From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 27 02:21:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017DD16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:21:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx0.metrocast.net (coltrane-mx.metrocast.net [65.175.128.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95CE743D46 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:21:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tenpin784@metrocast.net) Received: (qmail 17766 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2005 02:21:45 -0000 Received: from xwing.jbarbieri.net (HELO ?10.10.100.253?) (65.175.136.163) by coltrane-mx.metrocast.net with SMTP; 27 Mar 2005 02:21:45 -0000 Message-ID: <424618B7.9000500@metrocast.net> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:21:43 -0500 From: John Barbieri User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Thomas M. Skeren III" References: <42435FCE.9000807@metrocast.net> <424361ED.2090208@fsklaw.com> In-Reply-To: <424361ED.2090208@fsklaw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with High Point Tech RocketRaid 1640 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:21:48 -0000 Turns out this happens on the i386 version, AND on FreeBSD 4.9. Im lost on what to do now. Is there any other program like Samba I could try? It only seems to happen when transferring with Samba too :( Thanks again John Thomas M. Skeren III wrote: > Hey John... > > Had many problems with operations and the amd 64 kernel. I switched > to the i386 kernel and have had no problems. > > John Barbieri wrote: > >> Good evening. >> >> Recently I setup a free bsd 5.3-amd64 box with dual opterons and 1GB >> of ram. >> >> >> I constructed a RAID 5 array using the HPT rocketraid 1640, >> conisiting of 4 disks, each with 200GB capacity. >> >> >> Everything worked well, until I installed and ran Samba from the >> ports collection. >> >> >> Now, apparently whenever I transfer with samba, the computer freezes >> for a few moments, then an array comes back, stating: >> >> Mar 24 13:14:12 tie kernel: hpt374: Device removed: controller 1 >> channel 3 >> Mar 24 13:14:12 tie kernel: hpt374: Device removed: controller 1 >> channel 1 >> >> >> >> The weird thing is, I transferred over 15GB of data over FTP, but the >> second I used Samba (which is usually faster, which is why i switched >> to it), the controller stated the two drives disconnected. >> >> >> How come I can transfer 15GB one way, and nothing the other? >> >> Now my RAID array is broken, and I lost all the data on it (which is >> ok, since I have it backed up). But this is my 2nd time doing this >> today, thinking maybe the first time was a fluke. >> >> >> info: >> >> FreeBSD tie.jbarbieri.net 5.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 #1: >> Wed Mar 23 21:01:23 EST 2005 >> John@tie.jbarbieri.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TIE amd64 >> >> pkg_info: >> >> autoconf-2.13.000227_5 Automatically configure source code on many >> Un*x platforms >> automake-1.4.6_1 GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator >> (legacy version >> cvsup-without-gui-16.1h General network file distribution system >> optimized for CVS >> gettext-0.14.1 GNU gettext package >> gmake-3.80_2 GNU version of 'make' utility >> libiconv-1.9.2_1 A character set conversion library >> libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (version 1.3) >> libtool-1.5.10_1 Generic shared library support script (version 1.5) >> linux_base-8-8.0_6 Base set of packages needed in Linux mode (only >> for i386) >> m4-1.4.1 GNU m4 >> perl-5.8.5 Practical Extraction and Report Language >> popt-1.7 A getopt(3) like library with a number of >> enhancements, fro >> rpm-3.0.6_9 The Red Hat Package Manager >> samba-2.2.12 A free SMB and CIFS client and server for UNIX >> >> >> as you can see, not much installed. I just rebuilt this box last >> night as well >> >> If you have any ideas, please let me know. If you need more info, let >> me know. >> >> >> Thank you in advanced >> >> John Barbieri >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 27 19:55:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6362816A4CE; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:55:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B153143D39; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:55:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E831FF931; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:55:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 8FE101FF91D; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:55:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 5013D157E5; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455FC155EB; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:54:25 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: FreeBSD current mailing list Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: FreeBSD net mailing list Subject: test/review: plug mii leakage X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD net mailing list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:55:09 -0000 Hi, could you please test following patch: http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/mii-20050326-plug-leaks.diff Any feedback welcome. Thanks in advance. -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT Index: sys/dev/mii/mii.c =================================================================== RCS file: /local/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/dev/mii/mii.c,v retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -p -r1.25 mii.c --- sys/dev/mii/mii.c 16 Feb 2005 05:56:39 -0000 1.25 +++ sys/dev/mii/mii.c 26 Mar 2005 19:02:41 -0000 @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ miibus_probe(device_t dev) struct mii_attach_args ma, *args; struct mii_data *mii; device_t child = NULL, parent; - int bmsr, capmask = 0xFFFFFFFF; + int bmsr, capmask = 0xFFFFFFFF, count = 0; mii = device_get_softc(dev); parent = device_get_parent(dev); @@ -149,12 +149,24 @@ miibus_probe(device_t dev) args = malloc(sizeof(struct mii_attach_args), M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT); + if (args == NULL) { + device_printf(dev, "%s: memory allocation failure, " + "phyno %d", __func__, ma.mii_phyno); + continue; + } bcopy((char *)&ma, (char *)args, sizeof(ma)); child = device_add_child(dev, NULL, -1); + if (child == NULL) { + free(args, M_DEVBUF); + device_printf(dev, "%s: device_add_child failed", + __func__); + continue; + } device_set_ivars(child, args); + count++; } - if (child == NULL) + if (count == 0) return(ENXIO); device_set_desc(dev, "MII bus"); @@ -176,20 +188,40 @@ miibus_attach(device_t dev) */ mii->mii_ifp = device_get_softc(device_get_parent(dev)); v = device_get_ivars(dev); + if (v == NULL) + return (ENXIO); /* XXX */ ifmedia_upd = v[0]; ifmedia_sts = v[1]; ifmedia_init(&mii->mii_media, IFM_IMASK, ifmedia_upd, ifmedia_sts); - bus_generic_attach(dev); - return(0); + return(bus_generic_attach(dev)); } int miibus_detach(device_t dev) { struct mii_data *mii; + device_t *children, *childp; + int error, j, childcount = 0; + void *v; + + if (device_get_state(dev) != DS_ATTACHED) + return (EBUSY); - bus_generic_detach(dev); + device_get_children(dev, &children, &childcount); + for (j = 0, childp = children; j < childcount; j++, childp++) { + /* + * Free ivars but not before device_detach. + * miibus_child_* fuinctions still use them unchecked. + */ + v = device_get_ivars(*childp); + if ((error = device_detach(*childp)) != 0) + return (error); + if (v != NULL) { + device_set_ivars(*childp, NULL); + free(v, M_DEVBUF); + } + } mii = device_get_softc(dev); ifmedia_removeall(&mii->mii_media); mii->mii_ifp = NULL; @@ -300,12 +332,16 @@ mii_phy_probe(device_t dev, device_t *ch int bmsr, i; v = malloc(sizeof(vm_offset_t) * 2, M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT); - if (v == 0) { + if (v == NULL) { return (ENOMEM); } v[0] = ifmedia_upd; v[1] = ifmedia_sts; *child = device_add_child(dev, "miibus", -1); + if (*child == NULL) { + free(v, M_DEVBUF); + return (ENXIO); + } device_set_ivars(*child, v); for (i = 0; i < MII_NPHY; i++) { @@ -319,14 +355,23 @@ mii_phy_probe(device_t dev, device_t *ch } if (i == MII_NPHY) { + device_set_ivars(*child, NULL); + free(v, M_DEVBUF); device_delete_child(dev, *child); *child = NULL; return(ENXIO); } - bus_generic_attach(dev); + i = bus_generic_attach(dev); - return(0); + /* Free ivars as they are no longer needed. */ + v = device_get_ivars(*child); + if (v != NULL) { + device_set_ivars(*child, NULL); + free(v, M_DEVBUF); + } + + return(i); } /* From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 08:20:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADC616A4CE; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:20:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63D943D2D; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:20:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC8C1FF931; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:20:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id D7EC91FF91D; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:20:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 739C9153C4; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6970F15384; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:19:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: FreeBSD net mailing list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: FreeBSD current mailing list Subject: Re: test/review: plug mii leakage X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD net mailing list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:20:10 -0000 On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hi, > could you please test following patch: there is an updated one at http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/mii-20050327-plug-leaks.diff which plugs another leak found by jmg. > Any feedback welcome. > > Thanks in advance. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 11:01:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B5316A4FE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:01:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E9843D1F for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:01:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2SB1do0035445 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:01:39 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j2SB1bl6035438 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:01:37 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:01:37 GMT Message-Id: <200503281101.j2SB1bl6035438@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:01:39 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net [nfs] [patch] NFS root configurations wit 1 problem total. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 16:50:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C599516A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:50:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hanghau.pacific.net.hk (hanghau.pacific.net.hk [202.64.33.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2446F43D39 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmok@attglobal.net) Received: from [192.168.16.50] (154.159.17.210.fixed.pacific.net.hk [210.17.159.154]) by hanghau.pacific.net.hk with ESMTP id j2SGoAHf019173; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:50:11 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:50:08 +0800 From: John Mok User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <42344AF7.6070701@attglobal.net> <423C72A1.7060000@cronyx.ru> <4240497D.5030304@attglobal.net> <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Roman Kurakin Subject: Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:50:22 -0000 After issuing the following commands :- #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata lmi dlci0 ansi #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata rfc1490 dlci16 rfc1490 #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata dlci16 rl0 inet inet #ifconfig ng0 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 ifconfig: interface ng0 does not exist The command ifconfig shows :- rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet6 fe80::207:40ff:fe09:f09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.255.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.255.255 ether 00:07:40:09:0f:09 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=9 inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fec1:9c58%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ether 00:01:03:c1:9c:58 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=9 inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fe34:61af%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 192.168.16.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 ether 00:01:03:34:61:af media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 and the command "ngctl list" shows :- There are 4 total nodes: Name: ngctl811 Type: socket ID: 00000011 Num hooks: 0 Name: Type: frame_relay ID: 00000004 Num hooks: 1 Name: sync_ar1 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000002 Num hooks: 0 Name: sync_ar0 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 1 Would it be the problem that I test it with cable disconnected from the modem (i.e.CSU/DSU)? Thanks a lot. John Mok Julian Elischer wrote: > did the last command do anything? > > please show the output of: > ifconfig > ngctl list > > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 18:35:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B833F16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:35:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf10.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf10.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4600D43D3F for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:35:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from c0ldbyte@myrealbox.com) Received: from mxip14.cluster1.charter.net (mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.144])j2SIZBm9026914 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:35:11 -0500 Received: from 24.247.253.134.gha.mi.chartermi.net (HELO eleanor.us1.wmi.uvac.net) (24.247.253.134) by mxip14.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2005 13:35:09 -0500 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.91,128,1110171600"; d="scan'208"; a="117432865:sNHT169786568" Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:35:10 -0500 (EST) From: c0ldbyte To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> Message-ID: <20050328133403.E440@eleanor.us1.wmi.uvac.net> References: <42344AF7.6070701@attglobal.net> <423C72A1.7060000@cronyx.ru> <4240497D.5030304@attglobal.net> <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:35:12 -0000 On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, John Mok wrote: > > After issuing the following commands :- > > #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream > #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata lmi dlci0 ansi > #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata rfc1490 dlci16 rfc1490 > #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata dlci16 rl0 inet inet > #ifconfig ng0 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 > ifconfig: interface ng0 does not exist > > The command ifconfig shows :- > > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet6 fe80::207:40ff:fe09:f09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 192.168.255.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.255.255 > ether 00:07:40:09:0f:09 > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier > xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=9 > inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fec1:9c58%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > ether 00:01:03:c1:9c:58 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=9 > inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fe34:61af%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 > inet 192.168.16.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 > ether 00:01:03:34:61:af > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > and the command "ngctl list" shows :- > > There are 4 total nodes: > Name: ngctl811 Type: socket ID: 00000011 Num hooks: 0 > Name: Type: frame_relay ID: 00000004 Num hooks: 1 > Name: sync_ar1 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000002 Num hooks: 0 > Name: sync_ar0 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 1 > > Would it be the problem that I test it with cable disconnected from the modem > (i.e.CSU/DSU)? > > Thanks a lot. > > John Mok > > > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> did the last command do anything? >> >> please show the output of: >> ifconfig >> ngctl list >> You have ng_ether or ng_iface loaded ? From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 19:17:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3331716A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:17:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A36B43D1D for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:17:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0DA7A423; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:17:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <42485836.6030203@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:17:10 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Mok References: <42344AF7.6070701@attglobal.net> <423C72A1.7060000@cronyx.ru> <4240497D.5030304@attglobal.net> <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Roman Kurakin Subject: Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:17:11 -0000 what does "ngctl types" say? looks like you don't have all the right modules loaded.. John Mok wrote: > > After issuing the following commands :- > > #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream > #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata lmi dlci0 ansi > #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata rfc1490 dlci16 rfc1490 > #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata dlci16 rl0 inet inet > #ifconfig ng0 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 > ifconfig: interface ng0 does not exist are you SURE none of these returned an error? > > The command ifconfig shows :- > > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet6 fe80::207:40ff:fe09:f09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 192.168.255.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.255.255 > ether 00:07:40:09:0f:09 > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier > xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=9 > inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fec1:9c58%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > ether 00:01:03:c1:9c:58 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=9 > inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fe34:61af%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 > inet 192.168.16.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 > ether 00:01:03:34:61:af > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > and the command "ngctl list" shows :- > > There are 4 total nodes: > Name: ngctl811 Type: socket ID: 00000011 Num hooks: 0 > Name: Type: frame_relay ID: 00000004 Num hooks: 1 > Name: sync_ar1 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000002 Num hooks: 0 > Name: sync_ar0 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 1 > > Would it be the problem that I test it with cable disconnected from > the modem (i.e.CSU/DSU)? > > Thanks a lot. > > John Mok > > > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> did the last command do anything? >> >> please show the output of: >> ifconfig >> ngctl list >> >> From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 19:38:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052D416A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:38:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk (mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.0.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224AA43D46 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:38:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter.sewell@cl.cam.ac.uk) Received: from stem.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.9.62] helo=cl.cam.ac.uk) by mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.092 #1) id 1DG04E-0001F2-00 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:38:30 +0100 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:38:29 +0100 From: Peter Sewell Message-Id: Subject: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:38:32 -0000 [apologies to anyone who has seen this on the end-to-end list] Our recent technical reports may be of interest to BSD TCP/IP developers: TCP, UDP, and Sockets: rigorous and experimentally-validated behavioural specification. Volume 1: Overview UCAM-CL-TR-624 Volume 2: The Specification UCAM-CL-TR-625 They are available from together with the summary paper: Rigorous specification and conformance testing techniques for network protocols, as applied to TCP, UDP, and Sockets. These give a detailed and precise specification of the behaviour of three common TCP/IP stacks - versions of FreeBSD, Linux, and Windows XP - as seen from socket calls and the wire interface. The specification has been validated through extensive testing (primarily against FreeBSD for the TCP aspects). It models the actual observed behaviour, bugs and all, rather than an idealisation of the RFCs. The specification is annotated for the non-specialist reader, and we hope that it will be useful as an informal reference for stack implementors and for sockets users (supplementing the existing RFCs and books), as well as supporting automated conformance testing. Our techniques may be useful in the development of new protocols and extensions. We would greatly appreciate feedback, on both content and usability. Peter, for the Netsem team: Steve Bishop, Matthew Fairbairn, Michael Norrish, Peter Sewell, Michael Smith, Keith Wansbrough From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 23:53:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6714616A4D7 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:53:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cwb.pacific.net.hk (cwb.pacific.net.hk [202.14.67.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49C343D2D for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:53:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmok@attglobal.net) Received: from [192.168.16.50] (154.159.17.210.fixed.pacific.net.hk [210.17.159.154]) by cwb.pacific.net.hk with ESMTP id j2SNr9Ou024984; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:53:10 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <424898E3.8080007@attglobal.net> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:53:07 +0800 From: John Mok User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <42344AF7.6070701@attglobal.net> <423C72A1.7060000@cronyx.ru> <4240497D.5030304@attglobal.net> <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> <42485836.6030203@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <42485836.6030203@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:53:21 -0000 The command "ngctl types" shows :- There are 5 total types: Type name Number of living nodes --------- ---------------------- socket 1 rfc1490 0 lmi 0 frame_relay 0 sync_ar 2 What other modules are needed? How to add them, whether load them dynamically or compiled into kernel? Thanks a lot. John Mok Julian Elischer wrote: > what does > "ngctl types" > say? > > looks like you don't have all the right modules loaded.. > > > John Mok wrote: > >> >> After issuing the following commands :- >> >> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream >> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata lmi dlci0 ansi >> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata rfc1490 dlci16 rfc1490 >> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata dlci16 rl0 inet inet >> #ifconfig ng0 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 >> ifconfig: interface ng0 does not exist > > > > > are you SURE none of these returned an error? > >> >> The command ifconfig shows :- >> >> rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> options=8 >> inet6 fe80::207:40ff:fe09:f09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 >> inet 192.168.255.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.255.255 >> ether 00:07:40:09:0f:09 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (none) >> status: no carrier >> xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> options=9 >> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fec1:9c58%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >> ether 00:01:03:c1:9c:58 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active >> xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >> options=9 >> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fe34:61af%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >> inet 192.168.16.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 >> ether 00:01:03:34:61:af >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active >> plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 >> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 >> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 >> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >> >> and the command "ngctl list" shows :- >> >> There are 4 total nodes: >> Name: ngctl811 Type: socket ID: 00000011 Num hooks: 0 >> Name: Type: frame_relay ID: 00000004 Num hooks: 1 >> Name: sync_ar1 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000002 Num hooks: 0 >> Name: sync_ar0 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 1 >> >> Would it be the problem that I test it with cable disconnected from >> the modem (i.e.CSU/DSU)? >> >> Thanks a lot. >> >> John Mok >> >> >> Julian Elischer wrote: >> >>> did the last command do anything? >>> >>> please show the output of: >>> ifconfig >>> ngctl list >>> >>> > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 00:47:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D5E16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:47:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C042443D46 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:47:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B677A41E; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:47:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4248A5BB.3040508@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:47:55 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Mok References: <42344AF7.6070701@attglobal.net> <423C72A1.7060000@cronyx.ru> <4240497D.5030304@attglobal.net> <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> <42485836.6030203@elischer.org> <424898E3.8080007@attglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <424898E3.8080007@attglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:47:57 -0000 John Mok wrote: > > The command "ngctl types" shows :- > > There are 5 total types: > Type name Number of living nodes > --------- ---------------------- > socket 1 > rfc1490 0 > lmi 0 > frame_relay 0 > sync_ar 2 > > What other modules are needed? How to add them, whether load them > dynamically or compiled into kernel? > > Thanks a lot. kldload ng_iface at least it should be loaded automatically if you add the line shown below.. > > John Mok > > > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> what does >> "ngctl types" >> say? >> >> looks like you don't have all the right modules loaded.. >> >> >> John Mok wrote: >> >>> >>> After issuing the following commands :- >>> >>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream >> ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux replace the next line with.. #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi and add: ngctl name fr-mux:dlci0 lmi >>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata rfc1490 dlci16 rfc1490 >> this could be replaved by: ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: rfc1490 dlci16 downstream >>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata dlci16 rl0 inet inet >> this line is totally confused.. should be: ngctl name fr-mux:dlci16 protomux ngctl mkpeer protomux: iface inet inet now you can add the ip addresses.. sorry I didn't read it better several days ago.. >>> >>> #ifconfig ng0 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 >>> ifconfig: interface ng0 does not exist >> >> >> >> >> >> are you SURE none of these returned an error? >> >>> >>> The command ifconfig shows :- >>> >>> rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>> options=8 >>> inet6 fe80::207:40ff:fe09:f09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 >>> inet 192.168.255.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.255.255 >>> ether 00:07:40:09:0f:09 >>> media: Ethernet autoselect (none) >>> status: no carrier >>> xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>> options=9 >>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fec1:9c58%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >>> ether 00:01:03:c1:9c:58 >>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>> status: active >>> xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>> options=9 >>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fe34:61af%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >>> inet 192.168.16.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 >>> ether 00:01:03:34:61:af >>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>> status: active >>> plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 >>> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 >>> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >>> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 >>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >>> >>> and the command "ngctl list" shows :- >>> >>> There are 4 total nodes: >>> Name: ngctl811 Type: socket ID: 00000011 Num >>> hooks: 0 >>> Name: Type: frame_relay ID: 00000004 Num >>> hooks: 1 >>> Name: sync_ar1 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000002 Num >>> hooks: 0 >>> Name: sync_ar0 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000001 Num >>> hooks: 1 >>> >>> Would it be the problem that I test it with cable disconnected from >>> the modem (i.e.CSU/DSU)? >>> >>> Thanks a lot. >>> >>> John Mok >>> >>> >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>> >>>> did the last command do anything? >>>> >>>> please show the output of: >>>> ifconfig >>>> ngctl list >>>> >>>> >> From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 01:21:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2DE16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:21:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-relay1.yahoo.com (mail-relay1.yahoo.com [216.145.48.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C926543D53 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:21:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (proxy7.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.98])j2T1KnZ1069749; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:20:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:20:48 +0900 Message-ID: From: gnn@freebsd.org To: Peter Sewell In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.12.0 (Your Wildest Dreams) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3.50 (powerpc-apple-darwin7.7.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:21:07 -0000 Hi Peter, Interesting paper and work. Are you plannning to share the tools as well? That's what I'd be most interested in seeing, basically the ability to turn your conformance tests into regression tests. Thanks, George From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 08:49:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25D516A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:49:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from handler7.mail.rice.edu (handler7.mail.rice.edu [128.42.58.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AA143D41 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:49:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from willmann@rice.edu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by handler7.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 760521DB0A for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:49:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by handler7.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCB11DB09 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:49:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from handler7.mail.rice.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (handler7.mail.rice.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23171-03 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:49:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.249.249.247] (dunwlessnat.rice.edu [128.42.64.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by handler7.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E621DB03 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:49:04 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <4b42090824704fe104ed6be2304f3b15@rice.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Paul Willmann Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:49:04 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-20030616-p6 at mail.rice.edu X-DCC--Metrics: handler7.mail.rice.edu 1067; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Subject: Plan to remove GIANT dependence in ixgb driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:49:07 -0000 Hi all, I'm new to the list, but before I go ahead and modify the ixgb (intel 10 Gb NIC) driver to have its own mutex, I want to just send out an announcement to avoid any duplication of effort by anyone else who might be doing the same. The drivers in CURRENT and STABLE both require giant. I have a pair of NICs and multiprocessor machines to test this on. Please send me an email if you've got a concern about this or have already started work... Thanks, --Paul Willmann From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 09:26:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB4D16A4CE; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:26:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk (mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.0.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F7743D1F; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:26:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter.sewell@cl.cam.ac.uk) Received: from stem.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.9.62] helo=cl.cam.ac.uk) by mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.092 #1) id 1DGCzF-0001sr-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:26:13 +0100 To: gnn@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message from gnn@freebsd.org of "Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:20:48 +0900." Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:26:13 +0100 From: Peter Sewell Message-Id: cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Peter.Sewell@cl.cam.ac.uk Subject: Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:26:15 -0000 >Hi Peter, > >Interesting paper and work. Many thanks. >Are you plannning to share the tools as >well? That's what I'd be most interested in seeing, basically the >ability to turn your conformance tests into regression tests. It's unclear at the moment - we'd certainly like to make that regression testing more routine, but the current tools are non-trivial to drive. We'll be looking to see how much interest there is, and also how accessible the spec is, before going further. What kind of regression testing is in use now? best wishes, Peter From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 14:07:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0D316A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:07:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from geppetto.cs.interbusiness.it (relay-2.cs.interbusiness.it [151.99.250.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D19643D3F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:07:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emilio.mastriani@comunicando.biz) Received: from ctdevd01 (host28-213.pool8019.interbusiness.it [80.19.213.28]) j2TE5sY6015326 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:05:55 +0200 (MEST) From: "emilio mastriani" To: Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:08:28 +0200 Organization: comunicando Message-ID: <000001c53468$c90a3660$0900a8c0@ctdevd01> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Racoon(8) Deleting SPD Entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:07:08 -0000 Hi, I have a similar problem. I=92m using native kernel 2.6.9-1.667 in fedora core3 and ipsec-tools -0.3.3-5.6=20 My peer (84.222.18.181) is a zyxel series 600 and I=92m natted behind a same router. The network is: =20 Ipsec-sever (fc3) zyxel/NAT internet zyxel ipsec ipsec client 192.168.0.71------------------192.168.0.1/80.19.213.28------------------ ---------------84.222.18.181/192.168.254.254-------------192.168.254.123 =20 The dialog start, the connection is established, but I can=92t ping and after 360 sec, it go down. =20 The ipsec.conf: #!/usr/bin/setkey -f =20 #configurazione per 192.168.0.71 =20 #svuoto il SAD e SPD flush; spdflush; =20 #security policy spdadd 192.168.0.71 192.168.254.123 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/80.19.213.28-84.222.18.181/require; spdadd 192.168.254.123 192.168.0.71 any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/84.222.18.181-80.19.213.28/require; =20 The racoon.conf =20 # Racoon IKE daemon configuration file. # See 'man racoon.conf' for a description of the format and entries. =20 path include "/etc/racoon"; path pre_shared_key "/etc/racoon/psk.txt"; path certificate "/etc/racoon/certs"; =20 log debug3; =20 padding { maximum_length 20; # maximum padding length. randomize off; # enable randomize length. strict_check off; # enable strict check. exclusive_tail off; # extract last one octet. } =20 listen { #isakmp ::1 [7000]; isakmp 192.168.0.71 [500]; isakmp_natt 192.168.0.71 [4500]; #admin [7002]; #administrative's port by kmpstat strict_address; #required all addresses must be found } =20 #specification of default various timer timer { #these values can be changed per remote node counter 5; #maximum trying count to send interval 20 sec; #maximum interval to resend persend 1; #the number of packets per a send =20 #timer for a waiting to complete each phase phase1 180 sec; phase2 360 sec; } =20 remote anonymous { exchange_mode main; lifetime time 28800 sec; #sec,min,hour nat_traversal on; proposal { encryption_algorithm 3des; hash_algorithm md5; authentication_method pre_shared_key; dh_group 1; } } =20 sainfo anonymous { lifetime time 28800 sec; encryption_algorithm 3des; authentication_algorithm hmac_md5; compression_algorithm deflate; } =20 =20 psk.txt is correctly setted ;-) =20 =20 The racoon_start.sh #!/bin/sh /sbin/setkey -FP sleep 1 /sbin/setkey -F sleep 1 /sbin/setkey -f /etc/ipsec.conf sleep 1 /sbin/setkey -DP sleep 1 killall racoon sleep 1 /usr/sbin/racoon -d -f /etc/racoon/racoon.conf =20 The short trace : Mar 29 15:36:12 laptopemy kernel: device eth0 left promiscuous mode Mar 29 15:36:14 laptopemy kernel: eth0: Promiscuous mode enabled. Mar 29 15:36:14 laptopemy kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode Mar 29 15:36:47 laptopemy kernel: device eth0 left promiscuous mode Mar 29 15:36:52 laptopemy kernel: eth0: Promiscuous mode enabled. Mar 29 15:36:52 laptopemy kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode Mar 29 15:37:58 laptopemy kernel: device eth0 left promiscuous mode Mar 29 15:38:08 laptopemy kernel: eth0: Promiscuous mode enabled. Mar 29 15:38:08 laptopemy kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode Mar 29 15:48:07 laptopemy racoon: INFO: @(#)ipsec-tools 0.3.3 (http://ipsec-tools.sourceforge.net) Mar 29 15:48:07 laptopemy racoon: INFO: @(#)This product linked OpenSSL 0.9.7a Feb 19 2003 (http://www.openssl.org/) Mar 29 15:48:08 laptopemy racoon: WARNING: /etc/racoon/racoon.conf:9: "debug3" it is osboleted. use "debug2" Mar 29 15:48:08 laptopemy racoon: INFO: 192.168.0.71[4500] used as isakmp port (fd=3D8) Mar 29 15:48:08 laptopemy racoon: INFO: 192.168.0.71[4500] used for NAT-T Mar 29 15:48:08 laptopemy racoon: INFO: 192.168.0.71[500] used as isakmp port (fd=3D9) Mar 29 15:48:24 laptopemy racoon: INFO: IPsec-SA request for 84.222.18.181 queued due to no phase1 found. Mar 29 15:48:24 laptopemy racoon: INFO: initiate new phase 1 negotiation: 80.19.213.28[500]<=3D>84.222.18.181[500] Mar 29 15:48:24 laptopemy racoon: INFO: begin Identity Protection mode. Mar 29 15:48:48 laptopemy racoon: INFO: ISAKMP-SA established 80.19.213.28[500]-84.222.18.181[500] spi:5751c3384413cdd1:32fa62bc06fe123c Mar 29 15:48:48 laptopemy racoon: INFO: initiate new phase 2 negotiation: 80.19.213.28[0]<=3D>84.222.18.181[0] Mar 29 15:48:51 laptopemy racoon: WARNING: attribute has been modified. Mar 29 15:48:52 laptopemy racoon: INFO: IPsec-SA established: ESP/Tunnel 84.222.18.181->80.19.213.28 spi=3D113195563(0x6bf3a2b) Mar 29 15:48:52 laptopemy racoon: INFO: IPsec-SA established: ESP/Tunnel 80.19.213.28->84.222.18.181 spi=3D3612357826(0xd75034c2) Mar 29 15:50:27 laptopemy racoon: INFO: purged IPsec-SA proto_id=3DESP spi=3D3612357826. Mar 29 15:50:28 laptopemy racoon: INFO: purged ISAKMP-SA = proto_id=3DISAKMP spi=3D5751c3384413cdd1:32fa62bc06fe123c. Mar 29 15:50:29 laptopemy racoon: INFO: ISAKMP-SA deleted 80.19.213.28[500]-84.222.18.181[500] spi:5751c3384413cdd1:32fa62bc06fe123c =20 Any idea? I don=92t know how to continue. =20 Thanks for all. =20 =20 Dott. Emilio mastriani From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 14:15:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D4D16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:15:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from falcon.loomes.de (smtp.loomes.de [212.40.161.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB1643D55 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:15:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markus@trippelsdorf.de) Received: from port-212-202-35-78.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.35.78] helo=bsd.trippelsdorf.de) by falcon.loomes.de with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1DGHUj-0003Y5-PU for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:15:01 +0200 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:15:00 +0200 From: Markus Trippelsdorf To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050329141500.GA10011@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: re0: discard oversize frame X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:15:04 -0000 I sometimes get the following error message using a RealTek 8169S Single-chip Gigabit Ethernet card: re0: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 > max 1506) This happens at seemingly random times. root ~ # ifconfig re0 re0: flags=8843 mtu 1492 options=1b inet 192.68.0.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.68.0.255 ether 00:08:54:36:f2:2f media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active Notice that 1514-1506=1500-1492. Is this something to worry about? Thanks in advance. -- Markus From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 15:45:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF5416A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:45:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cwb.pacific.net.hk (cwb.pacific.net.hk [202.14.67.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4F343D4C for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:45:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmok@attglobal.net) Received: from [192.168.16.50] (154.159.17.210.fixed.pacific.net.hk [210.17.159.154]) by cwb.pacific.net.hk with ESMTP id j2TFj9Ou009568; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:45:09 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <42497803.40904@attglobal.net> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:45:07 +0800 From: John Mok User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <42344AF7.6070701@attglobal.net> <423C72A1.7060000@cronyx.ru> <4240497D.5030304@attglobal.net> <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> <42485836.6030203@elischer.org> <424898E3.8080007@attglobal.net> <4248A5BB.3040508@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4248A5BB.3040508@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:45:19 -0000 Dear Julian, I have re-compiled the kernel with NETGRAPH_ETHER and NETGRAPH_IFACE. I failed to create the lmi node :- #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream #ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi ngctl: send msg: Invalid arguments Command "ngctl types" returns :- There are 7 total types: Type name Number of living nodes --------- ---------------------- socket 1 frame_relay 1 ether 3 rfc1490 0 lmi 0 iface 0 sync_ar 2 Command "ngctl show fr-mux:" returns :- Name: fr-mux Type: frame_relay ID: 00000007 Num hooks: 1 Local hook Peer name Peer type Peer ID Peer hook ---------- --------- --------- ------- --------- downstream sync_ar0 sync_ar 00000001 rawdata Except the brief description on manpage, please help to advise where I could find the detailed documentation (e.g. user guides or admin guides etc.) about what node types and hooks are available in netgraph. Thank you very much. John Mok Julian Elischer wrote: > > > John Mok wrote: > >> >> The command "ngctl types" shows :- >> >> There are 5 total types: >> Type name Number of living nodes >> --------- ---------------------- >> socket 1 >> rfc1490 0 >> lmi 0 >> frame_relay 0 >> sync_ar 2 >> >> What other modules are needed? How to add them, whether load them >> dynamically or compiled into kernel? >> >> Thanks a lot. > > > > kldload ng_iface at least > > it should be loaded automatically if you add the line shown below.. > > >> >> John Mok >> >> >> Julian Elischer wrote: >> >>> what does >>> "ngctl types" >>> say? >>> >>> looks like you don't have all the right modules loaded.. >>> >>> >>> John Mok wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> After issuing the following commands :- >>>> >>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream >>> >>> > > ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux > > replace the next line with.. > #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi > > and add: > ngctl name fr-mux:dlci0 lmi > >>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata rfc1490 dlci16 rfc1490 >>> >>> > this could be replaved by: > ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: rfc1490 dlci16 downstream > > >>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata dlci16 rl0 inet inet >>> >>> > this line is totally confused.. > > should be: > ngctl name fr-mux:dlci16 protomux > ngctl mkpeer protomux: iface inet inet > > now you can add the ip addresses.. > > sorry I didn't read it better several days ago.. > > >>>> >>>> #ifconfig ng0 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 >>>> ifconfig: interface ng0 does not exist >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> are you SURE none of these returned an error? >>> >>>> >>>> The command ifconfig shows :- >>>> >>>> rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>> options=8 >>>> inet6 fe80::207:40ff:fe09:f09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 >>>> inet 192.168.255.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.255.255 >>>> ether 00:07:40:09:0f:09 >>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (none) >>>> status: no carrier >>>> xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>> options=9 >>>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fec1:9c58%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >>>> ether 00:01:03:c1:9c:58 >>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>>> status: active >>>> xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>> options=9 >>>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fe34:61af%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >>>> inet 192.168.16.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 >>>> ether 00:01:03:34:61:af >>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>>> status: active >>>> plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 >>>> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 >>>> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >>>> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 >>>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >>>> >>>> and the command "ngctl list" shows :- >>>> >>>> There are 4 total nodes: >>>> Name: ngctl811 Type: socket ID: 00000011 Num >>>> hooks: 0 >>>> Name: Type: frame_relay ID: 00000004 Num >>>> hooks: 1 >>>> Name: sync_ar1 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000002 Num >>>> hooks: 0 >>>> Name: sync_ar0 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000001 Num >>>> hooks: 1 >>>> >>>> Would it be the problem that I test it with cable disconnected from >>>> the modem (i.e.CSU/DSU)? >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot. >>>> >>>> John Mok >>>> >>>> >>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>> >>>>> did the last command do anything? >>>>> >>>>> please show the output of: >>>>> ifconfig >>>>> ngctl list >>>>> >>>>> >>> > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 16:32:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C0016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:32:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-2.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB7943D58 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:32:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@unixpages.org) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IE400B7HGMVF0@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:32:56 +0200 (MEST) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:32:55 +0200 (MEST) Received: from haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.181.92])j2TGWsBg021996; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:32:54 +0200 (MEST) Received: from gondor.middleearth (gondor.middleearth [192.168.1.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))(Postfix) with ESMTP id 021B628450; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:32:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by gondor.middleearth (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0AF2C2285A; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:32:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:32:46 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer In-reply-to: <4b42090824704fe104ed6be2304f3b15@rice.edu> To: Paul Willmann Message-id: <20050329163246.GF87756@unixpages.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=9sSKoi6Rw660DLir; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT X-PGP-Key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D References: <4b42090824704fe104ed6be2304f3b15@rice.edu> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plan to remove GIANT dependence in ixgb driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:32:57 -0000 --9sSKoi6Rw660DLir Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:49:04AM -0600, Paul Willmann wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I'm new to the list, but before I go ahead and modify the ixgb (intel=20 > 10 Gb NIC) driver to have its own mutex, I want to just send out an=20 > announcement to avoid any duplication of effort by anyone else who=20 > might be doing the same. The drivers in CURRENT and STABLE both=20 > require giant. I have a pair of NICs and multiprocessor machines to=20 > test this on. Please send me an email if you've got a concern about=20 > this or have already started work... >=20 Great, finally someone with ixgb hardware :-) Would you be interested in testing out some patches? (altq support and per-interface polling) Also, Maxime Henrion committed a busdma change to HEAD a couple of days ago, I'm sure he would appreciate some feedback. To answer your question, I don't think anyone is working on removing GIANT from this driver at the moment. - Christian --=20 Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D --9sSKoi6Rw660DLir Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCSYMubHYXjKDtmC0RAjHaAJ4/ELTZv0HSvWeIc7onsdZW6R7zeQCeL3t8 6jWmmLFi34CTzJY30xsndeA= =qUx3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9sSKoi6Rw660DLir-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 17:05:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAF616A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:05:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B7E43D2F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:05:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920) id D05415CA0A; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:05:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:05:04 +0200 From: Maxime Henrion To: Christian Brueffer Message-ID: <20050329170504.GH25563@elvis.mu.org> References: <4b42090824704fe104ed6be2304f3b15@rice.edu> <20050329163246.GF87756@unixpages.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050329163246.GF87756@unixpages.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Paul Willmann Subject: Re: Plan to remove GIANT dependence in ixgb driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:05:05 -0000 Christian Brueffer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:49:04AM -0600, Paul Willmann wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm new to the list, but before I go ahead and modify the ixgb (intel > > 10 Gb NIC) driver to have its own mutex, I want to just send out an > > announcement to avoid any duplication of effort by anyone else who > > might be doing the same. The drivers in CURRENT and STABLE both > > require giant. I have a pair of NICs and multiprocessor machines to > > test this on. Please send me an email if you've got a concern about > > this or have already started work... > > > > Great, finally someone with ixgb hardware :-) Would you be interested > in testing out some patches? (altq support and per-interface polling) > Also, Maxime Henrion committed a busdma change to HEAD a couple of days > ago, I'm sure he would appreciate some feedback. Yeah, actually Paul already tested my changes and thanks to him I'll MFC them to RELENG_5 if re@ gives me his approval. Cheers, Maxime From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 17:23:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7399D16A4CE; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:23:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E78143D46; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:23:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2THNceb006450; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:23:38 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j2THNcJC006447; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:23:38 -0800 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:23:38 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Peter Sewell Message-ID: <20050329172338.GA5995@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: gnn@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:23:43 -0000 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:26:13AM +0100, Peter Sewell wrote: >=20 > >Hi Peter, > > > >Interesting paper and work. =20 >=20 > Many thanks. >=20 > >Are you plannning to share the tools as > >well? That's what I'd be most interested in seeing, basically the > >ability to turn your conformance tests into regression tests. >=20 > It's unclear at the moment - we'd certainly like to make that > regression testing more routine, but the current tools are non-trivial > to drive. We'll be looking to see how much interest there is, and > also how accessible the spec is, before going further. In what way are they hard to drive? Are they difficult to set up, or difficult to run? If they are difficult to set up, you might take a look at using EmuLab (www.emulab.net) to build images with configured tests so OSes just need to be updated to test a change. > What kind of regression testing is in use now? None for the most part. People test some limited things, but I don't think anyone does the kind if rigorous testing we should be doing. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCSY8ZXY6L6fI4GtQRAn9SAJ9BFJ2BZJ9dhUP8K/XgDvZe7syhBgCeM0sU aPbyRZofsmDg+X73OaDTx6s= =UI7a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 18:42:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCCE16A4CE; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:42:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk (mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.0.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E1543D31; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:42:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter.sewell@cl.cam.ac.uk) Received: from stem.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.9.62] helo=cl.cam.ac.uk) by mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.092 #1) id 1DGLfi-0001Xt-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:42:38 +0100 To: Brooks Davis In-Reply-To: Message from Brooks Davis <20050329172338.GA5995@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:42:37 +0100 From: Peter Sewell Message-Id: cc: gnn@freebsd.org cc: Peter.Sewell@cl.cam.ac.uk cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:42:42 -0000 >> >Are you plannning to share the tools as >> >well? That's what I'd be most interested in seeing, basically the >> >ability to turn your conformance tests into regression tests. >> >> It's unclear at the moment - we'd certainly like to make that >> regression testing more routine, but the current tools are >> >non-trivial >> to drive. We'll be looking to see how much interest there is, and >> also how accessible the spec is, before going further. > >In what way are they hard to drive? Are they difficult to set up, or >difficult to run? both, I'm afraid - there's quite a complex infrastructure, both for generating tests and for running the checker over them (in parallel on a server farm), then interpreting the results of the checker is non-trivial. One needs to iterate the test generation/checking/spec-fixing loop many times. >If they are difficult to set up, you might take a >look at using EmuLab (www.emulab.net) to build images with configured >tests so OSes just need to be updated to test a change. Interesting - I didn't know about that (though I don't think it helps right now). >> What kind of regression testing is in use now? > >None for the most part. People test some limited things, but I don't >think anyone does the kind if rigorous testing we should be doing. ah :-( cheers, Peter From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 22:00:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5425A16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:00:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F5443D2F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:00:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874377A425; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:00:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4249CFF9.1000508@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:00:25 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Mok References: <42344AF7.6070701@attglobal.net> <423C72A1.7060000@cronyx.ru> <4240497D.5030304@attglobal.net> <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> <42485836.6030203@elischer.org> <424898E3.8080007@attglobal.net> <4248A5BB.3040508@elischer.org> <42497803.40904@attglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <42497803.40904@attglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:00:26 -0000 John Mok wrote: > Dear Julian, > > I have re-compiled the kernel with NETGRAPH_ETHER and NETGRAPH_IFACE. > I failed to create the lmi node :- why do you want ng_ether? (it's not a problem but it's nothing to do with frame relay.) let's see you full (new) script again.. > > #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream > #ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux > #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi > ngctl: send msg: Invalid arguments > > Command "ngctl types" returns :- > > There are 7 total types: > Type name Number of living nodes > --------- ---------------------- > socket 1 > frame_relay 1 > ether 3 > rfc1490 0 > lmi 0 > iface 0 > sync_ar 2 > > Command "ngctl show fr-mux:" returns :- > > Name: fr-mux Type: frame_relay ID: 00000007 Num hooks: 1 > Local hook Peer name Peer type Peer ID Peer > hook > ---------- --------- --------- ------- > --------- > downstream sync_ar0 sync_ar 00000001 > rawdata > > Except the brief description on manpage, please help to advise where > I could find the detailed documentation (e.g. user guides or admin > guides etc.) > about what node types and hooks are available in netgraph. each node type specifies what hooks are availabel on it in its own man page.. (you do know about the node man pages right? (e.g. man ng_iface) also man ngctl man nghook man 4 netgraph man 3 netgraph also cd /usr/share/examples/netgraph there was an article on daemonnews.org on netgraph but it seems otha ve disappeared! > Thank you very much. > > John Mok > > > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> >> >> John Mok wrote: >> >>> >>> The command "ngctl types" shows :- >>> >>> There are 5 total types: >>> Type name Number of living nodes >>> --------- ---------------------- >>> socket 1 >>> rfc1490 0 >>> lmi 0 >>> frame_relay 0 >>> sync_ar 2 >>> >>> What other modules are needed? How to add them, whether load them >>> dynamically or compiled into kernel? >>> >>> Thanks a lot. >> >> >> >> >> kldload ng_iface at least >> >> it should be loaded automatically if you add the line shown below.. >> >> >>> >>> John Mok >>> >>> >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>> >>>> what does >>>> "ngctl types" >>>> say? >>>> >>>> looks like you don't have all the right modules loaded.. >>>> >>>> >>>> John Mok wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> After issuing the following commands :- >>>>> >>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux >> >> replace the next line with.. >> #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi >> >> and add: >> ngctl name fr-mux:dlci0 lmi >> >>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata rfc1490 dlci16 rfc1490 >>>> >>>> >>>> >> this could be replaved by: >> ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: rfc1490 dlci16 downstream >> >> >>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata dlci16 rl0 inet inet >>>> >>>> >>>> >> this line is totally confused.. >> >> should be: >> ngctl name fr-mux:dlci16 protomux >> ngctl mkpeer protomux: iface inet inet >> >> now you can add the ip addresses.. >> >> sorry I didn't read it better several days ago.. >> >> >>>>> >>>>> #ifconfig ng0 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 >>>>> ifconfig: interface ng0 does not exist >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> are you SURE none of these returned an error? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The command ifconfig shows :- >>>>> >>>>> rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>> options=8 >>>>> inet6 fe80::207:40ff:fe09:f09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 >>>>> inet 192.168.255.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.255.255 >>>>> ether 00:07:40:09:0f:09 >>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (none) >>>>> status: no carrier >>>>> xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>> options=9 >>>>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fec1:9c58%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >>>>> ether 00:01:03:c1:9c:58 >>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>>>> status: active >>>>> xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>> options=9 >>>>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fe34:61af%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >>>>> inet 192.168.16.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 >>>>> ether 00:01:03:34:61:af >>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>>>> status: active >>>>> plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 >>>>> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 >>>>> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >>>>> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 >>>>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >>>>> >>>>> and the command "ngctl list" shows :- >>>>> >>>>> There are 4 total nodes: >>>>> Name: ngctl811 Type: socket ID: 00000011 Num >>>>> hooks: 0 >>>>> Name: Type: frame_relay ID: 00000004 Num >>>>> hooks: 1 >>>>> Name: sync_ar1 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000002 Num >>>>> hooks: 0 >>>>> Name: sync_ar0 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000001 Num >>>>> hooks: 1 >>>>> >>>>> Would it be the problem that I test it with cable disconnected >>>>> from the modem (i.e.CSU/DSU)? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>>> >>>>> John Mok >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> did the last command do anything? >>>>>> >>>>>> please show the output of: >>>>>> ifconfig >>>>>> ngctl list >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 01:17:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B998916A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:17:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-relay1.yahoo.com (mail-relay1.yahoo.com [216.145.48.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5503943D41 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:17:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (proxy7.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.98])j2U1HGkN050351; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:17:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:17:17 +0900 Message-ID: From: gnn@freebsd.org To: Peter Sewell In-Reply-To: References: <20050329172338.GA5995@odin.ac.hmc.edu> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.12.0 (Your Wildest Dreams) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3.50 (powerpc-apple-darwin7.7.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rigorous specification for TCP, UDP, and Sockets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:17:30 -0000 At Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:42:37 +0100, Peter Sewell wrote: > >None for the most part. People test some limited things, but I don't > >think anyone does the kind if rigorous testing we should be doing. > > ah :-( > I'd like to amend that to "we're working on it" :-) Later, George From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 15:47:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5FE16A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:47:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta03.techtelnet.net (smtp3.techtel.com.ar [200.69.128.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7187743D3F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:47:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gsantillan@desetech.com.ar) Received: (qmail 23475 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 15:41:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO DESEWRK01) (gsantillan@desetech.com.ar@[200.69.143.227]) (envelope-sender ) by mail (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Mar 2005 15:41:30 -0000 From: "DESETech - German P. Santillan" To: Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:45:05 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcU0dkaDJZsYsmfWRciZbdQK1ubFRw== Message-Id: <20050329154720.7187743D3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:23:03 +0000 Subject: TFTPD X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:47:22 -0000 What is the maximums concurrent connections to inetd=C2=B4s tftpd = daemon? Thanks in advance Germ=C3=A1n P. Santill=C3=A1n Administrador de Redes Responsable Dpto. T=C3=A9cnico DESETech Argentina S.A. San Mart=C3=ADn 133 - CP: B8000FIC Bah=C3=ADa Blanca - Argentina Tel/Fax: +54 (291) 456-5642 gsantillan@desetech.com.ar http://www.desetech.com.ar =20 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 14:10:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F18C16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:10:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-srv1.teleservice.net (mail-srv1.teleservice.net [193.109.175.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F89A43D5A for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:10:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olsson@puffy.nu) Received: from [195.66.24.2] by mail-srv1.sjobo.nu (GMS 10.02.3270/NU2793.00.3c1025a7) with ESMTP id weuvoeaa for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:09:39 +0200 Message-ID: <424AB340.1060207@puffy.nu> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:10:08 +0200 From: Philip Olsson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050111) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: em(4) + bridging X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:10:16 -0000 Hello Iam woundering if there exists any patchset that will fix the broken em-driver or if anyone can bring my up to date with the development of the driver. Right now I want to do dummynet on em with dot1q, works fine with other nics but I want to do it with a em(4) card. If sending a em card somewhere will help let me know. // Philip From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 15:10:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5283716A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:10:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C42743D48 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:10:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2UFAdUi041651; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:10:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 82690-01; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:10:11 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2UFAcYt041622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:10:38 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) id j2UFARu0028947; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:10:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:10:27 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Philip Olsson Message-ID: <20050330151027.GA28805@ip.net.ua> References: <424AB340.1060207@puffy.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <424AB340.1060207@puffy.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em(4) + bridging X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:10:09 -0000 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Philip, On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:10:08PM +0200, Philip Olsson wrote: > Iam woundering if there exists any patchset that will fix the broken=20 > em-driver or if anyone can bring my up to date with the development of=20 > the driver. >=20 What version of FreeBSD? > Right now I want to do dummynet on em with dot1q, works fine with other= =20 > nics but I want to do it with a em(4) card. >=20 You decide, do you need bridge(4) or dummynet(4) (subject and body disagree)? I fixed a broken "bridging on VLANs whose parent interfaces support h/w VLAN tag encapsulation" in HEAD a while ago, on February 18, in this commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/040840.html > If sending a em card somewhere will help let me know. >=20 If the above (or MFC of it) solves your problem, I will kindly accept a card, if you've got a spare one. ;) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCSsFiqRfpzJluFF4RAnvuAKCQHGxLqEOHtaO6Lxh9ZldjmXSUZwCeJS04 o0h7s8JFKFd6aM/IyJdN5eI= =VCy7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 15:27:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106C216A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:27:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-srv1.teleservice.net (mail-srv1.teleservice.net [193.109.175.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF2C43D1D for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olsson@puffy.nu) Received: from [195.66.24.2] by mail-srv1.sjobo.nu (GMS 10.02.3270/NU2793.00.3c1025a7) with ESMTP id cgyvoeaa for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:27:19 +0200 Message-ID: <424AC552.8020502@puffy.nu> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:27:14 +0200 From: Philip Olsson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050111) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <424AB340.1060207@puffy.nu> <20050330151027.GA28805@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20050330151027.GA28805@ip.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: em(4) + bridging X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:27:23 -0000 >On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:10:08PM +0200, Philip Olsson wrote: > > >>Iam woundering if there exists any patchset that will fix the broken >>em-driver or if anyone can bring my up to date with the development of >>the driver. >> >> >> >What version of FreeBSD? > > > 5-stable >>Right now I want to do dummynet on em with dot1q, works fine with other >>nics but I want to do it with a em(4) card. >> >> >> >You decide, do you need bridge(4) or dummynet(4) (subject and body >disagree)? I fixed a broken "bridging on VLANs whose parent >interfaces support h/w VLAN tag encapsulation" in HEAD a while ago, >on February 18, in this commit: > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/040840.html > > > I need both briding and dummynet, right now briding does not work. Your change is only in -current, i run stable. I will try to try them later tonight. >>If sending a em card somewhere will help let me know. >> >> >> >If the above (or MFC of it) solves your problem, I will kindly >accept a card, if you've got a spare one. ;) > > Well, I could cough up the money for a card if that would help fixing the issues or help development. // Philip From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 17:01:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C7D16A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:01:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D47143D48 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:01:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2UH1Zss048017; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:01:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 89813-20; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:01:07 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2UH1YN9048013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:01:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) id j2UH1NY9029384; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:01:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:01:23 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Philip Olsson Message-ID: <20050330170123.GA29295@ip.net.ua> References: <424AB340.1060207@puffy.nu> <20050330151027.GA28805@ip.net.ua> <424AC552.8020502@puffy.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <424AC552.8020502@puffy.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: em(4) + bridging X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:01:03 -0000 --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi again, On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:27:14PM +0200, Philip Olsson wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:10:08PM +0200, Philip Olsson wrote: > >=20 > > > >>Iam woundering if there exists any patchset that will fix the broken=20 > >>em-driver or if anyone can bring my up to date with the development of= =20 > >>the driver. > > > 5-stable >=20 > >>Right now I want to do dummynet on em with dot1q, works fine with other= =20 > >>nics but I want to do it with a em(4) card. > >> > >> =20 > >> > >You decide, do you need bridge(4) or dummynet(4) (subject and body > >disagree)? I fixed a broken "bridging on VLANs whose parent > >interfaces support h/w VLAN tag encapsulation" in HEAD a while ago, > >on February 18, in this commit: > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/040840.html > > > >=20 > > > I need both briding and dummynet, right now briding does not work. > Your change is only in -current, i run stable. > I will try to try them later tonight. >=20 As a work-around, em(4) driver supports turning off VLAN tagging in hardware, so you can switch it off without code modifications and expect with a reasonable chance of success it will now work. For example, ifconfig em0 -vlanhwtag Then try bridging on VLAN interfaces again. If it works now, then merging my patch to RELENG_5 will definitely help you. Unfortunately, I'm not in a mood (nor I think re@ would) to merge (commit) this change now, so close to a release. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCSttiqRfpzJluFF4RArlxAJwPWSXCyYWRL811Qz/U/XEQmsEl0ACgk5bl 4OhvvqhoF1ZzBceqhpZp3uY= =llvh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 17:56:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D9916A4CF for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:56:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4088D43D31 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j2UHtvAP025472; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:55:57 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j2UHtsUp025470; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:55:54 -0800 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:55:54 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: "DESETech - German P. Santillan" Message-ID: <20050330175554.GA24465@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20050329154720.7187743D3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050329154720.7187743D3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TFTPD X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:56:01 -0000 --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 12:45:05PM -0300, DESETech - German P. Santillan wr= ote: > What is the maximums concurrent connections to inetd=B4s tftpd daemon? It's a function of inetd's configuration. Take a look at the -c, -C, -R, and -s options of inetd and the config file format in the inetd(8) manpage. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCSugqXY6L6fI4GtQRAp/DAJsFul7R5s+q5ZKDJr97DO4Mcc1jlQCgwk+q S+E3/bYXlPAU+EjYMEgggts= =DCyC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 21:07:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92E816A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:07:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918AD43D54 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:07:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru (8.13.0/vak/3.0) id j2UL3k1m045894 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org.checked; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:03:46 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (localhost.cronyx.ru [127.0.0.1]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru (8.13.0/vak/3.0) with ESMTP id j2UL1gUp045871; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:01:42 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <424B1F86.2040407@cronyx.ru> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:52:06 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru-RU; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030426 X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Mok References: <42344AF7.6070701@attglobal.net> <423C72A1.7060000@cronyx.ru> <4240497D.5030304@attglobal.net> <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> <42485836.6030203@elischer.org> <424898E3.8080007@attglobal.net> <4248A5BB.3040508@elischer.org> <42497803.40904@attglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <42497803.40904@attglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:07:07 -0000 Hi, John Mok: > Dear Julian, > > I have re-compiled the kernel with NETGRAPH_ETHER and NETGRAPH_IFACE. > I failed to create the lmi node :- > > #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream > #ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux > #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi Why 'ansi'? It should be 'annexD'. annexD means ANSI T1.617 AnnexD (1994) In fact, I dont know if anyone support version of year 1991 now. rik > > ngctl: send msg: Invalid arguments > > Command "ngctl types" returns :- > > There are 7 total types: > Type name Number of living nodes > --------- ---------------------- > socket 1 > frame_relay 1 > ether 3 > rfc1490 0 > lmi 0 > iface 0 > sync_ar 2 > > Command "ngctl show fr-mux:" returns :- > > Name: fr-mux Type: frame_relay ID: 00000007 Num hooks: 1 > Local hook Peer name Peer type Peer ID Peer > hook ---------- --------- --------- ------- > --------- downstream sync_ar0 sync_ar > 00000001 rawdata > > Except the brief description on manpage, please help to advise where I > could find the detailed documentation (e.g. user guides or admin > guides etc.) about what node types and hooks are available in netgraph. > > Thank you very much. > > John Mok > > > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> >> >> John Mok wrote: >> >>> >>> The command "ngctl types" shows :- >>> >>> There are 5 total types: >>> Type name Number of living nodes >>> --------- ---------------------- >>> socket 1 >>> rfc1490 0 >>> lmi 0 >>> frame_relay 0 >>> sync_ar 2 >>> >>> What other modules are needed? How to add them, whether load them >>> dynamically or compiled into kernel? >>> >>> Thanks a lot. >> >> >> >> >> kldload ng_iface at least >> >> it should be loaded automatically if you add the line shown below.. >> >> >>> >>> John Mok >>> >>> >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>> >>>> what does >>>> "ngctl types" >>>> say? >>>> >>>> looks like you don't have all the right modules loaded.. >>>> >>>> >>>> John Mok wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> After issuing the following commands :- >>>>> >>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux >> >> replace the next line with.. >> #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi >> >> and add: >> ngctl name fr-mux:dlci0 lmi >> >>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata rfc1490 dlci16 rfc1490 >>>> >>>> >>>> >> this could be replaved by: >> ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: rfc1490 dlci16 downstream >> >> >>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata dlci16 rl0 inet inet >>>> >>>> >>>> >> this line is totally confused.. >> >> should be: >> ngctl name fr-mux:dlci16 protomux >> ngctl mkpeer protomux: iface inet inet >> >> now you can add the ip addresses.. >> >> sorry I didn't read it better several days ago.. >> >> >>>>> >>>>> #ifconfig ng0 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 >>>>> ifconfig: interface ng0 does not exist >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> are you SURE none of these returned an error? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The command ifconfig shows :- >>>>> >>>>> rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>> options=8 >>>>> inet6 fe80::207:40ff:fe09:f09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 >>>>> inet 192.168.255.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.255.255 >>>>> ether 00:07:40:09:0f:09 >>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (none) >>>>> status: no carrier >>>>> xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>> options=9 >>>>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fec1:9c58%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >>>>> ether 00:01:03:c1:9c:58 >>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>>>> status: active >>>>> xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>> options=9 >>>>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fe34:61af%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >>>>> inet 192.168.16.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 >>>>> ether 00:01:03:34:61:af >>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>>>> status: active >>>>> plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 >>>>> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 >>>>> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >>>>> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 >>>>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >>>>> >>>>> and the command "ngctl list" shows :- >>>>> >>>>> There are 4 total nodes: >>>>> Name: ngctl811 Type: socket ID: 00000011 Num >>>>> hooks: 0 >>>>> Name: Type: frame_relay ID: 00000004 Num >>>>> hooks: 1 >>>>> Name: sync_ar1 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000002 Num >>>>> hooks: 0 >>>>> Name: sync_ar0 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000001 Num >>>>> hooks: 1 >>>>> >>>>> Would it be the problem that I test it with cable disconnected >>>>> from the modem (i.e.CSU/DSU)? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>>> >>>>> John Mok >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> did the last command do anything? >>>>>> >>>>>> please show the output of: >>>>>> ifconfig >>>>>> ngctl list >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 22:21:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8082116A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:21:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf13.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf13.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2000843D55 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:21:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from c0ldbyte@myrealbox.com) Received: from mxip01.cluster1.charter.net (mxip01a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.131])j2UMLe1S029954 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:21:41 -0500 Received: from 24.247.253.134.gha.mi.chartermi.net (HELO eleanor.us1.wmi.uvac.net) (24.247.253.134) by mxip01.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2005 11:00:55 -0500 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.91,136,1110171600"; d="scan'208"; a="738831245:sNHT940454216" Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:00:56 -0500 (EST) From: c0ldbyte To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050329154720.7187743D3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20050330105815.P40884@eleanor.us1.wmi.uvac.net> References: <20050329154720.7187743D3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1632599821-1112198456=:40884" Subject: Re: TFTPD X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:21:42 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1632599821-1112198456=:40884 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, DESETech - German P. Santillan wrote: > What is the maximums concurrent connections to inetd´s tftpd daemon? > > Thanks in advance > It will be the same as what /etc/defaults/rc.conf:122:inetd_flags is set to. most likely 60 by default. Its not really specific to tftpd. Best of luck, --c0ldbyte -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF7DF979F Comment: Fingerprint = D1DC 0AA4 1C4E EAD4 24EB 7E77 B261 50BA F7DF 979F iD8DBQFCSs06smFQuvffl58RArZ8AJ4j5WyAdooDC5cHNSevHiLs3rgleQCghXlO 2X7qIF3JyJI5xLbR5S0dFYY= =b8aE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0-1632599821-1112198456=:40884-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 23:06:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A754616A4CE for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:06:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hanghau.pacific.net.hk (hanghau.pacific.net.hk [202.64.33.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E236743D45 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:06:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmok@attglobal.net) Received: from [192.168.16.50] (154.159.17.210.fixed.pacific.net.hk [210.17.159.154]) by hanghau.pacific.net.hk with ESMTP id j2UN5qHf012317; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 07:05:56 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <424B30CE.6050809@attglobal.net> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 07:05:50 +0800 From: John Mok User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maren S. Leizaola" References: <42344AF7.6070701@attglobal.net> <423C72A1.7060000@cronyx.ru> <4240497D.5030304@attglobal.net> <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> <42485836.6030203@elischer.org> <424898E3.8080007@attglobal.net> <4248A5BB.3040508@elischer.org> <42497803.40904@attglobal.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:06:08 -0000 Yes, the framing is IETF. Maren S. Leizaola wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, John Mok wrote: > >> Dear Julian, >> >> I have re-compiled the kernel with NETGRAPH_ETHER and NETGRAPH_IFACE. >> I failed to create the lmi node :- >> >> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream >> #ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux >> #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi > > > isn't the framing in your Cisco 1600 IETF? > >> ngctl: send msg: Invalid arguments >> >> Command "ngctl types" returns :- >> >> There are 7 total types: >> Type name Number of living nodes >> --------- ---------------------- >> socket 1 >> frame_relay 1 >> ether 3 >> rfc1490 0 >> lmi 0 >> iface 0 >> sync_ar 2 >> >> Command "ngctl show fr-mux:" returns :- >> >> Name: fr-mux Type: frame_relay ID: 00000007 Num hooks: 1 >> Local hook Peer name Peer type Peer ID Peer >> hook ---------- --------- --------- ------- >> --------- downstream sync_ar0 sync_ar >> 00000001 rawdata >> Except the brief description on manpage, please help to advise where >> I could find the detailed documentation (e.g. user guides or admin >> guides etc.) about what node types and hooks are available in netgraph. >> >> Thank you very much. >> >> John Mok >> >> >> Julian Elischer wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> John Mok wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The command "ngctl types" shows :- >>>> >>>> There are 5 total types: >>>> Type name Number of living nodes >>>> --------- ---------------------- >>>> socket 1 >>>> rfc1490 0 >>>> lmi 0 >>>> frame_relay 0 >>>> sync_ar 2 >>>> >>>> What other modules are needed? How to add them, whether load them >>>> dynamically or compiled into kernel? >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> kldload ng_iface at least >>> >>> it should be loaded automatically if you add the line shown below.. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> John Mok >>>> >>>> >>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>> >>>>> what does >>>>> "ngctl types" >>>>> say? >>>>> >>>>> looks like you don't have all the right modules loaded.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> John Mok wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> After issuing the following commands :- >>>>>> >>>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux >>> >>> replace the next line with.. >>> #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi >>> >>> and add: >>> ngctl name fr-mux:dlci0 lmi >>> >>>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata rfc1490 dlci16 rfc1490 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> this could be replaved by: >>> ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: rfc1490 dlci16 downstream >>> >>> >>>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata dlci16 rl0 inet inet >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> this line is totally confused.. >>> >>> should be: >>> ngctl name fr-mux:dlci16 protomux >>> ngctl mkpeer protomux: iface inet inet >>> >>> now you can add the ip addresses.. >>> >>> sorry I didn't read it better several days ago.. >>> >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> #ifconfig ng0 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 >>>>>> ifconfig: interface ng0 does not exist >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> are you SURE none of these returned an error? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The command ifconfig shows :- >>>>>> >>>>>> rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>>> options=8 >>>>>> inet6 fe80::207:40ff:fe09:f09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 >>>>>> inet 192.168.255.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.255.255 >>>>>> ether 00:07:40:09:0f:09 >>>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (none) >>>>>> status: no carrier >>>>>> xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>>> options=9 >>>>>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fec1:9c58%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >>>>>> ether 00:01:03:c1:9c:58 >>>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>>>>> status: active >>>>>> xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>>> options=9 >>>>>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fe34:61af%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >>>>>> inet 192.168.16.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 >>>>>> ether 00:01:03:34:61:af >>>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>>>>> status: active >>>>>> plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 >>>>>> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 >>>>>> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >>>>>> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 >>>>>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >>>>>> >>>>>> and the command "ngctl list" shows :- >>>>>> >>>>>> There are 4 total nodes: >>>>>> Name: ngctl811 Type: socket ID: 00000011 Num >>>>>> hooks: 0 >>>>>> Name: Type: frame_relay ID: 00000004 Num >>>>>> hooks: 1 >>>>>> Name: sync_ar1 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000002 Num >>>>>> hooks: 0 >>>>>> Name: sync_ar0 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000001 Num >>>>>> hooks: 1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Would it be the problem that I test it with cable disconnected >>>>>> from the modem (i.e.CSU/DSU)? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>>>> >>>>>> John Mok >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> did the last command do anything? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> please show the output of: >>>>>>> ifconfig >>>>>>> ngctl list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 05:19:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEAB16A4CE for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 05:19:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.wlink.com.np (smtp4.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8349E43D1D for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 05:19:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bikrant@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 17733 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2005 05:19:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 31 Mar 2005 05:19:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 44162 invoked by uid 1008); 31 Mar 2005 05:19:14 -0000 Received: from bikrant@wlink.com.np by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.70. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.76):. Processed in 0.010249 secs); 31 Mar 2005 05:19:14 -0000 Received: from smtp1.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.76) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 31 Mar 2005 05:19:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 7647 invoked by uid 508); 31 Mar 2005 05:19:13 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.wlink.com.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 31 Mar 2005 05:19:03 -0000 (Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:04:03 +0545) From: Bikrant Neupane To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:03:51 +0545 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503311103.51196.bikrant@wlink.com.np> X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; -104.9 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=-104.9 required=5.0 Subject: Using radius client X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 05:19:22 -0000 Hi I would like the radius client send some optional parameters to my Radius server ( running Radiator). How would I do that? I am authenticating pppoe users with the radius server. Now I would like add some features like MACAddress+UserName+Password authentication. So that I can restrict the username on MAC address basis. I am running PPPoE with radius client on FreeBSD 4.10 and 4.9. Any help/pointer is highly appreciated. with regards, Bikrant From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 06:08:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E83C16A4CE for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:08:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0326843D2D for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:08:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru (8.13.0/vak/3.0) id j2V63nct050754 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org.checked; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:03:49 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (localhost.cronyx.ru [127.0.0.1]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru (8.13.0/vak/3.0) with ESMTP id j2V63Uwb050731; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:03:30 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <424B9E81.60004@cronyx.ru> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:53:53 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru-RU; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030426 X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Mok References: <42344AF7.6070701@attglobal.net> <423C72A1.7060000@cronyx.ru> <4240497D.5030304@attglobal.net> <42404B15.5040605@elischer.org> <424835C0.9070603@attglobal.net> <42485836.6030203@elischer.org> <424898E3.8080007@attglobal.net> <4248A5BB.3040508@elischer.org> <42497803.40904@attglobal.net> <424B30CE.6050809@attglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <424B30CE.6050809@attglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "Maren S. Leizaola" cc: Julian Elischer cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HOWTO connect MCI using Netgraph + Frame Relay with Digi SYNC/570i X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:08:06 -0000 John Mok: > Yes, the framing is IETF. == RFC1490 > Maren S. Leizaola wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, John Mok wrote: >> >>> Dear Julian, >>> >>> I have re-compiled the kernel with NETGRAPH_ETHER and >>> NETGRAPH_IFACE. I failed to create the lmi node :- >>> >>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream >>> #ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux >>> #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi >> >> >> >> isn't the framing in your Cisco 1600 IETF? >> >>> ngctl: send msg: Invalid arguments >>> >>> Command "ngctl types" returns :- >>> >>> There are 7 total types: >>> Type name Number of living nodes >>> --------- ---------------------- >>> socket 1 >>> frame_relay 1 >>> ether 3 >>> rfc1490 0 >>> lmi 0 >>> iface 0 >>> sync_ar 2 >>> >>> Command "ngctl show fr-mux:" returns :- >>> >>> Name: fr-mux Type: frame_relay ID: 00000007 Num hooks: 1 >>> Local hook Peer name Peer type Peer ID Peer >>> hook ---------- --------- --------- ------- >>> --------- downstream sync_ar0 sync_ar >>> 00000001 rawdata >>> Except the brief description on manpage, please help to advise where >>> I could find the detailed documentation (e.g. user guides or admin >>> guides etc.) about what node types and hooks are available in netgraph. >>> >>> Thank you very much. >>> >>> John Mok >>> >>> >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> John Mok wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The command "ngctl types" shows :- >>>>> >>>>> There are 5 total types: >>>>> Type name Number of living nodes >>>>> --------- ---------------------- >>>>> socket 1 >>>>> rfc1490 0 >>>>> lmi 0 >>>>> frame_relay 0 >>>>> sync_ar 2 >>>>> >>>>> What other modules are needed? How to add them, whether load them >>>>> dynamically or compiled into kernel? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> kldload ng_iface at least >>>> >>>> it should be loaded automatically if you add the line shown below.. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> John Mok >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> what does >>>>>> "ngctl types" >>>>>> say? >>>>>> >>>>>> looks like you don't have all the right modules loaded.. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> John Mok wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> After issuing the following commands :- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux >>>> >>>> replace the next line with.. >>>> #ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi >>>> >>>> and add: >>>> ngctl name fr-mux:dlci0 lmi >>>> >>>>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata rfc1490 dlci16 rfc1490 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> this could be replaved by: >>>> ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: rfc1490 dlci16 downstream >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> #ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0:rawdata dlci16 rl0 inet inet >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> this line is totally confused.. >>>> >>>> should be: >>>> ngctl name fr-mux:dlci16 protomux >>>> ngctl mkpeer protomux: iface inet inet >>>> >>>> now you can add the ip addresses.. >>>> >>>> sorry I didn't read it better several days ago.. >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> #ifconfig ng0 1.2.3.4 5.6.7.8 >>>>>>> ifconfig: interface ng0 does not exist >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> are you SURE none of these returned an error? >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The command ifconfig shows :- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>>>> options=8 >>>>>>> inet6 fe80::207:40ff:fe09:f09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 >>>>>>> inet 192.168.255.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast >>>>>>> 192.168.255.255 >>>>>>> ether 00:07:40:09:0f:09 >>>>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (none) >>>>>>> status: no carrier >>>>>>> xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>>>> options=9 >>>>>>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fec1:9c58%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >>>>>>> ether 00:01:03:c1:9c:58 >>>>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>>>>>> status: active >>>>>>> xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >>>>>>> options=9 >>>>>>> inet6 fe80::201:3ff:fe34:61af%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >>>>>>> inet 192.168.16.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.16.255 >>>>>>> ether 00:01:03:34:61:af >>>>>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>>>>>> status: active >>>>>>> plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 >>>>>>> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 >>>>>>> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >>>>>>> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 >>>>>>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and the command "ngctl list" shows :- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are 4 total nodes: >>>>>>> Name: ngctl811 Type: socket ID: 00000011 Num >>>>>>> hooks: 0 >>>>>>> Name: Type: frame_relay ID: 00000004 Num >>>>>>> hooks: 1 >>>>>>> Name: sync_ar1 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000002 Num >>>>>>> hooks: 0 >>>>>>> Name: sync_ar0 Type: sync_ar ID: 00000001 Num >>>>>>> hooks: 1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would it be the problem that I test it with cable disconnected >>>>>>> from the modem (i.e.CSU/DSU)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John Mok >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> did the last command do anything? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> please show the output of: >>>>>>>> ifconfig >>>>>>>> ngctl list >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 06:13:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1029316A4CE; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:13:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.skyinet.net (smtp2.skyinet.net [202.78.97.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8446443D5D; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fooler@skyinet.net) Received: from fooler (fooler.ilo.skyinet.net [202.78.118.66]) by smtp2.skyinet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 607F75BA72; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:13:06 +0800 (PHT) Message-ID: <05af01c535b8$b4a51720$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> From: "fooler" To: "Bikrant Neupane" , References: <200503311104.57782.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:13:06 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: radius client parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:13:09 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bikrant Neupane" To: Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 1:19 PM Subject: radius client parameters > Hi > > I would like the radius client send some optional parameters to my Radius > server ( running Radiator). How would I do that? > I am authenticating pppoe users with the radius server. Now I would like add > some features like MACAddress+UserName+Password authentication. So that I can > restrict the username on MAC address basis. > > I am running PPPoE with radius client on FreeBSD 4.10 and 4.9. > > Any help/pointer is highly appreciated. although brian somers (author of user ppp) forgot to document from the ppp's man page, the mac address is in the CALLING_STATION_ID (type 31) radius attribute :-> fooler. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 12:02:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD90A16A4CE; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:02:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.Awfulhak.org (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [80.177.173.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADBF43D4C; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:02:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from dev.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.5]) by gw.Awfulhak.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2VC2ELX003687; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:02:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:02:13 +0100 From: Brian Somers To: "fooler" Message-ID: <20050331130213.656c4b88@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> In-Reply-To: <05af01c535b8$b4a51720$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> References: <200503311104.57782.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> <05af01c535b8$b4a51720$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on gw.lan.Awfulhak.org cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Bikrant Neupane Subject: Re: radius client parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:02:20 -0000 On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:13:06 +0800, "fooler" wrote: > although brian somers (author of user ppp) forgot to document from the ppp's > man page, the mac address is in the CALLING_STATION_ID (type 31) radius > attribute :-> > > fooler. Patches are always welcome :*P -- Brian Somers Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 15:41:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7562C16A4CE; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:41:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.yazzy.org (mail.yazzy.org [217.8.140.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FD543D48; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:41:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@yazzy.org) Received: from yazzy.yazzy.net (yazzy.yazzy.org [192.168.98.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yazzy.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A874F39911; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:43:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:41:50 +0000 From: Marcin Jessa To: Brian Somers Message-Id: <20050331154150.05ccb738.lists@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <20050331130213.656c4b88@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> References: <200503311104.57782.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> <05af01c535b8$b4a51720$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> <20050331130213.656c4b88@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> Organization: YazzY.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: fooler@skyinet.net cc: bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: radius client parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:41:29 -0000 Hi Brian, guys. Do you plan to add additional radius atributes to the PPP code ? The one I really miss is tx/rx data rate limitation. It'd be great if PPP could set bandwith limit based on those atributes received from radius server(s). I can't unfortunately code that myself but I know this is done with Linux's ppp by www.mikrotik.com/ and http://www.staros.com/ They all provide their changed code as it's GPL'd. Cheers On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:02:13 +0100 Brian Somers wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:13:06 +0800, "fooler" wrote: > > although brian somers (author of user ppp) forgot to document from the ppp's > > man page, the mac address is in the CALLING_STATION_ID (type 31) radius > > attribute :-> > > > > fooler. > > Patches are always welcome :*P > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 21:20:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677CF16A4D1 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:20:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from handler7.mail.rice.edu (handler7.mail.rice.edu [128.42.58.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0178E43D54 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from willmann@rice.edu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by handler7.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 55FFA1DB12 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:20:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by handler7.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6331DB10 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:20:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from handler7.mail.rice.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (handler7.mail.rice.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11414-09 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:20:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.249.249.247] (dunwlessnat.rice.edu [128.42.64.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by handler7.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998891DB05 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:20:24 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: <20050329163246.GF87756@unixpages.org> References: <4b42090824704fe104ed6be2304f3b15@rice.edu> <20050329163246.GF87756@unixpages.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <3aec47f347fda81b54eac63da15d30c3@rice.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul Willmann Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:20:22 -0600 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-20030616-p6 at mail.rice.edu X-DCC--Metrics: handler7.mail.rice.edu 1066; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Subject: Re: Plan to remove GIANT dependence in ixgb driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:20:29 -0000 On Mar 29, 2005, at 10:32 AM, Christian Brueffer wrote: > Great, finally someone with ixgb hardware :-) Would you be interested > in testing out some patches? (altq support and per-interface polling) I would be willing to do this sometime given enough warning. Like most people, I've got other stuff that needs doing, too. :) But, if given warning and a clear specification of what needs testing, sure, I would not mind at all. --Paul From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 1 04:45:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBD416A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:45:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.wlink.com.np (smtp4.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A682443D4C for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:45:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 55296 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2005 04:45:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO av-scanner-02.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.91) by 0 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2005 04:45:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 27283 invoked by uid 1009); 1 Apr 2005 04:45:45 -0000 Received: from bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np by av-scanner-02.wlink.com.np by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.20 ( Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.78):. Processed in 0.015282 secs); 01 Apr 2005 04:45:45 -0000 Received: from smtp3.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.78) by av-scanner-02.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 1 Apr 2005 04:45:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 17418 invoked by uid 514); 1 Apr 2005 04:45:41 -0000 Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.wlink.com.np) by smtp3.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 01 Apr 2005 04:45:41 -0000 (Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:30:41 +0545) From: Bikrant Neupane To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:30:26 +0545 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200503311104.57782.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> <05af01c535b8$b4a51720$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> In-Reply-To: <05af01c535b8$b4a51720$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200504011030.26312.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> X-Spam-Check-By: smtp3.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; -4.9 / 5.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 cc: fooler cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: radius client parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 04:45:47 -0000 On Thursday 31 March 2005 11:58, fooler wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bikrant Neupane" > To: > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 1:19 PM > Subject: radius client parameters > > > Hi > > > > I would like the radius client send some optional parameters to my Radius > > server ( running Radiator). How would I do that? > > I am authenticating pppoe users with the radius server. Now I would like > > add > > > some features like MACAddress+UserName+Password authentication. So that I > > can > > > restrict the username on MAC address basis. > > > > I am running PPPoE with radius client on FreeBSD 4.10 and 4.9. > > > > Any help/pointer is highly appreciated. > > although brian somers (author of user ppp) forgot to document from the > ppp's man page, the mac address is in the CALLING_STATION_ID (type 31) > radius attribute :-> Thanks for the reply. I am sending you the debug output i get in my radius log. Is CALLING_STATION_ID enabled by default in the radius configuration? However I don't see any Attributes in the access-request log. I guess it is the client which is not sending the CALLING_STATION_ID attribute by default to the server. How do I configure the radius client (in Freebsd) to send this attribute to the radius server ? >>>>>>>>>>> Thu Mar 10 03:42:36 2005: DEBUG: Packet dump: *** Received from xx.xx.xx.xx port 1634 .... Code: Access-Request Identifier: 142 Authentic: <151>d<201><229><8><187>d5<210><212>9<9>T<245>?D Attributes: User-Name = "dust" Service-Type = Framed-User Framed-Protocol = PPP User-Password = "<178>#|IU<176>qA<240>.<18><28>C<252><173><134>" NAS-Identifier = "pppoe-02.x.x.x" NAS-Port-Type = Ethernet NAS-Port = 44971 >>>>>>>>>>>> bikrant > > fooler. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 1 05:10:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011D016A4CE; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:10:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.skyinet.net (smtp2.skyinet.net [202.78.97.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC6143D31; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:10:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fooler@skyinet.net) Received: from fooler (fooler.ilo.skyinet.net [202.78.118.66]) by smtp2.skyinet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 85DB45BB08; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:10:47 +0800 (PHT) Message-ID: <024e01c53679$2c2cbf80$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> From: "fooler" To: "Marcin Jessa" , "Brian Somers" References: <200503311104.57782.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np><05af01c535b8$b4a51720$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net><20050331130213.656c4b88@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <20050331154150.05ccb738.lists@yazzy.org> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:10:49 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np Subject: Re: radius client parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 05:10:50 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcin Jessa" To: "Brian Somers" Cc: ; ; ; Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:41 PM Subject: Re: radius client parameters > Hi Brian, guys. > > Do you plan to add additional radius atributes to the PPP code ? > The one I really miss is tx/rx data rate limitation. > It'd be great if PPP could set bandwith limit based on those atributes received from radius server(s). > I can't unfortunately code that myself but I know this is done with Linux's ppp by www.mikrotik.com/ and http://www.staros.com/ > They all provide their changed code as it's GPL'd. hello marcin... current radius rfc (rfc2865) didnt say anything about tx/rx data rate limitation radius attribute... but there is a way how to do it with freebsd :-> since freebsd ppp supported RAD_FILTER_ID and part of the access-accept radius packet type... just simply send the label to FILTER_ID radius attribute and put that label into /etc/ppp/ppp.linkup file where inside that label is doing the bandwidth management using IPFW as its bandwidth manager... just make sure you do a cleanup (removing ipfw pipe rules) inside /etc/ppp/ppp.linkdown file upon disconnection... you need a pipe number for ipfw for identification for that connection... just play with the tunnel interface number as its pipe number for easy creating and removing pipe :-> fooler. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 1 05:56:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C9F16A4CE; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:56:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.skyinet.net (smtp1.skyinet.net [202.78.97.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373AF43D1D; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:56:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fooler@skyinet.net) Received: from fooler (fooler.ilo.skyinet.net [202.78.118.66]) by smtp1.skyinet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 311625839C; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:56:09 +0800 (PHT) Message-ID: <026601c5367f$821296d0$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> From: "fooler" To: "Bikrant Neupane" , References: <200503311104.57782.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np><05af01c535b8$b4a51720$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> <200504011030.26312.bikrant_ml@wlink.com.np> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:56:01 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: radius client parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 05:56:32 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bikrant Neupane" To: Cc: "fooler" ; Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 12:45 PM Subject: Re: radius client parameters > Is CALLING_STATION_ID enabled by default in the radius configuration? since you are using freebsd 4.10 while i look the code of user ppp in freebsd 5.3... please check at /usr/src/usr.sbin/ppp/radius.c function radius_Authenticate() if you find this: if (rad_put_string(r->cx.rad, RAD_NAS_IDENTIFIER, hostname) != 0) { log_Printf(LogERROR, "rad_put: rad_put_string: %s\n", rad_strerror(r->cx.rad)); rad_close(r->cx.rad); return 0; } } if ((mac_addr = getenv("HISMACADDR")) != NULL && rad_put_string(r->cx.rad, RAD_CALLING_STATION_ID, mac_addr) != 0) { log_Printf(LogERROR, "rad_put: %s\n", rad_strerror(r->cx.rad)); rad_close(r->cx.rad); return; } radius_put_physical_details(r->cx.rad, authp->physical); if you dont find RAD_CALLING_STATION_ID then fetch the latest version of user-ppp and youll be fine... > However > I don't see any Attributes in the access-request log. I guess it is the > client which is not sending the CALLING_STATION_ID attribute by default to > the server. How do I configure the radius client (in Freebsd) to send this > attribute to the radius server ? pppoed is the one resposible assigning the mac address to environment variable HISMACADDR while the user-ppp get and put it to CALLING_STATION_ID radius attribute (as show above code)... therefore user-ppp automatically do it for you to send that radius attribute.. fooler. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 17:16:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CB716A4CE; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:16:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bl6-63-183.dsl.telepac.pt (bl6-63-183.dsl.telepac.pt [82.155.63.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3416D43D1D; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:16:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from boys0xHv@cashette.com) Message-ID: From: "Robertson" To: "Robertson" Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:17:47 -0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-networking@freebsd.org Subject: Returned package. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:16:18 -0000 Good day to you sir, Check below if your message doesn't load: http://caclickbutton.info Get back to you later, Margaret Craig green watermellon Were those pilots practicing praying?