From owner-freebsd-bugbusters Mon Mar 4 17:23:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5FD37B402 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 17:23:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id DADFA5346; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 02:23:17 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: buggers@ofug.org, bugbusters@freebsd.org Subject: Mailing list transition From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 05 Mar 2002 02:23:17 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 8 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Now that bugbusters@freebsd.org has been up for a while, I'd suggest we start using it instead of buggers@ofug.org (not that buggers sees a lot of traffic, but I hope this will change as the puzzle starts coming together) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugbusters" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-bugbusters Fri Mar 8 18: 3:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Received: from venus.sun.com (venus.Sun.COM [192.9.25.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3262537B405 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:03:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from custmail.sun.com (custmail.sun.com [192.18.97.201]) by venus.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA20445 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:03:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mysun.com ([192.18.97.201]) by custmail.sun.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GSOO9W00.K2T for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 19:01:08 -0700 From: "Hiten Pandya" To: bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 02:01:08 GMT X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: Closable list of PRs (duplicate copy for this list) X-Accept-Language: en X-Priority: 1 (Highest) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi BugBusters!, As now this list is finally on FreeBSD.org, I thought, it was kinda useful, for me to post my big list of _closable_ PRs to this list. I hope someone will take interest. :) Buggers List of PRs (Problem Reports): misc/34039 (FreeBSD fortune(6) tips to be added) docs/34074 (Incomplete disklabel instructions) docs/34038 (New Article for the a.out to ELF upgrade process [in detail]) docs/34005 (mmap man page description of ENOMEM is ambiguous) docs/32468 (broken link in handbook: sysutils/mkisofs - [tmp. fix]) kern/26510 (panic Intel STL2 server board with 4GB RAM) i386/26812 (old bootstrap /sys/i386/boot/... still in -STABLE branch) docs/32020 (loader.8 manpage missing tunables) i386/26736 (System freeze booting from (i386) 4.3 floppies) i386/34399 (Undefined datatypes in netinet headers) [ the above PR can be closed, according to the followup, I checked the header file src/netinet/in_systm.h, as well write code. ] kern/28162 ([4G Memory Problem] - fixed in RELENG_4, HEAD, 4.5]) i386/29045 (paninc ffs_blkfree) i386/29096 ([no feedback from originator]) i386/31728 (Install hangs...) i386/33089 ([no feedback from originator]) i386/34051 ([not enought information - looks misfiled to me]) i386/28536 ([needs to be handed over to the MSDOSFS maintainer]) i386/28536 [ the above PR is pretty simple to fix. As I followedup to the PR, I mentioned to hand it over to the MSDOSFS maintainer. But after checking CVS logs, I found out that the code is originally from NetBSD (imported by dfr@). A similar type of fix, is also in the NetBSD MSDOSFS code (-current one). /* * Check and validate (or perhaps invalidate?) the fsinfo structure? * XXX */ if (pmp->pm_fsinfo) { if (pmp->pm_nxtfree == (u_long)-1) pmp->pm_fsinfo = 0; } In a nutshell, I think the patch supplied in the PR is good enough to be applied to sys/fs/msdosfs/msdos_vfsops.c. Although, I think this should be looked into by a more experienced person other than me ( I am dumb ). It would also be good, if this change was to be backported to NetBSD, as I can see an XXX comment in the above code as well. :) ] NOTE: Some of them might be closed, as this was last updated around two weeks ago. regards, Hiten Pandya To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugbusters" in the body of the message