From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 6 14:59:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E7916A4E0 for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 14:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@mail.ru) Received: from mx27.mail.ru (mx27.mail.ru [194.67.23.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4033443D49 for ; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 14:59:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amdmi3@mail.ru) Received: from [213.148.29.33] (port=22671 helo=nexii.panopticon) by mx27.mail.ru with esmtp id 1G9k6a-000EdF-00; Sun, 06 Aug 2006 18:59:53 +0400 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.2]) by nexii.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5432217041; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:59:40 +0400 (MSD) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92DA6433F; Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:59:54 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:59:54 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20060806145954.GC907@hades.panopticon> Mail-Followup-To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20060731203213.GA75233@hades.panopticon> <864pwtoorp.fsf@xps.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <864pwtoorp.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: absolute vs. relative offsets in disklabel X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:59:55 -0000 * Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav (des@des.no) wrote: > > Recent `disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly' thread gave me a > > thought - why do we have absolute offsets in disklabel? > We don't, AFAIK. Since the transition to GEOM, the offsets are > relative to the start of the containing provider. It has nothing to do with GEOM, it's ondisk format of disklabel. I've confirmed, there are global offsets. -- Best regards, Dmitry mailto:amdmi3@mail.ru