From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 00:10:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBE716A4CE for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 00:10:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA6B43D2D for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 00:10:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from [198.60.22.205] (helo=mgr5.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Auoh7-0000uP-02; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:10:33 -0700 Received: from [207.135.128.145] (helo=misty.eyesbeyond.com) by mgr5.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Auoh5-0007b9-Sn; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:10:32 -0700 Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) i1M8ASN2072589; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:10:29 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1M8AR0Y072578; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:10:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:10:26 -0700 From: Greg Lewis To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040222081026.GA68300@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <20040222004847.GA57661@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040222062539.GA50119@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20040222073554.GA71568@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040222073907.GA95266@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20040222074600.GA71722@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040222074600.GA71722@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mgr5.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=8.0 tests=XMSubMetaS_00 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: glewis@eyesbeyond.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Mon Jan 26 13:00:24 MST 2004) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packages with diablo dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:10:34 -0000 On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:46:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:39:07AM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:35:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:25:39PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:48:47PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > It looks like 51 ports now depend on the diablo ports to build; this > > > > > means the packages cannot be built on bento, since the diablo packages > > > > > are interactive and impossible to build there. Can you please do > > > > > something about this? > > > > > > > > Last time this came up I volunteered the attached patch. Does it fix the > > > > problem or not? I didn't hear whether it did or didn't. If it does fix > > > > the problem I'll commit it. If not, can you suggest a variable the package > > > > install script can test for to workaround things on bento? > > > > > > Well, I modified bento to set that variable in the build environment, > > > and now it just hangs: > > > > > > [...] > > > this Agreement which, in Foundation's opinion, reasonably preserves > > > the intent of this Agreement. This Agreement is binding upon and > > > shall inure to the benefit of Foundation and its successors and > > > assigns. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of the > > > parties, and superceded all previous communications, written or > > > oral, relating to the subject of this Agreement. > > > > > > > > > Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no] > > > > If it gets here its gotten too far. The idea of the patch was to bypass > > this for bento. > > > > Are there _any_ special environment variables that bento sets when its > > installing the packages for a build? All we need is something which > > the package install script and test for and say "Ok, this is bento". > > I mentioned above that bento now sets PACKAGE_BUILDING in the build > environment. My bad. But obviously this isn't passed to the package install script as it would exit before the licensing agreement if that environment setting was passed on. Maybe pkg_add runs the scripts with a different environment? -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org