From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 02:02:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8F016A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:02:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8CC43D4C for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:02:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.drews@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m69so45438rne for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.1.71 with SMTP id 71mr38626rna; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8cb27cbf04072419021f62c74e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:02:25 -0500 From: Jon Drews To: Maksym Marchenko In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: X: bad display name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:02:26 -0000 Hello Maksym: You need to have the proper hostnames in /etc/hosts: ::1 localhost localhost.covad.net notebook.covad.net 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.covad.net notebook.covad.net where notebook is my hostname. On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:24:21 +0200, Maksym Marchenko wrote: > I'm installing FreeBSD. With XFree 86, and than at the end of X session > I have always: > > xauth: creating new authority file /root/.Xauthority > xauth: (argv):1: bad display name ":0" in "remove" command > xauth: (argv):1: bad display name ":0" in "remove" command > > Something here isn't right. How (where) can I correct this problem. > Can (must) I edit this .Xauthority file? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 02:08:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1356A16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:08:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41006.mail.yahoo.com (web41006.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF8EF43D4C for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:08:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040725020849.44439.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.121] by web41006.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:08:49 PDT Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:08:49 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: FreeBSD v4.10 - Newbie Needs Help - KDE Really Slow !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:08:50 -0000 Hi all, I just installed FreeBSD v4.10. All installed OK & I choose KDE as the Desktop Problem: KDE v3 is reallly SLOW!! - Takes 2 minutes to start/load !! - Just opening a simple Console takes almost a minute !! - Resolution looks really grainy - as if its 256 colors - Don't know how to change this ??? My System: Pentium 200Mhz 128MB RAM 16MB PCI Creative Graphics Blaster Riva TNT I have Windows 2000 installed on the Primary Boot partition & that runs very fast. I thought that FreeBSD with KDE would run just as fast if not faster than Windows 2000 ??? If it helps, the only thing I can think of is whether the system loaded the correct Graphics Card ?? - BUT I don't know how to check this ?? - Cannot find a Display Properties like windows that lists the Graphics Card ?? Any suggestions/help is greatly appreciated :)) BTW: I searched Google Groups & freebsd Digest before posting but not much help :( Regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 04:09:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0980F16A4CF for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:09:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D7D43D3F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:09:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:11:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4103327E.1080606@daleco.biz> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:09:34 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DK References: <20040725020849.44439.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040725020849.44439.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2004 04:11:22.0515 (UTC) FILETIME=[71EBA630:01C471FD] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD v4.10 - Newbie Needs Help - KDE Really Slow !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:09:38 -0000 DK wrote: >Hi all, > >I just installed FreeBSD v4.10. >All installed OK & I choose KDE as the Desktop > >Problem: KDE v3 is reallly SLOW!! > > > Probably true. >- Takes 2 minutes to start/load !! > > 2 minutes --- After the system grabs the tty? How long from the power button until you have a desktop? >- Just opening a simple Console takes almost a minute !! > > This might be KDE, might be other bad configuration. >- Resolution looks really grainy - as if its 256 colors - Don't know how to change this ??? > > > Read the FreeBSD handbook (IIRC, Chapter 5 is the one ... whichever is "The X Window System"). It's a process that's not easily described in a short email such as this... >My System: >Pentium 200Mhz >128MB RAM >16MB PCI Creative Graphics Blaster Riva TNT > > I'm running GNOME2 on an AMD 475 for one of my workers. It suffers from similar issues ... quite slow in starting new apps, etc. GNOME's a big environment, with lots of stuff running in the background. So is KDE. If I felt this worker could handle it, I'd give them something a tad less weighty like black/fluxbox or fvwm. I personally would not consider ever running a new GNOME or KDE on a Pentium I...unless I had no other choice. And, if it were me, I'd probably still pick fluxbox instead of trying to deal with modern, full blown environments on old hardware.... >I have Windows 2000 installed on the Primary Boot partition & that runs very fast. >I thought that FreeBSD with KDE would run just as fast if not faster than Windows 2000 ??? > > That I find interesting. Have you tried booting the system to a regular CLI? There could easily be things holding up the boot process. Sendmail looking for a hostname is often one of them.... One thing I can tell you, adding RAM to FBSD does a lot more for the system than it does for Windows, in my experience. If you've another chip, don't spare the horses.... >If it helps, the only thing I can think of is whether the system loaded the correct Graphics Card >?? >- BUT I don't know how to check this ?? - Cannot find a Display Properties like windows that lists >the Graphics Card ?? > > > KDE, and any other wm/environment, runs on top of XFree86. XFree86 reads from configuration files ... mine is /etc/X11/XF868Config. Like I said above, you need to read up a bit before you get it going. >Any suggestions/help is greatly appreciated :)) > >BTW: I searched Google Groups & freebsd Digest before posting but not much help :( > > Umm, yeah. You'd have to have a better idea what to look for, I guess. I know when I was a newb, I didn't even install a GUI for like 2 years..... >Regards, > >DK > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 04:10:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C6816A4CF for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:10:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EAE43D39 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:10:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (spamrefuse@yahoo.com) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004072513:10:46:751843.23117.2925525936 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:10:46 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <410332CF.5020900@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:10:55 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040725 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: YES-__TRSYS_LV__3 (SR:-5.25) (SRN:SPAMROBOT) ----------------- Subject: Portupgrade Stale dependency: "specify -O to force" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:10:58 -0000 Hi, When I use commands from the portupgrade port, I get this message: Stale dependency: kde-3.2.3 --> autoconf-2.57_1 -- manually run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. I wanted to use the '-O' option, but that does not seem to exist. I've tried 'pkgdb -O' or 'pkgdb -FO' Is this '-O' suggestion mistake in the portupgrade port? How can I use the force option? Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 04:20:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E7216A4CF for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:20:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E6043D49 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:20:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:21:57 -0500 Message-ID: <410334FA.7020604@daleco.biz> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:20:10 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob References: <410332CF.5020900@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <410332CF.5020900@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2004 04:21:58.0140 (UTC) FILETIME=[ECC853C0:01C471FE] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade Stale dependency: "specify -O to force" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:20:13 -0000 Rob wrote: > > Hi, > > When I use commands from the portupgrade port, I get this message: > > Stale dependency: kde-3.2.3 --> autoconf-2.57_1 -- manually run > 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. > > I wanted to use the '-O' option, but that does not seem to exist. > I've tried 'pkgdb -O' or 'pkgdb -FO' > > Is this '-O' suggestion mistake in the portupgrade port? > > How can I use the force option? > > Rob. Hmm, pretty sure that should be a little "o". At least that's what the help screen and the manpage seem to indicate... [/usr/ports] [23:16] % pkgdb --help pkgdb rev.1.69 usage: pkgdb [-hafFQQquv] [-c pkgname] [-o pkgname] [-s /old_pkgname/new_pkgname/] [file ...] -h, --help Show this message -o, --origin=PKGNAME[=ORIGIN] Look up or change the origin of the given package The help seems to indicate you would type something like: $pkgdb -o I usually just do it with -F HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 04:27:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6413B16A4CF for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:27:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2876F43D39 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:27:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:29:37 -0500 Message-ID: <410336C6.4040803@daleco.biz> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:27:50 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Benson References: <000001c47178$5cfec070$6500a8c0@giga7nnxp> In-Reply-To: <000001c47178$5cfec070$6500a8c0@giga7nnxp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2004 04:29:38.0531 (UTC) FILETIME=[FF326B30:01C471FF] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:27:53 -0000 Aaron Benson wrote: >Hi, > > For me, yes. YMMV. If you've 500 machines to switch over, I'd sure as heck buy one more and stick something else on it. You'll never learn as much from reading and not doing and you will from trying to do and reading .... Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 05:16:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5886716A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:16:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51010.mail.yahoo.com (web51010.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC6E743D46 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:16:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrisryanemail@yahoo.com.au) Message-ID: <20040725051642.46934.qmail@web51010.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.51.23.15] by web51010.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:16:42 EST Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:16:42 +1000 (EST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Chris=20Ryan?= To: "Michael L. Squires" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040724110942.P35802@familysquires.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Make buildkernal KERNKONF ( etc etc ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:16:43 -0000 --- "Michael L. Squires" wrote: > > > On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, [iso-8859-1] Chris Ryan wrote: > > > I am trying to turn a p2 - 233 with 128mb RAM into > a > > FW / router . and need to run natd > I found that I had to go to more RAM, or use sysctl > to set the maximum > files open, with 4.10-STABLE on a PII/300 with 128MB > of RAM doing what > you describe, plus snort (memory hog) and sendmail > for my mail gateway. > hmm ok... > I'm running "make buildkernel KERNCONF=;make > installkernel > KERNCONF=" right now under 5.2-CURRENT and > 4.10-STABLE; I wonder if > you have all the source tree installed on that > system, and you have a > kernel configuration file of the specified name in > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf. ok thanks.... will try a complete new install - nuke it and start again... ( saves me throwing the box out the second storey window ) will let you know how i go thanks again Chris > > Mike Squires > > Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies. http://au.movies.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 07:09:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8CE16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:09:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pdx.chatusa.com (pdx.ChatUSA.com [205.238.41.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587CA43D48 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:09:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from longterm@pdx.chatusa.com) Received: from dannewxp (xmax.TeleSat.net [205.238.42.202] (may be forged)) by pdx.chatusa.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA10293 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <03a101c47216$43de5df0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> From: "Dan" To: Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:08:32 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: RE: Routing where can I ask a wirless routing question freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dan List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:09:10 -0000 Hello, In using FreeBsd 5.2.1-Release I am running into some trouble. I have = successfully recompiled the kernel with support for atheros based = wireless cards. I have also been able to setup the card into access = point "Hostap" mode correctly. I have tried the bridging recommend in = the FreeBSD wireless setup at = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-wireles= s.html but was unsuccessful. I have configured the wireless adapter with = it's own subnet of ip's one for the actual box and the rest client ip''. = The subnet is not the same as the one on the wireless adapter. When I = enable bridge mode as dicussed in the link above, I can ping the ip = allocated to the ethernet adapter and the one allocated to the wireless = adapter when wirelessly connected to the freebsd box, but when the = bridging is disabled I can only ping the ip assigned to the wireless = adapter in the machine when wirelessly connected. When I ssh to the box = either with bridging on or off to the wireless ip on the machine I can = ping google.com and other common web sites. I need help trying to route = the adapted and client ip's to the internet. Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 07:10:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80CD16A4CE; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:10:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FF343D1F; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:10:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08352AE06C; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80740-02; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B55AEAE067; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:10:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040725071006.B55AEAE067@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:10:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-07-04 - 2004-07-24 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:10:13 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 16-Jul : 5.* on an IBM ThinkPad T41 Fun and games getting things installed http://freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 07:12:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994EF16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:12:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B8343D49 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:12:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6P7CijX027542; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 09:12:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6P7CipB027539; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 09:12:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 09:12:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: DK In-Reply-To: <20040725020849.44439.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040725091118.S27321@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20040725020849.44439.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD v4.10 - Newbie Needs Help - KDE Really Slow !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:12:47 -0000 > I just installed FreeBSD v4.10. > All installed OK & I choose KDE as the Desktop > > Problem: KDE v3 is reallly SLOW!! > > - Takes 2 minutes to start/load !! > - Just opening a simple Console takes almost a minute !! > - Resolution looks really grainy - as if its 256 colors - Don't know how to change this ??? > > My System: > Pentium 200Mhz > 128MB RAM > 16MB PCI Creative Graphics Blaster Riva TNT > yes KDE is really slow, quite like this on P200. the simplest solution is not to use it at all (on faster machines too). Unless all you need is fancy graphics KDE doesn't have anything really useful. Use fvwm2 or icewm as window manager it's fast. you may like to run few of KDE apps, but without KDE as a whole From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 08:38:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9015D16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:38:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from s2.home.ro (s2.home.ro [193.231.236.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98FB43D1F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:38:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vladtudorache@home.ro) Received: (qmail 4251 invoked by uid 30); 25 Jul 2004 08:38:52 -0000 Date: 25 Jul 2004 08:38:52 -0000 Message-ID: <20040725083852.4250.qmail@s2.home.ro> From: Vlad Tudorache To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII X-Mailer: HOME.RO FreeMail v2.1 X-Originating-IP: 80.97.185.215 Subject: I have a problem! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:38:59 -0000 I'm using FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE with two systems. Both have VIA chipsets - the older KT133A (my parents' home) and the "newer" KM266 (my home). For both of them I've compiled specific kernels, with ACPI support. KT133A works perfectly - no errors, warnings or anything of this kind. With KM266 there is a problem: fdc0 is NOT detected, for the kernel cannot reserve I/O ports. With ACPI disabled, on the other hand, USB subsytem reports various errors - restarting one or more ports, then giving up with controller configuration. The GENERIC kernel you provide works well when apm0 is off (the ASROCK MB I use has only ACPI), but it has no ACPI support. What can I do (in order to have ACPI, fdc0 and USB working well)? Thank you. Vlad Tudorache, vladtudorache@home.ro ---- Home, no matter how far... http://www.home.ro From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 10:13:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC4816A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:13:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A8B43D48 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from angus.g.barrow@stud.man.ac.uk) Received: from [10.2.18.1] (helo=gerhayn.mcc.ac.uk) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Bog08-000LLN-7C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:13:04 +0100 Received: from spc1-with1-4-0-cust247.bagu.broadband.ntl.com ([213.106.183.247] helo=[192.168.1.10]) by gerhayn.mcc.ac.uk with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.04) id 1Bog08-000DVE-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:13:04 +0100 From: Angus Barrow To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1090753960.2113.9.camel@agb-dtop.studnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:12:40 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: MBDX3AGB from spc1-with1-4-0-cust247.bagu.broadband.ntl.com ([192.168.1.10]) [213.106.183.247] X-Authenticated-From: angus.g.barrow@stud.man.ac.uk X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1Bog08-000LLN-7C*nqRZpsZ1zGs* Subject: Interface Statistics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: angus.g.barrow@stud.man.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:13:11 -0000 Hi, I'm a relative newbie to the world of computer admining and have the following problem. I'm one of a group of students sharing a connection which is limited (by the cabelco) to 1GB maximum transfer in any 24 hour period. I've been trying in vain to find a way to at least warn us if the transfer in a 24 hour period approaches a gigabyte. I know that on linux ifconfig shows a counter of the total amount of data transfered over an interface and was wondering if there is a similar tool for FreeBSD as the ifconfig provided doesn't seem to show this information. I've tried googleing in vain and have attempted to set up ntop and zabbix to see if they could provide the information (ntop didn't want to play and zabbix still has me beat). I'm running the configuration shown below: -=INTERNET=- | | -=ROUTER.STUDNET=- | | -=SWITCH=- | | -=Computers in rooms=- The router has two NIC's, xl0 is DHCP configured and is the internet, the other (dc0) is 192.168.1.1. The router is running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE and drops almost all incoming traffic via ipfw and uses natd to masquerade the connections. Sorry about the rambling post I'm not really sure how much detail to provide. Thanks in advance for any help you can give me. Angus Barrow From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 10:35:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AD416A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:35:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av6-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (av6-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EED43D1F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:35:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av6-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id D842437E47; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:35:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.177]) by av6-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F5537E42 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:35:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A0B4D37E43 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:35:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 14696 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Jul 2004 10:34:59 -0000 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:34:59 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Angus Barrow Message-ID: <20040725103459.GA14659@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Angus Barrow , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1090753960.2113.9.camel@agb-dtop.studnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1090753960.2113.9.camel@agb-dtop.studnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interface Statistics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:35:03 -0000 On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:12:40PM +0100, Angus Barrow wrote: > Hi, > I'm a relative newbie to the world of computer admining and have the > following problem. I'm one of a group of students sharing a connection > which is limited (by the cabelco) to 1GB maximum transfer in any 24 hour > period. I've been trying in vain to find a way to at least warn us if > the transfer in a 24 hour period approaches a gigabyte. > > I know that on linux ifconfig shows a counter of the total amount of > data transfered over an interface and was wondering if there is a > similar tool for FreeBSD as the ifconfig provided doesn't seem to show > this information. > > I've tried googleing in vain and have attempted to set up ntop and > zabbix to see if they could provide the information (ntop didn't want to > play and zabbix still has me beat). > > I'm running the configuration shown below: > > > > -=INTERNET=- > | > | > -=ROUTER.STUDNET=- > | > | > -=SWITCH=- > | > | > -=Computers in rooms=- > > The router has two NIC's, xl0 is DHCP configured and is the internet, > the other (dc0) is 192.168.1.1. The router is running FreeBSD > 5.2.1-RELEASE and drops almost all incoming traffic via ipfw and uses > natd to masquerade the connections. Parsing the output of 'netstat -I xl0 -b' (or 'netstat -ib' for all interfaces) seems like a viable solution. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 10:47:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B750916A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:47:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.bahnhof.se (mailut.bahnhof.net [213.136.33.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7EB43D41 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:47:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.rowlands@mypost.se) Received: from mfilter2.bahnhof.se (mail.bahnhof.se [213.136.33.1]) by smtp2.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D93588C80 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:47:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by re-injector2.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B07EAA548; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:47:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4.bahnhof.se ([213.136.33.3]) by localhost (mfilter2.bahnhof.se [10.0.1.22]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20716-05; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pcmarpxy.mine.nu (81-170-150-191.bahnhofbredband.net [81.170.150.191]) by smtp4.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C5812E3B2; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.mwrwin2k.se [127.0.0.1]) by pcmarpxy.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C371050C; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pcmarpxy.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pcmarpxy.mine.nu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75333-06; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EXCHSRV1.mwrwin2k.se (kalendar.mine.nu [192.168.0.4]) by pcmarpxy.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26FE10501; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:47:10 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:47:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4789E43478F3994BB8D967C73FD9C6880C2B8A@exchsrv1> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD v4.10 - Newbie Needs Help - KDE Really Slow !! Thread-Index: AcRx7K5xi4tWWy0BT8G4pDGqldb4CAARhACw From: "mark rowlands" To: "DK" , X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at bahnhof.se Subject: RE: FreeBSD v4.10 - Newbie Needs Help - KDE Really Slow !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:47:14 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of DK > Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 4:09 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: FreeBSD v4.10 - Newbie Needs Help - KDE Really Slow !! >=20 > Hi all, >=20 > I just installed FreeBSD v4.10. > All installed OK & I choose KDE as the Desktop >=20 > Problem: KDE v3 is reallly SLOW!! >=20 > - Takes 2 minutes to start/load !! Does dns resolution work? Open up a console and try=20 nslookup something.somewhere.com > - Just opening a simple Console takes almost a minute !! > - Resolution looks really grainy - as if its 256 colors - Don't know how > to change this ??? That is an X configuration issue, not a kde issue. What do you have in /etc/X11/XF86Config > My System: > Pentium 200Mhz > 128MB RAM > 16MB PCI Creative Graphics Blaster Riva TNT Kde / X are never going to exactly rock with this config From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 11:33:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5457716A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:33:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1896343D3F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:33:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@rcn.com) Received: from 207-237-110-41.c3-0.crm-ubr4.crm.ny.cable.rcn.com ([207.237.110.41] helo=localhost) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1BohGM-0006Zk-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:33:54 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:33:54 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time) From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: X-X-Sender: beerstud@spamcop.net@mail.cesmail.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: BerkeleyDB 4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:33:55 -0000 I have tried to locate the latest version of the BerkeleyDB. It is version 4.2 I believe. I cannot find it in the ports collection. If it is in fact not available through the ports collection, would it be all right to just download the program and install it? Thanks! Gerard Seibert gerard-seibert@rcn.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 11:41:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E6716A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:41:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from absolut.wixb.com (absolut.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AB443D3F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:41:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from coors.wixb.com (coors.wixb.com [10.43.82.5]) by absolut.wixb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59A439829 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 06:41:09 -0500 (CDT) Organization: Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee WI USA Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040725064010.00bcfbe8@absolut.wixb.com> X-Sender: jbronson@absolut.wixb.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 06:41:08 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "J.D. Bronson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: dismount error on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:41:10 -0000 I reboot my machine at about 50% of the time..I see this in the logs: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted Is this a known issue? I dont know why its complaining...any pointers would be appreciated! -- J.D. Bronson Aurora Health Care // Information Services // Milwaukee, WI USA Office: 414.978.8282 // Email: jd@aurora.org // Pager: 414.314.8282 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 12:01:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804BC16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:01:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from redqueen.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4A043D49 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:01:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.2.122] (nimrod.elvandar.intranet [10.0.2.122]) by redqueen.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE04410685E; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:01:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4103A110.3060203@elvandar.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:01:20 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J.D. Bronson" References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040725064010.00bcfbe8@absolut.wixb.com> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040725064010.00bcfbe8@absolut.wixb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dismount error on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:01:23 -0000 J.D. Bronson wrote: > I reboot my machine at about 50% of the time..I see > this in the logs: > > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted > > Is this a known issue? > > I dont know why its complaining...any pointers would be appreciated! > > > Hey J.D This tells you that your drive's did not properly shutdown when requested. So that could imply a reset, or a crash. When you reboot normally your disk would sync itself and then properly shutdown. The message tells you that that was not the case, so it needs checks (which i think follows after the message you describe) Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 12:04:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1E616A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:04:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from absolut.wixb.com (absolut.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7D743D49 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:04:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from coors.wixb.com (coors.wixb.com [10.43.82.5]) by absolut.wixb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B3339829; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:04:36 -0500 (CDT) Organization: Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee WI USA Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040725070354.00bcf0b8@absolut.wixb.com> X-Sender: jbronson@absolut.wixb.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:04:35 -0500 To: Remko Lodder From: "J.D. Bronson" In-Reply-To: <4103A110.3060203@elvandar.org> References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040725064010.00bcfbe8@absolut.wixb.com> <4103A110.3060203@elvandar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dismount error on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:04:36 -0000 At 07:01 AM 7/25/2004, you wrote: >This tells you that your drive's did not properly shutdown when requested. >So that could imply a reset, or a crash. When you reboot >normally your disk would sync itself and then properly shutdown. > >The message tells you that that was not the case, so it needs checks >(which i think follows after the message you describe) Thanks - this of course is what I had expected, but trying to find out WHY its not dismounting properly.... Yes, fsck does run after this message as expected too... thanks- -- J.D. Bronson Aurora Health Care // Information Services // Milwaukee, WI USA Office: 414.978.8282 // Email: jd@aurora.org // Pager: 414.314.8282 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 12:06:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3630116A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:06:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from redqueen.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C2E43D31 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:06:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.2.122] (nimrod.elvandar.intranet [10.0.2.122]) by redqueen.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329CB10685E; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:06:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4103A24D.5070406@elvandar.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:06:37 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J.D. Bronson" References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040725064010.00bcfbe8@absolut.wixb.com> <4103A110.3060203@elvandar.org> <6.1.2.0.2.20040725070354.00bcf0b8@absolut.wixb.com> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040725070354.00bcf0b8@absolut.wixb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dismount error on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:06:43 -0000 J.D. Bronson wrote: > > Thanks - this of course is what I had expected, but trying to find out > WHY its not dismounting properly.... > > Yes, fsck does run after this message as expected too... > > thanks- Ah , well i have it with my SATA controller. It does not handle the reboot cyclus very well, perhaps you can watch the reboot to see whether it sync's and such.. Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 12:33:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F58516A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:33:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C9643D3F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:33:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6PCXIx3014938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:33:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6PCXI3V014937; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:33:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:33:18 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." Message-ID: <20040725123318.GB14398@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." , DK , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040725020849.44439.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> <4103327E.1080606@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4103327E.1080606@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:33:18 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: DK cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD v4.10 - Newbie Needs Help - KDE Really Slow !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:33:33 -0000 --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:09:34PM -0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wro= te: > DK wrote: > >If it helps, the only thing I can think of is whether the system loaded= =20 > >the correct Graphics Card > >?? > >- BUT I don't know how to check this ?? - Cannot find a Display Properti= es=20 > >like windows that lists > >the Graphics Card ?? > KDE, and any other wm/environment, runs on top of XFree86. XFree86 reads > from configuration files ... mine is /etc/X11/XF868Config. Like I said= =20 > above, you > need to read up a bit before you get it going. The XF86Config file is actually not going to be amazingly helpful. Nowadays X Windows essentially configures itself completely automatically -- you can often run it successfully *without* any XF86Config file -- and the XF86Config just serves to override various default choices. When X autoconfigures it will choose the graphics mode that gives the largest possible screen resolution it knows your monitor and card will support (but not necessarily the greatest colour depth). However, if your monitor doesn't provide the X server with the horizontal and vertical frequency information it needs, it will choose a conservative low resolution setup that any monitor should be able to cope with. To see exactly what settings are being used run: % xdpyinfo | less Scroll down until you find the section marked 'screen #0' where it tells you the display size and colour depth. Most of the rest of the information that command prints out is unlikely to be interesting to you. To see exactly what X Windows recognises your graphincs hardware as, you need to look into the log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log Again, that's much more information than what you need, but if you scan through the file you should see an entry like: (--) PCI:*(1:0:0) nVidia Corporation NV15 [GeForce2 GTS/Pro] rev 164, M= em @ 0xee000000/24, 0xf0000000/27, BIOS @ 0xefff0000/16 although the details will be different from system to system. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBA6iNiD657aJF7eIRAnjOAJ484CeEWzgRSXBzQwfnVl3dCWgXSQCgk/nc qJmPMQ6GCYdtf0nGNySSMk8= =7J4c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 12:39:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D755216A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:39:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail0.ewetel.de (mail0-105.ewetel.de [212.6.122.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BC143D1F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:39:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from ensign.laverenz.de (dialin-80-228-11-066.ewetel.net [80.228.11.66]) by mail0.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6PCd56A001237 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:39:08 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.laverenz.de [127.0.0.1]) by ensign.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A11476F424 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:39:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ensign.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ensign.laverenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 76848-01 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:39:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ensign.laverenz.de (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 2585776F423; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:39:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:39:03 +0200 From: Uwe Laverenz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040725123903.GB76561@ensign.laverenz.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040722152044.GB61751@ensign.laverenz.de> <20040722162424.GA40143@kayjay.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040722162424.GA40143@kayjay.xs4all.nl> Organization: private site Sender: uwe@laverenz.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at laverenz.de X-CheckCompat: OK Subject: problem found, not solved (was: NVidia vs. KT600) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:39:11 -0000 On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 06:24:24PM +0200, Karel J. Bosschaart wrote: > Same problem here on FreeBSD 5.2 (recent -current), I have the same > nvidia card with an Asus A7M-266 board (AMD chipset). I haven't observed > it on 4.10 (yet?). Ok, I've been trying to find out the reason for this problem, I changed the hardware between several computers, tested older FreeBSD-versions and upgraded to Xorg. Finally I removed the GF4 and tested with an old GF2-pro, which works without problems in all tested systems. I still have no explanation, but I guess this must be another NVidia-bug?! I think we have to wait for a new release from NVidia. :-/ cu, Uwe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 12:39:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B67116A4CF for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:39:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCBF43D1F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:39:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6PCdCc6015009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:39:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6PCdBLv015008; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:39:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:39:11 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." Message-ID: <20040725123911.GC14398@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." , Rob , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <410332CF.5020900@yahoo.com> <410334FA.7020604@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <410334FA.7020604@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:39:12 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: Rob cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade Stale dependency: "specify -O to force" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:39:18 -0000 --TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:20:10PM -0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wro= te: > Rob wrote: > >When I use commands from the portupgrade port, I get this message: > > > > Stale dependency: kde-3.2.3 --> autoconf-2.57_1 -- manually run > > 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. > > > >I wanted to use the '-O' option, but that does not seem to exist. > >I've tried 'pkgdb -O' or 'pkgdb -FO' > > > >Is this '-O' suggestion mistake in the portupgrade port? > > > >How can I use the force option? > Hmm, pretty sure that should be a little "o". At least that's > what the help screen and the manpage seem to indicate... >=20 > [/usr/ports]=20 > [23:16] = =20 > % pkgdb --help > pkgdb rev.1.69 >=20 > usage: pkgdb [-hafFQQquv] [-c pkgname] [-o pkgname] [-s=20 > /old_pkgname/new_pkgname/] [file ...] >=20 > -h, --help Show this message The message is a mite confusing. It means you should either run: # pkgdb -F to fix up the dependency records within /var/db/pkg before you run portupgrade(1), or that you should run: # portupgrade -O ... to tell portupgrade to omit the dependency checks as it does its work. The former is considerably preferable to the latter. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBA6nviD657aJF7eIRAjv5AJ9pjhRv/EvzLlrmliZFFvcArVXSugCfdFh+ 2/PTpRFlCNMP37+JoN1hk7c= =5HiX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 12:40:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816FA16A4DE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:40:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (awc8.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.62.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2C443D39 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:40:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] ([192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6PCdvt8009283 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:40:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <4103AA11.7060806@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:39:45 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 X-Accept-Language: en, pl, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerard Seibert References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BerkeleyDB 4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:40:08 -0000 Gerard Seibert wrote: > I have tried to locate the latest version of the BerkeleyDB. It is version > 4.2 I believe. I cannot find it in the ports collection. A quick search gives me: orchid# cd /usr/ports orchid# make search name="db42" Port: db42-4.2.52_2 Path: /usr/ports/databases/db42 Info: The Berkeley DB package, revision 4.2 Maint: matthias.andree@gmx.de B-deps: libtool-1.5.2_1 R-deps: Port: db42-nocrypto-4.2.52_2 Path: /usr/ports/databases/db42-nocrypto Info: The Berkeley DB package, revision 4.2 Maint: matthias.andree@gmx.de B-deps: libtool-1.5.2_1 R-deps: If I'm not sure about a port name I find ports site very useful: http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html Cheers, Karol -- Karol Kwiatkowski From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 12:57:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C42E16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:57:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15EB343D39 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:57:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.173.26.85 with login) by smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2004 12:57:56 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:59:15 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4101EF5C.1020306@earthlink.net> <200407241125.16409.krinklyfig@spymac.com> <20040724195243.GA6286@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040724195243.GA6286@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407250559.15750.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Subject: Re: How to Handle the Three Newest Additions to the /usr/ports/CHANGES? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: krinklyfig@spymac.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:57:57 -0000 On Saturday 24 July 2004 12:52 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:25:16AM -0700, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > > On Saturday 24 July 2004 10:00 am, Matthew Seaman > > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:12:47AM -0700, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > > > > smogmonster# portsdb -uU > > > > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please > > > > wait.."Makefile", line 34: Malformed conditional (${XFREE86_VERSION} > > > > == 3 && !defined(WITHOUT_X)) > > > > "Makefile", line 36: if-less endif > > > > "Makefile", line 36: Need an operator > > > > make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > > > > ===> chinese/arphicttf failed > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > 1 error > > > > > > Run cvsup(1) again -- looks like you managed to cvsup in the middle of > > > all of the commits being made to add the xorg capability to the ports > > > tree. It's been fixed now. > > > > I hate to tell you this, but I tried it again and it's still getting this > > error. BTW, I'm updating ports-all. > > Then take 'chinese' out of your refuse file. In fact, if you want to > be able to build an INDEX yourself, you have to take all of the > language categories out of the refuse file. > > Otherwise, just download a recently built INDEX by: > > # make fetchindex > > and forget all about running portsdb before running portupgrade. I appreciate this. I went ahead and renamed my refuse file, and portsdb -Uu (does the order of the options matter?) worked after that. I was focused too much on the XFree86/XOrg issue and didn't see that was the problem. Thanks again, - jt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 07:33:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9FB16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:33:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sol.chel.skbkontur.ru (sol.chel.skbkontur.ru [212.57.175.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EF843D2D for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:33:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ilia@chel.skbkontur.ru) Received: from localhost.chel.skbkontur.ru (localhost.chel.skbkontur.ru [127.0.0.1])i6P7X3fj067828 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:33:04 +0600 (YEKST) (envelope-from ilia@chel.skbkontur.ru) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:33:01 +0600 (YEKST) From: =?koi8-r?B?6czY0SD7ydDJw8nO?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040725133048.C67561-100000@sol.chel.skbkontur.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:39:18 +0000 Subject: GRE + natd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:33:16 -0000 What is status of GRE support within NATD ? Regards, (=EE=C1=C9=CC=D5=DE=DB=C9=C5 =D0=CF=D6=C5=CC=C1=CE=C9=D1) Ilia Chipitsine (=E9=CC=D8=D1 =FB=C9=D0=C9=C3=C9=CE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 07:58:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E957516A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:58:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sol.chel.skbkontur.ru (sol.chel.skbkontur.ru [212.57.175.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6907F43D39 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:58:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ilia@chel.skbkontur.ru) Received: from localhost.chel.skbkontur.ru (localhost.chel.skbkontur.ru [127.0.0.1])i6P7wLGw068009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:58:21 +0600 (YEKST) (envelope-from ilia@chel.skbkontur.ru) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:58:19 +0600 (YEKST) From: =?koi8-r?B?6czY0SD7ydDJw8nO?= To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20040725135526.Y67561-100000@sol.chel.skbkontur.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:39:18 +0000 Subject: merging ipfilter-4.1.3 into FreeBSD-5.X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:58:28 -0000 Is ipfilter-4.1.3 expected any time in FreeBSD-5.X ? Regards, (=EE=C1=C9=CC=D5=DE=DB=C9=C5 =D0=CF=D6=C5=CC=C1=CE=C9=D1) Ilia Chipitsine (=E9=CC=D8=D1 =FB=C9=D0=C9=C3=C9=CE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 13:46:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D49216A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:46:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA17E43D2F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:46:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6PDk4OV015620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:46:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6PDk4Kx015619; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:46:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:46:04 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Vlad Tudorache Message-ID: <20040725134604.GD14398@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Vlad Tudorache , questions@freebsd.org References: <20040725083852.4250.qmail@s2.home.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040725083852.4250.qmail@s2.home.ro> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:46:04 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I have a problem! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:46:11 -0000 --zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 08:38:52AM -0000, Vlad Tudorache wrote: > I'm using FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE with two systems. Both have VIA > chipsets - the older KT133A (my parents' home) and the "newer" KM266 > (my home). For both of them I've compiled specific kernels, with > ACPI support. KT133A works perfectly - no errors, warnings or > anything of this kind. With KM266 there is a problem: fdc0 is NOT > detected, for the kernel cannot reserve I/O ports. With ACPI > disabled, on the other hand, USB subsytem reports various errors - > restarting one or more ports, then giving up with controller > configuration. The GENERIC kernel you provide works well when apm0 > is off (the ASROCK MB I use has only ACPI), but it has no ACPI > support. What can I do (in order to have ACPI, fdc0 and USB working > well)? [ Format recovered, as Greg says. Pressing the return key is good for your Karma] Other than waiting patiently, I don't think that there is actually a good solution to this problem right now. Turning on ACPI support kills access to the floppy drive on quite a few motherboards and for most available system versions. =20 There was this thread on freebsd-current@... quite recently, which offers a glimmer of hope that a fix is on the horizon, but no indication when, or indeed, if, anything will be MFC's to 4.x: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-June/028938.html Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBA7mciD657aJF7eIRAnWHAJ9y2hfZTAjZdXrYZZres7rb0uaBkACffsAJ XFrtj+X57uAafwHRkohYQnc= =4GTX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 13:51:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291EF16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:51:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F68143D1D for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:51:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6PDp5Zn015701 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:51:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6PDp5oi015700; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:51:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:51:04 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "J.D. Bronson" Message-ID: <20040725135104.GE14398@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "J.D. Bronson" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040725064010.00bcfbe8@absolut.wixb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040725064010.00bcfbe8@absolut.wixb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:51:05 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dismount error on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:51:10 -0000 --imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 06:41:08AM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: > I reboot my machine at about 50% of the time..I see > this in the logs: >=20 > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted >=20 > Is this a known issue? >=20 > I dont know why its complaining...any pointers would be appreciated! If you reboot your machine by typing 'reboot' you don't run the various rc.d scripts to turn off any services you have running. If a process has an open file descriptor onto the root FS and doesn't play ball with the usual sync and dismount procedure, it could have the results you observe. Try using the command: # shutdown -r now to get a clean shutdown and reboot. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBA7rIiD657aJF7eIRAhQlAJ9+4thLXHe7Tay2UtZf3Bw43qnypgCbBm/L VLUAAUsw/MzmFwiUA/HORF0= =/IHg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 14:24:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2B616A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:24:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bolina.hsb.se (hsb-server-16-94-162.ip-pluggen.com [194.16.94.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A466443D1D for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:24:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andersmansson@bolina.hsb.se) Received: from almedal-35-54.ip-pluggen.com ([212.181.35.54]:49281) by bolina.hsb.se with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BojwJ-0000vN-3d for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:25:29 +0200 Message-ID: <4103C2A0.6050106@bolina.hsb.se> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:24:32 +0200 From: Anders Mansson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040723) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -104.9 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: ............................................................... -Uu', I get the following error message: Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-1.14.1 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: fvwm-imlib-2.4.18 ... - 11406 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.... ..... done] [...] ........................................................................ Content analysis details: (-104.9 points, 5.0 required) SA Version: (SpamAssassin 2.63) SA Options: (Spam=No , autolearn=ham) SA Options: (DCC=bolina03 1074; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 , Pyzor=Reported 0 times. , Rbl=) pts rule name description --------------------------------------------------1% [score: 0.0000] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -------------------------------------------------- Subject: Duplicate INDEX entry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:24:41 -0000 Hi! When trying to update my ports with 'portsdb -Uu', I get the following error message: Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-1.14.1 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: fvwm-imlib-2.4.18 Done. done [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11406 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.... ..... done] Can someone please explaine what this means and how to remedy it? Regards Anders From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 15:25:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA2F16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:25:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from c001.snv.cp.net (h021.c001.snv.cp.net [209.228.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E3B843D31 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:25:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kisha@lissaganda.com) Received: (cpmta 8609 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2004 08:25:15 -0700 Received: from 209.228.32.117 (HELO mail.lissaganda.com.criticalpath.net) by smtp.register-admin.com (209.228.32.135) with SMTP; 25 Jul 2004 08:25:15 -0700 X-Sent: 25 Jul 2004 15:25:15 GMT Received: from [203.131.138.135] by mail.lissaganda.com with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: kisha@lissaganda.com X-Sent-From: kisha@lissaganda.com Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:25:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: Web Mail 5.6.4-0 Message-Id: <20040725082515.23158.h003.c001.wm@mail.lissaganda.com.criticalpath.net> Subject: burncd question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:25:17 -0000 %uname -a FreeBSD SOULFLY.BACK.TO.THE.PRIMITIVE.PH 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 #0: Mon Jun 21 14:53:05 PHT 2004 dataholic@SOULFLY.BACK.TO.THE.PRIMITIVE.PH:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MMP i386 cd-RW dmesg: ata1-slave: FAILURE - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE no interrupt acd0: CDRW at ata1-slave BIOSPIO SOULFLY# burncd -f /dev/acd0 -s 12 data downloads.iso fixate burncd: ioctl(CDIOCSTART): Device busy SOULFLY# $ ls -l /usr/sbin/burncd -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18196 Jun 24 17:51 /usr/sbin/burncd i always get this message, when i attempt to burn an .iso, anyone whats this error is all about, my sony 24x burner is fine when i burn files from my windows XP which is my first partition, i hope anyone can help me fixing this problem, thanks ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 15:31:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8D216A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:31:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (ganymede.revolutionsp.com [64.246.0.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B18443D3F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:31:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from klr@6s-gaming.com) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.revolutionsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D36615CD5 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:29:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 81.84.175.12 (SquirrelMail authenticated user klr@6s-gaming.com); by mail.revolutionsp.com with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:29:29 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <55702.81.84.175.12.1090758569.squirrel@81.84.175.12> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:29:29 -0000 (GMT) From: "Hugo Silva" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: jails: am I missing something or.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:31:38 -0000 Hi, Ok, so I decided to use jails instead of vmware and try to live with the limitations (only 1 ip address, etc..).. Well, another jail limitation is the impossibility of setting user quotas inside a jail UNLESS the jail has a filesystem on its own (at least this is the most satisfatory answer I found after googling for some hours). Great, so I have 2x80G + 1x200G hdds. I had a jail running on ad2, and I wanted to create another jail on the same hdd. To my surprise, sysinstall would complain about not being able to write data to ad2. I had this problem before, so I couldn't believe the cause was what I thought.. I unmounted the first jail and tried again.. this time, I could create the new partition on ad2. so... It is unthinkable to be umount'ing EVERY jail if I want to add one. I need separate filesystems for jails if I want (I *need* to) user quotas on jails If I have separate filesystems, I can't create a new jail while the disk is being used (ie other jails mount'ed). Living with 1 ip? I could do it. Now, this is a major drawback. I've been a FreeBSD user for a long time, so I'm hoping there is a solution to this matter-- (bottom line: working user quotas INSIDE jails: need either a way to have them w/ different partitions and be able to create new jails with all other jails running, or need a way to use quotas with only a big partition) I find it weird there exists this big limitation on the jail system. Any ideias are so very welcome Regards, Hugo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 15:33:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3D416A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:33:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20C743D1F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:33:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6PFWKIB032372; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:32:20 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:33:29 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4103C2A0.6050106@bolina.hsb.se> In-Reply-To: <4103C2A0.6050106@bolina.hsb.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407250833.29089.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Anders Mansson Subject: Re: Duplicate INDEX entry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:33:55 -0000 On Sunday 25 July 2004 07:24 am, Anders Mansson wrote: > Hi! When trying to update my ports with 'portsdb -Uu', I get the > following error message: > > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please > wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-1.14.1 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: fvwm-imlib-2.4.18 > Done. > done > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11406 > port entries found > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.... >.....6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000........ >.11000.... ..... done] > > Can someone please explaine what this means and how to remedy it? > You have something installed that looks identical to those ports. I get the same messages and ignor them. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 15:41:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3355E16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:41:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from f19.mail.ru (f19.mail.ru [194.67.57.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D523043D39 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:41:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shameel@list.ru) Received: from mail by f19.mail.ru with local id 1Bol7c-0001CI-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:41:08 +0400 Received: from [195.82.21.88] by msg.mail.ru with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:41:08 +0400 From: Shamil Sabirov To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [195.82.21.88] Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:41:08 +0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Subject: FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Shamil Sabirov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:41:19 -0000 Hello!!! I have question: When FreeBSD 5.3 will be released? Thanks. Bye. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 16:05:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB93D16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:05:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16C4743D41 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:05:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mayday@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 22739 invoked by uid 65534); 25 Jul 2004 16:05:04 -0000 Received: from p508A9E58.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.12]) (80.138.158.88) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 25 Jul 2004 18:05:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #431110 From: Benjamin Sobotta To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Shamil Sabirov Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:10:00 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407251810.00528.mayday@gmx.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:05:07 -0000 Hi! I guess when the stuff below is done... :) http://www.de.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/todo.html Cheers, Ben On Sunday 25 July 2004 15:41, Shamil Sabirov wrote: > Hello!!! I have question: > When FreeBSD 5.3 will be released? > Thanks. Bye. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 16:23:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA0116A559 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:23:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6A343D5D for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:23:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6PGN1aO082340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:23:02 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6PGN14I082339; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:23:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:23:01 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Kent Stewart Message-ID: <20040725162301.GA63269@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Kent Stewart , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Anders Mansson References: <4103C2A0.6050106@bolina.hsb.se> <200407250833.29089.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407250833.29089.kstewart@owt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:23:02 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Anders Mansson Subject: Re: Duplicate INDEX entry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:23:17 -0000 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 08:33:29AM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Sunday 25 July 2004 07:24 am, Anders Mansson wrote: > > Hi! When trying to update my ports with 'portsdb -Uu', I get the > > following error message: > > > > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please > > wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-1.14.1 > > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: fvwm-imlib-2.4.18 > > Done. > > done > > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11406 > > port entries found > > .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.... > >.....6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000........ > >.11000.... ..... done] > > > > Can someone please explaine what this means and how to remedy it? > > >=20 > You have something installed that looks identical to those ports. I get= =20 > the same messages and ignor them. Agreed, those messages are harmless and can be ignored. However, what's happening is that those ports are actually part of a master-slave pairing, where the difference is enabling some feature like gtk support. Either you have a Makefile setting somewhere (/etc/make.conf possibly) which unconditionally turns on that support, or the port tries to be too clever for it's own good, and turns on support for the feature automatically if it detects that the required libraries are installed. That effectively makes the master port identical to the slave port, hence the error message. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBA95liD657aJF7eIRAsX9AJ9cD/OeUALgREptIcquvdaj9zBTKgCffpl5 kkqrxNTyXjDt2AjaVvSI1bg= =FRoO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 16:43:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F54516A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:43:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51608.mail.yahoo.com (web51608.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C189143D39 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:43:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040725164340.39903.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [210.23.171.135] by web51608.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 09:43:40 PDT Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 09:43:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Jayson Alvarez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Compiling Application, always a nightmare. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:43:41 -0000 Hi, I have one main question to ask: Do I always have to wait for freebsd to make a port for a certain application(that there might be somewhat special process involve) or is it possible for me to compile it from its sources by myself? For example, I am looking for kaffeine and as its dependency, it says I will have to install xinelib first so I downloaded its latest sources from their main website xinehq.de(failing from retrieving it first from freebsd.org/ports), but then, same as with most of the applications that I have compiled from their sources, it stops in the middle of "make" and I always end up just installing a precompiled package in .tgz format("sort of better luck next time: no package available for xinelib") I know there's something wrong while I'm doing a `./configure`, only I'm not really sure what it is. I've examined the config.log and found some lines similar to these: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ configure: WARNING: libmng.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor! configure: WARNING: libmng.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to bug-autoconf@gnu.org. ## configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ## and also these: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ configure: WARNING: ucontext.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: ucontext.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: ucontext.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to bug-autoconf@gnu.org. ## configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------ ## checking for ucontext.h... yes $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Do you know if they are relevant? I also have the following packages installed in my system: pkg_info |grep make automake-1.7.9_1 gmake-3.80_2 imake-4.3.0_2 I really want to know what processess, or pointers(ex;tools, environment variables and so on and so forth.) should I consider when compiling from the sources. Any help is greatly appreciated. -jay:) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 16:44:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A047B16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:44:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414F843D5A for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:44:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7B469A39; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:44:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:44:19 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "Hugo Silva" Message-Id: <20040725124419.74d4fd0a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <55702.81.84.175.12.1090758569.squirrel@81.84.175.12> References: <55702.81.84.175.12.1090758569.squirrel@81.84.175.12> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jails: am I missing something or.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:44:21 -0000 "Hugo Silva" wrote: > Hi, > > Ok, so I decided to use jails instead of vmware and try to live with the > limitations (only 1 ip address, etc..).. > > Well, another jail limitation is the impossibility of setting user quotas > inside a jail UNLESS the jail has a filesystem on its own (at least this > is the most satisfatory answer I found after googling for some hours). > Great, so I have 2x80G + 1x200G hdds. I had a jail running on ad2, and I > wanted to create another jail on the same hdd. > > To my surprise, sysinstall would complain about not being able to write > data to ad2. I had this problem before, so I couldn't believe the cause > was what I thought.. I unmounted the first jail and tried again.. this > time, I could create the new partition on ad2. > > so... > > It is unthinkable to be umount'ing EVERY jail if I want to add one. Format the second drive as one big vinum partition. You can then manipulate the space into different filesystems using vinum without affecting the other partitions. This is also nice as vinum allows you to turn non-contiguous space into a single filesystem. So, if you allocate 5G for a jail and then realize you need 10G, you can allocate more space into the vinum partition and use growfs to enlarge the filesystem. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 17:42:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AFF16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:42:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bolina.hsb.se (hsb-server-16-94-162.ip-pluggen.com [194.16.94.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B198843D3F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:42:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andersmansson@bolina.hsb.se) Received: from almedal-35-54.ip-pluggen.com ([212.181.35.54]:49456) by bolina.hsb.se with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bon28-0007BO-Ok for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:43:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4103F11A.1080104@bolina.hsb.se> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:42:50 +0200 From: Anders Mansson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040723) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -104.9 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: ............................................................... error messages appears: . . panel-applet-atk-object.c:115: error: `ATK_ROLE_EMBEDDED' undeclared (first use in this function) panel-applet-atk-object.c:115: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported on ly once panel-applet-atk-object.c:115: error: for each function it appears in.) gmake[2]: *** [panel-applet-atk-object.lo] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libgail-gnome/work/libgail-gmake[1]: `/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libgail-gnome/work/libgail- gnome-1.0.5' gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 *** Error code 2 [...] ........................................................................ Content analysis details: (-104.9 points, 5.0 required) SA Version: (SpamAssassin 2.63) SA Options: (Spam=No , autolearn=ham) SA Options: (DCC=bolina03 1114; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 , Pyzor=Reported 0 times. , Rbl=) pts rule name description --------------------------------------------------1% [score: 0.0000] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -------------------------------------------------- Subject: All-recursive errors when doing a 'portupgrade -arR' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:42:53 -0000 Hi! When i do a 'portupgrade -arR' the following error messages appears: . . panel-applet-atk-object.c:115: error: `ATK_ROLE_EMBEDDED' undeclared (first use in this function) panel-applet-atk-object.c:115: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported on ly once panel-applet-atk-object.c:115: error: for each function it appears in.) gmake[2]: *** [panel-applet-atk-object.lo] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libgail-gnome/work/libgail- gnome-1.0.5/gail-gnome' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libgail-gnome/work/libgail- gnome-1.0.5' gmake: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libgail-gnome. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade32048.23 ma ke ** Fix the problem and try again. ---> Skipping 'x11/gnome2' (gnome2-2.6.2) because a requisite package 'libgail- gnome-1.0.4' (x11-toolkits/libgail-gnome) failed (specify -k to force) ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! x11-toolkits/libgail-gnome (libgail-gnome-1.0.4) (compiler error) * x11/gnome2 (gnome2-2.6.2) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 222 ignored, 1 skipped and 1 failed As a freeBSD newbie I haven't got a clue on how to fix it. Can someone please help me fix it and help me understand the error messages? Regards Anders From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 17:44:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9985E16A4D0 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:44:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mirrorball.theloosingend.net (m069c.studby.ntnu.no [129.241.130.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3368643D46 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:44:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: (qmail 51342 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Jul 2004 17:43:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jul 2004 17:43:59 -0000 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:43:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@mirrorball.theloosingend.net To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040725193815.X49960@mirrorball.theloosingend.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-816994367-1090777439=:49960" Subject: Font issue under linux-emulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:44:01 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-816994367-1090777439=:49960 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Lately fonts in linux-programs running under the linux-emulation on my FreeBSD system aren't rendered as they used to. The antialiasing doesn't seem to work anymore. I'm not sure what caused this, but it happened after a major portupgrade of lots of ports. Both Mathematica, Maple and Opera are affected. I've included the output of "linux-opera -debugfont", but it doesn't seem to be any useful though. I've placed symliks to fonts.conf, fonts.dtd and local.conf in /usr/compat/linux/etc/fonts. And as I said: this used to work perfectly. Any hints? sve --0-816994367-1090777439=:49960 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=operafontout Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20040725194359.N49960@mirrorball.theloosingend.net> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=operafontout WCBSRU5ERVIgZXh0ZW5zaW9uIHN1cHBvcnRlZCAocmVxdWlyZWQgYnkgWGZ0 IDEpOiBZZXMNCmxpYlhyZW5kZXIgbG9hZCBzdGF0dXM6IFN1Y2Nlc3MNClRy eWluZyB0byBsb2FkIFhmdCBsaWJyYXJ5IGZyb20gT3BlcmEgZXhlY3V0YWJs ZS4NClRyeWluZyB0byBsb2FkIFhmdCAyLi4uDQoJU3ltYm9sIHJlc29sdXRp b24gcHJvYmxlbTogL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9zaGFyZS9saW51eC1vcGVyYS9iaW4v b3BlcmE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBzeW1ib2w6IFhmdEZvbnRPcGVuDQoJU3ltYm9s IHJlc29sdXRpb24gcHJvYmxlbTogL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9zaGFyZS9saW51eC1v cGVyYS9iaW4vb3BlcmE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBzeW1ib2w6IFhmdEZvbnRDbG9z ZQ0KCVN5bWJvbCByZXNvbHV0aW9uIHByb2JsZW06IC91c3IvWDExUjYvc2hh cmUvbGludXgtb3BlcmEvYmluL29wZXJhOiB1bmRlZmluZWQgc3ltYm9sOiBY ZnRMaXN0Rm9udHMNCglTeW1ib2wgcmVzb2x1dGlvbiBwcm9ibGVtOiAvdXNy L1gxMVI2L3NoYXJlL2xpbnV4LW9wZXJhL2Jpbi9vcGVyYTogdW5kZWZpbmVk IHN5bWJvbDogWGZ0VGV4dEV4dGVudHMxNg0KCVN5bWJvbCByZXNvbHV0aW9u IHByb2JsZW06IC91c3IvWDExUjYvc2hhcmUvbGludXgtb3BlcmEvYmluL29w ZXJhOiB1bmRlZmluZWQgc3ltYm9sOiBYZnRUZXh0RXh0ZW50czMyDQoJU3lt Ym9sIHJlc29sdXRpb24gcHJvYmxlbTogL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9zaGFyZS9saW51 eC1vcGVyYS9iaW4vb3BlcmE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBzeW1ib2w6IFhmdENoYXJF eGlzdHMNCglTeW1ib2wgcmVzb2x1dGlvbiBwcm9ibGVtOiAvdXNyL1gxMVI2 L3NoYXJlL2xpbnV4LW9wZXJhL2Jpbi9vcGVyYTogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHN5bWJv bDogWGZ0RHJhd0NyZWF0ZQ0KCVN5bWJvbCByZXNvbHV0aW9uIHByb2JsZW06 IC91c3IvWDExUjYvc2hhcmUvbGludXgtb3BlcmEvYmluL29wZXJhOiB1bmRl ZmluZWQgc3ltYm9sOiBYZnREcmF3U3RyaW5nMTYNCglTeW1ib2wgcmVzb2x1 dGlvbiBwcm9ibGVtOiAvdXNyL1gxMVI2L3NoYXJlL2xpbnV4LW9wZXJhL2Jp bi9vcGVyYTogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHN5bWJvbDogWGZ0RHJhd1N0cmluZzMyDQoJ U3ltYm9sIHJlc29sdXRpb24gcHJvYmxlbTogL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9zaGFyZS9s aW51eC1vcGVyYS9iaW4vb3BlcmE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBzeW1ib2w6IFhmdERy YXdEZXN0cm95DQoJU3ltYm9sIHJlc29sdXRpb24gcHJvYmxlbTogL3Vzci9Y MTFSNi9zaGFyZS9saW51eC1vcGVyYS9iaW4vb3BlcmE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBz eW1ib2w6IFhmdERyYXdTZXRDbGlwDQoJRmFpbGVkDQpUcnlpbmcgdG8gbG9h ZCBYZnQgMS4uLg0KCVN5bWJvbCByZXNvbHV0aW9uIHByb2JsZW06IC91c3Iv WDExUjYvc2hhcmUvbGludXgtb3BlcmEvYmluL29wZXJhOiB1bmRlZmluZWQg c3ltYm9sOiBYZnRGb250T3Blbg0KCVN5bWJvbCByZXNvbHV0aW9uIHByb2Js ZW06IC91c3IvWDExUjYvc2hhcmUvbGludXgtb3BlcmEvYmluL29wZXJhOiB1 bmRlZmluZWQgc3ltYm9sOiBYZnRGb250Q2xvc2UNCglTeW1ib2wgcmVzb2x1 dGlvbiBwcm9ibGVtOiAvdXNyL1gxMVI2L3NoYXJlL2xpbnV4LW9wZXJhL2Jp bi9vcGVyYTogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHN5bWJvbDogWGZ0TGlzdEZvbnRzDQoJU3lt Ym9sIHJlc29sdXRpb24gcHJvYmxlbTogL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9zaGFyZS9saW51 eC1vcGVyYS9iaW4vb3BlcmE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBzeW1ib2w6IFhmdEZvbnRT ZXREZXN0cm95DQoJU3ltYm9sIHJlc29sdXRpb24gcHJvYmxlbTogL3Vzci9Y MTFSNi9zaGFyZS9saW51eC1vcGVyYS9iaW4vb3BlcmE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBz eW1ib2w6IFhmdFBhdHRlcm5HZXRTdHJpbmcNCglTeW1ib2wgcmVzb2x1dGlv biBwcm9ibGVtOiAvdXNyL1gxMVI2L3NoYXJlL2xpbnV4LW9wZXJhL2Jpbi9v cGVyYTogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHN5bWJvbDogWGZ0UGF0dGVybkdldEludGVnZXIN CglTeW1ib2wgcmVzb2x1dGlvbiBwcm9ibGVtOiAvdXNyL1gxMVI2L3NoYXJl L2xpbnV4LW9wZXJhL2Jpbi9vcGVyYTogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHN5bWJvbDogWGZ0 VGV4dEV4dGVudHMxNg0KCVN5bWJvbCByZXNvbHV0aW9uIHByb2JsZW06IC91 c3IvWDExUjYvc2hhcmUvbGludXgtb3BlcmEvYmluL29wZXJhOiB1bmRlZmlu ZWQgc3ltYm9sOiBYZnRUZXh0RXh0ZW50czMyDQoJU3ltYm9sIHJlc29sdXRp b24gcHJvYmxlbTogL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9zaGFyZS9saW51eC1vcGVyYS9iaW4v b3BlcmE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBzeW1ib2w6IFhmdEdseXBoRXhpc3RzDQoJU3lt Ym9sIHJlc29sdXRpb24gcHJvYmxlbTogL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9zaGFyZS9saW51 eC1vcGVyYS9iaW4vb3BlcmE6IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBzeW1ib2w6IFhmdERyYXdD cmVhdGUNCglTeW1ib2wgcmVzb2x1dGlvbiBwcm9ibGVtOiAvdXNyL1gxMVI2 L3NoYXJlL2xpbnV4LW9wZXJhL2Jpbi9vcGVyYTogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHN5bWJv bDogWGZ0RHJhd1N0cmluZzE2DQoJU3ltYm9sIHJlc29sdXRpb24gcHJvYmxl bTogL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9zaGFyZS9saW51eC1vcGVyYS9iaW4vb3BlcmE6IHVu ZGVmaW5lZCBzeW1ib2w6IFhmdERyYXdTdHJpbmczMg0KCVN5bWJvbCByZXNv bHV0aW9uIHByb2JsZW06IC91c3IvWDExUjYvc2hhcmUvbGludXgtb3BlcmEv YmluL29wZXJhOiB1bmRlZmluZWQgc3ltYm9sOiBYZnREcmF3RGVzdHJveQ0K CVN5bWJvbCByZXNvbHV0aW9uIHByb2JsZW06IC91c3IvWDExUjYvc2hhcmUv bGludXgtb3BlcmEvYmluL29wZXJhOiB1bmRlZmluZWQgc3ltYm9sOiBYZnRE cmF3U2V0Q2xpcA0KCUZhaWxlZA0KTG9hZGluZyBYZnQgbGlicmFyeSBmcm9t IE9wZXJhIGV4ZWN1dGFibGUgZmFpbGVkLiBUcnlpbmcgdG8gbG9hZCBpdCBv biBvdXIgb3duLg0KVHJ5aW5nIHRvIGxvYWQgWGZ0IDIuLi4NCglkbG9wZW4o ImxpYlhmdC5zby4yIikgc3VjY2VlZGVkDQoJU3VjY2Vzcw0KWGZ0IGZvbnRz IGF2YWlsYWJsZToNCglWZXJkYW5hIFttaWNyb3NvZnRdDQoJRmxhc2ggW1hm dF0NCglDTi1BcmlhbCBbWGZ0XQ0KCUJhdWhhdXMgOTMgW3Vyd10NCglHZW9y Z2lhIFttaWNyb3NvZnRdDQoJTmltYnVzIE1vbm8gTCBbdXJ3XQ0KCUZpeGVk c3lzIFtYZnRdDQoJVGFob21hIFttaWNyb3NvZnRdDQoJTHVjaWRhIENvbnNv bGUgW2ImaF0NCglTbmFwIElUQyBbWGZ0XQ0KCUVyYXMgQm9sZCBJVEMgW2l0 Y10NCglBcmlhbCBSb3VuZGVkIE1UIEJvbGQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCVdTVF9D emVjIFtYZnRdDQoJTHVjaWRhIFNhbnMgVW5pY29kZSBbYiZoXQ0KCU9wZW5T eW1ib2wgW1hmdF0NCglDdXBvbGEgW1hmdF0NCglVbmNpYWwgW1hmdF0NCglF c3RyYW5nZWxvIEVkZXNzYSBbWGZ0XQ0KCUdvdWR5IFN0b3V0IFttaWNyb3Nv ZnRdDQoJTWlzdHJhbCBbdXJ3XQ0KCVdpZGUgTGF0aW4gW3Vyd10NCglHZW50 aXVtQWx0IFtYZnRdDQoJSGFldHRlbnNjaHdlaWxlciBbWGZ0XQ0KCUJsYWNr YWRkZXIgSVRDIFtpdGNdDQoJQm9va3NoZWxmIFN5bWJvbCA3IFtyaWNvaF0N CglCZWVza25lZXMgSVRDIFtpdGNdDQoJQ29taWMgU2FucyBNUyBbbWljcm9z b2Z0XQ0KCUNhbGlzdG8gTVQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUJpdHN0cmVhbSBWZXJh IFNlcmlmIFtiaXRzdHJlYW1dDQoJR2FyYW1vbmQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUNv ZGUyMDAwIFtYZnRdDQoJODUxNG9lbSBbWGZ0XQ0KCVBhbGF0aW5vIExpbm90 eXBlIFtsaW5vdHlwZV0NCglSb2Nrd2VsbCBFeHRyYSBCb2xkIFttb25vdHlw ZV0NCglTaWducyBNVCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJTmltYnVzIFNhbnMgTCBbdXJ3 XQ0KCUtleXN0cm9rZXMgTVQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUNlbnR1cnkgU2Nob29s Ym9vayBMIFt1cnddDQoJQ2FzbG9uIFtYZnRdDQoJTHV4aSBTZXJpZiBbYiZo XQ0KCVdTVF9TcGFuIFtYZnRdDQoJV2FsYmF1bSBbYWRvYmVdDQoJV2luZ2Rp bmdzIDIgW21pY3Jvc29mdF0NCglXaW5nZGluZ3MgMyBbbWljcm9zb2Z0XQ0K CUp1bmljb2RlIFtYZnRdDQoJQWxtYW5hYyBNVCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJRmVs aXggVGl0bGluZyBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJVHcgQ2VuIE1UIENvbmRlbnNlZCBb bW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJRWRkYSBbWGZ0XQ0KCUx1Y2lkYSBTYW5zIFtiJmhdDQoJ RWR3YXJkaWFuIFNjcmlwdCBJVEMgW2l0Y10NCglSb3R1bmRhIFtYZnRdDQoJ QnJhZGxleSBIYW5kIElUQyBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJV2ViZGluZ3MgW21pY3Jv c29mdF0NCglFbmdyYXZlcnMgTVQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUJlbGxHb3RoaWMg QlQgW1hmdF0NCglNZXJjdXJpdXMgU2NyaXB0IE1UIEJvbGQgW21vbm90eXBl XQ0KCUdlbnRpdW0gW1hmdF0NCglQbGFjYXJkIENvbmRlbnNlZCBbbW9ub3R5 cGVdDQoJQ291cmllciBbaWJtXQ0KCUNvcHBlcnBsYXRlIEdvdGhpYyBMaWdo dCBbdXJ3XQ0KCUlzYWJlbGxhIFtYZnRdDQoJQm9kb25pIE1UIEJsYWNrIFtt b25vdHlwZV0NCglIdW1hbmlzdGljIFtYZnRdDQoJQnJhZGxleSBIYW5kIElU QyBbaXRjXQ0KCU1TIE1pbmNobyBbcmljb2hdDQoJSW1wcmludCBNVCBTaGFk b3cgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCU1hbmdhbCBbbWljcm9zb2Z0XQ0KCVR3IENlbiBN VCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJQW5kYWxlIE1vbm8gW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUx1Y2lk YSBTYW5zIFR5cGV3cml0ZXIgW2ImaF0NCglDZW50dXJ5IFttb25vdHlwZV0N CglHaWxsIFNhbnMgVWx0cmEgQm9sZCBDb25kZW5zZWQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0K CUJvbiBBcGV0aXQgTVQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUFyaWFsIFttb25vdHlwZV0N CglXU1RfU3dlZCBbWGZ0XQ0KCUFyaWFsIEJsYWNrIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglB YmFkaSBNVCBDb25kZW5zZWQgRXh0cmEgQm9sZCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJQ2Fy bWVuIFtYZnRdDQoJTWlyYWdlIFtYZnRdDQoJUm9ja3dlbGwgW21vbm90eXBl XQ0KCUZyYW5rbGluIEdvdGhpYyBIZWF2eSBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJRWxlcGhh bnQgW1hmdF0NCglBYmFkaSBNVCBDb25kZW5zZWQgTGlnaHQgW21vbm90eXBl XQ0KCUxhdGhhIFttaWNyb3NvZnRdDQoJU3RhbmRhcmQgU3ltYm9scyBMIFt1 cnddDQoJRnJhbmtsaW4gR290aGljIERlbWkgQ29uZCBbaXRjXQ0KCUJpdHN0 cmVhbSBDeWJlcmJpdCBbWGZ0XQ0KCVRlcm1pbmFsIFtYZnRdDQoJTWljcm9z b2Z0IFNhbnMgU2VyaWYgW21pY3Jvc29mdF0NCglQYXJpc2lhbiBbWGZ0XQ0K CUx1Y2lkYSBCbGFja2xldHRlciBbYiZoXQ0KCVR3IENlbiBNVCBDb25kZW5z ZWQgRXh0cmEgQm9sZCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJSktTYW50YWwgW1hmdF0NCglG cmFua2xpbiBHb3RoaWMgRGVtaSBDb25kIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglQYXJ0aWVz IE1UIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglDb3VyaWVyIDEwIFBpdGNoIFtiaXRzdHJlYW1d DQoJVmFjYXRpb24gTVQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCVJhbnNvbSBbWGZ0XQ0KCUFs Z2VyaWFuIFt1cnddDQoJTWF0aXNzZSBJVEMgW1hmdF0NCglIb2xpZGF5cyBN VCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJVXRvcGlhIFthZG9iZV0NCglQcmlzdGluYSBbaXRj XQ0KCVBlcnBldHVhIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglCcmFnZ2Fkb2NpbyBbbW9ub3R5 cGVdDQoJQ2VudHVyeSBTY2hvb2xib29rIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglCYXRhbmcg W21pY3Jvc29mdF0NCglNYXJsZXR0IFttaWNyb3NvZnRdDQoJQmFsZHVyIFtY ZnRdDQoJTW9ub3R5cGUgQ29yc2l2YSBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJUmluZ2xldCBb WGZ0XQ0KCVRlcm1pbmFsIEdyZWVrIDczNyAoNDM3RykgW1hmdF0NCglNUyBP dXRsb29rIFttaWNyb3NvZnRdDQoJRXJhcyBNZWRpdW0gSVRDIFtpdGNdDQoJ TVMgUmVmZXJlbmNlIFNhbnMgU2VyaWYgW21pY3Jvc29mdF0NCglQZWlnbm90 IFtYZnRdDQoJR2xvdWNlc3RlciBNVCBFeHRyYSBDb25kZW5zZWQgW21vbm90 eXBlXQ0KCUFtYnJvc2lhIFtYZnRdDQoJVVJXIENoYW5jZXJ5IEwgW3Vyd10N CglDZW50dXJ5IEdvdGhpYyBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJRXJhcyBMaWdodCBJVEMg W2l0Y10NCglDYWxpYmFuIFtYZnRdDQoJQnJpdGFubmljIEJvbGQgW3Vyd10N CglIYXJyaW5ndG9uIFtYZnRdDQoJRmxvcmFsQ2Fwc05vdXZlYXUgW1hmdF0N CglCaXRzdHJlYW0gVmVyYSBTYW5zIFtiaXRzdHJlYW1dDQoJUm9ja3dlbGwg Q29uZGVuc2VkIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglNYWlhbmRyYSBHRCBbWGZ0XQ0KCUdp bGwgU2FucyBNVCBFeHQgQ29uZGVuc2VkIEJvbGQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCVN5 bWJvbCBbWGZ0XQ0KCVNJbVBMIFtYZnRdDQoJVVJXIEdvdGhpYyBMIFt1cndd DQoJVHJhbnNwb3J0IE1UIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglCb29rbWFuIE9sZCBTdHls ZSBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJVHJlYnVjaGV0IE1TIFttaWNyb3NvZnRdDQoJQXJp YWwgTmFycm93IFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglGcmFua2xpbiBHb3RoaWMgRGVtaSBb bW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJSW1wYWN0IFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglQYXB5cnVzIFtpdGNd DQoJRnJlbmNoIFNjcmlwdCBNVCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJS2lubyBNVCBbbW9u b3R5cGVdDQoJQml0c3RyZWFtIENoYXJ0ZXIgW2JpdHN0cmVhbV0NCglBZ2Vu Y3kgRkIgW1hmdF0NCglzYW52aWpqbyBbbWljcm9zb2Z0XQ0KCVdTVF9JdGFs IFtYZnRdDQoJTVMgUmVmZXJlbmNlIFNwZWNpYWx0eSBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJ THV4aSBTYW5zIFtiJmhdDQoJVElUVVMgQ3liZXJiaXQgQmFzaWMgW2JpdHN0 cmVhbV0NCglXU1RfRnJlbiBbWGZ0XQ0KCUJhc3RhcmRhIFtYZnRdDQoJU3F1 YXJlQ2FwcyBbWGZ0XQ0KCWhvb2dlIDA1XzUzIFtYZnRdDQoJQ291cmFudCBb WGZ0XQ0KCUdpbGwgU2FucyBNVCBDb25kZW5zZWQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUNy eXN0YWwgW1hmdF0NCglNYXR1cmEgTVQgU2NyaXB0IENhcGl0YWxzIFttb25v dHlwZV0NCglCZWxsIE1UIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglSYWF2aSBbbWljcm9zb2Z0 XQ0KCUxvbWJhcmRpY01peCBbWGZ0XQ0KCUdpbGwgU2FucyBVbHRyYSBCb2xk IFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglNYXBsZVBpIFtYZnRdDQoJU2NyaXB0IE1UIEJvbGQg W21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUNhc3RlbGxhciBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJRnJhbmtsaW4g R290aGljIEJvb2sgW2l0Y10NCglDdXBvbGFVbmljb2RlIFtYZnRdDQoJQnJ1 c2ggU2NyaXB0IE1UIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglCb2NrbGluIFtYZnRdDQoJQmVy bmFyZCBNVCBDb25kZW5zZWQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCU1TIFNlcmlmIFtYZnRd DQoJV1NUX0VuZ2wgW1hmdF0NCglDb2xvbm5hIE1UIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglI ZWxvbmlhIFtYZnRdDQoJRnJhbmtsaW4gR290aGljIE1lZGl1bSBbbW9ub3R5 cGVdDQoJU3BvcnRzIFR3byBNVCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJQmFza2VydmlsbGUg T2xkIEZhY2UgW3Vyd10NCglCb29rIEFudGlxdWEgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUNv cHBlcnBsYXRlIEdvdGhpYyBCb2xkIFt1cnddDQoJUm9tYW5VbmNpYWxNb2Rl cm4gW1hmdF0NCglFcmFzIERlbWkgSVRDIFtpdGNdDQoJVGV4dHVyYSBbWGZ0 XQ0KCURlY29yYXRpdmUgW1hmdF0NCglCaXRzdHJlYW0gVmVyYSBTYW5zIE1v bm8gW2JpdHN0cmVhbV0NCglVUlcgUGFsbGFkaW8gTCBbdXJ3XQ0KCUZpeGVk c3lzIEV4Y2Vsc2lvciAyLjAwIFtYZnRdDQoJTW9ub3BvbCBbWGZ0XQ0KCUZy YW5rbGluIEdvdGhpYyBNZWRpdW0gW2l0Y10NCglDb3VyaWVyIFtYZnRdDQoJ RXVyb3N0aWxlIFt1cnddDQoJQW5kcmFkZSBbWGZ0XQ0KCUdhdXRhbWkgW21p Y3Jvc29mdF0NCglUZW1wdXMgU2FucyBJVEMgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUx1eGkg TW9ubyBbYiZoXQ0KCVBlcnBldHVhIFRpdGxpbmcgTVQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0K CU9DUiBBIEV4dGVuZGVkIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglNb25vdHlwZSBTb3J0cyBb bW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJU2ltU3VuIFtYZnRdDQoJQ2FwcmljZSBbWGZ0XQ0KCURp bmdiYXRzIFt1cnddDQoJQ3VybHogTVQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUdvdWR5IE9s ZCBTdHlsZSBbdXJ3XQ0KCVdpbmdkaW5ncyBbbWljcm9zb2Z0XQ0KCUdyYWRs IFtYZnRdDQoJQ291cmllciBOZXcgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUp1aWNlIElUQyBb WGZ0XQ0KCVNpbGtzY3JlZW4gW1hmdF0NCglDb29wZXIgQmxhY2sgW3Vyd10N CglEb2kgTGEgR2lhbmcgW21pY3Jvc29mdF0NCglGb290bGlnaHQgTVQgTGln aHQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCUZyYWN0dXIgW1hmdF0NCglCb2RvbmkgTVQgQ29u ZGVuc2VkIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglVUlcgQm9va21hbiBMIFt1cnddDQoJTVYg Qm9saSBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJTmltYnVzIFJvbWFuIE5vOSBMIFt1cnddDQoJ U3ltYm9sIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglCb2RvbmkgTVQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCVRo YW1lcyBbWGZ0XQ0KCVJhZ2UgSXRhbGljIFtpdGNdDQoJU3RlbmNpbCBbdXJ3 XQ0KCVN5bGZhZW5BUk0gW21pY3Jvc29mdF0NCglMdWNpZGEgQnJpZ2h0IFti JmhdDQoJR2lnaSBbaXRjXQ0KCVBsYXliaWxsIFt1cnddDQoJTW9kZXJuIE5v LiAyMCBbWGZ0XQ0KCUZyYW5rbGluIEdvdGhpYyBCb29rIFttb25vdHlwZV0N CglWZXJzYWwgW1hmdF0NCglEaXJlY3Rpb25zIE1UIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglF eHRyYXZhZ2FudENhcGl0YWxzIFtYZnRdDQoJT255eCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJ THVjaWRhIEZheCBbYiZoXQ0KCVBpY2FkaWxseSBbWGZ0XQ0KCVZVIFRpbWVz IFtYZnRdDQoJQ3Vyc29yIFt4ZnJlZTg2XQ0KCVNocnV0aSBbbWljcm9zb2Z0 XQ0KCVNwb3J0cyBUaHJlZSBNVCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJRGVzZGVtb25hIFtY ZnRdDQoJRnJhbmtsaW4gR290aGljIE1lZGl1bSBDb25kIFttb25vdHlwZV0N CglWaW5lciBIYW5kIElUQyBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJTW9ub3NwYWNlIFtYZnRd DQoJU3lzdGVtIFtYZnRdDQoJTHVjaWRhIEhhbmR3cml0aW5nIFtiJmhdDQoJ VGhyeW9tYW5lcyBbbWFjcm9tZWRpYV0NCglTbWFsbCBGb250cyBbWGZ0XQ0K CUdpbGwgU2FucyBNVCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJVHVuZ2EgW21pY3Jvc29mdF0N CglGcmFua2xpbiBHb3RoaWMgRGVtaSBbaXRjXQ0KCVBhbGFjZSBTY3JpcHQg TVQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCU5ld3MgR290aGljIE1UIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCglG b3J0ZSBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuIFttb25vdHlwZV0N CglGcmFua2xpbiBHb3RoaWMgTWVkaXVtIENvbmQgW2l0Y10NCglCZWxsR290 aGljIEJsayBCVCBbWGZ0XQ0KCUx1Y2lkYSBDYWxsaWdyYXBoeSBbYiZoXQ0K CU1vcnJpcyBbWGZ0XQ0KCVdTVF9HZXJtIFtYZnRdDQoJQXJpYWwgVW5pY29k ZSBNUyBbbW9ub3R5cGVdDQoJRXJhcyBVbHRyYSBJVEMgW2l0Y10NCglGYW50 YWlzaWVBcnRpc3RpcXVlIFtYZnRdDQoJTVMgU2FucyBTZXJpZiBbWGZ0XQ0K CU1lYWQgW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KQXV0b2RldGVjdGluZyBnZW5lcmljIENTUyBm b250cyAod2lsbCBiZSBvdmVycmlkZGVuIGJ5IHByZWZlcmVuY2Ugc2V0dGlu Z3MpOg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYgZm9udCBWZXJkYW5hIFttaWNy b3NvZnRdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYgZm9udCBDTi1Bcmlh bCBbWGZ0XTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBOaW1idXMg TW9ubyBMIFt1cnddOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IEZp eGVkc3lzIFtYZnRdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IEx1 Y2lkYSBDb25zb2xlIFtiJmhdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYg Zm9udCBBcmlhbCBSb3VuZGVkIE1UIEJvbGQgW21vbm90eXBlXTogMTINClNj b3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBXU1RfQ3plYyBbWGZ0XTogMTINClNj b3JlIGZvciBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIGZvbnQgTHVjaWRhIFNhbnMgVW5pY29kZSBb YiZoXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBCb29rc2hlbGYg U3ltYm9sIDcgW3JpY29oXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBmYW50YXN5IGZvbnQg Q29taWMgU2FucyBNUyBbbWljcm9zb2Z0XTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBzZXJp ZiBmb250IEJpdHN0cmVhbSBWZXJhIFNlcmlmIFtiaXRzdHJlYW1dOiAxMg0K U2NvcmUgZm9yIHNlcmlmIGZvbnQgR2FyYW1vbmQgW21vbm90eXBlXTogMTIN ClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCA4NTE0b2VtIFtYZnRdOiAxMg0K U2NvcmUgZm9yIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYgZm9udCBOaW1idXMgU2FucyBMIFt1cndd OiAxNA0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNlcmlmIGZvbnQgQ2VudHVyeSBTY2hvb2xib29r IEwgW3Vyd106IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2VyaWYgZm9udCBMdXhpIFNlcmlm IFtiJmhdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IFdTVF9TcGFu IFtYZnRdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYgZm9udCBMdWNpZGEg U2FucyBbYiZoXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBDb3Vy aWVyIFtpYm1dOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IEFuZGFs ZSBNb25vIFttb25vdHlwZV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZv bnQgTHVjaWRhIFNhbnMgVHlwZXdyaXRlciBbYiZoXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZv ciBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIGZvbnQgR2lsbCBTYW5zIFVsdHJhIEJvbGQgQ29uZGVu c2VkIFttb25vdHlwZV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2Fucy1zZXJpZiBmb250 IEFyaWFsIFttb25vdHlwZV06IDE1DQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZv bnQgV1NUX1N3ZWQgW1hmdF06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2Fucy1zZXJpZiBm b250IEFyaWFsIEJsYWNrIFttb25vdHlwZV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2Fu cy1zZXJpZiBmb250IE1pY3Jvc29mdCBTYW5zIFNlcmlmIFttaWNyb3NvZnRd OiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IENvdXJpZXIgMTAgUGl0 Y2ggW2JpdHN0cmVhbV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2VyaWYgZm9udCBVdG9w aWEgW2Fkb2JlXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBzZXJpZiBmb250IENlbnR1cnkg U2Nob29sYm9vayBbbW9ub3R5cGVdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFj ZSBmb250IE1hcmxldHQgW21pY3Jvc29mdF06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9u b3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgTW9ub3R5cGUgQ29yc2l2YSBbbW9ub3R5cGVdOiAxMg0K U2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IFRlcm1pbmFsIEdyZWVrIDczNyAo NDM3RykgW1hmdF06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2Fucy1zZXJpZiBmb250IE1T IFJlZmVyZW5jZSBTYW5zIFNlcmlmIFttaWNyb3NvZnRdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUg Zm9yIGZhbnRhc3kgZm9udCBVUlcgQ2hhbmNlcnkgTCBbdXJ3XTogMTINClNj b3JlIGZvciBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIGZvbnQgQml0c3RyZWFtIFZlcmEgU2FucyBb Yml0c3RyZWFtXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIGZvbnQgR2ls bCBTYW5zIE1UIEV4dCBDb25kZW5zZWQgQm9sZCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdOiAxMg0K U2NvcmUgZm9yIHNlcmlmIGZvbnQgQm9va21hbiBPbGQgU3R5bGUgW21vbm90 eXBlXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIGZvbnQgQXJpYWwgTmFy cm93IFttb25vdHlwZV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3IgY3Vyc2l2ZSBmb250IElt cGFjdCBbbW9ub3R5cGVdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNlcmlmIGZvbnQgQml0 c3RyZWFtIENoYXJ0ZXIgW2JpdHN0cmVhbV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9u b3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgV1NUX0l0YWwgW1hmdF06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2Fu cy1zZXJpZiBmb250IEx1eGkgU2FucyBbYiZoXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBt b25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBXU1RfRnJlbiBbWGZ0XTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBt b25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBDb3VyYW50IFtYZnRdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNh bnMtc2VyaWYgZm9udCBHaWxsIFNhbnMgTVQgQ29uZGVuc2VkIFttb25vdHlw ZV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2Fucy1zZXJpZiBmb250IEdpbGwgU2FucyBV bHRyYSBCb2xkIFttb25vdHlwZV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2VyaWYgZm9u dCBGcmFua2xpbiBHb3RoaWMgQm9vayBbaXRjXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBz ZXJpZiBmb250IE1TIFNlcmlmIFtYZnRdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9z cGFjZSBmb250IFdTVF9FbmdsIFtYZnRdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNlcmlm IGZvbnQgQm9vayBBbnRpcXVhIFttb25vdHlwZV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Ig c2VyaWYgZm9udCBSb21hblVuY2lhbE1vZGVybiBbWGZ0XTogMTINClNjb3Jl IGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBCaXRzdHJlYW0gVmVyYSBTYW5zIE1vbm8g W2JpdHN0cmVhbV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgRml4 ZWRzeXMgRXhjZWxzaW9yIDIuMDAgW1hmdF06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9u b3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgTW9ub3BvbCBbWGZ0XTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25v c3BhY2UgZm9udCBDb3VyaWVyIFtYZnRdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNhbnMt c2VyaWYgZm9udCBUZW1wdXMgU2FucyBJVEMgW21vbm90eXBlXTogMTINClNj b3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBMdXhpIE1vbm8gW2ImaF06IDEyDQpT Y29yZSBmb3IgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgT0NSIEEgRXh0ZW5kZWQgW21vbm90 eXBlXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBNb25vdHlwZSBT b3J0cyBbbW9ub3R5cGVdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250 IERpbmdiYXRzIFt1cnddOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250 IENvdXJpZXIgTmV3IFttb25vdHlwZV06IDE1DQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2VyaWYg Zm9udCBVUlcgQm9va21hbiBMIFt1cnddOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNlcmlm IGZvbnQgTmltYnVzIFJvbWFuIE5vOSBMIFt1cnddOiAxNA0KU2NvcmUgZm9y IHNlcmlmIGZvbnQgRnJhbmtsaW4gR290aGljIEJvb2sgW21vbm90eXBlXTog MTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBzZXJpZiBmb250IFZVIFRpbWVzIFtYZnRdOiAxMg0K U2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IEN1cnNvciBbeGZyZWU4Nl06IDEy DQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgTW9ub3NwYWNlIFtYZnRdOiAx Mg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYgZm9udCBHaWxsIFNhbnMgTVQgW21v bm90eXBlXTogMTINClNjb3JlIGZvciBzZXJpZiBmb250IFRpbWVzIE5ldyBS b21hbiBbbW9ub3R5cGVdOiAxNQ0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250 IFdTVF9HZXJtIFtYZnRdOiAxMg0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYgZm9u dCBBcmlhbCBVbmljb2RlIE1TIFttb25vdHlwZV06IDEyDQpTY29yZSBmb3Ig c2Fucy1zZXJpZiBmb250IE1TIFNhbnMgU2VyaWYgW1hmdF06IDEyDQpTY29y ZSBmb3IgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgTW9ub3BvbCBbQWx0c3lzXTogMTENClNj b3JlIGZvciBzZXJpZiBmb250IFJvbWFudW5jaWFsbW9kZXJuIFtBbHRzeXNd OiAxMQ0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNlcmlmIGZvbnQgVnUgdGltZXMgW0JpdG1hcCBz b2Z0d2FyZV06IDExDQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgQml0c3Ry ZWFtIGN5YmVyYml0IFtCaXRzdHJlYW1dOiAxMQ0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNhbnMt c2VyaWYgZm9udCBDbl9hcmlhbCBbTWlzY106IDExDQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9u b3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgQ29kZTIwMDAgW01pc2NdOiAxMQ0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1v bm9zcGFjZSBmb250IEZpeGVkc3lzIGV4Y2Vsc2lvciAyLjAwIFtNaXNjXTog MTENClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBNb25vc3BhY2UgW01pc2Nd OiAxMQ0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IFRpdHVzIGN5YmVyYml0 IGJhc2ljIFtNaXNjXTogMTENClNjb3JlIGZvciBzZXJpZiBmb250IFZ1IHRp bWVzIFtNaXNjXTogMTENClNjb3JlIGZvciBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIGZvbnQgQXZh bnRnYXJkZSBbQWRvYmVdOiAxMQ0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNlcmlmIGZvbnQgQm9v a21hbiBbQWRvYmVdOiAxMQ0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IENv dXJpZXIgW0Fkb2JlXTogMTMNClNjb3JlIGZvciBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIGZvbnQg SGVsdmV0aWNhIG5hcnJvdyBbQWRvYmVdOiAxMQ0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIHNhbnMt c2VyaWYgZm9udCBIZWx2ZXRpY2EgW0Fkb2JlXTogMTMNClNjb3JlIGZvciBz ZXJpZiBmb250IE5ldyBjZW50dXJ5IHNjaG9vbGJvb2sgW0Fkb2JlXTogMTAN ClNjb3JlIGZvciBzZXJpZiBmb250IFRpbWVzIFtBZG9iZV06IDEzDQpTY29y ZSBmb3IgZmFudGFzeSBmb250IFphcGYgY2hhbmNlcnkgW0Fkb2JlXTogMTEN ClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBHb3RoaWMgW0RhZXdvb106IDEw DQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgTWluY2hvIFtEYWV3b29dOiAx MA0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IEZhbmdzb25nIHRpIFtJc2Fz XTogMTANClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBTb25nIHRpIFtJc2Fz XTogMTANClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBGaXhlZCBbSmlzXTog MTANClNjb3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBGaXhlZCBbTWlzY106IDEw DQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgTmlsIFtNaXNjXTogMTANClNj b3JlIGZvciBtb25vc3BhY2UgZm9udCBDbGVhbiBbU2NodW1hY2hlcl06IDEw DQpTY29yZSBmb3IgbW9ub3NwYWNlIGZvbnQgRml4ZWQgW1NvbnldOiAxMA0K U2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IEx1Y2lkYXR5cGV3cml0ZXIgW0Im aF06IDEwDQpTY29yZSBmb3Igc2VyaWYgZm9udCBDaGFydGVyIFtCaXRzdHJl YW1dOiAxMA0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IFRlcm1pbmFsIFtC aXRzdHJlYW1dOiAxMA0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IFRlcm1p bmFsIFtEZWNdOiAxMA0KU2NvcmUgZm9yIG1vbm9zcGFjZSBmb250IENvdXJp ZXIgW0JpdHN0cmVhbV06IDExDQpBbmQgdGhlIHdpbm5lcnMgYXJlOg0KCXNl cmlmOiBUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4gW21vbm90eXBlXQ0KCXNhbnMtc2VyaWY6 IEFyaWFsIFttb25vdHlwZV0NCgljdXJzaXZlOiBJbXBhY3QgW21vbm90eXBl XQ0KCWZhbnRhc3k6IENvbWljIFNhbnMgTVMgW21pY3Jvc29mdF0NCgltb25v c3BhY2U6IENvdXJpZXIgTmV3IFttb25vdHlwZV0NClVJIGZvbnQ6IEFyaWFs IFttb25vdHlwZV0NCkZvbnQgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9y bWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSBsb2FkZWQNCkZvbnQgLW1p c2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0yMC0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNv MTA2NDYtMSBsb2FkZWQNClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJv b2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQg b2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1j LTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiMTk6MzUiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUt YXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1 OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1h bC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIjEwMCUiDQpVc2Ug Zm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAt MC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1l ZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjog Ikdvb2dsZSBzZWFyY2giDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1i b29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFk IG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAt Yy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkdvIHRvIFdlYiBhZGRyZXNzIGhlcmUi DQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0x My0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2Fy aWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEp IGZvcjogIk5ldyBwYWdlIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUt Ym9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVh ZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0w LWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJCbGFuayBwYWdlIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQg LWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0w LWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0t ci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIxOToz NSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwt LTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25f YXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYt MSkgZm9yOiAiR28gdG8gV2ViIGFkZHJlc3MgaGVyZSINClVzZSBmb250IC1h ZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1p c284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXIt bm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiR29vZ2xl IHNlYXJjaCINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1u b3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1p c2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNv MTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiMTAwJSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdh cmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGlu c3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0w LTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiVGltZTogICAwOjAwIg0KVXNl IGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0w LTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1t ZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6 ICJTcGVlZDogICA/Ig0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9v ay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBv ZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMt MC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJUb3RhbDogICAwIEIiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAt YWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAt aXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1y LW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkltYWdl czogICAwLzAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXIt bm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1t aXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlz bzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkRvY3VtZW50OiAgIDAlIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFk b2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlz bzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1u b3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJDYXNjYWRl Ig0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0t MTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9h cmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0x KSBmb3I6ICJUaWxlIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9v ay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBv ZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMt MC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJQYW5lbHMiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUt YXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1 OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1h bC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkhvbWUiDQpVc2Ug Zm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAt MC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1l ZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjog IkZpbmQiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9y bWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNj LWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEw NjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIlByaW50Ig0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2Fy ZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5z dGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAt MC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJTYXZlIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFk b2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlz bzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1u b3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJPcGVuIg0K VXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMt MC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlh bC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBm b3I6ICJOZXcgcGFnZSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJv b2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQg b2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1j LTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiQmxhbmsgcGFnZSINClVzZSBmb250IC1h ZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1p c284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXIt bm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiTmV3IHBh Z2UiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFs LS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNu X2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2 LTEpIGZvcjogIkJsYW5rIHBhZ2UiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRn YXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChp bnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMt MC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkNhc2NhZGUiDQpVc2UgZm9u dCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1w LTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1 bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIlRp bGUiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFs LS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNu X2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2 LTEpIGZvcjogIlBhbmVscyINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRl LWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3Rl YWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAt MC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiSG9tZSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9i ZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284 ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9y bWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiRmluZCINClVz ZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAt MC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwt bWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9y OiAiUHJpbnQiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXIt bm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1t aXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlz bzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIlNhdmUiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRn YXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChp bnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMt MC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIk9wZW4iDQpVc2UgZm9udCAt YWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAt aXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1y LW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIjE5OjM1 Ig0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0t MTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9h cmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0x KSBmb3I6ICIxMDAlIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9v ay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBv ZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMt MC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJHb29nbGUgc2VhcmNoIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQg LWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0w LWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0t ci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJHbyB0 byBXZWIgYWRkcmVzcyBoZXJlIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2Fy ZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5z dGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAt MC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJUaW1lOiAgIDA6MDAiDQpVc2Ug Zm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAt MC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1l ZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjog IlNwZWVkOiAgID8iDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29r LXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9m IC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0w LWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIlRvdGFsOiAgIDAgQiINClVzZSBmb250IC1h ZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1p c284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXIt bm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiSW1hZ2Vz OiAgIDAvMCINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1u b3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1p c2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNv MTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiRG9jdW1lbnQ6ICAgMCUiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRv YmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNv ODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5v cm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIjE5OjM1Ig0K Rm9udCAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0w LWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xIGxvYWRlZA0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50 Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAo aW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEz LTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJodHRwOi8vd3d3Lmdvb2ds ZS5jb20vIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5v cm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlz Yy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28x MDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJIb21lIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2Fy ZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5z dGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAt MC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJGaW5kIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFk b2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlz bzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1u b3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJQcmludCIN ClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEz LTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJp YWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkg Zm9yOiAiU2F2ZSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2st ci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2Yg LW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAt aXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiT3BlbiINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFu dGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEg KGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0x My0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiTmV3IHBhZ2UiDQpVc2Ug Zm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAt MC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1l ZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjog Ikdvb2dsZSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1u b3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1p c2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNv MTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiVGltZTogICAwOjAwIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2Jl LWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4 NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3Jt YWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJTcGVlZDogICA/ Ig0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0t MTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9h cmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0x KSBmb3I6ICJUb3RhbDogICAwIEIiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRn YXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChp bnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMt MC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkltYWdlczogICAwLzAiDQpV c2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0w LTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFs LW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZv cjogIkRvY3VtZW50OiAgIDAlIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2Fy ZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5z dGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAt MC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJOZXcgcGFnZSINClVzZSBmb250 IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAt MC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVt LXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiR29v Ig0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0t MTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9h cmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0x KSBmb3I6ICIuLi4iDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29r LXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9m IC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0w LWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogImh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8iDQpV c2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0w LTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFs LW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZv cjogIkRvY3VtZW50OiAgIDEwMCUiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRn YXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChp bnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMt MC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIlRvdGFsOiAgIDAgQiINClVz ZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAt MC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwt bWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9y OiAiaHR0cDovL3d3dy5nb29nbGUuY29tLyINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1h dmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5 LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFs LS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiRG9jdW1lbnQ6ICAg MTAwJSINCkZvbnQgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0x MS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSBsb2FkZWQNCkZvbnQgLW1pc2MtY25f YXJpYWwtYm9sZC1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEg bG9hZGVkDQpGb250IC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0t MTQtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEgbG9hZGVkDQpGb250IC1taXNjLWNu X2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYt MSBsb2FkZWQNClVzZSBmb250IC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLWJvbGQtci1ub3Jt YWwtLTExLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xIGZvcjogIldlYiINClVzZSBm b250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0w LXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVk aXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAi ICINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwt LTExLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25f YXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYt MSkgZm9yOiAiICINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2st ci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2Yg LW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1jLTAt aXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiICINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdh cmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGlu c3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0w LTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiICINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9i ZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284 ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9y bWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiSW1hZ2VzIg0K VXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEt MC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlh bC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBm b3I6ICIgIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5v cm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlz Yy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28x MDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIgIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUt Ym9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVh ZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0w LWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIgIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2 YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTkt MSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwt LTExLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIgIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQg LWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtcC0w LWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0t ci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJHcm91 cHMiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFs LS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNu X2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2 LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29r LXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9m IC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0w LWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRn YXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChp bnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEt MC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRv YmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNv ODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5v cm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2Ug Zm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAt MC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1l ZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjog Ik5ld3MiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9y bWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNj LWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEw NjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1i b29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFk IG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAt Yy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZh bnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0x IChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0t MTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAt YWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAt aXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1y LW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpV c2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0w LTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFs LW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZv cjogIkZyb29nbGUiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29r LXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9m IC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0w LWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRn YXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChp bnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEt MC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRv YmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNv ODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5v cm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2Ug Zm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAt MC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1l ZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjog IiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1ib2xkLXItbm9ybWFsLS0x MS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSBmb3I6ICJtb3JlIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQg LW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtYm9sZC1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlz bzEwNjQ2LTEgZm9yOiAiICINClVzZSBmb250IC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLWJv bGQtci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xIGZvcjogIlx1 MDBiYiINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3Jt YWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2Mt Y25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2 NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiICINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJv b2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTE0LTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQg b2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xNC0wLTAtMC1j LTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiR29vZ2xlIFNlYXJjaCINClVzZSBmb250 IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTE0LTAtMC0wLXAt MC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVt LXItbm9ybWFsLS0xNC0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiSSdt IEZlZWxpbmcgTHVja3kiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1i b29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS05LTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQg b2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS05LTAtMC0wLWMt MC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIgIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50 Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChp bnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0w LTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiICINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9i ZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4 NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3Jt YWwtLTktMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkFkdmFuY2VkIg0K VXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0w LTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFs LW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9y OiAiICINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3Jt YWwtLTktMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1j bl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2 LTEpIGZvcjogIlNlYXJjaCINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRl LWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVh ZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAt Yy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZh bnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS05LTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEg KGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS05 LTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIgIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFk b2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNv ODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5v cm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiUHJlZmVyZW5j ZXMiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFs LS05LTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25f YXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS05LTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0x KSBmb3I6ICIgIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1y LW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1t aXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNv MTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiICINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRl LWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVh ZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAt Yy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkxhbmd1YWdlIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFk b2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNv ODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5v cm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiVG9vbHMiDQpV c2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0w LTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFs LW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZv cjogIkFkdmVydGlzaW5nIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUt Ym9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVh ZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0w LWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIgIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2 YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTkt MSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwt LTExLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJQcm9ncmFtcyINClVz ZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAt MC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwt bWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9y OiAiLSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3Jt YWwtLTExLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2Mt Y25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2 NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiQnVzaW5lc3MiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRn YXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChp bnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTEt MC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiAiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRv YmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNv ODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5v cm1hbC0tMTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIlNvbHV0aW9u cyINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwt LTExLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25f YXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYt MSkgZm9yOiAiLSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2st ci1ub3JtYWwtLTExLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2Yg LW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1jLTAt aXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiQWJvdXQiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZh bnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0x IChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0t MTEtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkdvb2dsZSINClVzZSBm b250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAt cC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRp dW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIlx1 MDBhOSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3Jt YWwtLTktMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1j bl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2 LTEpIGZvcjogIjIwMDQiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1i b29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS05LTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQg b2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS05LTAtMC0wLWMt MC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJHb29nbGUiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUt YXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS05LTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5 LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFs LS05LTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICItIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQg LWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1wLTAt aXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1y LW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiU2VhcmNo aW5nIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1h bC0tOS0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNu X2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYt MSkgZm9yOiAiNCINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2st ci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAt bWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlz bzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIiwiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJk ZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS05LTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3Rl YWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS05LTAtMC0w LWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIyODUiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUt YXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS05LTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5 LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFs LS05LTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIsIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQg LWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1wLTAt aXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1y LW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiMTk5Ig0K VXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0w LTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFs LW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tOS0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9y OiAiLCINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3Jt YWwtLTktMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1j bl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2 LTEpIGZvcjogIjc3NCINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJv b2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBv ZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtYy0w LWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIndlYiINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFu dGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTktMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAo aW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTkt MC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogInBhZ2VzIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQg LWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0w LWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0t ci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICJOZXcg cGFnZSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3Jt YWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2Mt Y25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2 NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiR29vIg0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUt Ym9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVh ZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0w LWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIuLi4iDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUt YXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1 OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1h bC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogImh0dHA6Ly93d3cu Z29vZ2xlLmNvbS8iDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29r LXItbm9ybWFsLS0xNC0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9m IC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTQtMC0wLTAtYy0w LWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkknbSBGZWVsaW5nIEx1Y2t5Ig0KVXNlIGZv bnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTMtMC0wLTAt cC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1jbl9hcmlhbC1tZWRp dW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIx OTozNSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3Jt YWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2Mt Y25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2 NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiaHR0cDovL3d3dy5nb29nbGUuY29tLyINClVzZSBmb250 IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAt MC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVt LXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiR29v Z2xlIHNlYXJjaCINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFudGdhcmRlLWJvb2st ci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEgKGluc3RlYWQgb2Yg LW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xMy0wLTAtMC1jLTAt aXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiMTAwJSINClVzZSBmb250IC1hZG9iZS1hdmFu dGdhcmRlLWJvb2stci1ub3JtYWwtLTE0LTAtMC0wLXAtMC1pc284ODU5LTEg KGluc3RlYWQgb2YgLW1pc2MtY25fYXJpYWwtbWVkaXVtLXItbm9ybWFsLS0x NC0wLTAtMC1jLTAtaXNvMTA2NDYtMSkgZm9yOiAiSSdtIEZlZWxpbmcgTHVj a3kiDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZhbnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFs LS0xNC0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0xIChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNu X2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0tMTQtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2 LTEpIGZvcjogIkdvb2dsZSBTZWFyY2giDQpVc2UgZm9udCAtYWRvYmUtYXZh bnRnYXJkZS1ib29rLXItbm9ybWFsLS0xNC0wLTAtMC1wLTAtaXNvODg1OS0x IChpbnN0ZWFkIG9mIC1taXNjLWNuX2FyaWFsLW1lZGl1bS1yLW5vcm1hbC0t MTQtMC0wLTAtYy0wLWlzbzEwNjQ2LTEpIGZvcjogIkknbSBGZWVsaW5nIEx1 Y2t5Ig0KVXNlIGZvbnQgLWFkb2JlLWF2YW50Z2FyZGUtYm9vay1yLW5vcm1h bC0tMTMtMC0wLTAtcC0wLWlzbzg4NTktMSAoaW5zdGVhZCBvZiAtbWlzYy1j bl9hcmlhbC1tZWRpdW0tci1ub3JtYWwtLTEzLTAtMC0wLWMtMC1pc28xMDY0 Ni0xKSBmb3I6ICIxOTozNiINCg== --0-816994367-1090777439=:49960-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 17:55:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8124C16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:55:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out012.verizon.net (out012pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3342543D54 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:55:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.120.54]) by out012.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040725175516.CJCU22270.out012.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:55:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4103F3FD.4030505@mac.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:55:09 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Jayson Alvarez References: <20040725164340.39903.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040725164340.39903.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out012.verizon.net from [68.161.120.54] at Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:55:15 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling Application, always a nightmare. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:55:19 -0000 Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: > Do I always have to wait for freebsd to make a port > for a certain application (that there might be somewhat > special process involve) or is it possible for me to > compile it from its sources by myself? With time and skilled effort, it's possible to compile any application from sources yourself. People who possess the appropriate knowledge may create instructions for how to build the software on FreeBSD without errors. This is what ports are, a set of Makefiles (and patches where needed) which make it easy and convenient for normal users to compile software for themselves, and also enable building precompiled packages. > For example, I am looking for kaffeine and as its > dependency, it says I will have to install xinelib > first so I downloaded its latest sources from their > main website xinehq.de(failing from retrieving it > first from freebsd.org/ports), but then, same as with > most of the applications that I have compiled from > their sources, it stops in the middle of "make" and I > always end up just installing a precompiled package in > .tgz format("sort of better luck next time: no package > available for xinelib") If you take a look at /usr/ports/multimedia/libxine, you will see exactly what is needed to build xinelib under FreeBSD. In particular, there are about a dozen changes to the source code under libxine/files which are needed for the software to compile and run under FreeBSD. That's somewhat unusual, and generally implies that libxine was not written very well or very portably. Good software requires zero changes to run on a different platform, but multimedia software tends to be finicky. > I really want to know what processess, or > pointers(ex;tools, environment variables and so on and > so forth.) should I consider when compiling from the > sources. Well, it obviously helps to be able to write and debug code. If you are reasonably competent as a software developer, the next step would be to read the Porter's Handbook at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook If you aren't a developer, your best bet is probably to use the ports or precompiled packages for now, and learn about coding by writing your own programs until you know enough to be able to understand and change/fix other people's code. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 18:42:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3804016A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:42:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD0C43D31 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:42:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 28603444 for multiple; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:27:34 -0700 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:42:30 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Jorn Argelo" Message-Id: <20040725134230.22d06fad@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <200407241841.i6OIfsq2066062@www.wcborstel.nl> References: <200407241841.i6OIfsq2066062@www.wcborstel.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Aaron Benson Subject: Re: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:42:42 -0000 On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:41:54 +0200 (CEST) "Jorn Argelo" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > This email is going to any Linux house whom has pitched themselves > > via their websites and reviews, from my research as being possible > > alternatives to XP at this stage. Depends on your Google hit and > > thereafter (if found within 2 pages) site FAQ's I suppose. > > > > As a currently dedicated M$ house (apart from Oracle Databases), > > we question the move to a XP desktop amid the Linux hype in recent > > times. Any IT department trying to save company money is only > > doing the right thing and ask the question, what can Linux do for > > us? > > As mentioned before, FreeBSD is NOT Linux. Keep that in mind. > > > I've flipped through your FAQ's and over forums but result in no > > answer for Active Directory 2K3 and Exchange 2K3 server client > > connectivity, integration and functionality? Note that we have not > > moved to these product versions yet. Hence this email. > > KDE's Kmail can connect to Exchange servers, I believe. As for > logging into active directory ... That doesn't exist AFAIK. Perhaps > there are programs that allow such things, but I wouldn't count on > that. Windows is an excellent OS for integration with Active > Directory. AFAIK sylpheed-claws can too... IIRC Exchange is imap... or something... Windows see below for more info on active directory integration. :) > > I ask because I cannot see a server based centralised > > authentication and administrative option in Linux. If there were, > > say a "centralised server option" for Linux, this would be > > seriously considered. Is there a User Manager equivalent (NT4 > > domain for example) or Exchange Administrator equivalent (Exchange > > 5.5) "functional" alternative? More importantly, 2K3 Server and > > Exchange integration? > > YP/NIS works and can be gotten to work on Windows(using something free similiar to below from Microsoft.) Many unixes(note lower case :P) are also begining to supprt LDAP now. IIRC FreeBSD 5x does. > Not AFAIK. > > > Failing that, connecting clients as above to M$ servers would be > > sufficient. Stay with M$ in servers, go with Linux in desktops. > > I've seen enough "glossy brochures" and want to know the facts. > > Again, you can't do this when you want centralised server option. > > > The cost difference is obvious. The functional difference is not. > > I've still no reason to choose your Linux over Windows XP Pro at > > this stage. Cost is not enough. Any sane IT department doesn't > > need screaming users due to lack of pure functionality. Experience > > suggests most find it difficult enough getting around the OS to > > even perform basic functions, let alone usability. > > > > Assuming aforementioned functionality, where does your Linux stand > > with converting between M$ Office 97/2K/2K3? Will our accounts > > department be able to work with their previous 40Mb Excel files > > full of VLookups and Formulas straightup, or is it going to be > > bigger than a Lotus 4.1 to Excel 5 conversion debacle? > > Of course Word,PowerPoint,Publisher and Access are questioned > > also. > > OpenOffice.org can do the job there, but a file created with OOo > will be rather misshapen when opened with Excel and vica versa. So > it's not advicable. What about gnumeric? There are also other assorted programs out there to fill the need desired. Remember, on unix you are not as limited in vendor options as you are on windows and there is a much larger software base to choose from. :) > > I'm talking up to 500 user desktops to be upgraded. Upgraded need > > not be a literal word. Installing Linux from scratch would be > > expected. Anything "upgrade wise" extra would be a bonus. > > > > Outside of M$ Office, current application functionality would have > > to be trialed. This is expected. A list of currently supported M$ > > applications would be helpful. > > > > Your detailed reply appreciated > > > > So, for your needs, upgrading to Linux or BSD or whatever is a BAD > idea, IMHO. Your employees and your desktops simply don't have any > use of it, with the desires mentioned above. As long as you wish for > integration with Active Directory, then an Microsoft OS is still the > best for you. Can be done :) http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/productinfo/features/default.asp Those idiots still have not put in ssh, thought!?!?! :/ /me feels telnet should be a executable offense :P BTW I have been using unix since it is simpler to type than unix-like os or unix derivative... not to be confused with the upper case UNIX ^_^ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 19:00:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD2816A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:00:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FED43D55 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:00:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arden@nildram.co.uk) Received: from [10.0.0.6] (82-133-110-58.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk [82.133.110.58]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D84A256072; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:00:48 +0100 (BST) From: arden To: kisha@lissaganda.com In-Reply-To: <20040725082515.23158.h003.c001.wm@mail.lissaganda.com.criticalpath.net> References: <20040725082515.23158.h003.c001.wm@mail.lissaganda.com.criticalpath.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1090781932.3530.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:58:53 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd Subject: Re: burncd question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:00:57 -0000 have you tried cdrecord? On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 16:25, kisha@lissaganda.com wrote: > %uname -a > FreeBSD SOULFLY.BACK.TO.THE.PRIMITIVE.PH > 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 #0: Mon Jun > 21 14:53:05 PHT 2004 > dataholic@SOULFLY.BACK.TO.THE.PRIMITIVE.PH:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MMP i386 > > cd-RW dmesg: > ata1-slave: FAILURE - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE no > interrupt > acd0: CDRW at ata1-slave BIOSPIO > > SOULFLY# burncd -f /dev/acd0 -s 12 data downloads.iso > fixate > burncd: ioctl(CDIOCSTART): Device busy > > SOULFLY# $ ls -l /usr/sbin/burncd > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18196 Jun 24 17:51 > /usr/sbin/burncd > > i always get this message, when i attempt to burn an > .iso, anyone whats this error is all about, my sony 24x > burner is fine when i burn files from my windows XP > which is my first partition, i hope anyone can help me > fixing this problem, thanks ;) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 20:00:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CCF16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:00:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl (zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl [150.254.89.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A5D43D45 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:00:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from r@zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl) Received: from zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6PK3x6a023826 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:03:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from r@zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl) Received: (from r@localhost) by zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i6PK3x8f023825 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:03:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from r) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:03:58 +0200 From: /root/of/all/evil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040725200358.GA23815@zeik.wns.amu.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Cant get daemons starting during boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:00:45 -0000 Definition of the problem: Installed applications daemons which have their startup scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ are not starting during system boot as they should (only one script is starting - apache2). Description of the problem: I had very good working server at FBSD 5.2.1 with several applications (such as apache2, mysql, pureftpd, postfix, saslauth) and I have upgraded it one day, due to security advisories of FBSD developers, and application advisories due to portaudit advisories. Buildworld and whole process of upgrading system from cvsup goes well, portupgrade of applications also. And after that I discovered, that upgraded applications does not start during system boot. I chcecked my srcipts permissions (fine), same scripts (fine too - if I run any script from commandline after the system start, it boots the proper daemon nicely) and config files of applications (fine too). After that I started to read forums, and google, then find out that daemons now needs declarations in /etc/rc.conf so I added them. Still nothing. I finished with that I added the scripts at the end of the only starting script which is apache2 script, but this is *NOT* proper solution, even if daemons are working. Also, I dont see anything uncommon content in any system log. Can *anybody* give me *any* hint/tip or tell me what I did wrong? Im fightng with that for almost two weeks right now, and that affects all 3 of my machines. System details: rc.conf: apache2_enable="YES" oidentd_enable="YES" mysqld_enable="YES" pureftpd_enable="YES" local_startup="/usr/local/etc/rc.d" installed versions: apache-2.0.50 mysql-client-4.0.20 mysql-server-4.0.20 pure-ftpd-1.0.19 postfix-2.1.3,1 cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.18_2 sample startup script from .../rc.d/: pure-ftpd.sh: #!/bin/sh # PROVIDE: pureftpd # REQUIRE: NETWORKING SERVERS # BEFORE: DAEMON # KEYWORD: FreeBSD shutdown # # Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to enable pure-ftpd: # # pureftpd_enable="YES" # . /etc/rc.subr name=pureftpd rcvar=`set_rcvar` command=/usr/local/sbin/pure-config.pl pureftpd_config=${pureftpd_config:-"/usr/local/etc/pure-ftpd.conf"} required_files=${pureftpd_config} pidfile=/var/run/pure-ftpd.pid procname=pure-ftpd pureftpd_enable="YES" command_args=${pureftpd_config} load_rc_config $name run_rc_command "$1" file permissions: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 50 23 Maj 14:42 000.compat4x.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 181 24 Cze 23:50 000.mysql-client.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 248 13 Lip 19:11 000.pkgtools.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1809 21 Lip 20:30 apache2.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 407 31 Maj 20:29 apache2.sh.orig -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 227 9 Lip 14:27 helix.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 549 24 Cze 23:41 mysql-server.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 550 24 Cze 13:48 oidentd.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 558 21 Lip 20:23 pure-ftpd.sh system: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 Please, give me any help, if you know what is going on here. Thanks a lot, r. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 20:28:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC68D16A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:28:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0E743D39 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:28:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6PKSYcO000776; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:28:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6PKSXqG000773; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:28:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:28:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Vulpes Velox In-Reply-To: <20040725134230.22d06fad@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> Message-ID: <20040725222809.C730@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <200407241841.i6OIfsq2066062@www.wcborstel.nl> <20040725134230.22d06fad@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Jorn Argelo cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Aaron Benson Subject: Re: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:28:47 -0000 > > will be rather misshapen when opened with Excel and vica versa. So > > it's not advicable. > > What about gnumeric? There are also other assorted programs out there > to fill the need desired. works fine - actually i use it and works well From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 21:36:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC8716A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:36:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6552D43D2D for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:36:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@rcn.com) Received: from 207-237-110-41.c3-0.crm-ubr4.crm.ny.cable.rcn.com ([207.237.110.41] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1Boqfs-0006Df-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:36:52 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:36:52 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: Gerard@FreeBSD.ORG, Seibert@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20040725174604.C2F1816A503@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20040725174604.C2F1816A503@hub.freebsd.org> Message-Id: <20040725173227.529D.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.11.02 [en] Subject: Re: BerkeleyDB 4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard-seibert@rcn.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:36:53 -0000 On Sunday, July 25, 2004 1:46:04 PM Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: |>Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:39:45 +0200 |>From: Karol Kwiatkowski |>Subject: Re: BerkeleyDB 4.2 |>To: Gerard Seibert |>Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org |>Message-ID: <4103AA11.7060806@orchid.homeunix.org> |>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii |> |>Gerard Seibert wrote: |>> I have tried to locate the latest version of the BerkeleyDB. It is version |>> 4.2 I believe. I cannot find it in the ports collection. |> |>A quick search gives me: |> |>orchid# cd /usr/ports |>orchid# make search name="db42" |>Port: db42-4.2.52_2 |>Path: /usr/ports/databases/db42 |>Info: The Berkeley DB package, revision 4.2 |>Maint: matthias.andree@gmx.de |>B-deps: libtool-1.5.2_1 |>R-deps: |> |>Port: db42-nocrypto-4.2.52_2 |>Path: /usr/ports/databases/db42-nocrypto |>Info: The Berkeley DB package, revision 4.2 |>Maint: matthias.andree@gmx.de |>B-deps: libtool-1.5.2_1 |>R-deps: |> |> |>If I'm not sure about a port name I find ports site very useful: |>http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html |> |>Cheers, |> |>Karol |> |>-- |>Karol Kwiatkowski ********** Reply Separator ********** Sunday, July 25, 2004 5:32:27 PM Yes, you are correct. I was looking for: 1) BerkeleyDB 2) BerkeleyDB 4.2 3) SleepyCat and a few other variants. I never thought to just try DB or DB42. Thanks Gerard Seibert gerard-seibert@rcn.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 22:14:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B83616A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:14:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E66D43D2D for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:14:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marchenk@in.tum.de) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Maksym Marchenko Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=koi8-r MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:15:40 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera7.23/Win32 M2 build 3227 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de Subject: 4.10 - something strange X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:14:59 -0000 Hello, I've installed for a two days 4.10 on my laptop And new kernel with options options PNPBIOS device pcm # for my onboard sound device wi # for my Lucent ORiNOCO (so was in 4.9 kernel also) But in 4.9 my soundcard and wi0 worked perfectly Now in 4.10 it worked very strange: during boot-process it starts wi0 only about every 2-nd reboot(e.g. time - 50%) and sound (I'm using KDE) - sometimes I hear *garbage* during KDE-start-up, sometimes good sound; but even when I hear good sound at start-up, later I want to hear mp3 (in the same X_session) but I hear *garbage*. Then (for example in 10 minuts) I can hear again *real* musik (e.g. mp3, wav). And vice versa. So I don't know, what that can be ... Can I handle this problem or the better way - back in 4.9??? May be someone already knew, how to make it right? Or someone have the same problem? Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 23:04:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C903416A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:04:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A168C43D48 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:04:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA35C69A39 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:04:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:04:45 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040725190445.0a8bc8ce.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Apaching binding to *:* ?? (Weirdness) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:04:47 -0000 I have a FreeBSD 5.1 server (can't upgrade to 5.2 yet, until the em driver is fixed) and I'm getting it ready to set up a jail for a staging environment. I'm having some weird action from Apache. It seems that every apache process binds to *:* twice, in addition to IP:80 and IP:443. Has anyone seen this before? This is Apache 1.3.28 (although an upgrade is on the schedule) I had _wanted_ to test the new version of Apache in the jail prior to upgrading, but I'm not so sure that's going to work. Anyone seen this before? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 00:37:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04F916A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:37:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mcp.lphp.org (ASt-Lambert-152-2-2-96.w82-120.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.120.206.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA0443D2F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:37:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from bsdbox.lphp.local (bsdbox.lphp.local [192.168.0.2]) by mcp.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6Q0bPFN064024 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:37:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) From: Antoine Jacoutot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:37:24 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407260237.24582.ajacoutot@lphp.org> Subject: error compiling php4-domxml X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:37:28 -0000 Hi :) I'm trying to compile php4-domxml without success. Here is the output from make install, anybody has an idea on how to fix this ? Thanks in advance. $ pwd /usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml $ make ===> Vulnerability check disabled ===> Found saved configuration for php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 ===> Extracting for php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 >> Checksum OK for php-4.3.8.tar.bz2. ===> Patching for php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 ===> php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 depends on executable: phpize - found ===> php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/automake - found ===> php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf - found ===> php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool13 - found ===> php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 depends on executable: pkg-config - found ===> php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 depends on shared library: xml2.5 - found ===> PHPizing for php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 autoheader: `config.h.in' is created Configuring for: PHP Api Version: 20020918 Zend Module Api No: 20020429 Zend Extension Api No: 20021010 ===> Configuring for php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1 checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1-gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes checking if compiler supports -R... yes checking for PHP prefix... /usr/local checking for PHP includes... -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM checking for PHP extension directory... /usr/local/lib/php/20020429 checking for re2c... exit 0; checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for nawk... nawk checking for DOM support... yes, shared checking for the location of libz... /usr checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for libxml version... >= 2.4.14 checking for DOM XSLT support... no checking for DOM EXSLT support... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1-ranlib... no checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... yes loading cache /dev/null within ltconfig checking for object suffix... o checking for executable suffix... no checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.lo... yes checking if cc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... no checking if cc static flag -static works... -static checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... ok checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd5.2.1 ld.so checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes *** Warning: the command libtool uses to detect shared libraries, *** /usr/bin/file, produces output that libtool cannot recognize. *** The result is that libtool may fail to recognize shared libraries *** as such. This will affect the creation of libtool libraries that *** depend on shared libraries, but programs linked with such libtool *** libraries will work regardless of this problem. Nevertheless, you *** may want to report the problem to your system manager and/or to *** bug-libtool@gnu.org checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... no checking for objdir... .libs creating libtool updating cache /dev/null configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating config.h ===> Building for php4-domxml-4.3.8_1 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool13 --mode=compile cc -I. -I/usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml/include -I/usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml/main -I/usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -prefer-pic -c /usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml/php_domxml.c -o php_domxml.lo mkdir .libs cc -I. -I/usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml/include -I/usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml/main -I/usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -prefer-pic -c /usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml/php_domxml.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/php_domxml.lo cc: unrecognized option `-prefer-pic' In file included from /usr/local/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:796, from /usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml/php_domxml.h:25, from /usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml/php_domxml.c:33: /usr/local/include/libxml2/libxml/encoding.h:28:19: iconv.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/local/include/libxml2/libxml/parser.h:796, from /usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml/php_domxml.h:25, from /usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml/php_domxml.c:33: /usr/local/include/libxml2/libxml/encoding.h:136: error: syntax error before "iconv_t" *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml/work/php-4.3.8/ext/domxml. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/php4-domxml. Antoine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 01:23:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC40416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 01:23:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from usenet.ath.cx (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95B843D49 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 01:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (reader.usenet.ath.cx [10.0.0.3]) by usenet.ath.cx (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6Q1Nw92068436 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:23:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <41045F44.4030703@bah.homeip.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:32:52 +0200 From: "Bernt. H" User-Agent: Thunderbird 0.4 (FreeBSD 4.8) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: make installworld trouble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 01:23:47 -0000 Trying to install world on this machine but it does not like make installworld. I have not much of a clue. is it perl? vm? help! uname -a FreeBSD usenet2.ath.cx 4.10-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #0: Thu Jul 15 13:44:12 CEST 2004 xyz@x.yz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLFW i386 vm/vnode_pager.h -> vm/vnode_pager.ph *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 02:10:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867C716A4CE; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:10:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B0D43D2F; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:10:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) Received: from dhcp-7.sql1.plosh.net (c-24-4-233-31.client.comcast.net [24.4.233.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF2FA90E; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:10:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) From: Peter Losher Organization: ISC To: current@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:10:14 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_GgGBBVx+rwrlNxt"; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407251910.14818.Peter_Losher@isc.org> Subject: Driver support for 3ware 8506-12 in i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:10:18 -0000 --Boundary-02=_GgGBBVx+rwrlNxt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi -=20 Many of you saw my messages last month on getting a 3ware 8506-12 SATA=20 RAID controller working under heavy I/O on 5.2.1/amd64, and despite the=20 work of Paul Saab in getting me a version of the -CURRENT twe driver, it=20 still locks up under heavy I/O. =20 So since this box is behind schedule, and I need to get this box stable,=20 I am likely to side-grade this box to 5.2.1/i386, with the understanding=20 that the twe driver as it stands now just isn't 64-bit compatible. When=20 5.3-RELEASE is out and the twe driver is hopefully 64-bit clean, I can=20 reconsider going back to amd64 on this box. Does anyone have a 8506 series (esp. a 8506-12) controller running under=20 5.2.1/i386 in production? I'd like to know before hand before I make=20 the jump. Best Wishes - Peter =2D-=20 Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP Key E8048D08 | "The bits must flow" --Boundary-02=_GgGBBVx+rwrlNxt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBBGgGPtVx9OgEjQgRAsfOAKDZqNKAMVHCzMRs6gsmHaQ/PPdebgCfYWqB NgPFbdbrt4H+nSjb6hFDdR8= =HFcE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_GgGBBVx+rwrlNxt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 02:21:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F4016A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:21:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from urchin.rlc.qld.edu.au (urchin.rlc.qld.edu.au [202.9.58.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F6243D53 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:21:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alex@helbig.cc) Received: from tm290xx.helbig.cc (laptop.rlc.qld.edu.au [10.0.0.96]) i6Q2LJMb082828; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:21:20 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from alex@helbig.cc) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20040726121625.01d9fbf0@smtp.muse.org.au> X-Sender: alexh@smtp.muse.org.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:21:17 +1000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Alex Helbig Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: alex Helbig Subject: High interrupt load under 5.2.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:21:24 -0000 Hi Everyone, I am having some issues with 5.2.1-RELEASE on an Intel SE7500WV2 with an Intel SRCU42L Raid controller. The issue I have is the number of interrupts per second being caught by the code for either the em or iir device. The output of vmstat and top will show what I mean: %vmstat -i interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 163 0 irq6: fdc0 3 0 irq8: rtc 803888 127 irq9: em0 em1 iir0+ 360580529 57408 irq13: npx0 1 0 irq15: ata1 49 0 irq0: clk 628017 99 Total 362012650 57636 %top -s last pid: 829; load averages: 0.89, 0.71, 0.62 54 processes: 5 running, 41 sleeping, 7 waiting, 1 lock CPU states: 0.1% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 14.4% interrupt, 85.2% idle Mem: 6944K Active, 6012K Inact, 39M Wired, 9312K Buf, 1952M Free Swap: 4071M Total, 4071M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 11 root -16 0 0K 12K CPU3 3 104:59 99.02% 99.02% idle: cpu3 12 root -16 0 0K 12K RUN 2 104:58 99.02% 99.02% idle: cpu2 13 root -16 0 0K 12K CPU1 1 104:42 99.02% 99.02% idle: cpu1 22 root -68 -187 0K 12K *Giant 0 61:32 55.18% 55.18% irq9: em0 em1 iir0+ 14 root -16 0 0K 12K CPU0 0 42:46 40.77% 40.77% idle: cpu0 829 alexh -68 0 2208K 1468K CPU2 2 0:00 6.66% 0.63% top %dmesg | head -n 15 Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb 23 20:45:55 GMT 2004 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0a35000. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc0a35244. ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) XEON(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2392.95-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf24 Stepping = 4 Features=0x3febfbff Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 2147418112 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2080645120 (1984 MB) The points that seem relevant to me in diagnosing this are: * This is a default install of 5.2.1-RELEASE. No custom kernel, no additional software installed. * The box is currently doing nothing other than sitting in a rack * The same box with 5.1-RELEASE did not exhibit this behavior * It seems that the em and iir devices are all sitting behind IRQ9 - I suspect this is not a good thing for when the box does become loaded Does anyone have any suggestions that may either clarify my problem or help me resolve it. Please reply to me and to the list as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks in advance Alex Helbig. ------------------------------------------------- Alex Helbig Head of IT Services Redeemer Lutheran College 745 Rochedale Rd Rochedale Q 4123 Australia Ph: +61 7 3341 4555 Fax: +61 7 3341 9143 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 02:58:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8421916A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:58:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skippyii.compar.com (test.compar.com [216.208.38.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CB643D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:58:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from hermes (CPE00062566c7bb-CM000039c69a66.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.193.82.185])i6Q30RvB013649; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:00:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Message-ID: <001a01c472bb$d6e94880$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matt Emmerton" To: "Bernt. H" , "freebsd questions" References: <41045F44.4030703@bah.homeip.net> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:54:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: make installworld trouble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:58:14 -0000 > Trying to install world on this machine but it does not like > make installworld. > I have not much of a clue. is it perl? vm? > > help! > > uname -a > FreeBSD usenet2.ath.cx 4.10-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #0: Thu Jul 15 > 13:44:12 CEST 2004 xyz@x.yz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLFW i386 > > vm/vnode_pager.h -> vm/vnode_pager.ph > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph. > *** Error code 1 Looks like this is failing in the installation of Perl -- the part where it generates a perl-ized version of every system header. Are you following the procedure outlined here? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html#AEN26900 -- Matt Emmerton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 03:03:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF97416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:03:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net (pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0D543D46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:03:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kg6rir@kg6rir.com) Received: from pool0130.cvx36-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.18.130]) by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Bovlx-0002fp-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:03:30 -0700 Message-ID: <41047485.5020309@kg6rir.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:03:33 +0000 From: 'Andy' User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Mozilla Thunderbird on FreebSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kg6rir@kg6rir.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:03:31 -0000 Hello - I did a search on the freebsd.org website and I can't find any info regarding the porting of Mozilla Thunderbird. Thanks andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 03:14:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556E816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:14:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53004.mail.yahoo.com (web53004.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5EF443D2F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:14:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reza_cavalera@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040726031402.56422.qmail@web53004.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.138.255.170] by web53004.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:14:02 PDT Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:14:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Reza Muhammad To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040725071006.B55AEAE067@nezlok.unixathome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-07-04 - 2004-07-24 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:14:03 -0000 I belive that freesbie-1.0 use 5.2.1 as a core, but why freesbie-1.0 cant detect my nic on T41 automatically ? please help me to solve it. regards reza --- Dan Langille wrote: > The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of > practical > examples and how-to guides. This message is posted > weekly > to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of > letting people > know what's available on the website. Before you > post a question > here it might be a good idea to first search the > mailing list > archives > > > and/or The FreeBSD Diary > . > > These are the articles posted during this period: > > 16-Jul : 5.* on an IBM ThinkPad T41 > Fun and games getting things installed > http://freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41.php?2 > > > -- > Dan Langille > BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 03:15:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F6216A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:15:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD50943D1F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:15:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B90213625; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:15:30 +1200 (NZST) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:15:29 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: 'Andy' Message-ID: <20040726031529.GA708@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: <41047485.5020309@kg6rir.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41047485.5020309@kg6rir.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Mozilla Thunderbird on FreebSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:15:34 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:03:33AM +0000, 'Andy' wrote: > Hello - > > I did a search on the freebsd.org website and I can't find any info > regarding the porting of Mozilla Thunderbird. # cd /usr/ports # make key=thunderbird search will return you the results you want: /usr/ports/mail/thunderbird -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Lots of folks confuse bad management with destiny" - Kin Hubbard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 03:37:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A3816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:37:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC0F43D48 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:37:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E0B3813625; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:37:17 +1200 (NZST) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:37:17 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: 'Andy' Message-ID: <20040726033717.GA915@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: <41047485.5020309@kg6rir.com> <20040726031529.GA708@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <41047C1A.8070009@kg6rir.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41047C1A.8070009@kg6rir.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mozilla Thunderbird on FreebSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:37:19 -0000 [Please don't remove the Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:35:54AM +0000, 'Andy' wrote: > So just to confirm, Mozilla Thunderbird will work with FreeBSD ????? Yes. Has for ages. -- Jonathan Chen | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is to do -- Sartre | Scooby do be do -- Scooby From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 03:38:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B2416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:38:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD5343D49 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:38:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])i6Q3bo41097613; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:37:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com) Received: from wolf.bytecraft.au.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.bytecraft.au.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 86024-08; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:37:50 +1000 (EST) Received: from svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com ([10.0.0.4])i6Q3bmAF097607; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:37:49 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com) Received: from wombat.bytecraft.au.com (Not Verified[10.0.0.3]) by svmarshal.bytecraft.au.com with MailMarshal (v5,0,3,78) id ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:37:47 +1000 Received: from [10.0.17.42] (wstaylorm.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com [10.0.17.42]) by wombat.bytecraft.au.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0563F0F; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:37:46 +1000 (EST) From: Murray Taylor To: Joseph Peterson In-Reply-To: <38a23c360407230627101c68da@mail.gmail.com> References: <20040723130109.GD795@alex.lan> <38a23c360407230627101c68da@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Bytecraft Systems Message-Id: <1090813065.349.35.camel@wstaylorm.dand06.au.bytecraft.au.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:37:45 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Program for diagrams. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:38:01 -0000 root@wstaylorm (/usr/ports)ttyp0 # make search key=tcm | more Port: tcm-2.20_1 Path: /usr/ports/graphics/tcm Info: The Toolkit for Conceptual Modeling, create diagrams/tables/trees TCM does ER, State machines, Some UML (I dont use this yet) DFD diagrams etc ... with a lot of rule based checking .. On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 23:27, Joseph Peterson wrote: > Is that along the lines of visio? > Have you looked at dia? (/usr/ports/graphics/dia) > > -joe > > On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:01:09 +0200, Alex de Kruijff > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was looking for a open-source altenative for Rational Rose or Together > > to create use-case-, classe-, collabaration-, sequance-, state-, ect. > > diagrams. I was wondering if you could advise me what program to use for > > this. > > > > Tanks, > > Alex > > > > Articles based on solutions that I use: > > http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > **************************************************************** > This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal. > **************************************************************** -- Murray Taylor Special Projects Engineer --------------------------------- Bytecraft Systems & Entertainment P: +61 3 8710 2555 F: +61 3 8710 2599 D: +61 3 9238 4275 M: +61 417 319 256 E: murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com or visit us on the web http://www.bytecraftsystems.com http://www.bytecraftentertainment.com --------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material. E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --------------------------------------------------------------- **************************************************************** This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal. **************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 03:39:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1D316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:39:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dezi.net (89-6-237-24.gci.net [24.237.6.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D20E43D31 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:39:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joep@ninestar.com) Received: (qmail 12962 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2004 03:39:38 -0000 Received: from pc-00065.dezi.net (HELO 192.168.1.65) (192.168.1.65) by allinwonder.dezi.net (192.168.1.1) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 03:39:38 -0000 From: Joe Pokupec To: Freebsd-Questions X-Mailer: PocoMail 3.1 (1880) - EVALUATION VERSION X-URL: http://www.pocomail.com/ Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:39:39 -0800 Message-ID: <2004725193939.204480@JOETABLET> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Converting or Reading UFS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:39:42 -0000 Hey= Guys, I have 4 large (120- 200 Gig) hard drives= that were used in my 5.1 server. The server died and I'm no longer using= FreeBSD. Any idea how I can get the data off these drives? - Convert UFS to any other mountable and= readable format XP, Linux or OS X? If so, where? I thought maybe Ghost, but= it will only allow sector copies, which are not readable by Ghost= Explorer... - Mount these drives in VMWare FreeBSD 5.1= session via USB 2.0? If so, how can I do this? Is there a simple automount= app that will scan and mount available partitions in Gnome or KDE? I'm able= to see the da0 device show up in the terminal when I plug in the device,= but how can I tell what the partitioning scheme is? And how can I mount= them? - If I re-install 5.1 on a spare box, I'm= still stuck with dealing with how to view the partitions of these hard= drives and mounting them appropriately... Maybe I'm going about this all wrong... If= I throw a previously partitioned hd in a FreeBSD 5.1 box, is there an easy= way to mount and view the data on it? Can I tell what type of formatting= was used? It will be either UFS or NTFS... Thanks Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 03:59:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16E916A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:59:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from usenet.ath.cx (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE54943D48 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:59:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (reader.usenet.ath.cx [10.0.0.3]) by usenet.ath.cx (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6Q3x7bE069870; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 05:59:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <410483A1.7000405@bah.homeip.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 06:08:01 +0200 From: "Bernt. H" User-Agent: Thunderbird 0.4 (FreeBSD 4.8) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Emmerton References: <41045F44.4030703@bah.homeip.net> <001a01c472bb$d6e94880$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <001a01c472bb$d6e94880$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd questions Subject: Re: make installworld trouble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:59:07 -0000 Matt Emmerton wrote: >>Trying to install world on this machine but it does not like >>make installworld. >>I have not much of a clue. is it perl? vm? >> >>help! >> >>uname -a >>FreeBSD usenet2.ath.cx 4.10-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #0: Thu Jul 15 >>13:44:12 CEST 2004 xyz@x.yz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELLFW i386 >> >>vm/vnode_pager.h -> vm/vnode_pager.ph >>*** Error code 1 >> >>Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph. >>*** Error code 1 > > > Looks like this is failing in the installation of Perl -- the part where it > generates a perl-ized version of every system header. > > Are you following the procedure outlined here? > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html#AEN26900 > > -- > Matt Emmerton Yes i'm following that. But when i look in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph There is only empty dirs. So I changed the makefile from: beforedepend all: links SUBDIR= c2ph h2ph h2xs perlbug perlcc perldoc pl2pm splain .include .PATH: ${PERL5SRC} To this. beforedepend all: links SUBDIR= .include .PATH: ${PERL5SRC} And now it manage to get passed that bit. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 04:20:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932D316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:20:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from usenet.ath.cx (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC00C43D2D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:20:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (reader.usenet.ath.cx [10.0.0.3]) by usenet.ath.cx (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6Q4KhJE070132; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 06:20:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <410488B1.8050702@bah.homeip.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 06:29:37 +0200 From: "Bernt. H" User-Agent: Thunderbird 0.4 (FreeBSD 4.8) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Emmerton References: <41045F44.4030703@bah.homeip.net> <001a01c472bb$d6e94880$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <001a01c472bb$d6e94880$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd questions Subject: Re: make installworld trouble - - - Solved X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:20:32 -0000 Matt Emmerton wrote: >>Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph. >>*** Error code 1 > > > Looks like this is failing in the installation of Perl -- the part where it > generates a perl-ized version of every system header. > > Are you following the procedure outlined here? > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html#AEN26900 > > -- > Matt Emmerton > Yes i'm following that. But when i look in > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/ > There is only empty dirs. So I changed the makefile from: > beforedepend all: links > SUBDIR= c2ph h2ph h2xs perlbug perlcc perldoc pl2pm splain > .include > .PATH: ${PERL5SRC} > To this. > beforedepend all: links > SUBDIR= > .include > .PATH: ${PERL5SRC} > And now it manage to get passed that bit. Now it's working as it should. Even color in midnight commander. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 04:24:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1A916A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:24:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5760F43D39 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:24:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 28646291 for multiple; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:09:49 -0700 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:24:42 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Joe Pokupec Message-Id: <20040725232442.74e9ddcd@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <2004725193939.204480@JOETABLET> References: <2004725193939.204480@JOETABLET> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: Freebsd-Questions Subject: Re: Converting or Reading UFS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 04:24:57 -0000 On Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:39:39 -0800 Joe Pokupec wrote: man mount From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 05:41:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6F316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 05:41:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from somkix.pair.com (somkix.pair.com [209.68.2.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E15643D1D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 05:41:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sys@secondbox.net) Received: (qmail 43129 invoked by uid 3079); 26 Jul 2004 05:41:01 -0000 Date: 26 Jul 2004 05:41:01 -0000 Message-ID: <20040726054101.43128.qmail@somkix.pair.com> From: sys@secondbox.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: You don't have permissions to send to this user! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 05:41:02 -0000 You have sent a mail to with "Re: Re: Thanks!" in the "Subject" line. Unfortunately your mail has been stopped by the anti-SPAM system of SecondBox.net, because your e-mail address is not on the list of Dimiter Dobrev's friends. If you wish to have your mail received by Dimiter Dobrev, you should include "strawberry" in the "Subject" line, or deposit 10 cents by way of anti-SPAM guarantee. If Dimiter Dobrev decides that you have wasted his time, he may well retain this amount. If you wish to send a message with an anti-SPAM deposit attached to it, then: 1. Open an e-mail box at Second Box (http://2-box.net). 2. Pay in 10 cents in your Second Box wallet. 3. Send your letter to Dimiter Dobrev from your Second Box address. Your letter was received on 26.07.2004 at 01:41 EDT. Its contents is given at the bottom of this message. --------------------- Vie ste izpratili pismo do Dimiter Dobrev sys Subject: "Re: Re: Thanks!". Za syxalenie pismoto vi e sprjano ot anti-SPAM zawtitata na SecondBox.net, zawtoto vawijat e-mail adres ne e vkljuqen v spisyka na prijatelite na Dimiter Dobrev. Ako iskate vaweto pismo da byde poluqeno ot Dimiter Dobrev, to trjabva da vkljuqite dumata "strawberry" v Subject-a na pismoto si ili da depozirate 10 centa kato garancija, qe pismoto vi ne sydyrxa SPAM. Ako Dimiter Dobrev rewi, qe ste mu zagubili vremeto, to toj moxe da zadyrxi tezi pari. Ako iskate da izpratite pismo s prikrepen kym nego anti-SPAM depozit, to trjabva: 1. Da si napravite kutija v Second Box (http://2-box.net). 2. Da vnesete 10 centa v Second Box portfejla si. 3. Da izpratite pismoto si do Dimiter Dobrev ot vawija Second Box adres. Vaweto pismoto be poluqeno na 26.07.2004 v 01:41 EDT. Eto i sydyrxanieto mu: --------------------- Please have a look at the attached file. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 06:03:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9581016A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 06:03:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from comsmtp2.singnet.com.sg (comsmtp2.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1E443D31 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 06:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pryan@singnet.com.sg) Received: from dory.singnet.com.sg (dory.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.115]) i6Q63lWf007751 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:03:47 +0800 Received: (from cooluser@localhost) by dory.singnet.com.sg (8.11.6/8.11.2) id i6Q63kc30371 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:03:46 +0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dory.singnet.com.sg: cooluser set sender to pryan@singnet.com.sg using -f To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <1090821826.41049ec22c907@dory.singnet.com.sg> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:03:46 +0800 (SGT) From: Peter Ryan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: SingNet WebMail Subject: reading CD directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pryan@singnet.com.sg List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 06:03:50 -0000 Hi, I made bootable CD's from the 2 installation floppies for freeBSD 4.10. Is there someway I can see what is on these disks. I suspect one may be bad, even though I have used it many times. I can easily cut another, but I was wondering if there was some way to check the directory or contents of the suspect. I searched through google and have figured out how to mount cd's, but the ones made from bootable floppies just show . and .. when I do ls -a Any comments appreciated. (My experience in all is very very limited) Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 07:18:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8276816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:18:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sthav01.proact.se (sthav01.proact.se [212.214.215.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A84343D53 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:18:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mathias.samuelson@proact.se) Received: from sthav01.proact.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.proact.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BFE18E5F; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:18:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from semail01.proact.se (semail01.proact.se [192.168.168.234])by s thav01.proact.se (Postfix) with ESMTPid 05BC418E48; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:18: 01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by semail01.proact.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)id < N5CHBTR7>; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:18:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4104B03E.3080102@proact.se> From: Mathias Samuelson To: iaccounts@ibctech.ca Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:18:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-imss-version: 2.0 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:33.05235 C:20 M:1 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.0000 0.0000) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl split() question (OT)... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:18:34 -0000 Steve Bertrand wrote: > Perl hackers -- Figured someone would have a reasonably quick, easy answer > for this: > > I am trying to read through a file, line-by-line, and I want to extract > the text in between the [ and ] characters. I would normally half the line > by split() - ing the line first by [ as follows: > > if ($logLine =~ /$struct$structStart/) { > @lineArray = split (/[/, $logLine); > > and then further, half again later using the ]. However, Perl does not > like it when I search for [, as it thinks I am trying to use a regex. I > have tried to escape the pattern, to no avail. > > Is there a 'special' escape for this, and more importantly, is there an > easier way to extract data from a line of a file without having to split > it up twice? > > An example of the line I'm trying to get the contents out of is this: > > | "LRED[Conversation started on 03 Feb 21:51:11] > > and I need the data between [ ... ]. > > I know it's OT, but hopefully someone can help me out. > > Tks! > > Steve Something like this perhaps: while(<>) { /.*\[(.*)\].*/; $text = $1; } Rgds Mathias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 07:25:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D439A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:25:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hp2.euro.net.mk (hp2.euro.net.mk [212.110.94.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B86F43D2F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:25:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from FreeBSD@euro.net.mk) Received: from [212.110.94.68] by hp2.euronet.com.mk (NTMail 7.00.0018/SG1971.09.57a4aa33) with ESMTP id wxdlpaaa for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:29:15 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:25:43 +0200 From: Perica Veljanovski To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-Id: <20040726092114.9FF6.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.10.02 [en] X-VSMLoop: euronet.com.mk Subject: how to upgrade Perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:25:49 -0000 Hi all, How do I upgrade perl version 5.005_03 to Perl 5.8 on my FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE from ports? Tryed: cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 make install and nothing happend :P ps. /usr/ports/comms/p5-Device-SerialPort does not run on Perl5.0 10x -- <> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 07:34:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DFC16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:34:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4857C43D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:34:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6Q7YscO031031; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:34:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6Q7YsK3031028; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:34:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:34:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Joe Pokupec In-Reply-To: <2004725193939.204480@JOETABLET> Message-ID: <20040726093426.W31001@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <2004725193939.204480@JOETABLET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Freebsd-Questions Subject: Re: Converting or Reading UFS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:34:57 -0000 > I have 4 large (120- 200 Gig) hard drives server. The server died and I'm no longer using I can get the data off these drives? > > > - Convert UFS to any other mountable and OS X? If so, where? I thought maybe Ghost, but sector copies, which are not readable by Ghost > isn't OS X capable of reading UFS? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 08:53:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D66816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:53:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.8ball.co.za (8ball.co.za [196.22.201.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275C443D1F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:53:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nelis@8ball.co.za) Received: (qmail 20343 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jul 2004 08:53:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.9?) (192.168.10.9) by 192.168.10.1 with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 08:53:46 -0000 From: Nelis Lamprecht To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20040725190445.0a8bc8ce.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <20040725190445.0a8bc8ce.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7Ohv6NkBqdcJV3GaL/i5" Organization: 8ball Network Solutions Message-Id: <1090832042.17004.40.camel@nelis.brabys.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:54:25 +0200 cc: FreeBSD Questions Mail List Subject: Re: Apaching binding to *:* ?? (Weirdness) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: nelis@8ball.co.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:53:58 -0000 --=-7Ohv6NkBqdcJV3GaL/i5 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 01:04, Bill Moran wrote: > I'm having some weird action from Apache. It seems that every apache pro= cess > binds to *:* twice, in addition to IP:80 and IP:443. Has anyone seen thi= s > before? This is Apache 1.3.28 (although an upgrade is on the schedule) = I > had _wanted_ to test the new version of Apache in the jail prior to upgra= ding, > but I'm not so sure that's going to work. >=20 > Anyone seen this before? Are you not confusing local addresses to foreign ? Each local address will have a foreign address as far as I understand it. What is the output of sockstat -4l ? =46rom sockstat(1) LOCAL ADDRESS For Internet sockets, this is the address the local end of the socket is bound to (see getsockname(2)). For bound UNIX sockets, it is the socket's filename. For other UNIX sockets, it is a right arrow followed by the endpoint's filename, or ``??'' if the endpoint could not be determined. = =20 FOREIGN ADDRESS (Internet sockets only) The address the foreign end of the socket is bound to (see getpeername(2)). --=20 Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." --=-7Ohv6NkBqdcJV3GaL/i5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBBMaqQfIMKiRMCrERAjT4AKDDSyi7O/IvkNGc5MT4YcWU4w81TgCeI54X v4+XUv0BLDx2eRarK7In0DI= =cqLh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7Ohv6NkBqdcJV3GaL/i5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 09:12:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F087216A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:12:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053F543D58 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:12:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i6Q9CI3f024200 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:12:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <4104CAF2.1030801@circlesquared.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:12:18 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Question List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: lost and found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:12:48 -0000 I'd be very grateful if someone would steer me towards some documentation about dealing with, even recovering, files in lost and found directories. TIA. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 09:15:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8625A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:15:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BB243D5E for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:15:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i6Q9F23f024206; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:15:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <4104CB96.3010006@circlesquared.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:15:02 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Perica Veljanovski References: <20040726092114.9FF6.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> In-Reply-To: <20040726092114.9FF6.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: how to upgrade Perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:15:38 -0000 Perica Veljanovski wrote: > Hi all, > > How do I upgrade perl version 5.005_03 to Perl 5.8 on my FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE > from ports? > > Tryed: > cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 > make install > and nothing happend :P Nothing at all? Was there no output on the console? If you did see the normal kind of burbling, but still find ports use the original version, you probably haven't done: #use.perl port Peter. > > ps. /usr/ports/comms/p5-Device-SerialPort does not run on Perl5.0 > > 10x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 09:16:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C846F16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:16:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from borg-cube.com (netblock-66-159-209-110.dslextreme.com [66.159.209.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7750F43D49 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:16:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dburr@borg-cube.com) Received: from netblock-66-159-209-110.dslextreme.com (dburr@netblock-66-159-209-110.dslextreme.com [66.159.209.110]) by borg-cube.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6Q9GZJc047769 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:16:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dburr@borg-cube.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:16:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Donald Burr of Borg To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20040726021244.C47678@borg-cube.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=3.0 tests=USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on gatekeeper.borg-cube.com Subject: Any way to net boot the FreeBSD installer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:16:42 -0000 I'm trying to install FreeBSD on a VIA Epia M6000 box - this is one of those "Mini ITX" machines that has NO floppy drive controller, and the machine doesn't have a CD-ROM drive either. However, this machine DOES have a BIOS that can net-boot using PXE. Yes, I did try booting from a USB floppy drive. The first install disk booted, however when it asked for the MFSroot disk, it was unable to read it. Probably because the boot floppy was expecting to read data from a (nonexistent) floppy drive/controller, rather than the USB floppy drive (which it probably doesn't know anything about). Is there a way I can net-boot (using PXE) the FreeBSD installer? I do have another FreeBSD box here on my home network that I can set up as a network boot server. I just don't really know what to do, having never done this sort of thing before. Can anyone offer up some help, guidance, a "HOW TO" type guide, etc.? Thanks! -- Donald Burr of Borg | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! Website: http://www.borg-cube.com/ | http://www.freebsd.org/ PO Box 91212, Santa Barbara CA 93190-1212 \----------------------------- Tel: (805)563-0672 FAX: (760)875-9237 ICQ# 16997506 AIM: dburrofborg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 09:21:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FEA16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:21:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C3243D55 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:21:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A0A023EF8; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:21:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:21:05 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Perica Veljanovski Message-ID: <20040726092105.GA44501@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040726092114.9FF6.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726092114.9FF6.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: how to upgrade Perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:21:07 -0000 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Perica Veljanovski wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > How do I upgrade perl version 5.005_03 to Perl 5.8 on my FreeBSD 4.10-REL= EASE > from ports? >=20 > Tryed: > cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 > make install > and nothing happend :P You have to use the use.perl script: # use.perl port For more information have a look at: /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/pkg-message Simon --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBM0BCkn+/eutqCoRAglqAKDicgy3lfsVmkOrKrlhDwSZ0eZZ6gCfaC3B PrUI6sYEIPIdtUGTy+FXteM= =zeGf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 09:33:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B46316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:33:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com (mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B5943D1D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:33:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mathias@haas.se) Received: from haas.se ([213.113.216.89] [213.113.216.89]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with SMTP id <20040726093326.SJDV23501.mxfep01.bredband.com@haas.se> for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:33:26 +0200 Received: (qmail 956 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2004 09:32:59 -0000 Received: from mathias@haas.se by p3-550.haas.se by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:1(192.168.10.10):. Processed in 0.025646 secs); 26 Jul 2004 09:32:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.10?) (192.168.10.10) by p3-550.haas.se with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 09:32:59 -0000 Message-ID: <4104D039.8070602@haas.se> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:34:49 +0200 From: Mathias Haas User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Urgent! Firewire support in 4.6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mathias@haas.se List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:33:29 -0000 Hello! My wifes' company had a break-in during the night today and they stole ALL the computers. They have their backup on an external firewire disk. At home I have a FreeBSD 4.6.2 setup - but I believe that 4.6.2 doesn't have firewire support, is this correct? Is there any way to add firewire support to the kernel or do I have to upgrade to a later version of FreeBSD? If so, what are the odds for a successfull upgrade from 4.6.2 to 4.10 ? A fresh reinstall would take a lot of time since the 4.6.2 server runs a ton of applications. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 09:34:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C7D16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:34:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [217.122.132.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4349B43D48 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:34:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:34:53 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:34:53 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20040726093453.GA18479@nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: icewm or..? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:34:55 -0000 Recently I read in this mailinglist some advice about a windowmanager even more flexible then Icewm. I can't remember the name though ;-( Someone wrote that all you need to do to add a program to the menu was: open the menu some place and choose "add" ;-) I remember is was not fvwm (which I use now), blackbox, etc.. Any ideas? Would be a great help.. -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.10 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 09:59:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0343C16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:59:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3865D43D4C for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:59:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6Q9xADV062130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:59:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6Q9xAKt062129; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:59:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:59:10 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Peter Risdon Message-ID: <20040726095910.GD61141@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Peter Risdon , FreeBSD Question List References: <4104CAF2.1030801@circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fOHHtNG4YXGJ0yqR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4104CAF2.1030801@circlesquared.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:59:10 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: FreeBSD Question List Subject: Re: lost and found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:59:17 -0000 --fOHHtNG4YXGJ0yqR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:12:18AM +0100, Peter Risdon wrote: > I'd be very grateful if someone would steer me towards some=20 > documentation about dealing with, even recovering, files in lost and=20 > found directories. There's not a great deal out there, because the lost+found directory is pretty uncomplicated. See fsck(8) for the basics, but what happens is this. An unclean shutdown can result in corrupted information being written into a directory structure. That effectively wipes out all record of a files' *name*. However, the exhaustive search of the filesystem contents done by fsck(8) can still locate the files *contents*. Rather than just throwing that data away the files are preserved by making a directory entry in the 'lost+found' directory. Unfortunately, since the file name is lost, the system has to make up it's own name, which it does based on the inode number of the file. That's a good choice, because it's guarranteed to be unique amongst all of the files on that filesystem. Unfortunately there isn't going to be some sort of nice automated system you can use to restore everything to the way it was before the crash: if there was, fsck(8) would do that already for you. You're going to have to go through all of those orphaned files and by inspecting the contents try and work out what they were and where they belong. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --fOHHtNG4YXGJ0yqR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBNXuiD657aJF7eIRAlzlAJ9GApGb+5n50azBI7JbTJnTAVUw6wCdHD5Q /TiCtpdo+MNYmsAfN5c9E6k= =Oe2U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fOHHtNG4YXGJ0yqR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 10:03:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A77316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:03:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D0243D5F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:03:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i6QA3D3f024339; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:03:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <4104D6E0.3020202@circlesquared.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:03:12 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4104CAF2.1030801@circlesquared.com> <20040726095910.GD61141@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040726095910.GD61141@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Question List Subject: Re: lost and found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:03:34 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:12:18AM +0100, Peter Risdon wrote: > >>I'd be very grateful if someone would steer me towards some >>documentation about dealing with, even recovering, files in lost and >>found directories. > > > There's not a great deal out there, because the lost+found directory > is pretty uncomplicated. See fsck(8) for the basics, but what happens > is this. An unclean shutdown can result in corrupted information > being written into a directory structure. That effectively wipes out > all record of a files' *name*. However, the exhaustive search of the > filesystem contents done by fsck(8) can still locate the files > *contents*. Rather than just throwing that data away the files are > preserved by making a directory entry in the 'lost+found' directory. > Unfortunately, since the file name is lost, the system has to make up > it's own name, which it does based on the inode number of the file. > That's a good choice, because it's guarranteed to be unique amongst > all of the files on that filesystem. > > Unfortunately there isn't going to be some sort of nice automated > system you can use to restore everything to the way it was before the > crash: if there was, fsck(8) would do that already for you. You're > going to have to go through all of those orphaned files and by > inspecting the contents try and work out what they were and where they > belong. Great - just what I needed to know. Thanks very much. Peter. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 10:06:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46CA16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:06:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rowlf.cinergycom.net (rowlf.cinergycom.net [216.135.3.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE4A43D48 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:06:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jjacobi@haascabinet.com) Received: from c016414.customers.cinergycom.net ([216.205.223.46] helo=ISPROGRAMMER2) by rowlf.cinergycom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bp2NC-0004SK-QK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 05:06:22 -0500 From: "Jim Jacobi" To: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 06:06:16 -0400 Message-ID: <001001c472f8$3188a0b0$0301010a@ISPROGRAMMER2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-CCC-Cleanmail-Virus-Signature: 4a3d2f6bb160fbdda72eaae0a23f59d0 Subject: Is there a solution to this problem? (Install troubles on IBM x-series 345 and ServeRaid 6i) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jjacobi@haascabinet.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:06:23 -0000 Is there a solution to this problem - IBM x-Server 345 with Raid Controller 6i? Thanks, Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 10:14:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA1E16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:14:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D9343D41 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6QAEd0m062376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:14:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6QAEdlt062375; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:14:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:14:39 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Mathias Haas Message-ID: <20040726101438.GE61141@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Mathias Haas , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4104D039.8070602@haas.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u5E4XgoOPWr4PD9E" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4104D039.8070602@haas.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:14:39 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Urgent! Firewire support in 4.6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:14:45 -0000 --u5E4XgoOPWr4PD9E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 11:34:49AM +0200, Mathias Haas wrote: > Hello! My wifes' company had a break-in during the night today and they= =20 > stole ALL the computers. They have their backup on an external firewire= =20 > disk. > At home I have a FreeBSD 4.6.2 setup - but I believe that 4.6.2 doesn't= =20 > have firewire support, is this correct? > Is there any way to add firewire support to the kernel or do I have to=20 > upgrade to a later version of FreeBSD? > If so, what are the odds for a successfull upgrade from 4.6.2 to 4.10 ?= =20 > A fresh reinstall would take a lot of time since the 4.6.2 server runs a= =20 > ton of applications. Yikes. Yes, FireWire support was first introduced in FreeBSD 5.0 and then later MFC'd to 4.x: see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dfwohci&apropos=3D0&sektion= =3D0&manpath=3DFreeBSD+4.10-stable&format=3Dhtml A 4.6.2 to 4.10 upgrade should be do-able by the make {build,install}{world,kernel} process as spelt out in /usr/src/UPDATING. Just use cvsup(1) to grab the latest RELENG_4 or RELENG_4_10 sources and follow the instructions. There's plenty in the Handbook about doing an upgrade like that: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/synching.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html That should get you a kernel+base system update without screwing up all of the other software you've got installed. Although it is impossible to be completely certain about that. If the machine you intend to do this to is a production system, then I'd advise you not to, but instead to hunt around for a reasonably cheap new machine with FireWire capability and install there instead. In any case, get good backups of your 4.6.2 box before doing anything else to that machine. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --u5E4XgoOPWr4PD9E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBNmOiD657aJF7eIRAkyFAJ4ntgKBZQrJEz2fxIPK03LOvyRZzgCeICo+ gIyeo2VyIULFBYCjCstMEzo= =01uy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u5E4XgoOPWr4PD9E-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 11:06:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D05716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:06:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.themarshalls.co.uk (mail.themarshalls.co.uk [80.229.196.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962C043D1D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:06:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@themarshalls.co.uk) Received: from net.themarshalls.co.uk (femail.themarshalls.co.uk [192.168.7.3]) by mail.themarshalls.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21732E82C; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:06:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from 194.70.180.170 (proxying for unknown) (SquirrelMail authenticated user drew); by net.themarshalls.co.uk with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:05:58 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <47759.194.70.180.170.1090839958.squirrel@194.70.180.170> In-Reply-To: <20040724232921.GC7816@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <41022833.6090509@themarshalls.co.uk> <41022D4E.8040307@circlesquared.com> <20040724104531.GC91096@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <4102BF57.1080308@themarshalls.co.uk> <20040724232921.GC7816@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:05:58 +0100 (BST) From: "Drew Marshall" To: "Matthew Seaman" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-TheMarshalls-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner in accordance with our mail policy see http://www.themarshalls.co.uk/policy X-TheMarshalls-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing php4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:06:27 -0000 On Sun, July 25, 2004 0:29, Matthew Seaman said: > On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:58:15PM +0100, Drew Marshall wrote: > >> I understand the logic but I would have thought a line somewhere in >> Makefile or the README just to give poor stupid people like me a clue as >> to where to start looking. Ons further question that has come from my >> compilation of the php4-extension is that once you have made your >> selection the first time these options seem to be saved somewhere (The >> build process states found previous configuration or similar) where is >> this? I missed an option in my hurry this morning and now can't get back >> to the menu options (No matter how many make cleans, pkg_deletes etc I >> do) to re-set or add the options. > > the lang/php?-extensions ports just use the standard OPTIONS mechanism > that a large number of other ports use. > > To modify a previously setup configuration, just do: > > # make reconfig > > The configuration data is stored as a file /var/db/ports/{foo}/options > where {foo} is the LATEST_LINK name for the port -- ie the same name > as the package installed by the port, but with any version numbers > split off. It can be different though. > > In order to return any particular port to the pristene never > configured state, simply delete the appropriate {foo} directory from > /var/db/ports. you can do that by: > > # make rmconfig > > In order to prevent the options dialog ever coming up (eg. when you've > supplied your own settings via portupgrade's MAKE_ARGS array), add > BATCH=yes either in the environment or to the make argument list (the > MAKE_ARGS array is probably the handiest way of doing that). All of > these things are discussed in the ports(7) man page. > > Cheers, > > Matthew Thank you so much for your help, that's one of the things I love about Open Source, you never stop learning! Kind regards Drew -- In line with our policy, this message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. www.themarshalls.co.uk/policy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 11:09:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32C516A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:09:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hp2.euro.net.mk (hp2.euro.net.mk [212.110.94.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3449743D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:09:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from FreeBSD@euro.net.mk) Received: from [212.110.94.68] by hp2.euronet.com.mk (NTMail 7.00.0018/SG1971.09.57a4aa33) with ESMTP id xahlpaaa for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:12:44 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:09:10 +0200 From: Perica Veljanovski To: Peter Risdon , FreeBSD-Questions In-Reply-To: <4104CB96.3010006@circlesquared.com> References: <20040726092114.9FF6.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> <4104CB96.3010006@circlesquared.com> Message-Id: <20040726130255.A008.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.10.02 [en] X-VSMLoop: euronet.com.mk Subject: Re: how to upgrade Perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:09:19 -0000 > > How do I upgrade perl version 5.005_03 to Perl 5.8 on my FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE > > from ports? > > > > Tryed: > > cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 > > make install > > and nothing happend :P > > Nothing at all? Was there no output on the console? > > If you did see the normal kind of burbling, but still find ports use the > original version, you probably haven't done: > > #use.perl port all done :) I did the make install in ssh from a windows box, an gues what, the windows box crashed during the make install on the fbsd box. And since I'm lazy enough not to run script(1) I didn't see the end of make which probobly sad what you sugested. 10x Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 11:16:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC31B16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:16:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from poczta.wup-katowice.pl (wup.katowice.pik-net.pl [213.216.66.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E202D43D3F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:16:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arek@wup-katowice.pl) Received: from poczta.wup-katowice.pl (localhost.wup-katowice.pl [127.0.0.1]) by poczta.wup-katowice.pl (Postfix) with SMTP id BE2A47E84D; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:19:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [213.216.67.82] (arek.wup-katowice.pl [213.216.67.82]) by poczta.wup-katowice.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0D67E83C; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:19:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4104E87F.5050505@wup-katowice.pl> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:18:23 +0200 From: Arek Czereszewski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040714 X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040726093453.GA18479@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20040726093453.GA18479@nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: icewm or..? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: arek@wup-katowice.pl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:16:30 -0000 dick hoogendijk wrote: > Recently I read in this mailinglist some advice about a windowmanager > even more flexible then Icewm. I can't remember the name though ;-( > > Someone wrote that all you need to do to add a program to the menu was: > open the menu some place and choose "add" ;-) > > I remember is was not fvwm (which I use now), blackbox, etc.. > Any ideas? Would be a great help.. > Maybe you think about xfce4?? Arek -- Arek Czereszewski | jid: aro(at)chrome.pl arek(at)wup-katowice.pl | gg: 1349941 "*nix is like a wigwam: no windows, no gates, apache inside." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 11:17:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB6016A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:17:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD59143D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:17:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pculmo@obs2.net) Received: from MicronLinuxBox.obs2.net (roc-66-66-201-1.rochester.rr.com [66.66.201.1])i6QBHVv2016261 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:17:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from micronlinuxbox.obs2.net (MicronLinuxBox.obs2.net [10.200.1.1]) i6QBKOF7021279 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:20:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:20:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul R Culmo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Procmail port 3.22 and FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:17:34 -0000 Greetings, I'm a newbie on FreeBSD 5.2.1 or any FreeBSD version for that matter but I've been using Linux for the last 5 years. I've recently attempted to get the Procmail port working on FBSD 5.2.1 but have not been successful. I've searched high and low and found some really good docs, on how to do it to get it working. Yes I've compiled and installed the port, that's not a problem. Integrating into Sendmail is the problem, but from pine if I | /usr/local/bin/procmail it will work. Has anyone had any trouble with procmail on FBSD 5.2.1 or any version of FBSD ? is there a trick to get it to kick start using Sendmail ? Looking at the maillog and /var/log/messages I do not see any errors of any sort regarding this problem. Even creating a procmail log in the .procmailrc doesn't get appended it's almost as if It's not firing up. I do believe the sendmail part is right I have done the following Editing hostname.mc FEATURE(local_procmail) MAILER(procmail) (before any local mailers) make all install restart You'd think this would fix the problem, not.. still having a problem with the Sendmail integration of procmail. I have it working on Linux. I noticed a file mailer.conf - do I need to do anything with this ? Can anyone help ? Thanks in advanced. -- Paul R Culmo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 11:47:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDC516A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:47:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B9B43D55 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:47:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from merv@merv.org.uk) Received: from FreeBSD.merv.org.uk ([81.103.176.198]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040726114653.OOYC20701.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@FreeBSD.merv.org.uk> for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:46:53 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.merv.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) by FreeBSD.merv.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69707D4 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:46:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from FreeBSD.merv.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (FreeBSD.merv.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10786-06 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:46:07 +0100 (BST) Received: by FreeBSD.merv.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6B437318; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:46:07 +0100 (BST) From: merv Organization: Home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:46:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040726092114.9FF6.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> <4104CB96.3010006@circlesquared.com> <20040726130255.A008.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> In-Reply-To: <20040726130255.A008.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407261246.06872.merv@merv.org.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at merv.org.uk Subject: Re: how to upgrade Perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:47:30 -0000 You will also have to reinstall all the other p5 ports that you may have installed prior to this upgrade. So that they all compile for 5.8 On Monday 26 July 2004 12:09, Perica Veljanovski wrote: > > > How do I upgrade perl version 5.005_03 to Perl 5.8 on my FreeBSD > > > 4.10-RELEASE from ports? > > > > > > Tryed: > > > cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 > > > make install > > > and nothing happend :P > > > > Nothing at all? Was there no output on the console? > > > > If you did see the normal kind of burbling, but still find ports use the > > original version, you probably haven't done: > > > > #use.perl port > > all done :) > > I did the make install in ssh from a windows box, an gues what, the > windows box crashed during the make install on the fbsd box. And since > I'm lazy enough not to run script(1) I didn't see the end of make > which probobly sad what you sugested. > > 10x Peter. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 19:48:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3220316A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:48:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-fs.sunrise.ch (mta-fs-be-02.sunrise.ch [194.158.229.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EB143D54 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:48:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max.hochreutener@coolmail.ch) Received: from maxdesktop (62.167.45.52) by mail-fs.sunrise.ch (7.0.028) id 40FD6E85000E5195 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:48:32 +0200 From: To: Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:49:36 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C47291.47821BB0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcRyfp7s72QoqJqhTteYWniOVuz/HA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:01:17 +0000 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: How to turn off the HDD? How to reduce the overall noise? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:48:34 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C47291.47821BB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Constantine, I read this threat in the forum http://lists.freebsd.org . I am looking for the same function. Do you have a solution meanwhile? Thanks and best regards Max Hochreutener, Switzerland ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C47291.47821BB0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 07:49:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077B216A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:49:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out006.verizon.net (out006pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EBD43D1D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:49:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvelez502@verizon.net) Received: from david ([162.83.138.191]) by out006.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040726074903.HCAN22385.out006.verizon.net@david> for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:49:03 -0500 Message-ID: <000801c472e5$07f9b8a0$6501a8c0@david> From: "David" To: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:49:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from [162.83.138.191] at Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:49:03 -0500 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:01:17 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Is there a /dev/video in freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:49:05 -0000 I am using freebsd 5.2. Xawtv has a command called streamer to capture video/audio from /dev/video. I cannot find /dev/video in freebsd. Can you tell me where this file is or does it uses a different name. I appreciate your help -Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 12:06:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C0316A4D3 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:06:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zdemail03.zdem.compaq.com (zdemail03.zdem.compaq.com [161.114.112.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7CB43D1D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:06:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephan.ullrich@hp.com) Received: from bbnexg11.emea.cpqcorp.net (bbnexg11.emea.cpqcorp.net [16.57.5.20]) by zdemail03.zdem.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F22B8FE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:06:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bbnexc02.emea.cpqcorp.net ([16.57.5.27]) by bbnexg11.emea.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:05:41 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:05:41 +0200 Message-ID: <59CA32C0B391A84FAE3F37A8304DF75D0118EACA@bbnexc02.emea.cpqcorp.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Error Thread-Index: AcRzCN63fnKDtkWaRY2GT079MfK0iAAAABH3 From: "Ullrich, Stephan (IPG Sales Government)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 12:05:41.0550 (UTC) FILETIME=[DF3D84E0:01C47308] Subject: Abwesenheitsnotiz: Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:06:21 -0000 Vielen Dank f=FCr Ihre e-Mail. Many thanks for your e-mail. Am 26. und 27.07.2004 bin ich auf einer Messe und habe keinen Zugriff = auf meine e-Mails. In dringenden F=E4llen versuchen Sie mich bitte mobil = unter 01 51/ 14 75 20 54 zu erreichen. Due to a fair I'm out of the office on 07/26/ and 07/27/04 without any = access to my mails. In urgent cases please try to reach me on my cell = phone under +49 (0) 1 51/ 14 75 20 54. Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Best regards Stephan Ullrich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 12:06:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB44516A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:06:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A104643D41 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:06:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corporate.compliance@hp.com) Received: from cceexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net (cceexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.81.1.33]) by ztxmail05.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F1BEB10 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:06:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cceexc10.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.81.1.2]) by cceexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:06:38 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6529.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:06:38 -0500 Message-ID: <736C1E553D26CC42974EE3289511414C0D3CCCDD@cceexc10.americas.cpqcorp.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Corporate.compliance@hp.com Thread-Index: AcRzCQD9IUFs2kA5QpSM2FjNe7MsTgAAAAda From: "Corporate Compliance" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 12:06:38.0683 (UTC) FILETIME=[014B52B0:01C47309] Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Corporate.compliance@hp.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:06:39 -0000 Thank you for contacting the Office of Business Practices. =20 If your situation is life-threatening, please contact appropriate = medical services. =20 If your situation is an emergency, you may call the GuideLine, our = ethics resource helpline available in the USA 24x7 @ 1-800-424 2965, and = outside the USA by using the AT&T pre-dial numbers (see: = http://www.att.com/business_traveler/cgi/access.cgi?) and the staff at = the GuideLine will contact our office or the appropriate personnel. =20 If you are submitting a question regarding an incident or wish to = initiate a case, please be advised that a case manager will respond to = your question or issue within the next 3 business days. (See note re. = special holiday closeure.) =20 If you are an HP employee, in the interim, you may wish to refer to the = Standards of Business Conduct at: http://sbc.corp.hp.com/index.htm. = Our role in this process will be to assist you in interpreting the = Standards of Business Conduct and, if necessary, finding appropriate = resources to help resolve the issue. These resources may include other = support or functional specialists. Involving others in the process will = be done with your permission or anonymously. You may wish to also consider consulting other resources in the interim = such as your manager or your HR representative, if appropriate.=20 We appreciate your interest in HP's ethical business conduct. Regards, Office of Business Practices Corporate Affairs =20 THANK YOU. =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 12:09:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE9B16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:09:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D35A743D41 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:09:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 2214 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Jul 2004 12:08:31 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:08:31 +0200 From: Michal Pasternak To: David Message-ID: <20040726120831.GA2162@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: <000801c472e5$07f9b8a0$6501a8c0@david> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000801c472e5$07f9b8a0$6501a8c0@david> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a /dev/video in freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michal Pasternak List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:09:31 -0000 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David [Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:49:01AM -0400]: > I am using freebsd 5.2. Xawtv has a command > called streamer to capture video/audio from > /dev/video. I cannot find /dev/video in freebsd. Which kind of TV card do you have? --=20 m --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBBPQ/g9vpIMn2guARAp+2AJ4qh3UY2k6NkI/nfBtbH2HW72h5zgCdGemo aB6lJOPJGKKTOCcSJ0U6jM4= =qI7V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 12:16:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E9016A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:16:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc2-cmbg1-3-0-cust94.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [213.107.104.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4AB43D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:16:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1Bp4PM-000I9n-H3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:16:44 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:16:44 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20040726121644.GA34251@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20040726021244.C47678@borg-cube.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726021244.C47678@borg-cube.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Any way to net boot the FreeBSD installer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:16:46 -0000 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 02:16:35AM -0700, Donald Burr of Borg wrote: [---snip---] > Can anyone offer up some help, guidance, a "HOW TO" type guide, etc.? > Thanks! I used this HOWTO. Fairly straight forward. http://www.tnpi.biz/computing/freebsd/pxe-netboot.shtml HTH Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: 3B9D 8BBB EB03 BA83 5DB4 3B88 86FC F03A 90A1 BE8F _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBPYrhvzwOpChvo8RAgVlAJ9Y/NUXrat+SPrJOttObTgqFXRF2gCfap2T JjBfCeJr2X9MfumCiZce6r8= =nWnt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 12:18:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57E216A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:18:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zukmail03.zreo.compaq.com (zukmail03.zreo.compaq.com [161.114.128.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8118543D4C for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:18:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric.benoit@hp.com) Received: from idaexg11.emea.cpqcorp.net (idaexg11.emea.cpqcorp.net [16.16.5.24]) by zukmail03.zreo.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400B917A for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:18:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from idaexc01.emea.cpqcorp.net ([16.16.5.47]) by idaexg11.emea.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:18:56 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:18:56 +0200 Message-ID: <7184FD7F14ED864E82927268351595F6228369@idaexc01.emea.cpqcorp.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Mail System Error - Returned Mail Thread-Index: AcRzCrjIBO//6ctdTlqc5GczLcOKXAAAAAUf From: "Benoit, Eric" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 12:18:56.0759 (UTC) FILETIME=[B938C870:01C4730A] Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Mail System Error - Returned Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:18:58 -0000 Bonjour, Je serai indisponible jusqu'au 23 Ao=FBt 2004, sans acc=E8s =E0 ma = messagerie. En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez contacter Corinne = Costamagna, mon Backup , au +33 6 7299 1776 =E0 partir du 02 Ao=FBt ou = mon Manager, Philippe Roussel, jusqu'au 30 Juillet au +33 6 7299 3764. Merci. Eric BENOIT Hello, I will be out of the Office until 23rd August'04, and I won't read my = e-mail. In case of=20 emergency, call +33 6 7299 3764, My Manager. . Thanks. Eric BENOIT Hallo, Ich bin nicht im B=FCro bis 23/08/2004 und werde meine elektronische = Post nich lesen. =20 Im Notfall k=F6nnen Sie +33 6 7299 3764, Philippe Roussel telefonieren. Danke. Eric BENOIT From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 12:19:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E2216A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:19:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CCB43D53 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:19:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63282749FA for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:19:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4104F6F3.2080900@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:20:03 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portupgrade(1) kde fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:19:51 -0000 I'm trying to upgrade kde (the meta-port), 3.1.2->3.2.3_1 using portupgrade(1) but it fails trying to install kdelibs. Can anyone shed any light on what's wrong? FreeBSD redshift 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #2: Sun Jul 25 19:19:46 BST 2004 root@redshift:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/REDSHIFT i386 /home/mark{106}# pkg_info | grep kde kde-3.1.2 The "meta-port" for KDE kdebase-3.1.2 This package provides the basic applications for the KDE sy kdegames-3.1.2 Games for the KDE integrated X11 desktop kdegraphics-3.1.2 Graphics utilities for the KDE3 integrated X11 desktop kdelibs-3.1.2 This is the base set of libraries needed by KDE programs kdemultimedia-3.1.2 Multimedia utilities for the KDE integrated X11 desktop kdenetwork-3.1.2 Network-related programs and modules for KDE kdesdk-3.1.4 KDE Software Development Kit kdeutils-3.1.2 Utilities for the KDE integrated X11 desktop xmms-kde-3.0.0 Integrates XMMS into the KDE3 Panel /home/mark{107}# /home/mark{107}# portupgrade -Rv kde-3.1.2 [snip successful build of dependencies and kdelibs] pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/share/servicetypes' [snip lots of similar lines] pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/include/kate' rmdir: /usr/local/include/arts: Directory not empty pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?) [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 148 packages found (-1 +0) (...) done] ---> Uninstallation of kdelibs-3.1.2 ended at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:12:26 +0100 (consumed 00:00:28) ---> Installation of x11/kdelibs3 started at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:12:26 +0100 ---> Installing the new version via the port ===> Installing for kdelibs-3.2.3_1 ===> kdelibs-3.2.3_1 conflicts with installed package(s): kdebase-3.1.2 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade681.35 make reinstall ---> Updating dependency info ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/digikam-0.5.1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kde-3.1.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kdebase-3.1.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kdegames-3.1.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kdegraphics-3.1.2/+CONTENTS egrep: /var/db/pkg/kdelibs-3.1.2/+CONTENTS: No such file or directory ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kdemultimedia-3.1.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kdenetwork-3.1.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kdesdk-3.1.4/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/kdeutils-3.1.2/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/koffice-1.2.1_1,1/+CONTENTS ---> Modifying /var/db/pkg/xmms-kde-3.0.0/+CONTENTS ---> Restoring the old version ** Fix the installation problem and try again. ---> Installation of x11/kdelibs3 ended at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:12:58 +0100 (consumed 00:00:32) ---> Upgrade of x11/kdelibs3 ended at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:12:58 +0100 (consumed 00:52:53) [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 149 packages found (-0 +1) . done] ---> Skipping 'editors/koffice-kde3' (koffice-1.2.1_1,1) because a requisite package 'kdelibs-3.1.2' (x11/kdelibs3) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Skipping 'games/kdegames3' (kdegames-3.1.2) because a requisite package 'kdelibs-3.1.2' (x11/kdelibs3) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Skipping 'net/kdenetwork3' (kdenetwork-3.1.2) because a requisite package 'kdelibs-3.1.2' (x11/kdelibs3) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Skipping 'graphics/kdegraphics3' (kdegraphics-3.1.2) because a requisite package 'kdelibs-3.1.2' (x11/kdelibs3) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Skipping 'x11/kdebase3' (kdebase-3.1.2) because a requisite package 'kdelibs-3.1.2' (x11/kdelibs3) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Skipping 'misc/kdeutils3' (kdeutils-3.1.2) because a requisite package 'kdelibs-3.1.2' (x11/kdelibs3) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Skipping 'multimedia/kdemultimedia3' (kdemultimedia-3.1.2) because a requisite package 'kdelibs-3.1.2' (x11/kdelibs3) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Skipping 'x11/kde3' (kde-3.1.2) because a requisite package 'kdeutils-3.1.2' (misc/kdeutils3) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) - graphics/png (png-1.2.5_6) - lang/python (python-2.3.4_1) - textproc/expat2 (expat-1.95.7) - converters/libiconv (libiconv-1.9.2) - devel/gettext (gettext-0.13.1_1) - devel/libgnugetopt (libgnugetopt-1.2) - lang/perl5 (perl-5.6.1_15) - devel/imake-4 (imake-4.3.0_2) - audio/libogg (libogg-1.1,3) - audio/libvorbis (libvorbis-1.0.1,3) - devel/pcre (pcre-4.5) - graphics/jpeg (jpeg-6b_3) - print/freetype2 (freetype2-2.1.7_3) - graphics/tiff (tiff-3.6.1_1) - graphics/lcms (lcms-1.13,1) - graphics/libmng (libmng-1.0.7) - print/cups-base (cups-base-1.1.20.0) - devel/pkgconfig (pkgconfig-0.15.0_1) - x11-fonts/fontconfig (fontconfig-2.2.3,1) - x11-fonts/libXft (libXft-2.1.6) - converters/uulib (uulib-0.5.20) - graphics/libart_lgpl2 (libart_lgpl2-2.3.16) - textproc/libxml2 (libxml2-2.6.11_1) - audio/libaudiofile (libaudiofile-0.2.6) - textproc/libxslt (libxslt-1.1.8_1) - audio/esound (esound-0.2.34) - audio/cdparanoia (cdparanoia-3.9.8_7) - x11/XFree86-4-libraries (XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_7) - x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings (XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0) - x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontScalable (XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0) - x11-toolkits/qt33 (qt-3.3.2_2) - audio/arts (arts-1.2.3,1) - multimedia/xanim (xanim-2.92.0) - devel/fam (fam-2.6.9_4) - graphics/libglut (libglut-6.0.1) ! x11/kdelibs3 (kdelibs-3.1.2) (install error) * editors/koffice-kde3 (koffice-1.2.1_1,1) * games/kdegames3 (kdegames-3.1.2) * net/kdenetwork3 (kdenetwork-3.1.2) * graphics/kdegraphics3 (kdegraphics-3.1.2) * x11/kdebase3 (kdebase-3.1.2) * misc/kdeutils3 (kdeutils-3.1.2) * multimedia/kdemultimedia3 (kdemultimedia-3.1.2) * x11/kde3 (kde-3.1.2) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 35 ignored, 8 skipped and 1 failed ---> Session ended at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:13:04 +0100 (consumed 00:53:12) /home/mark{104}# man -k portupgrade portupgrade(1), portinstall(1) - tools to upgrade installed packages or install new ones via ports or packages /home/mark{105}# Thanks. Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 12:26:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0107716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:26:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99DE43D54 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:26:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from [198.92.228.35] (laptop.makeworld.com [198.92.228.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD2B6142 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:26:20 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4104F8BD.3000707@makeworld.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:27:41 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com Subject: Questions regarding /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:26:29 -0000 I'm curious - I have an AthlonXP cpu, and I seen on several posts where people have listed, CPUTYPE?=athlon-xp in /etc/make.conf. My question is this, what are the ramifications if I added that to my /etc/make.conf now, after my current device has had nothing in the before mentioned file. How might the above effect pre installed/compiled apps be effected. Also - where can I find valid CPUTYPE? parms so I ensure I use the correct one. In addition, if I add some of the "tweaks" such as CFLAGS= -O -pipe COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe to /etc/make.conf - would there be any impact in pre installed/compiles programs after the fact. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ClamAV virus dat updated: Mon Jul 26 2004 at 03:02:52 daily.cvd updated (version: 422, sigs: 1134, f-level: 2, builder: ccordes) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 12:40:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DDD16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:40:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E16043D2F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6QCcxIB013490; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 05:38:59 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 05:40:08 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4104F6F3.2080900@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4104F6F3.2080900@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407260540.08976.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Mark Ovens Subject: Re: portupgrade(1) kde fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:40:13 -0000 On Monday 26 July 2004 05:20 am, Mark Ovens wrote: > I'm trying to upgrade kde (the meta-port), 3.1.2->3.2.3_1 using > portupgrade(1) but it fails trying to install kdelibs. > > Can anyone shed any light on what's wrong? > > FreeBSD redshift 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #2: Sun Jul 25 > 19:19:46 BST 2004 root@redshift:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/REDSHIFT > i386 > > /home/mark{106}# pkg_info | grep kde > > kde-3.1.2 The "meta-port" for KDE > kdebase-3.1.2 This package provides the basic applications for > the KDE sy > kdegames-3.1.2 Games for the KDE integrated X11 desktop > kdegraphics-3.1.2 Graphics utilities for the KDE3 integrated X11 > desktop kdelibs-3.1.2 This is the base set of libraries needed > by KDE programs kdemultimedia-3.1.2 Multimedia utilities for the KDE > integrated X11 desktop kdenetwork-3.1.2 Network-related programs > and modules for KDE kdesdk-3.1.4 KDE Software Development Kit > kdeutils-3.1.2 Utilities for the KDE integrated X11 desktop > xmms-kde-3.0.0 Integrates XMMS into the KDE3 Panel > /home/mark{107}# > > /home/mark{107}# portupgrade -Rv kde-3.1.2 > > [snip successful build of dependencies and kdelibs] > > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > '/usr/local/share/servicetypes' > > [snip lots of similar lines] > > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > '/usr/local/include/kate' rmdir: /usr/local/include/arts: Directory > not empty > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing > list is incorrectly specified?) > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 148 > packages found (-1 +0) (...) done] > ---> Uninstallation of kdelibs-3.1.2 ended at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 > 13:12:26 +0100 (consumed 00:00:28) > ---> Installation of x11/kdelibs3 started at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 > 13:12:26 +0100 > ---> Installing the new version via the port > ===> Installing for kdelibs-3.2.3_1 > > ===> kdelibs-3.2.3_1 conflicts with installed package(s): > kdebase-3.1.2 > > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > *** Error code 1 > It told you what to do right here. You can't directly upgrade to the next level because of the file shift. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 12:45:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F90316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:45:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ctb-mesg6.saix.net (ctb-mesg6.saix.net [196.25.240.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54EB43D2D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:45:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail63133@telkomsa.net) Received: from host2-fbsd.Dembe.net (tpr-115-236.telkomadsl.co.za [165.165.115.236]) by ctb-mesg6.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63D3168F4 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:45:29 +0200 (SAST) From: Livhu Tshisikule Organization: Dembe Open Source Unix Solutions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:45:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407261445.25612.mail63133@telkomsa.net> Subject: How can I recover /usr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:45:46 -0000 Hi, 1. How can I recover /usr, when I boot the system it goes to single user and ask me to run fsck manually but the /usr has a bad block. The machine is a server for diskless machines. Regards Livhu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 13:11:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F9C16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:11:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com (bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com [155.208.255.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A1543D31 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:11:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guillaume.goutaudier@hp.com) Received: from gaurand.grenoble.hp.com (gaurand.grenoble.hp.com [15.128.162.249]) by bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEFE39142 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:11:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hp.com (dhcp-15-128-30-35.grenoble.hp.com [15.128.30.35]) by gaurand.grenoble.hp.com with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_24419+JAGae58098)/8.7.3 SMKit7.02) id PAA08952; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:13:27 +0200 (METDST) Message-ID: <4105030E.3070006@hp.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:11:42 +0200 From: Guillaume Goutaudier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Guillaume Goutaudier Subject: BCM4401-B0 card error on FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:11:59 -0000 Hi all, I'm trying to move from Linux to FreeBSD on my compaq nx5000 laptop. The FreeBSD version I installed is 5.2.1. I have a problem with the integrated broadcom BCM4401-B0 NIC. This is not a BCM4401 but a BCM4401-B0 card (PCI ID = 0x170c), and the bfe driver does not seem to work: In the dmesg output, I don't have a single line with "bfe0: ...". Instead, all I have is: pci1: at device 14.0 (no driver attached) When I try to install the bfe module manually, I get: # kldload miibus.ko interface miibus.1 already present in the KLD 'kernel'! kldload: can't load miibus.ko: file exists # kldload if_bfe.ko module_register: module pci/bfe already exists! Module pci/bfe failed to register: 17 module_register: module bfe/miibus already exists! Module bfe/miibus failed to register: 17 I'm not familiar at all with *BSD drivers stuff so any help will be REALLY appreciated ... cheers, Guillaume From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 13:14:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4738116A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:14:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (mxfep02.bredband.com [195.54.107.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC1343D3F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:14:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mathias_nospam@haas.se) Received: from haas.se ([213.113.216.89] [213.113.216.89]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with SMTP id <20040726131438.WOCL23867.mxfep02.bredband.com@haas.se> for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:14:38 +0200 Received: (qmail 5283 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2004 13:14:21 -0000 Received: from mathias_nospam@haas.se by p3-550.haas.se by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:1(192.168.10.10):. Processed in 0.027759 secs); 26 Jul 2004 13:14:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.10?) (192.168.10.10) by p3-550.haas.se with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 13:14:21 -0000 Message-ID: <41050414.7070902@haas.se> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:16:04 +0200 From: Mathias Haas User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4104D039.8070602@haas.se> <20040726101438.GE61141@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040726101438.GE61141@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Urgent! Firewire support in 4.6.2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mathias@haas.se List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:14:40 -0000 Thanks both of you for the answer! I've once tried to CVSup a 5.1 prerelease to release and that didn't work too well. I found a computer with a spare disk where I installed 5.2.1, that took only 15 minutes and from there, restoring the backup was simple. I'll now use that computer to build a copy of the old 4.6.2 and then DD the whole disk to the old machine. Thanks for the help, it's easy to panic in situations like these. /Mathias Matthew Seaman wrote: >On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 11:34:49AM +0200, Mathias Haas wrote: > > >>Hello! My wifes' company had a break-in during the night today and they >>stole ALL the computers. They have their backup on an external firewire >>disk. >>At home I have a FreeBSD 4.6.2 setup - but I believe that 4.6.2 doesn't >>have firewire support, is this correct? >>Is there any way to add firewire support to the kernel or do I have to >>upgrade to a later version of FreeBSD? >>If so, what are the odds for a successfull upgrade from 4.6.2 to 4.10 ? >>A fresh reinstall would take a lot of time since the 4.6.2 server runs a >>ton of applications. >> >> > >Yikes. Yes, FireWire support was first introduced in FreeBSD 5.0 and >then later MFC'd to 4.x: see > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=fwohci&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+4.10-stable&format=html > >A 4.6.2 to 4.10 upgrade should be do-able by the make >{build,install}{world,kernel} process as spelt out in >/usr/src/UPDATING. Just use cvsup(1) to grab the latest RELENG_4 or >RELENG_4_10 sources and follow the instructions. There's plenty in >the Handbook about doing an upgrade like that: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/synching.html > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html > >That should get you a kernel+base system update without screwing up >all of the other software you've got installed. Although it is >impossible to be completely certain about that. If the machine you >intend to do this to is a production system, then I'd advise you not >to, but instead to hunt around for a reasonably cheap new machine with >FireWire capability and install there instead. > >In any case, get good backups of your 4.6.2 box before doing anything >else to that machine. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 13:23:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6192A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:23:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from redtick.homeunix.com (adsl-68-89-250-152.dsl.okcyok.swbell.net [68.89.250.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85F643D2F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:23:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from boxend@redtick.homeunix.com) Received: from redtick.homeunix.com (localhost.homeunix.com [127.0.0.1]) i6QDM54t037103; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:22:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from boxend@redtick.homeunix.com) Received: (from boxend@localhost) by redtick.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i6QDM5xA037102; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:22:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from boxend) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:22:04 -0500 From: Mark To: Guillaume Goutaudier Message-ID: <20040726132204.GA37066@redtick.homeunix.com> References: <4105030E.3070006@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4105030E.3070006@hp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BCM4401-B0 card error on FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:23:10 -0000 Try bge. On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Guillaume Goutaudier wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to move from Linux to FreeBSD on my compaq nx5000 laptop. > The FreeBSD version I installed is 5.2.1. > > I have a problem with the integrated broadcom BCM4401-B0 NIC. > > This is not a BCM4401 but a BCM4401-B0 card (PCI ID = 0x170c), and > the bfe driver does not seem to work: > > In the dmesg output, I don't have a single line with "bfe0: ...". > Instead, all I have is: > > pci1: at device 14.0 (no driver attached) > > When I try to install the bfe module manually, I get: > > # kldload miibus.ko > interface miibus.1 already present in the KLD 'kernel'! > kldload: can't load miibus.ko: file exists > # kldload if_bfe.ko > module_register: module pci/bfe already exists! > Module pci/bfe failed to register: 17 > module_register: module bfe/miibus already exists! > Module bfe/miibus failed to register: 17 > > I'm not familiar at all with *BSD drivers stuff so any help will be > REALLY appreciated ... > > cheers, > > > Guillaume > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ********** The information contained in this communication is confidential, private, proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. ********** ============================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 13:28:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DF216A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:28:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from msr38.hinet.net (msr38.hinet.net [168.95.4.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2689943D3F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:28:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net) Received: from sonic (61-227-219-173.dynamic.hinet.net [61.227.219.173]) by msr38.hinet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA06038 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:27:58 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:18:31 -0400 From: Robert Storey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040726211831.121c9df9.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: implementing spf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:28:01 -0000 I never heard of spf until yesterday, when there was a big discussion about it on Slashdot. The discussion was very political (about Microsoft, Richard Stallman, etc). I don't want to get into any of the politics here, as it's not appropriate for this list. But I am interested in the technology aspect. Specifically: 1) Is the technology useful? 2) How does one implement spf on the server side? 3) How does one implement spf on the client side? I most interested in No. 3 above - specifically, is there anything that I must do as an end-user to make use of spf? Thanks in advance, Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 13:48:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A360A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:48:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ocsmail.ocs.open-channels.com (ocsmail.ocs.open-channels.com [66.151.185.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F32543D5F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from ocsmailjp.ocs.com ([172.20.224.26] RDNS failed) by ocsmail.ocs.open-channels.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:48:03 -0400 Received: (from root@localhost) by ocsmailjp.ocs.com (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id i6QDm3hj030317; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:48:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:48:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200407261348.i6QDm3hj030317@ocsmailjp.ocs.com> From: "MailScanner" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-MailScanner: generated X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 13:48:03.0655 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C385D70:01C47317] Subject: Warning: E-mail viruses detected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:48:06 -0000 Our virus detector has just been triggered by a message you sent:- To: americas_password@ocs.com Subject: Delivery reports about your e-mail Date: Mon Jul 26 09:48:03 2004 One or more of the attachments (cnd.hp.com) are on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and will not have been delivered. Consider renaming the files or putting them into a "zip" file to avoid this constraint. The virus detector said this about the message: Report: MailScanner: Executable DOS/Windows programs are dangerous in email (cnd.hp.com) No programs allowed (cnd.hp.com) -- OCS Mail Administrator http://www.ocs.com/ (This is an automated message) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 13:49:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A3C16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:49:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from etustar.ze.tum.de (etustar.ze.tum.de [129.187.39.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9CD43D1F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:49:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from estartu@etustar.ze.tum.de) Received: from etustar.ze.tum.de (estartu@localhost.ze.tu-muenchen.de [127.0.0.1]) by etustar.ze.tum.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6QDncqj079453; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:49:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from estartu@etustar.ze.tum.de) Received: (from estartu@localhost) by etustar.ze.tum.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6QDnUH6079452; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:49:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from estartu) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:49:30 +0200 From: Gerhard Schmidt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040726134930.GA79357@augusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Strange behavior of sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:49:40 -0000 --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, i=B4ve try to set up an pxeboot for automatic installation of my FreeBSD=20 systems. Installing works without a problem.=20 To do the custom setup I need for my servers, I have created a package=20 and a post-install script for this package. The post Install script does=20 some changes to /etc/rc.conf. I initializes a second network device and activates some auf the installed packages. That works fine.=20 The script also add sshd_enabled=3D"YES" to /etc/rc.conf.=20 When i do a cat /etc/rc.conf from the holographic shell everything seems=20 OK but after reboot some of the additions are gone (some not all)=20 The lines missing are=20 inetd_enable=3D"YES" keymap=3D"german.iso" nfs_client_enable=3D"YES" ntpdate_enable=3D"YES" ntpdate_flags=3D"..." rpcbind_enable=3D"YES" sshd_enable=3D"YES" usbd_enable=3D"YES" the lines for the second Networkdevice and activation of the installed=20 packages remain in the rc.conf. Bye Estartu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gerhard Schmidt | Nick : estartu IRC : Estartu | Fischbachweg 3 | | PGP Public Key 86856 Hiltenfingen | Privat: estartu@augusta.de | on Request=20 --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use MessageID: GAloOC/wiuteBhXAggtzv1zVMuaDRaMw iQCVAwUBQQUL6Qzx22nOTJQRAQGNPAP/ZsMeys6WghcM3xDsww5hu6ONW9PrAaGk Epgp8m1XoLZczSRtNsbI1AY5J/8aqTeXSo3IZj2UO7aBifQTTt3YIF6BNv47CK2o VT7b6vFXf2C1cmPWaZqteb/U0IClQ9AtsWdyQJ973gCnQUBjuv5Xl96fPaEfjHsS HTUwmz5rI9s= =NG8X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 13:55:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5729016A4CF for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:55:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxo2.vol.cz (mxo2.vol.cz [195.250.128.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9457643D1F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:55:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from m1.post.cz (m1.post.cz [212.20.96.227]) by mxo2.vol.cz (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6QDt2S2068883 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:55:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from m1.post.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m1.post.cz (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with SMTP id i6QDsvXd093497 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:55:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:55:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200407261355.i6QDsvXd093497@m1.post.cz> From: vitdan@post.cz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-By-The-Graces-Of: The Vacation program Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-replied X-Vol-Skip-Autoreply: yes X-Vol-Skip-Antispam: yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Subject: Automaticka odpoved / Automatic reply X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:55:04 -0000 Mate e-mail od --- Tato zpr=E1va byla vygenerov=E1na automaticky jako odpov=EC=EF=20 na Va=B9i zpr=E1vu s p=F8edm=ECtem: Returned mail: see transcript for details Pros=EDme, neodpov=EDdejte na n=ED. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 14:06:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0E316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:06:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B223D43D1F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:06:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bp679-00076J-KR; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:06:04 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bp677-0000eU-LX; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:06:01 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:06:01 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Robert Storey In-Reply-To: <20040726211831.121c9df9.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> Message-ID: References: <20040726211831.121c9df9.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: Jan Grant X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Level: / cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: implementing spf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:06:06 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Robert Storey wrote: [on spf] > 1) Is the technology useful? > > 2) How does one implement spf on the server side? > > 3) How does one implement spf on the client side? > > I most interested in No. 3 above - specifically, is there anything that > I must do as an end-user to make use of spf? The answer to (3) directly is, "no"* - which is why SPF is so useful, since it doesn't require large (or any) changes to a user's clients (assuming you're not doing mailing list expansion via your MUA, which I believe some packages do). The SPF pages at pobox have all the details you could want, including pointers to various implementations. It's pretty simple and straightforward; furthermore, the license situation is positive. If the MARID stuff ends up encumbered with what RMS calls a non-free-software-compatible license then it's quite likely that it simply won't fly, regardless. SPF itself is in use right now, however. jan * if you're originating email from "offsite" (dialup lines etc.) then you may need to coordinate with your mail admin to ensure you're targeting the correct MSA. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Donate a signature: http://ioctl.org/jan/sig-submit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 14:28:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8213E16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:28:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042F743D31 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:28:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from henrik.w.lund@broadpark.no) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (52.80-202-129.nextgentel.com [80.202.129.52]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFB62EF5; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:29:29 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <410593AE.4050707@broadpark.no> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:28:46 -0700 From: Henrik W Lund User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: nb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <4104F8BD.3000707@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <4104F8BD.3000707@makeworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions regarding /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:28:59 -0000 Chris wrote: > I'm curious - I have an AthlonXP cpu, and I seen on several posts > where people have listed, CPUTYPE?=athlon-xp in /etc/make.conf. > > My question is this, what are the ramifications if I added that to my > /etc/make.conf now, after my current device has had nothing in the > before mentioned file. > > How might the above effect pre installed/compiled apps be effected. > Also - where can I find valid CPUTYPE? parms so I ensure I use the > correct one. > > In addition, if I add some of the "tweaks" such as > CFLAGS= -O -pipe > COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe > to /etc/make.conf - would there be any impact in pre > installed/compiles programs after the fact. > Greetings! No, nothing you put into make.conf will affect already installed software. This file is for setting build-time options, and as such will only affect subsequent software builds. And yes, rebuilding and reinstalling a package you already have qualifies as a "subsequent build". As for valid CPUTYPE values, have you checked out the manpage? man make.conf I'm pretty sure I've seen it in there somewhere. Hope this helps! -Henrik W Lund From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 14:33:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2166016A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:33:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7088943D5A for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:33:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F75274D46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:33:36 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <41051652.9070806@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:33:54 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040726) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4104F6F3.2080900@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> <200407260540.08976.kstewart@owt.com> <200407260605.37511.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200407260605.37511.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade(1) kde fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:33:45 -0000 Kent Stewart wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On a 2nd read, I thought I was kind of sharp. No problem. I saw the message: ===> kdelibs-3.2.3_1 conflicts with installed package(s): kdebase-3.1.2 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** Error code 1 but it seemed misleading because I thought that portupgrade(1) pkg_delete-ed the old version (after first backing up the files) - obviously not. > What you have is a similar > problem to the old problem with XFree86-server and -libraries. You > update -libraries, which contain the new files, and then you delete > them when you update -server. Then, nothing would update because files > were missing. > > There were a number of comments on -questions or -ports when this first > happened. Yes, I'd searched the mailing lists (for KDE problems, not XFree86) but didn't find anything that seemd relevant, although after your reply some of them make sense now. > You might get by just deleting kdebase. > Delete kde-libs surely? Is this a limitation/shortcoming/bug of portupgrade(1)? Is the whole point of it ot that it handles, often complex, dependencies for you? Thanks for the reply. Regards, Mark > Kent > > On Monday 26 July 2004 05:40 am, Kent Stewart wrote: >> On Monday 26 July 2004 05:20 am, Mark Ovens wrote: >> > I'm trying to upgrade kde (the meta-port), 3.1.2->3.2.3_1 using >> > portupgrade(1) but it fails trying to install kdelibs. >> > >> > Can anyone shed any light on what's wrong? >> > >> > FreeBSD redshift 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #2: Sun Jul 25 >> > 19:19:46 BST 2004 root@redshift:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/REDSHIFT >> > i386 >> > >> > /home/mark{106}# pkg_info | grep kde >> > >> > kde-3.1.2 The "meta-port" for KDE >> > kdebase-3.1.2 This package provides the basic applications >> > for the KDE sy >> > kdegames-3.1.2 Games for the KDE integrated X11 desktop >> > kdegraphics-3.1.2 Graphics utilities for the KDE3 integrated X11 >> > desktop kdelibs-3.1.2 This is the base set of libraries >> > needed by KDE programs kdemultimedia-3.1.2 Multimedia utilities for >> > the KDE integrated X11 desktop kdenetwork-3.1.2 Network-related >> > programs and modules for KDE kdesdk-3.1.4 KDE Software >> > Development Kit kdeutils-3.1.2 Utilities for the KDE >> > integrated X11 desktop xmms-kde-3.0.0 Integrates XMMS into the >> > KDE3 Panel >> > /home/mark{107}# >> > >> > /home/mark{107}# portupgrade -Rv kde-3.1.2 >> > >> > [snip successful build of dependencies and kdelibs] >> > >> > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory >> > '/usr/local/share/servicetypes' >> > >> > [snip lots of similar lines] >> > >> > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory >> > '/usr/local/include/kate' rmdir: /usr/local/include/arts: Directory >> > not empty >> > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing >> > list is incorrectly specified?) >> > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 148 >> > packages found (-1 +0) (...) done] >> > ---> Uninstallation of kdelibs-3.1.2 ended at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 >> > 13:12:26 +0100 (consumed 00:00:28) >> > ---> Installation of x11/kdelibs3 started at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 >> > 13:12:26 +0100 >> > ---> Installing the new version via the port >> > ===> Installing for kdelibs-3.2.3_1 >> > >> > ===> kdelibs-3.2.3_1 conflicts with installed package(s): >> > kdebase-3.1.2 >> > >> > They install files into the same place. >> > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). >> > *** Error code 1 >> >> It told you what to do right here. You can't directly upgrade to the >> next level because of the file shift. >> >> Kent > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 14:36:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B6416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:36:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9267043D5A for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:36:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 3645 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Jul 2004 14:35:27 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:35:27 +0200 From: Michal Pasternak To: David Message-ID: <20040726143527.GA3599@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: <000801c472e5$07f9b8a0$6501a8c0@david> <20040726120831.GA2162@pasternak.w.lub.pl> <001c01c4731d$05ea3f20$6501a8c0@david> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001c01c4731d$05ea3f20$6501a8c0@david> cc: Michal Pasternak cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a /dev/video in freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michal Pasternak List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:36:09 -0000 --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David [Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:29:52AM -0400]: > Hi, I figure out how to disable attachment viewing. That was my PGP signature. > I am using a Hauppauge > wintv card which uses the bt878 chipset. I also used that once. All information about it on FreeBSD (oh, almost all, use links) can be found here: http://telepresence.dmem.strath.ac.uk/bt848/ . IIRC, fxtv worked for me with that. --=20 m --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBBRavg9vpIMn2guARAgCQAKCTuuc9i9+KdNAv5X5s9qqXfpeLvQCfS2qc T7FFMmo5nREtuyqVsK7rpWE= =SdYz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 14:36:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FA716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:36:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959D443D46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:36:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518582760BA for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:36:13 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <410516EF.3080601@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:36:31 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040726) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4104F8BD.3000707@makeworld.com> <410593AE.4050707@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <410593AE.4050707@broadpark.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Questions regarding /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:36:17 -0000 Henrik W Lund wrote: > Greetings! > > No, nothing you put into make.conf will affect already installed > software. This file is for setting build-time options, and as such will > only affect subsequent software builds. And yes, rebuilding and > reinstalling a package you already have qualifies as a "subsequent build". > > As for valid CPUTYPE values, have you checked out the manpage? > > man make.conf > > I'm pretty sure I've seen it in there somewhere. > /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf is where it is described. HTH Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 14:45:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B55E16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:45:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FFC43D1F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350F96171; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:45:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (racerx@localhost)i6QEj8wn045068; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:45:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:45:08 -0500 (CDT) From: RacerX To: Henrik W Lund In-Reply-To: <410593AE.4050707@broadpark.no> Message-ID: <20040726094310.S45041@makeworld.com> References: <4104F8BD.3000707@makeworld.com> <410593AE.4050707@broadpark.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions regarding /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:45:20 -0000 Best regards, Chris On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Henrik W Lund wrote: > Chris wrote: > >> I'm curious - I have an AthlonXP cpu, and I seen on several posts where >> people have listed, CPUTYPE?=athlon-xp in /etc/make.conf. >> >> My question is this, what are the ramifications if I added that to my >> /etc/make.conf now, after my current device has had nothing in the before >> mentioned file. >> >> How might the above effect pre installed/compiled apps be effected. >> Also - where can I find valid CPUTYPE? parms so I ensure I use the correct >> one. >> >> In addition, if I add some of the "tweaks" such as >> CFLAGS= -O -pipe >> COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe >> to /etc/make.conf - would there be any impact in pre installed/compiles >> programs after the fact. >> > Greetings! > > No, nothing you put into make.conf will affect already installed software. > This file is for setting build-time options, and as such will only affect > subsequent software builds. And yes, rebuilding and reinstalling a package > you already have qualifies as a "subsequent build". > > As for valid CPUTYPE values, have you checked out the manpage? > > man make.conf > > I'm pretty sure I've seen it in there somewhere. Great! So it only effect things after the fact. Perhaps I might consider recompiling WM's such as Gnome? Or worry about that when there is an upgrade and deal with it then via portupgrade? Thanks - -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ClamAV virus dat updated: Mon Jul 26 2004 at 03:02:52 daily.cvd updated (version: 422, sigs: 1134, f-level: 2, builder: ccordes) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 14:48:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1A716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:48:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A5B43D41 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:48:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Luke@FoolishGames.com) Received: from defiant (24.176.9.241.kzo.mi.chartermi.net [24.176.9.241]) (authenticated bits=0)ESMTP id i6QEoTfS002768; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:50:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Luke@FoolishGames.com) Message-Id: <200407261450.i6QEoTfS002768@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> From: "Lucas Holt" To: "'RacerX'" , "'Henrik W Lund'" Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:48:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2149 Thread-Index: AcRzH39KXgLoCAlHRVed1R09kNJmPQAAC0Kg In-Reply-To: <20040726094310.S45041@makeworld.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.amerclamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on (ªÙ¿¦Q X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Questions regarding /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:48:32 -0000 Don't worry about recompiling everything right away. Gnome takes a long time to compile! The cpu type does seem to help multimedia apps and WMs if they were designed to take advantage of the extra instructions. I usually get a machine up and then change the cpu type after I have the basics worked out. Eventually after buildworlds and portupgrade I get everything built with the new settings. It works out fine. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 14:51:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB5816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:51:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF7843D46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:51:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA95A6171; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:51:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (racerx@localhost)i6QEpo73045173; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:51:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:51:49 -0500 (CDT) From: RacerX To: Lucas Holt In-Reply-To: <200407261450.i6QEoTfS002768@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> Message-ID: <20040726095011.W45134@makeworld.com> References: <200407261450.i6QEoTfS002768@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: 'Henrik W Lund' Subject: RE: Questions regarding /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:51:59 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Lucas Holt wrote: > Don't worry about recompiling everything right away. Gnome takes a long > time to compile! The cpu type does seem to help multimedia apps and WMs if > they were designed to take advantage of the extra instructions. > > I usually get a machine up and then change the cpu type after I have the > basics worked out. Eventually after buildworlds and portupgrade I get > everything built with the new settings. It works out fine. Perfect! Thanks - I want to take advantage of some of these settings. I just never bothered to set them on creation. This is good to know tho - and now it goes in as a "Best Practice" to set these on new installs. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ClamAV virus dat updated: Mon Jul 26 2004 at 03:02:52 daily.cvd updated (version: 422, sigs: 1134, f-level: 2, builder: ccordes) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:00:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53E616A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:00:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grerelbul01.net.external.hp.com (grerelbul01.net.external.hp.com [155.208.255.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E7E43D55 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:00:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from guillaume.goutaudier@hp.com) Received: from gaurand.grenoble.hp.com (gaurand.grenoble.hp.com [15.128.162.249]) by grerelbul01.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D80037DFE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:01:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hp.com (dhcp-15-128-30-35.grenoble.hp.com [15.128.30.35]) by gaurand.grenoble.hp.com with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_24419+JAGae58098)/8.7.3 SMKit7.02) id RAA09039 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:02:24 +0200 (METDST) Message-ID: <41051C97.7030200@hp.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:00:39 +0200 From: Guillaume Goutaudier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: BCM4401-B0 card error on FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:00:50 -0000 bge gives me exactly the same error message. And still nothing like "bge0: ..." in dmesg output. Try bge. On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Guillaume Goutaudier wrote: >/ Hi all, />/ />/ I'm trying to move from Linux to FreeBSD on my compaq nx5000 laptop. />/ The FreeBSD version I installed is 5.2.1. />/ />/ I have a problem with the integrated broadcom BCM4401-B0 NIC. />/ />/ This is not a BCM4401 but a BCM4401-B0 card (PCI ID = 0x170c), and />/ the bfe driver does not seem to work: />/ />/ In the dmesg output, I don't have a single line with "bfe0: ...". />/ Instead, all I have is: />/ />/ pci1: at device 14.0 (no driver attached) />/ />/ When I try to install the bfe module manually, I get: />/ />/ # kldload miibus.ko />/ interface miibus.1 already present in the KLD 'kernel'! />/ kldload: can't load miibus.ko: file exists />/ # kldload if_bfe.ko />/ module_register: module pci/bfe already exists! />/ Module pci/bfe failed to register: 17 />/ module_register: module bfe/miibus already exists! />/ Module bfe/miibus failed to register: 17 />/ />/ I'm not familiar at all with *BSD drivers stuff so any help will be />/ REALLY appreciated ... />/ />/ cheers, />/ />/ />/ Guillaume />/ / From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:09:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E603816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:09:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC71A43D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:09:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian.flaherty@hp.com) Received: from cceexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net (cceexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.81.1.28]) by ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F64999AF for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:09:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cceexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.81.1.19]) by cceexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:47:50 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:11:10 -0500 Message-ID: <479EDB3748C57E45B312082DE80C2A3A03AF160A@cceexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: MAIL SYSTEM ERROR - RETURNED MAIL Thread-Index: AcRzEgSaOwLAmlbkQwqDWPqbUWkvVwAAABvm From: "Flaherty, Brian" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 13:47:53.0392 (UTC) FILETIME=[261A5B00:01C47317] Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: MAIL SYSTEM ERROR - RETURNED MAIL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:09:40 -0000 Thanks for your e-mail. Please note that I'll be out of the office = Monday July 26th, 27th and 28th. I will have limited acces to email = during that time. Brian Flaherty From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:11:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC0B16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:11:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rhwi.net (mail.rhwi.net [64.72.68.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4971743D49 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:11:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from techielists@regionalhelpwanted.com) Received: from creemore (creemore.internal.rhw [192.168.1.37]) by mail.rhwi.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D34A24FA0 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:09:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:11:23 -0400 From: Jeanne Schock To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040726111123.7ae74c07.techielists@regionalhelpwanted.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: jabber webmin config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:11:39 -0000 Hi, I have a working jabber 1.4.3 install on FreeBSD 4.8 and I would like to provide my office with a GUI. I'm not sure what webmin wants me to do with regards to a jabber.xml file, jabber.sh and the jabber daemon. I start jabber with the standard jabberd.sh script. Webmin is asking for the "path to jabber server program" (jabber_daemon). The patch-jabber.xml file in the jabberport/files/ dir states "Currently on FreeBSD jabberd is started with the -h option from /path/rc.d/jabber.sh. You'll need to modify it.." I'm not clear on what webmin needs. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks, Jeanne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:20:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3557616A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:20:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from redtick.homeunix.com (adsl-68-89-250-152.dsl.okcyok.swbell.net [68.89.250.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5AA43D68 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from boxend@redtick.homeunix.com) Received: from redtick.homeunix.com (localhost.homeunix.com [127.0.0.1]) i6QFJi4t037483 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:19:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from boxend@redtick.homeunix.com) Received: (from boxend@localhost) by redtick.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i6QFJilW037482 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:19:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from boxend) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:19:44 -0500 From: Mark To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040726151944.GA37441@redtick.homeunix.com> References: <41051C97.7030200@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41051C97.7030200@hp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: BCM4401-B0 card error on FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:20:59 -0000 You may have to build a kernel with the "device bge" # gig cards "device bfe" # 10- 100 cards entries to build the moduals, I would have thought they were with the base system. But I had to build a kernel for the bfe modual to work. Side note: The bfe entry is not in the GENERIC kernel on 4.10 but will build and work. The bge modual would not find my broadcom 4401. On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 05:00:39PM +0200, Guillaume Goutaudier wrote: > bge gives me exactly the same error message. > And still nothing like "bge0: ..." in dmesg output. > > > Try bge. > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Guillaume Goutaudier wrote: > >/ Hi all, > />/ > />/ I'm trying to move from Linux to FreeBSD on my compaq nx5000 laptop. > />/ The FreeBSD version I installed is 5.2.1. > />/ > />/ I have a problem with the integrated broadcom BCM4401-B0 NIC. > />/ > />/ This is not a BCM4401 but a BCM4401-B0 card (PCI ID = 0x170c), and > />/ the bfe driver does not seem to work: > />/ > />/ In the dmesg output, I don't have a single line with "bfe0: ...". > />/ Instead, all I have is: > />/ > />/ pci1: at device 14.0 (no driver attached) > />/ > />/ When I try to install the bfe module manually, I get: > />/ > />/ # kldload miibus.ko > />/ interface miibus.1 already present in the KLD 'kernel'! > />/ kldload: can't load miibus.ko: file exists > />/ # kldload if_bfe.ko > />/ module_register: module pci/bfe already exists! > />/ Module pci/bfe failed to register: 17 > />/ module_register: module bfe/miibus already exists! > />/ Module bfe/miibus failed to register: 17 > />/ > />/ I'm not familiar at all with *BSD drivers stuff so any help will be > />/ REALLY appreciated ... > />/ > />/ cheers, > />/ > />/ > />/ Guillaume > />/ / > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ********** The information contained in this communication is confidential, private, proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. ********** ============================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:43:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438EE16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:43:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.mgmservers.net (wendy.mgmservers.net [66.90.118.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD5643D46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:43:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailinglists@mgmservers.com) Received: (qmail 45321 invoked by uid 105); 26 Jul 2004 15:43:29 -0000 Received: from mailinglists@mgmservers.com by wendy by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.74. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(68.248.209.238):. Processed in 0.162171 secs); 26 Jul 2004 15:43:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.6?) (mailinglists@mgmservers.com@68.248.209.238) by mail.mgmservers.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 15:43:29 -0000 From: Jason Cribbins To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20040725190445.0a8bc8ce.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <20040725190445.0a8bc8ce.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Mailing List Catcher Message-Id: <1090856605.39634.2.camel@butters.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:43:26 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apaching binding to *:* ?? (Weirdness) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailinglists@mgmservers.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:43:52 -0000 On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 19:04, Bill Moran wrote: > I'm having some weird action from Apache. It seems that every apache process > binds to *:* twice, in addition to IP:80 and IP:443. Has anyone seen this > before? This is Apache 1.3.28 (although an upgrade is on the schedule) I > had _wanted_ to test the new version of Apache in the jail prior to upgrading, > but I'm not so sure that's going to work. > > Anyone seen this before? Actually thats default behavior for apache and many other daemons. You can limit what IPs it listens on in the httpd.conf file Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:45:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C1D16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:45:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41006.mail.yahoo.com (web41006.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D42343D54 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:45:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.121] by web41006.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:45:02 PDT Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:45:02 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:45:24 -0000 Hi all, I just installed FreeBSD v4.10 I would like to install a basic FAST Windows 2000 like Window Manager that "ONLY" has: - Basic FAST GUI - MS Notepad like Editor - MS Windows Explorer like File Manager I am setting this up as a test web server with Apache etc... I want very BASIC Windows like GUI with a GUI Text Editor(NOT VI, more like Notepad) to edit configuration files etc AND a Windows Explorer like File Manager to move files easily around & from the CD(ie. NOT command line stuff!) ----------------- My System: Pentium 200Mhz 128MB SDRAM 16MB PCI Creative Graphics Blaster Riva TNT 10 GIG HD ----------------- I have Windows 2000 installed on the Primary Boot partition & that runs VERY fast (compared to FreeBSD + KDE or GNOME) Any suggestions/help is greatly appreciated :)) Regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:47:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F5A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:47:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gir.bullmedia.com.au (gir.bullmedia.com.au [202.94.33.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D006043D5C for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:47:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrisryanemail@yahoo.com.au) Received: from [192.168.25.100] (ppp0B28.dsl.pacific.net.au [202.7.77.40]) by gir.bullmedia.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E8727217; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:16:28 +0930 (CST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:46:42 +1000 From: Chris Ryan To: "Michael L. Squires" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040724110942.P35802@familysquires.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Make buildkernal KERNKONF ( etc etc ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:47:35 -0000 > I'm running "make buildkernel KERNCONF=;make installkernel > KERNCONF=" right now under 5.2-CURRENT and 4.10-STABLE; I wonder if > you have all the source tree installed on that system, and you have a > kernel configuration file of the specified name in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf. > > Mike Squires > Thanks again Mike Did a complete re-install - all works well Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:48:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FD516A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:48:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D8743D60 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:48:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4013F388EB7; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:48:11 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:48:09 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: DK , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <853199244B556CD56594F251@utd49554.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:48:41 -0000 --On Monday, July 26, 2004 08:45:02 AM -0700 DK wrote: > Hi all, > > I just installed FreeBSD v4.10 > > I would like to install a basic FAST Windows 2000 like Window Manager > that "ONLY" has: - Basic FAST GUI > - MS Notepad like Editor > - MS Windows Explorer like File Manager > > I am setting this up as a test web server with Apache etc... > > I want very BASIC Windows like GUI with a GUI Text Editor(NOT VI, more > like Notepad) to edit configuration files etc AND a Windows Explorer like > File Manager to move files easily around & from the CD(ie. NOT command > line stuff!) > Use webmin. That will allow you to use a browser to do your config stuff. If you really want a GUI, tvm should work fine for what you want to do. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:49:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA38D16A4CF for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:49:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lupinella.troll.no (lupinella.troll.no [80.232.37.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B6143D72 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:49:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qt-interest-request@trolltech.com) Received: by trolltech.com id ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:48:20 +0200 From: List Delivery Subsystem Sender: qt-interest-request@trolltech.com Priority: bulk Precedence: bulk X-Loop: qt-interest To: questions@freebsd.org References: <20040726154815Z21505-29160+2589@trolltech.com> Message-Id: <20040726154826Z24404-29161+2023@trolltech.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:48:20 +0200 Subject: Re: Message could not be delivered X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:49:18 -0000 The address questions@freebsd.org is not subscribed to qt-interest. We do not allow posting to qt-interest from non-subscribers. If you are subscribed to qt-interest using a different address and would like to change your subscription address to questions@freebsd.org, please reply to this message and we can change your subscription address. If you know what your subscription address is, that's helpful. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:49:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526C816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:49:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9182343D5F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:49:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:49:03 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:49:40 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: 'DK' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:49:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 15:49:03.0182 (UTC) FILETIME=[133C46E0:01C47328] Subject: RE: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:49:43 -0000 Check out icewm in ports. Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 > -----Original Message----- > From: DK [mailto:asdzxc111@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 10:45 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? > > > Hi all, > > I just installed FreeBSD v4.10 > > I would like to install a basic FAST Windows 2000 like Window > Manager that "ONLY" has: > - Basic FAST GUI > - MS Notepad like Editor > - MS Windows Explorer like File Manager > > I am setting this up as a test web server with Apache etc... > > I want very BASIC Windows like GUI with a GUI Text Editor(NOT > VI, more like Notepad) to edit > configuration files etc AND a Windows Explorer like File > Manager to move files easily around & > from the CD(ie. NOT command line stuff!) > > ----------------- > My System: > Pentium 200Mhz > 128MB SDRAM > 16MB PCI Creative Graphics Blaster Riva TNT > 10 GIG HD > ----------------- > > I have Windows 2000 installed on the Primary Boot partition & > that runs VERY fast > (compared to FreeBSD + KDE or GNOME) > > > Any suggestions/help is greatly appreciated :)) > > > Regards, > > DK > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:50:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBFC16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:50:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17DC43D58 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:50:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4287A388DBC for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:49:57 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:49:51 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <3ABA36B34D74E6494D36DF34@utd49554.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <200407261246.06872.merv@merv.org.uk> References: <20040726092114.9FF6.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> <4104CB96.3010006@circlesquared.com> <20040726130255.A008.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> <200407261246.06872.merv@merv.org.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: how to upgrade Perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:50:30 -0000 --On Monday, July 26, 2004 12:46:06 PM +0100 merv wrote: > You will also have to reinstall all the other p5 ports that you may have > installed prior to this upgrade. So that they all compile for 5.8 > This explains something. I tried to upgrade perl and ran use.perl port, but that broke things. Is there a trivial way to see what p5 ports you have installed? I'm perfectly willing to do the work if the end result is functional. :-) Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:04:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA7616A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:04:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from marshal.ul.ie (marshal.ul.ie [136.201.1.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0FD43D5C for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:04:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian.sheehan@ul.ie) Received: from exch-staff4.ul.ie (Not Verified[136.201.1.128]) by marshal.ul.ie with NetIQ MailMarshal (v5.5.6.7) id ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:03:14 -0500 Received: from ul.ie (memex.idc.ul.ie [136.201.107.91]) by exch-staff4.ul.ie with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id PVJGYA2Y; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:54:22 +0100 Message-ID: <41052A3C.2090803@ul.ie> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:58:52 +0100 From: Brian Sheehan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040429) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ports & packages: problems with fetch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:04:15 -0000 Hi, I've recently been having problems with the ports/packages system on a newly installed 4.10-RELEASE FreeBSD machine. Some port/package installations would fail, making it seem that a large proportion of package repositories where out of date, and that only a small number were up to date. I more or less solved the problem, but I'm posting this here as it took quite a lot of fiddling to overcome it, and it took me a while to cop what the actual problem was: a dodgy proxy server between me and the freeBSD repositories. Some port / package installations would fail with: fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/: size unknown If the file were fetched manually, the same "size unknown" warning would be displayed, but fetch would actually go ahead and download the file anyway. If the file were placed in /usr/ports/distfiles, installation would sometimes work. In cases where it didn't, an inspection of the downloaded .tar.gz file with cat showed it to in fact contain a http error response from the proxy server I was using. Fetching the same files from a machine outside the firewall worked perfectly. Solution: I tried a different proxy server in the organisation where I work - it is administered by a different department than the one I was using, and seems to work reliably with fetch. Does this sound like a reasonable explanation to people? If so, which proxy servers are know to be problematic? Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:06:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1C416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:06:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com [161.114.1.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9608743D54 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:06:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from claudio.vespucci@hp.com) Received: from ataexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net (ataexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.114.1.31]) by ztxmail04.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDA7F87 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:05:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ataexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.114.1.51]) by ataexg12.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:52:30 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:29:55 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Returned mail: Data format error Thread-Index: AcRzJWc7+C/xDR/wSG2AMRAVWYb7AgAAAANH From: "Vespucci, Claudio" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 15:52:30.0555 (UTC) FILETIME=[8ED6E2B0:01C47328] Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: Data format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:06:20 -0000 Thank you for your message.=20 I will be out of the office on Friday July 23rd and Monday July 26th. I = will not have access to e-mail during this time. I will respond to your = message promptly upon my return. Regards, Claudio Vespucci + HP Way Global Diversity and Inclusion +39-02-92122007 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:09:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F6416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:09:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rtl.org (rtl-3.i2k.com [63.94.12.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B624C43D39 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:09:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jstewart@rtl.org) Received: from mis3c.rtl.lan (rtl-2.i2k.com [63.94.12.206]) by mail.rtl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DC230ABB for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:05:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mis3c.rtl.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6EFC6129361; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:08:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:08:03 -0400 From: Jason Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040726160803.GI19131@rtl.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:09:12 -0000 On 26/07/04 08:45 -0700, DK wrote: > Hi all, > > I just installed FreeBSD v4.10 > > I would like to install a basic FAST Windows 2000 like Window Manager that "ONLY" has: > - Basic FAST GUI > - MS Notepad like Editor > - MS Windows Explorer like File Manager > > I am setting this up as a test web server with Apache etc... > > I want very BASIC Windows like GUI with a GUI Text Editor(NOT VI, more like Notepad) to edit > configuration files etc AND a Windows Explorer like File Manager to move files easily around & > from the CD(ie. NOT command line stuff!) Windows 2000 is not "Basic". If you run twm with xfm or something similar you will be dissapointed when you compare it to w2k. Fluxbox is a good, extremely lightwieght window manager. It's very basic, as in no eye candy, but it's nice to older, less powerful machines. For file managing, you might want to look at gentoo (no, not the Linux dist.) file manager, tkdesk, or rox-filer. > ----------------- > My System: > Pentium 200Mhz > 128MB SDRAM > 16MB PCI Creative Graphics Blaster Riva TNT > 10 GIG HD > ----------------- > > I have Windows 2000 installed on the Primary Boot partition & that runs VERY fast > (compared to FreeBSD + KDE or GNOME) > X11 can be a big hog sometimes. You will not get a window manager (actually desktop environment) that looks and acts like windows (i.e. KDE) to run quickly on this type of hardware. I have a PII 400Mhz with 196MB RAM running fluxbox that performs quite snappy. I wouldn't dare put gnome or KDE on it though. Regards, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:18:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A1916A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:18:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605C043D46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:18:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from merv@merv.org.uk) Received: from FreeBSD.merv.org.uk ([81.103.176.198]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040726161626.VTYG4990.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@FreeBSD.merv.org.uk> for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:16:26 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.merv.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) by FreeBSD.merv.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFE17F7 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:17:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from FreeBSD.merv.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (FreeBSD.merv.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11624-10 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:17:57 +0100 (BST) Received: by FreeBSD.merv.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3C523742; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:17:57 +0100 (BST) From: merv Organization: Home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:17:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040726092114.9FF6.FREEBSD@euro.net.mk> <200407261246.06872.merv@merv.org.uk> <3ABA36B34D74E6494D36DF34@utd49554.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <3ABA36B34D74E6494D36DF34@utd49554.utdallas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407261717.56768.merv@merv.org.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at merv.org.uk Subject: Re: how to upgrade Perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:18:20 -0000 pkg_version -v | grep "p5" On Monday 26 July 2004 16:49, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Monday, July 26, 2004 12:46:06 PM +0100 merv wrote: > > You will also have to reinstall all the other p5 ports that you may have > > installed prior to this upgrade. So that they all compile for 5.8 > > This explains something. I tried to upgrade perl and ran use.perl port, > but that broke things. > > Is there a trivial way to see what p5 ports you have installed? I'm > perfectly willing to do the work if the end result is functional. :-) > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > The University of Texas at Dallas > AVIEN Founding Member > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:19:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0F916A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:19:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7EA43D69 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:19:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88D569A40; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:18:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:18:48 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: mailinglists@mgmservers.com Message-Id: <20040726121848.551041fc.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1090856605.39634.2.camel@butters.lan> References: <20040725190445.0a8bc8ce.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1090856605.39634.2.camel@butters.lan> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apaching binding to *:* ?? (Weirdness) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:19:10 -0000 Jason Cribbins wrote: > On Sun, 2004-07-25 at 19:04, Bill Moran wrote: > > I'm having some weird action from Apache. It seems that every apache process > > binds to *:* twice, in addition to IP:80 and IP:443. Has anyone seen this > > before? This is Apache 1.3.28 (although an upgrade is on the schedule) I > > had _wanted_ to test the new version of Apache in the jail prior to upgrading, > > but I'm not so sure that's going to work. > > > > Anyone seen this before? > > Actually thats default behavior for apache and many other daemons. You can > limit what IPs it listens on in the httpd.conf file I guess I should've been smarter and included some of the Apache config: ... Listen 209.235.192.67:80 ## ## SSL Support ## ## When we also provide SSL we have to listen to the ## standard HTTP port (see above) and to the HTTPS port ## #Listen 209.235.192.67:80 Listen 209.235.192.67:443 #Port 443 ... This is my current attempt to get things acting as I would like. As you can see by the commented out parts, I've tried a number of other combinations. There are not other Listen, Port, or BindAddress declarations in the config. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:23:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E1916A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:23:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722F843D49 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:23:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6QGNLcO059010; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:23:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6QGNLaV059007; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:23:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:23:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: DK In-Reply-To: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040726182212.D58869@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:23:38 -0000 > I am setting this up as a test web server with Apache etc... > > I want very BASIC Windows like GUI with a GUI Text Editor(NOT VI, more like Notepad) to edit > configuration files etc AND a Windows Explorer like File Manager to move files easily around & > from the CD(ie. NOT command line stuff!) so why you installed FreeBSD while windows 2000 (maybe XP) is what you want? don't expect other software that are not windows to be windows. fortunately they are not. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:24:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C5116A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:24:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tellabs.fi (mx2.tellabs.fi [193.65.253.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56ED043D55 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:24:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.merenkov@tellabs.com) Received: from ([172.23.207.10]) by mx2.tellabs.fi with ESMTP id KP-CAW72.5228126; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:23:38 +0100 Received: from USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net (usnvwwms2c.hq.tellabs.com [172.23.216.105]) by mailw00.hq.tellabs.com (8.11.1/8.8.6) with ESMTP id i6QGNcu01973 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:23:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from USNVEX1.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net ([172.23.216.101]) by USNVEX3.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:24:28 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:23:54 -0500 Message-ID: <7E2D48FC693966469785470740993F746E211F@USNVEX1.tellabs-west.tellabsinc.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: xal Thread-Index: AcRzLPHjG+16BC6vSU6ZrjBHco6WhwAAAAEM From: "Merenkov, David T." To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 16:24:28.0721 (UTC) FILETIME=[0627CA10:01C4732D] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: xal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:24:46 -0000 I will be out of the office on Monday July 26th thru Friday July 30th with = limited acces to email=2E =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A------------------------= -----------------=0D=0A=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The=0D=0Ainformatio= n contained in this message may be privileged and confidential=0D=0Aand p= rotected from disclosure=2E If the reader of this message is not the=0D= =0Aintended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering= =0D=0Athis message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified tha= t any=0D=0Areproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communicat= ion is=0D=0Astrictly prohibited=2E If you have received this communicatio= n in error,=0D=0Aplease notify us immediately by replying to the message = and deleting it=0D=0Afrom your computer=2E Thank you=2E Tellabs=0D=0A= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=0D=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:32:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929E416A4E2 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:32:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.midasnetworks.com (216-110-12-8.gen.twtelecom.net [216.110.12.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE6843D73 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:32:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clb@midasnetworks.com) Received: from [192.168.1.254] (216-110-12-124.gen.twtelecom.net [216.110.12.124]) (authenticated bits=0)i6QGWC2N073019 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:32:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from clb@midasnetworks.com) From: Chris Boyd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Midas Networks, Inc. Message-Id: <1090859528.3543.40.camel@cookie> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6-1mdk Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:32:08 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: interface aliases with the fxp driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: clb@midasnetworks.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:32:40 -0000 While setting up a server with several IP addresses on the same interface, we noticed something a bit odd. When we add the new IP address with the command ifconfig fxp0 alias 192.168.12.100 netmask 255.255.255.255 We can ping the address and all seems well at first. Then apparently the other machines' ARP caches time out, and the 192.168.12.100 IP address is no longer reachable on the LAN. tcpdump confirms that the server is not responding to ARP requests. Adding the arp keyword to the ifconfig command seems to fix things. ifconfig fxp0 alias arp 192.168.12.100 netmask 255.255.255.255 Works as we'd expect. This was observed on 4.9-RELEASE and 4.10-STABLE I've not tried it on boxes with other kinds of Ethernet cards yet. Is this normal, or a bug in the fxp driver? Thanks! --Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:35:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2F116A4CF for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:35:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5ob2.obsmtp.com [12.158.34.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73F3843D6B for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:35:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hakim.Singhji@nychhc.org) Received: from source ([207.127.241.11]) by exprod5ob2.obsmtp.com ([12.158.34.250]) with SMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:34:26 PDT Received: from NYC-HHC-MTA by gwia.nychhc.org with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:34:25 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:33:53 -0400 X-Mailer: Groupwise 6.5 Message-ID: <20040726T123353Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> From: Hakim Singhji To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="____YSYUKIGJHYQPJRKAJHOV____" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: hakim.singhji@earthlink.net Subject: 3COM NIC Card??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:35:13 -0000 --____YSYUKIGJHYQPJRKAJHOV____ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All, I recently purchased a pair of 3Com 3C905CTXM EtherLink XL PCI TX Network = adapter PCI 100 Mbps NIC Cards and I wanted to know if they are compatible = with FreeBSD 4.10 (stable). Could someone please give me some feedback on = this thanks. Hakim Z. Singhji Coordinating Mgr. / Infection Control 718-245-3923 hakim.singhji@nychhc.org --____YSYUKIGJHYQPJRKAJHOV____ Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIILQwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIILNDCCCzACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCCCSQw ggKsMIICFaADAgECAgMMuKcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoT HFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA0MDcyMDEzMzU1NFoXDTA1MDcyMDEzMzU1NFowgYcxEDAO BgNVBAQTB1NpbmdoamkxDjAMBgNVBCoTBUhha2ltMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1IYWtpbSBTaW5naGppMScw JQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhhoYWtpbS5zaW5naGppQG55Y2hoYy5vcmcxIjAgBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWE3Np bmdoamloQG55Y2hoYy5vcmcwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAPJoZoR/CSJZ9Tt0 wmyG2WqsUMNU3JVAPc7WK0B3bxChEcOI/WbIBhuDDHtaqBe/5QoYBmcHe6cA6u3yNjP3cm+A56aX 85+Y/pcRpClPLR/DOALlyANabq8UQ25pBziaJFpNFav+unPMKq56Vw9vPv7Ya1aevZRzAuUimn5n 8D4hAgMBAAGjSjBIMDgGA1UdEQQxMC+BGGhha2ltLnNpbmdoamlAbnljaGhjLm9yZ4ETc2luZ2hq aWhAbnljaGhjLm9yZzAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBADLwUJHcKv9hgmb4 YtT6wYzAWj1cAJhMCBODfNccxiEYqVrudtbnzQCwvWzRf5CpZOv2Z+lPeTKli+dmfkRv99/qpVl8 4kdrnKD6fqcN5ogfW7vRuRP7dIw53XKkkoaJYbsUOyvGIaBuTJTul2Tijl4q2zyxI7xQue9URGo7 UwgmMIIDLTCCApagAwIBAgIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNV BAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29u c3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UE AxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1m cmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTk2MDEwMTAwMDAwMFoXDTIwMTIzMTIzNTk1OVowgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAw gYkCgYEA1GnX1LCUZFtx6UfYDFG26nKRsIRefS0Nj3sS34UldSh0OkIsYyeflXtL734Zhx2G6qPd uc6WZBrCFG5ErHzmj+hND3EfQDimAKOHePb5lIZererAXnbr2RSjXW56fAylS1V/Bhkpf56aJtVq uzgkCGqYx7Hao5iR/Xnb5VrEHLkCAwEAAaMTMBEwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQQFAAOBgQDH7JJ+Tvj1lqVnYiqk8E0RYNBvjWBYYawmu1I1XAjPMPuoSpaKH2JCI4wXD/S6ZJwX rEcp352YXtJsYHFcoqzceePnbgBHH7UNKOgCneSa/RP0ptl8sfjcXyMmCZGAc9AUG95DqYMl8uac LxXK/qarigd1iwzdUYRr5PjRzneigTCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdEx CzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEa MBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2Vydmlj ZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqG SIb3DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAwMDBaFw0x MzA3MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAo UHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCB nzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me7L3N9Vvy Gna9fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r1fOCdz0D viv+uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCBkTASBgNV HRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhhd3RlLmNvbS9U aGF3dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNVHREEIjAgpB4wHDEa MBgGA1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPqCy7MDaNm rGcPf6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUaC4J0niVQ lGLH2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx0x1G/11f ZU8xggHnMIIB4wIBATBpMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGlu ZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBD QQIDDLinMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCggdUwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDQwNzI2MTIzMzUyWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUTivUWGPkGvSTeqdW9MiqRxP/YNEw dgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMWkwZzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgIC AIAwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwQwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICATgwBwYF Kw4DAhowDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYCDv7BGQKKk99JeYtls7wwpkZnmvvjFWVPP0Xv1bmecHSU/ PzMwsBeSJNlOlIHE3rlXXSsh6NBrygBqU7+xIfy/syHoOgCohylei2Lj+mkGrNqaAHm3hZGEkBhg zsFGBSnYY/Yvrujp5mPOJ88XqwDHap77aj78eWytQzxR0JanoQ== --____YSYUKIGJHYQPJRKAJHOV____-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:44:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DD316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:44:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3C043D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:44:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i6QGZSH21182; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:35:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200407261635.i6QGZSH21182@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net (Wojciech Puchar) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:35:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20040726182212.D58869@chylonia.3miasto.net> from "Wojciech Puchar" at Jul 26, 2004 06:23:21 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: DK cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:44:11 -0000 > > > I am setting this up as a test web server with Apache etc... > > > > I want very BASIC Windows like GUI with a GUI Text Editor(NOT VI, more like Notepad) to edit > > configuration files etc AND a Windows Explorer like File Manager to move files easily around & > > from the CD(ie. NOT command line stuff!) > > so why you installed FreeBSD while windows 2000 (maybe XP) is what you > want? Probably he wanted something more reliable and secure, but still wants some of the convenience (from his point of view anyway). He's looking for what he perceives as the best of both worlds. But, I am not one to answer the original question because I prefer using vi and command line stuff, etc rather than be bothered with all that GUI interference, that never seems to do things the way I really want it. ////jerry > > don't expect other software that are not windows to be windows. > fortunately they are not. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:45:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D8716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:45:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2E443D6D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from server2.messagingengine.com (server2.internal [10.202.2.133]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5792C12ED6; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:44:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by server2.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1C6E385A65; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:44:59 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.4 (F2.72; T1.001; A1.62; B3.01; Q3.01) References: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> To: "DK" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:44:59 -0400 From: "Jud" X-Sasl-Enc: b5Ni+ATBdNEBliuXhVMuyA 1090860299 Message-Id: <1090860299.32172.201095699@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:45:22 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:45:02 -0700 (PDT), "DK" said: > Hi all, > > I just installed FreeBSD v4.10 > > I would like to install a basic FAST Windows 2000 like Window Manager > that "ONLY" has: > - Basic FAST GUI > - MS Notepad like Editor > - MS Windows Explorer like File Manager > > I am setting this up as a test web server with Apache etc... > > I want very BASIC Windows like GUI with a GUI Text Editor(NOT VI, more > like Notepad) to edit > configuration files etc AND a Windows Explorer like File Manager to move > files easily around & > from the CD(ie. NOT command line stuff!) > > ----------------- > My System: > Pentium 200Mhz > 128MB SDRAM > 16MB PCI Creative Graphics Blaster Riva TNT > 10 GIG HD > ----------------- > > I have Windows 2000 installed on the Primary Boot partition & that runs > VERY fast > (compared to FreeBSD + KDE or GNOME) > > > Any suggestions/help is greatly appreciated :)) What you want is attainable, but not in the form you're asking for. Linux distros aimed at the former Win user like Mandrake, RedHat/Fedora, etc., have obscured what was once a clear divide between the Win (all-in-one) and *nix (an application for each task) way of doing things. Packages that include window managers, file managers and editors are pretty well restricted to the two big "desktop environments," GNOME and KDE. However, there is a different and fairly easy way to attack the problem, using individual pieces that together will do what you want. The "leanest" desktop environment for Linux/Unix/FreeBSD is XFCE4. It includes a window manager and a file manager, is fairly easy to use, and is much lighter on resources than GNOME or KDE. That leaves editors. Preferences among editors can be the stuff of flamewars, but I'll don my asbestos suit and say that nedit seems to me to be fairly lightweight and easy to use. If you want to assemble your "package" from 3 pieces rather than 2, then some choices you might consider are: Window Managers - - Blackbox/Fluxbox/Openbox: Blackbox and variants, minimalist but adequate, lightning-fast and easy enough to use if you can right-click. - Icewm: A bit less minimalistic than the -boxes, still fast. I found configuring icewm to my liking a bit more difficult than it was with the -boxes. File Managers - - Rox-filer: Nice, fairly intuitive, simple lightweight GUI file manager. Re: editors, I've already mentioned nedit. Also - I know you didn't ask, but if you want to use a browser, Opera is small, fast and works very nicely. I'm sure others will have various suggestions in all these categories. Jud From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:45:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D370A16A4CF for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:45:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E9843D5D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:45:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE1969A39; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:16:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:16:41 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: nelis@8ball.co.za Message-Id: <20040726121641.2892ebef.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1090832042.17004.40.camel@nelis.brabys.co.za> References: <20040725190445.0a8bc8ce.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1090832042.17004.40.camel@nelis.brabys.co.za> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apaching binding to *:* ?? (Weirdness) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:45:27 -0000 Nelis Lamprecht wrote: > On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 01:04, Bill Moran wrote: > > > I'm having some weird action from Apache. It seems that every apache process > > binds to *:* twice, in addition to IP:80 and IP:443. Has anyone seen this > > before? This is Apache 1.3.28 (although an upgrade is on the schedule) I > > had _wanted_ to test the new version of Apache in the jail prior to upgrading, > > but I'm not so sure that's going to work. > > > > Anyone seen this before? > > Are you not confusing local addresses to foreign ? Each local address > will have a foreign address as far as I understand it. What is the > output of sockstat -4l ? Don't think so. Here's a snippet of the above command: ... www httpd 941 4 tcp4 *:* *:* www httpd 941 5 tcp4 *:* *:* www httpd 941 16 tcp4 209.235.192.67:443 *:* www httpd 941 17 tcp4 209.235.192.67:80 *:* ... Every apache process has those four listening entries. Thanks for the feedback. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:47:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D231816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:47:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8043943D6D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:47:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045832741B5 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:46:19 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4105356D.3080508@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:46:37 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040726) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040726T123353Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> In-Reply-To: <20040726T123353Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 3COM NIC Card??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:47:07 -0000 Hakim Singhji wrote: > Hello All, > > I recently purchased a pair of 3Com 3C905CTXM EtherLink XL PCI TX > Network adapter PCI 100 Mbps NIC Cards and I wanted to know if they > are compatible with FreeBSD 4.10 (stable). Could someone please give > me some feedback on this thanks. > Yes, http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.10R/hardware-i386.html#ETHERNET Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:53:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4951916A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:53:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxeorb01.capgemini.com (mxeorb01.capgemini.com [198.184.232.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB9043D6B for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:53:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anti-virus.csc@capgemini.co.uk) Received: from mxeorb01.capgemini.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6QGqZlm010198 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:52:35 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mxiorb01.capgemini.com (crayfish [205.223.236.82])by i6QGqXnQ010177for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:52:34 +0200 (MEST) Received: from missbhamswi02.capgemini.co.uk (smtpi02.capgemini.co.uk id i6QGqXKK013771for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:52:33 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: <200407261652.i6QGqXKK013771@mxiorb01.capgemini.com> From: anti-virus.csc@capgemini.co.uk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:52:20 +0100 (BST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-imss-version: 2.5 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:73.72613 C:22 M:2 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:3 C:4 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.5000 2.0000) Subject: A Virus has been detected in your Email X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:53:27 -0000 The following Message you sent contained a Virus and will NOT be delivered To: nick.meyne@capgemini.co.uk Subject: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:52:18 +0200 Details of the Virus detected are as follows Scenarios/Incoming/Incoming: Sophos AV Interface for Mimesweeper: Threat: 'W32/MyDoom-O' detected by 'Sophos AV Interface for MIMEsweeper'. Scenarios/Incoming/Incoming: Blocked File Extensions: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'cgey.com'. Scenarios/Incoming/Incoming: Block Executables: 'ItemLength.GE.0'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:55:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D946E16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:55:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954CC43D1D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:55:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 28700699 for multiple; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:39:52 -0700 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:54:47 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Jason Stewart Message-Id: <20040726115447.1e2e6150@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040726160803.GI19131@rtl.org> References: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> <20040726160803.GI19131@rtl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:55:24 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:08:03 -0400 Jason Stewart wrote: > On 26/07/04 08:45 -0700, DK wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just installed FreeBSD v4.10 > > > > I would like to install a basic FAST Windows 2000 like Window > > Manager that "ONLY" has:- Basic FAST GUI > > - MS Notepad like Editor > > - MS Windows Explorer like File Manager > > > > I am setting this up as a test web server with Apache etc... > > > > I want very BASIC Windows like GUI with a GUI Text Editor(NOT VI, > > more like Notepad) to edit configuration files etc AND a Windows > > Explorer like File Manager to move files easily around & from the > > CD(ie. NOT command line stuff!) > > Windows 2000 is not "Basic". If you run twm with xfm or something > similar you will be dissapointed when you compare it to w2k. If you are talking about the front end to it, it is insanely basic, barely configurable, and and does not require much power to pull something off like it. > Fluxbox is a good, extremely lightwieght window manager. It's very > basic, as in no eye candy, but it's nice to older, less powerful > machines. For file managing, you might want to look at gentoo (no, > not the Linux dist.) file manager, tkdesk, or rox-filer. > > > ----------------- > > My System: > > Pentium 200Mhz > > 128MB SDRAM > > 16MB PCI Creative Graphics Blaster Riva TNT > > 10 GIG HD > > ----------------- > > > > I have Windows 2000 installed on the Primary Boot partition & that > > runs VERY fast(compared to FreeBSD + KDE or GNOME) > > > > X11 can be a big hog sometimes. You will not get a window manager > (actually desktop environment) that looks and acts like windows > (i.e. KDE) to run quickly on this type of hardware. I have a PII > 400Mhz with 196MB RAM running fluxbox that performs quite snappy. I > wouldn't dare put gnome or KDE on it though. Actually KDE does more than Explorer has ever done... same for gnome... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 16:56:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CA416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:56:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.magma.ca (mx2.magma.ca [206.191.0.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB42043D3F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:56:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ebudd@grokking.org) Received: from in1.magma.ca (in1.magma.ca [206.191.0.223]) by mx2.magma.ca (Magma's Mail Server) with ESMTP id i6QGu8eh022489 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:56:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.sohotech.ca (ottawa-hs-64-26-169-251.s-ip.magma.ca [64.26.169.251]) by in1.magma.ca (Magma's Mail Server) with ESMTP id i6QGu7m5026850 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:56:08 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (heinlein.sohotech.ca [192.168.1.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx1.sohotech.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6QGu5Uk080989 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:56:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ebudd@grokking.org) Message-ID: <410537A5.4040709@grokking.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:56:05 -0400 From: Ed Budd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040702) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040726T123353Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> In-Reply-To: <20040726T123353Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Subject: Re: 3COM NIC Card??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:56:36 -0000 Hakim Singhji wrote: > Hello All, > > I recently purchased a pair of 3Com 3C905CTXM EtherLink XL PCI TX Network adapter PCI 100 Mbps NIC Cards and I wanted to know if they are compatible with FreeBSD 4.10 (stable). Could someone please give me some feedback on this thanks. > > > Hakim Z. Singhji > Coordinating Mgr. / Infection Control > 718-245-3923 > hakim.singhji@nychhc.org These have always worked great for me. Enable the 'xl' and 'miibus' drivers in your kernel conf: "man xl" for details. EB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:06:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF63216A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:06:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3A343D31 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:06:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6QH4rIB024476; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:04:54 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:06:03 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4104F6F3.2080900@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> <200407260605.37511.kstewart@owt.com> <41051652.9070806@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <41051652.9070806@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407261006.03632.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Mark Ovens Subject: Re: portupgrade(1) kde fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:06:24 -0000 On Monday 26 July 2004 07:33 am, Mark Ovens wrote: > Kent Stewart wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > On a 2nd read, I thought I was kind of sharp. > > No problem. I saw the message: > > ===> kdelibs-3.2.3_1 conflicts with installed package(s): > kdebase-3.1.2 > > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > *** Error code 1 > > but it seemed misleading because I thought that portupgrade(1) > pkg_delete-ed the old version (after first backing up the files) - > obviously not. > > > What you have is a similar > > problem to the old problem with XFree86-server and -libraries. You > > update -libraries, which contain the new files, and then you delete > > them when you update -server. Then, nothing would update because > > files were missing. > > > > There were a number of comments on -questions or -ports when this > > first happened. > > Yes, I'd searched the mailing lists (for KDE problems, not XFree86) > but didn't find anything that seemd relevant, although after your > reply some of them make sense now. > > > You might get by just deleting kdebase. > > Delete kde-libs surely? Kdelibs has the new files and when you try to update kdebase later, it messes up the install. That is why you have to delete kdebase first. If the files had been moved from kdelibs into kdebase, it wouldn't have mattered. > > Is this a limitation/shortcoming/bug of portupgrade(1)? Is the whole > point of it ot that it handles, often complex, dependencies for you? Portupgrade doesn't deal with the situation with large projects such as KDE when files or tools are moved from a lower port into one required as a base port such as kdelibs. I don't think it could deal with it. I always build packages and can just reinstall the one that I just trashed. Kent > > Thanks for the reply. > > Regards, > > Mark > > > Kent > > > > On Monday 26 July 2004 05:40 am, Kent Stewart wrote: > >> On Monday 26 July 2004 05:20 am, Mark Ovens wrote: > >> > I'm trying to upgrade kde (the meta-port), 3.1.2->3.2.3_1 using > >> > portupgrade(1) but it fails trying to install kdelibs. > >> > > >> > Can anyone shed any light on what's wrong? > >> > > >> > FreeBSD redshift 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #2: Sun Jul 25 > >> > 19:19:46 BST 2004 > >> > root@redshift:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/REDSHIFT i386 > >> > > >> > /home/mark{106}# pkg_info | grep kde > >> > > >> > kde-3.1.2 The "meta-port" for KDE > >> > kdebase-3.1.2 This package provides the basic applications > >> > for the KDE sy > >> > kdegames-3.1.2 Games for the KDE integrated X11 desktop > >> > kdegraphics-3.1.2 Graphics utilities for the KDE3 integrated > >> > X11 desktop kdelibs-3.1.2 This is the base set of > >> > libraries needed by KDE programs kdemultimedia-3.1.2 Multimedia > >> > utilities for the KDE integrated X11 desktop kdenetwork-3.1.2 > >> > Network-related programs and modules for KDE kdesdk-3.1.4 > >> > KDE Software Development Kit kdeutils-3.1.2 Utilities for > >> > the KDE integrated X11 desktop xmms-kde-3.0.0 Integrates > >> > XMMS into the KDE3 Panel > >> > /home/mark{107}# > >> > > >> > /home/mark{107}# portupgrade -Rv kde-3.1.2 > >> > > >> > [snip successful build of dependencies and kdelibs] > >> > > >> > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > >> > '/usr/local/share/servicetypes' > >> > > >> > [snip lots of similar lines] > >> > > >> > pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory > >> > '/usr/local/include/kate' rmdir: /usr/local/include/arts: > >> > Directory not empty > >> > pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the > >> > packing list is incorrectly specified?) > >> > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 148 > >> > packages found (-1 +0) (...) done] > >> > ---> Uninstallation of kdelibs-3.1.2 ended at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 > >> > 13:12:26 +0100 (consumed 00:00:28) > >> > ---> Installation of x11/kdelibs3 started at: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 > >> > 13:12:26 +0100 > >> > ---> Installing the new version via the port > >> > ===> Installing for kdelibs-3.2.3_1 > >> > > >> > ===> kdelibs-3.2.3_1 conflicts with installed package(s): > >> > kdebase-3.1.2 > >> > > >> > They install files into the same place. > >> > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > >> > *** Error code 1 > >> > >> It told you what to do right here. You can't directly upgrade to > >> the next level because of the file shift. > >> > >> Kent > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:10:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A5B16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:10:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C5A43D6A for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:10:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C9027524C for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:10:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <41053B28.7030905@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:11:04 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040726) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4104F6F3.2080900@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> <200407260605.37511.kstewart@owt.com> <41051652.9070806@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> <200407261006.03632.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200407261006.03632.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade(1) kde fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:10:54 -0000 Kent Stewart wrote: > Kdelibs has the new files and when you try to update kdebase later, it > messes up the install. That is why you have to delete kdebase first. If > the files had been moved from kdelibs into kdebase, it wouldn't have > mattered. > Ah, I see. OK, I'll give it a spin. Thanks for the help Kent. Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:12:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C4A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:12:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from utelscin.el.utwente.nl (utelscin.el.utwente.nl [130.89.17.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 239C243D7F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:12:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marklin-return-@scintilla.utwente.nl) Received: (qmail 28083 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2004 17:11:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact marklin-help@scintilla.utwente.nl; run by ezmlm Date: 26 Jul 2004 17:11:58 -0000 Message-ID: <1090861918.28082.ezmlm@scintilla.utwente.nl> From: marklin-return-@scintilla.utwente.nl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: responder for marklin@scintilla.utwente.nl Received: (qmail 28078 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2004 17:11:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO netlx010.civ.utwente.nl) (130.89.1.92) by utelscin.el.utwente.nl with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 17:11:58 -0000 Received: from freebsd.org (cpe-66-74-97-245.dc.rr.com [66.74.97.245] (may be forged))i6QHAj932478 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:10:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: ezmlm response X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:12:02 -0000 Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the marklin@scintilla.utwente.nl mailing list. I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at marklin-owner@scintilla.utwente.nl. -------------------------------------- The Marklin Mailinglist - General info -------------------------------------- 1. Topic of this list 2. Subscribing 3. Unsubscribing 4. Changing address 5. Digest list 6. Policies 7. Where to find more information - 1 - Topic of this list This list is meant for discussion on hobby Model-railroading with Marklin modell-trains. - 2 - Subscribing To subscribe to the Marklin Mailinglist, send a message to: marklin-subscribe@scintilla.utwente.nl You will receive a confirmation request which you will have to reply to before you really are subscribed. Normally hitting the reply button will insert the correct correct address, but please check it against the address listed in body of the confirmation-request if you have problems with replying. - 3 - Unsubscribing To unsubscribe from a mailinglist, send a message to marklin-unsubscribe@scintilla.utwente.nl And reply to the confirmation-request you receive - 4 - Address Change In the event of an address change, it would probably be the wisest to first send an unsubscribe for the old address (this can be done from the new address), and then a new subscribe to the new address (the order is important). - 5 - Digest List There's a digested version of the Marklin Mailinglist available to people who don't want to receive each message directly. Send a message to marklin-digest-subscribe@scintilla.utwente.nl to subscribe yourself and marklin-digest-unsubscribe@scintilla.utwente.nl to get yourself removed from the digest-list. For the digest list too you will receive a confirmation-request for your action to which you will have to reply to activate it, just as it is with the normal list. - 6 - Policies The 'behave yourself part': It's is not allowed to send: * attachments. For example but not limited to pictures, word-documents, excel-sheets, execultables, etc.etc. These message are very large so they: (1) put a huge load on our mailserver (2) fill up other subscribers mailboxes (3) forces many people to take a coffeebreak while downloading their mail. * Advertisements. What are advertisements? (1) promotional message for a dealer (2) overly enthousiastic stories about one certain product only. (3) Links to 'new items' on dealer ABC's homepage (4) Anything else that will possible give someone directly or indirectly financial profit resulting from your message Why don't we allow this? The mailinglist is hosted behind a university network, which is a not for profit organisation. So no commercial activities. * buy and sell message Please go to http://www.scintilla.utwente.nl/marklin/ and place an advert in the Market-place. * Anything that contains abusive language or insults to other members, mations, cultures, etc. * replies to messages where you quote the complete messages. Only include relevant parts if it's nescessary to clarify your response. Your audience recevied the same message you are relying to, they already know what's going on or else they will reread the thread. When you send a message it's best to: * Read your message when you've finished writing it. * Read it again afer you did the suggestion on the line above. * Use your common sense. If a subscriber does not adhere to these policies and doesn't respond/react to warnings from the list-maintainer the address can and will be blocked. You'd be the second person in 4 1/2 years.............. - 7 - Where to find more information. You can find more information on the World Wide Web, surf to http://www.scintilla.utwente.nl/marklin/ For more questions, please contact me. Greetings, Fred van Dijk maintainer Marklin Mailinglist f.vandijk@scintilla.utwente.nl Below this line you will find the standard-info from the mailinglist-software ezmlm. It also contains some explanation for advanced features not explained above. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Administrative commands for the marklin list --- I can handle administrative requests automatically. Please do not send them to the list address! Instead, send your message to the correct command address: To subscribe to the list, send a message to: To remove your address from the list, send a message to: Send mail to the following for info and FAQ for this list: Similar addresses exist for the digest list: To get messages 123 through 145 (a maximum of 100 per request), mail: To get an index with subject and author for messages 123-456 , mail: They are always returned as sets of 100, max 2000 per request, so you'll actually get 100-499. To receive all messages with the same subject as message 12345, send an empty message to: The messages do not really need to be empty, but I will ignore their content. Only the ADDRESS you send to is important. You can start a subscription for an alternate address, for example "john@host.domain", just add a hyphen and your address (with '=' instead of '@') after the command word: To stop subscription for this address, mail: In both cases, I'll send a confirmation message to that address. When you receive it, simply reply to it to complete your subscription. If despite following these instructions, you do not get the desired results, please contact my owner at marklin-owner@scintilla.utwente.nl. Please be patient, my owner is a lot slower than I am ;-) --- Enclosed is a copy of the request I received. Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28078 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2004 17:11:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO netlx010.civ.utwente.nl) (130.89.1.92) by utelscin.el.utwente.nl with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 17:11:58 -0000 Received: from freebsd.org (cpe-66-74-97-245.dc.rr.com [66.74.97.245] (may be forged)) by netlx010.civ.utwente.nl (8.11.7/HKD) with ESMTP id i6QHAj932478 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:10:45 +0200 Message-Id: <200407261710.i6QHAj932478@netlx010.civ.utwente.nl> From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To: marklin-help@scintilla.utwente.nl Subject: {Virus!} Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:10:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_8447B89C.77AA604E" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be infected X-UTwente-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=9.276, vereist 5, BAYES_44 -0.00, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 2.57, MIME_BASE64_ILLEGAL 1.58, MIME_MISSING_BOUNDARY 1.84, MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT 3.03, NO_REAL_NAME 0.16, SARE_FROM_SPAM_WORD3 0.10) X-UTwente-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssssssss X-MailScanner-From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_8447B89C.77AA604E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dit is een bericht van het | This is a message from the UTwente MailScanner virus | UTwente MailScanner E-Mail Virus beschermingssysteem | Protection Service --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Waarschuwing: | Warning: Er zijn 1 of meer bijlagen uit dit | This message has had one or more bericht verwijderd | attachments removed (attachment.zip) | Lees de | Please read the "UTwente-Attachment-Warning.txt" bijlage voor meer informatie. | attachment(s) for more information. | | --------------------------------------'------------------------------------ Dear user of scintilla.utwente.nl, We have found that your account was used to send a large amount of spam during the recent week. Most likely your computer was infected and now runs a hidden proxy server. We recommend you to follow our instruction in order to keep your computer safe. Sincerely yours, scintilla.utwente.nl support team. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_8447B89C.77AA604E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="UTwente-Attachment-Warning.txt" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="UTwente-Attachment-Warning.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dit is een bericht van het | This is a message from the UTwente MailScanner virus | UTwente MailScanner E-Mail Virus beschermingssysteem op netlx010 | Protection Service on netlx010 --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ De oorspronkelijke e-mail bijlage | The original e-mail attachment "attachment.zip" scheen te zijn geinfecteerd door | was believed to be infected by a een virus. De bijlage is vervangen | virus and has been replaced by this door deze waarschuwing. | warning message. | Indien u een kopie van de | If you wish to receive a copy of oorspronkelijke bijlage wenst te | the original email, please e-mail ontvangen, verzoeken we u via | ITBE helpdesk. e-mail contact op te nemen met de | ITBE helpdesk. | helpdesk@itbe.utwente.nl Voor een goede afhandeling van uw | Remember to include the whole verzoek hebben we dit complete | of this message in your request. bericht (inclusief alle headers) | nodig. | | Op | At Mon Jul 26 19:11:58 2004 heeft onze e-mail inhoud scanner | the content filters said: het volgende gevonden: | | attachment.zip->attachment.doc = Infection: W32/Mydoom.O@mm | Bericht voor de ITBE helpdesk: | Note to ITBE Help Desk: Kijk op | Look on netlx010 in | in /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20040726 (message= i6QHAj932478) | -- Postmaster Universiteit Twente ------=_NextPart_000_0003_8447B89C.77AA604E-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:14:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39AC16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:14:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nhinsights.com (nhinsights.com [216.122.242.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CF443D5A for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:14:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@computersthatrock.com) Received: from inigo (home.nhinsights.com [69.161.61.161]) by nhinsights.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i6QHDQS62997 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:13:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd@computersthatrock.com) From: "Rob" To: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:13:36 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: Sendmail Upgrade/relay Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@computersthatrock.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:14:10 -0000 Hello, I just upgraded sendmail on my test mailserver from a very old 8.11.6 to 8.13.0. The upgrade finally went ok after a few problems but now I cannot relay. I have the IP of my machine in /etc/mail/access (just as it was before) but in the maillog it says that relaying is denied for this IP. I have double checked that my IP didn't change and I also did the "makemap hash /etc/mail/access < /etc/mail/access" to make sure that my db was up to date. I can't figure out what the problem might be. Any pointers greatly appreciated. Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:19:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958E116A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:19:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AED43D31 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:19:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i6QHJofO002907; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:19:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)i6QHJND2025613; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:19:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040726093426.W31001@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <2004725193939.204480@JOETABLET> <20040726093426.W31001@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:19:23 -0400 To: Wojciech Puchar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: Joe Pokupec cc: Freebsd-Questions Subject: Re: Converting or Reading UFS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:19:56 -0000 On Jul 26, 2004, at 3:34 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> I have 4 large (120- 200 Gig) hard drives server. The server >> died and I'm no longer using FreeBSD I can get the data off these >> drives? >> >> - Convert UFS to any other mountable and OS X? If so, where? I >> thought maybe Ghost, but sector copies, which are not readable by >> Ghost >> > isn't OS X capable of reading UFS? Yes, certainly. However, MacOS X keeps filesystem data in network byte order (aka big-endian); I'm not sure whether it knows how to understand a FreeBSD UFS filesystem, which most probably uses native little-endian byte order. It may still be worth a try. Otherwise, the best bet is to mount these drives on a FreeBSD box long enough to either rsync the data to some other machine, or take a backup using tar or dump. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:22:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B67A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:22:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC92D43D41 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:22:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.weinem@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bp9Bf-000769-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:22:55 +0200 Received: from p5090127b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.144.18.123]) (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bp9Bd-0001lt-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:22:54 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:28:16 +0200 From: Mark Weinem To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20040726172816.GA5007@vigor10.my.domain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions References: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> <1090860299.32172.201095699@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1090860299.32172.201095699@webmail.messagingengine.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:792133076e75aed7698b2e188f68c4a6 Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:22:56 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Jud wrote: > The "leanest" desktop environment for Linux/Unix/FreeBSD is XFCE4. I don't think so; look here: http://www.xwinman.org/otherdesktops.html Ciao, Mark Weinem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:27:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDE316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:27:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF52643D4C for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:26:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com) Received: from ms-mss-01 ([10.10.4.10])i6QHQvOD022109 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from socal.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I1G00IMUZ4X9F@ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.6.201] (Forwarded-For: [68.8.243.244]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (mshttpd); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:26:57 -1000 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 07:26:57 -1000 From: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <1756b9c1756974.17569741756b9c@socal.rr.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Changing cards in a reader (next step??) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:27:00 -0000 Aloha I need to know where to go next. I have originated two previous threads regarding this problem. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-June/050819.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-July/053047.html I have followed all suggestions and responded with the output of my attemps. The problem remains unresolved. I have also requested that if anyone has this working *properly* to respond but no one did. Can I *assume* that this is a bug? Is the next step filing a bug report? Being a newbie, can someone steer me in the right direction to file a bug report. Is there something else I should do? Any assistance would be appreciated. Thank You Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:37:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC35416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:37:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pursued-with.net (adsl-66-125-9-244.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [66.125.9.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8743D43D1D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:37:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@pursued-with.net) Received: from babelfish.pursued-with.net (babelfish.pursued-with.net [10.0.0.42]) by pursued-with.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BB11F7706; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:39:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:39:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Stevens To: Robert Storey In-Reply-To: <20040726211831.121c9df9.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> Message-ID: References: <20040726211831.121c9df9.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: implementing spf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@pursued-with.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:37:59 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Robert Storey wrote: > I never heard of spf until yesterday, when there was a big discussion > about it on Slashdot. The discussion was very political (about > Microsoft, Richard Stallman, etc). I don't want to get into any of the > politics here, as it's not appropriate for this list. But I am > interested in the technology aspect. Most of the technology issues aren't appropriate for this list, either, so I suspect you care less about the propriety than your particular interest. > Specifically: > > 1) Is the technology useful? > > 2) How does one implement spf on the server side? > > 3) How does one implement spf on the client side? > > I most interested in No. 3 above - specifically, is there anything that > I must do as an end-user to make use of spf? As an end-user, nothing. http://spf.pobox.com/users.html. Same site for a general FAQ which addresses implementation (it's done via DNS records). The Slashdot article had a link to the Microsoft implementation; the complaint about it is that they are releasing a free license to implement, which can be revoked at any time. KeS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:39:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D238216A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:39:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web81408.mail.yahoo.com (web81408.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6968243D55 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:39:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jam_man@sbcglobal.net) Message-ID: <20040726173948.68133.qmail@web81408.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.248.234.109] by web81408.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:39:48 PDT Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:39:48 -0700 (PDT) From: jam man To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: AMD64 support: FreeBSD v.s. Gentoo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:39:49 -0000 Does Gentoo or FreeBSD have better support for the AMD64 architecture at this point? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:42:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5264316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:42:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D655443D1F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:42:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6QHg5cO064753; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:42:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6QHg4kN064750; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:42:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:42:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Mark Weinem In-Reply-To: <20040726172816.GA5007@vigor10.my.domain> Message-ID: <20040726193927.I64434@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> <1090860299.32172.201095699@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20040726172816.GA5007@vigor10.my.domain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:42:06 -0000 > > > The "leanest" desktop environment for Linux/Unix/FreeBSD is XFCE4. > > I don't think so; look here: > > http://www.xwinman.org/otherdesktops.html > XD640 looks really cool, unfortunately it's about 1/3 done. but i still don't understand sense of projects like XPde? what's a sense of making things almost exactly looking like windows?! windows is 100% windows compatible From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:42:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3605D16A4CF for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:42:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483B443D55 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:42:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6QHgicO064797; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:42:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6QHgi9B064794; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:42:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:42:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: jam man In-Reply-To: <20040726173948.68133.qmail@web81408.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040726194210.J64434@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20040726173948.68133.qmail@web81408.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 support: FreeBSD v.s. Gentoo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:42:44 -0000 > Does Gentoo or FreeBSD have better support for the > AMD64 architecture at this point? what is gentoo? is it some new OS or linux distro? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:43:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8675A16A4D2 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:43:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419FC43D60 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 28707267 for multiple; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:28:39 -0700 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:43:34 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: DK Message-Id: <20040726124334.0af32925@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:43:53 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:45:02 -0700 (PDT) DK wrote: > Hi all, > > I just installed FreeBSD v4.10 > > I would like to install a basic FAST Windows 2000 like Window > Manager that "ONLY" has:- Basic FAST GUI > - MS Notepad like Editor > - MS Windows Explorer like File Manager > > I am setting this up as a test web server with Apache etc... > > I want very BASIC Windows like GUI with a GUI Text Editor(NOT VI, > more like Notepad) to edit configuration files etc AND a Windows > Explorer like File Manager to move files easily around & from the > CD(ie. NOT command line stuff!) man ports check out portupgrade and cvsup find stuff you like in ports/editors, ports/x11-wm, and ports/x11-fm... btw there is a nice search and port list on freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:46:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB8016A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:46:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2318943D64 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:46:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:48:15 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:48:53 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: 'Wojciech Puchar' , Mark Weinem Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:48:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 17:48:15.0617 (UTC) FILETIME=[BA6B3F10:01C47338] cc: freebsd-questions Subject: RE: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:46:58 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net] > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 12:42 PM > To: Mark Weinem > Cc: freebsd-questions > Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? > > > > > > > The "leanest" desktop environment for Linux/Unix/FreeBSD is XFCE4. > > > > I don't think so; look here: > > > > http://www.xwinman.org/otherdesktops.html > > > XD640 looks really cool, unfortunately it's about 1/3 done. > > but i still don't understand sense of projects like XPde? > what's a sense > of making things almost exactly looking like windows?! > windows is 100% windows compatible Making things look like windows just makes it easier for people changing platforms. I am using icewm with an XP theme, so that people that done know, or care to know, don't have to learn a new interface. It is very effective in a work environment. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:47:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1793A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:47:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B5843D48 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:47:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bp9Z2-0001jL-00 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:47:04 +0200 Received: from numerus.ling.uu.se ([130.238.78.148]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:47:04 +0200 Received: from bkhl by numerus.ling.uu.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:47:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: bkhl@elektrubadur.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_Lindstr=F6m?=) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:47:01 +0200 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <20040726173948.68133.qmail@web81408.mail.yahoo.com> <20040726194210.J64434@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: numerus.ling.uu.se Mail-Copies-To: never X-Home-Page: http://bkhl.elektrubadur.se/ User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:AOkHuWIFtRzS4N6N+61JuA/YIW0= Sender: news Subject: Re: AMD64 support: FreeBSD v.s. Gentoo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:47:10 -0000 Wojciech Puchar writes: >> Does Gentoo or FreeBSD have better support for the >> AMD64 architecture at this point? > what is gentoo? > > is it some new OS or linux distro? It's a Linux distribution, so I assume the question was meant to be: "Does Linux or FreeBSD for the AMD64 architecture at this point?" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:47:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F58816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:47:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92CAD43D3F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:47:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@HiWAAY.net) Received: (qmail 16464 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2004 17:47:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.68?) (69.73.60.132) by smtp2.knology.net with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 17:47:08 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) In-Reply-To: <1756b9c1756974.17569741756b9c@socal.rr.com> References: <1756b9c1756974.17569741756b9c@socal.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Kelly Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:47:04 -0500 To: FreeBSD_Questions FreeBSD_Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Subject: Re: Changing cards in a reader (next step??) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:47:15 -0000 On Jul 26, 2004, at 12:26 PM, hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com wrote: > I have followed all suggestions and responded with the output of my > attemps. The problem remains unresolved. I have also requested that > if anyone has this working *properly* to respond but no one did. Why not install /usr/ports/emulators/mtools/ and configure "O:" drive ("O" for Olympus) as /dev/da2s1 ? Then one does not have to be root to insert or remove the card. Just access the card with mdir, mcopy, mdel, mcd, etc ... Yank the card out any time you are not using it and insert another just as one does with tar and tapes. I'm thinking your issue is probably within mount_msdos. Mtools implement the DOS filesystem internally. Each M-command issued starts at the start of media, finds the directory and volume data, then goes to the appropriate file(s), completely from scratch each time. So there is no "mount". It does tend to remember current directory. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:48:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C251816A4CF for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:48:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0314743D1F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:48:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id i6QHnuO7004396; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:49:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from localhost (laffer1@localhost) with ESMTP id i6QHntUp004393; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:49:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:49:55 -0400 (EDT) From: User LAFFER1 To: Hakim Singhji In-Reply-To: <20040726T123353Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> Message-ID: <20040726134926.N4334@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> References: <20040726T123353Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.amerclamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on (®Ù¿¦Q X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: hakim.singhji@earthlink.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3COM NIC Card??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:48:19 -0000 They should be. I have used the same card in 4.9 stable and 5.2.1 release. On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Hakim Singhji wrote: > Hello All, > > I recently purchased a pair of 3Com 3C905CTXM EtherLink XL PCI TX Network adapter PCI 100 Mbps NIC Cards and I wanted to know if they are compatible with FreeBSD 4.10 (stable). Could someone please give me some feedback on this thanks. > > > Hakim Z. Singhji > Coordinating Mgr. / Infection Control > 718-245-3923 > hakim.singhji@nychhc.org > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:51:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF27816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:51:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2E043D5C for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:51:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clint@0lsen.net) Received: from 0lsen.net ([24.20.127.157]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004072617513601400dlmole>; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:51:36 +0000 Received: by 0lsen.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F326E17326; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:51:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:51:35 -0700 From: Clint Olsen To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040726175135.GA32899@0lsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: NULlsen Network X-Disclaimer: Mutt Bites! Subject: Odd /etc/hosts entry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:51:37 -0000 So, I just debugged a majorly annoying problem doing port forwarding with SSH. Thanks to some creative Googling, I realized I had a weird entry in my hosts file. What does this "::1" entry mean? #::1 localhost localhost.my.domain -Clint From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:53:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7517D16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:53:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C89C43D55 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:53:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408A569A39; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:53:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:53:18 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Clint Olsen Message-Id: <20040726135318.31cf9e1f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040726175135.GA32899@0lsen.net> References: <20040726175135.GA32899@0lsen.net> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd /etc/hosts entry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:53:20 -0000 Clint Olsen wrote: > So, I just debugged a majorly annoying problem doing port forwarding with > SSH. Thanks to some creative Googling, I realized I had a weird entry in > my hosts file. What does this "::1" entry mean? > > #::1 localhost localhost.my.domain That's an IPv6 entry. You may want to recompile your kernel without IPv6 support while you're at it. If you don't understand IPv6, removing support from the kernel can head off problems before they happen. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:53:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CC916A4F2 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:53:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361D743D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:53:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 39245 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Jul 2004 17:53:38 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.236666 secs); 26 Jul 2004 17:53:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 17:53:36 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:53:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3418.209.167.16.15.1090864416.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <20040726175135.GA32899@0lsen.net> References: <20040726175135.GA32899@0lsen.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:53:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "Clint Olsen" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd /etc/hosts entry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:53:31 -0000 > So, I just debugged a majorly annoying problem doing port forwarding with > SSH. Thanks to some creative Googling, I realized I had a weird entry in > my hosts file. What does this "::1" entry mean? > > #::1 localhost localhost.my.domain It's an entry for IPv6, and it is commented out (not used). ::1 is the IP for localhost with IPv6, exactly the same as 127.0.0.1 is for v4. Steve > > -Clint > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 17:54:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEC316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:54:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4A543D6D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:54:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id i6QHu4YM004524; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:56:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Received: from localhost (laffer1@localhost) with ESMTP id i6QHu4Wj004521; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:56:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from laffer1@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:56:04 -0400 (EDT) From: User LAFFER1 To: Clint Olsen In-Reply-To: <20040726175135.GA32899@0lsen.net> Message-ID: <20040726135551.N4334@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> References: <20040726175135.GA32899@0lsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.amerclamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on (¥Ù¿¦Q X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd /etc/hosts entry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:54:03 -0000 Its for ip6. On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Clint Olsen wrote: > So, I just debugged a majorly annoying problem doing port forwarding with > SSH. Thanks to some creative Googling, I realized I had a weird entry in > my hosts file. What does this "::1" entry mean? > > #::1 localhost localhost.my.domain > > -Clint > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 18:01:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569D116A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:01:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BDE43D5A for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:01:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clint@0lsen.net) Received: from 0lsen.net ([24.20.127.157]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20040726180138012009hgpue>; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:01:42 +0000 Received: by 0lsen.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 18DD517326; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:01:38 -0700 From: Clint Olsen To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20040726180138.GA32941@0lsen.net> References: <20040726175135.GA32899@0lsen.net> <20040726135318.31cf9e1f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726135318.31cf9e1f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: NULlsen Network X-Disclaimer: Mutt Bites! cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd /etc/hosts entry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:01:43 -0000 On Jul 26, Bill Moran wrote: > That's an IPv6 entry. > > You may want to recompile your kernel without IPv6 support while you're at > it. If you don't understand IPv6, removing support from the kernel can > head off problems before they happen. Ahh, yes. That's for the tip! -Clint -- Clint Olsen . -- . clint at NULlsen dot net .' ,-. `. ;_,' ( ; `. ``;' FreeBSD: Rebooting is for hardware upgrades. ` -- ' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 18:03:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD64B16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:03:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zdemail03.zdem.compaq.com (zdemail03.zdem.compaq.com [161.114.112.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAB143D68 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:03:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from university-dev@hp.com) Received: from demexg11.emea.cpqcorp.net (demexg11.emea.cpqcorp.net [16.41.86.138]) by zdemail03.zdem.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9B3897 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:03:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rtoexc02.emea.cpqcorp.net ([16.41.86.56]) by demexg11.emea.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:48:34 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:48:24 +0200 Message-ID: <67EBB9787FE159418BA12D0D8D445111012E7BDE@rtoexc02.emea.cpqcorp.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Returned mail: see transcript for details Thread-Index: AcRzH5ozODO8RJuRTFWGvtycZ90VsAAAAAak From: "University-dev" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 14:48:34.0804 (UTC) FILETIME=[A08DBB40:01C4731F] Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: see transcript for details X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:03:12 -0000 Thank you for your message. I will be out of the office on holiday until Monday 9th of August with = no access to my e-mail.=20 For urgent matters please contact serial@hp.com I will respond to your message on my return Jerome BERTHIER From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 18:16:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6082716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:16:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144A843D46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:16:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe.laws@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m69so85789rne for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.89.38 with SMTP id m38mr284711rnb; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5ac5e3b004072611166f3bf090@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:16:55 -0700 From: Joe Laws To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Does FreeBSD need to be on a Primary Partition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:16:56 -0000 Since I have about 10 partitions (3primary, 7 extended), I was wondering if BSD needs a root partition on one of the primary partitions. I have heard this is the case in some of the BSD's. -Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 18:21:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6950D16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:21:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail836.megamailservers.com (mail836.carrierinternetsolutions.com [69.49.106.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28A143D31 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:21:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dickwilliams@covad.net) X-POP-User: dickwilliams.covad.net Received: from [192.168.1.104] (h-68-166-7-31.atlngahp.covad.net [68.166.7.31])i6QIKvQV022205 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:20:57 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <8995D86A-DF30-11D8-A2D2-000A959F5C82@covad.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Richard W Williams Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:20:56 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Subject: Gnome2 port on AMD64 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:21:01 -0000 I am trying to build the Gnome2 port but I'm stuck trying to fetch Hermes-1.3.3.tar.bz2 from the default www.clanlib.org or from ftp.freebsd.org. Neither source will respond. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 18:34:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9206416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:34:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4772043D2D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:34:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6QIXEIB029322; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:33:15 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:34:24 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <8995D86A-DF30-11D8-A2D2-000A959F5C82@covad.net> In-Reply-To: <8995D86A-DF30-11D8-A2D2-000A959F5C82@covad.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407261134.24876.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Richard W Williams Subject: Re: Gnome2 port on AMD64 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:34:42 -0000 On Monday 26 July 2004 11:20 am, Richard W Williams wrote: > I am trying to build the Gnome2 port but I'm stuck trying to fetch > Hermes-1.3.3.tar.bz2 from the default www.clanlib.org or from > ftp.freebsd.org. Neither source will respond. > http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/sorcerer/sources/Hermes/1.3.3/ I did a web search and found that copy. The md5 agrees with what is in the Hermes distinfo. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 18:41:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA6116A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:41:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web81407.mail.yahoo.com (web81407.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3F0243D60 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:41:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jam_man@sbcglobal.net) Message-ID: <20040726184115.78452.qmail@web81407.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.248.234.109] by web81407.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:41:15 PDT Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:41:15 -0700 (PDT) From: jam man To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: AMD64 support: FreeBSD v.s. Gentoo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:41:16 -0000 --- Björn_Lindström wrote: > Wojciech Puchar writes: > > >> Does Gentoo or FreeBSD have better support for > the > >> AMD64 architecture at this point? > > what is gentoo? > > > > is it some new OS or linux distro? > > It's a Linux distribution, so I assume the question > was meant to be: > > "Does Linux or FreeBSD for the AMD64 architecture at > this point?" It doesn't really matter...yes gentoo is a linux distro. and its the only linux distro I would consider with the AMD64 architecture. I was looking to see if anyone here has used (or has knowledge of) both AMD64 OSes' support and functionality for x86-64 applications. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 18:44:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDD116A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:44:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.nolet.com (mail.nolet.com [66.235.181.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D0543D3F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:44:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") From: "mailscanner" To: Message-Id: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:39:44 -0400 X-mailscanner: Found to be clean X-mailscanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=2.122, required 5, BAYES_10, MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT) X-mailscanner-SpamScore: ss X-DeliveryA: Failed Subject: Warning: E-mail viruses detected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:44:41 -0000 Our virus detector has just been triggered by a message you sent:- To: obmanka@antispam.com Subject: Mail Delivery (failure obmanka@antispam.com) Date: Mon Jul 26 12:39:44 2004 One or more of the attachments (message.scr) are on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and will not have been delivered. Consider renaming the files or putting them into a "zip" file to avoid this constraint. The virus detector said this about the message: Report: Windows Screensavers are often used to hide viruses (message.scr) -- EQUAT Customer Service clients@equat.com http://www.equat.com/ Phone: 604-687-1288 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 18:52:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B6116A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:52:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7167F43D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 2334 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jul 2004 18:45:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 18:45:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7391C1AD; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:49:04 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (it.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99615-01; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:49:04 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0299B1B8; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:49:04 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:48:59 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Joe Laws Message-Id: <20040726214859.33b15510@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <5ac5e3b004072611166f3bf090@mail.gmail.com> References: <5ac5e3b004072611166f3bf090@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD need to be on a Primary Partition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:52:17 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:16:55 -0700 Joe Laws wrote: > Since I have about 10 partitions (3primary, 7 extended), I was > wondering if BSD needs a root partition on one of the primary > partitions. I have heard this is the case in some of the BSD's. Yes. What you call "primary partition" in the BSD world is called slice and what you call "extended partitions" are called partiotions. So for ad0s1a is: ad0 = ide disk 0 (primary master) s1 = first slice a = first partition on the first slice (usually the / also called "root" partition) http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html will give you more details -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 19:04:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0C916A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:04:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0E443D58 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:04:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from server2.messagingengine.com (server2.internal [10.202.2.133]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2BFC11217; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:04:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by server2.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id DA58585AF5; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:04:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.4 (F2.72; T1.001; A1.62; B3.01; Q3.01) References: <20040726154502.88509.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> <1090860299.32172.201095699@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20040726172816.GA5007@vigor10.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <20040726172816.GA5007@vigor10.my.domain> To: "Mark Weinem" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:04:11 -0400 From: "Jud" X-Sasl-Enc: suG0oNUeGUhq6ltZiEppTw 1090868651 Message-Id: <1090868651.14810.201107422@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: Whats the fastest Windows 2000 like Window Manager ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:04:17 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:28:16 +0200, "Mark Weinem" said: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Jud wrote: > > > The "leanest" desktop environment for Linux/Unix/FreeBSD is XFCE4. > > I don't think so; look here: > > http://www.xwinman.org/otherdesktops.html Oops, right you are. My fault for thinking of a bunch of qualifiers (nice-looking, functional, easily available in ports, that I am familiar with) and failing to include any of these qualifiers in what I wrote. Thanks for bringing up the xwinman site in this thread - it's a nice resource that I used extensively as a newbie. Jud From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 19:05:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C342A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:05:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vscan-d.ucl.ac.uk (vscan-d.ucl.ac.uk [128.40.105.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D2C43D39 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:05:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from pp by vscan-d.ucl.ac.uk with MailScanner (Exim 4.34) id 1BpAmx-00052M-Pw for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:05:31 +0100 From: "The UCL Email Virus Scanner" To: questions@freebsd.org X-MailScanner: generated Message-Id: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:05:31 +0100 Subject: Warning: Possible E-mail viruses detected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:05:32 -0000 The UCL E-Mail Virus Protection System has been triggered by a message you sent:- To: boxoffice@ucl.ac.uk Subject: Returned mail: Data format error Date: Mon Jul 26 20:05:31 2004 One or more of the attachments (mail.scr) are on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and will not have been delivered. Consider renaming the files or putting them into a "zip" file to avoid this constraint. -- UCL E-mail Virus Protection System Helpdesk@ucl.ac.uk Internal phone: 37779 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 19:11:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED3316A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:11:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av7-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (av7-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C966343D1D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:11:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av7-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 74CDC37E45; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:11:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.177]) by av7-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6517737E42 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:11:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp2-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 13B8B37E46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:11:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 57188 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Jul 2004 19:11:24 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:11:24 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Message-ID: <20040726191124.GA57091@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu , Joe Laws , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5ac5e3b004072611166f3bf090@mail.gmail.com> <20040726214859.33b15510@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726214859.33b15510@it.buh.tecnik93.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Joe Laws cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD need to be on a Primary Partition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:11:28 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:48:59PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:16:55 -0700 > Joe Laws wrote: > > > Since I have about 10 partitions (3primary, 7 extended), I was > > wondering if BSD needs a root partition on one of the primary > > partitions. I have heard this is the case in some of the BSD's. > > Yes. What you call "primary partition" in the BSD world is called slice True, although I am not quite certain that FreeBSD actually must be booted from a primary partition. I think it depends on the bootmanager. I believe the default bootmanager does require a primary partition though, and the standard installation program probably also requires that so a primary partition is recommended. > and what you call "extended partitions" are called partiotions. Not quite true. Extended partitions are also called slices in BSD. BSD-partitions do not really have a counterpart in the DOS/Windows world. > > So for ad0s1a is: > ad0 = ide disk 0 (primary master) > s1 = first slice > a = first partition on the first slice (usually the / also called "root" partition) > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install.html > will give you more details > > > -- > IOnut > Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 19:38:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC5D16A4D0 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:38:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A67843D53 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:38:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6QJcktG053486 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:38:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6QJcjWH096820 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:38:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6QJcidk096819 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:38:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:38:42 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20040726193842.GA96788@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:38:48 -0000 I'm trying a net/ftp install of 4.8 on my Thinkpad. The laptop didn't come with a builtin NIC so I bought a Xircom 10/100 card. (I'm using the IBM UBS to CAT5 connector.) The floppy install puts up /stand/sysinstall nicely, but when I goto the network sections I eventually see only SLIP or PPP as options. Setting up the options screen and setting DHCP to "YES" makes no difference. According to the FreeBSD laptop web pages Xircom ought to work. As far as I can get is wriding up with eithr a slattach graphic or one for ppp. Since DHCP is working and since my cabling is okay, I'm at adead end. Suggestions? Thanks for any clues! gary PS: I did try my old 5.2 CD install, but it trapped and died. (??) -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 19:51:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309C116A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:51:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr (postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B7243D55 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:51:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hyvernp@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (alesia-8-82-224-213-22.fbx.proxad.net [82.224.213.22]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78B016B39B for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:51:50 +0200 (CEST) From: HYVERNAT Philippe To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1090871510.861.3.camel@cyrius> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:51:50 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: compile + distfile X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:51:52 -0000 Hello, I run on freebsd 4.10 and i want to install Java, but cos to the licence restriction i must download it and place into /usr/ports//distfiles I move it into this directory, but when i compile again, the make file doesn't find it in /usr/ports/distfiles it's the same spelling. It is the same thing with relaplayer 8 Could you help me please ? Thanks a lot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 19:54:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BAC16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:54:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns2.brasilsat.com.br (ns2.brasilsat.com.br [200.250.169.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A540A43D41 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:54:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cra@kftec.com.br) Received: from kftec.com.br ([192.168.2.200])i6QL27FJ009369 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:02:15 -0300 Received: from 33KFPGS/SpoolDir by kftec.com.br (Mercury 1.47); 26 Jul 04 18:58:38 -0300 Received: from SpoolDir by 33KFPGS (Mercury 1.47); 26 Jul 04 18:58:17 -0300 Received: from kftec.com.br (192.168.10.200) by kftec.com.br (Mercury 1.47) with ESMTP; 26 Jul 04 18:58:12 -0300 Message-ID: <410561AD.AAC6A3AC@kftec.com.br> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:55:25 -0300 From: Cleyton Agapito X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------914A7284FFF5D025F9AC1B18" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: modules dynamically loaded (doubt) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:54:31 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------914A7284FFF5D025F9AC1B18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all, I have same modules (fdc.ko, speaker.ko, snd_cmi.ko, etc...) that i removed from kernel core (5.2-RL) to be dynamically loaded when need. looks that device nodes are created in boot stage, because they aren´t there when i load module after, then i must use loader.conf and kldunload one by one (i didn´t find a option to unload all unused modules). the devfs wouldn´t load the proper module like it do with cd9660.ko? or unload module if idle? what i´m doing wrong? kind regards. --------------914A7284FFF5D025F9AC1B18-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 20:07:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D965A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:07:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rhwi.net (mail.rhwi.net [64.72.68.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E16843D62 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:07:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from techielists@regionalhelpwanted.com) Received: from creemore (creemore.internal.rhw [192.168.1.37]) by mail.rhwi.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B88BF24FA9; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:05:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:07:04 -0400 From: Jeanne To: Jeanne Schock Message-Id: <20040726160704.1914cd3c.techielists@regionalhelpwanted.com> In-Reply-To: <20040726111123.7ae74c07.techielists@regionalhelpwanted.com> References: <20040726111123.7ae74c07.techielists@regionalhelpwanted.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jabber webmin config - CANCEL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:07:21 -0000 I believe that webmin currently doesn't support jabber 1.4.3. No big deal, it wasn't critical. Cheers, Jeanne On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:11:23 -0400 Jeanne Schock wrote: > Hi, > > I have a working jabber 1.4.3 install on FreeBSD 4.8 and I would like to provide my office with a GUI. I'm not sure what webmin wants me to do with regards to a jabber.xml file, jabber.sh and the jabber daemon. I start jabber with the standard jabberd.sh script. Webmin is asking for the "path to jabber server program" (jabber_daemon). The patch-jabber.xml file in the jabberport/files/ dir states "Currently on FreeBSD jabberd is started with the -h option from /path/rc.d/jabber.sh. You'll need to modify it.." I'm not clear on what webmin needs. Any help would be much appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Jeanne > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Jeanne Schock Systems Administrator 845-471-5200 x.41 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 20:14:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587FD16A506 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:14:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C7343D1D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:14:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6QKEJcO072317; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:14:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6QKEIgT072314; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:14:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:14:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: jam man In-Reply-To: <20040726184115.78452.qmail@web81407.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040726221228.Q72176@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20040726184115.78452.qmail@web81407.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 support: FreeBSD v.s. Gentoo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:14:22 -0000 > > "Does Linux or FreeBSD for the AMD64 architecture at > > this point?" > > It doesn't really matter...yes gentoo is a linux > distro. and its the only linux distro I would consider > with the AMD64 architecture. I was looking to see if one moment. distribution is distribution, linux is a kernel. CPU support isn't the distribution feature. they just put everything in one CD/DVD with some installer. > anyone here has used (or has knowledge of) both AMD64 > OSes' support and functionality for x86-64 > applications. i only used NetBSD and it has full support of AMD64 - i mean 64-bit mode both for kernel and userspace, no emulation needed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 20:16:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40CE16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:16:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E379A43D5A for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:16:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6QKGxcO072496; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:16:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6QKGwnI072491; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:16:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:16:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20040726193842.GA96788@tao.thought.org> Message-ID: <20040726221617.E72176@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20040726193842.GA96788@tao.thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:16:59 -0000 > I'm trying a net/ftp install of 4.8 on my Thinkpad. The > laptop didn't come with a builtin NIC so I bought a > Xircom 10/100 card. (I'm using the IBM UBS to CAT5 connector.) > The floppy install puts up /stand/sysinstall nicely, but when > I goto the network sections I eventually see only SLIP or PPP > as options. > install kernel just didn't load this driver. i'm not sure now, but when booting in boot menu there is option for booting with PCMCIA support, but it's not default choice From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 20:36:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7646716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:36:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from host4-server.com (host4-server.com [64.141.41.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCC943D2D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:36:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinchoi@host4-server.com) Received: from chinchoi by host4-server.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BpCDI-00087C-R9 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:36:48 -0400 From: To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.26 X-IPAddress: 64.141.32.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:36:48 -0400 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host4-server.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32043 544] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - host4-server.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: snmp port application X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:36:50 -0000 -- Hi all I have this problem when complied zebra to support snmp ===> ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 conflicts with installed package(s): net-snmp-5.1.1_1 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). I checked the port application in the freebsd site and got This is Net-SNMP (previously known as "ucd-snmp"). It should be same one "right"? How can I compile the zebra without an error Thank you very much From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 20:46:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED08816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:46:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EE043D46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:46:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6QKkAtG053627; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:46:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6QKk8Q5097003; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:46:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6QKk6LX097002; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:46:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:46:06 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20040726204606.GB96834@tao.thought.org> References: <20040726193842.GA96788@tao.thought.org> <20040726221617.E72176@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726221617.E72176@chylonia.3miasto.net> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:46:14 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:16:58PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > I'm trying a net/ftp install of 4.8 on my Thinkpad. The > > laptop didn't come with a builtin NIC so I bought a > > Xircom 10/100 card. (I'm using the IBM UBS to CAT5 connector.) > > The floppy install puts up /stand/sysinstall nicely, but when > > I goto the network sections I eventually see only SLIP or PPP > > as options. > > > install kernel just didn't load this driver. > > i'm not sure now, but when booting in boot menu there is option for > booting with PCMCIA support, but it's not default choice there was one screen that mentioned the cards. gave 4 address ranges for the card; i toook the default of 0x0000. anybody else on-list have the xircom card working? i'd be only too pleased if i'm missing some magic incantation rather than having bought the wrong card... thanks, and if anyone else has insights, i'd be much obliged to hear! gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 20:46:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A57016A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:46:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672E143D49 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:46:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.197.67] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1BpCMS-0001bd-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:46:17 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16645.28051.646935.643090@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:46:11 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Subject: snmp port application X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:46:18 -0000 ask@peter-angela.com writes: > How can I compile the zebra without an error "make -DDISABLE_CONFLICTS install" Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 20:47:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080EC16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:47:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dallypost.com (ns1.dallypost.com [12.160.224.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A9A43D49 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:47:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lance@dallypost.com) Received: from dallypost.com (DallyPost [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by dallypost.com (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i6QLLMXx001660 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:21:22 -0600 Received: (from apache@localhost) by dallypost.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i6QLLMkr001658; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:21:22 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: dallypost.com: apache set sender to lance@dallypost.com using -f Received: from 24.119.94.130 (SquirrelMail authenticated user lance) by www.dallypost.com with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:21:22 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <1898.24.119.94.130.1090876882.squirrel@www.dallypost.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:21:22 -0600 (MDT) From: "Lance Earl" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Stuck in a Loop installing PHP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: lance@dallypost.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:47:06 -0000 I am new to FREEBSD and am tring to set up a web server to replace my redhat box. I installed 4.8 by selecting the Developer method and everything installed without a hitch. I then upgraded the ports database using cvsup, again, no problems. I then installed Apache v2 from a port, no problems. It was while installing mod_php v5 that things got out of wack. I started the install from a port around 6:00pm and it ran all night. The next morning I was surprized to see that it was still working. It was a Saturday so I left it alone to do its thing. Saturday evening it was still working. It appeared to be stuck in a loop as it would work for a while and then pause on the same line. By late saturday night, I decided that something was broken and shut it down. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Lance Earl DallyPost, Inc. 208-548-2721 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 20:59:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E8A16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:59:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from host4-server.com (host4-server.com [64.141.41.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1125043D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:59:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinchoi@host4-server.com) Received: from chinchoi by host4-server.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BpCZO-0001zQ-PV for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:59:38 -0400 From: To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.26 X-IPAddress: 64.141.32.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:59:38 -0400 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host4-server.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32043 544] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - host4-server.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: snmp port application X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:59:40 -0000 -- Hi all I have this problem when complied zebra to support snmp ===> ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 conflicts with installed package(s): net-snmp-5.1.1_1 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). I checked the port application in the freebsd site and got This is Net-SNMP (previously known as "ucd-snmp"). It should be same one "right"? How can I compile the zebra without an error Thank you very much From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 21:03:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9F216A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:03:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B0843D55 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:03:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i6QL36Vd019000 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:03:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000501c47352$906c84c0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:53:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: restarting services after portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:03:10 -0000 Hello, Does anyone have a pkgtools.conf file that restarts updated services? I'm trying to get this going, so i don't have to restart all of them manually, wanting the update process to run as automated as possible via a cron script. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 21:05:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AB516A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:05:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C35543D41 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:05:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.chello.nl [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF6F8120; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:06:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76684-05; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:06:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.110] (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DDA80AF; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:06:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Jorn Argelo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:05:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040726184115.78452.qmail@web81407.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040726184115.78452.qmail@web81407.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407262305.39026.jorn@wcborstel.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.domain.tld cc: jam man Subject: [Half OT]Re: AMD64 support: FreeBSD v.s. Gentoo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:05:49 -0000 On Monday 26 July 2004 20:41, jam man wrote: > --- Bj=F6rn_Lindstr=F6m wrote: > > Wojciech Puchar writes: > > >> Does Gentoo or FreeBSD have better support for > > > > the > > > > >> AMD64 architecture at this point? > > > > > > what is gentoo? > > > > > > is it some new OS or linux distro? > > > > It's a Linux distribution, so I assume the question > > was meant to be: > > > > "Does Linux or FreeBSD for the AMD64 architecture at > > this point?" > > It doesn't really matter...yes gentoo is a linux > distro. and its the only linux distro I would consider > with the AMD64 architecture. I was looking to see if > anyone here has used (or has knowledge of) both AMD64 > OSes' support and functionality for x86-64 > applications. As a matter of fact, I just got Gentoo up and running next to my Windows=20 partition on my AMD64. There isn't much difference between the two. At leas= t,=20 when building everything from scratch. I got no experience with packages or= =20 anything. Gentoo is just a tad harder to get up and running then FreeBSD is= ,=20 but shouldn't be too much of a problem if you follow the documentation=20 provided at Gentoo's site.=20 One interesting point for desktop users is that Gentoo automatically compil= es=20 X.org as a dependency of KDE rather then XFree86. And I must say, my TFT is= =20 quite sharper then it was with XFree86. Further some minor things are added= =20 to the standard KDE setup, but they aren't worth mentioning. One thing I am= =20 missing is that you have an overview of what you can compile into KDE. Gent= oo=20 just compiles the base KDE with a few extras and further you'll have to=20 continue to compile the other KDE things from the portage (same thing as th= e=20 ports-tree) But, on-topic, it's still a matter of preferences and what you're experienc= ed=20 with. There are no complete new features or anything. It's still just FreeB= SD=20 or Gentoo, but the OS just talks 64-bit rather then 32-bit. As for the main= =20 question, Gentoo or Mandrake or whatever distribution is all the same when= =20 looking at AMD64 support and performance, as long as you're using the same= =20 kernel. Cheers, Jorn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 21:23:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8033416A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:23:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BFF43D45 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:23:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E40083FAC; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:23:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:23:00 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Jorn Argelo Message-ID: <20040726212300.GA10937@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040726184115.78452.qmail@web81407.mail.yahoo.com> <200407262305.39026.jorn@wcborstel.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407262305.39026.jorn@wcborstel.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: jam man cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT]Re: AMD64 support: FreeBSD v.s. Gentoo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:23:02 -0000 --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > One interesting point for desktop users is that Gentoo automatically comp= iles=20 > X.org as a dependency of KDE rather then XFree86. And I must say, my TFT = is=20 > quite sharper then it was with XFree86. Since some days, -current defaults to X.org. Users of other FreeBSD version can update their ports and have a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING howto switch from XFree to X.org Simon --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBXY0Ckn+/eutqCoRAvBkAJ94PcOqaJWQVglVADBivCQB2Hc4FwCfaG4I s7zC3rrBeF1nmTnzV8PDE80= =plTa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 21:28:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE06516A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:28:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F8643D46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:28:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6QLS2cO076090; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:28:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6QLS2o5076087; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:28:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:28:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Simon Barner In-Reply-To: <20040726212300.GA10937@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Message-ID: <20040726232737.U75993@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20040726184115.78452.qmail@web81407.mail.yahoo.com> <20040726212300.GA10937@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: jam man cc: Jorn Argelo cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT]Re: AMD64 support: FreeBSD v.s. Gentoo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:28:06 -0000 > > quite sharper then it was with XFree86. > > Since some days, -current defaults to X.org. Users of other FreeBSD version > can update their ports and have a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING howto > switch from XFree to X.org > i'm of of topic in X.org and XFree - what's the difference? any URL? thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 21:53:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E167F16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:53:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-04-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7CF43D31 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:53:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i6QLrsIZ007533 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:53:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000501c47359$a8ee2740$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:43:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: f-prot on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:53:58 -0000 Hello, Has anyone got f-prot via ports to install on 5.2.1? I'm getting an error when it atempts to download f-prot-sig and another file presumably the definitions. Any help appreciated. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 21:55:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43ED16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:55:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from corona.wixb.com (corona.wixb.com [65.43.82.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D3A43D46 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:55:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) X-Scanned: at corona.wixb.com with ID 41057DE8.000 by j-chkmail Received: from coors.wixb.com (coors.wixb.com [10.43.82.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by corona.wixb.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6QLtqMu003401; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:55:52 -0500 (CDT) Organization: Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee WI USA Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040726165457.00c26170@absolut.wixb.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:55:51 -0500 To: "dave" From: "J.D. Bronson" In-Reply-To: <000501c47359$a8ee2740$0200a8c0@satellite> References: <000501c47359$a8ee2740$0200a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: f-prot on 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:55:54 -0000 At 04:43 PM 7/26/2004, you wrote: >Hello, > Has anyone got f-prot via ports to install on 5.2.1? I'm getting an >error when it atempts to download f-prot-sig and another file presumably the >definitions. >Any help appreciated. >Dave. See my post from over the weekend? I downloaded the free version from f-prot directly. it installs it updates it wont run. Still no answer from f-prot - JDB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 21:56:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EF716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:56:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from amcuxfw802.amc.af.mil (amcuxfw802.amc.af.mil [131.9.254.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A320D43D54 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.hauan@fairchild.af.mil) Received: from amcw2av803.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.19.116]) by fw2.amc.af.mil with SMTP id i6QLtof1004625; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:56:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from amcw2ms873.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.25.136]) M2004072616555907512 ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:55:59 -0500 Received: from amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.19.74]) by amcw2ms873.amc.ds.af.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:56:00 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:56:00 -0500 Message-ID: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C10C7@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: wrong Xircom card?? Thread-Index: AcRzUaWYvNIrf6gZRJm00ZVngptA3QACjhFw From: "Hauan, David" To: "Gary Kline" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 21:56:00.0231 (UTC) FILETIME=[566B5770:01C4735B] cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: RE: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:56:05 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Kline [mailto:kline@tao.thought.org] > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 1:46 PM > To: Wojciech Puchar > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? >=20 >=20 > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:16:58PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > I'm trying a net/ftp install of 4.8 on my Thinkpad. The > > > laptop didn't come with a builtin NIC so I bought a > > > Xircom 10/100 card. (I'm using the IBM UBS to CAT5 connector.) > > > The floppy install puts up /stand/sysinstall nicely, but when > > > I goto the network sections I eventually see only SLIP or PPP > > > as options. > > > > > install kernel just didn't load this driver. > >=20 > > i'm not sure now, but when booting in boot menu there is option for > > booting with PCMCIA support, but it's not default choice >=20 >=20 > there was one screen that mentioned the cards. gave 4 > address ranges for the card; i toook the default of 0x0000. >=20 > anybody else on-list have the xircom card working? i'd > be only too pleased if i'm missing some magic incantation > rather than having bought the wrong card... >=20 > thanks, and if anyone else has insights, i'd be much obliged > to hear! >=20 > gary Do as above and select irq 3 from the next screen. That worked for my wireless card. dave =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 22:01:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A609816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:01:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy07.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDDB43D4C for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:01:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy07 [148.235.52.27]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I1H00DM1BTRU4@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:01:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dup-200-64-114-155.prodigy.net.mx (du-200-64-114-155.prodigy.net.mx [200.64.114.155])(built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I1H005R5BTQH3@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:01:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:09:06 -0500 From: Miguel Cardenas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200407261709.06904.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 X-imss-version: 2.5 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:67.18441 C:22 M:2 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:3 C:2 M:2 S:2 R:2 (0.5000 1.0000) Subject: OSS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:01:10 -0000 Hello... Anybody has installed OSS on FreeBSD 5.2.1? Am trying the system inside a VMWare machine and had troubles installing OSS... I did it once, but reinstalled the system and did not work again... it gets installed fine (OSS) but when running 'soundon' it says there was a problem... The OSS module is loaded in memory, but simply does not work... When installing the package it says the following error message: /dev/mixer0: No such file or directory What can I do? how can I create /dev/mixer? devices? Thanks!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 22:29:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACF016A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:29:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262CB43D1D for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:29:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) (authenticated bits=0)i6QMTe4K005028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:29:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: Eric F Crist Organization: Secure Computing Networks To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:29:42 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200407261709.06904.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> In-Reply-To: <200407261709.06904.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407261729.42954.ecrist@secure-computing.net> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: OSS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:29:57 -0000 On Monday 26 July 2004 05:09 pm, Miguel Cardenas wrote: > Hello... > > Anybody has installed OSS on FreeBSD 5.2.1? Am trying the system inside a > VMWare machine and had troubles installing OSS... I did it once, but > reinstalled the system and did not work again... it gets installed fine > (OSS) but when running 'soundon' it says there was a problem... > > The OSS module is loaded in memory, but simply does not work... > > When installing the package it says the following error message: > > /dev/mixer0: No such file or directory > > What can I do? how can I create /dev/mixer? devices? > > Thanks!! This should be automatically created by devfs. I would make certain that the proper device entry is installed in your kernel config. For my system, I need to add the following line to my kernel config file: device pcm I hope this helps. Eric F Crist From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 22:35:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C02716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:35:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ddardaar.mine.nu (bwd93.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.29.227.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C637643D5A for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:35:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from radek@raadradd.com) Received: by ddardaar.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B8128A58C; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:35:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:35:53 +0200 From: Radek Kozlowski To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20040726223553.GE75904@werd> References: <20040726184115.78452.qmail@web81407.mail.yahoo.com> <20040726212300.GA10937@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20040726232737.U75993@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726232737.U75993@chylonia.3miasto.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: jam man cc: Jorn Argelo cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT]Re: AMD64 support: FreeBSD v.s. Gentoo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:35:48 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 11:28:02PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > quite sharper then it was with XFree86. > > > > Since some days, -current defaults to X.org. Users of other FreeBSD version > > can update their ports and have a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING howto > > switch from XFree to X.org > > > i'm of of topic in X.org and XFree - what's the difference? > > any URL? > > thanks Dude, search the mailing lists or http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/. Is this really so difficult? -Radek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 23:05:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428AF16A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:05:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07EF43D1F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:05:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6QN5LtG053861; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:05:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6QN5KDY097396; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:05:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6QN5JU3097395; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:05:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:05:18 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: "Hauan, David" Message-ID: <20040726230518.GA97334@tao.thought.org> References: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C10C7@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C10C7@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:05:27 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 04:56:00PM -0500, Hauan, David wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gary Kline [mailto:kline@tao.thought.org] > > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 1:46 PM > > To: Wojciech Puchar > > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > > Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:16:58PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > I'm trying a net/ftp install of 4.8 on my Thinkpad. The > > > > laptop didn't come with a builtin NIC so I bought a > > > > Xircom 10/100 card. (I'm using the IBM UBS to CAT5 connector.) > > > > The floppy install puts up /stand/sysinstall nicely, but when > > > > I goto the network sections I eventually see only SLIP or PPP > > > > as options. > > > > > > > install kernel just didn't load this driver. > > > > > > i'm not sure now, but when booting in boot menu there is option for > > > booting with PCMCIA support, but it's not default choice > > > > > > there was one screen that mentioned the cards. gave 4 > > address ranges for the card; i toook the default of 0x0000. > > > > anybody else on-list have the xircom card working? i'd > > be only too pleased if i'm missing some magic incantation > > rather than having bought the wrong card... > > > > thanks, and if anyone else has insights, i'd be much obliged > > to hear! > > > > gary > Do as above and select irq 3 from the > next screen. That worked for my wireless > card. > will try, thanks. i believe i chose irq 11. gary > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 23:14:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D9916A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:14:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F14F43D4C for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:14:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 61C5413631; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:14:38 +1200 (NZST) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:14:38 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Paul R Culmo Message-ID: <20040726231438.GD1801@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Procmail port 3.22 and FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:14:41 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 07:20:24AM -0400, Paul R Culmo wrote: > Greetings, [...] > I've searched high and low and found some really good docs, on how to do > it to get it working. Yes I've compiled and installed the port, that's > not a problem. Integrating into Sendmail is the problem, but from pine > if I > > | /usr/local/bin/procmail it will work. > > Has anyone had any trouble with procmail on FBSD 5.2.1 or any version of > FBSD ? You need to create a "~/.forward" file with the following contents: "|/usr/local/bin/procmail" -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Opportunity does not knock, it presents itself when you beat down the door" - W.E. Channing From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 15:29:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592A716A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:29:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14102.mail.yahoo.com (web14102.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EF1A43D5A for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:29:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sikander88@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040726152914.19084.qmail@web14102.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.149.36.20] by web14102.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:29:14 PDT Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:29:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Sikander Abbasi To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:17:06 +0000 Subject: problem installing freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:29:33 -0000 Dear Sir, I am new to freebsd i am having problem installing freebsd, when i tried to install it say max one fat partition, i have 2 fat primary partition and keep 5 gd 1 partition for installing freebsd. plz help me in this with regards sikander Abbasi __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 23:35:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAB816A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:35:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79B143D39 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:35:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com) Received: from ms-mss-01 ([10.10.4.10])i6QNZi6j016589 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from socal.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I1H00LRGG7K9W@ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.6.202] (Forwarded-For: [68.8.243.244]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (mshttpd); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:35:44 -1000 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:35:44 -1000 From: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com To: David Kelly Message-id: <17230c6172048a.172048a17230c6@socal.rr.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: FreeBSD_Questions FreeBSD_Questions Subject: Re: Changing cards in a reader (next step??) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:35:48 -0000 From: David Kelly Date: Monday, July 26, 2004 7:47 am > > On Jul 26, 2004, at 12:26 PM, hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com wrote: > > > I have followed all suggestions and responded with the output of > my > > attemps. The problem remains unresolved. I have also requested that > > if anyone has this working *properly* to respond but no one did. > > Why not install /usr/ports/emulators/mtools/ and configure "O:" > drive > ("O" for Olympus) as /dev/da2s1 ? > Aloha and thanks for responding. I hadn't tried mtools so I did as you reccommended. The results were less than satisfactory. The problem is when I am changing to a different size card. I start with a 128MB SmartMedia card in the reader. hp# mdir O:/dcim/100olymp Volume in drive O has no label Directory for O:/dcim/100olymp . 05-30-2004 15:59 .. 05-30-2004 15:59 p6050002 jpg 672166 06-05-2004 7:19 p6050003 jpg 677171 06-05-2004 7:19 p6050004 jpg 684658 06-05-2004 7:23 p6050005 jpg 664210 06-05-2004 7:23 p6050006 jpg 663849 06-05-2004 7:24 p6050009 jpg 689533 06-05-2004 7:37 p6050010 jpg 697084 06-05-2004 7:37 p6050011 jpg 691391 06-05-2004 7:59 p6050012 jpg 695390 06-05-2004 7:59 p1010074 jpg 680523 01-01-2000 0:00 12 files 6 815 975 bytes 124 059 648 bytes free Then I remove it and place a 8MB SM card in the reader. hp# mdir O:/dcim/100olymp init O: non DOS media Cannot initialize 'O:' If I unplug and replug the USB cable hp# mdir O:/dcim/100olymp Volume in drive O has no label Directory for O:/dcim/100olymp . 06-26-2004 14:24 .. 06-26-2004 14:24 p7120001 jpg 694158 07-12-2004 18:27 3 files 694 158 bytes 7 446 528 bytes free The display is different using mtools but the results are the same. Thanks again for the help. I hope you have another idea or two. Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 23:37:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B5116A4CE for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:37:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [65.173.111.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF73543D3F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:37:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6QNbfu0012640; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:37:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id i6QNbfQd012637; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:37:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:37:41 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jonathan Chen In-Reply-To: <20040726231438.GD1801@grimoire.chen.org.nz> Message-ID: <20040726173429.J12586@wonkity.com> References: <20040726231438.GD1801@grimoire.chen.org.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:37:41 -0600 (MDT) cc: Paul R Culmo cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Procmail port 3.22 and FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:37:48 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 07:20:24AM -0400, Paul R Culmo wrote: >> Greetings, > > [...] >> I've searched high and low and found some really good docs, on how to do >> it to get it working. Yes I've compiled and installed the port, that's >> not a problem. Integrating into Sendmail is the problem, but from pine >> if I >> >> | /usr/local/bin/procmail it will work. >> >> Has anyone had any trouble with procmail on FBSD 5.2.1 or any version of >> FBSD ? > > You need to create a "~/.forward" file with the following contents: > > "|/usr/local/bin/procmail" That's not needed when sendmail uses procmail directly. My 4.10 system just has FEATURE(local_procmail) in /etc/mail/hostname.mc. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 00:36:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41EC16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:36:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7689543D4C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:36:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i6R0Zto23233; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:35:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200407270035.i6R0Zto23233@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: mail63133@telkomsa.net (Livhu Tshisikule) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:35:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200407261445.25612.mail63133@telkomsa.net> from "Livhu Tshisikule" at Jul 26, 2004 02:45:25 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I recover /usr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:36:05 -0000 > > Hi, > > 1. How can I recover /usr, when I boot the system it goes to single user and > ask me to run fsck manually but the /usr has a bad block. The machine is a > server for diskless machines. Well, hopefully you have been making backups. Put another disk in and boot to single user. fdisk, disklabel and newfs space for /usr and restore /usr from backups. Then fix /etc/fstab to mount the new space as /usr instead of the old bad space. Or you may want to completely replace the disk by making file systems on the new disk for everything on the old one and doing a dump/restore of the still good file systems as well as the restore of a /usr from backup. This is a good idea because typically if you get a bad block on one filesystem it is a sign that the disk is on its last legs. There are built in fail-over sectors on modern disks and if you see a bad sector it likely means that it has already used up all the fail-over sectors. So, time to replace it, before things really crap out. If you don't have backups (tsk tsk) then you can try figuring out a way to direct copy every file except the one with the bad sector to some new space and then figure out how to recreate the file that crosses the bad sector. But, that will take some doing. If the bad sector is the superblock, you might be able to figure out how to use an alternate superblock just long enough to copy files off the disk, but not to keep running. I have read about that but never tried it so someone else would have to coach you on that sort of thing. Good luck, ////jerry > > Regards > Livhu > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 00:42:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C392816A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:42:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de (emailhub.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B99D743D45 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:42:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 789456123@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 5161 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 00:42:45 -0000 Received: from r065048.stusta.swh.mhn.de (HELO ?10.150.65.48?) (10.150.65.48) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 00:42:45 -0000 Message-ID: <4105A4F0.1090104@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:42:24 +0200 From: Lutz Petersen <789456123@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: R/W mount of / denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:42:47 -0000 After a system crash (e.g. a power failure), the terminal-less FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE I run does not boot up properly any more. Here is an excerpt from /var/log/messages: Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: / was not properly dismounted Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /home was not properly dismounted Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted As a result, BIND does not start up any more, which leaves my FreeBSD box in an unusable state (no internet connection, no network connections that use DNS). I did not experience this behaviour with 4-STABLE. What's wrong here? The other day I read about a misconfiguration of /etc/fstab (wrong fs_passno), which prevented FreeBSD from doing the usual consistency checking at startup time. My fstab is looking fine however. Any help is greatly appreciated, Lutz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 00:56:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC7A16A525 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:56:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D585F43D1F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:55:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6R0tttG053992; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:55:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6R0tr6K097650; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:55:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6R0tqH7097645; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:55:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:55:51 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: "Hauan, David" Message-ID: <20040727005551.GA97598@tao.thought.org> References: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C10C7@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> <20040726230518.GA97334@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726230518.GA97334@tao.thought.org> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:56:01 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 04:05:18PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 04:56:00PM -0500, Hauan, David wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Gary Kline [mailto:kline@tao.thought.org] > > > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 1:46 PM > > > To: Wojciech Puchar > > > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > > > Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:16:58PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > > I'm trying a net/ftp install of 4.8 on my Thinkpad. The > > > > > laptop didn't come with a builtin NIC so I bought a > > > > > Xircom 10/100 card. (I'm using the IBM UBS to CAT5 connector.) > > > > > The floppy install puts up /stand/sysinstall nicely, but when > > > > > I goto the network sections I eventually see only SLIP or PPP > > > > > as options. > > > > > > > > > install kernel just didn't load this driver. > > > > > > > > i'm not sure now, but when booting in boot menu there is option for > > > > booting with PCMCIA support, but it's not default choice > > > > > > > > > there was one screen that mentioned the cards. gave 4 > > > address ranges for the card; i toook the default of 0x0000. > > > > > > anybody else on-list have the xircom card working? i'd > > > be only too pleased if i'm missing some magic incantation > > > rather than having bought the wrong card... > > > > > > thanks, and if anyone else has insights, i'd be much obliged > > > to hear! > > > > > > gary > > Do as above and select irq 3 from the > > next screen. That worked for my wireless > > card. > > > > will try, thanks. i believe i chose irq 11. > To reply to my last post: no joy. I tried no kernel config, just selected irq3 and the Default card addr of 0x0000. The installation floppies recognized the card and said it was initializing things, but same results: I would up with only slip and ppp choices. I tried the full-screen intall option next. Xircon ("xe") was't among the drivers in the Network list. Is there a way of installing the xe driver from floppy? Or... ? thanks, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 01:40:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DA416A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:40:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.praemunio.com (mail.praemunio.com [66.179.47.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 903B543D48 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:40:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frank@knobbe.us) Received: from localhost (HELO mail.knobbe.us) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 20:40:25 -0500 Received: from localhost (HELO ??) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Jul 2004 20:40:24 -0500 From: Frank Knobbe To: Fractal In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cr9INJuPMeXwJK3wdZno" Message-Id: <1090892423.553.129.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:40:23 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD and WinNT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:40:27 -0000 --=-cr9INJuPMeXwJK3wdZno Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 09:27, Fractal wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 4.8 and I need to install on the same machine > WindowsNT-like operating system. I tried to do this and installed it. > But after recovering of BSD bootstrap loader using sysinstall I found > that I cannot load Windows. Namely, there was two question signs > ('??') in the second string of BSD loader menu (the first was > 'FreeBSD') and after selecting it by F3 my computer rebooted. Windows > should run on NTFS partition, not FAT. Can I do something and if yes, > what? I'm one of those guys that prefers to boot into the Windows boot manager. From there I can start Win2000 (used solely for games these days) and FreeBSD.=20 So if you were to install BSD first, then Windows, and not recover your bootsector, you would boot into Windows like I do. My boot.ini looks like this: [boot loader] timeout=3D10 default=3Dc:\bootsect.bsd [operating systems] c:\bootsect.bsd=3D" FreeBSD " multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(2)\WINNT=3D" Windows 2000 Professional Native Mode " /fastdetect bootsect.bsd is nothing else than a copy of /boot/boot1 from BSD. So from the Windows boot menu, I choose FreeBSD (or wait) and it boots BSD. Cheers, Frank --=-cr9INJuPMeXwJK3wdZno Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBBbKGJjGc5ftAw8wRAsGJAKDBFIY6QAJ7x2erzZKy6RpASWEm1ACfVqjQ EWJprWxpeUAmbtzOFp++5WM= =UfvA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cr9INJuPMeXwJK3wdZno-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 01:56:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDF916A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:56:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FF643D31 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:56:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pculmo@obs2.net) Received: from MicronLinuxBox.obs2.net (roc-66-66-201-1.rochester.rr.com [66.66.201.1])i6R1uev2014408; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:56:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from micronlinuxbox.obs2.net (MicronLinuxBox.obs2.net [10.200.1.1]) i6R1xV9K021798; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:59:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:59:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul R Culmo To: Jonathan Chen In-Reply-To: <20040726231438.GD1801@grimoire.chen.org.nz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Procmail port 3.22 and FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:56:49 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Jonathan Chen wrote: > You need to create a "~/.forward" file with the following contents: > > "|/usr/local/bin/procmail" Thanks for the reply :) but I tried creating the .forward file with these contents and also the "| exec /usr/local/bin/procmail exit 75" Which I read in a website during my searches, To no avail this did not work either, this is a weird one..for sure. However, I am loving this challenge. I do really like FreeBSD very much. It's MEGA fast. Thanks again. -- Paul R Culmo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 01:59:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FC916A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:59:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C915843D58 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:59:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from free.bsd@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 30109 invoked by uid 65534); 27 Jul 2004 01:59:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO kojo) (203.70.36.119) by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 03:59:21 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20105305 From: "FreeBSD Daemon" To: , Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:04:55 +0800 Message-ID: <000601c4737e$21c5ef30$0501a8c0@kojo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Subject: US BC001 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:59:25 -0000 Dear list I got a low end network card (chip: Surecom BC001). Plugged into a PCI slot it is not recognized by FreeBSD 4.10. I googled and found that the producer gives a RealTek 8139 driver to it (http://www.lantech.com.tw/eng/products/index.php?mode=view&id=12&PHPSES SID=e828906aae1ab4f3f63a0069b5e9eed8), but as mentioned it does not show up as rl. Can someone help me? TIA zheyu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 02:01:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F5116A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:01:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EA343D54 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:01:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C39113631; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:01:51 +1200 (NZST) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:01:51 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: Paul R Culmo Message-ID: <20040727020150.GB2229@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: <20040726231438.GD1801@grimoire.chen.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Procmail port 3.22 and FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:01:56 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:59:31PM -0400, Paul R Culmo wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > > You need to create a "~/.forward" file with the following contents: > > > > "|/usr/local/bin/procmail" > > Thanks for the reply :) but I tried creating the .forward file with > these contents and also the > > "| exec /usr/local/bin/procmail exit 75" This will definitely *not* work. Why don't your try what I've given you? Include the quotes in the file as well. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Opportunity does not knock, it presents itself when you beat down the door" - W.E. Channing From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 02:06:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6A116A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:06:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008DA43D4C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:06:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pculmo@obs2.net) Received: from MicronLinuxBox.obs2.net (roc-66-66-201-1.rochester.rr.com [66.66.201.1])i6R262Mv012901; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:06:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ns1.obs2.net (MicronLinuxBox.obs2.net [10.200.1.1]) i6R28qsR021819; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:08:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:08:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul R Culmo To: Warren Block In-Reply-To: <20040726173429.J12586@wonkity.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: Procmail port 3.22 and FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:06:08 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Warren Block wrote: > > You need to create a "~/.forward" file with the following contents: > > > > "|/usr/local/bin/procmail" > > That's not needed when sendmail uses procmail directly. My 4.10 system > just has FEATURE(local_procmail) in /etc/mail/hostname.mc. > Waren that is what I have been reading online many sites and FAQ that you don't need the .forward file but I thanked Jonathan for his input as I appreciate any input. I've tried the .forward file but wait.. this just in.. I found a few things , The kernel had IPV6 compiled in which I don't need, at the moment. Perhaps in another project I'll try that. I commented it out in my config and recompiled..installed and bounced the box. Still No worke... I found a entry in my hostname.mc that read Feature(local_lmtp) Commented out.. Performed the typical under /etc/mail make all install restart Working like a champion now.. so perhaps between the IPV6 components in the Knrl and my fixing the .mc file it's workig like it should. So for those other newbies, comment out any FEATURE(local..) other than FEATURE(local_procmail) and be sure that MAILER(procmail) comes first in the .mc file before anything else. Thanks to you and Jonathan once again for your input! :) ----- Paul R Culmo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 02:30:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E60016A4CE; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:30:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61E343D2D; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:30:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i6R2UMES018621; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:30:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:30:22 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: FreeBSD Daemon Message-ID: <20040727023022.GE9514@dan.emsphone.com> References: <000601c4737e$21c5ef30$0501a8c0@kojo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c4737e$21c5ef30$0501a8c0@kojo> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: US BC001 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:30:30 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 27), FreeBSD Daemon said: > I got a low end network card (chip: Surecom BC001). Plugged into a PCI > slot it is not recognized by FreeBSD 4.10. > I googled and found that the producer gives a RealTek 8139 driver to it > (http://www.lantech.com.tw/eng/products/index.php?mode=view&id=12&PHPSES > SID=e828906aae1ab4f3f63a0069b5e9eed8), but as mentioned it does not show > up as rl. > Can someone help me? It might just be using a PCI ID that the rl driver doesn't know about. Run "pciconf -lv", find your card, and note the chip= value. The first 4 digits are the device ID, and the last 4 are the vendor ID. Add them to /sys/pci/if_rlreg.h (search for VENDORID) and to /sys/pci/if_rl.c (search for rl_devs), rebuild your kernel, and reboot. If it works, submit a pr with the info so it can be added to the next release. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 02:43:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DED016A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:43:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout03-03.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout03-03.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18D4343D1D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:43:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ara@avvali.com) Received: (qmail 23064 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 02:43:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail-2-6.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.166.93) by smtpout03-03.mesa1.secureserver.net with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 02:43:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 14261 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2004 02:43:53 -0000 Message-ID: <20040727024353.14260.qmail@webmail-2-6.mesa1.secureserver.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:43:53 -0700 From: Ara@Avvali.COM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: RE: [SPAM] freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 70, Issue 5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:43:54 -0000 Can you give more info, like what operating systems are you ruining on your hard drive and i assume you have 2 primary fat partitions right? so yo u have to have access to make a third one one thing you have too keep in mind is when it asks to install FreeBSD boot manager, say yes, sorry can't help more as i need more info Message: 34 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:29:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Sikander Abbasi Subject: problem installing freebsd To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040726152914.19084.qmail@web14102.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear Sir, I am new to freebsd i am having problem installing freebsd, when i tried to install it say max one fat partition, i have 2 fat primary partition and keep 5 gd 1 partition for installing freebsd. plz help me in this with regards sikander Abbasi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 02:57:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A8B16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:57:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA9C43D31 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:57:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1BpI9I-0005uA-Hr; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:57:04 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:57:05 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040726152914.19084.qmail@web14102.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040726152914.19084.qmail@web14102.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407262157.05270.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b8beb4d82eb40df67745a007cf6171df3350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: Sikander Abbasi Subject: Re: problem installing freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:57:04 -0000 On Monday 26 July 2004 10:29 am, Sikander Abbasi wrote: > Dear Sir, > > I am new to freebsd i am having problem installing > freebsd, when i tried to install it say max one fat > partition, > > i have 2 fat primary partition and keep 5 gd 1 > partition for installing freebsd. > > plz help me in this > > with regards > > sikander Abbasi It sounds as though you're using fdisk and it's telling you that you can only have one "active" primary partition. Where are you getting the message? Are you using the FreeBSD installation CDROM? Or are you working with the partition table in another program such as fdisk? Let us know so that we can provide better assistance. Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 03:04:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEC716A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:04:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (fed1rmmtao11.cox.net [68.230.241.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2011F43D39 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:04:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) Received: from reichlieu.lan ([68.6.195.68]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP id <20040727030440.EUTC24435.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@reichlieu.lan> for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:04:40 -0400 Received: from reichlieu.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reichlieu.lan (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6R34dal063536 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:04:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mnavarre@reichlieu.lan) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reichlieu.lan (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6R34c0w063535 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:04:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mnavarre) From: Matt Navarre To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:04:38 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200407241841.i6OIfsq2066062@www.wcborstel.nl> <20040725134230.22d06fad@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040725134230.22d06fad@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407262004.38574.mnavarre@cox.net> X-SA-Scanned: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.41 Subject: Re: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:04:41 -0000 On Sunday 25 July 2004 11:42, Vulpes Velox wrote: > > As mentioned before, FreeBSD is NOT Linux. Keep that in mind. > > > > > I've flipped through your FAQ's and over forums but result in no > > > answer for Active Directory 2K3 and Exchange 2K3 server client > > > connectivity, integration and functionality? Note that we have not > > > moved to these product versions yet. Hence this email. > > > > KDE's Kmail can connect to Exchange servers, I believe. As for > > logging into active directory ... That doesn't exist AFAIK. Perhaps > > there are programs that allow such things, but I wouldn't count on > > that. Windows is an excellent OS for integration with Active > > Directory. > > AFAIK sylpheed-claws can too... IIRC Exchange is imap... or > something... Ximian just open-sourced their Connector plug-in for Evolution. Works great for email at least, I never really needed any of the other bells, whistles, chrome or gewgaws that MS put in Outlook, so I don't know how well it handles things like calendars and whatnot. But it's a place to start. -- "We all enter this world in the same way: naked, screaming, and soaked in blood. But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't have to stop there." -- Dana Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 03:19:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A4E16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:19:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1174E43D39 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:19:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB43313631; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:19:48 +1200 (NZST) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:19:48 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: 'Andy' Message-ID: <20040727031948.GB2525@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: <41047485.5020309@kg6rir.com> <20040726031529.GA708@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <41047C1A.8070009@kg6rir.com> <20040726033717.GA915@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <410488D9.3000006@kg6rir.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <410488D9.3000006@kg6rir.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mozilla Thunderbird on FreebSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:19:50 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 04:30:17AM +0000, 'Andy' wrote: > Could you please email me the direct URL link on how to install or how > to install these ports for Thunderbird on FreeBSD? I would appreciate it. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html -- Jonathan Chen ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "We laugh in the face of danger, we drop icecubes down the vest of fear" - Edmond Blackadder III From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 04:33:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F7516A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:33:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6EB43D31 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:33:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@comcast.net) Received: from krvn.comcast.net (c-24-0-241-226.client.comcast.net[24.0.241.226]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004072704334001600ojj4ce> (Authid: fbsd); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:33:41 +0000 Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.0.20040726231952.01afc188@mail.comcast.net> X-Sender: fbsd@mail.comcast.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:33:36 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "V.Nair" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: NFS Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:33:42 -0000 Hello all, I am running FreeBSD 5.2.1 and am having problems with NFS. I have an NFS server that is also running 5.2.1. The client is able to mount the NFS export and I am able to get a directory listing. However, I am unable to write to the NFS mount from the client, even as root. This is what my relevant /etc/fstab line looks like: taffy:/media /media nfs rw 0 0 Any suggestion would be appreciated. VN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 04:34:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A7116A4CE; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:34:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC9543D1F; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:33:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq54-134.dial.allstream.net [216.123.140.134]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 0FF8B5D28; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:33:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:33:30 -0400 From: epilogue To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040727003330.135d8f36@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: wm dropping keypresses since moving to xorg (strange) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:34:00 -0000 hello x11, questions, i have some reservations about sending this in, because it sounds a bit weird, but i've jumped through all the usual self-serve hoops and i'm about at my wits end. since switching to xorg, when i alt+tab to a window with my wm of choice (fluxbox-devel), the 1st keypress is always dropped in the new window, regardless of whether that window is a *term, mail client, browser, ... say i alt+tab to an xterm. for 'man' to appear on the command line, i must type 'mman' or 'ccd' for 'cd'. the window only drops that 1st key. if i alt+tab away and come back, it will again drop only the 1st key. here is what i know: 1) it doesn't happen if i use the mouse. 2) this problem was not apparent when i tested for it with icewm or xfce4. 3) fluxbox used to play very nicely with xfree. here is what i've tried: 1) google, fbsd and xorg mailing lists. 2) contacted the fluxbox developers over irc. several are running xorg and fluxbox on linux without the problems i'm seeing. (?!) 3) rebuilt xorg then fluxbox-devel. removed .fluxbox to ensure that the default settings would load. 4) played with xorg.conf (used old xfree.conf, built a new xorg.conf, and changed various settings withing xorg.conf) 5) attempted to pinpoint the issue via xev, but failed miserably. it smells like some sort of 'focus' problem to me. any suggestions would be very much appreciated. hoping that i'm not alone here. thanks, epi p.s. a little additional info for any of you who know a bit about fluxbox settings. the problem seems only to occur with those keybindings (like alt+tab) which are mapped to 'NextWindow' or 'NextWindow 1' but _not_ with 'NextTab'. naturally, the same holds true for the shift+foo combos which translate to 'Previous____'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 04:36:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA0B16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:36:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mygirlfriday.info (mo-65-41-216-204.sta.sprint-hsd.net [65.41.216.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86B4543D2D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:36:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gv-list-freebsdquestions@mygirlfriday.info) Received: (qmail 45804 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 04:36:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO major.mygirlfriday.info) (192.168.0.5) by mongo.mygirlfriday.info with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 04:36:11 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:36:11 -0500 From: Gary Organization: Hardly X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1382249088.20040726233611@mygirlfriday.info> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <20040726211831.121c9df9.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: implementing spf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:36:13 -0000 Hi Kevin / Robert, On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:39:59 -0700 (PDT) UTC (7/26/2004, 12:39 PM -0500 UTC my time), Kevin Stevens and On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Robert Storey wrote in part: >> Specifically: >> >> 1) Is the technology useful? >> >> 2) How does one implement spf on the server side? >> >> 3) How does one implement spf on the client side? >> >> I most interested in No. 3 above - specifically, is there anything that >> I must do as an end-user to make use of spf? K> As an end-user, nothing. http://spf.pobox.com/users.html. Same site for K> a general FAQ which addresses implementation (it's done via DNS records). K> The Slashdot article had a link to the Microsoft implementation; the K> complaint about it is that they are releasing a free license to implement, K> which can be revoked at any time. For the other side of the coin, regarding SPF.. we have....... -- Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 04:40:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7554616A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:40:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp (p1028-ipbffx02marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.111.132.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F2D43D45 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:40:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lukek@meibin.net) Received: (qmail 19734 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jul 2004 04:40:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.8?) (192.168.10.8) by 192.168.20.5 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 04:40:53 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:37:38 +0900 From: Luke Kearney To: "V.Nair" In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20040726231952.01afc188@mail.comcast.net> References: <6.1.2.0.0.20040726231952.01afc188@mail.comcast.net> Message-Id: <20040727133551.E0A0.LUKEK@meibin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.07.01 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:40:55 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:33:36 -0500 "V.Nair" spake thus: > Hello all, > > I am running FreeBSD 5.2.1 and am having problems with NFS. I have an NFS > server that is also running 5.2.1. The client is able to mount the NFS > export and I am able to get a directory listing. However, I am unable to > write to the NFS mount from the client, even as root. This is what my > relevant /etc/fstab line looks like: > > > taffy:/media /media nfs rw 0 0 > > > Any suggestion would be appreciated. > > > VN have users been mapped to a user on the nfs server itself ? ie: -maproot=UID HTH LukeK -- Luke Kearney From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 05:56:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC75616A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 05:56:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ubbn.net (mail.ubbn.net [61.56.191.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5233843D53 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 05:56:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ispeter@ubbn.net) Received: from noneb42692b961 (venus.ubbn.net [61.56.191.112]) by mail.ubbn.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 911BC33E7B for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:56:37 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <000601c4739e$7b4c9520$0d1420ac@noneb42692b961> From: "Peter" To: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:56:37 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: BandwidthD syntax error? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 05:56:42 -0000 use ports install bandwidthd For FreeBSD 4.10 can't use bandwidthd (FreeBSD 4.10)? you can try it ^^ ########################################## about this error =A1G Syntax Error "parse error" on line 40=20 Syntax Error "parse error" on line 40=20 Syntax Error "parse error" on line 40=20 Syntax Error "parse error" on line 40=20 ########################################## ports=A1G libpcap ( http://www.tcpdump.org/ ) /usr/ports/net/libpcap libpng (http://www.libpng.org/ ) /usr/ports/graphics/png ########################################## Install step=A1G 1. make deinstall "libpcap" and "libpng" and "bandwidthd" 2. make install "libpcap" 3. make install "libpng" 4. make install "bandwidthd" now i can use bandwidthd ^^ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 06:23:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51A216A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:23:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from s1.mail.pciwest.net (s1.mail.pciwest.net [64.5.1.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DA0543D4C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:23:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrwid@presys.com) Received: (qmail 17822 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 06:23:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO presys.com) (216.239.177.89) by presys.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 06:23:14 -0000 Message-ID: <4105F4D4.6000006@presys.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:23:16 -0700 From: John Widenoja User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20040711 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mounting linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:23:16 -0000 I appologize in advance for having to ask this question. I have skimmed through the manual, and have missed the answer. I use BSD on a disk which is 50-50 win 98 and 5.2. I use, on the same computer win ME and RH linux 8.0. I can access the dos partitions with no problem using "mount_msdosfs", but no matter what I try, I am unable to access the RH partition. The RH partition is on a scsi U-160 drive, but the dos side is right there. I would appreciate any suggestions on how to mount the linux partition. Thanks, John Widenoja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 06:58:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0997316A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:58:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mwinf0203.wanadoo.fr (smtp2.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09A843D41 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:58:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jthys@wanadoo.fr) Received: from thys.homeunix.org (AVelizy-112-1-16-55.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.51.166.55]) by mwinf0203.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C997D100006C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:58:33 +0200 (CEST) From: jens To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:42:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <4105F4D4.6000006@presys.com> In-Reply-To: <4105F4D4.6000006@presys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407271042.04102.jthys@wanadoo.fr> Subject: Re: mounting linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:58:36 -0000 On Tuesday 27 July 2004 08:23, John Widenoja wrote: Your linux fs must be ext2 or ext3 Compile in the kernel the option EXT2FS command line after reboot mount_ext2 /dev/adxxx /mnt with eventually the -o ro option gentoo for example). Kind regards. Jens > I appologize in advance for having to ask this question. I have skimmed > through the manual, and have missed the answer. > > I use BSD on a disk which is 50-50 win 98 and 5.2. I use, on the same > computer win ME and RH linux 8.0. I can access the dos partitions with > no problem using "mount_msdosfs", but no matter what I try, I am unable > to access the RH partition. > > The RH partition is on a scsi U-160 drive, but the dos side is right there. > > I would appreciate any suggestions on how to mount the linux partition. > > Thanks, > John Widenoja > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 07:18:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A036816A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:18:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeus.itg.uiuc.edu (zeus.itg.uiuc.edu [130.126.126.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4834943D45 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:18:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philipp1@zeus.itg.uiuc.edu) Received: from zeus.itg.uiuc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.itg.uiuc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6R7IdZj011388 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:18:39 -0500 Received: (from philipp1@localhost) by zeus.itg.uiuc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6R7IdMG011386 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:18:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:18:39 -0500 From: Anthony Philipp To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040727071839.GA11116@zeus.itg.uiuc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: best way to update my system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:18:40 -0000 Hello all, i recently updated my laptop by using cvsup to download the latest 5.2.1 + patches source, and the did all the steps to make world. it works fine, but is there another way which takes less time, to update my laptop? what i would really like is a way to cvsup the security patches, and just build those and then just install those, that way i dont have to worry about a new kernel or anything. right now my cvsup file reads *default tag=RELENG_5_2 if i changed to RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE would that just give me the patches to 5.2.1? if patching by source doesnt work this way is there a way to use binary patches? well thank you for the help anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 07:46:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC0B16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:46:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ps10.kent.dot.net.au (ps10.kent.dot.net.au [202.147.78.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E446343D58 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:46:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gavinm@cpusmashcrew.net) Received: from dialup-7.8.194.203.acc04-kent-syd.comindico.com.au ([203.194.8.7] helo=gav) by ps10.kent.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 1BpN5f-0008Rf-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:13:39 +1000 From: "Gavin M" To: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:47:46 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcRzrgGgE3B+SvOVSQiOsK7xwa9WsQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-Id: Subject: Problems with USB Flash Memory Device under FreeBSD 4.10 - "NOT READY, Medium not present" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:46:40 -0000 Hi Everyone, I recently switched from FreeBSD 5.2.1 to 4.10 in the hope that it would solve my seemingly unsolvable Nvidia driver freeze issue. Alas, it did not. However, now that I am running FreeBSD 4.10 (and intend to stay with it) I am having an error when I insert my Prolific TDX MemoDisk 256Mb Flash Memory stick. When I insert the stick, the following messages are displayed in the log and on the console that go something like this: Jul 23 16:20:48 UnixBox /kernel: uhub2: Prolific Technology Inc. USB_HUB, class 9/0, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 Jul 23 16:20:48 UnixBox /kernel: uhub2: 1 port with 0 removable, self powered Jul 23 16:20:49 UnixBox /kernel: umass0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB_Storage, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 3 Jul 23 16:20:49 UnixBox /kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 Jul 23 16:20:49 UnixBox /kernel: da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device Jul 23 16:20:49 UnixBox /kernel: da0: 650KB/s transfers Jul 23 16:20:49 UnixBox /kernel: da0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present I have jumped to the conclusion (I'm a daring guy) that "NOT READY, Medium not present" is a sure sign indicator of what the issue is but googling, searching forums and mailing lists, and extensive man page study sessions (camcontrol, etc) - which I really don't find hugely entertaining, turned up very little. There were signs of this problem on devices other than mine but the fixes for them unfortunately haven't worked for me. Also this device worked fine with FreeBSD 5.2.1 installed fresh from the box (Although I do now have my own kernel rolled). I would really appreciate some help if anyone knows what could be the issue. The flash stick works fine in other machines so it can't be hardware related. I've tried to include as much information as possible, but I feel I might be at a bit of a dead end. An attempt to mount the stick displays this: gavin@UnixBox:~$ sudo mount -t msdos /dev/da0 /mnt msdos: /dev/da0: Device not configured And the following gets written to the log and console when the above mount operation is attempted: Jul 23 17:04:35 UnixBox sudo: gavin : TTY=ttyv0 ; PWD=/usr/home/gavin ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/mount -t msdos -o ro /dev/da0 /mnt Jul 23 17:04:35 UnixBox /kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ CAPACITY. CDB: 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jul 23 17:04:35 UnixBox /kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): NOT READY asc:3a,0 Jul 23 17:04:35 UnixBox /kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Medium not present Further more, information from dmesg about kernel and USB driver initialisation: Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #1: Sun Jul 25 19:41:06 EST 2004 root@UnixBox.Workgroup:/usr/src/sys/compile/UNIXBOXKERNEL Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 902052412 Hz CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (902.05-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x642 Stepping = 2 Features=0x183f9ff AMD Features=0xc0440000 real memory = 268369920 (262080K bytes) avail memory = 255545344 (249556K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0573000. Preloaded elf module "nvidia.ko" at 0xc057309c. link_elf: symbol linux_ioctl_register_handler undefined ------------------------------------SNIP------------------------------------ --- uhci0: port 0xc000-0xc01f irq 9 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xc400-0xc41f irq 9 at device 7.3 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: (vendor=0x1106, dev=0x3057) at 7.4 chip1: port 0xc800-0xc803,0xcc00-0xcc03,0xd000-0xd0ff irq 10 at device 7.5 on pci0 Many thanks for even bothering to read this far Gav From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 07:48:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A684A16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:48:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy07.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468E443D31 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:48:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy07 [148.235.52.27]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I1I00HDF30X0Y@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:48:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dup-200-64-114-66.prodigy.net.mx (du-200-64-114-66.prodigy.net.mx [200.64.114.66])(built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I1I00J4930W3N@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:48:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:57:38 -0500 From: Miguel Cardenas In-reply-to: <200407261729.42954.ecrist@secure-computing.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200407270257.39296.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 X-imss-version: 2.5 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:21 M:2 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:3 C:2 M:2 S:2 R:2 (0.5000 1.0000) References: <200407261709.06904.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> <200407261729.42954.ecrist@secure-computing.net> Subject: Re: OSS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:48:39 -0000 Hello Sorry for my ignorance, am new to FreeBSD... which is the kernel config file? is it a configuration for compiling or at boot time? am linux user so will not bee too hard, just tell me which is the file pls :D Regards, Miguel > This should be automatically created by devfs. I would make certain that > the proper device entry is installed in your kernel config. For my system, > I need to add the following line to my kernel config file: > > device pcm > > I hope this helps. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 07:49:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0800316A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:49:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net (audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59DB43D45 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:49:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1BpMiJ-0003KX-HV; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 00:49:31 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Sikander Abbasi Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:49:32 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040727060922.53333.qmail@web14103.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040727060922.53333.qmail@web14103.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407270249.32723.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b7599385cad4a4c3df8c1f2a355e136c7350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: problem installing freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:49:36 -0000 On Tuesday 27 July 2004 01:09 am, Sikander Abbasi wrote: > Dear sir, > > thanking you for your reply > > I am using freebsd 5.2 cdrom installing,it give > errorwhen it start installing file system, error, max > one fat partition allow. > > with regards > Sikander Abbasi Are you having FreeBSD install a fat filesystem? Are you trying to install FreeBSD to a fat filesystem? Do you have operating systems on both fat partitions? Did you label both fat partitions as bootable? Did you label the FreeBSD partition as bootable? What mount points did you assign to the fat partitions? How did you divided the FreeBSD partition into /, swap, etc.? You might try ignoring (not changing, not mounting, not labelling as bootable) the fat partitions during installation and see if that helps. You might also try more recent releases such as FreeBSD 4.10 or 5.2.1. Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 07:50:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF5916A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:50:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E824643D5A for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:49:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6R7nhK0067860 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:49:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6R7nhQU067859; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:49:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:49:43 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Jonathan Chen Message-ID: <20040727074942.GA67512@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Jonathan Chen , Paul R Culmo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040726231438.GD1801@grimoire.chen.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726231438.GD1801@grimoire.chen.org.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:49:43 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: Paul R Culmo cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Procmail port 3.22 and FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:50:02 -0000 --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:14:38AM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 07:20:24AM -0400, Paul R Culmo wrote: > > Greetings, >=20 > [...] > > I've searched high and low and found some really good docs, on how to d= o=20 > > it to get it working. Yes I've compiled and installed the port, that's= =20 > > not a problem. Integrating into Sendmail is the problem, but from pin= e=20 > > if I > >=20 > > | /usr/local/bin/procmail it will work. =20 > >=20 > > Has anyone had any trouble with procmail on FBSD 5.2.1 or any version o= f=20 > > FBSD ? >=20 > You need to create a "~/.forward" file with the following contents: >=20 > "|/usr/local/bin/procmail" Not if he's using 'FEATURE(local_procmail)' -- that makes procmail the default local delivery agent. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBgkWiD657aJF7eIRAgoeAJ454ohD9ifqmPXH2Uo59quh+FcM+ACfUGrL m3acqg/M7bBDWSxXHQ8XdMc= =2XsY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 08:05:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F5116A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:05:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E8643D1F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq54-134.dial.allstream.net [216.123.140.134]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id AD912B47C4; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:05:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:05:21 -0400 From: epilogue To: mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx Message-Id: <20040727040521.03eb706b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200407270257.39296.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> References: <200407261709.06904.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> <200407261729.42954.ecrist@secure-computing.net> <200407270257.39296.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OSS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:05:56 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:57:38 -0500 Miguel Cardenas wrote: > Hello > > Sorry for my ignorance, am new to FreeBSD... which is the kernel config > file? is it a configuration for compiling or at boot time? am linux user > so will not bee too hard, just tell me which is the file pls :D hello miguel, the best place to start would be the freebsd handbook. you can read the online copy at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ or consult your local copy in /usr/share/doc/en/books/handbook/index.html see section 9. cheers, epi > Regards, > Miguel > > > This should be automatically created by devfs. I would make certain > > that the proper device entry is installed in your kernel config. For > > my system, I need to add the following line to my kernel config file: > > > > device pcm > > > > I hope this helps. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 09:59:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A858E16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:59:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grep.po.cs.msu.su (grep.po.cs.msu.su [158.250.16.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB7D43D64 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:59:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from george@grep.po.cs.msu.su) Received: from grep.po.cs.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grep.po.cs.msu.su (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6R9xjAH015263; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:59:45 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from george@grep.po.cs.msu.su) Received: (from george@localhost) by grep.po.cs.msu.su (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6R9xj3I015262; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:59:45 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from george) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:59:45 +0400 From: "Fr. Br. George" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040727095945.GA15250@grep.po.cs.msu.su> References: <008e01c448e9$1f4175a0$2b35f8cc@support3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008e01c448e9$1f4175a0$2b35f8cc@support3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Mike Oliveri Subject: Re: PHP 4.3.6_1 breaks SquirrelMail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:59:55 -0000 On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Mike Oliveri wrote: > I'm running FreeBSD 4.9 and we had a brief problem with SquirrelMail this afternoon. Upon restarting Apache (1.3), it could not find one of the libso files, so we upgraded both Apache (to 1.3.31 from ports) and PHP (to 4.3.6_1 from ports) and now we get an error like the following: > > > Fatal error: Call to undefined function: session_id() in > > /path/to/squirrelmail/functions/global.php on > > line 293 > > With what we're seeing at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user/17999, it appears there is a problem with the build of PHP that is disabling a necessary function of PHP for SquirrelMail to function properly. I am receiving the same error message on SquirrelMail 1.4.1 and 1.4.3 from source and 1.4.2_1 from ports. > > I tried setting session.auto_start = 1 (as opposed to = 0) in the php.ini files in /usr/local/etc, but that resulted in SquirrelMail coming up with a blank page. Viewing the source shows only the opening and closing HTML and Body tags in the document with no content. > > Has anyone else run into this problem? Just installing php4-session package (php4-session-4.3.8_1 at the time) made SM work properly. -- George V Kouryachy (aka Fr. Br. George) mailto:george at po_cs_msu_su From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 10:01:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F5D16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:01:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB5843D68 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:01:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADD4C3F3D; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:01:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:01:01 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Anthony Philipp Message-ID: <20040727100101.GA68182@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040727071839.GA11116@zeus.itg.uiuc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040727071839.GA11116@zeus.itg.uiuc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best way to update my system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:01:03 -0000 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Anthony Philipp wrote: [ please wrap your lines at 72 - 76 characters. Thanks ] > if patching by source doesnt work this way is there a way to > use binary patches? Yes, have a look at ports/security/freebsd-update I don't know, though, whether it works after you have used the source method to update your system. I know that it used to not work, but I remember that something has changed. Simon --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBifdCkn+/eutqCoRAlQyAKDjS709tAdXa6BX0KE3qxk/ChYk5QCg47q+ yv+gkqXqyEcnhWdmZj7BzQI= =d1ke -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 10:09:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4D516A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:09:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453B643D31 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:09:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40C6D3F3D; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:09:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:09:17 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Peter Message-ID: <20040727100917.GB68182@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <000601c4739e$7b4c9520$0d1420ac@noneb42692b961> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c4739e$7b4c9520$0d1420ac@noneb42692b961> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BandwidthD syntax error? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:09:21 -0000 --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Peter wrote: > use ports install bandwidthd For FreeBSD 4.10 >=20 > can't use bandwidthd (FreeBSD 4.10)? > you can try it ^^ >=20 > ########################################## > about this error ?G >=20 > Syntax Error "parse error" on line 40=20 > Syntax Error "parse error" on line 40=20 > Syntax Error "parse error" on line 40=20 > Syntax Error "parse error" on line 40=20 >=20 > ########################################## > ports?G >=20 > libpcap ( http://www.tcpdump.org/ ) > /usr/ports/net/libpcap >=20 > libpng (http://www.libpng.org/ ) > /usr/ports/graphics/png >=20 > ########################################## >=20 > Install step?G >=20 > 1. make deinstall "libpcap" and "libpng" and "bandwidthd" > 2. make install "libpcap" > 3. make install "libpng" > 4. make install "bandwidthd" >=20 > now i can use bandwidthd ^^ I guess that the error is due to libpcap, which is also in /usr/lib. Could you please verify this be de-installing the libpcap port and building bandwidthd. Otherwise it libpng must be the culprit... Be sure to post the whole error message. Simon --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBinMCkn+/eutqCoRAnpcAKDub+sTrKORktP8jBcg9Bw8cvIcWACePHBg ofA5yOrqGOqKaG6+PgUg2/4= =BCKK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 10:39:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FED16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:39:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web40913.mail.yahoo.com (web40913.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2330E43D1F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:39:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from son_jaya@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040727103937.91346.qmail@web40913.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.158.77.18] by web40913.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:39:37 PDT Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:39:37 -0700 (PDT) From: sonjaya To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: error when install from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:39:38 -0000 my bsd box is : freebsd 5.2 current i386 > here my detail insatll when i try install from ports > > # /usr/ports/database/db42/ > #make > --cut-- > checking for strip... strip > checking for strip... /usr/bin/strip > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel > checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables > configure:3687: checking for C compiler default output > configure:3690: cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -D_THREAD_SAFE -lpthread conftest.c >&5 > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthread <-- hwo to solved this what should i do , because some friend told me to downgrade my freebsd to 4.10 , i can do that because my bsd box have been online and serve many comp. thank's SONJAYA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 11:32:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5254016A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:32:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.abv.bg (smtp.abv.bg [194.153.145.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F270843D31 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:32:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from han_tzar@abv.bg) Received: (qmail 11304 invoked by uid 501); 27 Jul 2004 11:31:58 -0000 Received: from app2.ni.bg (HELO webmail.gyuvetch.bg) (192.168.151.19) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 11:31:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 32191 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 11:31:59 -0000 Received: from app2.ni.bg (192.168.151.19) by webmail.gyuvetch.bg with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 11:31:59 -0000 Message-ID: <210335128.1090927919856.JavaMail.nobody@app2.ni.bg> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:31:59 +0300 (EEST) From: Ivelin Wsev To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AbvMail 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 193.68.7.118 Subject: about wmp11 v.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:32:03 -0000 Hi i am from Bulgaria and i have some question i have a one wireless PCI card Linksys WMP11 -EU v.4 how can i make this card to work i try whit 4.10 and 5.2 but they kannot see the card please help me if you cann i do'not know hawto install him when i write ifconfig -l i kannot see this cartd please explain me if you cannot help me then please lets try whit CNet cnwl-311 or D-Link DWL-510 and please ecscuse me for my bad english ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.elmaz.com/ - Çàïîçíàíñòâà! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 11:46:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DA116A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:46:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.x9media.com (mail.x9media.com [81.209.147.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3621343D39 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomas.may@x9media.com) X-AuthUser: thomas.may@x9media.com Received: from thomas (145.253.97.197:1374) by mail.x9media.com with [XMail 1.20 ESMTP Server] ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:51:58 +0200 From: "Thomas May" To: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:49:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcRzz8BJ0FAXr8MST/WGM0n0Ep6fiA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-Id: <20040727114624.3621343D39@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: php port with java/ext support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:46:25 -0000 Hi, i like to compile mod_php5 port with the java/ext support, can someone help me ? thanx thomas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 11:46:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6BB16A4F5 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:46:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de (smtpde02.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36B743D4C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:46:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philipp.koock@sap.com) Received: from sap-ag.de (smtpde02) by smtpde02.sap-ag.de (out) with ESMTP id NAA06274 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:46:31 +0200 (MESZ) Message-ID: <71B031D98A3BC54581F38DD5107EC5A5887F2F@dewdfe24.wdf.sap.corp> From: "Koock, Philipp" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:46:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) X-SAP: out Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Procmail + Sieve ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:46:38 -0000 Hi there Guys, I'm using a setup of Exim, procmail and Cyrus2 together. Now, exim recevies the mail, passes it to procmail via some kind of pipe and procmail uses cyrdeliver to put mails into the corredsponding cyrus imap mail folders ... now is there a way to put sieve between procmail and cyrus ? like make sieve filter all messages that procmail didn't ? removing the target mailbox from the cyrdeliver command doesn't help. How do i pass mail to cyrus so that is still applys the sieve rules ? thanks, wodan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 08:38:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B088716A4CE; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:38:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay19-f26.bay19.hotmail.com [64.4.53.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF8743D39; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:38:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youngdream8039@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:38:00 -0700 Received: from 61.187.16.2 by by19fd.bay19.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:38:00 GMT X-Originating-IP: [61.187.16.2] X-Originating-Email: [youngdream8039@hotmail.com] X-Sender: youngdream8039@hotmail.com From: "M.M. Yang" To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:38:00 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jul 2004 08:38:00.0535 (UTC) FILETIME=[064F4670:01C473B5] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:15:01 +0000 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: "printf" doesn't work in ia64_init()? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:38:00 -0000 Hi all, I'm reading the function ia64_init(), and try to use "printf" to output some information. But if I put "printf" before "msgbufinit()", I won't see any word I expect by using dmesg. In the same function after "cninit()", it comments: /* * Initialize the console before we print anything out. */ cninit(); /* OUTPUT NOW ALLOWED */ So I have thought "printf" should work after cninit(). But now it seems to work only after msgbufinit(). Is there any way I can output information before msgbufinit()? Regards, Annie _________________________________________________________________ ÓëÁª»úµÄÅóÓѽøÐн»Á÷£¬ÇëʹÓà MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/cn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 12:19:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321A916A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:19:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fam.ulusiada.pt (mail.fam.ulusiada.pt [193.136.184.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F66E43D5E for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:19:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: (qmail 16130 invoked by uid 502); 27 Jul 2004 12:19:45 -0000 Received: from by mail.fam.ulusiada.pt in 0.113481 secs); 27 Jul 2004 12:19:45 -0000 Date: 27 Jul 2004 12:19:45 -0000 From: "Mail System Anti-Virus Administrator" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Tnz-Problem-Type: 40 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain cc: lixo@mail.fam.ulusiada.pt Subject: Illegal attachment type found in sent message "stolen" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:19:50 -0000 Attention: questions@freebsd.org. A Illegal attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching it's destination. The Illegal attachment type was reported to be: Não e permitido o envio de ficheiros PIF Please contact your I.T support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: questions@freebsd.org RCPT TO: 31722000@fam.ulusiada.pt ... and with the following headers: From: questions@freebsd.org To: 31722000@fam.ulusiada.pt Subject: stolen Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:23:55 +0100 The original message is kept in: mail.fam.ulusiada.pt:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine where the Mail System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- Illegal attachment type 'Não e permitido o envio de ficheiros PIF ' found in file /var/spool/qmailscan/mail.fam.ulusiada.pt109093078440416115/note.pif --- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 12:23:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E5316A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:23:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhost.cotse.com (mailhost.cotse.com [216.112.42.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F0643D3F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:23:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MAILOR-DAEMON@mailhost.cotse.com) Received: from mailhost.cotse.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cotse.com (5.7.4/5.7.4) with ESMTP id i6RCNdgq024869 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:23:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from MAILOR-DAEMON@mailhost.cotse.com) Received: (from heypete@localhost) by mailhost.cotse.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i6RCNYDt024866 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:23:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:23:34 -0400 (EDT) From: MAILOR-DAEMON@mailhost.cotse.com Message-Id: <200407271223.i6RCNYDt024866@mailhost.cotse.com> To: Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:23:42 -0000 The original message was received at Tue Jul 27 08:23:33 EDT 2004 ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- (reason: 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- .. while talking to mailhost.cotse.com.: >>> DATA <<< 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown <<< 503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 12:45:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994B016A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:45:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay01.kbs.net.au (relay01.kbs.net.au [203.220.32.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF3E43D66 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:45:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayjen6@dodo.com.au) Received: from [203.221.126.135] (helo=[203.221.126.135]) by relay01.kbs.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BpRL4-0005jy-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:45:51 +1000 Message-ID: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:45:50 +0800 From: Duggan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:45:54 -0000 I am new to FreeBSD and am using it as linux has a problem with my setup that I was unable to resolve. Anyways, I am liking what I have read about FreeBSD. I am a bit of a control freak and did a custom install of FreeBSD 4.10 over the net with the required package and all the support docs. I went to install links and this is what happened: EJINSIDE# pkg_add -r links /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found I decide to try and do the the same to get bash and the exact same thing happened. I did a google search and found an identical error posted on some russian BSD forums, however I was unable interpret the dialog. I also found other errors that were similar but with different files. Being new to FreeBSD these did make much sense to me. So this brings me to the crux of the matter. How do I find out what exactly is wrong? and how do I fix it? Any help appreciated. Elijah /wayjen6@dodo.com.au (not a subscriber so email me directly as well as the list)/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 12:48:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EAA16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:48:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server.tcslea.org (server.tcslea.org [205.238.132.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9657443D3F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdnewbie@coolarrow.com) X-Antivirus: clamav via cgpav Received: from [205.238.178.100] (HELO system) by server.tcslea.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b7) with ESMTP id 432634 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:48:05 -0500 Message-ID: <200407270748000178.07B2E20B@coolarrow.com> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 07:48:00 -0500 From: "Chris" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: security run output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:48:07 -0000 *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* When I get my nightly email from the "security run output" it normally has= about the last 20 lines or less from the /var/log/messages. Is there a way= to increase that to about the last 50 lines? Thanks, Chris _________________________________________________________ Email harvesters eat this: sendjunkmailhere@coolarrow.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 12:53:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD28616A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:53:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C77843D49 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:53:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6RCpjIB011996; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 05:51:46 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 05:52:56 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407270552.56943.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Duggan Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:53:05 -0000 On Tuesday 27 July 2004 05:45 am, Duggan wrote: > I am new to FreeBSD and am using it as linux has a problem with my > setup that I was unable to resolve. Anyways, I am liking what I have > read about FreeBSD. > > I am a bit of a control freak and did a custom install of FreeBSD > 4.10 over the net with the required package and all the support docs. > I went to install links and this is what happened: > > EJINSIDE# pkg_add -r links > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found > > I decide to try and do the the same to get bash and the exact same > thing happened. > > I did a google search and found an identical error posted on some > russian BSD forums, however I was unable interpret the dialog. I > also found other errors that were similar but with different files. > Being new to FreeBSD these did make much sense to me. > > So this brings me to the crux of the matter. How do I find out what > exactly is wrong? and how do I fix it? > > Any help appreciated. Have you turned off some features via /etc/make.conf or didn't cvsup src-all. I have a /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libssl.so.3 which was produced in my last buildworld and added to /usr/lib. Kent > > Elijah > /wayjen6@dodo.com.au (not a subscriber so email me directly as well > as the list)/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 13:08:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B7E16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:08:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7D843D60 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:08:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C2824D527 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:07:07 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4106538D.2070506@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:07:25 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (Windows/20040723) X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <0E1A1C28F9D61A4D8B6F70AFA3C1B1E42831@srvw2000-cnv1.cnv.local> <38a23c360407220825778b6c68@mail.gmail.com> <4100214E.4090405@orchid.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <4100214E.4090405@orchid.homeunix.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Random Freeze X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:08:51 -0000 Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: > Joseph Peterson wrote: > >> Unfortunately that is not the solution to my problem, I've run >> memtest86 on my laptop several times and found no problems... any >> other thoughts? =) >> >> -joe >> > > Just a thought: > > Have you build your world and / or kernel from source? If that's the > case double check processor-specific make options like CPUTYPE, CFLAGS, > COPTFLAGS, etc. (they can be used from command line and from /etc/make.conf) > > Good luck! > > Karol > I'm seeing the same problem on my dual Athlon box. The freezes are totally random AFAICT, sometimes when the machine is just idling. I've not used any CPU-specific make options but may try setting some to see if it makes a difference. One thing though, I only have cpu I686_CPU set, not I486_CPU and I586_CPU as well, maybe that could be a problem? I'm running -CURRENT and the build I did on 8 April didn't have this problem but it started with the next build I did a couple of weeks ago. I've cvsup'd and rebuilt a couple of times since, the last on 25 July, but the problem persists. Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 13:12:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B9916A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:12:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com (mtagate2.de.ibm.com [195.212.29.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D709043D48 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:12:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from HOMM@de.ibm.com) Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate2.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6RDCGgB096098 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:12:16 GMT Received: from d12ml062.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228])id i6RDCFS3164570 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:12:16 +0200 From: Roland Hommerich To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:13:56 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D12ML062/12/M/IBM(Release 6.0.2CF2HF259 | March 11, 2004) at 27/07/2004 15:13:58 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Roland Hommerich is out of the office. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:12:19 -0000 I will be out of the office starting 24.07.2004 and will not return until 19.08.2004. In case of urgent matters please contact Uwe Muehlhausen/Germany/IBM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 13:16:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F016A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:16:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay01.kbs.net.au (relay01.kbs.net.au [203.220.32.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBA343D5C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:16:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayjen6@dodo.com.au) Received: from [203.221.126.135] (helo=[203.221.126.135]) by relay01.kbs.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BpRoK-0003o7-00; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:16:04 +1000 Message-ID: <41065594.301@dodo.com.au> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:16:04 +0800 From: Duggan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kent Stewart References: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> <200407270552.56943.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200407270552.56943.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:16:07 -0000 I tried cvsup src-all just now and it says command not found. Elijah Kent Stewart wrote: >On Tuesday 27 July 2004 05:45 am, Duggan wrote: > > >>I am new to FreeBSD and am using it as linux has a problem with my >>setup that I was unable to resolve. Anyways, I am liking what I have >>read about FreeBSD. >> >>I am a bit of a control freak and did a custom install of FreeBSD >>4.10 over the net with the required package and all the support docs. >> I went to install links and this is what happened: >> >>EJINSIDE# pkg_add -r links >>/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found >> >>I decide to try and do the the same to get bash and the exact same >>thing happened. >> >>I did a google search and found an identical error posted on some >>russian BSD forums, however I was unable interpret the dialog. I >>also found other errors that were similar but with different files. >>Being new to FreeBSD these did make much sense to me. >> >>So this brings me to the crux of the matter. How do I find out what >>exactly is wrong? and how do I fix it? >> >>Any help appreciated. >> >> > >Have you turned off some features via /etc/make.conf or didn't cvsup >src-all. > >I have a >/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libssl.so.3 > >which was produced in my last buildworld and added to /usr/lib. > >Kent > > > >>Elijah >>/wayjen6@dodo.com.au (not a subscriber so email me directly as well >>as the list)/ >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 13:47:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9357D16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:47:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay01.kbs.net.au (relay01.kbs.net.au [203.220.32.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5990643D31 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:47:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayjen6@dodo.com.au) Received: from [203.221.126.135] (helo=[203.221.126.135]) by relay01.kbs.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BpSIp-0001Bv-00; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:47:36 +1000 Message-ID: <41065CF7.4000908@dodo.com.au> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:47:35 +0800 From: Duggan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kent Stewart References: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> <200407270552.56943.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200407270552.56943.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:47:42 -0000 What is this buildworld stuff about? Elijah Kent Stewart wrote: >On Tuesday 27 July 2004 05:45 am, Duggan wrote: > > >>I am new to FreeBSD and am using it as linux has a problem with my >>setup that I was unable to resolve. Anyways, I am liking what I have >>read about FreeBSD. >> >>I am a bit of a control freak and did a custom install of FreeBSD >>4.10 over the net with the required package and all the support docs. >> I went to install links and this is what happened: >> >>EJINSIDE# pkg_add -r links >>/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found >> >>I decide to try and do the the same to get bash and the exact same >>thing happened. >> >>I did a google search and found an identical error posted on some >>russian BSD forums, however I was unable interpret the dialog. I >>also found other errors that were similar but with different files. >>Being new to FreeBSD these did make much sense to me. >> >>So this brings me to the crux of the matter. How do I find out what >>exactly is wrong? and how do I fix it? >> >>Any help appreciated. >> >> > >Have you turned off some features via /etc/make.conf or didn't cvsup >src-all. > >I have a >/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libssl.so.3 > >which was produced in my last buildworld and added to /usr/lib. > >Kent > > > >>Elijah >>/wayjen6@dodo.com.au (not a subscriber so email me directly as well >>as the list)/ >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 13:49:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECABE16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:49:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A3443D5A for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:49:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6RDloIB013627; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:47:50 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:49:01 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> <200407270552.56943.kstewart@owt.com> <41065594.301@dodo.com.au> In-Reply-To: <41065594.301@dodo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407270649.01787.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Duggan Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:49:05 -0000 On Tuesday 27 July 2004 06:16 am, Duggan wrote: > I tried cvsup src-all just now and it says command not found. > Cvsup is a port that you would have to add to your system. Before you worry about what you have, you might read Chapters 4 and 19 of the Handbook at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html There are a number of possibilities. You might not have installed all of the sources and features that you needed when you created the system. There is a cvsup tag of RELENG_4_10 that will follow the security tree for 4.10. Most of these operations are easy once you have a basic understanding of the process of maintaining a system. There is a freebsd-newbies list that might help get you started. Since the system can't find the library you are having problems with, it becomes a function of what is the easiest way to get it working. It looks like you chose to little when you did the install. Being a control freak is ok but when you are getting started, a custom install may not work. Using cvsup to grab the latest code and then following the instructions in Chapter 19 is one way of doing this. Other people may have different ideas and I don't know what would be the fastest on your end. Kent > Elijah > > Kent Stewart wrote: > >On Tuesday 27 July 2004 05:45 am, Duggan wrote: > >>I am new to FreeBSD and am using it as linux has a problem with my > >>setup that I was unable to resolve. Anyways, I am liking what I > >> have read about FreeBSD. > >> > >>I am a bit of a control freak and did a custom install of FreeBSD > >>4.10 over the net with the required package and all the support > >> docs. I went to install links and this is what happened: > >> > >>EJINSIDE# pkg_add -r links > >>/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found > >> > >>I decide to try and do the the same to get bash and the exact same > >>thing happened. > >> > >>I did a google search and found an identical error posted on some > >>russian BSD forums, however I was unable interpret the dialog. I > >>also found other errors that were similar but with different files. > >>Being new to FreeBSD these did make much sense to me. > >> > >>So this brings me to the crux of the matter. How do I find out > >> what exactly is wrong? and how do I fix it? > >> > >>Any help appreciated. > > > >Have you turned off some features via /etc/make.conf or didn't cvsup > >src-all. > > > >I have a > >/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libssl.so.3 > > > >which was produced in my last buildworld and added to /usr/lib. > > > >Kent > > > >>Elijah > >>/wayjen6@dodo.com.au (not a subscriber so email me directly as well > >>as the list)/ > >>_______________________________________________ > >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 13:52:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB77016A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:52:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay01.kbs.net.au (relay01.kbs.net.au [203.220.32.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7DB43D5D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:52:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayjen6@dodo.com.au) Received: from [203.221.126.135] (helo=[203.221.126.135]) by relay01.kbs.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BpSNZ-0001tN-00; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:52:30 +1000 Message-ID: <41065E1E.8010400@dodo.com.au> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:52:30 +0800 From: Duggan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kent Stewart References: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> <200407270552.56943.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200407270552.56943.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:52:34 -0000 The file libssl.so.3 doesn't exist in either of the directories you suggested. In fact /usr/obj is a dead end. How would I do a full search? Elijah Kent Stewart wrote: >On Tuesday 27 July 2004 05:45 am, Duggan wrote: > > >>I am new to FreeBSD and am using it as linux has a problem with my >>setup that I was unable to resolve. Anyways, I am liking what I have >>read about FreeBSD. >> >>I am a bit of a control freak and did a custom install of FreeBSD >>4.10 over the net with the required package and all the support docs. >> I went to install links and this is what happened: >> >>EJINSIDE# pkg_add -r links >>/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found >> >>I decide to try and do the the same to get bash and the exact same >>thing happened. >> >>I did a google search and found an identical error posted on some >>russian BSD forums, however I was unable interpret the dialog. I >>also found other errors that were similar but with different files. >>Being new to FreeBSD these did make much sense to me. >> >>So this brings me to the crux of the matter. How do I find out what >>exactly is wrong? and how do I fix it? >> >>Any help appreciated. >> >> > >Have you turned off some features via /etc/make.conf or didn't cvsup >src-all. > >I have a >/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libssl.so.3 > >which was produced in my last buildworld and added to /usr/lib. > >Kent > > > >>Elijah >>/wayjen6@dodo.com.au (not a subscriber so email me directly as well >>as the list)/ >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 13:54:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC7C16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:54:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay01.kbs.net.au (relay01.kbs.net.au [203.220.32.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D830743D46 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:54:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayjen6@dodo.com.au) Received: from [203.221.126.135] (helo=[203.221.126.135]) by relay01.kbs.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1BpSPa-0002Dg-00; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:54:35 +1000 Message-ID: <41065E9B.4080805@dodo.com.au> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:54:35 +0800 From: Duggan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kent Stewart References: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> <200407270552.56943.kstewart@owt.com> <41065594.301@dodo.com.au> <200407270649.01787.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200407270649.01787.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:54:38 -0000 Kent Stewart wrote: >On Tuesday 27 July 2004 06:16 am, Duggan wrote: > > >>I tried cvsup src-all just now and it says command not found. >> >> >> > >Cvsup is a port that you would have to add to your system. Before you >worry about what you have, you might read Chapters 4 and 19 of the >Handbook at >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html > >There are a number of possibilities. You might not have installed all of >the sources and features that you needed when you created the system. >There is a cvsup tag of RELENG_4_10 that will follow the security tree >for 4.10. > >Most of these operations are easy once you have a basic understanding of >the process of maintaining a system. There is a freebsd-newbies list >that might help get you started. > >Since the system can't find the library you are having problems with, it >becomes a function of what is the easiest way to get it working. It >looks like you chose to little when you did the install. Being a >control freak is ok but when you are getting started, a custom install >may not work. > >Using cvsup to grab the latest code and then following the instructions >in Chapter 19 is one way of doing this. Other people may have different >ideas and I don't know what would be the fastest on your end. > >Kent > > > > >>Elijah >> >>Kent Stewart wrote: >> >> >>>On Tuesday 27 July 2004 05:45 am, Duggan wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I am new to FreeBSD and am using it as linux has a problem with my >>>>setup that I was unable to resolve. Anyways, I am liking what I >>>>have read about FreeBSD. >>>> >>>>I am a bit of a control freak and did a custom install of FreeBSD >>>>4.10 over the net with the required package and all the support >>>>docs. I went to install links and this is what happened: >>>> >>>>EJINSIDE# pkg_add -r links >>>>/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found >>>> >>>>I decide to try and do the the same to get bash and the exact same >>>>thing happened. >>>> >>>>I did a google search and found an identical error posted on some >>>>russian BSD forums, however I was unable interpret the dialog. I >>>>also found other errors that were similar but with different files. >>>>Being new to FreeBSD these did make much sense to me. >>>> >>>>So this brings me to the crux of the matter. How do I find out >>>>what exactly is wrong? and how do I fix it? >>>> >>>>Any help appreciated. >>>> >>>> >>>Have you turned off some features via /etc/make.conf or didn't cvsup >>>src-all. >>> >>>I have a >>>/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libssl.so.3 >>> >>>which was produced in my last buildworld and added to /usr/lib. >>> >>>Kent >>> >>> >>> >>>>Elijah >>>>/wayjen6@dodo.com.au (not a subscriber so email me directly as well >>>>as the list)/ >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>>> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > > Thats for that, I'll try cvsup and failing that I will do a user install. Elijah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 13:55:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B50216A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:55:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bacardi.wixb.com (bacardi.wixb.com [65.43.82.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF0B43D54 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:55:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) X-Scanned: at bacardi.wixb.com with ID 41065ED4.000 by j-chkmail Received: from dakota.wixb.com (bacardi.wixb.com [10.43.82.173]) by bacardi.wixb.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6RDtWN0009200; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:55:33 -0500 (CDT) Organization: Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee WI USA Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040727085422.024f6670@localhost> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:54:48 -0500 To: Duggan From: "J.D. Bronson" In-Reply-To: <41065E1E.8010400@dodo.com.au> References: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> <200407270552.56943.kstewart@owt.com> <41065E1E.8010400@dodo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:55:43 -0000 At 08:52 AM 07/27/2004, Duggan wrote: >The file libssl.so.3 doesn't exist in either of the directories you >suggested. In fact /usr/obj is a dead end. How would I do a full search? > >Elijah # find / -name libssl.so.3 -- J.D. Bronson Aurora Health Care // Information Services // Milwaukee, WI USA Office: 414.978.8282 // Email: jd@aurora.org // Pager: 414.314.8282 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 14:05:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0A716A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:05:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E6243D54 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:05:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6RE5VsV071148 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:05:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6RE5VIO071147; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:05:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:05:31 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Duggan Message-ID: <20040727140530.GB70711@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Duggan , Kent Stewart , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41065CF7.4000908@dodo.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:05:31 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kent Stewart Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:05:39 -0000 --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 09:47:35PM +0800, Duggan wrote: > What is this buildworld stuff about? It's one of the two great things that makes FreeBSD stand out from the crowd. You can pull the latest system sources down from the net and compile, install and use a whole new system -- utilities, shared libraries, kernel and all with about a dozen commands and one reboot. Read all about how to do that here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/synching.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html Of course, you don't have to do any of that, but it can be incredibly convenient for keeping things up to date. If you're wondering what the other thing is, it's the ports system. (Nb. Any similarity to Gentoo's e-merge system is entirely deliberate. They copied us.) Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBmEqiD657aJF7eIRAsBTAKCirN6xVpM3XwqY6YvE3mv6t9vzSACgmIWK arKOsVHa05uP5gWlNxqmOpA= =To7Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 14:07:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE87216A4D1 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:07:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BF443D1D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:07:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9ED603F3D; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:07:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:07:37 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Duggan Message-ID: <20040727140737.GA70100@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:07:40 -0000 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > EJINSIDE# pkg_add -r links > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found It sound like you did not install the crypto package. To install it now, do the following: /stand/sysinstall ->Configure->Distributions->crypto then select your ftp mirror, and you should be done. HTH, Simon --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBmGpCkn+/eutqCoRAuNEAJwI1JIfoWFDF192hNYQDim+nCV1swCgm9Ml aDbs/305VTUNQ6Sqj6+7wZ4= =Cm24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 14:07:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA8E16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:07:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46A043D48 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:07:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@jwebmedia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (66.49.54.54.nw.nuvox.net [66.49.54.54]) i6RE7mb8018844 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:07:48 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 09:07:42 -0500 From: Joseph Koenig To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 5.2.1 + IBM ServeRAID + SMP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:07:46 -0000 Hello, I have an IMB xSeries 220 server with Dual 1.2 GHz P3's and an IBM ServeRAID card. Due to the ServeRAID card I need to install FreeBSD 5.x. The question is, how stable is 5.2.1 at this point? All I really need to install and run on the system is MySQL and PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL will only have 1 database and MySQL will have about 80. Is this a reasonably stable set-up? What about if I enable SMP to make use of the dual processors? Thanks, Joe Koenig Production Manager jWeb New Media Design joe@jWebmedia.com http://www.jwebmedia.com/ 636.928.3162 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 14:29:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D0D16A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:29:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB7243D66 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:29:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i6RETTE25687; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:29:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200407271429.i6RETTE25687@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:29:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200407270257.39296.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> from "Miguel Cardenas" at Jul 27, 2004 02:57:38 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OSS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:29:33 -0000 > > Hello > > Sorry for my ignorance, am new to FreeBSD... which is the kernel config file? > is it a configuration for compiling or at boot time? am linux user so will > not bee too hard, just tell me which is the file pls :D Well, in pre 5.xxx versions it is in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf. You should find at least 2 in there already: GENERIC and LINT. Make a copy of GENERIC and modify the copy and follow instructions in the handbook or any of the other good FreeBSD books then to build a new kernel. There is an old way that still works in 4.xxx and a new way that is a bit more automated. The old way has you doing /usr/sbin/config CONF_file_name cd ../../compile/CONF_file_name make depend make make install (only if you want it to actually replace your current kernel now you can do this manually later) The new way is supposed to be better, but old habits die hard and this way leaves files where I know how to find them. I have yet to do anything more than burn at 5.xxx CD so I am not sure the files are exactly the same in 5.xxx, but they won't be extremely different in principal. ////jerry > > Regards, > Miguel > > > This should be automatically created by devfs. I would make certain that > > the proper device entry is installed in your kernel config. For my system, > > I need to add the following line to my kernel config file: > > > > device pcm > > > > I hope this helps. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 15:05:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE70B16A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:05:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4E5C43D41 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:05:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mayday@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 6454 invoked by uid 65534); 27 Jul 2004 15:05:27 -0000 Received: from p508A9A34.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.12]) (80.138.154.52) by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 17:05:27 +0200 X-Authenticated: #431110 From: Benjamin Sobotta To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:10:38 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407271710.38954.mayday@gmx.net> cc: Joseph Koenig Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.2.1 + IBM ServeRAID + SMP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:05:39 -0000 Hi! I have 5.2.1 running on an SMP machine and it works just fine. I never had any crashes. The machine is used for numerical calculations. I don't know about the RAID but SMP seems to work fine (for me). Cheers, Ben On Tuesday 27 July 2004 14:07, Joseph Koenig wrote: > Hello, > > I have an IMB xSeries 220 server with Dual 1.2 GHz P3's and an IBM > ServeRAID card. Due to the ServeRAID card I need to install FreeBSD 5.x. > The question is, how stable is 5.2.1 at this point? All I really need to > install and run on the system is MySQL and PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL will only > have 1 database and MySQL will have about 80. Is this a reasonably stable > set-up? What about if I enable SMP to make use of the dual processors? > Thanks, > > Joe Koenig > Production Manager > jWeb New Media Design > joe@jWebmedia.com > http://www.jwebmedia.com/ > 636.928.3162 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 15:06:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884AD16A4CE; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:06:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15D243D41; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:06:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.250]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6RF6pGZ061097; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:06:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6RF6pCJ002364; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:06:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6RF6p38002363; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:06:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:06:51 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: "M.M. Yang" Message-ID: <20040727150651.GA2285@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "printf" doesn't work in ia64_init()? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:06:52 -0000 On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 08:38:00AM +0000, M.M. Yang wrote: > Hi all, > I'm reading the function ia64_init(), and try > to use "printf" to output some information. But if I put "printf" before > "msgbufinit()", I won't see any word I expect by using dmesg. That's correct. > In the same function after "cninit()", it comments: > /* > * Initialize the console before we print anything out. > */ > cninit(); > > /* OUTPUT NOW ALLOWED */ > > So I have thought "printf" should work after cninit(). But now it seems to > work only after msgbufinit(). printf() does work right after cninit(). The output just doesn't get saved in the message buffer. Hence, dmesg(8) doesn't show it, but it certainly gets printed to the system console. Look at the console... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 15:13:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B8716A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:13:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from merle.it.northwestern.edu (merle.it.northwestern.edu [129.105.16.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7932243D1D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:13:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from r-militante@northwestern.edu) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by merle.it.northwestern.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i6RFDZtS024632 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:13:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from merle.it.northwestern.edu (darkpossum.medill.northwestern.edu [129.105.246.24]) by merle.it.northwestern.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma024184; Tue, 27 Jul 04 10:13:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:16:10 -0500 From: Redmond Militante To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040727151610.GA2790@darkpossum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Sender: redmond@darkpossum.medill.northwestern.edu X-URL: http://darkpossum.medill.northwestern.edu/gnupg.php Subject: limit login attempts with pam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Redmond Militante List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:13:41 -0000 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hello i'm interested in configuring PAM on my 4x system so that a user is locked = out of ignored if trying to log in unsuccessfully via ftp within the space = of a minute or so. i'm trying to eliminate brute force attacks... can anyone point me towards some good tutorials on how to do this? thanks redmond --=20 Redmond Militante Software Engineer / Medill School of Journalism FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 #0: Thu Jul 1 14:36:26 CDT 2004 i386 10:15AM up 10 days, 16:19, 3 users, load averages: 0.08, 0.09, 0.08 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBnG67g+NJl/fSB0RAsq/AJ0e9j9ITTJjSrdPNO1Pw9kK9QCwhACgnIQ+ uTvxhPR+BflhP3BvfO7OCM4= =NHdC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 15:44:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EDC16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:44:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hermes.webtent.net (hermes.webtent.net [192.216.106.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E548143D55 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:44:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@webtent.com) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (webtent.org [198.79.127.235]) by hermes.webtent.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i6RFigj03600 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:44:42 -0400 From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Message-Id: <1090943083.8898.65.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:44:43 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SASL error Decrypt integrity check failed with sample-server test for GSSAPI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:44:52 -0000 Trying to get SASL to work with Heimdal 0.6 on FreeBSD 5.2.1. When doing the sample-server test, it finds my ticket OK and presents a response that the sample-client accepts and gives its response. The problem is when sending that client response back to the server, this is what happens: esmtp# ./sample-server -s imap -p ../plugins/.libs Generating client mechanism list... Sending list of 8 mechanism(s) S: Waiting for client mechanism... C: got 'GSSAPI' lt-sample-server: SASL Other: GSSAPI Error: Miscellaneous failure (see text) (Decrypt integrity check failed) lt-sample-server: Starting SASL negotiation: authentication failure (authentication failure) esmtp# ./sample-client -s imap -n esmtp.webtent.net -u spam -p ../plugins/.libs service=imap Waiting for mechanism list from server... S: recieved 57 byte message Choosing best mechanism from: NTLM LOGIN ANONYMOUS PLAIN GSSAPI OTP DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 returning OK: spam Using mechanism GSSAPI Preparing initial. Sending initial response... C: Both the SASL and saslauthd ports are version 2.1.19 on the system. Anyone know what 'Decrypt integrity check failed' means? I found references to the password being wrong when Googling it, but the password has been reset and I get this same error with any user. I am starting the sample-server and sample-client as follows, seems to find the service keytab OK, I am using what I think is setup correctly. I extracted the Kerberos keytab for imap/esmtp.webtent.net and have it placed correctly in /etc/krb5.keytab with 600 owned by the 'cyrus' user. The realm is WEBTENT.NET. ./sample-server -s imap -p ../plugins/.libs ./sample-client -s imap -n esmtp.webtent.net -u spam -p ../plugins/.libs kadmin> list spam spam@WEBTENT.NET esmtp# klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Principal: spam@WEBTENT.NET Issued Expires Principal Jul 27 10:18:04 Jul 27 20:18:04 krbtgt/WEBTENT.NET@WEBTENT.NET Jul 27 10:18:09 Jul 27 20:18:04 imap/esmtp.webtent.net@WEBTENT.NET esmtp# ls -la /etc/krb5.keytab -rw------- 1 cyrus mail 586 Jul 26 19:49 /etc/krb5.keytab -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 16:13:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1782E16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:13:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.vipowernet.net (smtp1.vipowernet.net [65.112.145.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654CA43D54 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:13:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanford@technonupe.net) Received: from vipowernet.net ([65.112.145.101]) by smtp1.vipowernet.net (8.12.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6R8uH8w029760 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:56:18 -0400 Received: from 192.168.0.168 ([65.113.92.178]) by vipowernet.net ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:13:25 +0400 From: "Stanford .T. Mings Jr." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1090944805.4713.86.camel@tux> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5-4mdk Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:13:26 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rcpt-To: Subject: FreeBSD on HP's ProLiant ML110 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:13:29 -0000 Has anyone gotten FreeBSD on this machine(HP ProLiant ML110 tower server) and if so, was there any issues ? I am considering getting one of these as my main File/Mail Server and so far it seems to be a good deal for a single user LAN Server. stm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 16:32:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3352F16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:32:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com (bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com [155.208.255.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AAB43D39 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:32:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from g.goutaudier@alplog.fr) Received: from gaurand.grenoble.hp.com (gaurand.grenoble.hp.com [15.128.162.249]) by bbnrelbul01.net.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2829D37D16; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:32:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alplog.fr (dhcp-15-128-30-35.grenoble.hp.com [15.128.30.35]) by gaurand.grenoble.hp.com with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_24419+JAGae58098)/8.7.3 SMKit7.02) id SAA10136; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:33:44 +0200 (METDST) Message-ID: <41068379.9040906@alplog.fr> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:31:53 +0200 From: Guillaume Goutaudier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark References: <41051C97.7030200@hp.com> <20040726151944.GA37441@redtick.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20040726151944.GA37441@redtick.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BCM4401-B0 card error on FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:32:15 -0000 I just recompiled a 4.10 kernel with bfe support. I grab source code from http://people.freebsd.org/~dmlb/bfe-4.8.tar.gz At boot time, I get: pci1: (vendor=0x14e4, dev=0x170c) at 14.0 irq 11 When I try to insert the driver manually: module_register: module pci/bfe already exists! linker_file_sysinit "if_bfe.ko" failed to register! 17 I think I'm gone go back to Linux... cheers, Guillaume Mark wrote: > You may have to build a kernel with the > "device bge" # gig cards > "device bfe" # 10- 100 cards > entries to build the moduals, I would have thought they > were with the base system. But I had to build a kernel > for the bfe modual to work. > > Side note: The bfe entry is not in the GENERIC kernel > on 4.10 but will build and work. The bge modual would not > find my broadcom 4401. > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 05:00:39PM +0200, Guillaume Goutaudier wrote: > >>bge gives me exactly the same error message. >>And still nothing like "bge0: ..." in dmesg output. >> >> >>Try bge. >> >>On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Guillaume Goutaudier wrote: >> >>>/ Hi all, >> >>/>/ >>/>/ I'm trying to move from Linux to FreeBSD on my compaq nx5000 laptop. >>/>/ The FreeBSD version I installed is 5.2.1. >>/>/ >>/>/ I have a problem with the integrated broadcom BCM4401-B0 NIC. >>/>/ >>/>/ This is not a BCM4401 but a BCM4401-B0 card (PCI ID = 0x170c), and >>/>/ the bfe driver does not seem to work: >>/>/ >>/>/ In the dmesg output, I don't have a single line with "bfe0: ...". >>/>/ Instead, all I have is: >>/>/ >>/>/ pci1: at device 14.0 (no driver attached) >>/>/ >>/>/ When I try to install the bfe module manually, I get: >>/>/ >>/>/ # kldload miibus.ko >>/>/ interface miibus.1 already present in the KLD 'kernel'! >>/>/ kldload: can't load miibus.ko: file exists >>/>/ # kldload if_bfe.ko >>/>/ module_register: module pci/bfe already exists! >>/>/ Module pci/bfe failed to register: 17 >>/>/ module_register: module bfe/miibus already exists! >>/>/ Module bfe/miibus failed to register: 17 >>/>/ >>/>/ I'm not familiar at all with *BSD drivers stuff so any help will be >>/>/ REALLY appreciated ... >>/>/ >>/>/ cheers, >>/>/ >>/>/ >>/>/ Guillaume >>/>/ / >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Guillaume Goutaudier Infrastructure Team | | Alplog consultant HP Services EMEA (SEM) | | g.goutaudier@alplog.fr guillaume.goutaudier@hp.com | | | | Alplog Hewlett-Packard | | 119, Bd Stalingrad Boulevard Steve Biko | | 69100 Villeurbanne (FR) 38090 Villefontaine (FR) | | Tel +33 04 72 69 26 00 Tel +33 04 74 99 30 65 | --------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 17:25:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA4616A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:25:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from highland.isltd.insignia.com (highland.isltd.insignia.com [195.74.141.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A3343D2D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com) Received: from dailuaine.isltd.insignia.com (dailuaine.isltd.insignia.com [172.16.64.11])i6RHP4hH084729 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:25:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com) Received: from speyburn.isltd.insignia.com (speyburn [172.16.64.16]) i6RHP3gF027816 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:25:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com) From: Jim Hatfield To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:27:46 +0100 Organization: Insignia Solutions Message-ID: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.640 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Subject: Transparent proxying in 4.x with squid and ipf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:25:06 -0000 I used to do transparent http proxying with ipfw and Squid, but lost that when I switched from ipfw to ipf. The Squid port Makefile says: ># This option does not work on FreeBSD at the moment: ># ># --enable-ipf-transparent ># Enable Transparent Proxy support for IP-Filter systems (incl 3.0) ># (IPFilter headers are not currently installed to the base system, ># PRs ports/60700 and misc/44148 describe the problem; see ># http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-17.html for information ># about how to do transparent proxying with ipfw) Is this ever likely to be possible again in 4.x or will I have to wait for 5-STABLE? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 17:49:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A2E16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:49:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF80643D2D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:49:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) X-Sasl-enc: MAlpqvZuT3QK1TdbSW4r/A 1090950582 Received: from modem-1999.snake.dialup.pol.co.uk (modem-1999.snake.dialup.pol.co.uk [62.137.119.207]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CF0C1304B for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:49:41 -0400 (EDT) From: "R. W." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:50:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407271850.45282.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: De-installing Gnome 2.4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:49:45 -0000 I installed both Gnome and KDE (FreeBSD 5.2.1) and have been keeping both up to date for some time. But I scarcely ever use Gnome, and don't want the hassle of running the 2.6 upgrade script. How do I de-install Gnome 2.4.2? Will removing the metaport alone suffice? (When I recently portupgraded KDE several GTK based applications stopped working properly, but they were OK after I rebuilt them.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 18:03:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6492916A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:03:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (awb95.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.61.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4D343D5A for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:03:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] ([192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6RI3Eu8085954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:03:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <410698D0.7010406@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:02:56 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 X-Accept-Language: en, pl, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <0E1A1C28F9D61A4D8B6F70AFA3C1B1E42831@srvw2000-cnv1.cnv.local> <38a23c360407220825778b6c68@mail.gmail.com> <4100214E.4090405@orchid.homeunix.org> <4106538D.2070506@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4106538D.2070506@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Random Freeze X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:03:32 -0000 Mark Ovens wrote: > I'm seeing the same problem on my dual Athlon box. The freezes are > totally random AFAICT, sometimes when the machine is just idling. > > I've not used any CPU-specific make options but may try setting some to > see if it makes a difference. One thing though, I only have > > cpu I686_CPU > > set, not I486_CPU and I586_CPU as well, maybe that could be a problem? AFAIK, that's a proper setting for Athlons. What I recommend is you shouldn't play with make options before setting up a stable system (sorry if that's too obvious). > I'm running -CURRENT and the build I did on 8 April didn't have this > problem but it started with the next build I did a couple of weeks ago. > I've cvsup'd and rebuilt a couple of times since, the last on 25 July, > but the problem persists. I don't have much experience with CURRENT (and with SMP) but if you didn't change the config files it looks like something in the code (this is possible in CURRENT, right?). Only thing I can think of is reading freebsd-current and searching the archives. Not much from me, sorry. Regards, Karol -- Karol Kwiatkowski From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 18:16:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657A716A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:16:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk (heisenberg.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB69243D48 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:16:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [82.68.31.177] (helo=Demon.vickiandstacey.com) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BpWUq-0007K6-GA; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:16:16 +0000 Received: from crom.vickiandstacey.com (crom [192.168.1.10]) i6RIGLWe005640; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:16:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from crom.vickiandstacey.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6RIG2bg069893; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:16:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey@crom.vickiandstacey.com) Received: (from stacey@localhost) by crom.vickiandstacey.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6RIFvSm069892; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:15:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:15:57 +0100 From: Stacey Roberts To: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de Message-ID: <20040727181557.GE495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6lCXDTVICvIQMz0h" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.68.31.177] cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:16:18 -0000 --6lCXDTVICvIQMz0h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I've installed apcupsd (latest in ports) on a FreeBSD-5.2.x server. The server has an APC BackUPS Pro 1000i ups system connected to it via the APC supplied 940-0020B serial signalling cable. After installing apcupsd, the message from pkg-message appears, instructing the following: ************************************************** NOTE IF you install a apcupsd server: Change to /dev and create a softlink to usv from the serial line the USV is connected to, e.g. cd /dev ln -s cuaa1 usv Read the MANUAL to do site specific configuration assigenments! Especially have a detailed look into the chapter describing the shutdown procedure. ************************************************** So this is what I did. Here's what I've then figured I need to do for my apcupsd.conf file: ## apcupsd.conf v1.1 ## # # for apcupsd release 3.10.13 (16 April 2004) - freebsd # # "apcupsd" POSIX config file # # ========= General configuration parameters ============ # # UPSNAME xxx # Use this to give your UPS a name in log files and such. This # is particulary useful if you have multiple UPSes. This does not # set the EEPROM. UPSNAME apc # # UPSCABLE [ simple | smart | ether | usb | # 940-0119A | 940-0127A | 940-0128A | 940-0020B | # 940-0020C | 940-0023A | 940-0024B | 940-0024C | # 940-1524C | 940-0024G | 940-0095A | 940-0095B | # 940-0095C | M-04-02-2000 ] # # defines the type of cable that you have. UPSCABLE 940-0020B # # Old types, still valid, are mapped to the new drivers # # keyword driver used # UPSTYPE [ backups dumb # | sharebasic dumb # | netups dumb # | backupspro apcsmart # | smartvsups apcsmart # | newbackupspro apcsmart # | backupspropnp apcsmart # | smartups apcsmart # | matrixups apcsmart # | sharesmart apcsmart # # *** New driver names. They can be used directly # rather than using one of the above aliases. # # UPSTYPE [ dumb | apcsmart | net | usb | snmp | test] # # defines the type of UPS you have. UPSTYPE dumb # # #DEVICE /dev/ # name of your UPS device # # Here a table of the possible devices related with the UPS drivers. # # NOTE!!! for USB devices, please use a form indicated below # including the [0-15] as written! # # Driver Device Description # dumb /dev/tty** Serial character device # apcsmart /dev/tty** Serial character device # usb /dev/usb/hiddev[0-15] On most systems # net hostname:port Network link to a master apcupsd # through NIS # snmp hostname:port:vendor:community # SNMP Network link to an SNMP-enabled # UPS device. Vendor is the MIB used by # the UPS device: can be "APC" or "RFC" # where APC is the powernet MIB and RFC # is the IETF's rfc1628 UPS-MIB. # Port is usually 161. DEVICE /dev/usv # #LOCKFILE # path for serial port lock file LOCKFILE /var/spool/lock # Note in the above, that UPSTYPE is set to "dumb", as with the type being set to backupspro (which is what I would have thought I should need), apcupsd complains that the wrong upstype has been configured, and that its decided to use backups instead. The "DEVICE /dev/usv" is also there by default, and I didn't change this, thinking that this is somehow related to the message in pkg-message. However, despite my being able to start apcupsd fromcmdline okay enough, on reboot, apcupsd does not start. I've (after backing up the original), copied the sample shell startup file to apcupsd.sh and checked that its executable: -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1486 Jul 25 14:10 /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apcupsd.sh* So, why is it not starting automatically on reboot? The other problem I've got is that with the instruction to create a soft link for /dev/usv, on reboot, that soft link is of course disappears, so I have to manually recreate that soft link again, before (again) manually starting apcupsd from cmdline. Is there something that I've missed out somewhere that is causing apcupsd not to start automatically on reboot? Here is what I am able to see fromk apcaccess status: $ apcaccess status localhost:3551 APC : 001,019,0499 DATE : Mon Jul 26 20:50:45 BST 2004 HOSTNAME : thor.vickiandstacey.com RELEASE : 3.10.13 VERSION : 3.10.13 (16 April 2004) freebsd UPSNAME : apc CABLE : APC Cable 940-0020B MODEL : DUMB UPS Driver UPSMODE : Stand Alone STARTTIME: Mon Jul 26 20:45:10 BST 2004 STATUS : ONLINE MBATTCHG : 5 Percent MINTIMEL : 3 Minutes MAXTIME : 0 Seconds NUMXFERS : 0 TONBATT : 0 seconds CUMONBATT: 0 seconds XOFFBATT : N/A STATFLAG : 0x02000008 Status Flag END APC : Mon Jul 26 20:50:45 BST 2004 $ If there is any more information I should post that would of use to anyone wanting to assist, please let me know. Thanks for the time. Regards, Stacey --6lCXDTVICvIQMz0h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQEVAwUBQQab2edvY+8mWFvRAQGbmggAqQ47T3AcJnAGlxUX2WXfOrg+nId50rSW 4E0bAaATpLpuaEgD2Np14FWW59vFsNktEVJsDzj5govzEpVs5TqE5Oe1Rj4gitgV 5F+LoWhDJwuIhNGN8eSzkaERGv5/Tz/1zzXwdHPs2QAf8ZEiRUOh0P7XgyKMZNw8 l2g+qufirgiF7vNMbF3k+QEdcw8fghWN/FSrGwCMVflZIV7d5CJ7SQbR7Nm779CM gjH/IzIbJmex/W8g8V600BsMkMNvIT99+m9D5CXzxZZ0ifhPqL6N1Vo+UsS3gT8x P+dOP0+xglGRGgENdCSYE2AwjlmWQhycg+JC1oogu5EntrAeF9M9xQ== =pvUM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6lCXDTVICvIQMz0h-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 18:18:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE6716A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:18:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DDC43D2F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:18:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E8F69A39 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:18:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:18:45 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040727141845.4e7cceb1.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Postgres running in 5.1 jail corrupts Postgres running in host environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:18:48 -0000 I'm running Postgres 7.4 installed from a just cvsupped FreeBSD ports. I've got a production machine that's going to need a lot of upgrades, and I want to test them out prior to upgrading the production environment. So I built a jail on the production machine to install the new software in and test prior. Seems logical, right? Anyway, I set security.jail.sysvipc_allowed=1 so Postgres can run in the jail, but every time I start Postgres in the jail, the Postgres running in the host environ goes wacky. If I try to connect with psql, I get the following error: psql: FATAL: semctl(65542, 0, SETVAL, 0) failed: Invalid argument This is FreeBSD 5.1-p17 (I can't upgrade to 5.2.1 until the em driver is fixed ... but if someone knows for sure that this is fixed in 5.2.1, I'll push harder to get that driver fixed!) Anyone have any idea what's going wrong here? Or what I can do to fix it? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 18:47:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C114516A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:47:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from host4-server.com (host4-server.com [64.141.41.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AE543D46 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:47:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chinchoi@host4-server.com) Received: from chinchoi by host4-server.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BpWzA-0001JH-3B; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:47:36 -0400 From: To: roberthuff@rcn.com X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.26 X-IPAddress: 64.141.32.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:47:36 -0400 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host4-server.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32043 544] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - host4-server.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: re: snmp port application X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:47:41 -0000 -- Dear Robert Thank you After complied it, it overwrite my previous net-snmp How can I avoid it Thank you "make -DDISABLE_CONFLICTS install" Robert Huff Hi all I have this problem when complied zebra to support snmp ===> ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 conflicts with installed package(s): net-snmp-5.1.1_1 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). I checked the port application in the freebsd site and got This is Net-SNMP (previously known as "ucd-snmp"). It should be same one "right"? How can I compile the zebra without an error Thank you very much From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 19:12:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03EA16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:12:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031C543D5D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:12:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i6RJCS3f029457; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:12:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <4106A91C.70500@circlesquared.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:12:28 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stacey Roberts References: <20040727181557.GE495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> In-Reply-To: <20040727181557.GE495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de Subject: Re: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:12:59 -0000 Stacey Roberts wrote: > > [snip] > The other problem I've got is that with the instruction to create a soft link >for /dev/usv, on reboot, that soft link is of course disappears, so I have to >manually recreate that soft link again, before (again) manually starting apcupsd from cmdline. You need to make an appropriate entry in devfs.conf for any customisation of /dev to persist beyond a reboot with FreeBSD 5. - something like: link target name > > Is there something that I've missed out somewhere that is causing apcupsd not to start automatically on reboot? > I imagine this is the same problem. Peter. > > If there is any more information I should post that would of use to anyone wanting to assist, please let me know. > > Thanks for the time. > > Regards, > > Stacey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 19:45:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B7216A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:45:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from karol.adlerka.sk (karol.adlerka.sk [193.87.161.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284C643D45 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:45:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lucky@karol.adlerka.sk) Received: from karol.adlerka.sk (karol.adlerka.sk [193.87.161.50]) by karol.adlerka.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED85171081 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:33:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:33:44 +0200 (CEST) From: lucky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:45:11 -0000 do you provide also C-sources of your utilities on your web-page? if yes, where can i find them? thank you PS: i know, my english is not very good :-( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 19:55:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA6116A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:55:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pythagoras.zen.co.uk (pythagoras.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D8B43D4C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:55:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [82.68.31.180] (helo=Demon.vickiandstacey.com) by pythagoras.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BpY32-00056R-82; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:55:40 +0000 Received: from crom.vickiandstacey.com (crom [192.168.1.10]) i6RJtjiI005730; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:55:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from crom.vickiandstacey.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6RJtR4Q070271; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:55:33 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey@crom.vickiandstacey.com) Received: (from stacey@localhost) by crom.vickiandstacey.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6RJtHDj070270; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:55:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:55:17 +0100 From: Stacey Roberts To: Peter Risdon Message-ID: <20040727195517.GF495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> References: <20040727181557.GE495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106A91C.70500@circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ublo+h3cBgJ33ahC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4106A91C.70500@circlesquared.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Originating-Pythagoras-IP: [82.68.31.180] cc: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Stacey Roberts Subject: Re: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:55:41 -0000 --Ublo+h3cBgJ33ahC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter, Thanks for the reply. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Risdon " To: To Stacey Roberts Date: Tue, 27 Jul, 2004 20:12 BST Subject: Re: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x > Stacey Roberts wrote: > > > >[snip] > >The other problem I've got is that with the instruction to create a soft= =20 > >link=20 > >for /dev/usv, on reboot, that soft link is of course disappears, so I=20 > have to > >manually recreate that soft link again, before (again) manually starting= =20 > >apcupsd from cmdline. >=20 > You need to make an appropriate entry in devfs.conf for any=20 > customisation of /dev to persist beyond a reboot with FreeBSD 5. -=20 > something like: >=20 > link target name Ah.., yes.., Do you mind checking my syntax, please? According to your sugg= estion, I'd be adding: link /dev/cuaa1 /dev/usv to /etc/devfs.conf, and that should be it? Whislt I'm keen to try this out, could I then ask the obvious question, is = there some reason why in apcupsd.conf I am not allowed to simply use /dev/c= uaa1? Thanks again for taking the time. Regards, Stacey >=20 > > > >Is there something that I've missed out somewhere that is causing apcups= d=20 > >not to start automatically on reboot? > > >=20 > I imagine this is the same problem. >=20 > Peter. >=20 >=20 > > > >If there is any more information I should post that would of use to anyo= ne=20 > >wanting to assist, please let me know. > > > >Thanks for the time. > > > >Regards, > > > >Stacey --Ublo+h3cBgJ33ahC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQEVAwUBQQazIudvY+8mWFvRAQEbYwf/TdVnxnwOPWBcdC4/v15uYVlj+R4B9SEr /h0GFSKgFrUZ22kwDZ/a2wKaHOL54xHtXEyvfiiMNp7b2pBAS6Ym6zbfnxJPFUsC e6rWQe3hRsGW6FAqbq0AkWTYkzBsVxmzfvTl8raoZMG5UszKHRucMs694/8KWswU j/TGA0mHEOEfJ7q6zoG/9Jhzb7ry+DzlzIm8+HTYcjDntTPSC/cv97gWa2Etnhz2 3v7Fq9NMwedjhhd7sbwU+tl0PeZZTUsc+agModlE94visIWGv17x/zV4fzGdrR9I DJY8TEKUwWZW0OAp0CRJ3gZMOU4pcbxkfCiQm4KwVzNwmvkfB4Fh+Q== =5dWH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ublo+h3cBgJ33ahC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 20:00:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D7016A4D3 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:00:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3017443D80 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i6RK053f029580; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:00:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <4106B445.4080902@circlesquared.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:00:05 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stacey Roberts References: <20040727181557.GE495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106A91C.70500@circlesquared.com> <20040727195517.GF495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> In-Reply-To: <20040727195517.GF495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de Subject: Re: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:00:48 -0000 Stacey Roberts wrote: > Hi Peter, > Thanks for the reply. > >>Stacey Roberts wrote: >> >>>[snip] >>>The other problem I've got is that with the instruction to create a soft >>>link >>>for /dev/usv, on reboot, that soft link is of course disappears, so I >> >>have to >> >>>manually recreate that soft link again, before (again) manually starting >>>apcupsd from cmdline. >> >>You need to make an appropriate entry in devfs.conf for any >>customisation of /dev to persist beyond a reboot with FreeBSD 5. - >>something like: >> >>link target name > > > Ah.., yes.., Do you mind checking my syntax, please? According to your suggestion, I'd be adding: > > link /dev/cuaa1 /dev/usv > > to /etc/devfs.conf, and that should be it? No - look at the file, there are sample entries there: # Commonly used by many ports link acd0 cdrom link cuaa0 pilot So you'd want: link cuaa1 usv > > Whislt I'm keen to try this out, could I then ask the obvious question, >is there some reason why in apcupsd.conf I am not allowed to simply use /dev/cuaa1? > I'm afraid I'm not sufficiently familiar with this software to answer. But it would almost certainly be less problematic to stick with the suggested link. > Thanks again for taking the time. My pleasure, hope it helps. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 20:23:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9D016A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:23:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from redqueen.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95E243D58 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:23:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.2.122] (nimrod.elvandar.intranet [10.0.2.122]) by redqueen.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB2710685E for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:23:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4106B9AD.9040406@elvandar.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:23:09 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org Subject: Re: question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:23:13 -0000 lucky wrote: > do you provide also C-sources of your utilities on your web-page? > if yes, where can i find them? > > thank you > > PS: i know, my english is not very good :-( > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Forgotten this list.. oeps Depends on what utilities you mean. If you mean stuff in the base system, yes they are on the webpage, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweg.cgi lets you surf through the files.. (if you ment that). You can download everything via CVS/CVSup( this is faster then cvs! imo)/FTP and http transfers. Read the handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/) for more information on updating your source tree to get the sources (so that you can locally read then) Cheers! -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 20:35:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C68A16A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:35:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF38543D49 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:35:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:37:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4106BCA6.8070908@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:35:50 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <200407270748000178.07B2E20B@coolarrow.com> In-Reply-To: <200407270748000178.07B2E20B@coolarrow.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jul 2004 20:37:39.0421 (UTC) FILETIME=[8EEE68D0:01C47419] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security run output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:35:55 -0000 Chris wrote: >When I get my nightly email from the "security run output" it normally has about the last 20 lines or less from the /var/log/messages. Is there a way to increase that to about the last 50 lines? > >Thanks, >Chris > > Hmm, I don't think that it's necessarily true that /etc/periodic is sending you the last 20 or so lines ... it's only sending "kernel" notifications, which in the case of most setups of syslog.conf, are *also* logged to /var/log/messages, hence some confusion here. So, one good question in return would be, "are you sure that you're not seeing all you want in your periodic output?" You can take a look at the manpages and source for periodic(8) and friends to learn a little more... I'm in no way an expert --- it could be possible that an expert could modify the periodic.sh script to do what you want; but in your case, I'd think that you could create a small script to do what you want and run it nightly from your personal crontab. Something like what's below. HTH, Kevin Kinsey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #/bin/sh # mailmessages.sh --- mail yesterday's /var/log/messages output to root... yday=`date -v -1d "+%b %d"` grep "$yday" /var/log/messages | mail -s "Contents of /var/log/messages" root From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 20:28:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97CA16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:28:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from redqueen.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD8343D41 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:28:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.2.122] (nimrod.elvandar.intranet [10.0.2.122]) by redqueen.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03DB10685E; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:28:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4106BAD8.1060805@elvandar.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:28:08 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lucky References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:28:08 -0000 lucky wrote: > do you provide also C-sources of your utilities on your web-page? > if yes, where can i find them? > > thank you > > PS: i know, my english is not very good :-( And please, fixup your mailserver, it loops back to yourself :-) (private mailing wont work i am afraid) -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 20:40:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438FF16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:40:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F7D43D4C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:40:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE0126021B for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:40:52 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4106BDEA.8000405@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:41:14 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040726) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <0E1A1C28F9D61A4D8B6F70AFA3C1B1E42831@srvw2000-cnv1.cnv.local> <38a23c360407220825778b6c68@mail.gmail.com> <4100214E.4090405@orchid.homeunix.org> <4106538D.2070506@freebsd.org> <410698D0.7010406@orchid.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <410698D0.7010406@orchid.homeunix.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Random Freeze X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:40:57 -0000 Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: > Mark Ovens wrote: > >> I'm seeing the same problem on my dual Athlon box. The freezes are >> totally random AFAICT, sometimes when the machine is just idling. >> >> I've not used any CPU-specific make options but may try setting some to >> see if it makes a difference. One thing though, I only have >> >> cpu I686_CPU >> >> set, not I486_CPU and I586_CPU as well, maybe that could be a problem? > > AFAIK, that's a proper setting for Athlons. What I recommend is you > shouldn't play with make options before setting up a stable system > (sorry if that's too obvious). > >> I'm running -CURRENT and the build I did on 8 April didn't have this >> problem but it started with the next build I did a couple of weeks ago. >> I've cvsup'd and rebuilt a couple of times since, the last on 25 July, >> but the problem persists. > > I don't have much experience with CURRENT (and with SMP) but if you > didn't change the config files it looks like something in the code (this > is possible in CURRENT, right?). Only thing I can think of is reading > freebsd-current and searching the archives. Not much from me, sorry. > I've noticed something; it only seems to freeze when I'm in X. I had the machine up for over 30 hours at the command line yesterday whilst I upgraded some ports, including KDE (which was why I did it from the command line). I rebooted it when I'd finished. I've never had it stay up anywhere near that long since the 8 April build. Some conflict between XFree86 (4.3.0) and -CURRENT/5.2.1-RELEASE? Also, my machine dual-boots with XP and that stays up for days at a time so, in my case at least, I doubt it's hardware, plus I've run memtest86 and it was OK. Thanks for the input. I'm going to subscribe to freebsd-current and search the archives. Regards, Mark > Regards, > > Karol > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 20:41:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689D816A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:41:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC1E43D5D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:41:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 32301 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jul 2004 20:35:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 20:35:22 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29BC135; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:41:52 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (it.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06255-03; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:41:52 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5448D10C; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:41:52 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:41:51 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: lucky Message-Id: <20040727234151.23d0a6e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:41:55 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:33:44 +0200 (CEST) lucky wrote: > > do you provide also C-sources of your utilities on your web-page? > if yes, where can i find them? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 20:54:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409D116A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:54:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21C243D1D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:54:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i6RKsppO059932; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:54:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:54:51 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: lucky Message-ID: <20040727205451.GC71175@dan.emsphone.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:54:56 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 27), lucky said: > do you provide also C-sources of your utilities on your web-page? > if yes, where can i find them? Yes; you can browse the source at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/, or download it from ftp.freebsd.org, or fetch it online and keep up-to-date with cvsup. http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/cvsup.html -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 20:55:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EDB16A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:55:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (cs.earlham.edu [159.28.230.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375F843D55 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:55:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (localhost.cs.earlham.edu [127.0.0.1]) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6RKtG50087818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:55:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: (from skylar@localhost) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i6RKtFvx087817; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:55:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: quark.cs.earlham.edu: skylar set sender to skylar@quark.cs.earlham.edu using -f Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:55:15 -0500 From: Skylar Thompson To: Hakim Singhji Message-ID: <20040727205515.GA87546@quark.cs.earlham.edu> References: <20040726T123353Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040726T123353Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Sender: "Skylar Thompson" X-Accept-Primary-Language: en X-Accept-Secondary-Language: es SMTP-Mailing-Host: quark.cs.earlham.edu X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE X-Uptime: 3:53PM up 39 days, 12:38, 15 users, load averages: 0.07, 0.19, 0.22 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.3 (2004 June 7, compiled Jul 11 2004 16:34:39) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on quark.cs.earlham.edu X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: skylar@cs.earlham.edu cc: hakim.singhji@earthlink.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3COM NIC Card??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Skylar Thompson List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:55:26 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:33:53PM -0400, Hakim Singhji wrote: > Hello All, >=20 > I recently purchased a pair of 3Com 3C905CTXM EtherLink XL PCI TX Network > adapter PCI 100 Mbps NIC Cards and I wanted to know if they are > compatible with FreeBSD 4.10 (stable). Could someone please give me some > feedback on this thanks. Sure are. We've got a bunch of machines with them, and they work fine. They're supported by the xl(4) driver. --=20 -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBBsEzsc4yyULgN4YRAkvWAJsH/A3KImLt2h8CaKmSf4Ti49LEDACgoFls fZs+fALaz1qAj4OCpHHpWYo= =Tvlg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 20:50:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FD716A4D3 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:50:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF6E43D55 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:50:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6RKokcO040092; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:50:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6RKokHQ040089; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:50:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:50:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: lucky In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040727225001.X40031@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:50:47 -0000 > do you provide also C-sources of your utilities on your web-page? > if yes, where can i find them? in installation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 21:21:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BB916A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:21:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.infotechfl.com (mailrelay.infotechfl.com [209.251.147.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FA343D3F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:21:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gmulder@infotechfl.com) Received: from garymulder ([172.20.0.75]) by mail.infotechfl.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6RLLSN22910 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:21:32 -0400 Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20040727165107.011d98c8@mail.infotechfl.com> X-Sender: gmulder@mail.infotechfl.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:21:27 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gary Mulder Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: vinum create drive problem, can't add second disk to config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:21:43 -0000 All, I have two 160GB disks I want to mirror (ad0 and ad2). I loaded a fresh install FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE on the boot disk, and are following the mirroring instructions at: http://devel.reinikainen.net/docs/how-to/Vinum/ I have successfully added one half of the mirror and now are booting off the vinum devices (the vinum devices fsck and boot fine). However I persistently get the following error when adding the second disk. Here's my environment: # uname -a FreeBSD testbox 4.10-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE #0: Tue May 25 22:47:12 GMT 2004 root@perseus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 # disklabel -r ad2s1 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 320159322 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 19928*) h: 320159306 16 vinum # (Cyl. 0*- 19928*) Note that the fstype of /dev/ad2s1h is correctly set to vinum, a common cause of the following vinum error, but apparently not the cause of my problem. # ls -l /dev/ad2s1h crw-r----- 2 root operator 116, 0x00020017 Jul 26 21:23 /dev/ad2s1h And here is how I am trying to add the second disk: # cat /etc/vinum1_onlydrive.conf drive mirror1 device /dev/ad2s1h # vinum create /etc/vinum1_onlydrive.conf 1: drive mirror1 device /dev/ad2s1h ** 1 : Invalid argument 1 drives: D mirror0 State: up Device /dev/ad0s1h Avail: 0/156327 MB (0%) 5 volumes: V swap State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 511 MB V root State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 4096 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 4096 MB V var State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 4096 MB V home State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 140 GB 5 plexes: P swap.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 511 MB P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 140 GB 5 subdisks: S swap.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 511 MB S root.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 4096 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 4096 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 4096 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 140 GB # tail -4 /var/log/vinum_history 27 Jul 2004 20:54:33.452226 *** vinum started *** 27 Jul 2004 20:54:33.452846 create /etc/vinum1_onlydrive.conf drive mirror1 device /dev/ad2s1h 27 Jul 2004 20:54:33.471889 *** Created devices *** # tail -1 /var/log/messages Jul 27 20:54:33 testbox /kernel: vinum: drive mirror1 is up I am either missing something obvious or something strange is occurring. The above vinum how-to suggests using the "-f" option to create for the second disk. However when I do this the drive count in "vinum list" goes up but mirror1 is never created. Any help would be appreciated! Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 21:28:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B291F16A4D0 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:28:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069EE43D62 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:28:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from [192.168.254.3] (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696F24B1DF; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:28:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4106C9FE.7030506@cordula.ws> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:32:46 +0200 From: cpghost User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040710) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lucky References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:28:27 -0000 lucky wrote: >do you provide also C-sources of your utilities on your web-page? >if yes, where can i find them? > > When installing FreeBSD, you have the option to install the source tree. On an fully installed system, the complete sources are then under /usr/src. Remko already pointed out that you can also ftp or cvsup the sources, or that you can browse the CVS repository with the cvsweb interface. Happy hacking! -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 21:34:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FD216A4D5 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:34:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from weber.ucsd.edu (weber.ucsd.edu [132.239.206.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212F143D39 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:34:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jharaden@weber.ucsd.edu) Received: by weber.ucsd.edu (Postfix, from userid 8826) id 2262B8517; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Full-Name: Paul Chan X-Mailer: ELM [2.4] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040727213449.2262B8517@weber.ucsd.edu> From: jharaden@weber.ucsd.edu (Paul Chan) Subject: no subject (file transmission) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:34:51 -0000 1. I am running freeBSd ssd 5.2.1 on ~ntel motherboard (D865GBL) with a intel 3.2 GHZ pentium 4 cpu (BX80546GP320). I have a hp laserjet 1300 connected to a parallell port with the following communications mode: lptcontrol -i -d /dev/lpt0 I have no problems printing either plane text or groff data. But after many print jobs, I get the following console message: stray irq 7. I don't know what this means. Do you know what it means, and have any suggestions for fixing it. 2. My full email address is jharaden@weber.ucsd.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 21:37:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1264016A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:37:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk (heisenberg.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851F443D4C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:37:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [82.68.31.182] (helo=Demon.vickiandstacey.com) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BpZdD-00023K-BS; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:37:07 +0000 Received: from crom.vickiandstacey.com (crom [192.168.1.10]) i6RLbDuo005828; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:37:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from crom.vickiandstacey.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6RLapRm070514; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:36:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey@crom.vickiandstacey.com) Received: (from stacey@localhost) by crom.vickiandstacey.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6RLakMe070513; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:36:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:36:46 +0100 From: Stacey Roberts To: Peter Risdon Message-ID: <20040727213646.GG495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> References: <20040727181557.GE495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106A91C.70500@circlesquared.com> <20040727195517.GF495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106B445.4080902@circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVcIhgQsEzAXu06J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4106B445.4080902@circlesquared.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.68.31.182] cc: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Stacey Roberts Subject: Re: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:37:11 -0000 --EVcIhgQsEzAXu06J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter, =20 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Risdon " To: To Stacey Roberts Date: Tue, 27 Jul, 2004 21:00 BST Subject: Re: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x > Stacey Roberts wrote: > >Hi Peter, > > Thanks for the reply. > > > >>Stacey Roberts wrote: > >> > >>>[snip] > >>>The other problem I've got is that with the instruction to create a so= ft=20 > >>>link=20 > >>>for /dev/usv, on reboot, that soft link is of course disappears, so I= =20 > >> > >>have to > >> > >>>manually recreate that soft link again, before (again) manually starti= ng=20 > >>>apcupsd from cmdline. > >> > >>You need to make an appropriate entry in devfs.conf for any=20 > >>customisation of /dev to persist beyond a reboot with FreeBSD 5. -=20 > >>something like: > >> > >>link target name > > > > > >Ah.., yes.., Do you mind checking my syntax, please? According to your= =20 > >suggestion, I'd be adding: > > > >link /dev/cuaa1 /dev/usv > > > >to /etc/devfs.conf, and that should be it? >=20 > No - look at the file, there are sample entries there: >=20 > # Commonly used by many ports > link acd0 cdrom > link cuaa0 pilot >=20 > So you'd want: >=20 > link cuaa1 usv Okay, I understand. And I take it that if the serial signalling cable is ac= tually connected to (labeled) serial port 1, then the corresponding device = tobe used here would be cuaa0? >=20 >=20 >=20 > > > >Whislt I'm keen to try this out, could I then ask the obvious question,= =20 > >is there some reason why in apcupsd.conf I am not allowed to simply=20 > use /dev/cuaa1? > > >=20 > I'm afraid I'm not sufficiently familiar with this software to answer.=20 > But it would almost certainly be less problematic to stick with the=20 > suggested link. I understand., seems to be there for what I imagine to be for some good rea= son. This has been really helpful, Peter. Thanks again. Regards, Stacey >=20 > >Thanks again for taking the time. >=20 > My pleasure, hope it helps. >=20 > Peter. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --EVcIhgQsEzAXu06J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQEVAwUBQQbK7OdvY+8mWFvRAQG00gf+Oyu4ysHKTBeHRVSzz3PhRGylh4zkxRYf 8KPyNuZOWmJIZttkRI0adRYGBsydgyJchAlq1tpPDFWQDsWjx3R8Ob0dGFKowmHw GFcuVp00MxEHhab/vktHEMO84WnXC/RkO8/um7eBK9fNXp5pdCFA2+nlPsa6mEsw Ij2db/A/fgbqazaU5QK6ThYjj2tDc3UQ2XnLDVkunMcCsDeExDz5jWFTxkrHfR1v gRG1MOC8FgSMKJChY8N3sXH68Pvo/IYgbs+7c0hINpibOS1G0IqxcDhGmXSppXsZ hGmE0arPX4WsYAytDG0xgFC9k5DeQAN/P3G/x8IOyBrJvp3CHl2veg== =uNlN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVcIhgQsEzAXu06J-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 21:45:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3523016A4ED for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:45:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web42008.mail.yahoo.com (web42008.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 067BC43D54 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:45:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soohyun_choi@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040727214533.43516.qmail@web42008.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [144.82.214.139] by web42008.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:45:33 PDT Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:45:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Soo-Hyun Choi To: "R. W." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200407271850.45282.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: De-installing Gnome 2.4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:45:40 -0000 Have you tried 'make deinstall' at the Gnome directory under '/usr/ports/../gnome'? (The Gnome's port directory may differ.) --- "R. W." wrote: > I installed both Gnome and KDE (FreeBSD 5.2.1) and > have been keeping both up > to date for some time. But I scarcely ever use > Gnome, and don't want the > hassle of running the 2.6 upgrade script. > > How do I de-install Gnome 2.4.2? Will removing the > metaport alone suffice? > > (When I recently portupgraded KDE several GTK based > applications stopped > working properly, but they were OK after I rebuilt > them.) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ===== UCL Computer Science __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 21:57:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C21616A4DB for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:57:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE73243D58 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:57:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i6RLud3f029973; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:56:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <4106CF97.50305@circlesquared.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:56:39 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stacey Roberts References: <20040727181557.GE495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106A91C.70500@circlesquared.com> <20040727195517.GF495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106B445.4080902@circlesquared.com> <20040727213646.GG495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> In-Reply-To: <20040727213646.GG495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de Subject: Re: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:57:01 -0000 Stacey Roberts wrote: > Hi Peter, > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Risdon " > [snip] >>So you'd want: >> >>link cuaa1 usv > > > Okay, I understand. And I take it that if the serial signalling cable is actually connected to (labeled) serial port 1, then the corresponding device tobe used here would be cuaa0? > > The numbering of serial ports in FreeBSD starts at 0, so what would be called com1 in DOS/Windows is cuaa0 in FreeBSD. If the numbering of the ports on your computer follows the same pattern, then serial port 1 would map to cuaa0. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:04:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E71016A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:04:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B7243D58 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:04:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004072722043001400clqsje>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:04:31 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 261A612; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:04:30 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "R. W." References: <200407271850.45282.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 27 Jul 2004 18:04:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200407271850.45282.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Message-ID: <44wu0p9kep.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: De-installing Gnome 2.4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:04:31 -0000 "R. W." writes: > I installed both Gnome and KDE (FreeBSD 5.2.1) and have been keeping both up > to date for some time. But I scarcely ever use Gnome, and don't want the > hassle of running the 2.6 upgrade script. > > How do I de-install Gnome 2.4.2? Will removing the metaport alone suffice? The meta-port has many dependencies. Some may be required by installed applications, but others may be removable. > (When I recently portupgraded KDE several GTK based applications stopped > working properly, but they were OK after I rebuilt them.) The -r and -R options to portupgrade help with this problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:06:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66ED16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:06:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pythagoras.zen.co.uk (pythagoras.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AE843D46 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [82.68.31.179] (helo=Demon.vickiandstacey.com) by pythagoras.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Bpa66-0006YD-56; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:06:58 +0000 Received: from crom.vickiandstacey.com (crom [192.168.1.10]) i6RM74Qc005864; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:07:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from crom.vickiandstacey.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6RM6gUN070684; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:06:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey@crom.vickiandstacey.com) Received: (from stacey@localhost) by crom.vickiandstacey.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6RM6WrG070683; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:06:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from stacey) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:06:32 +0100 From: Stacey Roberts To: Peter Risdon Message-ID: <20040727220632.GJ495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> References: <20040727181557.GE495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106A91C.70500@circlesquared.com> <20040727195517.GF495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106B445.4080902@circlesquared.com> <20040727213646.GG495@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <4106CF97.50305@circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3hAdtgBjtgL7p0NQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4106CF97.50305@circlesquared.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Originating-Pythagoras-IP: [82.68.31.179] cc: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Stacey Roberts Subject: Re: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:07:00 -0000 --3hAdtgBjtgL7p0NQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Risdon " To: To Stacey Roberts Date: Tue, 27 Jul, 2004 22:56 BST Subject: Re: apcupsd vs FreeBSD-5.2.x > Stacey Roberts wrote: > >Hi Peter, > > =20 > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Peter Risdon " > >[snip] > >>So you'd want: > >> > >>link cuaa1 usv > > > > > >Okay, I understand. And I take it that if the serial signalling cable is= =20 > >actually connected to (labeled) serial port 1, then the corresponding=20 > >device tobe used here would be cuaa0? > > > > >=20 > The numbering of serial ports in FreeBSD starts at 0, so what would be=20 > called com1 in DOS/Windows is cuaa0 in FreeBSD. Yes, I knew this.., >=20 > If the numbering of the ports on your computer follows the same pattern,= =20 > then serial port 1 would map to cuaa0. Thanks for that clarification. I just thought that the pkg-message using cu= aa1 was somewhat strange as this is in effect serial 2 and not the first se= rial interface. I would have thought that the example would have used the f= irst (cuaa0) for the example by default. Cheers for this. Regards, Stacey >=20 >=20 > Peter. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --3hAdtgBjtgL7p0NQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQEVAwUBQQbR5edvY+8mWFvRAQGN/wf9FLYjT+hnU56VypbEXtzOjEeNIHq9lliN GSOWZbBVtDtYaGmxUVqEMrBf+yxrSGEqyZLTUXCPOyVEavW0WNRnef+tQ1tKZHFR Y9zPdZpIFxX7lm3RKFSJvNOnSBywthQS7PhD5rfIc4sciKmRVCSAPth0T2fgUlWo myHpNU5lDYVl7FwTOA1Zgw/jJB68d3UNKpNu8RdeX1lLDbxjc19J9tHUqFbX3CwL DUS6PIZf/+AEvLmL04EpRzZbl/cK54gx2Yp47c3ZPR4Z2zwo8hVhgxDGyOPfMZqn JF3TZ/Hp4QkW/mem5Uc1y2+5TI1BO5PKpzxq6kKMrtdrjij4XEgELA== =sWTj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3hAdtgBjtgL7p0NQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:21:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F25016A4D0 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:21:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from scorpion.eng.ufl.edu (scorpion.eng.ufl.edu [128.227.116.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8857F43D31 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:21:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob88@eng.ufl.edu) Received: (qmail 18132 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 22:21:27 -0000 Received: from scanner.engnet.ufl.edu (HELO ?128.227.152.221?) (128.227.152.221) by scorpion.eng.ufl.edu with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 22:21:27 -0000 Message-ID: <4106D567.2090603@eng.ufl.edu> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:21:27 -0400 From: Bob Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040628) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: wayjen6@dodo.com.au Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:21:29 -0000 > Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:45:50 +0800 > From: Duggan > Subject: FreeBSD 4.10 pkg_add "Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found"? > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <41064E7E.2000801@dodo.com.au> > > I am new to FreeBSD and am using it as linux has a problem with my setup > that I was unable to resolve. Anyways, I am liking what I have read > about FreeBSD. > > I am a bit of a control freak and did a custom install of FreeBSD 4.10 > over the net with the required package and all the support docs. I went > to install links and this is what happened: > Um, when you say "custom install" do you mean that when you selected the install method you selected "Custom Begin a custom installation (for experts)"? If so, the first thing you should do is start over and do a "Standard" install, or you will be plagued by little problems like this until you ARE and expert. A "Standard" install will let you customize almost anything you might wish to customize, but will then handle the details for you. "Custom" install is for people who want to do unusual things with those details. > EJINSIDE# pkg_add -r links > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found > > I decide to try and do the the same to get bash and the exact same thing > happened. > > I did a google search and found an identical error posted on some > russian BSD forums, however I was unable interpret the dialog. I also > found other errors that were similar but with different files. Being > new to FreeBSD these did make much sense to me. > > So this brings me to the crux of the matter. How do I find out what > exactly is wrong? and how do I fix it? > A good first step with this sort of thing is to go to the FreeBSD web site and search there, including the mailing list archives, the Handbook, and the FAQ. May not find you the answer, but it has a good chance of it, and you will learn something useful in the process, even if it's not what you set out to learn. If that doesn't work, ask on this list... > Any help appreciated. > OK. The short answer is "Install the OpenSSL package (or port)." E.g. become root, run /stand/sysinstall, and do a post-install configuration, which will let you install additional packages. There are other ways to do it, but that's probably the one least likely to generate more mysteries. Installing the "Crypto" distribution might also be a good solution. Hope that helps. - Bob > Elijah > /wayjen6@dodo.com.au (not a subscriber so email me directly as well as > the list)/ > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:32:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D3016A4CF for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:32:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D33B43D55 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:32:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dantavious@comcast.net) Received: from focus.derrick.con (pcp04630633pcs.gambrl01.md.comcast.net[68.49.58.89]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20040727223243011006etqje> (Authid: dantavious); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:32:43 +0000 From: Derrick Edwards To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:40:19 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407271840.19222.dantavious@comcast.net> Subject: ATAPICAM FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:32:45 -0000 =A0Good day to all. I have been going crazy trying to get K3b to work.=20 Everytime I attempt to burn a cd, the system freezes and reboots. I have be= en=20 on the formus for a month now trying to find a soulution. Seems a lot of=20 other people are having the same issue, and all theses guys are pointing to= =20 atapicam. =A0I reinstalled 4.10 for testing =A0and k3b works perfectly. Is= =20 atapicam really the problem as I suspect? If so, will this be fixed prior t= o=20 5.3 release. Apologize in advance if this is a silly question.=20 Thanks for your assistance, please let me know if you need additional info. Derrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:34:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05BD16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:34:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B8B43D31 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:34:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (dsl093-180-184.sac1.dsl.speakeasy.net[66.93.180.184]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004072722343311100998jre> (Authid: jayobrien@att.net); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:34:34 +0000 Message-ID: <4106D878.6010804@att.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:34:32 -0700 From: Jay O'Brien User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Console 50-lines at bootup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:34:36 -0000 I ran FreeBSD for the first time last week; I have 4.10 working. Following http://users.rcn.com/rneswold/fbsd-init.html I have set up console fonts in /etc/rc.conf and set up 50-line mode in /etc/ttys. I can use vidcontrol VGA_80x50 and vidcontrol green black from the console to set ttyv0 or whatever virtual terminal I'm using. I cannot make it set up the VGA_80x50 and 'green black' parameters when booting up. I've tried many iterations of the text in /etc.rc.local or /etc.rc.conf.local and I get errors and failures to boot that forced me to learn about single-user mode to recover. (Probably a good thing that I had to learn about single-user!) I would like the system to boot up into VGA_80x50 and green on black, and I'm stumped. Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, CA, USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:42:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A9316A4D2 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:42:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776AA43D46 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:42:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i6RMg2S6070715; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:42:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:42:02 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: "Jay O'Brien" Message-ID: <20040727224202.GD71175@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4106D878.6010804@att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4106D878.6010804@att.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD - questions Subject: Re: Console 50-lines at bootup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:42:04 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 27), Jay O'Brien said: > I cannot make it set up the VGA_80x50 and 'green black' parameters > when booting up. I've tried many iterations of the text in > /etc.rc.local or /etc.rc.conf.local and I get errors and failures to boot > that forced me to learn about single-user mode to recover. (Probably a > good thing that I had to learn about single-user!) :) > I would like the system to boot up into VGA_80x50 and green on black, and > I'm stumped. This should work: allscreens_flags="-m on 80x50 green black" ("-m on" enables the mouse) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:42:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F4016A4F7 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:42:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pencil.math.missouri.edu (pencil.math.missouri.edu [128.206.49.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1689F43D66 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:42:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rich@pencil.math.missouri.edu) Received: from pencil.math.missouri.edu (rich@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6RMgsev010018 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:42:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rich@pencil.math.missouri.edu) Received: (from rich@localhost)i6RMgsjm010017 for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:42:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rich) From: Rich Winkel Message-Id: <200407272242.i6RMgsjm010017@pencil.math.missouri.edu> To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:42:54 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pencil.math.missouri.edu X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.71, clamav-milter version 0.71 X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: locale spec for greek fonts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:42:56 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to use greek fonts in x11/kde in 4.8-release. I'm currently using MM_CHARSET=ISO-8859-7; export MM_CHARSET LANG=el_GR; export LANG LC_ALL=el_GR; export LC_ALL But I keep getting the error: Warning: locale not supported by C library, locale unchanged Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks! (in hopeful anticipation :) Rich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:53:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF7A16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:53:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8CF643D60 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:53:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akio@despammed.com) Received: (qmail 926 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2004 22:12:47 -0000 Received: from r065048.stusta.swh.mhn.de (HELO ?10.150.65.48?) (10.150.65.48) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 25 Jul 2004 22:12:47 -0000 Message-ID: <4104304A.5060004@despammed.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:12:26 +0200 From: Lutz Petersen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: R/W mount of / denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:53:19 -0000 After a system crash (e.g. a power failure), the terminal-less FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE I run does not boot up properly any more. Here is an excerpt from /var/log/messages: Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: / was not properly dismounted Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /home was not properly dismounted Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted As a result, BIND does not start up any more, which leaves my FreeBSD box in an unusable state (no internet connection, no network connections that use DNS). I did not experience this behaviour with 4-STABLE. What's wrong here? The other day I read about a misconfiguration of /etc/fstab (wrong fs_passno), which prevented FreeBSD from doing the usual consistency checking at startup time. My fstab is looking fine however. Any help is greatly appreciated, Lutz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:55:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20FA16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:55:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482E243D68 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:55:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (dsl093-180-184.sac1.dsl.speakeasy.net[66.93.180.184]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004072722551011200d45c6e> (Authid: jayobrien@att.net); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:55:11 +0000 Message-ID: <4106DD5E.3020908@att.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:55:26 -0700 From: Jay O'Brien User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - questions References: <4106D878.6010804@att.net> <20040727224202.GD71175@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20040727224202.GD71175@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Console 50-lines at bootup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:55:28 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 27), Jay O'Brien said: > >>I cannot make it set up the VGA_80x50 and 'green black' parameters >>when booting up. I've tried many iterations of the text in >>/etc.rc.local or /etc.rc.conf.local and I get errors and failures to boot >>that forced me to learn about single-user mode to recover. (Probably a >>good thing that I had to learn about single-user!) > > > :) > > >>I would like the system to boot up into VGA_80x50 and green on black, and >>I'm stumped. > > > This should work: > > allscreens_flags="-m on 80x50 green black" > > ("-m on" enables the mouse) > Thank you, Where should I place that instruction? Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:58:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7DC16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:58:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server.tcslea.org (server.tcslea.org [205.238.132.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7734243D2F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:58:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@coolarrow.com) X-ExtScanner: Niversoft's FindAttachments (free) X-Antivirus: clamav via cgpav Received: from [205.238.178.37] (HELO system) by server.tcslea.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b7) with ESMTP id 432859; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:58:00 -0500 Message-ID: <200407271757530797.09E141DE@coolarrow.com> In-Reply-To: <4106BCA6.8070908@daleco.biz> References: <200407270748000178.07B2E20B@coolarrow.com> <4106BCA6.8070908@daleco.biz> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:57:53 -0500 From: "Chris" To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: security run output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:58:01 -0000 *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* Hmm, I found: /etc/periodic/security/700.kernelmsg which seems to be what generates the information I was talking about in the= email. So I guess you were correct that it's not from /var/log/messages= after all. Having said that, I don't have any idea if there is something in that small= script that I could change to increase the number of lines it puts into= the email. It's a bourne shell script, it appears: if [ -r /etc/defaults/periodic.conf ] then . /etc/defaults/periodic.conf source_periodic_confs fi . /etc/periodic/security/security.functions rc=3D0 case "$daily_status_security_kernelmsg_enable" in [Yy][Ee][Ss]) dmesg 2>/dev/null | check_diff new_only dmesg - "${host} kernel log messages:" rc=3D$?;; *) rc=3D0;; esac exit $rc And thanks for that script - I'll give it a try. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 22:59:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D3516A4CE; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:59:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf19.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf19.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117C243D4C; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:59:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MrL0L@charter.net) Received: from mxip08.cluster1.charter.net (mxip08a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.138])i6RMxo9V022646; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:59:51 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO gamez) (68.189.127.165) by mxip08.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2004 18:59:50 -0400 Message-Id: <3948se$4e064r@mxip08a.cluster1.charter.net> X-Ironport-AV: i="3.83,92,1089000000"; d="scan'217,208"; a="148904091:sNHT17981256" From: "Remi" To: , Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:59:47 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Thread-Index: AcR0LWnOigBHERUATnGlpDPgodFVbw== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: AMD64 Mobile CPU scaling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:59:53 -0000 I just got an AMD64 laptop and I'm having a problem with CPU(auto) scaling. Its running 5.2.1 and it looks like it running at 800MHz, is it possible to scale this up to full speed? And how? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 23:04:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6F616A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:04:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC0E43D5C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:04:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 2A6FB37E43; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:04:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.181]) by av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C40B37E42 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:04:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E46E937E43 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:04:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 73975 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Jul 2004 23:04:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:04:04 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Jay O'Brien Message-ID: <20040727230404.GA73966@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Jay O'Brien , FreeBSD - questions References: <4106D878.6010804@att.net> <20040727224202.GD71175@dan.emsphone.com> <4106DD5E.3020908@att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4106DD5E.3020908@att.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD - questions Subject: Re: Console 50-lines at bootup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:04:08 -0000 On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 03:55:26PM -0700, Jay O'Brien wrote: > Dan Nelson wrote: > > > In the last episode (Jul 27), Jay O'Brien said: > > > >>I cannot make it set up the VGA_80x50 and 'green black' parameters > >>when booting up. I've tried many iterations of the text in > >>/etc.rc.local or /etc.rc.conf.local and I get errors and failures to boot > >>that forced me to learn about single-user mode to recover. (Probably a > >>good thing that I had to learn about single-user!) > > > > > > :) > > > > > >>I would like the system to boot up into VGA_80x50 and green on black, and > >>I'm stumped. > > > > > > This should work: > > > > allscreens_flags="-m on 80x50 green black" > > > > ("-m on" enables the mouse) > > > > Thank you, > > Where should I place that instruction? /etc/rc.conf -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 23:05:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C9816A4FA for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:05:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C79B43D55 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:05:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040727230502.ZOA28609.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:05:02 -0400 From: "JJB" To: "Dan Nelson" , "Jay O'Brien" Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:05:01 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040727224202.GD71175@dan.emsphone.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal cc: FreeBSD - questions Subject: RE: Console 50-lines at bootup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:05:08 -0000 What Dan meant to say is add this line to your rc.conf file and reboot allscreens_flags="-m on 80x50 green black" -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Dan Nelson Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 6:42 PM To: Jay O'Brien Cc: FreeBSD - questions Subject: Re: Console 50-lines at bootup? In the last episode (Jul 27), Jay O'Brien said: > I cannot make it set up the VGA_80x50 and 'green black' parameters > when booting up. I've tried many iterations of the text in > /etc.rc.local or /etc.rc.conf.local and I get errors and failures to boot > that forced me to learn about single-user mode to recover. (Probably a > good thing that I had to learn about single-user!) :) > I would like the system to boot up into VGA_80x50 and green on black, and > I'm stumped. This should work: allscreens_flags="-m on 80x50 green black" ("-m on" enables the mouse) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 23:05:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B640916A4FB for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:05:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F005D43D1F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:05:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 16008 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jul 2004 22:58:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 22:58:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F046F135; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:05:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (it.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09376-08; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:05:21 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7596D34; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:05:21 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:05:15 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Derrick Edwards Message-Id: <20040728020515.2f77fa9c@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <200407271840.19222.dantavious@comcast.net> References: <200407271840.19222.dantavious@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATAPICAM FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:05:28 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:40:19 -0400 Derrick Edwards wrote: > =A0Good day to all. I have been going crazy trying to get K3b to work.=20 > Everytime I attempt to burn a cd, the system freezes and reboots. I have = been=20 > on the formus for a month now trying to find a soulution. Seems a lot of= =20 > other people are having the same issue, and all theses guys are pointing = to=20 > atapicam. =A0I reinstalled 4.10 for testing =A0and k3b works perfectly. I= s=20 > atapicam really the problem as I suspect? If so, will this be fixed prior= to=20 > 5.3 release. Apologize in advance if this is a silly question.=20 > Thanks for your assistance, please let me know if you need additional inf= o. > Derrick FYI, on my system FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Wed May 26 02:08:58 EEST 2004 I have no such problems. It is a VIA KT400/8235 (and also on an 8237) with a Plextor PX 708A DVD+RW burner. Have you contacted k3b maintainer ? I found him to be very helpful. --=20 IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 00:00:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2240716A50D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:00:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ariel.globecom.net (ariel.globecom.net [212.116.67.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB2D43D2F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:00:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mattias.bjork@sydnet.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ariel.globecom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1603864E314 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:00:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ariel.globecom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ariel.bahnhof.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 16398-02-47 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:00:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-gw.globecom.net (mail-gw.globecom.net [212.116.65.149]) by ariel.globecom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE8F64DF43 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:00:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from setiathome.birch.se (unknown [212.116.92.111]) by mail-gw.globecom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7DEB860 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:00:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 24478 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jul 2004 00:00:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.201?) (192.168.10.201) by setiathome.birch.se with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 00:00:32 -0000 Message-ID: <4106ECA4.5000902@sydnet.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:00:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mattias_Bj=F6rk?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040719) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derrick Edwards , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200407271840.19222.dantavious@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <200407271840.19222.dantavious@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at globecom.net Subject: Re: ATAPICAM FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:00:40 -0000 Hi, Derrick Edwards wrote: > Good day to all. I have been going crazy trying to get K3b to work. > Everytime I attempt to burn a cd, the system freezes and reboots. I have been > on the formus for a month now trying to find a soulution. Seems a lot of > other people are having the same issue, and all theses guys are pointing to > atapicam. I reinstalled 4.10 for testing and k3b works perfectly. Is > atapicam really the problem as I suspect? If so, will this be fixed prior to > 5.3 release. Apologize in advance if this is a silly question. > Thanks for your assistance, please let me know if you need additional info. > Derrick > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" When you are burning are you using SCSI, IDE or both in a combination? I have had some problems (on 5.2.1-RELEASE-p5) with using a SCSI CD-reader in combination with my NEC 1100 burner. If I start K3B it freezes my system, but if I removed my SCSI CD-reader the problem went away. But the I only had my IDE NEC 1100 burner left. Note that I had a Hard drive as well attached too my SCSI controller card and that did not cause in my eye's any problems. Perhaps you are having a similar problem? But then again I don't think that my problems is directly related too yours. Thanks Mattias Björk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 00:08:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AF316A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:08:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AE643D31 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:08:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (dsl093-180-184.sac1.dsl.speakeasy.net[66.93.180.184]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004072800081211100995fne> (Authid: jayobrien@att.net); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:08:12 +0000 Message-ID: <4106EE6B.3060409@att.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:08:11 -0700 From: Jay O'Brien User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - questions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Console 50-lines at bootup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:08:14 -0000 Dan, Erik, JJB... Thank you all, that worked. And once I saw the whole screen with green on black, (ugh!) I went back to white on black. But now at least I know how to do it! Now to find the syntax for allscreens_flags and learn about that argument. I may want to set different virtual terminals to different settings. Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, CA USA Ref: FreeBSD console 50 lines JJB wrote: > What Dan meant to say is add this line to your rc.conf file and > reboot > > allscreens_flags="-m on 80x50 green black" > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Dan Nelson > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 6:42 PM > To: Jay O'Brien > Cc: FreeBSD - questions > Subject: Re: Console 50-lines at bootup? > > In the last episode (Jul 27), Jay O'Brien said: > >>I cannot make it set up the VGA_80x50 and 'green black' parameters >>when booting up. I've tried many iterations of the text in >>/etc.rc.local or /etc.rc.conf.local and I get errors and failures > > to boot > >>that forced me to learn about single-user mode to recover. > > (Probably a > >>good thing that I had to learn about single-user!) > > > :) > > >>I would like the system to boot up into VGA_80x50 and green on > > black, and > >>I'm stumped. > > > This should work: > > allscreens_flags="-m on 80x50 green black" > > ("-m on" enables the mouse) > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 00:29:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D56316A504 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:29:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AE643D31 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:29:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i6S0Tblt094657; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:29:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:29:37 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: "Jay O'Brien" Message-ID: <20040728002937.GE71175@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4106EE6B.3060409@att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4106EE6B.3060409@att.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD - questions Subject: Re: Console 50-lines at bootup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:29:39 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 27), Jay O'Brien said: > Thank you all, that worked. And once I saw the whole screen with green on > black, (ugh!) I went back to white on black. But now at least I know how > to do it! > > Now to find the syntax for allscreens_flags and learn about that argument. > I may want to set different virtual terminals to different settings. The startup scripts basically run vidcontrol $allscreens_flags, once for each vty. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 01:12:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1863716A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:12:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14304.mail.yahoo.com (web14304.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03BD043D1D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:12:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linuxrule@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040728011215.32339.qmail@web14304.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [208.138.40.158] by web14304.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:12:15 PDT Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:12:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Stanley Wright To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Samba X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:12:17 -0000 I'm having a problem setting up Samba(Ver 2.2.7a) on FreeBSD. Ive already set Samba up on RedHAt and Mandrake with no issues. I can see the icon for the FreeBSD share under Network Neighborhood but when it is clicked I get the message: The computer or sharename could not be found. On the FreeBSD box if I run for example \\\\smbclient\\homes it prompts for a password and I connect getting the smb: \> prompt. Also, I can map a network drive thru windows explorer and this works fine as well as testparm. The following is the global section of my smb.conf file: [global] hosts allow = 169.254. workgroup = FREEBSD printing = bsd printcap name = /etc/printcap encrypt passwords = yes load printers = yes guest account = pcguest remote announce = 169.254.190.255/FREEBSD security = share Any idea where I'm going wrong ?? Stanley --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 01:26:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC5E16A4D0 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:26:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from asmtp-a063f29.pas.sa.earthlink.net (asmtp-a063f29.pas.sa.earthlink.net [207.217.120.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225BA43D46 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:26:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from system-administrator@earthlink.net) Received: from user-0cceq8c.cable.mindspring.com ([24.199.105.12] helo=earthlink.net)(TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1BpdCi-0005SG-9n; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:26:00 -0700 Message-ID: <410700AB.3080404@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:26:03 -0400 From: "Hakim Z. Singhji" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olaf Hoyer References: <4101DCAF.3050804@earthlink.net> <4101E16B.1070000@daleco.biz> <4101E4B7.3030505@earthlink.net> <20040724152258.T20056@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> In-Reply-To: <20040724152258.T20056@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 59e746354e49a56ad5e26e230a8c4dea74bf435c0eb9d478649883cad881a676321c9ee99085888b7ce9d7d6371795e9350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.199.105.12 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Gateway??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:26:01 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Olaf Hoyer wrote: | On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Hakim Z. Singhji wrote: | |>| |>| 10/100? There are less Gigabit types that are supported, yet, |>| but then the reason for that should be pretty obvious. |>| |>| Anyway, you generally can't go wrong with 3Com. That said, |>| I've never had trouble with 3Com, SiS, DEC/Intel, even RealTek |>| and the onboard VIA/Rhine stuff (drivers, respectively: xl, sis, dc, |>| rl, vr). |>| |>| That covers quite a few chipsets. There are plenty more. The |>| only problem I have answering your post is that I don't know what's |>| *not* supported. Also, some users have reported issues with "watchdog |>| timeout" errors using 5.X FBSD and one of the drivers mentioned above. |>| You could probably spot which one on Google ... | | | Hi! | | Well, I personally prefer the Intel Etherexpress in 100MBit Scenarios. | (fxp) | | You also could look at ebay, sometimes they show up in bundles of 5 or | so, and then are below those 30$ list price... | | Or you could have a look at a Znyx or Adaptec or Intel dual/Quad card, I | also noticed some Adaptec quad ones on german ebay recently. | | In Gigabit world, well, Intel or Broadcom (em or bge) cards are nice, | but given the scenario you have, they are overkill and quite costly | compared to some fxp or xl. | | Do _not_ go for Realtek or Via, they impose a far heavier load on the | CPU than Intel or 3COM. | | HTH | Olaf | Hi Olaf, Thanks alot for your help, I found a pretty good deal on a pair 3COM Xl's $10 each...pretty good huh. Hey maybe I could use you as a resource if I have any questions about setting up the Gateway/Router. Thanks again. HZS -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBBwCrNF6tCt5tOyIRAkr9AJ9dRdcevTSJoVeQLo2sPNFgHPtMigCguZEa ulyosIh6cWZnWogvKTh2cnQ= =9tRi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 01:37:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9894916A4CE; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:37:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net (audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F71B43D64; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:37:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from system-administrator@earthlink.net) Received: from user-0cceq8c.cable.mindspring.com ([24.199.105.12] helo=earthlink.net) by audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1BpdNj-0001Hv-Ok; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:37:24 -0700 Message-ID: <41070356.90000@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:37:26 -0400 From: "Hakim Z. Singhji" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Duda References: <4101DCAF.3050804@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000103050806000304080307" X-ELNK-Trace: 59e746354e49a56ad5e26e230a8c4dea74bf435c0eb9d478649883cad881a6765bd07fe051c91978866af61c445b02cc350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.199.105.12 cc: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Gateway??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:37:25 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms000103050806000304080307 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pavel Duda wrote: | Hakim Z. Singhji wrote: | |> Does anyone have any suggestions |> on the type of NIC I should use? | | | Almost any "normal" NIC will be fine. I'm using mostly Realtek-based | (RTL8139) and Intel (8255) cards wo problems. | | _______________________________________________ | freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies | To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi Everyone, I would like to thank you for all your help...I found a pair of 3COM XL's for $10 each...I was told that is a steal... so I went for it. Thanks again. Oh, I may need your help once I get started building the box remember I'm originally from Linux World. So this will be a new hack for me. Hope I can look to you guys for help if I get in trouble. HZS -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBBwNWNF6tCt5tOyIRAuG9AKCKAA/u6WFZDMc0F8lPWjF1Bm6fsgCg43ZZ 4kiTmFl8vATMP//PXnRatpE= =rqv5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------ms000103050806000304080307 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJXzCC AwowggJzoAMCAQICAwy3+zANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UE ChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNv bmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDQwNzIwMDQzNzMzWhcNMDUwNzIwMDQzNzMz WjBtMRAwDgYDVQQEEwdTaW5naGppMQ4wDAYDVQQqEwVIYWtpbTEWMBQGA1UEAxMNSGFraW0g U2luZ2hqaTExMC8GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYic3lzdGVtLWFkbWluaXN0cmF0b3JAZWFydGhsaW5r Lm5ldDCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAKd/oxjiCDKnjc9i9x0ShwKf 0je62ZWmuKAqSYADDjzxuLO0C3uq46rZqsn3Iv3/cTOTHApwnmUTQH+POqBCMEVs5rHF1mNt u7XAZZIa8xbimcVq0W0x/4JPeLPYG2DdSOx1Z8XqXxyMAxjFBB5OJXMNy7/ZIB2jOuTcCC1x io90N6Ds+CyMM0O9W4oBge3hlsiioxNdWOGV0WgYDIQp1kHdi22z9nsk+XUsJBtIZwFM/6Rq J5vMhJUzrw8HDKHZDTYkHSupjntSIPifib5jd0UBByceORoCtDpyZDTPYu4h5P99H55VJip0 51Y/5Jtf/Lz94t/VxWTX/ds9P26OnH8CAwEAAaM/MD0wLQYDVR0RBCYwJIEic3lzdGVtLWFk bWluaXN0cmF0b3JAZWFydGhsaW5rLm5ldDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUA A4GBAHGQIOeOm0aznqXsh0tZ2npAUEpgGsvBfRJzKbJ6RsIEFbOvkdT6HF2zHYiGpv7qK8lT +2OSfhn9S56800PMUm7o/g+uIJGta0GhRSlh8LmIc1wkuQTEPKLJ4oUTL0h4sMwOiuOZxc+W DYd2yPRN+c50rdQXcV5R+fUe4X0aXmYKMIIDCjCCAnOgAwIBAgIDDLf7MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB BAUAMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBM dGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTAeFw0w NDA3MjAwNDM3MzNaFw0wNTA3MjAwNDM3MzNaMG0xEDAOBgNVBAQTB1NpbmdoamkxDjAMBgNV BCoTBUhha2ltMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1IYWtpbSBTaW5naGppMTEwLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFiJzeXN0 ZW0tYWRtaW5pc3RyYXRvckBlYXJ0aGxpbmsubmV0MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8A MIIBCgKCAQEAp3+jGOIIMqeNz2L3HRKHAp/SN7rZlaa4oCpJgAMOPPG4s7QLe6rjqtmqyfci /f9xM5McCnCeZRNAf486oEIwRWzmscXWY227tcBlkhrzFuKZxWrRbTH/gk94s9gbYN1I7HVn xepfHIwDGMUEHk4lcw3Lv9kgHaM65NwILXGKj3Q3oOz4LIwzQ71bigGB7eGWyKKjE11Y4ZXR aBgMhCnWQd2LbbP2eyT5dSwkG0hnAUz/pGonm8yElTOvDwcModkNNiQdK6mOe1Ig+J+JvmN3 RQEHJx45GgK0OnJkNM9i7iHk/30fnlUmKnTnVj/km1/8vP3i39XFZNf92z0/bo6cfwIDAQAB oz8wPTAtBgNVHREEJjAkgSJzeXN0ZW0tYWRtaW5pc3RyYXRvckBlYXJ0aGxpbmsubmV0MAwG A1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAcZAg546bRrOepeyHS1naekBQSmAay8F9 EnMpsnpGwgQVs6+R1PocXbMdiIam/uoryVP7Y5J+Gf1LnrzTQ8xSbuj+D64gka1rQaFFKWHw uYhzXCS5BMQ8osnihRMvSHiwzA6K45nFz5YNh3bI9E35znSt1BdxXlH59R7hfRpeZgowggM/ MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMM V2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25z dWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYD VQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNv bmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5 WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRk LjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2 vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9 A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEw EgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0 ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYDVR0R BCIwIKQeMBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GB AEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZ Ohl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVN d+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDOzCCAzcCAQEwaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMG A1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBl cnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECAwy3+zAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBpzAYBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNDA3MjgwMTM3MjZaMCMGCSqG SIb3DQEJBDEWBBQR15zu5Z8UVppckfdj5290M7Ap/DBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqG SIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG 9w0DAgIBKDB4BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxazBpMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3 dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIDDLf7MHoGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMWugaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhh d3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECAwy3+zANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASC AQAyHKdyJ6M74q7AJmCwx1Ie6aRn/t48iIvY37gsGFBPpLJmpCa270vnq9AymEXyVGDQ+sJa q8lSb2zN4S54tt6RL9l4+3ufaBPMnqkj+NCj+vEml9ONDSc+fdt5uY+WX+7iUx/jqHd3eEJ7 KKob90AwTYVIb4mL5MH8pD1qtU7Rc7vRc/Ku32r0J91cHHqG9YzPr4BlkbBWkwMDdLTjPaH1 xZIMvhr2LIb73z7jKNdGad6tC0zgZTDPxsIZuEVinb7ZoBE1A5FIxtLCWg1gOFnTQPJ4lKaf Dm+aM64gAHnbZ/ppWXsG/lzBY3ryQeP71ey4Icke00H4NHc+ZCRyFOc6AAAAAAAA --------------ms000103050806000304080307-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 01:40:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2D416A4D4 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:40:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE1443D5D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:40:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:41:48 -0500 Message-ID: <410703EF.50103@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:39:59 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanley Wright References: <20040728011215.32339.qmail@web14304.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728011215.32339.qmail@web14304.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2004 01:41:48.0687 (UTC) FILETIME=[0C5769F0:01C47444] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:40:02 -0000 Stanley Wright wrote: >I'm having a problem setting up Samba(Ver 2.2.7a) on FreeBSD. Ive already set Samba up on RedHAt and Mandrake with no issues. > >I can see the icon for the FreeBSD share under Network Neighborhood but when it is clicked I get the message: > >The computer or sharename could not be found. >On the FreeBSD box if I run for example \\\\smbclient\\homes it prompts for a password and I connect getting the smb: \> prompt. > >Also, I can map a network drive thru windows explorer and this works fine as well as testparm. > >The following is the global section of my smb.conf file: >[global] > hosts allow = 169.254. > workgroup = FREEBSD > printing = bsd > printcap name = /etc/printcap > encrypt passwords = yes > load printers = yes > guest account = pcguest > remote announce = 169.254.190.255/FREEBSD > security = share > >Any idea where I'm going wrong ?? > >Stanley > > > Really, I don't. Just a wild shot in the dark: Name resolution? Seems in my experience Winboxen are occasionally bad about not looking too hard to find a host... Kevin Kinsey DaleCo, S.P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 01:56:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D9B16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:56:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from comsmtp2.singnet.com.sg (comsmtp2.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E9843D68 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:56:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pryan@singnet.com.sg) Received: from dory.singnet.com.sg (dory.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.115]) i6S1ubw9006712 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:56:37 +0800 Received: (from cooluser@localhost) by dory.singnet.com.sg (8.11.6/8.11.2) id i6S1ubY25196 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:56:37 +0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dory.singnet.com.sg: cooluser set sender to pryan@singnet.com.sg using -f To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <1090979797.410707d54ef8f@dory.singnet.com.sg> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:56:37 +0800 (SGT) From: Peter Ryan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: SingNet WebMail Subject: can I use "Make" from within KDE Shell Konsole X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pryan@singnet.com.sg List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:56:53 -0000 It is safe to install ports from within KDE ? At present I shut down KDE, go to the command line and start a Make. If I need to get a file manually from somewhere, I go back into KDE to get it. I would rather do it all from within KDE if possible. The Shell Konsole appears to be the same as the command line thing I have been using. Thanks Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 02:12:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CCB16A4DC for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:12:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from comsmtp2.singnet.com.sg (comsmtp2.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F73343D54 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:12:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pryan@singnet.com.sg) Received: from dory.singnet.com.sg (dory.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.115]) i6S2CW6p008024; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:12:32 +0800 Received: (from cooluser@localhost) by dory.singnet.com.sg (8.11.6/8.11.2) id i6S2CWe00789; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:12:32 +0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dory.singnet.com.sg: cooluser set sender to pryan@singnet.com.sg using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1090980752.41070b905929c@dory.singnet.com.sg> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:12:32 +0800 (SGT) From: Peter Ryan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: SingNet WebMail cc: jay2xra@yahoo.com Subject: openoffice install and java JRE on 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pryan@singnet.com.sg List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:12:40 -0000 Hi Jay, I am quite confused about this diablo jre install. I just tried installing diablo jre 13 from the ports collection, but it tells me to get the file manually from freebsdfoundation. The file it wants me to download is diablo-latte-1.3.1-0.tar.bz2 I had already put a downloaded file into the /usr/ports/distfile directory, but its name was diablo-jre-1.3.1.0.tgz These files seem to have the same version number, but i dont know how to use the one I have. Could I ask you - how did you install the diablo-jre-1.3.1.0.tgz that you downloaded. I mean, what command or whatever did you use ? The same question applies to the OpenOffice 1.1.2 install you did after that. These things dont seem to be in the ports collection, and I dont know if they are considered "packages" or something different. Thanks for your patience - I am still struggling to come to grips with this environment. Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 02:46:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC2916A4CF; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:46:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf24.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf24.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A2043D31; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:46:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MrL0L@charter.net) Received: from mxip09.cluster1.charter.net (mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.139])i6S2kOp4010121; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:46:25 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO gamez) (68.189.127.165) by mxip09.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2004 22:46:23 -0400 Message-Id: <3948sc$45b0jp@mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net> X-Ironport-AV: i="3.83,92,1089000000"; d="scan'208"; a="139821689:sNHT31192286" From: "Remi" To: , , Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:46:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcR0TRCqixzhvlxzR9upCeDC9w8hCA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: AMD64 Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:46:26 -0000 I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz on 5.2.1-R CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU) I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 03:15:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC0B16A4D4 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:15:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8B443D31 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:15:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE9E69A39; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:15:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:15:25 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: pryan@singnet.com.sg Message-Id: <20040727231525.7d8150b2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <1090979797.410707d54ef8f@dory.singnet.com.sg> References: <1090979797.410707d54ef8f@dory.singnet.com.sg> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can I use "Make" from within KDE Shell Konsole X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:15:28 -0000 Peter Ryan wrote: > It is safe to install ports from > within KDE ? > > At present I shut down KDE, go to > the command line and start a Make. > > If I need to get a file manually > from somewhere, I go back into KDE > to get it. > > I would rather do it all from > within KDE if possible. The Shell > Konsole appears to be the same as > the command line thing I have > been using. Yes, it's safe. The only time you'll have problems is if you're upgrading or reinstalling a port that is actually _part_ of KDE. If you're unsure, you'll be safe shutting down KDE like you have been, but other ports will install fine, even ports that depend on already installed KDE stuff. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 03:34:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E4D16A4D4 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:34:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F048A43D5D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:34:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from Nomad (nat-server.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.245]) (authenticated bits=0)i6S3YWhs010303; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:34:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) From: "Eric Crist" To: , "'FreeBSD'" Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:34:42 -0500 Message-ID: <008201c47453$d5598d60$6401a8c0@Nomad> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <1090979797.410707d54ef8f@dory.singnet.com.sg> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: RE: can I use "Make" from within KDE Shell Konsole X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:34:49 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Peter Ryan > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 8:57 PM > To: FreeBSD > Subject: can I use "Make" from within KDE Shell Konsole > > > It is safe to install ports from > within KDE ? > > At present I shut down KDE, go to > the command line and start a Make. > > If I need to get a file manually > from somewhere, I go back into KDE > to get it. > > I would rather do it all from > within KDE if possible. The Shell > Konsole appears to be the same as > the command line thing I have > been using. > > Thanks > Peter Unless you're updating the KDE ports themselves, you should be fine. On occaision, I've updated those, and I'm fine. The new versions run when I restart KDE. Once in a great while, you'll run into library conflicts (when you run a GUI exec within the same session), that clears once you've restarted KDE. All in all, it's a safe bet. I've had little problems, and don't think you'll run into any problems. Running an xterm bascially creates another vterm with the same login as your current KDE session. You have all the same rights. By the same token, if you 'su' to root, and run the command for an executable for a GUI exec, that program will run within your current X session (probably unpriveleged) with root permissions. I often do this with cvsup-gui, ethereal, nessus, and nmap-fe. Hope this helps. Eric F Crist From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 04:02:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E3816A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:02:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ru.abb.com (mail.ru.abb.com [212.65.67.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF18143D53 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:02:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Konstantin.Nizhegorodov@ru.abb.com) To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: Konstantin.Nizhegorodov@ru.abb.com Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:02:10 +1100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ABB_RUEXT_HUB01/RUEXT(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 28.07.2004 08:03:55 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: USB APC UPS support in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:02:28 -0000 Hello, sorry if it is wrong place to address this issue to... Could anybody port apcupsd daemon or something else on FreeBSD to support APC UPS USB connection? Or is it already done? Regards, Konstantin Nizhegorodov. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 06:13:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B655916A4EF; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:13:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail01.solnet.ch (mail01.solnet.ch [212.101.4.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E21643D46; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:13:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomas@bsdunix.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.solnet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523CE624B4; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:13:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail01.solnet.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35543-05; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:13:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.104] (unknown [82.220.17.18]) by mail01.solnet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9740962497; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:13:43 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <45EB4ED2-E05D-11D8-9F3B-000A95D3E736@bsdunix.ch> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Thomas Vogt Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:13:41 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) X-Virus-Scanned: by SolNet mail01.solnet.ch cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: sucon 04 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:13:47 -0000 Dear list members, The registration for the anual Swiss Unix Conference has been opened. The online registration form can be found at: https://www.suug.ch/sucon/04/register.html If you register before August 9 you can benefit from early bird registration discounts and save 40% on all fees and additionaly get the chance to win O'Reilly books. SUCON'04 - 2nd Swiss Unix Conference September 2-4, 2004 Technopark, Zurich http://www.sucon.ch/ Some BSD highlights: Poul-Henning Kamp Old mistakes repeated (but you do get the source code now): UNIX is the best operating system ever designed so everybody is running UNIX on their computer, right ? This presentation takes a partisan looks a why UNIX never became a big success in the eighties, failed to win the market in the nineties, and still struggles in the market in the new millenium. Poul-Henning will take a critical look at the mistakes of the past and the mistakes of the present and try to make it really clear what needs to happen for UNIX to become a real success. Hubert Feyrer NetBSD Status Report Fall 2004 As a follower of the Berkeley 4.4BSD Unix operating system, NetBSD is the oldest Open Source operating system project under development today. With it's focus on portability to a wide range of hardware, NetBSD is equally good for running on desktop PCs, various server hardware as well as a wide range of contemporaty handheld and embedded devices. A lot has happened since the project started, and with finally reaching the NetBSD 2.0 release after more than 10 years, this talk will give an overview of the past events from both technical and project administrative point of view, introduce where the NetBSD project stands today and what some of the plans for the future are. Henning Brauer A Secure BGP Implementation The Border Gateway Protocol, BGP, is the standard protocol to exchange routing information. So-called full mesh BGP peers build up a table describing the entire Internet. When something goes wrong with bgp, such as loosing tcp session(s) or the bgp daemon dieing, the affected router is loosing all its routes and the affected site may disappear from the internet until the problem is fixed. If an attacker is able to insert routes remotely the implications are even worse. The basics of the BGP protocol are going to be looked at from a security point of view, especially taking care about the tcp session, and what has been done in OpenBSD and the included bgpd to secure BGP. And many other *BSD related talks. See http://www.suug.ch/sucon/04/programme_f.html Hope to see you at the conference! Best Regards Thomas Vogt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 06:28:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35AA16A4D4; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:28:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8129843D55; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:28:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (andy@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6S6SjGA057785; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:28:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)i6S6Sjwn057782; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:28:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:28:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: Remi In-Reply-To: <3948sc$45b0jp@mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net> Message-ID: <20040728021955.E55464@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <3948sc$45b0jp@mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:28:52 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Remi wrote: > I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz > on 5.2.1-R > CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU) > > I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all? First, you could start by not cross-posting to three different mailing lists. Then, change the power-saving settings that you have in the system's bios. Laptops do not always run at their rated clock speed. Doing so would have a significant negative impact on the system's battery life. As such, plugging in your laptop before the system posts, will likely yield a Mhz guestimate much closer to what you were expecting. Regards, Andy | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 06:42:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C43216A575; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:42:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail01.solnet.ch (mail01.solnet.ch [212.101.4.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4922143D45; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:42:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdlists@bsdunix.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.solnet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6AF624C2; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:42:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail01.solnet.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37800-05; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:42:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.104] (unknown [82.220.17.18]) by mail01.solnet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80C3624AE; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:42:19 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <44F2D069-E061-11D8-9F3B-000A95D3E736@bsdunix.ch> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Thomas Vogt Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:42:18 +0200 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) X-Virus-Scanned: by SolNet mail01.solnet.ch cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: sucon 04 with *bsd talks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:42:23 -0000 Dear list members, The registration for the anual Swiss Unix Conference has been opened. The online registration form can be found at: https://www.suug.ch/sucon/04/register.html If you register before August 9 you can benefit from early bird registration discounts and save 40% on all fees and additionaly get the chance to win O'Reilly books. SUCON'04 - 2nd Swiss Unix Conference September 2-4, 2004 Technopark, Zurich http://www.sucon.ch/ Some BSD highlights: Poul-Henning Kamp Old mistakes repeated (but you do get the source code now): UNIX is the best operating system ever designed so everybody is running UNIX on their computer, right ? This presentation takes a partisan looks a why UNIX never became a big success in the eighties, failed to win the market in the nineties, and still struggles in the market in the new millenium. Poul-Henning will take a critical look at the mistakes of the past and the mistakes of the present and try to make it really clear what needs to happen for UNIX to become a real success. Hubert Feyrer NetBSD Status Report Fall 2004 As a follower of the Berkeley 4.4BSD Unix operating system, NetBSD is the oldest Open Source operating system project under development today. With it's focus on portability to a wide range of hardware, NetBSD is equally good for running on desktop PCs, various server hardware as well as a wide range of contemporaty handheld and embedded devices. A lot has happened since the project started, and with finally reaching the NetBSD 2.0 release after more than 10 years, this talk will give an overview of the past events from both technical and project administrative point of view, introduce where the NetBSD project stands today and what some of the plans for the future are. Henning Brauer A Secure BGP Implementation The Border Gateway Protocol, BGP, is the standard protocol to exchange routing information. So-called full mesh BGP peers build up a table describing the entire Internet. When something goes wrong with bgp, such as loosing tcp session(s) or the bgp daemon dieing, the affected router is loosing all its routes and the affected site may disappear from the internet until the problem is fixed. If an attacker is able to insert routes remotely the implications are even worse. The basics of the BGP protocol are going to be looked at from a security point of view, especially taking care about the tcp session, and what has been done in OpenBSD and the included bgpd to secure BGP. And many other *BSD related talks. See http://www.suug.ch/sucon/04/programme_f.html Hope to see you at the conference! Best Regards Thomas Vogt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 07:16:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C33B16A53D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:16:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ps11.kent.dot.net.au (ps11.kent.dot.net.au [202.147.78.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6D143D54 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:16:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gavinm@cpusmashcrew.net) Received: from dialup-237.225.221.203.acc52-kent-syd.comindico.com.au ([203.221.225.237] helo=[192.168.0.3]) by ps11.kent.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 1Bpifp-0002rU-00; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:16:25 +1000 Message-ID: <410752CB.6090207@cpusmashcrew.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:16:27 +1000 From: Gavin M User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040725) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040728011215.32339.qmail@web14304.mail.yahoo.com> <410703EF.50103@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <410703EF.50103@daleco.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Samba X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:16:35 -0000 Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > Stanley Wright wrote: > >> I'm having a problem setting up Samba(Ver 2.2.7a) on FreeBSD. Ive >> already set Samba up on RedHAt and Mandrake with no issues. >> >> I can see the icon for the FreeBSD share under Network Neighborhood >> but when it is clicked I get the message: >> >> The computer or sharename could not be found. On the FreeBSD box if I >> run for example \\\\smbclient\\homes it prompts for a password and I >> connect getting the smb: \> prompt. >> >> Also, I can map a network drive thru windows explorer and this works >> fine as well as testparm. >> >> The following is the global section of my smb.conf file: >> [global] >> hosts allow = 169.254. >> workgroup = FREEBSD >> printing = bsd >> printcap name = /etc/printcap >> encrypt passwords = yes >> load printers = yes >> guest account = pcguest >> remote announce = 169.254.190.255/FREEBSD >> security = share >> >> Any idea where I'm going wrong ?? >> >> Stanley > > Really, I don't. Just a wild shot in the dark: Name resolution? > Seems in my experience Winboxen are occasionally bad about not > looking too hard to find a host... > > Kevin Kinsey > DaleCo, S.P. > > Interesting smb.conf file you have there, it raises two questions. Firstly, are you using a DHCP server on this network somewhere? It is naughty to use 169.254 for multihost LAN's, so are you using the default private address of 169.254.0.0 on one or more of your network nodes? I could say in advance though that if you are, you need to change that. I suggest 192.168.0.0/24. Plenty of sites have info about it. Unless you have some use for these lines, I suggest you remove them from your smb.conf: guest account = pcguest // if this is genuinely the user you setup to be guest then include it - otherwise this user should be 'nobody' remote announce = 169.254.190.255/FREEBSD // This causes samba to make announcements to the class B private address space (the address an interface gets in windows when it can not find a DHCP server. Its just not cool to use these addresses on a LAN, although they may work to some extent, Windows machines particularly don't like them. security = share // This should be set to 'user' unless you specifically know what it does and want it to do something else. Removing it makes it run in 'user' by default. hosts allow = 169.254. // This should be the cause of your overall problem. Remove this, unless the SAMBA machine is directly connected to the internet, in which case you may want to limit access to addresses from your local net Gav. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 07:27:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846FA16A4D8 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:27:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay9-f34.bay9.hotmail.com [64.4.47.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CEA43D3F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:27:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lancelotest@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:27:37 -0700 Received: from 70.68.235.3 by by9fd.bay9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:27:36 GMT X-Originating-IP: [70.68.235.3] X-Originating-Email: [lancelotest@hotmail.com] X-Sender: lancelotest@hotmail.com From: "¿WÃÈ LanceLoTest" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:27:36 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2004 07:27:37.0255 (UTC) FILETIME=[5B73A370:01C47474] Subject: Postfix + SASL + MySQL,,What did I miss >"< X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:27:37 -0000 Hi, everyone Originally, I used /usr/local/etc/sasldb2 to store accounts/passwords(plain text) data, and used Mozilla Thunderbird as my MUA. I can pass the SASL authentication(both smtp and imap) successfully. After that, I wanted to use MySQL to store accounts/passwords(plain text), but I got fail of SASL authentication. I am using FreeBSD 5.2 release, and have complete installed these softwares from port: cyrus-imapd-2.2.6 cyrus-sasl-2.1.19 cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.19 postfix-2.1.4,1 (build with MySQL) I follow these instructions to set up smtpd.conf http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-questions/2004-April/042847.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-March/039296.html I have been searched and read many documents on mail-listing and google, but I still don't know what I miss @@, and /var/log/maillog doesn't provide enough information to me to solve the problem. I am sure that I have enter correct accounts/passwords. Please note that it works well with /usr/local/etc/sasldb2, but not MySQL >"< It seems to me that it doesn't talk to MySQL at all, because I tried to use incorrect sql_user/sql_passwd in smtpd.conf, it gived me the same log in /var/log/maillog Please give me some hints to fix this problem, I have tried it for several weeks, kind of tired, but I don't want to give up. Thank you in advance. These are some logs, and configurations: (the accounts and password are real, you can test it if you want) # cat /var/log/maillog Jul 27 21:09:01 me postfix/smtpd[771]: connect from S01060050fc412395.vf.shawcable.net[70.68.235.3] Jul 27 21:09:04 me postfix/smtpd[771]: warning: SASL authentication failure: Password verification failed Jul 27 21:09:04 me postfix/smtpd[771]: warning: S01060050fc412395.vf.shawcable.net[70.68.235.3]: SASL PLAIN authentication failed Jul 27 21:09:05 me postfix/smtpd[771]: warning: S01060050fc412395.vf.shawcable.net[70.68.235.3]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed Jul 27 21:09:11 me postfix/smtpd[771]: lost connection after AUTH from S01060050fc412395.vf.shawcable.net[70.68.235.3] Jul 27 21:09:11 me postfix/smtpd[771]: disconnect from S01060050fc412395.vf.shawcable.net[70.68.235.3] mysql> use mail; mysql> select * from user; +----+----------+----------+---------+---------------+------------------------+-------- | ID | USERNAME | PASSWORD | FORWARD | DOMAIN | MAIL | FILTER +----+----------+----------+---------+---------------+------------------------+-------- | 1 | test | zzzzzz | test | me.uos.idv.tw | test@me.uos.idv.tw | OK | 2 | cyrus | zzzzzz | cyrus | me.uos.idv.tw | cyrus@me.uos.idv.tw | OK | 3 | kkk | zzzzzz | kkk | me.uos.idv.tw | kkk@mail.me.uos.idv.tw | OK +----+----------+----------+---------+---------------+------------------------+-------- 3 rows in set (0.02 sec) I have these parameters in main.cf: broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtpd_sasl_local_domain = smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_non_fqdn_sender smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_auth_destination, permit_mx_backup, check_relay_domains, reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unauth_destination, reject smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated reject_unauth_pipelining reject_unknown_client # cat /usr/local/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf pwcheck_method: auxprop auxprop_plugin: sql mech_list: plain login sql_engine: mysql sql_hostnames: localhost sql_user: mail sql_passwd: secret sql_database: mail sql_select: select PASSWORD from user where USERNAME='%u' sql_verbose: true I have tried to change auxprop_plugin: mysql and USERNAME='%u@%r' as well. _________________________________________________________________ Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 07:34:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D2916A4D0 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:34:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41006.mail.yahoo.com (web41006.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAFB843D3F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:34:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040728073411.74741.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.121] by web41006.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:34:11 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:34:11 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Is there a Complete "Package"(NOT Ports) for: [Apache+PHP+MySQL+Mod_SSL+Mod_Perl] ?? - newbie+3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:34:12 -0000 Hi all, I just wanted to know if there is available anywhere a Complete "Package" that is Ready to Go for a FreeBSD Server imlementation that contains: Apache PHP MySQL Mod_SSL Mod_Perl ... & before anyone flames, yes I know you can just d/l the ports & compile from source! ... Thats not what I am looking for. Tried that & found it was too much messing around (compared to the equivalent on Windows 2000) Any suggestions/help is greatly appreciated :)) BTW: thanks to all who replied to my previous questions :)) Regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 07:52:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A58816A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:52:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from test.softjoys.com (test.softjoys.com [212.113.101.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C034F43D53 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:52:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from blosh@softjoys.com) Received: from [212.113.101.166] (zoo.softjoys.com [212.113.101.166]) by test.softjoys.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6S7qRZQ032474 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:52:28 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from blosh@softjoys.com) Message-ID: <41075B49.10005@softjoys.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:52:41 +0400 From: Vladimir Bloshchitsyn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070007050908050605060100" X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-101.5 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_01=-1.524, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on test.softjoys.com X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Dial-In server with authentication at remote TACACS+ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:52:32 -0000 --------------070007050908050605060100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Pls, Tell me way to configure Dial-In server with authentication at remote TACACS+ ? Thx --------------070007050908050605060100 Content-Type: text/plain Scanned by evaluation version of Dr.Web antivirus Daemon http://drweb.ru/unix/ --------------070007050908050605060100-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 07:52:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E6C16A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:52:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bitnatter.de (port-212-202-52-215.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.52.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F215943D39 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:52:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wodan@bitnatter.de) Received: from natter ([127.0.0.1] helo=P6097203 ident=root) by natter with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BpQ51-0001g6-00 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:25:12 +0200 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:24:50 +0200 From: Wodan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Procmail + Sieve ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: wodan@bitnatter.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:52:44 -0000 Hi there Guys, I'm using a setup of Exim, procmail and Cyrus2 together. Now, exim recevies the mail, passes it to procmail via some kind of pipe and procmail uses cyrdeliver to put mails into the corredsponding cyrus imap mail folders ... now is there a way to put sieve between procmail and cyrus ? like make sieve filter all messages that procmail didn't ? removing the target mailbox from the cyrdeliver command doesn't help. How do i pass mail to cyrus so that is still applys the sieve rules ? thanks, wodan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 07:54:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EFB16A58F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:54:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bitnatter.de (port-212-202-52-215.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.52.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE42B43D5D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:54:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wodan@bitnatter.de) Received: from natter ([127.0.0.1] helo=P6097203 ident=root) by natter with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BpOU6-0001cY-00 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:42:59 +0200 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:42:31 +0200 From: Wodan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Procmail + Sieve ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: wodan@bitnatter.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:54:29 -0000 Hi there Guys, I'm using a setup of Exim, procmail and Cyrus2 together. Now, exim recevies the mail, passes it to procmail via some kind of pipe and procmail uses cyrdeliver to put mails into the corredsponding cyrus imap mail folders ... now is there a way to put sieve between procmail and cyrus ? like make sieve filter all messages that procmail didn't ? removing the target mailbox from the cyrdeliver command doesn't help. How do i pass mail to cyrus so that is still applys the sieve rules ? thanks, wodan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 07:54:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1E716A4D2 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:54:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bitnatter.de (port-212-202-52-215.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.52.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EE443D1F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:54:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philipp@koock.net) Received: from natter ([127.0.0.1] helo=P6097203 ident=root) by natter with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BpQ9s-0001gN-00 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:30:12 +0200 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:29:51 +0200 From: Philipp Koock To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Procmail + Sieve ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:54:49 -0000 Hi there Guys, I'm using a setup of Exim, procmail and Cyrus2 together. Now, exim recevies the mail, passes it to procmail via some kind of pipe and procmail uses cyrdeliver to put mails into the corredsponding cyrus imap mail folders ... now is there a way to put sieve between procmail and cyrus ? like make sieve filter all messages that procmail didn't ? removing the target mailbox from the cyrdeliver command doesn't help. How do i pass mail to cyrus so that is still applys the sieve rules ? thanks, wodan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 08:10:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB6D16A4DA for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:10:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro (Hawat.CC.UBBCluj.Ro [193.226.40.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76E343D5A for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:10:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from taipan@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro) Received: from hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro (hawat [127.0.0.1]) by hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6S8FxNE009059; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:15:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from taipan@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro) Received: from localhost (taipan@localhost)i6S8FxEV009056; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:15:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from taipan@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:15:59 +0300 (EEST) From: Radu MOLNAR To: Peter Ryan In-Reply-To: <1090979797.410707d54ef8f@dory.singnet.com.sg> Message-ID: <20040728111528.E9052@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro> References: <1090979797.410707d54ef8f@dory.singnet.com.sg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: can I use "Make" from within KDE Shell Konsole X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:10:44 -0000 I do this all the time and have not had any problems yet. Radu On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Peter Ryan wrote: > It is safe to install ports from > within KDE ? > > At present I shut down KDE, go to > the command line and start a Make. > > If I need to get a file manually > from somewhere, I go back into KDE > to get it. > > I would rather do it all from > within KDE if possible. The Shell > Konsole appears to be the same as > the command line thing I have > been using. > > Thanks > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 08:23:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B9C16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:23:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from host.bsdhost.net (host.bsdhost.net [66.160.134.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E5343D4C for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:23:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fred@bsdhost.net) Received: from beaujon-1-81-57-7-31.fbx.proxad.net ([81.57.7.31] helo=[172.16.1.3]) by host.bsdhost.net with asmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BpjZs-00090x-Ju for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 01:14:20 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) In-Reply-To: <41075B49.10005@softjoys.com> References: <41075B49.10005@softjoys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <671075AC-E06F-11D8-B215-000A9575BCC8@bsdhost.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: fred@bsdhost.net Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:23:28 +0200 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Subject: ip traffic redirection. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:23:27 -0000 Hello gang... This is maybe the wrong list for this question but anyway... For a proof of concept I need to setup a gateway to divert certain kind of ip traffic to a special program who do some counting and modification on these packets and then re-inject them back. This has to be a gateway and not a router. Does someone know if there is a package un the FreeBSD ports who can help me do that? Can I do that using ipfw and in that case can someone send me a pointer to some docs or examples ? Thanks a lot. Fred From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 08:50:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB2E16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:50:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8FC43D1F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:50:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6S8oHmH072397 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:50:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6S8oHkD072396; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:50:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:50:17 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: fred@bsdhost.net Message-ID: <20040728085016.GB72137@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , fred@bsdhost.net, questions@freebsd.org References: <41075B49.10005@softjoys.com> <671075AC-E06F-11D8-B215-000A9575BCC8@bsdhost.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XF85m9dhOBO43t/C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <671075AC-E06F-11D8-B215-000A9575BCC8@bsdhost.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:50:17 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ip traffic redirection. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:50:59 -0000 --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:23:28AM +0200, fred@bsdhost.net wrote: > This is maybe the wrong list for this question but anyway... No -- this is the right list for questions. > For a proof of concept I need to setup a gateway to divert certain kind= =20 > of ip traffic to a special program who do some counting and=20 > modification on these packets and then re-inject them back. This has to= =20 > be a gateway and not a router. Yes, that's doable. It sounds very much like transparent proxying. So long as you can select the traffic you want to process solely by examining the IP headers it should be easy. Of course, the process you feed the selected packets to can do whatever it wants with them and can be programmed to decode packet payloads as required. =20 > Does someone know if there is a package un the FreeBSD ports who can=20 > help me do that? Can I do that using ipfw and in that case can someone=20 > send me a pointer to some docs or examples ? What you want to do sounds very much like transparent proxying. That can be implemented fairly simply under FreeBSD using, for example ipfw(8)'s 'fwd' mechanism. There's a nics discussion in the Squid FAQ which you should be able to mine for clues: http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-17.html Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBB2jIiD657aJF7eIRAq84AJ9S5xV7IPcA4YI05xojbg96cqbX+gCgsCHC AHK22pByxIbxOKPlBDLCAkg= =uXGr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 09:33:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B40716A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:33:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC42343D2F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:33:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phil.brennan@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 80so792rnl for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.97.66 with SMTP id u66mr53317rnb; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:33:24 +0100 From: Phil Brennan To: Remi In-Reply-To: <3948sc$45b0jp@mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3948sc$45b0jp@mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net> cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:33:25 -0000 Just force the cpu speed to high in your bios setup. On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:46:22 -0700, Remi wrote: > I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz > on 5.2.1-R > CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU) > > I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 09:37:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D3216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:37:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from host.bsdhost.net (host.bsdhost.net [66.160.134.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22FD43D3F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:37:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fred@bsdhost.net) Received: from beaujon-1-81-57-7-31.fbx.proxad.net ([81.57.7.31] helo=[172.16.1.3]) by host.bsdhost.net with asmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Bpkj6-000AUG-K6; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:27:56 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20040728085016.GB72137@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <41075B49.10005@softjoys.com> <671075AC-E06F-11D8-B215-000A9575BCC8@bsdhost.net> <20040728085016.GB72137@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: fred@bsdhost.net Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:37:04 +0200 To: Matthew Seaman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ip traffic redirection. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:37:04 -0000 Hello Matthew, Thanks for your email. This looks like a good lead for what I need to do. Just one more question. Is there a user level bridge package on FreeBSD ? Fred On Jul 28, 2004, at 10:50 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:23:28AM +0200, fred@bsdhost.net wrote: > >> This is maybe the wrong list for this question but anyway... > > No -- this is the right list for questions. > >> For a proof of concept I need to setup a gateway to divert certain >> kind >> of ip traffic to a special program who do some counting and >> modification on these packets and then re-inject them back. This has >> to >> be a gateway and not a router. > > Yes, that's doable. It sounds very much like transparent proxying. > So long as you can select the traffic you want to process solely by > examining the IP headers it should be easy. Of course, the process > you feed the selected packets to can do whatever it wants with them > and can be programmed to decode packet payloads as required. > >> Does someone know if there is a package un the FreeBSD ports who can >> help me do that? Can I do that using ipfw and in that case can someone >> send me a pointer to some docs or examples ? > > What you want to do sounds very much like transparent proxying. That > can be implemented fairly simply under FreeBSD using, for example > ipfw(8)'s 'fwd' mechanism. > > There's a nics discussion in the Squid FAQ which you should be able to > mine for clues: > > http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-17.html > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks > Savill Way > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow > Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH > UK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 09:43:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FAB16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:43:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41005.mail.yahoo.com (web41005.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95A3643D67 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:43:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040728094328.70503.qmail@web41005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.121] by web41005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:43:28 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:43:28 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:43:28 -0000 Hi all, I wish BSD had a BigApache installer package, as it would make my life easier... -------------------------------- http://www.bigapache.org/ The BigApache Enterprise Ready Server is free software: This Package provides a full implementation of Apache and it`s commonly used extension modules for the Win32 plattform Windows 2000 & Windows XP This is the base package for BigApache: It includes Apache 2.x mod_ssl OpenSSL mod_perl mod_python mod_jk Mailserver Mercury Additional modules are available in the module distributions and in the BigApache-modules repository. ---------------------------------- Regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 09:49:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9CA16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:49:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B5643D39 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:49:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])i6S9ne85028808; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:49:40 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) i6S9oRkl084110; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:50:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost)i6S9oRws084109; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:50:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:50:27 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: DK Message-ID: <20040728095027.GA84071@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20040728094328.70503.qmail@web41005.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728094328.70503.qmail@web41005.mail.yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:49:43 -0000 On 2004-07-28 02:43, DK wrote: > Hi all, > > I wish BSD had a BigApache installer package, as it would make my life > easier... All of these are available on FreeBSD too (except Mercury Mailserver, which is just another Win32 MTA that I don't know about but somehow feel reluctant to trust more than my Sendmail or Postfix installations). > -------------------------------- > http://www.bigapache.org/ > The BigApache Enterprise Ready Server is free software: > > This Package provides a full implementation of Apache and it`s > commonly used extension modules for the Win32 plattform Windows 2000 & Windows XP > This is the base package for BigApache: > It includes > Apache 2.x > mod_ssl > OpenSSL > mod_perl > mod_python > mod_jk > Mailserver Mercury > Additional modules are available in the module distributions and in the BigApache-modules > repository. > ---------------------------------- Why isn't it easy for you to install all these things on FreeBSD? Which part of the installation troubles you? A recent addition to the Handbook was a section on Apache. Perhaps, by letting us know what gives you trouble we can improve the documentation to help you and anyone else that tries to install an Apache web server from now on. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 10:49:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F164E16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:49:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEC443D54 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:49:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amoundalexis@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 76so49667rnl for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:49:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.10 with SMTP id w10mr291637rna; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:49:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:49:26 -0400 From: Alex Moundalexis To: DK In-Reply-To: <20040728073411.74741.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040728073411.74741.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a Complete "Package"(NOT Ports) for: [Apache+PHP+MySQL+Mod_SSL+Mod_Perl] ?? - newbie+3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:49:31 -0000 AFAIK, no. There are several Linux-based packages that include several - though not all - of those components. Not that I've seen for FreeBSD. I'd seriously recommend a source install, especially with the mod_ssl and static mod_perl modules. In my experience there's just too much that usually gets muddled with package-based installs of these components, especially together. A good set of Linux-based instructions are here... http://lamps.efactory.de/e-archive.shtml Or, that's only 5 packages to install. Could just 5 five seperate pkg_adds, and hope for the best. - A http://www.moundalexis.com On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 00:34:11 -0700 (PDT), DK wrote: > Hi all, > > I just wanted to know if there is available anywhere a Complete "Package" that is Ready to > Go for a FreeBSD Server imlementation that contains: > > Apache > PHP > MySQL > Mod_SSL > Mod_Perl > > .... & before anyone flames, yes I know you can just d/l the ports & compile from source! > > .... Thats not what I am looking for. Tried that & found it was too much messing around > (compared to the equivalent on Windows 2000) > > Any suggestions/help is greatly appreciated :)) > BTW: thanks to all who replied to my previous questions :)) > > Regards, > DK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 10:58:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5B416A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:58:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEDF43D39 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:58:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6SAvtce073694 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:57:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6SAvsLx073693; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:57:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:57:54 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: fred@bsdhost.net Message-ID: <20040728105754.GA73549@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , fred@bsdhost.net, questions@freebsd.org References: <41075B49.10005@softjoys.com> <671075AC-E06F-11D8-B215-000A9575BCC8@bsdhost.net> <20040728085016.GB72137@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:57:55 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ip traffic redirection. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:58:42 -0000 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:37:04AM +0200, fred@bsdhost.net wrote: > Thanks for your email. This looks like a good lead for what I need to=20 > do. > Just one more question. Is there a user level bridge package on FreeBSD= =20 > ? You can certainly set up a machine as a filtering bridge -- it's a fairly common firewall type. It's not what I'd call 'user' level, but then I think you probably mean something quite different by that. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/filtering-bridges/a= rticle.html You should be able to combine the setup for the bridging with the transparent proxying without too much difficulty. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBB4ayiD657aJF7eIRAnAaAJ94YKuipzN3cC5mM+MzDOroaH7qlgCfdATT IXVEI3PHuwS/7k2/uEdHI5Q= =pz4N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 11:20:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3D816A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:20:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mirrorball.theloosingend.net (m069c.studby.ntnu.no [129.241.130.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C07543D46 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:20:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: (qmail 56282 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Jul 2004 11:20:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 11:20:24 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:20:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@mirrorball.theloosingend.net To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040728131142.E53978@mirrorball.theloosingend.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Antialiased fonts in Linux applications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:20:27 -0000 Font in Linux applications no longer render as they should. Both antialiasing and hinting is off. This applies to Acrobat Reader, Mathematica, Maple and Opera (ie. all my Linux applications) I have symlinks to /usr/X11R6/etc/fonts/* in /usr/compat/linux/etc/fonts This used to work, but I don't know what has changed since then, since I did a lot of portupgrades in time between this was last known to work, and when it recently stopped working. Any help would be greatly appricated. -- Svein Halvor Here is a list of my ports: Hermes-1.3.2 Fast pixel formats conversion library ImageMagick-5.5.7.15_1 Image processing tools Mesa-3.4.2_2 A graphics library similar to SGI's OpenGL ORBit-0.5.17_2 High-performance CORBA ORB with support for the C language ORBit2-2.10.3 High-performance CORBA ORB with support for the C language Xaw3d-1.5 A 3-D Athena Widget set that looks like Motif aalib-1.4.r5_1 An ascii art library acpicatools-20021118.0 Some utilities for Intel ACPICA (Debugger, ASL Compiler and acroread-5.08 View, distribute and print PDF documents arts-1.1.4_2,1 Audio system for the KDE integrated X11 desktop aspell-0.50.5_3 Spelling checker with better suggestion logic than ispell atk-1.6.1 A GNOME accessibility toolkit (ATK) autoconf-2.53_1 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf213-2.13.000227_5 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms automake-1.5,1 GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator automake14-1.4.5_9 GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator (legacy version avifile-0.7.38_3,2 AVI player/converter with numerous codecs, including MPEG-4 bash-2.05b.007 The GNU Bourne Again Shell bbpager-0.3.1 A pager for the Blackbox window manager bison-1.75_2 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with Yacc bitstream-vera-1.10 Bitstream Vera TrueType font collection boxtools-0.65.0 Style tools for the blackbox family of window managers bsd-airtools-0.3 BSD Wireless Scanning Tools cdparanoia-3.9.8_7 A CDDA extraction tool (also known as ripper) cdrtools-2.0.3_1 Cdrecord and several other programs to record CD-R[W] compat3x-i386-5.0.20020925 A convenience package to install the compat3x libraries coreutils-5.0_1 The Free Software Foundation's core utilities ctorrent-1.3.2 BitTorrent Client written in C for FreeBSD and Linux cups-base-1.1.20.0 The Common UNIX Printing System: headers, libs, & daemons cups-pstoraster-7.07_1 GNU Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to non-PS prin curl-7.11.0 Non-interactive tool to get files from FTP, GOPHER, HTTP(S) cvsup-16.1h General network file distribution system optimized for CVS db4-4.0.14_1,1 The Berkeley DB package, revision 4 db41-4.1.25_1 The Berkeley DB package, revision 4.1 dbh-1.0.18 Disk Based Hashtables dict-1.9.11 Dictionary Server Protocol (RFC2229) client djbfft-0.76 An extremely fast library for floating-point convolution docbook-sk-4.1.2_3 XML version of the DocBook DTD version controlled for Scrol docbook-xml-4.2_1 XML version of the DocBook DTD docbook-xsl-1.65.1 XSL DocBook stylesheets dri-4.3.0,1 OpenGL hardware acceleration drivers for XFree86 dv2jpg-1.1_3 Convert Type-2 DV codec-encoded AVI streams to mjpeg-encode dvts-1.0a_3 A imprementation of Digital Video Transport System emacs-21.3 GNU editing macros esound-0.2.34 A sound library for enlightenment package expat-1.95.7 XML 1.0 parser written in C ezm3-1.1 Easier, more portable Modula-3 distribution for building CV fam-2.6.9_4 A file alteration monitor ffmpeg-0.4.5_7 Hyper fast realtime audio/video encoder/converter, streamin fftw-2.1.5_2 Fast C routines to compute the Discrete Fourier Transform findutils-4.1_2 The GNU find utilities flac-1.1.0_3 Free lossless audio codec flashplayer-0.4.10_1 GPL standalone Flash (TM) player fontconfig-2.2.2,1 An XML-based font configuration API for X Windows freebsd-games-5.1.1_4 FreeBSD-modified "Standard" BSD games freetype2-2.1.7_3 A free and portable TrueType font rendering engine gaim-0.80 Multi-protocol instant messaging client gcc-3.3.4_20040616 GNU Compiler Collection 3.3 gd-2.0.15_1,1 A graphics library for fast creation of images gdbm-1.8.3_1 The GNU database manager gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0_1 A graphic library for GTK+ gettext-0.13.1_1 GNU gettext package ghostscript-gnu-7.07_5 GNU Postscript interpreter ghostview-1.5 An X11 front-end for ghostscript, the GNU postscript previe gimp-2.0.2,1 A GNU Image Manipulation Program gimp-print-4.2.7 GIMP Print Printer Driver gkrellm-2.2.1 A GTK based system monitor gle-3.0.3 A GL Tubing and Extrusion Library glib-1.2.10_10 Some useful routines of C programming (previous stable vers glib-2.4.2 Some useful routines of C programming (current stable versi gmake-3.80_2 GNU version of 'make' utility gnomehier-1.0_17 A utility port that creates the GNOME directory tree gnupg-1.2.4_1 The GNU Privacy Guard gnutls-1.0.13 GNU Transport Layer Security library grepmail-4.80 Search mailboxes for a given regexp and display matching em gtk-1.2.10_11 Gimp Toolkit for X11 GUI (previous stable version) gtk-2.4.3_1 Gimp Toolkit for X11 GUI (current stable version) gtk-engines2-2.2.0_3 Theme engine for the gtk+-2.0 toolkit gtk-xfce-engine-2.1.10 An XFCE engine for GTK 2.0 gtkglarea-1.99.0_4 An OpenGL widget for the GTK+2 GUI toolkit gtkspell2-2.0.5_1 A GTK+ 2 spell checking component guile-1.6.4_1 GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extension hdf-4.1r5 Hierarchical Data Format library (from NCSA) help2man-1.29 Automatically generating simple manual pages from program o hicolor-icon-theme-0.5 A high-color icon theme shell from the FreeDesktop project iconv-2.0_3 Charset conversion library and utilities id3lib-3.8.3 Library for manipulating ID3v1/v1.1 and ID3v2 tags id3tool-1.2 A utility for manipulating mp3 ID3 Tags id3v2-0.1.9_2 Command line id3v2 tag editor imake-6.7.0_2 Imake and other utilities from X.Org imlib-1.9.14_2 A graphic library for enlightenment package imlib2-1.1.0 The next generation graphic library for enlightenment packa intltool-0.30_1 Xml internationalization support for GNOME, and others ispell-3.2.06_4 An interactive spelling checker for multiple languages jasper-1.700.5 An implementation of the codec specified in the JPEG-2000 s javavmwrapper-1.4 Wrapper script for various Java Virtual Machines jbigkit-1.5 Lossless compression for bi-level images such as scanned pa jhead-2.0 Exif Jpeg camera setting parser and thumbnail remover jpeg-6b_3 IJG's jpeg compression utilities lame-3.93.1 ISO code based fast MP3 encoder kit lapack-3.0 A library of Fortran 77 subroutines for linear algebra lcms-1.09,1 Light Color Management System -- a color management library libIDL-0.8.3_2 A library for creating trees of CORBA Interface Definition libXft-2.1.6 A client-sided font API for X applications liba52-0.7.4_1 A free library for decoding ATSC A/52 streams, aka AC-3 libao-esound-0.8.4_1 Portable audio output library libart_lgpl2-2.3.16 Library for high-performance 2D graphics libaudiofile-0.2.6 A sound library for SGI audio file libcroco-0.5.1 CSS2 parsing library libdv-0.101_1 Quasar DV codec (libdv): software codec for DV video encodi libdvdcss-1.2.8_1 Portable abstraction library for DVD decryption libdvdread-0.9.4 This is needed by ogle, which is a DVD player that supports libexif-0.5.12_2 Library to read digital camera file meta-data libflash-0.4.10 GPL Flash (TM) Library libfpx-1.2.0.9 Library routines for working with Flashpix images libgcrypt-1.2.0_1 "General purpose crypto library based on code used in GnuPG libglade2-2.4.0 GNOME glade library libgnomecanvas-2.6.1.1 A graphics library for GNOME libgnugetopt-1.2 GNU getopt library libgpg-error-0.7_1 Common error values for all GnuPG components libgsf-1.10.0 An extensible i/o abstraction for dealing with structured f libiconv-1.9.1_3 A character set conversion library libid3tag-0.15.0b_1 ID3 tags library (part of MAD project) libijs-0.35 C library that supports plugin printer driver for Ghostscri libltdl-1.5.2 System independent dlopen wrapper libmad-0.15.0b Libmad library (part of MAD project) libmikmod-3.1.10 MikMod Sound Library libmng-1.0.5 Multiple-image Network Graphics (MNG) reference library libmpeg2-0.3.1_1 A free library for decoding mpeg-2 and mpeg-1 video streams libogg-1.1,3 Ogg bitstream library librsvg2-2.6.5_1 Library for parsing and rendering SVG vector-graphic files libslang-1.4.9 Routines for rapid alpha-numeric terminal applications deve libtasn1-0.2.7 ASN.1 structure parser library libtool-1.3.5_1 Generic shared library support script libtool-1.5.6_1 Generic shared library support script (version 1.5) libungif-4.1.0b1 Tools and library routines for working with GIF images libvorbis-1.0.1,3 Audio compression codec library libwmf-0.2.8.2 Tools and library for converting Microsoft WMF (windows met libxfce4gui-4.0.6 XFce 4 widget library required by xfce4 and xfwm4 libxfce4mcs-4.0.6 XFce 4 settings management library used by most XFce 4 modu libxfce4util-4.0.6 XFce 4 library with non-graphical helper functions libxml-1.8.17_1 Xml parser library for GNOME libxml2-2.6.9 Xml parser library for GNOME linc-1.0.3_2 A library for writing networked servers & clients linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.0_2 XFree86 libraries, Linux/i386 binary linux-aspell-0.50.4.1 Spelling checker with better logic than ispell (linux versi linux-expat-1.95.5_1 Linux/i386 binary port of Expat XML-parsing library linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_1 The official Macromedia Flash Player for Linux Mozilla and linux-fontconfig-2.1_1 Linux/i386 binary of Fontconfig linux-openmotif-2.1.30_1 Motif toolkit Linux libraries linux-opera-7.53.20040716 A blazingly fast, full-featured, standards-compliant browse linux_base-8-8.0_4 Base set of packages needed in Linux mode (only for i386) linuxpluginwrapper-20040310_2 A wrapper allowing use of linux-plugins with native applica lsof-4.71.3 Lists information about open files (similar to fstat(1)) lynx-2.8.4.1c A non-graphical, text-based World-Wide Web client m4-1.4_1 GNU m4 mad-0.15.0b The "meta-port" for the MAD sound playback system madplay-esound-0.15.0b_2 Madplay MP3 player (part of MAD project) mjpegtools-1.6.1_2 Set of tools to record/playback/edit videos in MPEG format mkcatalog-1.1 A maintainance utility for sgml catalog files most-4.9.4 A pager (like less) which has support for windows and binar mp3_check-1.98_1 Verifies the integrity of mp3 audio files mp3asm-0.1.3.1_1 MP3 frame level editor mp3check-1.5 A tool for checking and fixing mp3 archive inconsistencies mp3ck-0.02 A consistency check utility for MPEG Layer 2 or 3 files or mp3splt-2.0_1 Utility to split mp3 and ogg files (via CUE sheets) mpg123-esound-0.59r_9 Command-line player for mpeg layer 1, 2 and 3 audio mplayer-fonts-0.50 A font pack for the mplayer OSD and SUB mplayer-gtk-esound-0.92.0_5 High performance media player/encoder supporting many forma mysql-client-3.23.58_2 Multithreaded SQL database (client) nas-1.6 Network Audio System nasm-0.98.35,1 General-purpose multi-platform x86 assembler nmap-3.50 Port scanning utility for large networks nspr-4.4.1_1 A platform-neutral API for system level and libc like funct nss-3.9_1 Libraries to support development of security-enabled applic open-motif-2.2.2_2 Motif X11 Toolkit (industry standard GUI (IEEE 1295)) opencdk-0.5.4_1,1 Open Crypto Development Kit openldap-client-2.1.26 Open source LDAP client implementation openoffice-1.1.1 Integrated wordprocessor/dbase/spreadheet/drawing/chart/bro openssl-0.9.7d SSL and crypto library opera-7.53.20040716 A blazingly fast, full-featured, standards-compliant browse p5-TimeDate-1.16,1 Perl5 module containing a better/faster date parser for abs p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1 Perl extension interface to James Clark's XML parser, expat pango-1.4.0_1 An open-source framework for the layout and rendering of i1 pcre-4.5 Perl Compatible Regular Expressions library pdftk-0.94 A simple tool for doing everyday things with PDF documents perl-5.6.1_15 Practical Extraction and Report Language perl-5.8.4 Practical Extraction and Report Language php5-cli-5.0.0.r2 PHP Command Line Interpreter pico-4.58 PIne's message COmposition editor pkgconfig-0.15.0_1 A utility used to retrieve information about installed libr pkill-0.2 NetBSD's pgrep and pkill: find or signal processes matching png-1.2.5_5 Library for manipulating PNG images popt-1.7 A getopt(3) like library with a number of enhancements, fro pornview-0.2.0.p.1_4 PornView is an image viewer/manager portupgrade-20040113_2 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management tool s py22-expat-2.2.2_2 Python interface to the Expat XML parser python-2.3.4 An interpreted object-oriented programming language qmake-3.2.3_1 The build utility of the Qt project qt-3.3.1_1 Multiplatform C++ application framework rar-3.30,1 File archiver (binary port) rpm-3.0.6_9 The Red Hat Package Manager ruby-1.6.8.2003.10.15 An object-oriented interpreted scripting language ruby-bdb1-0.2.1 Ruby interface to Berkeley DB revision 1.8x with full featu ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p3 A set of Ruby modules to provide Ruby 1.8 functionalities samba-2.2.8a_1 A free SMB and CIFS client and server for UNIX samba-libsmbclient-3.0.4_1 The shared lib from the samba packages scr2png-1.1_4 Converts the output of "vidcontrol -p" to PNG scr2txt-1.1 Converts the output of "vidcontrol -p" to text sdl-1.2.7_1,1 Cross-platform multi-media development API (developm. vers. sdocbook-xml-4.1.2.5_2 "Simplified" DocBook XML DTD shared-mime-info-0.14_3 A MIME type database from the FreeDesktop project shntool-1.2.3_1 Multi-purpose .wav/.shn processing utility shorten-3.5.1 Fast and optionally lossless compression for waveform files sox-12.17.3_1 SOund eXchange - universal sound sample translator speex-1.0.3_1,1 An open-source patent-free voice codec startup-notification-0.7 Library that supports startup notification spec from freede svgalib-1.4.3_2 A low level console graphics library tcl-8.3.5_2 Tool Command Language tcl-8.4.5,1 Tool Command Language tcllib-1.4 A collection of utility modules for Tcl thunderbird-0.7 Mozilla Thunderbird is standalone mail and news that stands tiff-3.6.1_1 Tools and library routines for working with TIFF images tightvnc-1.2.8 Enhanced version of VNC tk-8.3.5_2 Graphical toolkit for TCL tk-8.4.5,1 Graphical toolkit for TCL transcode-0.6.12 A text-console utility for video stream processing ttmkfdir-20021109 Create fonts.scale file for use with TrueType font server unixODBC-2.2.7_1 ODBC library suite for Unix unrar-3.30_1,3 Extract, view & test RAR archives unzip-5.50 List, test and extract compressed files in a ZIP archive urwfonts-1.0 Another font package for X vorbis-tools-1.0.1_1,3 Play, encode, and manage Ogg Vorbis files vorbisgain-0.34_1 Calculates the perceived sound level of an Ogg Vorbis file vpnc-0.2_8 Client for Cisco 3000 VPN Concentrator webfonts-0.21_1 TrueType core fonts for the Web wget-1.8.2_6 Retrieve files from the Net via HTTP and FTP win32-codecs-2.0.90_1,1 Huge compilation of Win32 binary codecs, including MPEG-4(D windowmaker-0.80.2_3 GNUStep-compliant NeXTStep window manager clone wine-20040408 Microsoft Windows compatibility layer for Unix-like systems wmicons-1.0 Icons mainly for use in Window Maker wrapper-1.0_3 Wrapper for XFree86-4 server xcdroast-0.98.a.15_1 Another X11 frontend to mkisofs/cdrecord xfce-4.0.6 The "meta-port" for the XFce 4 desktop environment xfce4-battery-plugin-0.2.0_2 Battery monitor panel plugin for XFce4 xfce4-desktop-4.0.6 XFce 4 desktop background manager and root menu xfce4-fm-4.0.6 XFce 4 file manager xfce4-fm-icons-4.0.6 XFce 4 icon themes for the xffm file manager xfce4-iconbox-4.0.6 XFce 4 icon box, an alternative taskbar xfce4-mcs-manager-4.0.6 XFce 4 settings manager xfce4-mcs-plugins-4.0.6 XFce 4 settings manager plugins xfce4-mixer-4.0.6 XFce 4 volume mixer module for xfce4-panel xfce4-panel-4.0.6 XFce 4 panel module xfce4-panel-themes-4.0.6 Icon themes for the XFce 4 panel xfce4-print-4.0.6 XFce 4 graphical frontend for printing xfce4-systray-4.0.6 XFce 4 system tray module for xfce4-panel xfce4-toys-4.0.6 Toys for the XFce 4 panel xfce4-utils-4.0.6 XFce 4 essential utilities and scripts xfce4-wm-4.0.6 XFce 4 window manager xfce4-wm-themes-4.0.6 XFce 4 window decoration themes for xfwm4 xmlcatmgr-2.1 SGML and XML catalog manager xmms-1.2.10 X Multimedia System --- An audio player with a Winamp GUI xmms-flac-1.1.0_1 XMMS input plugin for playing FLAC files xmms-shn-2.2.8_1 XMMS plugin to allow playing shorten-compressed audio xmms-speex-0.9.1_1 XMMS input plugin to play speex files xmms-status-plugin-1.0_1 XMMS control applet for GNOME 2 panel / KDE tray xorg-6.7.0 X.Org distribution metaport xorg-clients-6.7.0_1 X client programs and related files from X.Org xorg-fonts-100dpi-6.7.0 X.Org 100dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-75dpi-6.7.0 X.Org 75dpi bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-cyrillic-6.7.0 X.Org Cyrillic bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-encodings-6.7.0 X.Org font encoding files xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-6.7.0 X.Org miscellaneous bitmap fonts xorg-fonts-truetype-6.7.0 X.Org TrueType fonts xorg-fonts-type1-6.7.0 X.Org Type1 fonts xorg-fontserver-6.7.0 X font server from X.Org xorg-libraries-6.7.0_1 X11 libraries and headers from X.Org xorg-nestserver-6.7.0 Nesting X server from X.Org xorg-printserver-6.7.0 X Print server from X.Org xorg-server-6.7.0_5 X.Org X server and related programs xorg-vfbserver-6.7.0 X virtual framebuffer server from X.Org xscreensaver-4.16 Save your screen while you entertain your cat xv-3.10a_3 An X11 program that displays images of various formats xvid-0.9.2,1 An opensource MPEG-4 codec, based on OpenDivx zip-2.3_1 Create/update ZIP files compatible with pkzip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 11:27:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7784B16A4D2 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:27:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41003.mail.yahoo.com (web41003.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 116F043D54 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:27:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.122] by web41003.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:27:15 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 04:27:15 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: keramida@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040728095027.GA84071@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:27:16 -0000 --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > All of these are available on FreeBSD too (except Mercury Mailserver, > which is just another Win32 MTA that I don't know about but somehow feel > reluctant to trust more than my Sendmail or Postfix installations). Yes, but not as ONE nice Package: eg: FreeBSD PORTS apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 I tried to install apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 THEN apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 and its messed up!! If you want people(Windows user) using BSD on mass for servers etc, develop a Package that contains many of the necessary Apache modules: eg: ONE Package(NOT an array of messy Ports) ESSENTIAL: Apache MySQL mod_ssl(Contains:OpenSSL) mod_perl PHP OPTIONAL: IMAP mod_python mod_auth_nds mod_auth_mysql mod_fastcgi mod_jk XML GD > > -------------------------------- > Why isn't it easy for you to install all these things on FreeBSD? > > Which part of the installation troubles you? A recent addition to the > Handbook was a section on Apache. Perhaps, by letting us know what > gives you trouble we can improve the documentation to help you and > anyone else that tries to install an Apache web server from now on. Being a long time Windows 2000 user & a coder in C, C++, Assembler, Perl, PHP I am making a real effort to set up a Web Server on the FreeBSD platform. I can install apache OK. Installing other modules(mod_perl, mod_ssl, php etc...) with it is a nightmare... What I have noticed so far about FreeBSD: FreeBSD is about 5 YEARS behind windows(I would actually say 1990, but people my have heart attacks) - apologies to all the hard work put in by BSD contributors! - with FreeBSD & Windows 2000 installed on the SAME computer, the GUI of Windows 2000 is MUCH faster than any of the BSD window managers(wmaker, FVWM, blackbox, fluxbox, XFCE(STILL can't start this from exec, whats the damn command startxfce4 ??? this doesn't work!)... I won't even comment on the shitty performance of KDE & GNOME - If people say it should be used without a GUI... they must be over 40, bald, lonely & most love shitty VI - I can EDIT any file faster on a GUI editor then any coder I have seen at UNI/WORK who say VI is better... - No default GUI File Explorer(excluding KDE/GNOME, not that there's is usable) - had to install xfe on wmaker(still about as useless as Windows 3.1 File Manager) - FreeBSD does NOT Default Mount my CD & Floppy(this is ridiculous - even MS DOS NOT to mention Windows 3.1[Year 1990... ring a bell] did this!!) - you honestly expect new users to edit configuration files so it automounts ?? ... instead of having stuff in the man/manual/docs about mounting/unmounting, just automount them as DEFAULT... no need to read the docs... logical ??? - 300 Million Users of Windows thinks so ;)) (BTW: I am NOT including KDE/GNOME) - No default Find Files GUI - I won't even comment on lack of functionality of Cmd line whereis/search/find I can tell you that 95% of people who use computers want "EASE of USE" - This INCLUDES easy installation of the Operating System - This should INCLUDE a default setup that HAS: a Default FAST GUI/File Manager/Find Files/Editor .. this is all that is needed to get a user up & going to installing & configuring the OS to thier tastes ... did I forget to mention as default AUTOMOUNT !! I cannot tell you the shock & disappointment I had in finding out that Windows 2000 runs FASTER than FreeBSD with any GUI/Windows Manager/Desktop Environment ... :((( ...damn I have gone way off track here... sorry for the ranting people... but after 6 days straight of messing around trying to install Apache/MySQL/Mod_Perl/Mod_SSL/PHP.. I am a little tired... 3 days of that was trying to get a basic GUI/File Manager/Find Files/Editor working Kind Regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 11:52:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1317516A4D7; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:52:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from redqueen.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A17043D3F; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:52:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.2.122] (nimrod.elvandar.intranet [10.0.2.122]) by redqueen.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B5710685E; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:51:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <41079361.50409@elvandar.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:52:01 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DK References: <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: keramida@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:52:05 -0000 DK wrote: > --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >>All of these are available on FreeBSD too (except Mercury Mailserver, >>which is just another Win32 MTA that I don't know about but somehow feel >>reluctant to trust more than my Sendmail or Postfix installations). > > > Yes, but not as ONE nice Package: > eg: FreeBSD PORTS > apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 > apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 > > I tried to install apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 THEN apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 > and its messed up!! Perhaps, in contradiction to Windows (in which you have to press : next next next okay and your software is installed) you need to 'rtfm'. This being said think the best way to install it, is using apache+mod_ssl... as installation base, and then add mod_perl seperatly. Can that be done? Yes it can be done, and you would have known if you had asked or read some documentation. > > If you want people(Windows user) using BSD on mass for servers etc, develop a Package that > contains many of the necessary Apache modules: > eg: ONE Package(NOT an array of messy Ports) It works absolutly fine, i dont think we want one big package for everything, then it would be like rpm and FreeBSD imo does not want to follow Redhat and such. Oh and that requires a lot of disks for installing, Suse anyone? (DVD or six seven CD's?). > > ESSENTIAL: > Apache > MySQL > mod_ssl(Contains:OpenSSL) > mod_perl > PHP > > OPTIONAL: > IMAP > mod_python > mod_auth_nds > mod_auth_mysql > mod_fastcgi > mod_jk > XML > GD > All possible with the ports... > > >>>-------------------------------- >> >>Why isn't it easy for you to install all these things on FreeBSD? >> >>Which part of the installation troubles you? A recent addition to the >>Handbook was a section on Apache. Perhaps, by letting us know what >>gives you trouble we can improve the documentation to help you and >>anyone else that tries to install an Apache web server from now on. > > > > Being a long time Windows 2000 user & a coder in C, C++, Assembler, Perl, PHP I am making a real > effort to set up a Web Server on the FreeBSD platform. Good, at least you try/ > > I can install apache OK. Installing other modules(mod_perl, mod_ssl, php etc...) with it is a > nightmare... As said, read the documentation , or learn to search, since if you did that and installd apache with modssl included. And you would have searched you would have come across mod_perl and even mod_php, which is apxs'ed into the apache library stuff and can be used within 'seconds'. > > > What I have noticed so far about FreeBSD: > > FreeBSD is about 5 YEARS behind windows(I would actually say 1990, but people my have heart > attacks) - apologies to all the hard work put in by BSD contributors! I think we are in front of windows. We can have multiple users at the same time, refresh our system without always having to reboot {update some random pacakge in windows and it requires a reboot}. Besides that BSD has nice SMP support, and AMD-64 support with working drivers, that cannot be said from Windows XP 64bit eh? > > - with FreeBSD & Windows 2000 installed on the SAME computer, the GUI of Windows 2000 is MUCH > faster than any of the BSD window managers(wmaker, FVWM, blackbox, fluxbox, XFCE(STILL can't start > this from exec, whats the damn command startxfce4 ??? this doesn't work!)... I won't even comment > on the shitty performance of KDE & GNOME - If people say it should be used without a GUI... they > must be over 40, bald, lonely & most love shitty VI - I can EDIT any file faster on a GUI editor > then any coder I have seen at UNI/WORK who say VI is better... Well i dont agree on this one either, my gnome starts much faster then windows and especially fvwm2 is very fast and light. And instead of ranting on XFCE you can (again) ask how things work, it's not pressing the next button here either. I think you are 20, full of hair and you just love notepad. And that's fine, since i am 20, full of hair and i love vi.. everybody has it's editor... dont rant on that since that's lame.. > > - No default GUI File Explorer(excluding KDE/GNOME, not that there's is usable) - had to install > xfe on wmaker(still about as useless as Windows 3.1 File Manager) > > - FreeBSD does NOT Default Mount my CD & Floppy(this is ridiculous - even MS DOS NOT to mention > Windows 3.1[Year 1990... ring a bell] did this!!) - you honestly expect new users to edit > configuration files so it automounts ?? ... instead of having stuff in the man/manual/docs about > mounting/unmounting, just automount them as DEFAULT... no need to read the docs... logical ??? No they did not, you had to enable the driver first before it even got recognized. Here you have the possibility to mount a floppy and a disk. And again, the handbook has some information about this afaik/ > - 300 Million Users of Windows thinks so ;)) (BTW: I am NOT including KDE/GNOME) Windows has a larger user base, that's correct. > > - No default Find Files GUI - I won't even comment on lack of functionality of Cmd line > whereis/search/find In gnome there is a find option that enables you to find files. And then there is find, which can do a lot more then you probably think now. > > I can tell you that 95% of people who use computers want "EASE of USE" > - This INCLUDES easy installation of the Operating System Following the handbook makes FreeBSD installable by nearly anyone. > - This should INCLUDE a default setup that HAS: a Default FAST GUI/File Manager/Find Files/Editor > .. this is all that is needed to get a user up & going to installing & configuring the OS to thier > tastes ... did I forget to mention as default AUTOMOUNT !! You should not shout that much, that's bad for your heart. FreeBSD has features that enable you to pick what you want as X-client (window manager), follow the handbook.. > > > I cannot tell you the shock & disappointment I had in finding out that Windows 2000 runs FASTER > than FreeBSD with any GUI/Windows Manager/Desktop Environment ... :((( Opinions, again i dont agree, and if you do find this i suggest you have some benchmarks with what applications run faster, etc. Since then you made a good point with some proof. > > > > ...damn I have gone way off track here... sorry for the ranting people... but after 6 days > straight of messing around trying to install Apache/MySQL/Mod_Perl/Mod_SSL/PHP.. I am a little > tired... 3 days of that was trying to get a basic GUI/File Manager/Find Files/Editor working You perhaps should have asked, search, or rtfm before giving yourself a heart beat of 160... If you still think that it can be done better, you are free to alter things so that it can do what you wish, since you tell us that you are an experienced coder that should not be that hard.. Besides that: just ask us if something is weird for you, perhaps that's the same for others and we should improve our documentation, instead of ranting you can actually help us and others, in despite to windows in which that is very hard to do so. > > > Kind Regards, > > DK > Cheers Remko -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 12:16:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741FB16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:16:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8589843D6B for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:16:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i6SCFe3f032354; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:15:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <410798EC.7010400@circlesquared.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:15:40 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DK References: <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:16:08 -0000 DK wrote: > --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >>All of these are available on FreeBSD too (except Mercury Mailserver, >>which is just another Win32 MTA that I don't know about but somehow feel >>reluctant to trust more than my Sendmail or Postfix installations). > > > Yes, but not as ONE nice Package: > eg: FreeBSD PORTS > apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 > apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 >[snip] Hi, You're probably aware of this already, but FreeBSD is developed collaboratively. I'm just a user, and have nothing at all to do with the project. There are a few things called meta-ports which install a load of stuff at once - there's one for installing an *instant workstation*, for example. If anyone had felt the need to produce one for the setup you're describing, or indeed that it would be a sensible thing to do, they would have done it. As a matter of fact, the PHP port has just been made even less like the way you'd like it to be - and for some excellent reasons, I now see. I didn't at first but I was wrong, not the port maintainer. You might step back a moment and reflect that you might be missing some very important points. The arguments you made are based on things that have, after all, been apparent to everyone always. FreeBSD is as it is by design, not negligence or backwardness. FreeBSD might well not be for you. Luckily, we can choose which operating system suits us best. But until you figure out why things are done this way with FreeBSD, and then consider the merits of this approach, you're not going to get anywhere with it. Regards, Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 12:18:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDDA16A4CF; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:18:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from n2sw.com (n2sw.webair.com [216.130.191.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4756243D54; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:18:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from webairsteve (unknown [216.130.191.71]) by n2sw.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2533620EE; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <00b901c474b6$b807df10$47bf82d8@webairsteve> From: "Steve" To: "Remko Lodder" , "DK" References: <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> <41079361.50409@elvandar.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:22:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 cc: keramida@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:18:32 -0000 to set the record straight, fbsd is not and has never been close to linux if you want to run an os that will run out of the box then yes by all means run redhat, but you also get xinetd, and root enabled in ssh. if you do want to run a semi serious web server then i would build from source, so i would not complain about ther enot being any ports, lets see you make a port, or do you know how to setup virtual hosting on a name basis for apache and postfix, perhaps you can add postfix, clamav, and squirrelmail to your mush beloved port. come to think of it you might want to add mysql-4.2.0 and phpnuke to that port. -- Steve Rieger ICQ # 5956607 yahoo IM riegersteve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Remko Lodder" To: "DK" Cc: ; Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:52 AM Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? > DK wrote: > > > --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > >>All of these are available on FreeBSD too (except Mercury Mailserver, > >>which is just another Win32 MTA that I don't know about but somehow feel > >>reluctant to trust more than my Sendmail or Postfix installations). > > > > > > Yes, but not as ONE nice Package: > > eg: FreeBSD PORTS > > apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 > > apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 > > > > I tried to install apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 THEN apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 > > and its messed up!! > > Perhaps, in contradiction to Windows (in which you have to press : next > next next okay and your software is installed) you need to 'rtfm'. This > being said think the best way to install it, is using apache+mod_ssl... > as installation base, and then add mod_perl seperatly. Can that be > done? Yes it can be done, and you would have known if you had asked or > read some documentation. > > > > > If you want people(Windows user) using BSD on mass for servers etc, develop a Package that > > contains many of the necessary Apache modules: > > eg: ONE Package(NOT an array of messy Ports) > > It works absolutly fine, i dont think we want one big package for > everything, then it would be like rpm and FreeBSD imo does not want to > follow Redhat and such. Oh and that requires a lot of disks for > installing, Suse anyone? (DVD or six seven CD's?). > > > > > > ESSENTIAL: > > Apache > > MySQL > > mod_ssl(Contains:OpenSSL) > > mod_perl > > PHP > > > > OPTIONAL: > > IMAP > > mod_python > > mod_auth_nds > > mod_auth_mysql > > mod_fastcgi > > mod_jk > > XML > > GD > > > > All possible with the ports... > > > > > > >>>-------------------------------- > >> > >>Why isn't it easy for you to install all these things on FreeBSD? > >> > >>Which part of the installation troubles you? A recent addition to the > >>Handbook was a section on Apache. Perhaps, by letting us know what > >>gives you trouble we can improve the documentation to help you and > >>anyone else that tries to install an Apache web server from now on. > > > > > > > > Being a long time Windows 2000 user & a coder in C, C++, Assembler, Perl, PHP I am making a real > > effort to set up a Web Server on the FreeBSD platform. > > Good, at least you try/ > > > > > I can install apache OK. Installing other modules(mod_perl, mod_ssl, php etc...) with it is a > > nightmare... > > As said, read the documentation , or learn to search, since if you did > that and installd apache with modssl included. And you would have > searched you would have come across mod_perl and even mod_php, which is > apxs'ed into the apache library stuff and can be used within 'seconds'. > > > > > > > What I have noticed so far about FreeBSD: > > > > FreeBSD is about 5 YEARS behind windows(I would actually say 1990, but people my have heart > > attacks) - apologies to all the hard work put in by BSD contributors! > > I think we are in front of windows. We can have multiple users at the > same time, refresh our system without always having to reboot {update > some random pacakge in windows and it requires a reboot}. Besides that > BSD has nice SMP support, and AMD-64 support with working drivers, that > cannot be said from Windows XP 64bit eh? > > > > > - with FreeBSD & Windows 2000 installed on the SAME computer, the GUI of Windows 2000 is MUCH > > faster than any of the BSD window managers(wmaker, FVWM, blackbox, fluxbox, XFCE(STILL can't start > > this from exec, whats the damn command startxfce4 ??? this doesn't work!)... I won't even comment > > on the shitty performance of KDE & GNOME - If people say it should be used without a GUI... they > > must be over 40, bald, lonely & most love shitty VI - I can EDIT any file faster on a GUI editor > > then any coder I have seen at UNI/WORK who say VI is better... > > Well i dont agree on this one either, my gnome starts much faster then > windows and especially fvwm2 is very fast and light. And instead of > ranting on XFCE you can (again) ask how things work, it's not pressing > the next button here either. I think you are 20, full of hair and you > just love notepad. And that's fine, since i am 20, full of hair and i > love vi.. everybody has it's editor... dont rant on that since that's lame.. > > > > > - No default GUI File Explorer(excluding KDE/GNOME, not that there's is usable) - had to install > > xfe on wmaker(still about as useless as Windows 3.1 File Manager) > > > > > > > - FreeBSD does NOT Default Mount my CD & Floppy(this is ridiculous - even MS DOS NOT to mention > > Windows 3.1[Year 1990... ring a bell] did this!!) - you honestly expect new users to edit > > configuration files so it automounts ?? ... instead of having stuff in the man/manual/docs about > > mounting/unmounting, just automount them as DEFAULT... no need to read the docs... logical ??? > > No they did not, you had to enable the driver first before it even got > recognized. Here you have the possibility to mount a floppy and a disk. > And again, the handbook has some information about this afaik/ > > > - 300 Million Users of Windows thinks so ;)) (BTW: I am NOT including KDE/GNOME) > > Windows has a larger user base, that's correct. > > > > > - No default Find Files GUI - I won't even comment on lack of functionality of Cmd line > > whereis/search/find > > In gnome there is a find option that enables you to find files. And then > there is find, which can do a lot more then you probably think now. > > > > > I can tell you that 95% of people who use computers want "EASE of USE" > > - This INCLUDES easy installation of the Operating System > > Following the handbook makes FreeBSD installable by nearly anyone. > > > - This should INCLUDE a default setup that HAS: a Default FAST GUI/File Manager/Find Files/Editor > > .. this is all that is needed to get a user up & going to installing & configuring the OS to thier > > tastes ... did I forget to mention as default AUTOMOUNT !! > > You should not shout that much, that's bad for your heart. FreeBSD has > features that enable you to pick what you want as X-client (window > manager), follow the handbook.. > > > > > > > I cannot tell you the shock & disappointment I had in finding out that Windows 2000 runs FASTER > > than FreeBSD with any GUI/Windows Manager/Desktop Environment ... :((( > > Opinions, again i dont agree, and if you do find this i suggest you have > some benchmarks with what applications run faster, etc. Since then you > made a good point with some proof. > > > > > > > > > ...damn I have gone way off track here... sorry for the ranting people... but after 6 days > > straight of messing around trying to install Apache/MySQL/Mod_Perl/Mod_SSL/PHP.. I am a little > > tired... 3 days of that was trying to get a basic GUI/File Manager/Find Files/Editor working > > You perhaps should have asked, search, or rtfm before giving yourself a > heart beat of 160... > > If you still think that it can be done better, you are free to alter > things so that it can do what you wish, since you tell us that you are > an experienced coder that should not be that hard.. > > Besides that: just ask us if something is weird for you, perhaps that's > the same for others and we should improve our documentation, instead of > ranting you can actually help us and others, in despite to windows in > which that is very hard to do so. > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > DK > > > > > Cheers > Remko > > -- > Kind regards, > > Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org > Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org > Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 12:26:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD32916A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:26:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADDC43D2F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:26:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6SCSbjM012568; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:28:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i6SCSb2I012567; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:28:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:28:37 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Lutz Petersen Message-ID: <20040728122837.GA12257@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Lutz Petersen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4104304A.5060004@despammed.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4104304A.5060004@despammed.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: R/W mount of / denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:26:45 -0000 Why don't you do what the message says: run fsck ? On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:12:26AM +0200, Lutz Petersen typed: > After a system crash (e.g. a power failure), the terminal-less FreeBSD > 5.2.1-RELEASE I run does not boot up properly any more. Here is an > excerpt from /var/log/messages: > > Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: / was not properly dismounted > Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. > Filesystem is not clean - run fsck > Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. > Filesystem is not clean - run fsck > Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /home was not properly dismounted > Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted > Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted > Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted > > As a result, BIND does not start up any more, which leaves my FreeBSD > box in an unusable state (no internet connection, no network connections > that use DNS). I did not experience this behaviour with 4-STABLE. What's > wrong here? > > The other day I read about a misconfiguration of /etc/fstab (wrong > fs_passno), which prevented FreeBSD from doing the usual consistency > checking at startup time. My fstab is looking fine however. > > Any help is greatly appreciated, > Lutz > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 13:00:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB8C16A5CA for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:00:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from squid12.laughingsquid.net (squid12.laughingsquid.net [66.216.98.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1989243D62 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:00:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m8905186@ncafe.com) Received: (qmail 32044 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2004 13:00:44 -0000 Received: from adsl-63-192-133-118.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO ?192.168.1.60?) (63.192.133.118) by squid12.laughingsquid.net with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 13:00:44 -0000 Message-ID: <4107A35B.4050907@ncafe.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:00:11 -0700 From: Nicholas Jackson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040715 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040726T123353Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> <20040726134926.N4334@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> In-Reply-To: <20040726134926.N4334@adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 3COM NIC Card somehow stuck in half-on mode? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicholasj@ncafe.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:00:46 -0000 Hello, I have a 3Com 3C905TX Ethernet card that suddenly refuses to work normally. I have tried turning off autonegotiate and specifying the various media options in ifconfig but no joy. And of course the situation has survived many reboots. The card is specified in rc.conf properly, and it shows up in dmesg, but it is not showing up with an IP address in ifconfig. Any ideas? Is there any way to debug the connection between the PCI bus and the card? It seems to be sensing when it is plugged in to a 10BaseT or 100BaseT Ethernet, so I don't think it's dead.. Thank you, Nick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 13:03:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727BD16A51B; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:03:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf07.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf07.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139FD43D46; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:03:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MrL0L@charter.net) Received: from mxip03.cluster1.charter.net (mxip03a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.133])i6SD3pAn008421; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:03:51 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO gamez) (68.189.127.165) by mxip03.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2004 09:03:51 -0400 Message-Id: <391ogq$4b3267@mxip03a.cluster1.charter.net> X-Ironport-AV: i="3.83,93,1089000000"; d="scan'208"; a="145852615:sNHT21287956" From: "Remi" To: "'Phil Brennan'" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:03:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcR0hfaaYHlxac4sSeSNFaeyo5igSwAHTw2w X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: AMD64 Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:03:53 -0000 That's exactly the problem. The BIOS won't let me. And the AC line is plugged in. Windows XP Pro detects it correctly, there's something something else going on with BSD. -----Original Message----- From: Phil Brennan [mailto:phil.brennan@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:33 AM To: Remi Cc: questions@freebsd.org; amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Woes Just force the cpu speed to high in your bios setup. On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:46:22 -0700, Remi wrote: > I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz > on 5.2.1-R > CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU) > > I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 13:05:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303E316A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:05:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from girvas-gw.girvas.ru (girvas-gw.girvas.ru [81.195.163.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4502E43D46 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:05:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from n.lastovka@girvas.ru) Received: from gugenot (gugenot [192.168.25.135] (may be forged)) i6SD52Y4001230 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:05:02 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from n.lastovka@girvas.ru) X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.31a, engine: 4.31b, virus records: 52590, updated: 26.07.2004] From: "??????? (??????) ????????" To: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:05:02 +0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20040728120242.B52DF16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: what does it mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:05:28 -0000 Hi, I get message like this >Subject: Cron /usr/local/sbin/update_dat >mv: *.tar: No such file or directory >ftp: Error retrieving file - `404 Object Not Found' what it mean? what I need to do and where can I find out information about it? Thanks as ever From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 13:09:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDF316A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:09:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F41643D5C for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:09:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 56857 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 13:09:23 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.210997 secs); 28 Jul 2004 13:09:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 13:09:21 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:09:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3328.209.167.16.15.1091020161.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <20040728122837.GA12257@ei.bzerk.org> References: <4104304A.5060004@despammed.com> <20040728122837.GA12257@ei.bzerk.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:09:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "Ruben de Groot" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: Lutz Petersen cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: R/W mount of / denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:09:13 -0000 > > Why don't you do what the message says: run fsck ? I get from the OP's message that it is a 'headless' (quote "terminal-less") server, and it's difficult for him to run fsck. I believe he is asking how to mitigate this problem so it doesn't continue to happen (fix so fsck runs by itself?). We have ~15 FBSD servers, and I only ever had one do this to me. I never did find out the problem, but the box was with old hardware and we simply replaced it. I'm curious to know if someone else has an answer. OP, I hope I understand what you are saying properly. Steve > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:12:26AM +0200, Lutz Petersen typed: >> After a system crash (e.g. a power failure), the terminal-less FreeBSD >> 5.2.1-RELEASE I run does not boot up properly any more. Here is an >> excerpt from /var/log/messages: >> >> Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a >> Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: / was not properly dismounted >> Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. >> Filesystem is not clean - run fsck >> Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. >> Filesystem is not clean - run fsck >> Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /home was not properly >> dismounted >> Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted >> Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted >> Jul 25 20:18:04 server kernel: WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted >> >> As a result, BIND does not start up any more, which leaves my FreeBSD >> box in an unusable state (no internet connection, no network connections >> that use DNS). I did not experience this behaviour with 4-STABLE. What's >> wrong here? >> >> The other day I read about a misconfiguration of /etc/fstab (wrong >> fs_passno), which prevented FreeBSD from doing the usual consistency >> checking at startup time. My fstab is looking fine however. >> >> Any help is greatly appreciated, >> Lutz >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 13:11:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8ED16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:11:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A4343D31 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:11:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 57248 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 13:12:05 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 2.732269 secs); 28 Jul 2004 13:12:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 13:12:02 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:12:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3330.209.167.16.15.1091020322.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: References: <20040728120242.B52DF16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:12:02 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: n.lastovka@girvas.ru User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what does it mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:11:55 -0000 >>Subject: Cron /usr/local/sbin/update_dat >>mv: *.tar: No such file or directory >>ftp: Error retrieving file - `404 Object Not Found' > > what it mean? what I need to do and where can I find out information about > it? Well, your program: '/usr/local/sbin/update_dat' Appears to be uploading files but can't find the file to upload. Open up the program file and take a look around. Your answer is sure to be in there (assuming that it is not a compiled program). Steve > > Thanks > as ever > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 13:28:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EBA16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:28:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAD443D55 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:28:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from henrik.w.lund@broadpark.no) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (52.80-202-129.nextgentel.com [80.202.129.52]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540C53251 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:29:24 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <41082894.5070007@broadpark.no> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:28:36 -0700 From: Henrik W Lund User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: nb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040728073411.74741.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728073411.74741.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Is there a Complete "Package"(NOT Ports) for: [Apache+PHP+MySQL+Mod_SSL+Mod_Perl] ?? - newbie+3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:28:54 -0000 DK wrote: >Hi all, > >I just wanted to know if there is available anywhere a Complete "Package" that is Ready to >Go for a FreeBSD Server imlementation that contains: > >Apache >PHP >MySQL >Mod_SSL >Mod_Perl > >... & before anyone flames, yes I know you can just d/l the ports & compile from source! > >... Thats not what I am looking for. Tried that & found it was too much messing around >(compared to the equivalent on Windows 2000) > > >Any suggestions/help is greatly appreciated :)) >BTW: thanks to all who replied to my previous questions :)) > > >Regards, >DK > Greetings! I don't think there exists such a package, but why don't make your own meta-port that depends on any package you want to install? In the same way the port x11/xorg doesn't install any files by itself, it depends on all packages that are needed to get a useable xorg configuration, the port you make will depend on anything you want! If you think that the configuration is really useful, commit the port, so that others in your present situation may take advantage of it. 1. Make a port, (misc/yourport), depending on Apache, MySQL, Mod_SSL, Mod_Perl, etc... 2. To install from package, run portinstall -P misc/yourport (this will build from source whenever a precompiled package doesn't exist). To learn how to make a port, read the Porter's Handbook at the FreeBSD website (I don't know how to make one, as I've never tried. It just struck me as being a good idea). Hope this helps! -Henrik W Lund From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 13:42:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B4716A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:42:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2874943D5F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:42:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])i6SDfvAw012076; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:41:57 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) i6SDgjPk061888; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:42:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)i6SDgi4o061879; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:42:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:42:44 +0300 (EEST) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: DK In-Reply-To: <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040728155525.S12001@orion> References: <20040728095027.GA84071@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:42:03 -0000 On 2004-07-28 04:27, DK wrote: > --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > All of these are available on FreeBSD too (except Mercury Mailserver, > > which is just another Win32 MTA that I don't know about but somehow feel > > reluctant to trust more than my Sendmail or Postfix installations). > > Yes, but not as ONE nice Package: > eg: FreeBSD PORTS > apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 > apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 > > I tried to install apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 THEN > apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 and its messed up!! I can understand why building things from source in a new, previously unknown, system might be a source of frustration and anger. Don't let the fact that FreeBSD is *different* from what you were used to working with until now confuse and anger you. Some times, it's better to install smaller packages that work together in a well-known way, than huge mega-monsters that break in unexpected ways later on. I'm sure that, even on Windows, you've used small packages that do one thing and do it correctly. The most popular IRC client on Windows is mIRC, which installs and runs in a breeze without having a ton of "modules" and other install-time knobs that user will tweak at their pleasure. Would you call mIRC a messed up installer? Anyway, just to check that I'm not writing junk, I've just installed apache with mod_ssl, ipv6 and mode_perl support. The process of installation is relatively straightforward, but you didn't provide any details on how or why "it messed up" so I'm going to describe what I did and you're welcome to try the installation one more time if that helps at all. I used the www/apache13-modssl+ipv6 port to install Apache, then www/mod_perl to install mod_perl version 1.x (which could be substituted in a breeze with www/mod_perl2 to use the newer version) tweaked Apache's config file a bit and voila... my web server was up and running in less than 5 minutes. Did you actually *try* to install Apache using the ports? You still didn't answer my question in an earlier post about the problems you seem to be having: Why isn't it easy for you to install all these things on FreeBSD? Which part of the installation troubles you? A recent addition to the Handbook was a section on Apache. Perhaps, by letting us know what gives you trouble we can improve the documentation to help you and anyone else that tries to install an Apache web server from now on. > If you want people(Windows user) using BSD on mass for servers etc, > develop a Package that contains many of the necessary Apache modules: > eg: ONE Package (NOT an array of messy Ports) > > ESSENTIAL: > Apache > MySQL > mod_ssl(Contains:OpenSSL) > mod_perl > PHP Note that OpenSSL is part of the base system in FreeBSD. Unlike Windows, where in the best case it's considered an "add-on" that you have to add later. You don't need to add anything to your FreeBSD system to have OpenSSL support, provided you keep the system itself relatively up to date, using the recommended update instructions of the Handbook or the file /usr/src/UPDATING. > OPTIONAL: > IMAP > mod_python > mod_auth_nds > mod_auth_mysql > mod_fastcgi > mod_jk > XML > GD Exactly what we have now. You can use the Ports to install all of the above and a lot more. There are more than 10,000 ports in the FreeBSD collection now; a number that is far larger than anything Microsoft Windows can boast about for programs that are tightly integrated to its system, are available for any version of Windows and work mostly out of the box with minimal changes *if* any are needed at all. On 2004-07-28 04:27, DK wrote: > --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > Why isn't it easy for you to install all these things on FreeBSD? > > > > Which part of the installation troubles you? A recent addition to the > > Handbook was a section on Apache. Perhaps, by letting us know what > > gives you trouble we can improve the documentation to help you and > > anyone else that tries to install an Apache web server from now on. > > Being a long time Windows 2000 user & a coder in C, C++, Assembler, > Perl, PHP I am making a real effort to set up a Web Server on the > FreeBSD platform. > > I can install apache OK. Installing other modules(mod_perl, mod_ssl, > php etc...) with it is a nightmare... You're a coder. At least you claim to be one, and I have no reason to doubt it, if you feel so. If the FreeBSD ports don't meet your special requirements, because their limitations block you from doing things the way you like them done, you can always download the source of Apache, mod_perl, mod_ssl, php or any other programs you wish to install and follow the build instructions contained therein. It doesn't *have* to be a nightmare. When you don't know how to do something, this list is the place to ask. > What I have noticed so far about FreeBSD: > > FreeBSD is about 5 YEARS behind windows (I would actually say 1990, > but people my have heart attacks) - apologies to all the hard work put > in by BSD contributors! Over-generalizations are not helping you find out why FreeBSD does things differently. They don't help us assist you with the problems you're having because you still haven't mentioned what the exact nature of those problems was. Please, spare us the apologies and the insults too :-/ > - with FreeBSD & Windows 2000 installed on the SAME computer, the GUI > of Windows 2000 is MUCH faster than any of the BSD window > managers That's in vivid contrast to the general feeling of "speed" that thousands of FreeBSD users have reported so far. > (wmaker, FVWM, blackbox, fluxbox, XFCE(STILL can't start this > from exec, whats the damn command startxfce4 ??? this doesn't > work!)... Actually, fvwm2 can be shown to have a very small memory footprint and still a usable look that doesn't lack some of the nice features of Windows 9x. I've even seen themes of fvwm2 that resemble and mimic the Windows XP look without requiring 128 MB of system memory just to get started. I'm not sure why you claim that Windows is faster/lighter but if you do have raw numbers to back your claim up I'd be interested to see them. I've been using windowmaker and fvwm2 for more than 8 years now and I can tell you that their configurability is almost unsurpassed, their look can be tweaked and changed to resemble almost anything and their speed is so good that I can no longer work on Windows machines without feeling I'm being constantly slowed down by the system's GUI flaws. > I won't even comment on the shitty performance of KDE & GNOME > - If people say it should be used without a GUI... they must be over > 40, bald, lonely & most love shitty VI - I can EDIT any file faster on > a GUI editor then any coder I have seen at UNI/WORK who say VI is > better... One of my friends installed KDE for the first time last year, after having worked with Windows for a long time. He's 20, has a flock of hair that's wilder than I could ever imagine hair can be, very social, full of energy, liveliness and vigor, and he doesn't really like VI but has become a great Emacs fan in a weekend's time. Of course, anecdotal evidence is not going to convince you that you might be reacting in an angry way and missing important details, but as I've often repeated in cases like this one: Be patient! Nobody learns how to install, configure, use & hack a new system in an afternoon's time (unless their name is Linus, they live in Finland and the winter has been raging on outside for months). > - No default GUI File Explorer (excluding KDE/GNOME, not that there's > is usable) - had to install xfe on wmaker(still about as useless as > Windows 3.1 File Manager) That's because you're still bound to old habits. I have no use for slow, GUI monsters that require me to point and click for every little detail of what I want to do. For those that do, there's always x11-fm/tkdesk which is an excellent file manager, in my opinion. It even resembles Windows Commander for those of you, Windows users, who have kept the good tradition of Norton Commander and haven't been dragged in the hell of whatever Microsoft wants to sell today as the New Cool Explorer Style(TM) :-P When you do spend some time with FreeBSD though and try to learn some of the commands available to the command line user, you might be surprised at the power that is hidden under the hood in any *real* UNIX system. But let's leave this for the future to show. > - FreeBSD does NOT Default Mount my CD & Floppy(this is ridiculous - > even MS DOS NOT to mention Windows 3.1 [Year 1990... ring a bell] did > this!!) There is a reason why it's not enabled by default, but if you really, absolutely *MUST* enable it, it's described in the documentation. You could always search for it yourself or ask on this list for details, pointers and/or help with your setup. > - you honestly expect new users to edit configuration files so > it automounts ?? ... instead of having stuff in the man/manual/docs > about mounting/unmounting, just automount them as DEFAULT... no need > to read the docs... logical ??? No. Why would it be logical? It *is* different, as I've said, but this doesn't make it more logical than the FreeBSD way. The philosophy of Windows that you've come from is "enable everything and let the poor bugger chase the bugs of all the things that he's running later". The philosophy of UNIX systems has (usually) been "let the administrator of the system control *exactly* what he runs and how". By enabling everything in FreeBSD we'd be succumbing to the same sort of distorted philosophy that has brought Windows to its current state, with trojans, viruses, hacks, spyware, adware and anything else you can think of being able to exploit unknown parts of your system to wreak all sorts of havoc behind your back. That's not something we like. If you do like this sort of thing, then you can always enable everything on your workstations :-) > - 300 Million Users of Windows thinks so ;)) (BTW: I am NOT including > KDE/GNOME) Honestly, I'd be very curious to see where you got that number from. > - No default Find Files GUI - I won't even comment on lack of > functionality of Cmd line whereis/search/find Oh, but there *is* such functionality. You just didn't look hard enough to find it (sic). The command for searching your disk is, very unsurprisingly, called "find". Read its manual page with: man find and if you still have problems using it, I'll be glad to help. > I can tell you that 95% of people who use computers want "EASE of USE" > - This INCLUDES easy installation of the Operating System The FreeBSD Handbook is linked from the documentation pages of FreeBSD at `http://www.FreeBSD.org/docs.html'. One of the first things described in the Handbook, in great detail, including screenshots that will assist you during the installation. Did you try reading the "installation" chapter of the Handbook? Did you look for any other sort of documentation that would help you get started with FreeBSD? > - This should INCLUDE a default setup that HAS: a Default FAST > GUI/File Manager/Find Files/Editor .. this is all that is needed to > get a user up & going to installing & configuring the OS to thier > tastes ... did I forget to mention as default AUTOMOUNT !! It's easy to install fully functional, complete desktops like KDE or GNOME from the installation CD-ROMs. Refer to the installation instructions on your CD-ROM disk (there should be a file called INSTALL.TXT with a lot of help about the installation itself) or to the online documentation I mentioned earlier for details. > I cannot tell you the shock & disappointment I had in finding out that > Windows 2000 runs FASTER than FreeBSD with any GUI/Windows > Manager/Desktop Environment ... :((( I don't really think so, but you're entitled to your own, personal opinion. Since you're not mentioning why you think that this is so, I'll have to answer with just a simple phrase: "not really". > ...damn I have gone way off track here... sorry for the ranting > people... but after 6 days straight of messing around trying to > install Apache/MySQL/Mod_Perl/Mod_SSL/PHP.. I am a little tired... It is obvious that you're tired, angry and totally pissed off. Take your time. Relax a bit, and start over. This time, please, read the installation instructions carefully. Try to understand what is being said, and if you don't ask. Send mail to this list with your questions and I'll be one of the first to answer. Remember, though, that FreeBSD is a *different* system from the Windows you've been used until now. There might be things that you have learned to do in one way with Windows but have to be unlearned or adjusted to make the best out of your FreeBSD experience. I hope you have better luck the second time you try :-) > 3 days of that was trying to get a basic GUI/File Manager/Find > Files/Editor working I'll repeat just once more and then stop talking: Whenever you face problems like this one, that seem impossibly difficult for a FreeBSD newcomer, don't hesitate to ask. There are no stupid questions. There are, however, many knowledgeable and helpful people on this list. Regards, Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 13:54:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E32F16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:54:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECA443D48 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:54:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ab72@optushome.com.au) Received: from planetab.com (c211-31-24-44.rivrw6.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.31.24.44])i6SDslOs027666 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:54:47 +1000 Received: (qmail 21696 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2004 13:54:47 -0000 Received: from pc-00101.planetab.com (HELO giga7nnxp) (192.168.0.101) by netgate.planetab.com (192.168.0.1) with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2004 13:54:47 -0000 From: "Aaron Benson" To: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:54:47 +1000 Message-ID: <001901c474aa$71ee4700$6500a8c0@giga7nnxp> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: RE: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:54:55 -0000 Hi, Centralised admin is my primary concern. User perspective is obviously functionality. Anyway.... I've decided the best course of action to save money for the company is to run a kickarse Microsft 2K3 server Terminal Server, then use "SOME SORT" of ULinux OS to run on the client machine with a compatible TS client like rdesktop, PXES etc. possibly including a combo with LTSP, Rdesktop and Wilisystem if I want an EPROM diskless total boot from ULinux workstation desktop to W2K3 Terminal Server without user interaction. The question is, out of all the ULinux flavours, which one should I run which costs nothing or very little and will last for 4-6years in that time period? "Very little" equates to somewhat less than running Windows XP for a similar period. Cost savings include at least virus scanners and significant patch updates from Microsoft. Of course I'd rather update a single server than around 500 workstations both LAN and VPN remote machines. Virus signatures, multiple Microsoft patches etc. can be avoided. Reminder is I'm used to using XP. Our users range from Windows NT 4.0,Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP. Based on a decent TS client, this shouldn't matter anyway. Your advice appreciated. Regards Aaron Benson -----Original Message----- From: Aaron Benson [mailto:ab72@optushome.com.au] Sent: Saturday, 24 July 2004 10:19 PM To: 'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org' Subject: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative? Hi, This email is going to any Linux house whom has pitched themselves via their websites and reviews, from my research as being possible alternatives to XP at this stage. Depends on your Google hit and thereafter (if found within 2 pages) site FAQ's I suppose. As a currently dedicated M$ house (apart from Oracle Databases), we question the move to a XP desktop amid the Linux hype in recent times. Any IT department trying to save company money is only doing the right thing and ask the question, what can Linux do for us? I've flipped through your FAQ's and over forums but result in no answer for Active Directory 2K3 and Exchange 2K3 server client connectivity, integration and functionality? Note that we have not moved to these product versions yet. Hence this email. I ask because I cannot see a server based centralised authentication and administrative option in Linux. If there were, say a "centralised server option" for Linux, this would be seriously considered. Is there a User Manager equivalent (NT4 domain for example) or Exchange Administrator equivalent (Exchange 5.5) "functional" alternative? More importantly, 2K3 Server and Exchange integration? Failing that, connecting clients as above to M$ servers would be sufficient. Stay with M$ in servers, go with Linux in desktops. I've seen enough "glossy brochures" and want to know the facts. The cost difference is obvious. The functional difference is not. I've still no reason to choose your Linux over Windows XP Pro at this stage. Cost is not enough. Any sane IT department doesn't need screaming users due to lack of pure functionality. Experience suggests most find it difficult enough getting around the OS to even perform basic functions, let alone usability. Assuming aforementioned functionality, where does your Linux stand with converting between M$ Office 97/2K/2K3? Will our accounts department be able to work with their previous 40Mb Excel files full of VLookups and Formulas straightup, or is it going to be bigger than a Lotus 4.1 to Excel 5 conversion debacle? Of course Word,PowerPoint,Publisher and Access are questioned also. I'm talking up to 500 user desktops to be upgraded. Upgraded need not be a literal word. Installing Linux from scratch would be expected. Anything "upgrade wise" extra would be a bonus. Outside of M$ Office, current application functionality would have to be trialed. This is expected. A list of currently supported M$ applications would be helpful. Your detailed reply appreciated regards, Aaron Benson Network, Security, Server Administrator Strathfield Group Ltd Sydney Australia ph: +61 2 9747 7677 PS. To blindly accept the Microsoft standards without researching alternatives would be irresponsible. Total cost of ownership, flexibility, and reliability should all be considered when making infrastructure decisions. Multiple platforms including Microsoft, Linux, and commercial Unix should all be considered when setting the direction of an organizational IT strategy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:00:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64BF16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:00:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8F843D2F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:00:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BpoyE-0004ox-SS for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:59:50 +0200 From: Daniela To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:52:00 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> Subject: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:00:04 -0000 Hi all! I recently got a new IP on my outside interface, and I replaced the old IP with the new one in my IPFW ruleset, and restarted natd. Now everything was alright until my network clients (on the inside interface) started complaining that they can't connect to remote servers. Ping still works, but they can't fetch their mail or surf the net. It looks like something is wrong with my firewall, but I changed nothing but the old address. Are there other processes that need to be restarted? Regards, Daniela From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:03:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E9316A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:03:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE71E43D45 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 62647 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 14:03:24 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.22455 secs); 28 Jul 2004 14:03:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 14:03:22 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:03:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3453.209.167.16.15.1091023402.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:03:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: dgw@liwest.at User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:03:17 -0000 > Hi all! > > I recently got a new IP on my outside interface, and I replaced the old IP > with the new one in my IPFW ruleset, and restarted natd. > Now everything was alright until my network clients (on the inside > interface) > started complaining that they can't connect to remote servers. Ping still > works, but they can't fetch their mail or surf the net. > It looks like something is wrong with my firewall, but I changed nothing > but > the old address. > Are there other processes that need to be restarted? Did you actually change the IP on the interface itself? If not: edit /etc/rc.conf and change the IP/Netmask, then: # /etc/netstart Steve > > Regards, > Daniela > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:09:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87D016A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E8A43D46 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:09:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i6SE9nr8016955; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:09:49 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:09:49 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: DK Message-ID: <20040728140948.GA9972@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20040728073411.74741.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728073411.74741.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a Complete "Package"(NOT Ports) for: [Apache+PHP+MySQL+Mod_SSL+Mod_Perl] ?? - newbie+3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:09:51 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 28), DK said: > I just wanted to know if there is available anywhere a Complete "Package" > that is Ready to Go for a FreeBSD Server imlementation that contains: > > Apache > PHP > MySQL > Mod_SSL > Mod_Perl $ pkg_add -r apache mysql-server php mod_perl mod_ssl doesn't seem to be a port, whatever it is. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:16:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811E716A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:16:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471E243D39 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:16:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BppDe-00057s-Ka; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:15:46 +0200 From: Daniela To: "Steve Bertrand" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:07:56 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <3453.209.167.16.15.1091023402.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3453.209.167.16.15.1091023402.squirrel@209.167.16.15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281507.56893.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:16:00 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:03, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I recently got a new IP on my outside interface, and I replaced the old > > IP with the new one in my IPFW ruleset, and restarted natd. > > Now everything was alright until my network clients (on the inside > > interface) > > started complaining that they can't connect to remote servers. Ping still > > works, but they can't fetch their mail or surf the net. > > It looks like something is wrong with my firewall, but I changed nothing > > but > > the old address. > > Are there other processes that need to be restarted? > > Did you actually change the IP on the interface itself? If not: > > edit /etc/rc.conf and change the IP/Netmask, then: > > # /etc/netstart Yes, the IP was changed. I ran /etc/netstart, but it didn't help. As I said, ping works as normal, and the packet sniffer shows normal TCP connections and there are even answers from the remote servers, so I really have no clue what could be wrong. I don't think it would do this with a wrong IP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:21:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF88B16A4D7 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:21:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BE643D54 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:21:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 64669 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 14:21:51 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.211918 secs); 28 Jul 2004 14:21:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 14:21:49 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:21:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3549.209.167.16.15.1091024509.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <200407281507.56893.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <3453.209.167.16.15.1091023402.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <200407281507.56893.dgw@liwest.at> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:21:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: dgw@liwest.at User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:21:41 -0000 > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:03, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> > Hi all! >> > >> > I recently got a new IP on my outside interface, and I replaced the >> old >> > IP with the new one in my IPFW ruleset, and restarted natd. >> > Now everything was alright until my network clients (on the inside >> > interface) >> > started complaining that they can't connect to remote servers. Ping >> still >> > works, but they can't fetch their mail or surf the net. >> > It looks like something is wrong with my firewall, but I changed >> nothing >> > but >> > the old address. >> > Are there other processes that need to be restarted? >> >> Did you actually change the IP on the interface itself? If not: >> >> edit /etc/rc.conf and change the IP/Netmask, then: >> >> # /etc/netstart > > Yes, the IP was changed. I ran /etc/netstart, but it didn't help. As I > said, > ping works as normal, and the packet sniffer shows normal TCP connections > and > there are even answers from the remote servers, so I really have no clue > what > could be wrong. I don't think it would do this with a wrong IP. > > Do you have an ``alias_address'' statement in your natd.conf file? Usually, you will specify the interface that natd operates on, but in some situations, some will specify an alias address instead. Check the file, and ensure that you are not aliasing the old address. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:27:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396C716A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:27:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from amcuxfw802.amc.af.mil (amcuxfw802.amc.af.mil [131.9.254.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3F243D58 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:27:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.hauan@fairchild.af.mil) Received: from amcw2av808.amc.ds.af.mil (amcw2av808.amc.af.mil [131.9.19.137]) by fw2.amc.af.mil with SMTP id i6SEQpwE017320; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:27:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from AMCW2BH506.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.25.136]) M2004072809272010729 ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:27:20 -0500 Received: from amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.19.74]) by AMCW2BH506.amc.ds.af.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:27:18 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:27:18 -0500 Message-ID: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C1376@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Problems after IP change Thread-Index: AcR0rkfbrpMrbhoQTt6AvRiTXAHbFgAARmEg From: "Hauan, David" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2004 14:27:18.0267 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC8124B0:01C474AE] cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:27:25 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Bertrand [mailto:iaccounts@ibctech.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:22 AM > To: dgw@liwest.at > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Problems after IP change >=20 >=20 > > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:03, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> > Hi all! > >> > > >> > I recently got a new IP on my outside interface, and I=20 > replaced the > >> old > >> > IP with the new one in my IPFW ruleset, and restarted natd. > >> > Now everything was alright until my network clients (on=20 > the inside > >> > interface) > >> > started complaining that they can't connect to remote=20 > servers. Ping > >> still > >> > works, but they can't fetch their mail or surf the net. > >> > It looks like something is wrong with my firewall, but I changed > >> nothing > >> > but > >> > the old address. > >> > Are there other processes that need to be restarted? > >> > >> Did you actually change the IP on the interface itself? If not: > >> > >> edit /etc/rc.conf and change the IP/Netmask, then: > >> > >> # /etc/netstart > > > > Yes, the IP was changed. I ran /etc/netstart, but it didn't=20 > help. As I > > said, > > ping works as normal, and the packet sniffer shows normal=20 > TCP connections > > and > > there are even answers from the remote servers, so I really=20 > have no clue > > what > > could be wrong. I don't think it would do this with a wrong IP. > > > > >=20 > Do you have an ``alias_address'' statement in your natd.conf file? >=20 > Usually, you will specify the interface that natd operates=20 > on, but in some > situations, some will specify an alias address instead. >=20 > Check the file, and ensure that you are not aliasing the old address. >=20 > Steve Can you ping outside addresses from the inside clients? Is the FW box running dhcp? If not did you change the gateway on the inside clients? Just a thought. dave=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:27:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB5116A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:27:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71D643D46 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:27:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A835F6294; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:27:47 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4107B7E2.3000606@makeworld.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:27:46 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Benson References: <001901c474aa$71ee4700$6500a8c0@giga7nnxp> In-Reply-To: <001901c474aa$71ee4700$6500a8c0@giga7nnxp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:27:58 -0000 Aaron Benson wrote: > Hi, > > Centralised admin is my primary concern. User perspective is obviously > functionality. > Anyway.... > I've decided the best course of action to save money for the company is > to run a kickarse Microsft 2K3 server Terminal Server, then use "SOME > SORT" of ULinux OS to run on the client machine with a compatible TS > client like rdesktop, PXES etc. possibly including a combo with LTSP, > Rdesktop and Wilisystem if I want an EPROM diskless total boot from > ULinux workstation desktop to W2K3 Terminal Server without user > interaction. > The question is, out of all the ULinux flavours, which one should I run > which costs nothing or very little and will last for 4-6years in that > time period? "Very little" equates to somewhat less than running Windows > XP for a similar period. > Cost savings include at least virus scanners and significant patch > updates from Microsoft. Of course I'd rather update a single server than > around 500 workstations both LAN and VPN remote machines. Virus > signatures, multiple Microsoft patches etc. can be avoided. > Reminder is I'm used to using XP. Our users range from Windows NT > 4.0,Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP. Based on a decent TS client, this > shouldn't matter anyway. > Your advice appreciated. > > Regards > > Aaron Benson > > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Benson [mailto:ab72@optushome.com.au] > Sent: Saturday, 24 July 2004 10:19 PM > To: 'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org' > Subject: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative? > > > > Hi, > > This email is going to any Linux house whom has pitched themselves via > their websites and reviews, from my research as being possible > alternatives to XP at this stage. Depends on your Google hit and > thereafter (if found within 2 pages) site FAQ's I suppose. > > As a currently dedicated M$ house (apart from Oracle Databases), we > question the move to a XP desktop amid the Linux hype in recent times. > Any IT department trying to save company money is only doing the right > thing and ask the question, what can Linux do for us? > > I've flipped through your FAQ's and over forums but result in no answer > for Active Directory 2K3 and Exchange 2K3 server client connectivity, > integration and functionality? Note that we have not moved to these > product versions yet. Hence this email. > > I ask because I cannot see a server based centralised authentication and > administrative option in Linux. If there were, say a "centralised server > option" for Linux, this would be seriously considered. Is there a User > Manager equivalent (NT4 domain for example) or Exchange Administrator > equivalent (Exchange 5.5) "functional" alternative? More importantly, > 2K3 Server and Exchange integration? > > Failing that, connecting clients as above to M$ servers would be > sufficient. Stay with M$ in servers, go with Linux in desktops. I've > seen enough "glossy brochures" and want to know the facts. > > The cost difference is obvious. The functional difference is not. I've > still no reason to choose your Linux over Windows XP Pro at this stage. > Cost is not enough. Any sane IT department doesn't need screaming users > due to lack of pure functionality. Experience suggests most find it > difficult enough getting around the OS to even perform basic functions, > let alone usability. > > Assuming aforementioned functionality, where does your Linux stand with > converting between M$ Office 97/2K/2K3? Will our accounts department be > able to work with their previous 40Mb Excel files full of VLookups and > Formulas straightup, or is it going to be bigger than a Lotus 4.1 to > Excel 5 conversion debacle? > Of course Word,PowerPoint,Publisher and Access are questioned also. > > I'm talking up to 500 user desktops to be upgraded. Upgraded need not be > a literal word. Installing Linux from scratch would be expected. > Anything "upgrade wise" extra would be a bonus. > > Outside of M$ Office, current application functionality would have to be > trialed. This is expected. A list of currently supported M$ applications > would be helpful. WHY are you asking what flavor of Lunix to run on a FreeBSD list? Subscribe to a Linux list and ask there. -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ClamAV virus dat updated: Wed Jul 28 2004 at 03:02:59 daily.cvd updated (version: 424, sigs: 1141, f-level: 2, builder: tkojm) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:28:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA9016A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:28:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41011.mail.yahoo.com (web41011.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E65E43D69 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:28:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.121] by web41011.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:28:17 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: Remko Lodder In-Reply-To: <41079361.50409@elvandar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: keramida@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:28:20 -0000 --- Remko Lodder wrote: > > --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >>All of these are available on FreeBSD too (except Mercury Mailserver, > >>which is just another Win32 MTA that I don't know about but somehow feel > >>reluctant to trust more than my Sendmail or Postfix installations). > > > > Yes, but not as ONE nice Package: > > eg: FreeBSD PORTS > > apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 > > apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 > > > > I tried to install apache+mod_ssl+ipv6-1.3.31+2.8.18_4 THEN apache+mod_perl-1.3.31 > > and its messed up!! > > Perhaps, in contradiction to Windows (in which you have to press : next > next next okay and your software is installed) you need to 'rtfm'. This > being said think the best way to install it, is using apache+mod_ssl... > as installation base, and then add mod_perl seperatly. Can that be > done? Yes it can be done, and you would have known if you had asked or > read some documentation. thnx for that :) So is the correct order: 1. apache+mod_ssl 2. mod_perl - in what order do you add the MySQL & PHP ?? I have been trying to follow "Apache/MySQL/PHP/Mod_Perl Guide": http://megaz.arbuz.com/?p=apache_howto .... but after following the long process, MySQL is not running & Mod_Perl wouldn't install BTW: All I have been doing for 6 days is read docs/man/guides... > > If you want people(Windows user) using BSD on mass for servers etc, develop a Package that > > contains many of the necessary Apache modules: > > eg: ONE Package(NOT an array of messy Ports) > > It works absolutly fine, i dont think we want one big package for > everything, then it would be like rpm and FreeBSD imo does not want to > follow Redhat and such. Oh and that requires a lot of disks for > installing, Suse anyone? (DVD or six seven CD's?). 6 CD's for what ??? An OS with a FAST GUI/File Manager/FindFiles/Editor + Web Server ... more like 350MB ;) then add 250MB for Office :)) > > ESSENTIAL: > > Apache > > MySQL > > mod_ssl(Contains:OpenSSL) > > mod_perl > > PHP > > > > OPTIONAL: > > IMAP > > mod_python > > mod_auth_nds > > mod_auth_mysql > > mod_fastcgi > > mod_jk > > XML > > GD > > > > All possible with the ports... > >>>-------------------------------- > >> > >>Why isn't it easy for you to install all these things on FreeBSD? > >> > >>Which part of the installation troubles you? A recent addition to the > >>Handbook was a section on Apache. Perhaps, by letting us know what > >>gives you trouble we can improve the documentation to help you and > >>anyone else that tries to install an Apache web server from now on. > > > > Being a long time Windows 2000 user & a coder in C, C++, Assembler, Perl, PHP I am making a > real > > effort to set up a Web Server on the FreeBSD platform. > > Good, at least you try/ > > > > > I can install apache OK. Installing other modules(mod_perl, mod_ssl, php etc...) with it is a > > nightmare... > > As said, read the documentation , or learn to search, since if you did > that and installd apache with modssl included. And you would have > searched you would have come across mod_perl and even mod_php, which is > apxs'ed into the apache library stuff and can be used within 'seconds'. whats apxs'ed short for ?? > > What I have noticed so far about FreeBSD: > > > > FreeBSD is about 5 YEARS behind windows(I would actually say 1990, but people my have heart > > attacks) - apologies to all the hard work put in by BSD contributors! > > I think we are in front of windows. We can have multiple users at the > same time, refresh our system without always having to reboot {update > some random pacakge in windows and it requires a reboot}. Besides that > BSD has nice SMP support, and AMD-64 support with working drivers, that > cannot be said from Windows XP 64bit eh? Refreshing the system without a reboot is a Priority in front of Automount ?? nice one developers ... & windows 2000 doesn't have a nice SMP ... that's news to my DUAL 1 Ghz Pentium III system at home I use as a workstation .. I know its hard for people to swallow, but MS Windows IS easier to use than BSD/Linux/OSX ... thats WHY its the most widely used.... regardless of marketing/costs etc ... > > - with FreeBSD & Windows 2000 installed on the SAME computer, the GUI of Windows 2000 is MUCH > > faster than any of the BSD window managers(wmaker, FVWM, blackbox, fluxbox, XFCE(STILL can't > start > > this from exec, whats the damn command startxfce4 ??? this doesn't work!)... I won't even > comment > > on the shitty performance of KDE & GNOME - If people say it should be used without a GUI... > they > > must be over 40, bald, lonely & most love shitty VI - I can EDIT any file faster on a GUI > editor > > then any coder I have seen at UNI/WORK who say VI is better... > > Well i dont agree on this one either, my gnome starts much faster then > windows and especially fvwm2 is very fast and light. And instead of > ranting on XFCE you can (again) ask how things work, it's not pressing > the next button here either. I think you are 20, full of hair and you > just love notepad. And that's fine, since i am 20, full of hair and i > love vi.. everybody has it's editor... dont rant on that since that's lame.. Actually I am 30, I use EmEditor for coding(nice GUI colors) but I do have all my hair(touch wood) - 2/3 isn't bad Remko ;) Gnome starts faster than Windows ?? Start time is not important - I am talking about reaction time of the GUI - Menu's apearing, moving icons, applications appearing etc - Working with Fedora at Uni(Yes, I am doing a Masters) the other day, its on a 50 Node Cluster - Its running on systems faster than what I have at home(above), yet feels like its as gluggy as Windows 95! - nice one Linux As for XFCE, how do you start it from the .xinitrc The XFCE Homepage site says "exec startxfce4" - but that didn't work for me ?? > > - No default GUI File Explorer(excluding KDE/GNOME, not that there's is usable) - had to > install > > xfe on wmaker(still about as useless as Windows 3.1 File Manager) > > > > > > - FreeBSD does NOT Default Mount my CD & Floppy(this is ridiculous - even MS DOS NOT to > mention > > Windows 3.1[Year 1990... ring a bell] did this!!) - you honestly expect new users to edit > > configuration files so it automounts ?? ... instead of having stuff in the man/manual/docs > about > > mounting/unmounting, just automount them as DEFAULT... no need to read the docs... logical ??? > > No they did not, you had to enable the driver first before it even got > recognized. Here you have the possibility to mount a floppy and a disk. > And again, the handbook has some information about this afaik/ Whats the purpose of having to manually set the system to automount ?? as opposed to having it as a system install default ?? if there is an advantage, I am sure its for the 0.01% of the user base > > - 300 Million Users of Windows thinks so ;)) (BTW: I am NOT including KDE/GNOME) > > Windows has a larger user base, that's correct. > > > > - No default Find Files GUI - I won't even comment on lack of functionality of Cmd line > > whereis/search/find > > In gnome there is a find option that enables you to find files. And then > there is find, which can do a lot more then you probably think now. - sorry, I wasn't clear above - For the lack of a GUI Find Files option, I meant the default install or with Window Managers(wmaker), not the Desktop Environments like KDE/Gnome(which are also fast... NOT) - which I don't use as they are slow > > I can tell you that 95% of people who use computers want "EASE of USE" > > - This INCLUDES easy installation of the Operating System > > Following the handbook makes FreeBSD installable by nearly anyone. - installable YES, configurable ... you've got to be shitting me :o - install BSD+wmaker(easy) - start the GUI - oops some doc reading here(easy+1) - while in wmaker, dynamically change the Montior settings from 1600x1200 32b to 1028x768 24b (wouldn't have a clue - off to the docs - manually edit configuration files ?? - then restart - but what is the correct horizontal frequency OR vertical refresh(hard++) - I don't know & I don't want to know(hey while I am at it, why don't I start designing my own CPU)... that's why people use Windows(easy to configure) I played with BSD back in 1997 & thought it needed some work.. so I gave it a miss.. Fast Forward to 2004, & all I see are developers adding features that are not that important, yet missing the basics of what the majority of USER's want(not coders) Apple OSX understands this(nice GUI over BSD base - shame about the stupid high prices & dumb one button mouse)... sorry BSD/Linux developers ...your just giving more air to MS by focusing on the wrong things ...XPde seem to have the right idea... looks promising... hope the GUI reaction time is fast http://www.xpde.com/ that reminds me of my Java Lecturer(I hate Java BTW) in which every time students had a problem, he would never look at the code but just reply "check out the java docs.. its all in there" ... yea right.. > > - This should INCLUDE a default setup that HAS: a Default FAST GUI/File Manager/Find > Files/Editor > > .. this is all that is needed to get a user up & going to installing & configuring the OS to > thier > > tastes ... did I forget to mention as default AUTOMOUNT !! > > You should not shout that much, that's bad for your heart. FreeBSD has > features that enable you to pick what you want as X-client (window > manager), follow the handbook.. ... heart... I had it replaced with the plastic one installed yesterday... it was conflicting with BSD !! > > I cannot tell you the shock & disappointment I had in finding out that Windows 2000 runs > FASTER > > than FreeBSD with any GUI/Windows Manager/Desktop Environment ... :((( > > Opinions, again i dont agree, and if you do find this i suggest you have > some benchmarks with what applications run faster, etc. Since then you > made a good point with some proof. Benchmarks - How about FreeBSD+wmaker(GUI) & Windows 2000 installed on EXACTLY the same box Any person standing next to me could see which is faster Windows 2000 GUI - Much faster than Wmaker Loading/Using Notepad/Wordpad - Much faster than Nedit Windows Explorer - Heaps faster than xfe maybe you would like a test of the Apache Web Server on BSD against the Apache Web Server on Windows 2000 ?? - I will search the net & get back to you on that if you are interested ?? I wonder if people that run web servers on BSD never use a GUI thereby saying how fast BSD is... - yes, keep using VI & don't forget to feed the Horse :) > > ...damn I have gone way off track here... sorry for the ranting people... but after 6 days > > straight of messing around trying to install Apache/MySQL/Mod_Perl/Mod_SSL/PHP.. I am a little > > tired... 3 days of that was trying to get a basic GUI/File Manager/Find Files/Editor working > > You perhaps should have asked, search, or rtfm before giving yourself a > heart beat of 160... All I have been doing till 4am every morning is reading/searching :(( > If you still think that it can be done better, you are free to alter > things so that it can do what you wish, since you tell us that you are > an experienced coder that should not be that hard.. ..able to code yes, that much free time, I wish !! > Besides that: just ask us if something is weird for you, perhaps that's > the same for others and we should improve our documentation, instead of > ranting you can actually help us and others, in despite to windows in > which that is very hard to do so. There is nothing wrong with the docs regarding installing/using BSD - docs are fine :) If a user wants to install 5 related applications, like Apache/MySQL/PHP/Mod.SSL.Perl - these have certain order installation requirements(if from source) - seeing as BSD is used so much as a Web Server, some docs on installing these combinations might help ...BUT even better, the ability to install each as 5 seperate Packages would make a HUGE difference in time/configuration if this could be done without the packages causing conflicts with each other! Although a Tutorial in the Docs for Apache & its important components would help, its the lack of providing the basics that every OS should have & I don't mean Redhat/Linux(I don't like Linux BTW) I choose to try BSD because of its "stated" rock solid performance as a Web Server compared to Windows 2000(regardless of costs) ... but if BSD's performance is related to being able to turn off services & close ports, I can do that in windows - with an nice GUI(albeit not with the same level of manual tuning / tradeoff for all the other nice things that windows offers) If BSD's better performance is due to System Admins running Web Servers but doing so without the GUI(???)... then you maybe right Remko, BSD may not be right for me. - In the year 2004, I refuse to spend my time coding in front of a screen hacking in "cmd line syntax".. hey thats just me! .... woohh, that was a long blah... I think BSD is getting to me ;) Kind Regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:29:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028E616A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:29:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700DE43D5C for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:29:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6SESsAZ075896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:28:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6SESsna075895; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:28:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:28:54 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Dan Nelson Message-ID: <20040728142854.GB75617@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Dan Nelson , DK , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040728073411.74741.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> <20040728140948.GA9972@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728140948.GA9972@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:28:54 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: DK cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a Complete "Package"(NOT Ports) for: [Apache+PHP+MySQL+Mod_SSL+Mod_Perl] ?? - newbie+3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:29:18 -0000 --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:09:49AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 28), DK said: > > I just wanted to know if there is available anywhere a Complete "Packag= e" > > that is Ready to Go for a FreeBSD Server imlementation that contains: > >=20 > > Apache > > PHP > > MySQL > > Mod_SSL > > Mod_Perl >=20 > $ pkg_add -r apache mysql-server php mod_perl=20 >=20 > mod_ssl doesn't seem to be a port, whatever it is. Unlike other apache mods, mod_ssl includes a bunch of patches to the base apache, so there isn't a separate mod_ssl port -- you'ld install the apache+mod_ssl package instead. That is if you want Apache-1.3.x. If you want Apache-2.0.x, then the mod_ssl functionality is bundled as one of the core modules. The apache2 package also comes with IPv6 support out of the box. In fact, all of those packages have multiple versions available in the ports tree -- your command line as is would need to be altered to select the appropriate versions of those servers. To the OP -- yes, that's more complicated than it might be, but the complexity is the flip side of flexibility and choice and the philosophy of giving you precise control over your computer. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBB7gmiD657aJF7eIRArYGAJ9aQSsIjMJUk1vYy/2SG/H1VP4i+ACgl22S XD3auy3XqGhG8Bo6yizkgl4= =U2pj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:31:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BED216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:31:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A7143D6E for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:31:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BppS8-0005Ru-Vh; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:30:45 +0200 From: Daniela To: "Steve Bertrand" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:22:55 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281507.56893.dgw@liwest.at> <3549.209.167.16.15.1091024509.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3549.209.167.16.15.1091024509.squirrel@209.167.16.15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281522.55263.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:31:05 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:21, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> Did you actually change the IP on the interface itself? If not: > >> > >> edit /etc/rc.conf and change the IP/Netmask, then: > >> > >> # /etc/netstart > > > > Yes, the IP was changed. I ran /etc/netstart, but it didn't help. As I > > said, > > ping works as normal, and the packet sniffer shows normal TCP connections > > and > > there are even answers from the remote servers, so I really have no clue > > what > > could be wrong. I don't think it would do this with a wrong IP. > > Do you have an ``alias_address'' statement in your natd.conf file? I have no natd.conf file. At least I never touched it. But it always worked like a dream. BTW, natd is started with the command line "natd -n rl0". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:35:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357C616A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:35:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at (lilzmailso01.liwest.at [212.33.55.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2F143D67 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:35:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BppWV-0003co-2B; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:35:15 +0200 From: Daniela To: "Hauan, David" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:27:25 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C1376@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> In-Reply-To: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C1376@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281527.25536.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:35:29 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:27, Hauan, David wrote: > > >> Did you actually change the IP on the interface itself? If not: > > >> > > >> edit /etc/rc.conf and change the IP/Netmask, then: > > >> > > >> # /etc/netstart > > > > > > Yes, the IP was changed. I ran /etc/netstart, but it didn't > > > > help. As I > > > > > said, > > > ping works as normal, and the packet sniffer shows normal > > > > TCP connections > > > > > and > > > there are even answers from the remote servers, so I really > > > > have no clue > > > > > what > > > could be wrong. I don't think it would do this with a wrong IP. > > > > Do you have an ``alias_address'' statement in your natd.conf file? > > > > Usually, you will specify the interface that natd operates > > on, but in some > > situations, some will specify an alias address instead. > > > > Check the file, and ensure that you are not aliasing the old address. > > > > Steve > > Can you ping outside addresses from the inside clients? > Is the FW box running dhcp? > If not did you change the gateway on the inside clients? Yes, I can ping everything and I can also open TCP connections from the clients. A SYN packet goes out and a SYN/ACK comes back, but I don't see any further packets. That's why I suspected my firewall, but I changed almost nothing in the configuration. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:36:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31FE16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:36:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486CE43D2F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:36:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 66682 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 14:36:27 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 3.037201 secs); 28 Jul 2004 14:36:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 14:36:23 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:36:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3564.209.167.16.15.1091025383.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <200407281522.55263.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281507.56893.dgw@liwest.at> <3549.209.167.16.15.1091024509.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <200407281522.55263.dgw@liwest.at> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:36:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: dgw@liwest.at User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:36:17 -0000 >> Do you have an ``alias_address'' statement in your natd.conf file? > > I have no natd.conf file. At least I never touched it. But it always > worked > like a dream. BTW, natd is started with the command line "natd -n rl0". Try shutting down natd and load it with: # natd -a x.x.x.x where x.x.x.x == your_new_ip Does this help? Also, post the relevant ``natd'' line entries in your /etc/natd.conf file. Steve > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:38:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B6D16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:38:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2694843D3F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:38:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 66910 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 14:38:12 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.208951 secs); 28 Jul 2004 14:38:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 14:38:10 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:38:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3566.209.167.16.15.1091025490.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <200407281522.55263.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281507.56893.dgw@liwest.at> <3549.209.167.16.15.1091024509.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <200407281522.55263.dgw@liwest.at> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:38:10 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: dgw@liwest.at User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:38:02 -0000 > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:21, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> >> Did you actually change the IP on the interface itself? If not: >> >> >> >> edit /etc/rc.conf and change the IP/Netmask, then: >> >> >> >> # /etc/netstart >> > >> > Yes, the IP was changed. I ran /etc/netstart, but it didn't help. As I >> > said, >> > ping works as normal, and the packet sniffer shows normal TCP >> connections >> > and >> > there are even answers from the remote servers, so I really have no >> clue >> > what >> > could be wrong. I don't think it would do this with a wrong IP. >> >> Do you have an ``alias_address'' statement in your natd.conf file? > > I have no natd.conf file. At least I never touched it. But it always > worked > like a dream. BTW, natd is started with the command line "natd -n rl0". Also, I forget if you said whether you actually reloaded your firewall rules or not. Steve > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:39:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA1016A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:39:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sferics.mongueurs.net (sferics.mongueurs.net [81.80.147.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC8143D4C for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:39:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@landgren.net) Received: from [172.17.1.1] (exo.bpinet.com [81.80.147.206]) by sferics.mongueurs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45A3A935 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:39:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4107BAA2.4010008@landgren.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:39:30 +0200 From: David Landgren Organization: The Lusty Decadent Delights of Imperial Pompeii User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 'closed stream' on portupgrade, pkgdb -F X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:39:33 -0000 List, I'm having trouble bringing a machine up to par. I migrated from 4.8-RC2 to 4.10-STABLE this morning. No problems there. When I do a pkg_version -vL= I get a couple of dozen things to upgrade. I've synched my ports tree, run pkgdb -Uu. I have rebuilt ruby18 % ruby --version ruby 1.8.1 (2004-05-02) [i386-freebsd4] and portupgrade and yet each time I run the following commands % pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database closed stream % portupgrade png closed stream If I make deinstall && make reinstall portupgrade I get % portupgrade png [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 76 packages found (-1 +1) (...). done] closed stream I guess I can run around manually and update stuff, but it is a bit of pain. If anyone has a clue, I'd be most grateful. I don't see what I'm overlooking. thanks, David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:39:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2E516A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:39:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (simmts5.bellnexxia.net [206.47.199.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DB843D1F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:39:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@interpool.ca) Received: from interpool.homeunix.com ([70.48.228.132]) by simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.netSMTP <20040728143838.DCSY3387.simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@interpool.homeunix.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:38:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:39:22 -0400 From: Gerry Freymann To: "??????? (??????) ????????" Message-Id: <20040728103922.5b8dca83.lists@interpool.ca> In-Reply-To: References: <20040728120242.B52DF16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org> Organization: Interpool Development www.interpool.ca X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what does it mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:39:43 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:05:02 +0400 "??????? (??????) ????????" wrote: >I get message like this >>Subject: Cron /usr/local/sbin/update_dat >>mv: *.tar: No such file or directory >>ftp: Error retrieving file - `404 Object Not Found' > >what it mean? what I need to do and where can I find out information >about it? Looks to me like the script that updates the virus definition files for Macafee, but your mileage may vary. What does it mean? It means it was unable to download the latest package I think. But why don't you know what it's supposed to be doing? ;-) Regards, gerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:43:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D2416A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:43:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns2.brasilsat.com.br (ns2.brasilsat.com.br [200.250.169.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF44143D2D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:43:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cra@kftec.com.br) Received: from kftec.com.br ([192.168.2.200])i6SFpAFJ023374 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:51:13 -0300 Received: from 33KFPGS/SpoolDir by kftec.com.br (Mercury 1.47); 28 Jul 04 13:48:14 -0300 Received: from SpoolDir by 33KFPGS (Mercury 1.47); 28 Jul 04 13:48:00 -0300 Received: from kftec.com.br (192.168.10.200) by kftec.com.br (Mercury 1.47) with ESMTP; 28 Jul 04 13:47:58 -0300 Message-ID: <4107BBEA.30456FF7@kftec.com.br> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:44:58 -0300 From: Cleyton Agapito X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------F064CFB4B1C64ACEEE50321B" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: modules load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:43:44 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------F064CFB4B1C64ACEEE50321B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, Sorry if this sound stupid, but i can´t understand yet how FBSD work with modules. The Handbook is not so clear about what you must compile statically in kernel (like so difference between make and buildkernel procedures), i suppose that if you don´t use a feature every time it will be a module (right?), but i´m a little disapointed because i must load in loader.conf and they stay there all the time or else i can´t find the device on /dev (like fdc.ko), i thought to unload all unused with kldunload but it must be done one by one. I have many others questions bsd-related like that but maybe this is not the right place, the FAQs are not enough to learn system and others hacker-like are so difficult! Where can I find a median list to ask commons operational questions? I wonder with FBSD, it´s not so easy like linux but is very much better (my opinion) :-) Thanks very much, Cleyton --------------F064CFB4B1C64ACEEE50321B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:46:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB9D16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:46:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at (lilzmailso01.liwest.at [212.33.55.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F3943D2D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:46:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bppgh-0003nn-KI; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:45:47 +0200 From: Daniela To: "Steve Bertrand" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:37:57 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281522.55263.dgw@liwest.at> <3564.209.167.16.15.1091025383.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3564.209.167.16.15.1091025383.squirrel@209.167.16.15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281537.57983.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:46:00 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:36, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> Do you have an ``alias_address'' statement in your natd.conf file? > > > > I have no natd.conf file. At least I never touched it. But it always > > worked > > like a dream. BTW, natd is started with the command line "natd -n rl0". > > Try shutting down natd and load it with: > > # natd -a x.x.x.x > > where x.x.x.x == your_new_ip > > Does this help? No, it's still the same. > Also, post the relevant ``natd'' line entries in your /etc/natd.conf file. natd.conf doesn't exist. Do you mean rc.conf? Here it is: natd_interface="rl0" natd_enable="YES" But I didn't change anything here, and it always worked. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:48:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDA216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:48:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E66143D46 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:48:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 68226 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 14:49:03 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.241313 secs); 28 Jul 2004 14:49:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 14:49:01 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:49:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3589.209.167.16.15.1091026142.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <200407281537.57983.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281522.55263.dgw@liwest.at> <3564.209.167.16.15.1091025383.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <200407281537.57983.dgw@liwest.at> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:49:02 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: dgw@liwest.at User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:48:53 -0000 > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:36, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> >> Do you have an ``alias_address'' statement in your natd.conf file? >> > >> > I have no natd.conf file. At least I never touched it. But it always >> > worked >> > like a dream. BTW, natd is started with the command line "natd -n >> rl0". >> >> Try shutting down natd and load it with: >> >> # natd -a x.x.x.x >> >> where x.x.x.x == your_new_ip >> >> Does this help? > > No, it's still the same. > >> Also, post the relevant ``natd'' line entries in your /etc/natd.conf >> file. > > natd.conf doesn't exist. Do you mean rc.conf? Here it is: > natd_interface="rl0" > natd_enable="YES" > > But I didn't change anything here, and it always worked. > Indeed, I did mean rc.conf...sorry ;o) Now would be a good time to post your fw ruleset. Steve > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:49:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FDB16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:49:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9803E43D49 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:49:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bppjv-0005kL-0j; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:49:07 +0200 From: Daniela To: "Steve Bertrand" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:41:17 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281522.55263.dgw@liwest.at> <3566.209.167.16.15.1091025490.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3566.209.167.16.15.1091025490.squirrel@209.167.16.15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281541.17597.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:49:20 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:38, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> Do you have an ``alias_address'' statement in your natd.conf file? > > > > I have no natd.conf file. At least I never touched it. But it always > > worked > > like a dream. BTW, natd is started with the command line "natd -n rl0". > > Also, I forget if you said whether you actually reloaded your firewall > rules or not. Of course I reloaded it, and when I view a diff between the current and previous output of `ipfw l` there's just the address changed. Nothing else. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:56:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD9516A4CE; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:56:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dnsmail3.umb.com (dnsmail3.umb.com [198.136.201.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2514943D60; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:56:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Randall.Munden@umb.com) Received: from y8107a.umb.corp.umb.com (viruswall2.umb.com [192.168.3.213]) by dnsmail3.umb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i6SEu6YX020686; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:56:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from y6002a.umb.corp.umb.com ([172.19.43.31]) by y8107a with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:56:06 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:56:06 -0500 Message-ID: <6EA1FE6FDA1CD4409718AF7E3694795C04D918@y6002a.umb.corp.umb.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD Gateway??? Thread-Index: AcR0Q3YWjrOeCfhmQr67m3m0ZKqUyQAbn8CF From: "Munden, Randall J" To: "Hakim Z. Singhji" , cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD Gateway??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:56:10 -0000 This might be helpful: http://www.kcgeek.com/archives/howto/building_a_freebsd_natdhcp_gateway/0= 50802.html -----Original Message----- From: Hakim Z. Singhji [mailto:system-administrator@earthlink.net] Sent: Tue 7/27/2004 8:37 PM To: Pavel Duda Cc: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; = freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Gateway??? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pavel Duda wrote: | Hakim Z. Singhji wrote: | |> Does anyone have any suggestions |> on the type of NIC I should use? | | | Almost any "normal" NIC will be fine. I'm using mostly Realtek-based | (RTL8139) and Intel (8255) cards wo problems. | | _______________________________________________ | freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies | To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi Everyone, I would like to thank you for all your help...I found a pair of 3COM XL's for $10 each...I was told that is a steal... so I went for it. Thanks again. Oh, I may need your help once I get started building the box remember I'm originally from Linux World. So this will be a new hack for me. Hope I can look to you guys for help if I get in trouble. HZS -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBBwNWNF6tCt5tOyIRAuG9AKCKAA/u6WFZDMc0F8lPWjF1Bm6fsgCg43ZZ 4kiTmFl8vATMP//PXnRatpE=3D =3Drqv5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 14:56:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAE416A4D0 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:56:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0390343D70 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:56:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bppqh-0005rP-2k; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:56:07 +0200 From: Daniela To: "Steve Bertrand" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:48:17 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281537.57983.dgw@liwest.at> <3589.209.167.16.15.1091026142.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3589.209.167.16.15.1091026142.squirrel@209.167.16.15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281548.17563.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:56:20 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:49, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> Also, post the relevant ``natd'' line entries in your /etc/natd.conf > >> file. > > > > natd.conf doesn't exist. Do you mean rc.conf? Here it is: > > natd_interface="rl0" > > natd_enable="YES" > > > > But I didn't change anything here, and it always worked. > > Indeed, I did mean rc.conf...sorry ;o) > > Now would be a good time to post your fw ruleset. add 00300 divert 8668 ip from any to any add 01300 unreach port tcp from any to any 6699 add 01400 allow log all from any to any via lo0 add 01600 check-state add 01700 allow log logamount 1000 tcp from any to me 22 in setup keep-state add 01701 allow log logamount 1000 tcp from me 22 to any out add 01702 allow log logamount 1000 tcp from any to me 21 in setup keep-state add 01703 allow log logamount 1000 tcp from me 21 to any out add 01900 deny log tcp from any to any in established add 11700 allow tcp from any to any out setup keep-state add 11701 allow udp from 212.33.32.160 53 to any in recv rl0 add 11702 allow udp from any to 212.33.32.160 53 add 11703 allow udp from 212.33.55.5 53 to any in recv rl0 add 11704 allow udp from any to 212.33.55.5 53 add 11705 allow udp from 212.0.0.0/8 67 to 255.255.255.255 68 in recv rl0 add 11801 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 3 add 11802 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 4 add 11803 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 8 out add 11804 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 0 in add 11805 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 9 out add 11806 allow log icmp from any to any icmptypes 11 in add 11807 allow log icmp from any to any icmptypes 11 out add 11900 allow icmp from me to 224.0.0.1 icmptypes 9 in via rl0 add 11901 allow icmp from 10.0.0.1 to 224.0.0.1 icmptypes 9 in via rl1 add 11902 allow all from me to 224.0.0.2/24 out via rl0 add 11903 allow all from 10.0.0.1 to 224.0.0.2/24 out via rl1 add 11904 allow udp from me 520 to 81.10.248.255 520 out via rl0 add 11905 allow udp from me 520 to 81.10.248.255 520 in via rl0 add 11906 allow udp from 10.0.0.1 520 to 10.255.255.255 520 in via rl1 add 11907 allow udp from 10.0.0.1 520 to 10.255.255.255 520 out via rl1 add 11908 allow udp from me 520 to 10.255.255.255 520 out via rl1 add 11909 allow udp from me 520 to 10.255.255.255 520 in via rl1 add 11910 allow ip from any to 224.0.0.9/24 in via rl0 add 20000 allow all from 10.0.0.0/24 to any in recv rl1 add 20001 allow all from any to 10.0.0.0/24 out xmit rl1 keep-state add 20002 count log all from 10.0.0.0/24 to any add 20003 count log all from any to 10.0.0.0/24 add 65534 deny log ip from any to any From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 15:06:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2961B16A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:06:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA8643D5D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:06:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 70611 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 15:06:14 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 3.339132 secs); 28 Jul 2004 15:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 15:06:10 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:06:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3600.209.167.16.15.1091027170.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <200407281548.17563.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281537.57983.dgw@liwest.at> <3589.209.167.16.15.1091026142.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <200407281548.17563.dgw@liwest.at> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:06:10 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: dgw@liwest.at User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:06:07 -0000 > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:49, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> >> Also, post the relevant ``natd'' line entries in your /etc/natd.conf >> >> file. >> > >> > natd.conf doesn't exist. Do you mean rc.conf? Here it is: >> > natd_interface="rl0" >> > natd_enable="YES" >> > >> > But I didn't change anything here, and it always worked. >> >> Indeed, I did mean rc.conf...sorry ;o) >> >> Now would be a good time to post your fw ruleset. > > add 00300 divert 8668 ip from any to any > add 01300 unreach port tcp from any to any 6699 > add 01400 allow log all from any to any via lo0 > add 01600 check-state Well, I would hate to do this, but for testing purposes, add a rule (very briefly)... > add 00300 divert 8668 ip from any to any > add 01300 unreach port tcp from any to any 6699 > add 01400 allow log all from any to any via lo0 add 1500 allow log logamount 1000 all from any to any and check to see if things are working. Your security log file may indicate where traffic is going whether it is or not. Also, I know you haven't changed anything, but what does the output from this command state?: # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding Steve > > add 01700 allow log logamount 1000 tcp from any to me 22 in setup > keep-state > add 01701 allow log logamount 1000 tcp from me 22 to any out > add 01702 allow log logamount 1000 tcp from any to me 21 in setup > keep-state > add 01703 allow log logamount 1000 tcp from me 21 to any out > > add 01900 deny log tcp from any to any in established > > add 11700 allow tcp from any to any out setup keep-state > add 11701 allow udp from 212.33.32.160 53 to any in recv rl0 > add 11702 allow udp from any to 212.33.32.160 53 > add 11703 allow udp from 212.33.55.5 53 to any in recv rl0 > add 11704 allow udp from any to 212.33.55.5 53 > add 11705 allow udp from 212.0.0.0/8 67 to 255.255.255.255 68 in recv rl0 > > add 11801 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 3 > add 11802 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 4 > add 11803 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 8 out > add 11804 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 0 in > add 11805 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 9 out > add 11806 allow log icmp from any to any icmptypes 11 in > add 11807 allow log icmp from any to any icmptypes 11 out > > add 11900 allow icmp from me to 224.0.0.1 icmptypes 9 in via rl0 > add 11901 allow icmp from 10.0.0.1 to 224.0.0.1 icmptypes 9 in via rl1 > add 11902 allow all from me to 224.0.0.2/24 out via rl0 > add 11903 allow all from 10.0.0.1 to 224.0.0.2/24 out via rl1 > add 11904 allow udp from me 520 to 81.10.248.255 520 out via rl0 > add 11905 allow udp from me 520 to 81.10.248.255 520 in via rl0 > add 11906 allow udp from 10.0.0.1 520 to 10.255.255.255 520 in via rl1 > add 11907 allow udp from 10.0.0.1 520 to 10.255.255.255 520 out via rl1 > add 11908 allow udp from me 520 to 10.255.255.255 520 out via rl1 > add 11909 allow udp from me 520 to 10.255.255.255 520 in via rl1 > add 11910 allow ip from any to 224.0.0.9/24 in via rl0 > > > add 20000 allow all from 10.0.0.0/24 to any in recv rl1 > add 20001 allow all from any to 10.0.0.0/24 out xmit rl1 keep-state > add 20002 count log all from 10.0.0.0/24 to any > add 20003 count log all from any to 10.0.0.0/24 > > > add 65534 deny log ip from any to any > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 15:07:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D0416A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:07:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout03-03.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout03-03.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE6DA43D6A for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:07:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ara@avvali.com) Received: (qmail 23504 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2004 15:07:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail01.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.166.114) by smtpout03-03.mesa1.secureserver.net with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 15:07:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 8639 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2004 15:07:03 -0000 Message-ID: <20040728150703.8638.qmail@webmail01.mesa1.secureserver.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:07:03 -0700 From: Ara@Avvali.COM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, henrik.w.lund@broadpark.no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: RE: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 70, Issue 10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:07:06 -0000 Message: 9 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:28:36 -0700 From: Henrik W Lund Subject: Re: Is there a Complete "Package"(NOT Ports) for: [Apache+PHP+MySQL+Mod_SSL+Mod_Perl] ?? - newbie+3 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <41082894.5070007@broadpark.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed DK wrote: >Hi all, > >I just wanted to know if there is available anywhere a Complete "Package" that is Ready to >Go for a FreeBSD Server imlementation that contains: > >Apache >PHP >MySQL >Mod_SSL >Mod_Perl > >... & before anyone flames, yes I know you can just d/l the ports & compile from source! > >... Thats not what I am looking for. Tried that & found it was too much messing around >(compared to the equivalent on Windows 2000) > > >Any suggestions/help is greatly appreciated :)) >BTW: thanks to all who replied to my previous questions :)) > > >Regards, >DK > Greetings! yes try http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 15:15:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0CA16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:15:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421C643D68 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:15:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@jwebmedia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (66.49.54.54.nw.nuvox.net [66.49.54.54]) i6SFFhTu004105 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:15:45 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:15:37 -0500 From: Joseph Koenig To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD + Dell PowerVault NAS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:15:53 -0000 Hi, Has anyone used FreeBSD with a Dell PowerVault NAS (Windows-based)? We are considering moving some servers to a facility that uses PowerVault NAS machines with Windows to do backups. Is there any issue with this? I should be able to connect via NFS or SMB and just tar directly to the NAS machine, correct? Thanks, Joe Koenig Production Manager jWeb New Media Design joe@jWebmedia.com http://www.jwebmedia.com/ 636.928.3162 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 15:19:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1224216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:19:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2F743D62 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:19:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BpqCo-0006I3-R2; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:18:58 +0200 From: Daniela To: "Steve Bertrand" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:11:09 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281548.17563.dgw@liwest.at> <3600.209.167.16.15.1091027170.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3600.209.167.16.15.1091027170.squirrel@209.167.16.15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281611.09200.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:19:12 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:06, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:49, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> >> Also, post the relevant ``natd'' line entries in your /etc/natd.conf > >> >> file. > >> > > >> > natd.conf doesn't exist. Do you mean rc.conf? Here it is: > >> > natd_interface="rl0" > >> > natd_enable="YES" > >> > > >> > But I didn't change anything here, and it always worked. > >> > >> Indeed, I did mean rc.conf...sorry ;o) > >> > >> Now would be a good time to post your fw ruleset. > > > > add 00300 divert 8668 ip from any to any > > add 01300 unreach port tcp from any to any 6699 > > add 01400 allow log all from any to any via lo0 > > add 01600 check-state > > Well, I would hate to do this, but for testing purposes, add a rule (very > briefly)... > > > add 00300 divert 8668 ip from any to any > > add 01300 unreach port tcp from any to any 6699 > > add 01400 allow log all from any to any via lo0 > > add 1500 allow log logamount 1000 all from any to any > > and check to see if things are working. Your security log file may > indicate where traffic is going whether it is or not. Yes, it works, but of course I can't leave this rule in all the time. The SYN/ACK packet that comes back from the remote server is denied by rule 01900. But it should be allowed by the check-state rule. > Also, I know you haven't changed anything, but what does the output from > this command state?: > > # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding It is set to 1. I changed this a long time ago. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 15:23:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E54216A4D1 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:23:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C728743D55 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:23:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 72574 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 15:23:22 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.457877 secs); 28 Jul 2004 15:23:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 15:23:20 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:23:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3652.209.167.16.15.1091028200.squirrel@209.167.16.15> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:23:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: dgw@liwest.at User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281548.17563.dgw@liwest.at> <3600.209.167.16.15.1091027170.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <200407281611.09200.dgw@liwest.at> In-Reply-To: <200407281611.09200.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:23:11 -0000 > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:06, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 14:49, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> >> >> Also, post the relevant ``natd'' line entries in your >> /etc/natd.conf >> >> >> file. >> >> > >> >> > natd.conf doesn't exist. Do you mean rc.conf? Here it is: >> >> > natd_interface="rl0" >> >> > natd_enable="YES" >> >> > >> >> > But I didn't change anything here, and it always worked. >> >> >> >> Indeed, I did mean rc.conf...sorry ;o) >> >> >> >> Now would be a good time to post your fw ruleset. >> > >> > add 00300 divert 8668 ip from any to any >> > add 01300 unreach port tcp from any to any 6699 >> > add 01400 allow log all from any to any via lo0 >> > add 01600 check-state >> Well, I would hate to do this, but for testing purposes, add a rule (very >> briefly)... >> > add 00300 divert 8668 ip from any to any >> > add 01300 unreach port tcp from any to any 6699 >> > add 01400 allow log all from any to any via lo0 >> add 1500 allow log logamount 1000 all from any to any >> and check to see if things are working. Your security log file may indicate where traffic is going whether it is or not. > > Yes, it works, but of course I can't leave this rule in all the time. The SYN/ACK packet that comes back from the remote server is denied by rule > 01900. But it should be allowed by the check-state rule. > >> Also, I know you haven't changed anything, but what does the output from >> this command state?: >> # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding > > It is set to 1. I changed this a long time ago. I figured so...what happens if you add 'keep-state' to rules 20000, 20002 and 20003? Steve > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 15:28:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873F416A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:28:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sferics.mongueurs.net (sferics.mongueurs.net [81.80.147.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9068643D5E for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:28:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@landgren.net) Received: from [172.17.1.1] (exo.bpinet.com [81.80.147.206]) by sferics.mongueurs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3178C8B7; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:28:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4107C60D.5050607@landgren.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:28:13 +0200 From: David Landgren Organization: The Lusty Decadent Delights of Imperial Pompeii User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040728073411.74741.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> <41082894.5070007@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <41082894.5070007@broadpark.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Is there a Complete "Package"(NOT Ports) for: [Apache+PHP+MySQL+Mod_SSL+Mod_Perl] ?? - newbie+3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:28:17 -0000 Henrik W Lund wrote: > DK wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I just wanted to know if there is available anywhere a Complete >> "Package" that is Ready to >> Go for a FreeBSD Server imlementation that contains: >> >> Apache >> PHP >> MySQL >> Mod_SSL >> Mod_Perl >> >> ... & before anyone flames, yes I know you can just d/l the ports & >> compile from source! >> >> ... Thats not what I am looking for. Tried that & found it was too >> much messing around >> (compared to the equivalent on Windows 2000) Um, there is no equivalent on W2K, but I digress... One thing to remember is that Apache and mod_perl are usually run as two separate instances. You run static Apache off port 80, and dynamic Apache (hence +mod_perl) on port 8000 or whatever, and this is reverse-proxied back through the static server at port 80 (and 8000 is firewalled off from the outside). This results in big savings in memory. mod_perl processes can weigh 80Mb apiece, easily. Standard httpd processes weigh in at about 3Mb. You don't want to tie up an 80Mb process spoonfeeding some luser on a modem. Reverse proxying lets you have a large number of small static processes and only a handful of mod_perl processes. There are also a number of ways you can proxify the dynamic requests, so there's no one-size-fits-all. The easiest way is to do something like: ProxyPass /dyn http://localhost:8000/ ProxyPassReverse /dyn http://localhost:8000/ Then you have to decide who gets the https port. My advice would be let the static handle it. (--enable-ssl) Next, the question of MySQL. I expect you mean that PHP and/or mod_perl needs MySQL support. PHP configure will detect this automatically if you have it installed. In mod_perl, you'll probably want to attack it via Apache::DBI and DBD::Mysql. Finally, you can install mod_perl and PHP and DSO (i.e., loadable modules), after you have your basic installation up and running. (Just remember to --enable-so). The level of PHP processing you plan to do will indicate whether you should be running it directly out of port 80 or proxified from 8000. There are so many ways to put these pieces together, depending on your needs, that there is no simple package that puts them all together. I sympathise with your remark that it's so much easier under W2K. The trouble is, a well-tuned mod_perl installation will run rings around anything IIS/ASP can do, but that comes at a cost of knowing how to set it up. I would recommend investing in the mod_perl book by Stas Beckman and Eric Cholet. http://www.modperlbook.com/ Regards, David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 15:45:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2031516A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:45:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at (lilzmailso01.liwest.at [212.33.55.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE9D43D48 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:45:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BpqcC-0004qA-Np; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:45:13 +0200 From: Daniela To: "Steve Bertrand" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:37:23 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281611.09200.dgw@liwest.at> <3652.209.167.16.15.1091028200.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3652.209.167.16.15.1091028200.squirrel@209.167.16.15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281637.23563.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:45:27 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:23, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > Yes, it works, but of course I can't leave this rule in all the time. > > The SYN/ACK packet that comes back from the remote server is denied by > rule > > > 01900. But it should be allowed by the check-state rule. > > > >> Also, I know you haven't changed anything, but what does the output > > from > > >> this command state?: > >> # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding > > > > It is set to 1. I changed this a long time ago. > > I figured so...what happens if you add 'keep-state' to rules 20000, 20002 > and 20003? Nothing. BTW, here we have the problem: The initial SYN packet isn't matched by rule 11700 (setup keep-state). Setup means the SYN flag is set, right? So why is it not matched? If I remove the "setup" keyword to match all outgoing packets, the SYN/ACK from the server is still denied by rule 01900. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 15:52:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531A316A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:52:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D736343D53 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq56-122.dial.allstream.net [216.123.134.122]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 066BE5D1C; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:52:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:51:43 -0400 From: epilogue To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040728115143.76e3685b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040728131142.E53978@mirrorball.theloosingend.net> References: <20040728131142.E53978@mirrorball.theloosingend.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net Subject: Re: Antialiased fonts in Linux applications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:52:17 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:20:24 +0200 (CEST) Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: > > Font in Linux applications no longer render as they should. Both > antialiasing and hinting is off. This applies to Acrobat Reader, > Mathematica, Maple and Opera (ie. all my Linux applications) > > I have symlinks to /usr/X11R6/etc/fonts/* in /usr/compat/linux/etc/fonts > > This used to work, but I don't know what has changed since then, since I > did a lot of portupgrades in time between this was last known to work, > and when it recently stopped working. i noticed the same thing happen to my setup, after upgrading to xorg. in my case acroread works. unfortunately, i don't run mathematica or maple. however, for linux-opera, try adding the following settings in $HOME/.linux-opera/opera6.ini: [User Prefs] <<---- under this section Enable Core X Fonts=0 Enable Xft Fonts=1 Trust Qt FontSwitching=0 though i find that many pages in opera don't look quite as sharp as before, this should make your opera fonts look acceptable. from within opera, you can also tinker with alt+p > fonts in order to better align the output to your tastes. hopefully someone will suggest a more general (ie. system-wide) fix for your issue. in the meantime, i would suggest taking a gander at your/var/log/Xorg.0.log for any error and warning messages. hth. cheers, epi > Any help would be greatly appricated. > > > -- > Svein Halvor > > > Here is a list of my ports: > > Hermes-1.3.2 Fast pixel formats conversion library > ImageMagick-5.5.7.15_1 Image processing tools > Mesa-3.4.2_2 A graphics library similar to SGI's OpenGL > ORBit-0.5.17_2 High-performance CORBA ORB with support for the C > language ORBit2-2.10.3 High-performance CORBA ORB with support for > the C language Xaw3d-1.5 A 3-D Athena Widget set that looks > like Motif aalib-1.4.r5_1 An ascii art library > acpicatools-20021118.0 Some utilities for Intel ACPICA (Debugger, ASL > Compiler and acroread-5.08 View, distribute and print PDF documents > arts-1.1.4_2,1 Audio system for the KDE integrated X11 desktop > aspell-0.50.5_3 Spelling checker with better suggestion logic than > ispell atk-1.6.1 A GNOME accessibility toolkit (ATK) > autoconf-2.53_1 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x > platforms autoconf213-2.13.000227_5 Automatically configure source code > on many Un*x platforms automake-1.5,1 GNU Standards-compliant > Makefile generator automake14-1.4.5_9 GNU Standards-compliant Makefile > generator (legacy version avifile-0.7.38_3,2 AVI player/converter with > numerous codecs, including MPEG-4 bash-2.05b.007 The GNU Bourne > Again Shell bbpager-0.3.1 A pager for the Blackbox window manager > bison-1.75_2 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with > Yacc bitstream-vera-1.10 Bitstream Vera TrueType font collection > boxtools-0.65.0 Style tools for the blackbox family of window > managers bsd-airtools-0.3 BSD Wireless Scanning Tools > cdparanoia-3.9.8_7 A CDDA extraction tool (also known as ripper) > cdrtools-2.0.3_1 Cdrecord and several other programs to record CD-R[W] > compat3x-i386-5.0.20020925 A convenience package to install the compat3x > libraries coreutils-5.0_1 The Free Software Foundation's core > utilities ctorrent-1.3.2 BitTorrent Client written in C for FreeBSD > and Linux cups-base-1.1.20.0 The Common UNIX Printing System: headers, > libs, & daemons cups-pstoraster-7.07_1 GNU Postscript interpreter for > CUPS printing to non-PS prin curl-7.11.0 Non-interactive tool to > get files from FTP, GOPHER, HTTP(S) cvsup-16.1h General network > file distribution system optimized for CVS db4-4.0.14_1,1 The > Berkeley DB package, revision 4 db41-4.1.25_1 The Berkeley DB > package, revision 4.1 dbh-1.0.18 Disk Based Hashtables > dict-1.9.11 Dictionary Server Protocol (RFC2229) client > djbfft-0.76 An extremely fast library for floating-point > convolution docbook-sk-4.1.2_3 XML version of the DocBook DTD version > controlled for Scrol docbook-xml-4.2_1 XML version of the DocBook DTD > docbook-xsl-1.65.1 XSL DocBook stylesheets > dri-4.3.0,1 OpenGL hardware acceleration drivers for XFree86 > dv2jpg-1.1_3 Convert Type-2 DV codec-encoded AVI streams to > mjpeg-encode dvts-1.0a_3 A imprementation of Digital Video > Transport System emacs-21.3 GNU editing macros > esound-0.2.34 A sound library for enlightenment package > expat-1.95.7 XML 1.0 parser written in C > ezm3-1.1 Easier, more portable Modula-3 distribution for > building CV fam-2.6.9_4 A file alteration monitor > ffmpeg-0.4.5_7 Hyper fast realtime audio/video encoder/converter, > streamin fftw-2.1.5_2 Fast C routines to compute the Discrete > Fourier Transform findutils-4.1_2 The GNU find utilities > flac-1.1.0_3 Free lossless audio codec > flashplayer-0.4.10_1 GPL standalone Flash (TM) player > fontconfig-2.2.2,1 An XML-based font configuration API for X Windows > freebsd-games-5.1.1_4 FreeBSD-modified "Standard" BSD games > freetype2-2.1.7_3 A free and portable TrueType font rendering engine > gaim-0.80 Multi-protocol instant messaging client > gcc-3.3.4_20040616 GNU Compiler Collection 3.3 > gd-2.0.15_1,1 A graphics library for fast creation of images > gdbm-1.8.3_1 The GNU database manager > gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0_1 A graphic library for GTK+ > gettext-0.13.1_1 GNU gettext package > ghostscript-gnu-7.07_5 GNU Postscript interpreter > ghostview-1.5 An X11 front-end for ghostscript, the GNU postscript > previe gimp-2.0.2,1 A GNU Image Manipulation Program > gimp-print-4.2.7 GIMP Print Printer Driver > gkrellm-2.2.1 A GTK based system monitor > gle-3.0.3 A GL Tubing and Extrusion Library > glib-1.2.10_10 Some useful routines of C programming (previous > stable vers glib-2.4.2 Some useful routines of C programming > (current stable versi gmake-3.80_2 GNU version of 'make' utility > gnomehier-1.0_17 A utility port that creates the GNOME directory tree > gnupg-1.2.4_1 The GNU Privacy Guard > gnutls-1.0.13 GNU Transport Layer Security library > grepmail-4.80 Search mailboxes for a given regexp and display > matching em gtk-1.2.10_11 Gimp Toolkit for X11 GUI (previous stable > version) gtk-2.4.3_1 Gimp Toolkit for X11 GUI (current stable > version) gtk-engines2-2.2.0_3 Theme engine for the gtk+-2.0 toolkit > gtk-xfce-engine-2.1.10 An XFCE engine for GTK 2.0 > gtkglarea-1.99.0_4 An OpenGL widget for the GTK+2 GUI toolkit > gtkspell2-2.0.5_1 A GTK+ 2 spell checking component > guile-1.6.4_1 GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extension > hdf-4.1r5 Hierarchical Data Format library (from NCSA) > help2man-1.29 Automatically generating simple manual pages from > program o hicolor-icon-theme-0.5 A high-color icon theme shell from the > FreeDesktop project iconv-2.0_3 Charset conversion library and > utilities id3lib-3.8.3 Library for manipulating ID3v1/v1.1 and > ID3v2 tags id3tool-1.2 A utility for manipulating mp3 ID3 Tags > id3v2-0.1.9_2 Command line id3v2 tag editor > imake-6.7.0_2 Imake and other utilities from X.Org > imlib-1.9.14_2 A graphic library for enlightenment package > imlib2-1.1.0 The next generation graphic library for enlightenment > packa intltool-0.30_1 Xml internationalization support for GNOME, and > others ispell-3.2.06_4 An interactive spelling checker for multiple > languages jasper-1.700.5 An implementation of the codec specified in > the JPEG-2000 s javavmwrapper-1.4 Wrapper script for various Java > Virtual Machines jbigkit-1.5 Lossless compression for bi-level > images such as scanned pa jhead-2.0 Exif Jpeg camera setting > parser and thumbnail remover jpeg-6b_3 IJG's jpeg compression > utilities lame-3.93.1 ISO code based fast MP3 encoder kit > lapack-3.0 A library of Fortran 77 subroutines for linear > algebra lcms-1.09,1 Light Color Management System -- a color > management library libIDL-0.8.3_2 A library for creating trees of > CORBA Interface Definition libXft-2.1.6 A client-sided font API > for X applications liba52-0.7.4_1 A free library for decoding ATSC > A/52 streams, aka AC-3 libao-esound-0.8.4_1 Portable audio output library > libart_lgpl2-2.3.16 Library for high-performance 2D graphics > libaudiofile-0.2.6 A sound library for SGI audio file > libcroco-0.5.1 CSS2 parsing library > libdv-0.101_1 Quasar DV codec (libdv): software codec for DV video > encodi libdvdcss-1.2.8_1 Portable abstraction library for DVD > decryption libdvdread-0.9.4 This is needed by ogle, which is a DVD > player that supports libexif-0.5.12_2 Library to read digital camera > file meta-data libflash-0.4.10 GPL Flash (TM) Library > libfpx-1.2.0.9 Library routines for working with Flashpix images > libgcrypt-1.2.0_1 "General purpose crypto library based on code used in > GnuPG libglade2-2.4.0 GNOME glade library > libgnomecanvas-2.6.1.1 A graphics library for GNOME > libgnugetopt-1.2 GNU getopt library > libgpg-error-0.7_1 Common error values for all GnuPG components > libgsf-1.10.0 An extensible i/o abstraction for dealing with > structured f libiconv-1.9.1_3 A character set conversion library > libid3tag-0.15.0b_1 ID3 tags library (part of MAD project) > libijs-0.35 C library that supports plugin printer driver for > Ghostscri libltdl-1.5.2 System independent dlopen wrapper > libmad-0.15.0b Libmad library (part of MAD project) > libmikmod-3.1.10 MikMod Sound Library > libmng-1.0.5 Multiple-image Network Graphics (MNG) reference > library libmpeg2-0.3.1_1 A free library for decoding mpeg-2 and mpeg-1 > video streams libogg-1.1,3 Ogg bitstream library > librsvg2-2.6.5_1 Library for parsing and rendering SVG vector-graphic > files libslang-1.4.9 Routines for rapid alpha-numeric terminal > applications deve libtasn1-0.2.7 ASN.1 structure parser library > libtool-1.3.5_1 Generic shared library support script > libtool-1.5.6_1 Generic shared library support script (version 1.5) > libungif-4.1.0b1 Tools and library routines for working with GIF > images libvorbis-1.0.1,3 Audio compression codec library > libwmf-0.2.8.2 Tools and library for converting Microsoft WMF > (windows met libxfce4gui-4.0.6 XFce 4 widget library required by xfce4 > and xfwm4 libxfce4mcs-4.0.6 XFce 4 settings management library used by > most XFce 4 modu libxfce4util-4.0.6 XFce 4 library with non-graphical > helper functions libxml-1.8.17_1 Xml parser library for GNOME > libxml2-2.6.9 Xml parser library for GNOME > linc-1.0.3_2 A library for writing networked servers & clients > linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.0_2 XFree86 libraries, Linux/i386 binary > linux-aspell-0.50.4.1 Spelling checker with better logic than ispell > (linux versi linux-expat-1.95.5_1 Linux/i386 binary port of Expat > XML-parsing library linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_1 The official Macromedia > Flash Player for Linux Mozilla and linux-fontconfig-2.1_1 Linux/i386 > binary of Fontconfig linux-openmotif-2.1.30_1 Motif toolkit Linux > libraries linux-opera-7.53.20040716 A blazingly fast, full-featured, > standards-compliant browse linux_base-8-8.0_4 Base set of packages > needed in Linux mode (only for i386) linuxpluginwrapper-20040310_2 A > wrapper allowing use of linux-plugins with native applica lsof-4.71.3 > Lists information about open files (similar to fstat(1)) > lynx-2.8.4.1c A non-graphical, text-based World-Wide Web client > m4-1.4_1 GNU m4 > mad-0.15.0b The "meta-port" for the MAD sound playback system > madplay-esound-0.15.0b_2 Madplay MP3 player (part of MAD project) > mjpegtools-1.6.1_2 Set of tools to record/playback/edit videos in MPEG > format mkcatalog-1.1 A maintainance utility for sgml catalog files > most-4.9.4 A pager (like less) which has support for windows and > binar mp3_check-1.98_1 Verifies the integrity of mp3 audio files > mp3asm-0.1.3.1_1 MP3 frame level editor > mp3check-1.5 A tool for checking and fixing mp3 archive > inconsistencies mp3ck-0.02 A consistency check utility for MPEG > Layer 2 or 3 files or mp3splt-2.0_1 Utility to split mp3 and ogg > files (via CUE sheets) mpg123-esound-0.59r_9 Command-line player for mpeg > layer 1, 2 and 3 audio mplayer-fonts-0.50 A font pack for the mplayer > OSD and SUB mplayer-gtk-esound-0.92.0_5 High performance media > player/encoder supporting many forma mysql-client-3.23.58_2 Multithreaded > SQL database (client) nas-1.6 Network Audio System > nasm-0.98.35,1 General-purpose multi-platform x86 assembler > nmap-3.50 Port scanning utility for large networks > nspr-4.4.1_1 A platform-neutral API for system level and libc like > funct nss-3.9_1 Libraries to support development of > security-enabled applic open-motif-2.2.2_2 Motif X11 Toolkit (industry > standard GUI (IEEE 1295)) opencdk-0.5.4_1,1 Open Crypto Development Kit > openldap-client-2.1.26 Open source LDAP client implementation > openoffice-1.1.1 Integrated > wordprocessor/dbase/spreadheet/drawing/chart/bro openssl-0.9.7d SSL > and crypto library opera-7.53.20040716 A blazingly fast, full-featured, > standards-compliant browse p5-TimeDate-1.16,1 Perl5 module containing a > better/faster date parser for abs p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1 Perl extension > interface to James Clark's XML parser, expat pango-1.4.0_1 An > open-source framework for the layout and rendering of i1 pcre-4.5 > Perl Compatible Regular Expressions library > pdftk-0.94 A simple tool for doing everyday things with PDF > documents perl-5.6.1_15 Practical Extraction and Report Language > perl-5.8.4 Practical Extraction and Report Language > php5-cli-5.0.0.r2 PHP Command Line Interpreter > pico-4.58 PIne's message COmposition editor > pkgconfig-0.15.0_1 A utility used to retrieve information about > installed libr pkill-0.2 NetBSD's pgrep and pkill: find or > signal processes matching png-1.2.5_5 Library for manipulating > PNG images popt-1.7 A getopt(3) like library with a number of > enhancements, fro pornview-0.2.0.p.1_4 PornView is an image > viewer/manager portupgrade-20040113_2 FreeBSD ports/packages > administration and management tool s py22-expat-2.2.2_2 Python interface > to the Expat XML parser python-2.3.4 An interpreted > object-oriented programming language qmake-3.2.3_1 The build > utility of the Qt project qt-3.3.1_1 Multiplatform C++ > application framework rar-3.30,1 File archiver (binary port) > rpm-3.0.6_9 The Red Hat Package Manager > ruby-1.6.8.2003.10.15 An object-oriented interpreted scripting language > ruby-bdb1-0.2.1 Ruby interface to Berkeley DB revision 1.8x with full > featu ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p3 A set of Ruby modules to provide Ruby 1.8 > functionalities samba-2.2.8a_1 A free SMB and CIFS client and server > for UNIX samba-libsmbclient-3.0.4_1 The shared lib from the samba > packages scr2png-1.1_4 Converts the output of "vidcontrol -p" to > PNG scr2txt-1.1 Converts the output of "vidcontrol -p" to text > sdl-1.2.7_1,1 Cross-platform multi-media development API (developm. > vers. sdocbook-xml-4.1.2.5_2 "Simplified" DocBook XML DTD > shared-mime-info-0.14_3 A MIME type database from the FreeDesktop project > shntool-1.2.3_1 Multi-purpose .wav/.shn processing utility > shorten-3.5.1 Fast and optionally lossless compression for waveform > files sox-12.17.3_1 SOund eXchange - universal sound sample > translator speex-1.0.3_1,1 An open-source patent-free voice codec > startup-notification-0.7 Library that supports startup notification spec > from freede svgalib-1.4.3_2 A low level console graphics library > tcl-8.3.5_2 Tool Command Language > tcl-8.4.5,1 Tool Command Language > tcllib-1.4 A collection of utility modules for Tcl > thunderbird-0.7 Mozilla Thunderbird is standalone mail and news that > stands tiff-3.6.1_1 Tools and library routines for working with > TIFF images tightvnc-1.2.8 Enhanced version of VNC > tk-8.3.5_2 Graphical toolkit for TCL > tk-8.4.5,1 Graphical toolkit for TCL > transcode-0.6.12 A text-console utility for video stream processing > ttmkfdir-20021109 Create fonts.scale file for use with TrueType font > server unixODBC-2.2.7_1 ODBC library suite for Unix > unrar-3.30_1,3 Extract, view & test RAR archives > unzip-5.50 List, test and extract compressed files in a ZIP > archive urwfonts-1.0 Another font package for X > vorbis-tools-1.0.1_1,3 Play, encode, and manage Ogg Vorbis files > vorbisgain-0.34_1 Calculates the perceived sound level of an Ogg Vorbis > file vpnc-0.2_8 Client for Cisco 3000 VPN Concentrator > webfonts-0.21_1 TrueType core fonts for the Web > wget-1.8.2_6 Retrieve files from the Net via HTTP and FTP > win32-codecs-2.0.90_1,1 Huge compilation of Win32 binary codecs, > including MPEG-4(D windowmaker-0.80.2_3 GNUStep-compliant NeXTStep window > manager clone wine-20040408 Microsoft Windows compatibility layer > for Unix-like systems wmicons-1.0 Icons mainly for use in Window > Maker wrapper-1.0_3 Wrapper for XFree86-4 server > xcdroast-0.98.a.15_1 Another X11 frontend to mkisofs/cdrecord > xfce-4.0.6 The "meta-port" for the XFce 4 desktop environment > xfce4-battery-plugin-0.2.0_2 Battery monitor panel plugin for XFce4 > xfce4-desktop-4.0.6 XFce 4 desktop background manager and root menu > xfce4-fm-4.0.6 XFce 4 file manager > xfce4-fm-icons-4.0.6 XFce 4 icon themes for the xffm file manager > xfce4-iconbox-4.0.6 XFce 4 icon box, an alternative taskbar > xfce4-mcs-manager-4.0.6 XFce 4 settings manager > xfce4-mcs-plugins-4.0.6 XFce 4 settings manager plugins > xfce4-mixer-4.0.6 XFce 4 volume mixer module for xfce4-panel > xfce4-panel-4.0.6 XFce 4 panel module > xfce4-panel-themes-4.0.6 Icon themes for the XFce 4 panel > xfce4-print-4.0.6 XFce 4 graphical frontend for printing > xfce4-systray-4.0.6 XFce 4 system tray module for xfce4-panel > xfce4-toys-4.0.6 Toys for the XFce 4 panel > xfce4-utils-4.0.6 XFce 4 essential utilities and scripts > xfce4-wm-4.0.6 XFce 4 window manager > xfce4-wm-themes-4.0.6 XFce 4 window decoration themes for xfwm4 > xmlcatmgr-2.1 SGML and XML catalog manager > xmms-1.2.10 X Multimedia System --- An audio player with a Winamp > GUI xmms-flac-1.1.0_1 XMMS input plugin for playing FLAC files > xmms-shn-2.2.8_1 XMMS plugin to allow playing shorten-compressed audio > xmms-speex-0.9.1_1 XMMS input plugin to play speex files > xmms-status-plugin-1.0_1 XMMS control applet for GNOME 2 panel / KDE tray > xorg-6.7.0 X.Org distribution metaport > xorg-clients-6.7.0_1 X client programs and related files from X.Org > xorg-fonts-100dpi-6.7.0 X.Org 100dpi bitmap fonts > xorg-fonts-75dpi-6.7.0 X.Org 75dpi bitmap fonts > xorg-fonts-cyrillic-6.7.0 X.Org Cyrillic bitmap fonts > xorg-fonts-encodings-6.7.0 X.Org font encoding files > xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-6.7.0 X.Org miscellaneous bitmap fonts > xorg-fonts-truetype-6.7.0 X.Org TrueType fonts > xorg-fonts-type1-6.7.0 X.Org Type1 fonts > xorg-fontserver-6.7.0 X font server from X.Org > xorg-libraries-6.7.0_1 X11 libraries and headers from X.Org > xorg-nestserver-6.7.0 Nesting X server from X.Org > xorg-printserver-6.7.0 X Print server from X.Org > xorg-server-6.7.0_5 X.Org X server and related programs > xorg-vfbserver-6.7.0 X virtual framebuffer server from X.Org > xscreensaver-4.16 Save your screen while you entertain your cat > xv-3.10a_3 An X11 program that displays images of various > formats xvid-0.9.2,1 An opensource MPEG-4 codec, based on OpenDivx > zip-2.3_1 Create/update ZIP files compatible with pkzip > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 15:53:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CAE16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:53:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D77E43D66 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:53:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 75550 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 15:53:11 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.245294 secs); 28 Jul 2004 15:53:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 15:53:09 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:53:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3816.209.167.16.15.1091029989.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <200407281637.23563.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281611.09200.dgw@liwest.at> <3652.209.167.16.15.1091028200.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <200407281637.23563.dgw@liwest.at> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:53:09 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: dgw@liwest.at User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:53:01 -0000 > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:23, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> > Yes, it works, but of course I can't leave this rule in all the time. >> >> The SYN/ACK packet that comes back from the remote server is denied by >> rule >> >> > 01900. But it should be allowed by the check-state rule. >> > >> >> Also, I know you haven't changed anything, but what does the output >> >> from >> >> >> this command state?: >> >> # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding >> > >> > It is set to 1. I changed this a long time ago. >> >> I figured so...what happens if you add 'keep-state' to rules 20000, >> 20002 >> and 20003? > > Nothing. > BTW, here we have the problem: The initial SYN packet isn't matched by > rule > 11700 (setup keep-state). Setup means the SYN flag is set, right? AFAIK, setup means the SYN bit MUST be set. Try these rules: > add 01900 deny log tcp from any to any in established add 2000 allow log all from any to any in via rl1 keep-state add 2002 allow log all from any to any out via rl0 keep-state > So why > is > it not matched? If I remove the "setup" keyword to match all outgoing > packets, the SYN/ACK from the server is still denied by rule 01900. I'll go over the ruleset again here and see if I can find a misplaced 'out' or 'in'. Steve > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:11:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BC716A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:11:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EEC43D55 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:11:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692A424E8DA for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:11:39 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4107D053.1010206@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:12:03 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040726) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Console in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:11:51 -0000 If I put this in ~/.xinitrc exec startkde > /dev/console 2>&1 to redirect messages to the console in order to read them in xconsole, X starts and immediately exits with the error: /home/mark/.xinitrc: cannot create /dev/console: permission denied I've uncommented this line in /etc/fbtab: /dev/ttyv0 0600 /dev/console and dev/console exists: /home/mark{12}% ls -l /dev/con* crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 0 28 Jul 16:55 /dev/console crw------- 1 root wheel 234, 255 28 Jul 11:29 /dev/consolectl This used to work in 4.x and XFree86 4.1 but now I'm running -CURRENT and XFree86 4.3.0. Has something changed, or have I missed something? Thanks. Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:13:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759DA16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:13:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366BD43D73 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:13:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bpr3b-0007He-A7; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:13:31 +0200 From: Daniela To: "Steve Bertrand" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:05:42 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281637.23563.dgw@liwest.at> <3816.209.167.16.15.1091029989.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3816.209.167.16.15.1091029989.squirrel@209.167.16.15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281705.42474.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:13:44 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:53, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> I figured so...what happens if you add 'keep-state' to rules 20000, > >> 20002 > >> and 20003? > > > > Nothing. > > BTW, here we have the problem: The initial SYN packet isn't matched by > > rule > > 11700 (setup keep-state). Setup means the SYN flag is set, right? > > AFAIK, setup means the SYN bit MUST be set. Try these rules: > > add 01900 deny log tcp from any to any in established > > add 2000 allow log all from any to any in via rl1 keep-state > add 2002 allow log all from any to any out via rl0 keep-state > > > So why > > is > > it not matched? If I remove the "setup" keyword to match all outgoing > > packets, the SYN/ACK from the server is still denied by rule 01900. > > I'll go over the ruleset again here and see if I can find a misplaced > 'out' or 'in'. Now it is getting funny. I played around with the ruleset, adding and removing count log rules. Suddenly it worked. I removed all extra count log rules, and compared the resulting ruleset file with the backup I made before. Nothing changed! Was that a bug? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:18:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4821E16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:18:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372E443D60 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:18:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 78086 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 16:18:38 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.20394 secs); 28 Jul 2004 16:18:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 16:18:36 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:18:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3983.209.167.16.15.1091031516.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <200407281705.42474.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281637.23563.dgw@liwest.at> <3816.209.167.16.15.1091029989.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <200407281705.42474.dgw@liwest.at> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:18:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: dgw@liwest.at User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:18:28 -0000 > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:53, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> >> I figured so...what happens if you add 'keep-state' to rules 20000, >> >> 20002 >> >> and 20003? >> > >> > Nothing. >> > BTW, here we have the problem: The initial SYN packet isn't matched by >> > rule >> > 11700 (setup keep-state). Setup means the SYN flag is set, right? >> >> AFAIK, setup means the SYN bit MUST be set. Try these rules: >> > add 01900 deny log tcp from any to any in established >> >> add 2000 allow log all from any to any in via rl1 keep-state >> add 2002 allow log all from any to any out via rl0 keep-state >> >> > So why >> > is >> > it not matched? If I remove the "setup" keyword to match all outgoing >> > packets, the SYN/ACK from the server is still denied by rule 01900. >> >> I'll go over the ruleset again here and see if I can find a misplaced >> 'out' or 'in'. > > Now it is getting funny. I played around with the ruleset, adding and > removing > count log rules. Suddenly it worked. I removed all extra count log rules, > and > compared the resulting ruleset file with the backup I made before. Nothing > changed! Was that a bug? I'd like to see the difference. Could you post this output? (The contents of rules.patch). # diff orig_rules_file new_rules_file > rules.patch Steve > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:21:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D459416A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:21:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9893243D3F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:21:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BprB5-0007Od-Uw; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:21:15 +0200 From: Daniela To: "Steve Bertrand" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:13:27 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281705.42474.dgw@liwest.at> <3983.209.167.16.15.1091031516.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <3983.209.167.16.15.1091031516.squirrel@209.167.16.15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407281713.27154.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:21:29 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 16:18, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:53, Steve Bertrand wrote: > >> >> I figured so...what happens if you add 'keep-state' to rules 20000, > >> >> 20002 > >> >> and 20003? > >> > > >> > Nothing. > >> > BTW, here we have the problem: The initial SYN packet isn't matched by > >> > rule > >> > 11700 (setup keep-state). Setup means the SYN flag is set, right? > >> > >> AFAIK, setup means the SYN bit MUST be set. Try these rules: > >> > add 01900 deny log tcp from any to any in established > >> > >> add 2000 allow log all from any to any in via rl1 keep-state > >> add 2002 allow log all from any to any out via rl0 keep-state > >> > >> > So why > >> > is > >> > it not matched? If I remove the "setup" keyword to match all outgoing > >> > packets, the SYN/ACK from the server is still denied by rule 01900. > >> > >> I'll go over the ruleset again here and see if I can find a misplaced > >> 'out' or 'in'. > > > > Now it is getting funny. I played around with the ruleset, adding and > > removing > > count log rules. Suddenly it worked. I removed all extra count log rules, > > and > > compared the resulting ruleset file with the backup I made before. > > Nothing changed! Was that a bug? > > I'd like to see the difference. Could you post this output? (The contents > of rules.patch). > > # diff orig_rules_file new_rules_file > rules.patch Nothing! That produces an empty file. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:26:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C66216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:26:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F50843D1D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 78964 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 16:27:01 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.23223 secs); 28 Jul 2004 16:27:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 16:27:00 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:27:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4095.209.167.16.15.1091032020.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <200407281713.27154.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200407281452.00859.dgw@liwest.at> <200407281705.42474.dgw@liwest.at> <3983.209.167.16.15.1091031516.squirrel@209.167.16.15> <200407281713.27154.dgw@liwest.at> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:27:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: dgw@liwest.at User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after IP change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:26:52 -0000 > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 16:18, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> > On Wednesday 28 July 2004 15:53, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> >> >> I figured so...what happens if you add 'keep-state' to rules >> 20000, >> >> >> 20002 >> >> >> and 20003? >> >> > >> >> > Nothing. >> >> > BTW, here we have the problem: The initial SYN packet isn't matched >> by >> >> > rule >> >> > 11700 (setup keep-state). Setup means the SYN flag is set, right? >> >> >> >> AFAIK, setup means the SYN bit MUST be set. Try these rules: >> >> > add 01900 deny log tcp from any to any in established >> >> >> >> add 2000 allow log all from any to any in via rl1 keep-state >> >> add 2002 allow log all from any to any out via rl0 keep-state >> >> >> >> > So why >> >> > is >> >> > it not matched? If I remove the "setup" keyword to match all >> outgoing >> >> > packets, the SYN/ACK from the server is still denied by rule 01900. >> >> >> >> I'll go over the ruleset again here and see if I can find a misplaced >> >> 'out' or 'in'. >> > >> > Now it is getting funny. I played around with the ruleset, adding and >> > removing >> > count log rules. Suddenly it worked. I removed all extra count log >> rules, >> > and >> > compared the resulting ruleset file with the backup I made before. >> > Nothing changed! Was that a bug? >> >> I'd like to see the difference. Could you post this output? (The >> contents >> of rules.patch). >> >> # diff orig_rules_file new_rules_file > rules.patch > > Nothing! That produces an empty file. Well, at least it's working. I have no idea what the problem could of been. :o) Steve > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:27:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC68216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:27:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41010.mail.yahoo.com (web41010.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9993943D55 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040728162744.29274.qmail@web41010.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.45.12.95] by web41010.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:27:44 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:27:44 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20040728155525.S12001@orion> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:27:44 -0000 --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Some times, it's better to install smaller packages that work together > in a well-known way, than huge mega-monsters that break in unexpected > ways later on. Firstly, thnx Giorgos for responding! All I want from BSD to is a Rock Solid Web Server with as default: - FreeBSD+Minimilist GUI(wmaker will do) - File Manager(got xfe working) - Editor(got nedit installed) - Apache+Mod_SSL+MySQL+PHP+Mod_Perl - Firewall (is one installed as default ??) - Web Browser(Mozilla installed but its slow - will try firefox later) Thats all, nothing else! I would have thought that with so many people running BSD Web Servers, that there would be a similar default install out-of-the-box out there... > Anyway, just to check that I'm not writing junk, I've just installed > apache with mod_ssl, ipv6 and mode_perl support. > I used the www/apache13-modssl+ipv6 port to install Apache, then > www/mod_perl to install mod_perl version 1.x (which could be > substituted in a breeze with www/mod_perl2 to use the newer > version) tweaked Apache's config file a bit and voila... my web server > was up and running in less than 5 minutes. I guess my problem is I know where all the files go on my Windows box, but I am not sure where the files go on the BSD box when an install goes wrong. If the pkg_delete fails, how do I manually remove the files for a failed [Apache+Mod_SSL+MySQL+PHP+Mod_Perl] installation ?? > Did you actually *try* to install Apache using the ports? Yes, apache by itself is easy, its installing the bunch - Apache+Mod_SSL+MySQL+PHP+Mod_Perl > You still didn't answer my question in an earlier post about the problems you seem > to be having: > > Why isn't it easy for you to install all these things on FreeBSD? > > Which part of the installation troubles you? A recent addition to > the Handbook was a section on Apache. Perhaps, by letting us know > what gives you trouble we can improve the documentation to help you > and anyone else that tries to install an Apache web server from > now on. sorry about, thought I did - here goes: - Installing Packages is nice & easy & straight forward from the docs(should be more of these!) - Installing ports/packages via ftp/net - Forget it!! I have barely got BSD running, the last thing I want is connecting a BSD box to my broadband connection ?? Does BSD have a default firewall ?? Don't know, having trouble installing stuff let alone configuring a firewall via scripts/files Currently as we speak, I am getting about a hit every 10 seconds from worms... thankfully being caught by my firewall on my Windows 2000 box. >> Why isn't it easy for you to install all these things on FreeBSD? Specifically, its the ./configure business of the different installations & the pedantic order which to install the different Apache modules etc.. Then its going step by step with the install guides & when I try to install MySQL, I type # groupadd mysql & I get "command not found" ... ??? no idea, I am following the install guides... now if I am doing the same as everyone else with a fresh install of BSD, why is it no one else gets groupadd mysql "command not found" ?? I just don't see the point of compiling each program from source. - But if I try to install all of them from the packages, then it breaks down. - I am used to from Windows, installing from packages, then once everything is installed & running, I go back & tweak the apps to my likeing BSD wants me to do the tweaks in configuration files prior to compiling from source BEFORE I have had a chance to fiddle with the app to SEE what needs to be tweak. ie installing PHP the setting of mm should be --without-mm ?? what the... that should be a tweak AFTER its installed not before... then manually chmod because for some reason, even though I am logged in as root, all files are not by default excute/write accessable ..oops ranting again... what the manual needs, is more step-by-step screen shots so things are less hit & miss - not just for the install process, but for something like install a Web Server with its modules - Apache+Mod_SSL+MySQL+PHP+Mod_Perl > Note that OpenSSL is part of the base system in FreeBSD. Unlike > Windows, where in the best case it's considered an "add-on" that you have > to add later. You don't need to add anything to your FreeBSD system to > have OpenSSL support, provided you keep the system itself relatively up > to date, using the recommended update instructions of the Handbook or > the file /usr/src/UPDATING. I assume I would need to be connect to the net for this... but I would first need to secure the system from attack BEFORE I connect - maybe this should be the first part of the docs, straight after installing BSD+GUI+Editor+FileManager but BEFORE installing Apache > > OPTIONAL: > > IMAP > Exactly what we have now. You can use the Ports to install all of the > above and a lot more. There are more than 10,000 ports in the FreeBSD > collection now; a number that is far larger than anything Microsoft > Windows can boast about for programs that are tightly integrated to its > system, are available for any version of Windows and work mostly out of > the box with minimal changes *if* any are needed at all. Yes, but at the moment, I am manually saving ports/packages from my Windows Box on CD then put this into my BSD CDROM & installing from there - if I am lucky & they are packages, then its fast & simple - if its installing ports, then its slow, time consuming & prone to getting errors! Like trying to install something as simple as xfce, then having to go back & get the dependencies... ahhh - Multiply that by 10 apps - back & forth ... > If the FreeBSD ports don't meet your special requirements, because their > limitations block you from doing things the way you like them done, you > can always download the source of Apache, mod_perl, mod_ssl, php or any > other programs you wish to install and follow the build instructions > contained therein. I tried that first & when that didn't work, I went to the ports. When that failed, I went to the Packages. When that failed.... I became Mr Grumpy.... > When you don't know how to do something, this list is the place to ask. When I try my next install(its now 2.00am), I will report back my findings... in more detail! > you still haven't mentioned what the exact nature of those problems was. .. will get back in an hour or so when I try another install > > - with FreeBSD & Windows 2000 installed on the SAME computer, the GUI > > of Windows 2000 is MUCH faster than any of the BSD window managers > > That's in vivid contrast to the general feeling of "speed" that > thousands of FreeBSD users have reported so far. > > Actually, fvwm2 can be shown to have a very small memory footprint and > still a usable look that doesn't lack some of the nice features of > Windows 9x. I've even seen themes of fvwm2 that resemble and mimic the > Windows XP look without requiring 128 MB of system memory just to get > started. I'm not sure why you claim that Windows is faster/lighter but > if you do have raw numbers to back your claim up I'd be interested to > see them. Raw numbers no... just sitting in front of the BSD screen counting the seconds.. wondering how people use this OS - then I do a reboot & select WIN2000 & can't believe the difference. If you want, when I have time, I could take an mpg of it & upload it for all ?? > I've been using windowmaker and fvwm2 for more than 8 years now and I > can tell you that their configurability is almost unsurpassed, their > look can be tweaked and changed to resemble almost anything and their > speed is so good that I can no longer work on Windows machines without > feeling I'm being constantly slowed down by the system's GUI flaws. I got fvwm2 to run. How to get it to look like a Windows 2000/XP set up... I could NOT get it to work!! I D/L the files below but could not install them(can't work out where they are supposed to go ???) "fvwm2 configured to look very much like Windows XP" screenshot - http://xwinman.org/screenshots/fvwm2-horen.jpg configuration files - http://xwinman.org/screenshots/fvwm2-config-horen.tar.gz icons - http://xwinman.org/screenshots/fvwm2-icons-horen.tar.gz > Be patient! I will try :) > Nobody learns how to install, configure, use & hack a new system in an afternoon's time no... 6 days, that should be more than enough... I mastered windows 95 in 1 > > - No default GUI File Explorer (excluding KDE/GNOME, not that there's > > is usable) - had to install xfe on wmaker(still about as useless as > > Windows 3.1 File Manager) > > That's because you're still bound to old habits. I have no use for > slow, GUI monsters that require me to point and click for every little > detail of what I want to do. MS GUI's shows more detailed information to me than simple cmd line responses for info .. not sure how you see Windows 2000 Explorer as slow... > When you do spend some time with FreeBSD though and try to learn some of > the commands available to the command line user, you might be surprised > at the power that is hidden under the hood in any *real* UNIX system. > > But let's leave this for the future to show. I am interested to see this ... > > - FreeBSD does NOT Default Mount my CD & Floppy(this is ridiculous - > > even MS DOS NOT to mention Windows 3.1 [Year 1990... ring a bell] did > > this!!) > > There is a reason why it's not enabled by default, but if you really, > absolutely *MUST* enable it, it's described in the documentation. You > could always search for it yourself or ask on this list for details, > pointers and/or help with your setup. I can mount my Floppy when I run gluggy KDE, but under Wmaker, I type: mount -v -t msdos /dev/fd0c /mnt ... and this says its mounted but when I go into xfe.. I cannot see a floppy directory with files ??? ... any hints at to what could be wrong ??? When I figure this out, then I will like to automount ... any Q&D config hints ??? > > - 300 Million Users of Windows thinks so ;)) (BTW: I am NOT including > > KDE/GNOME) > > Honestly, I'd be very curious to see where you got that number from. Read it in a Forbes article.. but a gestimate would be: USA/Canada 90 Million Europe 90 Million China 30 Million India 30 Million Rest of Asia 10 Russia 25 Million Rest Eastern Countries 25 Million This would inlcude company/univeristy workstation, computer legal/illegal copies ... ohh didn't even include the Middle East... > Oh, but there *is* such functionality. You just didn't look hard enough > to find it (sic). The command for searching your disk is, very > unsurprisingly, called "find". Read its manual page with: > > man find will look into that ... > The FreeBSD Handbook is linked from the documentation pages of FreeBSD > at `http://www.FreeBSD.org/docs.html'. One of the first things > described in the Handbook, in great detail, including screenshots that > will assist you during the installation. I agree, that installation was easy, except for the damage its done to my partitions I have Windows 2000(primary P) & BSD(primary P) When I run partition magic in Win2000, its says that I have a BAD partition. Doing some searching, found that BSD messes up something with the sizes of the geometry of the selected partitions(slices) - still don't know how to fix this ??? > Did you try reading the "installation" chapter of the Handbook? Did you > look for any other sort of documentation that would help you get started > with FreeBSD? I read the installation chapter then: 2 FreeBSD Books I have + FreeBSD Documentation · FAQ · Handbook · Manual pages · For Newbies + Google > It's easy to install fully functional, complete desktops like KDE or > GNOME from the installation CD-ROMs. Refer to the installation > instructions on your CD-ROM disk (there should be a file called > INSTALL.TXT with a lot of help about the installation itself) or to the > online documentation I mentioned earlier for details. I don't want a bloated desktop install like KDE(see beginning email) > > I cannot tell you the shock & disappointment I had in finding out that > > Windows 2000 runs FASTER than FreeBSD with any GUI/Windows > > Manager/Desktop Environment ... :((( > > I don't really think so, but you're entitled to your own, personal > opinion. Since you're not mentioning why you think that this is so, > I'll have to answer with just a simple phrase: "not really". I replied to "Remko Lodder" same subject post & I said there the different speeds I was getting > It is obvious that you're tired, angry and totally pissed off. > > Take your time. Relax a bit, and start over. I will try to relax... thnks > This time, please, read the installation instructions carefully. Try to > understand what is being said, and if you don't ask. Send mail to this > list with your questions and I'll be one of the first to answer. I will try again & again.... until I get this right.... > I hope you have better luck the second time you try :-) Try 6th > Whenever you face problems like this one, that seem impossibly difficult > for a FreeBSD newcomer, don't hesitate to ask. > > There are no stupid questions. There are, however, many knowledgeable > and helpful people on this list. thnx ... I will report back then with any problem I encounter on my next try :) Kind Regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:43:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C0116A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:43:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from raptor.cigb.edu.cu (raptor.cigb.edu.cu [200.55.134.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1FE43D2D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu) Received: from atlas.cigb.edu.cu ([172.16.1.12]) by raptor.cigb.edu.cu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:43:03 -0400 Received: from Unknown [172.16.1.4] by atlas.cigb.edu.cu - SurfControl E-mail Filter (4.6); Wednesday, 28 July 2004, 11:44:11 Received: from [172.16.11.106] ([172.16.11.106]) by mercurio.cigb.edu.cu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:44:09 -0400 Message-ID: <200407281144.20839.osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu> From: Osmany Guirola Cruz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:44:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2004 15:44:09.0535 (UTC) FILETIME=[B908CCF0:01C474B9] References: <20040728073411.74741.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Organization: CIGB User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Subject: ports update problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:43:30 -0000 Hi people i am updating my ports via CTM i have the Empty ctm and did ctm -v ports-cur.5300xEmpty.gz without problem and then do the same with the ctm short files .... after that i did a portsdb -uU but now i can not install any port these are the errors when i do portinstall mono /usr/ports/INDEX:1:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. ............................................ /usr/ports/INDEX:11414:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. /usr/ports/INDEX:11415:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. /usr/ports/INDEX:11416:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. /usr/ports/INDEX:11417:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. /usr/ports/INDEX:11418:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. /usr/ports/INDEX:11419:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. /usr/ports/INDEX:11420:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. /usr/ports/INDEX:11421:Port info line must consist of 10 fields. /usr/ports/INDEX:11422:Port info line must consist of 10 fields another "funny" thing is with barry, whe i use barry i see this in the console %barry make: cannot open /Mk/bsd.port.mk. barry: WARNING: Key ?accessibility not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. %barry: WARNING: Key ?arabic not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?archivers not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?astro not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?audio not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?benchmarks not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?biology not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?cad not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?chinese not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?comms not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?converters not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?databases not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?deskutils not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?devel not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?dns not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?editors not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?emulators not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?finance not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?french not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?ftp not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?games not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?german not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?graphics not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?hebrew not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?hungarian not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?irc not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?japanese not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?java not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?korean not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?lang not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?mail not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?math not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?mbone not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?misc not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?multimedia not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?net not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?net-mgmt not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?news not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?palm not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?picobsd not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?polish not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?portuguese not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?print not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?russian not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?science not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?security not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?shells not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?sysutils not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?textproc not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?ukrainian not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?vietnamese not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?www not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?x11 not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?x11-clocks not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?x11-fm not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?x11-fonts not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?x11-servers not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?x11-themes not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?x11-toolkits not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. barry: WARNING: Key ?x11-wm not found in database /usr/ports//INDEX.db. WHere is the problem??HELP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:48:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E159316A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:48:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51703.mail.yahoo.com (web51703.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.221]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4941843D70 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:48:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from washville2003@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040728164802.52346.qmail@web51703.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.201.214.1] by web51703.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:48:02 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:48:02 -0700 (PDT) From: samy lancher To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: ata1: resetting devices ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:48:04 -0000 Hello All, This morning I have seen the following log message on my FreeBSD 4.7 server. ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device done. I would really appreciate if someone could tell me the cause for this message and is there something to worry about the server?. Thanks in advance. Thanks, Naveen. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:58:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E284316A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:58:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897BB43D53 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:58:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdjunkie@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 76so61123rnl for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.56 with SMTP id w56mr492501rna; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:58:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <32ab229c04072809585cf7aef6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:58:30 -0600 From: Gordon Freeman To: "konstantin.nizhegorodov@ru.abb.com" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB APC UPS support in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:58:32 -0000 apcupsd was written for Linux and it doesn't work with USB UPS devices on FreeBSD due to the hefty differences in the USB implementation between Linux and FreeBSD. The last time I looked there weren't any USB based UPS monitoring services for FreeBSD. On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:02:10 +1100, konstantin.nizhegorodov@ru.abb.com wrote: > Hello, > sorry if it is wrong place to address this issue to... > Could anybody port apcupsd daemon or something else on FreeBSD to support > APC UPS USB connection? > Or is it already done? > > Regards, > Konstantin Nizhegorodov. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:59:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8029416A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:59:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from parrot.aev.net (host29-15.pool8174.interbusiness.it [81.74.15.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC1143D58 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:59:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-149-59.38-151.net24.it [151.38.59.149]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6SH0gc6053807 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:00:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from mailer (xanatar.ventu [10.1.2.6]) by soth.ventu (8.13.0/8.12.10) with SMTP id i6SGw3FK023282 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:58:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-Id: <200407281658.i6SGw3FK023282@soth.ventu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Post Road Mailer for OS/2 (Green Edition Ver 3.0) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:58:06 EST From: Andrea Venturoli X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 Subject: No answer send-pr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrea Venturoli List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:59:16 -0000 Hello. I wrapped up a small port and submitted it with send-pr. However (after maybe a couple week) I don't see it in the list of upcoming ports, nor did I get any answer. IIRC I should get an automated message, just to inform me that my report was received... is it so? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 16:59:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B08B16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:59:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E083843D49 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:59:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.104.195.124]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040728165844.INGA6195.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:58:45 +0100 Received: from scott by llama.fishballoon.org with local (Exim 4.40 (FreeBSD)) id 1Bprlv-000Lcz-B9; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:59:19 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:59:19 +0100 From: Scott Mitchell To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20040728165918.GA82093@llama.fishballoon.org> References: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C10C7@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> <20040726230518.GA97334@tao.thought.org> <20040727005551.GA97598@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040727005551.GA97598@tao.thought.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p4 i386 Sender: Scott Mitchell cc: FreeBSD Mailing List cc: "Hauan, David" Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:59:21 -0000 On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 05:55:51PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > To reply to my last post: no joy. I tried no kernel config, > just selected irq3 and the Default card addr of 0x0000. > The installation floppies recognized the card and said it > was initializing things, but same results: I would up > with only slip and ppp choices. > > I tried the full-screen intall option next. Xircon ("xe") > was't among the drivers in the Network list. Is there a > way of installing the xe driver from floppy? What exact Xircom card is this? The xe driver only knows about the older Xircom PCMCIA cards. Some of their CardBus adapters are (I believe) handled by the dc driver. Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 17:09:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA3B16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:09:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E10943D1D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])i6SH9Ndo025778; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:09:23 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) i6SHAAug086580; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:10:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)i6SHAA4M086579; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:10:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:10:10 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: DK Message-ID: <20040728171010.GA86397@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <41079361.50409@elvandar.org> <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> cc: Remko Lodder cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:09:32 -0000 On 2004-07-28 07:28, DK wrote: > --- Remko Lodder wrote: > > > eg: ONE Package(NOT an array of messy Ports) > > > > It works absolutly fine, i dont think we want one big package for > > everything, then it would be like rpm and FreeBSD imo does not want to > > follow Redhat and such. Oh and that requires a lot of disks for > > installing, Suse anyone? (DVD or six seven CD's?). > > 6 CD's for what ??? An OS with a FAST GUI/File Manager/FindFiles/Editor + Web Server > ... more like 350MB ;) then add 250MB for Office :)) That's the route some Linux distributions have been going down. Please, bear in mind while your're trying to set up FreeBSD, that FreeBSD is thankfully not like these Linux distributions. It's not even a Linux distribution at all, but a BSD system. > > As said, read the documentation , or learn to search, since if you did > > that and installd apache with modssl included. And you would have > > searched you would have come across mod_perl and even mod_php, which is > > apxs'ed into the apache library stuff and can be used within 'seconds'. > > whats apxs'ed short for ?? Apache server extensions that do not need to be linked to your Web server at build time, but can be loaded at run-time as modules. > Refreshing the system without a reboot is a Priority in front of > Automount ?? nice one developers... > & windows 2000 doesn't have a nice SMP ... that's news to my DUAL 1 > Ghz Pentium III system at home I use as a workstation I don't know about that. I've only worked with non-SMP systems so far. Perhaps Remko was overreacting to your overreaction ;-) > .. I know its hard for people to swallow, but MS Windows IS easier to > use than BSD/Linux/OSX ... thats WHY its the most widely > used.... regardless of marketing/costs etc ... Yes, I know. Windows is easier. Thanks, I won't buy! Do you want to come at home and explain what is easy about Windows to my sister who's been fighting with DVD playback on Windows XP for more than a month now, who wasted precious exam-period time to troubleshoot and solve Powerpoint and Word problems? > Gnome starts faster than Windows ?? Start time is not important - I am > talking about reaction time of the GUI - Menu's apearing, moving > icons, applications appearing etc - Start-time *IS* important and I don't know why you want to present it like something totally unimportant. Perhaps because it suits your bragging about the "speed" of Windows? I'm not sure :-( Reaction-time that you mention above is something that depends on a lot of subjective factors, on the themes you have selected, on the load of the machine at the time and a host of other things. Can you describe the setup of the machine at the time you measured this "reaction time" that bothered you and the tests you did to measure it? > Working with Fedora at Uni (Yes, I am doing a Masters) the other day, > its on a 50 Node Cluster - Its running on systems faster than what I > have at home(above), yet feels like its as gluggy as Windows 95! - > nice one Linux FreeBSD is not Linux. Sorry, you'd have to complain to the Fedora people for any problems you have with their slow monster of an RPM-beast. Yes, I hate working on Fedora too, and I avoid it like hell. But that has nothing to do with the way FreeBSD works or what it can do :) > As for XFCE, how do you start it from the .xinitrc The XFCE Homepage > site says "exec startxfce4" - but that didn't work for me ?? The X11 desktop is described in detail in "The X Window System", a chapter of the FreeBSD Handbook. This chapter contains a lot of useful information for people who are new to X11. Please do read it. There is even a section in that chapter that describes XFCE4 and the steps that you need to take to install it and start it. I'm sure you'll find it very helpful. As usual, if you have comments, suggestions or complaints about the document, you can always contact the FreeBSD Documentation Team as described in the bottom of every documentation page. Point your favorite browser to http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11.html and happy reading :-) > Whats the purpose of having to manually set the system to automount ?? > as opposed to having it as a system install default ?? if there is an > advantage, I am sure its for the 0.01% of the user base It's more in the range of 99.9%. Automounting can be annoying like hell when you happen to accidentally insert media in your drives. It can also be insecure if you don't want anyone to use the machine you've installed to mount CD-ROMs, floppies or other media of their choise. Instead of leaving *all* the users exposed to risks like this, which is the usual Windows philosophy of doing stuff, FreeBSD has the capability to automount media but keeps it disabled by default. Is it so hard to edit a text file like rc.conf and add a simple line like this? amd_enable="YES" Do you really mean that this is so much harder to do than fumble and fight with multiple dialogs, which you have to remember by heart of course, just to find that disabling automounting is impossible (unless you download TweakMyRegistry version 95.3.2000.13.27 paying careful attention to the version numbers because the wrong version can mess up your entire system with a single click)? I somehow doubt it ;-) > - sorry, I wasn't clear above - For the lack of a GUI Find Files > option, I meant the default install or with Window Managers(wmaker), > not the Desktop Environments like KDE/Gnome(which are also > fast... NOT) - which I don't use as they are slow As I wrote before, there's always "find". > - installable YES, configurable ... you've got to be shitting me :o Not really. But even if we provided examples of this configurability you wouldn't accept them as valid examples because they wouldn't be point and click on some wimpy dialog-based wizard, right? > - start the GUI - oops some doc reading here(easy+1) > - while in wmaker, dynamically change the Montior settings from > 1600x1200 32b to 1028x768 24b (wouldn't have a clue - off to the docs > - manually edit configuration files ?? - then restart - but what is > the correct horizontal frequency OR vertical refresh(hard++) - I don't > know & I don't want to know(hey while I am at it, why don't I start > designing my own CPU)... that's why people use Windows(easy to > configure) You don't really need to know or provide all of these details. I just updated my system to use X.org the new X11 ports of FreeBSD from XFree86 4.3 that I used to have before. Running the xorgcfg utility that the documentation of X.org mentions and running it only *once* I generated an /etc/X11/xorg.conf file that was essentially the same as the one I had before. So I went ahead and deleted the new X11 configuration file. Surprise! The new X11 servers worked like a charm with my old config. Which doesn't specify a refresh rate, mind you! > I played with BSD back in 1997 & thought it needed some work.. so I > gave it a miss.. Fast Forward to 2004, & all I see are developers > adding features that are not that important, yet missing the basics of > what the majority of USER's want(not coders) This statement is just too general to even attempt to reply to. > ...XPde seem to have the right idea... looks promising... hope the GUI > reaction time is fast I'll ask yet one more time. Are you sure that XPde is faster than, say, windowmaker running with a simple theme? Or are you saying this just because it catters to your need to "look" at something that resembles Windows XP because you're afraid of changing the way you think about a desktop? > that reminds me of my Java Lecturer (I hate Java BTW) in which every > time students had a problem, he would never look at the code but just > reply "check out the java docs.. its all in there" ... yea right ... One of the features of Open Source projects that keep them apart from the commercial world of Windows is exactly this sort of thing: it's all in the documentation. We don't need to hide anything from you to protect our intellectual "property" or "assets". I'm not sure why you're saying "yea right" above :-/ > Benchmarks - How about FreeBSD+wmaker(GUI) & Windows 2000 installed on > EXACTLY the same box. Any person standing next to me could see which > is faster > Windows 2000 GUI - Much faster than Wmaker > Loading/Using Notepad/Wordpad - Much faster than Nedit > Windows Explorer - Heaps faster than xfe Windows 2000 GUI is faster than windowmaker? Now that's news. I've seen this "fast" 2000 GUI crawl almost to a halt because someone else is copying a large directory tree over the network. I've also seen windowmaker fly on a Pentium 200 with 64 MB of RAM while I was updating a huge checkout from a CVS server, over the network too. Are you sure there's nothing wrong with your BSD setup? You should also note than nedit is not the "Notepad" of X11. The features of Nedit are much much better and innumerable compared to the lack of features of Notepad. Highlighting, configurable TAB size, wrapping and block-mode editing are just a few that I remember now. Even if nedit takes 1 second more than Notepad to load, its wealth of features is more than ample reward to me. If you want to compare Notepad to an X11 editor, you should probably compare it to 'xedit' and that would probably be an insult to the features of xedit ;-) I won't comment on the Windows Explorer stuff because your postings to the list start looking like a troll attempt, since you haven't provided any details on the setup of your BSD system but keep dismissing all the efforts of mine and others to help you set it up and configure it as irrelevant "because BSD sucks so much when compared to Windows". > There is nothing wrong with the docs regarding installing/using BSD - > docs are fine :) But you haven't provided any solid proof of having read any of it, except a single URL in one of your posts that wasn't even one of the documents at www.FreeBSD.org :-/ > In the year 2004, I refuse to spend my time coding in front of a > screen hacking in "cmd line syntax".. hey thats just me! Then it is possible that BSD is not for you. You seem to be fixed in your ways and solid as a rock in refusing anything that is not Windows. Sorry, but we can't help you with that. Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 17:10:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0201416A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:10:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D6343D5F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:10:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 20374 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2004 17:03:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 17:03:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93752135; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:10:13 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (it.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38934-06; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:10:13 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 348BC2B; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:10:13 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:10:12 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Andrea Venturoli Message-Id: <20040728201012.05ae427b@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <200407281658.i6SGw3FK023282@soth.ventu> References: <200407281658.i6SGw3FK023282@soth.ventu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No answer send-pr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:10:16 -0000 [ 72 chars / line, please ] On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:58:06 EST Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I wrapped up a small port and submitted it with send-pr. However > (after maybe a couple week) I don't see it in the list of upcoming > ports, nor did I get any answer. IIRC I should get an automated > message, just to inform me that my report was received... is it so? Yes, you should. Try the PR database web interface and see if you PR got there; if not, submit it again. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?query -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 17:15:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8440516A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:15:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5ob2.obsmtp.com [12.158.34.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C36AE43D69 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:15:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hakim.Singhji@nychhc.org) Received: from source ([207.127.241.11]) by exprod5ob2.obsmtp.com ([12.158.34.250]) with SMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:15:39 PDT Received: from NYC-HHC-MTA by gwia.nychhc.org with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:15:38 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:15:09 -0400 X-Mailer: Groupwise 6.5 Message-ID: <20040728T131509Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> From: Hakim Singhji To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="____PYPUQIQTKNKAHWVGCFCO____" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: HOWTO Ping LAN??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:15:41 -0000 --____PYPUQIQTKNKAHWVGCFCO____ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, Many of you have seen my posts lately, I'm a noobie to FreeBSD. I'm = trying to configure a home "Windows Free" home network complete with = default gateway, LAN, Wireless 802.11b and several flavors of Linux/BSD. Its a pretty big project for me and is teaching me ALOT. However I have a = test setup and I'm am not able to ping my local machine. I can only ping = my gateway. My local machine is enabled to receive FTP, PING and SSH. In = addition the firewall on my default gateway is also configured to operate = those services. I don't know where I''ve gone wrong, my default gateway works fine = however...I cannot find my network from the outside. What is the = problem??? Thanks in advance for all your help. HZS Hakim Z. Singhji Coordinating Mgr. / Infection Control 718-245-3923 hakim.singhji@nychhc.org --____PYPUQIQTKNKAHWVGCFCO____ Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIILQwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIILNDCCCzACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCCCSQw ggKsMIICFaADAgECAgMMuKcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoT HFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA0MDcyMDEzMzU1NFoXDTA1MDcyMDEzMzU1NFowgYcxEDAO BgNVBAQTB1NpbmdoamkxDjAMBgNVBCoTBUhha2ltMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1IYWtpbSBTaW5naGppMScw JQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhhoYWtpbS5zaW5naGppQG55Y2hoYy5vcmcxIjAgBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWE3Np bmdoamloQG55Y2hoYy5vcmcwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAPJoZoR/CSJZ9Tt0 wmyG2WqsUMNU3JVAPc7WK0B3bxChEcOI/WbIBhuDDHtaqBe/5QoYBmcHe6cA6u3yNjP3cm+A56aX 85+Y/pcRpClPLR/DOALlyANabq8UQ25pBziaJFpNFav+unPMKq56Vw9vPv7Ya1aevZRzAuUimn5n 8D4hAgMBAAGjSjBIMDgGA1UdEQQxMC+BGGhha2ltLnNpbmdoamlAbnljaGhjLm9yZ4ETc2luZ2hq aWhAbnljaGhjLm9yZzAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBADLwUJHcKv9hgmb4 YtT6wYzAWj1cAJhMCBODfNccxiEYqVrudtbnzQCwvWzRf5CpZOv2Z+lPeTKli+dmfkRv99/qpVl8 4kdrnKD6fqcN5ogfW7vRuRP7dIw53XKkkoaJYbsUOyvGIaBuTJTul2Tijl4q2zyxI7xQue9URGo7 UwgmMIIDLTCCApagAwIBAgIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNV BAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29u c3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UE AxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1m cmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTk2MDEwMTAwMDAwMFoXDTIwMTIzMTIzNTk1OVowgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAw gYkCgYEA1GnX1LCUZFtx6UfYDFG26nKRsIRefS0Nj3sS34UldSh0OkIsYyeflXtL734Zhx2G6qPd uc6WZBrCFG5ErHzmj+hND3EfQDimAKOHePb5lIZererAXnbr2RSjXW56fAylS1V/Bhkpf56aJtVq uzgkCGqYx7Hao5iR/Xnb5VrEHLkCAwEAAaMTMBEwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQQFAAOBgQDH7JJ+Tvj1lqVnYiqk8E0RYNBvjWBYYawmu1I1XAjPMPuoSpaKH2JCI4wXD/S6ZJwX rEcp352YXtJsYHFcoqzceePnbgBHH7UNKOgCneSa/RP0ptl8sfjcXyMmCZGAc9AUG95DqYMl8uac LxXK/qarigd1iwzdUYRr5PjRzneigTCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdEx CzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEa MBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2Vydmlj ZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqG SIb3DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAwMDBaFw0x MzA3MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAo UHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCB nzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me7L3N9Vvy Gna9fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r1fOCdz0D viv+uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCBkTASBgNV HRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhhd3RlLmNvbS9U aGF3dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNVHREEIjAgpB4wHDEa MBgGA1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPqCy7MDaNm rGcPf6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUaC4J0niVQ lGLH2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx0x1G/11f ZU8xggHnMIIB4wIBATBpMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGlu ZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBD QQIDDLinMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCggdUwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDQwNzI4MTMxNTA3WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUXZsMOAq3++OfCXdVgXe4Kk8O4rww dgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMWkwZzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgIC AIAwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwQwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICATgwBwYF Kw4DAhowDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYCP/JOSS8KGG5KO2RzQlsH0wnF33gbgTpnqBN0aCP39YTU/ fvq0sLxLXrjwDuNtxajctcZfPnqf1jPhALALVTUMApQfBGPHU178Va6IvOg3lUF+Re3n6/R3Cb/w 0CcExaa6RwRzHiHOgazBR9z6CS1RL8VmqE3lf6oTlWvCS7SMVg== --____PYPUQIQTKNKAHWVGCFCO____-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 17:27:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708B716A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:27:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4082443D53 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:27:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AE969A39; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:27:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:26:59 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Hakim Singhji Message-Id: <20040728132659.2f368ade.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728T131509Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> References: <20040728T131509Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HOWTO Ping LAN??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:27:01 -0000 PLEASE wrap your lines. I'm not interested in fixing obnoxious email formatting any more. See http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Hakim Singhji wrote: > Hi All, > > Many of you have seen my posts lately, I'm a noobie to FreeBSD. I'm trying > to configure a home "Windows Free" home network complete with default > gateway, LAN, Wireless 802.11b and several flavors of Linux/BSD. > > Its a pretty big project for me and is teaching me ALOT. However I have a > test setup and I'm am not able to ping my local machine. I can only ping > my gateway. My local machine is enabled to receive FTP, PING and SSH. In > addition the firewall on my default gateway is also configured to operate > those services. > > I don't know where I''ve gone wrong, my default gateway works fine > however...I cannot find my network from the outside. What is the problem??? > Thanks in advance for all your help. Do you have _real_ IPs? Most people only get one real IP from their ISP, and then use "private" IPs (such as 192.168.0.x or 10.0.0.x) for the rest of their machines. If you're doing such, you'll either need exciting nat rules on the gateway, or some other workaround. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 17:30:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C771416A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:30:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9649E43D3F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:30:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garciarojas@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so4681821cwb for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.116.63 with SMTP id o63mr122412cwc; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <397b2cad04072810303137069a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:30:14 -0500 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Guillermo_Garc=EDa-Rojas?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040728171010.GA86397@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <41079361.50409@elvandar.org> <20040728171010.GA86397@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Subject: Re: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:30:15 -0000 Ok, this is mi case: I have an old Pentium-MMX 200 Mhz and 40Mb RAM, 1 Gb HD. Can you put Windows 2000 on it? I don't think so. It's running OpenBSD 3.5, it can run FreeBSD too. This machine is my DHCP server for 9 machines and gives them internet access, it does NAT too. Did I mention I have no monitor??? I do not need it, so I do not need a GUI Can you live without your Windows 2000 GUI? Can you work without it? What if some big company ask you to work for them, but they have UNIX systems, are you prepared or can you handle that work? One more thing, my OpenBSD 3.5 costs me $0, FreeBSD price is $0 too. Did you spend the same amount of money on your Windows 2000?? Regards! On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:10:10 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2004-07-28 07:28, DK wrote: > > --- Remko Lodder wrote: > > > > eg: ONE Package(NOT an array of messy Ports) > > > > > > It works absolutly fine, i dont think we want one big package for > > > everything, then it would be like rpm and FreeBSD imo does not want t= o > > > follow Redhat and such. Oh and that requires a lot of disks for > > > installing, Suse anyone? (DVD or six seven CD's?). > > > > 6 CD's for what ??? An OS with a FAST GUI/File Manager/FindFiles/Editor= + Web Server > > ... more like 350MB ;) then add 250MB for Office :)) >=20 > That's the route some Linux distributions have been going down. >=20 > Please, bear in mind while your're trying to set up FreeBSD, that > FreeBSD is thankfully not like these Linux distributions. It's not even > a Linux distribution at all, but a BSD system. >=20 > > > As said, read the documentation , or learn to search, since if you di= d > > > that and installd apache with modssl included. And you would have > > > searched you would have come across mod_perl and even mod_php, which = is > > > apxs'ed into the apache library stuff and can be used within 'seconds= '. > > > > whats apxs'ed short for ?? >=20 > Apache server extensions that do not need to be linked to your Web > server at build time, but can be loaded at run-time as modules. >=20 > > Refreshing the system without a reboot is a Priority in front of > > Automount ?? nice one developers... >=20 > > & windows 2000 doesn't have a nice SMP ... that's news to my DUAL 1 > > Ghz Pentium III system at home I use as a workstation >=20 > I don't know about that. I've only worked with non-SMP systems so far. > Perhaps Remko was overreacting to your overreaction ;-) >=20 > > .. I know its hard for people to swallow, but MS Windows IS easier to > > use than BSD/Linux/OSX ... thats WHY its the most widely > > used.... regardless of marketing/costs etc ... >=20 > Yes, I know. Windows is easier. Thanks, I won't buy! >=20 > Do you want to come at home and explain what is easy about Windows to my > sister who's been fighting with DVD playback on Windows XP for more than > a month now, who wasted precious exam-period time to troubleshoot and > solve Powerpoint and Word problems? >=20 > > Gnome starts faster than Windows ?? Start time is not important - I am > > talking about reaction time of the GUI - Menu's apearing, moving > > icons, applications appearing etc - >=20 > Start-time *IS* important and I don't know why you want to present it > like something totally unimportant. Perhaps because it suits your > bragging about the "speed" of Windows? I'm not sure :-( >=20 > Reaction-time that you mention above is something that depends on a lot > of subjective factors, on the themes you have selected, on the load of > the machine at the time and a host of other things. Can you describe > the setup of the machine at the time you measured this "reaction time" > that bothered you and the tests you did to measure it? >=20 > > Working with Fedora at Uni (Yes, I am doing a Masters) the other day, > > its on a 50 Node Cluster - Its running on systems faster than what I > > have at home(above), yet feels like its as gluggy as Windows 95! - > > nice one Linux >=20 > FreeBSD is not Linux. Sorry, you'd have to complain to the Fedora > people for any problems you have with their slow monster of an > RPM-beast. >=20 > Yes, I hate working on Fedora too, and I avoid it like hell. But that > has nothing to do with the way FreeBSD works or what it can do :) >=20 > > As for XFCE, how do you start it from the .xinitrc The XFCE Homepage > > site says "exec startxfce4" - but that didn't work for me ?? >=20 > The X11 desktop is described in detail in "The X Window System", a > chapter of the FreeBSD Handbook. This chapter contains a lot of useful > information for people who are new to X11. Please do read it. >=20 > There is even a section in that chapter that describes XFCE4 and the > steps that you need to take to install it and start it. I'm sure you'll > find it very helpful. >=20 > As usual, if you have comments, suggestions or complaints about the > document, you can always contact the FreeBSD Documentation Team as > described in the bottom of every documentation page. >=20 > Point your favorite browser to >=20 > http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11.html >=20 > and happy reading :-) >=20 > > Whats the purpose of having to manually set the system to automount ?? > > as opposed to having it as a system install default ?? if there is an > > advantage, I am sure its for the 0.01% of the user base >=20 > It's more in the range of 99.9%. Automounting can be annoying like hell > when you happen to accidentally insert media in your drives. It can > also be insecure if you don't want anyone to use the machine you've > installed to mount CD-ROMs, floppies or other media of their choise. >=20 > Instead of leaving *all* the users exposed to risks like this, which is > the usual Windows philosophy of doing stuff, FreeBSD has the capability > to automount media but keeps it disabled by default. >=20 > Is it so hard to edit a text file like rc.conf and add a simple line > like this? >=20 > amd_enable=3D"YES" >=20 > Do you really mean that this is so much harder to do than fumble and > fight with multiple dialogs, which you have to remember by heart of > course, just to find that disabling automounting is impossible (unless > you download TweakMyRegistry version 95.3.2000.13.27 paying careful > attention to the version numbers because the wrong version can mess up > your entire system with a single click)? >=20 > I somehow doubt it ;-) >=20 > > - sorry, I wasn't clear above - For the lack of a GUI Find Files > > option, I meant the default install or with Window Managers(wmaker), > > not the Desktop Environments like KDE/Gnome(which are also > > fast... NOT) - which I don't use as they are slow >=20 > As I wrote before, there's always "find". >=20 > > - installable YES, configurable ... you've got to be shitting me :o >=20 > Not really. But even if we provided examples of this configurability > you wouldn't accept them as valid examples because they wouldn't be > point and click on some wimpy dialog-based wizard, right? >=20 > > - start the GUI - oops some doc reading here(easy+1) >=20 > > - while in wmaker, dynamically change the Montior settings from > > 1600x1200 32b to 1028x768 24b (wouldn't have a clue - off to the docs > > - manually edit configuration files ?? - then restart - but what is > > the correct horizontal frequency OR vertical refresh(hard++) - I don't > > know & I don't want to know(hey while I am at it, why don't I start > > designing my own CPU)... that's why people use Windows(easy to > > configure) >=20 > You don't really need to know or provide all of these details. I just > updated my system to use X.org the new X11 ports of FreeBSD from XFree86 > 4.3 that I used to have before. >=20 > Running the xorgcfg utility that the documentation of X.org mentions and > running it only *once* I generated an /etc/X11/xorg.conf file that was > essentially the same as the one I had before. So I went ahead and > deleted the new X11 configuration file. >=20 > Surprise! The new X11 servers worked like a charm with my old config. > Which doesn't specify a refresh rate, mind you! >=20 > > I played with BSD back in 1997 & thought it needed some work.. so I > > gave it a miss.. Fast Forward to 2004, & all I see are developers > > adding features that are not that important, yet missing the basics of > > what the majority of USER's want(not coders) >=20 > This statement is just too general to even attempt to reply to. >=20 > > ...XPde seem to have the right idea... looks promising... hope the GUI > > reaction time is fast >=20 > I'll ask yet one more time. Are you sure that XPde is faster than, say, > windowmaker running with a simple theme? Or are you saying this just > because it catters to your need to "look" at something that resembles > Windows XP because you're afraid of changing the way you think about a > desktop? >=20 > > that reminds me of my Java Lecturer (I hate Java BTW) in which every > > time students had a problem, he would never look at the code but just > > reply "check out the java docs.. its all in there" ... yea right ... >=20 > One of the features of Open Source projects that keep them apart from > the commercial world of Windows is exactly this sort of thing: it's all > in the documentation. We don't need to hide anything from you to > protect our intellectual "property" or "assets". >=20 > I'm not sure why you're saying "yea right" above :-/ >=20 > > Benchmarks - How about FreeBSD+wmaker(GUI) & Windows 2000 installed on > > EXACTLY the same box. Any person standing next to me could see which > > is faster > > Windows 2000 GUI - Much faster than Wmaker > > Loading/Using Notepad/Wordpad - Much faster than Nedit > > Windows Explorer - Heaps faster than xfe >=20 > Windows 2000 GUI is faster than windowmaker? Now that's news. >=20 > I've seen this "fast" 2000 GUI crawl almost to a halt because someone > else is copying a large directory tree over the network. I've also seen > windowmaker fly on a Pentium 200 with 64 MB of RAM while I was updating > a huge checkout from a CVS server, over the network too. >=20 > Are you sure there's nothing wrong with your BSD setup? >=20 > You should also note than nedit is not the "Notepad" of X11. The > features of Nedit are much much better and innumerable compared to the > lack of features of Notepad. Highlighting, configurable TAB size, > wrapping and block-mode editing are just a few that I remember now. > Even if nedit takes 1 second more than Notepad to load, its wealth of > features is more than ample reward to me. If you want to compare > Notepad to an X11 editor, you should probably compare it to 'xedit' and > that would probably be an insult to the features of xedit ;-) >=20 > I won't comment on the Windows Explorer stuff because your postings to > the list start looking like a troll attempt, since you haven't provided > any details on the setup of your BSD system but keep dismissing all the > efforts of mine and others to help you set it up and configure it as > irrelevant "because BSD sucks so much when compared to Windows". >=20 > > There is nothing wrong with the docs regarding installing/using BSD - > > docs are fine :) >=20 > But you haven't provided any solid proof of having read any of it, > except a single URL in one of your posts that wasn't even one of the > documents at www.FreeBSD.org :-/ >=20 > > In the year 2004, I refuse to spend my time coding in front of a > > screen hacking in "cmd line syntax".. hey thats just me! >=20 > Then it is possible that BSD is not for you. You seem to be fixed in > your ways and solid as a rock in refusing anything that is not Windows. >=20 > Sorry, but we can't help you with that. >=20 > Giorgos >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 --=20 --- Guillermo Garc=EDa Rojas Covarrubias Director General=20 SoloBSD http://www.solobsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 17:35:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C554216A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:35:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4831843D5C for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:35:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6SHYY0E058432; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:34:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6SHYXfV065683; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:34:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6SHYWAV065682; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:34:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:34:31 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Scott Mitchell Message-ID: <20040728173431.GB65532@tao.thought.org> References: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C10C7@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> <20040726230518.GA97334@tao.thought.org> <20040727005551.GA97598@tao.thought.org> <20040728165918.GA82093@llama.fishballoon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728165918.GA82093@llama.fishballoon.org> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD Mailing List cc: "Hauan, David" Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:35:17 -0000 On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 05:59:19PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 05:55:51PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > To reply to my last post: no joy. I tried no kernel config, > > just selected irq3 and the Default card addr of 0x0000. > > The installation floppies recognized the card and said it > > was initializing things, but same results: I would up > > with only slip and ppp choices. > > > > I tried the full-screen intall option next. Xircon ("xe") > > was't among the drivers in the Network list. Is there a > > way of installing the xe driver from floppy? > > What exact Xircom card is this? The xe driver only knows about the older > Xircom PCMCIA cards. Some of their CardBus adapters are (I believe) > handled by the dc driver. > I have the Xircom Ethernet II 10/100 CBE2-100 (IIRC); someone on the -mobile list said that only 5.X recognizes this card. Both a floppy install of 5.2.1 and a CDROM 5.2.1 recognize the Cardbus; but both poison almost immediately. --So, for now, I'm sticking with 4.8 and looking for a PCMCIA card that works with 4.8. gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 17:44:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D889F16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:44:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718CD43D5C for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:44:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7877B24D0FC for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:44:13 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4107E607.50709@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:44:39 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040726) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4107D053.1010206@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4107D053.1010206@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: (SOLVED) Console in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:44:22 -0000 Mark Ovens wrote: > If I put this in ~/.xinitrc > > exec startkde > /dev/console 2>&1 > > to redirect messages to the console in order to read them in xconsole, X > starts and immediately exits with the error: > > /home/mark/.xinitrc: cannot create /dev/console: permission denied > > I've uncommented this line in /etc/fbtab: > > /dev/ttyv0 0600 /dev/console > Duh! Seems you have to reboot for the changes to /etc/fbtab to take effect. It's been that long since I set it up that I'd forgotten. Sorry for the noise folks. Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 17:59:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE8016A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:59:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA0743D5F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:59:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040728175946.WPF2023.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:59:46 -0400 From: "JJB" To: "samy lancher" , Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:59:41 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040728164802.52346.qmail@web51703.mail.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: ata1: resetting devices ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:59:47 -0000 These means that you have a mismatch between the devices and the ribbon connecting them to your motherboard. Most common cause is a UDMA66 hard drive plugged into the master connector on the ribbon and a UDMA33 CDROM. The messages is telling you the IDE hard drive controller is defaulting the ribbon read/write speed to the slower speed of the CDROM. Now this is not harmful to your hardware, but does deny your server the ability to utilize the full speed potential of your hard drive. This is easily fixed by moving the CDROM drive from the slave connector on the primary IDE controller to the master commenter on the secondary IDE controller on your motherboard. This also can occur if you have two hard drives on the primary IDE controller of different speeds. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of samy lancher Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:48 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ata1: resetting devices ... Hello All, This morning I have seen the following log message on my FreeBSD 4.7 server. ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device done. I would really appreciate if someone could tell me the cause for this message and is there something to worry about the server?. Thanks in advance. Thanks, Naveen. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:01:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2477A16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:01:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F8D43D5F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:01:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6SI1CQA078371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:01:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6SI0fgC078359; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:00:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:00:41 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Cleyton Agapito Message-ID: <20040728180041.GB77702@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Cleyton Agapito , FreeBSD References: <4107BBEA.30456FF7@kftec.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hYooF8G/hrfVAmum" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4107BBEA.30456FF7@kftec.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:01:12 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: modules load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:01:24 -0000 --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:44:58AM -0300, Cleyton Agapito wrote: > Sorry if this sound stupid, but i can?t understand yet how FBSD work > with > modules. The Handbook is not so clear about what you must compile > statically in > kernel (like so difference between make and buildkernel procedures), i > suppose > that if you don?t use a feature every time it will be a module (right?), > but i?m a > little disapointed because i must load in loader.conf and they stay > there all the time > or else i can?t find the device on /dev (like fdc.ko), i thought to > unload all unused with > kldunload but it must be done one by one. > I have many others questions bsd-related like that but maybe this > is not the right place, the > FAQs are not enough to learn system and others hacker-like are so > difficult! Where can I find > a median list to ask commons operational questions? > I wonder with FBSD, it?s not so easy like linux but is very much > better (my opinion) :-) No -- it's not a stupid question at all. Some drivers have to be compiled into the kernel, others may either be compiled in or loaded as modules and there are a few proprietary drivers /only/ available as modules (the nVidia graphics driver is a good example of the latter). Some of those modules must be loaded early in the boot process -- hence you need to make an entry in loader.conf to get them loaded before the kernel really starts to boot. Others the kernel will load as it probes the hardware, and finds devices it needs to drive. Yet others can be loaded later on, even after the system has completely booted up -- in fact where this is the case you'll often find that the module will be loaded automatically for you. And just to be more confusing, the capabilities of the various drivers are being refined and extended over time, so a module in 4.x which has to be compiled in might be dynamically loadable in 5.x. Usually there will be a man page for each driver in section 4 of the manual -- eg. fdc(4) is the driver for the floppy disk controller. That, or one of the pages referenced from it, should explain how devices can be loaded: generally if it doesn't say anything along those lines, the driver may well be compiled-in only, but there's no surefire way of telling. Of course, if you are familiar with the system sources, you can just look at the source code for each driver and tell pretty quickly in what ways it can be used. The usual strategies with FreeBSD are either: 1) create your own custom kernel image, where you include the drivers you have hardware for, and exclude the rest. In this case, you wouldn't generally use loadable modules at all. 2) run using the GENERIC kernel, which has support for most common devices, and can load modules to support anything else you're likely to encounter. I've never heard of anyone trying to make a 'maximally dynamically loaded' kernel. Might be an interesting thing to try at some point. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBB+nJiD657aJF7eIRAjnoAKC1VKFaZ8f72UOuFH8Hul1iGRGqOwCghgug OP2FyyqfAHZl7CLdbt2CBvU= =+bK0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:08:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E4D16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:08:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B23A43D69 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:08:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 28974624 for multiple; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:53:07 -0700 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:08:11 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Aaron Benson" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040728130811.4cfce9ce@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <000a01c474a8$a5c86d00$6500a8c0@giga7nnxp> References: <20040725134230.22d06fad@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <000a01c474a8$a5c86d00$6500a8c0@giga7nnxp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com Subject: Re: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:08:30 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:41:55 +1000 "Aaron Benson" wrote: > Hi, > > > Centralised admin is my primary concern. User perspective is > obviously functionality. > > Anyway.... > > I've decided the best course of action to save money for the company > is to run a kickarse > Microsft 2K3 server Terminal Server, then use "SOME SORT" of ULinux > OS to run on the client machine with a compatible TS client like > rdesktop, PXES etc. possibly including a combo with LTSP, Rdesktop > and Wilisystem if I want an EPROM diskless total boot from ULinux > workstation desktop to W2K3 Terminal Server without user > interaction. Can be done using freebsd too. Look into bootp, PXE, and whatever... http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/pxe/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pxe/article.html http://www.tnpi.biz/computing/freebsd/pxe-netboot.shtml And there is even more info out there on how to do it. ;) > The question is, out of all the ULinux flavours, which one should I > run which costs nothing or very little and will last for 4-6years in > that time period? "Very little" equates to somewhat less than > running Windows XP for a similar period. You can DL freebsd and get it all working with everything you need for free. Cheaper than running WinXP is easy in this area. > Cost savings include at least virus scanners and significant patch > updates from Microsoft. Of course I'd rather update a single server > than around 500 workstations both LAN and VPN remote machines. Virus > signatures, multiple Microsoft patches etc. can be avoided. Depends on how the antivirus is liscensed. > Reminder is I'm used to using XP. Our users range from Windows NT > 4.0,Windows 2000 Pro and Windows XP. Based on a decent TS client, > this shouldn't matter anyway. > > Your advice appreciated. > > > Regards > > > Aaron Benson > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vulpes Velox [mailto:v.velox@vvelox.net] > Sent: Monday, 26 July 2004 4:43 AM > To: Jorn Argelo > Cc: Aaron Benson; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Are you truly a M$ desktop alternative? > > > On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:41:54 +0200 (CEST) > "Jorn Argelo" wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This email is going to any Linux house whom has pitched > > > themselves via their websites and reviews, from my research as > > > being possible alternatives to XP at this stage. Depends on your > > > Google hit and thereafter (if found within 2 pages) site FAQ's I > > > suppose. > > > > > > As a currently dedicated M$ house (apart from Oracle Databases), > > > we question the move to a XP desktop amid the Linux hype in > > > recent times. Any IT department trying to save company money is > > > only doing the right thing and ask the question, what can Linux > > > do for us? > > > > As mentioned before, FreeBSD is NOT Linux. Keep that in mind. > > > > > I've flipped through your FAQ's and over forums but result in no > > > > > > answer for Active Directory 2K3 and Exchange 2K3 server client > > > connectivity, integration and functionality? Note that we have > > > not moved to these product versions yet. Hence this email. > > > > KDE's Kmail can connect to Exchange servers, I believe. As for > > logging > > > into active directory ... That doesn't exist AFAIK. Perhaps there > > are programs that allow such things, but I wouldn't count on that. > > Windows > > > is an excellent OS for integration with Active Directory. > > AFAIK sylpheed-claws can too... IIRC Exchange is imap... or > something... > > Windows see below for more info on active directory integration. :) > > > > I ask because I cannot see a server based centralised > > > authentication > > > > and administrative option in Linux. If there were, say a > > > "centralised server option" for Linux, this would be seriously > > > considered. Is there a User Manager equivalent (NT4 domain for > > > example) or Exchange Administrator equivalent (Exchange > > > 5.5) "functional" alternative? More importantly, 2K3 Server and > > > Exchange integration? > > > > > YP/NIS works and can be gotten to work on Windows(using something > free similiar to below from Microsoft.) Many unixes(note lower case > :P) are also begining to supprt LDAP now. IIRC FreeBSD 5x does. > > > Not AFAIK. > > > > > Failing that, connecting clients as above to M$ servers would be > > > > > > sufficient. Stay with M$ in servers, go with Linux in desktops. > > > I've > > > > seen enough "glossy brochures" and want to know the facts. > > > > Again, you can't do this when you want centralised server option. > > > > > The cost difference is obvious. The functional difference is > > > not. I've still no reason to choose your Linux over Windows XP > > > Pro at this stage. Cost is not enough. Any sane IT department > > > doesn't need screaming users due to lack of pure functionality. > > > Experience suggests most find it difficult enough getting around > > > the OS to even > > > > perform basic functions, let alone usability. > > > > > > Assuming aforementioned functionality, where does your Linux > > > stand with converting between M$ Office 97/2K/2K3? Will our > > > accounts department be able to work with their previous 40Mb > > > Excel files full > > > > of VLookups and Formulas straightup, or is it going to be bigger > > > > > > than a Lotus 4.1 to Excel 5 conversion debacle? Of course > > > Word,PowerPoint,Publisher and Access are questioned also. > > > > OpenOffice.org can do the job there, but a file created with OOo > > will be rather misshapen when opened with Excel and vica versa. So > > it's not > > > advicable. > > What about gnumeric? There are also other assorted programs out > there to fill the need desired. > > Remember, on unix you are not as limited in vendor options as you > are on windows and there is a much larger software base to choose > from. :) > > > > I'm talking up to 500 user desktops to be upgraded. Upgraded > > > need not be a literal word. Installing Linux from scratch would > > > be expected. Anything "upgrade wise" extra would be a bonus. > > > > > > Outside of M$ Office, current application functionality would > > > have to be trialed. This is expected. A list of currently > > > supported M$ applications would be helpful. > > > > > > Your detailed reply appreciated > > > > > > > So, for your needs, upgrading to Linux or BSD or whatever is a BAD > > > > idea, IMHO. Your employees and your desktops simply don't have any > > use > > > of it, with the desires mentioned above. As long as you wish for > > integration with Active Directory, then an Microsoft OS is still > > the best for you. > > Can be done :) > > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/productinfo/features/default.asp > > Those idiots still have not put in ssh, thought!?!?! :/ > /me feels telnet should be a executable offense :P > > > > BTW I have been using unix since it is simpler to type than > unix-like os or unix derivative... not to be confused with the upper > case UNIX ^_^ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:10:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8B816A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:10:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE2943D2F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:10:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6SI9vBF078502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:09:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6SI9vYG078501; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:09:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:09:57 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <20040728180957.GC77702@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Andrea Venturoli , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200407281658.i6SGw3FK023282@soth.ventu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="g7w8+K/95kPelPD2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407281658.i6SGw3FK023282@soth.ventu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:09:57 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No answer send-pr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:10:17 -0000 --g7w8+K/95kPelPD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 06:58:06PM -0500, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > I wrapped up a small port and submitted it with send-pr. However (after m= aybe a couple week) I don't see it in the list > of upcoming ports, nor did I get any answer. > IIRC I should get an automated message, just to inform me that my report = was received... is it so? >=20 You mean this one? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/62046 It was committed on January 29th. As far as I know you don't get back a message when that happens -- you're meant to follow the appropriate mailing list (in this case freebsd-port-bugs@freebsd.org) to see when that happens. If that wasn't the PR you meant, then it seems your submission has gone astray, as that's the only PR listed with your name on it. If so, I'd try resubmitting the PR, but be sure to add a note saying that you tried to submit before and it never aparently showed up. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --g7w8+K/95kPelPD2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBB+v0iD657aJF7eIRAt/IAKCzmvR6LYHTPO+MUV8Zl+VTVFT41QCgjNk3 pWXenuF9WMj4l58FxBbPSdg= =HGvx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --g7w8+K/95kPelPD2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:12:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8312D16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:12:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51708.mail.yahoo.com (web51708.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BCF343D4C for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:12:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from washville2003@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040728181253.70990.qmail@web51708.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.201.214.1] by web51708.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:12:53 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:12:53 -0700 (PDT) From: samy lancher To: Barbish3@adelphia.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ata1: resetting devices ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:12:59 -0000 Hi, Thanks for the reply. Yes, i do have two hard drives in my server. I am not sure about their speeds. Could you please give me the solution if the problem is from having two hard drives. Thanks, Naveen. JJB wrote: These means that you have a mismatch between the devices and the ribbon connecting them to your motherboard. Most common cause is a UDMA66 hard drive plugged into the master connector on the ribbon and a UDMA33 CDROM. The messages is telling you the IDE hard drive controller is defaulting the ribbon read/write speed to the slower speed of the CDROM. Now this is not harmful to your hardware, but does deny your server the ability to utilize the full speed potential of your hard drive. This is easily fixed by moving the CDROM drive from the slave connector on the primary IDE controller to the master commenter on the secondary IDE controller on your motherboard. This also can occur if you have two hard drives on the primary IDE controller of different speeds. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of samy lancher Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:48 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ata1: resetting devices ... Hello All, This morning I have seen the following log message on my FreeBSD 4.7 server. ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device done. I would really appreciate if someone could tell me the cause for this message and is there something to worry about the server?. Thanks in advance. Thanks, Naveen. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:18:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03EB16A4CF; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:18:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE1F43D5A; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:18:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i6SIIUc01719; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:18:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200407281818.i6SIIUc01719@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: asdzxc111@yahoo.com (DK) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:18:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20040728162744.29274.qmail@web41010.mail.yahoo.com> from "DK" at Jul 28, 2004 09:27:44 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:18:36 -0000 > > --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > Some times, it's better to install smaller packages that work together > > in a well-known way, than huge mega-monsters that break in unexpected > > ways later on. > Firstly, thnx Giorgos for responding! > > All I want from BSD to is a Rock Solid Web Server with as default: > - FreeBSD+Minimilist GUI(wmaker will do) > - File Manager(got xfe working) > - Editor(got nedit installed) > - Apache+Mod_SSL+MySQL+PHP+Mod_Perl > - Firewall (is one installed as default ??) > - Web Browser(Mozilla installed but its slow - will try firefox later) > Thats all, nothing else! > > I would have thought that with so many people running BSD Web Servers, > that there would be a > similar default install out-of-the-box out there... Yes, but with so many people running BSD, there probably are nearly that many different combinations of features that have been chosen. FreeBSD users tend to cherish that freedom to do it their own way and not be condemned to whatever some weenie in a cube somewhere decided they should be required to run. On the other hand, some people have put together their own standard set of OS + ports and made up a sort of package that they install on all the systems they manage. Tools are available for that in the FreeBSD world. But, note that unlike the MS world, those people still selected what they wanted and made it their way first, before going on to build an installable set. We actually do that here. We even have our own custom made installation process. Our sites just plop in the CD and only have to enter in their desired host name, IP, gateway, nameserver, etc and it does everything including deciding how to slice and partition their disk for them. But, I don't imagine very many persons who are not using our type of service would want that exact system. So, they make their own. > > I guess my problem is I know where all the files go on my Windows box, > but I am not sure where the > files go on the BSD box when an install goes wrong. If the pkg_delete > fails, how do I manually > remove the files for a failed [Apache+Mod_SSL+MySQL+PHP+Mod_Perl] > installation ?? Generally I have had better luck finding things on FreeBSD than ever on a MS system, but even on FreeBSD it can take some looking. Mostly, things are systematic and fairly logical once you are familiar with the system. But, remember that ports come from many places and people. They are not created by the FreeBSD core team, but by anyone who wants to submit a port. There are some requirements for how to make them install right using the ports system, but otherwise, the port maintainer is the one who designs and implements it all and there are many independant port maintainers. Their are tools such as find(1) and ls(1) in combination with wild-cards and grep(1) that help a lot. For pretty much everything installed from ports, start looking in /usr/local. Also, look under the port itself in such places as /usr/ports/category/port/work and such. Example, for the vim editor, there are a lot of files in /usr/ports/editors/vim/work that are residue from the install process. > > > ... much deleted > > ... > sorry about, thought I did - here goes: > > - Installing Packages is nice & easy & straight forward from the docs(should be more of these!) > - Installing ports/packages via ftp/net - Forget it!! > I have barely got BSD running, the last thing I want is connecting a BSD > box to my broadband > connection ?? Does BSD have a default firewall ?? Don't know, having > trouble installing stuff let > alone configuring a firewall via scripts/files You are probably better off and more secure with an initial install, with no additional work or tweaking, of FreeBSD on the net than you would be with a MS system with every know "fix" available. The system is inherently more secure and in addition - and maybe partially because of this - fewer, by far, attempts at cracking FreeBSD are made than are made against MS systems. Some of this is, of course, because there are much fewer FreeBSD systems out there to tempt kiddies. But, the fact that cracking FreeBSD is more difficult contributes to this effect. > Currently as we speak, I am getting about a hit every 10 seconds from > worms... thankfully being > caught by my firewall on my Windows 2000 box. Generally, FreeBSD is immune to those worms and viruses. You would be safer turning off your MS machine and reading your Email only on any UNIX system such as FreeBSD. Of course, you can also configure procmail and install spam assassin to help reduce the annoyance of that traffic. But, in the meantime you don't have to worry that those worms will be finding a welcome host for their misdeeds. > > >> Why isn't it easy for you to install all these things on FreeBSD? > > Specifically, its the ./configure business of the different installations & > the pedantic order > which to install the different Apache modules etc.. Yes, there is a learning curve, but it is a price you pay to be using a more powerful, secure and sophisticated OS with a lot of choices to be made. Hear again, you are not stuck with what some artificial world developer decides for you. You make the choices and do the work. That part does take more work, but the end result is nearly always much more satisfactory. > Then its going step by step with the install guides & when I try to install MySQL, I type # > groupadd mysql & I get "command not found" ... ??? no idea, I am following the install guides... > now if I am doing the same as everyone else with a fresh install of BSD, why is it no one else > gets groupadd mysql "command not found" ?? What does "commmand not found" sound like it means? The shell doesn't know how to find the command you typed in. Either you didn't update your search path to include the directory it is in or it didn't get installed correctly where it should be. Probably the first is true. So, find out where it should be and add that directory to the path. See man path. > I just don't see the point of compiling each program from source. - But > if I try to install all of > them from the packages, then it breaks down. Mostly, again because different people make different decisions about what to put on their system and that means compilation/linking can be different. Even if you don't type anything different, the system may know, based on what you are doing that different/additional library calls need to be built in, etc. - I am used to from Windows, > installing from > packages, then once everything is installed & running, I go back & tweak the apps to my likeing > > BSD wants me to do the tweaks in configuration files prior to compiling from source BEFORE I have > had a chance to fiddle with the app to SEE what needs to be tweak. ie installing PHP the setting > of mm should be --without-mm ?? what the... that should be a tweak AFTER its installed not > before... > See above notes about learning curve. It is also, for better or worse, an iterative process. The change you make today may reveal something else you want to change or add tomorrow. > then manually chmod because for some reason, even though I am logged in as root, all files are not > by default excute/write accessable Nice choice for preventing accidentally trashing stuff. Be thankful for this. You should have to be very intentional about modifying and even executing some files. It is not quite as cutsie and annoying as the MS habit of making you click numerous verification boxes, but it serves a similar purpose. > > ..oops ranting again... what the manual needs, is more step-by-step screen shots so things are > less hit & miss - not just for the install process, but for something like install a Web Server > with its modules - Apache+Mod_SSL+MySQL+PHP+Mod_Perl > Documentation is an ever growing need. There is no doubt about this. > > Note that OpenSSL is part of the base system in FreeBSD. Unlike > > Windows, where in the best case it's considered an "add-on" that you have > > to add later. You don't need to add anything to your FreeBSD system to > > have OpenSSL support, provided you keep the system itself relatively up > > to date, using the recommended update instructions of the Handbook or > > the file /usr/src/UPDATING. > I assume I would need to be connect to the net for this... but I would > first need to secure the > system from attack BEFORE I connect - maybe this should be the first > part of the docs, straight > after installing BSD+GUI+Editor+FileManager but BEFORE installing Apache Again, you are much safer on the net with a FreeBSD system. Just do it. I do all my installs over the net. Do use appropriate precautions such as ssh instead of telnet and ssl protected sites where possible and check md5-s of downloaded files. But, don't let it stop you from using it with FreeBSD. > > > > OPTIONAL: > > > IMAP > > Exactly what we have now. You can use the Ports to install all of the > > above and a lot more. There are more than 10,000 ports in the FreeBSD > > collection now; a number that is far larger than anything Microsoft > > Windows can boast about for programs that are tightly integrated to its > > system, are available for any version of Windows and work mostly out of > > the box with minimal changes *if* any are needed at all. > > Yes, but at the moment, I am manually saving ports/packages from my Windows Box on CD then put > this into my BSD CDROM & installing from there - if I am lucky & they are packages, then its fast > & simple - if its installing ports, then its slow, time consuming & prone to getting errors! That is a much more dangerous way of doing it than just doing the install the normal way if you are worrying about some worm/virus corrupting things or attacking your system while on the net. > > > When you don't know how to do something, this list is the place to ask. > > When I try my next install(its now 2.00am), I will report back my findings... in more detail! > > > you still haven't mentioned what the exact nature of those problems was. > > .. will get back in an hour or so when I try another install > > > > > - with FreeBSD & Windows 2000 installed on the SAME computer, the GUI > > > of Windows 2000 is MUCH faster than any of the BSD window managers > > > > That's in vivid contrast to the general feeling of "speed" that > > thousands of FreeBSD users have reported so far. > > > > Actually, fvwm2 can be shown to have a very small memory footprint and > > still a usable look that doesn't lack some of the nice features of > > Windows 9x. I've even seen themes of fvwm2 that resemble and mimic the > > Windows XP look without requiring 128 MB of system memory just to get > > started. I'm not sure why you claim that Windows is faster/lighter but > > if you do have raw numbers to back your claim up I'd be interested to > > see them. > > Raw numbers no... just sitting in front of the BSD screen counting the seconds.. wondering how > people use this OS - then I do a reboot & select WIN2000 & can't believe the difference. > If you want, when I have time, I could take an mpg of it & upload it for all ?? > It sounds a lot like you may have some processes wanting to check themselves via the net upon startup that are holding things up during boot. They will each wait until they time out before things move on. I have several dual-boot machines, WinXP/FreeBSD, Win2k/FreeBSd and Win95/FreeBSD and they all boot in about the same amount of time with the FreeBSD being maybe a mite faster to get to my login than the MS stuff being able to get to a state where I can actually do something - eg not just getting the spash screen or background displayed. So, either plug in the net or disable those utilities that want to talk and try things again. One final comment that covers everything in the rest of the rant. If you really want MS, then use MS. If you want to experiment with FreeBSD, try and learn it and be open to the FreeBSD way of doing things and do it that way for a while. Ask lots of questions be don't assume something is awful until you really understand it and can make realistic comparisons. There are things that can be improved in FreeBSD (there are a large number of volunteers who are working on making improvements) and documentation can always be improved (what MS documentation?? - they now include a sheet of pictures to show where to plug in the cords and a large booklet with disclaimers in many languages, but nothing useful and the online stuff is often meaning less, click on the ? and it just repeats the name of the program or some such. There is nothing that explains what is under the covers. FreeBSD documentation at least tries to explain how things work and what to do to make it work, even though it is a little difficult at first if you don't know what to look up). But, there is a reason that so many serious computer users choose UNIX including FreeBSD and eschew MS and such when they are trying to get real work done. So, relax and see if you can discover some of that. ////jerry > > > for a FreeBSD newcomer, don't hesitate to ask. > > > > There are no stupid questions. There are, however, many knowledgeable > > and helpful people on this list. > > thnx ... I will report back then with any problem I encounter on my next try :) > > Kind Regards, > > DK > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:36:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DC316A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:36:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51708.mail.yahoo.com (web51708.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE67643D6E for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:36:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from washville2003@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040728183619.77285.qmail@web51708.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.201.214.1] by web51708.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:36:19 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:36:19 -0700 (PDT) From: samy lancher To: Barbish3@adelphia.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ata1: resetting devices ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:36:20 -0000 These are the messages from "dmesg" ad0: 76345MB [155114/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device ad2: 38166MB [77545/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA33 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device Thanks, Naveen. JJB wrote: These means that you have a mismatch between the devices and the ribbon connecting them to your motherboard. Most common cause is a UDMA66 hard drive plugged into the master connector on the ribbon and a UDMA33 CDROM. The messages is telling you the IDE hard drive controller is defaulting the ribbon read/write speed to the slower speed of the CDROM. Now this is not harmful to your hardware, but does deny your server the ability to utilize the full speed potential of your hard drive. This is easily fixed by moving the CDROM drive from the slave connector on the primary IDE controller to the master commenter on the secondary IDE controller on your motherboard. This also can occur if you have two hard drives on the primary IDE controller of different speeds. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of samy lancher Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:48 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ata1: resetting devices ... Hello All, This morning I have seen the following log message on my FreeBSD 4.7 server. ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device done. I would really appreciate if someone could tell me the cause for this message and is there something to worry about the server?. Thanks in advance. Thanks, Naveen. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:37:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F8616A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:37:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4958F43D6D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040728183657.GTBQ6319.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:36:57 -0400 From: "JJB" To: "samy lancher" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:36:56 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040728181253.70990.qmail@web51708.mail.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ata1: resetting devices ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:37:16 -0000 Same solution, move IDE1 slave to IDE2 master. Check dmesg.boot file for boot messages about hard drives and their speeds. ATA66 should be your fastest drive and the one that you want FreeBSD on, and it should be the master on IDE1. -----Original Message----- From: samy lancher [mailto:washville2003@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:13 PM To: Barbish3@adelphia.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ata1: resetting devices ... Hi, Thanks for the reply. Yes, i do have two hard drives in my server. I am not sure about their speeds. Could you please give me the solution if the problem is from having two hard drives. Thanks, Naveen. JJB wrote: These means that you have a mismatch between the devices and the ribbon connecting them to your motherboard. Most common cause is a UDMA66 hard drive plugged into the master connector on the ribbon and a UDMA33 CDROM. The messages is telling you the IDE hard drive controller is defaulting the ribbon read/write speed to the slower speed of the CDROM. Now this is not harmful to your hardware, but does deny your server the ability to utilize the full speed potential of your hard drive. This is easily fixed by moving the CDROM drive from the slave connector on the primary IDE controller to the master commenter on the secondary IDE controller on your motherboard. This also can occur if you have two hard drives on the primary IDE controller of different speeds. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of samy lancher Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:48 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ata1: resetting devices ... Hello All, This morning I have seen the following log message on my FreeBSD 4.7 server. ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device done. I would really appreciate if someone could tell me the cause for this message and is there something to worry about the server?. Thanks in advance. Thanks, Naveen. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:40:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C61F16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:40:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from umail.ru (umail.mtu.ru [195.34.32.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7524743D75 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:40:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ky@df.ru) Received: from [81.195.4.190] (HELO localhost) by umail.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b6) with ESMTP-TLS id 282344853 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:39:22 +0400 From: "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." To: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:39:22 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407282239.22648.ky@df.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: df shows bugs values on gbde'd partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ky@df.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:40:32 -0000 Hello list! Here is my df output: # df Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ar0s1a 2026030 102610 1761338 6% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/ar0s1e 5077038 2959806 1711070 63% /usr /dev/ar0s1f 5077038 704904 3965972 15% /var /dev/ar0s1d.bde 20151502 17701936 837446 95% /mnt/home /dev/ar0s1g.bde 42348172 18014398521687354 -18014398482727034 46237809447% /mnt/var I tried to reboot but the values remains. However I see no problems with that. Server works fine in production environment with no panic for a least a month. Could someone tell me whats going on with my server? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:52:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A67316A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:52:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B57343D6B for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:52:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 95516 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2004 18:52:46 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.243478 secs); 28 Jul 2004 18:52:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 18:52:44 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:52:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4431.209.167.16.15.1091040764.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <200407282239.22648.ky@df.ru> References: <200407282239.22648.ky@df.ru> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:52:44 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: ky@df.ru User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: df shows bugs values on gbde'd partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:52:39 -0000 > Hello list! > Here is my df output: > # df > Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Avail Capacity > Mounted on > /dev/ar0s1a 2026030 102610 1761338 6% > / > devfs 1 1 0 > 100% /dev > /dev/ar0s1e 5077038 2959806 1711070 > 63% /usr > /dev/ar0s1f 5077038 704904 3965972 > 15% /var > /dev/ar0s1d.bde 20151502 17701936 837446 > 95% /mnt/home > /dev/ar0s1g.bde 42348172 18014398521687354 -18014398482727034 > 46237809447% /mnt/var Well, I would start with a back up. According to used space, you will have to go to your local computer store and pick up a 18014 TeraByte (18 PetaByte) disk drive, and copy all data over to it immediately. ;o) In all seriousness, I've never seen this but almost choked when I saw the numbers. Hope someone can help. BTW, what does the .bde stand for after the slice/partition? Steve > > I tried to reboot but the values remains. However I see no problems with > that. > Server works fine in production environment with no panic for a least a > month. > > Could someone tell me whats going on with my server? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 18:58:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D853316A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:58:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784F543D55 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:58:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:14200 helo=[192.168.2.100]) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BptdG-0004R7-Us for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:58:31 +0000 Message-ID: <4107F756.10203@zonnet.nl> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:58:30 +0200 From: Nico Meijer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040725 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Going OT: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have aninstaller package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:58:36 -0000 Hi DK, Sorry if I'll sound somewhat harsh at times. I mean no offense whatsover, so don't take it personal. > BTW: All I have been doing for 6 days is read docs/man/guides... It seems as though you have been missing the point. Completely, at times. Complaining one or two lines from a tutorial don't work (ie. "groupadd mysql") without reading: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/users-modifying.html is plain oversight. If you haven't yet grasped the 'feel' for FreeBSD, why are you trying to drive a Ferrari with it, when you can't even manage a tricycle with it yet? > Refreshing the system without a reboot is a Priority in front of Automount ?? Absolutely! Plus, getting timely security updates (which come in patches, if you like), rock solid stability, a speedy and robust IP stack, tremendous hardware support (rock solid, again). Oh, and it's free as in beer and free as in speech. > nice one developers I think more effort has been put into creating and maintaining a robust, managable and secure server platform than a workstation platform. Your gripe with FreeBSD might just lie there. Plus, if you're unhappy with something: do the work and submit the code. It's that easy. No whining, no fussing. > .. I know its hard for people to swallow, but MS Windows IS easier to use than BSD/Linux/OSX ... The only part that is hard to swallow is you putting *BSD, Linux and OS X on one big pile as if they're basically the same thing (to a user, they're not; to a sysadmin, they're not; they're all only "Unix-like"). Other than that, you're absolutely right. (But only if you accept the Microsoft way of doing things. If you don't, you're screwed.) > thats WHY its the most widely used.... regardless of marketing/costs etc ... I find that statement amusing, thank you. :-) > whats the damn command startxfce4 ??? this doesn't work!)... It worked for me. > If people say it should be used without a GUI... Especially as a server: I use CLI only. A GUI just gets in my way. > they must be over 40, 29 > bald, Just short hair; it's all there. > lonely I love my wife & son very much. > & most love shitty VI - I can EDIT any file faster on a GUI editor >>>then any coder I have seen at UNI/WORK who say VI is better... Good for you. > Gnome starts faster than Windows ?? Start time is not important To me, it is. My FreeBSD 4.10 booting into xdm, me typing in my username and password and logging in to IceWM *and start working* takes almost half the time it takes my coworkers' Windows 2000 Professional 'puters to boot up at all in a workable state. > - I am talking about reaction time of the GUI Yes, it seems that Windows is snappier. The X Window System, however, doesn't get in my way when I do other important stuff (backups, network stressing, whatever). Plus, I get to log in from *anywhere* (even a thin client) ans get *my* desktop on *my* pc. Don't get me started on Terminal Services as I've used it only once; I'd be flat in my face in ten seconds. I found that it completely sucked, but that's just my personal opinion. > nice one Linux Again, you are missing the point. > Whats the purpose of having to manually set the system to automount ?? as opposed to having it as > a system install default ?? if there is an advantage, I am sure its for the 0.01% of the user base How can security be just for 0.01%? Have you ever thought of it this way: "I want my computer to do something when *I* say it to!". >>>I can tell you that 95% of people who use computers want "EASE of USE" I am afraid you are right there. That is why the world of computing is in such a shitty state and we get a new worm or virus every 15 minutes. > - installable YES, configurable ... you've got to be shitting me :o Well... I think I just took a cr*p on your front lawn, dude. ;-) (that really is a pathetic attempt at a joke; I'm just kidding) > Fast Forward to 2004, & all I see are developers adding features that are not that important, yet > missing the basics of what the majority of USER's want(not coders) It all depends on what you use the system for and who you hold accountable. Are FreeBSD's developers accountable for what the WindowMaker people come up with? You are free to choose a GUI that fits you. > Apple OSX understands this(nice GUI over BSD base - shame about the stupid high prices & dumb one > button mouse)... Why? The one button mouse adds even more ease of use, no? > sorry BSD/Linux developers ...your just giving more air to MS by focusing on the > wrong things And rightfully so! Don't you get it? You are *free* to choose whatever system you want. If you choose any of the BSD's (for that matter), you are *free* to choose a GUI or the CLI. Also, should you opt for the GUI, you are *free* to choose which one. Also, you are *free* to choose whatever software you additionally would like to run. An editor? You are *free* to choose which one, be it CLI or GUI. A web server? Again, freedom. Choose Apache, choose thttpd, do so *freely*. But don't bitch about it not doing exactly what *you* happen to want in a full featured web server. Shut up and code, then. > maybe you would like a test of the Apache Web Server on BSD against the Apache Web Server on > Windows 2000 ?? - I will search the net & get back to you on that if you are interested ?? Please check to see if the report happens to be "Sponsored by Microsoft". ;-) > I wonder if people that run web servers on BSD never use a GUI thereby saying how fast BSD is... Why put down all of FreeBSD just because you think a few features suck/don't exist? If I happen to dislike a certain dashboard meter in my new Ford Focus, does that mean I have to hold a grudge against every Ford Motor Company worker? >>>...damn I have gone way off track here... sorry for the ranting people... Me too. Again, don't take it personal. > (I don't like Linux BTW) Wow, you hate FreeBSD, Java *and* Linux! ;-) > If BSD's better performance is due to System Admins running Web Servers but doing so without the > GUI(???)... then you maybe right Remko, BSD may not be right for me. I'd have to agree with Remko here. > - In the year 2004, I refuse to spend my time coding in front of a screen hacking in "cmd line > syntax".. hey thats just me! Which is perfectly okay! Good luck, whatever you happen to choose... Nico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 19:02:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A637C16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:02:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web21522.mail.yahoo.com (web21522.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.170.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E63643D53 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:02:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from time_to_hack@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040728190254.82842.qmail@web21522.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.248.72.254] by web21522.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:02:54 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:02:54 -0700 (PDT) From: bsd hack To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Kernel Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:02:54 -0000 Hi, I am working with the Kernel config file to optimize it and also to improve the overall security of the system! I have the following quetions: (1) There are a few options that are not available in the default kernel... like the IPFIREWALL options(and the like)... I basically need to know all possible options I can add to the kernel config file! (2) I guess these options can be used to set the kernel variables accessible through the sysctl command. So can I create my own options so that I can set a few kernel variables as and when I build the custom kernel? (3) and also my aim includes optimizing the kernel... so by enabling only the options I need to I should get a get optimization... is there anything else that can be done? (4) My aim is to improve local and network security. I guess enabling IPFIREWALL helps with the network security part.... are there any special options for local security? Thank you. -HKR --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 19:10:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A624A16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:10:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D056043D5F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:10:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.173.26.85 with login) by smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 19:10:35 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:10:34 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040728162744.29274.qmail@web41010.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728162744.29274.qmail@web41010.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407281210.34029.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: krinklyfig@spymac.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:10:36 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 09:27 am, DK wrote: > --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > Nobody learns how to install, configure, use & hack a new system in an > > afternoon's time > > no... 6 days, that should be more than enough... I mastered windows 95 in 1 Really? You mean you completely memorized all the important Win95 registry keys in one day? This is funny. You know, if you really wanted you could just host your site on Win95. Or whatever Win with IIS. But it looks to me like you're unhappy because you're encountering the "real" way this is done for the first time, and it's more complicated than Windows. Well, yes it is, but it's also the right way to do it, without cutting corners. In the end you'll be able to control the system much better, which should be of interest to you if you're writing programming for the web. If you want a more powerful system, then take the time to learn it (talking about much more than a week). If you just need to keep working and don't have the time to learn something new, then stick with what you know. - jt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 19:13:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8335516A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:13:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from amsterdam.servershost.net (amsterdam.servershost.net [66.225.219.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEA043D5F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:13:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from abidoon@mindblazetech.com) Received: from [203.81.200.164] (helo=vectorsigma) by amsterdam.servershost.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bptr7-0006JI-Kh for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:12:55 -0400 Message-ID: <001f01c474d6$e9c0b340$03a9a8c0@vectorsigma> From: "Abidoon Nadeem" To: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:12:55 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001B_01C47500.CC2F05A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - amsterdam.servershost.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - mindblazetech.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: help make crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:13:06 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C47500.CC2F05A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable please find my kernel config file attached this does fine when i make depend but it fails on make=20 please help i dont understand whats wrong i get an error code 1 Abidoon ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C47500.CC2F05A0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="ALPHATRION" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ALPHATRION" #=0A= # CUSTOMIZED -- kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386=0A= #=0A= # For more information on this file, please read the handbook section on=0A= # Kernel Configuration Files:=0A= #=0A= # = http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-co= nfig.html=0A= #=0A= # The handbook is also available locally in /usr/share/doc/handbook=0A= # if you've installed the doc distribution, otherwise always see the=0A= # FreeBSD World Wide Web server (http://www.FreeBSD.org/) for the=0A= # latest information.=0A= #=0A= # An exhaustive list of options and more detailed explanations of the=0A= # device lines is also present in the ../../conf/NOTES and NOTES files. =0A= # If you are in doubt as to the purpose or necessity of a line, check = first =0A= # in NOTES.=0A= #=0A= # $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC,v 1.394.2.3 2004/01/26 19:42:11 = nectar Exp $=0A= =0A= machine i386=0A= cpu I586_CPU=0A= ident ALPHATRION=0A= =0A= #To statically compile in device wiring instead of /boot/device.hints=0A= #hints "GENERIC.hints" #Default places to look for devices.=0A= =0A= #makeoptions DEBUG=3D-g #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols=0A= =0A= options SCHED_4BSD #4BSD scheduler=0A= options INET #InterNETworking=0A= options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols=0A= options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem=0A= options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support=0A= options UFS_ACL #Support for access control lists=0A= options UFS_DIRHASH #Improve performance on big directories=0A= options MD_ROOT #MD is a potential root device=0A= options NFSCLIENT #Network Filesystem Client=0A= options NFSSERVER #Network Filesystem Server=0A= options NFS_ROOT #NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT=0A= options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem=0A= options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem=0A= options PROCFS #Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS)=0A= options PSEUDOFS #Pseudo-filesystem framework=0A= options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!]=0A= options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 #Compatible with FreeBSD4=0A= options SCSI_DELAY=3D15000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI=0A= options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support=0A= options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory=0A= options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues=0A= options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores=0A= options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING #Posix P1003_1B real-time extensions=0A= options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev=0A= options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug=0A= # output. Adds ~128k to driver.=0A= options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug=0A= # output. Adds ~215k to driver.=0A= options PFIL_HOOKS # pfil(9) framework=0A= =0A= # Debugging for use in -current=0A= #options DDB #Enable the kernel debugger=0A= #options INVARIANTS #Enable calls of extra sanity checking=0A= options INVARIANT_SUPPORT #Extra sanity checks of internal structures, = required by INVARIANTS=0A= #options WITNESS #Enable checks to detect deadlocks and cycles=0A= #options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN #Don't run witness on spinlocks for speed=0A= =0A= # To make an SMP kernel, the next two are needed=0A= #options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel=0A= #device apic # I/O APIC=0A= =0A= device isa=0A= device eisa=0A= device pci=0A= =0A= # Floppy drives=0A= device fdc=0A= =0A= # ATA and ATAPI devices=0A= device ata=0A= device atadisk # ATA disk drives=0A= #device ataraid # ATA RAID drives=0A= device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives=0A= device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives=0A= #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives=0A= options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering=0A= =0A= # SCSI Controllers=0A= #device ahb # EISA AHA1742 family=0A= #device ahc # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices=0A= #device ahd # AHA39320/29320 and onboard AIC79xx devices=0A= #device amd # AMD 53C974 (Tekram DC-390(T))=0A= #device isp # Qlogic family=0A= #device mpt # LSI-Logic MPT-Fusion=0A= #device ncr # NCR/Symbios Logic=0A= #device sym # NCR/Symbios Logic (newer chipsets + those of `ncr')=0A= #device trm # Tekram DC395U/UW/F DC315U adapters=0A= =0A= #device adv # Advansys SCSI adapters=0A= #device adw # Advansys wide SCSI adapters=0A= #device aha # Adaptec 154x SCSI adapters=0A= #device aic # Adaptec 15[012]x SCSI adapters, AIC-6[23]60.=0A= #device bt # Buslogic/Mylex MultiMaster SCSI adapters=0A= =0A= #device ncv # NCR 53C500=0A= #device nsp # Workbit Ninja SCSI-3=0A= #device stg # TMC 18C30/18C50=0A= =0A= # SCSI peripherals=0A= #device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI)=0A= #device ch # SCSI media changers=0A= #device da # Direct Access (disks)=0A= #device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc)=0A= #device cd # CD=0A= #device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access)=0A= #device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE)=0A= =0A= # RAID controllers interfaced to the SCSI subsystem=0A= #device amr # AMI MegaRAID=0A= #device asr # DPT SmartRAID V, VI and Adaptec SCSI RAID=0A= #device ciss # Compaq Smart RAID 5*=0A= #device dpt # DPT Smartcache III, IV - See NOTES for options=0A= #device iir # Intel Integrated RAID=0A= #device ips # IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID=0A= #device mly # Mylex AcceleRAID/eXtremeRAID=0A= =0A= # RAID controllers=0A= #device aac # Adaptec FSA RAID=0A= #device aacp # SCSI passthrough for aac (requires CAM)=0A= #device ida # Compaq Smart RAID=0A= #device mlx # Mylex DAC960 family=0A= #device pst # Promise Supertrak SX6000=0A= #device twe # 3ware ATA RAID=0A= =0A= # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse=0A= device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller=0A= device atkbd # AT keyboard=0A= device psm # PS/2 mouse=0A= =0A= device vga # VGA video card driver=0A= =0A= device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support=0A= =0A= # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console=0A= device sc=0A= =0A= # Enable this for the pcvt (VT220 compatible) console driver=0A= device vt=0A= options XSERVER # support for X server on a vt console=0A= options FAT_CURSOR # start with block cursor=0A= =0A= #device agp # support several AGP chipsets=0A= =0A= # Floating point support - do not disable.=0A= device npx=0A= =0A= # Power management support (see NOTES for more options)=0A= #device apm=0A= # Add suspend/resume support for the i8254.=0A= device pmtimer=0A= =0A= # PCCARD (PCMCIA) support=0A= # Pcmcia and cardbus bridge support=0A= #device cbb # cardbus (yenta) bridge=0A= #device pcic # ExCA ISA and PCI bridges=0A= #device pccard # PC Card (16-bit) bus=0A= #device cardbus # CardBus (32-bit) bus=0A= =0A= # Serial (COM) ports=0A= device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports=0A= =0A= # Parallel port=0A= device ppc=0A= device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required)=0A= device lpt # Printer=0A= device plip # TCP/IP over parallel=0A= device ppi # Parallel port interface device=0A= #device vpo # Requires scbus and da=0A= =0A= # If you've got a "dumb" serial or parallel PCI card that is=0A= # supported by the puc(4) glue driver, uncomment the following=0A= # line to enable it (connects to the sio and/or ppc drivers):=0A= #device puc=0A= =0A= # PCI Ethernet NICs.=0A= #device de # DEC/Intel DC21x4x (``Tulip'')=0A= #device em # Intel PRO/1000 adapter Gigabit Ethernet Card=0A= #device txp # 3Com 3cR990 (``Typhoon'')=0A= #device vx # 3Com 3c590, 3c595 (``Vortex'')=0A= =0A= # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code.=0A= # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these = NICs!=0A= device miibus # MII bus support=0A= #device bfe # Broadcom BCM440x 10/100 ethernet=0A= #device bge # Broadcom BCM570xx Gigabit Ethernet=0A= #device dc # DEC/Intel 21143 and various workalikes=0A= device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558)=0A= #device pcn # AMD Am79C97x PCI 10/100 (precedence over 'lnc')=0A= #device re # RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169S/8110S=0A= #device rl # RealTek 8129/8139=0A= #device sf # Adaptec AIC-6915 (``Starfire'')=0A= #device sis # Silicon Integrated Systems SiS 900/SiS 7016=0A= #device sk # SysKonnect SK-984x and SK-982x gigabit ethernet=0A= #device ste # Sundance ST201 (D-Link DFE-550TX)=0A= #device ti # Alteon Networks Tigon I/II gigabit ethernet=0A= #device tl # Texas Instruments ThunderLAN=0A= #device tx # SMC EtherPower II (83c170 ``EPIC'')=0A= #device vr # VIA Rhine, Rhine II=0A= #device wb # Winbond W89C840F=0A= #device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'')=0A= =0A= # ISA Ethernet NICs. pccard nics included.=0A= #device cs # Crystal Semiconductor CS89x0 NIC=0A= # 'device ed' requires 'device miibus'=0A= #device ed # NE[12]000, SMC Ultra, 3c503, DS8390 cards=0A= #device ex # Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 and Pro/10+=0A= #device ep # Etherlink III based cards=0A= #device fe # Fujitsu MB8696x based cards=0A= #device ie # EtherExpress 8/16, 3C507, StarLAN 10 etc.=0A= #device lnc # NE2100, NE32-VL Lance Ethernet cards=0A= #device sn # SMC's 9000 series of ethernet chips=0A= #device xe # Xircom pccard ethernet=0A= =0A= # ISA devices that use the old ISA shims=0A= #device le=0A= =0A= # Wireless NIC cards=0A= #device wlan # 802.11 support=0A= #device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. =0A= #device awi # BayStack 660 and others=0A= #device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs.=0A= #device wl # Older non 802.11 Wavelan wireless NIC.=0A= =0A= # Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocate.=0A= device random # Entropy device=0A= device loop # Network loopback=0A= device ether # Ethernet support=0A= device sl # Kernel SLIP=0A= device ppp # Kernel PPP=0A= device tun # Packet tunnel.=0A= device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc)=0A= device md # Memory "disks"=0A= device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling=0A= device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation)=0A= =0A= # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter.=0A= # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this!=0A= device bpf # Berkeley packet filter=0A= =0A= # USB support=0A= device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface=0A= device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface=0A= device usb # USB Bus (required)=0A= #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices=0A= device ugen # Generic=0A= device uhid # "Human Interface Devices"=0A= device ukbd # Keyboard=0A= device ulpt # Printer=0A= device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da=0A= device ums # Mouse=0A= #device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player=0A= device uscanner # Scanners=0A= # USB Ethernet, requires mii=0A= #device aue # ADMtek USB ethernet=0A= #device axe # ASIX Electronics USB ethernet=0A= #device cue # CATC USB ethernet=0A= #device kue # Kawasaki LSI USB ethernet=0A= =0A= # FireWire support=0A= #device firewire # FireWire bus code=0A= #device sbp # SCSI over FireWire (Requires scbus and da)=0A= #device fwe # Ethernet over FireWire (non-standard!)=0A= =0A= =0A= # Sound Card =0A= device pcm=0A= device sbc=0A= =0A= # Advanced Networking=0A= options IPFIREWALL=0A= options IPDIVERT=0A= options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT=0A= options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE=0A= =0A= ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C47500.CC2F05A0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 19:27:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F2416A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:27:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 163A443D1F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:27:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.173.26.85 with login) by smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 19:27:53 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:27:52 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407281227.52474.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: krinklyfig@spymac.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:27:58 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 07:28 am, DK wrote: > maybe you would like a test of the Apache Web Server on BSD against the > Apache Web Server on Windows 2000 ?? - I will search the net & get back to > you on that if you are interested ?? > > I wonder if people that run web servers on BSD never use a GUI thereby > saying how fast BSD is... - yes, keep using VI & don't forget to feed the > Horse :) Have you taken a look at this lately? http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html I don't know how important uptime is to you, but that's a big reason so many people use it. - jt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 19:30:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A53516A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:30:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD3243D41 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:30:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 28985333 for multiple; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:15:09 -0700 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:30:12 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: samy lancher Message-Id: <20040728143012.4dc362d1@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040728164802.52346.qmail@web51703.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040728164802.52346.qmail@web51703.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ata1: resetting devices ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:30:24 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:48:02 -0700 (PDT) samy lancher wrote: > Hello All, > > This morning I have seen the following log message on my FreeBSD 4.7 > server. > > ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 > cable or device > > done. > > I would really appreciate if someone could tell me the cause for > this message and is there something to worry about the server?. Bad drive or cable most likely. I've seen it three times. Fist it was bad cable. The other two it was bad drives. Try a new cable first and if that does not fix it, it is the drive most likely. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 19:50:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD35B16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:50:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458F343D1F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:50:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040728195038.DFLT2023.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:50:38 -0400 From: "JJB" To: "samy lancher" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:50:37 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040728183619.77285.qmail@web51708.mail.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ata1: resetting devices ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:50:39 -0000 These messages say you have a UDMA66 hard drive on the master ribbon connector of IDE1 and a UDMA33 hard drive on the master ribbon connector of IDE2 and both ribbons are ATA66 ribbons. This will not hurt anything or cause any performance slow down. You can get rid of this problem by replacing the ATA66 ribbon on IDE2 with a ATA33 ribbon. -----Original Message----- From: samy lancher [mailto:washville2003@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:36 PM To: Barbish3@adelphia.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ata1: resetting devices ... These are the messages from "dmesg" ad0: 76345MB [155114/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device ad2: 38166MB [77545/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA33 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device Thanks, Naveen. JJB wrote: These means that you have a mismatch between the devices and the ribbon connecting them to your motherboard. Most common cause is a UDMA66 hard drive plugged into the master connector on the ribbon and a UDMA33 CDROM. The messages is telling you the IDE hard drive controller is defaulting the ribbon read/write speed to the slower speed of the CDROM. Now this is not harmful to your hardware, but does deny your server the ability to utilize the full speed potential of your hard drive. This is easily fixed by moving the CDROM drive from the slave connector on the primary IDE controller to the master commenter on the secondary IDE controller on your motherboard. This also can occur if you have two hard drives on the primary IDE controller of different speeds. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of samy lancher Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:48 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ata1: resetting devices ... Hello All, This morning I have seen the following log message on my FreeBSD 4.7 server. ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device done. I would really appreciate if someone could tell me the cause for this message and is there something to worry about the server?. Thanks in advance. Thanks, Naveen. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 19:52:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32DF16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:52:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A59743D5D for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:52:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040728195250.DGWI2023.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:52:50 -0400 From: "JJB" To: "samy lancher" Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:52:48 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040728183619.77285.qmail@web51708.mail.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ata1: resetting devices ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:52:51 -0000 These messages say you have a UDMA66 hard drive on the master ribbon connector of IDE1 controller and a UDMA33 hard drive on the master ribbon connector of IDE2 controller and both ribbons are ATA66 ribbons. This will not hurt anything or cause any performance slow down. You can get rid of this problem by replacing the ATA66 ribbon on IDE2 with a ATA33 ribbon. -----Original Message----- From: samy lancher [mailto:washville2003@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:36 PM To: Barbish3@adelphia.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ata1: resetting devices ... These are the messages from "dmesg" ad0: 76345MB [155114/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device ad2: 38166MB [77545/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA33 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device Thanks, Naveen. JJB wrote: These means that you have a mismatch between the devices and the ribbon connecting them to your motherboard. Most common cause is a UDMA66 hard drive plugged into the master connector on the ribbon and a UDMA33 CDROM. The messages is telling you the IDE hard drive controller is defaulting the ribbon read/write speed to the slower speed of the CDROM. Now this is not harmful to your hardware, but does deny your server the ability to utilize the full speed potential of your hard drive. This is easily fixed by moving the CDROM drive from the slave connector on the primary IDE controller to the master commenter on the secondary IDE controller on your motherboard. This also can occur if you have two hard drives on the primary IDE controller of different speeds. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of samy lancher Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:48 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ata1: resetting devices ... Hello All, This morning I have seen the following log message on my FreeBSD 4.7 server. ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device done. I would really appreciate if someone could tell me the cause for this message and is there something to worry about the server?. Thanks in advance. Thanks, Naveen. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 20:07:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF59B16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:07:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from v00051.home.net.pl (post.pl [212.85.96.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E33843D39 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:07:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from webart@post.pl) Received: from moonwalker.netconnect.pl (HELO ?10.17.2.24?) (webart.post@home@80.53.216.250) by matrix01b.home.net.pl with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 20:07:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4108077B.4060900@post.pl> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:07:23 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Jacek_Wo=BCniczak?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040724) X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:07:21 -0000 I have a following error (make) linking kernel umass.o: In function `umass_cam_attach_sim': umass.o(.text+0x17e3): undefined reference to `cam_simq_alloc' umass.o(.text+0x1834): undefined reference to `cam_sim_alloc' umass.o(.text+0x1843): undefined reference to `cam_simq_free' umass.o(.text+0x1865): undefined reference to `xpt_bus_register' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_rescan_callback': umass.o(.text+0x1893): undefined reference to `xpt_free_path' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_rescan': umass.o(.text+0x1908): undefined reference to `xpt_periph' umass.o(.text+0x1917): undefined reference to `xpt_create_path' umass.o(.text+0x1933): undefined reference to `xpt_setup_ccb' umass.o(.text+0x1950): undefined reference to `xpt_action' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_detach_sim': umass.o(.text+0x1a5c): undefined reference to `xpt_bus_deregister' umass.o(.text+0x1a78): undefined reference to `cam_sim_free' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_action': umass.o(.text+0x1e60): undefined reference to `cam_calc_geometry' umass.o(.text+0x1e71): undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_cb': umass.o(.text+0x1feb): undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_sense_cb': umass.o(.text+0x2154): undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_quirk_cb': umass.o(.text+0x218b): undefined reference to `xpt_done' *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 20:31:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE7016A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:31:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF4843D5F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:31:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a231.otenet.gr [212.205.215.231]) i6SKUxD9022182; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:31:00 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6SKUrfR061588; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:30:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6SKUrNE061581; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:30:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:30:52 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: DK Message-ID: <20040728203052.GA32457@gothmog.gr> References: <20040728155525.S12001@orion> <20040728162744.29274.qmail@web41010.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728162744.29274.qmail@web41010.mail.yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:31:14 -0000 On 2004-07-28 09:27, DK wrote: > > All I want from BSD to is a Rock Solid Web Server with as default: > - FreeBSD+Minimilist GUI(wmaker will do) > - File Manager(got xfe working) A GUI is something that is not required for a web server to function. Having said that, I'm using Apache on my workstation at home which (usually) also runs X11, windowmaker, a couple of xterms, a mozilla window with several tabs, and tkdesk when I need a GUI for file management (which is rare but still works fine). You should really try TkDesk one of these days. It's my all times favorite from the x11-fm category! ;-) > - Editor(got nedit installed) Great choise! The look & feel of nedit is AFAIK as close as one can get to the interface of Windows editors. The transition from wimpy editors like Notepad that croak and die miserably with files larger than a few KB to the power and flexibility of nedit is probably going to take a while to get used to, but I'm sure you'll eventually get the hang of it and be pleasantly surprised. > - Apache+Mod_SSL+MySQL+PHP+Mod_Perl Despite the fact that this *can* be done, are you sure you want all those extras on your web server? At least two of them (PHP and mod_perl) have overlapping functionality that I find rather redundant to have on one installation of Apache, unless of course you're going to sell virtual domain hosting to others who might want either the one or the other or even both. > - Firewall (is one installed as default ??) The Handbook is, again, your friend. FreeBSD comes with two different firewalls you can choose from, fully integrated to the heart of the OS, the FreeBSD kernel. No need to install third-party software just to enable security on your machine. The two firewalls, ipfw and ipfilter, can be enabled either by loading the proper 'module' to your kernel or by rebuilding the kernel to include the support for whichever of the two you prefer. The Handbook contains detailed instructions about setting up ipfw and there are tons of articles online about setting up ipfilter. The mailing list archives of this list also include a wealth of posts about configuring these two firewalls; I know because I've posted my share of articles too. Start at www.FreeBSD.org and browse to the mailing list archives. Search for posts about "firewall", "ipfw" and "ipfilter". Visit the FreeBSD documentation pages at www.FreeBSD.org/docs.html and read the article about "dialup-firewalls", the Handbook section on "Security" or anything else you feel that you need. > - Web Browser(Mozilla installed but its slow - will try firefox later) > Thats all, nothing else! Mozilla runs super-fast on a Celeron @ 1800 MHz here, but if you try firefox and find it simpler (it *is* simpler, and lighter than the full-blown mozilla) and you like it, then use that instead. This is just one of the cases where you're free to choose the way YOU want to work when dealing with FreeBSD ;-) > I would have thought that with so many people running BSD Web Servers, > that there would be a similar default install out-of-the-box out > there... We don't try to pretend that everyone can be pleased with the same set of tools. This is why it initially seems hard to use BSD. The great number of choises seems overwhelming. Coupled with the relative 'strangeness' of a completely new system it becomes unbearable. Patience... This is all you need for a while, while trying out a new system. > I guess my problem is I know where all the files go on my Windows box, > but I am not sure where the files go on the BSD box when an install > goes wrong. This is part of the 'strangeness' I mentioned above. Don't worry. Soon it all starts to fit in place, and you feel rather "at home" in BSD too. > If the pkg_delete fails, how do I manually remove the files for a > failed [Apache+Mod_SSL+MySQL+PHP+Mod_Perl] installation ?? The ports install stuff under /usr/local unless you specify otherwise (even this simple detail is configurable). I can't post in a simple message all the possible locations under /usr/local that a package might write files, but good candidates are: /usr/local/bin /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/lib /usr/local/libexec /usr/local/share If these paths seem like Greek to you, please refer to the hier(7) manpage by running: % man hier It contains a brief description of the filesystem layout on a FreeBSD system. A lot of these paths are described there. > Yes, apache by itself is easy, its installing the bunch - > Apache+Mod_SSL+MySQL+PHP+Mod_Perl You probably tried to bite a very large mouthful in a short time. As someone else posted, there is a learning curve that is a bit steep at first. Try installing one at a time. See if each part works as expected and, as I've repeatedly said, don't be afraid to ask. About anything... Even the simplest thing might seem a huge mountainous obstacle to you, impossible to pass, but perhaps someone can easily point to a couple of manpages, a link on the web, somewhere and clear things up for you in a few minutes. > Currently as we speak, I am getting about a hit every 10 seconds from > worms... thankfully being caught by my firewall on my Windows 2000 box. This is what I noticed lately too. My firewall log includes stuff like: : 22:47:27.311269 tun0 @0:23 b 212.205.216.181,3625 -> 212.205.215.231,135 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN : 22:47:30.281009 tun0 @0:23 b 212.205.216.181,3625 -> 212.205.215.231,135 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN : 22:47:32.258850 tun0 @0:23 b 212.205.216.181,3625 -> 212.205.215.231,135 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN : 22:48:12.147590 tun0 @0:23 b 212.205.210.40,3397 -> 212.205.215.231,135 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN : 22:48:15.641299 tun0 @0:23 b 212.205.210.40,3397 -> 212.205.215.231,135 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN These are 5 blocked attempts to connect in less than 50 seconds! Less than 10 seconds between attempts to break in. A very solid proof of the sad state that thousands of Windows machines are in and a very good reason why you *SHOULD* try to stick with BSD. Even if just for the sake of curiosity about ways to work free of this nonsense that the Windows world has to tolerate. > Specifically, its the ./configure business of the different > installations & the pedantic order which to install the different > Apache modules etc.. All this and more has been kindly taken care of by the FreeBSD port maintainers. The FreeBSD ports is one of the reasons why I am thoroughly and firmly avoiding to accept anything less than a flexible, extensible, configurable, solid as rock installation system now. Half-assed implementations of "inline" installer wizards that require me to click on silly knobs and buttons is no longer considered "cool" here. The FreeBSD ports have played a major role in making this a reality. > Then its going step by step with the install guides & when I try to install MySQL, I type # > groupadd mysql & I get "command not found" ... ??? no idea, I am following the install guides... > now if I am doing the same as everyone else with a fresh install of BSD, why is it no one else > gets groupadd mysql "command not found" ?? You have to be VERY careful when reading the instructions. There is no "groupadd" command on FreeBSD. There is a "pw" command though, which accepts a "groupadd" option to add new user groups. The full command would be then: # pw groupadd mysql You're not using the mysql ports though. It's obvious, because if you were the databases/mysql-40-server port would take care of all this automatically for you. > I just don't see the point of compiling each program from source. The Handbook chapter on ``Ports & Packages'' is once more your friend. To quote parts of that chapter: : Package Benefits : : * A compressed package tarball is typically smaller than the compressed : tarball containing the source code for the application. : : * Packages do not require any additional compilation. For large : applications, such as Mozilla, KDE, or GNOME this can be important, : particularly if you are on a slow system. : : * Packages do not require any understanding of the process involved in : compiling software on FreeBSD. : : Ports Benefits : : * Packages are normally compiled with conservative options, because they : have to run on the maximum number of systems. By installing from the : port, you can tweak the compilation options to (for example) generate : code that is specific to a Pentium IV or Athlon processor. : : * Some applications have compile time options relating to what they can and : cannot do. For example, Apache can be configured with a wide variety of : different built-in options. By building from the port you do not have to : accept the default options, and can set them yourself. : : In some cases, multiple packages will exist for the same application to : specify certain settings. For example, Ghostscript is available as a : ghostscript package and a ghostscript-nox11 package, depending on whether : or not you have installed an X11 server. This sort of rough tweaking is : possible with packages, but rapidly becomes impossible if an application : has more than one or two different compile time options. : : * The licensing conditions of some software distributions forbid binary : distribution. They must be distributed as source code. : : * Some people do not trust binary distributions. At least with source code, : you can (in theory) read through it and look for potential problems : yourself. : : * If you have local patches, you will need the source in order to apply : them. : : * Some people like having code around, so they can read it if they get : bored, hack it, borrow from it (license permitting, of course), and so : on. You've obviously missed this part, if you have read the Handbook at all. This is, unfortunately, more saddening than cursing and swearing about the stupidity of FreeBSD, because it means that my efforts and the efforts of all the members of the FreeBSD documentation team are (at least as far as you are concerned) in vain :-/ > But if I try to install all of them from the packages, then it breaks > down. I am used to from Windows, installing from packages, then once > everything is installed & running, I go back & tweak the apps to my > likeing This is one of the reasons why installing from source[1] is more flexible than precompiled binaries. When you build from source, it is *YOU* who decides which features to include and not someone who built binaries of some packages a year back, when your RELEASE was cut to a CD-ROM image. [1] When I say "from source" I'm referring to using the /usr/ports infrastructure for installing programs, not downloading random tarballs and furtively running uncomprehensible streams of commands in a fruitless attempt to "Just Make it Work"(TM). > BSD wants me to do the tweaks in configuration files prior to > compiling from source BEFORE I have had a chance to fiddle with the > app to SEE what needs to be tweak. ie installing PHP the setting of mm > should be --without-mm ?? what the... that should be a tweak AFTER its > installed not before... No. Because tweaking the build *before* parts of the programs are included that you'll never use results in smaller executables, faster load times, less bloat and generally in a more pleasing, warm & fuzzy sense of satisfaction when you've managed to shape the things the way you want instead of them shaping you to match their own idea of what you should do and how ;-) > then manually chmod because for some reason, even though I am logged > in as root, all files are not by default excute/write accessable There's a reason for that. Never underestimate the extra security the UNIX way of "disallowing everything and then explicitly allowing only what needs to be done" provides! > I assume I would need to be connect to the net for this... but I would > first need to secure the system from attack BEFORE I connect - maybe > this should be the first part of the docs, straight after installing > BSD+GUI+Editor+FileManager but BEFORE installing Apache Well, you could have read the Handbook before installing too. Why you didn't is beyond me. That's ok though. There are many ways to install a BSD system. One of them is the one I like. Another is the one you like. The good thing is that we can both use the one we prefer without forcing the other one to become something he isn't. You can always read the Handbook now, and see if it helps a bit with configuring a firewall, setting up your network connection, or doing anything else you need. As always, I'll point that if you find anything wrong, misleading, or plainly confusing about the Handbook me and the rest of the FreeBSD Documentation Team will be glad to know your comments, suggestions and/or complaints. If your suggestions seem sensible we'll also be glad to modify & improve the documentation. > I tried that first & when that didn't work, I went to the ports. When > that failed, I went to the Packages. When that failed.... I became Mr > Grumpy.... The fact that the ports work for thousands of people means that you've probably missed something along the way or are in some way confused. There is absolutely no need to be grumpy, but I can't help you with that. I've provided links and pointers to the documentation of FreeBSD more times than I have ever done until now, but there's no sign that you're making any use of the docs. > Raw numbers no... just sitting in front of the BSD screen counting the > seconds.. wondering how people use this OS - then I do a reboot & > select WIN2000 & can't believe the difference. If you want, when I > have time, I could take an mpg of it & upload it for all ?? An mpg of FreeBSD running? Hmmm, I'd be interested to know exactly HOW you'd do that. You're not complaining about the apparent slowness of FreeBSD by running it under VMWare or something similar, right? > I got fvwm2 to run. How to get it to look like a Windows 2000/XP set > up... I could NOT get it to work!! I D/L the files below but could not > install them (can't work out where they are supposed to go ???) > "fvwm2 configured to look very much like Windows XP" > screenshot - http://xwinman.org/screenshots/fvwm2-horen.jpg > configuration files - http://xwinman.org/screenshots/fvwm2-config-horen.tar.gz > icons - http://xwinman.org/screenshots/fvwm2-icons-horen.tar.gz THAT'S IT !!! This is the theme I was talking about. I only found out about it last night and were amazed by the flexibility of fvwm2 for even allowing such a thing! I haven't tried setting it up yet, so I'm not the best person to ask for instructions but I might find the time to tinker with it this weekend. Amazingly similar look to Windows XP though ;-) > > Nobody learns how to install, configure, use & hack a new system in > > an afternoon's time > > no... 6 days, that should be more than enough... I mastered windows 95 in 1 "I mastered" is, I bet, an exaggeration here, but I'll let it pass. I'm sure you didn't install mail, web, ftp, irc and connection sharing servers on Windows 95 in just one day. At least not if you practically had nil experience with the system. But anyway... > > That's because you're still bound to old habits. I have no use for > > slow, GUI monsters that require me to point and click for every little > > detail of what I want to do. > > MS GUI's shows more detailed information to me than simple cmd line > responses for info .. not sure how you see Windows 2000 Explorer as > slow... I'm a fast typist. I can quickly type "ps | more" and have an overview of the processes my systems runs. The equivalent in Windows is: 1. Move mouse over program/start bar. 2. Find a free area, uncluttered by the title of some window. 3. Click right mouse button. 4. Wait until menu pops up. 5. Move pointer to "Task manager" menu item. 6. Click left mouse button. 7. Wait until task manager pops up. 8. Click "processes" tab in the dialog. 9. Wait until the list gets updated. 10. Click on appropriate column to sort. This is a huge list of things to do when compared to just: 1. Type "ps | more" 2. Hit RETURN. Take this to its extreme, namely file operations on many dozens of files, and the point-click-drag-and-wait interface is honestly, at least for me, a real pain in the ass. This is, of course, my personal opinion, which you are not obliged to share. I just thought I'd mention it to show why I feel reluctant to believe that you found FreeBSD slower than Windows. > I can mount my Floppy when I run gluggy KDE, but under Wmaker, I type: > mount -v -t msdos /dev/fd0c /mnt > ... and this says its mounted If it all works as expected this shouldn't say anything at all. If you are, indeed, seeing something it's probably an indication of some error, which means nothing was mounted. > but when I go into xfe.. I cannot see a floppy directory with files ??? > ... any hints at to what could be wrong ??? Try changing the current directory to /mnt and see what files are in that directory. Are they the floppy contents? > > > - 300 Million Users of Windows thinks so ;)) (BTW: I am NOT > > > including KDE/GNOME) > > > > Honestly, I'd be very curious to see where you got that number from. > > Read it in a Forbes article.. but a gestimate would be: > USA/Canada 90 Million > Europe 90 Million > China 30 Million > India 30 Million > Rest of Asia 10 > Russia 25 Million > Rest Eastern Countries 25 Million Is it available online? Any chance we could have a link to that? > When I run partition magic in Win2000, its says that I have a BAD > partition. Doing some searching, found that BSD messes up something > with the sizes of the geometry of the selected partitions(slices) - > still don't know how to fix this ??? Don't "fix" anything. It's more likely that just Partition Magic that is brain-damaged and cannot read the BSD partition properly. > I read the installation chapter then: > 2 FreeBSD Books I have + > FreeBSD Documentation > ? FAQ > ? Handbook > ? Manual pages > ? For Newbies + > Google All this in just 6 days? Or do you mean that you've read all this during the past few months and now you've finally tried to install FreeBSD but failed? > I don't want a bloated desktop install like KDE(see beginning email) That's ok. I don't either ;-) Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 20:37:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCDA16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:37:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE3D43D1F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:37:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6SKa6IB022593; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:36:08 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:37:18 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4108077B.4060900@post.pl> In-Reply-To: <4108077B.4060900@post.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407281337.18537.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Jacek =?utf-8?q?Wo=C5=BAniczak?= Subject: Re: error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:37:26 -0000 On Wednesday 28 July 2004 01:07 pm, Jacek Wo=C5=BAniczak wrote: > I have a following error (make) > > linking kernel > umass.o: In function `umass_cam_attach_sim': > umass.o(.text+0x17e3): undefined reference to `cam_simq_alloc' > umass.o(.text+0x1834): undefined reference to `cam_sim_alloc' > umass.o(.text+0x1843): undefined reference to `cam_simq_free' > umass.o(.text+0x1865): undefined reference to `xpt_bus_register' > umass.o: In function `umass_cam_rescan_callback': > umass.o(.text+0x1893): undefined reference to `xpt_free_path' > umass.o: In function `umass_cam_rescan': > umass.o(.text+0x1908): undefined reference to `xpt_periph' > umass.o(.text+0x1917): undefined reference to `xpt_create_path' > umass.o(.text+0x1933): undefined reference to `xpt_setup_ccb' > umass.o(.text+0x1950): undefined reference to `xpt_action' > umass.o: In function `umass_cam_detach_sim': > umass.o(.text+0x1a5c): undefined reference to `xpt_bus_deregister' > umass.o(.text+0x1a78): undefined reference to `cam_sim_free' > umass.o: In function `umass_cam_action': > umass.o(.text+0x1e60): undefined reference to `cam_calc_geometry' > umass.o(.text+0x1e71): undefined reference to `xpt_done' > umass.o: In function `umass_cam_cb': > umass.o(.text+0x1feb): undefined reference to `xpt_done' > umass.o: In function `umass_cam_sense_cb': > umass.o(.text+0x2154): undefined reference to `xpt_done' > umass.o: In function `umass_cam_quirk_cb': > umass.o(.text+0x218b): undefined reference to `xpt_done' > *** Error code 1 > You commented out too much. Read the requirements for umass in the=20 kernel config file. If you don't need umass, coment it out too.=20 Kent =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 20:55:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A7A16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:55:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C287043D60 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:55:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.104.195.124]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040728205523.HLXO16401.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:55:23 +0100 Received: from tuatara.fishballoon.org ([192.168.1.6]) by llama.fishballoon.org with esmtp (Exim 4.40 (FreeBSD)) id 1BpvR9-000MHN-Pq; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:54:07 +0100 Received: (from scott@localhost) by tuatara.fishballoon.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6SKs5rU000656; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:54:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from scott) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:54:04 +0100 From: Scott Mitchell To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20040728205404.GA466@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C10C7@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> <20040726230518.GA97334@tao.thought.org> <20040727005551.GA97598@tao.thought.org> <20040728165918.GA82093@llama.fishballoon.org> <20040728173431.GB65532@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728173431.GB65532@tao.thought.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE i386 cc: FreeBSD Mailing List cc: "Hauan, David" Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:55:15 -0000 On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:34:31AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 05:59:19PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote: > > What exact Xircom card is this? The xe driver only knows about the older > > Xircom PCMCIA cards. Some of their CardBus adapters are (I believe) > > handled by the dc driver. > > > I have the Xircom Ethernet II 10/100 CBE2-100 (IIRC); someone > on the -mobile list said that only 5.X recognizes this card. > > Both a floppy install of 5.2.1 and a CDROM 5.2.1 recognize > the Cardbus; but both poison almost immediately. --So, for now, > I'm sticking with 4.8 and looking for a PCMCIA card that > works with 4.8. > > gary Yeah, that's a CardBus card that will only work with 5.x - there's no CardBus support whatsoever in 4.x. You seem to be getting some good pointers in another thread to PCMCIA adapters that should work with your machine. If you can find them, the Xircom CE3 or CEM56 / REM56 work pretty well. Most other Xircom cards don't work well on 4.x, and this is unlikely to be fixed, at least not by me. Cheers, Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 21:07:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9844516A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:07:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593AE43D53 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:07:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1B64913631; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:07:16 +1200 (NZST) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:07:16 +1200 From: Jonathan Chen To: 'Andy' Message-ID: <20040728210715.GB1525@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: <41047485.5020309@kg6rir.com> <20040726031529.GA708@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <41047C1A.8070009@kg6rir.com> <20040726033717.GA915@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <410488D9.3000006@kg6rir.com> <20040727031948.GB2525@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <4107BE26.9000903@kg6rir.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4107BE26.9000903@kg6rir.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mozilla Thunderbird on FreebSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:07:17 -0000 On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 02:54:30PM +0000, 'Andy' wrote: > Thank you for the info. > > One more that I could not locate on the list, was Firefox Browser. Is > there a link to that to? > > I went under the Software Application and I could not find Browsers/Firefox. # cd /usr/ports # make key=firefox search will grab several pages worth of info for you to look at. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 21:15:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28BA16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:15:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038D843D45 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:15:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6SLEO0E058920; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:14:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6SLEMYn066247; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:14:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6SLELll066246; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:14:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 14:14:21 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Scott Mitchell Message-ID: <20040728211421.GA66205@tao.thought.org> References: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C10C7@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> <20040726230518.GA97334@tao.thought.org> <20040727005551.GA97598@tao.thought.org> <20040728165918.GA82093@llama.fishballoon.org> <20040728173431.GB65532@tao.thought.org> <20040728205404.GA466@tuatara.fishballoon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728205404.GA466@tuatara.fishballoon.org> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD Mailing List cc: "Hauan, David" Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:15:49 -0000 On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:54:04PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:34:31AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 05:59:19PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote: > > > What exact Xircom card is this? The xe driver only knows about the older > > > Xircom PCMCIA cards. Some of their CardBus adapters are (I believe) > > > handled by the dc driver. > > > > > I have the Xircom Ethernet II 10/100 CBE2-100 (IIRC); someone > > on the -mobile list said that only 5.X recognizes this card. > > > > Both a floppy install of 5.2.1 and a CDROM 5.2.1 recognize > > the Cardbus; but both poison almost immediately. --So, for now, > > I'm sticking with 4.8 and looking for a PCMCIA card that > > works with 4.8. > > > > gary > > Yeah, that's a CardBus card that will only work with 5.x - there's no > CardBus support whatsoever in 4.x. > > You seem to be getting some good pointers in another thread to PCMCIA > adapters that should work with your machine. If you can find them, the > Xircom CE3 or CEM56 / REM56 work pretty well. Most other Xircom cards > don't work well on 4.x, and this is unlikely to be fixed, at least not by > me. > Nor me! (I am going towrite keyboard-click code so that I miss fewer keystrokes, but as for Real-Drivers{TM}. I'll pass.) So new delevopments that might be helpful to others on-list and as green as I am to laptops:: the 5.2.1R CDROM works-- it boots fully--but iff the Xircom card is missing. If this is not how things should work, I'd like to hear. On the 4.8 floppies was some blurb hat the PCMCIA cards were not hot-swappable... . There was some complaint (along with the trap/panic) about "Cardbus" along with an address that I could not copy. But if the Xircom card isn't broken, I should be able to configure it in /etc/rc.conf later. I didn't see any PCMCIA menus in /stand/sysinstall. Nutshell: 5.2 is being installed thanks everybody, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 21:17:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E318116A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:17:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E4A43D64 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:17:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6SLGicO065324; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:16:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6SLGibC065321; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:16:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:16:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: DK In-Reply-To: <20040728094328.70503.qmail@web41005.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040728231624.T65265@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20040728094328.70503.qmail@web41005.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:17:05 -0000 > Hi all, > > I wish BSD had a BigApache installer package, as it would make my life easier... contribution are welcome! > > -------------------------------- > http://www.bigapache.org/ > The BigApache Enterprise Ready Server is free software: > > This Package provides a full implementation of Apache and it`s > commonly used extension modules for the Win32 plattform Windows 2000 & Windows XP > This is the base package for BigApache: > It includes > Apache 2.x > mod_ssl > OpenSSL > mod_perl > mod_python > mod_jk > Mailserver Mercury > Additional modules are available in the module distributions and in the BigApache-modules > repository. > ---------------------------------- > > Regards, > DK > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 21:19:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695C116A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:19:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gaff.hhhr.ision.net (gaff.hhhr.ision.net [195.180.9.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1138543D41 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:19:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohoyer@ohoyer.de) Received: from gaff.hhhr.ision.net (ohoyer@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gaff.hhhr.ision.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6SLJVDt031660; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:19:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohoyer@ohoyer.de) Received: from localhost (ohoyer@localhost)i6SLJT5q031657; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:19:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohoyer@ohoyer.de) X-Authentication-Warning: gaff.hhhr.ision.net: ohoyer owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:19:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Olaf Hoyer Sender: ohoyer@gaff.hhhr.ision.net To: Joseph Koenig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040728231740.V30814@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD + Dell PowerVault NAS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:19:39 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Joseph Koenig wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone used FreeBSD with a Dell PowerVault NAS (Windows-based)? We are > considering moving some servers to a facility that uses PowerVault NAS > machines with Windows to do backups. Is there any issue with this? I should > be able to connect via NFS or SMB and just tar directly to the NAS machine, > correct? Thanks, Well, I've seen one of those providing NFS to a Solaris8 box, and it worked so far. IIRC there is the Windows Storage Server installed, which has Services for Unix as NFS-Provider, rumors go that lots of that code had beed derived from OpenBSD... HTH Olaf -- Olaf Hoyer ohoyer@gaff.hhhr.ision.net Fuerchterliche Erlebniss geben zu raten, ob der, welcher sie erlebt, nicht etwas Fuerchterliches ist. (Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Boese) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 21:28:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7BE16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:28:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (avb119.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.35.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88B243D49 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:28:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] ([192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6SLRqu8023568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:27:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <41081A51.60906@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:27:45 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 X-Accept-Language: en, pl, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040728190254.82842.qmail@web21522.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728190254.82842.qmail@web21522.mail.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Kernel Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:28:03 -0000 bsd hack wrote: > Hi, > I am working with the Kernel config file to optimize it and also to > improve the overall security of the system! Hi, that's good. I'll try to give you some ideas to start inline below: > I have the following quetions: > (1) There are a few options that are not available in the default > kernel... like the IPFIREWALL options(and the like)... I basically need to > know all possible options I can add to the kernel config file! Have a look at /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES file (assuming your machine architecture is i386, if not look in specific directory): # cat /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES | head # # NOTES -- Lines that can be cut/pasted into kernel and hints configs. # # This file contains machine dependent kernel configuration notes. For # machine independent notes, look in /sys/conf/NOTES. It points you to another file: usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES. There are options with explanations in both files. Also check FreeBSD Handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html > (2) I guess these options can be used to set the kernel variables > accessible through the sysctl command. So can I create my own options so > that I can set a few kernel variables as and when I build the custom > kernel? Any sysctl variable can be set in /etc/sysctl.conf file which is used before system goes to multi-user state. Many of them can be even changed "live". Check man sysctl(8), it will also bring loader.conf(5) to your attention. > Thank you. > > -HKR Good luck, Karol -- Karol Kwiatkowski From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 21:50:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A8916A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:50:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888DC43D58 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:50:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DD22551AB for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:50:28 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <41081FBE.5080401@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:50:54 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040726) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Fwd: Re: Random Freeze] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:50:46 -0000 Paul Mather wrote: > Mark, > > When you do, look for PREEMPTION. That should speed up the search. :-) > Yes, I searched the mailing lsts and found it, deleted #define PREEMPTION from sys/i38i6/include/param.h, rebuilt my kernel and the machine has been up for 13 hours now :-) Only thing is the screensaver hangs after ~5 minutes (that had me worried the first time it happened), but that's not really important. > Seriously, though, -CURRENT has been going through some major > instability the last fortnight or so. One thesis is that the > pre-emption code added has either introduced or uncovered some obscure > bugs. The net effect has been random freezes---most often reported is > when under load or doing something (e.g., rendering a complicated page) > using Mozilla, or when using XMMS. > The two apps I probably use the most! > One suggestion, until the culprit has been found, is to rebuild without > PREEMPTION (undef it in /usr/src/sys/i386/include/param.h). That has > certainly stopped the freezes in my case. > Me too. > If you're running -CURRENT, it is advisable to subscribe to the > freebsd-current mailing list---if nothing else but to be apprised of > ongoing problems like this, or to get a heads-up about possible future > instability caused by major repository/functionality changes. (For > example, today there was a heads-up about the GCC 3.4 import being done > [which seems to have broken things temporarily].) > I have done now. I'm only running -CURRENT because this is a dual CPU box and when I built it back in December what I was readin on the lists suggested that 5-STABLE was only a few months away and, since SMP support in 5.x is superior to 4.x, I figured upgrading 5-CURRENT->5-STABLE would be easier than 4-STABLE->%-STABLE. As soon as we get a 5-STABLE that's what I'll run. Thanks for your input. Regards, Mark > Cheers, > > Paul. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 21:59:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743C616A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:59:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB92543D58 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:59:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a156.otenet.gr [212.205.215.156]) i6SLwngS024139; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:58:49 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6SKoRgi088495; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:50:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6SKoReF088488; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:50:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:50:27 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: bsd hack Message-ID: <20040728205027.GA76905@gothmog.gr> References: <20040728190254.82842.qmail@web21522.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728190254.82842.qmail@web21522.mail.yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:59:02 -0000 On 2004-07-28 12:02, bsd hack wrote: > > I have the following quetions: > (1) There are a few options that are not available in the default > kernel... like the IPFIREWALL options(and the like)... I basically need to > know all possible options I can add to the kernel config file! Try reading these: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html > (2) I guess these options can be used to set the kernel variables > accessible through the sysctl command. So can I create my own options so > that I can set a few kernel variables as and when I build the custom > kernel? I don't think so. Read the Handbook sections I posted above for details. > (3) and also my aim includes optimizing the kernel... so by enabling > only the options I need to I should get a get optimization... is there > anything else that can be done? If security is what concerns you, the Handbook has also this chapter: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security.html There also many online articles that deal with the issue of security on a BSD system. Google will reveal dozens of them, but here's a starting pointer just to get you going: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/ct/13 Cheers, Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 22:19:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A4F16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:19:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from raptor.cigb.edu.cu (ns.cigb.edu.cu [200.55.134.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE24243D49 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:18:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu) Received: from atlas.cigb.edu.cu ([172.16.1.12]) by raptor.cigb.edu.cu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:18:25 -0400 Received: from Unknown [172.16.1.4] by atlas.cigb.edu.cu - SurfControl E-mail Filter (4.6); Wednesday, 28 July 2004, 18:18:20 Received: from [172.16.11.106] ([172.16.11.106]) by mercurio.cigb.edu.cu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:18:20 -0400 Message-ID: <200407281818.34503.osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu> From: Osmany Guirola Cruz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:18:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2004 22:18:20.0102 (UTC) FILETIME=[C9DEEE60:01C474F0] References: <20040723110721.20928.qmail@web51606.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040723110721.20928.qmail@web51606.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: CIGB User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Subject: mono 1.0 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:19:06 -0000 i am trying to install mono 1.0 on my freebsd 4.10 STABLE but it freeze here in the process of install MONO_PATH=. ../../mono/mini/mono --config ../../data/config ./../gacutil.exe /i ./Mono.GetOptions.dll /f /package 1.0 /gacdir /usr/local/lib /root /usr/local/lib Package exported to: /usr/local/lib/mono/1.0/Mono.GetOptions.dll -> /usr/local/lib/mono/gac/Mono.GetOptions/1.0.5000.0__0738eb9f132ed756/Mono.GetOptions.dll Mono.GetOptions installed into the gac (/usr/local/lib/mono/gac) and the process lt-mono have more than 60 % of CPU how can i solve these From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 22:19:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216EE16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:19:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.blackfoot.net (mail3.blackfoot.net [12.32.34.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AA843D55 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:19:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from mail1.blackfoot.net (mail1.int-net.blackfoot.net [192.168.100.22]) by mail3.blackfoot.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6SMPq4A016559 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:25:52 -0600 Received: from blackfoot.net (w3 [192.168.100.20]) by mail1.blackfoot.net (8.12.10/8.12.2) with SMTP id i6SMV86f010839 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:31:08 -0600 (MDT) From: "Gary Aitken" Sender: vagabond@blackfoot.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:31:05 -0600 X-Mailer: DMailWeb Web to Mail Gateway 2.8e, http://netwinsite.com/top_mail.htm Message-id: <41082929.1b9a.0@blackfoot.net> X-User-Info: 12.32.36.74 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: qpopper, make failure, COMMENTFILE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: vagabond@blackfoot.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:19:47 -0000 I just upgraded (I think :-)) from 4.5 to 4.10. Initially tried an upgrade, which failed because of an undefined reference in the X11 font server library (libfontconfig.so.1, FT_Get_BDF_Property"). Not to be deterred, I then attempted to do a complete install over the top of everything. This failed for the same reason. I then did an install without X11. This sort of seemed to work, although I don't think things finished up properly because I didn't get the usual questions about running an http server, etc. However, it appeared the sys sources were updated and all the files were in place, so I built a custom kernel (needed for my network drivers) and things started up ok; it says it's 4.10-RELEASE #0, and files in /etc were replaced and had to be tweaked (rc.conf, etc). Unfortunately, the popper I was using (qpopper 4.0.3) was causing things on clients attempting to pop to hang, so I decided to update it. I deleted it (pkg_delete), downloaded the new .tgz, and attempted to do a make: Makefile error: There is a COMMENTFILE in this port. COMMENTFILEs have been deprecated in favor of COMMENT variables. Please rectify this. *** Error code 1 I attempted to do a pkg_add, which resulted in: pkg_add: package bsdpan-Archive-Tar-1.10 has no origin recorded and many similar messages of other bsdpan stuff I'm guessing the entire package / make environment is hosed, and I probably need to completely rebuild the system from scratch. Is this true, or is there a simpler answer? Thanks for any insights. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 22:58:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF88A16A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:58:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cider.cibernet.com (cider.cibernet.com [212.113.16.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450A843D46 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:58:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tal@whatexit.org) Received: from [10.10.12.182] (ip2.198.145.31.iinet.com [198.145.31.2]) by cider.cibernet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EF1773EE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:59:28 +0100 (BST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <9C51062C-E0E9-11D8-B4EB-000D93C2342A@whatexit.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Tom Limoncelli Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:58:16 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Subject: Setting up good certs for ports/mail/imap-uw? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:58:25 -0000 The instructions for ports/mail/imap-uw tell you that "make cert" generates certs that are self-signed and warns you that it is better to get "real" certs but doesn't explain how to do that. Any suggestions? The long version... I install the port and then do "make cert" to make the certs: root@gsp:/ # cd /usr/ports/mail/imap-uw/ root@gsp:/usr/ports/mail/imap-uw # make cert Generating a 1024 bit RSA private key ...............................++++++ ............++++++ writing new private key to '/usr/local/certs/imapd.pem' ----- You are about to be asked to enter information that will be incorporated [...much later...] MD5 Fingerprint=09:88:5C:19:6A:3F:3A:F5:44:65:82:60:56:5A:B0:72 root@gsp:/usr/ports/mail/imap-uw # cd /usr/local/certs/ root@gsp:/usr/local/certs # ls imapd.pem ipop3d.pem Where is the .csr file to submit? Every document that explains the process says that self-signed certs are insecure and recommends getting a real cert, but never tells you how to do that. Sorry, I'm relatively new to email certs. (https certs give me none of these troubles! :-) ) Thanks in advance, Tom Limoncelli From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 22:59:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4FA16A4E8 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:59:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.magma.ca (mx2.magma.ca [206.191.0.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3E343D53 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:59:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ebudd@grokking.org) Received: from in1.magma.ca (in1.magma.ca [206.191.0.223]) by mx2.magma.ca (Magma's Mail Server) with ESMTP id i6SMxp10013698 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:59:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.sohotech.ca (ottawa-hs-64-26-169-251.s-ip.magma.ca [64.26.169.251]) by in1.magma.ca (Magma's Mail Server) with ESMTP id i6SMxoWN011665 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:59:51 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (heinlein.sohotech.ca [192.168.1.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx1.sohotech.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6SMxmCt095525 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:59:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ebudd@grokking.org) Message-ID: <41082FE4.4050107@grokking.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:59:48 -0400 From: Ed Budd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040702) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:59:52 -0000 > What I have noticed so far about FreeBSD: > > FreeBSD is about 5 YEARS behind windows(I would actually say 1990, but people my have heart > attacks) - apologies to all the hard work put in by BSD contributors! > > - with FreeBSD & Windows 2000 installed on the SAME computer, the GUI of Windows 2000 is MUCH > faster than any of the BSD window managers(wmaker, FVWM, blackbox, fluxbox, XFCE(STILL can't start > this from exec, whats the damn command startxfce4 ??? this doesn't work!)... I won't even comment > on the shitty performance of KDE & GNOME - If people say it should be used without a GUI... they > must be over 40, bald, lonely & most love shitty VI - I can EDIT any file faster on a GUI editor > then any coder I have seen at UNI/WORK who say VI is better... > > - No default GUI File Explorer(excluding KDE/GNOME, not that there's is usable) - had to install > xfe on wmaker(still about as useless as Windows 3.1 File Manager) > > - FreeBSD does NOT Default Mount my CD & Floppy(this is ridiculous - even MS DOS NOT to mention > Windows 3.1[Year 1990... ring a bell] did this!!) - you honestly expect new users to edit > configuration files so it automounts ?? ... instead of having stuff in the man/manual/docs about > mounting/unmounting, just automount them as DEFAULT... no need to read the docs... logical ??? > - 300 Million Users of Windows thinks so ;)) (BTW: I am NOT including KDE/GNOME) > > - No default Find Files GUI - I won't even comment on lack of functionality of Cmd line > whereis/search/find > > I can tell you that 95% of people who use computers want "EASE of USE" > - This INCLUDES easy installation of the Operating System > - This should INCLUDE a default setup that HAS: a Default FAST GUI/File Manager/Find Files/Editor > .. this is all that is needed to get a user up & going to installing & configuring the OS to thier > tastes ... did I forget to mention as default AUTOMOUNT !! > > > I cannot tell you the shock & disappointment I had in finding out that Windows 2000 runs FASTER > than FreeBSD with any GUI/Windows Manager/Desktop Environment ... :((( > > > > ...damn I have gone way off track here... sorry for the ranting people... but after 6 days > straight of messing around trying to install Apache/MySQL/Mod_Perl/Mod_SSL/PHP.. I am a little > tired... 3 days of that was trying to get a basic GUI/File Manager/Find Files/Editor working > > It must be very tiring and stressful to be a Troll. Perhaps you should consider another occupation... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 23:43:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B794416A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:43:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FAC43D53 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:43:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 3443 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jul 2004 23:36:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2004 23:36:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79658140; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:43:01 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (it.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68285-08; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:43:01 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EE638135; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:43:00 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:43:00 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: vagabond@blackfoot.net Message-Id: <20040729024300.67ea09f4@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <41082929.1b9a.0@blackfoot.net> References: <41082929.1b9a.0@blackfoot.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qpopper, make failure, COMMENTFILE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:43:06 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:31:05 -0600 "Gary Aitken" wrote: > I just upgraded (I think :-)) from 4.5 to 4.10. > Initially tried an upgrade, which failed because of an undefined reference > in the X11 font server library (libfontconfig.so.1, FT_Get_BDF_Property"). > > Not to be deterred, I then attempted to do a complete install over the top > of everything. This failed for the same reason. > > I then did an install without X11. This sort of seemed to work, although I > don't think things finished up properly because I didn't get the usual > questions about running an http server, etc. > > However, it appeared the sys sources were updated and all the files were in > place, so I built a custom kernel (needed for my network drivers) and > things started up ok; it says it's 4.10-RELEASE #0, and files in /etc were > replaced and had to be tweaked (rc.conf, etc). > > Unfortunately, the popper I was using (qpopper 4.0.3) was causing things on > clients attempting to pop to hang, so I decided to update it. I deleted it > (pkg_delete), downloaded the new .tgz, and attempted to do a make: > > Makefile error: There is a COMMENTFILE in this port. > COMMENTFILEs have been deprecated in > favor of COMMENT variables. > Please rectify this. > *** Error code 1 It seems you have an updated set of ports/Mk/bsd.*.mk but the old ports tree. cvsuping the hole tree, with no refuse files and rebuilding INDEX would probably help. But you will end rebuilding pretty much everything. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 00:13:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6735116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:13:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DAB43D5F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:13:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6T0DX0E059231; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:13:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6T0DWMh066547; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:13:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6T0DVR9066546; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:13:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:13:31 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Scott Mitchell Message-ID: <20040729001331.GA66469@tao.thought.org> References: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC68C10C7@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> <20040726230518.GA97334@tao.thought.org> <20040727005551.GA97598@tao.thought.org> <20040728165918.GA82093@llama.fishballoon.org> <20040728173431.GB65532@tao.thought.org> <20040728205404.GA466@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <20040728211421.GA66205@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040728211421.GA66205@tao.thought.org> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: wrong Xircom card?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:13:48 -0000 On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 02:14:21PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:54:04PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:34:31AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 05:59:19PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote: > > > > What exact Xircom card is this? The xe driver only knows about the older > > > > Xircom PCMCIA cards. Some of their CardBus adapters are (I believe) > > > > handled by the dc driver. > > > > > > > I have the Xircom Ethernet II 10/100 CBE2-100 (IIRC); someone > > > on the -mobile list said that only 5.X recognizes this card. > > > [ ... ] > > Yeah, that's a CardBus card that will only work with 5.x - there's no > > CardBus support whatsoever in 4.x. > > > > You seem to be getting some good pointers in another thread to PCMCIA > > adapters that should work with your machine. If you can find them, the > > Xircom CE3 or CEM56 / REM56 work pretty well. Most other Xircom cards > > don't work well on 4.x, and this is unlikely to be fixed, at least not by > > me. > > > [ ... ] > There was some complaint (along with the trap/panic) about > "Cardbus" along with an address that I could not copy. > But if the Xircom card isn't broken, I should be able to > configure it in /etc/rc.conf later. I didn't see any > PCMCIA menus in /stand/sysinstall. > Latest discoveries are that with the Xircom Ethernet II well seated, upon reboot, the kernel panics when it sees the card. It's a new card, so guessing it is a driver problem. Time to look for a new card. Inthe KERNEL config files does anybody have any experience with: ex # Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 and Pro/10+ ep # Etherlink III based cards fe # Fujitsu MB8696x based cards ie # EtherExpress 8/16, 3C507, StarLAN 10 lnc # NE2100, NE32-VL Lance Ethernet cards or am I looking in the wrong place? gary Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 00:43:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8443616A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:43:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from maui.ebi.ac.uk (maui.ebi.ac.uk [193.62.196.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3084C43D2D; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:43:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kreil@ebi.ac.uk) Received: from puffin.ebi.ac.uk (puffin.ebi.ac.uk [193.62.196.89]) by maui.ebi.ac.uk (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i6T0hTF29565; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:43:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from puffin.ebi.ac.uk (kreil@localhost) by puffin.ebi.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6T0hTC26000; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:43:29 +0100 Message-Id: <200407290043.i6T0hTC26000@puffin.ebi.ac.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:43:29 +0100 From: David Kreil X-EBI-Information: This email is scanned using www.mailscanner.info. X-EBI: Found to be clean X-EBI-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-7.989, required 5, HABEAS_SWE -8.00, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.01) cc: Kreil@ebi.ac.uk Subject: How to recover/reinitialize a trashed /var partition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:43:35 -0000 Hello, I am writing in the hope that someone can give me a hint of how to either recover or recreate a virgin FreeBSD /var partition in an otherwise (apparently) functioning system. Probably in the process of a drive failure in our hardware raid our /var volume got corrupted (yeah, I know this should not happen... sigh. I now also understand why it is recommended having /var on a separate partition...). I tried running fsck -y on /var after umount-ing it, which gives a segmentation fault (exit on signal 11) some way through the process after displaying ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ALLOCATE? yes CG 0: BAD MAGIC FILE NUMBER UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY Now I wonder - is this beyond repair? I should much like to recover /var, just to be able to have a look at the /var/logs to get an idea what went wrong when. About 3.6GB are reported to be in use by df. - If I cannot recover the /var partition, what is the canonical way of recreating it? I suppose I can run newfs on it, but how do I create the necessary subdir structure with the right file-permissions? Could /stand/sysinstall do that? With many thanks for your help in advance, Yours sincerely, David. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dr David Philip Kreil ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ Research Fellow `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) University of Cambridge (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' ++44 1223 764107, fax 333992 _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dpk20 (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 00:47:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA3C16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:47:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao10.cox.net (lakermmtao10.cox.net [68.230.240.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D7443D5F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:47:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from router.rcservers.com ([68.12.171.184]) by lakermmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP <20040729004707.LNCZ20727.lakermmtao10.cox.net@router.rcservers.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:47:07 -0400 Received: from dredster (dredster.rcservers.com [192.168.1.2]) by router.rcservers.com (8.13.0/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6T0l72I002828; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:47:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Message-ID: <2bab01c47505$93372ed0$0201a8c0@dredster> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: "Ed Budd" , References: <20040728112715.47686.qmail@web41003.mail.yahoo.com> <41082FE4.4050107@grokking.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:46:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2149 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2149 Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:47:09 -0000 . ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Budd" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:59 PM Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? >> ...damn I have gone way off track here... sorry for the ranting >> people... but after 6 days >> straight of messing around trying to install >> Apache/MySQL/Mod_Perl/Mod_SSL/PHP.. I am a little >> tired... 3 days of that was trying to get a basic GUI/File >> Manager/Find Files/Editor working >> >> > > It must be very tiring and stressful to be a Troll. Perhaps you should > consider another occupation... > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If this wasn't a troll, perhaps he needs to stick with Windows until he has a better understanding of what the difference between workstations and servers really are. -- Micheal Patterson TSG Network Administration 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:07:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA5216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:07:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from richard2.pil.net (richard2.pil.net [208.8.16.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11BB243D73 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:07:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: (qmail 27344 invoked by uid 1825); 29 Jul 2004 01:06:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 01:06:46 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:06:46 -0400 (EDT) From: up@3.am X-X-Sender: up@richard2.pil.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, FreeBSD ISP List Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: DLT "device not configured" error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:07:11 -0000 A few months ago I brought up a new server using an Adaptec 2200S RAID card, and it's been running fine with a RAID 1 array on channel 0. Today I tried to move the DLT (Quantum 4000) over to this server to make it the amanda server, so I plugged it into the controller's external port for channel 1. When I do, neither amanda or mt will see the device, I get: mt: /dev/nsa0: Device not configured I tried rebooting (production box, but it had to be tried) and the Adaptec BIOS correctly recognized the device, but I still got that error. I tried moving the SCSI cable to the channel 0 port, but that caused serious panics and an ugly fscking power-cycle. Power cycling the tape drive repeatedly throughout this had no effect. I even did a "sh MAKEDEV sa1" thinking that the 0 in nsa0 might have something to do with the SCSI channel. No dice. I'm all out of ideas...if anyone can spare a clue, please respond by cc'ing me directly, as I am not subscribed to the lists. TIA, James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:11:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B269216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:11:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from richard2.pil.net (richard2.pil.net [208.8.16.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 354BD43D58 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:11:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: (qmail 45267 invoked by uid 1825); 29 Jul 2004 01:11:03 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 01:11:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:11:03 -0400 (EDT) From: up@3.am X-X-Sender: up@richard2.pil.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD ISP List Subject: DLT "device not configured" errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:11:04 -0000 A few months ago I brought up a new server using an Adaptec 2200S RAID card, and it's been running fine with a RAID 1 array on channel 0. Today I tried to move the DLT (Quantum 4000) over to this server to make it the amanda server, so I plugged it into the controller's external port for channel 1. When I do, neither amanda or mt will see the device, I get: mt: /dev/nsa0: Device not configured I tried rebooting (production box, but it had to be tried) and the Adaptec BIOS correctly recognized the device, but I still got that error. I tried moving the SCSI cable to the channel 0 port, but that caused serious panics and an ugly fscking power-cycle. Since the disk array is on that channel, I won't try that again. Back to channel 1. Power cycling the tape drive repeatedly throughout this had no effect. I even did a "sh MAKEDEV sa1", thinking that maybe the "0" in "sa0" might have had something to do with the channel ID. No dice. I'm all out of ideas, and would appreciate if anyone could spare a clue. Please reply by cc'ing me directly as I am not subscribed to the lists. TIA! James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:15:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CB716A4CF; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:15:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB7A43D2F; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:15:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6T1F7OF001741; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:15:07 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id i6T1F7IO001740; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:15:07 -0700 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:15:07 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: David Kreil Message-ID: <20040729011507.GB20909@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <200407290043.i6T0hTC26000@puffin.ebi.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407290043.i6T0hTC26000@puffin.ebi.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to recover/reinitialize a trashed /var partition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:15:26 -0000 --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:43:29AM +0100, David Kreil wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I am writing in the hope that someone can give me a hint of how to either= =20 > recover or recreate a virgin FreeBSD /var partition in an otherwise=20 > (apparently) functioning system. >=20 > Probably in the process of a drive failure in our hardware raid our /var= =20 > volume got corrupted (yeah, I know this should not happen... sigh. I now = also=20 > understand why it is recommended having /var on a separate partition...). >=20 > I tried running fsck -y on /var after umount-ing it, which gives a=20 > segmentation fault (exit on signal 11) some way through the process after= =20 > displaying >=20 > ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames > ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY >=20 > ALLOCATE? yes >=20 > CG 0: BAD MAGIC FILE NUMBER > UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY >=20 > Now I wonder > - is this beyond repair? I should much like to recover /var, > just to be able to have a look at the /var/logs to get an idea what > went wrong when. About 3.6GB are reported to be in use by df. I'm guessing it's beyond reasionable repair, but I'm not ufs expert. Unless you've got data on there that you really need and didn't have backed up, I'd just rebuild from acratch. > - If I cannot recover the /var partition, what is the canonical way of > recreating it? I suppose I can run newfs on it, but how do I create the > necessary subdir structure with the right file-permissions? Could > /stand/sysinstall do that? The short version is: # populate /var /usr/sbin/mtree -deU -f /etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var # add sendmail bits /usr/sbin/mtree -deU -f /etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist -p / # create new syslog files /usr/sbin/newsyslog -CC # add a lastlog file /usr/bin/touch /var/log/lastlog I cribbed this from /etc/rc.d/var on current. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCE+aXY6L6fI4GtQRArxCAKDJ/P9CAM3Y9K0C5Pc2zpSB2ODbjgCfSTmw CWTYfpxt0n9itJ0JMRA9DFI= =opSh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:16:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403E216A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:16:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA49A43D41; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:16:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i6T1FoGZ051083; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:15:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:15:50 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: up@3.am Message-ID: <20040729011550.GA26125@dan.emsphone.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD ISP List cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DLT "device not configured" errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:16:13 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 28), up@3.am said: > A few months ago I brought up a new server using an Adaptec 2200S RAID > card, and it's been running fine with a RAID 1 array on channel 0. Today > I tried to move the DLT (Quantum 4000) over to this server to make it the > amanda server, so I plugged it into the controller's external port for > channel 1. When I do, neither amanda or mt will see the device, I get: > > mt: /dev/nsa0: Device not configured This could mean that there's no tape in the drive. Does "camcontrol devlist" see the drive? Also make sure you have the "aacp" device in the kernel; that allows non-disk devices to pass through the raid controller and be seen by FreeBSD. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:19:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDC816A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:19:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from structbio.vanderbilt.edu (reef.structbio.Vanderbilt.Edu [160.129.138.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFEE43D5A; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:19:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bandix@home.funnyvalentine.net) Received: from home.funnyvalentine.net (adsl-065-007-237-012.sip.bna.bellsouth.net [65.7.237.12]) i6T1JHRg028354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:19:18 -0500 Received: (from bandix@localhost) by home.funnyvalentine.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i6T1JBwj060096; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:19:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bandix) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:19:11 -0500 From: "Brandon D. Valentine" To: David Kreil Message-ID: <20040729011911.GA59212@brandon.dvalentine.com> References: <200407290043.i6T0hTC26000@puffin.ebi.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407290043.i6T0hTC26000@puffin.ebi.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to recover/reinitialize a trashed /var partition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:19:30 -0000 On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:43:29AM +0100, David Kreil wrote: > I am writing in the hope that someone can give me a hint of how to either > recover or recreate a virgin FreeBSD /var partition in an otherwise > (apparently) functioning system. If you've still got /usr/obj around from your last buildworld you can boot to single user mode and installworld again. If not, you can use mtree(8) to recreate the hierarchy for /var. This should work: # mtree -deU -f /etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var You may have to touch/chown/chmod a few files here and there to make sure the appropriate users have permissions to write to/from them. See /usr/src/etc/Makefile for some more information on that. Unfortunately I don't think there is a 'var' target in any of those Makefiles. HTH, Brandon D. Valentine -- brandon@dvalentine.com http://www.geekpunk.net Pseudo-Random Googlism: brandon is gummmmy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:20:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B5416A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:20:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from maui.ebi.ac.uk (maui.ebi.ac.uk [193.62.196.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B8A43D1F; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:20:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kreil@ebi.ac.uk) Received: from puffin.ebi.ac.uk (puffin.ebi.ac.uk [193.62.196.89]) by maui.ebi.ac.uk (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i6T1KiF16630; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:20:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from puffin.ebi.ac.uk (kreil@localhost) by puffin.ebi.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6T1Khd00595; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:20:44 +0100 Message-Id: <200407290120.i6T1Khd00595@puffin.ebi.ac.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Brooks Davis In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:15:07 PDT." <20040729011507.GB20909@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:20:43 +0100 From: David Kreil X-EBI-Information: This email is scanned using www.mailscanner.info. X-EBI: Found to be clean X-EBI-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-8, required 5, HABEAS_SWE -8.00) cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: David Kreil cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to recover/reinitialize a trashed /var partition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:20:53 -0000 Dear Brooks, Thank you very much for your fast and helpful reply. # populate /var /usr/sbin/mtree -deU -f /etc/mtree/BSD.var.dist -p /var # add sendmail bits /usr/sbin/mtree -deU -f /etc/mtree/BSD.sendmail.dist -p / # create new syslog files /usr/sbin/newsyslog -CC # add a lastlog file /usr/bin/touch /var/log/lastlog > I cribbed this from /etc/rc.d/var on current. This is fantastic, thanks! With best regards, David. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dr David Philip Kreil ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ Research Fellow `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) University of Cambridge (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' ++44 1223 764107, fax 333992 _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dpk20 (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:47:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA10D16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:47:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14106.mail.yahoo.com (web14106.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE20643D1F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:47:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandboxpro@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729014700.41645.qmail@web14106.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.214.84.59] by web14106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:47:00 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:47:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Sandbox Video Productions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: KDE vs Gnome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:47:02 -0000 IF i install both gnome & kde. how do i choose which one i want to start up. It seem that it only starts the GUI that was installed last. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:52:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442E516A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:52:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA57C43D2D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:52:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E63616C; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:51:48 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <41085833.3020408@makeworld.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:51:47 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sandbox Video Productions References: <20040729014700.41645.qmail@web14106.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040729014700.41645.qmail@web14106.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-Information: Isn't it ironic X-makeworld.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-makeworld.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0.342, required 5, RATWR10_MESSID 0.11, TW_TK 0.08, TW_TX 0.08, TW_XF 0.08) X-MailScanner-From: racerx@makeworld.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE vs Gnome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:52:01 -0000 Sandbox Video Productions wrote: > IF i install both gnome & kde. how do i choose which > one i want to start up. It seem that it only starts > the GUI that was installed last. > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Depends. 1. Are you using KDM? If so, you make your choice at the login menu. 2. If not above, edit .xinitrc and comment out one IE: exec startkde #gnome-session #exec startxfce4 #exec startfluxbox In the above example, KDE starts after entering startx #exec startkde gnome-session #exec startxfce4 #exec startfluxbox In the above example, Gnome starts ater entering startx -- Best regards, Chris -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ClamAV virus dat updated: Wed Jul 28 2004 at 03:02:59 daily.cvd updated (version: 424, sigs: 1141, f-level: 2, builder: tkojm) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 01:57:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F18816A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:57:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from richard2.pil.net (richard2.pil.net [208.8.16.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A69A843D39 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:57:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: (qmail 6167 invoked by uid 1825); 29 Jul 2004 01:57:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 01:57:21 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:57:21 -0400 (EDT) From: up@3.am X-X-Sender: up@richard2.pil.net To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20040729011550.GA26125@dan.emsphone.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD ISP List cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DLT "device not configured" errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:57:31 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 28), up@3.am said: > > A few months ago I brought up a new server using an Adaptec 2200S RAID > > card, and it's been running fine with a RAID 1 array on channel 0. Today > > I tried to move the DLT (Quantum 4000) over to this server to make it the > > amanda server, so I plugged it into the controller's external port for > > channel 1. When I do, neither amanda or mt will see the device, I get: > > > > mt: /dev/nsa0: Device not configured > > This could mean that there's no tape in the drive. Does "camcontrol > devlist" see the drive? Also make sure you have the "aacp" device in the > kernel; that allows non-disk devices to pass through the raid controller and > be seen by FreeBSD. I should have added: camcontrol doesn't see *any* devices, including the disks (and a rescan does nothing either). I did not have the aacp option enabled, so I will also try that. It does not appear that any kernel options are neccessary for camcontrol to work, as it works in all my older (4.9 and earlier) versions with virtually the same kernel options as in this box (4.10) James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 02:02:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F4416A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:02:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from maui.ebi.ac.uk (maui.ebi.ac.uk [193.62.196.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD2A43D54; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:02:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kreil@ebi.ac.uk) Received: from puffin.ebi.ac.uk (puffin.ebi.ac.uk [193.62.196.89]) by maui.ebi.ac.uk (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i6T22NF07258; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:02:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from puffin.ebi.ac.uk (kreil@localhost) by puffin.ebi.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6T22NX08498; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:02:23 +0100 Message-Id: <200407290202.i6T22NX08498@puffin.ebi.ac.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Brandon D. Valentine" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:19:11 CDT." <20040729011911.GA59212@brandon.dvalentine.com> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:02:23 +0100 From: David Kreil X-EBI-Information: This email is scanned using www.mailscanner.info. X-EBI: Found to be clean X-EBI-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-8, required 5, HABEAS_SWE -8.00) cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: David Kreil cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to recover/reinitialize a trashed /var partition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:02:26 -0000 Dear Brandon D Valentine, Thank you for your helpful comments. > You may have to touch/chown/chmod a few files here and there to make > sure the appropriate users have permissions to write to/from them. See > /usr/src/etc/Makefile for some more information on that. > > Unfortunately I don't think there is a 'var' target in any of those > Makefiles. Thanks for the pointer. Yes, shame there is no such target. Considering that folks generally advise putting /var on a separate partition, my kind of bad luck must be quite common. With best regards, David. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dr David Philip Kreil ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ Research Fellow `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) University of Cambridge (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' ++44 1223 764107, fax 333992 _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dpk20 (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 02:10:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF1916A4CF for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:10:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web40202.mail.yahoo.com (web40202.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30CB843D73 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:10:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jw_nyc@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729021005.70208.qmail@web40202.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [162.84.242.55] by web40202.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:10:05 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:10:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Jonathan White To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Finding Cosultants X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:10:35 -0000 Anyone have an idea how to find a FreeBSD consultant in Brooklyn NY? Thanks jonathan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 02:12:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A5916A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:12:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from richard2.pil.net (richard2.pil.net [208.8.16.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FC9043D7C for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:12:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from up@3.am) Received: (qmail 15857 invoked by uid 1825); 29 Jul 2004 02:12:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 02:12:55 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:12:55 -0400 (EDT) From: up@3.am X-X-Sender: up@richard2.pil.net To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20040729011550.GA26125@dan.emsphone.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD ISP List cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DLT "device not configured" errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:12:56 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 28), up@3.am said: > > A few months ago I brought up a new server using an Adaptec 2200S RAID > > card, and it's been running fine with a RAID 1 array on channel 0. Today > > I tried to move the DLT (Quantum 4000) over to this server to make it the > > amanda server, so I plugged it into the controller's external port for > > channel 1. When I do, neither amanda or mt will see the device, I get: > > > > mt: /dev/nsa0: Device not configured > > This could mean that there's no tape in the drive. Does "camcontrol > devlist" see the drive? Also make sure you have the "aacp" device in the > kernel; that allows non-disk devices to pass through the raid controller and > be seen by FreeBSD. The "aacp" device did the trick, for both the drive and camcontrol. Thanks! James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 03:00:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCF016A4D2 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:00:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hermes.webtent.net (hermes.webtent.net [192.216.106.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFBA43D1F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:00:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@webtent.com) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (webtent.org [198.79.127.235]) by hermes.webtent.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i6T304j29840 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:00:04 -0400 From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Message-Id: <1091070008.10979.12.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:00:08 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Install FreeBSD 5.2.1 on Compaq Proliant 800 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:00:45 -0000 Trying to install FreeBSD 5.2.1 on a Compaq Proliant 800, looking for someone that has done this or similar. Of course, you have to have the SmartStart CD, I have that, I choose System Erase and it loads the Compaq partition and the FreeBSD goes without error and when I reboot I get 'Invalid partition type', that's it. After System Erase, I set the configuration to Unix (Large Geometry), there are 4 SCSI drives, two 18GB and two 9GB, FreeBSD finds and represents all correctly on install. Seems the Compaq BIOS is just not letting me use those partitions as active? -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 03:06:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8321616A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:06:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from usw2.natel.net (2b.bz [209.152.117.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF47143D6D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:06:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from WD@US-Webmasters.com) Received: (qmail 23449 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2004 03:05:59 -0000 Received: from batv-01-030.dialup.netins.net (HELO xyz.US-Webmasters.com) (216.248.109.31) by us-webmasters.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 03:05:59 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040728220035.0641b960@209.152.117.178> X-Sender: wd@209.152.117.178 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:05:13 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "W. D." In-Reply-To: <20040729021005.70208.qmail@web40202.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: Jonathan White Subject: Re: Finding Cosultants X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:06:02 -0000 At 21:10 7/28/2004, Jonathan White wrote: >Anyone have an idea how to find a FreeBSD consultant in Brooklyn NY? > >Thanks >jonathan http://www.freebsd.org/commercial/consult.html http://www.Google.com/search?q=3D%28brooklyn+OR+nyc++OR+%22New+York%22%29+fr= eebsd http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=3D%28brooklyn+OR+nyc+OR+%22New+York%22%29+f= reebsd Start Here to Find It Fast!=99 ->= http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names -> http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 03:38:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C0716A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:38:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.blackfoot.net (mail3.blackfoot.net [12.32.34.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3888243D53 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:38:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from mail1.blackfoot.net (mail1.int-net.blackfoot.net [192.168.100.22])i6T3iHRl029058; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:44:17 -0600 Received: from blackfoot.net (w3 [192.168.100.20]) by mail1.blackfoot.net (8.12.10/8.12.2) with SMTP id i6T3nXnA003100; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:49:33 -0600 (MDT) From: "Gary Aitken" Sender: vagabond@blackfoot.net To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:49:29 -0600 X-Mailer: DMailWeb Web to Mail Gateway 2.8e, http://netwinsite.com/top_mail.htm Message-id: <410873c9.3639.0@blackfoot.net> X-User-Info: 12.32.36.74 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: qpopper, make failure, COMMENTFILE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: vagabond@blackfoot.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:38:03 -0000 Many thanks. I ended up doing a tar xzf /cdrom/ports/ports.tgz to restore it, then did the necessary rebuilding. >On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:31:05 -0600 >"Gary Aitken" wrote: > >> I just upgraded (I think :-)) from 4.5 to 4.10. >> Initially tried an upgrade, which failed because of an undefined reference >> in the X11 font server library (libfontconfig.so.1, FT_Get_BDF_Property"). >> >> Not to be deterred, I then attempted to do a complete install over the top >> of everything. This failed for the same reason. >> >> I then did an install without X11. This sort of seemed to work, although I >> don't think things finished up properly because I didn't get the usual >> questions about running an http server, etc. >> >> However, it appeared the sys sources were updated and all the files were in >> place, so I built a custom kernel (needed for my network drivers) and >> things started up ok; it says it's 4.10-RELEASE #0, and files in /etc were >> replaced and had to be tweaked (rc.conf, etc). >> >> Unfortunately, the popper I was using (qpopper 4.0.3) was causing things on >> clients attempting to pop to hang, so I decided to update it. I deleted it >> (pkg_delete), downloaded the new .tgz, and attempted to do a make: >> >> Makefile error: There is a COMMENTFILE in this port. >> COMMENTFILEs have been deprecated in >> favor of COMMENT variables. >> Please rectify this. >> *** Error code 1 > >It seems you have an updated set of ports/Mk/bsd.*.mk but the old ports >tree. cvsuping the hole tree, with no refuse files and rebuilding INDEX >would probably help. But you will end rebuilding pretty much everything. > > >-- >IOnut >Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 03:47:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2440116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:47:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (joel.tallye.com [216.99.199.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEB543D5E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:47:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lorenl@alzatex.com) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (hosea.tallye.com [127.0.0.1]) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6T3l8Iw005457 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:47:08 -0700 Received: (from sttng359@localhost) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10/Submit) id i6T3l8i2005455 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:47:08 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: hosea.tallye.com: sttng359 set sender to lorenl@alzatex.com using -f Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:47:08 -0700 From: "Loren M. Lang" To: FreeBSD Mailing list Message-ID: <20040729034708.GA5058@alzatex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C Subject: LinuxWorld Expo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:47:11 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was wondering if there will be a FreeBSD booth at the LinuxWorld Expo this year. --=20 I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C =20 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCHM8+vN6RuSjKAwRAhCjAJ9cL5hvxSdQW/G6704nOc96qgg6WQCeP+O4 Aj4hFTCgeW8tE3t6LD35hjQ= =RxY6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 03:48:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E3016A4CF for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:48:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14101.mail.yahoo.com (web14101.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D586B43D5C for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:48:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandboxpro@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729034852.95441.qmail@web14101.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.214.84.59] by web14101.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:48:52 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:48:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Sandbox Video Productions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: startx doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:48:57 -0000 I type "startx" and i get this msg before it terminates XFree86 Version 4.3.0 Release Date: 27 February 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 4.10 i386 [ELF] Build Date: 29 April 2004 Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/ to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Fri Jan 1 00:57:41 1999 (EE) Unable to locate/open config file (EE) Error from xf86HandleConfigFile() Fatal server error: no screens found When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send the full server output, not just the last messages. This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log". Please report problems to xfree86@xfree86.org. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 04:18:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36D816A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:18:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.infinitebubble.com (pia140-70.pioneernet.net [66.114.140.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A34743D62 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:18:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@infinitebubble.com) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (aurvandil.infinitebubble.com [192.168.1.1]) by mail.infinitebubble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA2333FE9; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <41087AA4.3040100@infinitebubble.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:18:44 -0700 From: Jason Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040721) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Fitzpatrick References: <1091070008.10979.12.camel@columbus.webtent.org> In-Reply-To: <1091070008.10979.12.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Install FreeBSD 5.2.1 on Compaq Proliant 800 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:18:57 -0000 Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > Trying to install FreeBSD 5.2.1 on a Compaq Proliant 800, looking for > someone that has done this or similar. Of course, you have to have the > SmartStart CD, I have that, I choose System Erase and it loads the > Compaq partition and the FreeBSD goes without error and when I reboot I > get 'Invalid partition type', that's it. After System Erase, I set the > configuration to Unix (Large Geometry), there are 4 SCSI drives, two > 18GB and two 9GB, FreeBSD finds and represents all correctly on install. > Seems the Compaq BIOS is just not letting me use those partitions as > active? > It's been a while since I actually did this and I wasn't bright enough to document the process. This is an a Proliant 1500. I believe I picked the SCO UnixWare 7 configuration just because it was the only one with Unix in the name. I think the only significance that choice has is in what, if any, wizardy type install option you're given. Additionally, I had to do at least the following two things to get it working. There may have been more. Again, I foolishly did not document the process. Set the APIC mode to "Full Table - Mapped" per the directions at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2003-October/021692.html Set the amount of physical memory in /boot/loader.conf like so: hw.physmem="98304k". Of course, you'll substitute a value that reflects the amount of memory your box actually has. On the first go round you'll need to pick the option from the Beastie menu to get to a boot prompt and type in: 'set hw.physmem="98304k"' and then 'boot' or, to play it safer, 'boot -s'. Hope this helps. :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 04:45:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC6016A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:45:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF8643D5F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:45:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:47:29 -0500 Message-ID: <410880F3.3050505@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:45:39 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sandbox Video Productions References: <20040729034852.95441.qmail@web14101.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040729034852.95441.qmail@web14101.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2004 04:47:29.0828 (UTC) FILETIME=[27645E40:01C47527] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startx doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:45:43 -0000 Sandbox Video Productions wrote: >I type "startx" and i get this msg before it >terminates > >XFree86 Version 4.3.0 >Release Date: 27 February 2003 >X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 >Build Operating System: FreeBSD 4.10 i386 [ELF] >Build Date: 29 April 2004 > Before reporting problems, check >http://www.XFree86.Org/ > to make sure that you have the latest version. >Module Loader present >Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) >default setting, > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) >informational, > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not >implemented, (??) unknown. >(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Fri Jan > 1 00:57:41 1999 >(EE) Unable to locate/open config file >(EE) Error from xf86HandleConfigFile() > >Fatal server error: >no screens found > >When reporting a problem related to a server crash, >please send >the full server output, not just the last messages. >This can be found in the log file >"/var/log/XFree86.0.log". >Please report problems to xfree86@xfree86.org. > > Well ... where is it? (Heh, both the "full server output" and the "config file")... Actually, maybe we can get somewhere just by locating the file in question. Quite often, that's /etc/X11/XF86Config ... you did create it, we must assume; or, you ran the auto config and saved your changes to wherever it said ... likely /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/? In that dir there are also some sample config files. Tune one to your liking and put it in one of the places noted above, and try again. Also, you might want to read the Handbook chapter on X. Used to be chapter 5, not sure now --- they are reworking it. HTH, KDK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 05:01:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D0716A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:01:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FADC43D54 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:01:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bq32T-00024F-00 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:01:09 +0200 Received: from p5480f0b2.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.128.240.178]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:01:09 +0200 Received: from thorsten by p5480f0b2.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:01:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Thorsten von Plotho-Kettner Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:36:57 +0200 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <20040729034852.95441.qmail@web14101.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5480f0b2.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Sender: news Subject: Re: startx doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:01:17 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:48:52 -0700, Sandbox Video Productions wrote: > I type "startx" and i get this msg before it > terminates [...] > Fatal server error: > no screens found > > When reporting a problem related to a server crash, > please send > the full server output, not just the last messages. > This can be found in the log file > "/var/log/XFree86.0.log". > Please report problems to xfree86@xfree86.org. Please tell us your graphic-device and your monitor. Is your Xf86Config configured? Just check out the command ´xf86config´ as root. Regards, Thorsten From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 05:33:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732EF16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:33:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from comsmtp1.singnet.com.sg (comsmtp1.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5E343D2F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:33:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pryan@singnet.com.sg) Received: from dory.singnet.com.sg (dory.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.115]) i6T5XSZD016001; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:33:28 +0800 Received: (from cooluser@localhost) by dory.singnet.com.sg (8.11.6/8.11.2) id i6T5XMs07656; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:33:22 +0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dory.singnet.com.sg: cooluser set sender to pryan@singnet.com.sg using -f To: Sandbox Video Productions Message-ID: <1091079202.41088c2215b12@dory.singnet.com.sg> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:33:22 +0800 (SGT) From: Peter Ryan References: <20040729034852.95441.qmail@web14101.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040729034852.95441.qmail@web14101.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: SingNet WebMail cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startx doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pryan@singnet.com.sg List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:33:30 -0000 Hi, I am very new to this, and have just struggled through many occurrences of the same sort of thing. During installation i had used the "third" xf86config option, which can also be run from the command line after installation. (This is the thing which asks questions about horizontal and vertical rates etc.) I could never get anything to work using this, but i really didnt know the answers to many of the questions. I came across an archived email that strongly recommended using the xf86cfg -textmode option. This worked perfectly for me the first time, and I have not had any of these "no screens" messages since. The xf86cfg -textmode is a screen based selection, and I felt it led me through in a much easier way. If you have already installed freeBSD, I think you can get into it by going through /stand/sysinstall then selecting XFree86 (configure XFree86 Server), then selecting the second option, xf86cfg -textmode I hope this helps a bit. Peter --- Sandbox Video Productions wrote: > I type "startx" and i get this msg before it > terminates > > XFree86 Version 4.3.0 > Release Date: 27 February 2003 > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 > Build Operating System: FreeBSD 4.10 i386 [ELF] > Build Date: 29 April 2004 > Before reporting problems, check > http://www.XFree86.Org/ > to make sure that you have the latest version. > Module Loader present > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) > default setting, > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) > informational, > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not > implemented, (??) unknown. > (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Fri Jan > 1 00:57:41 1999 > (EE) Unable to locate/open config file > (EE) Error from xf86HandleConfigFile() > > Fatal server error: > no screens found > > When reporting a problem related to a server crash, > please send > the full server output, not just the last messages. > This can be found in the log file > "/var/log/XFree86.0.log". > Please report problems to xfree86@xfree86.org. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 05:40:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7305A16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:40:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE2443D6A for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:40:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from system-administrator@earthlink.net) Received: from user-0cceq8c.cable.mindspring.com ([24.199.105.12] helo=earthlink.net) by mynah.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bq3e3-0002gr-My; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:39:59 -0700 Message-ID: <41088DB2.7010506@earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:40:02 -0400 From: "Hakim Z. Singhji" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: mailing.freebsd.stable,mailing.freebsd.hackers,comp.os.linux.networking To: Bill Moran References: <20040728T131509Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> <20040728132659.2f368ade.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040728132659.2f368ade.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 59e746354e49a56ad5e26e230a8c4dea74bf435c0eb9d47882885355c204f66b6691b1c713353d2d628257f3d9c4d90f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.199.105.12 cc: Hakim Singhji cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HOWTO Ping LAN??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:40:18 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bill, | Do you have _real_ IPs? I have one IP only... |Most people only get one real IP from their ISP, and |then use "private" IPs (such as 192.168.0.x or 10.0.0.x) for the rest |of their machines. Yes, I have a similar setup for my private network... |If you're doing such, you'll either need exciting nat rules on | the gateway, or some other workaround. Yes this is where I need assistance, I have read quite a bit on NAT however it seems that I am missing something??? With that said, I'll get back to business. I was thinking that NAT would resolve my issue, however only one way. What if I am outside my home-network and I want to SSH one of the machines behind the default gateway. At present it is not possible and I don't know how to make this possible. Figure 1 *************** * Internet * *24.199.1xx.xx* *************** ~ | ~ | *************** ************** * Defaut GW * __ __ *Kids Machine* *192.68.0.0 * *192.68.0.3 * ~ FreeBSD 4.10 * * Mandrake 10* *************** ************** ~ | ~ | *************** *Wrk Station 1* *192.68.0.1 * *Redhat 9 * *************** This is a rough diagram of the network... I would like to ssh, ping, etc. the machines behind the default gateway directly (without tunneling) from the outside the network (at work for example). Is this possible and if so how do I config. Keep in mind that my default gateway is FreeBSD. I know this may be a complicated project but if you could help that would help me greatly. Many thanks to everyone in advance. HZS Bill Moran wrote: | PLEASE wrap your lines. I'm not interested in fixing obnoxious email formatting | any more. See http://www.lemis.com/questions.html | | Hakim Singhji wrote: | |>Hi All, |> |>Many of you have seen my posts lately, I'm a noobie to FreeBSD. I'm trying |>to configure a home "Windows Free" home network complete with default |>gateway, LAN, Wireless 802.11b and several flavors of Linux/BSD. |> |>Its a pretty big project for me and is teaching me ALOT. However I have a |>test setup and I'm am not able to ping my local machine. I can only ping |>my gateway. My local machine is enabled to receive FTP, PING and SSH. In |>addition the firewall on my default gateway is also configured to operate |>those services. |> |>I don't know where I''ve gone wrong, my default gateway works fine |>however...I cannot find my network from the outside. What is the problem??? |> Thanks in advance for all your help. | | | Do you have _real_ IPs? Most people only get one real IP from their ISP, and | then use "private" IPs (such as 192.168.0.x or 10.0.0.x) for the rest of their | machines. If you're doing such, you'll either need exciting nat rules on | the gateway, or some other workaround. | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBCI2xNF6tCt5tOyIRAuioAJwIqSmh060ZCg4j2AB1qyFzbE4/+gCfRwtI 1HdZdh/+e9KVTjaP8tVoZ7s= =ZVbx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 05:41:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C77816A4CF for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:41:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E233C43D2D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 29051018 for multiple; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:25:51 -0700 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:40:55 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Chris Message-Id: <20040729004055.01771ec0@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <41085833.3020408@makeworld.com> References: <20040729014700.41645.qmail@web14106.mail.yahoo.com> <41085833.3020408@makeworld.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: Sandbox Video Productions cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE vs Gnome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:41:22 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:51:47 -0500 Chris wrote: > 1. Are you using KDM? If so, you make your choice at the login menu. > 2. If not above, edit .xinitrc and comment out one IE: > > exec startkde > #gnome-session > #exec startxfce4 > #exec startfluxbox > > In the above example, KDE starts after entering startx > > #exec startkde > gnome-session > #exec startxfce4 > #exec startfluxbox > > In the above example, Gnome starts ater entering startx The init file is cool, for any programs like xscreensaver or the like you want to run at start, just add it in like this... xscreensaver -nosplash& Be sure to add the &, or it will run the program and not go any father. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 05:53:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA66916A4CF for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:53:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41007.mail.yahoo.com (web41007.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B210043D48 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:53:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729055330.90694.qmail@web41007.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.121] by web41007.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:53:30 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:53:30 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20040728171010.GA86397@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Remko Lodder cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:53:31 -0000 --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > .. I know its hard for people to swallow, but MS Windows IS easier to > > use than BSD/Linux/OSX ... thats WHY its the most widely > > used.... regardless of marketing/costs etc ... > > Yes, I know. Windows is easier. Thanks, I won't buy! Neither will I .. can't remember the last time I paid for software... All my software is War.. *cough* ...donated... > Do you want to come at home and explain what is easy about Windows to my > sister who's been fighting with DVD playback on Windows XP for more than > a month now, who wasted precious exam-period time to troubleshoot and > solve Powerpoint and Word problems? I agree with you 100% Windows XP is CRAP! - I don't use it - its Windows 2000 with Windows ME integrated functionalty. If you want a rock solid GUI workstation, stick with Windows 2000 (all other Windows version are crap - I have tried & tested them all) > Reaction-time that you mention above is something that depends on a lot > of subjective factors, on the themes you have selected, on the load of > the machine at the time and a host of other things. Can you describe > the setup of the machine at the time you measured this "reaction time" > that bothered you and the tests you did to measure it? My Test Box Setup: Pentium 200Mhz 128MB RAM 5 GIG HD 16MB TNT Graphics Card Windows 2000 Parition (2GIG) FreeBSD Partition (3GIG) > FreeBSD is not Linux. Sorry, you'd have to complain to the Fedora > people for any problems you have with their slow monster of an > RPM-beast. > > Yes, I hate working on Fedora too, and I avoid it like hell. But that > has nothing to do with the way FreeBSD works or what it can do :) Your right... I went off topic. > The X11 desktop is described in detail in "The X Window System", a > chapter of the FreeBSD Handbook. This chapter contains a lot of useful > information for people who are new to X11. Please do read it. > > There is even a section in that chapter that describes XFCE4 and the > steps that you need to take to install it and start it. I'm sure you'll > find it very helpful. I will try another xfce4 install following step-by-step the BSD docs & get back to you... :) All I did so far was: # pkg_add xfce4 then went to .xinitrc with VI and added "exec startxfce4" .. typed startx & xfce wouldn't start... > > Whats the purpose of having to manually set the system to automount ?? > > as opposed to having it as a system install default ?? if there is an > > advantage, I am sure its for the 0.01% of the user base > > It's more in the range of 99.9%. Automounting can be annoying like hell > when you happen to accidentally insert media in your drives. It can > also be insecure if you don't want anyone to use the machine you've > installed to mount CD-ROMs, floppies or other media of their choise. Accidently ?? what ?? Like you were walking down a hall way, tripped & slipped & accidenlty shoved a CD into the drive :)) I can put a CD into Windows 2000 & it has never been accessed unless I explicitly do it. - I don't see the problem ?? > Instead of leaving *all* the users exposed to risks like this, which is > the usual Windows philosophy of doing stuff, FreeBSD has the capability > to automount media but keeps it disabled by default. Why not enable it by default & then allow people who love messing around with OS disable it manually - this seems more logical .... hey why not add a nice GUI that allows you to edit all the OS configurations .... nahh ... no one would use that !! > Is it so hard to edit a text file like rc.conf and add a simple line > like this? > > amd_enable="YES" Hard to edit... no your right, knowing where the file is located, yes ?? knowing where in the file it needs to go or does ordering matter, yes ?? > Do you really mean that this is so much harder to do than fumble and > fight with multiple dialogs, which you have to remember by heart of > course, just to find that disabling automounting is impossible (unless > you download TweakMyRegistry version 95.3.2000.13.27 paying careful > attention to the version numbers because the wrong version can mess up > your entire system with a single click)? TweakMyRegisty ?? not needed - use MS TweakUI - Freeware Windows XP - crap(stick with Windows 2000 - its the stable version, like v4.10) - as for automounting, I think you are confusing this with AutoRUN for CD's AFAIK - you cannot disable automounting of Floppys/CD in Windows 2000 > > - installable YES, configurable ... you've got to be shitting me :o > > Not really. But even if we provided examples of this configurability > you wouldn't accept them as valid examples because they wouldn't be > point and click on some wimpy dialog-based wizard, right? Right > > - while in wmaker, dynamically change the Montior settings from > > 1600x1200 32b to 1028x768 24b (wouldn't have a clue - off to the docs > > - manually edit configuration files ?? - then restart - but what is > > the correct horizontal frequency OR vertical refresh(hard++) - I don't > > know & I don't want to know(hey while I am at it, why don't I start > > designing my own CPU)... that's why people use Windows(easy to > > configure) > > You don't really need to know or provide all of these details. I just > updated my system to use X.org the new X11 ports of FreeBSD from XFree86 > 4.3 that I used to have before. seems like I did... the default configuration X choose for my wmaker was some high figure like 1280x1024 at low colors like 256 or 16b > Running the xorgcfg utility that the documentation of X.org mentions and > running it only *once* I generated an /etc/X11/xorg.conf file that was > essentially the same as the one I had before. So I went ahead and > deleted the new X11 configuration file. There is an xorgcfg ? - I will take a look at that ... > > ...XPde seem to have the right idea... looks promising... hope the GUI > > reaction time is fast > > I'll ask yet one more time. Are you sure that XPde is faster than, say, > windowmaker running with a simple theme? Or are you saying this just > because it catters to your need to "look" at something that resembles > Windows XP because you're afraid of changing the way you think about a > desktop? I couldn't get xpde to run, but the screenshots look nice... as for Windows XP ... don't like it, full of bugs, insecure & crashes easily... Windows 2000 - not a crash in 2 years... & with 80% of the services turned off as set out be the NSA document to secure Windows 2000, its pretty secure Don't get me wrong, I am not pushing MS crap, I am just more annoyed that the alternative(BSD, which I really want to get working) seems so far behind(my opinion) usability wise... .. as for the look ... couldn't care less for themes.. waste of time fidling & resources... I only want rock solid simple GUI's & stability & ease of use > I'm not sure why you're saying "yea right" above :-/ Because sometimes students search the Java(bloatware) docs & because the docs are thin on details, they ask the Lecturer for help... refering back to the docs is not helping.... > > Benchmarks - How about FreeBSD+wmaker(GUI) & Windows 2000 installed on > > EXACTLY the same box. Any person standing next to me could see which > > is faster > > Windows 2000 GUI - Much faster than Wmaker > > Loading/Using Notepad/Wordpad - Much faster than Nedit > > Windows Explorer - Heaps faster than xfe > > Windows 2000 GUI is faster than windowmaker? Now that's news. Don't know what to tell you... it IS on my box... either my Windows 2000 setup is good(likely) or my BSD setup is wrong(also likely) > I've seen this "fast" 2000 GUI crawl almost to a halt because someone > else is copying a large directory tree over the network. I've also seen > windowmaker fly on a Pentium 200 with 64 MB of RAM while I was updating > a huge checkout from a CVS server, over the network too. When I was fiddling with 4.5, I was able to crash the GUI many times... & was taken to the cmd line.... lets hope 4.10 is more stable! > Are you sure there's nothing wrong with your BSD setup? Thats what I would like to know ??? > You should also note than nedit is not the "Notepad" of X11. The > features of Nedit are much much better and innumerable compared to the > lack of features of Notepad. Highlighting, configurable TAB size, > wrapping and block-mode editing are just a few that I remember now. > Even if nedit takes 1 second more than Notepad to load, its wealth of > features is more than ample reward to me. If you want to compare > Notepad to an X11 editor, you should probably compare it to 'xedit' and > that would probably be an insult to the features of xedit ;-) point taken. Kind Regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 06:22:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BD416A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:22:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from umail.ru (umail.ru [195.34.32.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2057843D1F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:22:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ky@df.ru) Received: from [81.195.4.190] (HELO localhost) by umail.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b6) with ESMTP-TLS id 282555608 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:21:31 +0400 From: "Kentucky Mandeloid Mo." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:21:31 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200407282239.22648.ky@df.ru> <4431.209.167.16.15.1091040764.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <4431.209.167.16.15.1091040764.squirrel@209.167.16.15> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407291021.31782.ky@df.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: df shows bogus values on gbde'd partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ky@df.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:22:03 -0000 > In all seriousness, I've never seen this but almost choked when I saw the > numbers. Hope someone can help. BTW, what does the .bde stand for after > the slice/partition? > .bde means an attached crypted partiotoin. See gbde(8) on 5.x. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 06:36:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F403216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:36:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41007.mail.yahoo.com (web41007.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE0FD43D45 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:36:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729063637.97029.qmail@web41007.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.121] by web41007.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:36:37 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:36:37 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: "Guillermo_García-Rojas" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <397b2cad04072810303137069a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:36:38 -0000 --- Guillermo_García-Rojas wrote: > I have an old Pentium-MMX 200 Mhz and 40Mb RAM, 1 Gb HD. > Can you put Windows 2000 on it? > I don't think so. MY setup test box is: Pentium 200Mhz 128MB RAM 16MB TNT Graphics Card Windows 2000 runs rock solid & fast on my 17inch monitor :) ... & 1GIG is more than enough for Windows 2000 with about 600MB to spare > Did I mention I have no monitor??? > I do not need it, so I do not need a GUI > > Can you live without your Windows 2000 GUI? Can you work without it? Why would I want to... a GUI makes life easier & makes my ability to do work more productive :) > What if some big company ask you to work for them, but they have UNIX > systems, are you prepared or can you handle that work? Any OS will take me about 1 week to get up to speed - if its a MS product, about 2 days :) > One more thing, my OpenBSD 3.5 costs me $0, FreeBSD price is $0 too. > Did you spend the same amount of money on your Windows 2000?? Yea 0$ - all my software is War... *cough* ... donated Kind Regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 06:55:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5377D16A4D0 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:55:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41008.mail.yahoo.com (web41008.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1811D43D46 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:55:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729065528.59993.qmail@web41008.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.121] by web41008.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:55:27 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:55:27 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <200407281818.i6SIIUc01719@clunix.cl.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:55:28 -0000 --- Jerry McAllister wrote: > > - Installing Packages is nice & easy & straight forward from the > docs(should be more of these!) > > - Installing ports/packages via ftp/net - Forget it!! > > I have barely got BSD running, the last thing I want is connecting a BSD > > box to my broadband > > connection ?? Does BSD have a default firewall ?? Don't know, having > > trouble installing stuff let > > alone configuring a firewall via scripts/files > > You are probably better off and more secure with an initial install, with > no additional work or tweaking, of FreeBSD on the net than you would be > with a MS system with every know "fix" available. The system is > inherently more secure and in addition - and maybe partially because of > this - fewer, by far, attempts at cracking FreeBSD are made than are > made against MS systems. Some of this is, of course, because there are > much fewer FreeBSD systems out there to tempt kiddies. But, the fact > that cracking FreeBSD is more difficult contributes to this effect. So if I do a default install of FreeBSD & then connect to the net for ports/packages, is there a default firewall running in the background ?? > > > Then its going step by step with the install guides & when I try to install > MySQL, I type # > > groupadd mysql & I get "command not found" ... ??? no idea, I am following > the install guides... > > now if I am doing the same as everyone else with a fresh install of BSD, > why is it no one else > > gets groupadd mysql "command not found" ?? > > What does "commmand not found" sound like it means? > The shell doesn't know how to find the command you typed in. > Either you didn't update your search path to include the directory > it is in or it didn't get installed correctly where it should be. > Probably the first is true. So, find out where it should be and > add that directory to the path. See man path. thnx, will check out the path. > Again, you are much safer on the net with a FreeBSD system. > Just do it. I do all my installs over the net. > Do use appropriate precautions such as ssh instead of telnet and ssl > protected sites where possible and check md5-s of downloaded files. > But, don't let it stop you from using it with FreeBSD. Do you install FreeBSD first & connect to the net for ports/packages, or install the actual FreeBSD OS from the /stand/sysinstall & select the net ?? > It sounds a lot like you may have some processes wanting to check > themselves via the net upon startup that are holding things up > during boot. They will each wait until they time out before > things move on. I have several dual-boot machines, WinXP/FreeBSD, > Win2k/FreeBSd and Win95/FreeBSD and they all boot in about the same > amount of time with the FreeBSD being maybe a mite faster to get to > my login than the MS stuff being able to get to a state where I can > actually do something - eg not just getting the spash screen or background > displayed. So, either plug in the net or disable those utilities that > want to talk and try things again. My bootup is fine, its the BSD+wmaker running & opening nedit & a cmd prompts that are slower than Windows 2000 ?? any suggestions as to why ?? Kind regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 07:00:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347F116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:00:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBF743D2D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:00:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from poisondart@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ool-18ba36fb.dyn.optonline.net [24.186.54.251]) by mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I1L00NZQQ4Q2N@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:00:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:01:29 -0400 From: Jonathan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <4108A0C9.1050202@optonline.net> Organization: StreamForce Hosting Solutions MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) Subject: Major FreeBSD Problem plz help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:00:53 -0000 Hello, I messed something up in my FreeBSD-5.2.1 box. I ran sysinstall in root and installed compat4 and some other compatibility base dir thing and it extracted over / i think and now the box wont recognize my logins. I am locked out of my own box. Is there a way to reset what I did so i wont lose any data. My server is colocated at a datacenter and the techs would have to do it. Could you guys possibly explain what needs to be done so i wont lose any data and reset what i did. Any help would be greatly appreciated PoisonDart@optonline.net Regards, Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 07:22:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5D816A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:22:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41002.mail.yahoo.com (web41002.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B847643D39 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:22:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729072222.11986.qmail@web41002.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.121] by web41002.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:22:22 PDT Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:22:22 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: Nico Meijer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4107F756.10203@zonnet.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Going OT: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have aninstaller package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:22:25 -0000 --- Nico Meijer wrote: > Complaining one or two lines from a tutorial don't work (ie. "groupadd > mysql") without reading: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/users-modifying.html thnx, I will read that & see if it helps me solve my groupadd problem, > If you haven't yet grasped the 'feel' for FreeBSD, why are you trying to > drive a Ferrari with it, when you can't even manage a tricycle with it yet? Is trying to install an app a Ferrari.. gee you guys really don't understand how dumb point & click it is to install stuff on MS I cannot remember reading a manual for ever doing stuff in MS. Its just so logical & straight forward... that you can install & configure 99% of apps without having to ever read mans/docs/guides > > .. I know its hard for people to swallow, but MS Windows IS easier to use > than BSD/Linux/OSX ... > > The only part that is hard to swallow is you putting *BSD, Linux and OS > X on one big pile as if they're basically the same thing (to a user, > they're not; to a sysadmin, they're not; they're all only "Unix-like"). The point I was making was at one point or another, they all came from the same BSD tree... > > whats the damn command startxfce4 ??? this doesn't work!)... > > It worked for me. Damn Ferrari's! > Especially as a server: I use CLI only. A GUI just gets in my way. I am curious, how does a gui get in your way ?? > > Gnome starts faster than Windows ?? Start time is not important > > To me, it is. My FreeBSD 4.10 booting into xdm, me typing in my username > and password and logging in to IceWM *and start working* takes almost > half the time it takes my coworkers' Windows 2000 Professional 'puters > to boot up at all in a workable state. I reboot my Windows box once every 3-4 days.. so boot time is irrelevant to me... > > - I am talking about reaction time of the GUI > > Yes, it seems that Windows is snappier. Thank GOD someone actually can see this :-O > The X Window System, however, > doesn't get in my way when I do other important stuff (backups, network > stressing, whatever). Plus, I get to log in from *anywhere* (even a thin > client) ans get *my* desktop on *my* pc. Windows 2000 doesn't get in my way, never crashes... don't know what network stressing your talking about though... ...I too can log in using VNC & see my desktop :) > > Whats the purpose of having to manually set the system to automount ?? as > opposed to having it as > > a system install default ?? if there is an advantage, I am sure its for the > 0.01% of the user base > > How can security be just for 0.01%? Have you ever thought of it this > way: "I want my computer to do something when *I* say it to!". Automount is insecure... not for a home workstation.... thats just exaggerating > >>>I can tell you that 95% of people who use computers want "EASE of USE" > > I am afraid you are right there. That is why the world of computing is > in such a shitty state and we get a new worm or virus every 15 minutes. Ease of use is not why the world of computing is a shitty place... its the 'genuine' lack of alternatives... BSD too me could be something very great... I am sure thats what Jobs see's as well > > - installable YES, configurable ... you've got to be shitting me :o > > Well... I think I just took a cr*p on your front lawn, dude. ;-) > (that really is a pathetic attempt at a joke; I'm just kidding) Sickem Rex! > > Apple OSX understands this(nice GUI over BSD base - shame about the stupid > high prices & dumb one > > button mouse)... > > Why? The one button mouse adds even more ease of use, no? No! - why, do you have only ONE finger ?? My MS mouse with 4 Buttons & a scroll wheel allows my one hand to access 6 different functions - the wheel also acts as a 5th button :) > Don't you get it? You are *free* to choose whatever system you want. If > you choose any of the BSD's (for that matter), you are *free* to choose > a GUI or the CLI. Also, should you opt for the GUI, you are *free* to > choose which one. Also, you are *free* to choose whatever software you > additionally would like to run. An editor? You are *free* to choose > which one, be it CLI or GUI. A web server? Again, freedom. Choose > Apache, choose thttpd, do so *freely*. Freedom is nice... how about throwing me a line & create a default install so I don't need to waste so much time configuring & messing around ?? > Wow, you hate FreeBSD, Java *and* Linux! ;-) No, only Java, Linux & Apple & all versions of Windows except 2000 - I actually like BSD... or at least I am trying too.... its just that the 'skanky hoe' is a bit ugly & is in need of a makerover! Kind Regards, DK _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 07:25:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C567116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:25:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41006.mail.yahoo.com (web41006.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BF9643D69 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:25:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asdzxc111@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729072512.43648.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.76.1.121] by web41006.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:25:12 PDT Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:25:12 -0700 (PDT) From: DK To: krinklyfig@spymac.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200407281227.52474.krinklyfig@spymac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:25:12 -0000 --- Joshua Tinnin wrote: > > maybe you would like a test of the Apache Web Server on BSD against the > > Apache Web Server on Windows 2000 ?? - I will search the net & get back to > > you on that if you are interested ?? > > > > I wonder if people that run web servers on BSD never use a GUI thereby > > saying how fast BSD is... - yes, keep using VI & don't forget to feed the > > Horse :) > > Have you taken a look at this lately? > > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html > > I don't know how important uptime is to you, but that's a big reason so many > people use it. I agree with you 110% ... thats why I want to install & run a FreeBSD Apache Server instead of using a Windows Server box running Apache. Kind Regards, DK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 08:08:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE9916A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:08:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sleek.sleektech.nl (sleek.sleektech.nl [62.212.87.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB1043D4C for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:08:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@sleektech.nl) Received: (qmail 1104 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2004 08:05:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (193.173.42.52) by sleek.sleektech.nl with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 08:05:04 -0000 Message-ID: <4108B086.8060706@sleektech.nl> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:08:38 +0200 From: lists User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: netstat -m 'cannot allocate memory' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:08:45 -0000 Hello, On 2 of my systems I get the following error while doing netstat -m: $ netstat -m netstat: sysctl: retrieving mbstat: Cannot allocate memory This is a PIV 2ghz, with 1,5 GB of memory I couldn't find anything about this on the internet.. anyone that has any idea whats wrong here ? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 08:11:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08B516A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:11:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fwall.in.markiza.sk (fwall.in.markiza.sk [62.168.76.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD90A43D2F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:11:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.markiza.sk [127.0.0.1]) by fwall.in.markiza.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFA823081; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:11:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fwall.in.markiza.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fwall.in.markiza.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76483-04; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:11:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pleiades.aeternal.net (pleiades.in.markiza.sk [192.168.13.7]) by fwall.in.markiza.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2232B23039; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:11:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pleiades.aeternal.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 64B271703C; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:15:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:15:52 +0200 From: Martin Hudec To: Brent Wiese Message-ID: <20040729081552.GA13438@pleiades.aeternal.net> References: <20040721011646.IVPW25784.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@SAMBA> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040721011646.IVPW25784.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@SAMBA> X-Copyright: (C) 2004 Martin Hudec X-Operating-System: FreeBSD pleiades.aeternal.net 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 i386 X-PGP-Key: http://www.aeternal.net/corwin_aeternal.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at web.markiza.sk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: 'Gareth Bailey' Subject: Re: Courier-imap + Postfix problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Hudec List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:11:33 -0000 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 06:16:37PM -0700 or thereabouts, Brent Wiese wrote: > Sorry, I missed this question and have been away from the list for a bit. > Hopefully you figured this out by now, but just in case, I've answered > below. So was I :(. > > All i got to do now, it seems, is start portmap and fam on > > system boot. I know portmap_enable=3D"YES" in rc.conf does > > the trick, but what about starting fam? >=20 > Look in /usr/local/etc/rc.d >=20 > There will likely be several startup scripts in there for other services. > Use one as a skeleton to start up fam. Likely, if you installed fam from > ports, there will already be a startup script in that directory, it'll ju= st > need to be renamed. Many ports will put the scripts there with a "-sample" > extension. Check to make sure that file looks in the right places for your > daemon and if so, rename it to remove the -sample and it'll start up on > boot. There is no such script in ../etc/rc.d. All you have to do is to start portmap (in rc.conf), and then edit your /etc/inetd.conf and add there: sgi_fam/1-2 stream rpc/tcp wait root /usr/local/bin/fam fam and then killall -HUP inetd. This one should do the trick. Cheers, Martin --=20 Martin Hudec | corwin at aeternal.net | corwin at web.markiza.sk http://www.aeternal.net | cell +421 907 303 393 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCLI4ZYEZIv+rgggRAvK3AJ0V2DugfiiRJF/8YEDk/jXMqf2yWQCfV1Fw QiPSn6CjECMdKagsBDWHnbg= =/3LX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 08:28:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8151216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:28:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from n2sw.com (n2sw.webair.com [216.130.191.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E50743D3F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:28:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from webairsteve (unknown [216.130.191.71]) by n2sw.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B5E0C20EE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:28:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <014801c4755f$cefd5bb0$47bf82d8@webairsteve> From: "Steve" To: "lists" , References: <4108B086.8060706@sleektech.nl> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:33:02 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: netstat -m 'cannot allocate memory' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:28:44 -0000 what does dmesg, tail /var/log/messages, vmstat, and top tell you -- Steve Rieger ICQ # 5956607 yahoo IM riegersteve ----- Original Message ----- From: "lists" To: Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 1:08 AM Subject: netstat -m 'cannot allocate memory' > Hello, > > On 2 of my systems I get the following error while doing netstat -m: > > $ netstat -m > netstat: sysctl: retrieving mbstat: Cannot allocate memory > > This is a PIV 2ghz, with 1,5 GB of memory > > > I couldn't find anything about this on the internet.. anyone that has > any idea whats wrong here ? > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 08:40:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7D616A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:40:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sleek.sleektech.nl (sleek.sleektech.nl [62.212.87.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C8D43D5E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@sleektech.nl) Received: (qmail 5638 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2004 08:36:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (193.173.42.52) by sleek.sleektech.nl with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 08:36:39 -0000 Message-ID: <4108B7ED.90007@sleektech.nl> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:40:13 +0200 From: lists User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <4108B086.8060706@sleektech.nl> <014801c4755f$cefd5bb0$47bf82d8@webairsteve> In-Reply-To: <014801c4755f$cefd5bb0$47bf82d8@webairsteve> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: netstat -m 'cannot allocate memory' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:40:22 -0000 /var/log/messages gives: Jul 29 01:55:56 server /kernel: All mbuf clusters exhausted, please see tuning(7). So I have set in /boot/loader.conf kern.ipc.nmbclusters="32768" And rebooted the machine but stilll got the same message with netstat -m dmesg is not giving any weird messages top: last pid: 5178; load averages: 0.22, 0.12, 0.09 up 0+00:34:27 10:35:01 100 processes: 4 running, 96 sleeping CPU states: 11.3% user, 0.0% nice, 2.7% system, 0.0% interrupt, 86.0% idle Mem: 131M Active, 444M Inact, 180M Wired, 23M Cache, 163M Buf, 729M Free Swap: 3072M Total, 3072M Free # vmstat procs memory page disks faults cpu r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr ad0 ad2 in sy cs us sy id 2 6 0 238980 767852 439 1 1 0 356 0 0 0 359 3718 168 4 3 93 Steve wrote: >what does dmesg, tail /var/log/messages, vmstat, and top tell you >-- >Steve Rieger >ICQ # 5956607 >yahoo IM riegersteve >----- Original Message ----- >From: "lists" >To: >Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 1:08 AM >Subject: netstat -m 'cannot allocate memory' > > > > >>Hello, >> >>On 2 of my systems I get the following error while doing netstat -m: >> >>$ netstat -m >>netstat: sysctl: retrieving mbstat: Cannot allocate memory >> >>This is a PIV 2ghz, with 1,5 GB of memory >> >> >>I couldn't find anything about this on the internet.. anyone that has >>any idea whats wrong here ? >> >>Thanks >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 09:32:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B696816A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:32:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF1143D67 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:32:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6T9WZLr087180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:32:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6T9WWnA087179; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:32:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:32:32 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Hakim Z. Singhji" Message-ID: <20040729093232.GA86114@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "Hakim Z. Singhji" , Bill Moran , Hakim Singhji , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040728T131509Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> <20040728132659.2f368ade.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <41088DB2.7010506@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41088DB2.7010506@earthlink.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:32:36 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Bill Moran cc: Hakim Singhji Subject: Re: HOWTO Ping LAN??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:32:58 -0000 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:40:02AM -0400, Hakim Z. Singhji wrote: > Figure 1 >=20 > *************** > * Internet * > *24.199.1xx.xx* > *************** > ~ | > ~ | > *************** ************** > * Defaut GW * __ __ *Kids Machine* > *192.68.0.0 * *192.68.0.3 * > ~ FreeBSD 4.10 * * Mandrake 10* > *************** ************** > ~ | > ~ | > *************** > *Wrk Station 1* > *192.68.0.1 * > *Redhat 9 * > *************** >=20 > This is a rough diagram of the network... I would like to ssh, ping, > etc. the machines behind the default gateway directly (without > tunneling) from the outside the network (at work for example). Is this > possible and if so how do I config. Keep in mind that my default > gateway is FreeBSD. I know this may be a complicated project but if you > could help that would help me greatly. Many thanks to everyone in advanc= e. I'm afraid that's not going to be possible with your current network layout. If you want all of your machines to be accessible from the Internet, then you'll need routable addresses on all of your machines. I know you've said you don't want to use tunnelling, but unfortunately, that's the only way you can access a private address space as you have from outside it. A relatively simple way of doing that is to ssh into your gateway box, and use the '-L' or '-R' portforwarding options to create a tunnel to one of the internal machines, and then ssh or otherwise connect through that tunnel: see eg. http://www.linux.ie/articles/tutorials/ssh.php One other point: you're going to have problems if you're using 192.168.0.0 as the IP number on your FreeBSD machine. That's the *network* address, and shouldn't be applied directly to any specific machine. If you're running your internal network using 192.168.0.0/24 as the address space, then you have 254 addresses (from 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.0.254) to use for client machines, since 192.168.0.0 (network address) and 192.168.0.255 (broadcast address) are reserved as part of the networking setup. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFBCMQwiD657aJF7eIRAhAKAJjYBlhisUw8hTCZZwcxcUpETczSAJ9y/aP+ KZOfq7ctOWJImL/xgfEmZA== =aJT/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 09:36:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E137116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:36:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B40343D2D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:36:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:14807 helo=[192.168.2.100]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bq7Kt-000A6S-6a for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:36:27 +0000 Message-ID: <4108C51A.3060900@zonnet.nl> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:36:26 +0200 From: Nico Meijer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040725 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040729072222.11986.qmail@web41002.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040729072222.11986.qmail@web41002.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Going OT: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD haveaninstaller package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:36:29 -0000 Hi DK, Thanks for responding. Remember: tongue-in-cheek! > Is trying to install an app a Ferrari.. gee you guys really don't understand > how dumb point & click it is to install stuff on MS No, you are trying to build/drive/whatever a Ferrari/liner jet/whatever while you don't get/comprehend the basics of the system yet. "You have to learn how to fall / before you learn to fly" - [was that a Paul Simon quote?] Yes, I actually do know how easy it is to install stuff on MS. I also happen to know how much pain and agony are involved when your pointy-clicky app doesn't do what it is supposed to do. You're left in the dark, most of the times. I also know how easy it is for *others* to install stuff on *my* Windows workstation without me knowing! ;-) > I cannot remember reading a manual for ever doing stuff in MS. Its just so > logical & straight forward... that you can install & configure 99% of apps > without having to ever read mans/docs/guides Please, from now on, leave all comparisons to Windows 2000 out of this discussion and you'll get the/my/whatever point. My Sinclair ZX81 runs an OS, my MSX 1 and 2 machines (don't have those anymore :-( ) run an OS. None of 'em are like Windows 2000. It would be totally daft for me to compare these OS's. Agreed, both Windows 2000 and FreeBSD are "modern day operating systems". That doesn't mean, however, that they should act and feel the same way. You would like that, but that's just your opinion and what you specifically want. > The point I was making was at one point or another, they all came from the same > BSD tree... I'll let you figure that out for yourself: http://www.levenez.com/unix/ > I am curious, how does a gui get in your way ?? Windows: 1. Start 2. Programs 3. Accessories 4. Notepad (Yes, I could create a shortcut on the Desktop.) CLI: 1. nano -w [file] (Yes, I happen to like nano.) Remember: *I* find that the GUI gets in *my* way. Not "everybody's" or "your" way. > Thank GOD someone actually can see this :-O Ohw, that was an obvious one. ;-) Windows was created to perform desktop tasks so it has to run snappy at that and most of the time it does. > Windows 2000 doesn't get in my way, never crashes... Good for you. Windows 2000 is a major step ahead compared to any other version of Windows before that. Still, after 18 months of heavy usage (Macromedia stuff, Adobe stuff) I need to reinstall pronto. > ...I too can log in using VNC & see my desktop :) And not use your 'puter for anything else. Thanks, but no thanks. I can have 20 people use my desktop simultaneously without a hickup. I happen to like that. > Automount is insecure... not for a home workstation.... thats just exaggerating No, that's a difference of opinion. > Ease of use is not why the world of computing is a shitty place... its the > 'genuine' lack of alternatives... Somehow, somewhere, marketing people and a bunch of programmers decided that a computer should be usable by anyone, anytime with their brain switched off. Hence, I declare "shitty state", for I am confronted with the rubble on a day to day basis just as a lot of people on this list, I presume. People all over the world have been happy running Unix workstations, Mac workstations and whatnot. It is sad to see a marketing department so shrewd, that even elderly people who had no computer at all ran to the nearest software retailer to buy a copy of Windows 95 because they were made to believe they needed it. > No! - why, do you have only ONE finger ?? I'm sorry. How is having 5 'buttons' "easier" than having one button? Ahw, forget it. > Freedom is nice... how about throwing me a line & create a default install so I > don't need to waste so much time configuring & messing around ?? No. You do that. > No, only Java, Linux & Apple & all versions of Windows except 2000 - I actually > like BSD... or at least I am trying too.... its just that the 'skanky hoe' is a > bit ugly & is in need of a makerover! I am truly sorry you do not seem to get it. I feel your opinions are in the way of your comprehension. I think you might want to try running something like Mandrake or Xandros first. Good luck to you... Nico P.S. Should I feel the urge to add another note to this discussion, I'll refrain from making any comparisons to Windows (2000). I don't feel the discussion is served by these comparisons. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 09:39:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A1416A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:39:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542E343D2F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:39:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6T9dTK0087276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:39:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6T9dSbK087275; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:39:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:39:28 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "W. D." Message-ID: <20040729093928.GB86114@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "W. D." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jonathan White References: <20040729021005.70208.qmail@web40202.mail.yahoo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20040728220035.0641b960@209.152.117.178> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20040728220035.0641b960@209.152.117.178> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:39:29 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: Jonathan White cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding Cosultants X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:39:34 -0000 --pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:05:13PM -0500, W. D. wrote: > At 21:10 7/28/2004, Jonathan White wrote: > >Anyone have an idea how to find a FreeBSD consultant in Brooklyn NY? > > > >Thanks > >jonathan >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/commercial/consult.html > http://www.Google.com/search?q=3D%28brooklyn+OR+nyc++OR+%22New+York%22%29= +freebsd > http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=3D%28brooklyn+OR+nyc+OR+%22New+York%22%2= 9+freebsd Also try posing to the freebsd-jobs@freebsd.org list, describing what you want done and preferably some sort of idea of what rates you'll be prepared to pay. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCMXQiD657aJF7eIRAjyIAJ4qQqmJlBsIgNRGZY9nB93ZjydSFwCfUEVy se55AlqeCMmQqZP20foyqiI= =MVXR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 10:13:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A64916A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:13:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE5943D58 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:13:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DED25F4F9; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:13:47 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4108CDF3.2020505@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:14:11 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (Windows/20040723) X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <20040729014700.41645.qmail@web14106.mail.yahoo.com> <41085833.3020408@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <41085833.3020408@makeworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Sandbox Video Productions cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE vs Gnome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:13:57 -0000 Chris wrote: > Sandbox Video Productions wrote: >> IF i install both gnome & kde. how do i choose which >> one i want to start up. It seem that it only starts >> the GUI that was installed last. >> >> >> >> __________________________________ >> Do you Yahoo!? >> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! >> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Depends. > > 1. Are you using KDM? If so, you make your choice at the login menu. > 2. If not above, edit .xinitrc and comment out one IE: > > exec startkde > #gnome-session > #exec startxfce4 > #exec startfluxbox > > In the above example, KDE starts after entering startx > > #exec startkde > gnome-session > #exec startxfce4 > #exec startfluxbox > > In the above example, Gnome starts ater entering startx > Even easier, if you want to avoid editing ~/.xinitrc everytime you want to change between the two, you could add a case statement in ~/.xinitrc to handle args to startx(1): case "$1" in -k) exec startkde ;; -g) gnome-session ;; *) exec startkde ;; esac The '*' case being the default if there are no args. For this to work you have to hack /usr/X11R6/bin/startx and change the line defaultclient=/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm to defaultclient="" because if you specify any (client) args then startx(1) just starts X and an xterm - no window manager. The last time I used multiple WMs was in XFree86 3.x and I'm certain I didn't have to hack startx so it looks like the behaviour has changed, or it maybe that it was just so long ago that I've forgotten :-) See startx(1) and xinit(1) for details of the default startup behaviour. HTH Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 11:04:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E87416A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:04:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web42007.mail.yahoo.com (web42007.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FC2143D58 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:04:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soohyun_choi@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729110416.94516.qmail@web42007.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.16.66.105] by web42007.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:04:16 PDT Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 04:04:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Soo-Hyun Choi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: wireless LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:04:16 -0000 I'm using SONY VAIO Z1 series, and it seems that the built in wireless LAN isn't working properly. So I got a PC Card which is WaveLAN (Lucent), a bit old one but expect to work fine under FreeBSD 5.2.1. I've enabled 'pccard' at rc.conf file and the kernel seems to load the 'wi' driver by default. But the WaveLAN isn't working yet. Could anyone drive me in a good (complete) reference to get things working? Cheers, SH- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 11:29:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DAF16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:29:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ubersoft.co.za (mail.ubersoft.co.za [196.31.69.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4EC43D4C for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@ubersoft.co.za) Received: from localhost (localhost.ubersoft.co.za [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ubersoft.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id B135B5917 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:25:59 +0200 (SAST) Received: from mail.ubersoft.co.za ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.ubersoft.co.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15572-05 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:25:58 +0200 (SAST) Received: from bailey (garethb [192.168.0.11]) by mail.ubersoft.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9756A5914 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:25:58 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <007101c4755f$a9893160$0b00a8c0@bailey> From: "Gareth Bailey" To: "freebsd mail" References: <20040721011646.IVPW25784.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@SAMBA> <20040729081552.GA13438@pleiades.aeternal.net> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:31:59 +0200 Organization: Ubersoft MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ubersoft.co.za Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Courier-imap + Postfix problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gareth Bailey List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:29:15 -0000 Hi Martin, That worked for me! Thanks for the late post anyway. Gareth ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Martin Hudec" To: "Brent Wiese" Cc: ; "'Gareth Bailey'" = Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 10:15 AM Subject: Re: Courier-imap + Postfix problem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 11:31:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D7B16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:31:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.catacombs.de (mail.catacombs.de [80.67.228.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F8243D55 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:31:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beisser@lefti.net) Received: from hauntedhouse (pD9E918C7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.233.24.199]) (authenticated bits=0) by alpha.catacombs.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6TBV6rx058626; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:31:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from beisser@lefti.net) From: "Alexander Liebau" To: "Jonathan" , Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:29:36 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <4108A0C9.1050202@optonline.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on alpha.catacombs.de Subject: AW: Major FreeBSD Problem plz help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:31:44 -0000 yes the system is now in a fresh state (same as if you do a fresh install) root has no password and all user are gone (the install has overwritten the passwd-file). just log in on a local console with root (you wont need a password) -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]Im Auftrag von Jonathan Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Juli 2004 09:01 An: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Betreff: Major FreeBSD Problem plz help Hello, I messed something up in my FreeBSD-5.2.1 box. I ran sysinstall in root and installed compat4 and some other compatibility base dir thing and it extracted over / i think and now the box wont recognize my logins. I am locked out of my own box. Is there a way to reset what I did so i wont lose any data. My server is colocated at a datacenter and the techs would have to do it. Could you guys possibly explain what needs to be done so i wont lose any data and reset what i did. Any help would be greatly appreciated PoisonDart@optonline.net Regards, Jonathan _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 12:09:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2216016A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:09:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from asmtp-a063f35.pas.sa.earthlink.net (asmtp-a063f35.pas.sa.earthlink.net [207.217.120.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0782643D5C for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:09:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=localhost) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bq9jL-0007NG-HS; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:09:51 -0700 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:10:21 -0500 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Soo-Hyun Choi Message-ID: <20040729121021.GA42108@datawok.com> References: <20040729110416.94516.qmail@web42007.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040729110416.94516.qmail@web42007.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b7e9ef285c55c32d1eddd25cf36f29b77350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wireless LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:09:54 -0000 On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 04:04:16AM -0700, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > I'm using SONY VAIO Z1 series, and it seems that the > built in wireless LAN isn't working properly. So I got > a PC Card which is WaveLAN (Lucent), a bit old one but > expect to work fine under FreeBSD 5.2.1. > > I've enabled 'pccard' at rc.conf file and the kernel > seems to load the 'wi' driver by default. > > But the WaveLAN isn't working yet. Could anyone drive > me in a good (complete) reference to get things > working? > > Cheers, > SH- Have you configured the wireless interface yet? See: man ifconfig man wi Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 12:19:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803BB16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:19:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92.asp.att.net [204.127.203.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCCA43D55 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:19:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-10-157.client.mchsi.com[12.216.10.157]) by sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92) with SMTP id <20040729121917m92004i3ghe>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:19:17 +0000 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:19:12 -0500 (CDT) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040729070742.G17836@grond.sourballs.org> References: <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:19:29 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, DK wrote: > ... then you maybe right Remko, BSD may not be right for me. I think it's becoming clear that it's not. You seem to expect FreeBSD to be 'just like MSWindows, but Better!' - but it's *not* like MSWin, at all. If you keep expecting to install/adminsiter a UNIX-like system in the same way you install/administer a MSWindows system, you will be perpetually frustrated and disappointed, because you will *continually* run into the ways in which FreeBSD is nothing like Windows, and you will *never* use the OS in the way it was designed to be used (because your mind is stuck in Windows-land). If you're seriously interest in *learning* how to use UNIX-like systems, take it slowly and ask lots of specific questions. If you just want to rant, you're really wasting everybody's time. -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 12:20:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C044116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:20:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [18.29.1.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A03D43D31 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:20:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aa-sender@w3.org) Received: by frink.w3.org (Postfix, from userid 59936) id 9C48AA0C60; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:20:23 -0400 (EDT) To: questions@freebsd.org From: W3C List Manager In-Reply-To: <20040729122022.D31A9A0AE0@frink.w3.org> Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040729122023.9C48AA0C60@frink.w3.org> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:20:23 -0400 (EDT) Subject: IMPORTANT: your message to www-style X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:20:52 -0000 This is a response to a message apparently sent from your address to www-style@w3.org: Subject: Returned mail: Data format error From: questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:19:52 -0400 Your message has NOT been distributed to the list; before we distribute it, we need your permission to include your message in our Web archive of all messages distributed to this list. Please visit: http://www.w3.org/Mail/review?id=bd0880a181426ca1d497 and follow the simple procedure listed to give us permission to include your message in our Web archives. It should take less than one minute of your time, and only needs to be done once. If you do not give us this permission by Thu Aug 5 08:20:23 UTC 2004, your message will be deleted from our systems without being distributed to the list. Please do not reply to this message; for more information on this system, including information on how to provide feedback, please see: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/aa/ Note: W3C's mailing lists may not be used for unsolicited bulk email of any kind! -- W3C Postmaster, http://www.w3.org/Mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 17:50:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C43716A4CF for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:50:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mlxlx001.framecom.net (mlxlx001.frc-server.de [213.203.228.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3004B43D5E for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:50:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lopez@skr-clan.de) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by Framecom.net Received: from [217.94.110.96] (account lopez@skr-clan.de HELO Master) by mlxlx001.framecom.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 1212087 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:50:22 +0200 Message-ID: <001101c474cb$5adf8e40$0200a8c0@Master> From: "[SKR] Pedro Alonso Lopez" To: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:50:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:26:23 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:50:25 -0000 where to get a text howto change the device bus ids. i searched the handbook but not find anything. i also tryed google. does i can set this with a command or do i have to programm anything? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 10:02:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E9516A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:02:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lmfilto01.st1.spray.net (lmfilto01.st1.spray.net [212.78.202.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D5243D6E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:02:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sneakycat@lycos.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lmfilto01.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83571350AB for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:02:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lmcodec04.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.209])port 10024) with ESMTP id 26547-10 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:02:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lmcodec04.st1.spray.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lmcodec04.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A0589CF901 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:02:36 +0000 (GMT) From: "John Rackham " To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <1091095356019219@lycos-europe.com> X-Mailer: LycosMail X-Originating-IP: [62.255.32.13] Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:02:36 GMT Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_Lycos_0192191091095356_ID" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at spray.net X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:26:23 +0000 Subject: password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:02:39 -0000 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --=_NextPart_Lycos_0192191091095356_ID Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hello ive got a problem login to freebsd. i had a copy of freebsd given me and when i installed it it asks me for a login name and password. is there a way of findin out the login name and password? Film & TV Extras urgently required in your area - See Yourself in major Films & TV? Call 0907 1512440 to Register. calls cost 150pm --=_NextPart_Lycos_0192191091095356_ID-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 12:32:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8296C16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:32:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from n2sw.com (n2sw.webair.com [216.130.191.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D81443D60 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:32:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from webairsteve (unknown [216.130.191.71]) by n2sw.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A23DF20EE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:32:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <028c01c47581$f7066940$47bf82d8@webairsteve> From: "Steve" To: "John Rackham " , References: <1091095356019219@lycos-europe.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:37:32 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:32:47 -0000 login as root -- Steve Rieger ICQ # 5956607 yahoo IM riegersteve ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Rackham " To: Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 3:02 AM Subject: password > hello ive got a problem login to freebsd. i had a copy of freebsd given me and when i installed it it asks me for > a login name and password. is there a way of findin out the login name and password? > > Film & TV Extras urgently required in your area - See Yourself in major Films & TV? Call 0907 1512440 to Register. calls cost 150pm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 12:33:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD4C16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:33:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8041843D4C for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:33:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20040729123307016003nvbke>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:33:11 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6A2F82B; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:33:06 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Abidoon Nadeem" References: <001f01c474d6$e9c0b340$03a9a8c0@vectorsigma> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 29 Jul 2004 08:33:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <001f01c474d6$e9c0b340$03a9a8c0@vectorsigma> Message-ID: <44d62fuh6l.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help make crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:33:12 -0000 "Abidoon Nadeem" writes: > please find my kernel config file attached > this does fine when i make depend > but it fails on make > please help > > i dont understand whats wrong > > i get an error code 1 > The useful error messages were before that, and I don't have a -CURRENT box at hand, but a quick look showed me a few problems: you commented out scbus and da, but left in some other devices that require those. Also, you have both sc and vt enabled; I believe they are mutually exclusive. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 12:39:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB9616A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:39:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263EA43D5F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:39:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sven@yagonna.de) Received: from [212.227.126.208] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BqABj-0000YD-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:39:11 +0200 Received: from [80.146.42.129] (helo=sol.intern.yagonna.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BqABj-0002xA-00 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:39:11 +0200 Received: by sol.intern.yagonna.de (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 6BEB31A9; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:40:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:40:17 +0200 From: Sven Pfeifer To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040729124017.GA64449@yagonna.de> Mail-Followup-To: Sven Pfeifer , questions@FreeBSD.org References: <1091095356019219@lycos-europe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1091095356019219@lycos-europe.com> X-Organization: YaGonna X-Location: Wuppertal User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:fc38b4c18c1c0557192e98767c9e60c3 Subject: Re: password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sven Pfeifer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:39:44 -0000 Hi, John Rackham wrote: > hello ive got a problem login to freebsd. i had a copy of freebsd > given me and when i installed it it asks me for > a login name and password. is there a way of findin out the login > name and password? yes of course. yust log in as root (this is the system administrator) and type: cat /etc/master.passwd | cut -d ":" -f 1 if you can see the username, that matches your userid, set a new password for this username by typing: passwd the_username_you_found_out HTH Sven -- Why You Can't Find Your System Administrator: They are hiding under the stairs --[Simon Burr simes@tcp.co.uk] ------------------------------------------------------[rand. sig. #24] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 12:57:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA5716A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:57:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1FA43D2F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:56:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20040729125659016003k7eje>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:56:59 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id ED8F512; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:56:58 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Redmond Militante References: <20040727151610.GA2790@darkpossum> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 29 Jul 2004 08:56:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20040727151610.GA2790@darkpossum> Message-ID: <448yd3ug2t.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limit login attempts with pam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:57:00 -0000 Redmond Militante writes: > hello > > i'm interested in configuring PAM on my 4x system so that a user is locked out of ignored if trying to log in unsuccessfully via ftp within the space of a minute or so. i'm trying to eliminate brute force attacks... > > > can anyone point me towards some good tutorials on how to do this? Good tutorials? I don't know, but there is source for the pam_tally module included in the tree on my -STABLE machine. Think it over carefully before enabling this kind of capability, though; you may be making brute force attacks somewhat harder, but a denial-of-service attack on specific users will become trivial. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 13:15:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C598416A4D9 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:15:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.u4eatech.com (blackhole.u4eatech.com [195.188.241.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061B543D5D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:15:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.williamson@u4eatech.com) Received: by mail.u4eatech.com (Postfix, from userid 503) id 68237360058; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:15:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from apus.u4eatech.com (apus.degree2.com [172.30.40.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.u4eatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD0F360030 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:15:30 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <6.1.1.1.2.20040729135112.0af53cd8@cygnus> X-Sender: richard@cygnus X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.1.1 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:13:19 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Richard P. Williamson" In-Reply-To: <20040729124017.GA64449@yagonna.de> References: <1091095356019219@lycos-europe.com> <20040729124017.GA64449@yagonna.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Subject: Re: password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:15:38 -0000 To log in as root, >John Rackham wrote: >> hello ive got a problem login to freebsd. i had a copy of freebsd >> given me and when i installed it it asks me for >> a login name and password. is there a way of findin out the login >> name and password? User: root Password: [leave blank] Assuming you had the installation media and went through sysinstall et al, then you should be able to use the name/password that you entered during that process. The commands that Sven give below will tell you what the user name was, but if you can't remember what the password was, you'll need to change it to a new one. Once in, it is recommended you change the root password from [nothing] to [something], if [nothing] is still the root password: # passwd Changing local password for root. New password: [something] Retype the password: [something] passwd: updating the database... passwd: done # If you ever need to change the root password again, you'll need to log in using single user mode. The handbook will explain how to do that. If you've logged in as a user, then passwd works to change that user's local password. If you're logged in as root, you can change the password of a user using 'passwd -l [username]' http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html and '# man passwd' can help out here. HTH, rip At 13:40 29/07/2004. Sven Pfeifer had this to say: >Hi, > >John Rackham wrote: >> hello ive got a problem login to freebsd. i had a copy of freebsd >> given me and when i installed it it asks me for >> a login name and password. is there a way of findin out the login >> name and password? > >yes of course. yust log in as root (this is the system administrator) >and type: > > cat /etc/master.passwd | cut -d ":" -f 1 > >if you can see the username, that matches your userid, set a new >password for this username by typing: > > passwd the_username_you_found_out > >HTH > > > Sven > >-- >Why You Can't Find Your System Administrator: > They are hiding under the stairs --[Simon Burr simes@tcp.co.uk] >------------------------------------------------------[rand. sig. #24] >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 13:21:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D89416A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:21:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.u4eatech.com (blackhole.u4eatech.com [195.188.241.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB23743D5D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:21:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.williamson@u4eatech.com) Received: by mail.u4eatech.com (Postfix, from userid 503) id 5E9F6360054; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:21:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from apus.u4eatech.com (apus.degree2.com [172.30.40.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.u4eatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E4636002B for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:21:20 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <6.1.1.1.2.20040729134558.027c36d8@cygnus> X-Sender: richard@cygnus X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.1.1 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:24:42 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Richard P. Williamson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Subject: openssl/pem.h references undefined? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:21:34 -0000 Hello! I'm trying to port some linux code to FreeBSD (4.10). One of the files makes use of PEM_[read|write]_RSAPublicKey(...). The linux version used a seven-param list for both read and write, but the FreeBSD one seems to only require a two param list for the write version: #ifdef _FREEBSD PEM_write_RSAPublicKey(f, rsa); #else PEM_write_RSAPublicKey(f, rsa, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, "Zapf"); #endif I know this, because the precompiler complained about differing param counts during macro expansion. When I compile with the above change now, however, I get: ... /tmp/cc75DK8C.o: In function `MakeKey': /usr/jail/cvswork/dev/firmware/cli/include/authfunctions.h:96: undefined reference to `PEM_write_RSAPrivateKey' /usr/jail/cvswork/dev/firmware/cli/include/authfunctions.h:103: undefined reference to `PEM_write_RSAPublicKey' ... What am I missing? I tried reinstalling openssl just in case, but that didn't change the behavior during the build, and the handbook says it's part of the base install anyway. man pem states should be included, and I'm doing that. rip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 13:30:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B14B16A4F8 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:30:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pdx.chatusa.com (pdx.ChatUSA.com [205.238.41.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2184D43D60 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:30:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from longterm@pdx.chatusa.com) Received: from dannewxp (xmax.TeleSat.net [205.238.42.202] (may be forged)) by pdx.chatusa.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id GAA13265 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000801c47570$25df3ab0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> From: "Dan" To: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:29:30 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: freeBSD How to you set the prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dan List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:30:30 -0000 Where and how do you set the prompt to show what user name that your = on IE ROOT or user johndoe. Eample of what the end results I would like to see. # router1.pdx/chatusa.com user johndoe. Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 13:51:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9714116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:51:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4DE43D5C for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:51:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-10-157.client.mchsi.com[12.216.10.157]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with SMTP id <20040729135149m91006ttfbe>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:51:50 +0000 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:51:48 -0500 (CDT) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: Dan In-Reply-To: <000801c47570$25df3ab0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> Message-ID: <20040729085044.T17836@grond.sourballs.org> References: <000801c47570$25df3ab0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeBSD How to you set the prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:51:51 -0000 On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Dan wrote: > Where and how do you set the prompt to show what user name that your on IE ROOT or user johndoe. > Eample of what the end results I would like to see. > > # router1.pdx/chatusa.com user johndoe. It depends on what shell you're using. Read the man page for that shell, searching for information on the shell variable 'prompt'. -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:06:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E7916A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:06:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server2.sonservers.com (server2.sonservers.com [69.50.210.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7382B43D54 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:06:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from info@sonservers.com) Received: from 209-181-157-189.omah.qwest.net ([209.181.157.189] helo=192.168.1.20) by server2.sonservers.com with smtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1BqBXl-000EVs-8x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:06:01 -0500 From: Scott To: X-Mailer: Barca 1.0 (700) - Licensed Version Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:05:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20047299555.097692@IBM-R40> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server2.sonservers.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sonservers.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: info@sonservers.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:06:15 -0000 Hi, I completed my first update (upgrade?) of a 5.2.1 fresh FreeBSD install. I followed a couple how-to's, the handbook, and "Absolute BSD" as my guides. My machine is a 1.8Ghz AMD. Here is my supfile: *default host=3Dcvsup15.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=3D/usr *default prefix=3D/usr *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all ports-all tag=3D. Everything seemed to go without a hitch. I did: 1. cvsup mysupfile 2. make buildworld 3. make buildkernel 4. make installkernel 5. make installworld The system is up and seems to be running fine, but here's my question: uname -a shows: FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0: I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest revision is #9 or so? Do I need to tell it to get the latest revision somehow? Do I need to change the cvs tag=3D to something else to get up to date? Thanks for your time, Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:08:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD8816A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:08:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627BB43D6A for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:08:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i6TE8Qx05391; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:08:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200407291408.i6TE8Qx05391@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: sneakycat@lycos.co.uk (John Rackham ) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:08:25 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1091095356019219@lycos-europe.com> from "John Rackham " at Jul 29, 2004 10:02:36 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:08:30 -0000 > > hello ive got a problem login to freebsd. i had a copy of freebsd > given me and when i installed it it asks me for > a login name and password. is there a way of findin out the login > name and password? Well, if you are right in the middle of the installation process, then it is asking you to make up a password. During the installation it asks for a password for root. You should normally create one you can remember, but that is hard to guess. If you are past that stage and you did not create a password for root during installation, then probably you can log in using 'root' for the id and without any password (eg just hit return/enter without typing any password). If that works, then change the root password right away since root has complete control over the whole system. You wouldn't want to leave that sitting around for the cat to wander over the keys at a bad time (or an attacker to try out). If that doesn't work, then a password was probably created during the install, but you don't remember it. In that case, and if you have access to the console, you need to do a boot to single user and then change the root password and also maybe create a working account for yourself. How to do these things are well covered in the FreeBSD handbook which is available online on the FreeBSD website. ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:16:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28D816A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:16:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from itc.com.ar (tserver.itc.com.ar [200.43.69.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBCC43D45 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:16:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eferro@itc.com.ar) Received: from tecnica ([200.43.69.7]) by itc.com.ar (VisNetic.MailServer.v5.8.6.6) with SMTP id M41DFU for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:16:28 -0300 Message-ID: <001101c47576$81c6d9e0$0332a8c0@internetxaire.com.ar> From: "Ezequiel" To: References: <20047299555.097692@IBM-R40> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:15:31 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:16:31 -0000 Change this: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE for this *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1 On this way it will download the release 5.2.1 with the last revision ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott" To: Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:05 AM Subject: Updating 5.2.1 Release # Hi, I completed my first update (upgrade?) of a 5.2.1 fresh FreeBSD install. I followed a couple how-to's, the handbook, and "Absolute BSD" as my guides. My machine is a 1.8Ghz AMD. Here is my supfile: *default host=cvsup15.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all ports-all tag=. Everything seemed to go without a hitch. I did: 1. cvsup mysupfile 2. make buildworld 3. make buildkernel 4. make installkernel 5. make installworld The system is up and seems to be running fine, but here's my question: uname -a shows: FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0: I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest revision is #9 or so? Do I need to tell it to get the latest revision somehow? Do I need to change the cvs tag= to something else to get up to date? Thanks for your time, Scott _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:23:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA9616A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:23:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2F443D5D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:23:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i6TEMZx05472; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:22:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200407291422.i6TEMZx05472@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: asdzxc111@yahoo.com (DK) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:22:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20040729072512.43648.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com> from "DK" at Jul 29, 2004 12:25:12 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: krinklyfig@spymac.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:23:13 -0000 > > --- Joshua Tinnin wrote: > > > maybe you would like a test of the Apache Web Server on BSD against the > > > Apache Web Server on Windows 2000 ?? - I will search the net & get back to > > > you on that if you are interested ?? > > > > > > I wonder if people that run web servers on BSD never use a GUI thereby > > > saying how fast BSD is... - yes, keep using VI & don't forget to feed the > > > Horse :) > > > > Have you taken a look at this lately? > > > > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html > > > > I don't know how important uptime is to you, but that's a big reason so many > > people use it. > > > I agree with you 110% ... thats why I want to install & run a FreeBSD Apache > Server instead of using a Windows Server box running Apache. So, you want a reliable server, not a MS toy. One of the reasons FreeBSD is so much more of a reliable server is because it DOESN'T have all that MS stuff on it. ////jerry > > > Kind Regards, > > DK > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:26:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BFB16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:26:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E899743D49 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:26:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owen.g@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BqBrH-0006R5-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:26:11 +0200 Received: from [217.235.116.3] (helo=[192.168.1.250]) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BqBrH-00024v-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:26:11 +0200 Message-ID: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:29:31 +0200 From: "Owen.G" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:4e7b6bfadbfaa9d59ebe2d9dce9eb48d Subject: XFree86 4.4 port (for Chipset CLE266/VT8235 Graphics) - timescale? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:26:12 -0000 I also bought a EPIA Mini-ITX in early June before seeing the posting that the video wasn't supported by X on FreeBSD (Linux - supposedly yes, BSD not yet). The previous responder (thanks Erik) said, "the CLE266 chipset will be supported in the port of XFree86 4.4" I just had a look at the FreeBSD Ports page: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi and there's no sign of XFree86 4.4 yet. Questions: 1, Does anybody know the timescale of the port for XFree86 4.4? 2, Will the port of XFree86 4.4 be important enough that it will be announced on the "freebsd-announce" mailing list? (I did get an X windows manager running on the VGA S server but it was too low resolution to be useful.) Thanks in anticipation, Owen ==== On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:20:06AM +0200, junkmail@sensewave.com wrote: >> I am trying to set up a windows manager on a EPIA Mini-ITX M6000 >> board without any success. >> >> From the manual: >> Chipset CLE266/VT8235 Graphics: VIA Castlerock AGP >> >> From dmesg.boot: >> agp0: mem >> 0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 >> pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver >> attached) >> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem >> 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 >> >> Any hope? > -------------------------- > The via driver is available only from XFree86 4.4 (or in the x.org > release.) The XFree86 port in FreeBSD has not yet been updated to > 4.4, and the x.org ports are not quite finished yet. > In other words: No, the via driver is not available yet, but once the > X ports have been updated to the latest release it should work. > > -- > Erik Trulsson > ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:27:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D0116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:27:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5ob4.obsmtp.com [12.158.34.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E67D443D64 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:27:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hakim.Singhji@nychhc.org) Received: from source ([207.127.241.11]) by exprod5ob4.obsmtp.com ([12.158.34.250]) with SMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:27:11 PDT Received: from NYC-HHC-MTA by gwia.nychhc.org with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:27:11 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:27:05 -0400 X-Mailer: Groupwise 6.5 Message-ID: <20040729T102705Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> From: Hakim Singhji To: Hakim Z.Singhji , Matthew Seaman Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="____RKELBDBJGGQNKOZZCEPT____" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: Bill Moran cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HOWTO Ping LAN??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:27:12 -0000 --____RKELBDBJGGQNKOZZCEPT____ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Matt, You say that the only way I will be able to connect to my network is by = tunneling. =20 This is not what I want to do, I thought I may be able to SSH, Telnet, = www, etc.=20 from the outside to my default gateway and have the gateway pass SSH, = Telnet,=20 www., or any other request to the machine on the private network by = including the=20 "localhost.defaultgateway.domain.org" or something to that affect. Does NAT Overloading only go one way??? Hakim Z. Singhji Coordinating Mgr. / Infection Control 718-245-3923 hakim.singhji@nychhc.org >>> Matthew Seaman 7/29/2004 5:32:32 AM = >>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:40:02AM -0400, Hakim Z. Singhji wrote: > Figure 1 >=20 > *************** > * Internet * > *24.199.1xx.xx* > *************** > ~ | > ~ | > *************** ************** > * Defaut GW * __ __ *Kids Machine* > *192.68.0.1 * *192.68.0.3 * > FreeBSD 4.10 * * Mandrake 10* > *************** ************** > ~ | > ~ | > ***************** > *Wrk Station1* > *192.68.0.2 * > *Redhat 9 * > ***************** >=20 > This is a rough diagram of the network... I would like to ssh, ping, > etc. the machines behind the default gateway directly (without > tunneling) from the outside the network (at work for example). Is this > possible and if so how do I config. Keep in mind that my default > gateway is FreeBSD. I know this may be a complicated project but if you > could help that would help me greatly. Many thanks to everyone in = advance. I'm afraid that's not going to be possible with your current network layout. If you want all of your machines to be accessible from the Internet, then you'll need routable addresses on all of your machines. I know you've said you don't want to use tunnelling, but unfortunately, that's the only way you can access a private address space as you have from outside it. A relatively simple way of doing that is to ssh into your gateway box, and use the '-L' or '-R' portforwarding options to create a tunnel to one of the internal machines, and then ssh or otherwise connect through that tunnel: see eg. http://www.linux.ie/articles/tutorials/ssh.php=20 One other point: you're going to have problems if you're using 192.168.0.0 as the IP number on your FreeBSD machine. That's the *network* address, and shouldn't be applied directly to any specific machine. If you're running your internal network using 192.168.0.0/24 as the address space, then you have 254 addresses (from 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.0.254) to use for client machines, since 192.168.0.0 (network address) and 192.168.0.255 (broadcast address) are reserved as part of the networking setup. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --____RKELBDBJGGQNKOZZCEPT____ Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIILQwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIILNDCCCzACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCCCSQw ggKsMIICFaADAgECAgMMuKcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoT HFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA0MDcyMDEzMzU1NFoXDTA1MDcyMDEzMzU1NFowgYcxEDAO BgNVBAQTB1NpbmdoamkxDjAMBgNVBCoTBUhha2ltMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1IYWtpbSBTaW5naGppMScw JQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhhoYWtpbS5zaW5naGppQG55Y2hoYy5vcmcxIjAgBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWE3Np bmdoamloQG55Y2hoYy5vcmcwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAPJoZoR/CSJZ9Tt0 wmyG2WqsUMNU3JVAPc7WK0B3bxChEcOI/WbIBhuDDHtaqBe/5QoYBmcHe6cA6u3yNjP3cm+A56aX 85+Y/pcRpClPLR/DOALlyANabq8UQ25pBziaJFpNFav+unPMKq56Vw9vPv7Ya1aevZRzAuUimn5n 8D4hAgMBAAGjSjBIMDgGA1UdEQQxMC+BGGhha2ltLnNpbmdoamlAbnljaGhjLm9yZ4ETc2luZ2hq aWhAbnljaGhjLm9yZzAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBADLwUJHcKv9hgmb4 YtT6wYzAWj1cAJhMCBODfNccxiEYqVrudtbnzQCwvWzRf5CpZOv2Z+lPeTKli+dmfkRv99/qpVl8 4kdrnKD6fqcN5ogfW7vRuRP7dIw53XKkkoaJYbsUOyvGIaBuTJTul2Tijl4q2zyxI7xQue9URGo7 UwgmMIIDLTCCApagAwIBAgIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNV BAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29u c3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UE AxMbVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1m cmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTk2MDEwMTAwMDAwMFoXDTIwMTIzMTIzNTk1OVowgdExCzAJ BgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgG A1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMg RGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3 DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAw gYkCgYEA1GnX1LCUZFtx6UfYDFG26nKRsIRefS0Nj3sS34UldSh0OkIsYyeflXtL734Zhx2G6qPd uc6WZBrCFG5ErHzmj+hND3EfQDimAKOHePb5lIZererAXnbr2RSjXW56fAylS1V/Bhkpf56aJtVq uzgkCGqYx7Hao5iR/Xnb5VrEHLkCAwEAAaMTMBEwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQQFAAOBgQDH7JJ+Tvj1lqVnYiqk8E0RYNBvjWBYYawmu1I1XAjPMPuoSpaKH2JCI4wXD/S6ZJwX rEcp352YXtJsYHFcoqzceePnbgBHH7UNKOgCneSa/RP0ptl8sfjcXyMmCZGAc9AUG95DqYMl8uac LxXK/qarigd1iwzdUYRr5PjRzneigTCCAz8wggKooAMCAQICAQ0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdEx CzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEa MBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsTH0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2Vydmlj ZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqG SIb3DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhhd3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMzA3MTcwMDAwMDBaFw0x MzA3MTYyMzU5NTlaMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAo UHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTCB nzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAxKY8VXNV+065yplaHmjAdQRwnd/p/6Me7L3N9Vvy Gna9fww6YfK/Uc4B1OVQCjDXAmNaLIkVcI7dyfArhVqqP3FWy688Cwfn8R+RNiQqE88r1fOCdz0D viv+uxg+B79AgAJk16emu59l0cUqVIUPSAR/p7bRPGEEQB5kGXJgt/sCAwEAAaOBlDCBkTASBgNV HRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMEMGA1UdHwQ8MDowOKA2oDSGMmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGhhd3RlLmNvbS9U aGF3dGVQZXJzb25hbEZyZWVtYWlsQ0EuY3JsMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjApBgNVHREEIjAgpB4wHDEa MBgGA1UEAxMRUHJpdmF0ZUxhYmVsMi0xMzgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEASIzRUIPqCy7MDaNm rGcPf6+svsIXoUOWlJ1/TCG4+DYfqi2fNi/A9BxQIJNwPP2t4WFiw9k6GX6EsZkbAMUaC4J0niVQ lGLH2ydxVyWN3amcOY6MIE9lX5Xa9/eH1sYITq726jTlEBpbNU1341YheILcIRk13iSx0x1G/11f ZU8xggHnMIIB4wIBATBpMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGlu ZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBD QQIDDLinMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCggdUwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0B CQUxDxcNMDQwNzI5MTAyNzA0WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUdgdVRxp0drY0fO1JZ9lK8fpTTBgw dgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMWkwZzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgIC AIAwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwQwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICATgwBwYF Kw4DAhowDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYAHdwxnfepAJ0zu9pJE9ydyaFDMG3XNz0hgCv1FrC7vw5di jlTeXR0Mb8tX3f/uYCpNKdTjZDhJV9NeKbIO+BkgW4RiInse8lFgSi/e9EbDOKchtUijVY4E/7PV ACq4AeIZxu1aA4ydgxXcolDPVJJCjLlHOKRTCb+IvtJd5NNt2w== --____RKELBDBJGGQNKOZZCEPT____-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:30:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D0B16A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:30:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E8843D5A; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:30:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i6TEUBW05510; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:30:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200407291430.i6TEUBW05510@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: asdzxc111@yahoo.com (DK) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:30:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20040729065528.59993.qmail@web41008.mail.yahoo.com> from "DK" at Jul 28, 2004 11:55:27 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Jerry McAllister cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:30:15 -0000 > > --- Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > - Installing Packages is nice & easy & straight forward from the > > docs(should be more of these!) > > > - Installing ports/packages via ftp/net - Forget it!! > > > I have barely got BSD running, the last thing I want is connecting a BSD > > > box to my broadband > > > connection ?? Does BSD have a default firewall ?? Don't know, having > > > trouble installing stuff let > > > alone configuring a firewall via scripts/files > > > > You are probably better off and more secure with an initial install, with > > no additional work or tweaking, of FreeBSD on the net than you would be > > with a MS system with every know "fix" available. The system is > > inherently more secure and in addition - and maybe partially because of > > this - fewer, by far, attempts at cracking FreeBSD are made than are > > made against MS systems. Some of this is, of course, because there are > > much fewer FreeBSD systems out there to tempt kiddies. But, the fact > > that cracking FreeBSD is more difficult contributes to this effect. > > So if I do a default install of FreeBSD & then connect to the net for > ports/packages, is there a default firewall running in the background ?? There is one there, but you have to turn it on. Actually, there are two of them there. By the way, firewalls are useful tools, but they are not the be-all&end-all, last word in security. > > > > > Then its going step by step with the install guides & when I try to install > > MySQL, I type # > > > groupadd mysql & I get "command not found" ... ??? no idea, I am following > > the install guides... > > > now if I am doing the same as everyone else with a fresh install of BSD, > > why is it no one else > > > gets groupadd mysql "command not found" ?? > > > > What does "commmand not found" sound like it means? > > The shell doesn't know how to find the command you typed in. > > Either you didn't update your search path to include the directory > > it is in or it didn't get installed correctly where it should be. > > Probably the first is true. So, find out where it should be and > > add that directory to the path. See man path. > > thnx, will check out the path. Also, note the comment by whoever it was that said that groupadd is not the right thing to run for FreeBSD installations according to the docs. I haven't worked on that so don't personally know. > > Again, you are much safer on the net with a FreeBSD system. > > Just do it. I do all my installs over the net. > > Do use appropriate precautions such as ssh instead of telnet and ssl > > protected sites where possible and check md5-s of downloaded files. > > But, don't let it stop you from using it with FreeBSD. > > Do you install FreeBSD first & connect to the net for ports/packages, or > install the actual FreeBSD OS from the /stand/sysinstall & select the net ?? I download the mini-iso (miniinst) CD and install everything, OS, source, ports over the net. > > It sounds a lot like you may have some processes wanting to check > > themselves via the net upon startup that are holding things up > > during boot. They will each wait until they time out before > > things move on. I have several dual-boot machines, WinXP/FreeBSD, > > Win2k/FreeBSd and Win95/FreeBSD and they all boot in about the same > > amount of time with the FreeBSD being maybe a mite faster to get to > > my login than the MS stuff being able to get to a state where I can > > actually do something - eg not just getting the spash screen or background > > displayed. So, either plug in the net or disable those utilities that > > want to talk and try things again. > > My bootup is fine, its the BSD+wmaker running & opening nedit & a cmd prompts > that are slower than Windows 2000 ?? any suggestions as to why ?? Don't know about that. I have never used nedit. But, the editors I use pop up instantly - even when I am editing over the net. ////jerry > > Kind regards, > > DK > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:32:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC0316A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:32:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5206743D41 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:32:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6TEWCrU071264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:32:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6TEWCOF071263; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:32:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:32:12 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Dan Message-ID: <20040729143212.GB28698@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Dan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000801c47570$25df3ab0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000801c47570$25df3ab0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:32:12 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeBSD How to you set the prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:32:18 -0000 --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:29:30PM -0000, Dan wrote: > Where and how do you set the prompt to show what user name that your on= IE ROOT or user johndoe. > Eample of what the end results I would like to see. >=20 > # router1.pdx/chatusa.com user johndoe. Depends on what shell you're using. Assuming that you meant to type 'router1.pdx.chatusa.com' as the fully qualified hostname, then for tcsh(1): set prompt=3D"# %M user %n " For bash(1): PS1=3D"# \H user \u " For zsh(1): prompt=3D"# %M user %n " For sh(1), which doesn't have any sort of escape character support for its prompts, you'ld have to do something like: PS1=3D"# $(hostname) user $(id -un)" which just uses the regular string substition features supplied by the shell. [The difference is immaterial here, but if you wanted, say, to display the current working directory in your shell prompt, the %-escape or \-escape style would do it without any fuss. The sh(1) style means you'ld have to arrange to reset the prompt each time you changed directory.] Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCQpsiD657aJF7eIRAnQiAKCikSoojHI2XwluxMeOZa9+c3SF3gCgiEg3 GVXAbvccVkSh6K9vF5uhgJI= =FiqD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:35:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD45616A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:35:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zardoz.rd.imagescape.com (zardoz.rd.imagescape.com [66.100.151.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D4043D41 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from puna@imagescape.com) Received: from [192.168.0.59] (nikko.rd.imagescape.com [192.168.0.59]) (authenticated bits=0)i6TEZ9tB030207; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:35:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from puna@imagescape.com) Message-ID: <41090BAF.6010600@imagescape.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:37:35 -0500 From: Puna Tannehill Organization: Imaginary Landscape, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: info@sonservers.com References: <20047299555.097692@IBM-R40> In-Reply-To: <20047299555.097692@IBM-R40> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:35:13 -0000 Scott wrote: > Hi, > > I completed my first update (upgrade?) of a 5.2.1 fresh > FreeBSD install. I followed a couple how-to's, the handbook, > and "Absolute BSD" as my guides. My machine is a 1.8Ghz AMD. > > Here is my supfile: > > *default host=cvsup15.us.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/usr > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > src-all > ports-all tag=. > > Everything seemed to go without a hitch. I did: > > 1. cvsup mysupfile > 2. make buildworld > 3. make buildkernel > 4. make installkernel > 5. make installworld > > The system is up and seems to be running fine, but here's my > question: > > uname -a shows: > FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0: > > I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to > be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest > revision is #9 or so? Do I need to tell it to get the latest > revision somehow? Do I need to change the cvs tag= to > something else to get up to date? I thought the #number indicated the number of times the server has been rebooted based upon the last time the kernel was recompiled. Being that it is #0, it was your first book. Reboot the machine and check the number again. Puna > Thanks for your time, > Scott > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:37:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208D716A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:37:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38F043D62 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:37:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i6TEbKDT065019; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:37:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:37:18 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: lists Message-ID: <20040729143715.GB26125@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4108B086.8060706@sleektech.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4108B086.8060706@sleektech.nl> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netstat -m 'cannot allocate memory' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:37:22 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 29), lists said: > Hello, > > On 2 of my systems I get the following error while doing netstat -m: > > $ netstat -m > netstat: sysctl: retrieving mbstat: Cannot allocate memory > > This is a PIV 2ghz, with 1,5 GB of memory That means you have rebuilt your kernel and now kernel and world are out of sync. At minimum, rebuild libkvm and netstat. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:40:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FED316A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:40:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F6343D64 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:40:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6TEg4jM054039; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:42:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i6TEg4rk054038; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:42:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:42:04 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: DK Message-ID: <20040729144204.GA53762@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , DK , Giorgos Keramidas , Remko Lodder , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040728171010.GA86397@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20040729055330.90694.qmail@web41007.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040729055330.90694.qmail@web41007.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: Remko Lodder cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:40:18 -0000 I just need to set the record straight on this automount issue you keep ranting about... On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:53:30PM -0700, DK typed: [...] > > > Whats the purpose of having to manually set the system to automount ?? > > > as opposed to having it as a system install default ?? if there is an > > > advantage, I am sure its for the 0.01% of the user base > > > > It's more in the range of 99.9%. Automounting can be annoying like hell > > when you happen to accidentally insert media in your drives. It can > > also be insecure if you don't want anyone to use the machine you've > > installed to mount CD-ROMs, floppies or other media of their choise. > > Accidently ?? what ?? Like you were walking down a hall way, tripped & slipped > & accidenlty shoved a CD into the drive :)) No, more like you put a cd with sensitive data on it in the wrong tray of your 40+ identical rackmounted servers, exposing it to the wrong users on the wrong server. > I can put a CD into Windows 2000 & it has never been accessed unless I > explicitly do it. - I don't see the problem ?? You keep on measuring FreeBSD by MS Windows standards. Wrong. FreeBSD (and Unixlike OSses in general) are designed to be truly *multi-user* operating systems and their default settings will reflect that. Especially FreeBSD, which still is mostly used as a server OS, servicing many users. > - as for automounting, I think you are confusing this with AutoRUN for CD's > AFAIK - you cannot disable automounting of Floppys/CD in Windows 2000 And they call this a server platform? What a joke! Ruben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:46:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05E916A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:46:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005A243D49 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:46:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6TEjodO016126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:45:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6TEjolM016125; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:45:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:45:50 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Puna Tannehill Message-ID: <20040729144550.GC28698@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Puna Tannehill , info@sonservers.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20047299555.097692@IBM-R40> <41090BAF.6010600@imagescape.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41090BAF.6010600@imagescape.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:45:50 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: info@sonservers.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:46:09 -0000 --7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:37:35AM -0500, Puna Tannehill wrote: > Scott wrote: > >uname -a shows: > >FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0: > > > >I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to=20 > >be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest=20 > >revision is #9 or so? Do I need to tell it to get the latest=20 > >revision somehow? Do I need to change the cvs tag=3D to=20 > >something else to get up to date? >=20 > I thought the #number indicated the number of times the server has been= =20 > rebooted based upon the last time the kernel was recompiled. Being that = it=20 > is #0, it was your first book. Reboot the machine and check the number= =20 > again. I believe that the #n is the number of times the kernel has been re-compiled since the last time the system was installed. It's probably not a very interesting datum except to kernel hackers who need to do a lot of recompiling. What the original poster was thinking of is the patchlevel that gets incremented every time a new security (or nowadays: errata) patch is applied to any of the -RELEASE branches. That modifies the OS name (ie. the output of 'uname -r'), so instead of: 5.2.1-RELEASE it says (at the latest count): 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 See /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh for the file that controls all that. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCQ2eiD657aJF7eIRAhz1AJ90qvGVH6JbTpAXIIUwmoMbaQRdyACgjlvC He7GwPacwQsldpKBUgt2PH8= =E5G3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 14:55:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DB216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:55:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D08243D1D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:55:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915EF69A39; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:55:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:55:28 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <20040729105528.46377760.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200407291430.i6TEUBW05510@clunix.cl.msu.edu> References: <20040729065528.59993.qmail@web41008.mail.yahoo.com> <200407291430.i6TEUBW05510@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:55:36 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: > > My bootup is fine, its the BSD+wmaker running & opening nedit & a cmd prompts > > that are slower than Windows 2000 ?? any suggestions as to why ?? This is ridiculous. You're getting lousy help because most of your email sounds like a Troll ... and the Troll-feeders are answering your questions instead of people who know how to help. (Nothing against the Troll-feeders, they're just trying to help as well ... they just don't know any better) My FreeBSD system, using Gnome (which is a system hog) is faster than when Windows NT was installed ... and I _KNOW_ NT is faster than W2K. So, if you're honestly having speed problems, then something is wrong. So, you need to do the proper steps to figure out what's wrong with your system. Have you pasted a dmesg? My first guess would be that your hardware is a little off, and Windows has drivers for it but FreeBSD doesn't, thus you get expected performance on Windows, but crap on FreeBSD. Also, are you saying that you run nedit on both Windows and FreeBSD and it's faster on Windows? Or are you comparing nedit to an apple? Also, have you monitored various system "stuff"? Run top, systat, etc while starting the programs in an attempt to isolate the bottleneck. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 15:06:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F3116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:06:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server2.sonservers.com (server2.sonservers.com [69.50.210.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413B143D49 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:06:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from info@sonservers.com) Received: from 209-181-157-189.omah.qwest.net ([209.181.157.189] helo=192.168.1.20) by server2.sonservers.com with smtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1BqCTj-000G1g-GR; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:05:55 -0500 From: Scott To: Matthew Seaman , Puna Tannehill , X-Mailer: Barca 1.0 (700) - Licensed Version Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:05:49 -0500 Message-ID: <200472910549.670990@IBM-R40> In-Reply-To: <20040729144550.GC28698@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server2.sonservers.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sonservers.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: info@sonservers.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:06:12 -0000 =A0 ( =A0 What the original poster was thinking of is =A0 ( =A0 the patchlevel that gets incremented every =A0 ( =A0 time a new security (or nowadays: errata) =A0 ( =A0 patch is applied to any of the -RELEASE =A0 ( =A0 branches. =A0That modifies the OS name (ie. =A0 ( =A0 the output of 'uname -r') That is exactly right Matthew. I thought (assumed) that "#0" in the uname -a= output was the patchlevel of the OS. At this point in my life, I'm not so= concerned about what that number is, but rather I am running the most= secure and stable patchlevel available. So if I set my cvs tag as Ezequiel (thank you) suggested: change: *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE to: *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1 That will get me the latest patches? I'll make that change and rebuild again today. Thanks all for your help. :) Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 15:16:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD14616A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:16:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A4143D45 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:16:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nocmonkey@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 76so10524rnl for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.78.11 with SMTP id a11mr111001rnb; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:48:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:48:58 -0400 From: Danny To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD on IBM x360 type hardware X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:16:20 -0000 Has anyone had success running FreeBSD on an IBM x360 type server? x4 2Ghz Xeon, 2MB L3 2GB PC1600 DDR IBM ServerRAID 4Mx Ultra160 SCSI Controller IBM EXP300 Storage Expansion Unit Quantum SDLT 220 Tape Drive I will go into more detail with the specs, but I was wondering if anyone has had success with any xSeries IBM servers with FreeBSD installed? Thank you, ..D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 15:31:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFF116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:31:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (ns1.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B4D43D1F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:31:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from support.tsgincorporated.com (support.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.9])i6TFVJ3Y025193 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:31:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) i6TFVJnQ048054 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:31:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Message-ID: <03ca01c47581$8fd309e0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: References: <20040729063637.97029.qmail@web41007.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:34:38 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:31:33 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "DK" To: "Guillermo_García-Rojas" ; Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 1:36 AM Subject: Re: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? > > > > Can you live without your Windows 2000 GUI? Can you work without it? > > Why would I want to... a GUI makes life easier & makes my ability to do work > more productive :) Not really. Your windows 2k pro doesn't allow for remote administration unless you have pc anywhere running, or it's connected to a domain to allow remote management. If your gui crashes, the box dies. If IE crashes to far, the box will die. No pretty gui for you then. > > What if some big company ask you to work for them, but they have UNIX > > systems, are you prepared or can you handle that work? > > Any OS will take me about 1 week to get up to speed - if its a MS product, > about 2 days :) You've been playing with FreeBSD 4.10 for 6 days, and still have issues. You've played with 4.5 in the past also. Yet you still have problems. > > > One more thing, my OpenBSD 3.5 costs me $0, FreeBSD price is $0 too. > > Did you spend the same amount of money on your Windows 2000?? > > Yea 0$ - all my software is War... *cough* ... donated You should be used to the problems of not having docs on the software that's "donated" to your hard drive then. Except in this case, the docs ARE freely available, it would just appear that you decided to not use them and run head long into something you know little to nothing about. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but it's just like buying a car and not knowing it needs gas. First thing you'd do is blame the car for not running when if you look at the owners manual, it will plainly tell you that fuel is required. > > Kind Regards, > > DK > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 15:31:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C74116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:31:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpgate.tsgincorporated.com (smtp1.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A4043D58 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:31:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from support.tsgincorporated.com (support.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.9])i6TFVJw9025192 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:31:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) i6TFVJnO048054 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:31:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Message-ID: <03c901c47581$8fce4ef0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: References: <20040729065528.59993.qmail@web41008.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:34:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:31:33 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "DK" To: "Jerry McAllister" Cc: "Giorgos Keramidas" ; Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 1:55 AM Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer > --- Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > - Installing Packages is nice & easy & straight forward from the > > docs(should be more of these!) > > > - Installing ports/packages via ftp/net - Forget it!! > > > I have barely got BSD running, the last thing I want is connecting a BSD > > > box to my broadband > > > connection ?? Does BSD have a default firewall ?? Don't know, having > > > trouble installing stuff let > > > alone configuring a firewall via scripts/files > > > > You are probably better off and more secure with an initial install, with > > no additional work or tweaking, of FreeBSD on the net than you would be > > with a MS system with every know "fix" available. The system is > > inherently more secure and in addition - and maybe partially because of > > this - fewer, by far, attempts at cracking FreeBSD are made than are > > made against MS systems. Some of this is, of course, because there are > > much fewer FreeBSD systems out there to tempt kiddies. But, the fact > > that cracking FreeBSD is more difficult contributes to this effect. > > So if I do a default install of FreeBSD & then connect to the net for > ports/packages, is there a default firewall running in the background ?? No, but then again, there are hardly any services either. See, unlike Windows, you're not going to have the same issues with trojans and breeches. If it's just you, and you've not added anyone else, you're pretty damn safe. Root can't log in from remote at all unless you specifically change the options that would allow it. -- Micheal Patterson TSG Network Administration 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 15:42:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB7116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:42:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C87943D53 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:42:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6TFgAmw000998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:42:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6TFg9f8000993; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:42:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:42:09 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Hakim Singhji Message-ID: <20040729154209.GA80531@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Hakim Singhji , "Hakim Z. Singhji" , Bill Moran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040729T102705Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040729T102705Z_C5AF00120003@nychhc.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:42:10 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: "Hakim Z. Singhji" cc: Bill Moran cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HOWTO Ping LAN??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:42:35 -0000 --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 10:27:05AM -0400, Hakim Singhji wrote: > Hi Matt, >=20 > You say that the only way I will be able to connect to my network is by t= unneling. =20 > This is not what I want to do, I thought I may be able to SSH, Telnet, ww= w, etc.=20 > from the outside to my default gateway and have the gateway pass SSH, Tel= net,=20 > www., or any other request to the machine on the private network by inclu= ding the=20 > "localhost.defaultgateway.domain.org" or something to that affect. >=20 > Does NAT Overloading only go one way??? Essentially, yes. What you're after is called 'port forwarding' (which is actually a class of tunnelling methods). What you can't do in the sort of setup you describe is ssh(1) to the gateway machine and have it connect you to some arbitrary machine on your internal network. The outside world doesn't "know" anything about the arrangement of your private network: which machine should the gateway box forward the incoming connection to? All it sees is a TCP syn packet sent to port 22 on its internet interface. Going the other way round -- where the internal machine initiates the connection -- works because you can match up the response 'ACK' packet to the outgoing 'SYN' packet In order to allow remote access to your private machines you've somehow got to introduce a mechanism to permit the gateway machine to know which of the internal machines you want to connect to. You can set up non-standard ports on the NAT gateway to forward connections to internal machines: eg. Port: Destination: ---------------------- 2201 192.168.0.1:22 2202 192.168.0.2:22 2203 192.168.0.3:22 (see natd(8)=20 but a) you'ld have to do that for each service on each machine you want connectivity to, and b) it's not going to work in the specific case of ssh(1) specifically, because ssh(1) attempts to verify the identity of the host it connects to against the host keys presented to it during the SSH connection.=20 Probably the easiest thing to do is log into your gateway machine via ssh(1) and then take a second hop from there to your internal machines. telnet(1) is generally a bad idea for security reasons. ping(8) which operates via ICMP echo request is completely out: ICMP doesn't have the concept of port numbers at all, so there's no way to clue the NAT gateway into which machine you want to communicate with. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCRrQiD657aJF7eIRAsRsAKCZsPb5jer2+q0WNLZtknsQzWMG3wCggqW/ 6+VCz4KENhmcejDU7gXrSRU= =r7GL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 15:52:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776A316A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:52:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cnv.fr (nas-cbv-6-213-228-29-203.dial.proxad.net [213.228.29.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1D043D46 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:52:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cedric.gross@cnv.fr) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:51:57 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Message-ID: <0E1A1C28F9D61A4D8B6F70AFA3C1B1E4289D@srvw2000-cnv1.cnv.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Updating 5.2.1 Release # thread-index: AcR1fpl9vVfj0G+yRI2a0jqQNvZ66wABGupw From: "Cedric GROSS" To: Subject: RE: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:52:18 -0000 =20 > Matthew Seaman > On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:37:35AM -0500, Puna Tannehill wrote: > > Scott wrote: >=20 > > >uname -a shows: > > >FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0: > > > > > >I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to=20 > > >be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest=20 > > >revision is #9 or so? Do I need to tell it to get the latest=20 > > >revision somehow? Do I need to change the cvs tag=3D to=20 > > >something else to get up to date? > >=20 > > I thought the #number indicated the number of times the=20 > server has been=20 > > rebooted based upon the last time the kernel was=20 > recompiled. Being that it=20 > > is #0, it was your first book. Reboot the machine and=20 > check the number=20 > > again. >=20 > I believe that the #n is the number of times the kernel has been > re-compiled since the last time the system was installed. It's > probably not a very interesting datum except to kernel hackers who > need to do a lot of recompiling. >=20 > What the original poster was thinking of is the patchlevel that gets > incremented every time a new security (or nowadays: errata) patch is > applied to any of the -RELEASE branches. That modifies the OS name > (ie. the output of 'uname -r'), so instead of: So what is the diff between uname -r and uname -v, which produce for me : Uname -r : 5.2.1-RELEASE Uname -v : FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jun 14 14:52:08 CEST 2004 root@bruce.cnv.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CNV_TOTAL Extract from man page : -r Write the current release level of the operating system -v Write the version level of this release of the operating system So that's mean that there are several Release ( as relesase level) and inside each release level there are several version level, am'I understanding well ? Cedric. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:02:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65F516A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:02:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server2.sonservers.com (server2.sonservers.com [69.50.210.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BD143D78 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from info@sonservers.com) Received: from 209-181-157-189.omah.qwest.net ([209.181.157.189] helo=192.168.1.20) by server2.sonservers.com with smtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1BqDLf-000H26-7D; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:01:39 -0500 From: Scott To: Ezequiel , X-Mailer: Barca 1.0 (700) - Licensed Version Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:01:34 -0500 Message-ID: <200472911134.797002@IBM-R40> In-Reply-To: <001101c47576$81c6d9e0$0332a8c0@internetxaire.com.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server2.sonservers.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sonservers.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: info@sonservers.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:02:00 -0000 Ok, I just did as suggested: ( Change this: ( *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE ( ( for this ( *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1 and ran cvsup again. This time, I successfully and quickly deleted every thing under /usr/src. There must be something wrong with my cvs tag. I read the notice in the handbook that says "Be very careful to specify any tag=3D fields correctly. Some tags are valid only for certain collections of files. If you specify an incorrect or misspelled tag, CVSup will delete files which you probably do not want deleted." Here is my supfile that just deleted everything under /usr/src: *default host=3Dcvsup15.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=3D/usr *default prefix=3D/usr *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all ports-all tag=3D. To keep up to date with 5.2.1, is that the correct tag? I'm reinstalling now . . . Thanks, Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:13:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A122816A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:13:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from raptor.cigb.edu.cu (ns.cigb.edu.cu [200.55.134.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA7C43D31 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu) Received: from atlas.cigb.edu.cu ([172.16.1.12]) by raptor.cigb.edu.cu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:12:35 -0400 Received: from Unknown [172.16.1.4] by atlas.cigb.edu.cu - SurfControl E-mail Filter (4.6); Thursday, 29 July 2004, 12:12:21 Received: from [172.16.11.106] ([172.16.11.106]) by mercurio.cigb.edu.cu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:12:21 -0400 Message-ID: <200407291212.31884.osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu> From: Osmany Guirola Cruz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:12:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2004 16:12:21.0132 (UTC) FILETIME=[D3B7C4C0:01C47586] References: <0E1A1C28F9D61A4D8B6F70AFA3C1B1E4289D@srvw2000-cnv1.cnv.local> In-Reply-To: <0E1A1C28F9D61A4D8B6F70AFA3C1B1E4289D@srvw2000-cnv1.cnv.local> Organization: CIGB User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Subject: xsp server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:13:28 -0000 i am trying to compile xsp server 1.0 on my freebsd 4.10 STABLE i have installed mono and mod_mono ... i do the configuration process whitout problem then i do this #make Making all in doc Making all in server /usr/local/bin/mcs -debug+ -debug:full -nologo -r:System.Web.dll -r:Mono.Posix.dll /d:MODMONO_SERVER /out:mod-mono-server.exe error CS2008: No files to compile were specified Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warnings *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/osmany/mono/xsp-1.0/server. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/osmany/mono/xsp-1.0. then i do this #gmake Making all in doc gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/home/osmany/mono/xsp-1.0/doc' gmake[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/osmany/mono/xsp-1.0/doc' Making all in server gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/home/osmany/mono/xsp-1.0/server' /usr/local/bin/mcs -debug+ -debug:full -nologo -r:System.Web.dll -r:Mono.Posix.dll /d:MODMONO_SERVER /out:mod-mono-server.exe IApplicationHost.cs MonoWorkerRequest.cs Tracing.cs ApplicationServer.cs LingeringNetworkStream.cs BaseApplicationHost.cs BaseRequestBroker.cs IWebSource.cs server.cs ModMonoRequest.cs ModMonoWorkerRequest.cs ModMonoApplicationHost.cs AssemblyInfoModMono.cs Compilation succeeded and never finish it stay here forever and the mono process is using 80% of cpu This problem has solution Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:15:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605A216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:15:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96ECC43D45 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:15:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6TGFZCT067270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:15:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6TGFZ1c067269; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:15:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:15:34 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Cedric GROSS Message-ID: <20040729161534.GB80531@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Cedric GROSS , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <0E1A1C28F9D61A4D8B6F70AFA3C1B1E4289D@srvw2000-cnv1.cnv.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ftEhullJWpWg/VHq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0E1A1C28F9D61A4D8B6F70AFA3C1B1E4289D@srvw2000-cnv1.cnv.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:15:35 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:15:43 -0000 --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 05:51:57PM +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote: > So what is the diff between uname -r and uname -v, which produce for me > : >=20 > Uname -r : 5.2.1-RELEASE > Uname -v : FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jun 14 14:52:08 CEST 2004 > root@bruce.cnv.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CNV_TOTAL >=20 > Extract from man page : > -r Write the current release level of the operating system > -v Write the version level of this release of the operating system >=20 > So that's mean that there are several Release ( as relesase level) and > inside each release level there are several version level, am'I > understanding well ? The different flags to uname(1) basically select different bits out of the uname data -- so 'uname -a' gives you *all* of the data, 'uname -r' gives you the release level, 'uname -m' gives you the hardware architecture, etc. etc. Note that this command isn't FreeBSD specific -- the behaviour of uname(1) is part of the POSIX.2 specification, which means it will work the same way on any current unixoid OS you care to mention. Of course, different development groups do tend to have slightly different interpretations of exactly what it is POSIX.2 mandates should be printed out in each case. Under FreeBSD, 'uname -v' attempts to give you as unambiguous as possible identification of exactly what kernel/OS setup you have. Since FreeBSD has quite a number of different code branches, and several of those branches are under continuous development, and kernels can be compiled in various different configurations by various different people, it takes quite a complicated string to identify all of that. Other OSes tend to be somewhat more terse, especially those where the development process isn't exposed to the public: for instance Solaris just gives you the OS version number and the relevant patch id (if any) where patching has involved replacing the kernel image. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCSKmiD657aJF7eIRAiXhAJ9pqzv+oB2OHm3ICGgPyuy/I0GcGQCghn/4 r8UgFWeTJwX5UYTquZOOLG4= =iRQD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:16:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FE216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:16:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D2B43D64 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:16:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])i6TGGInG022316; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:16:18 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) i6TGH1R5004432; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:17:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)i6TGH1nt004431; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:17:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:17:01 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: DK Message-ID: <20040729161701.GA4084@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <200407281818.i6SIIUc01719@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <20040729065528.59993.qmail@web41008.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040729065528.59993.qmail@web41008.mail.yahoo.com> cc: Jerry McAllister cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:16:26 -0000 On 2004-07-28 23:55, DK wrote: > --- Jerry McAllister wrote: > > You are probably better off and more secure with an initial install, > > with no additional work or tweaking, of FreeBSD on the net than you > > would be with a MS system with every know "fix" available. > > So if I do a default install of FreeBSD & then connect to the net for > ports/packages, is there a default firewall running in the background ?? No, but the default setup of FreeBSD doesn't enable a ton of services. The /etc/inetd.conf file has nothing enabled by default. Even if it did, you'd have to manually enable inetd in /etc/rc.conf since it's also disabled by default: $ grep -v '^[[:space:]]*#' /usr/src/etc/inetd.conf $ grep inetd_enable /usr/src/etc/defaults/rc.conf inetd_enable="NO" # Run the network daemon dispatcher (YES/NO). > > Do use appropriate precautions such as ssh instead of telnet and ssl > > protected sites where possible and check md5-s of downloaded files. > > But, don't let it stop you from using it with FreeBSD. > > Do you install FreeBSD first & connect to the net for ports/packages, > or install the actual FreeBSD OS from the /stand/sysinstall & select > the net ?? There is no difference in the two statements presented as alternative options above. Keep in mind that /stand/sysinstall *IS* the FreeBSD installer. > My bootup is fine, its the BSD+wmaker running & opening nedit & a cmd > prompts that are slower than Windows 2000 ?? any suggestions as to why ?? You're probably using X11 with a "vesa" driver or something that doesn't take advantage of all the accelerations that your hardware can provide. Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:18:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A33016A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:18:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A367043D70 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:18:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6TGIhpF071458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:18:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6TGIhef071457; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:18:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:18:43 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Scott Message-ID: <20040729161843.GC80531@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Scott , Ezequiel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001101c47576$81c6d9e0$0332a8c0@internetxaire.com.ar> <200472911134.797002@IBM-R40> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200472911134.797002@IBM-R40> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:18:43 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: Ezequiel cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:18:51 -0000 --XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 11:01:34AM -0500, Scott wrote: > Ok, I just did as suggested: >=20 > ( Change this: > ( *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE > ( > ( for this > ( *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1 >=20 > and ran cvsup again. >=20 > This time, I successfully and quickly deleted every thing=20 > under /usr/src. Ooops. Yes, you would see that effect. There's actually no such tag as RELENG_5_2_1. What you need is RELENG_5_2 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCSNjiD657aJF7eIRApqRAJsGdD4DyG6Nj+wqAH2IFtximSM6JQCdHmG+ 6lxYXHRkaluxJY/nAvKdjAg= =nqNI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XMCwj5IQnwKtuyBG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:20:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86AC16A4D1 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:20:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F46D43D45 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:20:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6TGKTDM071507 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:20:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6TGKTwm071506; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:20:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:20:29 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Scott Message-ID: <20040729162029.GD80531@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Scott , Puna Tannehill , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040729144550.GC28698@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <200472910549.670990@IBM-R40> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3Pql8miugIZX0722" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200472910549.670990@IBM-R40> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:20:29 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Puna Tannehill Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:20:36 -0000 --3Pql8miugIZX0722 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 10:05:49AM -0500, Scott wrote: =20 > So if I set my cvs tag as Ezequiel (thank you) suggested: > change: *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE > to: *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2_1 > That will get me the latest patches? No -- that's correct in spirit, but wrong in detail. Use tag=3DRELENG_5_2 for best results. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --3Pql8miugIZX0722 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCSPNiD657aJF7eIRAmfVAJwKRy/xeNqJXXQ4X+vtaERxRi5XEQCfYk4f XtoUt1CE8FWwZHu5to+6jPI= =Acfc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3Pql8miugIZX0722-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:27:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF7B16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:27:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp813.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp813.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85FFD43D2D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:27:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from donaldj@ameritech.net) Received: from unknown (HELO pres7000.mylan.net) (donaldj@ameritech.net@68.248.233.189 with plain) by smtp813.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 16:27:38 -0000 From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:27:35 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200472910549.670990@IBM-R40> In-Reply-To: <200472910549.670990@IBM-R40> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407291127.36102.donaldj@ameritech.net> Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:27:38 -0000 > So if I set my cvs tag as Ezequiel (thank you) suggested: > change: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE > to: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1 > That will get me the latest patches? > > I'll make that change and rebuild again today. > > Thanks all for your help. :) > Scott > > _______________________________________________ Scott, You'll be much happier if you use: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2 That will get you what you want. I'm not sure, but I think using the your last proposed tag might just erase your sorces and that's it. Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:30:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D5216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:30:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server2.sonservers.com (server2.sonservers.com [69.50.210.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC6443D3F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from info@sonservers.com) Received: from 209-181-157-189.omah.qwest.net ([209.181.157.189] helo=192.168.1.20) by server2.sonservers.com with smtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1BqDn2-000Hil-RM; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:29:57 -0500 From: Scott To: Matthew Seaman X-Mailer: Barca 1.0 (700) - Licensed Version Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:29:54 -0500 Message-ID: <2004729112954.335273@IBM-R40> In-Reply-To: <20040729162029.GD80531@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server2.sonservers.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sonservers.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: info@sonservers.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:30:07 -0000 ( No -- that's correct in spirit, but wrong ( in detail. Use tag=3DRELENG_5_2 for best ( results. Ah, that would be what I did wrong then. I've reinstalled, am currently installing cvsup from ports and when that is done I'll try to update again with the correct tag this time. Thanks again to all that have helped. :) Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:32:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00A216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:32:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sjc.ihostsxode.net (sjc.ihostsxode.net [129.41.16.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3463A43D1F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:32:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mark-and-erika.com) Received: from millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com ([151.205.245.38]) by sjc.ihostsxode.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6TGVFJA014013 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:31:17 -0600 (MDT) Received: from millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) id i6TGVW3Z055068 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:31:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mark@mark-and-erika.com) Received: (from mfrank@localhost)i6TGVWe0055067 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:31:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mark@mark-and-erika.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:31:32 -0400 From: Mark Frank To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040729163132.GA3041@millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1091095356019219@lycos-europe.com> <20040729124017.GA64449@yagonna.de> <6.1.1.1.2.20040729135112.0af53cd8@cygnus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.1.1.1.2.20040729135112.0af53cd8@cygnus> X-Certified: Outgoing email is certified Windows Free. X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-System: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:32:03 -0000 * On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 02:13:19PM +0100 Richard P. Williamson wrote: > If you ever need to change the root password again, you'll need to > log in using single user mode. The handbook will explain how to > do that. Really? It's certainly not a requirement. Is there some reason to suggest you have to do this from single user mode? -- Mark Frank "The fix is only temporary...unless it works." - Red Green From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:33:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D74A16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:33:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zardoz.rd.imagescape.com (zardoz.rd.imagescape.com [66.100.151.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4132943D46 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:33:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from puna@imagescape.com) Received: from [192.168.0.59] (nikko.rd.imagescape.com [192.168.0.59]) (authenticated bits=0)i6TGWj4Y032367 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:32:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from puna@imagescape.com) Message-ID: <41092740.4080406@imagescape.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:35:12 -0500 From: Puna Tannehill Organization: Imaginary Landscape, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20047299555.097692@IBM-R40> <41090BAF.6010600@imagescape.com> <20040729144550.GC28698@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040729144550.GC28698@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:33:12 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:37:35AM -0500, Puna Tannehill wrote: > >>Scott wrote: > > >>>uname -a shows: >>>FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0: >>> >>>I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to >>>be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest >>>revision is #9 or so? Do I need to tell it to get the latest >>>revision somehow? Do I need to change the cvs tag= to >>>something else to get up to date? >> >>I thought the #number indicated the number of times the server has been >>rebooted based upon the last time the kernel was recompiled. Being that it >>is #0, it was your first book. Reboot the machine and check the number >> again. > > > I believe that the #n is the number of times the kernel has been > re-compiled since the last time the system was installed. It's > probably not a very interesting datum except to kernel hackers who > need to do a lot of recompiling. Oh right right. Thank you for the correction. I'm still wiping the sleep from my eyes. Actually, it might be an "fun" indicator of how many 15-20 minute chunks of time one can never get back. heehee hmm ~sighs and sips coffee~ Puna > What the original poster was thinking of is the patchlevel that gets > incremented every time a new security (or nowadays: errata) patch is > applied to any of the -RELEASE branches. That modifies the OS name > (ie. the output of 'uname -r'), so instead of: > > 5.2.1-RELEASE > > it says (at the latest count): > > 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 > > See /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh for the file that controls all that. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:41:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DED16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:41:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2472F43D4C for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:41:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])i6TGf9oa028106; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:41:10 +0300 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) i6TGfr2h004635; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:41:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)i6TGfrus004634; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:41:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:41:53 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: DK Message-ID: <20040729164153.GC4084@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <20040728171010.GA86397@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20040729055330.90694.qmail@web41007.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040729055330.90694.qmail@web41007.mail.yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:41:29 -0000 On 2004-07-28 22:53, DK wrote: > --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > Whats the purpose of having to manually set the system to automount ?? > > > as opposed to having it as a system install default ?? if there is an > > > advantage, I am sure its for the 0.01% of the user base > > > > It's more in the range of 99.9%. Automounting can be annoying like hell > > when you happen to accidentally insert media in your drives. It can > > also be insecure if you don't want anyone to use the machine you've > > installed to mount CD-ROMs, floppies or other media of their choise. > > Accidently ?? what ?? Like you were walking down a hall way, tripped & > slipped & accidenlty shoved a CD into the drive :)) > > I can put a CD into Windows 2000 & it has never been accessed unless I > explicitly do it. - I don't see the problem ?? Yes, which is exactly why every CD-ROM I've put in Windows 2000 installations is immediately scanned and autorun in the default setup of the system. Including those CD-ROMs whose autorun programs are brain-damaged and crash because of disk errors or bugs in the autorun program itself. Oh come on, I consider autorunning of removable media a security risk. You like it and try to present the opposite behavior as a fault. I don't think there is any case we can agree on this point. The best we can do about it is help you install amd, the automounter daemon and let us all live in peace :P > > Instead of leaving *all* the users exposed to risks like this, which is > > the usual Windows philosophy of doing stuff, FreeBSD has the capability > > to automount media but keeps it disabled by default. > > Why not enable it by default & then allow people who love messing around > with OS disable it manually - this seems more logical ... Exposing everyone to an unnecessary risk seems more logical just to please the users that come from a different OS? Hmmm... I really don't think so. > hey why not add a nice GUI that allows you to edit all the OS configurations > .... nahh ... no one would use that !! Because it requires a lot of things to work Right(TM) from the moment a computer fires up until the point that a usable GUI can reach a state of stability. You can always enable XDM at boot time and wait just a bit until X11 fires up, when you will be able to log into your BSD machine using a GUI. This is not something that should be forced on everyone though, because a lot of things might break and leave the user in the sorry state the Windows users find themselves so very often -- with a computer that has barely managed to reach a graphical mode and then froze when some driver did a stupid thing, leaving nothing but a blank screen to stare at. > > Is it so hard to edit a text file like rc.conf and add a simple line > > like this? > > > > amd_enable="YES" > > Hard to edit... no your right, knowing where the file is located, yes ?? > knowing where in the file it needs to go or does ordering matter, yes ?? One of the first things you see when logging into your BSD system is: o The Handbook and FAQ documents are at http://www.FreeBSD.org/ and, along with the mailing lists, can be searched by going to http://www.FreeBSD.org/search/. If the doc distribution has been installed, they're also available formatted in /usr/share/doc. All of the things you've presented so far as "difficult" and "confusing" are explained in the documentation pointed at by this message. If you had read even the Handbook you'd already know that it contains a chapter devoted to "Configuration and Tuning", which includes: 11.3 Core Configuration The principal location for system configuration information is within /etc/rc.conf. This file contains a wide range of configuration information, principally used at system startup to configure the system. Its name directly implies this; it is configuration information for the rc* files. An administrator should make entries in the rc.conf file to override the default settings from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. The defaults file should not be copied verbatim to /etc - it contains default values, not examples. All system-specific changes should be made in the rc.conf file itself. If something was confusing or you couldn't locate something in the docs, as every single page of the documentation says in the bottom of the text you could have mailed your questions here: For questions about FreeBSD, read the documentation before contacting . For questions about this documentation, e-mail . If you have tried all of these instead of bitching that FreeBSD is not Windows, I'm sure something more productive would have happened :-/ > > Do you really mean that this is so much harder to do than fumble and > > fight with multiple dialogs, which you have to remember by heart of > > course, just to find that disabling automounting is impossible (unless > > you download TweakMyRegistry version 95.3.2000.13.27 paying careful > > attention to the version numbers because the wrong version can mess up > > your entire system with a single click)? > > TweakMyRegisty ?? not needed - use MS TweakUI - Freeware > Windows XP - crap(stick with Windows 2000 - its the stable version, like > v4.10) Which is a program that is not installed by default in the operating system you seem to like so much. It's also a program that bears a big, fat warning about "things that can go wrong". It's a program that inexperienced users can use to wreak havoc in any Windows installation with a few clicks. But most importantly, it's a program that you have to know about before you can use it, you have to know how to install, how to run and what to tweak with. This is not very different from what you accuse FreeBSD about ;-) > - as for automounting, I think you are confusing this with AutoRUN for CD's > AFAIK - you cannot disable automounting of Floppys/CD in Windows 2000 Yes. When you insert a floppy disk it immediatelly becomes available to anyone who uses the machine. How very secure ;-) > > > - installable YES, configurable ... you've got to be shitting me :o > > > > Not really. But even if we provided examples of this configurability > > you wouldn't accept them as valid examples because they wouldn't be > > point and click on some wimpy dialog-based wizard, right? > > Right I think this is going to be my last post on the topic. There's not much point after this particular answer to discuss anything. > > Windows 2000 GUI is faster than windowmaker? Now that's news. > > Don't know what to tell you... it IS on my box... either my Windows 2000 > setup is good(likely) or my BSD setup is wrong(also likely) Or both. They are not mutually exclusive. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 16:53:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8693916A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:53:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 21322530218.direct.eti.at (21322530218.direct.eti.at [213.225.30.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7607143D5C for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:53:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) Received: from huckfinn-wi0.arved.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6TGrnBO045354; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:53:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) Received: (from tilman@localhost) by huckfinn-wi0.arved.de (8.13.0/8.12.6/Submit) id i6TGrnDp045353; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:53:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: huckfinn-wi0.arved.de: tilman set sender to tilman@arved.at using -f Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:53:49 +0200 From: Tilman Linneweh To: "Owen.G" Message-ID: <20040729165349.GA45316@arved.at> References: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4 port (for Chipset CLE266/VT8235 Graphics) - timescale? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:53:52 -0000 * "Owen.G" [Do, 29 Jul 2004 at 16:29 GMT]: > I just had a look at the FreeBSD Ports page: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi > > and there's no sign of XFree86 4.4 yet. > > Questions: > 1, Does anybody know the timescale of the port for XFree86 4.4? > 2, Will the port of XFree86 4.4 be important enough that it will be > announced on the "freebsd-announce" mailing list? AFAIK the XFree86 4.4 ports are currently tested. On CURRENT the X.org ports are now the default, they should work with your VIA too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 17:19:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401C216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:19:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E765E43D2F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:19:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:20:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4109319B.7070906@daleco.biz> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:19:23 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas References: <20040728171010.GA86397@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20040729055330.90694.qmail@web41007.mail.yahoo.com> <20040729164153.GC4084@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <20040729164153.GC4084@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2004 17:20:02.0677 (UTC) FILETIME=[48965A50:01C47590] cc: DK cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installerpackage like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:19:53 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2004-07-28 22:53, DK wrote: > > >>--- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> >> >>>Not really. But even if we provided examples of this configurability >>>you wouldn't accept them as valid examples because they wouldn't be >>>point and click on some wimpy dialog-based wizard, right? >>> >>> >>Right >> >> > >I think this is going to be my last post on the topic. There's not much point >after this particular answer to discuss anything. > > "Who could have put it better? As the pounding drums sound, Aragorn and Legolas rush to barricade the entrance to the burial chamber. Heavy footfalls sound and the statement is made, with plain disappointment, 'They have a cave troll.'" KDK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 17:52:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBD616A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:52:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5133043D58; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:52:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 29105545 for multiple; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:37:26 -0700 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:52:31 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: DK Message-Id: <20040729125231.39b5c448@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> References: <41079361.50409@elvandar.org> <20040728142817.77917.qmail@web41011.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: Remko Lodder cc: keramida@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesn't BSD have an installer package like this ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:52:42 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:28:17 -0700 (PDT) DK wrote: > .. I know its hard for people to swallow, but MS Windows IS easier > to use than BSD/Linux/OSX ... thats WHY its the most widely used.... > regardless of marketing/costs etc ... Depends on what you mean easy to use... if you by easy you mean lack of proper file manipulation tools, no easy to use package or ports system, search tools, easy to swap out window manager, and ect I guess so. > Gnome starts faster than Windows ?? Start time is not important - I > am talking about reaction time of the GUI - Menu's apearing, moving > icons, applications appearing etc - Working with Fedora at Uni(Yes, > I am doing a Masters) the other day, its on a 50 Node Cluster - Its > running on systems faster than what I have at home(above), yet feels > like its as gluggy as Windows 95! - nice one Linux Gnome does more than windows. BTW the speed in that case can most likely not be attributed to linux. Most likely it is not running with the defualt gnome settings and in some cases even safe or sane settings for compile options. > As for XFCE, how do you start it from the .xinitrc > The XFCE Homepage site says "exec startxfce4" - but that didn't work > for me ?? Works here. > Whats the purpose of having to manually set the system to automount > ?? as opposed to having it as a system install default ?? if there > is an advantage, I am sure its for the 0.01% of the user base Yes, it is a default installs should under no circumstances decide what users want to do with there systems. If you want to create a second freebsd distros that includes amd running and configed by defualt, feel free to. I personally find it rather bloody nice, rather than having to deal with some stupid program guessing where I want it mount. It is bloody annoying in multiuser enviroments. > > > - 300 Million Users of Windows thinks so ;)) (BTW: I am NOT > > > including KDE/GNOME) > > > > Windows has a larger user base, that's correct. > > > > > > - No default Find Files GUI - I won't even comment on lack of > > > functionality of Cmd line whereis/search/find > > > > In gnome there is a find option that enables you to find files. > > And then > > there is find, which can do a lot more then you probably think > > now. > > > - sorry, I wasn't clear above - For the lack of a GUI Find Files > option, I meant the default install or with Window Managers(wmaker), > not the Desktop Environments like KDE/Gnome(which are also fast... > NOT) - which I don't use as they are slow Guis to find files exist. Check the ports. /me has one hotkeyed to mod4+f BTW you are aware that the defualt configs for KDE and Gnome suck? If you want to complain about them, you have the wrong list. > > > I can tell you that 95% of people who use computers want "EASE > > > of USE"- This INCLUDES easy installation of the Operating System > > > > Following the handbook makes FreeBSD installable by nearly anyone. > > > - installable YES, configurable ... you've got to be shitting me :o Once you find a editor it like, it is exteremely. > - install BSD+wmaker(easy) > - start the GUI - oops some doc reading here(easy+1) > - while in wmaker, dynamically change the Montior settings from > 1600x1200 32b to 1028x768 24b(wouldn't have a clue - off to the docs > - manually edit configuration files ?? - then restart - but what is > the correct horizontal frequency OR vertical refresh(hard++) - I > don't know & I don't want to know(hey while I am at it, why don't I > start designing my own CPU)... that's why people use Windows(easy to > configure) I have all ways found windows harder to configure. Requires to much muching about and shoe horning it into areas it was never meant to go, just to get a bit of usability in. > I played with BSD back in 1997 & thought it needed some work.. so I > gave it a miss.. Fast Forward to 2004, & all I see are developers > adding features that are not that important, yet missing the basics > of what the majority of USER's want(not coders) Apple OSX > understands this(nice GUI over BSD base - shame about the stupid > high prices & dumb one button mouse)... sorry BSD/Linux developers > ...your just giving more air to MS by focusing on the wrong things You do realize the difference between a bleeding OS and a bloody WM and that they are both completely seperate? If you want to talk about missing basics, talk about windows, which still to this day does not have a proper CLI, windowing system, and still regards telnet as good do to inept developers and managamnet. There are a horde of tools and the like it is completely and uderly missing. > ...XPde seem to have the right idea... looks promising... hope the > GUI reaction time is fast http://www.xpde.com/ And agian, under X11, the gui is totally seperate from the OS. Don't see what is really so special about it yet, given it docs and the like. > that reminds me of my Java Lecturer(I hate Java BTW) in which every > time students had a problem, he would never look at the code but > just reply "check out the java docs.. its all in there" ... yea > right.. Ask better question or drop the class... Same here, ask proper question, learn, and get farther. BTW nothing about computers is intuitive. Any one telling you different is lieing to you and is trying to manipulate you into doing something for them, which most likely runs agianst your interest. > > You should not shout that much, that's bad for your heart. FreeBSD > > has features that enable you to pick what you want as X-client > > (window manager), follow the handbook.. > > ... heart... I had it replaced with the plastic one installed > yesterday... it was conflicting with BSD !! Huh? Plastic? > > > I cannot tell you the shock & disappointment I had in finding > > > out that Windows 2000 runs > > FASTER > > > than FreeBSD with any GUI/Windows Manager/Desktop Environment > > > ... :((( > > > > Opinions, again i dont agree, and if you do find this i suggest > > you have some benchmarks with what applications run faster, etc. > > Since then you made a good point with some proof. > > > Benchmarks - How about FreeBSD+wmaker(GUI) & Windows 2000 installed > on EXACTLY the same box Any person standing next to me could see > which is faster Windows 2000 GUI - Much faster than Wmaker > Loading/Using Notepad/Wordpad - Much faster than Nedit > Windows Explorer - Heaps faster than xfe Never had any problem what so ever blowing windows out of the water with FreeBSD. Even using just package and no compiling. If you want to blame something, blame your Xclient or WM setup. Which is most likely your problem, not FreeBSD. > maybe you would like a test of the Apache Web Server on BSD against > the Apache Web Server on Windows 2000 ?? - I will search the net & > get back to you on that if you are interested ?? Get to same speced computers or just one... install both... and test... there are packages for that in the ports. > I wonder if people that run web servers on BSD never use a GUI > thereby saying how fast BSD is...- yes, keep using VI & don't forget > to feed the Horse :) Or x/emacs... No need for X on a server. > > > ...damn I have gone way off track here... sorry for the ranting > > > people... but after 6 days straight of messing around trying to > > > install Apache/MySQL/Mod_Perl/Mod_SSL/PHP.. I am a little > > > tired... 3 days of that was trying to get a basic GUI/File > > > Manager/Find Files/Editor working > > > > You perhaps should have asked, search, or rtfm before giving > > yourself a heart beat of 160... > > All I have been doing till 4am every morning is reading/searching > :(( Some times it is best to hold off a bit and then try agian. The same is true for Windows and every other OS when you find a problem. > ... but if BSD's performance is related to being able to turn off > services & close ports, I can do that in windows - with an nice > GUI(albeit not with the same level of manual tuning / tradeoff for > all the other nice things that windows offers) I can assure you it's performace is not becuase of any of that stuff. It is becuase of a good fs and ect. No FAT derived crap. > If BSD's better performance is due to System Admins running Web > Servers but doing so without the GUI(???)... then you maybe right > Remko, BSD may not be right for me.- In the year 2004, I refuse to > spend my time coding in front of a screen hacking in "cmd line > syntax".. hey thats just me! See previous ;) But any ways, there are a lot of tweakable options under freebsd that very easy to access. Far easier than looking for obscure info on how to do it in windows using regedit. man sysctl Simply put, use what ever bloody works for you... if you don't like unix, fine, just don't start telling others how they should work, like, or what should be good enough for them ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 18:31:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C84916A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:31:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E5343D49; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:31:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owen.g@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BqFgH-0005Rt-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:31:05 +0200 Received: from [217.235.116.3] (helo=[192.168.1.250]) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BqFgG-0007j4-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:31:05 +0200 Message-ID: <41094335.4020405@onlinehome.de> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:34:29 +0200 From: "Owen.G" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tilman Linneweh References: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> <20040729165349.GA45316@arved.at> In-Reply-To: <20040729165349.GA45316@arved.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:4e7b6bfadbfaa9d59ebe2d9dce9eb48d cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4 port - timescale? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:31:42 -0000 Cheers Tilman, I just checked again on Ports for "5.2-CURRENT/i386" and "5.2.1-RELEASE/i386": version = XFree86-4.3.0,1 True, www.xfree86.org/4.4.0/RELNOTES2.html#4 does say: 'Summary of new features in 4.4.0. "A new driver for several VIA integrated graphics chipsets has been added."' and offers a source code download. I bought this PC so that, as a newbie, I don't twat the "working" copy of M$ on my other PC and to always have a working PC with a browser. CVSup and installing from ports is (only just) within my abilities (if nothing complains) - there's no way I'd be able to install from a tarball. Besides, isn't "Ports" the "preferred" installation medium for FreeBSD? So my question remains, how long for XFree86-4.4 in ports? 5.3-RELEASE/i386" perhaps? Is it also stupid of me to have a LCD monitor capable of only 1280x768 when the VIA driver documentation at www.xfree86.org says the VIA driver's display resolutions are: Option "PanelSize" "string" Specify the size (width x height) of the LCD panel attached to the system. Sizes 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768, 1280x1024, and 1400x1050 are supported. Owen ==== Tilman Linneweh wrote: > * "Owen.G" [Do, 29 Jul 2004 at 16:29 GMT]: > >>I just had a look at the FreeBSD Ports page: >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi >> >>and there's no sign of XFree86 4.4 yet. >> >>Questions: >>1, Does anybody know the timescale of the port for XFree86 4.4? >>2, Will the port of XFree86 4.4 be important enough that it will be >>announced on the "freebsd-announce" mailing list? > > > AFAIK the XFree86 4.4 ports are currently tested. > > On CURRENT the X.org ports are now the default, they should work with your > VIA too. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 18:39:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D0216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:39:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx-mtaout01.mts.net (wnpgmb02-group-smtpout.mts.net [142.161.130.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEEA243D6D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:39:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sluque@mun.ca) Received: from wnpgmb02dc1-178-56.dynamic.mts.net ([206.45.178.56]) by mx-mtaout01.mts.net with ESMTP <20040729183942.FLWS4492.mx-mtaout01.mts.net@wnpgmb02dc1-178-56.dynamic.mts.net> for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:39:42 -0500 From: Sebastian Luque Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:40:03 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407291340.03283.sluque@mun.ca> Subject: kmail date headers translated to local time. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:39:45 -0000 Hi there, I've been searching the web for a way to show the timezone offset as a phrase in kmail replies. Basically, just a placeholder, so that when I reply messages, the phrase says something like: On Mon, 23 Jul 2004, at 12:00 -0500, wrote: It's very similar to the question you posed to freebsd-questions. I'd be happy to hear whether you found a solution to your problem or know how to do what I need. Thanks a lot in advance. Greetings, Sebastian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 18:59:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A3916A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:59:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sleek.sleektech.nl (sleek.sleektech.nl [62.212.87.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EF743D49 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@sleektech.nl) Received: (qmail 86473 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2004 18:55:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?193.173.42.52?) (193.173.42.52) by sleek.sleektech.nl with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 18:55:57 -0000 Message-ID: <41094918.8080309@sleektech.nl> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:59:36 +0200 From: lists User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson , questions@freebsd.org References: <4108B086.8060706@sleektech.nl> <20040729143715.GB26125@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20040729143715.GB26125@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: netstat -m 'cannot allocate memory' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:59:46 -0000 Is it possible to rebuild these without doing a complete make world and if so without rebooting ? Dan Nelson wrote: >In the last episode (Jul 29), lists said: > > >>Hello, >> >>On 2 of my systems I get the following error while doing netstat -m: >> >>$ netstat -m >>netstat: sysctl: retrieving mbstat: Cannot allocate memory >> >>This is a PIV 2ghz, with 1,5 GB of memory >> >> > >That means you have rebuilt your kernel and now kernel and world are out of >sync. At minimum, rebuild libkvm and netstat. > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 19:19:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B31116A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:19:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cs.selu.edu (cs.selu.edu [147.174.59.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D758043D6E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:19:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jholland@cs.selu.edu) Received: from cs.selu.edu (jholland@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs.selu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6TJJhq9073019 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:19:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jholland@cs.selu.edu) Received: from localhost (jholland@localhost) by cs.selu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i6TJJhYf073016 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:19:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jholland@cs.selu.edu) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:19:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Jason P Holland To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040729141746.S73006@cs.selu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: openssl/openssh from ports or base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:19:44 -0000 Hello, What is the preferred method that people are using for keeping openssl and openssh up to date? Are most people using the ports version? Or the base version? Seems like if there is a vunlerability released, its much easier to cvsup the ports tree and reinstall. But if you use the base versions, is there a way to update that without doing a complete buildworld/installworld? Just curious what other freebsd users are doing. Thanks Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 19:23:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C996C16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:23:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49EBA43D5D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:23:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@66.122.48.149 with login) by smtp814.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 19:23:03 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: "FreeBSD-questions" Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:23:04 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407291223.04271.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Subject: Problem updating xorg-clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: krinklyfig@spymac.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:23:40 -0000 I'm getting an error message (below) when trying to upgrade the xorg-clients port, and I'm not at all sure how to fix it. Am running 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 with xorg-6.7.0_1. - jt making all in programs/xhost... cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp -ansi -pedantic -Wno-system-headers -Dasm=__asm -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef -I/usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc -I/usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/exports/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DCSRG_BASED -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DTCPCONN -DUNIXCONN -DHAS_STICKY_DIR_BIT -DHAS_FCHOWN -DIPv6 -DBSD44SOCKETS -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"' -c xhost.c xhost.c: In function `change_host': xhost.c:423: error: syntax error before "siaddr" xhost.c:434: error: `siaddr' undeclared (first use in this function) xhost.c:434: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once xhost.c:434: error: for each function it appears in.) xhost.c: In function `get_hostname': xhost.c:883: error: `XServerInterpretedAddress' undeclared (first use in this function) xhost.c:883: error: `sip' undeclared (first use in this function) xhost.c:884: warning: ISO C89 forbids mixed declarations and code xhost.c:888: error: syntax error before ')' token *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/programs/xhost. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/programs. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade99236.6 make ** Fix the problem and try again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 19:27:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6F516A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:27:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from itc.com.ar (tserver.itc.com.ar [200.43.69.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C614C43D41 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:27:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eferro@itc.com.ar) Received: from tecnica ([200.43.69.7]) by itc.com.ar (VisNetic.MailServer.v5.8.6.6) with SMTP id M41DFU for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:27:38 -0300 Message-ID: <001a01c475a1$f9f6c4e0$0332a8c0@internetxaire.com.ar> From: "Ezequiel" To: References: <200472911134.797002@IBM-R40> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:26:40 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:27:45 -0000 Scott, I'm sorry the correct tag is *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott" To: "Ezequiel" ; Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # Ok, I just did as suggested: ( Change this: ( *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1_RELEASE ( ( for this ( *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1 and ran cvsup again. This time, I successfully and quickly deleted every thing under /usr/src. There must be something wrong with my cvs tag. I read the notice in the handbook that says "Be very careful to specify any tag= fields correctly. Some tags are valid only for certain collections of files. If you specify an incorrect or misspelled tag, CVSup will delete files which you probably do not want deleted." Here is my supfile that just deleted everything under /usr/src: *default host=cvsup15.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_2_1 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all ports-all tag=. To keep up to date with 5.2.1, is that the correct tag? I'm reinstalling now . . . Thanks, Scott _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 19:29:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C6216A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:29:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AE143D53; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:29:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 29117717 for multiple; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:14:32 -0700 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:29:39 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Owen.G" Message-Id: <20040729142939.6de1dc7b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <41094335.4020405@onlinehome.de> References: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> <20040729165349.GA45316@arved.at> <41094335.4020405@onlinehome.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: Tilman Linneweh cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4 port - timescale? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:29:48 -0000 On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:34:29 +0200 "Owen.G" wrote: > Cheers Tilman, > > I just checked again on Ports for "5.2-CURRENT/i386" and > "5.2.1-RELEASE/i386": > version = XFree86-4.3.0,1 > > True, www.xfree86.org/4.4.0/RELNOTES2.html#4 does say: > 'Summary of new features in 4.4.0. "A new driver for several VIA > integrated graphics chipsets has been added."' and offers a source > code download. > > I bought this PC so that, as a newbie, I don't twat the "working" > copy of M$ on my other PC and to always have a working PC with a > browser. CVSup and installing from ports is (only just) within my > abilities (if nothing complains) - there's no way I'd be able to > install from a tarball. Besides, isn't "Ports" the "preferred" > installation medium for FreeBSD? > > So my question remains, how long for XFree86-4.4 in ports? > 5.3-RELEASE/i386" perhaps? > > Is it also stupid of me to have a LCD monitor capable of only > 1280x768 when the VIA driver documentation at www.xfree86.org says > the VIA driver's display resolutions are: > > Option "PanelSize" "string" > Specify the size (width x height) of the LCD panel attached to the > system. Sizes 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768, 1280x1024, and 1400x1050 > are supported. > > Owen > ==== > > Tilman Linneweh wrote: > > * "Owen.G" [Do, 29 Jul 2004 at 16:29 GMT]: > > > >>I just had a look at the FreeBSD Ports page: > >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi > >> > >>and there's no sign of XFree86 4.4 yet. > >> > >>Questions: > >>1, Does anybody know the timescale of the port for XFree86 4.4? > >>2, Will the port of XFree86 4.4 be important enough that it will > >be >announced on the "freebsd-announce" mailing list? > > > > > > AFAIK the XFree86 4.4 ports are currently tested. > > > > On CURRENT the X.org ports are now the default, they should work > > with your VIA too. There has been some sort of problem getting XFree86 4.4 into the ports. Not sure what. But Xorg should work if it was supported XFree86 4.4, since for all effective purposes XFree86 4.4 and Xorg is the same thing... due to when the fork happened... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 19:41:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B0416A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:41:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F7443D2F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:41:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i6TJfDRT099319; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:41:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:41:13 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: lists Message-ID: <20040729194112.GB9911@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4108B086.8060706@sleektech.nl> <20040729143715.GB26125@dan.emsphone.com> <41094918.8080309@sleektech.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41094918.8080309@sleektech.nl> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netstat -m 'cannot allocate memory' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:41:17 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 29), lists said: > Is it possible to rebuild these without doing a complete make world > and if so without rebooting ? Yes: cd /usr/src/lib/libkvm && make obj && make depend && make && make install cd /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat && make obj && make depend && make && make install You may also need to rebuild systat, sockstat, netstat, lsof, and possibly other programs, which is why a buildworld is usually recommended. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 19:45:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE6216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:45:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096A243D49 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:45:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owen.g@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BqGq7-0002Lw-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:45:19 +0200 Received: from [217.235.116.3] (helo=[192.168.1.250]) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BqGq6-0007SQ-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:45:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4109549B.7040009@onlinehome.de> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:48:43 +0200 From: "Owen.G" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vulpes Velox References: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> <20040729165349.GA45316@arved.at> <41094335.4020405@onlinehome.de> <20040729142939.6de1dc7b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040729142939.6de1dc7b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:4e7b6bfadbfaa9d59ebe2d9dce9eb48d cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4 port - timescale? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:45:22 -0000 OK, On www.x.org they say that the latest version of their X implementation is X11R6.7.0. I don't see it on the Ports page on FreeBSD.org. Is that because the ports page says: Last database update: 2004-07-16 08:54:22 UTC ? Owen ==== Vulpes Velox wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:34:29 +0200 > "Owen.G" wrote: > > >>Cheers Tilman, >> >>I just checked again on Ports for "5.2-CURRENT/i386" and >>"5.2.1-RELEASE/i386": >>version = XFree86-4.3.0,1 >> > > > There has been some sort of problem getting XFree86 4.4 into the > ports. Not sure what. But Xorg should work if it was supported XFree86 > 4.4, since for all effective purposes XFree86 4.4 and Xorg the current one is> is the same thing... due to when the fork > happened... > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 19:54:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E5B16A4CF for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:54:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from raptor.cigb.edu.cu (raptor.cigb.edu.cu [200.55.134.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FD343D53 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:54:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu) Received: from atlas.cigb.edu.cu ([172.16.1.12]) by raptor.cigb.edu.cu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:53:46 -0400 Received: from Unknown [172.16.1.4] by atlas.cigb.edu.cu - SurfControl E-mail Filter (4.6); Thursday, 29 July 2004, 15:53:37 Received: from [172.16.11.106] ([172.16.11.106]) by mercurio.cigb.edu.cu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:53:36 -0400 Message-ID: <200407291553.48015.osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu> From: Osmany Guirola Cruz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:53:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2004 19:53:36.0821 (UTC) FILETIME=[BCA52650:01C475A5] References: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> <20040729142939.6de1dc7b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <4109549B.7040009@onlinehome.de> In-Reply-To: <4109549B.7040009@onlinehome.de> Organization: CIGB User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Subject: osversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:54:13 -0000 i foun these line in the Makefile of mono .if ${OSVERSION} < 500000 EXTRA_PATCHES= ${FILESDIR}/extra-patch-signbit .elif ${OSVERSION} < 502113 IGNORE= "Does not work on 5.X before 502113" .endif how can i know if my"osversion" is greater than 502113 On Thursday 29 July 2004 15:48, Owen.G wrote: > OK, > > On www.x.org they say that the latest version of their X implementation > is X11R6.7.0. > > I don't see it on the Ports page on FreeBSD.org. Is that because the > ports page says: > Last database update: 2004-07-16 08:54:22 UTC ? > > Owen > ==== > > Vulpes Velox wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:34:29 +0200 > > > > "Owen.G" wrote: > >>Cheers Tilman, > >> > >>I just checked again on Ports for "5.2-CURRENT/i386" and > >>"5.2.1-RELEASE/i386": > >>version = XFree86-4.3.0,1 > > > > There has been some sort of problem getting XFree86 4.4 into the > > ports. Not sure what. But Xorg should work if it was supported XFree86 > > 4.4, since for all effective purposes XFree86 4.4 and Xorg > the current one is> is the same thing... due to when the fork > > happened... > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 19:56:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996F716A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:56:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server2.sonservers.com (server2.sonservers.com [69.50.210.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B0443D66 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:56:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from info@sonservers.com) Received: from 209-181-157-189.omah.qwest.net ([209.181.157.189] helo=192.168.1.20) by server2.sonservers.com with smtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1BqH0F-000LuY-I2; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:55:48 -0500 From: Scott To: Ezequiel , X-Mailer: Barca 1.0 (700) - Licensed Version Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:55:54 -0500 Message-ID: <2004729145554.287060@IBM-R40> In-Reply-To: <001a01c475a1$f9f6c4e0$0332a8c0@internetxaire.com.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server2.sonservers.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sonservers.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release # X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: info@sonservers.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:56:30 -0000 ( Scott, I'm sorry the correct tag is ( ( *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_2 That's ok Ezequiel. No harm done. Fortunately I was upgrading a fresh install so none of my own data was lost. I've learned a lot today. I've put off upgrading because the entire process looked so daunting, but when you break it down into each step, it's not as hard as I thought it would be. :) I just finished the upgrade using the correct cvs tag. It took three hours total, but seems to be up and running fine now. Uname now shows: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 Woo Hoo! It worked! Thanks again to everyone for the assistance today. :) Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 20:06:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1569716A4D3 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:06:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D1043D3F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:06:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.196.44]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004072920064101400rrvkle>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:06:42 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E86C712; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:06:40 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Osmany Guirola Cruz References: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> <20040729142939.6de1dc7b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <4109549B.7040009@onlinehome.de> <200407291553.48015.osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 29 Jul 2004 16:06:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200407291553.48015.osmany.guirola@cigb.edu.cu> Message-ID: <44zn5i60j3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: osversion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:06:43 -0000 Osmany Guirola Cruz writes: > i foun these line in the Makefile of mono > > .if ${OSVERSION} < 500000 > EXTRA_PATCHES= ${FILESDIR}/extra-patch-signbit > .elif ${OSVERSION} < 502113 > IGNORE= "Does not work on 5.X before 502113" > .endif > > how can i know if my"osversion" is greater than 502113 sysctl -n kern.osreldate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 20:25:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54B016A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:25:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sthav01.proact.se (sthav01.proact.se [212.214.215.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4459343D5E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:25:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mathias.samuelson@proact.se) Received: from sthav01.proact.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.proact.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1137918E13; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:25:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from semail01.proact.se (semail01.proact.se [192.168.168.234])by s thav01.proact.se (Postfix) with ESMTPid ECE5918E12; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:25: 11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by semail01.proact.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)id < N5CHB72V>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:26:14 +0200 Message-ID: <41095D40.70805@proact.se> From: Mathias Samuelson To: soohyun_choi@yahoo.com Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:25:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-imss-version: 2.0 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:33.49340 C:20 M:1 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.0000 0.0000) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wireless LAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:25:50 -0000 Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: > I'm using SONY VAIO Z1 series, and it seems that the > built in wireless LAN isn't working properly. So I got > a PC Card which is WaveLAN (Lucent), a bit old one but > expect to work fine under FreeBSD 5.2.1. > > I've enabled 'pccard' at rc.conf file and the kernel > seems to load the 'wi' driver by default. > > But the WaveLAN isn't working yet. Could anyone drive > me in a good (complete) reference to get things > working? > > Cheers, > SH- I sent this in reply to an earlier post, but failed to cc the list. It's not complete, but until you get better information perhaps it can help you out a bit: I have MA401 and it's working without any problems now. I started out with pccardd starting with configuration file, rather than using the default one. That didn't work so well, so in /etc/rc.conf I now have: pccard_enable="YES" pccard_mem="DEFAULT" pccard_beep="2" pccard_ifconfig="NO" pccardd_flags="" pccard_ether_delay="5" My understanding is that with this setup, pccardd will look for the file /etc/defaults/pccard.conf, then it might be the case (sorry for not being more knowledgable in this area) that it will read /etc/pccard.conf. Anyway, I have one and it looks like this: # Lucent WaveLAN/IEEE card "Lucent Technologies" "WaveLAN/IEEE" config 0x1 "wi0" 11 insert echo WaveLAN/IEEE inserted insert /etc/pccard_ether wi0 remove echo WaveLAN/IEEE removed remove /sbin/ifconfig wi0 delete # Netgear MA401 card "NETGEAR MA401RA Wireless PC" "Card" config auto "wi" ? 0x10000 insert /etc/pccard_ether $device start remove /etc/pccard_ether $device stop Now, when I insert the card, after a few seconds the card shows up in ifconfig. I hope this helps out a bit. And oh, I'm on 4.10-STABLE Best regards Mathias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 20:55:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD84F16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:55:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14104.mail.yahoo.com (web14104.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89BD443D55 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:55:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandboxpro@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729205515.65199.qmail@web14104.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.214.84.59] by web14104.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:55:15 PDT Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:55:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Sandbox Video Productions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Sound Driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:55:15 -0000 Starting KDE I always get this message. Then it just stalls Sound server informational message: Error while ititializing the sound driver: device /dev/dsp can't be opened (Device not configured) The sound server will continue using the null output device __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 20:57:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADDC16A4CE; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:57:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from slacknet.slacknet.com (slacknet.slacknet.com [204.228.135.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CAB43D41; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:57:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rj45@slacknet.com) Received: from rj45 (helo=localhost) by slacknet.slacknet.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.32 #1 (Debian)) id 1BqHy7-0002LE-P3; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:57:39 -0600 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:57:39 -0600 (MDT) From: RJ45 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on slacknet.slacknet.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false cc: mlaier@freebsd.org Subject: problems with PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:57:41 -0000 hello, I configured PF for natting machines on my LAN using FreeBSD as ADSL gateway. I just write a simple rule nat on tun0 from 172.16.16.0/24 to any -> (tun0) but NAT does not work, packets are blocked. ip forwarding is enabled using ipfilter works and packets are natted succesfully with a simple rule the same as before: map tun0 172.16.16.0/24 -> tun0/32 I am using PF on OpenBSD since the first time it was released so I Am sure it is not a problem of my configuration (After all more than very simple) using PF on FreeBSD I noticed simply packets are not NATted. I have to say I am using it on sparc64 FreeBSD 5.2.1 on ultra 60. anyone has some hints ? maybe on i386 works who knows ? thanks Rick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 21:23:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1120416A4DB for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:23:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7405943D58 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:23:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.208] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BqINP-00062m-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:23:47 +0200 Received: from [84.128.140.215] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BqINP-0006FW-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:23:47 +0200 From: Max Laier To: RJ45 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:21:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_rpWCBsenbvbZvc9"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407292321.47252.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:23:53 -0000 --Boundary-02=_rpWCBsenbvbZvc9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 29 July 2004 22:57, RJ45 wrote: > hello, > I configured PF for natting machines on my LAN > using FreeBSD as ADSL gateway. > > I just write a simple rule > nat on tun0 from 172.16.16.0/24 to any -> (tun0) ^^^^^^ > but NAT does not work, packets are blocked. > > ip forwarding is enabled > > using ipfilter works and packets are natted succesfully with a simple rule > the same as before: > > map tun0 172.16.16.0/24 -> tun0/32 > > > I am using PF on OpenBSD since the first time it was released > so I Am sure it is not a problem of my configuration (After all more > than very simple) > using PF on FreeBSD I noticed simply packets are not NATted. Well they are, but to a wrong address or no address at all, depending on th= e=20 state of tun0 upon loading the ruleset. > I have to say I am using it on sparc64 FreeBSD 5.2.1 on ultra 60. > > anyone has some hints ? Have you applied the dynamic address patches? # cd /usr/ports/security/pf && make extract && cd work/pf_freebsd_2.03/patc= hes # less README for details. Unless you did so, the "(ifname)" syntax will not work on 5.2.= 1R.=20 As a workaround you can place a #pfctl -f in your linkup script.= =20 Other than that, you might want to try a recent -current snapshot in order = to=20 build 3.5 pf (the port is still as of 3.4) out of the box. There you have a= ll=20 the fancy interface handling that comes with 3.5 (including dynamic address= es=20 of course) and additionally there is ALTQ ;) Patches for hme(4) from Pyun=20 YongHyeon are on http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/ALTQ_driver/ other drive= r=20 patches upon request. sparc64 should not be a problem for pf in general. > maybe on i386 works who knows ? Not with the dynamic address syntax, no. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --Boundary-02=_rpWCBsenbvbZvc9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBCWprXyyEoT62BG0RApL5AJ0asLEcy1APdgPf2RQEbae3nUU21wCfbR7R 4SeIrlp4IKnCy1XUUl/8uR0= =pEOh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_rpWCBsenbvbZvc9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 21:37:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31D516A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:37:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgw-20.stcloudstate.edu (exchange8.stcloudstate.edu [199.17.25.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4024143D2D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:37:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bepratt@stcloudstate.edu) Received: from exchange17.campus.stcloudstate.edu [199.17.25.221] by mailgw-20.stcloudstate.edu with XWall v3.30c ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:37:20 -0500 Received: from exchange2003.campus.stcloudstate.edu ([199.17.25.142]) by exchange17.campus.stcloudstate.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:37:18 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:37:16 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Atheros card support in 5.2.1 Thread-Index: AcR1tDbaqVJPT6bRQaeioMRlUA7QiA== From: "Pratt, Benjamin E." To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2004 21:37:18.0560 (UTC) FILETIME=[39172E00:01C475B4] Subject: Atheros card support in 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:37:18 -0000 Hello - I'm trying to get a card that's supported by madwifi drivers in Linux (atheros) to work in FreeBSD and eventually FreeSBIE. I've seen things posted in other threads that say that atheros cards are supported (at least some are) using the ath driver but in looking through my kernel configuration options I'm not seeing ath anywhere. I see an, awi, wi, and wl but no ath. Does anyone have any information about how to enable atheros support in 5.2.1?? Thanks, Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 21:45:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D5B16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:45:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BBA43D46 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:45:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rbgarga@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 76so27946rnl for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:45:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.209.3 with SMTP id h3mr173383rng; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <747dc8f304072910242b22e2b0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:24:31 -0300 From: Renato Botelho To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?FreePascal_don=B4t_run_fine_on_FreeBSD?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:45:58 -0000 Hi All, Here, I have a FreeBSD-5.2.1-RELEASE-p8, running FireBird-1.5.1. I have many udf=B4s wrote in Delphi to run on Firebird for windows, I tried to compile these udf=B4s with FreePascal on FreeBSD, and register on firebird, but it don=B4t work. The same udf=B4s works fine when compiled on FreePascal on Windows and Linux, and udf=B4s written in C/C++ works fine on FreeBSD. Does anyone know if exist any problem with FreePascal on FreeBSD? PS: I tried with fpc-1.0.10, 1.9.2 and 1.9.4 and get the same error. Thanks in advance --=20 Renato Botelho From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 21:50:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D1C16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:50:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2650B43D39 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:50:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 5012 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2004 21:43:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 21:43:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6998E128; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:39:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (it.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49734-02; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:39:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EEAA8B0; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:39:25 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:39:24 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Dan Message-Id: <20040729203924.211d63d5@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <000801c47570$25df3ab0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> References: <000801c47570$25df3ab0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeBSD How to you set the prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:50:12 -0000 On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:29:30 -0000 "Dan" wrote: > Where and how do you set the prompt to show what user name that your on IE ROOT or user johndoe. > Eample of what the end results I would like to see. > > # router1.pdx/chatusa.com user johndoe. In tch I use this prompt (which also has some colors taht I cannot reproduce here): user@short_hostname> current_path [current_time] last_command_exit_code _#_ itetcu@it> /usr/ports/converters/php4-recode [20:35:57] 0 _ #_ which is done by adding this two lines in ~/.cshrc set prompt = "%S%n@`hostname -s`> %{\e[0;31m%}%/%{\e[0m%} [%P] %{\e[1;36m%}%?%{\e[0m%} %s\n%B%U %{\e[0;31m%}#%{\e[0m%} %u%b" -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 21:59:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E56D16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:59:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 21322530218.direct.eti.at (21322530218.direct.eti.at [213.225.30.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C3D43D2D for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:59:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) Received: from huckfinn-wi0.arved.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6TLxGLI048026; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:59:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tilman@arved.at) Received: (from tilman@localhost) by huckfinn-wi0.arved.de (8.13.0/8.12.6/Submit) id i6TLxFA7048025; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:59:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: huckfinn-wi0.arved.de: tilman set sender to tilman@arved.at using -f Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:59:15 +0200 From: Tilman Linneweh To: "Owen.G" Message-ID: <20040729215915.GA48014@arved.at> References: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> <20040729165349.GA45316@arved.at> <4109549B.7040009@onlinehome.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4109549B.7040009@onlinehome.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4 port - timescale? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:59:18 -0000 * "Owen.G" [Do, 29 Jul 2004 at 21:48 GMT]: > I don't see it on the Ports page on FreeBSD.org. Is that because the > ports page says: > Last database update: 2004-07-16 08:54:22 UTC ? xorg metaport was committed on June 19. freshports.org is a very useful resource: http://www.freshports.org/x11/xorg regards tilman P.S. Please don't toppost. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 23:07:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0723116A4CF for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:07:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D1243D55 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:07:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0C9388FA4 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:06:57 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:06:54 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <005467CB63EA2B94FA1CCAA6@utd49554.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Problems after php upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:07:18 -0000 I just upgraded php today, and php no longer works on the web server. I upgraded the php4 port, and then installed the extensions. When I try to load a php page, it's blank, and I get errors like these in httpd-errors.log: PHP Warning: Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library './openssl.so' - Cannot open "./openssl.so" in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library './overload.so' - Cannot open "./overload.so" in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library './pcre.so' - Cannot open "./pcre.so" in Unknown on line 0 The php.ini file has this in it: extensions_dir = "/usr/local/lib/php/20020429" (which is where the extensions are.) The perms are root:wheel r--r--r. There's also a php.conf file now (in /usr/local/etc/) and it has PHP_EXT_DIR=20020249. I have the correct stuff in httpd.conf (otherwise php wouldn't have worked before.) I looked through the pkg-message files in the extensions and base dirs, but no luck. What did I miss? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 23:19:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3699916A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:19:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA95B43D1F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:19:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com) Received: from ms-mss-01 ([10.10.4.10])i6TNJ1OD012907 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from socal.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I1M00M5JZFPCA@ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.6.201] (Forwarded-For: [68.8.243.244]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (mshttpd); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:19:01 -1000 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:19:01 -1000 From: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <182391818247c7.18247c71823918@socal.rr.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Changing cards in a reader (new info) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:19:13 -0000 Aloha I have some additional information regarding this problem. I was reading some of the man pages for the ump-teenth time and I thought I would try something with fdisk. I started with a 128MB card in the reader. hp# mount_msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /mnt/olympus/ hp# ls -l /mnt/olympus/ hp# ls -l /mnt/olympus/dcim/100olymp/ total 6752 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 680523 Jan 1 2000 p1010074.jpg -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 672166 Jun 5 07:19 p6050002.jpg -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 677171 Jun 5 07:19 p6050003.jpg -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 684658 Jun 5 07:23 p6050004.jpg -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 664210 Jun 5 07:23 p6050005.jpg -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 663849 Jun 5 07:24 p6050006.jpg -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 689533 Jun 5 07:37 p6050009.jpg -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 697084 Jun 5 07:37 p6050010.jpg -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 691391 Jun 5 07:59 p6050011.jpg -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 695390 Jun 5 07:59 p6050012.jpg hp# hp# umount /mnt/olympus/ Replace the 128MB with a 8MB hp# mount_msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /mnt/olympus/ mount_msdosfs: /dev/da2s1: Invalid argument Fails to mount hp# fdisk -i da2 ******* Working on device /dev/da2 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=7 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl) parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=7 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl) Do you want to change our idea of what BIOS thinks ? [n] Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 1 (0x01),(Primary DOS with 12 bit FAT) start 25, size 15975 (7 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 10; end: cyl 249/ head 3/ sector 16 Do you want to change it? [n] The data for partition 2 is: Do you want to change it? [n] The data for partition 3 is: Do you want to change it? [n] The data for partition 4 is: Do you want to change it? [n] Partition 1 is marked active Do you want to change the active partition? [n] We haven't changed the partition table yet. This is your last chance. parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=7 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl) parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=7 heads=64 sectors/track=32 (2048 blks/cyl) Information from DOS bootblock is: 1: sysid 1 (0x01),(Primary DOS with 12 bit FAT) start 25, size 15975 (7 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 10; end: cyl 249/ head 3/ sector 16 2: 3: 4: Should we write new partition table? [n] hp# I answer no to all questions and then it mounts!! hp# mount_msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /mnt/olympus/ hp# ls -l /mnt/olympus/dcim/100olymp/ total 680 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 694158 Jul 12 18:27 p7120001.jpg hp# Of course this (fdisk) has to be done as root. If I want to mount and umount as a standard user I need to "chmod 660 da2s1" each time the card is changed and "fdisk -i" is run. I hope this triggers some memory cells on all the experienced users on this list. Is there a better way to do this? I am sorry my posts always seem to run long but I want to include what I feel is important. Thanks for all the help I have received and all the future help I hope I get :o) Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 23:21:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E128716A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:21:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2DC43D5A for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 17009 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2004 23:14:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Jul 2004 23:14:10 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB808140; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:20:53 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (it.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96130-07; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:20:53 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 04CCF113; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:20:52 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:20:52 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040730022052.5949bdf9@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <005467CB63EA2B94FA1CCAA6@utd49554.utdallas.edu> References: <005467CB63EA2B94FA1CCAA6@utd49554.utdallas.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro cc: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: Problems after php upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:21:16 -0000 On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:06:54 -0500 Paul Schmehl wrote: > I just upgraded php today, and php no longer works on the web server. I > upgraded the php4 port, and then installed the extensions. When I try to > load a php page, it's blank, and I get errors like these in > httpd-errors.log: > > PHP Warning: Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library './openssl.so' - > Cannot open "./openssl.so" in Unknown on line 0 > PHP Warning: Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library './overload.so' - > Cannot open "./overload.so" in Unknown on line 0 > PHP Warning: Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library './pcre.so' - > Cannot open "./pcre.so" in Unknown on line 0 > > The php.ini file has this in it: > extensions_dir = "/usr/local/lib/php/20020429" (which is where the > extensions are.) The perms are root:wheel r--r--r. Stupid question: Are this the perms of the 20020429 directory ? They should be rwxr-xr-x on the dir and r--r--r-- on the .so -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 23:56:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B1A16A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:56:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51310.mail.yahoo.com (web51310.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DD5B43D54 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:56:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gooober33-freebsd@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040729235638.621.qmail@web51310.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.23.48.231] by web51310.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:56:38 PDT Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:56:38 -0700 (PDT) From: BSDjunkie To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: PAM troubles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gooober33-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:56:40 -0000 Hello Everybody! I'm having problems with PAM on my system (4.08). I originally tried to update my source using CVSUP and everything seemed to go fine...make buildworld, make install world, make buildkernel, make installkernel....but when I got to the mergemaster part, I originally selected the 'Enter' option of leaving the files as they were and editing them later. I could not ever get the system to come up on 4.10 as it would freeze at the 'waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle' screen. So I reverted all the source code back to 4.08, recompiled everything and now everything works -- except PAM.... Any pointers on how to fix this???? Thanks for any info as I've googled on this and could not find much except for documentation explaining on how pam works.... Thanks for listening! Mark Withers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 00:13:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1403816A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:13:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from theatre.msu.edu (theatre.msu.edu [35.8.69.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4C343D66 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sagejona@theatre.msu.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.87] ([140.103.103.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by theatre.msu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6U0DIS6019583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:13:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sagejona@theatre.msu.edu) Message-ID: <41099297.7080501@theatre.msu.edu> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:13:11 -0400 From: "Jonathan T. Sage" Organization: MSU Dept of Theatre User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <005467CB63EA2B94FA1CCAA6@utd49554.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <005467CB63EA2B94FA1CCAA6@utd49554.utdallas.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime X-Phone: +1-517-974-1428 X-WWW-Home-Page: http://theatre.msu.edu X-PGP-Key-Figerprint: 182C CF3F 93A9 1DAA 2EBE D4D5 A159 96D9 452E A7F1 X-IM: AIM(jonathantsage,spartyman), ICQ(9587621), YIM(wisesage98) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6F16CD0FC524B664DAE6AD06" X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on www.theatre.msu.edu X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040526, clamav-milter version 0.71 X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after php upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:13:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6F16CD0FC524B664DAE6AD06 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul - From /usr/ports/UPDATING: If you have a previous php.ini configuration file, be sure to comment out the extension_dir parameter, since the correct path is statically compiled into the PHP binary. I missed this too the first time through, but it fixed the same exact problem. (possibly s/same exact/similar/) Hope this helps ~j Paul Schmehl wrote: > I just upgraded php today, and php no longer works on the web server. I > upgraded the php4 port, and then installed the extensions. When I try > to load a php page, it's blank, and I get errors like these in > httpd-errors.log: > > PHP Warning: Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library './openssl.so' - > Cannot open "./openssl.so" in Unknown on line 0 > PHP Warning: Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library './overload.so' > - Cannot open "./overload.so" in Unknown on line 0 > PHP Warning: Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library './pcre.so' - > Cannot open "./pcre.so" in Unknown on line 0 > > The php.ini file has this in it: > extensions_dir = "/usr/local/lib/php/20020429" (which is where the > extensions are.) The perms are root:wheel r--r--r. > > There's also a php.conf file now (in /usr/local/etc/) and it has > PHP_EXT_DIR=20020249. > > I have the correct stuff in httpd.conf (otherwise php wouldn't have > worked before.) > > I looked through the pkg-message files in the extensions and base dirs, > but no luck. > > What did I miss? > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > The University of Texas at Dallas > AVIEN Founding Member > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Jonathan T. Sage Theatrical Lighting / Set Designer Professional Web Design Homer: ...and when a woman says "something sounds funny", you'd better not laugh your ass off. [HTTP://www.JTSage.com] [sagejona@msu.edu] [See Headers for Contact Info] --------------enig6F16CD0FC524B664DAE6AD06 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBCZKboVmW2UUup/ERAsgOAJ9EeDsZIxbP3IcKevxM/z3pjlWpawCfeGA/ l+VFlIsv5RcP/4Ks+vXzKRc= =Z8fb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6F16CD0FC524B664DAE6AD06-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 00:24:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AE616A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:24:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7EE43D45 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:24:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-68-95-21-193.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [68.95.21.193]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88187388CEF for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:24:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:24:27 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <2147483647.1091129067@[192.168.2.102]> In-Reply-To: <20040730022052.5949bdf9@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <005467CB63EA2B94FA1CCAA6@utd49554.utdallas.edu> <20040730022052.5949bdf9@it.buh.tecnik93.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.3 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Problems after php upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:24:35 -0000 --On Friday, July 30, 2004 2:20 AM +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > Stupid question: Are this the perms of the 20020429 directory ? They > should be rwxr-xr-x on the dir and r--r--r-- on the .so > Not a stupid question at all. Perms on the dir are rwxr-xr-x. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 00:34:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C59B16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:34:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEC943D1F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:34:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-68-95-21-193.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [68.95.21.193]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FF9388C46; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:34:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:34:16 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: "Jonathan T. Sage" Message-ID: <2147483647.1091129656@[192.168.2.102]> In-Reply-To: <41099297.7080501@theatre.msu.edu> References: <005467CB63EA2B94FA1CCAA6@utd49554.utdallas.edu> <41099297.7080501@theatre.msu.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.3 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after php upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:34:33 -0000 --On Thursday, July 29, 2004 8:13 PM -0400 "Jonathan T. Sage" wrote: > Paul - From /usr/ports/UPDATING: > > If you have a previous php.ini configuration file, be sure to comment out > the extension_dir parameter, since the correct path is statically > compiled into the PHP binary. > > I missed this too the first time through, but it fixed the same exact > problem. (possibly s/same exact/similar/) > > Hope this helps ~j > Yep, that was it. Thanks. Missed it completely. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 01:02:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0088316A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:02:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.bitfreak.org (mail.bitfreak.org [65.75.198.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AAC43D62 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmp@bitfreak.org) Received: from speck.techno.pagans (c-24-21-241-225.client.comcast.net [24.21.241.225]) by mail.bitfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AC92A477 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spud (spud.techno.pagans [172.21.42.19]) by speck.techno.pagans (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C8717022 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:01:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "Darren Pilgrim" To: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:01:50 -0700 Message-ID: <000301c475d0$cf1ce040$132a15ac@spud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Different sysinstall labelling behaviour when run post-install vs. during install? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:02:01 -0000 Yesterday I was upgrading the disk in one of my workstations. Since I = was planning on growing the filesystems for my FreeBSD install at the same = time, I needed to manually create a new disklabel. I used sysinstall for = this, but ran into a problem: sysinstall doesn't allocate the partition = letters, with 'a' first, if you aren't doing an initial install. I ended up = using the "auto defaults" option to create the 'a' partition, then remove everything and create them as I wanted. I'm glad to say that it worked = out just fine, but this problem raises a couple of questions: Why does sysinstall behave differently when run post-install? How do I manually specify or change the partition letter to use? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 01:04:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E816416A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:04:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C27143D5E for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:04:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.drews@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 78so62121rnl for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.83.6 with SMTP id g6mr1754rnb; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8cb27cbf04072906572a83b085@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:57:54 -0500 From: Jon Drews To: Dan In-Reply-To: <000801c47570$25df3ab0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <000801c47570$25df3ab0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeBSD How to you set the prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:04:35 -0000 Hello Dan: This may be of help: Understanding Shell Prompts http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2000/09/20/FreeBSD_Basics.html On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:29:30 -0000, Dan wrote: > Where and how do you set the prompt to show what user name that your on IE ROOT or user johndoe. > Eample of what the end results I would like to see. > > # router1.pdx/chatusa.com user johndoe. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 01:14:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDE816A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:14:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29A343D46 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:14:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 4306 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2004 01:07:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Jul 2004 01:07:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48429121; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:14:32 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (it.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99748-07; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:14:31 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A7A926; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:14:31 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:14:29 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: "Jonathan T. Sage" Message-Id: <20040730041429.0fcceb2a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <41099297.7080501@theatre.msu.edu> References: <005467CB63EA2B94FA1CCAA6@utd49554.utdallas.edu> <41099297.7080501@theatre.msu.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro cc: Paul Schmehl cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems after php upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:14:41 -0000 On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:13:11 -0400 "Jonathan T. Sage" wrote: > Paul - From /usr/ports/UPDATING: > > If you have a previous php.ini configuration file, be sure to comment > out the extension_dir parameter, since the correct path is statically > compiled into the PHP binary. > > I missed this too the first time through, but it fixed the same exact > problem. (possibly s/same exact/similar/) > > Hope this helps ~j My php's recode.so make apache to dump core. I wonder if ti happens to anyone else. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 03:00:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DC816A4DD for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:00:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from comsmtp1.singnet.com.sg (comsmtp1.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB36B43D62 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:00:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pryan@singnet.com.sg) Received: from flounder.singnet.com.sg (flounder.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.116])i6U30N4J029071 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:00:23 +0800 Received: (from cooluser@localhost) by flounder.singnet.com.sg (8.11.6/8.11.2) id i6U30N513183 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:00:23 +0800 X-Authentication-Warning: flounder.singnet.com.sg: cooluser set sender to pryan@singnet.com.sg using -f To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <1091156423.4109b9c733864@flounder.singnet.com.sg> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:00:23 +0800 (SGT) From: Peter Ryan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: SingNet WebMail Subject: java jdk14 install - cannot find file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pryan@singnet.com.sg List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:00:32 -0000 Hi, as part of the jdk14 install, i have to download the file j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin from the sun web site and put it into the /usr/ports/distfiles folder. I did that - no problem. I can see the file listed in the right place. When i do the "Make", it aborts with an error. It cannot find the file I just downloaded. I highlight and copy the file name in the error message. Using KDE find files, i paste the filename into the search field, and the file is found in the distfiles folder !! If I do a whereis on the Konsole and it is not found. I cd'd to /usr/ports/distfiles and typed whereis j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin and i get j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin: back. I assume this means it is not found. I looked at the permissions of the file. they were rw-r--r--. I changed it to rwxr-xr-x. Didnt make any difference. The only other thing i noticed was that the file is a .bin, and the file type is listed as a shell script. i am really stuck. I am very new to this and cant see what is wrong. Can anyone help. Thanks Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 03:18:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5195416A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:18:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C016F43D55 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:18:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian.lynn@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 75so29684rnl for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.71.15 with SMTP id t15mr22715rna; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8b7090a604072920186ceb31a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:18:14 -0400 From: Brian Lynn To: "Owen.G" In-Reply-To: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4 port (for Chipset CLE266/VT8235 Graphics) - timescale? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:18:24 -0000 On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:29:31 +0200, Owen.G wrote: > I also bought a EPIA Mini-ITX in early June before seeing the posting > that the video wasn't supported by X on FreeBSD (Linux - supposedly yes, > BSD not yet). > > The previous responder (thanks Erik) said, "the CLE266 chipset will be > supported in the port of XFree86 4.4" > > I just had a look at the FreeBSD Ports page: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi > > and there's no sign of XFree86 4.4 yet. > > Questions: > 1, Does anybody know the timescale of the port for XFree86 4.4? > 2, Will the port of XFree86 4.4 be important enough that it will be > announced on the "freebsd-announce" mailing list? > > (I did get an X windows manager running on the VGA S server but it was > too low resolution to be useful.) > > Thanks in anticipation, > You can also do this by using the driver from XFree86's binary packages for 4.4. Once you have XFree86-4 installed using the port, do a portupgrade of the -Server port using the 4.3.99 snapshot port: portupgrade -f -o x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server-snap XFree86-Server Then you need to grab the via_drv.o file from the XFree86 binary package. I just installed the whole thing to a temp dir, then copied over the driver module. From XFree86.0.log: (II) LoadModule: "via" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/via_drv.o (II) Module via: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.4.0, module version = 4.1.30 Module class: XFree86 Video Driver ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.7 -Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 03:24:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB5B16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:24:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (ganymede.revolutionsp.com [64.246.0.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D68843D39 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:24:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from klr@6s-gaming.com) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.revolutionsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F67715CD6 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:21:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 81.84.175.12 (SquirrelMail authenticated user klr@6s-gaming.com); by mail.revolutionsp.com with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:21:45 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <50261.81.84.175.12.1091146905.squirrel@81.84.175.12> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:21:45 -0000 (GMT) From: "Hugo Silva" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: 5.2.1-p9 panics under high loads X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:24:04 -0000 Hi list, I have a Dual Xeon 2.8ghz w/ SMP enabled on a 5.2.1 server which is panicking under high loads. While I don't have a copy of the panic with me (datacenter still didn't mail it to me), I have seen this problem a while ago, don't remember if on this list. The problem was the same, 5.2 , SMP, and panic under high loads. Someone suggested that user adding a kernel option, which got him rid of the panics. But I couldn't find this thread. Does anyone know what this kernel option is? Best Regards, Hugo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 03:50:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BCA16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:50:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from asmtp-a063f31.pas.sa.earthlink.net (asmtp-a063f31.pas.sa.earthlink.net [207.217.120.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F21943D2F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:50:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=localhost) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1BqOPI-0003hK-Ob; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:50:09 -0700 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:50:41 -0500 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: "Pratt, Benjamin E." Message-ID: <20040730035041.GA44877@datawok.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b1612cc54e443e6da0b75db786771efc2350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.204.20.74 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Atheros card support in 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:50:59 -0000 On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 04:37:16PM -0500, Pratt, Benjamin E. wrote: > Hello - > > I'm trying to get a card that's supported by madwifi drivers in Linux > (atheros) to work in FreeBSD and eventually FreeSBIE. I've seen things > posted in other threads that say that atheros cards are supported (at > least some are) using the ath driver but in looking through my kernel > configuration options I'm not seeing ath anywhere. I see an, awi, wi, > and wl but no ath. > > Does anyone have any information about how to enable atheros support in > 5.2.1?? > > Thanks, > > Ben I think you need to add the following to your kernel configuration file: device ath device ath_hal Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 03:51:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2288716A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:51:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F52943D1F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:51:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan.warnke@sbcglobal.net) Received: from unknown (HELO WinXP1) (stefan.warnke@sbcglobal.net@68.120.136.171 with login) by smtp812.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2004 03:51:56 -0000 From: "Stefan Warnke" To: Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:52:08 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcR12qkhwLI0VaSGQaKGsI9b2OiL6w== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-Id: <20040730035157.0F52943D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Sysinstall errors and debug screen X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: StefanW@PObox.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 03:51:57 -0000 Hi, when installing FreeBSD with Sysinstall it sometimes happens that an error message comes up and the module couldn't get installed. Changing the medium (CD or different ftp server) sometimes helps. It's not consistence, on one machine I could install Samba 3 and MySQL 4, on another one I'm always getting an error after a successful download. Samba 4 and MySql 3 can install. Can anyone tell me where to find the "debug screen" with the error messages? What can I do to be able to install from the ports. I'm close to download the packages from Samba.org and MySql.com instead of wasting time with sysinstall. VBR Stefan Warnke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 04:22:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F64016A4D0 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:22:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FE943D46 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:22:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 29176161 for multiple; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:07:06 -0700 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:22:15 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Owen.G" Message-Id: <20040729232215.1c5a934f@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <4109549B.7040009@onlinehome.de> References: <410909CB.3060105@onlinehome.de> <20040729165349.GA45316@arved.at> <41094335.4020405@onlinehome.de> <20040729142939.6de1dc7b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <4109549B.7040009@onlinehome.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4 port - timescale? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:22:35 -0000 On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:48:43 +0200 "Owen.G" wrote: > OK, > > On www.x.org they say that the latest version of their X > implementation is X11R6.7.0. > > I don't see it on the Ports page on FreeBSD.org. That is the lastest version of Xorg, not XFree86. :P From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 04:23:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B484F16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:23:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.velocom.com.ar (smtp.velocom.com.ar [200.59.32.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C1E43D48 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:23:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mguadagnini@velocom.com.ar) Received: from smtp.velocom.com.ar (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.velocom.com.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8F6C6A95 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:25:53 -0300 (ARST) Received: from lucksys.lucksys.com (adsl358-tasa.via-net-works.net.ar [200.59.198.103]) by smtp.velocom.com.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4085C69F4 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:25:52 -0300 (ARST) From: Mariano Guadagnini To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:16:27 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407300116.27351.mguadagnini@velocom.com.ar> Subject: backspace and delete keys behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:23:08 -0000 Hi guys, I am new to Freebsd (after years of linux) and, althought system installation and configuration was quite seamlessly, I've an issue with the delete key of my keyboard (101 keys us layout): In xterm, the backspace key works ok, but when I press del, it prints the "~" character, instead of deleting . I have read it has something to do with keyboard layout config, but I couldn't find out how to fix it. So, any ideas? Thanks, (and forgive my poor english) Mariano Guadagnini Argentina From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 04:40:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B0716A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:40:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A0B43D6D for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:40:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp55-219.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.55.219])i6U4eE4Y001466; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:10:15 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: pryan@singnet.com.sg, FreeBSD Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:10:14 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <1091156423.4109b9c733864@flounder.singnet.com.sg> In-Reply-To: <1091156423.4109b9c733864@flounder.singnet.com.sg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200407301410.14110.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: java jdk14 install - cannot find file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:40:29 -0000 On Friday 30 July 2004 12:30, Peter Ryan wrote: > Hi, > > as part of the jdk14 install, i have to > download the file j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin > from the sun web site and put it into the > /usr/ports/distfiles folder. > I did that - no problem. > I can see the file listed in the right place. > > When i do the "Make", it aborts with an error. > It cannot find the file I just downloaded. > > I highlight and copy the file name in the error > message. > > Using KDE find files, i paste the filename into > the search field, and the file is found in the > distfiles folder !! > > If I do a whereis on the Konsole and it is not > found. I cd'd to /usr/ports/distfiles and typed > whereis j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin > and i get j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin: back. > I assume this means it is not found. > whereis does not find files in the general sense; just executables in PATH and man pages in manpath and sources in some ?standard place?. The j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin: response is just the header declaring what you asked - any results follow this with complete paths. The usual command for finding files is 'locate' but this depends on a data base that is only updated once a week by default and then only if your machine in running at the appropriate time. You could use $ find / -name j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin but with the search directed to the entire system you can expect that this might take almost forever. Much quicker would be $ find /usr/ports/distfiles -name j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin > I looked at the permissions of the file. > they were rw-r--r--. I changed it to > rwxr-xr-x. Didnt make any difference. > > The only other thing i noticed was that the > file is a .bin, and the file type is listed > as a shell script. What file type? You mean $ file j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin responds with script? It probably is and should be a Bourne shell script; take a look inside and make sure it is the required file and not just a URL of the true file. This sometimes happens. Failing that check very-very carefully that the file name in distfiles is exactly the same as that asked for by make. Malcolm > i am really stuck. I am very new to this and > cant see what is wrong. > > Can anyone help. > > Thanks > Peter > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 04:42:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075F016A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:42:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from whoweb.com (whoweb.com [216.38.168.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B52543D58 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:42:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon@whoweb.com) Received: from whoweb.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whoweb.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6U4h5RX082279 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:43:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by whoweb.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6U4h5DB082278 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:43:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:43:05 -0400 (EDT) From: jon Message-Id: <200407300443.i6U4h5DB082278@whoweb.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: mount_smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:42:50 -0000 The mount_smbfs(8) command on 5.2.1 allows multiple mounts using the same source and mount point. This sounds like a bug to me since other file systems such as ufs return an error on such attempts. Anyone know of a reason why this is allowed in mount_smbfs? J From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 05:01:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F0F16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 05:01:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from comsmtp2.singnet.com.sg (comsmtp2.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB1143D5F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 05:01:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pryan@singnet.com.sg) Received: from dory.singnet.com.sg (dory.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.115]) i6U50cgp005641; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:00:38 +0800 Received: (from cooluser@localhost) by dory.singnet.com.sg (8.11.6/8.11.2) id i6U50bC14530; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:00:37 +0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dory.singnet.com.sg: cooluser set sender to pryan@singnet.com.sg using -f To: Malcolm Kay Message-ID: <1091163637.4109d5f5dabf1@dory.singnet.com.sg> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:00:37 +0800 (SGT) From: Peter Ryan References: <1091156423.4109b9c733864@flounder.singnet.com.sg> <200407301410.14110.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <200407301410.14110.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: SingNet WebMail cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: java jdk14 install - cannot find file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pryan@singnet.com.sg List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 05:01:19 -0000 Thanks Malcolm, To make sure my eyes were not playing tricks, I was careful to do the KDE Find Files using a copy&paste of the file name in the error message - and it was found exactly where I put it, ie in /usr/ports/distfiles, which is where it is supposed to be The file is about 34MB, so is not just a header, but anyway, the error message says "... doesn't seem to exist". Thanks very much for the advice on finding files in the Konsole. I used the find /usr/ports/distfiles -name version from the Konsole, and it also found the file. (I pasted the file name from the error message to the end of the find command - so I dont think there is any spelling error) This is baffling. Thanks again Peter --- Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Friday 30 July 2004 12:30, Peter Ryan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > as part of the jdk14 install, i have to > > download the file j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin > > from the sun web site and put it into the > > /usr/ports/distfiles folder. > > I did that - no problem. > > I can see the file listed in the right place. > > > > When i do the "Make", it aborts with an error. > > It cannot find the file I just downloaded. > > > > I highlight and copy the file name in the error > > message. > > > > Using KDE find files, i paste the filename into > > the search field, and the file is found in the > > distfiles folder !! > > > > If I do a whereis on the Konsole and it is not > > found. I cd'd to /usr/ports/distfiles and typed > > whereis j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin > > and i get j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin: back. > > I assume this means it is not found. > > > > whereis does not find files in the general sense; > just executables in PATH and man pages in manpath > and sources in some ?standard place?. > > The j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin: response is just > the header declaring what you asked - any results > follow this with complete paths. > > The usual command for finding files is 'locate' > but this depends on a data base that is only updated > once a week by default and then only if your machine > in running at the appropriate time. > You could use > $ find / -name j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin > but with the search directed to the entire system > you can expect that this might take almost > forever. Much quicker would be > $ find /usr/ports/distfiles -name j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin > > > I looked at the permissions of the file. > > they were rw-r--r--. I changed it to > > rwxr-xr-x. Didnt make any difference. > > > > The only other thing i noticed was that the > > file is a .bin, and the file type is listed > > as a shell script. > > What file type? You mean > $ file j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin > responds with script? > It probably is and should be a Bourne shell script; > take a look inside and make sure it is the required > file and not just a URL of the true file. This > sometimes happens. > > Failing that check very-very carefully that the file > name in distfiles is exactly the same as that asked > for by make. > > Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 05:08:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90DC16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 05:08:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy07.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D38A43D3F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 05:08:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy07 [148.235.52.27]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I1N007VBFKHOK@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:07:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dup-200-64-114-216.prodigy.net.mx (du-200-64-114-216.prodigy.net.mx [200.64.114.216])(built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I1N0080CFKG46@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:07:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:17:19 -0500 From: Miguel Cardenas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200407300017.19291.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 X-imss-version: 2.5 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:15 M:2 S:5 R:5 X-imss-settings: Baseline:3 C:2 M:2 S:2 R:2 (0.5000 0.5000) Subject: Streaming audio with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 05:08:02 -0000 Hello list!! I'd like to know if there's a software to stream audio to a ShoutCast server... I tried on linux the shoutcast dj, but is too simple and just plays a list of mp3... I need to transmit a radio program and require to send voice, music and/or both if necesary... Found a *nix library libshout2 (don't remember the name right now) but has no full documentation and examples are too poor to develop my own simple application... If somebody knows of a mp3/ogg streamer to a shoutcast server I'd appreciate if you tell me, am experiencing some problems with transmision from inside of my LAN with windows through the firewall (stream passes fine but with drop-outs)... so I need to transmit directly from the *nix server... Thanks for any comment... Miguel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 05:53:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C10B16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 05:53:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de (gwdu60.gwdg.de [134.76.8.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2FF43D1F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 05:53:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gwdu60.gwdg.de (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6U5r9I9045054; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:53:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from localhost (kheuer2@localhost)i6U5r8lo045051; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:53:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: gwdu60.gwdg.de: kheuer2 owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:53:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Konrad Heuer To: jon In-Reply-To: <200407300443.i6U4h5DB082278@whoweb.com> Message-ID: <20040730070925.R5646@gwdu60.gwdg.de> References: <200407300443.i6U4h5DB082278@whoweb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 05:53:29 -0000 On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, jon wrote: > The mount_smbfs(8) command on 5.2.1 allows multiple mounts using the same > source and mount point. This sounds like a bug to me since other file > systems such as ufs return an error on such attempts. Anyone know of a > reason why this is allowed in mount_smbfs? Why shouldn't it be? The same holds true for nfs. And it really doesn't matter whether you mount via smbfs or nfs multiple times on the same client or once on multiple clients, does it? If you mount one or more times, if you use ufs or any other fs, it is always possible to write simultaneously to one and the same file leading to data loss. That's Unix since the early 1970s, isn't it? Of course you cannot mount a ufs more than once, but that's because the kernel needs to manage the buffer cache non-ambiguously to preserve data consistency in the fs structure. Regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheuer2@gwdg.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 06:31:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012FD16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:31:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from btito.demon.nl (btito.demon.nl [212.238.216.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A90D43D53 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:31:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@magicfingers.org) Received: from localhost.btito.local (localhost.btito.local [127.0.0.1]) by btito.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D691FB9A for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:30:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from btito.demon.nl (localhost.btito.local [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.btito.local (AvMailGate-2.0.2-6) id 18854-05AA4705; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:30:34 +0200 Received: from [10.185.240.49] (gateway.azr.nl [156.83.254.8]) by mail.btito.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A2E1FB99 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:30:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4109EB17.7060205@magicfingers.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:30:47 +0200 From: Bob Tito User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <20040729141746.S73006@cs.selu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040729141746.S73006@cs.selu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.2-6; AVE: 6.26.0.10; VDF: 6.26.0.51; host: cyrus.btito.local) Subject: Re: openssl/openssh from ports or base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:31:28 -0000 Jason P Holland wrote: >Hello, > >What is the preferred method that people are using for keeping openssl and >openssh up to date? Are most people using the ports version? Or the base >version? Seems like if there is a vunlerability released, its much easier >to cvsup the ports tree and reinstall. But if you use the base versions, >is there a way to update that without doing a complete >buildworld/installworld? Just curious what other freebsd users are doing. >Thanks > > I am quite happy with freebsd-update which fetches prebuild binaries if needed. Until now i fecthed updates just a couple of hours after an advisory. When using the GENERIC kernel you can get the updated kernel as well. Regards, Bob >Jason >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 06:34:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5193216A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:34:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail3.cableone.net [24.116.0.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E380243D53 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.122.85]) by smail3.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 29184608 for multiple; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:18:41 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:33:50 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx Message-Id: <20040730013350.7046e324@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <200407300017.19291.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> References: <200407300017.19291.mfcardenas@prodigy.net.mx> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Streaming audio with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:34:37 -0000 On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:17:19 -0500 Miguel Cardenas wrote: > Hello list!! > > I'd like to know if there's a software to stream audio to a > ShoutCast server... I tried on linux the shoutcast dj, but is too > simple and just plays a list of mp3... I need to transmit a radio > program and require to send voice, music and/or both if necesary... > > Found a *nix library libshout2 (don't remember the name right now) > but has no full documentation and examples are too poor to develop > my own simple application... > > If somebody knows of a mp3/ogg streamer to a shoutcast server I'd > appreciate if you tell me, am experiencing some problems with > transmision from inside of my LAN with windows through the firewall > (stream passes fine but with drop-outs)... so I need to transmit > directly from the *nix server... Search the ports using cast and shout... http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html is uber useful... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 09:02:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1611C16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:02:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1C143D60 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:02:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:04:54 -0500 Message-ID: <410A0E81.9090903@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:01:53 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mariano Guadagnini References: <200407300116.27351.mguadagnini@velocom.com.ar> In-Reply-To: <200407300116.27351.mguadagnini@velocom.com.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2004 09:04:55.0027 (UTC) FILETIME=[47DC7430:01C47614] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: backspace and delete keys behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:02:15 -0000 Mariano Guadagnini wrote: >Hi guys, I am new to Freebsd (after years of linux) and, althought system >installation and configuration was quite seamlessly, I've an issue with the >delete key of my keyboard (101 keys us layout): In xterm, the backspace key >works ok, but when I press del, it prints the "~" character, instead of >deleting . I have read it has something to do with keyboard layout config, >but I couldn't find out how to fix it. So, any ideas? > >Thanks, (and forgive my poor english) > > >Mariano Guadagnini >Argentina > > what does: >echo $TERM give you? It could possibly be the wrong terminal type --- try the following at the CLI (depending on which shell)... csh/tcsh: $setenv TERM xterm-color sh/bash: #TERM=xterm-color #export TERM HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 09:11:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D290A16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:11:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from york.smtp.ru (york.smtp.ru [62.118.249.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E7343D3F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:11:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lns@smtp.ru) Received: from [81.195.163.126] (account lns@smtp.ru HELO gugenot) by york.smtp.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 60228168 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:11:09 +0400 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.31a, engine: 4.31b, virus records: 52716, updated: 29.07.2004] From: "Nicholay Lastovka" To: "Freebsd-Questions@Freebsd. Org" Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:11:09 +0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: FW: portupgrade qw? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:11:40 -0000 Hi, I try to update pine, and make like this #portupgrade pine and see this string >/usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:35:in `require': No such file to load -- pkgtools (L >oadError)from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:35 where can i find information what need to do? thanks, as ever Phil From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 09:51:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7216016A4CF for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:51:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB22543D53 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:51:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6U9pVVG002744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:51:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6U9pUDK002743; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:51:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:51:30 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Darren Pilgrim Message-ID: <20040730095130.GB1956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Darren Pilgrim , questions@freebsd.org References: <000301c475d0$cf1ce040$132a15ac@spud> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000301c475d0$cf1ce040$132a15ac@spud> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:51:31 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Different sysinstall labelling behaviour when run post-install vs. during install? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:51:41 -0000 --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:01:50PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Yesterday I was upgrading the disk in one of my workstations. Since I was > planning on growing the filesystems for my FreeBSD install at the same ti= me, > I needed to manually create a new disklabel. I used sysinstall for this, > but ran into a problem: sysinstall doesn't allocate the partition letters, > with 'a' first, if you aren't doing an initial install. I ended up using > the "auto defaults" option to create the 'a' partition, then remove > everything and create them as I wanted. I'm glad to say that it worked o= ut > just fine, but this problem raises a couple of questions: >=20 > Why does sysinstall behave differently when run post-install? Interesting. I didn't know it did that. At a guess what may be happening is that sysinstall(8) is treating your disk as if it was the second or subsequent disk on the system. In which case, it probably wouldn't allocate an 'a' partition, which by convention contains a bootable image. =20 > How do I manually specify or change the partition letter to use? Don't use sysinstall(8). sysinstall is like the training wheels children use when learning to ride a bike: essential in the beginning, but once they've achieved some proficiency, the training wheels just get in the way. Use disklabel(8), or if you're running 5.x, bsdlabel(8). It's the same program either way, it just got renamed for 5.x. disklabel will let you examine and make arbitrary edits to the disk label. You can also use it to generate a disklabel automatically. To make the sort of changes you require, use 'disklabel -e' which will put you into an editor session showing the current disk label. Then just edit the 'partitions' section as required. When creating a new partition, you must fill in the 'size', 'offset' and 'fstype' fields. for ordinary 4.2BSD (ie UFS) partitions, the next three fields are hints to newfs(8) -- the default settings (fsize=3D1024, bsize=3D8192, bps/cpg=3D16) are a good first choice, but you can modify those at will =66rom the newfs(8) commandline. The cylinder number stuff after the '#' is generated automatically: you don't need to fill anything in there yourself. Once you've revamped the partitioning, you'll need to create filesystems to go inside those partitions. newfs(8) will create you a pristine new filesystem, or if you're feeling brave, you can use growfs(8) to extend a filesystem, but a) only where the old partition starts at exactly the same offset as the new one and b) only when the new partition is *larger* than the old one. growfs(8) is more often used with such things as vinum(8) -- for plain UFS partitions dumping the filesystem, modifying the drive layout, creating new filesystems and recovering the data from backup is generally the best way to do such things, and least likely to result in foot-shooting. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBChoiiD657aJF7eIRAo/zAJ0RVfEl4T/wtwNrvolUtCnd+9ubtQCgqKNc cjx2+5VvSVm8hE5O5C27DBo= =osMp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 09:56:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D0216A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:56:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fwall.in.markiza.sk (fwall.in.markiza.sk [62.168.76.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394B443D6A for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:56:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.markiza.sk [127.0.0.1]) by fwall.in.markiza.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4129E22FA4 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:56:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fwall.in.markiza.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fwall.in.markiza.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59509-09 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pleiades.aeternal.net (pleiades.in.markiza.sk [192.168.13.7]) by fwall.in.markiza.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6359122FA2 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pleiades.aeternal.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 76DAD1703C; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:01:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:01:15 +0200 From: Martin Hudec To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040730100115.GD20690@pleiades.aeternal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY" Content-Disposition: inline X-Copyright: (C) 2004 Martin Hudec X-Operating-System: FreeBSD pleiades.aeternal.net 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 i386 X-PGP-Key: http://www.aeternal.net/corwin_aeternal.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at web.markiza.sk Subject: postfix, saslauthd, pam_mysql - wrong username is being send X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Hudec List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:56:52 -0000 --xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I have postfix set up using saslauthd to authenticate against mysql database with pam_mysql. Usernames are stored in database like "user@domain.tld" (username with @ and domain is used because I have multiple domains virtualhosted there). But I am unable to authenticate because I am not getting whole username sent. I am getting just "username", not whole "username@domain.tld). Can anyone help and tell me how to get whole username to select from database please? In pam.conf: smtpd auth required pam_mysql.so user=3Dpostfix passwd=3D****** db=3Dpostfi= x table=3Dmailbox usercolumn=3Dusername passwdcolumn=3Dpassword crypt=3D1 smtp auth required pam_mysql.so user=3Dpostfix passwd=3D****** db=3Dpostfix= table=3Dmailbox usercolumn=3Dusername passwdcolumn=3Dpassword crypt=3D1 In smtpd.conf: pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: plain login In auth.log: Jul 30 11:46:02 amber postfix/smtpd[58005]: sql_select option missing Jul 30 11:46:02 amber postfix/smtpd[58005]: auxpropfunc error no mechanism = available=20 Jul 30 11:46:40 amber saslauthd[57854]: pam_mysql: select returned more tha= n one result Jul 30 11:46:40 amber saslauthd[57854]: do_auth : auth failure: [us= er=3Dtaker] [service=3Dsmtp] [realm=3Daeternal.net] [mech=3Dpam] [reason=3D= PAM auth error] NOTE: sql_select option missing and auxpropfunc error are there maybe because I miss some things in smtpd.conf. Correct? In maillog: Jul 30 11:46:40 amber postfix/smtpd[58005]: connect from unknown[192.168.0.= 39] Jul 30 11:46:40 amber postfix/smtpd[58005]: setting up TLS connection from = unknown[192.168.0.39] Jul 30 11:46:40 amber postfix/smtpd[58005]: TLS connection established from= unknown[192.168.0.39]: TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits) Jul 30 11:46:40 amber postfix/smtpd[58005]: warning: SASL authentication fa= ilure: Password verification failed Jul 30 11:46:40 amber postfix/smtpd[58005]: warning: unknown[192.168.0.39]:= SASL PLAIN authentication failed Jul 30 11:46:40 amber postfix/smtpd[58005]: lost connection after AUTH from= unknown[192.168.0.39] Jul 30 11:46:40 amber postfix/smtpd[58005]: disconnect from unknown[192.168= =2E0.39] In mysql.log: 040730 11:46:40 240 Connect postfix@localhost on postfix 240 Init DB postfix 240 Query SELECT password FROM mailbox WHERE user= name=3D'taker' 240 Quit Thank you, Martin --=20 Martin Hudec | corwin at aeternal.net | corwin at web.markiza.sk http://www.aeternal.net | cell +421 907 303 393 --xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBChxrZYEZIv+rgggRApJQAKCUgzJfq0fPjXYumUGQ71yfKdXYTgCfXybZ w/JWbjuJcsg9AofXcaIfUHw= =Z58B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 10:00:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D0816A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:00:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E33843D49 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:00:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 14616 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2004 10:00:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Jul 2004 10:00:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC25141; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:00:32 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (it.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34361-04; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:00:31 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 320696D; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:00:31 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:00:29 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." Message-Id: <20040730130029.3b8e7525@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <410A0E81.9090903@daleco.biz> References: <200407300116.27351.mguadagnini@velocom.com.ar> <410A0E81.9090903@daleco.biz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro cc: Mariano Guadagnini cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: backspace and delete keys behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:00:43 -0000 On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:01:53 -0500 "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." wrote: > Mariano Guadagnini wrote: > > >Hi guys, I am new to Freebsd (after years of linux) and, althought system > >installation and configuration was quite seamlessly, I've an issue with the > >delete key of my keyboard (101 keys us layout): In xterm, the backspace key > >works ok, but when I press del, it prints the "~" character, instead of > >deleting . I have read it has something to do with keyboard layout config, > >but I couldn't find out how to fix it. So, any ideas? > > > >Thanks, (and forgive my poor english) > > > > > >Mariano Guadagnini > >Argentina > > > > > > what does: > > >echo $TERM > > give you? > > It could possibly be the wrong terminal type --- try the following > at the CLI (depending on which shell)... > > csh/tcsh: > > $setenv TERM xterm-color itetcu@it> /home/itetcu/.dc [12:26:07] 0 % echo $TERM xterm itetcu@it> /home/itetcu/.dc [12:58:58] 0 % setenv TERM xterm-color itetcu@it> /home/itetcu/.dc [12:59:11] 0 % echo $TERM xterm-color itetcu@it> /home/itetcu/.dc [12:59:15] 0 % das~~~~das Where the ~ are made by pressing delete. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 10:08:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A320216A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:08:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fwall.in.markiza.sk (fwall.in.markiza.sk [62.168.76.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F4943D41 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:08:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.markiza.sk [127.0.0.1]) by fwall.in.markiza.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A280022FA2 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:08:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fwall.in.markiza.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fwall.in.markiza.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61310-02 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:08:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pleiades.aeternal.net (pleiades.in.markiza.sk [192.168.13.7]) by fwall.in.markiza.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E058322FA4 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:08:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pleiades.aeternal.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id F0A131703C; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:12:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:12:37 +0200 From: Martin Hudec To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040730101237.GA21739@pleiades.aeternal.net> References: <20040730100115.GD20690@pleiades.aeternal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040730100115.GD20690@pleiades.aeternal.net> X-Copyright: (C) 2004 Martin Hudec X-Operating-System: FreeBSD pleiades.aeternal.net 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 i386 X-PGP-Key: http://www.aeternal.net/corwin_aeternal.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at web.markiza.sk Subject: Re: postfix, saslauthd, pam_mysql - wrong username is being send X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Hudec List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:08:19 -0000 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, just few moments after my posting, I have solved it by running saslauthd with -r :). Now I have possible conflict in password (sent password is crypted maybe and stored is in md5). --=20 Martin Hudec | corwin at aeternal.net | corwin at web.markiza.sk http://www.aeternal.net | cell +421 907 303 393 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCh8VZYEZIv+rgggRAsWHAJ9UY0ukdSdO9Xnfe25cuK9JJW0WiwCeIttn BMFY73knomaty3g//qPlBeg= =AUgi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 10:10:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FAF16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600CC43D45 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:10:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i6UA9vPv003064 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:09:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6UA9sNh003059; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:09:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:09:54 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Peter Ryan Message-ID: <20040730100954.GC1956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Peter Ryan , FreeBSD References: <1091156423.4109b9c733864@flounder.singnet.com.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GPJrCs/72TxItFYR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1091156423.4109b9c733864@flounder.singnet.com.sg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:09:57 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: java jdk14 install - cannot find file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:10:02 -0000 --GPJrCs/72TxItFYR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:00:23AM +0800, Peter Ryan wrote: > as part of the jdk14 install, i have to > download the file j2sdk-1_4_2_04-linux-i586.bin > from the sun web site and put it into the > /usr/ports/distfiles folder. > I did that - no problem. > I can see the file listed in the right place. >=20 > When i do the "Make", it aborts with an error. > It cannot find the file I just downloaded. The distfiles the java/jdk14 port is looking for are: % make -V DISTFILES j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip j2sdk-1_4_2-bin-scsl.zip bsd-jdk14-patches-6.t= ar.gz The first two of those should come from Sun's website, and the third =66rom the eyesbeyond.com site. What you've got is the distfile for the java/linux-sun-jdk14 port, which is required to bootstrap building the native java/jdk14 port. (You only need the java/linux-sun-jdk14 port the first time you build java/jdk14: after that you can use it to rebuild itself: just set NATIVE_BOOTSTRAP=3Dyes in the make(1) argument list) Actually, you haven't got quite the right distfile even now. It should be: % make -V DISTFILES j2sdk-1_4_2_05-linux-i586.bin (ie Patch level 05 rather than 04). Re-cvsup to make sure your ports tree is up to date, then: # cd /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14 # make install Assuming you'ld already got linux compatability mode enabled -- if you didn't before, it will be installed as a dependency. You may well need to reboot around this point to get that working properly. # cd ../jdk14 # make install and follow the instructions it prints out about how to get hold of the source code. Once you've got the native JDK installed, you can, if you wish, delete linux-sun-jdk14, but having it installed does no real harm other than taking up diskspace. Yes, it is inordinately complicated to install a native JDK from source. Blame Sun -- it's their licensing restrictions that mean this whole rigmarole is required. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --GPJrCs/72TxItFYR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCh5yiD657aJF7eIRAtu9AKCuA8a1DhGCNVdlSrqrwJPB5rJJLgCeInYo 22vgETk/eBfTTVk0qBhI+r8= =VRDy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GPJrCs/72TxItFYR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 10:57:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7070716A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:57:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from northgate.starhub.net.sg (northgate.starhub.net.sg [203.117.1.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EB143D3F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:57:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pryan@singnet.com.sg) Received: from DellDual (cm124.sigma234.maxonline.com.sg [218.212.234.124]) i6UAur97009316; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:56:57 +0800 (SST) Message-Id: <200407301056.i6UAur97009316@northgate.starhub.net.sg> From: "Peter Ryan" To: "'Matthew Seaman'" Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:56:28 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <20040730100954.GC1956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Thread-Index: AcR2HW7n6bKkec3XSNOo8p2RTRP/mAABLpJQ cc: 'FreeBSD' Subject: RE: java jdk14 install - cannot find file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pryan@singnet.com.sg List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:57:03 -0000 Thanks a lot Mathew, I have the 3 files you first mentioned, and, yes, I have the linux compatabilty set. I will try the cvsup and see if that sorts things out. I'm glad to hear others find this java installation far from simple. Many thanks Peter > > > > When i do the "Make", it aborts with an error. > > It cannot find the file I just downloaded. > > The distfiles the java/jdk14 port is looking for are: > > % make -V DISTFILES > j2sdk-1_4_2-src-scsl.zip j2sdk-1_4_2-bin-scsl.zip > bsd-jdk14-patches-6.tar.gz > > The first two of those should come from Sun's website, and > the third from the eyesbeyond.com site. > > What you've got is the distfile for the java/linux-sun-jdk14 > port, which is required to bootstrap building the native > java/jdk14 port. > (You only need the java/linux-sun-jdk14 port the first time you build > java/jdk14: after that you can use it to rebuild itself: just > set NATIVE_BOOTSTRAP=yes in the make(1) argument list) > > Actually, you haven't got quite the right distfile even now. It should > be: > > % make -V DISTFILES > j2sdk-1_4_2_05-linux-i586.bin > > (ie Patch level 05 rather than 04). Re-cvsup to make sure > your ports tree is up to date, then: > > # cd /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14 > # make install > > Assuming you'ld already got linux compatability mode enabled > -- if you didn't before, it will be installed as a > dependency. You may well need to reboot around this point to > get that working properly. > > # cd ../jdk14 > # make install > > and follow the instructions it prints out about how to get > hold of the source code. Once you've got the native JDK > installed, you can, if you wish, delete linux-sun-jdk14, but > having it installed does no real harm other than taking up diskspace. > > Yes, it is inordinately complicated to install a native JDK > from source. Blame Sun -- it's their licensing restrictions > that mean this whole rigmarole is required. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks > Savill Way > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow > Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., > SL7 1TH UK > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 10:57:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FDF16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:57:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F062143D31 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:57:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i6UAv7wG003444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:57:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i6UAv6Ql003443; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:57:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:57:06 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: StefanW@PObox.com Message-ID: <20040730105706.GD1956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , StefanW@PObox.com, questions@freebsd.org References: <20040730035157.0F52943D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mSxgbZZZvrAyzONB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040730035157.0F52943D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Message not sent from an IPv4 address, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:57:07 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040705, clamav-milter version 0.74a on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sysinstall errors and debug screen X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:57:14 -0000 --mSxgbZZZvrAyzONB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 08:52:08PM -0700, Stefan Warnke wrote: > when installing FreeBSD with Sysinstall it sometimes happens that an error > message comes up and the module couldn't get installed. Changing the medi= um > (CD or different ftp server) sometimes helps. It's not consistence, on one > machine I could install Samba 3 and MySQL 4, on another one I'm always > getting an error after a successful download. Samba 4 and MySql 3 can > install. Hmmm... I'd advise you to just skip adding any third party software packages during the initial installation. Once you've got FreeBSD up and running, you can install packages from the command line by: # pkg_add -r pkgname which will download the appropriate package from one of the FTP mirror sites, together with any other packages it depends on, and install them. Note that both the Samba 3 and MySQL 4 packages you want are slightly trickier to deal with as there are packages for several different versions of that software available. You'll also need to install both mysql-client and mysql-server ports. eg: # pkg_add -r mysql41-server # pkg_add -r mysql41-client You can see what packages are available by looking at eg. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Late= st/ (Warning: that downloads a list of about 11,000 packages). Change the 'packages-4.10-release' bit to whatever is appropriate for the FreeBSD version you're running. It's also the case that the samba3 package isn't available on any of the -RELEASE CDs or package collections, as it was only renamed to that /after/ the last release (4.10-RELEASE). (Before then it was called 'samba-devel'). However, see below for how to use ports, which is probably the best way around that problem. =20 > Can anyone tell me where to find the "debug screen" with the error messag= es? > What can I do to be able to install from the ports. I'm close to download > the packages from Samba.org and MySql.com instead of wasting time with > sysinstall. Pressing Alt-F2 together will get you to a screen with debug output, but only during the initial system installation: it doesn't work if you run sysinstall(8) as a regular program on an already installed system. As for downloading the sources from samba.org or mysql.com and compiling yourself: there's a very neat and simple way of doing that with the FreeBSD ports system. eg: # cd /usr/ports/databases/mysql41-server # make install See the handbook for details: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html and here's a series on OnLamp articles which explain many tricks of the trade: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/07/FreeBSD_Basics.html http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/09/18/FreeBSD_Basics.html Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --mSxgbZZZvrAyzONB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBCimCiD657aJF7eIRApByAJsGbJzBXOD+CsxO5BBK0uoSugYkTQCeP4mD XYITK+sXVkyHU81oVp30mqg= =P3ha -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mSxgbZZZvrAyzONB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 11:16:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D1E16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:16:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web40103.mail.yahoo.com (web40103.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A439843D48 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:16:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040730111626.54706.qmail@web40103.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [130.37.20.20] by web40103.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:16:26 PDT Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:16:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Dino Vliet To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Freebsd and AMD64 Opteron and SMP support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:16:27 -0000 Hi there, I'm in the middle of setting up a small company that will be selling it's products online. I have to offer 47/7 support and to start without too much costs I wanted to build this system with opensource technologies so I chose Freebsd, with postgreSQl as database engine and Aolserver as webserver because these are the tools I'm most comfortable with. Currently we are in the middle of deciding upon the hardware and to me a 2-way or 4-way Opteron server would be the best choice for the moment. However, I have some questions about this architecture and how Freebsd supports it. 1) Does Freebsd support a SMP system of the AMD64 architecture(Opterons) and which version should I use? Development of this system will start in September or October. 2) If not, should I consider using Suse Linux or are there any other contenders? 3) Is it wise to setup a database server and web server on the same box? 4) At the moment, the applications like postgresql and aolserver in the ports collection are 32 bit applications? Will they be ported to 64 bit applications anytime soon? 5) Where can I find information about finetuning freebsd, postgresql and aolserver for performance and security? Many thanks folks, Brgds Dino Vliet __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 11:27:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF4516A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:27:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E52143D49 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:27:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from brillig.panix.com (brillig.panix.com [166.84.1.76]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F8948728 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:27:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01011587pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.181.2]) by brillig.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CDD2AA0E for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:27:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BqVXr-0008TT-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:27:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:27:27 -0400 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20040730112727.GA32528@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 07:20:29 up 62 days, 8:10, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.08, 0.01 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Repeated lockups with 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:27:29 -0000 I have 15 or so older PC's, moslty HP Vectra PII's all taking input on one or more of the serial ports and ultimately displaying the results via Apache. We have ben doing this for 3+ years using various version of OpenBSD. A couple of weeks ago, I replaced one of these amchine (which was an older P1) with a newer PII'. Shortly after that it started locking up almost every day. The symptom was always the same, a starnge checkerboard looking pattern on the monitor, and absolute hard lockup. Need to pll the poer cord to reset the machine. I fiddles around a while, and changed various parts on this amchine, but never did solve the problem. Then about a week ago, I replaced that machine with a totaly different one. The original "bad" machine passed memory, and hard drive tests, and has been running in the lab WO crashing for almos a week now. Yesterday, the "new" machine locked up in the exact same way. Help! Foes anyone have any ideas? Are there any know issues with 4.10, and serial ports? Thanks for any input whatsover. -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 11:29:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C756F16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:29:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from n2sw.com (n2sw.webair.com [216.130.191.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951EE43D31 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:29:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from webairsteve (unknown [216.130.191.71]) by n2sw.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BC25C20EE; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:29:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <021a01c47642$51378a50$47bf82d8@webairsteve> From: "Steve" To: "stan" , "Free BSD Questions list" References: <20040730112727.GA32528@teddy.fas.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:34:27 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: Repeated lockups with 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:29:39 -0000 do you have anything in dmesg, logs, any cores, etc ...... -- Steve Rieger ICQ # 5956607 yahoo IM riegersteve ----- Original Message ----- From: "stan" To: "Free BSD Questions list" Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 4:27 AM Subject: Repeated lockups with 4.10 > I have 15 or so older PC's, moslty HP Vectra PII's all taking input on one > or more of the serial ports and ultimately displaying the results via > Apache. We have ben doing this for 3+ years using various version of > OpenBSD. > > A couple of weeks ago, I replaced one of these amchine (which was an older > P1) with a newer PII'. Shortly after that it started locking up almost > every day. The symptom was always the same, a starnge checkerboard looking > pattern on the monitor, and absolute hard lockup. Need to pll the poer cord > to reset the machine. > > I fiddles around a while, and changed various parts on this amchine, but > never did solve the problem. Then about a week ago, I replaced that machine > with a totaly different one. The original "bad" machine passed memory, and > hard drive tests, and has been running in the lab WO crashing for almos a > week now. > > Yesterday, the "new" machine locked up in the exact same way. > > Help! Foes anyone have any ideas? Are there any know issues with 4.10, and > serial ports? > > Thanks for any input whatsover. > > -- > "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve > neither liberty nor safety." > -- Benjamin Franklin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 11:44:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B43316A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:44:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rader.servnow.com (rader.servnow.com [69.93.129.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616FB43D39 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:44:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from 12-202-252-157.client.insightbb.com ([12.202.252.157] helo=familysquires.net) by rader.servnow.com with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1BqVoa-0001T3-Pi; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:44:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 06:44:44 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael L. Squires" X-X-Sender: mikes@familysquires.net To: Joshua Tinnin In-Reply-To: <200407291223.04271.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Message-ID: <20040730064342.L35382@familysquires.net> References: <200407291223.04271.krinklyfig@spymac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: mikes@siralan.org X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - rader.servnow.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - siralan.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: Problem updating xorg-clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:44:49 -0000 I just built xorg from scratch under 5.2-CURRENT (of the past few days) and didn't have this problem. Mike Squires On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > I'm getting an error message (below) when trying to upgrade the xorg-clients > port, and I'm not at all sure how to fix it. Am running 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 with > xorg-6.7.0_1. > > - jt > > making all in programs/xhost... > cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp -ansi -pedantic -Wno-system-headers -Dasm=__asm > -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef -I/usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc > -I/usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/exports/include -I/usr/X11R6/include > -DCSRG_BASED -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DTCPCONN -DUNIXCONN > -DHAS_STICKY_DIR_BIT -DHAS_FCHOWN -DIPv6 -DBSD44SOCKETS > -DXVENDORNAME='"The X.Org Foundation"' -DXVENDORNAMESHORT='"X.Org"' -c > xhost.c > xhost.c: In function `change_host': > xhost.c:423: error: syntax error before "siaddr" > xhost.c:434: error: `siaddr' undeclared (first use in this function) > xhost.c:434: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > xhost.c:434: error: for each function it appears in.) > xhost.c: In function `get_hostname': > xhost.c:883: error: `XServerInterpretedAddress' undeclared (first use in this > function) > xhost.c:883: error: `sip' undeclared (first use in this function) > xhost.c:884: warning: ISO C89 forbids mixed declarations and code > xhost.c:888: error: syntax error before ')' token > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/programs/xhost. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients/work/xc/programs. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-clients. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade99236.6 > make > ** Fix the problem and try again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 12:20:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111C016A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:20:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C3B43D64 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:20:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94294251981; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:20:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <410A3D3C.5000008@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:21:16 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040729) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mariano Guadagnini References: <200407300116.27351.mguadagnini@velocom.com.ar> In-Reply-To: <200407300116.27351.mguadagnini@velocom.com.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: backspace and delete keys behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:20:50 -0000 Mariano Guadagnini wrote: > Hi guys, I am new to Freebsd (after years of linux) and, althought system > installation and configuration was quite seamlessly, I've an issue with the > delete key of my keyboard (101 keys us layout): In xterm, the backspace key > works ok, but when I press del, it prints the "~" character, instead of > deleting . I have read it has something to do with keyboard layout config, > but I couldn't find out how to fix it. So, any ideas? > > Thanks, (and forgive my poor english) > Add this to ~/.Xdefaults XTerm*vt100.translations: #override \n\ Delete: string(0x04) \n which maps Ctrl-D to the DEL key, then run % xrdb < ~/.Xdefaults to implement it (in the current X session). Note that this won't change the behaviour in the current xterm, but will in any new ones you open. HTH Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 12:58:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930C216A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:58:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao12.cox.net (lakermmtao12.cox.net [68.230.240.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F5D43D41 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:58:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james.coulter@cox.net) Received: from sabrina ([68.105.58.150]) by lakermmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP id <20040730125853.OGCK15342.lakermmtao12.cox.net@sabrina> for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:58:53 -0400 From: "James A. Coulter" To: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:58:51 -0500 Message-ID: <002501c47634$f68031f0$6e01a8c0@sabrina> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: DHCP and the "SIMPLE" option in /etc/rc.firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:58:54 -0000 I am setting up a firewall for a gateway/router running FreeBSD 4.10. This is for a small home LAN. I have already compiled and installed a custom kernel with the IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT options and configured the firewall to pass any to any without any problems - now it's time to start locking it down. I would like to use the firewall_type="SIMPLE" option rc.conf. But I'm not sure how I should set up my external nic in /etc/rc.firewall, i.e: # set these to your outside interface network and netmask and ip oif="ed0" onet="192.0.2.0" omask="255.255.255.240" oip="192.0.2.1" My outside interface is connected to a cable modem and is configured for DHCP Without a static IP address for my outside interface, how do I set these options? TIA for your help. Jim C. ----------------------------------- Check it out: The Black Dog Gallery http://polaris.umuc.edu/~jcoulter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 13:04:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90D716A4CE; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:04:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from northgate.starhub.net.sg (northgate.starhub.net.sg [203.117.1.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9EC43D1D; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:04:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pryan@singnet.com.sg) Received: from DellDual (cm124.sigma234.maxonline.com.sg [218.212.234.124]) i6UD4F97022469; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:04:22 +0800 (SST) Message-Id: <200407301304.i6UD4F97022469@northgate.starhub.net.sg> From: "Peter Ryan" To: "'Mark Ovens'" , "'Mariano Guadagnini'" Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:03:50 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <410A3D3C.5000008@freebsd.org> Thread-Index: AcR2L7s7whwuv8IIQ2SNmeEanwtMEAAA+u/A cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: backspace and delete keys behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pryan@singnet.com.sg List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:04:25 -0000 I've got the same thing on the 2 machines i am experimenting with. I am new and thought it was a standard feature :) I also defined a standard US 101 keyboard. Makes me think there is a setting or choice at installation that deals with this, rather than having to patch something. I counted my keys - there are 101. It looks as much like a standard US keyboard as anything else I have. My XF86Config file section for the keyboard contains Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "keyboard" option "XkbModel" "pc101" option "XkbLayout" "us" Could someone who this does not happen to tell me what is different in their file. I am running freeBSD 4.10 RELEASE Thanks Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Mark Ovens > Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 20:21 > To: Mariano Guadagnini > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: backspace and delete keys behavior > > Mariano Guadagnini wrote: > > Hi guys, I am new to Freebsd (after years of linux) and, althought > > system installation and configuration was quite seamlessly, I've an > > issue with the delete key of my keyboard (101 keys us layout): In > > xterm, the backspace key works ok, but when I press del, it > prints the > > "~" character, instead of deleting . I have read it has > something to > > do with keyboard layout config, but I couldn't find out how > to fix it. So, any ideas? > > > > Thanks, (and forgive my poor english) > > > > Add this to ~/.Xdefaults > > XTerm*vt100.translations: #override \n\ > Delete: string(0x04) \n > > which maps Ctrl-D to the DEL key, then run > > % xrdb < ~/.Xdefaults > > to implement it (in the current X session). > > Note that this won't change the behaviour in the current > xterm, but will in any new ones you open. > > HTH > > Regards, > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 13:20:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E734B16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:20:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B23243D3F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:20:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040730131950.RZRV6319.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:19:50 -0400 From: "JJB" To: "James A. Coulter" , Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:19:49 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: <002501c47634$f68031f0$6e01a8c0@sabrina> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: DHCP and the "SIMPLE" option in /etc/rc.firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:20:08 -0000 The handbook Firewall section has been rewritten. It's temporally available from www.a1poweruser.com/FBSD_firewall/ as the Doc group works to sanitize the English. It incorporates the long awaited solution to getting ipfw + natd + stateful rules to function together, as well as OpenBSD pf firewall which is scheduled to become the third built in firewall software solution delivered with the FreeBSD install when 5.x ever makes it to the stable branch. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of James A. Coulter Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 8:59 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: DHCP and the "SIMPLE" option in /etc/rc.firewall I am setting up a firewall for a gateway/router running FreeBSD 4.10. This is for a small home LAN. I have already compiled and installed a custom kernel with the IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT options and configured the firewall to pass any to any without any problems - now it's time to start locking it down. I would like to use the firewall_type="SIMPLE" option rc.conf. But I'm not sure how I should set up my external nic in /etc/rc.firewall, i.e: # set these to your outside interface network and netmask and ip oif="ed0" onet="192.0.2.0" omask="255.255.255.240" oip="192.0.2.1" My outside interface is connected to a cable modem and is configured for DHCP Without a static IP address for my outside interface, how do I set these options? TIA for your help. Jim C. ----------------------------------- Check it out: The Black Dog Gallery http://polaris.umuc.edu/~jcoulter _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 13:30:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3DC16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:30:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A8E43D49 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:30:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.25] (parish.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.235.43]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A190625E421; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:30:29 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <410A4D93.5060800@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:30:59 +0100 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 7.0 (X11/20040729) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pryan@singnet.com.sg References: <200407301304.i6UD4F97022469@northgate.starhub.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <200407301304.i6UD4F97022469@northgate.starhub.net.sg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: 'Mariano Guadagnini' cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: backspace and delete keys behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:30:33 -0000 Peter Ryan wrote: > I've got the same thing on the 2 machines i am experimenting > with. I am new and thought it was a standard feature :) > > I also defined a standard US 101 keyboard. > > Makes me think there is a setting or choice at installation that > deals with this, rather than having to patch something. > Add keysym Delete = 0x04 to ~/.xmodmaprc and add xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc to ~/.xinitrc To implement this in a running X session type this in an xterm xmodmap -e "keysym Delete = 0x04" Actually, this is probably a better solution for the OP as it is global whereas my previous suggestion is xterm specific. HTH Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 13:33:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1976E16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:33:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from itc.com.ar (tserver.itc.com.ar [200.43.69.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2965743D45 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:33:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soporte@itc.com.ar) Received: from tecnica ([200.43.69.7]) by itc.com.ar (VisNetic.MailServer.v5.8.6.6) with SMTP id M41DFU for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:33:46 -0300 Message-ID: <000a01c47639$b4a8eec0$0332a8c0@internetxaire.com.ar> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?INTERCOM_SRL_-_Soporte_T=E9cnico?= To: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:32:48 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: contigmalloc1: size must not be 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:33:53 -0000 Hello List: I have a small problem. I have a motherboard M754LMR (Model A631M of = ALton) with agp Ali 1631 chipset.=20 This issue, I saw it from 5.0-Release and including 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10. = When the kernel boots, it give me a panic. The portion of dmesg: =20 ... npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interfaces pcib0: on motherboard pcib0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xD0000000-0xD7ffffff at = device 0.0 on pci panic: contigmalloc1: size must not be 0 Uptime: 0s Automatic reboot 15 second - press a key on the .... I proved all bios config possible (I think) but it did not work. I = proved upgrade the flashrom and it did not work. I proved with a release = newer, but the problem persisted.I proved with another agp card but it = did not work because the agp onboard desabling is dynamic, and when the = OS boots, it see the agp onboard too.The support's page of the provider = is down. www.pcware.com Today, I'm using 4.10-Release-p2 without agp support in the kernel. I = complied it with the line "devide agp" comented out, but I'd like to = add it. Somebody knows if there will be some special config for this Bios whit = this video chipset ? It will be a bug ? Any idea ? Thank you in advance .. Ezequiel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 13:40:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC0A16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:40:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from itc.com.ar (tserver.itc.com.ar [200.43.69.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC2843D64 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:40:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eferro@itc.com.ar) Received: from tecnica ([200.43.69.7]) by itc.com.ar (VisNetic.MailServer.v5.8.6.6) with SMTP id M41DFU for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:40:24 -0300 Message-ID: <001901c4763a$a16d6ba0$0332a8c0@internetxaire.com.ar> From: "Ezequiel" To: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:39:25 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: contigmalloc1: size must not be 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:40:26 -0000 Hello List: I have a small problem. I have a motherboard M754LMR (Model A631M of = ALton) with agp Ali 1631 chipset.=20 This issue, I saw it from 5.0-Release and including 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10. = When the kernel boots, it give me a panic. The portion of dmesg: =20 ... npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interfaces pcib0: on motherboard pcib0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xD0000000-0xD7ffffff at = device 0.0 on pci panic: contigmalloc1: size must not be 0 Uptime: 0s Automatic reboot 15 second - press a key on the .... I proved all bios config possible (I think) but it did not work. I = proved upgrade the flashrom and it did not work. I proved with a release = newer, but the problem persisted.I proved with another agp card but it = did not work because the agp onboard desabling is dynamic, and when the = OS boots, it see the agp onboard too.The support's page of the provider = is down. www.pcware.com Today, I'm using 4.10-Release-p2 without agp support in the kernel. I = complied it with the line "devide agp" comented out, but I'd like to = add it. Somebody knows if there will be some special config for this Bios whit = this video chipset ? It will be a bug ? Any idea ? Thank you in advance .. Ezequiel PD: Sorry for the previous mail with another account ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 13:48:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DF816A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:48:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF00343D5F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:48:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from brillig.panix.com (brillig.panix.com [166.84.1.76]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1031D98192; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:47:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01011587pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.181.2]) by brillig.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42462AA0E; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:47:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BqXjp-0000tA-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:47:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:47:57 -0400 From: stan To: Steve Message-ID: <20040730134757.GA3401@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Steve , Free BSD Questions list References: <20040730112727.GA32528@teddy.fas.com> <021a01c47642$51378a50$47bf82d8@webairsteve> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <021a01c47642$51378a50$47bf82d8@webairsteve> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 09:45:46 up 62 days, 10:35, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: Repeated lockups with 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:48:18 -0000 On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 07:34:27AM -0700, Steve wrote: > do you have anything in dmesg, logs, any cores, etc ...... Unfortunately no. It apears that teh systems are getting some sort of hardware intrupt (serial port?, disk I/O ?), and that they then corupt somthing, and since they are off in an iterupt, they never return. Is it possible to add any kernel debuging or something like that to try to track this? -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 13:52:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C602B16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:52:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from n2sw.com (n2sw.webair.com [216.130.191.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE1343D3F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:52:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@n2sw.com) Received: from webairsteve (unknown [216.130.191.71]) by n2sw.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7518020EE; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:52:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <04e001c47656$32737930$47bf82d8@webairsteve> From: "Steve" To: "stan" References: <20040730112727.GA32528@teddy.fas.com><021a01c47642$51378a50$47bf82d8@webairsteve> <20040730134757.GA3401@teddy.fas.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:56:45 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: Repeated lockups with 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:52:19 -0000 is it possible that bios is set to powersave those devices... -- Steve Rieger ICQ # 5956607 yahoo IM riegersteve ----- Original Message ----- From: "stan" To: "Steve" Cc: "Free BSD Questions list" Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 6:47 AM Subject: Re: Repeated lockups with 4.10 > On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 07:34:27AM -0700, Steve wrote: > > do you have anything in dmesg, logs, any cores, etc ...... > > Unfortunately no. It apears that teh systems are getting some sort of > hardware intrupt (serial port?, disk I/O ?), and that they then corupt > somthing, and since they are off in an iterupt, they never return. > > Is it possible to add any kernel debuging or something like that to try to > track this? > -- > "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve > neither liberty nor safety." > -- Benjamin Franklin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 13:52:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55DE16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:52:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849BB43D55 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:52:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.197.67] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1BqXoH-0007EY-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:52:33 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16650.21146.545960.835251@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:52:26 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200407301304.i6UD4F97022469@northgate.starhub.net.sg> References: <410A3D3C.5000008@freebsd.org> <200407301304.i6UD4F97022469@northgate.starhub.net.sg> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Subject: RE: backspace and delete keys behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:52:40 -0000 I don't know what shell you're using, but for whatever help it may be: I have stty erase '^?' in my ,cshrc. My .xinitrc also has this (commented out): xmodmap -e "keysym BackSpace = Delete" Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 14:35:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F3016A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:35:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao03.cox.net (lakermmtao03.cox.net [68.230.240.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D64C43D41 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:35:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james.coulter@cox.net) Received: from sabrina ([68.105.58.150]) by lakermmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP id <20040730143533.FHQI17122.lakermmtao03.cox.net@sabrina>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:35:33 -0400 From: "James A. Coulter" To: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:35:31 -0500 Message-ID: <002701c47642$77b9a230$6e01a8c0@sabrina> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: DHCP and the "SIMPLE" option in /etc/rc.firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:35:35 -0000 Thanks - I'm going to give the Stateful + NATD rule set a try. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of JJB > Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 8:20 AM > To: James A. Coulter; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: DHCP and the "SIMPLE" option in /etc/rc.firewall > > > The handbook Firewall section has been rewritten. > > It's temporally available from www.a1poweruser.com/FBSD_firewall/ > as the Doc group works to sanitize the English. > It incorporates the long awaited solution to > getting ipfw + natd + stateful rules to function together, > as well as OpenBSD pf firewall which is scheduled to become > the third built in firewall software solution delivered with > the FreeBSD install when 5.x ever makes it to the stable branch. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of > James A. Coulter > Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 8:59 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: DHCP and the "SIMPLE" option in /etc/rc.firewall > > I am setting up a firewall for a gateway/router running FreeBSD 4.10. > > This is for a small home LAN. > > I have already compiled and installed a custom kernel with > the IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT options and configured the > firewall to pass any to any without any problems - now it's > time to start locking it down. > > I would like to use the firewall_type="SIMPLE" option > rc.conf. But I'm not sure how I should set up my external > nic in /etc/rc.firewall, i.e: > > # set these to your outside interface network and netmask and ip > oif="ed0" > onet="192.0.2.0" > omask="255.255.255.240" > oip="192.0.2.1" > > My outside interface is connected to a cable modem and is > configured for DHCP > > Without a static IP address for my outside interface, how do > I set these options? > > TIA for your help. > > Jim C. > > ----------------------------------- > Check it out: The Black Dog Gallery http://polaris.umuc.edu/~jcoulter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 14:55:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C6116A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:55:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao07.cox.net (lakermmtao07.cox.net [68.230.240.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A7E43D1F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:55:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james.coulter@cox.net) Received: from sabrina ([68.105.58.150]) by lakermmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709) with ESMTP id <20040730145558.FXDK6416.lakermmtao07.cox.net@sabrina> for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:55:58 -0400 From: "James A. Coulter" To: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:55:53 -0500 Message-ID: <002801c47645$51cfcb50$6e01a8c0@sabrina> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:55:59 -0000 I am using FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router for a small home LAN. My outside interface (dc1) is connected to a cable modem and is configured = for DHCP. I have compiled and installed a custome kernel with IPFIREWALL and = IPDIVERT options and with a rule set allowing any to any with no problems I am in the process of adding a proper rule set to provide security. I = was referred to http://freebsd.a1poweruser.com:6088/FBSD_firewall/ and = installed the Stateful + NATD Rule Set modified for my outside interface, domain = name servers, and DHCP server. I can ping IP addresses and pass SMTP mail back and forth from the gateway/router and all machines on the LAN, but I cannot ping URLs - I = am getting "ping: cannot resolve www.freebsd.org: Host name lookup failure" errors. This is what ipfw -a list looks like: sara# ipfw -a list 00005 0 0 allow ip from any to any via xl0 00010 52 3640 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00014 0 0 divert 8668 ip from any to any in recv dc1 00015 0 0 check-state 00020 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to 68.105.161.20 53 keep-state = out xmit dc1 setup 00021 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to 68.1.18.25 53 keep-state out = xmit dc1 setup 00022 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to 68.10.16.30 53 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00030 0 0 skipto 800 udp from any to 172.19.17.22 67 keep-state = out xmit dc1 00040 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 80 keep-state out xmit = dc1 setup 00050 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 443 keep-state out xmit = dc1 setup 00060 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 25 keep-state out xmit = dc1 setup 00061 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 110 keep-state out xmit = dc1 setup 00070 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from me to any uid root keep-state out = xmit dc1 setup 00080 0 0 skipto 800 icmp from any to any keep-state out xmit dc1 00090 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 37 keep-state out xmit = dc1 setup 00100 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 119 keep-state out xmit = dc1 setup 00110 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 22 keep-state out xmit = dc1 setup 00120 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 43 keep-state out xmit = dc1 setup 00130 0 0 skipto 800 udp from any to any 123 keep-state out xmit = dc1 00300 0 0 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in recv dc1 00301 0 0 deny ip from 172.16.0.0/12 to any in recv dc1 00302 0 0 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any in recv dc1 00303 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any in recv dc1 00304 0 0 deny ip from 0.0.0.0/8 to any in recv dc1 00305 0 0 deny ip from 169.254.0.0/16 to any in recv dc1 00306 0 0 deny ip from 192.0.2.0/24 to any in recv dc1 00307 0 0 deny ip from 204.152.64.0/23 to any in recv dc1 00308 0 0 deny ip from 224.0.0.0/3 to any in recv dc1 00315 0 0 deny tcp from any to any 113 in recv dc1 00320 0 0 deny tcp from any to any 137 in recv dc1 00321 0 0 deny tcp from any to any 138 in recv dc1 00322 0 0 deny tcp from any to any 139 in recv dc1 00323 0 0 deny tcp from any to any 81 in recv dc1 00330 0 0 deny ip from any to any in recv dc1 frag 00332 0 0 deny tcp from any to any in recv dc1 established 00360 0 0 allow udp from 172.19.17.22 to any 68 keep-state in recv = dc1 00370 0 0 allow tcp from any to me 80 limit src-addr 2 in recv dc1 setup 00370 0 0 allow tcp from any to me 8888 limit src-addr 2 in recv = dc1 setup 00380 0 0 allow tcp from any to me 22 limit src-addr 2 in recv dc1 setup 00400 0 0 deny log logamount 10 ip from any to any in recv dc1 00450 81 5288 deny log logamount 10 ip from any to any out xmit dc1 00800 0 0 divert 8668 ip from any to any out xmit dc1 00801 645 59255 allow ip from any to any 00999 0 0 deny log logamount 10 ip from any to any 65535 1 347 deny ip from any to any This is what my /etc/rc.conf looks like: hostname=3D"sara.mshome.net" ifconfig_dc1=3D"DHCP" ifconfig_dc0=3D"inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" firewall_enable=3D"YES" firewall_script=3D"/etc/ipfw.rules" firewall_logging=3D"YES" kern_securelevel_enable=3D"NO" linux_enable=3D"YES" moused_enable=3D"YES" named_enable=3D"YES" nfs_client_enable=3D"YES" nfs_reserved_port_only=3D"YES" nfs_server_enable=3D"YES" sendmail_enable=3D"YES" sshd_enable=3D"YES" usbd_enable=3D"YES" ntpd_enable=3D"YES" inetd_enable=3D"YES" gateway_enable=3D"YES" natd_enable=3D"YES" natd_interface=3D"dc1" natd_flags=3D"-dynamic" Finally, this is what /etc/resolv.conf looks like: sara# more /etc/resolv.conf search pn.at.cox.net nameserver 68.105.161.20 nameserver 68.1.18.25 nameserver 68.10.16.30 Any ideas? Thanks, Jim C. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 15:28:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6FC16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:28:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9210843D60 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:28:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 9175 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jul 2004 15:27:40 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2004 15:27:40 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.alphaque.com [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6UFN4q4072049; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:23:04 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:23:04 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair To: "James A. Coulter" In-Reply-To: <002501c47634$f68031f0$6e01a8c0@sabrina> Message-ID: <20040730231718.T483-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP and the "SIMPLE" option in /etc/rc.firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:28:07 -0000 On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, James A. Coulter wrote: > Without a static IP address for my outside interface, how do I set these > options? you could 1. use 'me' (without quotes) to represent the ip address in rc.firewall OR 2. hack up an /etc/dhclient-exit-hooks which grabs the new ip address and reruns rc.firewall with this new address Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 16:43:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D83C16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:43:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from whoweb.com (whoweb.com [216.38.168.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4904843D54 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:43:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailist@whoweb.com) Received: from whoweb.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whoweb.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6UGhV62092695; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:43:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mailist@localhost) by whoweb.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6UGhVTC092694; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:43:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:43:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Incoming Mail List Message-Id: <200407301643.i6UGhVTC092694@whoweb.com> To: jon@whoweb.com, kheuer2@gwdg.de In-Reply-To: <20040730070925.R5646@gwdu60.gwdg.de> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:43:06 -0000 >Why shouldn't it be? Because it's counterintuitive. Unless there's a method to use the multiple mount points as separate entry points to the file system for specialized program transactions similar to the Tru64 FFM file system, what's the point of having it mount itself back over itself on the same mount point? If nothing else, it creates more entries in the mount table and wastes resources. >And it really doesn't matter whether you mount via smbfs or nfs multiple >times on the same client or once on multiple clients, does it? No, it's not a technical issue for the OS, but it can make for painful system management. If you create an application that allows users to mount up a windows share to access it, you could end up with an unlimited number of mounts for the same file system. When it comes time to unmount that file system, if you haven't kept track of how many times it was mounted you'll have to keep inspecting the mount points to determine when the last unmount has occured or your file system will still be mounted. The application can certainly check the mount status when called upon to mount the file system, but it is convenient to depend upon the mount system calls (in the case of ufs) to return an error when the file system is already mounted. Is there a technical requirement, or benefit, for allowing multiple smbfs mounts of a windows share on the same mount point? ---------------------- > The mount_smbfs(8) command on 5.2.1 allows multiple mounts using the same > source and mount point. This sounds like a bug to me since other file > systems such as ufs return an error on such attempts. Anyone know of a > reason why this is allowed in mount_smbfs? Why shouldn't it be? The same holds true for nfs. And it really doesn't matter whether you mount via smbfs or nfs multiple times on the same client or once on multiple clients, does it? If you mount one or more times, if you use ufs or any other fs, it is always possible to write simultaneously to one and the same file leading to data loss. That's Unix since the early 1970s, isn't it? Of course you cannot mount a ufs more than once, but that's because the kernel needs to manage the buffer cache non-ambiguously to preserve data consistency in the fs structure. Regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheuer2@gwdg.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 17:02:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id E3CCA16A4CF; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20040730170200.E3CCA16A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:02:01 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2003/03/09 22:09:31 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions, -newbies or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from Majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions mailing list! If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list, you can send mail to "Majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG" with the following command in the body of your email message: unsubscribe freebsd-questions Greg Lehey Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions, -newbies or -hackers? =================================================== Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In addition, the FreeBSD-newbies list caters specifically for people who are new to FreeBSD and may be having trouble getting used to the environment. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If you're new to FreeBSD, and the message is about your own relationship to FreeBSD, send the message to FreeBSD-newbies. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.4 2003/03/09 22:09:31 grog Exp $ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 17:02:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id E6C2916A4CE; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20040730170200.E6C2916A4CE@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm constantly updating it. Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 17:33:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69E516A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:33:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns2.brasilsat.com.br (ns2.brasilsat.com.br [200.250.169.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB24143D53 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:33:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cra@kftec.com.br) Received: from kftec.com.br ([192.168.2.200])i6UIe7FJ007370 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:40:17 -0300 Received: from 33KFPGS/SpoolDir by kftec.com.br (Mercury 1.47); 30 Jul 04 16:38:08 -0300 Received: from SpoolDir by 33KFPGS (Mercury 1.47); 30 Jul 04 16:37:21 -0300 Received: from kftec.com.br (192.168.10.200) by kftec.com.br (Mercury 1.47) with ESMTP; 30 Jul 04 16:34:33 -0300 Message-ID: <410A85C9.8DB77C10@kftec.com.br> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:30:49 -0300 From: Cleyton Agapito X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------E397F5F55FCCEEC7AB293B4F" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: I18N throubles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:33:27 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------E397F5F55FCCEEC7AB293B4F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all, Please, i need same help, i have same throubles with I18N, i knew that others peoples have the same question in other lists too, but i cant find a answer. Like described in chapter 15 of handbook in administraton level setup, i created brasil class in /etc/login.conf: brasil:Brazillian Users Accounts:\ :charset=ISO-8859-1:\ :lang=pt_BR.ISO8859-1:\ :tc=default: and vipw: cleyton:(etc):(etc):(etc):brasil:0:0:Cleyton Agapito:/home/cleyton:/usr/bin/bash When I login i got the "brasil" class no found error. My console terminal is cons25l1 (in /etc/ttys) The rc.conf is: font8x16="iso-8x16" font8x14="iso-8x14" font8x8="iso-8x8" keymap="us.iso.acc" When I try compose in console mode i get "´a", "´c","~a", and in xterm only a beep. I did a file name with these character in konqueror (that works fine) and they appears like "?" in console and xterm. I´m using a 5.2-RL in a K6-II 550 with sis530 board. Best regards, Cleyton --------------E397F5F55FCCEEC7AB293B4F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 17:42:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BF116A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:42:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1052343D5E for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:42:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tschutt@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 78so98437rnl for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.164.39 with SMTP id m39mr247386rne; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <12abd8c2040730104259ea346e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:42:00 -0400 From: Tim Schutt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: amavisd/clamav Virus Recipient email notification template woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:42:12 -0000 Hi list, I've got postfix/amavisd/clamav configured on my mailserver, but I am having trouble getting the notification emails to format properly. I pulled the standard template out of the amavisd tarball right off their site, but the notification emails continuously come through blank, and all the usual headers are stripped out of it. I have postfix running under it's own user, and amavisd/clamav running under a secondary user/group exclusive to themselves (the same user for both processes). I've verified that the template file references in amavisd.conf are pointing to the correct location, and the files themselves are readable from the user that amavisd & clamav run under. Am I missing anything here, or where else should I be looking for errors that will tell me why this isn't working? Thanks in advance!! Tim tim@square1consulting.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 17:56:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E5F16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:56:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from host.bsdhost.net (host.bsdhost.net [66.160.134.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1343343D2F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:56:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fred@bsdhost.net) Received: from beaujon-1-81-57-7-31.fbx.proxad.net ([81.57.7.31] helo=[172.16.1.3]) by host.bsdhost.net with asmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BqbSE-000Odz-No for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:46:02 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: fred@bsdhost.net Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:55:35 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Subject: problem with clamav X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:56:16 -0000 Hello, Since two days I have a problem with clamav. The daemon clamd is clogging my CPU. I have try to update the port. I have tryed the devel version in the ports. I have also tryed the snapshot from clamav and the problem is still here. # top ... PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 2122 clamav 60 0 9512K 8168K RUN 6:27 95.80% 95.80% clamd ... I am running 4.10. Does someone experiance this or have already seen this ? Fred From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 17:56:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58EA16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:56:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADE143D54 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:56:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3908569A39; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:55:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:55:56 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Cleyton Agapito Message-Id: <20040730135556.73bc5722.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <410A85C9.8DB77C10@kftec.com.br> References: <410A85C9.8DB77C10@kftec.com.br> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I18N throubles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:56:52 -0000 Cleyton Agapito wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > Please, i need same help, i have same throubles with I18N, i knew > that others peoples have the same question in other lists too, but i > cant find a answer. > Like described in chapter 15 of handbook in administraton level > setup, i created brasil class in /etc/login.conf: >=20 > brasil:Brazillian Users Accounts:\ > :charset=3DISO-8859-1:\ > :lang=3Dpt_BR.ISO8859-1:\ > :tc=3Ddefault: Did you run cap_mkdb after updating this? > and vipw: >=20 > cleyton:(etc):(etc):(etc):brasil:0:0:Cleyton > Agapito:/home/cleyton:/usr/bin/bash >=20 > When I login i got the "brasil" class no found error. >=20 > My console terminal is cons25l1 (in /etc/ttys) >=20 > The rc.conf is: >=20 > font8x16=3D"iso-8x16" > font8x14=3D"iso-8x14" > font8x8=3D"iso-8x8" > keymap=3D"us.iso.acc" >=20 > When I try compose in console mode i get "=B4a", "=B4c","~a", and in xterm > only a beep. I did a file name with these character in konqueror (that > works fine) and they appears like "?" in console and xterm. >=20 > I=B4m using a 5.2-RL in a K6-II 550 with sis530 board. >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > Cleyton --=20 Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 18:20:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F26516A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:20:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC5D43D2D for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:20:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040730181937.TTVD2023.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:19:37 -0400 From: "JJB" To: "James A. Coulter" , Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:19:36 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: <002801c47645$51cfcb50$6e01a8c0@sabrina> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:20:37 -0000 Change this ipfw rule from 00005 allow ip from any to any via xl0 To 00005 allow ip from any to any via dc0 because dc0 is the lan interface name and not xl0. Change these statement in rc.conf because you have interface name backwards. Dc1 is the NIC connected to your cable modem and you want to get DHCP info from your ISP. Dc0 is the NIC connected to your LAN. From ifconfig_dc1="DHCP" ifconfig_dc0="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" to ifconfig_dc0="DHCP" ifconfig_dc1="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" You do not say how your LAN PCs get their ip address. You can hard code them on each LAN PC or you have to run isc-dhcp-server on your Gateway box to auto assign ip address to LAN PCs. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of James A. Coulter Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 10:56 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Firewall Rule Set not allowing access to DNS servers? I am using FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router for a small home LAN. My outside interface (dc1) is connected to a cable modem and is configured for DHCP. I have compiled and installed a custome kernel with IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT options and with a rule set allowing any to any with no problems I am in the process of adding a proper rule set to provide security. I was referred to http://freebsd.a1poweruser.com:6088/FBSD_firewall/ and installed the Stateful + NATD Rule Set modified for my outside interface, domain name servers, and DHCP server. I can ping IP addresses and pass SMTP mail back and forth from the gateway/router and all machines on the LAN, but I cannot ping URLs - I am getting "ping: cannot resolve www.freebsd.org: Host name lookup failure" errors. This is what ipfw -a list looks like: sara# ipfw -a list 00005 0 0 allow ip from any to any via xl0 00010 52 3640 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00014 0 0 divert 8668 ip from any to any in recv dc1 00015 0 0 check-state 00020 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to 68.105.161.20 53 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00021 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to 68.1.18.25 53 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00022 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to 68.10.16.30 53 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00030 0 0 skipto 800 udp from any to 172.19.17.22 67 keep-state out xmit dc1 00040 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 80 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00050 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 443 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00060 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 25 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00061 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 110 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00070 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from me to any uid root keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00080 0 0 skipto 800 icmp from any to any keep-state out xmit dc1 00090 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 37 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00100 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 119 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00110 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 22 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00120 0 0 skipto 800 tcp from any to any 43 keep-state out xmit dc1 setup 00130 0 0 skipto 800 udp from any to any 123 keep-state out xmit dc1 00300 0 0 deny ip from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in recv dc1 00301 0 0 deny ip from 172.16.0.0/12 to any in recv dc1 00302 0 0 deny ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any in recv dc1 00303 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any in recv dc1 00304 0 0 deny ip from 0.0.0.0/8 to any in recv dc1 00305 0 0 deny ip from 169.254.0.0/16 to any in recv dc1 00306 0 0 deny ip from 192.0.2.0/24 to any in recv dc1 00307 0 0 deny ip from 204.152.64.0/23 to any in recv dc1 00308 0 0 deny ip from 224.0.0.0/3 to any in recv dc1 00315 0 0 deny tcp from any to any 113 in recv dc1 00320 0 0 deny tcp from any to any 137 in recv dc1 00321 0 0 deny tcp from any to any 138 in recv dc1 00322 0 0 deny tcp from any to any 139 in recv dc1 00323 0 0 deny tcp from any to any 81 in recv dc1 00330 0 0 deny ip from any to any in recv dc1 frag 00332 0 0 deny tcp from any to any in recv dc1 established 00360 0 0 allow udp from 172.19.17.22 to any 68 keep-state in recv dc1 00370 0 0 allow tcp from any to me 80 limit src-addr 2 in recv dc1 setup 00370 0 0 allow tcp from any to me 8888 limit src-addr 2 in recv dc1 setup 00380 0 0 allow tcp from any to me 22 limit src-addr 2 in recv dc1 setup 00400 0 0 deny log logamount 10 ip from any to any in recv dc1 00450 81 5288 deny log logamount 10 ip from any to any out xmit dc1 00800 0 0 divert 8668 ip from any to any out xmit dc1 00801 645 59255 allow ip from any to any 00999 0 0 deny log logamount 10 ip from any to any 65535 1 347 deny ip from any to any This is what my /etc/rc.conf looks like: hostname="sara.mshome.net" ifconfig_dc1="DHCP" ifconfig_dc0="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_script="/etc/ipfw.rules" firewall_logging="YES" kern_securelevel_enable="NO" linux_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" named_enable="YES" nfs_client_enable="YES" nfs_reserved_port_only="YES" nfs_server_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" ntpd_enable="YES" inetd_enable="YES" gateway_enable="YES" natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="dc1" natd_flags="-dynamic" Finally, this is what /etc/resolv.conf looks like: sara# more /etc/resolv.conf search pn.at.cox.net nameserver 68.105.161.20 nameserver 68.1.18.25 nameserver 68.10.16.30 Any ideas? Thanks, Jim C. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 18:53:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E5916A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:53:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CDC43D31 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C6C69A3F; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:51:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:51:43 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Cleyton Agapito Message-Id: <20040730145143.61dbe5f7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <410A9766.511BD0DB@kftec.com.br> References: <410A85C9.8DB77C10@kftec.com.br> <20040730135556.73bc5722.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <410A9766.511BD0DB@kftec.com.br> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I18N throubles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:53:13 -0000 Cleyton Agapito wrote: > > I did=B4t find this stantment in man pages :-(=20 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dcap_mkdb&apropos=3D0&sektion=3D0= &manpath=3DFreeBSD+5.2-RELEASE+and+Ports&format=3Dhtml Please keep the mailing list CCed. > Bill Moran wrote: >=20 > > Cleyton Agapito wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Please, i need same help, i have same throubles with I18N, i knew > > > that others peoples have the same question in other lists too, but i > > > cant find a answer. > > > Like described in chapter 15 of handbook in administraton level > > > setup, i created brasil class in /etc/login.conf: > > > > > > brasil:Brazillian Users Accounts:\ > > > :charset=3DISO-8859-1:\ > > > :lang=3Dpt_BR.ISO8859-1:\ > > > :tc=3Ddefault: > > > > Did you run cap_mkdb after updating this? > > > > > and vipw: > > > > > > cleyton:(etc):(etc):(etc):brasil:0:0:Cleyton > > > Agapito:/home/cleyton:/usr/bin/bash > > > > > > When I login i got the "brasil" class no found error. > > > > > > My console terminal is cons25l1 (in /etc/ttys) > > > > > > The rc.conf is: > > > > > > font8x16=3D"iso-8x16" > > > font8x14=3D"iso-8x14" > > > font8x8=3D"iso-8x8" > > > keymap=3D"us.iso.acc" > > > > > > When I try compose in console mode i get "=B4a", "=B4c","~a", and in = xterm > > > only a beep. I did a file name with these character in konqueror (that > > > works fine) and they appears like "?" in console and xterm. > > > > > > I=B4m using a 5.2-RL in a K6-II 550 with sis530 board. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Cleyton > > > > -- > > Bill Moran > > Potential Technologies > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" >=20 --=20 Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 18:59:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B550E16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:59:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dhumketu.homeunix.net (dialpool-210-214-234-138.maa.sify.net [210.214.234.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5B843D6B for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:59:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@dhumketu.cjb.net) Received: by dhumketu.homeunix.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 223D03F0; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:27:43 +0530 (IST) Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:27:42 +0530 From: Shantanoo To: Sandbox Video Productions Message-ID: <20040730185742.GB71243@dhumketu.homeunix.net> Mail-Followup-To: Sandbox Video Productions , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040729014700.41645.qmail@web14106.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040729014700.41645.qmail@web14106.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Hmmm... I dunno X-OS: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE i386 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE vs Gnome X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:59:58 -0000 +++ Sandbox Video Productions [freebsd] [28-07-04 18:47 -0700]: | IF i install both gnome & kde. how do i choose which | one i want to start up. It seem that it only starts | the GUI that was installed last. | check out ~/.xinitrc for kde: echo "exec startke" > ~/.xinitrc for gnome: echo "exec gnome-session" > ~/.xinitrc Regards, Shantanoo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 19:03:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A7C16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:03:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns2.brasilsat.com.br (ns2.brasilsat.com.br [200.250.169.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA9643D1F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:03:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cra@kftec.com.br) Received: from kftec.com.br ([192.168.2.200])i6UKAUFJ007897 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:10:37 -0300 Received: from 33KFPGS/SpoolDir by kftec.com.br (Mercury 1.47); 30 Jul 04 18:08:28 -0300 Received: from SpoolDir by 33KFPGS (Mercury 1.47); 30 Jul 04 18:08:01 -0300 Received: from kftec.com.br (192.168.10.200) by kftec.com.br (Mercury 1.47) with ESMTP; 30 Jul 04 18:07:52 -0300 Message-ID: <410A9B96.A93492F9@kftec.com.br> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:03:50 -0300 From: Cleyton Agapito X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <410A85C9.8DB77C10@kftec.com.br> <20040730135556.73bc5722.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20040730145143.61dbe5f7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------476DD6E9D5A0610EA1F88C93" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: I18N throubles X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:03:54 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------476DD6E9D5A0610EA1F88C93 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sorry Bill, i didnt have intend. Thanks very much, i will try. Maybe it must to be include in handbook too. Thanks again Bill Moran wrote: > Cleyton Agapito wrote: > > > > I did´t find this stantment in man pages :-( > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=cap_mkdb&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+5.2-RELEASE+and+Ports&format=html > > Please keep the mailing list CCed. > > > Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > Cleyton Agapito wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Please, i need same help, i have same throubles with I18N, i knew > > > > that others peoples have the same question in other lists too, but i > > > > cant find a answer. > > > > Like described in chapter 15 of handbook in administraton level > > > > setup, i created brasil class in /etc/login.conf: > > > > > > > > brasil:Brazillian Users Accounts:\ > > > > :charset=ISO-8859-1:\ > > > > :lang=pt_BR.ISO8859-1:\ > > > > :tc=default: > > > > > > Did you run cap_mkdb after updating this? > > > > > > > and vipw: > > > > > > > > cleyton:(etc):(etc):(etc):brasil:0:0:Cleyton > > > > Agapito:/home/cleyton:/usr/bin/bash > > > > > > > > When I login i got the "brasil" class no found error. > > > > > > > > My console terminal is cons25l1 (in /etc/ttys) > > > > > > > > The rc.conf is: > > > > > > > > font8x16="iso-8x16" > > > > font8x14="iso-8x14" > > > > font8x8="iso-8x8" > > > > keymap="us.iso.acc" > > > > > > > > When I try compose in console mode i get "´a", "´c","~a", and in xterm > > > > only a beep. I did a file name with these character in konqueror (that > > > > works fine) and they appears like "?" in console and xterm. > > > > > > > > I´m using a 5.2-RL in a K6-II 550 with sis530 board. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Cleyton > > > > > > -- > > > Bill Moran > > > Potential Technologies > > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > Bill Moran > Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com --------------476DD6E9D5A0610EA1F88C93-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 19:06:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D97916A4CF for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:06:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from demos.bsdclusters.com (demos.bsdclusters.com [69.55.225.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3309C43D49 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:06:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kmacy@eventdriven.org) Received: from demos.bsdclusters.com (demos [69.55.225.36]) i6UJ5rHL010590 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:05:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kmacy@eventdriven.org) Received: from localhost (kmacy@localhost)i6UJ5rBU010586 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:05:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: demos.bsdclusters.com: kmacy owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:05:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Kip Macy X-X-Sender: kmacy@demos.bsdclusters.com To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040730120426.B53188@demos.bsdclusters.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Serverworks chipset support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:06:15 -0000 Can I anticipate any problems running FreeBSD on the ServerWorks HT-LE chipset (AMD64)? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 19:23:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A2B16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:23:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out001.verizon.net (out001pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7976143D49 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:23:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.100.95]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040730192252.KQYB25313.out001.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:22:52 -0500 Message-ID: <410AA009.7000702@mac.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:22:49 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Limoncelli References: <9C51062C-E0E9-11D8-B4EB-000D93C2342A@whatexit.org> In-Reply-To: <9C51062C-E0E9-11D8-B4EB-000D93C2342A@whatexit.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [68.161.100.95] at Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:22:52 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting up good certs for ports/mail/imap-uw? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:23:59 -0000 Tom Limoncelli wrote: > The instructions for ports/mail/imap-uw tell you that "make cert" > generates certs that are self-signed and warns you that it is better to > get "real" certs but doesn't explain how to do that. Any suggestions? "real" certs are ones signed by a well-known registrar like Verisign, EnTrust, Thawte, etc. To get one, you generate a CSR (certificate signing request) as done in "make cert", only you send that CSR to the registrar and pay them to sign it, very much like one does when getting a "real" SSL cert to do HTTPS. There is nothing magic about the well-known registrars, except that their CA certificates already ship as pre-trusted with the email clients and web browsers that most people use. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 19:30:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C18A16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:30:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D8843D3F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:30:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 1587 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2004 19:30:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Jul 2004 19:30:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C642DB0; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:30:16 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (it.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10972-05; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:30:16 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4570A6D; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:30:16 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:30:15 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: fred@bsdhost.net Message-Id: <20040730223015.58d5b496@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with clamav X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:30:45 -0000 On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:55:35 +0200 fred@bsdhost.net wrote: > > Hello, > > Since two days I have a problem with clamav. The daemon clamd is > clogging my CPU. > I have try to update the port. I have tryed the devel version in the > ports. I have also tryed the snapshot from clamav and the problem is > still here. > > # top > ... > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 2122 clamav 60 0 9512K 8168K RUN 6:27 95.80% 95.80% clamd > ... > > I am running 4.10. > > Does someone experiance this or have already seen this ? I believe this diff against devel-20040728 would resolve your problem: --- matcher-bm.c.bk Mon Jul 19 13:54:40 2004 +++ matcher-bm.c Thu Jul 29 21:59:42 2004 @@ -91,11 +91,27 @@ void cli_bm_free(struct cl_node *root) {7 + struct cli_bm_patt *b1, *b2; + int i; + if(root->bm_shift) free(root->bm_shift); - if(root->bm_suffix) + if(root->bm_suffix) { + for(i = 0; i < 65536; i++) { + b1 = root->bm_suffix[i]; + while(b1) { + b2 = b1; + b1 = b1->next; + if (b2->virname) + free(b2->virname); + if (b2->pattern) + free(b2->pattern); + free(b2); + } + } free(root->bm_suffix); + } } int cli_bm_scanbuff(const char *buffer, unsigned int length, const char **virname, const struct cl_node *root) -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 19:38:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8AA16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:38:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7258543D45 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:38:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lashby@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 75so53476rnl for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.92.11 with SMTP id p11mr113415rnb; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9cd98d120407301237e31f8ef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:37:53 -0500 From: Logan Ashby To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <12abd8c2040730104259ea346e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <12abd8c2040730104259ea346e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: amavisd/clamav Virus Recipient email notification template woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:38:33 -0000 On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:42:00 -0400, Tim Schutt wrote: > I've got postfix/amavisd/clamav configured on my mailserver, but I am > having trouble getting the notification emails to format properly. Virus and spam notifications are a bad idea. Both types of email forge the sender address, so notifications to the sender wind up going to a third party that can't do anything about the problem. Notices to the intended recipient are simply a waste of bandwidth. I know there are those who feel you should never discard mail, but in this case, I'm fine with it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 20:10:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF9016A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:10:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D4743D2F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:10:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A7869A39; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:09:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:09:47 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Logan Ashby Message-Id: <20040730160947.4fdbe0dd.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <9cd98d120407301237e31f8ef@mail.gmail.com> References: <12abd8c2040730104259ea346e@mail.gmail.com> <9cd98d120407301237e31f8ef@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amavisd/clamav Virus Recipient email notification template woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:10:41 -0000 Logan Ashby wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:42:00 -0400, Tim Schutt wrote: > > > I've got postfix/amavisd/clamav configured on my mailserver, but I am > > having trouble getting the notification emails to format properly. > > Virus and spam notifications are a bad idea. Both types of email > forge the sender address, so notifications to the sender wind up going > to a third party that can't do anything about the problem. Notices to > the intended recipient are simply a waste of bandwidth. > > I know there are those who feel you should never discard mail, but in > this case, I'm fine with it. Agreed. I actually have people on my blocklist because their virus protection continues to send me alerts that I "may have a virus on my system" If you're going to send notification, there is only one _proper_ way to do it: analyze the Received: headers and find out where the virus _really_ originated, then contact the abuse@ address for that domain with the message. Despite how easy this is to do, it doesn't seem like a lot of AV packages bother with it ... -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 20:30:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E811916A4CF for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:30:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pdx.chatusa.com (pdx.ChatUSA.com [205.238.41.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EA643D6B for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:30:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from longterm@pdx.chatusa.com) Received: from dannewxp (xmax.TeleSat.net [205.238.42.202] (may be forged)) by pdx.chatusa.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA29931 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <007401c47673$e0f18de0$ca2aeecd@dannewxp> From: "Dan" To: Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:28:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: freebsd How do you restart rc.conf without rebooting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dan List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:30:09 -0000 How do you restart rc.conf without rebooting your machine. Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 20:33:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4749416A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:33:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F00343D45 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:33:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5694169A39 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:32:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:32:30 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040730163230.63186325.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [OT] 64-bit PCI in 32-bit slots??? crazy?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:33:06 -0000 I'm inheriting some hardware. These boards have 64-bit PCI SATA cards jammed in 32-bit PCI slots. Oddly enough, the boxen boot and start Linux (which will be replaced with FreeBSD when I'm done) I guess my question is hardware-related. I mean, I can't believe this worked! Has anyone else seen/done this? Is this as crazy as it seems to me? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 20:43:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA20D16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:43:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from square1consulting.com (square1consulting.com [69.55.65.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8657543D3F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:43:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@square1consulting.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.square1consulting.com [127.0.0.1]) by square1consulting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F275F441C for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:43:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from square1consulting.com ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 58838-06 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:43:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.112] (roc-66-67-59-117.rochester.rr.com [66.67.59.117]) by square1consulting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8B64330 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:43:42 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) In-Reply-To: <20040730160947.4fdbe0dd.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <12abd8c2040730104259ea346e@mail.gmail.com> <9cd98d120407301237e31f8ef@mail.gmail.com> <20040730160947.4fdbe0dd.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <1F94DE30-E269-11D8-8A9E-000A27B47720@square1consulting.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Tim Schutt Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:43:33 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at square1consulting.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.9 tagged_above=-999.0 required=6.3 tests=AWL, USER_IN_WHITELIST X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: amavisd/clamav Virus Recipient email notification template woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:43:56 -0000 I completely understand where you are coming from, and I am only intending on notifying the intended recipient of the email, not the "sender" for the very reason that you note. If it was just me, I would can the message and be done with it. However, I am in the midst of marketing this service to some highly security conscious people so I would like the reinforcement of the notifications for their piece of mind and a little customer-stroking reminding them how great the service is. :-) Lame reason, maybe... but there is reasonable logic behind me wanting to do this. Tim. On Jul 30, 2004, at 4:09 PM, Bill Moran wrote: > If you're going to send notification, there is only one _proper_ way > to do it: > analyze the Received: headers and find out where the virus _really_ > originated, > then contact the abuse@ address for that domain with the message. > Despite how easy this is to do, it doesn't seem like a lot of AV > packages > bother with it ... > > -- > Bill Moran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 20:44:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D9716A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:44:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A6C43D1D for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:44:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i6UKhmQl045575; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:43:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:43:48 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20040730204348.GI9911@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20040730163230.63186325.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040730163230.63186325.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] 64-bit PCI in 32-bit slots??? crazy?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:44:02 -0000 In the last episode (Jul 30), Bill Moran said: > I'm inheriting some hardware. > > These boards have 64-bit PCI SATA cards jammed in 32-bit PCI slots. Oddly > enough, the boxen boot and start Linux (which will be replaced with > FreeBSD when I'm done) > > I guess my question is hardware-related. I mean, I can't believe this > worked! Has anyone else seen/done this? Is this as crazy as it seems to > me? Nope; you can put 64-bit cards in 32-bit slots as long as the card has the notch in the right place so it fits over one end of the slot. You can also put 32-bit cards in 64-bit slots. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 20:46:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CDE16A4D0 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:46:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tcbug.org (12-218-40-24.client.mchsi.com [12.218.40.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BCA43D68 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:46:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from friar_josh@ns1.tcbug.org) Received: by ns1.tcbug.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id C1655BB9A; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:47:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:47:02 -0500 From: Josh Paetzel To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20040730204702.GF3588@ns1.tcbug.org> References: <20040730163230.63186325.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040730163230.63186325.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] 64-bit PCI in 32-bit slots??? crazy?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:46:53 -0000 On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 04:32:30PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > I'm inheriting some hardware. > > These boards have 64-bit PCI SATA cards jammed in 32-bit PCI slots. Oddly > enough, the boxen boot and start Linux (which will be replaced with FreeBSD > when I'm done) > > I guess my question is hardware-related. I mean, I can't believe this > worked! Has anyone else seen/done this? Is this as crazy as it seems to > me? > > -- > Bill Moran I have a friend that is using a 64 bit SCSI card (29160 adaptec if memory serves) and it's backwards compatable with 32 bit slots Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 21:00:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA2316A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:00:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F9943D55 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:00:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lashby@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 76so74702rnk for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.9.5 with SMTP id 5mr279471rni; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9cd98d1204073014004ec42a6c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:00:16 -0500 From: Logan Ashby To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1F94DE30-E269-11D8-8A9E-000A27B47720@square1consulting.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <12abd8c2040730104259ea346e@mail.gmail.com> <9cd98d120407301237e31f8ef@mail.gmail.com> <1F94DE30-E269-11D8-8A9E-000A27B47720@square1consulting.com> Subject: Re: amavisd/clamav Virus Recipient email notification template woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:00:31 -0000 On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:43:33 -0400, Tim Schutt wrote: > Lame reason, maybe... but there is reasonable logic behind me wanting > to do this. That's understandable, but it may well backfire on you. I would be just as irritated at receiving hundreds, possibly thousands of notices that a virus wasn't delivered as I would at actually getting them. A once a day digest of stats on how many were blocked would work, but I don't know of any OSS packages that can do that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 21:27:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D7A16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:27:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F5E43D60 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:27:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhrider@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x17so6196cwb for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.122.19 with SMTP id u19mr37726cwc; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ceee7040730142679f8f0e5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:26:38 -0700 From: Dan Finn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: correct way to upgrade ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:27:10 -0000 I have seen a few threads lately about ssh and upgrading/updating it. What is the correct method for updating ssh that was installed as part of the base system. Uninstall and install openssh from ports? Thanks Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 21:31:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A4616A4CF for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:31:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bdc.corp.cetlink.net (rhsc-corp-gw.cetlink.net [209.198.2.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0179443D68 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:31:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff@cetlink.net) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:31:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1EF727B655B5344F8A08DCBCF5F4BB231537D7@bdc.corp.cetlink.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Apache 2.0.50 port is busted Thread-Index: AcR2fIWP6eYEUjI0QziwoIrZIPRXLQ== From: "Jeffrey Wheat" To: Subject: Apache 2.0.50 port is busted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:31:16 -0000 Has anyone else attempted to build the apache-2.0.50 port from cvs'd port tree a couple hours ago? I am trying to=20 build this on a 5.2.1 (i386) box and it looks like the=20 libtool bug is as present as ever: grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_dir.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_dir.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_dir.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=3Dinstall cp mod_imap.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_imap.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_imap.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_imap.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=3Dinstall cp mod_actions.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_actions.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_actions.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_actions.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. This happens for every module during the build. This server is a fresh install (today). I tried this yesterday with a fresh install and had=20 the same results. The 2.0.48 port will build and install correctly though. If anyone knows why this is happening, I would appreciate an email as I=20 had to unsubscribe from the lists due to too much other email already. Thanks! Jeffrey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 21:43:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1104116A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:43:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.bitfreak.org (mail.bitfreak.org [65.75.198.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF53243D5A for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:43:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmp@bitfreak.org) Received: from speck.techno.pagans (c-24-21-241-225.client.comcast.net [24.21.241.225]) by mail.bitfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FC22A477; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:43:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spud (spud.techno.pagans [172.21.42.19]) by speck.techno.pagans (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F6017022; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:43:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Darren Pilgrim" To: "'Matthew Seaman'" Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:43:05 -0700 Message-ID: <000a01c4767e$358a27e0$132a15ac@spud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <20040730095130.GB1956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Different sysinstall labelling behaviour when run post-install vs. during install? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:43:31 -0000 > From: Matthew Seaman [mailto:m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk] > > > How do I manually specify or change the partition letter to use? > > Don't use sysinstall(8). sysinstall is like the training wheels > children use when learning to ride a bike: essential in the beginning, > but once they've achieved some proficiency, the training wheels just > get in the way. The last time I used disklabel was on a 4.2-R system. That nasty little creature required you to calculate sector counts and offsets by hand and hope it didn't barf with errors about c not covering the entire disk or partition overlaps, despite your calculations indicating otherwise. It's nice to see it has evolved a bit since then. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 21:47:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E9116A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:47:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFF543D60 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:47:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eccmqv@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 75so58671rnl for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.92.31 with SMTP id p31mr62528rnb; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <65006f5e0407301446275a085f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:46:56 -0400 From: Dew Ediho To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040730205102.BBC6416A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040730205102.BBC6416A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Automated Account & Principle Creation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:47:12 -0000 I need to automate user account creation (useradd) in FreeBSD, I have a list of user information in comma seperated file. I also need to automate kerberos principle creation with the same set of information. any suggestions? I have considered autoexpect and perl, but is there a script out there that already achieves the same goal? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 21:48:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5407E16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:48:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.catacombs.de (mail.catacombs.de [80.67.228.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3875743D67 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:48:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beisser@lefti.net) Received: from hauntedhouse (pD9E91776.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.233.23.118]) (authenticated bits=0) by alpha.catacombs.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6ULlSrx085841; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:47:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from beisser@lefti.net) From: "Alexander Liebau" To: "Jeffrey Wheat" , Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:45:55 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1EF727B655B5344F8A08DCBCF5F4BB231537D7@bdc.corp.cetlink.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on alpha.catacombs.de Subject: AW: Apache 2.0.50 port is busted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:48:12 -0000 i had the same problem, asked the same questions and noone was able to help :/ -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]Im Auftrag von Jeffrey Wheat Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juli 2004 23:31 An: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Betreff: Apache 2.0.50 port is busted Has anyone else attempted to build the apache-2.0.50 port from cvs'd port tree a couple hours ago? I am trying to build this on a 5.2.1 (i386) box and it looks like the libtool bug is as present as ever: grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_dir.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_dir.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_dir.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=install cp mod_imap.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_imap.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_imap.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_imap.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. /usr/ports/www/apache2/work/httpd-2.0.50/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=install cp mod_actions.la /usr/local/libexec/apache2/ grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_actions.la: No such file or directory grep: /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_actions.la: No such file or directory Warning! dlname not found in /usr/local/libexec/apache2/mod_actions.la. Assuming installing a .so rather than a libtool archive. This happens for every module during the build. This server is a fresh install (today). I tried this yesterday with a fresh install and had the same results. The 2.0.48 port will build and install correctly though. If anyone knows why this is happening, I would appreciate an email as I had to unsubscribe from the lists due to too much other email already. Thanks! Jeffrey _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 21:55:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9308516A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:55:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zero.ics.uci.edu (zero.ics.uci.edu [128.195.1.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5092D43D62 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:55:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drio@ics.uci.edu) Received: from kurene.ics.uci.edu (kurene.ics.uci.edu [128.195.38.105]) by zero.ics.uci.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6ULs506001623 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by kurene.ics.uci.edu (Postfix, from userid 505) id B78291459FC; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:55:49 -0700 From: David Rio Deiros To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040730215549.GA630@ics.uci.edu> References: <89ceee7040730142679f8f0e5@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <89ceee7040730142679f8f0e5@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-100, required 5, USER_IN_WHITELIST) Subject: Re: correct way to upgrade ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:55:24 -0000 > I have seen a few threads lately about ssh and upgrading/updating it. > What is the correct method for updating ssh that was installed as part > of the base system. Uninstall and install openssh from ports? As you say, openssh is part of the base system. So just follow the typical process (handbook is our friend) and update your sources, compile and so on. David. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 21:57:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A443116A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:57:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.tele.fi (smtp.tele.fi [192.89.123.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF3043D5D for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:57:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from taina.kalintiv@benefon.fi) Received: from bensrv02.benefon.fi (gw.benefon.fi [194.197.24.10]) by smtp.tele.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C5D42CE1 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:56:51 +0300 (EEST) Received: from bensrv05.benefon.fi ([192.83.5.21]) by bensrv02.benefon.fi (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 2004073100563582:38775 ; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 00:56:35 +0300 From: taina.kalintiv@benefon.fi To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 01:00:21 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on BenSrv05/Benefon(Release 5.0.9 |November 16, 2001) at 31.07.2004 01:00:23,16, 2001) at 31.07.2004 00:56:35, 2001) at 31.07.2004 00:56:37, Serialize complete at 31.07.2004 00:56:37 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Taina Kalintiv Tak/Benefon is out of the office. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:57:19 -0000 I will be out of the office from 03.07.2004 until 09.08.2004. I have started my summer vacation. While I`m on vacation, please contact to Benefon`s Sales Office, email: salesoffice@benefon.fi. Notice! Because of vacations, Benefon factory and Sales Office are totally close from 5.7.2004 until 19.7.2004. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 30 22:15:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48A416A4CF for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:15:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from access.inet.co.th (access.inet.co.th [203.151.127.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5F643D41 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:15:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from _HOSTNAME_ (TruPPP0D147.inet.co.th [203.151.127.147]) by access.inet.co.th (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with SMTP id i6UMEPbE048142; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 05:14:26 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 31 Jul 2004 05:22:14 +0700 From: "User &" Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 05:22:14 +0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Stas D. Myasnikov" , JJB , "Daniel O'Connor" Message-ID: <20040730222214.GA2329@thai-aec.org> Mail-Followup-To: pirat , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Stas D. Myasnikov" , JJB , Daniel O'Connor References: <20040626013553.GA22207@thai-aec.org> <200406271408.06114.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20040626013553.GA22207@thai-aec.org> <20040626031957.GA22708@thai-aec.org> <20040626013553.GA22207@thai-aec.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=tis-620 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406271408.06114.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20040626013553.GA22207@thai-aec.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD firak.thai-aec.org 4.10-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE www-home-page: http://www.thai-aec.org www-FreeBSD-page: http://www.thai.net/makham Subject: Re: can not make ltmdm ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:15:21 -0000 On Saturday, 26 June 2004 at 8:35:53 +0700, pirat wrote: > Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 08:35:53 +0700 > From: pirat > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: can not make ltmdm ports > > hi sirs, > > my laptop is dell inspiron 1100 with Conexant D480 MDC modem controller. > i tried to compile ltmdm from ports but strange enough, it failed. i spent > about 2 months in looking or searching from internet if there were > any one else can use that modem in that machin with freebsd. > > finally, i have to come back to my box and decide to make from ports. > as mentioned above, make failed. can any one please helps me or explains me > why do make failed ? > > other informations about dell inspiron 1100 are attached. > thanks in advanced fro any helps and hints. > > > -- > with best regards, > psr > > http://www.thai-aec.org > http://www.thai.net/makham > >From root@inspiron.thai-aec.org Sat Jun 26 08:13:35 2004 > Return-Path: > Received: from inspiron.thai-aec.org (inspiron.thai-aec.org [192.168.1.70]) > by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5Q1DZmA022143 > for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 08:13:35 +0700 (ICT) > (envelope-from root@inspiron.thai-aec.org) > Received: from inspiron.thai-aec.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by inspiron.thai-aec.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5Q17ZHP001148 > for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 08:07:35 +0700 (ICT) > (envelope-from root@inspiron.thai-aec.org) > Received: (from root@localhost) > by inspiron.thai-aec.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5Q17Y9b001147 > for pirat@firak.thai-aec.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 08:07:34 +0700 (ICT) > (envelope-from root) > Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 08:07:34 +0700 (ICT) > From: Charlie Root > Message-Id: <200406260107.i5Q17Y9b001147@inspiron.thai-aec.org> > To: pirat@firak.thai-aec.org > Status: RO > Content-Length: 2910 > Lines: 64 > > hostb0@pci0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x25608086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82845G/GL/GV/GE/PE DRAM Controller / Host-Hub I/F Bridge' > class = bridge > subclass = HOST-PCI > agp0@pci0:2:0: class=0x030000 card=0x01491028 chip=0x25628086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82845G/GL/GV/GE/PE Integrated Graphics Device' > class = display > subclass = VGA > uhci0@pci0:29:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x24c08086 chip=0x24c28086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801DB/DBM (ICH4/M) USB UHCI Controller #1' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > uhci1@pci0:29:1: class=0x0c0300 card=0x24c08086 chip=0x24c48086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801DB/DBM (ICH4/M) USB UHCI Controller #2' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > uhci2@pci0:29:2: class=0x0c0300 card=0x24c08086 chip=0x24c78086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801DB/DBM (ICH4/M) USB UHCI Controller #3' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > none0@pci0:29:7: class=0x0c0320 card=0x24c08086 chip=0x24cd8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801DB/DBM (ICH4/M) USB EHCI Controller' > class = serial bus > subclass = USB > pcib1@pci0:30:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x244e8086 rev=0x82 hdr=0x01 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801BA/CA/DB/EB/ER (ICH2/3/4/5/5R) Hub Interface to PCI Bridge' > class = bridge > subclass = PCI-PCI > isab0@pci0:31:0: class=0x060100 card=0x00000000 chip=0x24c08086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801DB (ICH4) LPC Interface Bridge' > class = bridge > subclass = PCI-ISA > atapci0@pci0:31:1: class=0x01018a card=0x24c08086 chip=0x24cb8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801DB (ICH4) UltraATA/100 EIDE Controller' > class = mass storage > subclass = ATA > pcm0@pci0:31:5: class=0x040100 card=0x01491028 chip=0x24c58086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801DB/DBM (ICH4/M) AC'97 Audio Controller' > class = multimedia > subclass = audio > > none1@pci0:31:6: class=0x070300 card=0x542214f1 chip=0x24c68086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = '82801DB/DBM (ICH4/M) AC'97 Modem Controller' > class = simple comms > > bfe0@pci2:1:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10284401 chip=0x440114e4 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > device = 'BCM440x 10/100 Integrated Ethernet Controller' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > cbb0@pci2:4:0: class=0x060700 card=0x01491028 chip=0xac56104c rev=0x00 hdr=0x02 > vendor = 'Texas Instruments (TI)' > device = 'PCI1510 PC card CardBus Controller' > class = bridge > subclass = PCI-CardBus > > > /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm# uname -a > FreeBSD inspiron.thai-aec.org 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #1: Tue Jun 22 16:41:37 ICT 2004 pirat@inspiron.thai-aec.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/INSPIRON i386 > > /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm# dmesg > > Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #1: Tue Jun 22 16:41:37 ICT 2004 > pirat@inspiron.thai-aec.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/INSPIRON > Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc08d3000. > Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/snd_pcm.ko" at 0xc08d31f4. > Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/snd_ich.ko" at 0xc08d32a0. > Preloaded acpi_dsdt "/boot/Dell.aml" at 0xc08d334c. > Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc08d3390. > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.20GHz (2192.89-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 > Features=0xbfebf9ff > real memory = 267161600 (254 MB) > avail memory = 251756544 (240 MB) > random: > Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled > ACPI: DSDT was overridden. > ACPI-0374: *** Info: Table [DSDT] replaced by host OS > npx0: [FAST] > npx0: on motherboard > npx0: INT 16 interface > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 > cpu0: on acpi0 > acpi_tz0: on acpi0 > acpi_acad0: on acpi0 > acpi_cmbat0: on acpi0 > acpi_lid0: on acpi0 > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > acpi_button1: on acpi0 > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > pcib0: slot 2 INTA is routed to irq 11 > pcib0: slot 29 INTA is routed to irq 11 > pcib0: slot 29 INTB is routed to irq 11 > pcib0: slot 29 INTC is routed to irq 11 > pcib0: slot 29 INTD is routed to irq 11 > pcib0: slot 31 INTB is routed to irq 11 > pcib0: slot 31 INTB is routed to irq 11 > agp0: mem 0xf6f80000-0xf6ffffff,0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci0 > agp0: detected 892k stolen memory > agp0: aperture size is 128M > uhci0: port 0xbf80-0xbf9f irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0 > uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci1: port 0xbf40-0xbf5f irq 11 at device 29.1 on pci0 > uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb1: on uhci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhci2: port 0xbf20-0xbf3f irq 11 at device 29.2 on pci0 > uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb2: on uhci2 > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) > pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0 > pci2: on pcib1 > pcib1: slot 1 INTA is routed to irq 11 > bfe0: mem 0xfcffe000-0xfcffffff irq 11 at device 1.0 on pci2 > miibus0: on bfe0 > bmtphy0: on miibus0 > bmtphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > bfe0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:56:31:fe:79 > bfe0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > cbb0: at device 4.0 on pci2 > cardbus0: on cbb0 > pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 > pcib1: slot 4 INTA is routed to irq 11 > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci0: port 0xbfa0-0xbfaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 > pcm0: port 0xcc40-0xcc7f,0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xf6f7f400-0xf6f7f4ff,0xf6f7f800-0xf6f7f9ff irq 11 at device 31.5 on pci0 > pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > pcm0: > pci0: at device 31.6 (no driver attached) > atkbdc0: port 0x66,0x62,0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: flags 0x1000 irq 12 on atkbdc0 > psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 > orm0: