From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 25 00:31:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6AE16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 00:31:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omoikane.mb.skyweb.ca (omoikane.mb.skyweb.ca [209.5.243.8])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D52743D39
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 00:31:06 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mark@skyweb.ca)
Received: by omoikane.mb.skyweb.ca (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id DE1C862721; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 02:31:21 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 02:31:21 -0600
From: Mark Johnston <mjohnston@skyweb.ca>
To: current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040125083121.GE1314@omoikane.mb.skyweb.ca>
Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org
References: <20040124070846.GA595@omoikane.mb.skyweb.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040124070846.GA595@omoikane.mb.skyweb.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: RFC: Weekly status update 17/01/04-23/01/04 (cvs-src summary)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 08:31:08 -0000

This is a multi-followup that covers a few different things I got replies
on.  The question asked most was, essentially, "How did you decide what to
rate where?"  The answer is "Arbitrarily", but I'll be tuning the process
up next week, mostly by looking at PRs closed as an indicator of how
important a commit was.

The most-requested addition was a link to the discussion thread/CVS commit
message.  I wasn't sure whether to add this initially, not knowing whether
it would be used, but it sounds like it's worth the extra work for the
number of people that would use it.

I also had some suggestions on things that could be included and easier
ways to publish - I'll be talking those over with Jonathan Sage and Matteo
Riondato, both of whom are working on reports as well.

Mark