > > 4.4.0-STABLE)... > > Is this to imply we're going back to point releases rather than > patches along the "very stable" branch? > > That is, would we have a "4.4.6-STABLE" rather than "4.4-STABLE-p6"? > If so, I approve. > > -crl > -- > Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? > chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com > DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 21:31:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.de (mailout04.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9059E37B401 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd05.sul.t-online.de by mailout04.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 15iq49-0005oU-01; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:31:29 +0200 Received: from gateway.dmz.nich (520051413077-0001@[62.226.109.189]) by fmrl05.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 15iq46-19ElY8C; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:31:26 +0200 Received: from hatnix.weiss.nich (hatnix.weiss.nich [10.10.0.2]) by gateway.dmz.nich (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 76AE117C6B for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 07:45:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hempel-siegwarth.de (thor.weiss.nich [10.10.10.2]) by hatnix.weiss.nich (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386)) with ESMTP id 1C543E5B2 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:33:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3BA57D08.D0B6796A@hempel-siegwarth.de> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:33:12 +0200 From: Thorsten Hempel Reply-To: mail@hempel-siegwarth.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 520051413077-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG auth e111d358 subscribe freebsd-stable mail@hempel-siegwarth.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 21:52:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx.skyinet.net (mx.skyinet.net [202.78.97.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A5C37B40B; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hellraiser.cannoncreek.com (unknown [202.78.115.201]) by mx.skyinet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id DC3FD1B37B; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:52:21 +0800 (PHT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mars G Miro Reply-To: mars@cannoncreek.com To: jdp@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup bin/src packages MD5 checksum needed Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:03:57 +0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <00de01c13f38$e06c58c0$4500a8c0@nomad> In-Reply-To: <00de01c13f38$e06c58c0$4500a8c0@nomad> Received: from the Dark Corners of Oblivion (172.16.1.254) X-Sender-Ip: 172.16.1.254 X-Copyright: 2001, Mars G. Miro, All Rights Reserved X-Notice: Redistribution and Duplication prohibited without proper consent of the Author MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01091713035700.00845@hellraiser.cannoncreek.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Not so long ago, in a computer not so far away, on Monday 17 September 2001 13:23, John Polstra" scribed: > > Mars G Miro wrote: > > > Hello, > > > Is it possible? the only ones we have are the ones in > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jdp , but not the ones in > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jdp/s1g/ > > > > I'm not sure what you're saying, but I have added MD5 checksums to > > the web page at http://people.freebsd.org/~jdp/s1g/ this morning. > > err, sorry if it wasn't clearly stated... but that's exactly what I meant. Thanks! > > John > > -- > > John Polstra > > jdp@polstra.com > > > John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington > > USA > > > "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam > > Trungpa > (just being paranoid) cheers mars -- "Asked by reporters about his upcoming marriage to a forty-two-year-old woman, director Roman Polanski told reporters, `The way I look at it, she's the equivalent of three fourteen-year-olds.'" -- David Letterman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 22: 4:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D82637B407; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8H54Vu05526; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:04:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f8H54VW26309; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:04:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109170504.f8H54VW26309@harmony.village.org> To: "Chad R. Larson" Subject: Re: Update on 4.4 release date Cc: Jordan Hubbard , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Sep 2001 14:38:03 PDT." <20010916143803.A22183@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <20010916143803.A22183@freeway.dcfinc.com> <20010915184404Y.jkh@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:04:31 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010916143803.A22183@freeway.dcfinc.com> "Chad R. Larson" writes: : On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 06:44:04PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: : > o We're very close to being ready with the RELENG_4_4 branch (AKA : > 4.4.0-STABLE)... : : Is this to imply we're going back to point releases rather than : patches along the "very stable" branch? : : That is, would we have a "4.4.6-STABLE" rather than "4.4-STABLE-p6"? : If so, I approve. Unless Jordan tells me differently, I'm going to continue to do the -pX suffix for 4.4. The reason for that is that we don't reroll the release for each one of these. Now, if we do, well, I'll jump off that bridge when we come to it. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 22: 6:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D86937B40B for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8H56Ju05540; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:06:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f8H56IW26341; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:06:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109170506.f8H56IW26341@harmony.village.org> To: doug@safeport.com Subject: Re: pccard does not work with Cirrus Logic CL-PD6730, 2.01 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:40:11 EDT." References: Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:06:18 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message doug@safeport.com writes: : pcic0@pci0:4:0: class=0x060500 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11001013 rev=0xee hdr=0x00 The CL-PD6729/30 only kinda work with 4.4 code right now. I've not completely fixed it. Thanks for the report. This chip is a lot more common than I thought it would be. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 22:22: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nasu.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (nasu.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.128.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19FE37B401 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:21:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nantai.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp by nasu.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.11.2/1.1.29.3/26Jan01-1134AM) id f8H5L95152414; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:21:09 +0900 (JST) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp by nantai.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.11.2/1.1.29.3/30Jan01-0241PM) id f8H5L9u201558; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:21:09 +0900 (JST) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (IDENT:mVU5aFLs/EOJVc3adefgqdu2F8aszWPC@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.43.7]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/zodiac-May2000) with ESMTP id OAA17161; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:30:49 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200109170530.OAA17161@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: Claus Assmann Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: Keyboard NCD N-123UX doesn't work with 4.x? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:26:25 MST." <20010915092625.A1086@zardoc.esmtp.org> References: <20010915092625.A1086@zardoc.esmtp.org> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:30:48 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >My NCD keyboard N-123UX doesn't seem to work with FreeBSD 4.2 and >FreeBSD 4.4-RC on two PCs and one laptop. It works fine with FreeBSD >3.2 and OpenBSD 2.9-current (two machines are dual boot: one 3.2 >and 4.2, the other 4.4-RC and OpenBSD-current, so it shouldn't be >a hardware problem). No key is echoed at the Login: prompt after >the machine boots up with 4.x (at least for those two versions I >have available). Here's the dmesg part from one of the machines: > >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 > >Any idea how I can get the keyboard working with 4.x? Hmm, strange... Please add the following line to your kernel configuration file for 4.2 and 4.4-RC, and rebuild the kernel. options KBDIO_DEBUG=2 When starting the new kernel, enter "boot -v" at the loader prompt (I expect the keyboard is working before the kernel is started). Then, send me entire dmesg output. Thank you. Kazu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 23: 0:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts5.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC3C37B409; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TMA-1.brad-x.com ([64.228.80.123]) by tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP id <20010914220457.FMWL22914.tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net@TMA-1.brad-x.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 18:04:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.brad-x.com [127.0.0.1]) by TMA-1.brad-x.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8937B0C4; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 18:05:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 18:05:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Brad Laue To: George Reid Cc: j mckitrick , Subject: Re: FIXME! snd_pcm.ko kernel panic In-Reply-To: <20010914222935.A68383@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20010914180424.Y35642-100000@TMA-1.brad-x.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Upon patching the sources and recompiling, I kldunloaded snd_pcm.ko while snd_maestro3.ko was still loaded, and attempted to play an mp3; kernel panic ensued. Brad // -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- // On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, George Reid wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 05:17:56PM -0400, Brad Laue wrote: > > Great! Any chance I can get you to send me an unofficial patch in the > > meantime? > > Sure: http://people.freebsd.org/~greid/src/newpcm-kld2.diff > > Apply in /usr/src/sys/dev/sound > > -- > +-------------------+---------------------+ > | George Reid | FreeBSD Committer | > | +44 7740 197460 | greid@FreeBSD.org | > +-------------------+---------------------+ > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 23: 6:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E09737B408 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by pemaquid.safeport.com (8.11.5/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8H66hE67828; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 02:06:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 02:06:43 -0400 (EDT) From: To: Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pccard does not work with Cirrus Logic CL-PD6730, 2.01 In-Reply-To: <200109170506.f8H56IW26341@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, I am not sure how much of the traffic comes from me :) I think the Dell LM models around 1996-7 used this chip. At least I two LM's (a 133 and a 166) that have it. Happily some developers have the 7500 I use for work. I try again from time-to-time. On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Warner Losh wrote: > In message doug@safeport.com writes: > : pcic0@pci0:4:0: class=0x060500 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11001013 rev=0xee hdr=0x00 > > The CL-PD6729/30 only kinda work with 4.4 code right now. I've not > completely fixed it. Thanks for the report. This chip is a lot more > common than I thought it would be. > > Warner > _____ Douglas Denault doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 16 23:38:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rshb.com.ru (rshb.com.ru [195.162.58.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F1B37B406 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rshb.com.ru (vampiro.rsb.local [192.168.1.111]) by rshb.com.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8H6cPn04102 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:38:25 +0700 (OMSST) (envelope-from admin@rshb.com.ru) Message-ID: <3BA59A71.9080102@rshb.com.ru> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:38:41 +0700 From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010917 X-Accept-Language: ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RELENG_4_4: random kernel traps with ipfilter(?) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi. i've cvsup'ed yesterday with RELENG_4_4 tag and got strange traps and freezes with ipfilter(?) (both kernel compiled in and module). maximum uptime was about 75 minutes without any messages in /var/log/messages. haven't made debug kernel yet - is it known `feature' or I am the only lamb who put RELENG_4_4 on production server ? i would appreciate any way (other then debug kernel) to find out the reason. -- VAMPIRO-RIPN p.'s i've recvsup'ed source tree several times from different servers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 0: 4:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dart.sr.se (dart.SR.SE [193.12.91.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2CA37B405 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from honken.sr.se ([134.25.128.27]) by dart.sr.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA53603; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:04:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gunnar@pluto.sr.se) Received: from pluto.sr.se (pluto.SR.SE [134.25.193.91]) by honken.sr.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04907; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:04:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gunnar@pluto.sr.se) Received: (from root@localhost) by pluto.sr.se (8.11.6/8.11.1) id f8H74RN01122; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:04:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gunnar) Received: (from gunnar@localhost) by pluto.sr.se (8.11.6/8.11.1av) id f8H74NR01114; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:04:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gunnar) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:04:23 +0200 From: Gunnar Flygt To: FreeBSD Stable Cc: Jarrod.Sayers@unisa.edu.au Subject: Re: Building x11/gnome from ports Message-ID: <20010917090423.A984@sr.se> Reply-To: Gunnar Flygt Mail-Followup-To: Gunnar Flygt , FreeBSD Stable , Jarrod.Sayers@unisa.edu.au References: <20010917062243.V16003-100000@sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au> <49180.64.164.130.170.1000689340.squirrel@www.gaultopia.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <49180.64.164.130.170.1000689340.squirrel@www.gaultopia.org>; from e@gaultopia.org on Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 09:15:40PM -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 09:15:40PM -0400, Erik Gault wrote: > i was able to get it to build a few weeks ago by independently building > the guile-gnome package and then installing x11/gnome. i may have > done some other minor fiddling, i can't remember exactly, but i was > able to get it to build. sorry i don't have more detailed information... > > erik > > > > While trying to install x11/gnome from the ports tree, one of its > > runtime dependancies is x11-toolkits/guile-gnome which fails to > build. > > It dies with the following: > > > > ----- > > ===> Building for guile-gnome-0.20_3 > > make all-recursive > > Making all in guile-gnome > > Making all in zvt > > Making all in bonobo > > Making all in gtkhtml > > guile -l ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm -s > > ./../../guile-gtk/build-guile-gtk -I ../../guile-gtk glue > > ./gtkhtml.defs > .tmpg && mv .tmpg gtkhtml-glue.c > > ERROR: In procedure open-file: > > ERROR: No such file or directory: "../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm" *** > > Error code 2 > > > > Stop in > > > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/guile-gnome/work/gnome-guile-0.20/guile-gno > me/gtkhtml. I compiled gnome this night. It stopped at the same place. I went to that directory, did `make clean` `make` and everything was OK again. Gnome installed full way. > > *** Error code 1 > > ----- > > > > There is still an open PR ports/29463 but thats a compilation > problem. > > > > This seems to be parsing a file called ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm > > which doesn't exist, ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm.in exists though > > and if you try to use it, errors, ERROR: Unbound variable: > > @USING_LTDL_SCM@ appear. > > > > Any ideas? The ports tree is cvsupped off RELEASE_4_4_0 > yesterday. > > > > TIA, > > > > Jarrod Sayers > > Information Technologist > > School of Communication, Information and New Media > > University of South Australia, Magill Campus. > > Phone: +61 8 83024045 > > Fax: +61 8 83024745 > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \<,_ email: flygt@sr.se ---- (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 0:33:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from akira.corpex.com (akira.corpex.com [195.153.247.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D9E037B407 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 79979 invoked by uid 110); 17 Sep 2001 07:33:34 -0000 Date: 17 Sep 2001 07:33:34 -0000 Message-ID: <20010917073334.79978.qmail@akira.corpex.com> To: markm@freebsd.org, steve@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: AnnaCam@sexbot.com (ANNA) Subject: I WILL TEACH YOU TO HAVE SEX - MY CAN IS ON FOR YOU Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by ANNA (AnnaCam@sexbot.com) on Monday, September 17, 2001 at 08:33:34 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- message: Hello my friend My cam is always on for you.....for your sex I cannot forget all the words that you told me last saturday while my wet pussy was open for you. Now you can connect to my CAM directly from my home page http://www.freebox.com/livesex I will teach you how to do. I have a new software for that. You'll find me nude waiting you. Don't leave me alone without you Anna --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 0:45: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CD437B409 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:44:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sobek.lan ([62.252.8.96]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010917074453.TWFL710.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@sobek.lan>; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:44:53 +0100 Received: (from greid@localhost) by sobek.lan (8.11.5/8.11.5) id f8H7ioB73328; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:44:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from greid@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: sobek.lan: greid set sender to greid@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:44:50 +0100 From: George Reid To: Brad Laue Cc: j mckitrick , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FIXME! snd_pcm.ko kernel panic Message-ID: <20010917084450.A73303@FreeBSD.org> References: <20010914222935.A68383@FreeBSD.org> <20010914180424.Y35642-100000@TMA-1.brad-x.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010914180424.Y35642-100000@TMA-1.brad-x.com>; from brad@brad-x.com on Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:05:11PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:05:11PM -0400, Brad Laue wrote: > Upon patching the sources and recompiling, I kldunloaded snd_pcm.ko while > snd_maestro3.ko was still loaded, and attempted to play an mp3; kernel > panic ensued. > > Brad You need to make sure you've recompiled both snd_pcm.ko and snd_maestro3.ko by doing ``make'' in each of /sys/modules/sound/pcm and /sys/modules/sound/driver/maestro3 followed by ``make install''. -- +-------------------+---------------------+ | George Reid | FreeBSD Committer | | +44 7740 197460 | greid@FreeBSD.org | +-------------------+---------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 0:46:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.org.ru (sweet.etrust.ru [194.84.67.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED1637B406 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by freebsd.org.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8E08525C; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:45:35 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:45:35 +0400 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" To: z thompson Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installworld error Message-ID: <20010917114535.B58520@freebsd.org.ru> References: <20010916204548.A52652@nero.nero.lastamericanempire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20010916204548.A52652@nero.nero.lastamericanempire.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 08:45:48PM -0600, z thompson wrote: > > I'm getting the following error with make installworld: > > if [ -h /usr/include/ufs/ffs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/ufs/ffs; fi > if [ -h /usr/include/ufs/mfs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/ufs/mfs; fi > if [ -h /usr/include/ufs/ufs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/ufs/ufs; fi > if [ -h /usr/include/dev/ppbus ]; then rm -f /usr/include/dev/ppbus; > fi > if [ -h /usr/include/dev/usb ]; then rm -f /usr/include/dev/usb; fi > if [ -h /usr/include/machine ]; then rm -f /usr/include/machine; fi > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/include/../etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p > /usr/include > cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 cam/*.h > /usr/include/cam > install: not found > *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/src/include. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > Any ideas? I cvsupped early on 8/16. Looks like you have not /usr/obj with complete buildworld. -- Rgdz, /"\ Sergey Osokin aka oZZ, \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN osa@freebsd.org.ru X AGAINST HTML MAIL http://freebsd.org.ru/~osa/ / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 0:48:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7958A37B403 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sexta.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.16.13] ident=exim) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1) id 15it98-00021D-00; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:48:50 +0300 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sexta.cs.huji.ac.il ident=danny) by sexta.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp (Exim 3.15 #1) id 15it97-0000nD-00; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:48:49 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-0.24 To: FreeBSD Stable Cc: Warner Losh Subject: pci/pcic cards Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:48:49 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, I have 2 different cards: (pcmcia interface?) pci1: (vendor=0x16ab, dev=0x1103) at 7.0 irq 9 pci1: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x1042) at 7.0 irq 9 any way i can get them to work? I also have an Orinoco/Lucent isa which is almost working - once i get a free irq :-) thanks, danny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 1:38: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from finch-post-10.mail.demon.net (finch-post-10.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1563037B403; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 01:37:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vilnya.demon.co.uk ([158.152.19.238]) by finch-post-10.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15itud-000MOV-0A; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:37:55 +0000 Received: from haveblue (haveblue.rings [10.2.4.5]) by vilnya.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id C3AED32622; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:36:31 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <003901c13f53$efb422c0$0504020a@haveblue> From: "Cameron Grant" To: "Brad Laue" , "George Reid" Cc: "j mckitrick" , References: <20010914180424.Y35642-100000@TMA-1.brad-x.com> Subject: Re: FIXME! snd_pcm.ko kernel panic Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:37:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Upon patching the sources and recompiling, I kldunloaded snd_pcm.ko while > snd_maestro3.ko was still loaded, and attempted to play an mp3; kernel > panic ensued. this should be impossible in two ways: 1. snd_maestro3 depends on snd_pcm so the module system should not permit snd_maestro3 to be present in the systemwithout snd_pcm . 2. if you just load snd_maestro3, snd_pcm will be autoloaded. an autoloaded module cannot be unloaded manually. -cg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 1:51:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au (sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au [130.220.227.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF89437B408 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 01:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (sayersjm@localhost) by sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f8H8pIc74607; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:21:18 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from Jarrod.Sayers@unisa.edu.au) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:21:18 +0930 (CST) From: Jarrod Sayers X-X-Sender: To: Gunnar Flygt Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Building x11/gnome from ports In-Reply-To: <20010917090423.A984@sr.se> Message-ID: <20010917175628.U66934-100000@sanctuary.magill.unisa.edu.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Gunnar Flygt wrote: > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:04:23 +0200 > From: Gunnar Flygt > To: FreeBSD Stable > Cc: Jarrod.Sayers@unisa.edu.au > Subject: Re: Building x11/gnome from ports > [snip] > > > While trying to install x11/gnome from the ports tree, one of its > > > runtime dependancies is x11-toolkits/guile-gnome which fails to > > build. > > > It dies with the following: > > > > > > ----- > > > ===> Building for guile-gnome-0.20_3 > > > make all-recursive > > > Making all in guile-gnome > > > Making all in zvt > > > Making all in bonobo > > > Making all in gtkhtml > > > guile -l ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm -s > > > ./../../guile-gtk/build-guile-gtk -I ../../guile-gtk glue > > > ./gtkhtml.defs > .tmpg && mv .tmpg gtkhtml-glue.c > > > ERROR: In procedure open-file: > > > ERROR: No such file or directory: "../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm" *** > > > Error code 2 > > > > > > Stop in > > > > > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/guile-gnome/work/gnome-guile-0.20/guile-gno > > me/gtkhtml. > > I compiled gnome this night. It stopped at the same place. I went to > that directory, did `make clean` `make` and everything was OK again. > Gnome installed full way. Found the problem, it appears that a guile-gnome will only build if gtkhtml is instaled before the configure script is run. The configure script of guile-gnome goes looking for gtkhtml when its run and if it does not find it, the guile-gnome port wont build. But as a part of the guile-gnome code is gtkhtml, this is why it works the second time around, after a 'make clean' the configure script has to be re-run, and it finds it. Can someone test this patch for the ports Makefile making it install gtkhtml before the guile-gnome port? Im out of machines without it :) --- ports/x11-toolkits/guile-gnome/Makefile Sun Sep 16 15:38:10 2001 +++ ports/x11-toolkits/guile-gnome/Makefile.new Mon Sep 17 18:20:15 2001 @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ MAINTAINER= gnome@FreeBSD.org +BUILD_DEPENDS= gnome-gtkhtml-editor:${PORTSDIR}/www/gtkhtml + LIB_DEPENDS= guilegtk-1.2.0:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/guile-gtk USE_LIBTOOL= yes I may be barking up the wrong tree but my builds have begun working again. Jarrod Sayers Information Technologist School of Communication, Information and New Media University of South Australia, Magill Campus. Phone: +61 8 83024045 Fax: +61 8 83024745 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 2:47:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hq1.tyfon.net (hq1.tyfon.net [217.27.162.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4916237B401 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 02:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hq1.tyfon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BECB1C813 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:47:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hq1.tyfon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA09D1C7F0 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:47:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:47:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Dan Larsson To: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: mergemaster error in 4.4-STABLE? Message-ID: <20010917114428.G1022-100000@hq1.tyfon.net> Organization: Tyfon Svenska AB X-NCC-NIC: DL1999-RIPE X-NCC-RegID: se.tyfon MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Virus-Scanned: by hq1.tyfon.net Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG (cvsup and build yesterday with install today) after doing installworld I ran mergemaster. The below is the output of "cd /dev && /bin/sh MAKEDEV all": *** You installed a new /dev/MAKEDEV script, so make sure that you run 'cd /dev && /bin/sh MAKEDEV all' to rebuild your devices Would you like to run it now? y or n [n] y Running cd /dev && /bin/sh MAKEDEV all MAKEDEV: arith: syntax error: "^Hà\x85^N^H^\\x86^N^HÈ\x85^N^Hà\x85^N^Hé\x85^N^Hë\x85^N^Hî\x85^N^H^\\x86^N^H" bad node: mknod i4bteld1 Is this something to worry about? Regards +------ Dan Larsson -+- Tyfon Svenska AB -+- DL1999-RIPE 2AA5 90AE 5185 5924 1E0B 1A99 EC8A EA84 406B 06B9 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 2:52:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (pc-62-31-42-140-hy.blueyonder.co.uk [62.31.42.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF8837B40B; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 02:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nik@localhost) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f8H9Xl577538; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:33:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nik) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:33:47 +0100 From: Nik Clayton To: Scott Corey Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: FreeBSD Books Message-ID: <20010917103347.T18986@clan.nothing-going-on.org> References: <3BA429AB.5F261D83@bsdprophet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0iexB5Bk8cF8G6DP" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BA429AB.5F261D83@bsdprophet.org>; from Scott@bsdprophet.org on Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:25:15PM -0500 Organization: FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --0iexB5Bk8cF8G6DP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:25:15PM -0500, Scott Corey wrote: > Quite awhile back I remember that there were some FreeBSD books in the > making i.e. "Advanced BSD System Administration" provisional title and > "BSD in a Nutshell" what happened to them? Still in progress, I believe. "BSD in a Nutshell" is being written by Brett Glass, "Advanced BSD System Administration" (I think that's the correct title) is being written by Greg Lehey. N --=20 FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- --0iexB5Bk8cF8G6DP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjulw3sACgkQk6gHZCw343UGJwCeIUv6BeK97iw+OCEAn5DkqNS3 U/kAnRLTEGx/kcYBoGlcPoJXSwcys5CS =w7Y2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0iexB5Bk8cF8G6DP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 2:52:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rapidsite.net (mail.rapidsite.net [207.158.192.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06F2E37B407 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 02:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r00.nat.boca.verio.net (208.55.254.110) by mail.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.60s) with SMTP id 022086474 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 05:52:39 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Jason Vervlied To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mergemaster error in 4.4-STABLE? Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 05:52:38 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <20010917114428.G1022-100000@hq1.tyfon.net> In-Reply-To: <20010917114428.G1022-100000@hq1.tyfon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Loop-Detect: 1 Message-Id: <20010917095244.06F2E37B407@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday 17 September 2001 05:47 am, you wrote: > (cvsup and build yesterday with install today) > > after doing installworld I ran mergemaster. The below is the > output of "cd /dev && /bin/sh MAKEDEV all": > > *** You installed a new /dev/MAKEDEV script, so make sure that you run > 'cd /dev && /bin/sh MAKEDEV all' to rebuild your devices > > Would you like to run it now? y or n [n] y > Running cd /dev && /bin/sh MAKEDEV all > > MAKEDEV: arith: syntax error: > "^Hà\x85^N^H^\\x86^N^HÈ\x85^N^Hà\x85^N^Hé\x85^N^Hë\x85^N^Hî\x85^N^H^\\x86^N >^H" > > bad node: mknod i4bteld1 > > Just to note, I recieved the same error myself. -- jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 3:38:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5600A37B403 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 03:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f8HAbqM77160; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:37:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:37:52 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Kris Kennaway Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make buildworld compile errors Message-ID: <20010917133752.B74429@sunbay.com> References: <20010915140744.16306.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net> <20010915152705.B11447@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010915152705.B11447@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 03:27:05PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 03:27:05PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:07:44AM -0700, todorov@space.com wrote: > > Hello, I've recenly installed FreeBSD 4.1 and cvsup-ed to 4.4 (which is now stable as far as i know) and when i run make buildworld the following errors occured (the following text is from taken after doing make -j4 buildworld, when the errors occur) : > > FAQ: source upgrades from 4.1-R do not work. > I'm working on this. -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 3:44:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561C737B406 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 03:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f8HAhGw77784; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:43:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:43:16 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make -j4 vs -j8... 4 works, but 8 does not Message-ID: <20010917134316.C74429@sunbay.com> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010915123606.035fcc18@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010915123606.035fcc18@192.168.0.12>; from mike@sentex.net on Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:38:30PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:38:30PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > Should a parallel build always work ? I was just trying to stress a new > series of MB we are evaluating and to my suprise, -j4 works, but not -j8 > > ===> usr.sbin/boot0cfg > rm -f .depend > mkdep -f .depend > -a -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include > /usr/src/usr.sbin/boot0cfg/boot0cfg.c > cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/boot0cfg; make _EXTRADEPEND > echo boot0cfg: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > Try running with -dj as well and see what happens. You may also want to use -P. That should definitely work, and if it doesn't we need to fix it. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 4:38: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nero.lastamericanempire.com (con-64-133-48-46-CHE.sprinthome.com [64.133.48.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BACF37B40D for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nero.lastamericanempire.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 22CFEF801; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 05:36:50 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 05:36:50 -0600 From: z thompson To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installworld error Message-ID: <20010917053650.B65010@nero.nero.lastamericanempire.com> References: <20010916204548.A52652@nero.nero.lastamericanempire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010916204548.A52652@nero.nero.lastamericanempire.com>; from cublai@lastamericanempire.com on Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 08:45:48PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * z thompson [010916 20:46]: > > I'm getting the following error with make installworld: > > if [ -h /usr/include/ufs/ffs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/ufs/ffs; fi > if [ -h /usr/include/ufs/mfs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/ufs/mfs; fi > if [ -h /usr/include/ufs/ufs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/ufs/ufs; fi > if [ -h /usr/include/dev/ppbus ]; then rm -f /usr/include/dev/ppbus; > fi > if [ -h /usr/include/dev/usb ]; then rm -f /usr/include/dev/usb; fi > if [ -h /usr/include/machine ]; then rm -f /usr/include/machine; fi > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/include/../etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p > /usr/include > cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 cam/*.h > /usr/include/cam > install: not found > *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/src/include. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > > Any ideas? I cvsupped early on 8/16. Small mistype. I updated src on 9/16. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 4:39:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F78E37B411; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 04:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8HBdq939363; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 07:39:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010917073626.040c5470@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 07:39:51 -0400 To: Ruslan Ermilov From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: make -j4 vs -j8... 4 works, but 8 does not Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20010917134316.C74429@sunbay.com> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010915123606.035fcc18@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010915123606.035fcc18@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 01:43 PM 9/17/2001 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > ===> usr.sbin/boot0cfg > > rm -f .depend > > mkdep -f .depend > > -a -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include > > /usr/src/usr.sbin/boot0cfg/boot0cfg.c > > cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/boot0cfg; make _EXTRADEPEND > > echo boot0cfg: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > > 1 error > > *** Error code 2 > > 1 error > > *** Error code 2 > > >Try running with -dj as well and see what happens. >You may also want to use -P. I think the issue might have been due to the CPUTYPE=686 vs i686 typo on my part. Changing it to that fixed the problem it seems. ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 6: 4:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rshb.com.ru (rshb.com.ru [195.162.58.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D006937B409 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rshb.com.ru (vampiro.rsb.local [192.168.1.111]) by rshb.com.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8HD4Sp07477 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:04:28 +0700 (OMSST) (envelope-from admin@rshb.com.ru) Message-ID: <3BA5F4EB.9000308@rshb.com.ru> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:04:43 +0700 From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010917 X-Accept-Language: ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_4_4: random kernel traps with ipfilter(?) References: <3BA59A71.9080102@rshb.com.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > i've cvsup'ed yesterday with RELENG_4_4 tag and got strange traps and > freezes with ipfilter(?) (both kernel compiled in and module). I've found out new details: kernel panics or freezes occurs with enabled ipmon only. I'll miss this pretty thing. -- VAMPIRO-RIPN To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Sep 17 6:13:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail4.txucom.net (mail4.txucom.net [207.70.175.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E49B37B40B for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 06:13:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6205 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2001 13:13:33 -0000 Received: from lfkn-adsl-pwoodahec.txucom.net (HELO luftx.net) ([207.70.146.31]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.txucom.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 17 Sep 2001 13:13:33 -0000 Message-ID: <3BA5F6FC.F381989A@luftx.net> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:13:32 -0500 From: Robert Small X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: dc0: watchdog timeout Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I did a build/installworld on Saturday: FreeBSD blackhole.luftx.net 4.4-STABLE FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #16: Sat Sep 15 12:16:39 CDT 2000 Built/installed a new kernel (and ran mergemaster), and since then I keep getting: dc0: watchdog timeout Any ideas? This didn't appear till after the system was rebooted. Any ideas? Robert dmesg: FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #16: Sat Sep 15 12:16:39 CDT 2001 robert@blackhole.luftx.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLACKHOLE Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor (501.14-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x58c Stepping = 12 Features=0x8021bf AMD Features=0x80000800 real memory = 268369920 (262080K bytes) avail memory = 257323008 (251292K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc03ec000. Preloaded elf module "miibus.ko" at 0xc03ec09c. Preloaded elf module "snd_csa.ko" at 0xc03ec13c. Preloaded elf module "snd_pcm.ko" at 0xc03ec1dc. VESA: v3.0, 4096k memory, flags:0x1, mode table:0xc034b722 (1000022) VESA: NVidia K6-family MTRR support enabled (2 registers) md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdf10 apm0: on motherboard apm: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib2: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib2 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xd000-0xd00f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 10 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ahc0: port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem 0xeb000000-0xeb000fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci0 aic7870: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs pcm0: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f irq 5 at device 9.0 on pci0 pci0: (vendor=0x11ad, dev=0x0002) at 10.0 irq 9 pci0: (vendor=0x10b7, dev=0x9055) at 11.0 irq 9 pcib1: on motherboard pci2: on pcib1 orm0:
I have two servers load balanced = running a=20 large-load website (about 20 megabit each server)
one is running 4.4-STABLE other is = 4.3-STABLE from=20 about two months ago.
the apache binary is the same on = both.
the 4.4 system over time the apache = processes get=20 HUGE until the system runs out of swap, and the 4.3 system stays=20 small.
last pid: 55332;  load averages: = 64.88, 25.57,=20 17.49  up 48+04:46:20  17:29:09
768 processes: 13 running, = 754=20 sleeping, 1 zombie
CPU states: 24.0% user,  0.0% nice, 18.4%=20 system,  8.6% interrupt, 48.9% idle
Mem: 574M Active, 91M Inact, = 317M=20 Wired, 20M Cache, 112M Buf, 1664K Free
Swap: 3072M Total, 128M Used, = 2944M=20 Free, 4% Inuse, 16K In, 13M Out
 
  PID USERNAME PRI = NICE =20 SIZE    RES STATE  C   TIME  =20 WCPU    CPU COMMAND
41660 = nobody    =20 2   0  6996K  4452K select 1   0:03 10.25% = 10.25%=20 httpd-statu
41543 nobody     2   = 0 =20 6688K  4192K select 0   0:03  9.77%  9.77%=20 httpd-statu
42025 nobody     2   = 0 =20 6400K  3760K accept 1   0:03  9.72%  8.84%=20 httpd-statu
55332 root      24 -20 =20 2800K   880K CPU1   1   0:02 22.13%  = 6.54%=20 top
41792 nobody     2   0  = 7056K =20 4492K select 1   0:03  4.44%  4.44% = httpd-statu
41872=20 nobody     2   0  5980K  3804K = select=20 1   0:02  4.35%  4.35% = httpd-statu
    3=20 root      18   = 0    =20 0K     0K psleep 0  38:01  4.30%  = 4.30%=20 vmdaemon
41553 nobody     2   0 =20 5980K  3428K accept 0   0:03  4.72%  4.30%=20 httpd-statu
41915 nobody     2   = 0 =20 7648K  4912K accept 0   0:04  4.20%  4.20%=20 httpd-statu
42040 nobody     2   = 0 =20 5276K  3336K select 1   0:02  4.15%  4.15%=20 httpd-statu
41736 nobody     2   = 0 =20 6112K  3744K select 1   0:05  4.10%  4.10%=20 httpd-statu
42007 nobody     2   = 0 =20 5980K  3508K select 1   0:04  4.46%  4.05%=20 httpd-statu
41847 nobody     2   = 0 =20 4700K  2492K accept 0   0:02  2.68%  2.44%=20 httpd-statu
 
This is after about 20 minutes of = running. =20 given 3-4 hours they will be about 10 megs each.
 
This is the 4.3 system after 1 = hour of=20 uptime:
last pid: 23347;  load = averages: =20 3.58,  1.88,  1.72    up 3+16:15:28 =20 17:35:16
1328 processes:12 running, 1315 sleeping, 1 zombie
CPU = states:=20 11.7% user,  0.0% nice,  8.1% system,  6.4% interrupt, = 73.8%=20 idle
Mem: 661M Active, 55M Inact, 237M Wired, 50M Cache, 112M Buf, = 1664K=20 Free
Swap: 1024M Total, 8960K Used, 1015M Free
 
  PID USERNAME PRI NICE =20 SIZE    RES STATE  C   TIME  =20 WCPU    CPU COMMAND
  182=20 mysql      2   0 12352K   = 156K=20 poll   0   0:05  0.00%  0.00% = mysqld
23344=20 root     -10 -20  3440K   940K=20 CPU0   0   0:03  1.37%  1.37% = top
  195=20 nobody     2   0  3308K   = 248K=20 accept 0   0:00  0.00%  0.00% phphttpd
  196 = nobody     2   0  3308K   = 248K=20 accept 0   0:00  0.00%  0.00% phphttpd
  193 = nobody     2   0  3304K   = 236K=20 accept 0   0:00  0.00%  0.00% phphttpd
  194 = nobody     2   0  3296K   = 232K=20 accept 0   0:00  0.00%  0.00% phphttpd
  191 = root       2   0  = 3056K  =20 208K select 0   0:18  0.00%  0.00% phphttpd
23337 = root       2   0  = 2308K  1324K=20 select 1   0:00  0.00%  0.00% sshd
19526=20 root       2   0  = 2308K  1276K=20 select 1   0:00  0.00%  0.00% sshd
  106=20 root       2   0  = 2224K  =20 528K select 0   0:01  0.00%  0.00% = sshd
 8049=20 nobody     2   0  2068K  1236K = sbwait=20 0   0:01  0.00%  0.00% httpd-status
 7622=20 nobody     2   0  2064K  1268K = select=20 0   0:01  0.00%  0.00% httpd-status
 8251=20 nobody     2   0  2056K  1224K = sbwait=20 0   0:01  0.00%  0.00% httpd-status
 7260=20 nobody     2   0  2056K  1224K = sbwait=20 0   0:01  0.00%  0.00% httpd-status
 7780=20 nobody     2   0  2056K  1224K = select=20 1   0:01  0.00%  0.00% httpd-status
 7898=20 nobody     2   0  2056K  1204K = select=20 0   0:01  0.00%  0.00% httpd-status
 
 
Any ideas?
 
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C142C3.D796E150-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 15: 8:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from acura.isprime.com (acura.isprime.com [130.94.138.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABE937B403 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from energy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acura.isprime.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with SMTP id f8LM7ml79917; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:07:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001f01c142e9$cc0f9130$02010a0a@energy> From: "ISPrime Support" To: "Luke Cowell" , References: Subject: Re: memory leak in FBSD 4.4-STABLE Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:07:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001C_01C142C8.44A549E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Disposition-Notification-To: "ISPrime Support" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C142C8.44A549E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: memory leak in FBSD 4.4-STABLEI already did that on the boxes and = the configs are identical. --Phil Rosenthal Team Supreme, Inc. 347-739-4737 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Luke Cowell=20 To: ISPrime Support ; stable@FreeBSD.ORG=20 Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:04 PM Subject: Re: memory leak in FBSD 4.4-STABLE Well at any rate here's something you can do to keep you box stable = until a real solution in found. Update the MaxRequestsPerChild directive = in the apache conf. This may be at 0 where a child process will never = die. Set it to something like 100 so the child will die after it serves = 100 requests. I would go through the config and compare everything in the first = section on the 2 different servers.=20 Luke=20 On 9/21/01 2:47 PM, "ISPrime Support" wrote: Same binary of apache on both boxes, 1.3.20 --Phil Rosenthal Team Supreme, Inc. 347-739-4737 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Luke Cowell =20 To: ISPrime Support =20 Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:44 PM Subject: Re: memory leak in FBSD 4.4-STABLE On 9/21/01 2:35 PM, "ISPrime Support" wrote: I have two servers load balanced running a large-load website = (about 20 megabit each server) one is running 4.4-STABLE other is 4.3-STABLE from about two = months ago. the apache binary is the same on both. the 4.4 system over time the apache processes get HUGE until the = system runs out of swap, and the 4.3 system stays small. last pid: 55332; load averages: 64.88, 25.57, 17.49 up = 48+04:46:20 17:29:09 768 processes: 13 running, 754 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU states: 24.0% user, 0.0% nice, 18.4% system, 8.6% = interrupt, 48.9% idle Mem: 574M Active, 91M Inact, 317M Wired, 20M Cache, 112M Buf, = 1664K Free Swap: 3072M Total, 128M Used, 2944M Free, 4% Inuse, 16K In, 13M = Out =20 PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU = CPU COMMAND 41660 nobody 2 0 6996K 4452K select 1 0:03 10.25% = 10.25% httpd-statu 41543 nobody 2 0 6688K 4192K select 0 0:03 9.77% = 9.77% httpd-statu 42025 nobody 2 0 6400K 3760K accept 1 0:03 9.72% = 8.84% httpd-statu 55332 root 24 -20 2800K 880K CPU1 1 0:02 22.13% = 6.54% top 41792 nobody 2 0 7056K 4492K select 1 0:03 4.44% = 4.44% httpd-statu 41872 nobody 2 0 5980K 3804K select 1 0:02 4.35% = 4.35% httpd-statu 3 root 18 0 0K 0K psleep 0 38:01 4.30% = 4.30% vmdaemon 41553 nobody 2 0 5980K 3428K accept 0 0:03 4.72% = 4.30% httpd-statu 41915 nobody 2 0 7648K 4912K accept 0 0:04 4.20% = 4.20% httpd-statu 42040 nobody 2 0 5276K 3336K select 1 0:02 4.15% = 4.15% httpd-statu 41736 nobody 2 0 6112K 3744K select 1 0:05 4.10% = 4.10% httpd-statu 42007 nobody 2 0 5980K 3508K select 1 0:04 4.46% = 4.05% httpd-statu 41847 nobody 2 0 4700K 2492K accept 0 0:02 2.68% = 2.44% httpd-statu This is after about 20 minutes of running. given 3-4 hours they = will be about 10 megs each. This is the 4.3 system after 1 hour of uptime: last pid: 23347; load averages: 3.58, 1.88, 1.72 up = 3+16:15:28 17:35:16 1328 processes:12 running, 1315 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU states: 11.7% user, 0.0% nice, 8.1% system, 6.4% = interrupt, 73.8% idle Mem: 661M Active, 55M Inact, 237M Wired, 50M Cache, 112M Buf, = 1664K Free Swap: 1024M Total, 8960K Used, 1015M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU = COMMAND 182 mysql 2 0 12352K 156K poll 0 0:05 0.00% = 0.00% mysqld 23344 root -10 -20 3440K 940K CPU0 0 0:03 1.37% = 1.37% top 195 nobody 2 0 3308K 248K accept 0 0:00 0.00% = 0.00% phphttpd 196 nobody 2 0 3308K 248K accept 0 0:00 0.00% = 0.00% phphttpd 193 nobody 2 0 3304K 236K accept 0 0:00 0.00% = 0.00% phphttpd 194 nobody 2 0 3296K 232K accept 0 0:00 0.00% = 0.00% phphttpd 191 root 2 0 3056K 208K select 0 0:18 0.00% = 0.00% phphttpd 23337 root 2 0 2308K 1324K select 1 0:00 0.00% = 0.00% sshd 19526 root 2 0 2308K 1276K select 1 0:00 0.00% = 0.00% sshd 106 root 2 0 2224K 528K select 0 0:01 0.00% = 0.00% sshd 8049 nobody 2 0 2068K 1236K sbwait 0 0:01 0.00% = 0.00% httpd-status 7622 nobody 2 0 2064K 1268K select 0 0:01 0.00% = 0.00% httpd-status 8251 nobody 2 0 2056K 1224K sbwait 0 0:01 0.00% = 0.00% httpd-status 7260 nobody 2 0 2056K 1224K sbwait 0 0:01 0.00% = 0.00% httpd-status 7780 nobody 2 0 2056K 1224K select 1 0:01 0.00% = 0.00% httpd-status 7898 nobody 2 0 2056K 1204K select 0 0:01 0.00% = 0.00% httpd-status =20 Any ideas? Yeah, I'd check what versions of apache are you running ? You = theory doesn't hold much water unless the version are the same. I would = also check to see what sort of memory configuration you have for apache. Luke=20 ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C142C8.44A549E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: memory leak in FBSD 4.4-STABLE
I already did that on the boxes and the = configs are=20 identical.
--Phil Rosenthal
Team Supreme, Inc.
347-739-4737
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Luke Cowell
To: ISPrime Support ; stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Sent: Friday, September 21, = 2001 6:04=20 PM
Subject: Re: memory leak in = FBSD=20 4.4-STABLE

Well at any rate here=92s something = you can do=20 to keep you box stable until a real solution in found. Update the=20 MaxRequestsPerChild directive in the apache conf. This may be at 0 = where a=20 child process will never die. Set it to something like 100 so the = child will=20 die after it serves 100 requests.

 I would go through the = config=20 and compare everything in the first section on the 2 different = servers.=20

Luke


On 9/21/01 2:47 = PM,=20 "ISPrime Support" <support@isprime.com> wrote:
Same binary of apache on = both=20 boxes, 1.3.20
--Phil = Rosenthal
Team=20 Supreme, Inc.
347-739-4737
----- Original Message ----- =
From: Luke Cowell=20 <mailto:lukec@georgio.e-and-s.com>  
To: = ISPrime=20 Support <mailto:support@isprime.com>  
Sent: = Friday,=20 September 21, 2001 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: memory leak in = FBSD=20 4.4-STABLE

On 9/21/01 2:35 PM, "ISPrime Support"=20 <support@isprime.com> wrote:
I have two servers = load=20 balanced running a large-load website (about 20 megabit each=20 server)
one is running 4.4-STABLE other is 4.3-STABLE from = about two=20 months ago.
the apache binary is the same on both.
the 4.4 = system=20 over time the apache processes get HUGE until the system runs = out of=20 swap, and the 4.3 system stays small.
last pid: 55332; =  load=20 averages: 64.88, 25.57, 17.49  up 48+04:46:20 =  17:29:09
768=20 processes: 13 running, 754 sleeping, 1 zombie
CPU states: = 24.0% user,=20  0.0% nice, 18.4% system,  8.6% interrupt, 48.9% = idle
Mem:=20 574M Active, 91M Inact, 317M Wired, 20M Cache, 112M Buf, 1664K=20 Free
Swap: 3072M Total, 128M Used, 2944M Free, 4% Inuse, 16K = In, 13M=20 Out
  
  PID USERNAME PRI NICE =  SIZE=20    RES STATE  C   TIME =   WCPU=20    CPU COMMAND
41660 nobody =     2=20   0  6996K  4452K select 1   0:03 = 10.25%=20 10.25% httpd-statu
41543 nobody     2=20   0  6688K  4192K select 0   0:03=20  9.77%  9.77% httpd-statu
42025 nobody=20     2   0  6400K  3760K = accept 1=20   0:03  9.72%  8.84% httpd-statu
55332 = root=20      24 -20  2800K =   880K CPU1=20   1   0:02 22.13%  6.54% top
41792 = nobody=20     2   0  7056K  4492K = select 1=20   0:03  4.44%  4.44% httpd-statu
41872 = nobody=20     2   0  5980K  3804K = select 1=20   0:02  4.35%  4.35%=20 httpd-statu
    3 root=20      18   0=20     0K     0K psleep 0=20  38:01  4.30%  4.30% vmdaemon
41553 nobody=20     2   0  5980K  3428K = accept 0=20   0:03  4.72%  4.30% httpd-statu
41915 = nobody=20     2   0  7648K  4912K = accept 0=20   0:04  4.20%  4.20% httpd-statu
42040 = nobody=20     2   0  5276K  3336K = select 1=20   0:02  4.15%  4.15% httpd-statu
41736 = nobody=20     2   0  6112K  3744K = select 1=20   0:05  4.10%  4.10% httpd-statu
42007 = nobody=20     2   0  5980K  3508K = select 1=20   0:04  4.46%  4.05% httpd-statu
41847 = nobody=20     2   0  4700K  2492K = accept 0=20   0:02  2.68%  2.44%=20 httpd-statu

This is after about 20 minutes of = running.=20  given 3-4 hours they will be about 10 megs=20 each.

This is the 4.3 system after 1 hour of = uptime:
last pid:=20 23347;  load averages:  3.58,  1.88,  1.72=20    up 3+16:15:28  17:35:16
1328 = processes:12=20 running, 1315 sleeping, 1 zombie
CPU states: 11.7% user, =  0.0%=20 nice,  8.1% system,  6.4% interrupt, 73.8% = idle
Mem: 661M=20 Active, 55M Inact, 237M Wired, 50M Cache, 112M Buf, 1664K = Free
Swap:=20 1024M Total, 8960K Used, 1015M Free

PID = USERNAME PRI=20 NICE  SIZE    RES STATE  C =   TIME=20   WCPU    CPU = COMMAND
  182 mysql=20      2   0 12352K =   156K=20 poll   0   0:05  0.00%  0.00%=20 mysqld
23344 root     -10 -20  3440K =   940K CPU0   0   0:03  1.37% =  1.37% top
  195 nobody =     2=20   0  3308K   248K accept 0 =   0:00=20  0.00%  0.00% phphttpd
  196 nobody=20     2   0  3308K =   248K=20 accept 0   0:00  0.00%  0.00%=20 phphttpd
  193 nobody     2=20   0  3304K   236K accept 0 =   0:00=20  0.00%  0.00% phphttpd
  194 nobody=20     2   0  3296K =   232K=20 accept 0   0:00  0.00%  0.00%=20 phphttpd
  191 root =       2=20   0  3056K   208K select 0 =   0:18=20  0.00%  0.00% phphttpd
23337 root=20       2   0  2308K=20  1324K select 1   0:00  0.00%  0.00%=20 sshd
19526 root       2 =   0=20  2308K  1276K select 1   0:00  0.00%=20  0.00% sshd
  106 root=20       2   0  2224K=20   528K select 0   0:01  0.00% =  0.00%=20 sshd
 8049 nobody     2 =   0=20  2068K  1236K sbwait 0   0:01  0.00%=20  0.00% httpd-status
 7622 nobody =     2=20   0  2064K  1268K select 0   0:01=20  0.00%  0.00% httpd-status
 8251 nobody=20     2   0  2056K  1224K = sbwait 0=20   0:01  0.00%  0.00% = httpd-status
 7260=20 nobody     2   0  2056K =  1224K=20 sbwait 0   0:01  0.00%  0.00%=20 httpd-status
 7780 nobody     2=20   0  2056K  1224K select 1   0:01=20  0.00%  0.00% httpd-status
 7898 nobody=20     2   0  2056K  1204K = select 0=20   0:01  0.00%  0.00%=20 httpd-status

 
Any=20 ideas?



Yeah, I=92d=20 check what versions of apache are you running ? You theory = doesn=92t hold=20 much water unless the version are the same. I would also check to = see what=20 sort of memory configuration you have for apache.

Luke=20


------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C142C8.44A549E0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 16:15:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9264C37B41D for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blossom.cjclark.org (dialup-209.245.132.192.Dial1.SanJose1.Level3.net [209.245.132.192]) by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (8.11.5/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8LNEt317839; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from cjc@localhost) by blossom.cjclark.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) id f8LMK9Y02778; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:20:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:20:09 -0700 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: chip@chocobo.cx Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mergemaster goes postal / MAKEDEV problems Message-ID: <20010921152009.D980@blossom.cjclark.org> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <3BAA3B47.6000308@gmx.net> <3BAA0757.BF52C720@dp.abacus.co.uk> <20010921125059.A19142@mezcal.tue.le> <20010921104319.A8395@setzer.chocobo.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010921104319.A8395@setzer.chocobo.cx>; from chip@setzer.chocobo.cx on Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 10:43:19AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 10:43:19AM -0400, Chip Marshall wrote: > On September 21, 2001, Thomas Zenker sent me the following: > > > > Looks to me as if this is a really old bug surfacing here. Reference > > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=30637 > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24443 > > > > > > Is the above PR a reasonable fix and is it safe for people to apply this > > > change to /usr/src/bin/sh/expand.c ? > > > > > > If it is a good fix - any chance it would be committed? > > > > yes, that's it: > > And will it be put on the RELENG_4_4 branch? Unlikely, it is not a critical security fix. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 17:54: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from warez.scriptkiddie.org (uswest-dsl-142-38.cortland.com [209.162.142.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE1737B41C for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 17:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.69.11] (unknown [192.168.69.11]) by warez.scriptkiddie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE6662D01 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 17:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 17:54:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Lamont Granquist To: Subject: xl0 tx underrun / watchdog errors In-Reply-To: <20010921152009.D980@blossom.cjclark.org> Message-ID: <20010921173030.I13955-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG When doing an NMAP scan on a FreeBSD 4.4 (RELENG_4_4 Tag) Dell Lattitude C600 (as the target of the scan) I get the following errors: Sep 21 17:28:00 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 Sep 21 17:28:00 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 900 bytes Sep 21 17:28:01 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 Sep 21 17:28:01 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 960 bytes Sep 21 17:28:05 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 Sep 21 17:28:05 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 1020 bytes Sep 21 17:28:10 segflt /kernel: xl0: watchdog timeout Sep 21 17:28:13 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 Sep 21 17:28:13 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 120 bytes Sep 21 17:28:18 segflt /kernel: xl0: watchdog timeout Sep 21 17:28:20 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 Sep 21 17:28:20 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 120 bytes This is demonstrated easiest with: nmap -T Insane -sS -p 1- 192.168.69.10 Although -T Normal will also produce these errors. And I have set: sysctl -w net.inet.icmp.icmplim=200 (default) The dmesg output for the xl0 driver is: xl0: <3Com 3c556 Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd400-0xd4ff mem 0xfbffd800-0xfbffd87f,0xfbffdc00-0xfbffdc7f irq 11 at device 16.0 on pci0 xl0: Ethernet address: 00:01:03:82:df:00 miibus0: on xl0 I don't think that that behavior occured under the 4.3-ish -STABLE builds I had on here previously (at least I haven't noticed it before, have reason to believe I've scanned this machine previously and can't find it in my old logfiles -- i could be mistaken about having scanned this machine before though). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 17:59: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E557C37B40D for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 17:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (helo=den2) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hack)) id 15kb7p-0006oq-00; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:58:33 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: "'Lamont Granquist'" , Subject: RE: xl0 tx underrun / watchdog errors Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:58:33 +1200 Message-ID: <007f01c14301$b3ee1f00$0a01a8c0@den2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <20010921173030.I13955-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :: Sep 21 17:28:00 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 :: Sep 21 17:28:00 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing :: tx start threshold to 900 bytes :: Sep 21 17:28:01 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 :: Sep 21 17:28:01 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing :: tx start threshold to 960 bytes :: Sep 21 17:28:05 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 :: Sep 21 17:28:05 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing :: tx start threshold to 1020 bytes :: Sep 21 17:28:10 segflt /kernel: xl0: watchdog timeout :: Sep 21 17:28:13 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 :: Sep 21 17:28:13 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing :: tx start threshold to 120 bytes :: Sep 21 17:28:18 segflt /kernel: xl0: watchdog timeout :: Sep 21 17:28:20 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 :: Sep 21 17:28:20 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing :: tx start threshold to 120 bytes :: xl0: <3Com 3c556 Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd400-0xd4ff mem :: 0xfbffd800-0xfbffd87f,0xfbffdc00-0xfbffdc7f irq 11 at device :: 16.0 on pci0 :: xl0: Ethernet address: 00:01:03:82:df:00 :: miibus0: on xl0 I believe this is the 3Com Fast Etherlink hardware bug manifesting itself. I saw it with 4.3-RELEASE | -STABLE. It's in the archives, and Donald Becker's mentioned it too. -- Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 18:17:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from areilly.bpc-users.org (CPE-144-132-234-126.nsw.bigpond.net.au [144.132.234.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D6FD37B401 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 99760 invoked by uid 1000); 22 Sep 2001 01:17:33 -0000 From: "Andrew Reilly" Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:17:33 +1000 To: Jonathan Lyster Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: XFree86-4 woes Message-ID: <20010922111733.A94271@gurney.reilly.home> References: <200109211443.f8LEhhi26926@clmboh1-smtp1.columbus.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200109211443.f8LEhhi26926@clmboh1-smtp1.columbus.rr.com>; from jslyster@operamail.com on Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 10:49:45AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 10:49:45AM -0400, Jonathan Lyster wrote: > My problem is this: whenever I enter my root account this way and then try launching kedit or kcontrol, I > run into problems. No application will run this way--launched from a terminal that has been "su"ed to > access the root account. They worked fine when launched this way in XFree86-3.3.6, but not in version > 4.0.3. There must have been something wrong with your 3.3.6 setup, then, or perhaps you were using startx instead of kdm? What's happening is that when you use kdm (or even xdm), the server is put into a more secure mode, where connections are refused if clients can't supply the session cookie or whatever. If you "su -m", to inherit your old shell's environment, or use sudo (which generally does the same thing), then you'll find that X stuff continues to work. -- Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 19: 6:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73A5037B41B for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from we-66-74-161-11.we.mediaone.net (HELO win2kpro) (66.74.161.11) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2001 02:06:33 -0000 X-Apparently-From: From: "Andy" To: Subject: Subcribe Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:05:52 -0700 Message-ID: <003701c1430b$1c116d90$6402a8c0@ansle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 19:59: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.is.co.za (mercury.is.co.za [196.4.160.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F0137B40B for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c4-pta-72.dial-up.net (c4-pta-72.dial-up.net [196.26.210.72]) by mercury.is.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC9F3EBE; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:58:53 +0200 (SAST) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:01:10 +0200 (SAST) From: The Psychotic Viper X-X-Sender: To: Gabriel Ambuehl Cc: j mckitrick , , Subject: Re[2]: BRAVO 4.4 TEAM! In-Reply-To: <15069350861.20010921142620@buz.ch> Message-ID: <20010922045933.R39981-100000@lucifer.fuzion.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > Hello j, > > Friday, September 21, 2001, 12:09:09 AM, you wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:29:49PM -0500, jacks@sage-american.com > > wrote: > > | BRAVO to the 4.4 Team!!!! > > | > > | My update from 4.3 to 4.4 (custom kernel too) when absolutely > > | flawlessly!!! > > > Binary or source? > > Must be binary if he uses custom kernel... Beg to differ, could be either binary (with kernel recompile later,but unlikely) or a source update. Could be you had the two mixed up?:) PsyV To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 20: 3:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.is.co.za (mercury.is.co.za [196.4.160.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D472037B419 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 20:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c4-pta-6.dial-up.net (c4-pta-6.dial-up.net [196.26.210.6]) by mercury.is.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234A23FDF; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:03:44 +0200 (SAST) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:06:01 +0200 (SAST) From: The Psychotic Viper X-X-Sender: To: Christoph Sold Cc: , Subject: Re: CVS tag for 4.4? In-Reply-To: <3BAB44B2.4050409@i-clue.de> Message-ID: <20010922050140.U39981-100000@lucifer.fuzion.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Christoph Sold wrote: > francisv@dagupan.com wrote: > >Hi, > > > >What's the new CVS tag for the 4.4 branch? Is it RELENG_4_4 or still > >RELENG_4? > > > RELENG_4 -> FreeBSD-4-STABLE > ..stable as we know it > > RELENG_4_4 -> FreeBSD-4.4-Security > ... RELEASE plus only important security fixes. > Just a self sanity check, anyone else notice UPDATING on the RELENG_4 tag not indicating the release notice in the UPDATING on RELENG_4_4 , namely they both seem different (-stable has the older one:/). I have picked this up on 2/3 cvsup servers (5,11,and cvsup2.za) and am running cvsup 16_1d, so wondering if its me losing my mind or doing something wrong. TIA PsyV To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 20:46:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.bmi.net (smtp.bmi.net [204.57.191.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBB937B41E for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 20:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from johncoop.MSHOME (drumheller-router.bmi.net [206.63.201.3] (may be forged)) by smtp.bmi.net (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA14293; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:53:28 -0700 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 20:46:11 -0700 From: John Merryweather Cooper To: Scott D Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Balsa/aspell broken? Message-ID: <20010921204611.E24650@johncoop.MSHOME> References: <3BABFF62.1080108@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3BABFF62.1080108@earthlink.net>; from digitalox@earthlink.net on Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 20:02:58 -0700 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.2.0 Lines: 72 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < moving to freebsd-stable, cvs-* is committer-only-land > On 2001.09.21 20:02 Scott D wrote: > Hello, > > Hopefully I'm posting this to the right place. If not my apologies, > please let me know the best inquire about this. > > I updated the ports-base and mail on my 4.3 box and tried to build the > > new balsa 1.2 commit but it was broken. Getting the latest textproc > ports didn't help either ( aspell seems to be where its hanging up ). > > I've just upgraded to 4.4 stable, downloaded all ports and am still > having the same problem. I've deleted the previous balsa and done make > > clean and about everything I can think of. Any suggestions welcome. > > Here is the error I get: > file_util.cc: In function `class string autil::add_possible_dir(const > string &, const string &)': > file_util.cc:33: implicit declaration of function `int > autil::need_dir(...)' > gmake[2]: *** [file_util.lo] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/textproc/aspell/work/aspell-.33.7.1/util' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/textproc/aspell/work/aspell-.33.7.1' > gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/aspell. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/aspell. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/aspell. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/aspell. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/mail/balsa. > *** Error code 1 > > Thanks, > Scott > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message > Something's wrong with your libtool. Rebuild your libtool port and try again. file_util.cc compiles without so much as a warning on my machine. Should your problem continue, please include the compiler/libtool line, at a minimum--otherwise, things are hard to diagnose. A complete build log using: # script -a build.log make for the "offending" port is much more helpful--since one can also see anything weirding-out with your configuration. :) -- jmc MacroHard -- the perfection of form over substance, marketing over performance, and greed over design . . . To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 21: 2:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aurora.sol.net (aurora.sol.net [206.55.65.76]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA89737B416 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:02:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by aurora.sol.net (8.9.3/8.9.2/SNNS-1.02) id XAA34985; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:02:07 -0500 (CDT) From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <200109220402.XAA34985@aurora.sol.net> Subject: Re: 4.4-RELEASE kernel deadlock ("FFS node") To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, chuck@research.att.com Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:02:07 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <20010921091928.Q7319_chips.research.att.com@ns.sol.net> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > the one unusual thing about the configuration is that the filesystem > we are attempting to build on is a 136GB ccd across 4 scsi disks with > the fsize=8192 and the bsize=65536 (it is mainly to be used for large > data log files): FreeBSD doesn't support fsize/bsize so large. There are ongoing issues within the filesystem code and VM code that will cause such filesystems to break under heavy load. Matt Dillon also talked about this being less- than-optimal for the VM system from some technical points of view. I ran into this years ago, and have been content to live with newfs -c 96 -b 16384 -f 4096 -i 1048576 /dev/rccd${i}e on filesystems weighing in at 576GB. Note that this is also for very large file storage (see -i) and I'd love to use a larger -b/-f (and then a larger -c) but so far nobody's cared enough to do anything about it, and I have neither the kernel skills nor the time to look at it, since in reality the values above work fine and the only noticeable side effect is that the fsck goes a bit slower. I ran into problems with -b 32768 -f 8192 as well. I didn't attempt all combinations of options, though, since for my application, lockups were a bit random due to the light amount of use involved. -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 21: 7: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com (c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.176.204.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3775137B412 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f8M46rd37184; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:06:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200109220406.f8M46rd37184@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: The Psychotic Viper Cc: Christoph Sold , francisv@dagupan.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS tag for 4.4? In-Reply-To: <20010922050140.U39981-100000@lucifer.fuzion.ath.cx> References: <20010922050140.U39981-100000@lucifer.fuzion.ath.cx> Comments: In-reply-to The Psychotic Viper message dated "Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:06:01 +0200." From: "Bruce A. Mah" Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1423869446P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:06:53 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_-1423869446P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, The Psychotic Viper wrote: > Just a self sanity check, anyone else notice UPDATING on the RELENG_4 tag > not indicating the release notice in the UPDATING on RELENG_4_4 , namely > they both seem different (-stable has the older one:/). I have picked this > up on 2/3 cvsup servers (5,11,and cvsup2.za) and am running cvsup 16_1d, > so wondering if its me losing my mind or doing something wrong. You're not doing anything wrong. UPDATING gets, well, updated independently for RELENG_4 and RELENG_4_4 (and RELENG_4_3). Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1423869446P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE7rA5d2MoxcVugUsMRAk9SAKCspcH7gqdv9rzIabd8V260iHQ5dwCdExo/ vBpMRKO7EVyET4vnFoMghfI= =Dlmd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1423869446P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 21:47:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail2out.giga.net.tw (mail2out.giga.net.tw [203.133.1.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472A137B40C for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from index (u24-164.u203-203.giga.net.tw [203.203.24.164]) by mail2out.giga.net.tw (Postfix) with SMTP id 72D5B1473E for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:47:05 +0800 (CST) To: From: gd168@24k.com.tw Subject: Àô«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X±MÃD¬ã¨s³ø§i Date: ¬P´Á¤», 22 ¤E¤ë 2001 12:45:10 +0800 Message-Id: <37156.531365972224000.90637@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ¨ü¤åªÌ¡G§e¡@°ê¥ß¥xÆW¤j¾Çº[©ÒÄݦæ¬F¾Ç³N¬ã¨s³æ¦ì¡þ ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¥þ°ê¦U¯Å¾÷Ãö¹ÎÅé¡þ¤½¥q¦æ¸¹¡þ¤½·|©Î­Ó¤H¡@½Ðų®Ö¡I µo¤åªÌ¡G¥øÀs¿ì¤½¥Î«~¦³­­¤½¥q¡@¹q¸Ü¡G(02)2701-2000 ¥D¡@¦®¡G¨Ï¥Î¡eÀô«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X¡f¤§ÀuÂI¤Î±ÄÁÊ­nÂI¡C »¡¡@©ú¡GÀô«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X¤§±MÃD¬ã¨s³ø§i ¡]¤@¡^«e¨¥ ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@ªñ¦~¨Ó¡A¥Ñ©ó¦U¶µ¬ÛÃö§Þ³N¦¨¼ô¡A°t¦X¥b¾ÉÅé²£·~ÁO«kµo®i ¡@¡@¡@¨Ï±o¹p®g¦Lªí¾÷»ù®æ¤j´T¤U·Æ¡A¦U¼t°ÓµL¤£À£§C»ù®æ¡A¥HÂX¤j¥« ¡@¡@¡@³õ¦û¦³²v¡A¦A¥H«áÄòªº¯Ó§÷ÁȦ^¨ä§Q¼í¡A±zªá¦bºÒ¯»§Xªº¶O¥Î¡A ¡@¡@¡@ªø´Á¦Ó¨¥¹ê¦b¬O¤@µ§¥iÆ[ªº¤ä¥X¡C ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡e¨Ï¥ÎÀô«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X¤§¤T¤j²z¥Ñ¡f ¡@¡@¡@¡@ (1)§Þ³N¤W¤w¬ð¯}¡G¦³Å²©óºÒ¯»§X©M¾¥¤ô§X»Ý¨D¶q¤£Â_¦¨ªø¡A ¡@¡@¡@°ê¤H¤­¦~«e¶}©lµÛ¤â¡A°w¹ï¹p®g¦Lªí¾÷¹q¤l¼g¯u§Þ³N¤ÎºÒ¯»·P¥ú ¡@¡@¡@Åé¡A¶i¦æ¬ÛÃö¬ãµo¤u§@¡A¬ãµo¤p²Õ¦¨­û¬Ò¬°³ÕºÓ¤h¾Ç¾ú¡A¬ãµo¤p ¡@¡@¡@²Õ¦¨­û°w¹ï¦U¤j¼tµP¾÷¾¹ºë±Kµ²ºc¡A¤w¦³²`«×¤F¸Ñ¡A´x´¤³\¦h¬Û ¡@¡@¡@Ãö§Þ³N¡A¹ïºÒ¯»§Xªº§÷®Æ¤Î»sµ{°Ñ¼Æ¦³­Y¤z§ï¶i¡A¥H¾AÀ³¥xÆW¨È ¡@¡@¡@¼ö±a°ª·Å¼éÀ㪺®ð­ÔÀô¹Ò¡A¸gÄY®æ«~ºÞ±±¨î¡A°ê¤H©Ò¥Í²£ªºÀô«O ¡@¡@¡@¹p®gºÒ¯»§X¡A¦C¦L«~½è©M­ì¼t¦P¼Ë²M´·¡A¥B¤£·|¶Ë®`¾÷¾¹¡C ¡@¡@¡@¡@ (2)¬°Àô«OºÉ¤ß¤O¡GºÒ¯»§X³y¦¨¹ïÀô¹Òªº¦Ã¬V»P¤é­Ñ¼W¡A¤HÃþ ¡@¡@¡@À³¤Ï¬Ùı®©¡A§Ú­Ì¥u¦³¤@­Ó¦a²y¡A¬°¥þ¤HÃþ¤Î«á¥N¤l®]¡A«O¯d¤@ ¡@¡@¡@­Ó°®²bªº¥Í¦sÀô¹Ò¡A¤w¨ì¨è¤£®e½wªº¦a¨B¡IÅý§Ú­Ì±q®Õ¶é°µ°_¡A ¡@¡@¡@¤@°_¨Ó¦^¦¬¨Ã¨Ï¥ÎÀô«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X¡C ¡@¡@¡@¡@ (3)¸`¬Ù¦C¦L¶O¥Î¡G®Ú¾Ú¤u°Ó®É³ø 90¦~4¤ë12¤é³ø¾É«ü¥X¡A¥Î ¡@¡@¡@Àô«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X¥i¸`¬Ù¢³¦¨¥ª¥kªº¶O¥Î¡A¤£¥²¦hªá¿ú¡C ¡]¤G¡^¥þ²yÁͶդÀªR ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@1999¦~ºÒ¯»¥d§X¦A¥Í¦^¦¬¨Ï¥Î¤ñ¸û¡G ¡@¡@¡@¼Ú¬ü¥«³õ¦A¥Í¦^¦¬¥d§X¨Ï¥Î²v ¢²¢¯¢H (¬ù1/3) ¡@¡@¡@¥xÆW¥«³õ¦A¥Í¦^¦¬¥d§X¨Ï¥Î²v ¡@¢´¢H ¡@¡@¡@(¸ê®Æ¨Ó·½¡GRecharger´Á¥Z) ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¥xÆW¬ù¦³50¸U¥x¹p®g¦Lªí¾÷¡A¹w¦ô¨C¦~¨Ï¥Î¬ù100¡ã200¸U¤ä ¡@¡@¡@¹p®gºÒ¯»§X¡A»s³y¥X¬ù2000¡ã2500¤½¾·©TÅé¼o±óª«¡A¨Ã¥B¨C¦~³o ¡@¡@¡@­Ó¼Æ¥Ø¥¿¦b¦¨ªø¡C¦Ó³o¨Ç¶ì½¦¼o±óª«¶·­n¶W¹L¤Q­Ó¥@¬ö¨Ó¤À¸Ñ¡A ¡@¡@¡@¹ï¥xÆW¤T¸U¤»¤d¥­¤è¤½¨½ªº¤g¦a¤W¡A³y¦¨ÄY­«ªº­t²ü¡C ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¼Ú¬ü¦U°ê¬ÛÃöÀô«Oªk¥O±j¨î³W©w»s³y¼t°Óªº¦^¦¬¤ñ²v¡A¤w¦æ ¡@¡@¡@¤§¦h¦~¡A¹ï©ó¦^¦¬·~ªÌ¤]¦³¹ïÀ³ªº»²§U¬Fµ¦¡A¨Ã¤£Â_ªº±Ð¨|¨Ï¥Î ¡@¡@¡@ªÌ¦^¦¬¡B´î¶q¦A§Q¥Î(Recycle, Reduce, Reuse)ªºÆ[©À¡C ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¨Æ¹êÃÒ©ú¡A¦¹Á|¤£¶È¦³§U©óÀô«O¥B¯à­°§C¤ä¥X¡A¬ü°ê¤w©ú¥O ¡@¡@¡@Áp¨¹¬F©²ªº¦U³æ¦ì¥²¶·¨Ï¥ÎÀô«OºÒ¯»§X¡C ¡]¤T¡^¹ïÀô¹Ò«OÅ@¤Î¸ê·½¦^¦¬¦A§Q¥Î¡A¨ã¦³¥¿­±·N¸q ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¦pªG»s³y¨C­Ó¥d§X»Ý­n¶W¹L¤T¦j²æªo¡A¨º»ò¥xÆW¨C¦~´N·| ¡@¡@¡@¥Î±¼ªñ100 ¸U¥[±[ªº¥Ûªo¡C¦pªG±z´«¶RÀô«OºÒ¯»§X¡A«Ü©ú½T¦a¡A ¡@¡@¡@±z¤w¸g¹ï«OÅ@Àô¹Ò°µ¥X°^Äm¤F¡A¦]¬°§Ú­Ìªº§£§£³õ¥i¥H´î¤Ö¤@­Ó ¡@¡@¡@ªÅ¶¡¨Ó¦s©ñ±zªº¥d§X¡C ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¥H¥xÆW¥Ø«e¨Ï¥Î¶q·U¨Ó·U¦hªº¹p®g¦Lªí¾÷¦Ó¨¥¡A¨C¤Ñ¥á±óªº ¡@¡@¡@ºÒ¯»§X¤£ª¾¦h¤Ö¡A¦Ó³o¨ÇºÒ¯»§X¸ÌªººÒ¯»¦â¾¯·L²É¡A¤Ø¤o¬ù6-12 ¡@¡@¡@·L¦Ì¡A«o·|º¯¤J¦a¤U¤ô¡A¦Ã¬V¤ô·½¡A­Y·Q±q¤ô¤¤°£¥h³o¨ÇºÒ¯»·L ¡@¡@¡@²É¡A´N¥²¶·¥[¸Ë¯S®íÂo¤ô³]³Æ¡A¦]¦¹µL½×¤½¥q¥ø·~©Î¾Ç®Õ¤Î­Ó¤H ¡@¡@¡@³£¦³³d¥ô¤@°_¨Ó¨¾¤îºÒ¯»§X¦Ã¬VÀô¹Òªº¤u§@¡AºÒ¯»§Xªº¦^¦¬¦A§Q ¡@¡@¡@¥Î¡A¬O¥Ø«eªº°ß¤@³~®|¡C ¡]¥|¡^Àô«OºÒ¯»§X¤§±ÄÁÊ­nÂI ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¥Ñ©ó¥«°âÀô«OºÒ¯»§X¡A¨ÑÀ³°Ó¹L¦h¡A¦U®aªº«~½è°Ñ®t¤£»ô¡A ¡@¡@¡@·q½Ð»{©ú¥øÀs¥N²zªºÀô«OºÒ¯»§X¡A¬°¥Ø«e¥xÆW°ß¤@±M·~¾É¦V¤§Àô ¡@¡@¡@«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X¡A«~½èº¡·N«OÃÒ¡A¤£º¡¥]°h¡A½T«O®ø¶OÅv¯q¡AÁקK ¡@¡@¡@¶R¨ì¦H½è«~¡A¿ï¾Ü¥øÀs¡A«~½è¦³«O»Ù¡I ¡@¡@¡@±ÄÁÊ«e°È¥²¸ß°Ý¤U¦C­«­n°Ñ¦Ò¨Ì¾Ú¡G ¡@¡@¡@1.Àô«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X¡A¬O§_§¹¥þ¥H¼Ð·Ç»sµ{»s³y¡H¡@»sµ{¤¤¡A¼oºÒ ¡@¡@¡@¡@¯»¼Ñ¤Î¬ÛÃö¹s¥ó¬O§_²M²z°®²b¨ÃÀ˸դ¸¥ó©Ê¯à¡H ¡@¡@¡@2.Àx¯»¼Ñ¬O§_§¹¥þ²M¼ä°®²b«á¡A¤~­«·s¸Ë¶ñ¥þ·sºÒ¯»¡H ¡@¡@¡@3.©Ò¥R¶ñ¤§ºÒ¯»¡A¬O§_¬°°ê»Ú¶¡ª¾¦WºÒ¯»¼t¥X«~¡H ¡@¡@¡@4.©Ò¦³Àx¯»¼Ñ¡A¬O§_¥H«Ê±ø±K«Ê¡A§¹¾ã¥æ¥I¨Ï¥Î¤H¡H ¡@¡@¡@5.ºÒ¯»§X¬O§_³q¹L§¹¾ã¦ÓÄY®æ«~ºÞ´ú¸Õ«á¤~¥X¼t¡H ¡@¡@¡@6.´ú¸Õ¥Î¤§ºÒ¯»¬O§_¬°¥~¥[¡H¡@©Ò¥R¶ñªººÒ¯»¼Æ¶q©M­ì¼tºÒ¯»§X ¡@¡@¡@¡@®e¶q¬O§_¬Û¦P¡A·|¤£·|µu¤Ö¡H ¡@¡@¡@7.¥R¶ñ¤§ºÒ¯»¬O§_¸g¹Lºë±K´ú¸Õ¡A½T»{¤ñ¼Ð·Ç­È°ª¤~¸Ë¶ñ¡H ¡@¡@¡@8.©Ò§ó´«¤§·P¥ú¹ª¬O§_¬°°ê»Ú¶¡ª¾¦W¤§°ª¬ì§Þ¼tµP²£«~¡H ¡@¡@¡@9.ºÒ¯»§X¦¨«~¬O§_¥H¶Â¦â¶ì½¦¯È¹ê¬IÁ×¥ú¥]¸Ë«á¡A¨Ã¥H®ðªw³U©Î ¡@¡@¡@¡@¯S®íŨ¹Ô«OÅ@¡A¦A¸Ë¤J«OÅ@¼Ñ¡A¥H½T«O¹B¿é³~¤¤¤D¦Ü¨Ï¥Î«e¡A ¡@¡@¡@¡@¤£¨ü¥ô¦ó¥ú½u¨ä¥Lª«²z©Ê¡A¤Æ¾Ç©Ê¶Ë®`¡H ¡@¡@¡@¡@¥øÀs¥N²zªºÀô«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X·~¤w¥þ¼Æ³q¹L¤W­z´ú¸Õ¡A¥þ­±¹ê¬I ¡@¡@¡@¡@«~½èº¡·N«OÃÒ¦A­qÁÊ¡A¤£º¡·N«OÃÒ°h³f¡I ¡]¤­¡^»ù®æ¸ê°T¡GÀô«O¹p®gºÒ¯»§X¤§»ù®æ¤w¤½¥¬©óºô¯¸¡AÅwªï¤Wºô¬d¸ß ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@ºô§}¡Ghttp://clik.to/96969180 ¡]¤»¡^Ápµ¸¸ê°T¡G¥H¤W¸ê®Æ¥Ñ¥øÀs¿ì¤½¥Î«~¦³­­¤½¥q©Ò´£¨Ñ¡A¦p»Ý­qÁÊ ¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@½Ð¹q¡G(02)2701-2000§Ú­Ì¼ö¸Ûªº¦P¤¯¬°±zªA°È¡C To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 22:17:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79CC37B412 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 22:17:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD821E018; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:17:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from chips.research.att.com (chips.research.att.com [135.207.27.139]) by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA27518; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:17:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from chuck@localhost) by chips.research.att.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.8.5) id BAA12582; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:17:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:17:44 -0400 From: Chuck Cranor To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Chuck Cranor Subject: why my 4.4-RELEASE kernel deadlocks Message-ID: <20010922011744.B109536@chips.research.att.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organization: AT&T Labs-Research Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi- i have debugged the problem, here is the scoop: Background: every allocated FFS vnode has a private memory area allocated as malloc type "FFS node"... each FFS node allocation takes a 512 byte block out of the kernel memory allocator. this allocation occurs in the function ffs_vget() (see file sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c, look for MALLOC). the kernel memory allocator limits the number of memory allocations of each type to 102400K. if you try and allocate more than that, the kernel may sleep waiting for memory of that type to become free. you can see the current allocation with "vmstat -m" (note MemUse and Limit): Memory statistics by type Type Kern Type InUse MemUse HighUse Limit Requests Limit Limit Size(s) FFS node 334 167K 167K102400K 1170 0 0 512 if each "FFS node" allocation takes 512 bytes, then you can have at most 102400K/512 (i.e. 204800) nodes allocated before the kernel malloc refuses to allocate any more nodes. now consider when vnodes are allocated and freed. looking at file sys/kern/vfs_subr.c, the function getnewvnode() allocates new vnodes. it attempts to recycle a free vnode that has already been allocated before it allocates a new one. free vnodes are stored on the global list vnode_free_list and counted by the global "freevnodes". you can see the current value of freevnodes using the command "sysctl -a | grep freevnodes"... if there are not enough free vnodes, then the system allocates a new vnode using zalloc(vnode_zone). vnodes are freed by the vrele() function in the same file, but only if their v_usecount is going to drop to zero and VSHOULDFREE() is true. looking at sys/sys/vnode.h, VSHOULDFREE is true if the neither VFREE or VDOOMED flags are set, the hold count is zero, the use count is zero, and the vm_object's reference count and page count is zero (if there is a vm_object allocated). Problem: - vrele() does not free vnodes that have resident pages of memory associated with them (VSHOULDFREE will be false). - there is a global limit on the number of allocated vnodes on the system. this is in the global int "desiredvnodes" which shows up as "kern.maxvnodes" in "sysctl -a" output. ** FreeBSD kernel basically ignores kern.maxvnodes ** - the kernel will free an inactive vnode if all it's pages of memory in its vm_object become non-resident (e.g. paged out). -> if you have a system with a large amount of RAM (e.g. >800MB) it is possible for any user to create enough vnodes to fill the "FFS node" kernel malloc area and deadlock the system. the key is to create a large number of inactive vnodes each of which has a very small number of pages associated with (ideal: 1 page per vnode). [hint: think about "cvs co -AP ports"] here is an example program that creates a specified number of small files: /* * try.c chuck@research.att.com * will deadlock FreeBSD kernel if system has lots of RAM and mx is large * enough (e.g. >204800). tested on system with 2GB RAM. */ #include #include #include main(int argc, char **argv) { int psz = getpagesize(); char *buf; char fn[512]; int fd, lcv, mx; if (argc != 2) errx(1, "usage: try number-of-files"); mx = atoi(argv[1]); if (mx < 1) errx(1, "usage: try number-of-files"); buf = malloc(psz); if (!buf) err(1, "malloc"); bzero(buf, psz); strcpy(buf, "hi there!\n"); /* create directories for a lot of files */ for (lcv = 0 ; lcv < mx ; lcv += 1000) { sprintf(fn, "%d.d", lcv/1000); if (mkdir(fn, 0777) < 0) err(1, "mkdir"); } /* create alot of 1 page files */ for (lcv = 0 ; lcv < mx ; lcv++) { if ((lcv % 1000) == 0) { printf("%dk ", lcv / 1000); fflush(stdout); } sprintf(fn, "%d.d/%d.dat", lcv/1000, lcv%1000); fd = open(fn, O_CREAT|O_RDWR, 0666); if (fd < 0) err(1, "open"); if (write(fd, buf, psz) != psz) err(1, "write"); close(fd); } } now here is a script of me using it. note that before i run it, debug.numvnodes is less than kern.maxvnodes. when it finishes, note that debug.numvnodes is much greater than kern.maxvnodes and the kernel memory allocation for "FFS node" reported by "vmstat -m" is quite large (i didn't run it all the way to deadlock): Script started on Sat Sep 22 00:10:05 2001 cdn3> sysctl -a | egrep 'maxvnodes|numvnodes|freevnodes' kern.maxvnodes: 129183 debug.numvnodes: 340 debug.wantfreevnodes: 25 debug.freevnodes: 24 cdn3> ./try 150000 0k 1k 2k 3k 4k 5k 6k 7k 8k 9k 10k 11k 12k 13k 14k 15k 16k 17k 18k 19k 20k 21k 22k 23k 24k 25k 26k 27k 28k 29k 30k 31k 32k 33k 34k 35k 36k 37k 38k 39k 40k 41k 42k 43k 44k 45k 46k 47k 48k 49k 50k 51k 52k 53k 54k 55k 56k 57k 58k 59k 60k 61k 62k 63k 64k 65k 66k 67k 68k 69k 70k 71k 72k 73k 74k 75k 76k 77k 78k 79k 80k 81k 82k 83k 84k 85k 86k 87k 88k 89k 90k 91k 92k 93k 94k 95k 96k 97k 98k 99k 100k 101k 102k 103k 104k 105k 106k 107k 108k 109k 110k 111k 112k 113k 114k 115k 116k 117k 118k 119k 120k 121k 122k 123k 124k 125k 126k 127k 128k 129k 130k 131k 132k 133k 134k 135k 136k 137k 138k 139k 140k 141k 142k 143k 144k 145k 146k 147k 148k 149k cdn3> sysctl -a | egrep 'maxvnodes|numvnodes|freevnodes' kern.maxvnodes: 129183 debug.numvnodes: 150334 debug.wantfreevnodes: 25 debug.freevnodes: 25 cdn3> vmstat -m | grep 'FFS no' 512 ATA generic, UFS mount, FFS node, ifaddr, mount, BIO buffer, USBdev, FFS node150331 75166K 75166K102400K 151811 0 0 512 cdn3> cdn3> now, if there are enough other things trying to get RAM on the system, then they will cause the RAM for the small files we've created to be paged out and reallocated. if all the pages are removed from a vnode, then it gets freed. thus, an active system is less likely to deadlock because other users will be pushing these vnodes out of RAM. here is a simple program that allocates 1GB of RAM: /* * mzero.c chuck@research.att.com */ #include #include #define GB (1*1024*1024*1024) main() { void *p; int c; p = malloc(GB); if (!p) err(1, "malloc"); printf("malloc done, bzeroing....\n"); bzero(p, GB); printf("bzero done\n"); printf("hit ... "); c = getchar(); exit(0); } watch what happens to debug.freevnodes when i run this program: cdn3> ./mzero & [1] 298 cdn3> malloc done, bzeroing.... bzero done hit ... [1] + Suspended (tty input) ./mzero cdn3> sysctl -a | egrep 'maxvnodes|numvnodes|freevnodes' kern.maxvnodes: 129183 debug.numvnodes: 150336 debug.wantfreevnodes: 25 debug.freevnodes: 43800 cdn3> ./mzero & [2] 301 cdn3> malloc done, bzeroing.... bzero done hit ... [2] + Suspended (tty input) ./mzero cdn3> sysctl -a | egrep 'maxvnodes|numvnodes|freevnodes' kern.maxvnodes: 129183 debug.numvnodes: 150336 debug.wantfreevnodes: 25 debug.freevnodes: 146820 cdn3> vmstat -m | grep 'FFS no' 512 ATA generic, UFS mount, FFS node, ifaddr, mount, BIO buffer, USBdev, FFS node150331 75166K 75166K102400K 151811 0 0 512 cdn3> the vmstat shows the final memory usage in this test. most of the 75166K is on the free list (note debug.freevnodes=146820). Fix: you could hack around the problem by increasing the size of the FFS node malloc area. however, i believe it is wrong for the FreeBSD kernel to ignore the value of kern.maxvnodes. the kernel needs to be smarter about how it recycles vnodes when it reaches the kern.maxvnodes limit. specifically, it should reclaim some of the inactive vnodes that have pages of memory associated with them. chuck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 22:58:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.22.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8768237B416; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 22:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8M5wUb195804; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:58:30 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200109182102.f8IL29h65842@cwsys.cwsent.com> References: <200109182102.f8IL29h65842@cwsys.cwsent.com> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:58:26 -0400 To: Cy Schubert From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: LPD problems in 4.4-STABLE Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 2:01 PM -0700 9/18/01, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: >Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > > However, many clients break lpr's traditional scheme. So, new option >> -W was added. From man lpd: >> > > -W By default, the lpd daemon will only accept connections which > > originate from a reserved-port (<1024) on the remote host. The > > -W flag causes lpd to accept connections coming from any port. > >RFC 1179 states that LPD connections should originate from ports 721-731. >I know of only one LPD, MVS TCP/IP Print Services, enforces this. I >think it's fine to have an LPD option or options that allows print to >come from non-standard ports, e.g. < 1024 or any port, however should >LPR/LPD conform to the standard? [I am not quite sure what you are asking. FreeBSD's lpd does conform to the RFC in that it does require a connection from a reserved-port. That may not be "standard" in the sense of "matching the most common implementations of lpr", but it does follow the RFC...] The RFC claims that the only valid ports are 721-731, but freebsd's lpd accepts connections from almost any reserved port. So, we're already a little bit looser than the RFC. I think it is reasonable for us to allow any reserved port [if that is what you are asking...]. There is a good reason to have the requirement of a reserved port. In the RPI environment, we have print servers accepting print jobs from unix machines that we (the computer center) also runs. There are several hundred different students who use those unix workstations. When the print server accepts a job from a unix client, it assumes that the information in the control file is correct. Among other things, this includes the userid of the person sending the job, and we charge that userid based on how many pages the job will print. If the lpd server accepts connections from any port on a client, then a user can just telnet to the lpd port and submit their own control file (which conveniently does NOT charge them...). How could the server possibly tell legitimate control files from bogus ones? I am not much of a slave to the RFC, and I would happily change the protocol if it improves security or reliability. In the case of this change, I think we're better off following the RFC by default, and allowing a way to accept jobs from any port for those people who need it. (really I would like to have that an option which was set on a per-hostname basis, but -W was quick-and-easy to do). >Having said that, all UNIX systems I've worked on, except for AIX, do >not completely adhere to the RFC, hence printing from non-conforming >systems would definitely break. Based on what I have seen over the years, I doubt that there is ANY implementation which strictly and completely follows the RFC... :-) That said, if someone does run into a problem because they have an lpd client which connects from ports > 1024, then they will get an explicit-enough message from freebsd's lpd which will explain the problem to them. At that point they can decide to drop the reserved-port requirement (by adding -W to lpd's startup flags), or instead they might decide to drop the non-conforming lpd on their remote hosts... -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 22:59:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC26C37B417 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 22:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8M5xDu25448; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:59:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8M5xC725365; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:59:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109220559.f8M5xC725365@harmony.village.org> To: Ben Hockenhull Subject: Re: 4.4-STABLE hang on mounting / Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 21 Sep 2001 13:26:39 EDT." References: Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:59:12 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Ben Hockenhull writes: : I cvsupped to 4.4-STABLE from 4.3-STABLE and built a new kernel. It runs : through boot until the point at which it tries to mount root from : ufs:/dev/ad0s2a, at which point it hangs forever. : : This is a Sony Vaio R505TS, with a 20 gig Hitachi drive. : : Any ideas? Add the following to /boot/loader.conf: hw.pcic.intr_path=1 hw.pcic.irq=0 (or you can break into the boot loader and type set X=Y at the OK prompt for each of the above lines). Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 23: 2:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E1737B406 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8M62Mu25475; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:02:23 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8M62L725409; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:02:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109220602.f8M62L725409@harmony.village.org> To: The Psychotic Viper Subject: Re: CVS tag for 4.4? Cc: Christoph Sold , francisv@dagupan.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:06:01 +0200." <20010922050140.U39981-100000@lucifer.fuzion.ath.cx> References: <20010922050140.U39981-100000@lucifer.fuzion.ath.cx> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:02:21 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010922050140.U39981-100000@lucifer.fuzion.ath.cx> The Psychotic Viper writes: : Just a self sanity check, anyone else notice UPDATING on the RELENG_4 tag : not indicating the release notice in the UPDATING on RELENG_4_4 , namely : they both seem different (-stable has the older one:/). I have picked this : up on 2/3 cvsup servers (5,11,and cvsup2.za) and am running cvsup 16_1d, : so wondering if its me losing my mind or doing something wrong. That's entirely possible.... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 23: 3:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4EF37B41C; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8M63Au25484; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:03:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8M63A725429; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:03:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109220603.f8M63A725429@harmony.village.org> To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS tag for 4.4? Cc: The Psychotic Viper , Christoph Sold , francisv@dagupan.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:06:53 PDT." <200109220406.f8M46rd37184@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> References: <200109220406.f8M46rd37184@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> <20010922050140.U39981-100000@lucifer.fuzion.ath.cx> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:03:10 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200109220406.f8M46rd37184@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> "Bruce A. Mah" writes: : You're not doing anything wrong. UPDATING gets, well, updated : independently for RELENG_4 and RELENG_4_4 (and RELENG_4_3). It gets updated as I notice things... This is a far from regular schedule... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 23: 5:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A0B37B418; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8M652u25500; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:05:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8M650725463; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:05:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109220605.f8M650725463@harmony.village.org> To: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: LPD problems in 4.4-STABLE Cc: Cy Schubert , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:58:26 EDT." References: <200109182102.f8IL29h65842@cwsys.cwsent.com> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:05:00 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Garance A Drosihn writes: : >Having said that, all UNIX systems I've worked on, except for AIX, do : >not completely adhere to the RFC, hence printing from non-conforming : >systems would definitely break. : : Based on what I have seen over the years, I doubt that there is ANY : implementation which strictly and completely follows the RFC... :-) Based on working with Leo in the late 1980s when the LPR spec came out, it documented things not as they were, but as Leo wanted them to be... It is no wonder that there are no unix compliant LPR/LPD programs because a DOS TCP/IP dude wrote it... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 23:24:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from giganda.komkon.org (giganda.komkon.org [209.125.17.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E37037B420 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:24:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from str@localhost) by giganda.komkon.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f8M6Olp07279; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 02:24:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from str) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 02:24:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Roshchin Message-Id: <200109220624.f8M6Olp07279@giganda.komkon.org> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: binary upgrade via sysinstall Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Couple questions about binary upgrade via sysinstall: 1. When I did a binary upgrade via sysinstall it went all the way to the final menu saying that the upgrade is completed, but at that point there were no /kernel. It created /kernel.GENERIC , it renamed /kernel to /kernel.prev, but didn't create a new /kernel I remember when I was doing such a binary upgrade previously (3.x) - it did everything alright. So, I wonder, at what stage should sysinstall copy kernel.GENERIC to /kernel ? Upon a quick glance over the sysinstall source files, the only place where something (kernel_generic) is copied to /kernel is in installFixupBin. The only time this function is called is in dist.c: /* Only do bin fixup if bin dist was successfully extracted */ if ((old_dists & DIST_BIN) && !(Dists & DIST_BIN)) status |= installFixupBin(self); When should that be happening ? I must be missing the point when the /kernel is created. 2. BTW, if one wants to do a binary upgrade from an existing file system _remotely_, how would one is supposed to obtain a copy of the appropriate sysinstall for the new version (floppy and CD-ROM is out of question). Thanks, Igor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 21 23:52:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [206.29.169.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F2237B41A; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tedm.placo.com (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [206.29.168.154]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f8M6q4634999; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:52:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Garance A Drosihn" , "Cy Schubert" Cc: , Subject: RE: LPD problems in 4.4-STABLE Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:52:04 -0700 Message-ID: <00ac01c14333$16a83500$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Garance A >Drosihn >Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:58 PM >To: Cy Schubert >That said, if someone does run into a problem because they have an >lpd client which connects from ports > 1024, then they will get an >explicit-enough message from freebsd's lpd which will explain the >problem to them. > >At that point they can decide to drop the reserved-port requirement >(by adding -W to lpd's startup flags), or instead they might decide >to drop the non-conforming lpd on their remote hosts... > >-- >Garance Alistair Drosehn Hear hear! I've tested dozens of Windows LPR clients and none fails to print to an ordinary FreeBSD server running lpd WITHOUT the -W. Beyond that, I can't imagine any other operating system that supports: "many clients [that] break lpr's traditional scheme" All other operating systems that I've dealt with include LPR and thus there's zero interest among developers in reinventing the wheel and writing LPR implementations for them. Let's have a little reality here, folks. The number of UNMODIFIED lpr implementations that are non-compliant in this way in the world could probably be counted on the fingers of one hand. Ted Mittelstaedt tedm@toybox.placo.com Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide Book website: http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 0:11:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from epoch.longnow.org (dsl092-026-226.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.26.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7835337B417 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kurt@localhost) by epoch.longnow.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f8M7RdA38948; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:27:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kurt) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:27:39 -0700 From: "Kurt D. Bollacker" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: "Kurt D. Bollacker" Subject: newfs failure on install: "virtual timer expired" Message-ID: <20010922002739.D36078@longnow.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just reinstalled my dual CPU Dell PowerEdge server (adaptec 7890 SCSI chipset) with 4.4 (I was running 4.2), but during the creation of backup superblocks during newfs on /, I get a "Virtual timer expired" error. Of course, newfs halts, and the installation fails. I cannot find any reference anywhere as to what this error means coming from newfs. Since 4.2 and 4.3 install just fine, I have to assume this is a 4.4 specific bug, am willing to investigate it, but I need to start by knowing what the error means. Any guesses? Kurt :-) Oo........................................oO Kurt D. Bollacker The Long Now Foundation P.O. Box 29462, San Francisco, CA 94129-0462 415-561-6582 kurt@longnow.org Oo........................................oO To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 0:55:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from acmez.gatech.edu (acmez.gatech.edu [130.207.165.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A1E37B409 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from prism.gatech.edu (osbnhr@r77h93.res.gatech.edu [128.61.77.93]) by acmez.gatech.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id DAA03000 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:55:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3BAC4503.3060904@prism.gatech.edu> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:00:03 -0400 From: "Matthew L. Creech" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010916 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: sis driver broken? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I just installed 4.4-STABLE on a machine. I had the CD for 4.3-R so I installed it, and it worked perfectly. I then cvsup'ed to 4.4-STABLE and remade the world and kernel. Everything seemed to work fine with stable, but now all of a sudden the network card doesn't work anymore! Whether I specify my ip manually or use dhclient, it gives nothing. Dhclient just hangs with no output, while setting things up manually results in a ping telling me that my gateway doesn't exist. It's a Netgear FA311-TX, which uses the sis driver. I haven't seen anything about this on the -stable list, but did something change from 4.3 to 4.4 that would cause this problem? That's all I could think of, since the exact same configuration worked fine in 4.3. Thanks -- Matthew L. Creech To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 3:33: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.is.co.za (mercury.is.co.za [196.4.160.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2A437B411; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:33:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c4-pta-6.dial-up.net (c4-pta-6.dial-up.net [196.26.210.6]) by mercury.is.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A46B4457; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:32:34 +0200 (SAST) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:34:37 +0200 (SAST) From: The Psychotic Viper X-X-Sender: To: Warner Losh Cc: , Christoph Sold , , Subject: Re: CVS tag for 4.4? In-Reply-To: <200109220603.f8M63A725429@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: <20010922123228.M39981-100000@lucifer.fuzion.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <200109220406.f8M46rd37184@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> > "Bruce A. Mah" writes: >: You're not doing anything wrong. UPDATING gets, well, updated >: independently for RELENG_4 and RELENG_4_4 (and RELENG_4_3). > > It gets updated as I notice things... This is a far from regular schedule... Ahh ok thanx just noticed that and ran through a few checks but decided to just ask when this thread came up, not really critical:). Thanks PsyV To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 5:20:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5537A37B41D for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA84125; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:20:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:20:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109221220.OAA84125@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: binary upgrade via sysinstall In-Reply-To: <200109220624.f8M6Olp07279@giganda.komkon.org> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.1-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Igor Roshchin wrote: > _remotely_, how would one is supposed to obtain a copy of the appropriate > sysinstall for the new version (floppy and CD-ROM is out of question). Download the floppies/mfsroot.flp file, mount it using vnconfig, extract the image contained on it, and then mount that one again using vnconfig. It contains the sysinstall binary. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 5:40:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DBB37B419; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 05:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8MCeBS94497; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 08:40:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 08:40:09 -0400 To: stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa Subject: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD Cc: gshapiro@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG OK, here is a strange one. Using the stock sendmail in FreeBSD STABLE, I am seeing strange timeouts to some hosts. e.g. mail to ica.net via icamail.ica.net. Its defiantly listening, but a stock sendmail on FreeBSD immediately gives. The transaction below mail -v postmaster@ica.net Subject: test ignore EOT postmaster@ica.net... Connecting to icamail.ica.net. via esmtp... postmaster@ica.net... Connecting to mail6.ica.net. via esmtp... postmaster@ica.net... Deferred: Operation timed out with mail6.ica.net. takes about 1 second Yet, smtp1# telnet icamail.ica.net smtp Trying 209.151.129.144... Connected to icamail.ica.net. Escape character is '^]'. 220 ica.net VOPmail ESMTP Receiver Version 5.0.193.0 Ready If I grab the sources from ftp.sendmail.org and ./Build install it works as expected. Does anyone know whats special about the generic FreeBSD version that would cause this ? ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 8:35: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bleys.tpgi.com.au (bleys.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2341937B420 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 08:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by bleys.tpgi.com.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f8MFZ1H02759 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:35:01 +1000 Received: from buffy.tpgi.com.au(203.12.160.34) via SMTP by bleys.tpgi.com.au, id smtpdVp03PR; Sun Sep 23 01:34:58 2001 Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by buffy.tpgi.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA31411 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:34:58 +1000 Received: from pen-56k-031.tpgi.com.au(203.213.3.31), claiming to be "" via SMTP by buffy.tpgi.com.au, id smtpdK7kuag; Sun Sep 23 01:34:52 2001 From: Alastair Hogge Reply-To: agh@tpg.com.au To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:31:37 +0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01092301342102.34044@> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I'm having trouble updating from 4.1R to 4.4. After CVSup finihes with a sucess, I: # cd /usr/src # make buildworld But after about 2 minutes, make stops with this: cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I- -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/i386 -I/us r/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../libbfd/i386 -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/include -DDEFAUL T_EMULATION=\"elf_i386\" -DTARGET=\"i386-unknown-freebsd\" -DSCRIPTDIR=\"/usr/ob j/usr/src/i386/usr/libdata\" -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../cont rib/binutils/ld -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../contrib/binutils/ bfd -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld/../../../../include -DVERSION=\""2.11.2 2 0010719 [FreeBSD]"\" -DBFD_VERSION=\""2.11.2 20010719 [FreeBSD]"\" -I/usr/obj/ usr/src/i386/usr/include -static -o ld eelf_i386.o ldcref.o ldctor.o ldemul.o ldexp.o ldfile.o ldgram.o ldlang.o ldlex.o ldmain.o ldmisc.o ldver.o ldwrite.o l exsup.o mri.o ../libbfd/libbfd.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a eelf_i386.o: In function `gldelf_i386_open_dynamic_archive': eelf_i386.o(.text+0xc7b): undefined reference to `basename' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld. *** Error code 1 I've just recently installed 4.1 with sources, and I'm using CVSup "SNAP_16_1e" *default host=cvsup3.au.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4_4 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all doc-all ports-all tag=. I run CVSup like so: # cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/supfile -b cvsup.freebsd.org Is there something I'm supposed do after CVSup-ing and before make-ing? TIA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 8:58:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts20.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9719137B403 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 08:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TMA-1.brad-x.com ([64.228.80.123]) by tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP id <20010922155842.GLVQ1865.tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net@TMA-1.brad-x.com> for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:58:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.brad-x.com [127.0.0.1]) by TMA-1.brad-x.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8520D7B0C4 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:59:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:59:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Brad Laue To: Subject: RELNOTES suggestion Message-ID: <20010922115649.G54256-100000@TMA-1.brad-x.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Had an idea about RELNOTES, and being able to track the changes to it; is it a possibility to add date tags to each 'new entry', so that features can be pinned down to a specific date? Cheers, Brad // -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- // To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 9:52:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F2837B414 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 09:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (gshapiro@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id f8MGqmI8054707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Sep 2001 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id f8MGqlDa054704; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 09:52:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <15276.49631.32382.941@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 09:52:47 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under 21.5 (beta1) "anise" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mike> OK, here is a strange one. Using the stock sendmail in FreeBSD mike> STABLE, I am seeing strange timeouts to some hosts. e.g. mail to mike> ica.net via icamail.ica.net. > dig aaaa icamail.ica.net ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> aaaa icamail.ica.net = ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 4 ^^^^^^^^ ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; icamail.ica.net, type =3D AAAA, class =3D IN =46rom sendmail/README: When attempting to canonify a hostname, some broken name servers will return SERVFAIL (a temporary failure) on T_AAAA (IPv6) lookups. If you want to excuse this behavior, compile sendmail with -D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS and add WorkAroundBrokenAAAA to your= ResolverOptions setting. However, instead, we recommend catching the problem and reporting it to the name server administrator so we can rid t= he world of broken name servers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 10:15:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D1D37B417; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8MHF8S95258; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:15:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922131438.060e9930@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:15:07 -0400 To: Gregory Neil Shapiro From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <15276.49631.32382.941@horsey.gshapiro.net> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Actaully I should have said I get the same problem with that defined in /etc/make.conf ---Mike At 09:52 AM 9/22/2001 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >mike> OK, here is a strange one. Using the stock sendmail in FreeBSD >mike> STABLE, I am seeing strange timeouts to some hosts. e.g. mail to >mike> ica.net via icamail.ica.net. > > > dig aaaa icamail.ica.net > >; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> aaaa icamail.ica.net >;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch >;; got answer: >;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 4 > ^^^^^^^^ >;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 >;; QUERY SECTION: >;; icamail.ica.net, type = AAAA, class = IN > > > >From sendmail/README: > >When attempting to canonify a hostname, some broken name servers will >return SERVFAIL (a temporary failure) on T_AAAA (IPv6) lookups. If you >want to excuse this behavior, compile sendmail with >-D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS and add WorkAroundBrokenAAAA to your >ResolverOptions setting. However, instead, we recommend catching the >problem and reporting it to the name server administrator so we can rid the >world of broken name servers. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 10:20:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E419437B401 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (gshapiro@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id f8MHKCI8055000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id f8MHKCma054997; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:20:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15276.51275.841757.253895@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:20:11 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922131438.060e9930@192.168.0.12> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922131438.060e9930@192.168.0.12> X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under 21.5 (beta1) "anise" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mike> Actaully I should have said I get the same problem with that defined in mike> /etc/make.conf Did you also set the WorkAroundBrokenAAAA flag in the ResolverOptions setting as described? >> >From sendmail/README: >> >> When attempting to canonify a hostname, some broken name servers will >> return SERVFAIL (a temporary failure) on T_AAAA (IPv6) lookups. If you >> want to excuse this behavior, compile sendmail with >> -D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS and add WorkAroundBrokenAAAA to your >> ResolverOptions setting. However, instead, we recommend catching the >> problem and reporting it to the name server administrator so we can rid the >> world of broken name servers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 10:33:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C59537B41B; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8MHX8S95310; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:33:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922132118.03779ec0@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:33:06 -0400 To: Gregory Neil Shapiro From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <15276.51275.841757.253895@horsey.gshapiro.net> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922131438.060e9930@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922131438.060e9930@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:20 AM 9/22/2001 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >mike> Actaully I should have said I get the same problem with that defined in >mike> /etc/make.conf > >Did you also set the WorkAroundBrokenAAAA flag in the ResolverOptions >setting as described? Yes. In my .mc I have tried define(`confBIND_OPTS', `+WorkAroundBrokenAAAA')dnl and define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBrokenAAAA')dnl and I have had for some time, SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS in my /etc/make.conf still, smtp1# !mail mail -v postmaster@ica.net Subject: test EOT postmaster@ica.net... Connecting to icamail.ica.net. via esmtp... postmaster@ica.net... Connecting to mail6.ica.net. via esmtp... postmaster@ica.net... Deferred: Operation timed out with mail6.ica.net. smtp1# I also rebuilt it just to make sure the flags were being passed and it seems to be cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src -I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include -DNEWDB -DNIS -DNETINET6 -DTCPWRAPPERS -DMAP_REGEX -DSTARTTLS -D_FFR_TLS_O_T -D_FFR_TLS_1 -D_FFR_TLS_TOREK -D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/udb.c Also, where is it described in the README ? ---Mike > >> >From sendmail/README: > >> > >> When attempting to canonify a hostname, some broken name servers will > >> return SERVFAIL (a temporary failure) on T_AAAA (IPv6) lookups. If you > >> want to excuse this behavior, compile sendmail with > >> -D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS and add WorkAroundBrokenAAAA to your > >> ResolverOptions setting. However, instead, we recommend catching the > >> problem and reporting it to the name server administrator so we can > rid the > >> world of broken name servers. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 10:33:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp8.xs4all.nl (smtp8.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D84237B422 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtp8.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA11288; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:33:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.11.6/8.11.4) id f8MHXKK07268; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:33:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:33:20 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Brad Laue Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELNOTES suggestion Message-ID: <20010922193319.A7253@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20010922115649.G54256-100000@TMA-1.brad-x.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010922115649.G54256-100000@TMA-1.brad-x.com>; from brad@brad-x.com on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 11:59:14AM -0400 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 11:59:14AM -0400, Brad Laue wrote: > Had an idea about RELNOTES, and being able to track the changes to it; > is it a possibility to add date tags to each 'new entry', so that features > can be pinned down to a specific date? This, sort of, assumes that the person making a change to the source code also updates the relnotes. This is almost never the case. Of course the relnotes maintainers could try to figure it out themselves but that is the kind of work people generally run away from screaming. W/ -- | / o / /_ _ email: wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, The Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 10:46:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C4637B422 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (gshapiro@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id f8MHkXI8056811 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:46:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id f8MHkXQL056808; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:46:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15276.52856.896099.983550@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:46:32 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922132118.03779ec0@192.168.0.12> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922131438.060e9930@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922132118.03779ec0@192.168.0.12> X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under 21.5 (beta1) "anise" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mike> Yes. In my .mc I have tried mike> define(`confBIND_OPTS', `+WorkAroundBrokenAAAA')dnl mike> and mike> define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBrokenAAAA')dnl Ok, try the patch below (from Bill Fenner). If that does it, I'll work on getting it committed this weekend. mike> Also, where is it described in the README ? Line 642 of /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src/README. Index: daemon.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/contrib/sendmail/src/daemon.c,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.3.2.6 diff -u -r1.1.1.3.2.6 daemon.c --- daemon.c 2001/08/01 03:19:45 1.1.1.3.2.6 +++ daemon.c 2001/09/09 19:31:37 @@ -1877,17 +1877,6 @@ gothostent: if (hp == NULL) { -# if NAMED_BIND - /* check for name server timeouts */ - if (errno == ETIMEDOUT || h_errno == TRY_AGAIN || - (errno == ECONNREFUSED && UseNameServer)) - { - save_errno = errno; - mci_setstat(mci, EX_TEMPFAIL, "4.4.3", NULL); - errno = save_errno; - return EX_TEMPFAIL; - } -# endif /* NAMED_BIND */ # if NETINET6 /* ** Try v6 first, then fall back to v4. @@ -1903,6 +1892,17 @@ if (v6found) goto v6tempfail; # endif /* NETINET6 */ +# if NAMED_BIND + /* check for name server timeouts */ + if (errno == ETIMEDOUT || h_errno == TRY_AGAIN || + (errno == ECONNREFUSED && UseNameServer)) + { + save_errno = errno; + mci_setstat(mci, EX_TEMPFAIL, "4.4.3", NULL); + errno = save_errno; + return EX_TEMPFAIL; + } +# endif /* NAMED_BIND */ save_errno = errno; mci_setstat(mci, EX_NOHOST, "5.1.2", NULL); errno = save_errno; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 10:51:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC5637B40B; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8MHpdS95385; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:51:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922134750.037c97e8@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:51:37 -0400 To: Gregory Neil Shapiro From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <15276.52856.896099.983550@horsey.gshapiro.net> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922132118.03779ec0@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922131438.060e9930@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922132118.03779ec0@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:46 AM 9/22/2001 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >mike> Yes. In my .mc I have tried > >mike> define(`confBIND_OPTS', `+WorkAroundBrokenAAAA')dnl >mike> and >mike> define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBrokenAAAA')dnl > >Ok, try the patch below (from Bill Fenner). If that does it, I'll work on >getting it committed this weekend. Yes, it did the trick! Using SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS in /etc/make.conf was all I needed. Thanks very much for the fix, ---Mike >mike> Also, where is it described in the README ? > >Line 642 of /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src/README. Hmmm.. Putting down my crack pipe, I can see it now. >Index: daemon.c >=================================================================== >RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/contrib/sendmail/src/daemon.c,v >retrieving revision 1.1.1.3.2.6 >diff -u -r1.1.1.3.2.6 daemon.c >--- daemon.c 2001/08/01 03:19:45 1.1.1.3.2.6 >+++ daemon.c 2001/09/09 19:31:37 >@@ -1877,17 +1877,6 @@ > gothostent: > if (hp == NULL) > { >-# if NAMED_BIND >- /* check for name server timeouts */ >- if (errno == ETIMEDOUT || h_errno == TRY_AGAIN || >- (errno == ECONNREFUSED && UseNameServer)) >- { >- save_errno = errno; >- mci_setstat(mci, EX_TEMPFAIL, "4.4.3", NULL); >- errno = save_errno; >- return EX_TEMPFAIL; >- } >-# endif /* NAMED_BIND */ > # if NETINET6 > /* > ** Try v6 first, then fall back to v4. >@@ -1903,6 +1892,17 @@ > if (v6found) > goto v6tempfail; > # endif /* NETINET6 */ >+# if NAMED_BIND >+ /* check for name server timeouts */ >+ if (errno == ETIMEDOUT || h_errno == TRY_AGAIN || >+ (errno == ECONNREFUSED && UseNameServer)) >+ { >+ save_errno = errno; >+ mci_setstat(mci, EX_TEMPFAIL, "4.4.3", NULL); >+ errno = save_errno; >+ return EX_TEMPFAIL; >+ } >+# endif /* NAMED_BIND */ > save_errno = errno; > mci_setstat(mci, EX_NOHOST, "5.1.2", NULL); > errno = save_errno; -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 10:52:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA3837B42A for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (gshapiro@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id f8MHqjI8056906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0/8.12.0/Submit) id f8MHqiiL056903; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:52:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15276.53228.675977.660138@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:52:44 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922134750.037c97e8@192.168.0.12> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922132118.03779ec0@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922131438.060e9930@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922134750.037c97e8@192.168.0.12> X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under 21.5 (beta1) "anise" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> Ok, try the patch below (from Bill Fenner). If that does it, I'll work on >> getting it committed this weekend. mike> Yes, it did the trick! mike> Using SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS in mike> /etc/make.conf mike> was all I needed. Thanks very much for the fix, Which did it? :) The patch or adding SENDMAIL_CFLAGS to make.conf? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 10:58:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008CD37B415; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 10:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8MHwkS95419; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:58:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922135658.037c3dd8@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:58:45 -0400 To: Gregory Neil Shapiro From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD (solved) Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <15276.53228.675977.660138@horsey.gshapiro.net> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922134750.037c97e8@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922132118.03779ec0@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922131438.060e9930@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> <5.1.0.14.0.20010922134750.037c97e8@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:52 AM 9/22/2001 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >Which did it? :) The patch or adding SENDMAIL_CFLAGS to make.conf? Sorry, I should be been more clear. The patch seems to be the fix. The build flags and mc options have no effect. But the patch makes it work. In other words, on a default FreeBSD STABLE snapshot as of today, applying the patch you sent me fixes the problem. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 11: 7:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4792637B40F for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id f8MI7X681131; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:07:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:07:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200109221807.f8MI7X681131@earth.backplane.com> To: Joe Greco Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, chuck@research.att.com Subject: Re: 4.4-RELEASE kernel deadlock ("FFS node") References: <200109220402.XAA34985@aurora.sol.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Basically the buffer cache reserves 16K of KVM per buffer. It is possible to allocate larger buffers, but if you create a filesystem with a block size greater then 16384 you put all sorts of stress on the buffer cache code which could lead to problems such as memory fragmentation of the buffer cache KVA space. I don't know of any problems that would cause a system crash, but we just haven't tested the case well enough to be able to say that block sizes greater then 16384 are reliable. -Matt :> the one unusual thing about the configuration is that the filesystem :> we are attempting to build on is a 136GB ccd across 4 scsi disks with :> the fsize=8192 and the bsize=65536 (it is mainly to be used for large :> data log files): : :FreeBSD doesn't support fsize/bsize so large. There are ongoing issues :within the filesystem code and VM code that will cause such filesystems :to break under heavy load. Matt Dillon also talked about this being less- :than-optimal for the VM system from some technical points of view. I ran :into this years ago, and have been content to live with : :newfs -c 96 -b 16384 -f 4096 -i 1048576 /dev/rccd${i}e : :on filesystems weighing in at 576GB. Note that this is also for very :large file storage (see -i) and I'd love to use a larger -b/-f (and then :a larger -c) but so far nobody's cared enough to do anything about it, and :I have neither the kernel skills nor the time to look at it, since in :reality the values above work fine and the only noticeable side effect is :that the fsck goes a bit slower. : :I ran into problems with -b 32768 -f 8192 as well. I didn't attempt all :combinations of options, though, since for my application, lockups were a :bit random due to the light amount of use involved. :-- :Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net :"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I :won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) :With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 11:12:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sage-american.com (sage-american.com [216.122.141.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEA337B42C for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sageone (ppp-208-191-234-41.dialup.crchtx.swbell.net [208.191.234.41]) by sage-american.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA22092; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:10:47 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010922131055.01177b30@mail.sage-american.com> X-Sender: jacks@mail.sage-american.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:10:55 -0500 To: The Psychotic Viper , Gabriel Ambuehl From: jacks@sage-american.com Subject: Re: Re[2]: BRAVO 4.4 TEAM! Cc: j mckitrick , In-Reply-To: <20010922045933.R39981-100000@lucifer.fuzion.ath.cx> References: <15069350861.20010921142620@buz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It was a source update & recompile kernel... Another totally different box went just as smoothly.... At 05:01 AM 9.22.2001 +0200, The Psychotic Viper wrote: >Hi, > >On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > >> Hello j, >> >> Friday, September 21, 2001, 12:09:09 AM, you wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:29:49PM -0500, jacks@sage-american.com >> > wrote: >> > | BRAVO to the 4.4 Team!!!! >> > | >> > | My update from 4.3 to 4.4 (custom kernel too) when absolutely >> > | flawlessly!!! >> >> > Binary or source? >> >> Must be binary if he uses custom kernel... >Beg to differ, could be either binary (with kernel recompile later,but >unlikely) or a source update. Could be you had the two mixed up?:) > >PsyV > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Server Admin Sage-American http://www.sage-american.com jacks@sage-american.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 11:13:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from warez.scriptkiddie.org (uswest-dsl-142-38.cortland.com [209.162.142.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9CC37B419 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.69.11] (unknown [192.168.69.11]) by warez.scriptkiddie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DCA62D01; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:14:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Lamont Granquist To: Juha Saarinen Cc: Subject: RE: xl0 tx underrun / watchdog errors In-Reply-To: <007f01c14301$b3ee1f00$0a01a8c0@den2> Message-ID: <20010922110414.O16275-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG So you're suggesting its just this? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11869 On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Juha Saarinen wrote: > :: Sep 21 17:28:00 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 > :: Sep 21 17:28:00 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing > :: tx start threshold to 900 bytes > :: Sep 21 17:28:01 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 > :: Sep 21 17:28:01 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing > :: tx start threshold to 960 bytes > :: Sep 21 17:28:05 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 > :: Sep 21 17:28:05 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing > :: tx start threshold to 1020 bytes > :: Sep 21 17:28:10 segflt /kernel: xl0: watchdog timeout > :: Sep 21 17:28:13 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 > :: Sep 21 17:28:13 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing > :: tx start threshold to 120 bytes > :: Sep 21 17:28:18 segflt /kernel: xl0: watchdog timeout > :: Sep 21 17:28:20 segflt /kernel: xl0: transmission error: 90 > :: Sep 21 17:28:20 segflt /kernel: xl0: tx underrun, increasing > :: tx start threshold to 120 bytes > > :: xl0: <3Com 3c556 Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd400-0xd4ff mem > :: 0xfbffd800-0xfbffd87f,0xfbffdc00-0xfbffdc7f irq 11 at device > :: 16.0 on pci0 > :: xl0: Ethernet address: 00:01:03:82:df:00 > :: miibus0: on xl0 > > I believe this is the 3Com Fast Etherlink hardware bug manifesting > itself. I saw it with 4.3-RELEASE | -STABLE. It's in the archives, and > Donald Becker's mentioned it too. > > -- > Juha > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 12: 0:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gamma.root-servers.ch (gamma.root-servers.ch [195.49.62.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E98837B428 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 67896 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2001 19:00:41 -0000 Received: from dclient217-162-128-224.hispeed.ch (HELO athlon550) (217.162.128.224) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Sep 2001 19:00:41 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:04:33 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53bis) Educational Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <197179644324.20010922210433@buz.ch> To: jacks@sage-american.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re[6]: BRAVO 4.4 TEAM! In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010922135952.01177b30@mail.sage-american.com> References: <3.0.5.32.20010922131055.01177b30@mail.sage-american.com> <15069350861.20010921142620@buz.ch> <3.0.5.32.20010922131055.01177b30@mail.sage-american.com> <3.0.5.32.20010922135952.01177b30@mail.sage-american.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hello jacks, Saturday, September 22, 2001, 8:59:52 PM, you wrote: > Great Gabriel... I wanted to express some well-deserved Kudos to > the TEAM 4.4... I can only agree. Well done, guys. Best regards, Gabriel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5i iQEVAwUBO6zStMZa2WpymlDxAQGomggAlNZ7qkRZlWKFmSR5xoQj/sRN3KET8rq3 I/QfkV8VkWkqx5ycgDyy8i/l4tjvgPzO1ZirtQxuZlHvyFu14WxKsma1pxfc3m/y xlFWDZZldU9ILOfHhbLenDa+VbIjxDbXBSdQGFO4r8qOrGm6Ho5gNvd/+Le+RhU9 sTSgnhcOh1mbpbx3LAsyygfaPF303U8/jPQ9rXSx+Ouvv8P4diMcB5GGTBfbWbzM z9k+slm7U+ypmlH0WZDqYTFwb9pPtnpdQ01Lsz9OYfoJ/vagNkJQVKTjan/Q216X YdU4NwxUQLYa4nI5ayu4Ok4ARuy7oI4F+7ESKyxzTLNmrtTitn3rqA== =utQL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 12:26: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF7137B421; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.1]) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hack)) id 15ksPW-00013b-00; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 07:25:58 +1200 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 07:25:57 +1200 (NZST) From: Juha Saarinen To: Mike Tancsa Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , "gshapiro@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> Message-ID: X-S: Always MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > OK, here is a strange one. Using > > the stock sendmail in FreeBSD STABLE, I am seeing strange timeouts to some > hosts. e.g. mail to ica.net via icamail.ica.net. Its defiantly listening, > but a stock sendmail on FreeBSD immediately gives. The transaction below > > mail -v postmaster@ica.net > Subject: test ignore > > EOT > postmaster@ica.net... Connecting to icamail.ica.net. via esmtp... > postmaster@ica.net... Connecting to mail6.ica.net. via esmtp... > postmaster@ica.net... Deferred: Operation timed out with mail6.ica.net. > > takes about 1 second Is Sendmail doing ident lookups? -- Regards, Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 12:37: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from brian.sjc.got.net (66-81-4-207.static.o1.com [66.81.4.207]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F5037B426 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by brian.sjc.got.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 270FDA8BC; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:36:53 -0700 From: Brian Weiss To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Problem mounting / with 4.4-STABLE (9/20/01) Message-ID: <20010922123653.A80217@brian.got.net> Reply-To: brian@got.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I recently upgraded my laptop from 4.3-RELEASE to 4.4-STABLE (9/20/01) and the new kernel seems to have problems finding my HDD. When booting the kernel gets all the way to mounting the root filesystem and then spits out the following: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a no such device 'ad' setrootbyname failed ffs_mountroot: can't find rootvp Root mount failed: 6 I am able to boot my old custom 4.3-RELEASE kernel and the all the necessary device files do exist. It should also be noted that I have a desktop using a world/kernel built from the same source that boots just fine. I checked dmesg on the laptop for any other useful information but the only thing I noticed was that it doesn't mention anything about "ata" or "atapci". Here is the relevant stuff from my kernel config: device pci device ata options ATA_STATIC_ID I am going to attempt a build without the ATA_STATIC_ID option in a few here, but I won't know the results of that for at least a few hours. Both my laptop and desktop are using IBM drives (/dev/ad*) though the one in the laptop is quite a bit older. Laptop: ad0: 2067MB [4200/16/63] at ata0-master BIOSPIO Desktop: ad4: 43979MB [89355/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 ad6: 58644MB [119150/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA100 I have also been seeing some strange behavior when booting the 4.3-RELEASE kernel on my laptop. About 40-50% of the time it will hang when trying to mount / and it seems to be accessing both the HDD and my PCMCIA card pretty heavily. Generally the next reboot works fine. Might this be due to my world being out of sync with the kernel? Any help would be greatly appreciated. -- Brian Weiss http://we.got.net/~brian/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 12:41:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5156037B414 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.1]) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hack)) id 15kseD-00016K-00; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 07:41:09 +1200 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 07:41:09 +1200 (NZST) From: Juha Saarinen To: Lamont Granquist Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: xl0 tx underrun / watchdog errors In-Reply-To: <20010922110414.O16275-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> Message-ID: X-S: Always MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Lamont Granquist wrote: > > > So you're suggesting its just this? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11869 Yes, that looks exactly like the problem I had. The network would just stop working when copying files to and fro another host. Didn't see the patch though, so I ended up putting an Intel EEPRO in the box instead. -- Regards, Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 12:43:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BDD37B401; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:43:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id MAA24044; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:43:10 -0700 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda24042; Sat Sep 22 12:43:01 2001 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.6/8.9.1) id f8MJh1C38516; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from UNKNOWN(10.1.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpda38510; Sat Sep 22 12:42:17 2001 Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id f8MJgFi28807; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200109221942.f8MJgFi28807@cwsys.cwsent.com> X-Authentication-Warning: cwsys.cwsent.com: smtpd set sender to using -f Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdi28794; Sat Sep 22 12:41:27 2001 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-Sender: schubert To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: Cy Schubert , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LPD problems in 4.4-STABLE In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:58:26 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:41:27 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Garance A Drosihn writes: > At 2:01 PM -0700 9/18/01, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > >Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > > > However, many clients break lpr's traditional scheme. So, new option > >> -W was added. From man lpd: > >> > > > -W By default, the lpd daemon will only accept connections which > > > originate from a reserved-port (<1024) on the remote host. The > > > -W flag causes lpd to accept connections coming from any port. > > > >RFC 1179 states that LPD connections should originate from ports 721-731. > >I know of only one LPD, MVS TCP/IP Print Services, enforces this. I > >think it's fine to have an LPD option or options that allows print to > >come from non-standard ports, e.g. < 1024 or any port, however should > >LPR/LPD conform to the standard? > > [I am not quite sure what you are asking. FreeBSD's lpd does conform > to the RFC in that it does require a connection from a reserved-port. > That may not be "standard" in the sense of "matching the most common > implementations of lpr", but it does follow the RFC...] Warner answered my question yesterday. Thanks. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD Ministry of Management Services Province of BC > > The RFC claims that the only valid ports are 721-731, but freebsd's lpd > accepts connections from almost any reserved port. So, we're already a > little bit looser than the RFC. I think it is reasonable for us to > allow any reserved port [if that is what you are asking...]. > > There is a good reason to have the requirement of a reserved port. In > the RPI environment, we have print servers accepting print jobs from > unix machines that we (the computer center) also runs. There are > several hundred different students who use those unix workstations. > When the print server accepts a job from a unix client, it assumes > that the information in the control file is correct. Among other > things, this includes the userid of the person sending the job, and > we charge that userid based on how many pages the job will print. > > If the lpd server accepts connections from any port on a client, then > a user can just telnet to the lpd port and submit their own control > file (which conveniently does NOT charge them...). How could the > server possibly tell legitimate control files from bogus ones? > > I am not much of a slave to the RFC, and I would happily change the > protocol if it improves security or reliability. In the case of > this change, I think we're better off following the RFC by default, > and allowing a way to accept jobs from any port for those people > who need it. (really I would like to have that an option which was > set on a per-hostname basis, but -W was quick-and-easy to do). > > >Having said that, all UNIX systems I've worked on, except for AIX, do > >not completely adhere to the RFC, hence printing from non-conforming > >systems would definitely break. > > Based on what I have seen over the years, I doubt that there is ANY > implementation which strictly and completely follows the RFC... :-) > > That said, if someone does run into a problem because they have an > lpd client which connects from ports > 1024, then they will get an > explicit-enough message from freebsd's lpd which will explain the > problem to them. > > At that point they can decide to drop the reserved-port requirement > (by adding -W to lpd's startup flags), or instead they might decide > to drop the non-conforming lpd on their remote hosts... > > -- > Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu > Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 12:56:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DC637B426 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8MJuPS95776; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:56:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922155523.03bddfa0@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:56:24 -0400 To: Juha Saarinen From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922082451.05af6d70@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 07:25 AM 9/23/2001 +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote: >Is Sendmail doing ident lookups? Dont think so. How can I check? The patch posted later in this thread does fix the problem for me. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 12:58:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pr0n.kutulu.org (pr0n.kutulu.org [151.196.107.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF22E37B40A for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cc191573a (cc191573-a.longhill1.md.home.com [24.37.104.136]) by pr0n.kutulu.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id f8MF2e708299 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:02:40 GMT (envelope-from kutulu@kutulu.org) Message-ID: <005b01c143a0$a3107e40$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com> From: "Kutulu" To: Subject: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:56:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0057_01C1437F.1741A450"; micalg=SHA1 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C1437F.1741A450 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm trying to figure out what 'version' the sshd in FreeBSD is. The banner claims it's OpenSSH 2.3.0, but that's a pretty old version. Even more confusing, there are ports of OpenSSH 2.9 and 2.9p2 in the ports tree. I assume the FBSD built-in version has at least kept up with security fixes in OpenSSH, but is it still a "port" of OpenSSH 2.3.0, or does that version number no longer mean anything? If it is just OpenSSH patched for FBSD, is there a reason, other then simple lack of time or resources (both of which I have), that it hasn't been upgraded? --K ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C1437F.1741A450 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII7TCCAnww ggHloAMCAQICAwW08DANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQIFADCBkjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdl c3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMQ8wDQYDVQQKEwZUaGF3dGUxHTAbBgNVBAsT FENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNlcnZpY2VzMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9QZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBSU0EgMjAw MC44LjMwMB4XDTAxMDkyMjE0MDAxOFoXDTAyMDkyMjE0MDAxOFowQzEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3Rl IEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEgMB4GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYRa3V0dWx1QGt1dHVsdS5vcmcwgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBALuDdLgCHJxCJguCs8IK+K4Fic2MZAbW1CVoIPV1qU/ez9TI z5Yv4XRDskBUZxFogDSDdYPEGCbNB8Tp7TjwD+n2zAuIuapRMySbs7zQYef/fBd01rqRBmi/A9/v bPOuKHqOAvbMqWMH2D9hjCH2d3R8cJIoCglhEtyyxm9rOee5AgMBAAGjLjAsMBwGA1UdEQQVMBOB EWt1dHVsdUBrdXR1bHUub3JnMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQADgYEAlJ1wNCdT DYnUEQV9rBeSbJ8lJ1yxSHxwosdb8UzkD3H6AfRJBQQQ/qAIWh9ODW2UjMH5el3RgaZAbPUheG56 bPcKEdb+pGInFz8Rf0Baent6D3OLrvVT1wrJ+qeYuf61DHIAuorD/ZFeN8v3wLtyuuHRkPZmn/1b JgLc4S2qImIwggMtMIIClqADAgECAgEAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEV MBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0 ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQw IgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNv bmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNOTYwMTAxMDAwMDAwWhcNMjAxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCB 0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3du MRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2 aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJ KoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUA A4GNADCBiQKBgQDUadfUsJRkW3HpR9gMUbbqcpGwhF59LQ2PexLfhSV1KHQ6QixjJ5+Ve0vvfhmH HYbqo925zpZkGsIUbkSsfOaP6E0PcR9AOKYAo4d49vmUhl6t6sBeduvZFKNdbnp8DKVLVX8GGSl/ npom1Wq7OCQIapjHsdqjmJH9edvlWsQcuQIDAQABoxMwETAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAMfskn5O+PWWpWdiKqTwTRFg0G+NYFhhrCa7UjVcCM8w+6hKloofYkIjjBcP 9LpknBesRynfnZhe0mxgcVyirNx54+duAEcftQ0o6AKd5Jr9E/Sm2Xyx+NxfIyYJkYBz0BQb3kOp gyXy5pwvFcr+pquKB3WLDN1RhGvk+NHOd6KBMIIDODCCAqGgAwIBAgIQZkVyt8x09c9jdkWE0C6R ATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTES MBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMf Q2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFs IEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29t MB4XDTAwMDgzMDAwMDAwMFoXDTA0MDgyNzIzNTk1OVowgZIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQI EwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYD VQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNB IDIwMDAuOC4zMDCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA3jMypmPHCSVFPtJueCdngcXa iBmClw7jRCmKYzUqbXA8+tyu9+50bzC8M5B/+TRxoKNtmPHDT6Jl2w36S/HW3WGl+YXNVZo1Gp2S dagnrthy+boC9tewkd4c6avgGAOofENCUFGHgzzwObSbVIoTh/+zm51JZgAtCYnslGvpoWkCAwEA AaNOMEwwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDEtMjk3MBIGA1UdEwEB /wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBADGxS0dd+QFx5fVTbF15 1j2YwCYTYoEipxL4IpXoG0m3J3sEObr85vIk65H6vewNKjj3UFWobPcNrUwbvAP0teuiR59sogxY jTFCCRFssBpp0SsSskBdavl50OouJd2K5PzbDR+dAvNa28o89kTqJmmHf0iezqWf54TYyWJirQXG MYIB/jCCAfoCAQEwgZowgZIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQ BgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhhd3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBT ZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDIwMDAuOC4zMAIDBbTwMAkG BSsOAwIaBQCggbowGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDEw OTIyMTk1NjA2WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUH36w74NIHchQ4FzA3horNDMBMUMwWwYJKoZIhvcN AQkPMU4wTDAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4D AgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwBwYFKw4DAh0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYB/JZ1AhXPlbPwzuz51 9NF8KmOoIFGzXp2D1Cl7M9NVtkBp7GMhbY3ZTPLTKFcNHQCaEQ1rKwV4TaLKqExifPJJRyQB5OzN V9mIa9M9LrK8CLf10bKvR7mETz7n+OSxk6qoDBGu/R/qrH8n53FxMIuG+iQlSKkAGqcc1Cvl39OC WgAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C1437F.1741A450-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 13: 9:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBEA37B40C for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.1]) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hack)) id 15kt5l-0001BF-00; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 08:09:37 +1200 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 08:09:37 +1200 (NZST) From: Juha Saarinen To: Mike Tancsa Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: something strange with sendmail 8.11.6 on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922155523.03bddfa0@192.168.0.12> Message-ID: X-S: Always MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Mike Tancsa wrote: > Dont think so. How can I check? The patch posted later in this thread > does fix the problem for me. Sorry, I didn't see the replies later on this thread until I had replied. Not sure how Sendmail does it (I'm an Exim user), but a 'netstat -an' should show you if something's listening on port 113 when you send email. There's an option, 'confTO_IDENT' with a default value of 30 seconds, that sets the timeout waiting for a response to an ident query. Ahh... you might want to read Q3.12 in the comp.mail.sendmail FAQ at www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/sendmailv8.html to see if it applies to your situation. -- Regards, Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 13:12:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0427437B40D for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.1]) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hack)) id 15kt84-0001Bk-00; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 08:12:00 +1200 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 08:12:00 +1200 (NZST) From: Juha Saarinen To: Kutulu Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? In-Reply-To: <005b01c143a0$a3107e40$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com> Message-ID: X-S: Always MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Kutulu wrote: > I'm trying to figure out what 'version' the sshd in FreeBSD is. If you run 'ssh -v' you should see both the client and server versions printed out. -- Regards, Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 13:27:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pr0n.kutulu.org (pr0n.kutulu.org [151.196.107.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F62B37B40A for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cc191573a (kutulu@cc191573-a.longhill1.md.home.com [24.37.104.136]) by pr0n.kutulu.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id f8MFW0708443; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:32:00 GMT (envelope-from kutulu@kutulu.org) Message-ID: <008101c143a4$bbc434a0$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com> From: "Kutulu" To: "Juha Saarinen" Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" References: Subject: Re: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 16:25:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From: "Juha Saarinen" To: "Kutulu" Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" > On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Kutulu wrote: > > > I'm trying to figure out what 'version' the sshd in FreeBSD is. > > If you run 'ssh -v' you should see both the client and server versions > printed out. Thankee. Running ssh -v confirmed that it's "OpenSSH 2.3.0 with FreeBSD localisations", which is what I figured it was from the sshd banner. So, now I'm just curious if there's a reason it's still at 2.3.0, when OpenSSH is up to 2.9? The other 'third party' software like sendmail and BIND are kept pretty up to date, but OpenSSH is several versions behind. Just a lack of time to adequately test it? Or is the reason simply that there's no good reason to upgrade? I was going to install the port (because I like staying up to date on versions), but didn't know if there was some specific reason that version wasn't part of the base OS. --K To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 14: 7:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-11.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E994B37B405 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.173.248.152] (helo=chain.demon.nl) by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15ktzz-000Gi2-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:07:43 +0000 Received: from chain.demon.nl (alcatraz.chain.loc [192.168.0.4]) by chain.demon.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8ML6kD00362 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:06:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sven@chain.demon.nl) Message-ID: <3BACFD19.D564DF78@chain.demon.nl> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:05:29 +0200 From: Sven Hazejager Organization: CHAIN Software Technology B.V. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; IRIX64 6.5 IP28) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Parallel port config Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I've never been able to get my parallel port working at anything faster than "compatible", but now that I've upgraded to 4.4-STABLE, I'm trying again. I'm using an ASUS A7V with the parallel port in the BIOS set to ECP/EPP. Without any flags, ppc is started in COMPATIBLE mode at boot time. With a /boot/kernel.conf, I've tried the following: f ppc0 0x9 q This results in the following when booting: ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 0 flags 0x9 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/NIBBLE) in ECP mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold When I print something, the system hangs completely while uploading the file to the printer. Even top doesn't update its display anymore ;-). When the system comes back to life, top displays an interrupt count of 100% which drops to 0%. Any suggestions? Thanks! Sven -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 14:32: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f110.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF10B37B41E for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:32:01 -0700 Received: from 24.241.33.175 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:32:01 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.241.33.175] From: "Bryan Berch" To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Installing the doc on 4.4 stable Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:32:01 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2001 21:32:01.0812 (UTC) FILETIME=[04458540:01C143AE] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I cvsup'd last night and built the new kerenl no problems. Then updated my ports and tried to build the docproj from ports with it failing with: ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/bin/xsltproc in /usr/ports/textproc/lib xslt ===> Configuring for libxslt-1.0.4 cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/textproc/libxslt/work/libxslt-1.0.4 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/libxslt. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/libxslt. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/libxslt. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/libxslt. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/libxslt. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/docproj. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/docproj. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/docproj. Can someone give me an idea to the problem? Thanks Bryan _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 14:40:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6738437B413 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA07852; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:40:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:40:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200109222140.XAA07852@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Parallel port config In-Reply-To: <3BACFD19.D564DF78@chain.demon.nl> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.1-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sven Hazejager wrote: > When I print something, the system hangs completely while uploading the > file to the printer. Even top doesn't update its display anymore ;-). > When the system comes back to life, top displays an interrupt count of > 100% which drops to 0%. Have you tried lptcontrol -e? Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 14:58:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5AB37B40B for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E518F66E33; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:58:17 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kutulu Cc: Juha Saarinen , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? Message-ID: <20010922145817.B6270@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <008101c143a4$bbc434a0$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <008101c143a4$bbc434a0$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com>; from kutulu@kutulu.org on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:25:28PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 04:25:28PM -0400, Kutulu wrote: > Thankee. Running ssh -v confirmed that it's "OpenSSH 2.3.0 with > FreeBSD localisations", which is what I figured it was from the sshd > banner. So, now I'm just curious if there's a reason it's still at > 2.3.0, when OpenSSH is up to 2.9? The maintainer didn't merge the newer version into -stable before 4.4-R. -current has had the latest version for some time. Note that 2.9 was the version released after 2.3.0, because OpenBSD changed their numbering scheme. Kris --8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7rQl5Wry0BWjoQKURAojlAKCVwQVFDhKDxGZ72tW4qTkgoI5lEACgrdDh gnhRYP3/YBDTeAGETGnzoL8= =Aayq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 15:33: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from CRWdog.demon.co.uk (cs6669226-57.austin.rr.com [66.69.226.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10D237B410 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CRWdog.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B07F3E3C; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:33:01 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Kutulu , Juha Saarinen , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? In-Reply-To: Message from Kris Kennaway of "Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:58:17 PDT." <20010922145817.B6270@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_891371131P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:33:01 -0500 From: Andy Sparrow Message-Id: <20010922223301.3B07F3E3C@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_891371131P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Note > that 2.9 was the version released after 2.3.0, because OpenBSD changed > their numbering scheme. ??? I'm pretty sure I updated a whole slew of Slowaris systems (in my day job) to OpenSSH 2.5.2 right after the CERT SSH notification. Course, I subsequently updated them to 2.9.x not very long after that ;-) Cheers AS --==_Exmh_891371131P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE7rRGdPHh895bDXeQRAjV/AKC5RAdOiGkm2iO0SpMvhcVHik+vQwCfaulp HmV7rT9zSAXxHJ0AefG8zRA= =HKZv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_891371131P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 15:51:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372FA37B407 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:51:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EE6A966D20; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:51:11 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andy Sparrow Cc: Kris Kennaway , Kutulu , Juha Saarinen , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? Message-ID: <20010922155111.A7221@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010922223301.3B07F3E3C@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010922223301.3B07F3E3C@CRWdog.demon.co.uk>; from spadger@best.com on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:33:01PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:33:01PM -0500, Andy Sparrow wrote: >=20 > > Note > > that 2.9 was the version released after 2.3.0, because OpenBSD changed > > their numbering scheme. >=20 > ??? I'm pretty sure I updated a whole slew of Slowaris systems (in my day= job)=20 > to OpenSSH 2.5.2 right after the CERT SSH notification. Ah, sorry, you're right. Still, the FreeBSD version has all known security holes fixed..those are some of the "localizations". Kris --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7rRXfWry0BWjoQKURAg8jAJ0Yk3xBd//UU3OuKYD4SCjUs5hESgCcDvcL Oys+vbrnW3Lf0Yi3q9lPcMg= =5NCH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 15:56:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CEC37B405 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 15:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chimp.sentex.net (fcage [192.168.0.2]) by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8MMueS96185; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:56:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922185312.06494a18@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:56:39 -0400 To: Kris Kennaway From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20010922155111.A7221@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010922223301.3B07F3E3C@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> <20010922223301.3B07F3E3C@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 03:51 PM 9/22/2001 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: >Ah, sorry, you're right. Still, the FreeBSD version has all known >security holes fixed..those are some of the "localizations". Hi, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=28311 is still outstanding. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 16: 0:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5A037B425 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 16:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (helo=den2) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hack)) id 15kvkv-0001Wk-00; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:00:18 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: "'Mike Tancsa'" , "'Kris Kennaway'" Cc: Subject: RE: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:00:16 +1200 Message-ID: <00de01c143ba$584f61e0$0a01a8c0@den2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010922185312.06494a18@192.168.0.12> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :: Hi, :: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=28311 is still :: outstanding. What about 2.9p3 from the ports collection? Does the PR apply to that version too? -- Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 16:56:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from brian.sjc.got.net (66-81-4-207.static.o1.com [66.81.4.207]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BA537B40B for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 16:56:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by brian.sjc.got.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 43435A8BC; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 16:56:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 16:56:54 -0700 From: Brian Weiss To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem mounting / with 4.4-STABLE (9/20/01) Message-ID: <20010922165654.A45771@brian.got.net> Reply-To: brian@got.net References: <20010922123653.A80217@brian.got.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010922123653.A80217@brian.got.net>; from brian@got.net on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 12:36:53PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just to clarify, this is not the same problem which Ben Hockenhull previously posted. The system does not actually hang when booting, it just can't find the ad* device files. The fix proposed by Warner also seems to have no effect other than causing my 4.3-RELEASE kernel to hang when mounting /. -- Brian Weiss http://we.got.net/~brian/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 17: 4:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pr0n.kutulu.org (pr0n.kutulu.org [151.196.107.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FB637B40D for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cc191573a (cc191573-a.longhill1.md.home.com [24.37.104.136]) by pr0n.kutulu.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id f8MJ8k709083; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:08:46 GMT (envelope-from kutulu@kutulu.org) Message-ID: <007c01c143c3$05754620$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com> From: "Kutulu" To: "Kris Kennaway" Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" References: <008101c143a4$bbc434a0$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com> <20010922145817.B6270@xor.obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:02:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kris Kennaway" To: "Kutulu" Cc: "Juha Saarinen" ; "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 5:58 PM Subject: Re: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? > The maintainer didn't merge the newer version > into -stable before 4.4-R. -current has had the > latest version for some time. Thank you muchly. I don't have enough local access to the machine to risk keeping up with -CURRENT, but I do CVSup -STABLE nightly. Any rough idea when it'll make it in there? --K To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 17: 8: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747A137B40B for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:08:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ACE8D66D20; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:07:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:07:57 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kutulu Cc: Kris Kennaway , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? Message-ID: <20010922170757.A21404@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <008101c143a4$bbc434a0$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com> <20010922145817.B6270@xor.obsecurity.org> <007c01c143c3$05754620$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <007c01c143c3$05754620$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com>; from kutulu@kutulu.org on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 08:02:16PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 08:02:16PM -0400, Kutulu wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kris Kennaway" > To: "Kutulu" > Cc: "Juha Saarinen" ; "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" > > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 5:58 PM > Subject: Re: OpenSSH (?) version in FreeBSD -STABLE? >=20 > > The maintainer didn't merge the newer version > > into -stable before 4.4-R. -current has had the > > latest version for some time. >=20 > Thank you muchly. I don't have enough local access to the machine to risk > keeping up with -CURRENT, but I do CVSup -STABLE nightly. Any rough idea > when it'll make it in there? No. Kris --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7rSfcWry0BWjoQKURAhz8AJ9u97vMhq6j4kzlK+RD1N4b9FJj/ACgpDXc GygEurMyxYgc82lN4gGiFto= =Qw2t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 18:15:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vixie.stac.state.tx.us (ns.dir.state.tx.us [204.64.177.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F43537B413 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unstable@localhost) by vixie.stac.state.tx.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8N1IdA48405 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:18:40 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from unstable@vixie.stac.state.tx.us) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:18:39 -0500 (CDT) From: stuart nichols To: Subject: mkisofs not in 4.4-RELEASE Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mkisofs was not included in the 4.4-R version of cdrtools, and is not otherwise on the base installation CD. Is it on one of the other CDs? Is it in -STABLE? cdrtools is much less useful without it. -- stu unstable@stac.state.tx.us Office: (512) 463-7601 FAX: (512) 475-4759 stuart nichols State Technology Assessment Center Texas Department of Information Resources 300 West 15th Street Austin TX 78744 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 18:23:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD0837B428 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA16494; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:20:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:20:52 -0700 From: "Chad R. Larson" To: "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: j mckitrick , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Nuno Teixeira , "David W. Chapman Jr." Subject: Re: hw.ata.wc && hw.ata.tags && softupdates short question Message-ID: <20010922182052.B16388@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <20010921035414.B75668@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from doconnor@gsoft.com.au on Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:26:07PM +0930 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 12:26:07PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On 21-Sep-2001 j mckitrick wrote: >>| Doesn't harware write cache usually write itself to disk before power >>| outage or even after? >> >> And wouldn't a laptop be safe with write caching? At least if I keep the >> battery in? > > Sure, but it is still a risk Years ago, there was a main-frame drive manufacturer who used the spindle motor as a generator in the case of a power failure. The kinetic energy in the spinning disk pack was converted to electricity, so there would be enough energy to flush the cache to disk and then park the heads. I think it was Century. You know, those drives that looked like small washing machines and had removable disk packs? I wonder if any of the current PC drive manufacturers do (or have considered doing) the same thing? -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 18:38:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2674437B426 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dwcjr (unknown [66.64.12.254]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6371210F42B; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:38:44 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <002501c143d0$78fa1b40$fe0c4042@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Chad R. Larson" , "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: "j mckitrick" , , "Nuno Teixeira" References: <20010921035414.B75668@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010922182052.B16388@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: hw.ata.wc && hw.ata.tags && softupdates short question Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:38:39 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As pointed out, its believed that IBM uses capacitors to fix this problem. > Years ago, there was a main-frame drive manufacturer who used the > spindle motor as a generator in the case of a power failure. The > kinetic energy in the spinning disk pack was converted to electricity, > so there would be enough energy to flush the cache to disk and then park > the heads. I think it was Century. You know, those drives that looked > like small washing machines and had removable disk packs? > > I wonder if any of the current PC drive manufacturers do (or have > considered doing) the same thing? > > -crl > -- > Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? > chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com > DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 18:42:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ece.cmu.edu (ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.136.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA7B37B407 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vpn45.ece.cmu.edu (ANNEX-1.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.136.1]) (authenticated) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f8N1gMP20800; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:42:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:42:13 -0400 From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" To: "Chad R. Larson" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hw.ata.wc && hw.ata.tags && softupdates short question Message-ID: <168920000.1001209332@vpn45.ece.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010922182052.B16388@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <20010921035414.B75668@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010922182052.B16388@freeway.dcfinc.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Saturday, September 22, 2001 18:20:52 -0700, "Chad R. Larson" wrote: +----- | Years ago, there was a main-frame drive manufacturer who used the | spindle motor as a generator in the case of a power failure. The | kinetic energy in the spinning disk pack was converted to electricity, | so there would be enough energy to flush the cache to disk and then park | the heads. I think it was Century. You know, those drives that looked | like small washing machines and had removable disk packs? | | I wonder if any of the current PC drive manufacturers do (or have | considered doing) the same thing? +--->8 I'm thinking that that's dubious because of entropy. It might have been possible to pull it off with older drives if the flush could use a low-power mode, but modern disks are likely to be a lost cause. -- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][freebsd] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [JAPH][WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering KF8NH carnegie mellon university [linux: proof of the million monkeys theory] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 18:51:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from CRWdog.demon.co.uk (cs6669225-28.austin.rr.com [66.69.225.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C1637B40E for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CRWdog.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962433E36; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:51:41 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: stuart nichols Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, andy@CRWdog.demon.co.uk Subject: Re: mkisofs not in 4.4-RELEASE In-Reply-To: Message from stuart nichols of "Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:18:39 CDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:51:41 -0500 From: Andy Sparrow Message-Id: <20010923015141.962433E36@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > mkisofs was not included in the 4.4-R version > of cdrtools, and is not otherwise on the base > installation CD. Is it on one of the other > CDs? Is it in -STABLE? cdrtools is much less > useful without it. It's not in the base -STABLE, but it's in /usr/ports/sysutils. Cheers, AS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 18:58:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vixie.stac.state.tx.us (ns.dir.state.tx.us [204.64.177.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106E937B41A for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:58:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unstable@localhost) by vixie.stac.state.tx.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8N21hh48544; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:01:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from unstable@vixie.stac.state.tx.us) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:01:43 -0500 (CDT) From: stuart nichols To: Dave Uhring Cc: Subject: Re: mkisofs not in 4.4-RELEASE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Dave Uhring wrote: > On Saturday 22 September 2001 08:18 pm, stuart nichols wrote: > > mkisofs was not included in the 4.4-R version > > of cdrtools, and is not otherwise on the base > > installation CD. Is it on one of the other > > CDs? Is it in -STABLE? cdrtools is much less > > useful without it. > Did you read the Makefile in /usr/ports/sysutils/cdrtools? Yeah, I have now, but what does that have to do with packages? Am I supposed to read the ports Makefile for everything before I install the package? AND, mkisofs does not appear to be entombed within cdrtools.1.10.tgz anyway, so even if I defined MKISOFS, it doesn't look like I'd have got it anyway. And does that makefile even apply to a package add, anyway? I don't know. What I do know is that the package one-line description for cdrtools says it includes mkisofs, and yet it did not install it. Would I be expected to define CDRECORD to get that, too? Or READCD??? I don't think so. -- stu unstable@stac.state.tx.us Office: (512) 463-7601 FAX: (512) 475-4759 stuart nichols State Technology Assessment Center Texas Department of Information Resources 300 West 15th Street Austin TX 78744 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 18:58:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from femail45.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail45.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.254.60.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A7A37B403 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from math.missouri.edu ([24.12.197.197]) by femail45.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010920185637.SVKU21841.femail45.sdc1.sfba.home.com@math.missouri.edu>; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:56:37 -0700 Message-ID: <3BAA3BE5.4FB6035D@math.missouri.edu> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:56:37 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: mergemaster goes postal References: <20010920121758.B68279@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010920115210.B75316@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 12:17:58PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:41:28PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > > | happened on three separate systems cvsupped this afternoon > > | > > | *** You installed a new /dev/MAKEDEV script, so make sure that you run > > | 'cd /dev && /bin/sh MAKEDEV all' to rebuild your devices > > | > > | Would you like to run it now? y or n [n] y > > | Running cd /dev && /bin/sh MAKEDEV all > > | > > | MAKEDEV: arith: syntax error: à "{ > > | > > | bad node: mknod i4bteld1 > > > > Check the archives for the past few days. This has been asked several times > > in the last week or two. > > > > You'll either need to change the MAKEDEV script or change your CPUTYPE. > > What does CPUTYPE have to do with a shell script? > I think the bug is in sh. -- Stephen Montgomery-Smith stephen@math.missouri.edu http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 19: 1: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from CRWdog.demon.co.uk (cs6669225-28.austin.rr.com [66.69.225.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3F737B416 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:01:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CRWdog.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644233E36; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:01:02 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Juha Saarinen Cc: Lamont Granquist , "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: xl0 tx underrun / watchdog errors In-Reply-To: Message from Juha Saarinen of "Sun, 23 Sep 2001 07:41:09 +1200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:01:02 -0500 From: Andy Sparrow Message-Id: <20010923020102.644233E36@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Lamont Granquist wrote: > > > > > > > So you're suggesting its just this? > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11869 > > Yes, that looks exactly like the problem I had. The network would just > stop working when copying files to and fro another host. Didn't see the > patch though, so I ended up putting an Intel EEPRO in the box instead. Didn't even know that this fix existed. Incrementing to 300 seems to fix my problems completely (integrated NIC in HP Omnibook 6000). Can we get this MFC'd? Looks like it's been in -CURRENT for over two years now... Cheers, AS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 19:33:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from warez.scriptkiddie.org (uswest-dsl-142-38.cortland.com [209.162.142.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD29437B411 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.69.11] (unknown [192.168.69.11]) by warez.scriptkiddie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761BB62D01 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:33:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Lamont Granquist To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20010923020102.644233E36@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20010922191456.V27000-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG All my 4.3 and 4.4 boxen have problems with the only lookback address being valid is 127.0.0.1 instead of the entire /8. My ifconfig looks like: lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 (note that this is the correct netmask) but when i try this: % ping 127.0.0.2 PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes ^C --- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss it does not work like it should. (and i don't have any ipf filter rules on lo0 or anything of that nature) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 19:40:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A28A37B428 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 15kzCE-0002gj-00 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:40:42 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:40:42 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <20010922224041.I24981@pir.net> Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" References: <20010923020102.644233E36@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> <20010922191456.V27000-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010922191456.V27000-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org>; from lamont@scriptkiddie.org on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 07:33:58PM -0700 X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Lamont Granquist probably said: > All my 4.3 and 4.4 boxen have problems with the only lookback address > being valid is 127.0.0.1 instead of the entire /8. > > My ifconfig looks like: > > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > (note that this is the correct netmask) and note that the only ipv4 address listed is '127.0.0.1'. > --- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > it does not work like it should. Looks perfectly normal to me. What is "like it should" ? You don't have anything listening on the ip 127.0.0.2, why should anything answer ? P. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 19:41: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CBF37B42A for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:41:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA16797; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:40:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:40:56 -0700 From: "Chad R. Larson" To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" Cc: "Chad R. Larson" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hw.ata.wc && hw.ata.tags && softupdates short question Message-ID: <20010922194056.F16388@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <20010921035414.B75668@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010922182052.B16388@freeway.dcfinc.com> <168920000.1001209332@vpn45.ece.cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <168920000.1001209332@vpn45.ece.cmu.edu>; from allbery@ece.cmu.edu on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 09:42:13PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 09:42:13PM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On Saturday, September 22, 2001 18:20:52 -0700, "Chad R. Larson" > wrote: >+----- >| Years ago, there was a main-frame drive manufacturer who used the >| spindle motor as a generator in the case of a power failure. The >| kinetic energy in the spinning disk pack was converted to >| electricity, so there would be enough energy to flush the cache to >| disk and then park the heads. I think it was Century. You know, >| those drives that looked like small washing machines and had >| removable disk packs? >| >| I wonder if any of the current PC drive manufacturers do (or have >| considered doing) the same thing? >+--->8 > > I'm thinking that that's dubious because of entropy. It might have been > possible to pull it off with older drives if the flush could use a > low-power mode, but modern disks are likely to be a lost cause. Actually, it was the head parking that was the most important. These had removable packs, and if the heads weren't parked before the spindle slowed down enough for the heads to stop flying you got a head crash and a big repair bill. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 19:42:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EC637B416 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F1EDA66D20; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:42:23 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: stuart nichols Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mkisofs not in 4.4-RELEASE Message-ID: <20010922194223.B33886@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from unstable@stac.state.tx.us on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 08:18:39PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 08:18:39PM -0500, stuart nichols wrote: >=20 > mkisofs was not included in the 4.4-R version > of cdrtools, and is not otherwise on the base > installation CD. Is it on one of the other > CDs? Is it in -STABLE? cdrtools is much less > useful without it. It's in the mkisofs port/package. Kris --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7rUwPWry0BWjoQKURApRfAKCoS1xnaE4EjRir/+nKMWsCgsIyDwCfVJgQ WqrQV9RqNnmDnCex/5HDi9E= =IGXO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GID0FwUMdk1T2AWN-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 19:45:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nipsi.de (dsl-213-023-032-205.arcor-ip.net [213.23.32.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED18A37B41C for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31234 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2001 02:44:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nipsi.de) (172.16.1.101) by nipsi with SMTP; 23 Sep 2001 02:44:11 -0000 Message-ID: <3BAD4CED.934D1A09@nipsi.de> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 04:46:05 +0200 From: Dennis Berger Organization: Nipsi X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lamont Granquist Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 References: <20010922191456.V27000-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmm I don't have this problem ... Nipsi# uname -a FreeBSD Nipsi.home.net 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Mon Sep 17 13:07:51 CEST 2001 root@Nipsi.home.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/NIPSI i386 Nipsi# ifconfig lo0 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 Nipsi# ifconfig lo0 inet 127.0.0.2 netmask 255.0.0.0 Nipsi# ifconfig lo0 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9 inet 127.0.0.2 netmask 0xff000000 Nipsi# ping 127.0.0.2 PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.139 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.109 ms ^C --- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.109/0.124/0.139/0.015 ms Lamont Granquist schrieb: > All my 4.3 and 4.4 boxen have problems with the only lookback address > being valid is 127.0.0.1 instead of the entire /8. > > My ifconfig looks like: > > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > (note that this is the correct netmask) > > but when i try this: > > % ping 127.0.0.2 > PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes > ^C > --- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > it does not work like it should. > > (and i don't have any ipf filter rules on lo0 or anything of that nature) > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 19:46:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5999B37B41F for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id f8N2k2083827; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:46:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:46:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200109230246.f8N2k2083827@earth.backplane.com> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: "Chad R. Larson" , "Daniel O'Connor" , "j mckitrick" , , "Nuno Teixeira" Subject: Re: hw.ata.wc && hw.ata.tags && softupdates short question References: <20010921035414.B75668@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010922182052.B16388@freeway.dcfinc.com> <002501c143d0$78fa1b40$fe0c4042@inethouston.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :As pointed out, its believed that IBM uses capacitors to fix this problem. I'm rather skeptical of this. If someone can point out the article or technical spec then ok, but otherwise it's just rumor. It would take a fairly large capacitor to hold the input voltages in spec long enough to write out the cache. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 19:47:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from warez.scriptkiddie.org (uswest-dsl-142-38.cortland.com [209.162.142.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245C537B42A for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.69.11] (unknown [192.168.69.11]) by warez.scriptkiddie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06C562D01 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:47:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:48:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Lamont Granquist To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20010922191456.V27000-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> Message-ID: <20010922194706.G27000-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As people have already started pointing out to me in e-mail, this is correct behavior if you haven't defined any ip aliases. Now that I sit down and think about it, it does make perfect sense. On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Lamont Granquist wrote: > All my 4.3 and 4.4 boxen have problems with the only lookback address > being valid is 127.0.0.1 instead of the entire /8. > > My ifconfig looks like: > > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > (note that this is the correct netmask) > > but when i try this: > > % ping 127.0.0.2 > PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes > ^C > --- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > it does not work like it should. > > (and i don't have any ipf filter rules on lo0 or anything of that nature) > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 20: 8:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DE237B413 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (helo=den2) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hack)) id 15kzcl-0001sc-00 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:08:07 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: Subject: RE: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:08:06 +1200 Message-ID: <000701c143dc$f7331230$0a01a8c0@den2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <20010922224041.I24981@pir.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :: and note that the only ipv4 address listed is '127.0.0.1'. How come it works under Linux? lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:652472 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:652472 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 pts/2 juha@vimfuego:/usr/share/services$ ping 127.0.0.2 PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2) from 127.0.0.2 : 56(84) bytes of data. Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures. 64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=536 usec 64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=83 usec But FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE: lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 bash-2.05$ ping 127.0.0.2 PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes ^C --- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss -- Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 20:19:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDABE37B414 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 15kzno-0002wm-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:19:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:19:31 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <20010922231931.L24981@pir.net> Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20010922224041.I24981@pir.net> <000701c143dc$f7331230$0a01a8c0@den2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000701c143dc$f7331230$0a01a8c0@den2>; from juha@saarinen.org on Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 03:08:06PM +1200 X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Juha Saarinen probably said: > How come it works under Linux? > --- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics --- > 6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss Linux does all sorts of things differently from everyone else, why would this be any different ? 127.0.0.2 does not respond by default on any UNIX flavor I have access to immediately - FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris, OSF1, etc. P. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 20:22:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC6337B425 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (helo=den2) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hack)) id 15kzqY-0001v7-00 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:22:22 +1200 From: "Juha Saarinen" To: Subject: RE: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:22:21 +1200 Message-ID: <001201c143de$f4eeb590$0a01a8c0@den2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <20010922231931.L24981@pir.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :: Linux does all sorts of things differently from everyone else, why :: would this be any different ? Just curious... maybe they've got a GNU loopback interface? ;-)) :: 127.0.0.2 does not respond by default on any UNIX flavor I :: have access :: to immediately - FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris, OSF1, etc. Not on BSDi 4.1 either. -- Juha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 20:23: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ece.cmu.edu (ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.136.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342C837B42C for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vpn45.ece.cmu.edu (ANNEX-1.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.136.1]) (authenticated) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f8N3MoP25976; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:22:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:22:47 -0400 From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" To: Juha Saarinen , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <196470000.1001215366@vpn45.ece.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <000701c143dc$f7331230$0a01a8c0@den2> References: <000701c143dc$f7331230$0a01a8c0@den2> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday, September 23, 2001 15:08:06 +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote: +----- | :: and note that the only ipv4 address listed is '127.0.0.1'. | | How come it works under Linux? +--->8 Because one of the Linux networking people found an RFC which suggested that machines should respond to all net127 addresses, so they hacked the loopback driver to respond to all addresses within the subnet. -- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][freebsd] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [JAPH][WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering KF8NH carnegie mellon university [linux: proof of the million monkeys theory] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 20:45:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB4237B427 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:45:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8N3jou32012; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:45:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8N3jn746054; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:45:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109230345.f8N3jn746054@harmony.village.org> To: Lamont Granquist Subject: Re: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Sep 2001 19:33:58 PDT." <20010922191456.V27000-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> References: <20010922191456.V27000-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:45:49 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010922191456.V27000-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> Lamont Granquist writes: : All my 4.3 and 4.4 boxen have problems with the only lookback address : being valid is 127.0.0.1 instead of the entire /8. Ummm, that's the only valid address. Looks like it works to me. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 20:47: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E56037B429 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8N3kvu32020; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:46:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8N3ku746074; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:46:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109230346.f8N3ku746074@harmony.village.org> To: "Juha Saarinen" Subject: Re: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:08:06 +1200." <000701c143dc$f7331230$0a01a8c0@den2> References: <000701c143dc$f7331230$0a01a8c0@den2> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:46:56 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <000701c143dc$f7331230$0a01a8c0@den2> "Juha Saarinen" writes: : How come it works under Linux? Because Linux is broken. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 20:49:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403D037B401 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8N3n6u32029; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:49:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8N3n5746094; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:49:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109230349.f8N3n5746094@harmony.village.org> To: "Juha Saarinen" Subject: Re: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:22:21 +1200." <001201c143de$f4eeb590$0a01a8c0@den2> References: <001201c143de$f4eeb590$0a01a8c0@den2> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:49:05 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <001201c143de$f4eeb590$0a01a8c0@den2> "Juha Saarinen" writes: : :: Linux does all sorts of things differently from everyone else, why : :: would this be any different ? : : Just curious... maybe they've got a GNU loopback interface? ;-)) : : :: 127.0.0.2 does not respond by default on any UNIX flavor I : :: have access : :: to immediately - FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris, OSF1, etc. : : Not on BSDi 4.1 either. Or SunOS 3.x, SunOS 4.x, AIX, IRIX, VMS (all the various TCP/IP stacks available), DOS, WIN/NT, 4.2 BSD on a vax, 4.3 BSD on a vax, HP/UX, OSF/1, Ultrix and every single other machine I've ever used since 1985. It didn't used to "work" on Linux. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 21:10:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from blueyonder.co.uk (pcow034o.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.53.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71E737B409 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:10:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from reiteration.net ([62.31.233.77]) by blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.687.68); Sun, 23 Sep 2001 05:10:56 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 05:10:16 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: John Subject: cvsup-mirror port MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 U Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello list I have a LAN of 10 freebsd machines and seek to minimise bandwidth usage by running a local freebsd cvsup mirror, so I installed cvsup-mirror out of ports. This seemed to progress well, and the install script announced I was now a freebsd-mirror. What it does not do is to fill in the auth file in /home/cvsupin/.cvsup and I find I have to run cvspasswd in order to get this, otherwise I get error messages like: spod# less /var/log/cvsup.log CVSup update begins at 2001-09-23 04:07:06 Updating from cvsup-master.freebsd.org Connected to cvsup-master.freebsd.org No record for server "freefall.freebsd.org" in "/home/cvsupin/.cvsup/auth" CVSup update ends at 2001-09-23 04:07:06 cvspasswd generates a password line comprising of my email address and a md5 hash and instructs me to place the string cvsup-master.freebsd.org:email@your.domain:xxxxxx: (where xxxx is your plaintext password) into auth and to send the md5 hash string in a secure email to the upstream mirror admin (in this case cvsup- master.freebsd.org (aka freefall.freebsd.org) The question is, am I doing this correctly (I don't need write access to the upstream repository, so why the personal login) who would I need to contact, and what is their public key? any info/help appreciated -- John - freebsd-lists@i-zone.demon.co.uk - jfm@reiteration.net http://www.reiteration.net/~jfm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 21:33:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62AD37B428 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:33:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sdn-ar-007dcwashp213.dialsprint.net ([63.178.91.125] helo=moo.holy.cow) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #2) id 15l0xC-0000BZ-00; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:33:19 -0700 Received: by moo.holy.cow (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D63C950BAA; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:33:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:33:32 -0400 From: parv To: John Merryweather Cooper Cc: Scott D , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Balsa/aspell broken? Message-ID: <20010923003332.A47084@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: John Merryweather Cooper , Scott D , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <3BABFF62.1080108@earthlink.net> <20010921204611.E24650@johncoop.MSHOME> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010921204611.E24650@johncoop.MSHOME>; from john_m_cooper@yahoo.com on Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 08:46:11PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG this was, on the fateful occasion around Sep 21 23:46 -0400, sent by John Merryweather Cooper > ... > On 2001.09.21 20:02 Scott D wrote: > > ... > > having the same problem. I've deleted the previous balsa and done make > > > > clean and about everything I can think of. Any suggestions welcome. > > > > Here is the error I get: > > file_util.cc: In function `class string autil::add_possible_dir(const > > string &, const string &)': > > file_util.cc:33: implicit declaration of function `int > > autil::need_dir(...)' > > gmake[2]: *** [file_util.lo] Error 1 > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/textproc/aspell/work/aspell-.33.7.1/util' > > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/textproc/aspell/work/aspell-.33.7.1' > > gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 > > *** Error code 2 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/aspell. > > *** Error code 1 ... > > Something's wrong with your libtool. Rebuild your libtool port and try > again. file_util.cc compiles without so much as a warning on my ... also, see 29362 pr filed by yours truly for above aspell error... http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=29362 -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 21:36:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E4437B407 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 15l10f-0003o1-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:36:53 -0400 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:36:52 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup-mirror port Message-ID: <20010923003652.N24981@pir.net> Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from freebsd-lists@reiteration.net on Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 05:10:16AM +0100 X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John probably said: > Connected to cvsup-master.freebsd.org > No record for server "freefall.freebsd.org" in > "/home/cvsupin/.cvsup/auth" > CVSup update ends at 2001-09-23 04:07:06 > > cvspasswd generates a password line comprising of my email address and a > md5 hash and instructs me to place the string > cvsup-master.freebsd.org:email@your.domain:xxxxxx: (where xxxx is your > plaintext password) into auth and to send the md5 hash string in a > secure email to the upstream mirror admin (in this case cvsup- > master.freebsd.org (aka freefall.freebsd.org) > > The question is, am I doing this correctly (I don't need write access to > the upstream repository, so why the personal login) who would I need to > contact, and what is their public key? I'd assume that it's so cvsup-master is only used by the mirrors and not j. random public. You don't have to cvsup your mirror from cvsup-master, of course. I run mirrors at the two sites where I have a lot of machines to save bandwidth and cpu time on the official mirrors, but I just cvsup from one of the public mirrors ... P. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 21:39:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.tekrealm.net (dsl081-247-162.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.247.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13EB37B412 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by freebsd.tekrealm.net (8.11.6/8.11.4) id f8N4d7559625; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:39:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from elitetek@tekrealm.net) Received: (from elitetek@localhost) by freebsd.tekrealm.net (8.11.6/8.11.4av) id f8N4d7859617; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:39:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from elitetek@tekrealm.net) X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd.tekrealm.net: elitetek set sender to elitetek@tekrealm.net using -f Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 21:39:07 -0700 From: Andrew Stuart To: John Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup-mirror port Message-ID: <20010922213907.A59475@freebsd.tekrealm.net> Reply-To: elitetek@tekrealm.net References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from freebsd-lists@reiteration.net on Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 05:10:16AM +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 at 05:10:16 +0100, John wrote: --snip -- > CVSup update begins at 2001-09-23 04:07:06 > Updating from cvsup-master.freebsd.org > Connected to cvsup-master.freebsd.org > No record for server "freefall.freebsd.org" in > "/home/cvsupin/.cvsup/auth" > CVSup update ends at 2001-09-23 04:07:06 > > cvspasswd generates a password line comprising of my email address and a > md5 hash and instructs me to place the string > cvsup-master.freebsd.org:email@your.domain:xxxxxx: (where xxxx is your > plaintext password) into auth and to send the md5 hash string in a > secure email to the upstream mirror admin (in this case cvsup- > master.freebsd.org (aka freefall.freebsd.org) > --snip-- ok, the problem is. your only allowed to link to cvsup-master if you meet the requirements, and IIRC they expect you to be an open mirror. (someone correct me if im wrong) what you need to do is edit your config.sh (normal install is /usr/local/etc/cvsup/config.sh) and change the host="cvsup-master.freebsd.org" to whatever the closest mirror to you is. such as cvsup3.freebsd.org. -- Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 22:27: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pr0n.kutulu.org (pr0n.kutulu.org [151.196.107.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C2437B407 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cc191573a (kutulu@cc191573-a.longhill1.md.home.com [24.37.104.136]) by pr0n.kutulu.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id f8N0VC710112; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 00:31:13 GMT (envelope-from kutulu@kutulu.org) Message-ID: <000901c143f0$11990ea0$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com> From: "Kutulu" To: "Warner Losh" Cc: References: <001201c143de$f4eeb590$0a01a8c0@den2> <200109230349.f8N3n5746094@harmony.village.org> Subject: Re: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:24:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From: "Warner Losh" To: "Juha Saarinen" Cc: Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 11:49 PM Subject: Re: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 > In message <001201c143de$f4eeb590$0a01a8c0@den2> "Juha Saarinen" writes: > : :: Linux does all sorts of things differently from everyone else, why > : :: would this be any different ? > : > : Just curious... maybe they've got a GNU loopback interface? ;-)) > : > : :: 127.0.0.2 does not respond by default on any UNIX flavor I > : :: have access > : :: to immediately - FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris, OSF1, etc. > : > : Not on BSDi 4.1 either. > > Or SunOS 3.x, SunOS 4.x, AIX, IRIX, VMS (all the various TCP/IP stacks > available), DOS, WIN/NT, 4.2 BSD on a vax, 4.3 BSD on a vax, HP/UX, > OSF/1, Ultrix and every single other machine I've ever used since > 1985. Linux does have some company, though not very prestigious... from Win2k Professional: Pinging 127.1.2.3 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 127.1.2.3: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.1.2.3: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.1.2.3: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.1.2.3: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128 Ping statistics for 127.1.2.3: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms --K To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Sep 22 22:51:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nasu.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (nasu.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.128.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28B237B41C for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nantai.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp by nasu.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.11.2/1.1.29.3/26Jan01-1134AM) id f8N5pS5302055; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:51:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp by nantai.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.11.2/1.1.29.3/30Jan01-0241PM) id f8N5pRO505824; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:51:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (IDENT:yFjVV3XzJkGKvp9TWFAjK6mMmNNLZYS4@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.43.7]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/zodiac-May2000) with ESMTP id PAA18651; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:01:16 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200109230601.PAA18651@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: Claus Assmann Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: Keyboard NCD N-123UX doesn't work with 4.x? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2001 19:34:00 MST." <20010920193400.A1618@zardoc.esmtp.org> References: <20010915092625.A1086@zardoc.esmtp.org> <200109170530.OAA17161@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> <20010920193400.A1618@zardoc.esmtp.org> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:01:15 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >On Mon, Sep 17, 2001, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: > >Thanks for all the help provided and sorry for the late response. >I tried several things but didn't get very far. One thing we noticed >is that the keyboard works fine if we plug it in after the machine >booted. However, that isn't a good idea :-( I even hacked the kernel >sources to disable the probe call but that didn't help. I'm not >sure which of the start code causes the problem. > >> >My NCD keyboard N-123UX doesn't seem to work with FreeBSD 4.2 and >> >FreeBSD 4.4-RC on two PCs and one laptop. It works fine with FreeBSD >> >3.2 and OpenBSD 2.9-current (two machines are dual boot: one 3.2 > >> options KBDIO_DEBUG=2 > >When I do this, the machine isn't able to boot. It either stops >when it tries to mount / (flags 0) or a graphics characters is >printed to the screen over and over (flags 1,2). So in the former >case I wrote down the screen output: Hmm, the KBDIO_DEBUG option isn't supposed to have effect on anything other than debug output from the AT keyboard driver. Likewise, these flags shouldn't break the kernel. Something might have been accidentally broken. We had better start over from the fresh kernel source code. >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >kbdc: new command byte:0054 (set_controller...) >kbdc: TEST_AUX_PORT status:0000 >kbdc: RESET_AUX return code:00fa >kbdc: RESET_AUX status:00aa >kbdc: RESET_AUX ID:0000 >kbdc: new command byte:0065 (set_controller...) >psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 >... Looks like the keyboard is responding the way it is expected to... Kazu >Manual root filesystem specification: > >No matter what I enter, the system isn't able to mount / >Does this output help anything? Maybe I try something more >next weekend. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message