From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 00:00:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5AA16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:00:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m2o7i1@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE3243D4C for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m2o7i1@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m3so19228ugc for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:00:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rLeffuH7bxJTsoszLJ02sQMPOTsu1NDdLw6vFNE7tBxCIVJteiHz90mj81anW3E4S7Qwwh9QkcoFtOCRgJhEVfQOWp+1HV4aYJBksMq1OmvXXCiYqrj7+Nk6x40XN+0s0oZobDkTK+lP2Q386ho+jfTIkD+ppQ4N4EeHAJYm6rE= Received: by 10.66.164.4 with SMTP id m4mr331587uge; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:00:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.218.12 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:00:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2620c3260602111600u495c4ce5va5183f60375e7885@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:00:25 -0400 From: Moises Castellanos To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: I need help to install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:00:28 -0000 Hi. I want to install FreeBSD in my toshiba satellite A80-117 laptop, but when im in the first menu when i choose the option default, start to loading the kernel and the computer hang up, with the option of no ACPI too. The laptop has: Celeron M 1.4Ghz 256MB of RAM 40GB of Hard Drive. Atheros wireless Realtek LAN 10/100 ATI 9002 graphic card. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 00:02:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF24216A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:02:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F0143D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:02:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 90663 invoked by uid 1008); 12 Feb 2006 00:02:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 12 Feb 2006 00:02:20 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:02:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <62719.24.90.33.115.1139702540.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:02:20 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: In-Reply-To: Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: ifconfig wepkey on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:02:45 -0000 hi all... according to the man page of ifconfig in 6.0 the wepkey should be 5 or 13 characters. the wep key i always had is way longer than 13 characters 128 bit - one key only.. so when i try to set it up to the wi0 i get: # ifconfig wi0 wepkey 1:0xWEPKEY128BITENCRYPTIONBLAHBLA ifconfig: SIOCS80211: Invalid argument this worked fine in 5.4.. any solution? thanks... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 00:17:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54B916A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:17:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60011.mail.yahoo.com (web60011.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E414343D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:17:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 10466 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Feb 2006 00:17:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gIBuC5k7aa0wwvhg53LmumZskXh+D6zo+dIlWVZ6R8h+/jc7oWYinL4aVNQa4kHU32LTBdRMb9fz8sUwUP2gd1x7Agcv8bVQvUdFn7q+zQ6lS4cW4xjKYRFlp7Xl4SvS1wM0iGv+aoL3pPiClvTRQckxTHgAQqeOqQvPzz8Rteg= ; Message-ID: <20060212001718.10464.qmail@web60011.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.252.84.55] by web60011.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:17:18 EST Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:17:18 -0500 (EST) From: Peter To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <200602111532.k1BFWTDQ017997@clunix.cl.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: MBR blown away X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:17:19 -0000 --- Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > I need help. > > > > I added a slice to a single hard drive dual-boot (windows) system and > now > > I guess that scrambled my MBR. I get three options from the FreeBSD > (5.4) > > boot manager: > > > > 1. DOS > > 2. FreeBSD > > 3. FreeBSD > > > > I can boot to FreeBSD (the new slice is fine) by choosing option 3 but > the > > windows/dos option is fried. > > The MBR itself looks OK. According to that piece of menu you posted, > you > just added another bootable slice. So, there are now two bootable > FreeBSD > slices and one bootable Microsloth slice. The thing is, I never ran the boot manager after changing the (existing FAT32) windows partition to a FreeBSD slice. The boot manager config would be the same and so it continues to list DOS as a bootable partition when it is/may not. > Are you saying that the MS slice will no longer boot if you select '1' > from > the menu? If that is the case, it is not the MBR that was messed up. Correct, I chose '1' and then the system hangs (no messages/errors). > It is something in the MS slice - probably their boot sector. I don't > even > pretend to know how MS sets up theirs if it is any different from > FreeBSD. > > But, the MBR is doing what it is supposed to do. It discovers all the > bootable slices and makes a menu and transfers control to the selected > slice. What happens after that is not the problem of the MBR. I don't think the MBR discovers anything. It is pre-defined to just point to the bootable partitions. And it is the boot manager that creates the menu probably by looking at the MBR. AFAIK, the boot manager must be explicitly instructed to do that (sysintall must provide this instruction during a full install). > Did you use some utility to shrink the original two slices to fit in > the new one? Or was there already unused space (previously unallocated) > that you were using? I simply converted a 6GB FAT32 partition into a UFS2 slice (chopped into three 2GB partitions). -- Peter __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 00:30:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55B616A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:30:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jortega38@sbcglobal.net) Received: from web82008.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web82008.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F93743D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:30:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jortega38@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 38456 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Feb 2006 00:30:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=jdaTxSEAQp84s/qyP8+PLhVXtLENCy74Vo4+2Je1mtGMSVsno5c9UsUrXVRrhuT6gINzJsHqZ3UgJm8JWVpefl108nKZC62SfSorldXX8NscVOrbSPS0lULwO7uSSo9cFGWTvDDcGw8l/aVHGBa0WgHsNKpvBwDZovoK7LC37FM= ; Message-ID: <20060212003033.38454.qmail@web82008.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [71.141.140.165] by web82008.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:30:33 PST Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:30:33 -0800 (PST) From: Jose Jesus Ortega To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: help on network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:30:34 -0000 I have a Linksys Wireless-B network adapter. Its model No.WPC11. I can't make it work on freeBSD. I tried the ndis molecule like it says on the Handbook. It turned on but I can't make it go online. Using "ifconfig -a" won't see it. Any way to make it work? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 00:42:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C3F16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:42:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iedowse@iedowse.com) Received: from nowhere.iedowse.com (nowhere.iedowse.com [82.195.144.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F9EF43D48 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:42:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iedowse@iedowse.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=iedowse.com) by nowhere.iedowse.com via local-iedowse id ; 12 Feb 2006 00:42:23 +0000 (GMT) To: Erin Sharmahd In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 11 Feb 2006 14:00:47 MST." <6e4453640602111300u63636c4cu15c63e30b7618006@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:42:22 +0000 From: Ian Dowse Message-ID: <200602120042.aa14971@nowhere.iedowse.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I can't mount my USB thumb drive or ipod -- no /dev/da* X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:42:25 -0000 In message <6e4453640602111300u63636c4cu15c63e30b7618006@mail.gmail.com>, Erin Sharmahd writes: >Will this help, even though I can't mount any usb thumb drives or >anything like that? It's definitely worth a try. People have reported exactly this issue with both recent iPods, and PNY Attache devices. In the case of the iPods, removing the stall-clearing code was reported to fix the problem, but I don't know whether it will help with the thumb drive. Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 00:46:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199FB16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:46:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7468843D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:46:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060212004601.PTFZ22902.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:46:01 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Moises Castellanos" , Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:45:56 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <2620c3260602111600u495c4ce5va5183f60375e7885@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: I need help to install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:46:03 -0000 There is a laptop question list which you should post at. I think its called mobile. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Moises Castellanos Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 7:00 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: I need help to install Hi. I want to install FreeBSD in my toshiba satellite A80-117 laptop, but when im in the first menu when i choose the option default, start to loading the kernel and the computer hang up, with the option of no ACPI too. The laptop has: Celeron M 1.4Ghz 256MB of RAM 40GB of Hard Drive. Atheros wireless Realtek LAN 10/100 ATI 9002 graphic card. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 00:51:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A83516A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:51:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DD343D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:51:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060212005123.QBUW22902.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:51:23 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Jose Jesus Ortega" , Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:51:22 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060212003033.38454.qmail@web82008.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: help on network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:51:24 -0000 Is the card found in the boot process? There should be some messages in the boot log if the card is found. Maybe the driver for your card is not part of the base install system. You may have to compile the kernel to include support for your card. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jose Jesus Ortega Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 7:31 PM To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: help on network card I have a Linksys Wireless-B network adapter. Its model No.WPC11. I can't make it work on freeBSD. I tried the ndis molecule like it says on the Handbook. It turned on but I can't make it go online. Using "ifconfig -a" won't see it. Any way to make it work? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 01:29:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BDD16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:29:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A7543D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 3740 invoked by uid 1008); 12 Feb 2006 01:29:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 12 Feb 2006 01:29:09 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:29:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <61252.24.90.33.115.1139707749.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:29:09 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: "Randy Bush" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: <62719.24.90.33.115.1139702540.squirrel@mail.el.net> <17390.32548.734886.788402@roam.psg.com> In-Reply-To: <17390.32548.734886.788402@roam.psg.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ifconfig wepkey on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:29:33 -0000 >> according to the man page of ifconfig in 6.0 the wepkey should be 5 or >> 13 characters > ^ascii > comes out to a bit more in hex :-) > just enter wepkey 309EFC5AB8 what do you mean? i'm confused now... sorry. the key is generated by the point - wireless router. and i get an hex string back.. no matter what i put in as password (or how many ascii characters) i always get the 128 bit hex. so when i try it with ifconfig i always get the same error - even without the index and the 0x... ifconfig: SIOCS80211: Invalid argument > randy thanks... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 02:01:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91BD16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:01:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC0443D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:01:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.60] ([82.35.114.11]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:02:15 +0000 Message-ID: <43EE966C.9010800@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:59:08 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20060202070506.GA7209@bifteki.lan> In-Reply-To: <20060202070506.GA7209@bifteki.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2006 02:02:16.0071 (UTC) FILETIME=[58E65970:01C62F78] Subject: Re: Will FreeBSD run on an Intel Pentium II with 32MB RAM ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:01:15 -0000 > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:46:48AM +0530, Pranav Peshwe wrote: > >>Hello, >> I have a machine with an Intel Pentium II processor and 32 MB >>of RAM.Will i be able to run FreeBSD 5.4 on it ? Where are you? I have a biscuit box and a half of 72pin EDO and old SDRAM... Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 02:19:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2DA16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:19:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mattsullivan9@adelphia.net) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F0F43D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:19:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mattsullivan9@adelphia.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [68.66.139.230]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060212021943.XAIK18877.mta10.adelphia.net@[127.0.0.1]> for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:19:43 -0500 Message-ID: <43EE9B3F.7050708@adelphia.net> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:19:43 -0800 From: Matt Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Dell 530 RAID 5 Recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:19:53 -0000 I am considering using FreeBSD 6 on an old Dell Precision Workstation 530 MT. It has Dual Xeon 1.5 GHz CPUs, 4 x Fujitsu AIC-7892A MAJ3182M SCSI HDs, 1 GB RDRAM, Nvidia Elsa Gloria II Pro video, Integrated 3Com NIC, Lynksys Wireless-G USB network adapter, and Integrated Adaptec AIC-7892 SCSI controller. I would like to setup RAID 5. The intended use is in my home network as a personal SOA/J2EE/MySQL development box and family file server. Please review and comment on my assumptions: 1) FreeBSD 6-STABLE has fixed any 5.X SMP issues. 2) I will need an additional RAID controller card. 3) FreeBSD has issues similar to the folks at OpenBSD (my firewall OS) regarding Adaptec - http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html: we do not recommend the Adaptec cards for use. * Adaptec AAC-2622, AAC-364, AAC-3642, 2200S, 2410SA, 2610SA, 2810SA, 21610SA I would appreciate some recommendations with a focus on price/performance. Thanks, Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 02:34:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2624216A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:34:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennyboy@cableone.net) Received: from S3.cableone.net (s3.cableone.net [24.116.0.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671E443D48 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:34:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennyboy@cableone.net) Received: from badboybox.cableone.net (unverified [69.92.7.117]) by S3.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S3) with ESMTP id 46237494 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:04:53 -0700 Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:36:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Denny White To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http//wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii; X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 2, First 18, in=17, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 69.92.7.117 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Subject: Samba vulnerability & make problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:34:15 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Was trying to setup apsfilter to be able to print to my winbox printer. Got as far as the follwing: ===> apsfilter-7.2.6_2 depends on executable: smbclient - not found ===> Verifying install for smbclient in /usr/ports/net/samba ===> samba-2.2.12_2 has known vulnerabilities: => samba -- integer overflow vulnerability. Reference: => Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/apsfilter. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/apsfilter. Script done on Sat Feb 11 20:01:52 2006 I've got portaudit installed & the database was just updated several days ago, as well as the ports with portsnap & portupgrade. Have checked the last week or so of the cvs mailing list for samba & found nothing, so I didn't rerun portsnap & portupgrade. Already so many dependencies installed for apsfilter, I hated to update anything else right in the middle of all of this. Tried running the make command with -DIGNORE_VULNERABILITIES but still no dice. Any advice, pointers to reading up on it, help, appreciated. Denny White Please do not CC me. Already subscribed to mailing list. GnuPG key : 0x1644E79A | http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD) iD8DBQFD7krBy0Ty5RZE55oRAmQBAJ98IKinB70kHj56nIP9LkyZofhLogCgyHGM e0fTVOrU1FaXtS7KsJOUWLo= =rdeN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 02:39:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53F716A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:39:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com (outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com [64.136.20.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A9F243D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:39:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from webmail65.nyc.untd.com (webmail65.nyc.untd.com [10.141.27.205]) by smtpout01.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AABB87H84AJ8HC4J for (sender ); Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:39:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gs_stoller@juno.com) by webmail65.nyc.untd.com (jqueuemail) id LGYQ3EAK; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:38:55 PST Received: from [67.84.55.15] by webmail65.nyc.untd.com with HTTP: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:38:05 GMT X-Originating-IP: [67.84.55.15] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "gs_stoller@juno.com" Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:38:05 GMT To: freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20060211.183855.29586.250418@webmail65.nyc.untd.com> X-ContentStamp: 7:3:2032596865 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: /s5f1SIGSI3+WdnoYQ8yRORbALEFtJilyxb15r1AEKuw30WNA5kFoQ== X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.141.27.205|webmail65.nyc.untd.com|webmail65.nyc.untd.com|gs_stoller@juno.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, gs_stoller@juno.com Subject: Re: installation of FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:39:33 -0000 (Some data deleted) >> What happens is that I first get a message ?Building the boot loader >> arguments? on one line, and shortly afterwards the message ?Relocatin= g >> the loader and the BTX? on another line. After a delay of about 11 >> minutes, a third line appears containing the message ?Starting the BT= X >> loader?. I let the system run for about an hour and a half but no >> more messages appeared, nor did the computer indicate that the >> installation had completed. >> The only thing in my machine that I think could be ?not working? >> with the installation program is my BIOS . Here is all the >> information I have about my BIOS . It names itself as >> ?Energy Star Ally? written by Award Software Inc. and that it is >> an ?Award Modular BIOS? with ?Award Plug & Play BIOS extension >> v1.0A?. Its ID is v4.6OPGMA (the character between the "6" & >> the "P" is a vertical ellipse with a dot at its center, it is >> either zero or oh ). > How did you install it? (Two floppy disks / CD) > Did you get to the install screen? (sysinstall) I tried to install from a CDROM set (of 2). I never did get to the install screen. I tried simply booting the firs= t CDROM and it gave out those three lines. Similarly when I booted in= to my current system (4.3), mounted the first CDROM , and then typed "/= cdrom/stand/sysinstall". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 03:53:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C16F16A422 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:53:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C38A43D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:53:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t14so516096wxc for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:53:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pPZpEMIJ365sP9DMBOIfuj86vr54AEbWmICN+tj2MrdTmHWm+36Ktsh1MvWEUVOQ89WvtpOfU8+k5KZOOQKSZSlGZGAQjFz9QiyyE3ftN0ImMx7aRimiKhhd0zZcOkhew9NoXE/ylrKCNDv8SIizEvvIHAJEnaGfSkMhWV6fzkk= Received: by 10.70.80.7 with SMTP id d7mr932107wxb; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:53:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.58.15 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:53:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:53:15 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <43EE966C.9010800@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060202070506.GA7209@bifteki.lan> <43EE966C.9010800@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Subject: Re: Will FreeBSD run on an Intel Pentium II with 32MB RAM ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:53:16 -0000 On 2/11/06, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:46:48AM +0530, Pranav Peshwe wrote: > > > >>Hello, > >> I have a machine with an Intel Pentium II processor and 32 MB > >>of RAM.Will i be able to run FreeBSD 5.4 on it ? > > Where are you? I have a biscuit box and a half of 72pin EDO and old SDRAM= ... Same here. But to answer, yes, it will run fine, albeit a tad slow. You will probably not want to try installing X11, though I'm fairly certain it will run. Poking kde atop that would be a laugh. Compiling jdk-1.5 would probably take four-thousand moltons! -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 04:00:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C7F16A422 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:00:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B80F43D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:00:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060212040025.CFBY18877.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:00:25 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: , Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:00:19 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060211.183855.29586.250418@webmail65.nyc.untd.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: installation of FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:00:26 -0000 (Some data deleted) >> What happens is that I first get a message ?Building the boot loader >> arguments? on one line, and shortly afterwards the message ?Relocating >> the loader and the BTX? on another line. After a delay of about 11 >> minutes, a third line appears containing the message ?Starting the BTX >> loader?. I let the system run for about an hour and a half but no >> more messages appeared, nor did the computer indicate that the >> installation had completed. >> The only thing in my machine that I think could be ?not working? >> with the installation program is my BIOS . Here is all the >> information I have about my BIOS . It names itself as >> ?Energy Star Ally? written by Award Software Inc. and that it is >> an ?Award Modular BIOS? with ?Award Plug & Play BIOS extension >> v1.0A?. Its ID is v4.6OPGMA (the character between the "6" & >> the "P" is a vertical ellipse with a dot at its center, it is >> either zero or oh ). > How did you install it? (Two floppy disks / CD) > Did you get to the install screen? (sysinstall) I tried to install from a CDROM set (of 2). I never did get to the install screen. I tried simply booting the first CDROM and it gave out those three lines. Similarly when I booted into my current system (4.3), mounted the first CDROM , and then typed "/cdrom/stand/sysinstall". **************************************************** Where did you get your install cd from?? If you burned a downloaded iso file, did you run md5 to verify the checksum so you know its good? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 04:05:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8612D16A422 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:05:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4B743D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:05:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k1C45MiU019503; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:05:22 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k1C45LI6019502; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:05:21 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200602120405.k1C45LI6019502@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: petermatulis@yahoo.ca (Peter) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:05:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060212001718.10464.qmail@web60011.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: MBR blown away X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:05:23 -0000 > > > --- Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > > > > I need help. > > > > > > I added a slice to a single hard drive dual-boot (windows) system and > > now > > > I guess that scrambled my MBR. I get three options from the FreeBSD > > (5.4) > > > boot manager: > > > > > > 1. DOS > > > 2. FreeBSD > > > 3. FreeBSD > > > > > > I can boot to FreeBSD (the new slice is fine) by choosing option 3 but > > the > > > windows/dos option is fried. > > > > The MBR itself looks OK. According to that piece of menu you posted, > > you > > just added another bootable slice. So, there are now two bootable > > FreeBSD > > slices and one bootable Microsloth slice. > > > The thing is, I never ran the boot manager after changing the (existing > FAT32) windows partition to a FreeBSD slice. The boot manager config > would be the same and so it continues to list DOS as a bootable partition > when it is/may not. > > > Are you saying that the MS slice will no longer boot if you select '1' > > from > > the menu? If that is the case, it is not the MBR that was messed up. > > > Correct, I chose '1' and then the system hangs (no messages/errors). > > > It is something in the MS slice - probably their boot sector. I don't > > even > > pretend to know how MS sets up theirs if it is any different from > > FreeBSD. > > > > But, the MBR is doing what it is supposed to do. It discovers all the > > bootable slices and makes a menu and transfers control to the selected > > slice. What happens after that is not the problem of the MBR. > > > I don't think the MBR discovers anything. It is pre-defined to just point > to the bootable partitions. And it is the boot manager that creates the > menu probably by looking at the MBR. AFAIK, the boot manager must be > explicitly instructed to do that (sysintall must provide this instruction > during a full install). > > > Did you use some utility to shrink the original two slices to fit in > > the new one? Or was there already unused space (previously unallocated) > > that you were using? > > I simply converted a 6GB FAT32 partition into a UFS2 slice (chopped into > three 2GB partitions). Well, I still am guessing the problem lies in individual slices' boot sectors and not the MBR. just try and set the bootable flags in the slices the way you think they should be and see what happens. ////jerry > > -- > Peter > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________ > Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 04:35:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A472A16A422 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:35:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from playnet@mail333.com) Received: from smtp1.pochta.ru (smtp1.pochta.ru [81.211.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9DF43D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:35:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from playnet@mail333.com) Received: from pl (ip88.170.adsl.wplus.ru [195.131.170.88]) (author=playnet@mail333.com authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.pochta.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP daemon=POCHTA.RU id k1C4ZEiv054686 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:35:16 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from playnet@mail333.com) X-Author: playnet@mail333.com from pl (ip88.170.adsl.wplus.ru [195.131.170.88]) via Free Mail POCHTA.RU Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:39:15 +0300 From: Playnet X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1059667590.20060212073915@mail333.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: incorrect logins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: playnet List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:35:28 -0000 Hello FreeBSD, I see many records as Feb 10 21:08:55 sstand sshd[84600]: Failed password for root from 61.218.130.20 port 46356 ssh2 How can i block these IP, who try "root" as login? Have any soft in ports? -- Best regards, Playnet mailto:playnet@mail333.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 04:42:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D31416A422 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:42:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james_mapson@umpquanet.com) Received: from ns.museum.rain.com (gw-ipinc.museum.rain.com [65.75.192.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C0B43D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:42:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james_mapson@umpquanet.com) Received: from ns.museum.rain.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.museum.rain.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1C4gFKD033944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:42:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@umpquanet.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.museum.rain.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1C4gECa033943; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:42:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:42:14 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060212044214.GA33920@ns.museum.rain.com> References: <20060211094330.B415516A443@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060211094330.B415516A443@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, J_CHICKENPOX_43,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on ns.museum.rain.com Cc: Peter Subject: Re: MBR blown away X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:42:22 -0000 > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:19:07 -0500 (EST) > From: Peter > Subject: MBR blown away > To: freebsd-questions > Message-ID: <20060211021907.59503.qmail@web60014.mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > I need help. > > I added a slice to a single hard drive dual-boot (windows) system and now > I guess that scrambled my MBR. I get three options from the FreeBSD (5.4) > boot manager: > > 1. DOS > 2. FreeBSD > 3. FreeBSD > > I can boot to FreeBSD (the new slice is fine) by choosing option 3 but the > windows/dos option is fried. > > My current strategy is to use boot0cfg: > > # boot0cfg -B > > But I'm a little squeemish. I don't want to be locked out of FreeBSD (I > barely use Windows but I still would like it back for Visio). Any > guidance? Start by making a full backup of your FreeBSD installation. Then you'll feel less squeamish about whatever you do next. Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 05:18:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BDE16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:18:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuxgirl@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBFC43D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:18:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuxgirl@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q3so758911nzb for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:18:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lpKj4yVUM8mGddpFGljhIln8o/RkRA8a+r5EVprVF8vNPFDJXnuXk+Gk+DPcDX2ESURLDnAfAFwohi6eiUAEthhwCK2dqY5qZsOa7XEFvu7Zrp4iNUSxuBnFp3f2Qi1q4FlM0d8vquYVT3uUvk2RlqyqVZXN+BCPzgrU9uovFdg= Received: by 10.65.154.12 with SMTP id g12mr480255qbo; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:18:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.236.2 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:18:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e4453640602112118t47efdf1dsea2088deaa050f41@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:18:28 -0700 From: Erin Sharmahd To: Ian Dowse In-Reply-To: <200602120042.aa14971@nowhere.iedowse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e4453640602111300u63636c4cu15c63e30b7618006@mail.gmail.com> <200602120042.aa14971@nowhere.iedowse.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I can't mount my USB thumb drive or ipod -- no /dev/da* X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:18:29 -0000 > It's definitely worth a try. People have reported exactly this issue > with both recent iPods, and PNY Attache devices. In the case of the > iPods, removing the stall-clearing code was reported to fix the > problem, but I don't know whether it will help with the thumb drive. And, we've got a winner! Any idea if there are plans to fix this in the kernel itself? I looked and found this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dusb/86438 but it appears to still be open... Anyway, many thanks to everybody who provided suggestions and help here! Most especiall, thank you to Ian for finding this solution! ~Erin -- http://www.tuxgirl.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 05:21:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0402C16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:21:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B4143D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:21:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DF613C7DC; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:22:03 -0600 (CST) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5B4013C7DB; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:22:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E1813C404; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:22:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:22:02 -0600 (CST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Playnet In-Reply-To: <1059667590.20060212073915@mail333.com> Message-ID: <20060211232026.V72276@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <1059667590.20060212073915@mail333.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: incorrect logins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:21:25 -0000 > I see many records as > Feb 10 21:08:55 sstand sshd[84600]: Failed password for root from 61.218.130.20 port 46356 ssh2 > > How can i block these IP, who try "root" as login? > Have any soft in ports? There are some ports that do it. One thing I didn't like about the ports (at least the ones I looked at) was that the app managed removing the firewall rules itself. Which means that if the app crashes right after you lock yourself out for some reason, thoes firewall rules are never going to get reset. http://www.pjkh.com/wiki/ssh_monitor Is my own little perl script and associated crontab entries to get around it. But if it were me, I'd check the ports out too as some of them do more than what I wanted to do. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 03:03:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC3F16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:03:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com (outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com [64.136.20.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E973343D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:03:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from webmail65.nyc.untd.com (webmail65.nyc.untd.com [10.141.27.205]) by smtpout02.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AABB87KLXAHJAMDJ for (sender ); Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:02:45 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gs_stoller@juno.com) by webmail65.nyc.untd.com (jqueuemail) id LGYSES84; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:02:37 PST Received: from [67.84.55.15] by webmail65.nyc.untd.com with HTTP: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:02:06 GMT X-Originating-IP: [67.84.55.15] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "gs_stoller@juno.com" Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:02:06 GMT To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20060211.190237.29586.250540@webmail65.nyc.untd.com> X-ContentStamp: 7:3:1261575873 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: /s5f1SIGSI3+WdnoYQ8yRORbALEFtJillfboxNY+QarYIENiCwESoQ== X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.141.27.205|webmail65.nyc.untd.com|webmail65.nyc.untd.com|gs_stoller@juno.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:33:14 +0000 Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:03:29 -0000 I would like to have the source code of (the set of) programs that can "read from"/"write to" any sector of a disk without a file-system, think of them as the disk i/o programs that underly the file-system. I expect them to have (collectively) about four arguments,= one specifying the disk to access, the second pointing to a buffer (supplying the data to write or to accept the data read), the third stating the number of bytes to transfer, and the fourth giving the LBA = = address of the sector to be accessed. One function common to both the read program and the write program is the function to position the disk read/write head at the desired sector (given by its LBA ) [or notify the user via an interrupt (which one?) when that sector is at the read/write head]. This function is often named "seek". Source code with good comments are more desireable. One could combine the read & write programs into one program and add another argument telling the program whether it is to read or to write. One program that meets some of these requirements (but not all) is fdisk [it accesses only sector 0 ]. Its source would also be appreciated, all of those in the following versions of FreeBSD if available: versions 4.3, 4.7, & current-stable (6.0). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 06:32:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE64116A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:32:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shantanoo@ghar.dhoomketu.net.in) Received: from iqara.net (sendmail.iqara.net [203.187.192.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BC743D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:32:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shantanoo@ghar.dhoomketu.net.in) Received: (qmail 13464 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2006 06:30:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ghar.dhoomketu.net.in) ([219.91.153.219]) (envelope-sender ) by iqara.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Feb 2006 06:30:46 -0000 Received: by ghar.dhoomketu.net.in (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 878745C40; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:01:37 +0530 (IST) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:01:37 +0530 From: Shantanoo Mahajan To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20060212063137.GA1088@ghar.dhoomketu.net.in> Mail-Followup-To: Wojciech Puchar , RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43E4AE54.6060906@makeworld.com> <200602111252.13323.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <20060212000821.V46434@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060212000821.V46434@chylonia.3miasto.net> Organization: Hmmm... I dunno X-OS: FreeBSD 6.0-SECURITY i386 X-UPTIME: 11:58AM up 5 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.18, 0.22, 0.11 X-Mailer-Website: http://www.mutt.org X-GPG-Fingerprint: 614C 591B D401 98ED 1EF1 8BCF 30A1 5685 07A6 AA4B User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r581 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, RW Subject: Re: 6.0 on DVD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:32:11 -0000 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +++ Wojciech Puchar [freebsd] [12-02-06 00:09 +0100]: | >>If it's out there - where? | > | >I'm not sure about this, but aren't the DVD versions created by a third-= party | >company? | >_______________________________________________ |=20 | well i created 8.5GB DVD version of FreeBSD 6.0/amd64 by myself for perso= nal use. it is original install=20 | CD+all binary packages available on FTP. then i have to delete unpacked /= usr/share/doc/ from CD to fit :) Can you please post the procedure? Shantanoo --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD7tZJMKFWhQemqksRArNHAKCfem942EVmt1P3P5if7hreP+GnHgCgmgUx ttvfrgrUtNEGQd9+1WsEXDs= =hn2t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 07:15:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7E916A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:15:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF91543D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:15:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1C7FEu86803; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:15:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Robert Uzzi" Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:15:13 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <61705.207.70.139.52.1139688802.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: SATA Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:15:20 -0000 Well you want several things here: redundancy, add in card to preserve your existing motherboard, SATA, and cheap. So far you have found those four things are incompatible, that is why your here. I'm telling you point blank that they are incompatible and to give up looking for that combo. Get rid of one of these items and your being reasonable. If you want redundancy and cheap, and add-in card, then get a udma 133 card and discounted disk drives. If you want redundancy and cheap and SATA then replace your motherboard with one that has a SATA raid chipset on it and these existing SATA drives you apparently already have. By the time you buy a SATA raid card you can pay for a new motherboard that is better and faster and already has SATA raid on it. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: Robert Uzzi [mailto:ruzzi@compedgeracing.com] >Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:13 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: SATA Raid > > >None of there are relevant since the only add in card is UDMA >100 not SATA >different chipsets. The others are built in's and not add in cards. > > > >> >> Here's some output from 3 of my servers with different ide raid, >> judge for yourself: >> >> Server #1: FreeBSD 6.0, Promise udma raid chip on motherboard: >> >> www# dmesg >> . >> . >> ad4: 114473MB at ata2-master UDMA100 >> ad6: 114473MB at ata3-master UDMA100 >> Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle >> ar0: 114440MB status: READY >> ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad4 at ata2-master >> ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad6 at ata3-master >> . >> . >> >> www# atacontrol list >> ATA channel 0: >> Master: no device present >> Slave: no device present >> ATA channel 1: >> Master: acd0 0107/E1.07> ATA/ATAPI >> revision 4 >> Slave: no device present >> ATA channel 2: >> Master: ad4 ATA/ATAPI revision 6 >> Slave: no device present >> ATA channel 3: >> Master: ad6 ATA/ATAPI revision 6 >> Slave: no device present >> >> www# atacontrol status ar0 >> ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: READY >> >> >> Server #2 FreeBSD 5.4 Adaptec ATA RAID 1200A (Highpoint Rocket Raid >> 100) on a pci card >> >> # dmesg >> . >> . >> . >> atapci0: port >> >0xd800-0xd8ff,0xdfe0-0xdfe3,0xdfa8-0xdfaf,0xdfe4-0xdfe7,0xdff0-0 >xdff7 irq >> 9 at device 10.0 on pci2 >> ata2: channel #0 on atapci0 >> ata3: channel #1 on atapci0 >> . >> . >> . >> ad4: 152627MB [310101/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 >> ad6: 152627MB [310101/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA100 >> ar0: 152627MB [19457/255/63] status: READY subdisks: >> disk0 READY on ad4 at ata2-master >> disk1 READY on ad6 at ata3-master >> . >> . >> . >> >> # atacontrol list >> ATA channel 0: >> Master: no device present >> Slave: no device present >> ATA channel 1: >> Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI revision 0 >> Slave: no device present >> ATA channel 2: >> Master: ad4 ATA/ATAPI revision 6 >> Slave: no device present >> ATA channel 3: >> Master: ad6 ATA/ATAPI revision 6 >> Slave: no device present >> # >> # atacontrol status 0 >> ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: READY >> # >> >> Server #3 FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Intel ICH5R/6300ESB >SATA150 RAID chip >> on motherboard >> >> #dmesg >> . >> . >> . >> atapci1: port >> 0xe400-0xe407,0xe000-0xe003,0xd >> c00-0xdc07,0xd800-0xd803,0xd400-0xd40f irq 18 at device 31.2 on pci0 >> atapci1: failed to enable memory mapping! >> ata2: on atapci1 >> ata3: on atapci1 >> . >> . >> . >> ad4: 286168MB at ata2-master SATA150 >> ad6: 286168MB at ata3-master SATA150 >> ar0: 286168MB status: READY >> ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad4 at ata2-master >> ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad6 at ata3-master >> . >> . >> . >> mail# atacontrol list >> ATA channel 0: >> Master: no device present >> Slave: no device present >> ATA channel 1: >> Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI revision 0 >> Slave: no device present >> ATA channel 2: >> Master: ad4 Serial ATA v1.0 >> Slave: no device present >> ATA channel 3: >> Master: ad6 Serial ATA v1.0 >> Slave: no device present >> mail# >> >> mail# atacontrol status ar0 >> ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: READY >> mail# >> >> Ted Mittelstaedt >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Robert Uzzi >>>Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:35 PM >>>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>Subject: SATA Raid >>> >>> >>>Anyone know of any of the cheaper SATA raid cards that work well under >>>FreeBSD. I'd love to go get a 3ware but they are fairly pricey. >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>>-- >>>No virus found in this incoming message. >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.5/256 - Release Date: >>>2/10/2006 >>> >> >> > > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/257 - Release Date: >2/10/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 07:56:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC84B16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:56:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8B043D49 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:56:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 17367 invoked by uid 510); 12 Feb 2006 07:58:53 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1261. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.5/5.0):. Processed in 2.470927 secs); 12 Feb 2006 07:58:53 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.5/5.0):. Processed in 2.470927 secs Process 17360) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 12 Feb 2006 07:58:50 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1139731129.17153.7.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:58:50 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Samba vulnerability & make problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:56:59 -0000 On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 20:36, Denny White wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Was trying to setup apsfilter to be able to print to my > winbox printer. Got as far as the follwing: > > ===> apsfilter-7.2.6_2 depends on executable: smbclient - not found > ===> Verifying install for smbclient in /usr/ports/net/samba > ===> samba-2.2.12_2 has known vulnerabilities: > => samba -- integer overflow vulnerability. > Reference: > => Please update your ports tree and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/apsfilter. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/apsfilter. > > Script done on Sat Feb 11 20:01:52 2006 > > I've got portaudit installed & the database was just updated > several days ago, as well as the ports with portsnap & portupgrade. > Have checked the last week or so of the cvs mailing list for samba > & found nothing, so I didn't rerun portsnap & portupgrade. Already > so many dependencies installed for apsfilter, I hated to update > anything else right in the middle of all of this. Tried running the > make command with -DIGNORE_VULNERABILITIES but still no dice. Any > advice, pointers to reading up on it, help, appreciated. > Denny White Denny, Samba3 is in the ports try that instead. > > Please do not CC me. Already subscribed to mailing list. > I suggest you set you reply to the list then. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 08:09:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C71616A451 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:09:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from havoc.unixathome.org (havoc.unixathome.org [66.154.98.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4183D43D48 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:09:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@havoc.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0000256462 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from havoc.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (havoc.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75300-06 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:10:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by havoc.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 841695643B; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:10:01 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060212081001.841695643B@havoc.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:10:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2006-01-22 - 2006-02-11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:09:59 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 10-Feb : Is your ISP blocking port 25? Here's a Postfix solution. Don't submit! Use submission. http://freebsddiary.org/postfix-transport.php?2 5-Feb : IPv6 - getting your LAN connected IPv6 avoids NAT, and gives you more than you'll ever need. http://freebsddiary.org/ipv6.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 09:07:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B8016A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:07:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from amsfep17-int.chello.nl (amsfep17-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A05243D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:07:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from [213.200.137.21] by amsfep17-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20060212090719.KXBV3085.amsfep17-int.chello.nl@[213.200.137.21]>; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:07:19 +0100 Message-ID: <43EEFAC5.8050809@bah.homeip.net> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:07:17 +0100 From: B H User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD-4.10-RELEASE; sv-SE) X-Accept-Language: sv, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: How get swedish keyboard on the consol after loggin on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:07:22 -0000 After the system starts and before I log on to the system the keys and letters and seem to work OK. But as soon as I log on they don't. Why is that? Thanks! /John Put this in your rc.conf keymap="swedish.cp850" works on 4.10-RELEASE-p19 and 6.1-PRERELEASE #0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 09:13:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8E516A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:13:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lothrandil@n00b.apagnu.se) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC53C43D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:13:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lothrandil@n00b.apagnu.se) Received: from [81.233.240.72] (81.233.240.72) by pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.070) id 43EC2A6A00064215; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:13:14 +0100 Message-ID: <43EEFC2B.2080904@n00b.apagnu.se> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:13:15 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John S References: <43EE1639.5000304@kvanix.com> In-Reply-To: <43EE1639.5000304@kvanix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How get swedish keyboard on the consol after loggin on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:13:16 -0000 John S wrote: > After the system starts and before I log on to the system > the keys and letters and seem to work OK. But > as soon as I log on they don't. Why is that? > > Thanks! > /John Have you edited your ~/.login.conf to properly display Swedish characters? Take a look at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/using-localization.html on how to achieve it. Regards! //Niclas -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 09:26:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBBE16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:26:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFE943D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:26:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 18181 invoked by uid 510); 12 Feb 2006 09:28:18 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1261. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.6/5.0):. Processed in 0.973175 secs); 12 Feb 2006 09:28:18 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.6/5.0):. Processed in 0.973175 secs Process 18174) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 12 Feb 2006 09:28:17 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: playnet In-Reply-To: <1059667590.20060212073915@mail333.com> References: <1059667590.20060212073915@mail333.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1139736497.17153.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:28:17 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: incorrect logins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:26:23 -0000 On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 04:39, Playnet wrote: > Hello FreeBSD, > > I see many records as > Feb 10 21:08:55 sstand sshd[84600]: Failed password for root from 61.218.130.20 port 46356 ssh2 > > How can i block these IP, who try "root" as login? > Have any soft in ports? In the default setup of SSH, root login is disabled. Check the manual for ssh. As for blocking Ips check hosts_deny and hosts_allow. I would recommend that you block the ssh port at you firewall for stop remote logons via ssh etc. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 09:36:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAAF16A428 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:36:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D62143D48 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:36:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 69605 invoked by uid 1008); 12 Feb 2006 09:36:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 12 Feb 2006 09:36:33 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:36:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <53136.24.90.33.115.1139736993.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <20060212004340.Y94830@fledge.watson.org> References: <56096.24.90.33.115.1139706352.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20060212004340.Y94830@fledge.watson.org> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:36:33 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: "Andrew R. Reiter" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd-airtools X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:36:56 -0000 > not positive, but i think this no longer works... ok.. thanks. i found it in the net-mnmt ports. why is it there if it doesn't work? is there anything else like it in the ports (or online)? thanks.. > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, kalin mintchev wrote: > > : > : hi all... > : > : anybody successfully used bsd-airtools? > : > : i tried the dstumbler to look at my access point at home but nothing > :happens. i do get the interface with all the options but after that > :nothing shows up no mater which option i use... any ideas? thanks.... > : > :_______________________________________________ > :freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org mailing list > :http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile > :To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mobile-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > : > : > > -- > arr@watson.org > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 10:08:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A5016A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:08:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD3843D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:08:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 18926 invoked by uid 510); 12 Feb 2006 10:10:07 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1261. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.6/5.0):. Processed in 5.618841 secs); 12 Feb 2006 10:10:07 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.6/5.0):. Processed in 5.618841 secs Process 18906) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 12 Feb 2006 10:10:01 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: Matt Sullivan In-Reply-To: <43EE9B3F.7050708@adelphia.net> References: <43EE9B3F.7050708@adelphia.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1139739001.17153.31.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:10:01 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Dell 530 RAID 5 Recommendations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:08:12 -0000 On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 02:19, Matt Sullivan wrote: > I am considering using FreeBSD 6 on an old Dell Precision Workstation > 530 MT. > It has Dual Xeon 1.5 GHz CPUs, 4 x Fujitsu AIC-7892A MAJ3182M SCSI HDs, > 1 GB RDRAM, Nvidia Elsa Gloria II Pro video, Integrated 3Com NIC, > Lynksys Wireless-G USB network adapter, and Integrated > Adaptec AIC-7892 SCSI controller. > > I would like to setup RAID 5. The intended use is in my home network as > a personal SOA/J2EE/MySQL development box and family file server. > > Please review and comment on my assumptions: > 1) FreeBSD 6-STABLE has fixed any 5.X SMP issues. There was a problem but this was fixed at 5.4. There are odd reports of problems with older hardware. I have had a problem with an oldish quad Compaq machine which I have not had time to get to the bottom of. > 2) I will need an additional RAID controller card. > 3) FreeBSD has issues similar to the folks at OpenBSD (my firewall OS) > regarding Adaptec - http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html: > we do not recommend the Adaptec cards for use. > * Adaptec AAC-2622, AAC-364, AAC-3642, 2200S, 2410SA, 2610SA, > 2810SA, 21610SA Have a look at the hardware compat list at http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/hardware-i386.html this may help with the raid card. > I would appreciate some recommendations with a focus on price/performance. > > Thanks, > Matt > Matt, One thought I would separate the file server support from a development machine. You may get into speed problems when heavily loaded. For my network I use 2 modest machines with large IDE drives running a HA setup as a file server. They sync to each other via a Gigbyte direct Ethernet connection and if one goes down or if off line for maintenance the other takes over. See http://linux-ha.org/ . Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 10:41:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E0B16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:41:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A467943D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:41:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2006 10:41:06 -0000 Received: from 140.95.62.81.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [81.62.95.140] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 12 Feb 2006 11:41:06 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43EF10CD.6090003@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:41:17 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <1059667590.20060212073915@mail333.com> <1139736497.17153.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1139736497.17153.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: incorrect logins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars@gmx.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:41:08 -0000 Robert Slade wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 04:39, Playnet wrote: >> Hello FreeBSD, >> >> I see many records as >> Feb 10 21:08:55 sstand sshd[84600]: Failed password for root from 61.218.130.20 port 46356 ssh2 >> >> How can i block these IP, who try "root" as login? >> Have any soft in ports? > > In the default setup of SSH, root login is disabled. Check the manual > for ssh. > > As for blocking Ips check hosts_deny and hosts_allow. > > I would recommend that you block the ssh port at you firewall for stop > remote logons via ssh etc. > > Rob Either you 1 configure SSH to only allow logins from certain hostnames or IP addresses or for certain users, and/or 2 install a program to watch your logfiles and modify your firewall rules dynamically according to specified triggers, like /usr/ports/security/denyhosts, and/or 3 choose strong passwords or -phrases and not care From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 10:53:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3EC16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:53:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ABD43D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:53:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUK003LBM9QWFB0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:53:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([213.187.181.70]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUK00LPQM9P4EB0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:53:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:53:59 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf In-reply-to: <20060211214549.GA1674@holestein.holy.cow> To: Parv Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060212114457.0219ab78@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060211172807.0214a4b8@broadpark.no> <20060211214549.GA1674@holestein.holy.cow> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Script to clean text files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:53:51 -0000 At 22:45 11.02.2006, Parv wrote: >in message <7.0.1.0.2.20060211172807.0214a4b8@broadpark.no>, >wrote Kristian Vaaf thusly... > > > > > > Among other things, this script is suppose to add an empty line at > > the bottom of a file. > > > > But somehow it always removes the first line in a text file, > > how do I stop this? > >Can you provide a small sample file complete w/ things that you >want to remove? > > > > #!/usr/local/bin/bash > > # > > # Remove CRLF, trailing whitespace and double lines. > >What are "double lines"? > > > > # $ARBA: clean.sh,v 1.0 2007/11/11 15:09:05 vaaf Exp $ > > # > > for file in `find -s . -type f -not -name ".*"`; do > > if file -b "$file" | grep -q 'text'; then > > echo >> "$file" > > perl -i -pe 's/\015$//' "$file" > > perl -i -pe 's/[^\S\n]+$//g' "$file" > >Why do you have two perl runs? More importantly, you will remove >anything which is not whitespace or not newline. That means, in the >end, you should have a file filled w/ whitespace only. > > > > > perl -pi -00 -e 1 "$file" > > echo "$file: Done" > > fi > > done > >To remove CRLF, trailing whitespace, and 2 consecutive blank lines >... > > { > tr -d '\r' < "$file" \ > | sed -E -e 's/[[:space:]]+$//' \ > | cat -s - > "${file}.tmp" > } && mv -f "${file}.tmp" "$file" > > > - Parv > >-- Hello Parv! Yes I meant blank lines :) I've used the script for a long time now. The only error is that it removes the top blank space, if any. Which is a bit annoying. It's fine for scripts with shebangs but not for custom laid out documents etc. I just wanted to know where that error was. I use the Perl runs because those were the only runs people gave me. You know how it is, you enter a FreeBSD help channel and ask how you do this or that, and the upper gentlemen always reply "Learn Perl," and then they go on giving you Perl runs :) Your suggestion looks very very good. So is this alright? #!/usr/local/bin/bash # # Remove CRLF, trailing whitespace and blank lines. # $ARBA: clean.sh,v 1.0 2007/11/11 15:09:05 vaaf Exp $ # for file in `find -s . -type f -not -name ".*"`; do if file -b "$file" | grep -q 'text'; then echo >> "$file" tr -d '\r' < "$file" sed -E -e 's/[[:space:]]+$//' cat -s - > "${file}.tmp" && mv -f "${file}.tmp" "$file" echo "$file: Done" fi done All the best man, Vaaf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 11:35:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B578516A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:35:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ray@TXnet.com) Received: from txnet.com (unisys.txnet.com [212.1.98.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61BBD43D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:35:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ray@TXnet.com) Received: (qmail 98887 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2006 11:31:29 -0000 Received: from 212.1.98.10 by unisys.txnet.com (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (spamassassin: 3.0.3. Clear:RC:1(212.1.98.10):. Processed in 0.076051 secs); 12 Feb 2006 11:31:29 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: ray@TXnet.com via unisys.txnet.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(212.1.98.10):. Processed in 0.076051 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO X.txnet.com) (212.1.98.10) by unisys.txnet.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2006 11:31:28 -0000 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:35:05 +0200 From: Alex Renn X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <597571270.20060212133505@TXnet.com> To: Lowell Gilbert CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44y80jyreb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <358523811.20060209192506@TXnet.com> <44y80jyreb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: CD installation and file flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:35:10 -0000 Hello Lowell Gilbert! SUID/SGID files in my default installation do not have any flags set: $ uname -a FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 $ ls -alo `which su` -r-sr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 11992 Nov 3 08:11 /usr/bin/su That's why I'm asking about this. I think there should be some flags set by default. ====[ End of message ]==== Best Regards, Alex Renn ray@TXnet.com ===[ Original Message ]=== From: Lowell Gilbert To: Alex Renn Subject: CD installation and file flags Date: 10.02.2006 20:56 > Alex Renn writes: >> I installed FreeBSD 6.0 from CD and noticed that file flags were not >> applied by default to /boot, /bin, /sbin. > Right. suid files get the flags, but nothing else. >> I set kernel_securelevel to 3 but it does not help a lot while there >> are no schg flags on system files. > File flags are enforced at a securelevel of 1. If they are all you > care about, then there's no reason to add the filesystem mounting, > clock, and firewall restrictions of levels 2 and 3. >> Is there any script to set proper flags for all files in the default >> installation? > There is not widespread agreement on the definition of "proper" in > that sentence. Once you have a precise idea of what you think it > should be, writing a script for your particular needs will be > trivial. > Be well. ===[ End of Original Message ]=== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 11:35:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA01116A422 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:35:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ray@TXnet.com) Received: from txnet.com (unisys.txnet.com [212.1.98.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61A4843D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:35:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ray@TXnet.com) Received: (qmail 98887 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2006 11:31:29 -0000 Received: from 212.1.98.10 by unisys.txnet.com (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (spamassassin: 3.0.3. Clear:RC:1(212.1.98.10):. Processed in 0.076051 secs); 12 Feb 2006 11:31:29 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: ray@TXnet.com via unisys.txnet.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(212.1.98.10):. Processed in 0.076051 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO X.txnet.com) (212.1.98.10) by unisys.txnet.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2006 11:31:28 -0000 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:35:05 +0200 From: Alex Renn X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <597571270.20060212133505@TXnet.com> To: Lowell Gilbert CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44y80jyreb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <358523811.20060209192506@TXnet.com> <44y80jyreb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: CD installation and file flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:35:11 -0000 Hello Lowell Gilbert! SUID/SGID files in my default installation do not have any flags set: $ uname -a FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 $ ls -alo `which su` -r-sr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 11992 Nov 3 08:11 /usr/bin/su That's why I'm asking about this. I think there should be some flags set by default. ====[ End of message ]==== Best Regards, Alex Renn ray@TXnet.com ===[ Original Message ]=== From: Lowell Gilbert To: Alex Renn Subject: CD installation and file flags Date: 10.02.2006 20:56 > Alex Renn writes: >> I installed FreeBSD 6.0 from CD and noticed that file flags were not >> applied by default to /boot, /bin, /sbin. > Right. suid files get the flags, but nothing else. >> I set kernel_securelevel to 3 but it does not help a lot while there >> are no schg flags on system files. > File flags are enforced at a securelevel of 1. If they are all you > care about, then there's no reason to add the filesystem mounting, > clock, and firewall restrictions of levels 2 and 3. >> Is there any script to set proper flags for all files in the default >> installation? > There is not widespread agreement on the definition of "proper" in > that sentence. Once you have a precise idea of what you think it > should be, writing a script for your particular needs will be > trivial. > Be well. ===[ End of Original Message ]=== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 11:57:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB53416A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:57:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EBC43D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:57:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1CBvdbO087196; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:57:39 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43EF22AD.4070007@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:57:33 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lars@gmx.at References: <1059667590.20060212073915@mail333.com> <1139736497.17153.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <43EF10CD.6090003@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <43EF10CD.6090003@gmx.at> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFDF243C0F93E9FECB54ABBD8" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:57:39 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1283/Thu Feb 9 20:55:06 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: incorrect logins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:57:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFDF243C0F93E9FECB54ABBD8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable lars wrote: > Either you > 1 configure SSH to only allow logins from certain hostnames or > IP addresses or for certain users, and/or >=20 > 2 install a program to watch your logfiles and modify > your firewall rules dynamically according to specified > triggers, > like /usr/ports/security/denyhosts, and/or >=20 > 3 choose strong passwords or -phrases and not care You forgot: 4 Use SSH key based auth exclusively. Turn off all of the password stuff in sshd_config. Laugh at the poor fools trying to break in. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigFDF243C0F93E9FECB54ABBD8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD7yKz8Mjk52CukIwRA7JbAJ9jFvfcm9wd8G4uWENtMrlkDQVuKQCdHziW 2xV5eRcj7W6tSHt/7c9aAak= =g3Ca -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFDF243C0F93E9FECB54ABBD8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 12:02:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB0516A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:02:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from fobos.ldc.net (fobos.ldc.net [213.160.128.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE09A43D6B for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:02:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from privateew99bf2 (121-dup.ldc.net [213.160.136.121] (may be forged)) by fobos.ldc.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1CC27Qg005539 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:02:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) From: "a" To: Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:02:07 +0200 Message-ID: <000101c62fcc$2a2ca2c0$7988a0d5@privateew99bf2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: fobos.ldc.net; Sender-ip: 213.160.136.121; Sender-helo: privateew99bf2; ) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on fobos.ldc.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: A problem with the pppd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:02:20 -0000 Help me, please, with the pppd. The problem is the next. I want to connect to Internet Service Provide (ISP) with a callback. I use the pppd and the chat with the next scripts, which are inessential now: # pppd script /dev/cuad1 115200 debug defaultroute crtscts noipdefault connect "/usr/bin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/peers/login.chat.script.prostointernet.callback" callback 4504257 passive domain prostointer.net persist holdoff 300 # chat script login.chat.script.prostointernet.callback # It is one line really ABORT BUSY ABORT 'NO CARRIER' "" AT OK ATS0=1 OK ATDP5945050 TIMEOUT 300 CONNECT "" TIMEOUT 30 sername:-\\r-sername: login TIMEOUT 30 sword: password "hostname:" 0.0.0.0 The first step goes well: my side connects with the ISP and authentication is done successfully. After authentication and querying a callback, pppd hangs up the line. But then pppd exits. The ISP calls me back after some time. But there is no pppd already, and nobody is waiting for the incoming call. (Without callback I have no problem.) What do I wrong? mailto:a@zeos.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 12:25:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD7D16A433 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:25:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Received: from titania.auscert.org.au (gw.auscert.org.au [203.5.112.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA5243D48 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:25:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (app [10.0.1.192]) by titania.auscert.org.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1CCPRuE099431 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:25:27 +1000 (EST) Received: from app.auscert.org.au (localhost.auscert.org.au [127.0.0.1]) by app.auscert.org.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1CCPRCI076459 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:25:27 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au) Message-Id: <200602121225.k1CCPRCI076459@app.auscert.org.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Joel Hatton Dcc: Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:25:27 +1000 Subject: cvsup question - use just one supfile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:25:30 -0000 Hi, I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile? Something like: *default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_4 *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix this can't be the correct syntax, but is this practicable? thanks, -- Joel Hatton -- Security Analyst | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland | WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: auscert@auscert.org.au From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 12:31:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B369716A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25FA43D49 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:31:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060212123120.TFJZ22902.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:31:20 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "a" , Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:31:15 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <000101c62fcc$2a2ca2c0$7988a0d5@privateew99bf2> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: A problem with the pppd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:31:22 -0000 First of all you are trying to use kernel ppp. This was completely rewritten because it was so hard to configure and debug and it now called User ppp. ppppd (IE: kernel ppp) was kept around for backwards compatibility. For all practical purposes its dead and just waiting to be removed. You will get better help here if you change to user ppp. The install guide at www.a1poweruser.com has a step by step instructions for seting up user ppp callback function. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of a Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 7:02 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: A problem with the pppd Help me, please, with the pppd. The problem is the next. I want to connect to Internet Service Provide (ISP) with a callback. I use the pppd and the chat with the next scripts, which are inessential now: # pppd script /dev/cuad1 115200 debug defaultroute crtscts noipdefault connect "/usr/bin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/peers/login.chat.script.prostointernet.callback" callback 4504257 passive domain prostointer.net persist holdoff 300 # chat script login.chat.script.prostointernet.callback # It is one line really ABORT BUSY ABORT 'NO CARRIER' "" AT OK ATS0=1 OK ATDP5945050 TIMEOUT 300 CONNECT "" TIMEOUT 30 sername:-\\r-sername: login TIMEOUT 30 sword: password "hostname:" 0.0.0.0 The first step goes well: my side connects with the ISP and authentication is done successfully. After authentication and querying a callback, pppd hangs up the line. But then pppd exits. The ISP calls me back after some time. But there is no pppd already, and nobody is waiting for the incoming call. (Without callback I have no problem.) What do I wrong? mailto:a@zeos.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 12:35:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BABC16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:35:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACC343D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:35:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060212123550.TKMX22902.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:35:50 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "playnet" , "FreeBSD Mailing List" Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:35:49 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1059667590.20060212073915@mail333.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: incorrect logins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:35:52 -0000 This last week the subject of failed ssh logins was covered in 2 different threads and was answered in full. Please check the archives for your answers before asking the same question over again. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Playnet Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:39 PM To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: incorrect logins Hello FreeBSD, I see many records as Feb 10 21:08:55 sstand sshd[84600]: Failed password for root from 61.218.130.20 port 46356 ssh2 How can i block these IP, who try "root" as login? Have any soft in ports? -- Best regards, Playnet mailto:playnet@mail333.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 12:56:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C348716A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:56:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A4543D48 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:56:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from foo.antimatter.net (cpe-72-132-244-217.san.res.rr.com [72.132.244.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1CCu1J6027437 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:56:01 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060212044829.08502eb0@antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 04:55:40 -0800 To: Joel Hatton , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <200602121225.k1CCPRCI076459@app.auscert.org.au> References: <200602121225.k1CCPRCI076459@app.auscert.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: cvsup question - use just one supfile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:56:05 -0000 At 04:25 AM 2/12/2006, Joel Hatton wrote: >Hi, > >I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm >wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile? >Something like: > >*default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org >*default base=/var/db >*default prefix=/usr >*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3 >*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_4 >*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 >*default delete use-rel-suffix > >this can't be the correct syntax, but is this practicable? You need a different prefix for each tag. You'll still want to set your defaults, then override them as necessary, like this: src-all prefix=/foo tag=RELENG_5 src-all prefix=/bar tag=RELENG_6 -Glenn >thanks, >-- Joel Hatton -- >Security Analyst | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 >AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 >The University of Queensland | WWW: www.auscert.org.au >Qld 4072 Australia | Email: auscert@auscert.org.au >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 13:04:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6124E16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:04:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F05843D49 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:04:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 17527 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2006 13:04:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.187.177.216]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Feb 2006 13:04:41 -0000 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:04:37 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: kalin@el.net Message-ID: <20060212140437.0bdce4f5@localhost> In-Reply-To: <62719.24.90.33.115.1139702540.squirrel@mail.el.net> References: <62719.24.90.33.115.1139702540.squirrel@mail.el.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_SqSbskh3VDJBFDq6wxgGTnf; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ifconfig wepkey on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:04:44 -0000 --Sig_SqSbskh3VDJBFDq6wxgGTnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "kalin mintchev" wrote: > according to the man page of ifconfig in 6.0 the wepkey should be 5 > or 13 characters. the wep key i always had is way longer than 13 > characters 128 bit - one key only.. so when i try to set it up to > the wi0 i get: >=20 > # ifconfig wi0 wepkey 1:0xWEPKEY128BITENCRYPTIONBLAHBLA > ifconfig: SIOCS80211: Invalid argument Did you look in /var/log/messages? It probably tells you to load wlan_wep. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_SqSbskh3VDJBFDq6wxgGTnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD7zJwjV8GA4rMKUQRAk+GAKCraTVA94VZL0Sa5zcW/vDJsJwLqgCgue9I B7720SfuhyZ5os82OyPS9BQ= =t+8e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_SqSbskh3VDJBFDq6wxgGTnf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 13:37:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5045A16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:37:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9827143D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:37:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F8HPt-00050o-1z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:37:29 +0100 Received: from r5bp69.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.75.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:37:29 +0100 Received: from element by r5bp69.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:37:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Pavel Duda Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:37:08 +0100 Lines: 105 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010903080509020005000304" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5bp69.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Thunderbird/0.9 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Sender: news X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: LDAP authentication problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:37:41 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010903080509020005000304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I have problems to get LDAP authentiction working (pam_ldap)and after two days of struggle I'm almost giving up... I've tried few howtos like that one from samba.idealx.org but without success. First I wanted to run Samba PDC on FreeBSD, but I've stuck with pam_ldap authentication. Now I can: - browse LDAP database with ldapsearch or from other machine with LDAP browser - I'm able to use ldapsearch with user account created in this database ie.: 'ldapsearch -D "uid=testuser,ou=Users,dc=OHRADNI,dc=NET" -W' 'Enter LDAP Password: mypassword' '[will list all entries]' But when I try to use it for authentication it just don't work. For example I can't login with 'ssh testuser@localhost'. Because I have "loglevel -1" I can see many data in /var/log/debug.log, but I'm not sure what exactly I should look for in this debug output thus I don't know if problem is on LDAP side or something else in my setup. (I've attached gziped part of debug.log) Can somebody help ? Does someone have working setup of LDAP authentication on FreeBSD 6.0 and would be so kind to sent me some quick howto or give an advice ? Thanks --------------010903080509020005000304-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 13:41:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6A916A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:41:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev02@kvanix.com) Received: from pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B004D43D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev02@kvanix.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (83.250.224.223) by pne-smtpout1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.070) id 43E9FE42000EDDF8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:41:11 +0100 Message-ID: <43EF3AFB.9040505@kvanix.com> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:41:15 +0100 From: John S User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43EE1639.5000304@kvanix.com> In-Reply-To: <43EE1639.5000304@kvanix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: How get swedish keyboard on the consol after loggin on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:41:13 -0000 Thanks for the tips! but I'm still stumped. It seems to me I don't understand the chain of events properly. When I start the system and get to the lines: Sun Feb 12 14:17:52 CET 2006 FreeBSD/i386 (jfs000) (ttyv0) login: I can type my login which is john, but I can also type the letters or . But as soon as I log in as john (or root) and see the message of the day and the prompt: $ I can no longer type or - all I get is beep for each key press for those keys. Note also that my /etc/rc.conf has the lines font8X8="iso-8x8" font8x14="iso-8x14" font8x16="iso-8x16" keymap="swedish.iso" Also I set up the login classes as per the handbook and that appearently went well. I use only USB mouse and keyboard and not AT keyboard or mouse. I need some sort of a clue as to what happens to those keys before I logon and what happens during the logon process. That's where they disappear. Any more tips? John S wrote: > After the system starts and before I log on to the system > the keys and letters and seem to work OK. But > as soon as I log on they don't. Why is that? > > Thanks! > /John > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 13:48:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A10B16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60021.mail.yahoo.com (web60021.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A046743D49 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 12066 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Feb 2006 13:48:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gC7f1Yv1ns9DqSN70DYeA3m097i0nNAHd7bzA0Wnc6BSTeyqiamn+RRNSMK4tDP6lV6ogwh6OMhX1BxZP06tRswGvu5jICUVFr7S+lhAFCIW20+zqJjWgyZpa9P6TieMo7A9z+Gekymk+kjZXx6eWhWK4WMKmqz+sPp18Ev2tEw= ; Message-ID: <20060212134805.12064.qmail@web60021.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.252.84.55] by web60021.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:48:05 EST Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:48:05 -0500 (EST) From: Peter To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <200602120405.k1C45LI6019502@clunix.cl.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: MBR blown away X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:48:06 -0000 --- Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > > > --- Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > > > I added a slice to a single hard drive dual-boot (windows) system > and > > > now > > > > I guess that scrambled my MBR. I get three options from the > FreeBSD > > > (5.4) > > > > boot manager: > > > > > > > > 1. DOS > > > > 2. FreeBSD > > > > 3. FreeBSD > > > > > > > > I can boot to FreeBSD (the new slice is fine) by choosing option 3 > but > > > the > > > > windows/dos option is fried. > > > > > > The MBR itself looks OK. According to that piece of menu you > > > posted, you just added another bootable slice. So, there are now two > > > bootable FreeBSD slices and one bootable Microsloth slice. > > Correct, I chose '1' and then the system hangs (no messages/errors). > > I simply converted a 6GB FAT32 partition into a UFS2 slice (chopped > > into three 2GB partitions). > Well, I still am guessing the problem lies in individual slices' boot > sectors and not the MBR. just try and set the bootable flags in the > slices the way you think they should be and see what happens. In sysinstall I toggle bootable but it puts an 'A' which seems to mean auto-bootable. I can only set one 'A' here. -- Peter __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 13:48:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D593D16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:48:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C47143D4C for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:48:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F8Has-0007Ax-IY for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:48:50 +0100 Received: from r5bp69.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.75.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:48:50 +0100 Received: from element by r5bp69.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:48:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Pavel Duda Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:48:32 +0100 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <200602111541.31821.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5bp69.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Thunderbird/0.9 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <200602111541.31821.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Samba Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:48:56 -0000 Warren Liddell wrote: > When i try logging onto the FreeBSD machine from windows via samba, upon > entering the username/pswd windows Automatically adds: fred/shinjii > > All i want it to have is just shinjii .. what am i missing and where do i go > to fix this ? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If your Windows machine have a name FRED than this is normal behaviour. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 13:51:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80AA16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:51:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782C543D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:51:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3735C78; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:51:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65140-01; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:51:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-209-142.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.209.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEE95C16; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:51:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43EF3D81.5000202@mac.com> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:52:01 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gs_stoller@juno.com" References: <20060211.190237.29586.250540@webmail65.nyc.untd.com> In-Reply-To: <20060211.190237.29586.250540@webmail65.nyc.untd.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Direct disk access, was: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:51:57 -0000 gs_stoller@juno.com wrote: > I would like to have the source code of (the set of) programs > that can "read from"/"write to" any sector of a disk without a > file-system, think of them as the disk i/o programs that underly the > file-system. I expect them to have (collectively) about four arguments, > one specifying the disk to access, the second pointing to a buffer > (supplying the data to write or to accept the data read), the third > stating the number of bytes to transfer, and the fourth giving the LBA > address of the sector to be accessed. Sounds a bit like homework to me, but what you want is here: /usr/src/bin/dd See "man dd". -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 13:58:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E89016A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:58:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail7.tpgi.com.au (mail7.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EAA43D75 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:58:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed Received: from warren.shinji.nq.nu (60-240-189-206.tpgi.com.au [60.240.189.206]) by mail7.tpgi.com.au (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1CDvsfH027671 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:58:16 +1100 From: Warren Liddell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:57:48 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602111541.31821.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602121357.48226.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: Re: Samba Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:58:19 -0000 > If your Windows machine have a name FRED than this is normal behaviour. yes but there is an optino to turn it off so it dosent add that in and unfortunately, my windows machine isnt called fred. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 14:13:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341E716A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from fobos.ldc.net (fobos.ldc.net [213.160.128.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6220C43D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:13:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) Received: from privateew99bf2 (35-dup.ldc.net [213.160.137.35] (may be forged)) by fobos.ldc.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1CEDBex004064 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:13:17 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from a@zeos.net) From: "a" To: Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:13:10 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c62fde$787c6020$2389a0d5@privateew99bf2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: fobos.ldc.net; Sender-ip: 213.160.137.35; Sender-helo: privateew99bf2; ) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on fobos.ldc.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: RE: A problem with the pppd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:13:22 -0000 Thank You for a link. I will read and try, because I have had some problems with user ppp too. Elisej Babenko > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of fbsd_user > Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 2:31 PM > To: a; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: A problem with the pppd > > > First of all you are trying to use kernel ppp. > This was completely rewritten because it was so hard to > configure and debug and it now called User ppp. ppppd (IE: > kernel ppp) was kept around for backwards compatibility. For > all practical purposes its dead and just waiting to be > removed. You will get better help here if you change to user ppp. > > The install guide at www.a1poweruser.com has a step by step > instructions for seting up user ppp callback function. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of a > Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 7:02 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: A problem with the pppd > > > Help me, please, with the pppd. The problem is the next. > I want to connect to Internet Service Provide (ISP) with a > callback. I use the pppd and the chat with the next scripts, > which are inessential > now: > > # pppd script > > /dev/cuad1 115200 > > debug > defaultroute > crtscts > noipdefault > connect "/usr/bin/chat -v -f > /etc/ppp/peers/login.chat.script.prostointernet.callback" > callback 4504257 > passive > domain prostointer.net > persist > holdoff 300 > > # chat script login.chat.script.prostointernet.callback > # It is one line really > > ABORT BUSY ABORT 'NO CARRIER' > "" AT > OK ATS0=1 > OK ATDP5945050 > TIMEOUT 300 CONNECT "" > TIMEOUT 30 sername:-\\r-sername: login > TIMEOUT 30 sword: password > "hostname:" 0.0.0.0 > > The first step goes well: my side connects with the ISP and > authentication is done successfully. After authentication and > querying a callback, pppd hangs up the line. But then pppd > exits. The ISP calls me back after some time. But there is no > pppd already, and nobody is waiting for the incoming call. > (Without callback I have no problem.) > > What do I wrong? > mailto:a@zeos.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 14:14:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BB716A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:14:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay106-f18.bay106.hotmail.com [65.54.161.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA0243D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:14:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 06:14:00 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.161.200 by by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:13:59 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.68.247.73] X-Originating-Email: [antennex@hotmail.com] X-Sender: antennex@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Jack Stone" To: tedm@toybox.placo.com, steve@douville.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 08:13:59 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2006 14:14:00.0106 (UTC) FILETIME=[91BE70A0:01C62FDE] Cc: Subject: RE: Connecting to serial port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:14:00 -0000 >From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" >To: "Steve Douville" , >Subject: RE: Connecting to serial port >Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:51:12 -0800 > > >That happens, you can try a BIOS update, and also make sure >your motherboard CMOS settings specify the port for serial0, >and match port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4, and aren't set to auto. You >can also try changing the setting for plug-and-play OS to off, >(or on, if it was off before) > >You can ignore the message: > >"configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0" > >as long as your serial port actually responds. A lot of motherboards >will emit this message but the serial port still works. Unfortunately >it looks like yours isn't one of these due to the "not responding" error >message. > >Worst case, disble the motherboard serial ports and buy a pci serial >port card. > >This seems to happen a lot on systems that use pci-express, probably >because they are tying the serial port hardware to the pci bus >rather than the isa bus. > >Ted > Hi: I'm having this same problem with a new Abit AN8 MB, which has the pciexpress. I've tried changing the BIOS settings like suggested, PLUS, even trying a PCI card, but still the same no response. Does anyone have this MB and cured this problem? If so, please let me know as I really need that lost serial port for the UPS (no, USB won't drive it). Thanks. Best regards, Jack _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 14:24:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E61216A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:24:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFB443D55 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:24:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 21715 invoked by uid 510); 12 Feb 2006 14:25:58 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1261. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.296411 secs); 12 Feb 2006 14:25:58 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.6/5.0):. Processed in 1.296411 secs Process 21708) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 12 Feb 2006 14:25:56 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: Pavel Duda In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1139754356.19498.5.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:25:56 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: LDAP authentication problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:24:07 -0000 On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 13:37, Pavel Duda wrote: > Hi, > I have problems to get LDAP authentiction working (pam_ldap)and after > two days of struggle I'm almost giving up... > > I've tried few howtos like that one from samba.idealx.org but without > success. First I wanted to run Samba PDC on FreeBSD, but I've stuck with > pam_ldap authentication. > > Now I can: > - browse LDAP database with ldapsearch or from other machine with LDAP > browser > - I'm able to use ldapsearch with user account created in this database ie.: > 'ldapsearch -D "uid=testuser,ou=Users,dc=OHRADNI,dc=NET" -W' > 'Enter LDAP Password: mypassword' > '[will list all entries]' > > But when I try to use it for authentication it just don't work. For > example I can't login with 'ssh testuser@localhost'. > > Because I have "loglevel -1" I can see many data in /var/log/debug.log, > but I'm not sure what exactly I should look for in this debug output > thus I don't know if problem is on LDAP side or something else in my setup. > > (I've attached gziped part of debug.log) > > Can somebody help ? > Does someone have working setup of LDAP authentication on FreeBSD 6.0 > and would be so kind to sent me some quick howto or give an advice ? > I used the example on the samba site which is also available in the docs after samaba is installed. The only issues were that it is written for Linux and hence has different file locations and one of the Linux commands does not exist in FreeBSD. It is not a direct problem as it is only used for testing. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 14:28:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D4316A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:28:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [63.240.77.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B90843D4C for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:28:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([68.80.195.248]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2006021214281301300nv90ie>; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:28:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCBDB843; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:28:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bserver.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23747-08; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:28:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.214.102] (kbuilt.transpack.com [192.168.214.102]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF99B842; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:28:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43EF45EE.60503@allenmyland.com> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:27:58 -0500 From: Ken Stevenson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter References: <20060212134805.12064.qmail@web60021.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060212134805.12064.qmail@web60021.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at transpack.com Cc: Jerry McAllister , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: MBR blown away X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:28:17 -0000 Peter wrote: > --- Jerry McAllister wrote: > >>> >>> --- Jerry McAllister wrote: >>> > >>>>> I added a slice to a single hard drive dual-boot (windows) system >> and >>>> now >>>>> I guess that scrambled my MBR. I get three options from the >> FreeBSD >>>> (5.4) >>>>> boot manager: >>>>> >>>>> 1. DOS >>>>> 2. FreeBSD >>>>> 3. FreeBSD >>>>> >>>>> I can boot to FreeBSD (the new slice is fine) by choosing option 3 >> but >>>> the >>>>> windows/dos option is fried. >>>> The MBR itself looks OK. According to that piece of menu you >>>> posted, you just added another bootable slice. So, there are now > two >>>> bootable FreeBSD slices and one bootable Microsloth slice. > >>> Correct, I chose '1' and then the system hangs (no messages/errors). > >>> I simply converted a 6GB FAT32 partition into a UFS2 slice (chopped >>> into three 2GB partitions). > >> Well, I still am guessing the problem lies in individual slices' boot >> sectors and not the MBR. just try and set the bootable flags in the >> slices the way you think they should be and see what happens. > > In sysinstall I toggle bootable but it puts an 'A' which seems to mean > auto-bootable. > I can only set one 'A' here. > > -- > Peter > > I tend to agree with Jerry and others that the problem is not with the MBR, but with the Windows boot sector in the first partition. If that's true, you can't fix it with sysintall or FreeBSD. You have fix it with Windows tools. If you were running Windows 2000 or XP in the Windows partition, I would recommend that you use the Windows 2000 System Recovery Console and run the fixboot program to install a new Windows boot sector on the Windows partition. If you're running an older version of Windows, you need to find out what tool it uses to restore a boot sector. Chances are in the process you'll wipe out the FreBSD MBR which you'll have to fix using FreeBSD. I guess that's where boot0cfg comes in, but I've never used it. The best advice, though, is to backup everything you can before proceeding. -- Ken Stevenson Allen-Myland Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 14:40:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DBC16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:40:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB5A43D48 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:40:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 22879 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2006 14:40:46 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Feb 2006 14:40:46 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CA78628439; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:40:45 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Kristian Vaaf References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060211150451.02150468@broadpark.no> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 12 Feb 2006 09:40:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060211150451.02150468@broadpark.no> Message-ID: <44bqxcy70y.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File verification script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:40:48 -0000 Kristian Vaaf writes: > I need a simple script that uses CFV to report on broken MP3 albums. > All my MP3 albums contain an .sfv file that list MP3 tracks with their > CRC values. There are a bunch of them in ports, under the security category. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 14:46:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68EA416A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:46:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16F343D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:46:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F8IU1-0001Hw-7e for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:45:49 +0100 Received: from r5bp69.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.75.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:45:49 +0100 Received: from element by r5bp69.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:45:49 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Pavel Duda Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:44:54 +0100 Lines: 65 Message-ID: References: <1139754356.19498.5.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5bp69.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Thunderbird/0.9 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <1139754356.19498.5.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Sender: news Subject: Re: LDAP authentication problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:46:07 -0000 Robert Slade wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 13:37, Pavel Duda wrote: > >>Hi, >>I have problems to get LDAP authentiction working (pam_ldap)and after >>two days of struggle I'm almost giving up... >> >>I've tried few howtos like that one from samba.idealx.org but without >>success. First I wanted to run Samba PDC on FreeBSD, but I've stuck with >>pam_ldap authentication. >> >>Now I can: >>- browse LDAP database with ldapsearch or from other machine with LDAP >>browser >>- I'm able to use ldapsearch with user account created in this database ie.: >>'ldapsearch -D "uid=testuser,ou=Users,dc=OHRADNI,dc=NET" -W' >>'Enter LDAP Password: mypassword' >>'[will list all entries]' >> >>But when I try to use it for authentication it just don't work. For >>example I can't login with 'ssh testuser@localhost'. >> >>Because I have "loglevel -1" I can see many data in /var/log/debug.log, >>but I'm not sure what exactly I should look for in this debug output >>thus I don't know if problem is on LDAP side or something else in my setup. >> >>(I've attached gziped part of debug.log) >> >>Can somebody help ? >>Does someone have working setup of LDAP authentication on FreeBSD 6.0 >>and would be so kind to sent me some quick howto or give an advice ? >> > > > I used the example on the samba site which is also available in the docs > after samaba is installed. > > The only issues were that it is written for Linux and hence has > different file locations and one of the Linux commands does not exist in > FreeBSD. It is not a direct problem as it is only used for testing. > > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > So you make it work on your system ? I'm aware that guide on samba site is for linux and some of conf files are in different locations (like ldap.conf ). I have of course tried two howtos specific for FreeBSD too (like http://books.blurgle.ca/ or http://www.cultdeadsheep.org/FreeBSD/docs/Quick_and_dirty_FreeBSD_5_x_and_nss_ldap_mini-HOWTO.html). Still, I'm not able to determine where is my main problem, if it is LDAP related or some bad configuration in other part of whole authentization process (or maybe both). Now I have tried to do 'id testuser' and it is not able to recognize user and there is no additional output in debug.log so system doesn't even contact LDAP. So this could be the problem. I must have something wrong probably in pam.d or nsswitch, but I don't know what :-(. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 14:47:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C918716A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:47:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from mail7.tpgi.com.au (mail7.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCB643D75 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:47:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed Received: from warren.shinji.nq.nu (60-240-189-206.tpgi.com.au [60.240.189.206]) by mail7.tpgi.com.au (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1CEkfaa015264; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:47:02 +1100 From: Warren Liddell To: Duane Whitty Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:46:34 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602111541.31821.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <200602112040.39600.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <43EE0D4A.9080008@greenmeadow.ca> In-Reply-To: <43EE0D4A.9080008@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602121446.34642.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:47:11 -0000 On Saturday 11 February 2006 16:14, you wrote: > Warren Liddell wrote: > > On Saturday 11 February 2006 12:33, Duane Whitty wrote: > >> Warren Liddell wrote: > >>> When i try logging onto the FreeBSD machine from windows via samba, > >>> upon entering the username/pswd windows Automatically adds: > >>> fred/shinjii > >>> > >>> All i want it to have is just shinjii .. what am i missing and where do > >>> i go to fix this ? ok, as embaressing as this is, i managed to solve this problem as i had forgotten to add the sama accounts themselves using smbpasswd .. onc ei ran smbpasswd it worked straight up like it should. Thanks to all those who offerd assistance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 15:54:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DAC16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:54:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from playnet@mail333.com) Received: from smtp1.pochta.ru (smtp1.pochta.ru [81.211.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1BC43D4C for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:54:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from playnet@mail333.com) Received: from pl (ip-83-149-3-188.nwgsm.ru [83.149.3.188]) (author=playnet@mail333.com authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.pochta.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP daemon=POCHTA.RU id k1CFsPM3025236; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:54:29 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from playnet@mail333.com) X-Author: playnet@mail333.com from pl (ip-83-149-3-188.nwgsm.ru [83.149.3.188]) via Free Mail POCHTA.RU Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:58:23 +0300 From: Playnet X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1992396054.20060212185823@mail333.com> To: Frank Bonnet In-Reply-To: <43EB05D5.5000404@esiee.fr> References: <43EB05D5.5000404@esiee.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: one virtual IP interface on two ethernet ports ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: playnet List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:54:38 -0000 Hello Frank, Thursday, February 9, 2006, 12:05:25 PM, you wrote: FB> Is it possible with FreeBSD to setup a virtual IP interface FB> with load balancing that use two or more ethernet ports ? FB> thank you kldload /boot/kernel/ng_ether.ko kldload /boot/kernel/ng_one2many.ko ifconfig rl0 up ifconfig rl1 up ngctl mkpeer rl0: one2many upper one ngctl connect rl0: rl0:upper lower many0 ngctl connect rl1: rl0:upper lower many1 ngctl msg rl1: setpromisc 1 ngctl msg rl1: setautosrc 0 ngctl msg rl0:upper \ setconfig "{ xmitAlg=1 failAlg=1 enabledLinks=[ 1 1 ] }" ifconfig rl0 inet 192.168.0.78 Get from opennet.ru from tips http://www.opennet.ru/openforum/vsluhforumID1/51190.html#2 comments.. -- Best regards, Playnet mailto:playnet@mail333.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 16:23:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E72716A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:23:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765B743D48 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:23:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a236.otenet.gr [212.205.215.236]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1CGN2dx021208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:23:13 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1CGMs8p001119; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:22:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1CGMrPs001116; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:22:53 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:22:53 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: gs_stoller@juno.com Message-ID: <20060212162252.GA972@flame.pc> References: <20060211.190237.29586.250540@webmail65.nyc.untd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060211.190237.29586.250540@webmail65.nyc.untd.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.316, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.88, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:23:29 -0000 On 2006-02-12 03:02, "gs_stoller@juno.com" wrote: > I would like to have the source code of (the set of) programs > that can "read from"/"write to" any sector of a disk without a > file-system, think of them as the disk i/o programs that underly the > file-system. [...] I don't really understand what it is you're looking for, but the source code for *all* the FreeBSD `programs' is available at: http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ It's also available through FTP, CVS, CVSup and is distributed as part of the official release CD-ROMs. You can look for yourself, any time :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 16:42:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D3016A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:42:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F7A43D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:42:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F8KIu-000LmI-IF; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:42:32 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20060211043020.GA27461@rescomp.berkeley.edu> References: <20060211043020.GA27461@rescomp.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-2-394073727" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:42:27 +0000 To: Christopher Cowart X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: scripting sysinstall for pxeboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:42:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-2-394073727 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 11 Feb 2006, at 04:30, Christopher Cowart wrote: > On a not-a-show-stopper note, is there any way to get around > specifying > the hostname and/or net device? I'd rather not specify the hostname so > that I can have one generic script for many machines. Further, what if > a some other machine has a different kind of NIC? By hardcoding these > values into install.cfg, the solution becomes much less maintainable. > Why can't it obtain the hostname from DHCP? Any thoughts on this? Net device, I think you're out of luck. As for the hostname, if the DHCP server actually sends a hostname, then you *can* leave it out of install.cfg. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --Apple-Mail-2-394073727 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD72Vzme8yCsQvJJ0RAuWUAJ4pyYDLgXSJF5qbjrftdLrOl7j/ggCfbpIV EwypUCO2X5L08zFzgIWbMNk= =XwLu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-2-394073727-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 17:18:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C555C16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:18:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801DA43D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:18:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from [208.216.122.27] (morr0627.gti.net [208.216.122.27]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id E289235EA8; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:14:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43EF6DF5.3090709@gti.net> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:18:45 -0500 From: Bob Perry User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <43DC4330.6080607@gti.net> <441wypu812.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <43DE445A.3040904@gti.net> <44ek2p5ppq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44ek2p5ppq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to Startx Following Upgrade--Error in Locking Authority File X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:18:46 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Bob Perry writes: > >> Bingo! It works...but what is a stale authority file and how do you >> avoid them? > > "Stale" is a technical term that means pretty much the same thing it > does in your kitchen: something that should've been thrown out before > now. I haven't seen one in a long time, so I'm not sure where yours > came from, but a system crash might leave one behind. > > Not sure if I updated folks on this but the problem persists. (E-mail problems). I've since requested assistance from the gnome and x11 mailing list since the problem started following recent upgrades to those ports. Purpose here is to thank you for your assistance if I neglected to do so earlier. Bob Perry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 17:38:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C3316A420; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:38:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.cross@averageadmins.com) Received: from svr85.edns1.com (svr85.edns1.com [67.15.56.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D0B43D48; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:38:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff.cross@averageadmins.com) Received: from 24-117-52-138.cpe.cableone.net ([24.117.52.138] helo=[192.168.15.103]) by svr85.edns1.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1F8LBB-0001xK-0Q; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:38:35 -0800 Message-ID: <43EF7282.90307@averageadmins.com> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:38:10 -0600 From: Jeff Cross User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060131) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kalin@el.net References: <56096.24.90.33.115.1139706352.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20060212004340.Y94830@fledge.watson.org> <53136.24.90.33.115.1139736993.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <53136.24.90.33.115.1139736993.squirrel@mail.el.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr85.edns1.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - averageadmins.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: "Andrew R. Reiter" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd-airtools X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:38:42 -0000 kalin mintchev wrote: >> not positive, but i think this no longer works... >> > > ok.. thanks. i found it in the net-mnmt ports. why is it there if it > doesn't work? > is there anything else like it in the ports (or online)? > > thanks.. > > > >> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, kalin mintchev wrote: >> >> : >> : hi all... >> : >> : anybody successfully used bsd-airtools? >> : >> : i tried the dstumbler to look at my access point at home but nothing >> :happens. i do get the interface with all the options but after that >> :nothing shows up no mater which option i use... any ideas? thanks.... >> : >> :_______________________________________________ >> :freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org mailing list >> :http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile >> :To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mobile-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> : >> : >> >> -- >> arr@watson.org >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > As I said in a previous post, the dstumbler portion of the bsd-airtools works for me by doing the following: # ifconfig wi0 up # dstumbler wi0 Also, kismet is a really good tool for detecting wireless networks as well. It is available in the FreeBSD ports tree at /usr/ports/net-mgmt/kismet. However, I can only get this app to work with my Atheros (ath0) card, a Linksys WPC55AG. Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 17:53:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D87016A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:53:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thiago_est@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web30005.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30005.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC7DD43D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:53:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thiago_est@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 30620 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Feb 2006 17:53:18 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=typR13mg+rTPRb2li+dlWe8gAUCEB/+0m+Alka33kgSFgNXzYKlZbumZoUeOBGJ4QQ2SlwrNbdZs+7UnSjVQSvnYANreeKR1PCf5PrNbRe61WA5l5pcoNMb+NhqLuwGT0Fn2EWX367zrtUiPDRJYHZmx1+1eqdEPtwFSYbqTxoQ= ; Message-ID: <20060212175318.30618.qmail@web30005.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.191.117.172] by web30005.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:53:18 ART Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:53:18 -0300 (ART) From: Thiago Esteves To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <443bir120y.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: "#:Failed to force tx and rx idle state" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:53:19 -0000 --- Lowell Gilbert escreveu: > Thiago Esteves writes: > > > Hi, I've had troubles with a ethernet adapter > ...."dc".... It send the mensage ::: > > > > => dc0: Failed to force tx and rx idle > state <= > > > > ::: What's it? > > It tried and failed to reset the MAC controller. > What other symptoms are you seeing? > I started the DHCP client but It doesn't obtain a IP address. I tried to configure the IP address manually but It daesn't function... _______________________________________________________ Yahoo! doce lar. Faa do Yahoo! sua homepage. http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 18:26:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D016916A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:26:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EA443D45 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:26:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s18so595404wxc for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:26:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kBZLIgqFHag1+bRdaffJOnT0U/kN0EFWOwtjVCowtMyEAIHrxLSJXR5y92QE3IDXhfH7h+3i8y4uekp1r/GtzaiLZXah1VcgzJRYNFSYeOpWAqbb2fRTGOubuB2zp3LHwNU3b/0Sdiph5CHskqN0g0PB2k2Xts3kjAYzxeMCaQc= Received: by 10.70.12.14 with SMTP id 14mr1414479wxl; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.58.15 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:26:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:26:02 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060211.183855.29586.250418@webmail65.nyc.untd.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, gs_stoller@juno.com Subject: Re: installation of FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:26:03 -0000 On 2/11/06, fbsd_user wrote: > > (Some data deleted) > >> What happens is that I first get a message ?Building the boot > loader > >> arguments? on one line, and shortly afterwards the message > ?Relocating > >> the loader and the BTX? on another line. After a delay of about > 11 > >> minutes, a third line appears containing the message ?Starting > the BTX > >> loader?. I let the system run for about an hour and a half but > no > >> more messages appeared, nor did the computer indicate that the > >> installation had completed. > >> The only thing in my machine that I think could be ?not working? > >> with the installation program is my BIOS . Here is all the > >> information I have about my BIOS . It names itself as > >> ?Energy Star Ally? written by Award Software Inc. and that it is > >> an ?Award Modular BIOS? with ?Award Plug & Play BIOS extension > >> v1.0A?. Its ID is v4.6OPGMA (the character between the "6" & > >> the "P" is a vertical ellipse with a dot at its center, it is > >> either zero or oh ). > > > How did you install it? (Two floppy disks / CD) > > Did you get to the install screen? (sysinstall) > > I tried to install from a CDROM set (of 2). > I never did get to the install screen. I tried simply booting th= e > first CDROM and it gave out those three lines. Similarly when I > booted into my current system (4.3), mounted the first CDROM , and > then typed "/cdrom/stand/sysinstall". > > **************************************************** > > Where did you get your install cd from?? > If you burned a downloaded iso file, did you run md5 to > verify the checksum so you know its good? I missed the OP, so I apologise in advance for the multiple ccs. 11 Minutes to get to the boot loader startup? Is this a 80386? If it is, then as of some time ago these are no longer supported in a default install. http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/i386.htm -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 21:00:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE97016A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:00:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F8D43D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:00:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB575210192 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:59:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14546-01-8 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:59:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 56090210139 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:59:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1CKxjhl004648 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:59:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1CKxiTI004647 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:59:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) From: Gerard Seibert Organization: Seibercom,net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:59:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(=?utf-8?q?gxJxxc=0A=09RnSNPNr*/=5E=7EStawWU9KDJ-CT0k=24f=23?=@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2493210.ODrGnmY8D4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602121559.44033.gerard@seibercom.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1284/Sun Feb 12 11:00:59 2006 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Device Name & Netgear Router X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard@seibercom.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:00:05 -0000 --nextPart2493210.ODrGnmY8D4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I have a Netgear Cable/DSL Router - RP614v3 that connects two WinXP=20 machines with two FreeBSD 5.4 machines to each other. The router is=20 connected to a Cable Modem, but I do not think that is relevant to this=20 question. On the router's configuration screen, under maintenance is a "Attached=20 Devices" menu item. This will list all four machines connected to the=20 router with their respective MAC addresses. However, only the WinXP=20 machines have their 'Device Name' listed. I was wondering why this is. I cannot seem to locate any specific=20 information on the Netgear site regarding this. Everything works fine,=20 so I assume it is not a serious problem. =2D-=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net PGP: http://www.seibercom.net/sig/gerard.asc --nextPart2493210.ODrGnmY8D4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD76G/chM2dIO+3uMRAo0fAJ98sJsLljIYL6HUwI5rRAXtYcBklwCfbr8z SfSQQVHYfMojP40iAqW7f64= =kCaR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2493210.ODrGnmY8D4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 21:27:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353EA16A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:27:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EC743D48 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:27:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F8Ol3-0002bB-MM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:27:50 +0100 Received: from modemcable002.152-81-70.mc.videotron.ca ([70.81.152.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:27:49 +0100 Received: from ugob by modemcable002.152-81-70.mc.videotron.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:27:49 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ugo Bellavance Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:27:33 -0500 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <200602121559.44033.gerard@seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: modemcable002.152-81-70.mc.videotron.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <200602121559.44033.gerard@seibercom.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Device Name & Netgear Router X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:27:59 -0000 Gerard Seibert wrote: > I have a Netgear Cable/DSL Router - RP614v3 that connects two WinXP > machines with two FreeBSD 5.4 machines to each other. The router is > connected to a Cable Modem, but I do not think that is relevant to this > question. > > On the router's configuration screen, under maintenance is a "Attached > Devices" menu item. This will list all four machines connected to the > router with their respective MAC addresses. However, only the WinXP > machines have their 'Device Name' listed. > > I was wondering why this is. I cannot seem to locate any specific > information on the Netgear site regarding this. Everything works fine, > so I assume it is not a serious problem. Probably just because the router makes a request for the netbios name of computers. If you don't run samba on your freebsd box, it gets no answer, so no there is no serious problem about that. > > -- Ugo -> Please don't send a copy of your reply by e-mail. I read the list. -> Please avoid top-posting, long signatures and HTML, and cut the irrelevant parts in your replies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 21:34:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897E116A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D644243D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:34:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FD721018B for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:34:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14251-01-5 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B7CC210176 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1CLY7X1004839 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:34:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1CLY7fm004838 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:34:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) From: Gerard Seibert Organization: Seibercom,net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:34:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602121559.44033.gerard@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(=?utf-8?q?gxJxxc=0A=09RnSNPNr*/=5E=7EStawWU9KDJ-CT0k=24f=23?=@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7654142.Y1IiSx4Y67"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602121634.06907.gerard@seibercom.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1284/Sun Feb 12 11:00:59 2006 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Device Name & Netgear Router X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard@seibercom.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:34:17 -0000 --nextPart7654142.Y1IiSx4Y67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Gerard Seibert wrote: > > I have a Netgear Cable/DSL Router - RP614v3 that connects two WinXP > > machines with two FreeBSD 5.4 machines to each other. The router is > > connected to a Cable Modem, but I do not think that is relevant to > > this question. > > > > On the router's configuration screen, under maintenance is a > > "Attached Devices" menu item. This will list all four machines > > connected to the router with their respective MAC addresses. > > However, only the WinXP machines have their 'Device Name' listed. > > > > I was wondering why this is. I cannot seem to locate any specific > > information on the Netgear site regarding this. Everything works > > fine, so I assume it is not a serious problem. > > Probably just because the router makes a request for the netbios name > of computers. =A0If you don't run samba on your freebsd box, it gets no > answer, so no there is no serious problem about that. I have that latest version of Samba installed on both FreeBSD boxes. The=20 network works fine. Samba seems to be working correctly. It probably=20 has something to do with the way the router quarries for the BIOS name,=20 but that is just a guess. =2D-=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net PGP: http://www.seibercom.net/sig/gerard.asc --nextPart7654142.Y1IiSx4Y67 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD76nOchM2dIO+3uMRAqPkAJ4kCgGOjeGxLw0bDV3vBeado/y0QQCfWUc+ vqPIPb73c48EcixgaiBrgkw= =K5eC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7654142.Y1IiSx4Y67-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 21:34:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53E916A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:34:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from empmail.bowdoin.edu (empmail.bowdoin.edu [139.140.14.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579A843D49 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:34:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from shredder.bowdoin.edu ([139.140.181.133]) by empmail.bowdoin.edu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004)) with ESMTPP id <0IUL00MI7FVSWD00@empmail.bowdoin.edu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:33:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by shredder.bowdoin.edu (Postfix, from userid 12008) id 3DB0DCA0E; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:33:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:33:28 +0000 From: Alec Berryman In-reply-to: <200602121559.44033.gerard@seibercom.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060212213327.GA55015@thened.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-disposition: inline X-Ned-Wuz-Here: Yes X-GPG-Fingerprint: 3DB5 8785 53D9 8BF4 5049 B6B9 02E7 7FD9 881C 85C4 X-GPG-Key-ID: 881C85C4 References: <200602121559.44033.gerard@seibercom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: Device Name & Netgear Router X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:34:19 -0000 --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gerard Seibert on 2006-02-12 15:59:33 -0500: > On the router's configuration screen, under maintenance is a > "Attached Devices" menu item. This will list all four machines > connected to the router with their respective MAC > addresses. However, only the WinXP machines have their 'Device Name' > listed. >=20 > I was wondering why this is. I cannot seem to locate any specific > information on the Netgear site regarding this. Everything works > fine, so I assume it is not a serious problem. DHCP clients may send names along with requests; Windows computers send whatever name you've configured in the sharing or whatever section, and this is what you see. If you want your router to show a name for the FreeBSD host, put a line that reads 'send host-name "foo";' in /etc/dhclient.conf on that host. --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD76mnAud/2YgchcQRAkmWAJ4gjQPLhu65cjR9Vr4rPyqT1K4kAgCgztBG jggUSu/uiGnpTtapGVI3nbE= =eLuS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 21:39:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E2016A42C for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:39:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1640943D4C for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:39:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F8OwW-0004mB-An for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:39:40 +0100 Received: from modemcable002.152-81-70.mc.videotron.ca ([70.81.152.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:39:40 +0100 Received: from ugob by modemcable002.152-81-70.mc.videotron.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:39:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ugo Bellavance Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:39:23 -0500 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <200602121559.44033.gerard@seibercom.net> <20060212213327.GA55015@thened.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: modemcable002.152-81-70.mc.videotron.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <20060212213327.GA55015@thened.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Device Name & Netgear Router X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:39:44 -0000 Alec Berryman wrote: > Gerard Seibert on 2006-02-12 15:59:33 -0500: > >> On the router's configuration screen, under maintenance is a >> "Attached Devices" menu item. This will list all four machines >> connected to the router with their respective MAC >> addresses. However, only the WinXP machines have their 'Device Name' >> listed. >> >> I was wondering why this is. I cannot seem to locate any specific >> information on the Netgear site regarding this. Everything works >> fine, so I assume it is not a serious problem. > > DHCP clients may send names along with requests; Windows computers > send whatever name you've configured in the sharing or whatever > section, and this is what you see. If you want your router to show a > name for the FreeBSD host, put a line that reads 'send host-name > "foo";' in /etc/dhclient.conf on that host. Cool, I thought it was Netbios based. I learned something :). -- Ugo -> Please don't send a copy of your reply by e-mail. I read the list. -> Please avoid top-posting, long signatures and HTML, and cut the irrelevant parts in your replies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 23:41:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2288516A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:41:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bogo.readlist@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4431743D46 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bogo.readlist@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j40so479190ugd for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:41:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=OJLFXnDX/CNFHmC/lyhbMEDz3gTVB0Q5pZDT+SUPfuCdAarCoav/j/HNf2rIGtxBzhWKOPSHlPkrKBcpcuoWj+sDa2WC4qA4T8UMpiRadyNmNfnYgCU/K2oW3pl9+M5bNuR8B1Z0/aoXX9cSjKrNuVZlxRJOvPHIyaS36pXdS6Q= Received: by 10.48.215.6 with SMTP id n6mr604690nfg; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:35:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.224.13 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:35:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:35:14 -0800 From: bogo logo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD 5.4-stable amd64 disk problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:41:22 -0000 hi list, we have an amd64 machine on freebsd 5.4-stable (sync'ed + compiled today) with a 3ware 9500-8S card. The 3ware card is handling a 1.1TB RAID5 volume (4x 400gb SATA). Recently, we rebooted the box to do some upgrades; now there are several problems: 1) everytime we try to mount the 1.1TB partition, the machine reboots without any messages. 2) when we run fsck on it, this is what we get: box# fsck /dev/da0s1a ** /dev/da0s1a CANNOT READ BLK: 2343322528 CONTINUE? [yn] y THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 2343322528, 2343322529, 2343322530, 2343322531, LOOK FOR ALTERNATE SUPERBLOCKS? [yn] y 32 is not a file system superblock CANNOT READ BLK: 458302416 CONTINUE? [yn] y THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 458302416, 458302417, 458302418, 458302419, 458302420, 458302421, 458302422, 458302423, 458302424= , 458302425, 458302426, 458302427, 458302428, 458302429, 458302430, 458302431= , CANNOT READ BLK: 916604800 CONTINUE? [yn] y THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 916604800, 916604801, 916604802, 916604803, 916604804, 916604805, 916604806, 916604807, 916604808= , 916604809, 916604810, 916604811, 916604812, 916604813, 916604814, 916604815= , CANNOT READ BLK: 1374907184 CONTINUE? [yn] y THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 1374907184, 1374907185, 1374907186, 1374907187, 1374907188, 1374907189, 1374907190, 1374907191, 1374907192, 1374907193, 1374907194, 1374907195, 1374907196, 1374907197, 1374907198, 1374907199, CANNOT READ BLK: 1833209568 CONTINUE? [yn] y THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 1833209568, 1833209569, 1833209570, 1833209571, 1833209572, 1833209573, 1833209574, 1833209575, 1833209576, 1833209577, 1833209578, 1833209579, 1833209580, 1833209581, 1833209582, 1833209583, CANNOT SEEK BLK: -2003455344 CONTINUE? [yn] y CANNOT READ BLK: -2003455344 CONTINUE? [yn] y CANNOT SEEK BLK: -2003455344 CONTINUE? [yn] y THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: -2003455344, -2003455343, -2003455342, -2003455341, -2003455340, -2003455339, -2003455338, -2003455337, -2003455336, -2003455335, -2003455334, -2003455333, -2003455332, -2003455331, -2003455330, -2003455329, SEARCH FOR ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK FAILED. YOU MUST USE THE -b OPTION TO FSCK TO SPECIFY THE LOCATION OF AN ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK TO SUPPLY NEEDED INFORMATION; SEE fsck(8). ------------- How do we fix this? Why are there NEGATIVE disk sectors? The box freezes every time when we mount with with `mount -f /dev/da0s1a /mnt` thank you. -- this is the dmesg output.. -- Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Feb 12 21:50:34 UTC 2006 root@box:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRAP ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (2210.77-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin =3D "AuthenticAMD" Id =3D 0xfc0 Stepping =3D 0 Features=3D0x78bfbff AMD Features=3D0xe0500800 real memory =3D 268369920 (255 MB) avail memory =3D 247742464 (236 MB) ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf0-0xcf3,0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xfc003000-0xfc003fff irq 22 at device 2.0 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xfc004000-0xfc004fff irq 21 at device 2.1 on pci0 usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pci0: at device 2.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 8.0 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 atapci1: port 0xdc00-0xdc0f,0xb70-0xb73,0x970-0x977,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x9f0-0x9f7 irq 20 at device 10.0 on pci0 ata2: channel #0 on atapci1 ata3: channel #1 on atapci1 pcib1: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 14.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: 3.50.02.012 twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 0x7000-0x70ff mem 0xfb000000-0xfb7fffff,0xfb80e000-0xfb80e0ff irq 17 at device 9.0 on pci2 twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9500S-8, 8 ports, Firmware FE9X 2.06.00.009, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.051 skc0: port 0x7400-0x74ff mem 0xfb800000-0xfb803fff irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci2 skc0: (null) rev. (0x1) sk0: on skc0 sk0: Ethernet address: 00:0f:3d:f2:45:0c miibus0: on sk0 e1000phy0: on miibus0 e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto skc1: port 0x7800-0x78ff mem 0xfb804000-0xfb807fff irq 19 at device 11.0 on pci2 skc1: Marvell Yukon Lite Gigabit Ethernet rev. A3(0x7) sk1: on skc1 sk1: Ethernet address: 00:0d:61:7e:b2:5e miibus1: on sk1 e1000phy1: on miibus1 e1000phy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto atapci2: port 0x8c00-0x8c0f,0x8800-0x8803,0x8410-0x8417,0x8000-0x8003,0x7c10-0x7c17 irq 1= 6 at device 12.0 on pci2 ata4: channel #0 on atapci2 ata5: channel #1 on atapci2 atapci3: port 0xa000-0xa00f,0x9c00-0x9c03,0x9800-0x9807,0x9400-0x9403,0x9000-0x9007 mem 0xfb80c000-0xfb80c1ff irq 17 at device 13.0 on pci2 ata6: channel #0 on atapci3 ata7: channel #1 on atapci3 fwohci0: mem 0xfb808000-0xfb80bfff,0xfb80d000-0xfb80d7ff irq 18 at device 14.0 on pci2 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=3D1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:0d:61:56:00:7d:36:9a fwohci0: invalid speed 7 (fixed to 3). fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S800, 3 ports. fwohci0: Link S800, max_rec 4096 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:0d:61:7d:36:9a fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:0d:61:7d:36:9a fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant sbp0: on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: node_id=3D0xc800ffc0, gen=3D1, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <=3D 0, cable IRM =3D 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) fwohci0: phy int fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 orm0: at iomem 0xd0000-0xd17ff,0xc0000-0xcc7ff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2210769641 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ipfw2 initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to accept, logging unlimited acd0: DVDROM at ata0-master PIO4 ad2: 8063MB [16383/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA33 da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 100.000MB/s transfers da0: 1144377MB (2343684096 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 145887C) da1 at twa0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 100.000MB/s transfers da1: 190724MB (390602752 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 24313C) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad2s1a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 01:01:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB55016A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:01:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D6A43D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:01:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C503D33D40 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:01:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.212]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:01:44 -0500 Received: by web3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id C752517C3C; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:01:45 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: k6cusx10VURyXTv8IgLojU0XhABg/lk72qdHSUbTq7Dw 1139792505 From: "Robert Leftwich" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 5022 (F2.73; T1.15; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:01:45 +1100 Subject: Memory leak? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:01:46 -0000 After running some number crunching for the last twelve hours I noticed my box starting to use swap. Given that it has 4gb in it (of which 3gb is available, see my other email for that issue) and I know that the app never uses more than around 1gb I was surprised. Looking at the numbers from top I was even more surprised, there seems to be a significant chunk of memory unaccounted for (from memory when I checked after a couple of hours the inactive memory was around 1300M with Free in the 400M range, everything basically totalling to around the 3gb mark as expected). The app is driven by a script and is only running for around 1/2 hr per dataset after which it shuts down and restarts on a new dataset, so all memory should be freed up/made inactive after each restart, no? Mem: 274M Active, 227M Inact, 263M Wired, 95M Cache, 214M Buf, 4536K Free Swap: 4068M Total, 707M Used, 3361M Free, 17% Inuse real memory = 3221159936 (3071 MB) avail memory = 3106529280 (2962 MB) What's the best way to track down more information as to the cause of this problem? Thanks Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 02:44:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F22816A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:44:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F3043D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:44:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB815C70; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:44:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26837-04; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:44:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-209-142.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.209.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539205C50; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:44:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43EFF28E.6000108@mac.com> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:44:30 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Leftwich References: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory leak? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:44:23 -0000 Robert Leftwich wrote: [ ... ] > Mem: 274M Active, 227M Inact, 263M Wired, 95M Cache, 214M Buf, 4536K > Free > Swap: 4068M Total, 707M Used, 3361M Free, 17% Inuse > > real memory = 3221159936 (3071 MB) > avail memory = 3106529280 (2962 MB) > > What's the best way to track down more information as to the cause of > this problem? Try "top -o size"... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 06:32:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FFC16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:32:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com (outbound-mail.nyc.untd.com [64.136.20.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2BD943D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from webmail13.nyc.untd.com (webmail13.nyc.untd.com [10.141.27.153]) by smtpout01.nyc.untd.com with SMTP id AABB9AK8GAHJS3RA for (sender ); Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:31:34 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gs_stoller@juno.com) by webmail13.nyc.untd.com (jqueuemail) id LG3QRQQS; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:31:21 PST Received: from [67.84.55.15] by webmail13.nyc.untd.com with HTTP: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:31:19 GMT X-Originating-IP: [67.84.55.15] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "gs_stoller@juno.com" Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:31:19 GMT To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20060212.223121.2703.256080@webmail13.nyc.untd.com> X-ContentStamp: 2:3:4290393400 X-MAIL-INFO: 301c1cacc59cacec9c250dcc0d55cc19bca85971f1d818fc98f1f8619815c821e85d91 X-UNTD-OriginStamp: /s5f1SIGSI3+WdnoYQ8yRORbALEFtJil/yy/ELbHP9sf1SX5r7NVuA== X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.141.27.153|webmail13.nyc.untd.com|webmail13.nyc.untd.com|gs_stoller@juno.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, gs_stoller@juno.com Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:32:30 -0000 > I don't really understand what it is you're looking for, but the sourc= e > code for *all* the FreeBSD `programs' is available at: > http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ > It's also available through FTP, CVS, CVSup and is distributed as part= > of the official release CD-ROMs. > You can look for yourself, any time :) Is there a find command [that takes patterns] so if I know the name (o= r part of the name) of a program of interest, I can find out the directo= ry path to it so I can find it easily. Also, where do I look for the ba= sic sector i/o programs (the ones that underly the file-system, they are= eventually called just before the hardware does the i/o] and what are t= heir names? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 06:51:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5454216A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:51:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D5143D46 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:51:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id k1D6pVLS072292; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:51:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:51:31 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: "gs_stoller@juno.com" Message-ID: <20060213065131.GI2090@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20060212.223121.2703.256080@webmail13.nyc.untd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060212.223121.2703.256080@webmail13.nyc.untd.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:51:51 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 13), gs_stoller@juno.com said: > > I don't really understand what it is you're looking for, but the source > > code for *all* the FreeBSD `programs' is available at: > > > http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ > > > It's also available through FTP, CVS, CVSup and is distributed as part > > of the official release CD-ROMs. > > > You can look for yourself, any time :) > > Is there a find command [that takes patterns] so if I know the name > (or part of the name) of a program of interest, I can find out the > directory path to it so I can find it easily. Also, where do I look > for the basic sector i/o programs (the ones that underly the > file-system, they are eventually called just before the hardware does > the i/o] and what are their names? In usderland, they're called open, lseek, read, and write. Just open the raw disk device and treat it like a regular file, and remember you need to access it in 512-byte chunks. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 07:31:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D1416A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:31:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (ns1.internetinsite.com [208.179.97.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0585E43D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.internetinsite.com [IPv6:::1]) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1D7VMUG089621 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:31:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <43F035CA.7030408@chrismaness.com> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:31:22 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Flash Plugin for Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:31:23 -0000 What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin installer do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linux) Thanks Chris Maness From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 08:27:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CFD16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:27:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86AD43D46 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:27:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.ATOSORIGIN.ES [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD182E041; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:28:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:29:03 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Leftwich References: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory leak? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:27:59 -0000 Robert Leftwich wrote: > After running some number crunching for the last twelve hours I noticed > my box starting to use swap. Given that it has 4gb in it (of which 3gb > is available, see my other email for that issue) and I know that the app > never uses more than around 1gb I was surprised. Looking at the numbers > from top I was even more surprised, there seems to be a significant > chunk of memory unaccounted for (from memory when I checked after a > couple of hours the inactive memory was around 1300M with Free in the > 400M range, everything basically totalling to around the 3gb mark as > expected). The app is driven by a script and is only running for around > 1/2 hr per dataset after which it shuts down and restarts on a new > dataset, so all memory should be freed up/made inactive after each > restart, no? > > Mem: 274M Active, 227M Inact, 263M Wired, 95M Cache, 214M Buf, 4536K > Free > Swap: 4068M Total, 707M Used, 3361M Free, 17% Inuse > > real memory = 3221159936 (3071 MB) > avail memory = 3106529280 (2962 MB) > > What's the best way to track down more information as to the cause of > this problem? Do you run other applications also? There was a discussion on CURRENT@ some weeks ago about a memory leak that turned out to be firefox with some extensions, updates are available now. Cheers, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 08:41:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440EE16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:41:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCF143D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:41:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUM0040FASUJ400@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:41:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([213.187.181.70]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUM00H34ASTK2A0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:41:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:41:29 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf In-reply-to: <44bqxcy70y.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> To: Lowell Gilbert Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213094013.02158150@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060211150451.02150468@broadpark.no> <44bqxcy70y.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File verification script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:41:20 -0000 At 15:40 12.02.2006, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >Kristian Vaaf writes: > > > I need a simple script that uses CFV to report on broken MP3 albums. > > All my MP3 albums contain an .sfv file that list MP3 tracks with their > > CRC values. > >There are a bunch of them in ports, under the security category. In my previous e-mail I wrote: > The reason I'd prefer something as simple as this, is because most SFV > validation tools are so bloated with useless features. That includes the SFV tools in ports. I just want a simple script that uses cfv to verify MP3 albums, the same way I showed you my other script that uses cfv to seal my MP3 albums. Thanks, Vaaf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 08:49:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6A716A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:49:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD8A43D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:49:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUM004KSB60JC00@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:49:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([213.187.181.70]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUM00HWRB5ZYN60@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:49:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:49:22 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213094752.021a8eb0@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cc: Subject: How to ensure one blank line on top of ASCII files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:49:14 -0000 Hello! I need to make sure all my ASCII files start with one blank line. I just need to know what command to use, I've written the rest of the script to do this for me: -- for file in `find -s . -type f -not -name ".*"`; do if file -b "$file" | grep -q 'text'; then What to put here? :) echo "$file: Done" fi done -- Thanks! :) Vaaf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 09:10:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0195616A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:10:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E22943D4C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:10:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [62.68.187.173] (helo=[172.16.0.26]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1F8Zii-000KId-9W for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:10:08 +0100 Message-ID: <43F04D30.7050004@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:11:12 +0100 From: gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Upgrading 4.8 -> 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:10:12 -0000 Hello Guys, I would like to upgrade my server from 4.8 to 6.0. I think I know how to upgrade a system, I already did that for 4.3->4.8. I need the upgrade because some ports starting to throw errors and refuse to build. :-( It is a production server and I need to be careful. I have some questions: 1. Is it okay to use 6.0 for the production server? (I already have another 6.0 and tested it with various apps; it looks good but...) 2. The server is using a special .so file that was compiled for 4.8. We do not have the sources. Will this shared lib work with 6.0? 3. Should I upgrade to 5.4 first, or can I upgrade directly from 4.8 to 6.0? 4. Is there any special documentation that I must read before I upgrade to 6.0? Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 09:15:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E6F16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:15:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from empmail.bowdoin.edu (empmail.bowdoin.edu [139.140.14.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE5843D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:15:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from shredder.bowdoin.edu ([139.140.181.133]) by empmail.bowdoin.edu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004)) with ESMTPP id <0IUM0001UCEIOM00@empmail.bowdoin.edu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:15:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by shredder.bowdoin.edu (Postfix, from userid 12008) id 49B59CA4E; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:15:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:15:54 +0000 From: Alec Berryman In-reply-to: <43F04D30.7050004@messias.qhigh.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060213091554.GA14999@thened.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-disposition: inline X-Ned-Wuz-Here: Yes X-GPG-Fingerprint: 3DB5 8785 53D9 8BF4 5049 B6B9 02E7 7FD9 881C 85C4 X-GPG-Key-ID: 881C85C4 References: <43F04D30.7050004@messias.qhigh.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: Upgrading 4.8 -> 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:15:56 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline gandalf on 2006-02-13 10:11:12 +0100: > 2. The server is using a special .so file that was compiled for > 4.8. We do not have the sources. Will this shared lib work with 6.0? Probably with the compat4x port, but you'll want to test it out. > 3. Should I upgrade to 5.4 first, or can I upgrade directly from 4.8 > to 6.0? Yes, no. --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD8E5KAud/2YgchcQRAr0KAJ9EcqgES3TGDulg961mh1RsgOIWRQCfWeXj gbJalF/4P9pWtHPWBdFfhZM= =P3rj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 09:18:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399B816A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:18:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk) Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk (pfepb.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A756043D55 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:18:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk) Received: from desktop.home (x1-6-00-50-7f-27-a4-fc.k432.webspeed.dk [83.89.17.231]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A2AA5003E for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:18:31 +0100 (CET) From: Bjarne Wichmann Petersen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:20:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602131020.28753.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> Subject: lprps: ioctl(TIOCFLUSH): Operation not permitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:18:33 -0000 Hi I did something stuppid and messed up my lpd-setup. I looked around in KDE's "Printer Manager" in administrator-mode, and even though I didn't apply any changes it activated cupsd (should it do that?) which in turn overwrote my /etc/printcap. Now I can't get back to the old and working setup. I've removed /usr/local/etc/rc.d/cups.sh, so /etc/printcap doesn't get overwritten any more. Though I don't have a copy of my /etc/printcap I found older copy (which might be identical) which have worked in the past: laserjet|lp|ps|PS|S|hp|HP LaserJet 1200:\ :sh:sd=/var/spool/lpd/laserjet:\ :lp=/dev/lpt0:\ :mx#0:\ :if=/usr/local/libexec/psif: The psif-filter is installed and at that location. lpd is up and running. Now, if I try to print anything I get this errormessage in console/syslog: eb 13 09:50:46 desktop lprps[842]: laserjet: ioctl(TIOCFLUSH): Operation not supported by device Feb 13 09:50:46 desktop lpd[836]: laserjet: job could not be printed (cfA010desktop.home) I've tried to fiddle around with lptcontrol and gets tiocflush-errors for all switches but -s. I have NO idea for where to look next. Google doesn't turn up anything useful on tiocflush and I have no idea what it means. Bjarne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 09:32:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA6416A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:32:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eeycw.albert@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977FD43D5F for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eeycw.albert@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 18so932624nzp for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:32:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Hvp25PP7SjvdB395Llotsyn2wdTQc63wZU7GCOs4ivbqPVia8WkTP/wg3pPbZWAHZeYt8fVWr/KFnKlvS+gglwFKUtqv5a2SQhpdT49MECXRq2t54czZIC8y27nSW6hyuv4SxdNklISp7AAXYVZ0TEAjyiorGAfKljeGZNHBetM= Received: by 10.65.107.17 with SMTP id j17mr893007qbm; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:32:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.98.14 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:32:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7d3594220602130132q2b19c55m@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:32:28 +0800 From: Albert yu To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD installing on PC w/ Intel 64bit CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:32:33 -0000 Dear Support, Nice to meet you all first. I have a question on Hardware compatability while installing FreeBSD 4.8 on some newly built PCs. May I know is FreeBSD version 4.8 support Intel 64bit CPU w/ 915GV chipset Motherboard ? As I am gonna run some programs that can only be installed on version 4.8. And i am worrying the OS version do not work on this configuration. Thankyou alot for your help first. -- Have a nice day >From Albert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 10:30:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F1116A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE1343D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680A0D33F9E; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:30:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.212]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:30:17 -0500 Received: by web3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id A1D072484; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:30:17 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1139826617.10634.254226042@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: kCv8OrE51OiSorRPkrHdtkId4VJKOT8vRBZ4xoeNPGa5 1139826617 From: "Robert Leftwich" To: "Erik Norgaard" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 5022 (F2.73; T1.15; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) References: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:30:17 +1100 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory leak? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:30:18 -0000 On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:29:03 +0100, "Erik Norgaard" said: > > Do you run other applications also? > > There was a discussion on CURRENT@ some weeks ago about a memory leak > that turned out to be firefox with some extensions, updates are > available now. > Unfortunately no, its cli only, no x, pretty much just Postgres and Python and C :-( Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 11:21:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA8B16A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:21:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rl@cortexsystems.dk) Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk (pfepa.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F1F43D4C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:21:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rl@cortexsystems.dk) Received: from maximillion (cpe.atm2-0-1291173.0x50a0b74e.ronxx2.customer.tele.dk [80.160.183.78]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579C647FF0E for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:21:12 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Luckow_-_Cortex_Systems?= To: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:21:04 +0100 Message-ID: <001f01c6308f$94405b20$3e1310ac@maximillion> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcYwj5PJTYNiPCMjTTCka66LNN1axA== Cc: Subject: Interested in selling retail freeBSD sets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:21:14 -0000 Hi We're interested in selling freeBSD along with a range of other OS distributions on our website, which caters the European market. How would we going about obtaining these? Kind regards, =20 Ren=E9 Luckow Technical & Sales Consultant =20 Cortex Systems Snoldelev Bygade 59 DK4621 Gadstrup Denmark =20 E-mail: rene@cortexsystems.dk WWW: http://cortexsystems.dk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 11:25:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038D016A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:25:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from marski.suomi.net (marski.suomi.net [212.50.131.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1839543D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:25:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from spartak.suomi.net (spartak.suomi.net [212.50.140.227]) by marski.suomi.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 (built Dec 2 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUM00834IE74FC0@marski.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:25:21 +0200 (EET) Received: from spam1.suomi.net (spam1.suomi.net [212.50.131.165]) by mailstore.suomi.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUM0038JIE7QT80@mailstore.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:25:20 +0200 (EET) Received: from smtp.suomi.net (addr-82-128-230-204.suomi.net [82.128.230.204]) by spam1.suomi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E5B1A8D03 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:25:15 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:25:06 +0200 From: Teemu Korhonen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-OPOY-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the OPOY for more information X-OPOY-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-OPOY-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.325, required 5, AWL -2.72, BAYES_20 -1.95, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 5.00) X-OPOY-MailScanner-From: teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi User-Agent: Opera M2/8.50 (Win32, build 7700) Subject: need help with pcmcia wireless network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:25:28 -0000 I have a laptop with freebsd-6.0 and I've got everything working except my Buffalo WLI-CB-G54S wireless network card. When I insert the card I get following message "cardbus0: at device 0.0 (no driver attached)" I found two pages that seems to be instructions to get the card working: http://geocities.yahoo.co.jp/gl/stealth_daemon/view?.date=20050623&.utc=1133948970 http://geocities.yahoo.co.jp/gl/stealth_daemon/view?.date=20051207&.utc=1133982628 as they are japan, I can't get but the main idea. So far the ndisgen doesn't work it fails to build the .ko file, but I've had better luck with ndiscvt which made and if_ndis.ko both ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko are loaded, but I get no new devices and still get the "no driver attached" message. I have no idea what to do now and I really need to get that card working. Ideas anyone? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 11:29:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D4016A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:29:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from mail.dc-servers.com (mail.dc-servers.com [83.243.101.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74FD143D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:29:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: (qmail 17445 invoked by uid 399); 13 Feb 2006 11:29:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alfie.jigsawhq.com) (work@ashleymoran.me.uk@213.106.224.113) by mail.dc-servers.com with SMTP; 13 Feb 2006 11:29:36 -0000 From: Ashley Moran Organization: Codeweavers Ltd To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:28:11 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602131128.11168.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> Cc: Subject: Long list of stale dependencies for tomcat55 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:29:36 -0000 Does anyone know how my Tomcat installation on a 5.4 box has ended up including the following as tomcat dependencies? atk-1.10.3 libXft-2.1.7 xorg-fonts-encodings-6.9.0_1 desktop-file-utils-0.10_3 pango-1.10.3 glib-2.8.6 cairo-1.0.2_1 gtk-2.8.12 mozilla-1.7.12_5,2 tiff-3.8.0 bitstream-vera-1.10_2 I don't even know what half of them do. I've deleted all the stale dependencies because freshports.org says the only run-time dependency is java/jdk14 (jdk15 on my machine). Is this right? Ashley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 11:43:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D3216A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:43:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C7D43D6B for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:42:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 12110 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 22:42:59 +1100 Received: from 203-217-43-43.dyn.chime.net.au (HELO ?192.168.13.3?) (203.217.43.43) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 13 Feb 2006 22:42:58 +1100 Message-ID: <43F070BA.1000205@meijome.net> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:42:50 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kristian Vaaf References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213094752.021a8eb0@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213094752.021a8eb0@broadpark.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to ensure one blank line on top of ASCII files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:43:02 -0000 Kristian Vaaf wrote: > > Hello! > > I need to make sure all my ASCII files start with one blank line. > > I just need to know what command to use, > I've written the rest of the script to do this for me: > > -- > echo "" > MY_BLANK_LINE.txt > for file in `find -s . -type f -not -name ".*"`; do > > if file -b "$file" | grep -q 'text'; then > mv $file $file.tmp cat MY_BLANK_LINE.txt $file.tmp >> $file rm -f $file.tmp > echo "$file: Done" > > fi > > done rm -f MY_BLANK_LINE.txt There possibly are far more elegant solutions...but that should work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 11:43:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D89516A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:43:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from pinnacle.akherb.com (94-37-237-24.gci.net [24.237.37.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E3443D49 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:43:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix, from userid 1007) id EC0535D49; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:43:25 -0900 (AKST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pinnacle.akherb.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from [192.168.2.131] (209-124-141-064.ip.arctic.net [209.124.141.64]) by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611775D3D; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:43:24 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:42:58 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1748675.AOnIKtWJnF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602130243.20651.akbeech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Teemu Korhonen Subject: Re: need help with pcmcia wireless network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:43:27 -0000 --nextPart1748675.AOnIKtWJnF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 13 February 2006 02:25, Teemu Korhonen wrote: > I have a laptop with freebsd-6.0 and I've got everything working except my > Buffalo WLI-CB-G54S wireless network card. > When I insert the card I get following message "cardbus0: at > device 0.0 (no driver attached)" > > I found two pages that seems to be instructions to get the card working: > > http://geocities.yahoo.co.jp/gl/stealth_daemon/view?.date=3D20050623&.utc= =3D113 >3948970 > > http://geocities.yahoo.co.jp/gl/stealth_daemon/view?.date=3D20051207&.utc= =3D113 >3982628 > > as they are japan, I can't get but the main idea. > > So far the ndisgen doesn't work it fails to build the .ko file, but I've > had better luck with ndiscvt which made and if_ndis.ko > > both ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko are loaded, but I get no new devices and still > get the "no driver attached" message. > > I have no idea what to do now and I really need to get that card working. > Ideas anyone? What does pciconf -lv say about that card? Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - akbeech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1748675.AOnIKtWJnF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD8HDY1HPO4IQJSE0RAguCAJ9maJO4Py3BZDBFJ6sqlhAjsmJ6+QCfTwIr 4vhdTgO5tLAVBlqco8fZDUo= =7h4n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1748675.AOnIKtWJnF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 11:49:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4962116A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:49:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5B243D5D for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:49:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 26411 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 11:49:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.187.174.219]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 11:49:08 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:48:50 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: Teemu Korhonen Message-ID: <20060213124850.3229a380@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_eiU1Bh4bEMdWdqMik.6Zod_; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need help with pcmcia wireless network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:49:12 -0000 --Sig_eiU1Bh4bEMdWdqMik.6Zod_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Teemu Korhonen wrote: > I have a laptop with freebsd-6.0 and I've got everything working > except my Buffalo WLI-CB-G54S wireless network card. > When I insert the card I get following message "cardbus0: > at device 0.0 (no driver attached)" >=20 > I found two pages that seems to be instructions to get the card > working: >=20 > http://geocities.yahoo.co.jp/gl/stealth_daemon/view?.date=3D20050623&.utc= =3D1133948970 >=20 > http://geocities.yahoo.co.jp/gl/stealth_daemon/view?.date=3D20051207&.utc= =3D1133982628 >=20 > as they are japan, I can't get but the main idea. >=20 > So far the ndisgen doesn't work it fails to build the .ko file, but > I've had better luck with ndiscvt which made and if_ndis.ko You don't have to build if_ndis.ko and ndis.ko manually, they should already be present in /boot/kernel. If ndisgen "doesn't work" you usually get an error message. Without knowing the error message and how you got it, it's hard to tell what's wrong. =20 Try running ndisgen /path/to/INF /path/to/SYS an press return a few times. Afterwards you should either have the kernel module containing the firmware, or a reason why the build failed. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_eiU1Bh4bEMdWdqMik.6Zod_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD8HI+jV8GA4rMKUQRAi/4AKCcD+hwGb7YMf1mRczlxsabhCkPwgCcDRF6 6QhdqHbQV8cOaj29+pCcNrE= =iVPb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_eiU1Bh4bEMdWdqMik.6Zod_-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 11:57:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C138516A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:57:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@juiceless.net) Received: from smtp2.nblnetworks.fi (smtp2.nblnetworks.fi [217.30.182.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6194243D58 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:57:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@juiceless.net) Received: from ssl.nebula.fi (webmail.nebula.fi [217.30.180.120]) by smtp2.nblnetworks.fi (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1DC11kF013898 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:01:02 +0200 Received: from 213.243.141.188 (SquirrelMail authenticated user juicelessnet3) by ssl.nebula.fi with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:57:21 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <60315.213.243.141.188.1139831841.squirrel@ssl.nebula.fi> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:57:21 +0200 (EET) From: "Ville Lundberg" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: 6.0-release hanging without a clue (gmirror related?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:57:27 -0000 Hi, I have a 6.0-release-p4 system that is hanging constantly after about a week of uptime. Nothing is printed to the logs - it just hangs, the HD light is stuck on. I don't know if anything is printed out on the console, as the system is at client's premises. The system is a Epox 4PDA3I mb (Intel ICH5 disc controller), Pentium 4 2,6GHz, 1Gb ram, 2 x WD Raptor 36,7Gb SATA harddrives on gmirror. It is very lightly stressed, as it's used for one database application only. Actually, I don't know if the system freezes completely, as it is used only thru Apache - these crashes are noticed by client when the app no longer responses. After a cold reboot, gmirror loses one of the hds (component broken, skipping). I have two theories: 1) gmirror (or fbsd sata stuff) is the cause for crash. The HD light thing is what makes me suspect this (hd action when freezing). And, when rebuilding the mirror, it failed with WRITE_DMA timeouts. I cleaned the first and last blocks of the failing hd, and then I was able to add it back to the mirror. Manufacturer disk diagnostics did not report any errors on either hds - so the cold reboot is the cause of dropping the hd from gmirror. 2) Apache 1.3.34, MySQL 4.1.16, mod_perl 1.29, Perl (don't remember exact version, but pkg_add -r perl from 6.0-release), is the fault. The system was upgraded recently when the new hds were installed, from FB 4.10-rel, Apache 1.3.19 (no mod_perl), MySQL 4.0.18 to the above mentioned. With 4.10, it was rock solid with nice uptimes like 176 days until maintenance had to reboot it... Anyone have ideas how to get to the bottom of the problem - to know why it freezes in the first place? Or know if any of the software versions mentioned above have some issues? I can provide dmesg and such if wanted. --Ville From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 12:10:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC5716A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:10:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381B443D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:10:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [62.68.187.173] (helo=[172.16.0.26]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1F8cXR-000Dwt-59 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:10:41 +0100 Message-ID: <43F07782.5040002@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:11:46 +0100 From: gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: make buildworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:10:47 -0000 Hello, I have this file /etc/sup.sys: *default host=cvsup.hu.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all Then I traverse to /usr and execute this command: cvsup /etc/sup.sys After successful checkout, I do cd /usr/src make buildworld This is what I get: -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Building an up-to-date make(1) -------------------------------------------------------------- rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200408120\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELLNAME=\"sh\" /usr/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/buf.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/for.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/hash.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/hash_tables.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/job.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/lst.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/main.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/make.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/parse.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/proc.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/shell.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/str.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/util.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/var.c In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c:107: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c:59: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c:97: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/for.c:55: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/job.c:131: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/main.c:84: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/make.c:80: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/parse.c:86: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/str.c:49: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c:102: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c:84: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/util.c:59: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/var.c:96: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/make. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. What am I doing wrong? Additional questions: - Can I upgrade from 4.8 to 6.0 in one step? Or should I upgrade to 5.4 first? - I have a .so file for 4.8. I do not have the sources, will it work on 6.0? Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 12:19:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E8C16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:19:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from marski.suomi.net (marski.suomi.net [212.50.131.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E08A43D5C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:19:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from spartak.suomi.net (spartak.suomi.net [212.50.140.227]) by marski.suomi.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 (built Dec 2 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUM008QKKX04FD0@marski.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:19:48 +0200 (EET) Received: from spam1.suomi.net (spam1.suomi.net [212.50.131.165]) by mailstore.suomi.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUM003V4KX0QP90@mailstore.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:19:48 +0200 (EET) Received: from smtp.suomi.net (addr-82-128-230-204.suomi.net [82.128.230.204]) by spam1.suomi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542AB1A1F6B for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:19:43 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:19:34 +0200 From: Teemu Korhonen In-reply-to: <20060213124850.3229a380@localhost> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-OPOY-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the OPOY for more information X-OPOY-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-OPOY-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.354, required 5, AWL -2.07, BAYES_00 -2.60, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 5.00, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL 0.03) X-OPOY-MailScanner-From: teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi References: <20060213124850.3229a380@localhost> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.50 (Win32, build 7700) Subject: Re: need help with pcmcia wireless network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:19:54 -0000 Fabian Keil wrote Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:48:50 +0200: > Teemu Korhonen wrote: > >> I have a laptop with freebsd-6.0 and I've got everything working >> except my Buffalo WLI-CB-G54S wireless network card. >> When I insert the card I get following message "cardbus0: >> at device 0.0 (no driver attached)" >> >> I found two pages that seems to be instructions to get the card >> working: >> >> http://geocities.yahoo.co.jp/gl/stealth_daemon/view?.date=20050623&.utc=1133948970 >> >> http://geocities.yahoo.co.jp/gl/stealth_daemon/view?.date=20051207&.utc=1133982628 >> >> as they are japan, I can't get but the main idea. >> >> So far the ndisgen doesn't work it fails to build the .ko file, but >> I've had better luck with ndiscvt which made and if_ndis.ko > > You don't have to build if_ndis.ko and ndis.ko manually, > they should already be present in /boot/kernel. > > If ndisgen "doesn't work" you usually get an error message. > Without knowing the error message and how you got it, > it's hard to tell what's wrong. > Try running ndisgen /path/to/INF /path/to/SYS > an press return a few times. Afterwards you should > either have the kernel module containing the firmware, > or a reason why the build failed. > > Fabian It gives lots of errors, here's a grab: Building kernel module... In file included from /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:57: ./windrv.h:746: error: excess elements in char array initializer ./windrv.h:746: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239].nc_val') ./windrv.h:747: warning: braces around scalar initializer ./windrv.h:747: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239].nc_val[0]') ./windrv.h:747: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast ./windrv.h:747: error: initializer element is not computable at load time ./windrv.h:747: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239].nc_val[0]') ./windrv.h:747: error: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:747: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239].nc_val') ./windrv.h:747: error: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:747: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239].nc_val') ./windrv.h:748: warning: braces around scalar initializer ./windrv.h:748: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239].nc_idx') ./windrv.h:748: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast ./windrv.h:749: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer ./windrv.h:749: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239].nc_idx') ./windrv.h:750: warning: braces around scalar initializer ./windrv.h:750: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239].nc_idx') ./windrv.h:750: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast ./windrv.h:750: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer ./windrv.h:750: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239].nc_idx') ./windrv.h:750: warning: excess elements in scalar initializer ./windrv.h:750: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239].nc_idx') ./windrv.h:751: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:751: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:753: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:753: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:753: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:753: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:754: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:754: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:756: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:756: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:756: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:756: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:757: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:757: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:759: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:759: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:759: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:759: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:760: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:760: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:762: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:762: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:762: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:762: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:763: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:763: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:765: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:765: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:765: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:765: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:766: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:766: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:768: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:768: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:768: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:768: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:769: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:769: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:771: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:771: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:771: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:771: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:772: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:772: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:774: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:774: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:774: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:774: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:775: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:775: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:777: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:777: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:777: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:777: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:778: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:778: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:780: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:780: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:780: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:780: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:781: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:781: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:783: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:783: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:783: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:783: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:784: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:784: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:786: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:786: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:786: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:786: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:787: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:787: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:789: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:789: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:789: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:789: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:790: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:790: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:792: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:792: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:792: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:792: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:793: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:793: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:795: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:795: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:795: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:795: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:796: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:796: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:798: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:798: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:798: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:798: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:799: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:799: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:801: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:801: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:801: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:801: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:802: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:802: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:804: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:804: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:804: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:804: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:805: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:805: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:807: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:807: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:807: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:807: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:808: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:808: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:810: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:810: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:810: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:810: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:811: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:811: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:813: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:813: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:813: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:813: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:814: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:814: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:816: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:816: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:816: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:816: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:817: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:817: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:819: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:819: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:819: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:819: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:820: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:820: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:822: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:822: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:822: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:822: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:823: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:823: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:825: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:825: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:825: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:825: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:826: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:826: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:828: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:828: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:828: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:828: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:829: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:829: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:831: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:831: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:831: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:831: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:832: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:832: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:834: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:834: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:834: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:834: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:835: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:835: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:837: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:837: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:837: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:837: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:838: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:838: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:840: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:840: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:840: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:840: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:841: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:841: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:843: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:843: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:843: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:843: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:844: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:844: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:846: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:846: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:846: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:846: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:847: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:847: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:849: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:849: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:849: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:849: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:850: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:850: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:852: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:852: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:852: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:852: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:853: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:853: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:855: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:855: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:855: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:855: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:856: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:856: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:858: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:858: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:858: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:858: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:859: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:859: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:861: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:861: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:861: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:861: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:862: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:862: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:864: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:864: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:864: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:864: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:865: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:865: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:867: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:867: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:867: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:867: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:868: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:868: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:870: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:870: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:870: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:870: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:871: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:871: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:873: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:873: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:873: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:873: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:874: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:874: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:876: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:876: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:876: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:876: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:877: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:877: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:879: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:879: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:881: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:881: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:882: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:882: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:884: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:884: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:885: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:885: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:887: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:887: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:888: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:888: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:890: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:890: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:891: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:891: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:893: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:893: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:894: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:894: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:896: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:896: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:897: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:897: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:899: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:899: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:900: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:900: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:902: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:902: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:903: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:903: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:903: error: extra brace group at end of initializer ./windrv.h:903: error: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:904: warning: excess elements in struct initializer ./windrv.h:904: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_regvals[239]') ./windrv.h:904: error: syntax error before ';' token /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:74: error: elements of array `ndis_devs_pci' have incomplete type /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[0]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[0]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[0]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[0]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[1]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[1]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[1]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[1]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[2]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[2]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[2]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[2]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[3]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[3]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[3]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[3]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[4]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[4]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[4]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[4]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[5]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[5]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[5]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[5]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[6]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[6]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[6]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:75: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[6]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:76: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:76: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[7]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:76: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:76: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[7]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:76: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:76: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[7]') /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:76: warning: excess elements in struct initializer /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:76: warning: (near initialization for `ndis_devs_pci[7]') build failed. Exiting. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 12:23:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9746216A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:23:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from marski.suomi.net (marski.suomi.net [212.50.131.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD6843D5C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:23:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from spartak.suomi.net (spartak.suomi.net [212.50.140.227]) by marski.suomi.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 (built Dec 2 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUM008OBL3X4HD0@marski.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:23:57 +0200 (EET) Received: from spam1.suomi.net (spam1.suomi.net [212.50.131.165]) by mailstore.suomi.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUM003ZOL3XQP90@mailstore.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:23:57 +0200 (EET) Received: from smtp.suomi.net (addr-82-128-230-204.suomi.net [82.128.230.204]) by spam1.suomi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C5E5999 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:23:54 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:23:45 +0200 From: Teemu Korhonen In-reply-to: <200602130243.20651.akbeech@alaskaparadise.com> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-OPOY-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the OPOY for more information X-OPOY-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-OPOY-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.585, required 5, AWL -1.84, BAYES_00 -2.60, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 5.00, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL 0.03) X-OPOY-MailScanner-From: teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi References: <200602130243.20651.akbeech@alaskaparadise.com> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.50 (Win32, build 7700) Subject: Re: need help with pcmcia wireless network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:23:59 -0000 Beech Rintoul wrote Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:42:58 +0200: > On Monday 13 February 2006 02:25, Teemu Korhonen wrote: >> I have a laptop with freebsd-6.0 and I've got everything working except >> my >> Buffalo WLI-CB-G54S wireless network card. >> When I insert the card I get following message "cardbus0: at >> device 0.0 (no driver attached)" >> >> I found two pages that seems to be instructions to get the card working: >> >> http://geocities.yahoo.co.jp/gl/stealth_daemon/view?.date=20050623&.utc=113 >> 3948970 >> >> http://geocities.yahoo.co.jp/gl/stealth_daemon/view?.date=20051207&.utc=113 >> 3982628 >> >> as they are japan, I can't get but the main idea. >> >> So far the ndisgen doesn't work it fails to build the .ko file, but I've >> had better luck with ndiscvt which made and if_ndis.ko >> >> both ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko are loaded, but I get no new devices and >> still >> get the "no driver attached" message. >> >> I have no idea what to do now and I really need to get that card >> working. >> Ideas anyone? > > What does pciconf -lv say about that card? > > Beech > pciconf doesn't say anything about a pccard, but this seems related: none3@pci2:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x032e1154 chip=0x432014e4 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller' class = network If that is info of the card, then it's all wrong. It's supposed to be Buffalo WLI-CB-G54S From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 12:37:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A29416A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:37:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id (mx3.mra.co.id [202.51.30.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A094543D5F for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:37:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from localhost (localhost.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D6F30F7B for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:26:51 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx3.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30204-28 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:26:51 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mailbox.mra.co.id (unknown [172.16.0.225]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060FE30F62 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:26:51 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [172.16.0.228] (unknown [172.16.0.228]) by mailbox.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090D5FF75 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:29:21 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <43F072B3.2060208@mra.co.id> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:51:15 +0700 From: Beastie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051229 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mra.co.id Subject: IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:37:23 -0000 Dear List.. Is there any compatibility issue regarding IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID Controller with FreeBSD-6.0 Stable ? I'm planning to buy one, but first, ask for experience user in this list for it's compatibility and performance. Please enlight me. regards reza From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 12:48:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122EC16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:48:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B2243D68 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:48:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C275CA3; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:48:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45925-01; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:48:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-209-142.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.209.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F405C70; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:48:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F08018.8010902@mac.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:48:24 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Albert yu References: <7d3594220602130132q2b19c55m@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7d3594220602130132q2b19c55m@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD installing on PC w/ Intel 64bit CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:48:17 -0000 Albert yu wrote: > I have a question on Hardware compatability while installing FreeBSD 4.8 on > some newly built PCs. > May I know is FreeBSD version 4.8 support Intel 64bit CPU w/ 915GV chipset > Motherboard ? I think the answer is no, I believe 64-bit support was added around 5.2.1: http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html > As I am gonna run some programs that can only be installed on version 4.8. > And i am worrying the OS version do not work on this configuration. You should try to obtain newer programs. 4.8 isn't supported. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 12:52:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C6F16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:52:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B7943D4C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:52:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562105CA3; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:52:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28384-03; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:52:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-209-142.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.209.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2775C70; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:52:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F08122.5020306@mac.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:52:50 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Luckow_-_Cortex_Systems?= References: <001f01c6308f$94405b20$3e1310ac@maximillion> In-Reply-To: <001f01c6308f$94405b20$3e1310ac@maximillion> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Interested in selling retail freeBSD sets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:52:46 -0000 Ren Luckow - Cortex Systems wrote: > We're interested in selling freeBSD along with a range of other OS > distributions on our website, which caters the European market. OK. Have fun... > How would we going about obtaining these? http://www.freebsd.org/where.html If you wanted to become a FreeBSD mirror, see here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/index.html -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 13:02:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E8216A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:02:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from mail.dc-servers.com (mail.dc-servers.com [83.243.101.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 109CD43D49 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: (qmail 24859 invoked by uid 399); 13 Feb 2006 13:02:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alfie.jigsawhq.com) (work@ashleymoran.me.uk@213.106.224.113) by mail.dc-servers.com with SMTP; 13 Feb 2006 13:02:02 -0000 From: Ashley Moran Organization: Codeweavers Ltd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:00:37 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602131300.37289.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> Subject: More tomcat wierdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:02:01 -0000 I've reinstalled Tomcat (now in www/tomcat55) because it was going mental (100% CPU) and now the stop/start isn't working through the rc.d script. Tomcat starts and records the PID in /var/run/tomcat55.pid. But when I call the script with stop I get an error saying "tomcat not started? check pid file", or something to that effect. root@webserv2# ls -lad /var/run/. /var/run/tomcat55.pid drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Feb 13 12:10 /var/run/. -rw-r--r-- 1 www wheel 6 Feb 13 12:22 /var/run/tomcat55.pid It worked fine when it was running off the old www/jakarta-tomcat55 port - I don't know if anything has changed. Ashley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 13:30:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBF216A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:30:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggroth99@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-f16.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.49.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8AC43D49 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:30:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggroth99@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:30:07 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 66.238.149.124 by by14fd.bay14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:30:07 GMT X-Originating-IP: [66.238.149.124] X-Originating-Email: [ggroth99@hotmail.com] X-Sender: ggroth99@hotmail.com From: "Greg Groth" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:30:07 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2006 13:30:07.0486 (UTC) FILETIME=[9AFE41E0:01C630A1] Subject: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:30:08 -0000 I'm trying to set up a FreeBSD 6.0 box as a mail server, and while everything seems to be working OK for the most part, I have run into two issues that I cannot resolve (I'm new to BSD, please bear with me). Install went as follows: Installed via FTP last night along with "src - Sources for everything", IMAP-UW was compiled via ports with WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT enabled (same for cclient), OpenSSL, Cyrus-SASL2 & Cyrus-SASL2-saslauthd were compiled via ports with no flags. Sendmail was installed with the base install and recompiled (after SASL2 was up and running) with the following options added to make.conf: # SASL (cyrus-sasl v2) sendmail build flags... SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 # Adding to enable alternate port (smtps) for sendmail... SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -D_FFR_SMTP_SSL I followed the instructions I found at http://www.bsdconspiracy.net/howto/sendmail.html, and had no problems with the install except for Sendmail. After recompiling sendmail, I added the following lines to the mail.server.mc file: define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS',`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl define(`CERT_DIR', `/etc/mail/certs')dnl define(`confCACERT_PATH', `CERT_DIR')dnl define(`confCACERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl define(`confSERVER_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl define(`confSERVER_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl After running (in /etc/mail) "make clean", "make cf", "make install", "make restart", SMTP no longer works, and I find the following in maillog and messages Feb 12 20:25:55 mail sm-mta[1213]: daemon IPv4: problem creating SMTP socket Feb 12 20:26:00 mail sm-mta[1213]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket: daemon IPv4: cannot bind: Address already in use When I try and stop sendmail, I get a message that the pid for Sendmail cannot be found. I end up killing the missing Sendmail daemon using KSysGuard If I remove this line - "DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl" from the mail.server.mc file, make cf, make install, make restart, sendmail starts normally. When trying to access from another machine on my network, I can only connect on port 25 without a secure connection (I'm using Thunderbird for this), although SMTP-AUTH is working correctly. Any ideas on what I might need to do to get SSL / SMTP-AUTH working on SMTP? I took a look at the instructions in the handbook, but they were written for SASL1. Running netstat shows smtps listening on 465, but when I try to telnet to that port, the server drops the connection. My second problem is rather simple, after I create an IMAP folder, I am unable to delete it using a remote client. Thunderbird responds with "The mail server responded: RENAME failed: Can't create mailbox node /home/User/Trash/: File exists. Nothing shows up in any of the server logs though. Hopefully this is the right list for these questions, if not, could someone please direct me to the correct one? Any advice anyone can give me on either of these problems would be greatly appreciated. Greg Groth _________________________________________________________________ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 13:31:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE9816A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stcoles@tripos.com) Received: from mx2.tripos.com (mx1.tripos.com [192.160.145.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5738443D6A for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:31:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stcoles@tripos.com) X-SEF-Processed: 5_0_0_713__2006_02_13_07_31_11 X-SEF-B36DBD05-D5C8-4F1B-9AD7-DA304379853F: 1 From: "Steve Coles" To: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:28:59 -0000 Message-ID: <028a01c630a1$72ca5b50$649b14ac@tripos.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcYwoXGURrWhzQuES0ymZ5Zg9lX7jQ== X-Spam_score: 0.6 X-Spam_score_int: 6 X-Spam_bar: / Subject: SMP ATA woes on 6.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:31:13 -0000 I have a strange deterministic boot problem with ATA devices on 2-way dell precision machines which boot from their SCSI disks. I have 4 of these boxes, and the only difference is the add-in ATA controller in the affected box. A good summary would be "which kernels work": a) GENERIC from the distribution boots fine (uniprocessor) b) GENERIC built from 6.0-RELEASE boots fine c) SMP built from 6.0-RELEASE hangs during the ATA probe of my disks d) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with no ATA options/devices boots fine e) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with ATA options/devices hangs as in c) above .. It gets weirder F) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with no ATA options/devices boots fine (same as option d) above, then I load the ata modules from my normal login shell: $> kldload atapci (loads ata.ko etc ) $> Kldload atadisk .. And it produces a stable, fast, ATA disk subsystem G) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with no ATA options/devices boots fine (option d) above with a atapci_load="YES" atadisk_load="YES" In loader.conf produces the same hang as c) So...I presume the problem is related to the fact that the second CPU must be launched else the ATA code gets confused with my ATA subsystem (Naieve explanation of facts) Q: Is this a known bug ? Q: If it is, is it fixed in -STABLE ? Q: If so - when is a good cvsup date that gives me a fixed ata driver with a "stable stable" Help is much appreciated Cheers Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 13:41:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@www.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A315316A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:41:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu) Received: from afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu [147.91.1.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AFA43D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:41:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu) Received: from afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1DDfTt9032715 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:41:29 +0100 Received: from localhost (ggajic@localhost) by afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k1DDfSpd032712; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:41:28 +0100 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:41:27 +0100 (CET) From: Goran Gajic To: vladimir.korcek@gmail.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-RCUB-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the RCUB if you have problem with mail X-RCUB-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-RCUB-MailScanner-From: ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu Cc: freebsd-questions@www.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox-1.5.0.1 not starting after successfull instalation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:41:38 -0000 Hi, Have you tried rm -rf ~/.mozilla and then staring firefox? I have experienced same problem and solved it by removing old .mozilla everything seems ok. Regards, gg. >Hi, > >I encountered same problem, Firefox doesn't want start. >It took some (not short) time but I've installed new Firefox-1.5.0.1 >successfully, without errors after all. >Unfortunately, I cannot start it now. It simply ends earlier then it >starts. >Nothing happens: > >#/usr/X11R6/bin >#./firefox ># > >I've started it as root and also tried another user but result is the same >:( > >Could someone help??? > >Thanks in advance. > >Rgds, >Vlado From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 13:51:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC71C16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:51:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from shadow.sixcompanies.com (shadow.sixcompanies.com [65.43.82.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00EC43D60 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:51:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from dakota.wixb.com (shadow.sixcompanies.com [10.43.82.173]) by shadow.sixcompanies.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1DDpoo2077435; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:51:50 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213074844.011505f0@sixcompanies.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:52:01 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "J.D. Bronson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: qpopper/gdbm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:51:52 -0000 I am trying to compile qpopper (from src) and use APOP with the gdbm database. gdbm was installed from ports and works fine. I setup my env as such: LDFLAGS=-L/usr/lib -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/lib -R/usr/local/lib and ldconfig shows gdbm: # ldconfig -r | grep gdbm 86:-lgdbm.3 => /usr/local/lib/libgdbm.so.3 I ran ./configure --enable-apop ... ... checking ndbm.h usability... yes checking ndbm.h presence... yes checking for ndbm.h... yes checking gdbm.h usability... yes checking gdbm.h presence... yes checking for gdbm.h... yes checking dbm.h usability... no checking dbm.h presence... no checking for dbm.h... no checking for pam_authenticate in -lpam... yes checking which database manager to use ... checking gdbm ... checking for gdbm_open in -lgdbm... yes found gdbm so configure detected this.... but then when I ran 'make', the build fails! /usr/bin/gcc -c -I.. -I.. -I. -I../mmangle -I../common -O2 -pipe -mtune=pentium4 -idirafter /usr/local/include -freg-struct-return -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD -DUNIX popauth.c -o popauth.o /usr/bin/gcc -o popauth base64.o scram.o md5.o hmac.o popauth.o -lgdbm ../common/libcommon.a /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgdbm *** Error code 1 Stop in /tmp/qpopper4.1a2/popper. *** Error code 1 Can anyone point something out to me as to how to get ld to find -lgdbm when ldconfig and configure already picked it up? -JD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:10:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F7F16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:10:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bbobowski@gmail.com) Received: from fep1.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006FB43D5C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:10:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bbobowski@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (d235-186-39.home1.cgocable.net [24.235.186.39]) by fep1.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99329EB0D for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:10:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F0935B.4020901@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:10:35 -0500 From: Brian Bobowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040626 Thunderbird/0.7.1 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD User Questions List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Firewall/Web server difficulties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:10:32 -0000 All right. I've got my firewall up and running, and my workstation can get almost anywhere it needs to just fine. The lone exception being the web server located on the firewall machine itself. I can access it by directly referencing the private-interface IP, but if my workstation tries to get to the public-interface IP, nothing happens. Can't even ping it. ICMP and port 80 TCP should both be allowed from anywhere... but they're not getting through. (So far as I can tell, it's not just me who's unable to access these.) Does NAT simply not allow for servers to be running on the machine that performs it? I know it's not ideal, but I don't have the room to install another machine even if that were in my budget. I've set up NAT and IPFW per the directions in the handbook, and aside from that one difficulty, everything seems to be working. Please reply off the list. Thanks in advance, -BB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:11:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBF516A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:11:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from mx6.mail.ru (mx6.mail.ru [194.67.23.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E4343D5A for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:11:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from [80.243.64.201] (port=60367 helo=[10.0.1.5]) by mx6.mail.ru with asmtp id 1F8eQF-000DBw-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:11:24 +0300 Message-ID: <43F11FB2.7000105@mail.ru> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:09:22 +1000 From: Maxim Vetrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: IPFILTER rule error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:11:31 -0000 Hi, I'm running FreeBSD 6.0, IPFilter 4.1.8(416). Setting line for rpc outbound calls pass out quick on rl0 \ proto udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 gives me this error: ioctl (add/insert rule): No such process What is the process i'm missing? Regards, muxas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:17:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF97316A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:17:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189FB43D6D for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1DEHGLl023442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:17:19 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1DEH79B004514; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:17:07 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1DEH6c8004498; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:17:06 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:17:06 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Maxim Vetrov Message-ID: <20060213141706.GA94131@flame.pc> References: <43F11FB2.7000105@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F11FB2.7000105@mail.ru> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.342, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.86, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER rule error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:17:41 -0000 On 2006-02-14 10:09, Maxim Vetrov wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.0, IPFilter 4.1.8(416). > > Setting line for rpc outbound calls > > pass out quick on rl0 \ > proto udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 > > gives me this error: > > ioctl (add/insert rule): No such process > > What is the process i'm missing? Don't copy/paste just one line. Show us the exact options you used in your `/etc/rc.conf' file, and be *very* specific about the steps you took to enable that rule. Otherwise, we can only guess what's wrong. You don't want us to guess wrong, do you? - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:18:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1504916A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:18:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trix@basement.net) Received: from fran.basement.net (fran.basement.net [66.139.76.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D7043D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:18:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trix@basement.net) Received: from [192.168.15.239] (67-108-187-151.rpt.bna.sparkplugbb.com [67.108.187.151]) (authenticated bits=0) by fran.basement.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1DEISb3015671; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:18:33 -0600 Message-ID: <43F09534.3040506@basement.net> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:18:28 -0600 From: Trix Farrar Organization: Basement.NET User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060210212539.31C8E16A420@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060210212539.31C8E16A420@hub.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040304090208030407080404" Cc: Dan Langille Subject: Re: Contents of freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 123, Issue 19 ([PATCH] (/usr/lib/libxpg4.so.3 missing - Did I miss a memo?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: trix@basement.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:18:37 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040304090208030407080404 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:37:56 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:02:17PM -0600, Trix Farrar wrote: >> > On my network, I have several hosts that were originally installed with >> > FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE, 5.3-RELEASE, and 5.4-RELEASE. All of these have >> > been updated now to 6.0-RELEASE-p4. One host was originally installed >> > from 6.0-RELEASE media and subsequently updated to p4. All works well. >> > >> > I took a cue from The FreeBSD Handbook; 21.5 Tracking for Multiple >> > Machines, and have a central build host for the network. On this >> > machine, I do my make buildworld, make buildkernel and building of >> > packages to ports. That way I can just install port packages on the >> > non-build machine. > > If you do this, you need to make sure you're generating compatible > binaries. In this case, you seem to be generating binaries that are > targetted for an older release than FreeBSD 6.0. In order to run 5.x > binaries on FreeBSD 6.0, you need to install the compat5x port and > build with the corresponding kernel option. > >> > * How can I know whether or not it is save to delete libxpg4.a, >> > libxpg4.so, libxpg4.so.3, and libxpg4_p.a from /usr/lib on the machines >> > where they are present? > > Use the libchk port. > >> > * Why would bacula (or anything else, for that matter) even try to link >> > to this library in the first place? (Ok, I'll admit that I'm being lazy >> > on this one because I haven't really researched it yet) > > I'm guessing you are running an old 5.x binary from before the > removal. A 6.0 binary of bacula indeed will not try to link to this > nonexistent library. > I think I found the answer, at least as it relates to Bacula: libxpg4.so.3 used to be built up until FreeBSD 5.4, so a system that was originally installed before 6.0 would have that library lying around because it doesn't get deleted in the process of upgrading to/through 5.0-RELEASE. 6.0 systems, no longer have the source for this library (because it has been a dummy to satisfy link dependencies for some time), so it is no longer built or installed. Bacula's configure.in script specifically adds a link to libxpg4 as part of the build processes - - even though there are no functions to call in this library. On a 6.0 system, this would silently fail and all would be well. On pre-6.0 system, this would silently succeed and all would be well. It's when you try to cross systems that problems pop up. By applying the attached patch (which deletes 3 lines from autoconf/configure.in), the entire issue goes away. Would this be an issue for a PR or just a note to the Bacula developers? The lines I propose to delete are commented as a FreeBSD-specific hook. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD8JUtUn6S0hqD4tsRApolAKCoi93ZUsGgIhdzLD8IxyY6ZuEgygCbBGxw cggOIgfqSqJ2nIY/TVNKfKc= =Nh0n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------040304090208030407080404 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="bacula-1.38.5-noxpg4.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="bacula-1.38.5-noxpg4.patch" diff -ru bacula-1.38.5-old/autoconf/configure.in bacula-1.38.5/autoconf/configure.in --- bacula-1.38.5-old/autoconf/configure.in Wed Dec 14 15:43:16 2005 +++ bacula-1.38.5/autoconf/configure.in Mon Feb 13 08:10:57 2006 @@ -1557,9 +1557,6 @@ # AC_FUNC_FNMATCH dnl use local version -dnl# FreeBSD needs to link libxpg4 -AC_CHECK_LIB(xpg4, setlocale, [LIBS="$LIBS -lxpg4"]) -AC_CHECK_LIB(intl, gettext, [LIBS="$LIBS -lintl"]) AC_CHECK_LIB(sun, getpwnam) --------------040304090208030407080404-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:21:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6284E16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:21:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA2143D64 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:21:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 16030 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 01:21:32 +1100 Received: from 203-217-43-43.dyn.chime.net.au (HELO ?192.168.13.3?) (203.217.43.43) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 01:21:32 +1100 Message-ID: <43F095E6.2070901@meijome.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:21:26 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Bobowski References: <43F0935B.4020901@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43F0935B.4020901@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD User Questions List Subject: Re: Firewall/Web server difficulties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:21:33 -0000 Brian Bobowski wrote: > All right. I've got my firewall up and running, and my workstation can > get almost anywhere it needs to just fine. you dont' say if you are using ipfw, ipf , pf.... > I can access it by directly referencing the private-interface IP, but if > my workstation tries to get to the public-interface IP, nothing happens. > Can't even ping it. ICMP and port 80 TCP should both be allowed from > anywhere... but they're not getting through. (Assuming all your rules are ok...) AFAIK, you can't access the external interface of a NAT'ed system from the LAN side. Simply use a DNS inside that resolves the name you try to access to the internal interface instead of the external. this is FAQ, i think... > (So far as I can tell, it's > not just me who's unable to access these.) meaning others in your LAN? or others in the WAN? > Does NAT simply not allow for servers to be running on the machine that > performs it? I know it's not ideal, but I don't have the room to install > another machine even if that were in my budget. I've set up NAT and IPFW > per the directions in the handbook, and aside from that one difficulty, > everything seems to be working. > > Please reply off the list. CCing the list for the benefit of everyone else :) Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:21:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEF716A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:21:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F355043D46 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:21:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.ATOSORIGIN.ES [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA9B2E041; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:21:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F09638.9010003@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:22:48 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Vetrov References: <43F11FB2.7000105@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <43F11FB2.7000105@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER rule error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:21:33 -0000 Maxim Vetrov wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.0, IPFilter 4.1.8(416). > > Setting line for rpc outbound calls > > pass out quick on rl0 \ > proto udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 > > gives me this error: > > ioctl (add/insert rule): No such process > > What is the process i'm missing? Do you have that group? or maybe sunrpc is not in /etc/services - better try to write the port number. It will help to show the whole ruleset. Cheers, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:29:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C2916A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bbobowski@gmail.com) Received: from fep1.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B82143D4C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:29:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bbobowski@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (d235-186-39.home1.cgocable.net [24.235.186.39]) by fep1.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4487AE917; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:29:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F097BC.80308@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:29:16 -0500 From: Brian Bobowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040626 Thunderbird/0.7.1 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Meijome References: <43F0935B.4020901@gmail.com> <43F095E6.2070901@meijome.net> In-Reply-To: <43F095E6.2070901@meijome.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD User Questions List Subject: Re: Firewall/Web server difficulties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:29:14 -0000 Norberto Meijome wrote: >Brian Bobowski wrote: > > >>All right. I've got my firewall up and running, and my workstation can >>get almost anywhere it needs to just fine. >> >> > >you dont' say if you are using ipfw, ipf , pf.... > > > Sure I do. IPFW; mentioned lower down. >>I can access it by directly referencing the private-interface IP, but if >>my workstation tries to get to the public-interface IP, nothing happens. >>Can't even ping it. ICMP and port 80 TCP should both be allowed from >>anywhere... but they're not getting through. >> >> >(Assuming all your rules are ok...) AFAIK, you can't access the external > interface of a NAT'ed system from the LAN side. Simply use a DNS inside >that resolves the name you try to access to the internal interface >instead of the external. this is FAQ, i think... > > > I'm poking at that now, yes. I had difficulty getting it to work with virtual hosts... but I can at least reference it by the private-side IP address and get places. >>(So far as I can tell, it's >>not just me who's unable to access these.) >> >> >meaning others in your LAN? or others in the WAN? > > WAN. People have tried pinging and browsing, with no success. >>Does NAT simply not allow for servers to be running on the machine that >>performs it? I know it's not ideal, but I don't have the room to install >>another machine even if that were in my budget. I've set up NAT and IPFW >>per the directions in the handbook, and aside from that one difficulty, >>everything seems to be working. >> >>Please reply off the list. >> >> >CCing the list for the benefit of everyone else :) > >Beto > > > Hope the clarifications help, -BB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:29:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A8316A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:29:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDE743D69 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:29:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1DES3NU071610; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:28:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43F09769.9060808@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:27:53 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gandalf References: <43F07782.5040002@messias.qhigh.com> In-Reply-To: <43F07782.5040002@messias.qhigh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:29:23 -0000 gandalf wrote: > > Hello, > > I have this file /etc/sup.sys: > > *default host=cvsup.hu.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/usr > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > src-all > > > Then I traverse to /usr and execute this command: > > cvsup /etc/sup.sys > > After successful checkout, I do > > cd /usr/src > make buildworld > > This is what I get: > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Building an up-to-date make(1) > -------------------------------------------------------------- > rm -f .depend > mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/usr.bin/make > -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200408120\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID > -DDEFSHELLNAME=\"sh\" /usr/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/buf.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/for.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/hash.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/hash_tables.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/job.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/lst.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/main.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/make.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/parse.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/proc.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/shell.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/str.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/util.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/var.c > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c:107: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c:59: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c:97: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/for.c:55: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/job.c:131: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/main.c:84: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/make.c:80: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/parse.c:86: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/str.c:49: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c:102: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c:84: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/util.c:59: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/var.c:96: > /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory > mkdep: compile failed > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/make. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > > What am I doing wrong? > Possibly, and I say possibly, and this isn't to be taken personally: diving in before depth of the water. ;-) At the very least, you should have run "mergemaster -p" before make buildworld as this is a giant step (e.g. 4.8->4.11).. Did you? Probably the issue is simply the huge distance in time/development between 4.8 and 6.0. See below. > Additional questions: > > - Can I upgrade from 4.8 to 6.0 in one step? Or should I upgrade to > 5.4 first? Probably not. A fresh install would have a benefit: you could re-format your disks as UFS2. However, some people have been able to get from 4.11 to 5.X with cvsup/buildworld, and the 5.X -> 6.X jump is "a piece of cake". You just have to do the jump from 4 to 5 carefully, and from a much more recent 4.X codebase than 4.8 ..... > - I have a .so file for 4.8. I do not have the sources, will it work > on 6.0? > Dunno. Probably not natively, but maybe; there is, of course, the COMPAT_FREEBSD4 stuff, too. > Thanks, > > Laszlo Here's what I would try. Upgrade to RELENG_4 via the cvsup/buildworld process, read Bruce Mah's 4.11-5.X Migration Guide, and be sure and include "mergemaster -p" in your buildworld cycle. HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- In the next world, you're on your own. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:34:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1681716A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:34:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B0F43D73 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:34:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 16345 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 01:34:01 +1100 Received: from 203-217-43-43.dyn.chime.net.au (HELO ?192.168.13.3?) (203.217.43.43) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 01:34:01 +1100 Message-ID: <43F098D1.2000708@meijome.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:33:53 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Bobowski References: <43F0935B.4020901@gmail.com> <43F095E6.2070901@meijome.net> <43F097BC.80308@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43F097BC.80308@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD User Questions List Subject: Re: Firewall/Web server difficulties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:34:02 -0000 Brian Bobowski wrote: > Norberto Meijome wrote: > >> Brian Bobowski wrote: >> >> >>> All right. I've got my firewall up and running, and my workstation can >>> get almost anywhere it needs to just fine. >>> >> >> you dont' say if you are using ipfw, ipf , pf.... >> >> >> > Sure I do. IPFW; mentioned lower down. sorry my bad >>> I can access it by directly referencing the private-interface IP, but if >>> my workstation tries to get to the public-interface IP, nothing happens. >>> Can't even ping it. ICMP and port 80 TCP should both be allowed from >>> anywhere... but they're not getting through. >>> >> (Assuming all your rules are ok...) AFAIK, you can't access the external >> interface of a NAT'ed system from the LAN side. Simply use a DNS inside >> that resolves the name you try to access to the internal interface >> instead of the external. this is FAQ, i think... >> >> >> > I'm poking at that now, yes. I had difficulty getting it to work with > virtual hosts... but I can at least reference it by the private-side IP > address and get places. assuming you are using Apache, you can use * for Ip address and let it be name-based virt host. >>> (So far as I can tell, it's >>> not just me who's unable to access these.) >>> >> meaning others in your LAN? or others in the WAN? >> >> > WAN. People have tried pinging and browsing, with no success. then I would review the rules... good luck B From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:36:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CE016A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:36:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from m21.unixathome.org (m21.unixathome.org [205.150.199.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B6143D4C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:36:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [205.150.199.217]) by m21.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C16C378; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:36:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from m21.unixathome.org ([205.150.199.217]) by localhost (m21.unixathome.org [205.150.199.217]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18925-02; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:36:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [70.26.229.230]) by m21.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D044BF9B; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:36:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.55.0.99] (wocker.unixathome.org [10.55.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AA4B820; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:36:35 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" To: Trix Farrar Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:36:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <43F05322.28188.FC956F2@dan.langille.org> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <43F09534.3040506@basement.net> References: <20060210212539.31C8E16A420@hub.freebsd.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.31) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at unixathome.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Contents of freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 123, Issue 19 ([PATCH] (/usr/lib/libxpg4.so.3 missing - Did I miss a memo?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:36:46 -0000 On 13 Feb 2006 at 8:18, Trix Farrar wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:37:56 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:02:17PM -0600, Trix Farrar wrote: > >> > On my network, I have several hosts that were originally installed with > >> > FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE, 5.3-RELEASE, and 5.4-RELEASE. All of these have > >> > been updated now to 6.0-RELEASE-p4. One host was originally installed > >> > from 6.0-RELEASE media and subsequently updated to p4. All works well. > >> > > >> > I took a cue from The FreeBSD Handbook; 21.5 Tracking for Multiple > >> > Machines, and have a central build host for the network. On this > >> > machine, I do my make buildworld, make buildkernel and building of > >> > packages to ports. That way I can just install port packages on the > >> > non-build machine. > > > > If you do this, you need to make sure you're generating compatible > > binaries. In this case, you seem to be generating binaries that are > > targetted for an older release than FreeBSD 6.0. In order to run 5.x > > binaries on FreeBSD 6.0, you need to install the compat5x port and > > build with the corresponding kernel option. > > > >> > * How can I know whether or not it is save to delete libxpg4.a, > >> > libxpg4.so, libxpg4.so.3, and libxpg4_p.a from /usr/lib on the machines > >> > where they are present? > > > > Use the libchk port. > > > >> > * Why would bacula (or anything else, for that matter) even try to link > >> > to this library in the first place? (Ok, I'll admit that I'm being lazy > >> > on this one because I haven't really researched it yet) > > > > I'm guessing you are running an old 5.x binary from before the > > removal. A 6.0 binary of bacula indeed will not try to link to this > > nonexistent library. > > > > I think I found the answer, at least as it relates to Bacula: > > libxpg4.so.3 used to be built up until FreeBSD 5.4, so a system that was > originally installed before 6.0 would have that library lying around > because it doesn't get deleted in the process of upgrading to/through > 5.0-RELEASE. 6.0 systems, no longer have the source for this library > (because it has been a dummy to satisfy link dependencies for some > time), so it is no longer built or installed. > > Bacula's configure.in script specifically adds a link to libxpg4 as part > of the build processes - - even though there are no functions to call in > this library. > > On a 6.0 system, this would silently fail and all would be well. On > pre-6.0 system, this would silently succeed and all would be well. It's > when you try to cross systems that problems pop up. > > By applying the attached patch (which deletes 3 lines from > autoconf/configure.in), the entire issue goes away. > > Would this be an issue for a PR or just a note to the Bacula developers? > The lines I propose to delete are commented as a FreeBSD-specific hook. We could add it a patch for the port in the short term, but pass it along to the Bacula project as well. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:45:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4852B16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:45:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30AF243D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:45:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 26545 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Feb 2006 14:45:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=pngS9sYr2JDPTCABtPqjoyP7YSnDjCf4ezDp6/41tgFYQ26AYsg7iGKbzVTuW9VSHZwhXKg2SsY1u/wugIHNpzH/jJZ2kSm2IqC8lf7cNjzi71WRmz3FlhYdlAC6kmLujdIT7JyNPUPOS96qeR/KDDA0upvL9bQskiYJ2looH2o= ; Message-ID: <20060213144557.26543.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:45:57 PST Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:45:57 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Steve Coles , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <028a01c630a1$72ca5b50$649b14ac@tripos.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: SMP ATA woes on 6.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:45:59 -0000 --- Steve Coles wrote: > I have a strange deterministic boot problem > with ATA devices on 2-way dell > precision machines which boot from their SCSI > disks. I have 4 of these > boxes, and the only difference is the add-in > ATA controller in the affected > box. > > A good summary would be "which kernels work": > > a) GENERIC from the distribution boots fine > (uniprocessor) > b) GENERIC built from 6.0-RELEASE boots fine > c) SMP built from 6.0-RELEASE hangs during the > ATA probe of my disks > d) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE > with no ATA options/devices > boots fine > e) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE > with ATA options/devices hangs > as in c) above > > .. It gets weirder > > F) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE > with no ATA options/devices > boots fine (same as option d) above, then I > load the ata modules from my > normal login shell: > > $> kldload atapci (loads ata.ko etc ) > $> Kldload atadisk > > .. And it produces a stable, fast, ATA disk > subsystem > > G) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE > with no ATA options/devices > boots fine (option d) above with a > > atapci_load="YES" > atadisk_load="YES" > > In loader.conf produces the same hang as c) > > So...I presume the problem is related to the > fact that the second CPU must > be launched else the ATA code gets confused > with my ATA subsystem (Naieve > explanation of facts) > > Q: Is this a known bug ? > Q: If it is, is it fixed in -STABLE ? > Q: If so - when is a good cvsup date that gives > me a fixed ata driver with a > "stable stable" > > Help is much appreciated > > Cheers > > Steve > Why would someone buy such an expensive bunch of hardware and then run an untested, highly suspect O/S on it? Its mind-boggling... DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:47:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8054F16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:47:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from buonoalessandro@yahoo.it) Received: from smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B49E43D53 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:47:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from buonoalessandro@yahoo.it) Received: (qmail 10436 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 14:47:15 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Received:Mime-Version:Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Content-Type; b=eIHxuDbzPp46CnDvA0RIy3SZGnANDL7TBpvnpHVd0XfRYpxZP8qSVIICtQ9ekS9vJG46j6v/NUeFqPSo5PKB4/cF+0wwCt5Eybx2nXOHJ7P/+cZGg088XTgSWvYz0HQUCHLl430HEYThiC5qqvYIdjeMfok2YjHkK+t9Hd6JUhg= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.1?) (buonoalessandro@84.87.149.97 with plain) by smtp002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Feb 2006 14:47:14 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:47:07 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Alessandro Buono Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Subject: video/x-ms-asf-plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:47:18 -0000 Hi did you had an answer on this plug in? I am getting crazy and can find no answer... Thanks in advance, Kind regards. Alessandro Buono. ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:49:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7489516A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:49:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BEF43D6B for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:49:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8BA730B7 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:49:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80371-10 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:49:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (12-223-193-72.client.insightbb.com [12.223.193.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977347309B for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:49:29 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD Questions From: Joe Auty Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:49:24 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Subject: core dump with dump command in single user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:49:43 -0000 Hello, Following the instructions here: http://www.unixcities.com/howto/ index.html I did a: dump -0f - /usr | restore -rf - /backup/usr And after a while (after copying .56% of my files), gave me the following error: no space for string table asked me if I want to abort, I said no, and it core dumped. It did this while in single user mode with the volumes on both of my hard drives mounted (I was trying to dump from one HD to the other). What do you suggest I do? ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:51:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5505316A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:51:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from planoprez@yahoo.com) Received: from web33610.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33610.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0D4D43D75 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:51:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from planoprez@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 46887 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Feb 2006 14:51:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Q4GvwYTr8r1clCHF0Fo/dbayHJV0wuLftUpXgzwINs66ksvTCWSJUv0gaAhFWiI5K7fu9owoT4EyHtL0UOPkUvv4FdUfyPtjO5oPWDrJ8L4bgRJx2CkyD4fdss51QTxrHget3+WYE6YcPefCZPIasAXBIwVhNroUUW2+QyQPACU= ; Message-ID: <20060213145124.46885.qmail@web33610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [144.160.98.31] by web33610.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:51:24 PST Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:51:24 -0800 (PST) From: JP To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: kinit and Cannot Verify Certificate Error... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:51:48 -0000 Hello, I am attempting perform the following command to ensure that my client can access the KDC: %kinit ADMINISTRATOR@DOMAIN.COM ADMINISTRATOR@DOMAIN.COM's Password: xxxxxxx But I keep getting this failure message. I've attempted this on 2 other FreeBSD 6.0 boxes and the same error occurs. kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Cannot verify certificate Thanks, JP --------------------------------- Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:54:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BB016A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:54:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141A743D8B for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:54:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 6906 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 14:54:24 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 14:54:24 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E144228439; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:54:22 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: =?iso-8859-1?q?G=F6ran_Nilsson?= References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Feb 2006 09:54:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44wtfzl36p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD compiles to what POSIX or XPG? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:54:26 -0000 G=F6ran Nilsson writes: > I have tried google, and tried bsdfourms. Now I'll put my hope to > this list instead. >=20 > Does FreeBSD compiles to the POSIX or X/Open Portability Guide > XPG/1, /2, /3, /4 standards? I have found out that > Aix,HP-UX,Solaris are three of them that compiles to this standard. > So all systems that goes under "Unix" follow these standars. >=20 > I would be very interestead of a link to a document saying weither > or not FreeBSD compiles to any of the above mentioned standards. The FreeBSD "standards" group tries to keep FreeBSD in compliance, but nobody is about to pay the large fees needed to *certify* compliance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 14:58:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49F216A423 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:58:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EE743D8C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 16936 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 01:58:39 +1100 Received: from 203-217-43-43.dyn.chime.net.au (HELO ?192.168.13.3?) (203.217.43.43) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 01:58:37 +1100 Message-ID: <43F09E98.5020804@meijome.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:58:32 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freeBSD Questions Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090909020502090604030604" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Help needed - Hard lockups and reboots on laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:58:48 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090909020502090604030604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (sending again, i think the list server rejected the big attachments) Hi all, I've been running FBSD 6 on my laptop(hardware and software specs below) for the last 3 weeks. I have been experiencing spontaneous reboots (NOT panics, just blip, off it goes to restart), lockups and some app crashes (mainly Thunderbird, dont think it's related, but might as well mention it). - Reboots: usually related to using smbfs. If I have a remote share mounted and I get disconnected, trying to access this share either completely locks up OR reboots (not all the time, but scarily often). - Lockups are FAR more common: they seem to happen when I come back from a resume (about 4 to 6 out of 10 times it locks up), sometimes when I bring a network interface up or down, trying to shut down from within an xterm, or from the shutdown/reboot menu in WDM. My latest one was when the battery hit 2% and I heard the warning (not sure if it was from apmd or gkrellm2 battery plugin.... it just went beep...lockup). - Machine is a Toshiba Tecra A2, 2 x 512 Kingston RAM, 80 GB Seagate Momentus drive (new, but same problems with a 60GB Seagate drive too). Have been using this machine with same specs (except a 60 GB Fujitsu drive) for over a year with Windows XP Pro and had practically no issues AT ALL. - I have tried kernel with and without APIC , APM as module or built in (currently built in). ACPI detects a bunch of stuff but it panics on resume (the drive doesn't seem to go into sleep and it comes back all confused :-) ). I've posted on this issue before to this list. - APM seems to be working a bit better after a small hack of mine - added a wall cmd to the resume...that seems,SO FAR, to prevent the most common of lockups on resume. toshctl port works quite well. - Kernel is 6.1-Prerelease from Feb 10th (local time). BIOS is latest from Toshiba's site (v 1.40) . Changing settings in BIOS (mainly peripherals managed by OS or BIOS) doesn't make any noticeable difference. - Attached are my make.conf, rc.conf, /boot/loader.conf.local , current sysctl. - I'm using GELI for swap partition and my work data (on a file backed md device) - but all these problems pre-date use of GELI (though not presence of GELI in kernel) - I'm using the latest versions (as per ports) of Xorg, fluxbox-devel, gkrellm2, samba3 - pkg list attached. - Despite my preference for FreeBSD, Windows is starting to look like a better option stability-wise :( Is there anything I can do to improve the stability of this machine? Any suggestions for compile options? Suggestions for brands / models of laptops that are KNOWN to work fine with FBSD would be greatly appreciated too. TIA!!! Beto --------------090909020502090604030604-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 15:21:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3D416A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:21:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B698F43D5F for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:21:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 32093 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 15:21:48 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 15:21:48 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AAA0A28444; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:21:47 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Alex Renn References: <358523811.20060209192506@TXnet.com> <44y80jyreb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <597571270.20060212133505@TXnet.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Feb 2006 10:21:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <597571270.20060212133505@TXnet.com> Message-ID: <44slqnl1x0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 34 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: CD installation and file flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:21:56 -0000 Alex Renn writes: > Hello Lowell Gilbert! Hello! [Don't top-post, please.] > SUID/SGID files in my default installation do not have any flags set: > > $ uname -a > FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > $ ls -alo `which su` > -r-sr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 11992 Nov 3 08:11 /usr/bin/su > > That's why I'm asking about this. > I think there should be some flags set by default. Hmm, yes. The distribution tar files don't seem to have flags set. The tar documentation claims that it can handle file flags, but I've never tried it (the Gnu tar, which FreeBSD used until fairly recently, does not). From a quick look, the missing flags seem to be an artifact of the packaging process. Sorry about missing that earlier; flags are set on suid files by the source build/install process, and I haven't done a new install in a long time. If you source-upgrade the system, you'll get the flags set. However, if you are interested in this as a security measure, I recommend setting up your own mtree(1) specification to set the flags that *you* want. That will also allow you to use that same specification to check that the flags have remained the way you want them set. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 15:24:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ECF16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:24:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A2743D5C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:24:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 21222 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 15:24:03 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 15:24:03 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 312DB28439; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:24:03 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Kristian Vaaf References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060211150451.02150468@broadpark.no> <44bqxcy70y.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20060213094013.02158150@broadpark.no> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Feb 2006 10:24:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213094013.02158150@broadpark.no> Message-ID: <44oe1bl1t8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File verification script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:24:05 -0000 Kristian Vaaf writes: > I just want a simple script that uses cfv to verify MP3 albums, > the same way I showed you my other script that uses cfv to seal my MP3 albums. Well, cksfv seems to be appropriate for that application. I haven't actually tried any of these myself; mtree(1) works fine for me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 15:26:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DCB16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from colossus.nepinc.com (colossus.nepinc.com [66.207.129.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D162943D53 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:26:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from [192.168.97.98] (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by colossus.nepinc.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1DFQ2Ew058245 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:26:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <43F0A4FD.5070801@voidmain.net> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:25:49 -0500 From: Tom Grove Organization: VoidMain.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on colossus.nepinc.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87/1284/Sun Feb 12 11:00:59 2006 on colossus.nepinc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Undefined Symbol "resVgaShared" after upgrade to xorg 6.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@voidmain.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:26:04 -0000 I did a portupgrade this weekend and today my screen res went to 1024x768...that's not my normal resolution. I did some tinkering and found that no drivers showed up in xorgcfg when I try to setup my card. I looked at some logs and found this error message: Undefined symbol "resVgaShared" I'm not really sure what it means and was wondering if anyone else ran into similar problems? I'm running 6-stable and have an ATI radeon mobile card. In 6.8 everything worked fine...only after the upgrade did I start having problems. -Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 15:30:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262B616A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B63343D66 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 11431 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 15:30:03 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 15:30:03 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7619528439; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:30:02 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Bob Perry References: <43DC4330.6080607@gti.net> <441wypu812.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <43DE445A.3040904@gti.net> <44ek2p5ppq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <43EF6DF5.3090709@gti.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Feb 2006 10:30:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43EF6DF5.3090709@gti.net> Message-ID: <44irrjl1j9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to Startx Following Upgrade--Error in Locking Authority File X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:30:07 -0000 Bob Perry writes: > Not sure if I updated folks on this but the problem persists. (E-mail > problems). I've since requested assistance from the gnome and x11 > mailing list since the problem started following recent upgrades to > those ports. The base system has added some "/tmp"-cleaning at boot time, specifically to clear out X-related directories. Updating your system to (for example) 6-STABLE may make things work automatically. Alternatively, you could turn on the old /tmp cleaning, which will just wipe the whole directory. If you have a single-user system, the security risks aren't really an issue. Or you could use a memory disk for /tmp. That will (obviously) clear your whole /tmp automatically on a reboot. I do that on my desktops, by setting the tmpmfs and tmpsize variables in rc.conf(5). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 15:35:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB1216A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:35:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D4043D58 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 21637 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 15:35:12 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 15:35:12 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5230628439; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:35:12 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Thiago Esteves References: <20060212175318.30618.qmail@web30005.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Feb 2006 10:35:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060212175318.30618.qmail@web30005.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <44ek27l1an.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "#:Failed to force tx and rx idle state" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:35:15 -0000 Thiago Esteves writes: > --- Lowell Gilbert > escreveu: > > Thiago Esteves writes: > > > > > Hi, I've had troubles with a ethernet adapter > > ...."dc".... It send the mensage ::: > > > > > > => dc0: Failed to force tx and rx idle > > state <= > > > > > > ::: What's it? > > > > It tried and failed to reset the MAC controller. > > What other symptoms are you seeing? > > > > I started the DHCP client but It doesn't obtain a IP > address. I tried to configure the IP address manually > but It daesn't function... I've never seen that from a dc(4) card except for a time where it turned out that the hardware had failed. There are a number of entries in the BUGS section of the dc manual; check those out and try to determine if they affect you. Also, try setting the media type and options explicitly to match whatever the card is connected to, and see if you can establish link. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 15:49:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD25C16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:49:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AB043D58 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1F8fxJ-0007Ti-LC; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:49:37 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200602131128.11168.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> References: <200602131128.11168.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-6-477300374" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:49:33 +0000 To: Ashley Moran X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Long list of stale dependencies for tomcat55 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:49:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-6-477300374 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 13 Feb 2006, at 11:28, Ashley Moran wrote: > Does anyone know how my Tomcat installation on a 5.4 box has ended up > including the following as tomcat dependencies? > > atk-1.10.3 > libXft-2.1.7 > xorg-fonts-encodings-6.9.0_1 > desktop-file-utils-0.10_3 > pango-1.10.3 > glib-2.8.6 > cairo-1.0.2_1 > gtk-2.8.12 > mozilla-1.7.12_5,2 > tiff-3.8.0 > bitstream-vera-1.10_2 Nope. > I don't even know what half of them do. I've deleted all the stale > dependencies because freshports.org says the only run-time > dependency is > java/jdk14 (jdk15 on my machine). Is this right? According to make, yes: {ceri@shrike}-{ports/www/tomcat55} % make -V RUN_DEPENDS /usr/local/jdk1.4.2/bin/java:/usr/ports/java/jdk14 Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --Apple-Mail-6-477300374 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD8KqRme8yCsQvJJ0RAuSTAKCabQbNmQXry4gyQiJxXKpdAOWVsgCfXN4A 14GAvJnXlXTzRsv5Cz0jWZc= =obdI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-6-477300374-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 15:49:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2AE16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:49:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC8B43D77 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:49:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from [62.68.187.173] (helo=[172.16.0.26]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1F8fxJ-0009kV-Jz; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:49:37 +0100 Message-ID: <43F0AAD2.9050502@freemail.hu> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:50:42 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?L=E1szl=F3_Nagy?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Kinsey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43F07782.5040002@messias.qhigh.com> <43F09769.9060808@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <43F09769.9060808@daleco.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: make buildworld fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:49:46 -0000 > > Here's what I would try. Upgrade to RELENG_4 via the cvsup/buildworld > process, > read Bruce Mah's 4.11-5.X Migration Guide, and be sure and include > "mergemaster -p" in your buildworld cycle. Can you tell me where is that migration guide? When I google for it, I only get posts about that guide. But where is the guide itself? Another problem: I only have remote access to that machine. Is it possible to upgrade to 5.X without booting into single user mode? Yes, theoretically, I shouldn't do that but I'm in Hungary and the computer is in the US... Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 15:50:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6EC16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:50:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FC243D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:50:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1F8fyM-0007XE-MO; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:50:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200602131300.37289.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> References: <200602131300.37289.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-7-477369515" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:50:42 +0000 To: Ashley Moran X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More tomcat wierdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:50:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-7-477369515 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 13 Feb 2006, at 13:00, Ashley Moran wrote: > I've reinstalled Tomcat (now in www/tomcat55) because it was going > mental > (100% CPU) and now the stop/start isn't working through the rc.d > script. > > Tomcat starts and records the PID in /var/run/tomcat55.pid. But > when I call > the script with stop I get an error saying "tomcat not started? > check pid > file", or something to that effect. > > root@webserv2# ls -lad /var/run/. /var/run/tomcat55.pid > drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Feb 13 12:10 /var/run/. > -rw-r--r-- 1 www wheel 6 Feb 13 12:22 /var/run/tomcat55.pid > > It worked fine when it was running off the old www/jakarta-tomcat55 > port - I > don't know if anything has changed. "sh -x /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tomcat55.sh stop" may shed some light. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --Apple-Mail-7-477369515 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD8KrTme8yCsQvJJ0RAu9IAKC+laisoVdGyy82rJ6n7Bj0TSPL4wCgmgmH XVgi3tdprKgTx9JaBfBvxKw= =/7zU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-7-477369515-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 15:51:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB70316A423 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:51:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0828F43D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:51:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 2913 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 15:51:12 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 15:51:12 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AF1CC28439; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:51:11 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Steve Coles" References: <028a01c630a1$72ca5b50$649b14ac@tripos.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Feb 2006 10:51:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <028a01c630a1$72ca5b50$649b14ac@tripos.com> Message-ID: <44accvl0k0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 49 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP ATA woes on 6.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:51:14 -0000 "Steve Coles" writes: > I have a strange deterministic boot problem with ATA devices on 2-way dell > precision machines which boot from their SCSI disks. I have 4 of these > boxes, and the only difference is the add-in ATA controller in the affected > box. > > A good summary would be "which kernels work": > > a) GENERIC from the distribution boots fine (uniprocessor) > b) GENERIC built from 6.0-RELEASE boots fine > c) SMP built from 6.0-RELEASE hangs during the ATA probe of my disks > d) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with no ATA options/devices > boots fine > e) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with ATA options/devices hangs > as in c) above > > .. It gets weirder > > F) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with no ATA options/devices > boots fine (same as option d) above, then I load the ata modules from my > normal login shell: > > $> kldload atapci (loads ata.ko etc ) > $> Kldload atadisk > > .. And it produces a stable, fast, ATA disk subsystem > > G) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with no ATA options/devices > boots fine (option d) above with a > > atapci_load="YES" > atadisk_load="YES" > > In loader.conf produces the same hang as c) > > So...I presume the problem is related to the fact that the second CPU must > be launched else the ATA code gets confused with my ATA subsystem (Naieve > explanation of facts) > > Q: Is this a known bug ? > Q: If it is, is it fixed in -STABLE ? > Q: If so - when is a good cvsup date that gives me a fixed ata driver with a > "stable stable" I'm not sure about exactly the situation you are seeing, but there do seem to have been a number of changes related to ATA interactions with SMP, added since 6.0. If this system isn't in production yet, try just updating to the latest -STABLE. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 15:52:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33D316A423 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:52:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246B843D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:52:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 27575 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 15:52:52 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 15:52:52 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id DDA6428441; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:52:51 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Ashley Moran References: <200602131300.37289.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Feb 2006 10:52:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200602131300.37289.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> Message-ID: <4464njl0h8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More tomcat wierdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:52:54 -0000 Ashley Moran writes: > I've reinstalled Tomcat (now in www/tomcat55) because it was going mental > (100% CPU) and now the stop/start isn't working through the rc.d script. > > Tomcat starts and records the PID in /var/run/tomcat55.pid. But when I call > the script with stop I get an error saying "tomcat not started? check pid > file", or something to that effect. > > root@webserv2# ls -lad /var/run/. /var/run/tomcat55.pid > drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Feb 13 12:10 /var/run/. > -rw-r--r-- 1 www wheel 6 Feb 13 12:22 /var/run/tomcat55.pid > > It worked fine when it was running off the old www/jakarta-tomcat55 port - I > don't know if anything has changed. Maybe these are the changes in the UPDATING file? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 16:30:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF9316A420; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:30:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3253D43D55; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:30:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix, from userid 1022) id B6F681832E; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:31:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A5018330; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:31:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:31:02 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ashley Moran , Alex Zbyslaw , Roman Bogorodskiy , vsevolod@highsecure.ru In-Reply-To: <200507071857.j67IvOOT084077@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20060213112039.P36299@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <200507071857.j67IvOOT084077@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Syslog-NG at Boot (WAS: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/syslog-ng Makefile distinfo pkg-plist) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:30:57 -0000 > might expect to talk to it. I assume you put syslogng_enable="YES" into > /etc/rc.conf? as well as syslogd_enable="NO". (Or, it might work just to > change syslogd_program="/path/to/syslogngd" and not bother with changing > anything else). > > --Alex > Just to clarify, even the latest src/etc/rc.d/syslogd at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/rc.d/syslogd?rev=1.11&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Specially hard-codes /usr/sbin/$program as the executable, thus setting: syslogd_program="/usr/local/sbin/syslog-ng" syslogd_flags="-p /var/run/syslog.pid" syslogd_enable="YES" Has no effect at startup. It starts the system syslogd(8). *HOWEVER*, after the boot process is complete, /etc/rc.d/syslogd begins to honor syslogd_program="" (start, stop, status). It's very strange. Perhaps a more rc(8) compliant syslog-ng.sh.example should be packaged up? ~lava On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > novel 2005-07-07 18:57:24 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > sysutils/syslog-ng Makefile distinfo pkg-plist > Log: > - Update to 1.6.8 that fixes some bugs > - Fix potential broke as authors move old versions to old/ directory > - Make NOPORTDOCS work > > PR: 83102 > Submitted by: Vsevolod Stakhov > Approved by: Vince Valenti (maintainer) > > Revision Changes Path > 1.27 +3 -2 ports/sysutils/syslog-ng/Makefile > 1.19 +2 -2 ports/sysutils/syslog-ng/distinfo > 1.3 +14 -14 ports/sysutils/syslog-ng/pkg-plist > _______________________________________________ > cvs-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > l8* -lava x.25 - minix - bitnet - plan9 - 110 bps - ASR 33 - base8 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 16:35:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAB816A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:35:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from marski.suomi.net (marski.suomi.net [212.50.131.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA65D43D49 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:35:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi) Received: from spartak.suomi.net (spartak.suomi.net [212.50.140.227]) by marski.suomi.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 (built Dec 2 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUM008UPWQT4FJ0@marski.suomi.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:35:18 +0200 (EET) Received: from spam2.suomi.net (spam2.suomi.net [212.50.131.166]) by mailstore.suomi.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.04 (built Jul 15 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUM00FU7WQTVA00@mailstore.suomi.net>; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:35:17 +0200 (EET) Received: from smtp.suomi.net (addr-82-128-230-204.suomi.net [82.128.230.204]) by spam2.suomi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D257B11EF59; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:35:13 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:35:03 +0200 From: Teemu Korhonen In-reply-to: To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-OPOY-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the OPOY for more information X-OPOY-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-OPOY-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.235, required 5, AWL -2.19, BAYES_00 -2.60, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 5.00, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL 0.03) X-OPOY-MailScanner-From: teemu.korhonen@mbnet.fi References: User-Agent: Opera M2/8.50 (Win32, build 7700) Cc: akbeech@alaskaparadise.com Subject: Re: need help with pcmcia wireless network card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:35:22 -0000 Okay. I've got it sorted out. I found some instructions here, http://dannyman.toldme.com/2005/01/05/freebsd-howto-ndisulate-windows-drivers/ I used Dell drivers with ndisgen instead of Buffalo's and got it working. Thanks for kicking me in the right direction :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 17:03:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCCD16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:03:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E418243D5D for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:03:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 12766 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 17:03:31 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 17:03:30 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 73D6128439; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:03:30 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Chris Maness References: <43F035CA.7030408@chrismaness.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Feb 2006 12:03:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43F035CA.7030408@chrismaness.com> Message-ID: <44wtfzjin1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash Plugin for Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:03:32 -0000 Chris Maness writes: > What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin > installer do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linux) Try the www/linuxpluginwrapper port, along with the www/linux-flashplugin6 port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 17:31:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F62B16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB3B43D6B for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1DHUFD9072629; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:30:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43F0C21D.1050109@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:30:05 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd@voidmain.net References: <43F0A4FD.5070801@voidmain.net> In-Reply-To: <43F0A4FD.5070801@voidmain.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Undefined Symbol "resVgaShared" after upgrade to xorg 6.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:31:22 -0000 Tom Grove wrote: > I did a portupgrade this weekend and today my screen > res went to 1024x768...that's not my normal resolution. > I did some tinkering and found that no drivers showed > up in xorgcfg when I try to setup my card. I looked at > some logs and found this error message: > > Undefined symbol "resVgaShared" > > > I'm not really sure what it means and was wondering > if anyone else ran into similar problems? I'm running 6-stable > and have an ATI radeon mobile card. In 6.8 everything worked > fine...only after the upgrade did I start having problems. > > -Tom Wow, I didn't know 6.8 was even out! --- gee, what kinda guy makes fun of typos? Please forgive my obvious trolling :-) and let's move on... Anyway, I'd like to have seen a little more information in your posting: ---is xorg the only thing that got upgraded? ---what window manager/environment are you using? *Was it upgraded? ---what does your xorg configuration file say in re: *driver *screen definitions ---what is your "normal resolution"? IANAE, but I'd wonder if, since X seems to at least run, if the issue isn't "resVgaShared" so much as a change somewhere else. Gnome, KDE and I think XFCE all do some X management themselves (as do some others, probably) and a change in your WM might have caused your screen resolution to change also.... Of course, either of us could be barking up the wrong tree on this one. Kevin Kinsey -- You may be infinitely smaller than some things, but you're infinitely larger than others. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 17:40:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF6716A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:40:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (ns1.internetinsite.com [208.179.97.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFFF43D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:40:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.internetinsite.com [IPv6:::1]) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1DHeuB5099167; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:40:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <43F0C4A8.9040409@chrismaness.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:40:56 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <43F035CA.7030408@chrismaness.com> <44wtfzjin1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44wtfzjin1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash Plugin for Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:40:59 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Chris Maness writes: > > >> What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin >> installer do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linux) >> > > Try the www/linuxpluginwrapper port, along with the > www/linux-flashplugin6 port. > It installed OK but firefox is still complaining that it does not have the correct plug in. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 17:46:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62BA16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:46:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93BB43D4C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 5631 invoked by uid 510); 13 Feb 2006 17:48:23 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1261. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.5/5.0):. Processed in 2.365718 secs); 13 Feb 2006 17:48:23 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.5/5.0):. Processed in 2.365718 secs Process 5624) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 13 Feb 2006 17:48:20 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Luckow - Cortex Systems In-Reply-To: <001f01c6308f$94405b20$3e1310ac@maximillion> References: <001f01c6308f$94405b20$3e1310ac@maximillion> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1139852900.5141.9.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:48:20 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Interested in selling retail freeBSD sets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:46:26 -0000 On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:21, René Luckow - Cortex Systems wrote: > Hi > > We're interested in selling freeBSD along with a range of other OS > distributions on our website, which caters the European market. > > How would we going about obtaining these? > > Kind regards, > > René Luckow > Technical & Sales Consultant > > Cortex Systems > Snoldelev Bygade 59 > DK4621 Gadstrup > Denmark > > E-mail: rene@cortexsystems.dk > WWW: http://cortexsystems.dk > > > Rene, FreeBSD is what it says free. Please see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/introduction.html As I understand it, you are free to redistribute it provided that you do not claim to have produced it nor charge for it. You can charge for producing the CDs though. You can obtain the iso images to produce the CDs from the FreeBSD site. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 17:50:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A3516A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:50:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (ns1.internetinsite.com [208.179.97.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B37C43D6A for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:50:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.internetinsite.com [IPv6:::1]) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1DHoCmD099199 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:50:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <43F0C6D4.1070207@chrismaness.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:50:12 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD & Windows Boot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:50:13 -0000 If for what ever reason the FreeBSD boot loader does load windows, is there a way to repair the windows boot sector? I remember trying this in the past with ill results. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 17:56:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83D716A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:56:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA5543D62 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:56:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3FC565643F; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:56:54 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:56:54 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Ashley Moran Message-ID: <20060213175654.GB47931@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <200602131300.37289.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602131300.37289.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More tomcat wierdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:56:56 -0000 On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:00:37PM +0000, Ashley Moran wrote: > I've reinstalled Tomcat (now in www/tomcat55) because it was going mental > (100% CPU) and now the stop/start isn't working through the rc.d script. > > Tomcat starts and records the PID in /var/run/tomcat55.pid. But when I call > the script with stop I get an error saying "tomcat not started? check pid > file", or something to that effect. > > root@webserv2# ls -lad /var/run/. /var/run/tomcat55.pid > drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Feb 13 12:10 /var/run/. > -rw-r--r-- 1 www wheel 6 Feb 13 12:22 /var/run/tomcat55.pid > > It worked fine when it was running off the old www/jakarta-tomcat55 port - I > don't know if anything has changed. There were several changes relating to the use of rc-scripts over the `old-way' of tomcatctl binaries. I suggest you Cc: the maintainer of the project. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Beer. Now there's a temporary solution." - Homer Simpson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 18:00:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6541E16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:00:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59B143D5E for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:00:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A5B5CCB; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:00:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19303-05; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:00:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBFE5CC1; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:00:22 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1139852900.5141.9.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> References: <001f01c6308f$94405b20$3e1310ac@maximillion> <1139852900.5141.9.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <89450798-EC1B-4000-B6FB-1666DF028D5E@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:00:21 -0500 To: Robert Slade X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Luckow_-_Cortex_Systems?= , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Interested in selling retail freeBSD sets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:00:24 -0000 On Feb 13, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Robert Slade wrote: > As I understand it, you are free to redistribute it provided that > you do > not claim to have produced it nor charge for it. You can charge for > producing the CDs though. You are welcome to charge as much for FreeBSD as you like, actually. Of course, you can't stop someone from downloading FreeBSD themselves for free (or for the cost of bandwidth, anyway), so in effect, people charge a reasonable amount for putting together a nice CD/jewel case because that's what the market is willing to pay for.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 18:05:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDE516A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:05:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6820A43D62 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:05:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k1DI5XiU025607; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:05:33 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k1DI5X5v025606; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:05:33 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200602131805.k1DI5X5v025606@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: chris@chrismaness.com (Chris Maness) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:05:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <43F0C6D4.1070207@chrismaness.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD & Windows Boot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:05:51 -0000 > > If for what ever reason the FreeBSD boot loader does load windows, is > there a way to repair the windows boot sector? I remember trying this > in the past with ill results. Probably depends on what is wrong. Probably there is some MS utility that can repair it. Someone else will have to talk the MS stuff. Make sure you understand the different parts. Your terminology wanders a bit. The FreeBSD MBR and not the boot loader would be the only part that has anything to do with booting a Windos or any non FreeBSD OS. I think that is what you mean by boot loader though. The MBR only just recognized that the slice is bootable and reads in the boot sector and turns over control to it. It does nothing else with the Win sector or loader. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 18:17:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5E916A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:17:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E19143D82 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:16:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUN00AO81FYJSA0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:16:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([213.187.181.70]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUN003NE1FW6100@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:16:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:16:44 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf In-reply-to: <43F070BA.1000205@meijome.net> To: Norberto Meijome Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213191304.0219b820@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213094752.021a8eb0@broadpark.no> <43F070BA.1000205@meijome.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to ensure one blank line on top of ASCII files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:17:04 -0000 At 12:42 13.02.2006, Norberto Meijome wrote: >Kristian Vaaf wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I need to make sure all my ASCII files start with one blank line. > > > > I just need to know what command to use, > > I've written the rest of the script to do this for me: > > > > -- > > > >echo "" > MY_BLANK_LINE.txt > > > for file in `find -s . -type f -not -name ".*"`; do > > > > if file -b "$file" | grep -q 'text'; then > > > mv $file $file.tmp > cat MY_BLANK_LINE.txt $file.tmp >> $file > rm -f $file.tmp > > > echo "$file: Done" > > > > fi > > > > done > >rm -f MY_BLANK_LINE.txt > > >There possibly are far more elegant solutions...but that should work. I think I will look out for a more elegant approach :) If I fail to find one, I will use your suggestion. Thanks though, it kinda taught me a thing or two about shell programming. All the best, Fafa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 18:37:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E00616A455 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:37:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF2043D81 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.stelesys.com) by stelesys.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F8dHT-000IaG-NX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:58:15 -0500 Received: from 209.134.164.18 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jbell@stelesys.com) by www.stelesys.com with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:58:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:58:15 -0500 (EST) From: "Jerry Bell" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:37:22 -0000 It's hit or miss, but the first time someone visits the web site, they get a "server not found" page. On hitting refresh, they get the page - no problems. If I wait a while and try again, I get the same problem. The problem appears to be something in the initial communication with the web server. Using tcpdump, I can see that the PC connects to the web server and sends the GET request, but the server closes the connection abruptly. Comparing that flow to a normal session, I see that there are some extra packets between the initial SYN and the sending of the GET phrase that do not exist during a successful session. I'm running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 18 (built from the stable source as of that day). I'm using apache 1.3.34. I was on 1.3.33 and rebuilt the port to see if that was the problem. I'm not sure if this is an apache problem or a FreeBSD problem. Any suggestions on further troubleshooting or known issues? Thank you! Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 18:43:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59B016A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:43:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B866E43D7C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:43:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D195A730A4; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:43:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82647-08; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:43:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5477303E; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:43:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:43:23 -0500 To: "Jerry Bell" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:43:59 -0000 I think I"ve seen this before too... Is it possible that FreeBSD spins down the hard drive after inactivity, and the server doesn't always spin up the HD with a network request like this? On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Jerry Bell wrote: > It's hit or miss, but the first time someone visits the web site, > they get > a "server not found" page. On hitting refresh, they get the page - no > problems. If I wait a while and try again, I get the same problem. > > The problem appears to be something in the initial communication > with the > web server. Using tcpdump, I can see that the PC connects to the web > server and sends the GET request, but the server closes the connection > abruptly. Comparing that flow to a normal session, I see that > there are > some extra packets between the initial SYN and the sending of the GET > phrase that do not exist during a successful session. > > I'm running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 18 (built > from the > stable source as of that day). > I'm using apache 1.3.34. I was on 1.3.33 and rebuilt the port to > see if > that was the problem. > > I'm not sure if this is an apache problem or a FreeBSD problem. Any > suggestions on further troubleshooting or known issues? > > Thank you! > > Jerry > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 18:56:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E7A16A423 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:56:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennyboy@cableone.net) Received: from S4.cableone.net (s4.cableone.net [24.116.0.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7E443D72 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:56:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennyboy@cableone.net) Received: from badboybox.cableone.net (unverified [69.92.7.117]) by S4.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S4) with ESMTP id 46159080 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:30:15 -0700 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:58:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Denny White To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <1139731129.17153.7.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Message-ID: References: <1139731129.17153.7.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http//wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii; X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 6, First 20, in=9, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 69.92.7.117 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Subject: Re: Samba vulnerability & make problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:56:58 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 12 Robert Slade spake forth boldly: >> Was trying to setup apsfilter to be able to print to my >> winbox printer. Got as far as the follwing: >> >> ===> apsfilter-7.2.6_2 depends on executable: smbclient - not found >> ===> Verifying install for smbclient in /usr/ports/net/samba >> ===> samba-2.2.12_2 has known vulnerabilities: >> => samba -- integer overflow vulnerability. >> Reference: >> => Please update your ports tree and try again. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/print/apsfilter. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/print/apsfilter. >> >> Script done on Sat Feb 11 20:01:52 2006 >> >> I've got portaudit installed & the database was just updated >> several days ago, as well as the ports with portsnap & portupgrade. >> Have checked the last week or so of the cvs mailing list for samba >> & found nothing, so I didn't rerun portsnap & portupgrade. Already >> so many dependencies installed for apsfilter, I hated to update >> anything else right in the middle of all of this. Tried running the >> make command with -DIGNORE_VULNERABILITIES but still no dice. Any >> advice, pointers to reading up on it, help, appreciated. >> Denny White > > Denny, > > Samba3 is in the ports try that instead. > > Thanks for the advice, Robert. Did it. Found the proper printer driver & set it up. Took a long time to connect to an ftp server that had it (in case someone else has to do the same thing, don't cancel, it'll find a server eventually that has it). Apsfilter is setup now. Still have to fiddle with Samba settings. Had it setup once before a long time back when I was running FreeBSD 4.7, I believe, on my old laptop. It'll just take some patience & tinkering. Thanks again for the help. Denny White Please do not CC me. Already subscribed to mailing list. GnuPG key : 0x1644E79A | http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD) iD8DBQFD8IKPy0Ty5RZE55oRAu1hAJ9ypH21sKLDpQTM/kEAPh7UaybbUQCgumT4 K0x0NSNGaQgPBOoECGHoZz8= =uPNE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:17:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263CD16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:17:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lenzi@infopar.com.br) Received: from cwbgk1.k1.com.br (customer-200195196249.onda.com.br [200.195.196.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB91043D49 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:17:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lenzi@infopar.com.br) Received: from webpratico.com.br (M199.28.cwbgk [172.16.199.28] (may be forged)) by cwbgk1.k1.com.br (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1DJHRuh015164 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:17:27 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from lenzi@infopar.com.br) Received: from server (server [192.168.1.6]) by webpratico.com.br (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1DJL04N083258 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:21:00 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from lenzi@infopar.com.br) From: sergio lenzi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:17:25 -0200 Message-Id: <1139858245.78805.40.camel@server> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: The FreeBSD 6.0 ISO cd... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:17:34 -0000 Hello.... I am a FreeBSD user for a long time, but now I have a question about the ISO cdrom In FreeBSD 6.0-release, disk1 iso image it shows mounted in my FreeBSD release.... the folowing information from mount... Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/acd0 588840 588840 0 100% /cdrom a command du -s shows 1013144 root@ondabox# du -s . 1013144 . ===================== If I copy the contents of the cdrom to another directory in the file system it shows 1013144 too... I need to make a new cd1 with xorg version 6.9.0 and some packages for my own use... but I was unable to rebuild the cd... with an 600Mb size... My question is: Where can I find a documentation about the way the FreeBSD 6.0 release cd1 is built.... I try the make buildworld and make release but it does not build the iso image.... The ducumentation on the handbook and in internet is about the 5.x or 4.x .... Please thanks for any help..... Sergio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:26:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAA116A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:26:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A897043D55 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:26:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1F8jKw-0004UT-Qt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:26:14 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1F8jKs-0001ZX-3X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:26:10 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k1DJQ9wu006046 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:26:09 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:26:09 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060213192609.GC6003@sysadm.stc> References: <1139754356.19498.5.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: LDAP authentication problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:26:17 -0000 On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Pavel Duda wrote: > Now I have tried to do > 'id testuser' You need nss_ldap too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:29:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1374416A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:29:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B4F43D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:29:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 28570 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 19:29:27 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 19:29:27 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 463C428439; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:29:26 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Chris Maness References: <43F035CA.7030408@chrismaness.com> <44wtfzjin1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <43F0C4A8.9040409@chrismaness.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Feb 2006 14:29:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43F0C4A8.9040409@chrismaness.com> Message-ID: <447j7z2h2h.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash Plugin for Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:29:29 -0000 Chris Maness writes: > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Chris Maness writes: > > > > > >> What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin > >> installer do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linux) > >> > > > > Try the www/linuxpluginwrapper port, along with the > > www/linux-flashplugin6 port. > > > It installed OK but firefox is still complaining that it does not have > the correct plug in. Is the linux-flashplugin6 port installed (or some other version of Linux flashplugin, but 6 is the best choice)? Did you configure your libmap.conf as the port recommended? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:31:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C859E16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:31:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60019.mail.yahoo.com (web60019.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C352943D5E for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:31:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 8119 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Feb 2006 19:31:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=evCNXqNNAuXHxAqnVDvHbac25l3BQzdzoS0PON400e7KI3ixfPXfB39QqxuISBAHRAX6EbPy4ca6Ykb2tdHvd8FsMqiX8/YaGr9iV/OdwHm8NQdMzRy747wNwo4wyL46NH2mqpYnlz264XWwWJ+MJfMOPUVguL+ljyIqkIdOLWA= ; Message-ID: <20060213193132.8117.qmail@web60019.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.252.84.33] by web60019.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:31:32 EST Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:31:32 -0500 (EST) From: Peter To: Chris Maness , Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <43F0C4A8.9040409@chrismaness.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash Plugin for Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:31:33 -0000 --- Chris Maness wrote: > > > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Chris Maness writes: > > > > > >> What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin > >> installer do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linux) > >> > > > > Try the www/linuxpluginwrapper port, along with the > > www/linux-flashplugin6 port. > > > It installed OK but firefox is still complaining that it does not have > the correct plug in. http://unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc/2005-09/0258.html __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:32:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00A516A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59E643D46 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:32:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 21631 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2006 19:32:12 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Feb 2006 19:32:12 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 102A228441; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:32:11 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: sergio lenzi References: <1139858245.78805.40.camel@server> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Feb 2006 14:32:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1139858245.78805.40.camel@server> Message-ID: <443bin2gxw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The FreeBSD 6.0 ISO cd... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:32:13 -0000 sergio lenzi writes: > I need to make a new cd1 with xorg version 6.9.0 > and some packages for my own use... but I was > unable to rebuild the cd... with an 600Mb size... > > My question is: > Where can I find a documentation about the way > the FreeBSD 6.0 release cd1 is built.... "man release" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:37:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E45E16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:37:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B0A43D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:37:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.stelesys.com) by stelesys.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F8jVZ-0004K9-85; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:37:13 -0500 Received: from 209.134.164.18 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jbell@stelesys.com) by www.stelesys.com with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:37:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3913.209.134.164.18.1139859433.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:37:13 -0500 (EST) From: "Jerry Bell" To: "Joe Auty" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jerry Bell Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:37:14 -0000 It's certainly possible. This is a Dell PE 750, and I didn't do anything in bios or in FreeBSD to enable that, so I'm thinking it might not be that, but I'll investigate it. Thanks! Jerry > I think I"ve seen this before too... > > Is it possible that FreeBSD spins down the hard drive after > inactivity, and the server doesn't always spin up the HD with a > network request like this? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:38:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912FA16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:38:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9F343D58 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:38:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([68.80.195.248]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20060213193858m1200aflure>; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:38:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BD6B843; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:38:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bserver.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33287-09; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:38:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.214.102] (kbuilt.transpack.com [192.168.214.102]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49533B842; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:38:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F0E040.6040309@allenmyland.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:38:40 -0500 From: Ken Stevenson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry Bell References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> In-Reply-To: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at transpack.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:38:59 -0000 Jerry Bell wrote: > It's hit or miss, but the first time someone visits the web site, they get > a "server not found" page. On hitting refresh, they get the page - no > problems. If I wait a while and try again, I get the same problem. > > The problem appears to be something in the initial communication with the > web server. Using tcpdump, I can see that the PC connects to the web > server and sends the GET request, but the server closes the connection > abruptly. Comparing that flow to a normal session, I see that there are > some extra packets between the initial SYN and the sending of the GET > phrase that do not exist during a successful session. > > I'm running 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 18 (built from the > stable source as of that day). > I'm using apache 1.3.34. I was on 1.3.33 and rebuilt the port to see if > that was the problem. > > I'm not sure if this is an apache problem or a FreeBSD problem. Any > suggestions on further troubleshooting or known issues? > > Thank you! > > Jerry > On a couple of occasions, I've had a similar problem that was the result of Apache having multiple processes running, and 1 of the running processes was failing while all the others were okay. Try refreshing about 20 times and see if the problem comes and goes or if it only occurs on the first connection. In any event, restarting Apache fixed the problem for me. -- Ken Stevenson Allen-Myland Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:39:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9257516A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:39:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF0A43D53 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:39:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1F8jY5-0004d7-Sd for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:39:49 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1F8jY1-0001a1-57 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:39:45 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k1DJdj2c006076 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:39:45 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:39:45 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060213193945.GD6003@sysadm.stc> References: <20060210222422.19070.qmail@web34603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1139643367.8911.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1139643367.8911.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: Help Installing FreeBSD 6.0 with GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:39:54 -0000 On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:36:08AM +0000, Robert Slade wrote: > There are some minor issues with nvida video 3d cards but there are > nvida drivers for BSD. ATI cards are a bit more of a problem. In both > cases search the mailing list archives the info is there. I dont see any problems with ATI Radeon 9200 on my home PC, except I cant play linux-enemyterritory with it :-). X.org driver "just work", also you can have good 3D performance (at least with glxgears :-) ) if you'll install graphics/dri port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:40:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73AB16A425 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C9A43D46 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:40:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776357303B; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:40:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83291-06; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:40:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA467302D; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:40:41 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <3913.209.134.164.18.1139859433.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <3913.209.134.164.18.1139859433.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:40:39 -0500 To: "Jerry Bell" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:40:45 -0000 So ACPI is disabled? On Feb 13, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Jerry Bell wrote: > It's certainly possible. This is a Dell PE 750, and I didn't do > anything > in bios or in FreeBSD to enable that, so I'm thinking it might not be > that, but I'll investigate it. > > Thanks! > > Jerry >> I think I"ve seen this before too... >> >> Is it possible that FreeBSD spins down the hard drive after >> inactivity, and the server doesn't always spin up the HD with a >> network request like this? >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:41:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369DD16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:41:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AA543D76 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:41:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F695C78; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:41:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99891-01; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:41:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523B65C48; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:41:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9CB4E9E3-EE93-4E65-AD74-0ACC9B3C64FF@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:41:17 -0500 To: Jerry Bell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:41:41 -0000 On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Jerry Bell wrote: > It's hit or miss, but the first time someone visits the web site, > they get > a "server not found" page. On hitting refresh, they get the page - no > problems. If I wait a while and try again, I get the same problem. Path MTU problem? > The problem appears to be something in the initial communication > with the > web server. Using tcpdump, I can see that the PC connects to the web > server and sends the GET request, but the server closes the connection > abruptly. Comparing that flow to a normal session, I see that > there are > some extra packets between the initial SYN and the sending of the GET > phrase that do not exist during a successful session. The details would help. :-) Or you could tell us what the server is so we could try hitting it ourselves... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:42:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34A416A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:42:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE68543D7F for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:42:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9C3730B7 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:42:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83293-07 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:42:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1335730AD for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:42:04 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <719FB0CC-C8EF-47C5-A8EE-213880431AD5@netmusician.org> From: Joe Auty Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:42:03 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FBSD 6.0 kernel panic on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:42:06 -0000 Hello, I'm testing 6.0 on my test machine, and even in safe mode the machine kernel panics on boot. Where is the file that contains the kernel panic dumps, and where should I send my report to? ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:43:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B394F16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:43:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2B243D77 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:43:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1F8jbQ-0004jA-AE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:43:16 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1F8jbL-0001aC-IF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:43:11 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k1DJhB5H006087 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:43:11 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:43:11 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060213194311.GE6003@sysadm.stc> References: <20060210234503.B40092@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060210234503.B40092@chylonia.3miasto.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: randomized source IP for userland app?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:43:17 -0000 On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:46:42PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > is it possible for userland application (or many of then) for TCP > connections to select it's source IP address from a list random or > round-robin way? (say 2-4 different IP's) socket() with SOCK_RAW as 3rd parameter. you need to be root to run this app. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 19:53:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1428516A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:53:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bbobowski@gmail.com) Received: from fep3.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E7A43D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:53:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bbobowski@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (d235-186-39.home1.cgocable.net [24.235.186.39]) by fep3.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A01517ED9; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:53:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F0E3B6.9080407@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:53:26 -0500 From: Brian Bobowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040626 Thunderbird/0.7.1 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norberto Meijome References: <43F0935B.4020901@gmail.com> <43F095E6.2070901@meijome.net> <43F097BC.80308@gmail.com> <43F098D1.2000708@meijome.net> In-Reply-To: <43F098D1.2000708@meijome.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD User Questions List Subject: Re: Firewall/Web server difficulties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:53:43 -0000 Norberto Meijome wrote: >Brian Bobowski wrote: > > >>I'm poking at that now, yes. I had difficulty getting it to work with >>virtual hosts... but I can at least reference it by the private-side IP >>address and get places. >> >> > >assuming you are using Apache, you can use * for Ip address and let it >be name-based virt host. > > Already running thus. DNS seems to be the problem, then. (Which I'll poke at later assuming hosting alternatives don't work out.) >>WAN. People have tried pinging and browsing, with no success. >> >> > >then I would review the rules... > > Relevant rules text(and based on both startup text and behaviour of the firewall for other tasks, I know the rules file is being parsed) excerpted below: --- cmd="ipfw -q add" pif="rl0" #Interface which opens to the WAN; NAT interface prif="ed0" #LAN interface, private-side ks="keep-state" # More stuff here... $cmd 400 allow udp from 24.226.1.121 to me 68 in via $pif # DHCP server $cmd 401 allow tcp from any to me 80 in via $pif # Apache $cmd 402 allow tcp from any to me 22 in via $pif # SSH $cmd 403 allow icmp from any to me in via $pif # For testing; low-traffic, not worried about ping floods at this time --- The firewall's DHCP requests are working fine, so #400 is working properly. Other machines, however, cannot see it. These firewall rules are essentially a slightly-modified copy of the first example NAT ruleset in the handbook's IPFW section. The modifications consist of extending the 'good-tcpo' variable to a few more ports I want to use, putting more entries for my ISP's DNS servers, adding DHCP outbound and inbound permission 967 and 68) like the second example has, and adding port 22 and ICMP in the above set. That's one problem. The other is DNS. I'm still looking through the named.conf file and poking at the settings given for a secondary server... all I really want is a caching server that will first look at my own /etc/hosts file (where the domain names which refer to this machine are specified by their private-facing address). Any assistance, as always, appreciated. Especially with the first problem. (Off-list as I can't keep up with the volume of list delivery.) -BB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 20:12:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D2F16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:12:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C4643D46 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:12:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.stelesys.com) by stelesys.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F8k3J-0004jp-DO; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:12:05 -0500 Received: from 209.134.164.18 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jbell@stelesys.com) by www.stelesys.com with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:12:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4026.209.134.164.18.1139861525.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> In-Reply-To: <9CB4E9E3-EE93-4E65-AD74-0ACC9B3C64FF@mac.com> References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <9CB4E9E3-EE93-4E65-AD74-0ACC9B3C64FF@mac.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:12:05 -0500 (EST) From: "Jerry Bell" To: "Charles Swiger" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jerry Bell Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:12:10 -0000 I didn't want to spam the link out, but it's www.musiclodge.com. I will gather the capture data from working and non working sessions and send it out. Thanks! > On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Jerry Bell wrote: >> It's hit or miss, but the first time someone visits the web site, >> they get >> a "server not found" page. On hitting refresh, they get the page - no >> problems. If I wait a while and try again, I get the same problem. > > Path MTU problem? > >> The problem appears to be something in the initial communication >> with the >> web server. Using tcpdump, I can see that the PC connects to the web >> server and sends the GET request, but the server closes the connection >> abruptly. Comparing that flow to a normal session, I see that >> there are >> some extra packets between the initial SYN and the sending of the GET >> phrase that do not exist during a successful session. > > The details would help. :-) Or you could tell us what the server is > so we could try hitting it ourselves... > > -- > -Chuck > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 20:16:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAB116A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:16:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B2D43D77 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:15:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.stelesys.com) by stelesys.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F8k74-0004lK-Nr; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:15:58 -0500 Received: from 209.134.164.18 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jbell@stelesys.com) by www.stelesys.com with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:15:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4037.209.134.164.18.1139861758.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <3913.209.134.164.18.1139859433.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:15:58 -0500 (EST) From: "Jerry Bell" To: "Joe Auty" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jerry Bell Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:16:08 -0000 > So ACPI is disabled? I'm assuming it's enabled. Can that be a problem? Aug 29 12:04:46 www syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 18 07:49:41 UTC 2005 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: jerry@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (2800.12-MHz 686-class CPU) Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Features=0xbfebfbff Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: real memory = 536608768 (511 MB) Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: avail memory = 515444736 (491 MB) Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ACPI APIC Table: Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 3 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: npx0: on motherboard Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: npx0: INT 16 interface Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi0: on motherboard Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: cpu0: on acpi0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: on pcib0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib1: at device 3.0 on pci0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci1: on pcib1 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: port 0xece0-0xecff mem 0xfe2e0000-0xfe2fffff irq 18 at device 1.0 on pci1 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: Ethernet address: 00:12:3f:ec:f4:90 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib2: at device 28.0 on pci0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci2: on pcib2 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: mem 0xf4000000-0xf7ffffff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci2 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Unknown processor 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery not installed Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Kernel 4.1-0, Build 7406, S/N c540d4 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Supported Options=1097c Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhci0: port 0xcce0-0xccff irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb0: on uhci0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb0: USB revision 1.0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhci1: port 0xccc0-0xccdf irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb1: on uhci1 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb1: USB revision 1.0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device 29.4 (no driver attached) Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device 29.5 (no driver attached) Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib3: at device 30.0 on pci0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci3: on pcib3 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: port 0xdcc0-0xdcff mem 0xfdee0000-0xfdefffff irq 21 at device 2.0 on pci3 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: Ethernet address: 00:12:3f:ec:f4:91 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci3: at device 14.0 (no driver attached) Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: isa0: on isab0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atapci0: port 0xfea0-0xfeaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.2 on pci0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: kbd0 at atkbd0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio0: type 16550A Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: orm0: at iomem 0xec000-0xeffff,0xcd000-0xcdfff,0xc9000-0xccfff,0xc8000-0xc8fff,0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pmtimer0 on isa0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ppc0: parallel port not found. Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio1: port may not be enabled Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2800115843 Hz quality 800 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to accept, logging limited to 100 packets/entry by default Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aacd0: on aac0 Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aacd0: 152554MB (312432384 sectors) Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/aacd0s1a Aug 29 12:04:47 www kernel: em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 20:18:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAB316A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:18:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57E243D49 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:18:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F53730AD; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:18:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83444-06; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:18:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5F07303E; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:18:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4037.209.134.164.18.1139861758.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <3913.209.134.164.18.1139859433.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <4037.209.134.164.18.1139861758.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:18:08 -0500 To: "Jerry Bell" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:18:13 -0000 I'm hardly on expert on these sorts of things, but I *believe* that ACPI is responsible for power management stuff, including possibly spinning down your hard drive after inactivity. Try restarting with ACPI enabled (which you can do on your boot menu), or disable ACPI within your BIOS for a while to see if this helps.. certainly can't hurt to try. On Feb 13, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Jerry Bell wrote: >> So ACPI is disabled? > I'm assuming it's enabled. Can that be a problem? > > > Aug 29 12:04:46 www syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD > Project. > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, > 1988, > 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: The Regents of the University of > California. > All rights reserved. > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 18 > 07:49:41 UTC > 2005 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: jerry@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > quality 0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz > (2800.12-MHz 686-class CPU) > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 > Stepping = 1 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: > Features=0xbfebfbff GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE > > > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: real memory = 536608768 (511 MB) > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: avail memory = 515444736 (491 MB) > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ACPI APIC Table: > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 3 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on > motherboard > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on > motherboard > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: npx0: on motherboard > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: npx0: INT 16 interface > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi0: on motherboard > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency > 3579545 Hz > quality 1000 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> > port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: cpu0: on acpi0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib0: port > 0xcf8-0xcff > on acpi0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: on pcib0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib1: at device > 3.0 on > pci0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci1: on pcib1 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: Connection, > Version - 1.7.35> port 0xece0-0xecff mem 0xfe2e0000-0xfe2fffff irq > 18 at > device 1.0 on pci1 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: Ethernet address: 00:12:3f:ec:f4:90 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib2: at device > 28.0 on > pci0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci2: on pcib2 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: mem > 0xf4000000-0xf7ffffff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci2 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Unknown processor 100MHz, 48MB cache > memory, optional battery not installed > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Kernel 4.1-0, Build 7406, S/N c540d4 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Supported > Options=1097c > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhci0: > port > 0xcce0-0xccff irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb0: > on uhci0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb0: USB revision 1.0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev > 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self > powered > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhci1: > port > 0xccc0-0xccdf irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb1: > on uhci1 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb1: USB revision 1.0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev > 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self > powered > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device 29.4 (no > driver attached) > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: controller> > at device 29.5 (no driver attached) > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device 29.7 (no > driver attached) > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib3: at device > 30.0 on > pci0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci3: on pcib3 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: Connection, > Version - 1.7.35> port 0xdcc0-0xdcff mem 0xfdee0000-0xfdefffff irq > 21 at > device 2.0 on pci3 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: Ethernet address: 00:12:3f:ec:f4:91 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci3: at device 14.0 (no > driver > attached) > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: isab0: at device 31.0 > on pci0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: isa0: on isab0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atapci0: controller> > port 0xfea0-0xfeaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device > 31.2 on > pci0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device > 31.3 (no > driver attached) > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: fdc0: port > 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atkbdc0: > port > 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: kbd0 at atkbd0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port > 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio0: type 16550A > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: orm0: at iomem > 0xec000-0xeffff,0xcd000-0xcdfff,0xc9000-0xccfff,0xc8000-0xc8fff, > 0xc0000-0xc7fff > on isa0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pmtimer0 on isa0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ppc0: parallel port not found. > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sc0: at flags 0x100 on > isa0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, > flags=0x300> > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of > probed > irqs 0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio1: port may not be enabled > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: vga0: at port > 0x3c0-0x3df > iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2800115843 Hz > quality 800 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, > rule-based > forwarding enabled, default to accept, logging limited to 100 > packets/entry by default > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acd0: CDROM N104> at > ata0-master PIO4 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aacd0: on aac0 > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aacd0: 152554MB (312432384 sectors) > Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/aacd0s1a > Aug 29 12:04:47 www kernel: em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 20:21:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80B416A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:21:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B2C43D77 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.stelesys.com) by stelesys.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F8kC8-0004oD-5a; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:21:12 -0500 Received: from 209.134.164.18 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jbell@stelesys.com) by www.stelesys.com with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:21:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4075.209.134.164.18.1139862072.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <3913.209.134.164.18.1139859433.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <4037.209.134.164.18.1139861758.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:21:12 -0500 (EST) From: "Jerry Bell" To: "Joe Auty" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jerry Bell Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:21:17 -0000 I will give that a try. Thank you for your help! Jerry > I'm hardly on expert on these sorts of things, but I *believe* that > ACPI is responsible for power management stuff, including possibly > spinning down your hard drive after inactivity. Try restarting with > ACPI enabled (which you can do on your boot menu), or disable ACPI > within your BIOS for a while to see if this helps.. certainly can't > hurt to try. > > > > > On Feb 13, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Jerry Bell wrote: > >>> So ACPI is disabled? >> I'm assuming it's enabled. Can that be a problem? >> >> >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD >> Project. >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, >> 1988, >> 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: The Regents of the University of >> California. >> All rights reserved. >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 18 >> 07:49:41 UTC >> 2005 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: jerry@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >> quality 0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz >> (2800.12-MHz 686-class CPU) >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 >> Stepping = 1 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: >> Features=0xbfebfbff> GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE >> > >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: real memory = 536608768 (511 MB) >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: avail memory = 515444736 (491 MB) >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ACPI APIC Table: >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 3 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on >> motherboard >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on >> motherboard >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: npx0: on motherboard >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: npx0: INT 16 interface >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi0: on motherboard >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi0: Power Button (fixed) >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency >> 3579545 Hz >> quality 1000 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> >> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: cpu0: on acpi0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib0: port >> 0xcf8-0xcff >> on acpi0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: on pcib0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib1: at device >> 3.0 on >> pci0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci1: on pcib1 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: > Connection, >> Version - 1.7.35> port 0xece0-0xecff mem 0xfe2e0000-0xfe2fffff irq >> 18 at >> device 1.0 on pci1 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: Ethernet address: 00:12:3f:ec:f4:90 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib2: at device >> 28.0 on >> pci0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci2: on pcib2 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: mem >> 0xf4000000-0xf7ffffff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci2 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Unknown processor 100MHz, 48MB cache >> memory, optional battery not installed >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Kernel 4.1-0, Build 7406, S/N c540d4 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Supported >> Options=1097c >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhci0: >> port >> 0xcce0-0xccff irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb0: >> on uhci0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb0: USB revision 1.0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev >> 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self >> powered >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhci1: >> port >> 0xccc0-0xccdf irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb1: >> on uhci1 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb1: USB revision 1.0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev >> 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self >> powered >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device 29.4 (no >> driver attached) >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: > controller> >> at device 29.5 (no driver attached) >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device 29.7 (no >> driver attached) >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib3: at device >> 30.0 on >> pci0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci3: on pcib3 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: > Connection, >> Version - 1.7.35> port 0xdcc0-0xdcff mem 0xfdee0000-0xfdefffff irq >> 21 at >> device 2.0 on pci3 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: Ethernet address: 00:12:3f:ec:f4:91 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci3: at device 14.0 (no >> driver >> attached) >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: isab0: at device 31.0 >> on pci0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: isa0: on isab0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atapci0: > controller> >> port 0xfea0-0xfeaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device >> 31.2 on >> pci0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device >> 31.3 (no >> driver attached) >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: fdc0: port >> 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atkbdc0: >> port >> 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: kbd0 at atkbd0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port >> 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio0: type 16550A >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: orm0: at iomem >> 0xec000-0xeffff,0xcd000-0xcdfff,0xc9000-0xccfff,0xc8000-0xc8fff, >> 0xc0000-0xc7fff >> on isa0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pmtimer0 on isa0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ppc0: parallel port not found. >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sc0: at flags 0x100 on >> isa0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, >> flags=0x300> >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of >> probed >> irqs 0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio1: port may not be enabled >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: vga0: at port >> 0x3c0-0x3df >> iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2800115843 Hz >> quality 800 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, >> rule-based >> forwarding enabled, default to accept, logging limited to 100 >> packets/entry by default >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acd0: CDROM > N104> at >> ata0-master PIO4 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aacd0: on aac0 >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aacd0: 152554MB (312432384 sectors) >> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/aacd0s1a >> Aug 29 12:04:47 www kernel: em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex >> >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 20:23:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DEB16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:23:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2CE43D49 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:23:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71954730AD; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:23:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83444-10; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:23:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47726730BA; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:23:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4075.209.134.164.18.1139862072.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <3913.209.134.164.18.1139859433.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <4037.209.134.164.18.1139861758.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <4075.209.134.164.18.1139862072.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9FF3F032-55DB-4E8D-99C7-F23EF56BB356@netmusician.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:23:51 -0500 To: "Jerry Bell" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:23:55 -0000 Some software (such as VMWare) will only work with ACPI disabled anyway. Even in our Mac labs here, we disable all Energy Saver settings - it just isn't worth the hassle, especially when there isn't much to gain on a Desktop machine, IMHO. On Feb 13, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Jerry Bell wrote: > I will give that a try. > > Thank you for your help! > > Jerry >> I'm hardly on expert on these sorts of things, but I *believe* that >> ACPI is responsible for power management stuff, including possibly >> spinning down your hard drive after inactivity. Try restarting with >> ACPI enabled (which you can do on your boot menu), or disable ACPI >> within your BIOS for a while to see if this helps.. certainly can't >> hurt to try. >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 13, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Jerry Bell wrote: >> >>>> So ACPI is disabled? >>> I'm assuming it's enabled. Can that be a problem? >>> >>> >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD >>> Project. >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, >>> 1988, >>> 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: The Regents of the University of >>> California. >>> All rights reserved. >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 18 >>> 07:49:41 UTC >>> 2005 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: jerry@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz >>> quality 0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz >>> (2800.12-MHz 686-class CPU) >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 >>> Stepping = 1 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: >>> Features=0xbfebfbff>> ,P >>> GE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,P >>> BE >>>> >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: real memory = 536608768 (511 MB) >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: avail memory = 515444736 (491 MB) >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ACPI APIC Table: >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 3 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on >>> motherboard >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on >>> motherboard >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: npx0: on motherboard >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: npx0: INT 16 interface >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi0: on motherboard >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi0: Power Button (fixed) >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency >>> 3579545 Hz >>> quality 1000 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at >>> 3.579545MHz> >>> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: cpu0: on acpi0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib0: port >>> 0xcf8-0xcff >>> on acpi0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: on pcib0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib1: at device >>> 3.0 on >>> pci0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci1: on pcib1 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: >> Connection, >>> Version - 1.7.35> port 0xece0-0xecff mem 0xfe2e0000-0xfe2fffff irq >>> 18 at >>> device 1.0 on pci1 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: Ethernet address: 00:12:3f:ec:f4:90 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib2: at device >>> 28.0 on >>> pci0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci2: on pcib2 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: mem >>> 0xf4000000-0xf7ffffff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci2 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Unknown processor 100MHz, 48MB >>> cache >>> memory, optional battery not installed >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Kernel 4.1-0, Build 7406, S/N >>> c540d4 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aac0: Supported >>> Options=1097c >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhci0: >>> port >>> 0xcce0-0xccff irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb0: >>> on uhci0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb0: USB revision 1.0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class >>> 9/0, rev >>> 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self >>> powered >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhci1: >>> port >>> 0xccc0-0xccdf irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb1: >>> on uhci1 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: usb1: USB revision 1.0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class >>> 9/0, rev >>> 1.00/1.00, addr 1 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self >>> powered >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device >>> 29.4 (no >>> driver attached) >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: >> controller> >>> at device 29.5 (no driver attached) >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device >>> 29.7 (no >>> driver attached) >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pcib3: at device >>> 30.0 on >>> pci0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci3: on pcib3 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: >> Connection, >>> Version - 1.7.35> port 0xdcc0-0xdcff mem 0xfdee0000-0xfdefffff irq >>> 21 at >>> device 2.0 on pci3 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: Ethernet address: 00:12:3f:ec:f4:91 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci3: at device 14.0 (no >>> driver >>> attached) >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: isab0: at device 31.0 >>> on pci0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: isa0: on isab0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atapci0: >> controller> >>> port 0xfea0-0xfeaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device >>> 31.2 on >>> pci0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pci0: at device >>> 31.3 (no >>> driver attached) >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: fdc0: port >>> 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 >>> drive 0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atkbdc0: >>> port >>> 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: kbd0 at atkbd0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port >>> 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio0: type 16550A >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: orm0: at iomem >>> 0xec000-0xeffff,0xcd000-0xcdfff,0xc9000-0xccfff,0xc8000-0xc8fff, >>> 0xc0000-0xc7fff >>> on isa0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: pmtimer0 on isa0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ppc0: parallel port not found. >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sc0: at flags 0x100 on >>> isa0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, >>> flags=0x300> >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of >>> probed >>> irqs 0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: sio1: port may not be enabled >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: vga0: at port >>> 0x3c0-0x3df >>> iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounter "TSC" frequency >>> 2800115843 Hz >>> quality 800 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, >>> rule-based >>> forwarding enabled, default to accept, logging limited to 100 >>> packets/entry by default >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: acd0: CDROM >> N104> at >>> ata0-master PIO4 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aacd0: on aac0 >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: aacd0: 152554MB (312432384 sectors) >>> Aug 29 12:04:46 www kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/aacd0s1a >>> Aug 29 12:04:47 www kernel: em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex >>> >>> >> >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 20:34:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31ED716A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:34:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5967C43D4C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:34:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUN00CQD7U2JM60@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:34:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([213.187.181.70]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUN003DB7U15NC0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:34:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:34:49 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf In-reply-to: <44oe1bl1t8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> To: Lowell Gilbert Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213212443.02159628@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060211150451.02150468@broadpark.no> <44bqxcy70y.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20060213094013.02158150@broadpark.no> <44oe1bl1t8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File verification script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:34:52 -0000 At 16:24 13.02.2006, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >Kristian Vaaf writes: > > > I just want a simple script that uses cfv to verify MP3 albums, > > the same way I showed you my other script that uses cfv to seal > my MP3 albums. > >Well, cksfv seems to be appropriate for that application. > >I haven't actually tried any of these myself; >mtree(1) works fine for me. I know how to search the ports. Thanks though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 21:25:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D57216A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:25:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Kirk.Davis@epsb.ca) Received: from Exchange22.EDU.epsb.ca (exchange22.epsb.ca [198.161.119.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ACC43D49 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:25:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Kirk.Davis@epsb.ca) Received: from Exchange21.EDU.epsb.ca ([10.0.5.118]) by Exchange22.EDU.epsb.ca with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:25:05 -0700 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:25:04 -0700 Message-ID: <04C71268DFDAA8499EC1A248A44B6A2B019E50B6@Exchange21.EDU.epsb.ca> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems Thread-Index: AcYwoaOw+bjGrfkWQKWBpWY/+JPM/QAQMYMQ From: "Kirk Davis" To: "Greg Groth" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2006 21:25:05.0206 (UTC) FILETIME=[F4F53D60:01C630E3] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:25:08 -0000 Hi Greg, =20 > I'm trying to set up a FreeBSD 6.0 box as a mail server, and while=20 > everything seems to be working OK for the most part, I have=20 > run into two=20 > issues that I cannot resolve (I'm new to BSD, please bear=20 > with me). Install=20 > went as follows: Installed via FTP last night along with=20 > "src - Sources for=20 > everything", >=20 > IMAP-UW was compiled via ports with WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=20 > enabled (same for=20 > cclient), OpenSSL, Cyrus-SASL2 & Cyrus-SASL2-saslauthd were=20 > compiled via=20 > ports with no flags. >=20 > Sendmail was installed with the base install and recompiled=20 > (after SASL2 was=20 > up and running) with the following options added to make.conf: >=20 > # SASL (cyrus-sasl v2) sendmail build flags... > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=3D-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=3D2 > SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=3D-L/usr/local/lib > SENDMAIL_LDADD=3D-lsasl2 > # Adding to enable alternate port (smtps) for sendmail... > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+=3D -D_FFR_SMTP_SSL >=20 > I followed the instructions I found at=20 > http://www.bsdconspiracy.net/howto/sendmail.html, and had no=20 > problems with=20 > the install except for Sendmail. After recompiling sendmail,=20 > I added the=20 > following lines to the mail.server.mc file: >=20 > define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS',`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl > TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl > define(`CERT_DIR', `/etc/mail/certs')dnl > define(`confCACERT_PATH', `CERT_DIR')dnl > define(`confCACERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl > define(`confSERVER_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl > define(`confSERVER_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl > define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl > define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=3Dsmtp, Name=3DMTA')dnl This is your problem. The above line sets up the Sendmail daemon to listen on port 25 but the standard mc file distributed with FreeBSD also sets up a DAEMON port (it's at the end of the MC file). Here is what my DAEMON_OPTIONS lines look like. These should be the only DAEMON_OPTIONS lines in the mc file. dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=3DIPv4, Family=3Dinet') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=3DIPv6, Family=3Dinet6, Modifiers=3DO') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=3Dsmtps, Name=3DTLSMTA, M=3Ds')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=3Dsmtps, Name=3DTLSMTA, M=3Ds')dnl >=20 > After running (in /etc/mail) "make clean", "make cf", "make=20 > install", "make=20 > restart", SMTP no longer works, and I find the following in=20 > maillog and=20 > messages >=20 > Feb 12 20:25:55 mail sm-mta[1213]: daemon IPv4: problem=20 > creating SMTP socket > Feb 12 20:26:00 mail sm-mta[1213]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root):=20 > opendaemonsocket:=20 > daemon IPv4: cannot bind: Address already in use >=20 > When I try and stop sendmail, I get a message that the pid=20 > for Sendmail=20 > cannot be found. I end up killing the missing Sendmail daemon using=20 > KSysGuard >=20 > If I remove this line - "DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=3Dsmtp,=20 > Name=3DMTA')dnl" from the=20 > mail.server.mc file, make cf, make install, make restart,=20 > sendmail starts=20 > normally. When trying to access from another machine on my=20 > network, I can=20 > only connect on port 25 without a secure connection (I'm=20 > using Thunderbird=20 > for this), although SMTP-AUTH is working correctly. Have you tried to setup your mail client to connect to port 465? This is the smtps (SMTP SSL) port. > Any ideas on what I might need to do to get SSL / SMTP-AUTH=20 > working on SMTP?=20 > I took a look at the instructions in the handbook, but they=20 > were written=20 > for SASL1. Running netstat shows smtps listening on 465, but=20 > when I try to=20 > telnet to that port, the server drops the connection. Hmm... It should connect but you will not see anything since it is expecting an SSL connection. > My second problem is rather simple, after I create an IMAP=20 > folder, I am=20 > unable to delete it using a remote client. Thunderbird=20 > responds with "The=20 > mail server responded: RENAME failed: Can't create mailbox node=20 > /home/User/Trash/: File exists. Nothing shows up in any of=20 > the server logs=20 > though. I have not seen this problem although I have it setup for an office of Outlook users. I would check the permissions on the folders in the user home directory. This is where the IMAP user forlders are by default. I usually setup the clients to use the base imap if Mail and then create a Mail directory in the user home directory. That way the mail folders don't get messed up with the user stuff. >=20 > Hopefully this is the right list for these questions, if not,=20 > could someone=20 > please direct me to the correct one? Any advice anyone can=20 > give me on=20 > either of these problems would be greatly appreciated. >=20 ---- Kirk Kirk Davis Senior Network Analyst, ITS Edmonton Public Schools 1-780-429-8308 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 21:29:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661AF16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:29:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: from pinnacle.akherb.com (94-37-237-24.gci.net [24.237.37.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B7643D55 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:29:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@alaskaparadise.com) Received: by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 3D7355D96; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:29:25 -0900 (AKST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pinnacle.akherb.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from [192.168.2.131] (209-124-141-064.ip.arctic.net [209.124.141.64]) by pinnacle.akherb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107335D62; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:29:24 -0900 (AKST) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: Alaska Paradise Travel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:29:07 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <43F035CA.7030408@chrismaness.com> <44wtfzjin1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44wtfzjin1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5062693.9omNz2d4H6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602131229.21155.akbeech@alaskaparadise.com> Cc: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Flash Plugin for Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:29:27 -0000 --nextPart5062693.9omNz2d4H6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 13 February 2006 08:03, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Chris Maness writes: > > What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin Try my how-to located here: http://akparadise.byethost33.com/freebsd/linuxpluginwrapper_how_to.txt Beech =2D-=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - akbeech@alaskaparadise.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart5062693.9omNz2d4H6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD8Pox1HPO4IQJSE0RAg9pAJoCg6F6R2e51J5kBsaMXA7/vKb9MgCeMvcW PSUorHP+1sa6SslA9irr9oQ= =TwmA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5062693.9omNz2d4H6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 21:40:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3D316A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:40:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dscheidt@panix.com) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B353C43D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:40:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dscheidt@panix.com) Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B1013A9A1; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:40:53 -0500 (EST) Received: (from dscheidt@localhost) by panix2.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id k1DLesA16138; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:40:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:40:54 -0500 From: David Scheidt To: Robert Leftwich Message-ID: <20060213214053.GA20537@panix.com> References: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> <1139826617.10634.254226042@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1139826617.10634.254226042@webmail.messagingengine.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory leak? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:40:56 -0000 On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:30:17PM +1100, Robert Leftwich wrote: > From: Robert Leftwich > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:29:03 +0100, "Erik Norgaard" > said: > > > > Do you run other applications also? > > > > There was a discussion on CURRENT@ some weeks ago about a memory leak > > that turned out to be firefox with some extensions, updates are > > available now. > > > > Unfortunately no, its cli only, no x, pretty much just Postgres and > Python and C :-( I've seen (very, very, very, very) large memory leaks on long-lived Python processes. I haven't looked at it to figure out if it's python, some module, or the application doing something stupid. But the processes will grow until they hit their limits. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 21:46:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4DB16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:46:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3411343D4C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:46:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55425CB5; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:46:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66988-03; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:45:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5469D5C73; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:45:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4026.209.134.164.18.1139861525.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <9CB4E9E3-EE93-4E65-AD74-0ACC9B3C64FF@mac.com> <4026.209.134.164.18.1139861525.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1DFDCA44-74AC-475A-96A9-0E3AD5B492C4@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:45:55 -0500 To: Jerry Bell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:46:03 -0000 On Feb 13, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Jerry Bell wrote: > I didn't want to spam the link out, but it's www.musiclodge.com. I > will > gather the capture data from working and non working sessions and > send it > out. Well, I can confirm the behavior you've described. It looks somewhat like a stateful firewall or is in the way and is generating an RST, even while your webserver tries to generate a response. However, once the firewall sees the outbound traffic, it seems to create a dynamic rule which lets the traffic from subsequent connections through: 5-pan# tcpdump -tnXs 0 host www.musiclodge.com tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on en0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: S 2282569549:2282569549 (0) win 65535 0x0000: 4510 003c 4653 4000 4006 7328 c767 15ee E.. 199.103.21.238.50740: S 2634350592:2634350592 (0) ack 2282569550 win 65535 0x0000: 4500 0028 0000 4000 2506 d49f 3faf 642c E..(..@. %...?.d, 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 9d05 0000 880d 3f4e .g...P. 4......?N 0x0020: 5012 ffff 03bc 0000 0000 0000 0000 1b60 P..............` 0x0030: 2678 &x IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: . ack 1 win 65535 0x0000: 4510 0028 4655 4000 4006 733a c767 15ee E.. (FU@.@.s:.g.. 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4e 9d05 0001 ?.d,.4.P..? N.... 0x0020: 5010 ffff 03bd 0000 P....... 3-way handshake is completed here, next traffic should be from my machine making the "GET /", request, but instead your machine sends another ACK: IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: S 2238145710:2238145710 (0) ack 2282569550 win 65535 0x0000: 4500 003c 57fa 4000 3206 6f91 3faf 642c E.. 63.175.100.44.80: . ack 396204883 win 65535 0x0000: 4510 0034 4656 4000 4006 732d c767 15ee E.. 4FV@.@.s-.g.. 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4e 9d05 0001 ?.d,.4.P..? N.... 0x0020: 8010 ffff 8157 0000 0101 080a 451b adc7 .....W......E... 0x0030: 569b 6b77 V.kw Where did sequence # 396204883 come from? And your side follows up with a pair of connection resets, and a normal ACK packet, too. IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: R 2634350593:2634350593 (0) win 0 0x0000: 4500 0028 b6f6 4000 3206 10a9 3faf 642c E..(..@. 2...?.d, 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 9d05 0001 0000 0000 .g...P. 4........ 0x0020: 5004 0000 cb24 0000 0000 0000 0000 f3fa P.... $.......... 0x0030: 5489 T. IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: R 2634350593:2634350593 (0) win 0 0x0000: 4500 0028 4bfc 4000 3206 7ba3 3faf 642c E..(K.@.2. {.?.d, 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 9d05 0001 0000 0000 .g...P. 4........ 0x0020: 5004 0000 cb24 0000 0000 0000 0000 abb8 P.... $.......... 0x0030: c9be .. IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: S 2238145710:2238145710 (0) ack 2282569550 win 65535 0x0000: 4500 003c 3a9d 4000 3206 8cee 3faf 642c E..<:.@. 2...?.d, 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 8567 64ae 880d 3f4e .g...P. 4.gd...?N 0x0020: a012 ffff 9baf 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0301 ................ 0x0030: 0101 080a 569b 6ca3 451b adc6 bdd6 d7c9 ....V.l.E....... ...and my side closes, too. Something is badly confused. IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: R 2282569550:2282569550 (0) win 0 0x0000: 4500 0028 465a 4000 4006 7345 c767 15ee E.. (FZ@.@.sE.g.. 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4e 0000 0000 ?.d,.4.P..? N.... 0x0020: 5004 0000 a0cf 0000 P....... ------------------- When I repeat the connection attempt a few seconds later: IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: S 262625798:262625798(0) win 65535 0x0000: 4510 003c 46c8 4000 4006 72b3 c767 15ee E.. 199.103.21.238.50743: S 362624500:362624500(0) ack 262625799 win 65535 0x0000: 4500 003c e034 4000 3206 e756 3faf 642c E..<.4@. 2..V?.d, 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c637 159d 35f4 0fa7 5a07 .g...P. 7..5...Z. 0x0020: a012 ffff 169b 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0301 ................ 0x0030: 0101 080a 569b eb57 451b b055 55d6 9ceb ....V..WE..UU... IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: . ack 1 win 65535 0x0000: 4510 0034 46c9 4000 4006 72ba c767 15ee E.. 4F.@.@.r..g.. 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a07 159d 35f5 ?.d,. 7.P..Z...5. 0x0020: 8010 ffff 8157 0000 0101 080a 451b b055 .....W......E..U 0x0030: 569b eb57 V..W 3-way handshake finishes OK, this time your initial ACK is OK and includes a timestamp back. IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: P 1:17(16) ack 1 win 65535 0x0000: 4510 0044 46cd 4000 4006 72a6 c767 15ee E..DF.@.@.r..g.. 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a07 159d 35f5 ?.d,. 7.P..Z...5. 0x0020: 8018 ffff 8167 0000 0101 080a 451b b05d .....g......E..] 0x0030: 569b eb57 4745 5420 2f20 4854 5450 2f31 V..WGET./.HTTP/1 0x0040: 2e30 0d0a .0.. Here was my GET, which you then ACK.... IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50743: . ack 17 win 33304 0x0000: 4500 0034 052a 4000 3206 c269 3faf 642c E..4.*@. 2..i?.d, 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c637 159d 35f5 0fa7 5a17 .g...P. 7..5...Z. 0x0020: 8010 8218 be99 0000 0101 080a 569b eced ............V... 0x0030: 451b b05d db4e 4827 E..].NH' IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: P 17:19(2) ack 1 win 65535 0x0000: 4510 0036 46ce 4000 4006 72b3 c767 15ee E.. 6F.@.@.r..g.. 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a17 159d 35f5 ?.d,. 7.P..Z...5. 0x0020: 8018 ffff 8159 0000 0101 080a 451b b05e .....Y......E..^ 0x0030: 569b eced 0d0a V..... ...followed by a correct data response. IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50743: . 1:1449(1448) ack 19 win 33304 0x0000: 4500 05dc c865 4000 3206 f985 3faf 642c E....e@. 2...?.d, 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c637 159d 35f5 0fa7 5a19 .g...P. 7..5...Z. 0x0020: 8010 8218 2e5f 0000 0101 080a 569b ed01 ....._......V... 0x0030: 451b b05e 4854 5450 2f31 2e31 2032 3030 E..^HTTP/ 1.1.200 0x0040: 204f 4b0d 0a44 6174 653a 204d 6f6e 2c20 .OK..Date:.Mon,. [ ... ] Check your firewall, or see whether your ISP or whoever has put a HTTP reverse proxy in place which is breaking these connections. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 21:52:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424EA16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:52:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFBC43D46 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:52:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B593730BD; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:52:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84106-09; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:52:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2C7730B7; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:52:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <04C71268DFDAA8499EC1A248A44B6A2B019E50B6@Exchange21.EDU.epsb.ca> References: <04C71268DFDAA8499EC1A248A44B6A2B019E50B6@Exchange21.EDU.epsb.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <52BB6341-897A-4BFE-8264-41CAEBB23C95@netmusician.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:52:30 -0500 To: "Kirk Davis" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: Greg Groth , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:52:34 -0000 Hey Greg, Sorry if this completely throws a monkey wrench into your plans, but I feel inspired to interject since I once had a nearly identical setup as you... I switched to Postfix and Courier-IMAP since I found that performance of large mailboxes in IMAP-UW was pretty poor, especially over web- based email where messages are not cached. I switched to Postfix because it is so much more simple and straight forward than Sendmail. You should have no problems switching to Postfix, since it is basically Sendmail with a nicer wrapper/configuration. Just food for thought. On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Kirk Davis wrote: > Hi Greg, > >> I'm trying to set up a FreeBSD 6.0 box as a mail server, and while >> everything seems to be working OK for the most part, I have >> run into two >> issues that I cannot resolve (I'm new to BSD, please bear >> with me). Install >> went as follows: Installed via FTP last night along with >> "src - Sources for >> everything", >> >> IMAP-UW was compiled via ports with WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT >> enabled (same for >> cclient), OpenSSL, Cyrus-SASL2 & Cyrus-SASL2-saslauthd were >> compiled via >> ports with no flags. >> >> Sendmail was installed with the base install and recompiled >> (after SASL2 was >> up and running) with the following options added to make.conf: >> >> # SASL (cyrus-sasl v2) sendmail build flags... >> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 >> SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib >> SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 >> # Adding to enable alternate port (smtps) for sendmail... >> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -D_FFR_SMTP_SSL >> >> I followed the instructions I found at >> http://www.bsdconspiracy.net/howto/sendmail.html, and had no >> problems with >> the install except for Sendmail. After recompiling sendmail, >> I added the >> following lines to the mail.server.mc file: >> >> define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS',`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl >> TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl >> define(`CERT_DIR', `/etc/mail/certs')dnl >> define(`confCACERT_PATH', `CERT_DIR')dnl >> define(`confCACERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl >> define(`confSERVER_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl >> define(`confSERVER_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl >> define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl >> define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl > > This is your problem. The above line sets up the Sendmail daemon to > listen on port 25 but the standard mc file distributed with FreeBSD > also > sets up a DAEMON port (it's at the end of the MC file). > > Here is what my DAEMON_OPTIONS lines look like. These should be the > only DAEMON_OPTIONS lines in the mc file. > dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet') > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl > > >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl >> >> After running (in /etc/mail) "make clean", "make cf", "make >> install", "make >> restart", SMTP no longer works, and I find the following in >> maillog and >> messages >> >> Feb 12 20:25:55 mail sm-mta[1213]: daemon IPv4: problem >> creating SMTP socket >> Feb 12 20:26:00 mail sm-mta[1213]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): >> opendaemonsocket: >> daemon IPv4: cannot bind: Address already in use >> >> When I try and stop sendmail, I get a message that the pid >> for Sendmail >> cannot be found. I end up killing the missing Sendmail daemon using >> KSysGuard >> >> If I remove this line - "DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, >> Name=MTA')dnl" from the >> mail.server.mc file, make cf, make install, make restart, >> sendmail starts >> normally. When trying to access from another machine on my >> network, I can >> only connect on port 25 without a secure connection (I'm >> using Thunderbird >> for this), although SMTP-AUTH is working correctly. > > Have you tried to setup your mail client to connect to port 465? This > is the smtps (SMTP SSL) port. > > >> Any ideas on what I might need to do to get SSL / SMTP-AUTH >> working on SMTP? >> I took a look at the instructions in the handbook, but they >> were written >> for SASL1. Running netstat shows smtps listening on 465, but >> when I try to >> telnet to that port, the server drops the connection. > > Hmm... It should connect but you will not see anything since it is > expecting an SSL connection. > >> My second problem is rather simple, after I create an IMAP >> folder, I am >> unable to delete it using a remote client. Thunderbird >> responds with "The >> mail server responded: RENAME failed: Can't create mailbox node >> /home/User/Trash/: File exists. Nothing shows up in any of >> the server logs >> though. > > I have not seen this problem although I have it setup for an office of > Outlook users. I would check the permissions on the folders in the > user > home directory. This is where the IMAP user forlders are by > default. I > usually setup the clients to use the base imap if Mail and then > create a > Mail directory in the user home directory. That way the mail folders > don't get messed up with the user stuff. > >> >> Hopefully this is the right list for these questions, if not, >> could someone >> please direct me to the correct one? Any advice anyone can >> give me on >> either of these problems would be greatly appreciated. >> > > ---- Kirk > Kirk Davis > Senior Network Analyst, ITS > Edmonton Public Schools > 1-780-429-8308 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 21:54:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C90E16A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:54:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CCC43D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:54:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C904A5CB5; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:54:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29917-09; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:54:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133B35C73; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:54:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060213214053.GA20537@panix.com> References: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> <1139826617.10634.254226042@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20060213214053.GA20537@panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <010CAD73-FAA5-4468-B35A-6E526FF0CFDD@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:54:13 -0500 To: David Scheidt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: Robert Leftwich , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory leak? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:54:16 -0000 On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:40 PM, David Scheidt wrote: >> Unfortunately no, its cli only, no x, pretty much just Postgres and >> Python and C :-( > > I've seen (very, very, very, very) large memory leaks on long-lived > Python processes. I haven't looked at it to figure out if it's > python, some module, or the application doing something stupid. But > the processes will grow until they hit their limits. For contrast, I've got a Python-based daemon which handles 100K to 1 million logfile lines a day and spits them into a processing/ reporting system using either XMLRPC or SOAP, and it stays up for months without leaking memory or changing in size. As I said earlier, "top -o size" will identify the process(es) which is/are using excessive memory. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 22:00:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA8516A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:00:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net (smtp4.suscom.net [64.78.119.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A531343D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:00:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E847F15005E for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:00:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26915-01-11 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:00:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C5A62150075 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:00:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss [192.168.0.4]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1DM0mFg083404 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:00:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:00:51 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom In-Reply-To: <4026.209.134.164.18.1139861525.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> References: <9CB4E9E3-EE93-4E65-AD74-0ACC9B3C64FF@mac.com> <4026.209.134.164.18.1139861525.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060213165927.EA7D.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:00:59 -0000 Jerry Bell wrote: > I didn't want to spam the link out, but it's www.musiclodge.com. I will > gather the capture data from working and non working sessions and send it > out. > > Thanks! > > > On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Jerry Bell wrote: > >> It's hit or miss, but the first time someone visits the web site, > >> they get > >> a "server not found" page. On hitting refresh, they get the page - no > >> problems. If I wait a while and try again, I get the same problem. > > > > Path MTU problem? > > > >> The problem appears to be something in the initial communication > >> with the > >> web server. Using tcpdump, I can see that the PC connects to the web > >> server and sends the GET request, but the server closes the connection > >> abruptly. Comparing that flow to a normal session, I see that > >> there are > >> some extra packets between the initial SYN and the sending of the GET > >> phrase that do not exist during a successful session. > > > > The details would help. :-) Or you could tell us what the server is > > so we could try hitting it ourselves... > > > > -- > > -Chuck I just tried visiting the site five times in the past few minutes without incident. That probably does not help you very much though. I am using FF, the latest version if that means anything. -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 22:01:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56F116A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:01:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1601D43D48 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:01:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k1DM1CNr018058 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:01:12 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 166 Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (grobner2.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.119]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k1DM1BQA001326 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:01:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k1DM1AYl012868 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:01:10 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k1DM1AZM012867 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:01:10 +0100 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:01:10 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060213220110.GS4131@math.jussieu.fr> References: <20060210212512.GE22015@math.jussieu.fr> <20060211232241.GD17057@laverenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060211232241.GD17057@laverenz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.166]); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:01:12 +0100 (CET) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 43F101A8.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Subject: Re: pear problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:01:14 -0000 Le 12/02/2006 00:22:41+0100, Uwe Laverenz a crit > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:25:12PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote: > > > On a FreeBSD 5.4-p8 I've a problem to install pear ports. > > Do you use nss-ldap/pam-ldap on this machine? yes. > > > the ports install stop with core dump (php.core). > > > > Anyone have this problem ? > > Several people have reported problems like this, all of them use > nss-ldap. I could get around the problem when I disabled 2 php4-modules: > imagick and xslt (just commented them out in > /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini). Lots of thanks. Bests regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ime tage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Mon Feb 13 23:00:50 CET 2006 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 22:13:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A006916A422 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:13:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0FE43D46 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:13:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CADD33FDB; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:13:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.212]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:13:28 -0500 Received: by web3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 5AC7C259E3; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:13:29 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1139868809.6940.254283466@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: Mxuud0NAp0EpccUpj45bgXXAg7mtATD/qNmK/g6DnkIX 1139868809 From: "Robert Leftwich" To: "David Scheidt" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 5022 (F2.73; T1.15; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) References: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> <1139826617.10634.254226042@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20060213214053.GA20537@panix.com> In-Reply-To: <20060213214053.GA20537@panix.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:13:29 +1100 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory leak? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:13:30 -0000 On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:40:54 -0500, "David Scheidt" said: > > I've seen (very, very, very, very) large memory leaks on long-lived > Python processes. I haven't looked at it to figure out if it's > python, some module, or the application doing something stupid. But > the processes will grow until they hit their limits. What's your definition of long-lived? My scenario is that I'm processing a particular dataset in Python which is launched by a shell script, once finished (after 30-35mins) the Python app completes and the shell script launches another instance on a new dataset. All memory allocated by the finished Python app should be freed/made inactive shouldn't it? Here's some more data: After a reboot this is what top says: Mem: 45M Active, 13M Inact, 61M Wired, 4K Cache, 60M Buf, 2842M Free Swap: 4068M Total, 4068M Free which totals 3021M After 1 dataset it is: Mem: 107M Active, 1919M Inact, 158M Wired, 16K Cache, 214M Buf, 570M Free Swap: 4068M Total, 4068M Free which totals 2968M While running on the 6th dataset: Mem: 1032M Active, 1045M Inact, 260M Wired, 145M Cache, 214M Buf, 4664K Free Swap: 4068M Total, 108K Used, 4068M Free which totals 2700.6M Are my assumptions incorrect, should the totals displayed by top be at least approximately equal? Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 22:18:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFB516A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:18:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EC543D49 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:18:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-41-159.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.41.159]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1DMIui2016678 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:18:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <004801c630ea$3fa8b7a0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:10:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: horde on freebsd6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:18:59 -0000 Hello, I've got php4 and apache installed on freebsd6 with several php4 extensions. Now i want to install horde and imp to test them out while atempting to decide if horde would be suitable as a webmail solution. I try the install via ports, but pear always stops saying the port requires the cli or cgi version of php, but i have a conflicting port installed. I've already got php4 installed, does anyone have a workaround for this? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 22:37:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE0116A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:37:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D0943D5A for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094F221040F for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:25:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10002-01-19 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:25:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B43F2103AC for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:55:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss [192.168.0.4]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1DLt2rh083382 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:55:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:55:05 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom In-Reply-To: <200602131805.k1DI5X5v025606@clunix.cl.msu.edu> References: <43F0C6D4.1070207@chrismaness.com> <200602131805.k1DI5X5v025606@clunix.cl.msu.edu> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060213165322.EA7A.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD & Windows Boot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:37:01 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > If for what ever reason the FreeBSD boot loader does load windows, is > > there a way to repair the windows boot sector? I remember trying this > > in the past with ill results. > > Probably depends on what is wrong. > Probably there is some MS utility that can repair it. > Someone else will have to talk the MS stuff. > > Make sure you understand the different parts. > Your terminology wanders a bit. > > The FreeBSD MBR and not the boot loader would be the only part > that has anything to do with booting a Windos or any non FreeBSD OS. > I think that is what you mean by boot loader though. > The MBR only just recognized that the slice is bootable and reads > in the boot sector and turns over control to it. It does nothing > else with the Win sector or loader. > > ////jerry I could be wrong, but I believe using the MS version of 'fdisk' fixes the problem. Run this command from the C: prompt: fdisk /mbr See if that corrects the problem. -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 22:58:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3885616A423 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:58:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5448E43D53 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:58:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4742C5CB5; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:58:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22390-02; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:58:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F4E5C27; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:58:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1139868809.6940.254283466@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> <1139826617.10634.254226042@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20060213214053.GA20537@panix.com> <1139868809.6940.254283466@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5A1E3F19-24CD-42ED-A945-A37E57EB8748@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:58:07 -0500 To: Robert Leftwich X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Subject: Re: Memory leak? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:58:14 -0000 On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Robert Leftwich wrote: > After 1 dataset it is: > > Mem: 107M Active, 1919M Inact, 158M Wired, 16K Cache, 214M Buf, > 570M > Free > Swap: 4068M Total, 4068M Free > > which totals 2968M > > While running on the 6th dataset: > > Mem: 1032M Active, 1045M Inact, 260M Wired, 145M Cache, 214M Buf, > 4664K Free > Swap: 4068M Total, 108K Used, 4068M Free > > which totals 2700.6M Possibly your database is using lots of SysV shared memory, which would explain why "wired" is going up so much, otherwise perhaps something in the kernel is leaking. "sysctl kern.malloc" might be interesting to consider. > Are my assumptions incorrect, should the totals displayed by top be at > least approximately equal? Exclude the "buf" entry from your math, that will be closer. You should be looking further down at the SIZE column to see which processes are using so much RAM... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 00:00:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5236F16A44A for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D5243D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C441FD34579; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:00:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.212]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:00:45 -0500 Received: by web3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id D6037259F5; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:00:46 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1139875246.18972.254292031@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: vCXNWslnE175ZpKYpAN0y7fNUExgsXBH+TjaSzsVKy9e 1139875246 From: "Robert Leftwich" To: "Charles Swiger" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 5022 (F2.73; T1.15; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) References: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> <1139826617.10634.254226042@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20060213214053.GA20537@panix.com> <1139868809.6940.254283466@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5A1E3F19-24CD-42ED-A945-A37E57EB8748@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <5A1E3F19-24CD-42ED-A945-A37E57EB8748@mac.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:00:46 +1100 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Subject: Re: Memory leak? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:48 -0000 On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:58:07 -0500, "Charles Swiger" said: > On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Robert Leftwich wrote: > > Possibly your database is using lots of SysV shared memory, which > would explain why "wired" is going up so much, otherwise perhaps > something in the kernel is leaking. "sysctl kern.malloc" might be > interesting to consider. What should I be looking for? The maximum MemUse is devbuf 2039 8340K, the max InUse is sysctloid 3613 176K. > > > Are my assumptions incorrect, should the totals displayed by top be at > > least approximately equal? > > Exclude the "buf" entry from your math, that will be closer. You > should be looking further down at the SIZE column to see which > processes are using so much RAM... > I can't see anything that explains the discrepancy. Below is the top -o size after a reboot, followed by the current top after 8 datasets (the extra python process is the analysis app - at a low memory usage point): (Note that the original 2 python processes are web servers and that I have 3 postgres clusters running on different ports, pending a move to separate machines - assuming I can solve this problem) PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 599 msf 1 4 0 75256K 25408K accept 1 0:00 0.00% python 582 msf 1 76 0 53772K 5580K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 575 msf 1 76 0 53748K 5288K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 588 msf 1 76 0 53588K 5360K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 574 msf 1 76 0 53564K 5060K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 586 msf 1 76 0 52140K 14988K select 0 0:00 0.00% python 601 root 1 4 0 29388K 3944K sbwait 1 0:00 0.00% sshd 604 msf 1 76 0 29364K 3996K select 1 0:00 0.00% sshd 578 msf 1 76 0 29224K 5472K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 576 msf 1 76 0 29216K 5372K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 583 msf 1 76 0 20488K 5224K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 589 msf 1 76 0 20488K 4988K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 579 msf 1 76 0 20484K 5220K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 580 msf 1 81 0 19548K 5284K select 1 0:00 0.00% postgres 584 msf 1 77 0 19536K 5260K select 1 0:00 0.00% postgres 590 msf 1 76 0 19512K 5012K select 1 0:00 0.00% postgres PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 2256 msf 4 20 0 83228K 31876K kserel 1 0:01 0.00% python 2257 msf 1 4 0 56340K 19836K sbwait 1 0:00 0.00% postgres 582 msf 1 76 0 53920K 36916K select 0 0:11 0.00% postgres 575 msf 1 76 0 53748K 3948K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 588 msf 1 76 0 53708K 36704K select 0 0:03 0.00% postgres 574 msf 1 76 0 53564K 3856K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 586 msf 1 76 0 52140K 13912K select 0 0:00 0.00% python 2641 root 1 4 0 29388K 2876K sbwait 1 0:00 0.00% sshd 2644 msf 1 76 0 29364K 2904K select 1 0:00 0.00% sshd 578 msf 1 76 0 29224K 4140K select 0 0:02 0.00% postgres 576 msf 1 76 0 29216K 4048K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 583 msf 1 76 0 20488K 3940K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 589 msf 1 76 0 20488K 3808K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 579 msf 1 76 0 20484K 3896K select 0 0:00 0.00% postgres 580 msf 1 81 0 19548K 3960K select 1 0:00 0.00% postgres 584 msf 1 76 0 19536K 3936K select 1 0:00 0.00% postgres 590 msf 1 76 0 19512K 3828K select 1 0:00 0.00% postgres Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 00:02:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD6816A4CD for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:02:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C956843D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:02:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70AD313C7C0; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:02:56 -0600 (CST) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3F52213C7BF; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:02:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E50313C7BE; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:02:56 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:02:56 -0600 (CST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Dave In-Reply-To: <004801c630ea$3fa8b7a0$0200a8c0@satellite> Message-ID: <20060213180133.N8037@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <004801c630ea$3fa8b7a0$0200a8c0@satellite> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: horde on freebsd6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:02:16 -0000 > Hello, > I've got php4 and apache installed on freebsd6 with several php4 > extensions. Now i want to install horde and imp to test them out while > atempting to decide if horde would be suitable as a webmail solution. I try > the install via ports, but pear always stops saying the port requires the cli > or cgi version of php, but i have a conflicting port installed. I've already > got php4 installed, does anyone have a workaround for this? > Thanks. Not that I've done it, but /usr/ports/devel/pear/Makefile has this in it: WANT_PHP_SCR= yes And in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.php.mk there are these: # WANT_PHP_CLI=yes - Want the CLI version of PHP. # WANT_PHP_CGI=yes - Want the CGI version of PHP. # WANT_PHP_MOD=yes - Want the Apache Module for PHP. # WANT_PHP_SCR=yes - Want the CLI or the CGI version of PHP. # WANT_PHP_WEB=yes - Want the Apache Module or the CGI version of PHP. # You may combine multiple WANT_PHP_* knobs. So maybe it's as simple as: make install WANT_PHP_MOD=yes Maybe... good luck! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 00:10:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECC716A423 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:10:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9285E43D5D for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:09:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C33D34084; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:09:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.212]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:09:54 -0500 Received: by web3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id E02A225A11; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:09:55 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1139875795.19969.254293503@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: r94uxmOaiN8S8lvBfMsq4J8Yd50DPltMHzDElVzjpvOW 1139875795 From: "Robert Leftwich" To: "Charles Swiger" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 5022 (F2.73; T1.15; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) References: <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> <1139826617.10634.254226042@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20060213214053.GA20537@panix.com> <1139868809.6940.254283466@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5A1E3F19-24CD-42ED-A945-A37E57EB8748@mac.com> <1139875246.18972.254292031@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1139875246.18972.254292031@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:09:55 +1100 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Subject: Re: Memory leak? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:10:01 -0000 On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:00:46 +1100, "Robert Leftwich" > > I can't see anything that explains the discrepancy. Below is the top -o > size after a reboot, followed by the current top after 8 datasets (the > extra python process is the analysis app - at a low memory usage point): Oops, just noticed that the analysis app was at a *really* low memory usage point, i.e. it wasn't running at all, having spat the dummy on some bad data! So there wasn't any extra python app. Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 00:12:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E426C16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:12:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7B743D5F for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:12:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1E0BVUO074735; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:11:57 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43F12029.7020501@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:11:21 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave References: <004801c630ea$3fa8b7a0$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <004801c630ea$3fa8b7a0$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: horde on freebsd6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:12:49 -0000 Dave wrote: > Hello, > I've got php4 and apache installed on freebsd6 with > several php4 extensions. Now i want to install horde and > imp to test them out while atempting to decide if horde > would be suitable as a webmail solution. I try the install > via ports, but pear always stops saying the port requires > the cli or cgi version of php, but i have a conflicting port > installed. I've already got php4 installed, does anyone > have a workaround for this? > Thanks. > Dave. IANAE, but here are some ideas: 1. show us the error. 2. set "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" and try again. 3. uninstall the "conflicting port" and try again. 4. show us the error. 5. use PHP5, particularly lang/php5, which installs a CLI by default as well as the apache.so 6. format your hard drive and start over ... no, wait; that's not the FreeBSD Way(TM). 7. do some magic with configure statements. 8. show us the error? HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- Familiarity breeds attempt. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 00:50:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7A516A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:50:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DA943D58 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:50:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1E0otkN070347; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:50:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: "Steve Coles" Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:50:58 -0500 Message-ID: <2o92v1t78jpts7cd3k5kgg1s7cqfg4sn43@4ax.com> References: <028a01c630a1$72ca5b50$649b14ac@tripos.com> In-Reply-To: <028a01c630a1$72ca5b50$649b14ac@tripos.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP ATA woes on 6.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:50:57 -0000 On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:28:59 -0000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: > >Q: Is this a known bug ? >Q: If it is, is it fixed in -STABLE ? Not sure on either of the above specifically, but quite a bit of work has gone into IRQ routing and the ata subsystem since 6.0R. Your problem sounds somewhat similar to what I was seeing on a Dell 4way box back in August which was fixed in Sept=20 http://groups.google.ca/group/muc.lists.freebsd.current/tree/browse_frm/t= hread/54cf58899efae7e1/fe550105a6e0276a?rnum=3D1&hl=3Den&q=3Dfreebsd+tanc= sa+pci&_done=3D%2Fgroup%2Fmuc.lists.freebsd.current%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread= %2F54cf58899efae7e1%2F49d7837901cb3e5d%3Flnk%3Dst%26q%3Dfreebsd+tancsa+pc= i%26rnum%3D96%26hl%3Den%26#doc_fe550105a6e0276a regardless, there are a lot of bugfixes since 6.0 >Q: If so - when is a good cvsup date that gives me a fixed ata driver = with a >"stable stable" To today is quite stable. The FreeBSD folks are preparing for a release right now and what is in the tree works very well. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 00:56:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCE416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:56:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sequethin@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F34343D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:56:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sequethin@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v1so1255725nzb for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:56:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qeMdbM2XAGLPqpc/swGFpnixrMnLgt4DrdzsZbnH+p5UI/IhZHXWTDR7aFJNQTuChSt3+181Ek8O0CWI6yVc2FVXzF4becVSFgv060LiUZjHasxhThvAdQIwqvYGcxEP0Q7J+KqFePTwgN3u70fpKQhPBANPmz1YteUJkhUmDkc= Received: by 10.65.72.9 with SMTP id z9mr1371634qbk; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:56:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.143.9 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:56:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3060c2390602131656ha9478ddqacb0ff7dd1fc8bb2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:56:37 -0500 From: Mike Hernandez To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Logitech Dual Action Gamepad X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:56:38 -0000 Hello all, Just wondering if anyone has had success with this device on freebsd. It seems I can get the analog control to work but the "hat" (as it's called) doesn't. Mame isn't as much fun to use with the keyboard ;) Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 01:29:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4007016A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:29:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CAC43D79 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:29:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s18so1175833nze for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:29:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qRyc3xK2RoFDKDhCt2W/x58QKJMVnGeHl4ONcSw20rp92bW8yuDmRuBv9+PwmGqJoLyQ2QOSmLqog9Kl1p3J6vhUrr655ZSm1L0PFwYSTu6zQbJxtnPkNaxtYDZy6mMW+fG+R6SF9YIB1eN0oBP7MDURkD4aKBKNsGHuCSjakwo= Received: by 10.36.25.18 with SMTP id 18mr4004005nzy; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:29:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.17.6 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:29:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:29:45 -0500 From: Tsu-Fan Cheng To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: firefox core dump during saving X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:29:52 -0000 Hi, I am using firefox-1.5.0.1,1 on freebsd 6.0/amd64. Lately when I save the attachment from email, firefox core dumped. it happened right after I click on "OK" button on the pop-up that asked me whether to save it or to run the file with some app. Can someone point me a direction to fix this? thanks!! TFC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 01:38:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED7516A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:38:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@i13i.com) Received: from admin.i13i.com (admin.i13i.com [208.98.1.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D17FF43D5A for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:38:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@i13i.com) Received: (qmail 71551 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 01:47:38 -0000 Received: from mail.i13i.com (HELO webmail.i13i.com) (208.98.15.133) by admin.i13i.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 01:47:38 -0000 Received: from 201.155.124.120 (SquirrelMail authenticated user chris@i13i.com) by webmail.i13i.com with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:47:38 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <1370.201.155.124.120.1139881658.squirrel@webmail.i13i.com> In-Reply-To: <43F11FB2.7000105@mail.ru> References: <43F11FB2.7000105@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:47:38 -0600 (CST) From: chris@i13i.com To: "Maxim Vetrov" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER rule error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:38:14 -0000 > Hi, > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.0, IPFilter 4.1.8(416). > > Setting line for rpc outbound calls > > pass out quick on rl0 \ > proto udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 > > gives me this error: > > ioctl (add/insert rule): No such process > > What is the process i'm missing? > > Regards, > muxas > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hello, By default freebsd doesn't have any firewall's compiled into the kernel or loaded as kernel mod's so you need to add ipfilter_enable="YES" to rc.conf and type in kldload ipl so you dont have to reboot the machine and also make sure you add a simple rules to allow all or youll look yourself out as it defaults to deny all hope this help a bit. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 01:54:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC2616A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:54:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eeycw.albert@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598B943D53 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:54:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eeycw.albert@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so996263wra for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:54:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZyN1da+vpGNrAXc9/R3FfdBiIFyUWQNMrFESqALdRDZwC3oZTlnuloGoMFgfd5VV/38kPuRK7UtrX71esaK8PiS+O35SIiE1QKL0Jy7vVfiNaUAFabaxbitfHU27s7O9XdzATIS1I+4EqrzIio3jsyuMVmvJyansUFhYM8tIFSo= Received: by 10.65.236.12 with SMTP id n12mr1425136qbr; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:54:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.98.14 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:54:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7d3594220602131754q2717763cy@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:54:29 +0800 From: Albert yu To: Chuck Swiger , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <43F08018.8010902@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7d3594220602130132q2b19c55m@mail.gmail.com> <43F08018.8010902@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD installing on PC w/ Intel 64bit CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:54:34 -0000 opus, Thankyou alot for your help first. Finally i am seeking help from Google to find a PC that is not using 64bit CPU. Seems Dell Dimension 1100 suit my needs. My another concern is do the Intel 865 Chipset have VGA compatiable problem happen on FreeBSD 4.8. Some forum do say so, May I know do another tried to install FreeBSD in Dimension 1100 before ? Thankyou alot for your help again. >From Albert 2006/2/13, Chuck Swiger : > > Albert yu wrote: > > I have a question on Hardware compatability while installing FreeBSD 4.= 8on > > some newly built PCs. > > May I know is FreeBSD version 4.8 support Intel 64bit CPU w/ 915GV > chipset > > Motherboard ? > > I think the answer is no, I believe 64-bit support was added around 5.2.1= : > > http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html > > > As I am gonna run some programs that can only be installed on version > 4.8. > > And i am worrying the OS version do not work on this configuration. > > You should try to obtain newer programs. 4.8 isn't supported. > > -- > -Chuck > -- Have a nice day >From Albert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 02:07:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BF416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:07:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hartzell@alerce.com) Received: from merlin.alerce.com (w094.z064001164.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.164.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F3A43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:07:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hartzell@alerce.com) Received: from merlin.alerce.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merlin.alerce.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0AAB21B6; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:07:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from satchel.alerce.com (w092.z064001164.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.164.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by merlin.alerce.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5982165; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:07:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from satchel.alerce.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by satchel.alerce.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1E27j1G004267; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:07:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hartzell@satchel.alerce.com) Received: (from hartzell@localhost) by satchel.alerce.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1E27jFZ004264; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:07:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hartzell) From: George Hartzell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17393.15217.180510.93673@satchel.alerce.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:07:45 -0800 To: hartzell@alerce.com In-Reply-To: <17387.40069.340773.298703@satchel.alerce.com> References: <17387.40069.340773.298703@satchel.alerce.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about routing and an ssh based vpn. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: hartzell@alerce.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:07:47 -0000 George Hartzell writes: > > > > I have set up an ssh based vpn between a -STABLE laptop and a 5.3 > server. I can ping either end from the other. I'd like to route > traffic from the laptop to the public IP address of the server but it > doesn't seem to work. I can, as a sanity test, route packets from > the server to the laptop's ath0 IP address. > > I can't figure out why I can get it to work one way and not the > other. > > Help? > > Ok, I think that the *most* constructive comment might be something about pulling ones self up by one's own bootstraps..... Pithier possibilies leap to mind too. What I'm trying to do won't work. And, now that I see it I'm pretty much mortified that I even tried it, let alone asked anyone else. First, I establish an ssh connection to a machine (aka TheServer) and run a ppp session across it. Then, I try to add a route that sends all of the packets to that same machine (TheServer) down the tunnel. The problem is, of course, that they can no longer make it to the other end of the ssh session. Presumably it works coming the other way because the TheServer thinks that the ssh session is coming from the firewall's address and so it doesn't get confused.... Sigh. Bad geek, no beer. g. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 02:17:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F13816A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:17:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF13143D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:17:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([71.199.184.251] helo=[192.168.0.148]) by stelesys.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F8pkV-0007Vq-3T; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:17:03 -0500 Message-ID: <43F13D9F.5040606@stelesys.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:17:03 -0500 From: Jerry Bell User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Swiger References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <9CB4E9E3-EE93-4E65-AD74-0ACC9B3C64FF@mac.com> <4026.209.134.164.18.1139861525.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <1DFDCA44-74AC-475A-96A9-0E3AD5B492C4@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <1DFDCA44-74AC-475A-96A9-0E3AD5B492C4@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:17:04 -0000 Charles - thank you for your excellent investigation! I'm pretty sure that my colo provider isn't running a firewall (I've asked them not to, anyhow). I am running IPFW on that box, with the standard "allow tcp from any to any established" followed by the "allow tcp any to my_ip 80 setup". I've done that on other servers without it being a problem like this. I'm going to have the colo double check for router acl's or something like that in the morning. Since this is such an intermittent problem, I can't yet say that it's fixed, but I ran with the "disks being idled" theory and wrote a small script that creates a file and deletes a file every minute, and since that's been running, I've not seeing the issue repeat - but then this is not a very repeatable problem. Thanks again for your great assistance. Jerry Charles Swiger wrote: > On Feb 13, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Jerry Bell wrote: >> I didn't want to spam the link out, but it's www.musiclodge.com. I will >> gather the capture data from working and non working sessions and >> send it >> out. > > Well, I can confirm the behavior you've described. > > It looks somewhat like a stateful firewall or is in the way and is > generating an RST, even while your webserver tries to generate a > response. However, once the firewall sees the outbound traffic, it > seems to create a dynamic rule which lets the traffic from subsequent > connections through: > > 5-pan# tcpdump -tnXs 0 host www.musiclodge.com > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol > decode > listening on en0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes > IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: S 2282569549:2282569549(0) > win 65535 > 0x0000: 4510 003c 4653 4000 4006 7328 c767 15ee > E.. 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4d 0000 0000 > ?.d,.4.P..?M.... > 0x0020: a002 ffff 815f 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0300 > ....._.......... > 0x0030: 0101 080a 451b adc6 0000 0000 ....E....... > IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: S 2634350592:2634350592(0) > ack 2282569550 win 65535 > 0x0000: 4500 0028 0000 4000 2506 d49f 3faf 642c > E..(..@.%...?.d, > 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 9d05 0000 880d 3f4e > .g...P.4......?N > 0x0020: 5012 ffff 03bc 0000 0000 0000 0000 1b60 > P..............` > 0x0030: 2678 &x > IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: . ack 1 win 65535 > 0x0000: 4510 0028 4655 4000 4006 733a c767 15ee > E..(FU@.@.s:.g.. > 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4e 9d05 0001 > ?.d,.4.P..?N.... > 0x0020: 5010 ffff 03bd 0000 P....... > > 3-way handshake is completed here, next traffic should be from my > machine making the "GET /", request, but instead your machine sends > another ACK: > > IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: S 2238145710:2238145710(0) > ack 2282569550 win 65535 1453026167 1159441862> > 0x0000: 4500 003c 57fa 4000 3206 6f91 3faf 642c > E.. 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 8567 64ae 880d 3f4e > .g...P.4.gd...?N > 0x0020: a012 ffff 9cdb 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0301 > ................ > 0x0030: 0101 080a 569b 6b77 451b adc6 9345 1153 > ....V.kwE....E.S > > Interesting that the previous ack had no TCP options set, whereas this > one does include a timestamp in response. > > IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: . ack 396204883 win 65535 > > 0x0000: 4510 0034 4656 4000 4006 732d c767 15ee > E..4FV@.@.s-.g.. > 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4e 9d05 0001 > ?.d,.4.P..?N.... > 0x0020: 8010 ffff 8157 0000 0101 080a 451b adc7 > .....W......E... > 0x0030: 569b 6b77 V.kw > > Where did sequence # 396204883 come from? And your side follows up > with a pair of connection resets, and a normal ACK packet, too. > > IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: R 2634350593:2634350593(0) > win 0 > 0x0000: 4500 0028 b6f6 4000 3206 10a9 3faf 642c > E..(..@.2...?.d, > 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 9d05 0001 0000 0000 > .g...P.4........ > 0x0020: 5004 0000 cb24 0000 0000 0000 0000 f3fa > P....$.......... > 0x0030: 5489 T. > IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: R 2634350593:2634350593(0) > win 0 > 0x0000: 4500 0028 4bfc 4000 3206 7ba3 3faf 642c > E..(K.@.2.{.?.d, > 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 9d05 0001 0000 0000 > .g...P.4........ > 0x0020: 5004 0000 cb24 0000 0000 0000 0000 abb8 > P....$.......... > 0x0030: c9be .. > IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: S 2238145710:2238145710(0) > ack 2282569550 win 65535 1453026467 1159441862> > 0x0000: 4500 003c 3a9d 4000 3206 8cee 3faf 642c > E..<:.@.2...?.d, > 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 8567 64ae 880d 3f4e > .g...P.4.gd...?N > 0x0020: a012 ffff 9baf 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0301 > ................ > 0x0030: 0101 080a 569b 6ca3 451b adc6 bdd6 d7c9 > ....V.l.E....... > > ...and my side closes, too. Something is badly confused. > > IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: R 2282569550:2282569550(0) > win 0 > 0x0000: 4500 0028 465a 4000 4006 7345 c767 15ee > E..(FZ@.@.sE.g.. > 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4e 0000 0000 > ?.d,.4.P..?N.... > 0x0020: 5004 0000 a0cf 0000 P....... > > ------------------- > > When I repeat the connection attempt a few seconds later: > > IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: S 262625798:262625798(0) > win 65535 > 0x0000: 4510 003c 46c8 4000 4006 72b3 c767 15ee > E.. 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a06 0000 0000 > ?.d,.7.P..Z..... > 0x0020: a002 ffff 815f 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0300 > ....._.......... > 0x0030: 0101 080a 451b b055 0000 0000 ....E..U.... > IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50743: S 362624500:362624500(0) > ack 262625799 win 65535 1453058903 1159442517> > 0x0000: 4500 003c e034 4000 3206 e756 3faf 642c > E..<.4@.2..V?.d, > 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c637 159d 35f4 0fa7 5a07 > .g...P.7..5...Z. > 0x0020: a012 ffff 169b 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0301 > ................ > 0x0030: 0101 080a 569b eb57 451b b055 55d6 9ceb > ....V..WE..UU... > IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: . ack 1 win 65535 > > 0x0000: 4510 0034 46c9 4000 4006 72ba c767 15ee > E..4F.@.@.r..g.. > 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a07 159d 35f5 > ?.d,.7.P..Z...5. > 0x0020: 8010 ffff 8157 0000 0101 080a 451b b055 > .....W......E..U > 0x0030: 569b eb57 V..W > > 3-way handshake finishes OK, this time your initial ACK is OK and > includes a timestamp back. > > IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: P 1:17(16) ack 1 win 65535 > > 0x0000: 4510 0044 46cd 4000 4006 72a6 c767 15ee > E..DF.@.@.r..g.. > 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a07 159d 35f5 > ?.d,.7.P..Z...5. > 0x0020: 8018 ffff 8167 0000 0101 080a 451b b05d > .....g......E..] > 0x0030: 569b eb57 4745 5420 2f20 4854 5450 2f31 > V..WGET./.HTTP/1 > 0x0040: 2e30 0d0a .0.. > > Here was my GET, which you then ACK.... > > IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50743: . ack 17 win 33304 > > 0x0000: 4500 0034 052a 4000 3206 c269 3faf 642c > E..4.*@.2..i?.d, > 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c637 159d 35f5 0fa7 5a17 > .g...P.7..5...Z. > 0x0020: 8010 8218 be99 0000 0101 080a 569b eced > ............V... > 0x0030: 451b b05d db4e 4827 E..].NH' > IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: P 17:19(2) ack 1 win 65535 > > 0x0000: 4510 0036 46ce 4000 4006 72b3 c767 15ee > E..6F.@.@.r..g.. > 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a17 159d 35f5 > ?.d,.7.P..Z...5. > 0x0020: 8018 ffff 8159 0000 0101 080a 451b b05e > .....Y......E..^ > 0x0030: 569b eced 0d0a V..... > > ...followed by a correct data response. > > IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50743: . 1:1449(1448) ack 19 win > 33304 > 0x0000: 4500 05dc c865 4000 3206 f985 3faf 642c > E....e@.2...?.d, > 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c637 159d 35f5 0fa7 5a19 > .g...P.7..5...Z. > 0x0020: 8010 8218 2e5f 0000 0101 080a 569b ed01 > ....._......V... > 0x0030: 451b b05e 4854 5450 2f31 2e31 2032 3030 > E..^HTTP/1.1.200 > 0x0040: 204f 4b0d 0a44 6174 653a 204d 6f6e 2c20 > .OK..Date:.Mon,. > [ ... ] > > Check your firewall, or see whether your ISP or whoever has put a HTTP > reverse proxy in place which is breaking these connections. > > ---Chuck > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 03:21:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4C016A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:21:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lenzi@infopar.com.br) Received: from cwbgk1.k1.com.br (customer-200195196249.onda.com.br [200.195.196.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A257243D6E for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:21:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lenzi@infopar.com.br) Received: from webpratico.com.br (M199.28.cwbgk [172.16.199.28] (may be forged)) by cwbgk1.k1.com.br (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1E3LdaP031948 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:21:40 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from lenzi@infopar.com.br) Received: from server (server [192.168.1.6]) by webpratico.com.br (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1E3PBef090244 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:25:12 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from lenzi@infopar.com.br) From: sergio lenzi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <443bin2gxw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <1139858245.78805.40.camel@server> <443bin2gxw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:21:37 -0200 Message-Id: <1139887297.78805.89.camel@server> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: The FreeBSD 6.0 ISO cd... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:21:51 -0000 Em Seg, 2006-02-13 s 14:32 -0500, Lowell Gilbert escreveu: > sergio lenzi writes: > > > I need to make a new cd1 with xorg version 6.9.0 > > and some packages for my own use... but I was > > unable to rebuild the cd... with an 600Mb size... > > > > My question is: > > Where can I find a documentation about the way > > the FreeBSD 6.0 release cd1 is built.... > > "man release" Ok I try to investigate what the system does in a make release... the problem is that I do not have enough disk or cpu/memory for a complete build workd & make release.... I see that at some point in the Makefile it tries to execute a mkisoimage.sh from the i386 directory.... the same command executed against the original CD directory tree (produces the same 1052Mb filesystem...(of course, it does not fit on a CD).... Can someone point me another idea of how to "compress" the CD??? I tried the mkuzip but it result in a shell script.... that, will not boot from a "burned" CD.... Thanks for any help, Sergio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 03:35:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C49316A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:35:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gareth.reeves@widespreadsolutions.com) Received: from thurlow.textdrive.com (thurlow.textdrive.com [207.7.108.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9E343D5E for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:35:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gareth.reeves@widespreadsolutions.com) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (d53-64-144-227.nap.wideopenwest.com [64.53.227.144]) by thurlow.textdrive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAFEC9998 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:34:57 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <57CF42C6-2919-405B-A662-C5D0257FDBCF@widespreadsolutions.com> From: Gareth Reeves Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:34:55 -0600 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: /compat/linux undefined reference GLIBC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:35:13 -0000 Hi I am having some problems compiling and linking a very simple program that I wrote that uses some 3rd party libraries. They are written to run on Linux and are ELF. My understanding of all the things going on here is limited and I apologize for that now. The libraries execute fine but I am having problems building against them. I get a bunch of the following errors /opt/ito33/lib/libitoihg.so: undefined reference to `getenv@GLIBC_2.0' /opt/ito33/lib/libitoihg.so: undefined reference to `strcpy@GLIBC_2.0' /opt/ito33/lib/libitoihg.so: undefined reference to `free@GLIBC_2.0' /opt/ito33/lib/libitoihg.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_signal@GLIBC_2.3.2' My compile and link contains the -L/compat/linux/lib. This contains all of the libraries from adding the linux_base port. I dont know where to even start trying to figure out which files the GLIBC references should be in. Any help or guidance is much appreciated. Thanks GarethHi I am having some problems compiling and linking a very simple program that I wrote that uses some 3rd party libraries. They are written to run on Linux and are ELF. My understanding of all the things going on here is limited and I apologize for that now. The libraries execute fine but I am having problems building against them. I get a bunch of the following errors /opt/ito33/lib/libitoihg.so: undefined reference to `getenv@GLIBC_2.0' /opt/ito33/lib/libitoihg.so: undefined reference to `strcpy@GLIBC_2.0' /opt/ito33/lib/libitoihg.so: undefined reference to `free@GLIBC_2.0' /opt/ito33/lib/libitoihg.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_signal@GLIBC_2.3.2' My compile and link contains the -L/compat/linux/lib. This contains all of the libraries from adding the linux_base port. I dont know where to even start trying to figure out which files the GLIBC references should be in. Any help or guidance is much appreciated. Thanks Gareth Gareth Reeves widespread solutions (773) 259 0102 www.widespreadsolutions.com gareth.reeves@widespreadsolutions.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 03:36:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8351016A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:36:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A8C43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:36:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from ip02.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.10]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUN00073RB9SP40@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:35:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip02.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:36:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:36:06 -0400 From: Duane Whitty In-reply-to: <43F035CA.7030408@chrismaness.com> To: Chris Maness Message-id: <43F15026.1010909@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= References: <43F035CA.7030408@chrismaness.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060205) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flash Plugin for Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:36:52 -0000 Chris Maness wrote: > What do I use for a flash plugin for Firefox? The auto plugin installer > do-dad choked (I guess it was expecting linux) > > Thanks > Chris Maness > > _______________________________________________ This is what I am using from ports flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.13 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060204 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Shockwave Flash File name: libnpflash.so Flash Movie player Version 0.4.12 compatible with Shockwave Flash 4.0 Shockwave is a trademark of Macromedia GPLFLash homepage : gplflash.sf.net YMMV, --Duane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 03:50:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A01616A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:50:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 890E043D6E for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:50:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 36181 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Feb 2006 03:50:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TJn0u9FXvB+OQQijjAlZ90edaONXcG6BlLbK6Zquyn4bVllAHvwn9mPhrT22Dtfmv1jIzqFtbXSUVd4XwgHzVA5XTdIUa6/SJm7+Fq9xRSSEmA/EWmQmlmXaOYowU4lMjJtREzH90MdowjX+3KvXZkZOjZAlkXFBbZhyeXvJVQM= ; Message-ID: <20060214035019.36178.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [61.82.159.113] by web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:50:19 PST Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:50:19 -0800 (PST) From: Rob To: FreeBSD questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: dhclient and bootpd on same system OK? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:50:25 -0000 Hi, I have a home network with a router connected to the external internet, and four PCs on the home network. The router provides IPs with its DHCP server. (The router is a small commercial box skrewed to the wall). One of the PCs on the home network is a FreeBSD (6-Stable). This FreeBSD PC runs dhclient to get its IP configuration. So far so good. All other PCs on the network are Windows PCs, but have a BIOS that allow Network boots. Therefore I would like to set up the possibility to boot these PCs as diskless boxes from the FreeBSD PC, using the bootpd server. Hence, I'd like to make this FreeBSD PC a bootpd server. But it is already running dhclient. Would such a setup cause conflicts? Thanks, Rob. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 03:52:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B0216A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:52:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from porpoisepower@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2367F43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:52:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from porpoisepower@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j2so1155453nzf for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:52:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=F3bUfPHrCC+wqSGYat1L49H+ZqFqz4OMN8sYQQTii9d+VQyX4HxAQytN+s2bRMhbCV8p/DrUaKZCTFUJjis24rZ9xZquMFXoEgFRd06HVfXAVFCireb4Y7jITG2ZwsGLCGz2pe2ANmp5swL7noYgHc4nmMDzoZoMhrATc9X/TCw= Received: by 10.36.113.7 with SMTP id l7mr271134nzc; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:52:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.16? ( [70.226.145.199]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m2sm4240719nzf.2006.02.13.19.52.04; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:52:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F153E4.8090409@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:52:04 -0600 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Porpoise Power Subject: Wine Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:52:07 -0000 Hey all, I'm attempting to run Wine .97 on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine. It has problems because it wants to load heap to I thinx 0x80000000 or something. This seams to be a fairly well none bug caused by FreeBSD's nmap implementation. I've downloaded a couple different patches, but haven't installed them yet, for two reasons. 1. I don't know whether they work or not and I also am worried they may break something else. I haven't seen any documentation on how well they work, the documentation looked pretty sketchy. 2. I've no idea how to install a patch manually, I've always used cvsup for my updates. Anyways I was wondering if anyone can help me either, I. By sharing their experiences with these patches I'll list details on them below. II. Point me to a good tutorial on using these patch files. It's probably something very similar to OpenBSD's which I haven't played with in 2 years. III. Reveal that upcoming release will have a fixed nmap implemetation. thanks for the help. Jimi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 04:07:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE5D16A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:07:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9006543D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:07:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([71.199.184.251] helo=[192.168.0.148]) by stelesys.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F8rTW-0008Lr-OD; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:07:39 -0500 Message-ID: <43F1578A.8060803@stelesys.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:07:38 -0500 From: Jerry Bell User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry Bell References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <9CB4E9E3-EE93-4E65-AD74-0ACC9B3C64FF@mac.com> <4026.209.134.164.18.1139861525.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <1DFDCA44-74AC-475A-96A9-0E3AD5B492C4@mac.com> <43F13D9F.5040606@stelesys.com> In-Reply-To: <43F13D9F.5040606@stelesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:07:40 -0000 Looks like it's still an issue, so I'd say the firewall issue is still in play. If there is not a firewall/proxy in place, are there any known issues with IPFW (or anything else with FBSD) that could cause this behavior? Jerry Bell wrote: > Charles - thank you for your excellent investigation! I'm pretty sure > that my colo provider isn't running a firewall (I've asked them not > to, anyhow). I am running IPFW on that box, with the standard "allow > tcp from any to any established" followed by the "allow tcp any to > my_ip 80 setup". I've done that on other servers without it being a > problem like this. I'm going to have the colo double check for router > acl's or something like that in the morning. > > Since this is such an intermittent problem, I can't yet say that it's > fixed, but I ran with the "disks being idled" theory and wrote a small > script that creates a file and deletes a file every minute, and since > that's been running, I've not seeing the issue repeat - but then this > is not a very repeatable problem. > > Thanks again for your great assistance. > > Jerry > > > Charles Swiger wrote: >> On Feb 13, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Jerry Bell wrote: >>> I didn't want to spam the link out, but it's www.musiclodge.com. I >>> will >>> gather the capture data from working and non working sessions and >>> send it >>> out. >> >> Well, I can confirm the behavior you've described. >> >> It looks somewhat like a stateful firewall or is in the way and is >> generating an RST, even while your webserver tries to generate a >> response. However, once the firewall sees the outbound traffic, it >> seems to create a dynamic rule which lets the traffic from subsequent >> connections through: >> >> 5-pan# tcpdump -tnXs 0 host www.musiclodge.com >> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol >> decode >> listening on en0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes >> IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: S >> 2282569549:2282569549(0) win 65535 > 0,nop,nop,timestamp 1159441862 0> >> 0x0000: 4510 003c 4653 4000 4006 7328 c767 15ee >> E..> 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4d 0000 0000 >> ?.d,.4.P..?M.... >> 0x0020: a002 ffff 815f 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0300 >> ....._.......... >> 0x0030: 0101 080a 451b adc6 0000 0000 ....E....... >> IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: S >> 2634350592:2634350592(0) ack 2282569550 win 65535 >> 0x0000: 4500 0028 0000 4000 2506 d49f 3faf 642c >> E..(..@.%...?.d, >> 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 9d05 0000 880d 3f4e >> .g...P.4......?N >> 0x0020: 5012 ffff 03bc 0000 0000 0000 0000 1b60 >> P..............` >> 0x0030: 2678 &x >> IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: . ack 1 win 65535 >> 0x0000: 4510 0028 4655 4000 4006 733a c767 15ee >> E..(FU@.@.s:.g.. >> 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4e 9d05 0001 >> ?.d,.4.P..?N.... >> 0x0020: 5010 ffff 03bd 0000 P....... >> >> 3-way handshake is completed here, next traffic should be from my >> machine making the "GET /", request, but instead your machine sends >> another ACK: >> >> IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: S >> 2238145710:2238145710(0) ack 2282569550 win 65535 > 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,timestamp 1453026167 1159441862> >> 0x0000: 4500 003c 57fa 4000 3206 6f91 3faf 642c >> E..> 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 8567 64ae 880d 3f4e >> .g...P.4.gd...?N >> 0x0020: a012 ffff 9cdb 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0301 >> ................ >> 0x0030: 0101 080a 569b 6b77 451b adc6 9345 1153 >> ....V.kwE....E.S >> >> Interesting that the previous ack had no TCP options set, whereas >> this one does include a timestamp in response. >> >> IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: . ack 396204883 win 65535 >> >> 0x0000: 4510 0034 4656 4000 4006 732d c767 15ee >> E..4FV@.@.s-.g.. >> 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4e 9d05 0001 >> ?.d,.4.P..?N.... >> 0x0020: 8010 ffff 8157 0000 0101 080a 451b adc7 >> .....W......E... >> 0x0030: 569b 6b77 V.kw >> >> Where did sequence # 396204883 come from? And your side follows up >> with a pair of connection resets, and a normal ACK packet, too. >> >> IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: R >> 2634350593:2634350593(0) win 0 >> 0x0000: 4500 0028 b6f6 4000 3206 10a9 3faf 642c >> E..(..@.2...?.d, >> 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 9d05 0001 0000 0000 >> .g...P.4........ >> 0x0020: 5004 0000 cb24 0000 0000 0000 0000 f3fa >> P....$.......... >> 0x0030: 5489 T. >> IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: R >> 2634350593:2634350593(0) win 0 >> 0x0000: 4500 0028 4bfc 4000 3206 7ba3 3faf 642c >> E..(K.@.2.{.?.d, >> 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 9d05 0001 0000 0000 >> .g...P.4........ >> 0x0020: 5004 0000 cb24 0000 0000 0000 0000 abb8 >> P....$.......... >> 0x0030: c9be .. >> IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50740: S >> 2238145710:2238145710(0) ack 2282569550 win 65535 > 1460,nop,wscale 1,nop,nop,timestamp 1453026467 1159441862> >> 0x0000: 4500 003c 3a9d 4000 3206 8cee 3faf 642c >> E..<:.@.2...?.d, >> 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c634 8567 64ae 880d 3f4e >> .g...P.4.gd...?N >> 0x0020: a012 ffff 9baf 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0301 >> ................ >> 0x0030: 0101 080a 569b 6ca3 451b adc6 bdd6 d7c9 >> ....V.l.E....... >> >> ...and my side closes, too. Something is badly confused. >> >> IP 199.103.21.238.50740 > 63.175.100.44.80: R >> 2282569550:2282569550(0) win 0 >> 0x0000: 4500 0028 465a 4000 4006 7345 c767 15ee >> E..(FZ@.@.sE.g.. >> 0x0010: 3faf 642c c634 0050 880d 3f4e 0000 0000 >> ?.d,.4.P..?N.... >> 0x0020: 5004 0000 a0cf 0000 P....... >> >> ------------------- >> >> When I repeat the connection attempt a few seconds later: >> >> IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: S 262625798:262625798(0) >> win 65535 >> 0x0000: 4510 003c 46c8 4000 4006 72b3 c767 15ee >> E..> 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a06 0000 0000 >> ?.d,.7.P..Z..... >> 0x0020: a002 ffff 815f 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0300 >> ....._.......... >> 0x0030: 0101 080a 451b b055 0000 0000 ....E..U.... >> IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50743: S 362624500:362624500(0) >> ack 262625799 win 65535 > 1453058903 1159442517> >> 0x0000: 4500 003c e034 4000 3206 e756 3faf 642c >> E..<.4@.2..V?.d, >> 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c637 159d 35f4 0fa7 5a07 >> .g...P.7..5...Z. >> 0x0020: a012 ffff 169b 0000 0204 05b4 0103 0301 >> ................ >> 0x0030: 0101 080a 569b eb57 451b b055 55d6 9ceb >> ....V..WE..UU... >> IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: . ack 1 win 65535 >> >> 0x0000: 4510 0034 46c9 4000 4006 72ba c767 15ee >> E..4F.@.@.r..g.. >> 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a07 159d 35f5 >> ?.d,.7.P..Z...5. >> 0x0020: 8010 ffff 8157 0000 0101 080a 451b b055 >> .....W......E..U >> 0x0030: 569b eb57 V..W >> >> 3-way handshake finishes OK, this time your initial ACK is OK and >> includes a timestamp back. >> >> IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: P 1:17(16) ack 1 win >> 65535 >> 0x0000: 4510 0044 46cd 4000 4006 72a6 c767 15ee >> E..DF.@.@.r..g.. >> 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a07 159d 35f5 >> ?.d,.7.P..Z...5. >> 0x0020: 8018 ffff 8167 0000 0101 080a 451b b05d >> .....g......E..] >> 0x0030: 569b eb57 4745 5420 2f20 4854 5450 2f31 >> V..WGET./.HTTP/1 >> 0x0040: 2e30 0d0a .0.. >> >> Here was my GET, which you then ACK.... >> >> IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50743: . ack 17 win 33304 >> >> 0x0000: 4500 0034 052a 4000 3206 c269 3faf 642c >> E..4.*@.2..i?.d, >> 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c637 159d 35f5 0fa7 5a17 >> .g...P.7..5...Z. >> 0x0020: 8010 8218 be99 0000 0101 080a 569b eced >> ............V... >> 0x0030: 451b b05d db4e 4827 E..].NH' >> IP 199.103.21.238.50743 > 63.175.100.44.80: P 17:19(2) ack 1 win >> 65535 >> 0x0000: 4510 0036 46ce 4000 4006 72b3 c767 15ee >> E..6F.@.@.r..g.. >> 0x0010: 3faf 642c c637 0050 0fa7 5a17 159d 35f5 >> ?.d,.7.P..Z...5. >> 0x0020: 8018 ffff 8159 0000 0101 080a 451b b05e >> .....Y......E..^ >> 0x0030: 569b eced 0d0a V..... >> >> ...followed by a correct data response. >> >> IP 63.175.100.44.80 > 199.103.21.238.50743: . 1:1449(1448) ack 19 win >> 33304 >> 0x0000: 4500 05dc c865 4000 3206 f985 3faf 642c >> E....e@.2...?.d, >> 0x0010: c767 15ee 0050 c637 159d 35f5 0fa7 5a19 >> .g...P.7..5...Z. >> 0x0020: 8010 8218 2e5f 0000 0101 080a 569b ed01 >> ....._......V... >> 0x0030: 451b b05e 4854 5450 2f31 2e31 2032 3030 >> E..^HTTP/1.1.200 >> 0x0040: 204f 4b0d 0a44 6174 653a 204d 6f6e 2c20 >> .OK..Date:.Mon,. >> [ ... ] >> >> Check your firewall, or see whether your ISP or whoever has put a >> HTTP reverse proxy in place which is breaking these connections. >> >> ---Chuck >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 04:32:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE18D16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snnn119@gmail.com) Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEEB43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snnn119@gmail.com) Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x31so1022853pye for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:32:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type; b=SOO9OvVzI8JxgsH5yxllw8YVvv8ty6Fkz5KJ9AcIFY1qIP8lHNbAQkLoJhGRfB/YagmcGnVxlLLU+v44I/FKKBkxHTlIKPPLBVyFchuInrjRvv5ZUiUexSpaw17yzF4G0JK6nydwwyW3Vqn1MpWRLX9jsa9woksL3BsxCMJJFdU= Received: by 10.35.43.10 with SMTP id v10mr1016970pyj; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:25:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?222.187.43.150? ( [222.187.43.150]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m68sm390363pye.2006.02.13.20.25.53; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:25:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F159DD.3090305@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:17:33 +0800 From: snnn Organization: snnn User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051210) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, zh-cn, zh-tw, zh, fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms020309010804090009070401" Subject: WARNINGs about ipsec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: snnn119@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:32:30 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms020309010804090009070401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB18030; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. what does them meat? how to fix? thanks. --------------ms020309010804090009070401 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIQDjCC BSowggSToAMCAQICBAIAApowDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNV BAoTD0dURSBDb3Jwb3JhdGlvbjEnMCUGA1UECxMeR1RFIEN5YmVyVHJ1c3QgU29sdXRpb25z LCBJbmMuMSMwIQYDVQQDExpHVEUgQ3liZXJUcnVzdCBHbG9iYWwgUm9vdDAeFw0wMjA4Mjcx OTAyMDBaFw0xMjA4MjcyMzU5MDBaMIHcMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEXMBUGA1UEChMOQ29tb2Rv IExpbWl0ZWQxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJt cyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0 b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAyIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNDb21vZG8g Q2xhc3MgMyBTZWN1cml0eSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAPIMts+HhOoKcRRSLehXXElSOs/D8EJtYvL+puk+PHhkAw4gfmtraYeJVDgF9NrH BUAFGHd+/GuLDhyigsyshZs56ctLSBhIayjkwtFbrgOpfpgvTBNx37ApDE6qpjcmOLnQRFKC kD5wSNZ6mwkHvJTk9FUs8rcqvhyRHGqLg001bBDhc9oh2WLY8Rmw8ecgjbWXRyNLaoE1G69I 4DaokExNTOz1iM7GsdAv/3mQAdhRZOcvsQiNXc+t+rKAlqusi7VMtHTCRxPt6CMx9Cq5YRu9 zqRbNzG95Zyc+7IP18U7v8xaqw/IhkCJIqaQINOzbL4S8+MgLLvBrkNa2hZ26B8CAwEAAaOC AdkwggHVMEUGA1UdHwQ+MDwwOqA4oDaGNGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHVibGljLXRydXN0LmNvbS9j Z2ktYmluL0NSTC8yMDE4L2NkcC5jcmwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFDbg6HxtnUWR7pnlQnZNcLNQMKxe MIGSBgNVHSAEgYowgYcwSQYKKoZIhvhjAQIBBTA7MDkGCCsGAQUFBwIBFi1odHRwOi8vd3d3 LnB1YmxpYy10cnVzdC5jb20vQ1BTL09tbmlSb290Lmh0bWwwOgYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQMBMCow KAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWHGh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1AwgYkGA1UdIwSBgTB/ oXmkdzB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEYMBYGA1UEChMPR1RFIENvcnBvcmF0aW9uMScwJQYDVQQL Ex5HVEUgQ3liZXJUcnVzdCBTb2x1dGlvbnMsIEluYy4xIzAhBgNVBAMTGkdURSBDeWJlclRy dXN0IEdsb2JhbCBSb290ggIBpTArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDAyMDgyNzE5MDIyNFqBDzIwMDkw ODI3MjM1OTAwWjAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAeYwDwYDVR0TBAgwBgEB/wIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFAAOBgQA6HiRv2ts2bP46czndzWocaaEAH2/UrtUf1IgppSHCV/ZVezDn0mTWDsSqcDx2 dOIqrsdGZzKSyUvxp9fgVrz2chCdf7B11p1XtXGFqsQ6p0u47A/m0vj/tc3URSWs6ganirXN MiLkIZIb7840rjBEGu6bf/CUEYaKhxkBKDrPszCCBWwwggRUoAMCAQICEHFG+tApuIWvD5i6 NTcMcy4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5Db21vZG8g TGltaXRlZDEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1z IGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRv cnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDIgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxLDAqBgNVBAMTI0NvbW9kbyBD bGFzcyAzIFNlY3VyaXR5IFNlcnZpY2VzIENBMB4XDTA1MDIyNzAwMDAwMFoXDTA2MDIyNzIz NTk1OVowgdYxNTAzBgNVBAsTLENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrIC0gUEVSU09OQSBOT1Qg VkFMSURBVEVEMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6 Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAzIENvbW9kbyBM aW1pdGVkMRIwEAYDVQQDEwljeXBlciBzdW4xIDAeBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEXNubm4xMTlAZ21h aWwuY29tMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDgIsBVkpyGjF9zuorDtmolNMTA 447FTi+cGtUWb1xhx28f6GLHvpmiGXPfkLX5dkkfWBknD/gSMl30YjlP33wNXVtuReir2I5V nFFpBM39bB+Y+lzTy7LNXQUf0f9U3I8zGKLDrJr2x/Iznw8dYvgwpxUTmrvQU8ehD/LdqdyZ pQIDAQABo4IBsDCCAawwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUNuDofG2dRZHumeVCdk1ws1AwrF4wHQYDVR0O BBYEFN1iz3Ak8knF3+NHoCkbLTBYAGN4MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAA MCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjBGBgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGDCsGAQQB sjEBAgEBATArMCkGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh1odHRwczovL3NlY3VyZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQUzCB sAYDVR0fBIGoMIGlMDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJp dHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zLmNybDA6oDigNoY0aHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ2xhc3Mz U2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zLmNybDAtoCugKYEnQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18z QGNybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0MBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIFIDAcBgNVHREEFTATgRFzbm5uMTE5 QGdtYWlsLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAQrwhRcaz1AanCTlAQe2Inj8seYXLLPyf RBzF9/FtGjkM7levdkM3B/3937vgzsIiIkOl14mAoFiFStyhQe6Ig37yUTtvstqeDLNBcEm0 l8TsTf5r0oZ+xaYWicv3QRVxYCq2ioI0ka3pjacJCfKAC1ENwIh1Ms7cWLvYWZW1ZTo0p65z sHHlTkr4gT3zL0fje+tDlVVMroc3A5WONteWodLQUuSLJc3+DtOUdZLf3zhEbmQfKi9tJKox TxXeI2iz+e5Bmy42jq1fI5NS3oL9GCl91Bl3d9kwgZXwA9L2DRTM/uUmpCIDSUrwKCKrSppk 8IJ9JCdiC+dqlm/XzsendjCCBWwwggRUoAMCAQICEHFG+tApuIWvD5i6NTcMcy4wDQYJKoZI hvcNAQEFBQAwgdwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5Db21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEdMBsG A1UECxMUQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRp b25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsT FihjKTIwMDIgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxLDAqBgNVBAMTI0NvbW9kbyBDbGFzcyAzIFNlY3Vy aXR5IFNlcnZpY2VzIENBMB4XDTA1MDIyNzAwMDAwMFoXDTA2MDIyNzIzNTk1OVowgdYxNTAz BgNVBAsTLENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrIC0gUEVSU09OQSBOT1QgVkFMSURBVEVEMUYw RAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2Rv Lm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAzIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMRIwEAYD VQQDEwljeXBlciBzdW4xIDAeBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEXNubm4xMTlAZ21haWwuY29tMIGfMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDgIsBVkpyGjF9zuorDtmolNMTA447FTi+cGtUWb1xh x28f6GLHvpmiGXPfkLX5dkkfWBknD/gSMl30YjlP33wNXVtuReir2I5VnFFpBM39bB+Y+lzT y7LNXQUf0f9U3I8zGKLDrJr2x/Iznw8dYvgwpxUTmrvQU8ehD/LdqdyZpQIDAQABo4IBsDCC AawwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUNuDofG2dRZHumeVCdk1ws1AwrF4wHQYDVR0OBBYEFN1iz3Ak8knF 3+NHoCkbLTBYAGN4MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcG CCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjBGBgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGDCsGAQQBsjEBAgEBATArMCkG CCsGAQUFBwIBFh1odHRwczovL3NlY3VyZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQUzCBsAYDVR0fBIGoMIGl MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18z LmNybDA6oDigNoY0aHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2 aWNlc18zLmNybDAtoCugKYEnQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zQGNybC5jb21vZG8u bmV0MBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIFIDAcBgNVHREEFTATgRFzbm5uMTE5QGdtYWlsLmNvbTAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAQrwhRcaz1AanCTlAQe2Inj8seYXLLPyfRBzF9/FtGjkM7lev dkM3B/3937vgzsIiIkOl14mAoFiFStyhQe6Ig37yUTtvstqeDLNBcEm0l8TsTf5r0oZ+xaYW icv3QRVxYCq2ioI0ka3pjacJCfKAC1ENwIh1Ms7cWLvYWZW1ZTo0p65zsHHlTkr4gT3zL0fj e+tDlVVMroc3A5WONteWodLQUuSLJc3+DtOUdZLf3zhEbmQfKi9tJKoxTxXeI2iz+e5Bmy42 jq1fI5NS3oL9GCl91Bl3d9kwgZXwA9L2DRTM/uUmpCIDSUrwKCKrSppk8IJ9JCdiC+dqlm/X zsendjGCBFswggRXAgEBMIHxMIHcMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEXMBUGA1UEChMOQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBh bmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5 MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAyIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNDb21vZG8gQ2xh c3MgMyBTZWN1cml0eSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBDQQIQcUb60Cm4ha8PmLo1NwxzLjAJBgUrDgMCGgUA oIICvzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNjAyMTQw NDE3MzNaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBStkZ1F0rRawX5cZVIan59JJNxC6TBSBgkqhkiG9w0B CQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUr DgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDCCAQIGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGB9DCB8TCB3DELMAkGA1UEBhMC R0IxFzAVBgNVBAoTDkNvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDb21vZG8gVHJ1c3QgTmV0 d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9VGVybXMgYW5kIENvbmRpdGlvbnMgb2YgdXNlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3 LmNvbW9kby5uZXQvcmVwb3NpdG9yeTEfMB0GA1UECxMWKGMpMjAwMiBDb21vZG8gTGltaXRl ZDEsMCoGA1UEAxMjQ29tb2RvIENsYXNzIDMgU2VjdXJpdHkgU2VydmljZXMgQ0ECEHFG+tAp uIWvD5i6NTcMcy4wggEEBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGB9KCB8TCB3DELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxFzAV BgNVBAoTDkNvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDb21vZG8gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFG MEQGA1UECxM9VGVybXMgYW5kIENvbmRpdGlvbnMgb2YgdXNlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNvbW9k by5uZXQvcmVwb3NpdG9yeTEfMB0GA1UECxMWKGMpMjAwMiBDb21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEsMCoG A1UEAxMjQ29tb2RvIENsYXNzIDMgU2VjdXJpdHkgU2VydmljZXMgQ0ECEHFG+tApuIWvD5i6 NTcMcy4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYCYyuzDV9O3fT+S4lkHiyCB+NZlmtwOPCPP8cIcXUy6 z7LwDp9w7jWlh7CqAD3XiBYBDhHzbDN5RmML14UFpLO1YEwxid4i2d0bUxQjez3oW+ASyXE8 8kLxC96zK3YHi32Keaq8W/G/AEjUA91v08yvFOepJp0puvu7GFPy3eoe+wAAAAAAAA== --------------ms020309010804090009070401-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 04:32:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C8A16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:32:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snnn119@gmail.com) Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62C243D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:32:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snnn119@gmail.com) Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z59so1008082pyg for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:32:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type; b=WoTwes/o1YyE8br3qWF8QxE0Q53YMXapQTOeKG/YHHzG3nc0jDOnURaptJG8j8txJfJf9j1Zq/o01PYZE2GMSuxfsNVKxKglTitbcT4S27j+HEDB7/byErHCgnGc8MErJ0eMNimakwTvSRZNnqQOywDc9y5qHdo7sygzCXdriIs= Received: by 10.35.99.14 with SMTP id b14mr1019894pym; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:26:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?222.187.43.150? ( [222.187.43.150]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id v50sm352194pyv.2006.02.13.20.25.58; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:26:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F15AC9.2020402@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:21:29 +0800 From: snnn Organization: snnn User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051210) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, zh-cn, zh-tw, zh, fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms020901000603030000060604" Subject: font rendereralready registered X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: snnn119@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:32:33 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms020901000603030000060604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB18030; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Warning: font renderer for ".pcf" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".pcf.Z" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".pcf.gz" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".snf" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".snf.Z" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".snf.gz" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".bdf" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".bdf.Z" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".bdf.gz" already registered at priority 0 Warning: font renderer for ".pmf" already registered at priority 0 These warnings come out every day when I init X. How to fix? thank you. --------------ms020901000603030000060604 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIQDjCC BSowggSToAMCAQICBAIAApowDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNV BAoTD0dURSBDb3Jwb3JhdGlvbjEnMCUGA1UECxMeR1RFIEN5YmVyVHJ1c3QgU29sdXRpb25z LCBJbmMuMSMwIQYDVQQDExpHVEUgQ3liZXJUcnVzdCBHbG9iYWwgUm9vdDAeFw0wMjA4Mjcx OTAyMDBaFw0xMjA4MjcyMzU5MDBaMIHcMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEXMBUGA1UEChMOQ29tb2Rv IExpbWl0ZWQxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJt cyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0 b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAyIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNDb21vZG8g Q2xhc3MgMyBTZWN1cml0eSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAPIMts+HhOoKcRRSLehXXElSOs/D8EJtYvL+puk+PHhkAw4gfmtraYeJVDgF9NrH BUAFGHd+/GuLDhyigsyshZs56ctLSBhIayjkwtFbrgOpfpgvTBNx37ApDE6qpjcmOLnQRFKC kD5wSNZ6mwkHvJTk9FUs8rcqvhyRHGqLg001bBDhc9oh2WLY8Rmw8ecgjbWXRyNLaoE1G69I 4DaokExNTOz1iM7GsdAv/3mQAdhRZOcvsQiNXc+t+rKAlqusi7VMtHTCRxPt6CMx9Cq5YRu9 zqRbNzG95Zyc+7IP18U7v8xaqw/IhkCJIqaQINOzbL4S8+MgLLvBrkNa2hZ26B8CAwEAAaOC AdkwggHVMEUGA1UdHwQ+MDwwOqA4oDaGNGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHVibGljLXRydXN0LmNvbS9j Z2ktYmluL0NSTC8yMDE4L2NkcC5jcmwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFDbg6HxtnUWR7pnlQnZNcLNQMKxe MIGSBgNVHSAEgYowgYcwSQYKKoZIhvhjAQIBBTA7MDkGCCsGAQUFBwIBFi1odHRwOi8vd3d3 LnB1YmxpYy10cnVzdC5jb20vQ1BTL09tbmlSb290Lmh0bWwwOgYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQMBMCow KAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWHGh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1AwgYkGA1UdIwSBgTB/ oXmkdzB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEYMBYGA1UEChMPR1RFIENvcnBvcmF0aW9uMScwJQYDVQQL Ex5HVEUgQ3liZXJUcnVzdCBTb2x1dGlvbnMsIEluYy4xIzAhBgNVBAMTGkdURSBDeWJlclRy dXN0IEdsb2JhbCBSb290ggIBpTArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDAyMDgyNzE5MDIyNFqBDzIwMDkw ODI3MjM1OTAwWjAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAeYwDwYDVR0TBAgwBgEB/wIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFAAOBgQA6HiRv2ts2bP46czndzWocaaEAH2/UrtUf1IgppSHCV/ZVezDn0mTWDsSqcDx2 dOIqrsdGZzKSyUvxp9fgVrz2chCdf7B11p1XtXGFqsQ6p0u47A/m0vj/tc3URSWs6ganirXN MiLkIZIb7840rjBEGu6bf/CUEYaKhxkBKDrPszCCBWwwggRUoAMCAQICEHFG+tApuIWvD5i6 NTcMcy4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5Db21vZG8g TGltaXRlZDEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1z IGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRv cnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDIgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxLDAqBgNVBAMTI0NvbW9kbyBD bGFzcyAzIFNlY3VyaXR5IFNlcnZpY2VzIENBMB4XDTA1MDIyNzAwMDAwMFoXDTA2MDIyNzIz NTk1OVowgdYxNTAzBgNVBAsTLENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrIC0gUEVSU09OQSBOT1Qg VkFMSURBVEVEMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6 Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAzIENvbW9kbyBM aW1pdGVkMRIwEAYDVQQDEwljeXBlciBzdW4xIDAeBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEXNubm4xMTlAZ21h aWwuY29tMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDgIsBVkpyGjF9zuorDtmolNMTA 447FTi+cGtUWb1xhx28f6GLHvpmiGXPfkLX5dkkfWBknD/gSMl30YjlP33wNXVtuReir2I5V nFFpBM39bB+Y+lzTy7LNXQUf0f9U3I8zGKLDrJr2x/Iznw8dYvgwpxUTmrvQU8ehD/LdqdyZ pQIDAQABo4IBsDCCAawwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUNuDofG2dRZHumeVCdk1ws1AwrF4wHQYDVR0O BBYEFN1iz3Ak8knF3+NHoCkbLTBYAGN4MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAA MCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjBGBgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGDCsGAQQB sjEBAgEBATArMCkGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh1odHRwczovL3NlY3VyZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQUzCB sAYDVR0fBIGoMIGlMDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJp dHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zLmNybDA6oDigNoY0aHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ2xhc3Mz U2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zLmNybDAtoCugKYEnQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18z QGNybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0MBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIFIDAcBgNVHREEFTATgRFzbm5uMTE5 QGdtYWlsLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAQrwhRcaz1AanCTlAQe2Inj8seYXLLPyf RBzF9/FtGjkM7levdkM3B/3937vgzsIiIkOl14mAoFiFStyhQe6Ig37yUTtvstqeDLNBcEm0 l8TsTf5r0oZ+xaYWicv3QRVxYCq2ioI0ka3pjacJCfKAC1ENwIh1Ms7cWLvYWZW1ZTo0p65z sHHlTkr4gT3zL0fje+tDlVVMroc3A5WONteWodLQUuSLJc3+DtOUdZLf3zhEbmQfKi9tJKox TxXeI2iz+e5Bmy42jq1fI5NS3oL9GCl91Bl3d9kwgZXwA9L2DRTM/uUmpCIDSUrwKCKrSppk 8IJ9JCdiC+dqlm/XzsendjCCBWwwggRUoAMCAQICEHFG+tApuIWvD5i6NTcMcy4wDQYJKoZI hvcNAQEFBQAwgdwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5Db21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEdMBsG A1UECxMUQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRp b25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsT FihjKTIwMDIgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxLDAqBgNVBAMTI0NvbW9kbyBDbGFzcyAzIFNlY3Vy aXR5IFNlcnZpY2VzIENBMB4XDTA1MDIyNzAwMDAwMFoXDTA2MDIyNzIzNTk1OVowgdYxNTAz BgNVBAsTLENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrIC0gUEVSU09OQSBOT1QgVkFMSURBVEVEMUYw RAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2Rv Lm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAzIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMRIwEAYD VQQDEwljeXBlciBzdW4xIDAeBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEXNubm4xMTlAZ21haWwuY29tMIGfMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDgIsBVkpyGjF9zuorDtmolNMTA447FTi+cGtUWb1xh x28f6GLHvpmiGXPfkLX5dkkfWBknD/gSMl30YjlP33wNXVtuReir2I5VnFFpBM39bB+Y+lzT y7LNXQUf0f9U3I8zGKLDrJr2x/Iznw8dYvgwpxUTmrvQU8ehD/LdqdyZpQIDAQABo4IBsDCC AawwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUNuDofG2dRZHumeVCdk1ws1AwrF4wHQYDVR0OBBYEFN1iz3Ak8knF 3+NHoCkbLTBYAGN4MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcG CCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjBGBgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGDCsGAQQBsjEBAgEBATArMCkG CCsGAQUFBwIBFh1odHRwczovL3NlY3VyZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQUzCBsAYDVR0fBIGoMIGl MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18z LmNybDA6oDigNoY0aHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2 aWNlc18zLmNybDAtoCugKYEnQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zQGNybC5jb21vZG8u bmV0MBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIFIDAcBgNVHREEFTATgRFzbm5uMTE5QGdtYWlsLmNvbTAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAQrwhRcaz1AanCTlAQe2Inj8seYXLLPyfRBzF9/FtGjkM7lev dkM3B/3937vgzsIiIkOl14mAoFiFStyhQe6Ig37yUTtvstqeDLNBcEm0l8TsTf5r0oZ+xaYW icv3QRVxYCq2ioI0ka3pjacJCfKAC1ENwIh1Ms7cWLvYWZW1ZTo0p65zsHHlTkr4gT3zL0fj e+tDlVVMroc3A5WONteWodLQUuSLJc3+DtOUdZLf3zhEbmQfKi9tJKoxTxXeI2iz+e5Bmy42 jq1fI5NS3oL9GCl91Bl3d9kwgZXwA9L2DRTM/uUmpCIDSUrwKCKrSppk8IJ9JCdiC+dqlm/X zsendjGCBFswggRXAgEBMIHxMIHcMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEXMBUGA1UEChMOQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBh bmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5 MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAyIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNDb21vZG8gQ2xh c3MgMyBTZWN1cml0eSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBDQQIQcUb60Cm4ha8PmLo1NwxzLjAJBgUrDgMCGgUA oIICvzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNjAyMTQw NDIxMjlaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBSgHgC06WDfIXVLqxl2iQVgbx7tZjBSBgkqhkiG9w0B CQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUr DgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDCCAQIGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGB9DCB8TCB3DELMAkGA1UEBhMC R0IxFzAVBgNVBAoTDkNvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDb21vZG8gVHJ1c3QgTmV0 d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9VGVybXMgYW5kIENvbmRpdGlvbnMgb2YgdXNlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3 LmNvbW9kby5uZXQvcmVwb3NpdG9yeTEfMB0GA1UECxMWKGMpMjAwMiBDb21vZG8gTGltaXRl ZDEsMCoGA1UEAxMjQ29tb2RvIENsYXNzIDMgU2VjdXJpdHkgU2VydmljZXMgQ0ECEHFG+tAp uIWvD5i6NTcMcy4wggEEBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGB9KCB8TCB3DELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxFzAV BgNVBAoTDkNvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDb21vZG8gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFG MEQGA1UECxM9VGVybXMgYW5kIENvbmRpdGlvbnMgb2YgdXNlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNvbW9k by5uZXQvcmVwb3NpdG9yeTEfMB0GA1UECxMWKGMpMjAwMiBDb21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEsMCoG A1UEAxMjQ29tb2RvIENsYXNzIDMgU2VjdXJpdHkgU2VydmljZXMgQ0ECEHFG+tApuIWvD5i6 NTcMcy4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYBNCY2vNwd7DgjSpl88cixW5lM7z4SVER+U3Q5/F7W0 JODlI7tuztsx/bao/gaNhev+RaLiIffruXq+VPZzk3ouDwCb6ajYECb6/y/QSZgOeC2r/Ucc wKWaT90yoJbpOpXWPVuU54JW1nyi9dE2EjhwUkbDAua1t6LNIQIrFOIK8QAAAAAAAA== --------------ms020901000603030000060604-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 04:32:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C9116A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:32:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snnn119@gmail.com) Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B1043D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:32:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snnn119@gmail.com) Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s49so997344pyc for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:32:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type; b=GZt15wFGtj/S437FImQVw44Zk2685CZ9hMn4OC+rrMA0MJ25saK+6KRACyDX92RJP/10iX8nEDVNJ9KwNOQeEGliQEMWYj/qQZpLx7iyam8cQaEJVL8QFwgBmLbwMbb1NEXpaQxhsZfvQSoWjk3eMKqSXLKGQJ0zZobhSIZP4k4= Received: by 10.35.18.4 with SMTP id v4mr870508pyi; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:26:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?222.187.43.150? ( [222.187.43.150]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id w28sm382025pyc.2006.02.13.20.26.02; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:26:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F15B54.7070301@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:23:48 +0800 From: snnn Organization: snnn User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051210) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, zh-cn, zh-tw, zh, fr-fr, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms070802020407000201010800" Subject: How can I use joystick under freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: snnn119@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:32:51 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070802020407000201010800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB18030; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit $ dmesg | grep -i joy 139:uhid0: GreenAsia Inc. USB Joystick, rev 1.00/1.07, addr 2, iclass 3/0 when booting,the kernel detected it. but I can not use it under games.e.g.port: emulators/gens --------------ms070802020407000201010800 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIQDjCC BSowggSToAMCAQICBAIAApowDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwdTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNV BAoTD0dURSBDb3Jwb3JhdGlvbjEnMCUGA1UECxMeR1RFIEN5YmVyVHJ1c3QgU29sdXRpb25z LCBJbmMuMSMwIQYDVQQDExpHVEUgQ3liZXJUcnVzdCBHbG9iYWwgUm9vdDAeFw0wMjA4Mjcx OTAyMDBaFw0xMjA4MjcyMzU5MDBaMIHcMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEXMBUGA1UEChMOQ29tb2Rv IExpbWl0ZWQxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJt cyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0 b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAyIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNDb21vZG8g Q2xhc3MgMyBTZWN1cml0eSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAPIMts+HhOoKcRRSLehXXElSOs/D8EJtYvL+puk+PHhkAw4gfmtraYeJVDgF9NrH BUAFGHd+/GuLDhyigsyshZs56ctLSBhIayjkwtFbrgOpfpgvTBNx37ApDE6qpjcmOLnQRFKC kD5wSNZ6mwkHvJTk9FUs8rcqvhyRHGqLg001bBDhc9oh2WLY8Rmw8ecgjbWXRyNLaoE1G69I 4DaokExNTOz1iM7GsdAv/3mQAdhRZOcvsQiNXc+t+rKAlqusi7VMtHTCRxPt6CMx9Cq5YRu9 zqRbNzG95Zyc+7IP18U7v8xaqw/IhkCJIqaQINOzbL4S8+MgLLvBrkNa2hZ26B8CAwEAAaOC AdkwggHVMEUGA1UdHwQ+MDwwOqA4oDaGNGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHVibGljLXRydXN0LmNvbS9j Z2ktYmluL0NSTC8yMDE4L2NkcC5jcmwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFDbg6HxtnUWR7pnlQnZNcLNQMKxe MIGSBgNVHSAEgYowgYcwSQYKKoZIhvhjAQIBBTA7MDkGCCsGAQUFBwIBFi1odHRwOi8vd3d3 LnB1YmxpYy10cnVzdC5jb20vQ1BTL09tbmlSb290Lmh0bWwwOgYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQMBMCow KAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWHGh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1AwgYkGA1UdIwSBgTB/ oXmkdzB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEYMBYGA1UEChMPR1RFIENvcnBvcmF0aW9uMScwJQYDVQQL Ex5HVEUgQ3liZXJUcnVzdCBTb2x1dGlvbnMsIEluYy4xIzAhBgNVBAMTGkdURSBDeWJlclRy dXN0IEdsb2JhbCBSb290ggIBpTArBgNVHRAEJDAigA8yMDAyMDgyNzE5MDIyNFqBDzIwMDkw ODI3MjM1OTAwWjAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAeYwDwYDVR0TBAgwBgEB/wIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFAAOBgQA6HiRv2ts2bP46czndzWocaaEAH2/UrtUf1IgppSHCV/ZVezDn0mTWDsSqcDx2 dOIqrsdGZzKSyUvxp9fgVrz2chCdf7B11p1XtXGFqsQ6p0u47A/m0vj/tc3URSWs6ganirXN MiLkIZIb7840rjBEGu6bf/CUEYaKhxkBKDrPszCCBWwwggRUoAMCAQICEHFG+tApuIWvD5i6 NTcMcy4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwgdwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5Db21vZG8g TGltaXRlZDEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1z IGFuZCBDb25kaXRpb25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRv cnkxHzAdBgNVBAsTFihjKTIwMDIgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxLDAqBgNVBAMTI0NvbW9kbyBD bGFzcyAzIFNlY3VyaXR5IFNlcnZpY2VzIENBMB4XDTA1MDIyNzAwMDAwMFoXDTA2MDIyNzIz NTk1OVowgdYxNTAzBgNVBAsTLENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrIC0gUEVSU09OQSBOT1Qg VkFMSURBVEVEMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6 Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAzIENvbW9kbyBM aW1pdGVkMRIwEAYDVQQDEwljeXBlciBzdW4xIDAeBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEXNubm4xMTlAZ21h aWwuY29tMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDgIsBVkpyGjF9zuorDtmolNMTA 447FTi+cGtUWb1xhx28f6GLHvpmiGXPfkLX5dkkfWBknD/gSMl30YjlP33wNXVtuReir2I5V nFFpBM39bB+Y+lzTy7LNXQUf0f9U3I8zGKLDrJr2x/Iznw8dYvgwpxUTmrvQU8ehD/LdqdyZ pQIDAQABo4IBsDCCAawwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUNuDofG2dRZHumeVCdk1ws1AwrF4wHQYDVR0O BBYEFN1iz3Ak8knF3+NHoCkbLTBYAGN4MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAA MCAGA1UdJQQZMBcGCCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjBGBgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGDCsGAQQB sjEBAgEBATArMCkGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh1odHRwczovL3NlY3VyZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQUzCB sAYDVR0fBIGoMIGlMDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJp dHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zLmNybDA6oDigNoY0aHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ2xhc3Mz U2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zLmNybDAtoCugKYEnQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18z QGNybC5jb21vZG8ubmV0MBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIFIDAcBgNVHREEFTATgRFzbm5uMTE5 QGdtYWlsLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAQrwhRcaz1AanCTlAQe2Inj8seYXLLPyf RBzF9/FtGjkM7levdkM3B/3937vgzsIiIkOl14mAoFiFStyhQe6Ig37yUTtvstqeDLNBcEm0 l8TsTf5r0oZ+xaYWicv3QRVxYCq2ioI0ka3pjacJCfKAC1ENwIh1Ms7cWLvYWZW1ZTo0p65z sHHlTkr4gT3zL0fje+tDlVVMroc3A5WONteWodLQUuSLJc3+DtOUdZLf3zhEbmQfKi9tJKox TxXeI2iz+e5Bmy42jq1fI5NS3oL9GCl91Bl3d9kwgZXwA9L2DRTM/uUmpCIDSUrwKCKrSppk 8IJ9JCdiC+dqlm/XzsendjCCBWwwggRUoAMCAQICEHFG+tApuIWvD5i6NTcMcy4wDQYJKoZI hvcNAQEFBQAwgdwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5Db21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEdMBsG A1UECxMUQ29tb2RvIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPVRlcm1zIGFuZCBDb25kaXRp b25zIG9mIHVzZTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21vZG8ubmV0L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkxHzAdBgNVBAsT FihjKTIwMDIgQ29tb2RvIExpbWl0ZWQxLDAqBgNVBAMTI0NvbW9kbyBDbGFzcyAzIFNlY3Vy aXR5IFNlcnZpY2VzIENBMB4XDTA1MDIyNzAwMDAwMFoXDTA2MDIyNzIzNTk1OVowgdYxNTAz BgNVBAsTLENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrIC0gUEVSU09OQSBOT1QgVkFMSURBVEVEMUYw RAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBhbmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2Rv Lm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAzIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMRIwEAYD VQQDEwljeXBlciBzdW4xIDAeBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEXNubm4xMTlAZ21haWwuY29tMIGfMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDgIsBVkpyGjF9zuorDtmolNMTA447FTi+cGtUWb1xh x28f6GLHvpmiGXPfkLX5dkkfWBknD/gSMl30YjlP33wNXVtuReir2I5VnFFpBM39bB+Y+lzT y7LNXQUf0f9U3I8zGKLDrJr2x/Iznw8dYvgwpxUTmrvQU8ehD/LdqdyZpQIDAQABo4IBsDCC AawwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUNuDofG2dRZHumeVCdk1ws1AwrF4wHQYDVR0OBBYEFN1iz3Ak8knF 3+NHoCkbLTBYAGN4MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMCAGA1UdJQQZMBcG CCsGAQUFBwMEBgsrBgEEAbIxAQMFAjBGBgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGDCsGAQQBsjEBAgEBATArMCkG CCsGAQUFBwIBFh1odHRwczovL3NlY3VyZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQUzCBsAYDVR0fBIGoMIGl MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18z LmNybDA6oDigNoY0aHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2 aWNlc18zLmNybDAtoCugKYEnQ2xhc3MzU2VjdXJpdHlTZXJ2aWNlc18zQGNybC5jb21vZG8u bmV0MBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIFIDAcBgNVHREEFTATgRFzbm5uMTE5QGdtYWlsLmNvbTAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAQrwhRcaz1AanCTlAQe2Inj8seYXLLPyfRBzF9/FtGjkM7lev dkM3B/3937vgzsIiIkOl14mAoFiFStyhQe6Ig37yUTtvstqeDLNBcEm0l8TsTf5r0oZ+xaYW icv3QRVxYCq2ioI0ka3pjacJCfKAC1ENwIh1Ms7cWLvYWZW1ZTo0p65zsHHlTkr4gT3zL0fj e+tDlVVMroc3A5WONteWodLQUuSLJc3+DtOUdZLf3zhEbmQfKi9tJKoxTxXeI2iz+e5Bmy42 jq1fI5NS3oL9GCl91Bl3d9kwgZXwA9L2DRTM/uUmpCIDSUrwKCKrSppk8IJ9JCdiC+dqlm/X zsendjGCBFswggRXAgEBMIHxMIHcMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEXMBUGA1UEChMOQ29tb2RvIExp bWl0ZWQxHTAbBgNVBAsTFENvbW9kbyBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz1UZXJtcyBh bmQgQ29uZGl0aW9ucyBvZiB1c2U6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9yZXBvc2l0b3J5 MR8wHQYDVQQLExYoYykyMDAyIENvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNDb21vZG8gQ2xh c3MgMyBTZWN1cml0eSBTZXJ2aWNlcyBDQQIQcUb60Cm4ha8PmLo1NwxzLjAJBgUrDgMCGgUA oIICvzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNjAyMTQw NDIzNDhaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBR2RLsPT1W6OONjaRa2MShBAiG0XDBSBgkqhkiG9w0B CQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUr DgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDCCAQIGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGB9DCB8TCB3DELMAkGA1UEBhMC R0IxFzAVBgNVBAoTDkNvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDb21vZG8gVHJ1c3QgTmV0 d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9VGVybXMgYW5kIENvbmRpdGlvbnMgb2YgdXNlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3 LmNvbW9kby5uZXQvcmVwb3NpdG9yeTEfMB0GA1UECxMWKGMpMjAwMiBDb21vZG8gTGltaXRl ZDEsMCoGA1UEAxMjQ29tb2RvIENsYXNzIDMgU2VjdXJpdHkgU2VydmljZXMgQ0ECEHFG+tAp uIWvD5i6NTcMcy4wggEEBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGB9KCB8TCB3DELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxFzAV BgNVBAoTDkNvbW9kbyBMaW1pdGVkMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDb21vZG8gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFG MEQGA1UECxM9VGVybXMgYW5kIENvbmRpdGlvbnMgb2YgdXNlOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNvbW9k by5uZXQvcmVwb3NpdG9yeTEfMB0GA1UECxMWKGMpMjAwMiBDb21vZG8gTGltaXRlZDEsMCoG A1UEAxMjQ29tb2RvIENsYXNzIDMgU2VjdXJpdHkgU2VydmljZXMgQ0ECEHFG+tApuIWvD5i6 NTcMcy4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYB+q9BlMcPAulcuG+JkaBSr2BSmjQ1rFH0NWwekMJ83 /+c9o3cuOE4TWHK2zNDQRYPRmuxq2MUNq5DwGnKQ3fTdDIrkJ0hupe45QSFQUFhvDBW68KRb 2ywwjRlx64Uw7e8NCZzi0uUMEsfg2ToRvvUjJ1gz6e2dQwQLA0ufCPwwagAAAAAAAA== --------------ms070802020407000201010800-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 04:35:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F7A16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:35:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miles1190@cox.net) Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (fed1rmmtao10.cox.net [68.230.241.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388D343D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:35:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miles1190@cox.net) Received: from server3 ([68.0.187.76]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214043404.TDRG20441.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@server3> for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:34:04 -0500 Message-ID: <000801c63120$1a730d60$0202a8c0@http192.168.2.3> From: "M. Cummins" To: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:35:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:36:39 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: General Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:35:43 -0000 Hi. Sorry about the HTML formatted email. I'm extremely interested in installation of a FreeBSD build on a Dell = Dimension XPS P133s 133 MHz / 16 MB RAM, with a S3 Trio 64+ PCI (765) = and D-Link DFE 530-TX PCI adapter. I've noted the HCL for version 5 (or = maybe it was 6?) but I figure I would do better to simply ask - what = version do I need to run with my current hardware, and what is the = highest version I can run on the machine that I plan to install on? = Before you get too far on the reply, please also consider that I = primarily want to use the computer for a webserver (for my LAN) in = console mode (I doubt a GUI is a good idea considering the hardware I'm = using. Oh, and sorry if this is inapproprite, but I have no experience with = UNIX and really need to learn it. I figured FreeBSD was my best shot at = it, based on what I've seen. I've been looking at 2.2.8 and it seems to = be a decent choice, but I do consider that you probably know more about = this than I do. Thanks for even reading, and doubly so if you can help! Gratefully, Miles From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 05:08:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE6116A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:08:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from tin.colossus.net (tin.colossus.net [216.121.224.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DBF43D62 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:08:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from nexpc (63.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg [210.193.15.63]) by tin.colossus.net (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA09185; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:07:55 -0800 Message-ID: <04d401c63125$f6492ea0$c801a8c0@nexpc> From: "Foo Ji-Haw" To: "M. Cummins" , References: <000801c63120$1a730d60$0202a8c0@http192.168.2.3> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:17:32 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: Subject: Re: General Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:08:06 -0000 You can try the current version 6.0, or 5.4. Try to install without a GUI to minimise load. Learning FBSD may be a bit steep at first since you have no unix background. Try reading up on the Handbook to get started: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "M. Cummins" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:35 PM Subject: General Question > Hi. Sorry about the HTML formatted email. > > I'm extremely interested in installation of a FreeBSD build on a Dell Dimension XPS P133s 133 MHz / 16 MB RAM, with a S3 Trio 64+ PCI (765) and D-Link DFE 530-TX PCI adapter. I've noted the HCL for version 5 (or maybe it was 6?) but I figure I would do better to simply ask - what version do I need to run with my current hardware, and what is the highest version I can run on the machine that I plan to install on? Before you get too far on the reply, please also consider that I primarily want to use the computer for a webserver (for my LAN) in console mode (I doubt a GUI is a good idea considering the hardware I'm using. > > Oh, and sorry if this is inapproprite, but I have no experience with UNIX and really need to learn it. I figured FreeBSD was my best shot at it, based on what I've seen. I've been looking at 2.2.8 and it seems to be a decent choice, but I do consider that you probably know more about this than I do. > > Thanks for even reading, and doubly so if you can help! > > Gratefully, > Miles > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 06:13:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7C516A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:13:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Received: from web51608.mail.yahoo.com (web51608.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E82343D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:13:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 48900 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Feb 2006 06:13:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=riwWMzzGk8KlfgKWjz6jWjOgy7exftUw6n0XNlYY/eYqUrc4y1ZILVnCH7TuvIHFTYFHVhLlz8OZiX0vm58cVRzSThN4XifT5J+fsJTThB/YPyQZ6tRf1BXJdoYFtp5eNkUVeoBPRBRbjJfaFlp/h7IZlwcmErjgmvoSCH/G5zU= ; Message-ID: <20060214061338.48898.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.90.128.21] by web51608.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:13:38 PST Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:13:38 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Jayson Alvarez To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: HELP:(cisco serial (up, up) but cannot ping its interface from within. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:13:40 -0000 Hi, In "sh ip int br" a particular serial interface shows to be both line and protocol up but I cannot ping the interface from within the router itself. When I tried pinging from the outside, I can ping it... Any idea what seems to be misconfigured in our router??? Thanks.. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 06:22:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A50116A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:22:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E77243D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:22:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from foo.antimatter.net (cpe-72-132-244-217.san.res.rr.com [72.132.244.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1E6MsZE006202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:22:54 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213222157.06327160@antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:22:48 -0800 To: Mark Jayson Alvarez , questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20060214061338.48898.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060214061338.48898.qmail@web51608.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: HELP:(cisco serial (up, up) but cannot ping its interface from within. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:22:55 -0000 At 10:13 PM 2/13/2006, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: >Hi, > > In "sh ip int br" a particular serial interface shows to be both > line and protocol up but I cannot ping the interface from within > the router itself. When I tried pinging from the outside, I can ping it... > Any idea what seems to be misconfigured in our router??? What does this have to do with FreeBSD? You might have better luck posting to a mailing list for Cisco products. -Glenn > > Thanks.. > > >--------------------------------- > Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & > more on new and used cars. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 06:31:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D01816A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:31:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F9943D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:31:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1E6VGu97846; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:31:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Steve Coles" , Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:31:15 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <028a01c630a1$72ca5b50$649b14ac@tripos.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: SMP ATA woes on 6.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:31:28 -0000 Steve, You need to search the bug database to see if this is reported, and if not then use send-pr to file the bug. This is documented in the handbook for FreeBSD. And you should know also that a dmesg output is probably the minimum needed for anyone that knows anything to even bother looking at your problem. Much better would be supplying things like the BIOS revision on the motherboard, what the CMOS settings are, etc. Once all that is done then it is acceptable to post a message in this forum, referring to the assigned PR number, and asking if anyone else has seen the problem. Ted PS Dell Computers is not known to be particularly friendly to FreeBSD or Linux for that matter. They would not be my first choice for a FreeBSD server. >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Steve Coles >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 5:29 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: SMP ATA woes on 6.0-RELEASE > > >I have a strange deterministic boot problem with ATA devices on >2-way dell >precision machines which boot from their SCSI disks. I have 4 of these >boxes, and the only difference is the add-in ATA controller in >the affected >box. > >A good summary would be "which kernels work": > >a) GENERIC from the distribution boots fine (uniprocessor) >b) GENERIC built from 6.0-RELEASE boots fine >c) SMP built from 6.0-RELEASE hangs during the ATA probe of my disks >d) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with no ATA >options/devices >boots fine >e) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with ATA >options/devices hangs >as in c) above > >.. It gets weirder > >F) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with no ATA >options/devices >boots fine (same as option d) above, then I load the ata modules from my >normal login shell: > >$> kldload atapci (loads ata.ko etc ) >$> Kldload atadisk > >.. And it produces a stable, fast, ATA disk subsystem > >G) SMP kernel built from 6.0-RELEASE with no ATA >options/devices >boots fine (option d) above with a > >atapci_load="YES" >atadisk_load="YES" > >In loader.conf produces the same hang as c) > >So...I presume the problem is related to the fact that the >second CPU must >be launched else the ATA code gets confused with my ATA >subsystem (Naieve >explanation of facts) > >Q: Is this a known bug ? >Q: If it is, is it fixed in -STABLE ? >Q: If so - when is a good cvsup date that gives me a fixed ata >driver with a >"stable stable" > >Help is much appreciated > >Cheers > >Steve > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/258 - Release Date: >2/13/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 06:31:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB2216A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:31:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8495343D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:31:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1E6VGu97849; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:31:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Beastie" , Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:31:16 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <43F072B3.2060208@mra.co.id> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:31:36 -0000 Please supply the motherboard model number you are looking at. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Beastie >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 3:51 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID Controller > > >Dear List.. > >Is there any compatibility issue regarding IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID >Controller with FreeBSD-6.0 Stable ? >I'm planning to buy one, but first, ask for experience user in >this list >for it's compatibility and performance. >Please enlight me. > >regards >reza > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/257 - Release Date: >2/10/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 06:32:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A784016A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:32:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Received: from web51613.mail.yahoo.com (web51613.mail.yahoo.com [68.142.224.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF15243D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:32:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 49648 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Feb 2006 06:32:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=azKiCSqIpGNsh5eNW0Mm7IiXi3YDqYi86fU+ebhscqsHnsOGVeWz+morkU519jCzAkCjRgLlNf8AQQL7qa792DwiBC2wBJ1vlHO7e9/sc7hJ005Fd0zACYp5SMj+/RINZASc9U8YUxbZ7nuAAadN1dI6+wwUweK5YIce7+wMx24= ; Message-ID: <20060214063226.49646.qmail@web51613.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.90.128.21] by web51613.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:32:26 PST Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:32:26 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Jayson Alvarez To: Glenn Dawson , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060213222157.06327160@antimatter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: HELP:(cisco serial (up, up) but cannot ping its interface from within. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:32:27 -0000 Glenn Dawson wrote: At 10:13 PM 2/13/2006, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: What does this have to do with FreeBSD? Well, for one, I have a machine running FreeBSD 6.0 where I am pinging the said router from... and it works fine. However, when I telnet to the router from that machine and ping the interface after I successfully logged in, I cannot ping it anymore... :-) --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 07:05:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7A516A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:05:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6174943D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:05:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 21907 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 18:05:51 +1100 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO ?10.168.101.24?) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 18:05:51 +1100 Message-ID: <43F18147.2030801@meijome.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:05:43 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry Bell References: <1716.209.134.164.18.1139835495.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <9CB4E9E3-EE93-4E65-AD74-0ACC9B3C64FF@mac.com> <4026.209.134.164.18.1139861525.squirrel@www.stelesys.com> <1DFDCA44-74AC-475A-96A9-0E3AD5B492C4@mac.com> <43F13D9F.5040606@stelesys.com> <43F1578A.8060803@stelesys.com> In-Reply-To: <43F1578A.8060803@stelesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@meijome.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:05:53 -0000 Jerry Bell wrote: > Looks like it's still an issue, so I'd say the firewall issue is still > in play. If there is not a firewall/proxy in place, are there any > known issues with IPFW (or anything else with FBSD) that could cause > this behavior? Hi Jerry - hard to tell without seeing your firewall rules in place... any errors in httpd-error.log ? Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 07:06:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D45A16A443 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:06:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F89743D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:06:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4472B1A3C1D; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:06:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DCD1551DA6; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:06:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:06:07 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: snnn Message-ID: <20060214070607.GA60982@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <43F159DD.3090305@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F159DD.3090305@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNINGs about ipsec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:06:09 -0000 --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:17:33PM +0800, snnn wrote: > WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant > WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. >=20 > what does them meat? > how to fix? Nothing is "broken", but your network stack won't take advantage of multiple processors, just as in older versions of FreeBSD. Kris --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD8YFfWry0BWjoQKURApfRAJ9qUGrls7W8zTZi6fZQD6Ex6wsgCgCfT9lm ax7Y6pNjuCPG2aOThly5hDM= =cRMu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 08:11:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E159416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:11:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5942743D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:11:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1E8Awu98230; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:10:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:10:58 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <43F159DD.3090305@gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: WARNINGs about ipsec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:11:02 -0000 post dmesg please, we aren't telepathic. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of snnn >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 8:18 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: WARNINGs about ipsec > > >WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant >WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. > >what does them meat? >how to fix? > >thanks. > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/258 - Release Date: >2/13/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 08:11:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E20A16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:11:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF04B43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:11:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1E8Atu98218; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:10:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Charles Swiger" , "Jerry Bell" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:10:54 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <9CB4E9E3-EE93-4E65-AD74-0ACC9B3C64FF@mac.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:11:14 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Charles Swiger >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 11:41 AM >To: Jerry Bell >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem > > >On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Jerry Bell wrote: >> It's hit or miss, but the first time someone visits the web site, >> they get >> a "server not found" page. On hitting refresh, they get the page - no >> problems. If I wait a while and try again, I get the same problem. > >Path MTU problem? > That would be my vote also. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 08:11:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E7D16A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:11:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575E543D53 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:11:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1E8Atu98221; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:10:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Charles Swiger" , "Robert Slade" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:10:55 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <89450798-EC1B-4000-B6FB-1666DF028D5E@mac.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: =?windows-1250?Q?Ren=E9_Luckow_-_Cortex_Systems?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Interested in selling retail freeBSD sets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:11:22 -0000 The market would pay a lot more if some of these wanna be distributors would actually offer SUPPORT along with the FreeBSD CD. That's what we really want to see happening. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Charles Swiger >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 10:00 AM >To: Robert Slade >Cc: Ren Luckow - Cortex Systems; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Interested in selling retail freeBSD sets > > >On Feb 13, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Robert Slade wrote: >> As I understand it, you are free to redistribute it provided that >> you do >> not claim to have produced it nor charge for it. You can charge for >> producing the CDs though. > >You are welcome to charge as much for FreeBSD as you like, actually. > >Of course, you can't stop someone from downloading FreeBSD themselves >for free (or for the cost of bandwidth, anyway), so in effect, people >charge a reasonable amount for putting together a nice CD/jewel case >because that's what the market is willing to pay for.... > >-- >-Chuck > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/258 - Release Date: >2/13/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 08:34:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295C716A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:34:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9986A43D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:34:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1E8YQu98325; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:34:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Dave" , Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:34:26 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <004801c630ea$3fa8b7a0$0200a8c0@satellite> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: horde on freebsd6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:34:30 -0000 Setting up Horde/IMP is what you would term a very 'non trivial' exercise. It and it's series of ports that it's dependent on needs to be laid into the system in a particular way or problems like this happen. And if you want to completely take advantage of all IMP's features such as displaying word and excel documents that are e-mailed, spell checking, and such, you must install a lot more ports than what are listed as dependencies. The IMP port author was apparently shooting for a very stripped-down IMP installation I'm afraid. However once you do get it in, and running, it kicks the crap out of all other webmail interfaces out there. I have a document I can send to you that are my notes from the last Horde/IMP install I did on 6.0, just e-mail me off list. I must warn you though that you probably will have to scratch your entire installation and start over. horde/IMP is not a trivial little php app. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Dave >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:10 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: horde on freebsd6 > > >Hello, > I've got php4 and apache installed on freebsd6 with several php4 >extensions. Now i want to install horde and imp to test them out while >atempting to decide if horde would be suitable as a webmail >solution. I try >the install via ports, but pear always stops saying the port >requires the >cli or cgi version of php, but i have a conflicting port >installed. I've >already got php4 installed, does anyone have a workaround for this? >Thanks. >Dave. > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/258 - Release Date: >2/13/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 08:34:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5B516A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:34:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDDF43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1E8YTu98328; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:34:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Joe Auty" , "Kirk Davis" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:34:28 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <52BB6341-897A-4BFE-8264-41CAEBB23C95@netmusician.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Greg Groth , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:34:37 -0000 I'm sure glad that this message didn't pass through my work mailserver so that it's didn't see it, since my work e-mail inbox has 16383 messages in it (the limit that Outlook can display in IMAP mode) and is 412 megabytes in size, and performance is perfectly fine both with Outlook and Horde/IMP. I wouldn't want my mailserver reading it and thinking that it's OK to slack off. And yes I know I need to delete some messages, speak to the hand if your going to make that crack. This is imap-uw/sendmail. Perhaps you might consider that since you haven't run imap-uw in a while that your no longer qualified to make claims about it? Or perhaps you never had it setup properly? Or perhaps your hardware was slow? Nothing is wrong with Postfix / Courier-IMAP but nothing is wrong either with sendmail / uw-imap. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Auty >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:53 PM >To: Kirk Davis >Cc: Greg Groth; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems > > >Hey Greg, > >Sorry if this completely throws a monkey wrench into your plans, but >I feel inspired to interject since I once had a nearly identical >setup as you... > >I switched to Postfix and Courier-IMAP since I found that performance >of large mailboxes in IMAP-UW was pretty poor, especially over web- >based email where messages are not cached. I switched to Postfix >because it is so much more simple and straight forward than Sendmail. >You should have no problems switching to Postfix, since it is >basically Sendmail with a nicer wrapper/configuration. > >Just food for thought. > > >On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Kirk Davis wrote: > >> Hi Greg, >> >>> I'm trying to set up a FreeBSD 6.0 box as a mail server, and while >>> everything seems to be working OK for the most part, I have >>> run into two >>> issues that I cannot resolve (I'm new to BSD, please bear >>> with me). Install >>> went as follows: Installed via FTP last night along with >>> "src - Sources for >>> everything", >>> >>> IMAP-UW was compiled via ports with WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT >>> enabled (same for >>> cclient), OpenSSL, Cyrus-SASL2 & Cyrus-SASL2-saslauthd were >>> compiled via >>> ports with no flags. >>> >>> Sendmail was installed with the base install and recompiled >>> (after SASL2 was >>> up and running) with the following options added to make.conf: >>> >>> # SASL (cyrus-sasl v2) sendmail build flags... >>> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 >>> SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib >>> SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 >>> # Adding to enable alternate port (smtps) for sendmail... >>> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -D_FFR_SMTP_SSL >>> >>> I followed the instructions I found at >>> http://www.bsdconspiracy.net/howto/sendmail.html, and had no >>> problems with >>> the install except for Sendmail. After recompiling sendmail, >>> I added the >>> following lines to the mail.server.mc file: >>> >>> define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS',`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl >>> TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl >>> define(`CERT_DIR', `/etc/mail/certs')dnl >>> define(`confCACERT_PATH', `CERT_DIR')dnl >>> define(`confCACERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl >>> define(`confSERVER_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl >>> define(`confSERVER_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl >>> define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl >>> define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl >>> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl >> >> This is your problem. The above line sets up the Sendmail daemon to >> listen on port 25 but the standard mc file distributed with FreeBSD >> also >> sets up a DAEMON port (it's at the end of the MC file). >> >> Here is what my DAEMON_OPTIONS lines look like. These should be the >> only DAEMON_OPTIONS lines in the mc file. >> dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet') >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl >> >> >>> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl >>> >>> After running (in /etc/mail) "make clean", "make cf", "make >>> install", "make >>> restart", SMTP no longer works, and I find the following in >>> maillog and >>> messages >>> >>> Feb 12 20:25:55 mail sm-mta[1213]: daemon IPv4: problem >>> creating SMTP socket >>> Feb 12 20:26:00 mail sm-mta[1213]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): >>> opendaemonsocket: >>> daemon IPv4: cannot bind: Address already in use >>> >>> When I try and stop sendmail, I get a message that the pid >>> for Sendmail >>> cannot be found. I end up killing the missing Sendmail daemon using >>> KSysGuard >>> >>> If I remove this line - "DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, >>> Name=MTA')dnl" from the >>> mail.server.mc file, make cf, make install, make restart, >>> sendmail starts >>> normally. When trying to access from another machine on my >>> network, I can >>> only connect on port 25 without a secure connection (I'm >>> using Thunderbird >>> for this), although SMTP-AUTH is working correctly. >> >> Have you tried to setup your mail client to connect to port 465? This >> is the smtps (SMTP SSL) port. >> >> >>> Any ideas on what I might need to do to get SSL / SMTP-AUTH >>> working on SMTP? >>> I took a look at the instructions in the handbook, but they >>> were written >>> for SASL1. Running netstat shows smtps listening on 465, but >>> when I try to >>> telnet to that port, the server drops the connection. >> >> Hmm... It should connect but you will not see anything since it is >> expecting an SSL connection. >> >>> My second problem is rather simple, after I create an IMAP >>> folder, I am >>> unable to delete it using a remote client. Thunderbird >>> responds with "The >>> mail server responded: RENAME failed: Can't create mailbox node >>> /home/User/Trash/: File exists. Nothing shows up in any of >>> the server logs >>> though. >> >> I have not seen this problem although I have it setup for an office of >> Outlook users. I would check the permissions on the folders in the >> user >> home directory. This is where the IMAP user forlders are by >> default. I >> usually setup the clients to use the base imap if Mail and then >> create a >> Mail directory in the user home directory. That way the mail folders >> don't get messed up with the user stuff. >> >>> >>> Hopefully this is the right list for these questions, if not, >>> could someone >>> please direct me to the correct one? Any advice anyone can >>> give me on >>> either of these problems would be greatly appreciated. >>> >> >> ---- Kirk >> Kirk Davis >> Senior Network Analyst, ITS >> Edmonton Public Schools >> 1-780-429-8308 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/258 - Release Date: >2/13/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 08:54:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA5716A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id (mx3.mra.co.id [202.51.30.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C6043D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:53:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from localhost (localhost.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4556030F61; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:46:12 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx3.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43010-09; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:46:12 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mailbox.mra.co.id (unknown [172.16.0.225]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6BF30F60; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:46:12 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [172.16.0.228] (unknown [172.16.0.228]) by mailbox.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8587FFE11; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:48:37 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <43F19085.2020506@mra.co.id> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:10:45 +0700 From: Beastie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051229 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mra.co.id Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:54:11 -0000 Thanks Ted.. I would like to buy entry server board form Intel , IntelSE3720EP2. regards reza >Please supply the motherboard model number you are looking at. > >Ted > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Beastie >>Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 3:51 AM >>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>Subject: IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID Controller >> >> >>Dear List.. >> >>Is there any compatibility issue regarding IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID >>Controller with FreeBSD-6.0 Stable ? >>I'm planning to buy one, but first, ask for experience user in >>this list >>for it's compatibility and performance. >>Please enlight me. >> >>regards >>reza >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >>-- >>No virus found in this incoming message. >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/257 - Release Date: >>2/10/2006 >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 08:55:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098B716A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:55:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stcoles@tripos.com) Received: from mx2.tripos.com (mx1.tripos.com [192.160.145.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B671343D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:54:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stcoles@tripos.com) X-SEF-Processed: 5_0_0_713__2006_02_14_02_54_58 X-SEF-B36DBD05-D5C8-4F1B-9AD7-DA304379853F: 1 From: "Steve Coles" To: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:52:40 -0000 Message-ID: <02e101c63144$054e42f0$649b14ac@tripos.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcYxALrGhvmzO141SKyBgFULA0dJigAQtIzA In-Reply-To: <2o92v1t78jpts7cd3k5kgg1s7cqfg4sn43@4ax.com> X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / Subject: RE: SMP ATA woes on 6.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:55:00 -0000 Many thanks for the positive replies, the suggestions to cvsup to today were spot-on: the ata modules now load fine from loader.conf on the MP machine. To answer the troll: it's fast, free, proven, and they were $50 on eBay. Cheers Steve -----Original Message----- From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:mike@sentex.net] Sent: 14 February 2006 00:51 To: Steve Coles Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP ATA woes on 6.0-RELEASE On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:28:59 -0000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: > >Q: Is this a known bug ? >Q: If it is, is it fixed in -STABLE ? Not sure on either of the above specifically, but quite a bit of work has gone into IRQ routing and the ata subsystem since 6.0R. Your problem sounds somewhat similar to what I was seeing on a Dell 4way box back in August which was fixed in Sept http://groups.google.ca/group/muc.lists.freebsd.current/tree/browse_frm/thre ad/54cf58899efae7e1/fe550105a6e0276a?rnum=1&hl=en&q=freebsd+tancsa+pci&_done =%2Fgroup%2Fmuc.lists.freebsd.current%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F54cf58899efae7 e1%2F49d7837901cb3e5d%3Flnk%3Dst%26q%3Dfreebsd+tancsa+pci%26rnum%3D96%26hl%3 Den%26#doc_fe550105a6e0276a regardless, there are a lot of bugfixes since 6.0 >Q: If so - when is a good cvsup date that gives me a fixed ata driver >with a "stable stable" To today is quite stable. The FreeBSD folks are preparing for a release right now and what is in the tree works very well. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 09:09:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A1216A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:09:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2166143D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:09:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1E97su98445; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:07:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Beastie" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:07:53 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <43F19085.2020506@mra.co.id> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:09:12 -0000 I think you mean the SE7320EP2? That is not an entry server board. The entry server board is the E72xx-based boards, the E7320, E7520 and E7525 are the 'regular' non-entry level server motherboards. According to the following: http://www.intel.com/design/servers/RAID/SRCS16/index.htm the SRCS16 raid controller is comprised of 3 SiI3112A SATA controllers. The SiI3112 is listed in the FreeBSD 6.0 ata manpage as being a supported controller. The Silicon Image Medley metadata format is listed in the FreeBSD 6.0 ataraid manpage as being readable. I would assume the SiL3112A uses this metadata format. I think also both ethernet controllers on this motherboard are supported. I can tell you from experience that the Intel SE7210TP1-E motherboard works, but it uses the Intel Pro/1000 ethernet chip and the Intel 6300 ESB sata raid controller. at worst you might have to e-mail Soren if FreeBSD 6.0 does not recognize your raid array, but it would be a very minor change in the code to add it's identification strings to the driver, since all the heavy lifting code is already there. Unfortunately, SATA raid is pretty bleeding edge still, even Windows XP users have had problems with drivers for it working right. You won't have proof positive until you boot it. That is why it's important to buy motherboards from a retailer who will take them back for exchange if needed. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: Beastie [mailto:beastie@mra.co.id] >Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:11 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID Controller > > >Thanks Ted.. > >I would like to buy entry server board form Intel , IntelSE3720EP2. > >regards >reza > >>Please supply the motherboard model number you are looking at. >> >>Ted >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Beastie >>>Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 3:51 AM >>>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>>Subject: IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID Controller >>> >>> >>>Dear List.. >>> >>>Is there any compatibility issue regarding IntelSRCS16 SATA RAID >>>Controller with FreeBSD-6.0 Stable ? >>>I'm planning to buy one, but first, ask for experience user in >>>this list >>>for it's compatibility and performance. >>>Please enlight me. >>> >>>regards >>>reza >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>>-- >>>No virus found in this incoming message. >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/257 - Release Date: >>>2/10/2006 >>> >>> >>> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/258 - Release Date: >2/13/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 09:20:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6C116A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from tin.colossus.net (tin.colossus.net [216.121.224.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639B943D5A for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:20:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from nexpc (63.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg [210.193.15.63]) by tin.colossus.net (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA06156 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:20:50 -0800 Message-ID: <057001c63149$4b9de350$c801a8c0@nexpc> From: "Foo Ji-Haw" To: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:30:27 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Unable to install libwww (Perl) on FBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:20:53 -0000 Hi all, I've not no problems installing most of the applications on FBSD 5.4. = But I'm stuck with this one: Some background: 1. Just cvsupped 5 min ago 2. 5.4 OS 3. Using Perl 5.8.6 I'm trying to install ports/www/p5-libwww/, but in all the dependencies = that it tries to install, it always die on the same part of the error: perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LC_ALL =3D (unset), LANG =3D "en_EN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). =3D=3D=3D> Building for p5-Net-1.19,1 0: not found *** Error code 127 I've had this for p5-URI, p5-Net, p5-Compress-Zlib. In the end, I installed the package instead: pkg_add -r libwww Running a test script that includes LWP::UserAgent, I get this warning = message; perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LC_ALL =3D (unset), LANG =3D "en_EN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). Can anyone tell me how to get around this error/ warning? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 09:40:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECBC16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:40:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterharrison.-@tiscali.co.uk) Received: from mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF9B43D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:40:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterharrison.-@tiscali.co.uk) Received: from 88-109-65-131.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com) ([88.109.65.131]) by mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2006 09:40:10 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aa4HABcu8UOCFIU9LA Received: from 88-109-65-131.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([88.109.65.131]:59572 helo=desktop.piggybox) by mk-smarthost-8.mail.uk.tiscali.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1F8wfJ-000O2f-KR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:40:09 +0000 Received: from desktop.piggybox (localhost.piggybox [127.0.0.1]) by desktop.piggybox (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1E9qTrB000725 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:52:29 GMT (envelope-from peterharrison.-@tiscali.co.uk) Received: (from peter@localhost) by desktop.piggybox (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1E9qTlO000724 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:52:29 GMT (envelope-from peterharrison.-@tiscali.co.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: desktop.piggybox: peter set sender to peterharrison.-@tiscali.co.uk using -f Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:52:29 +0000 From: peter harrison To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060214095229.GB648@desktop.piggybox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: USB Mass Storage problem after upgrade... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:40:19 -0000 I upgraded last night from 6.0-RELEASE p2 to 6.0-RELEASE p4, and I'm now having difficulty mounting my cheap USB mass storage MP3 player. When I plug it in, the device is created properly, but when I try to mount it with "mount -t msdos /dev/da0s1 ~/mnt" I get "mount_msdosfs: /dev/da0s1: Invalid argument". I've umass.ko loaded as a module. The kernel is custom, but consists of GENERIC minus the uscanner device. My SD Card reader still mounts fine. Here's a tail of /var/log/messages: Feb 14 09:35:05 desktop kernel: umass0: detached Feb 14 09:45:58 desktop kernel: umass0: , rev 1.10/10.01, addr 2 Feb 14 09:45:58 desktop kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 Feb 14 09:45:58 desktop kernel: da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-4 device Feb 14 09:45:58 desktop kernel: da0: 1.000MB/s transfers Feb 14 09:45:58 desktop kernel: da0: 241MB (493568 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 241C) Feb 14 09:46:07 desktop kernel: Next free cluster in FSInfo (122912) exceeds maxcluster (122896) Can anyone offer me advice on how to resolve this? Peter Harrison -- You have a strong appeal for members of the opposite sex. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Oops - this is what you get for piping fortune into your sig, don't take offence! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 10:48:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D15016A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:48:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from mail.dc-servers.com (mail.dc-servers.com [83.243.101.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51ED643D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: (qmail 16390 invoked by uid 399); 14 Feb 2006 10:48:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alfie.jigsawhq.com) (work@ashleymoran.me.uk@213.106.224.113) by mail.dc-servers.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 10:48:06 -0000 From: Ashley Moran Organization: Codeweavers Ltd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:46:41 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602131300.37289.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602141046.41447.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> Cc: Ceri Davies Subject: Re: More tomcat wierdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:48:07 -0000 > "sh -x /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tomcat55.sh stop" may shed some light. > > Ceri On Monday 13 February 2006 15:50, Ceri Davies wrote: > "sh -x /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tomcat55.sh stop" may shed some light. Thanks for the -x tip... unfortunately the output is very long, and I don't have time to study the rc scripts right now as my company's servers are randomly exploding. Ashley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 11:04:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172B216A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:04:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8001943D5C for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([71.199.184.251] helo=[192.168.0.148]) by stelesys.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F8xyb-000BnQ-9z; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:04:09 -0500 Message-ID: <43F1B928.4080607@stelesys.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:04:08 -0500 From: Jerry Bell User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:04:18 -0000 What's the best way to go about verifying and fixing that? I have several other BSD servers on the same subnet in that colo that aren't having the problem. Many thanks for your help! Jerry Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Charles Swiger >> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 11:41 AM >> To: Jerry Bell >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem >> >> >> On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Jerry Bell wrote: >> >>> It's hit or miss, but the first time someone visits the web site, >>> they get >>> a "server not found" page. On hitting refresh, they get the page - no >>> problems. If I wait a while and try again, I get the same problem. >>> >> Path MTU problem? >> >> > > That would be my vote also. > > Ted > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 12:21:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F9216A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:21:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879C143D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:21:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214122132.IZNI7811.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:21:32 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Jerry Bell" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:21:33 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <43F1B928.4080607@stelesys.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:21:34 -0000 The Path MTU problem was fixed 2 years ago. You are beating a dead horse going down that path. My money is on your firewall rules. Debugging problems like this is a process of elimination. First thing is to remove your ipfw firewall from the system. If you complied ipfw into your kernel then recompile to remove it totally. Then test to see if problem is still happening. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jerry Bell Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 6:04 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem What's the best way to go about verifying and fixing that? I have several other BSD servers on the same subnet in that colo that aren't having the problem. Many thanks for your help! Jerry Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Charles Swiger >> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 11:41 AM >> To: Jerry Bell >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem >> >> >> On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Jerry Bell wrote: >> >>> It's hit or miss, but the first time someone visits the web site, >>> they get >>> a "server not found" page. On hitting refresh, they get the page - no >>> problems. If I wait a while and try again, I get the same problem. >>> >> Path MTU problem? >> >> > > That would be my vote also. > > Ted > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 12:41:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A086416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:41:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB4F43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:41:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l37so410179nfc for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:41:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IIXnfNf+jOR2AzKcBpWBAXnAVw8rBRVFPAcEuewoQTOfGF13xYyS0qagyl+sRP7yydO8DwNZGxnni/xi0u577olwwDGbfEZnDSVFIOgtZbuQGxvPX8HYl0YsbrCTBB46lHKU4tL6hMwMWzb90HEj55mXXRNVIMJzZitIF3DfX7M= Received: by 10.49.5.7 with SMTP id h7mr1252109nfi; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:41:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.108.10 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:41:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550602140441o2ee7e458j689000550fb87198@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:41:32 +0100 From: "Daniel A." To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Cant login to FTP server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:41:36 -0000 Hi, I have some FTP login problems. I run FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE, and I have ipf and ipnat enabled. _______SNIP_______ Status:=09Connecting to dienub.org ... Status:=09Connected with dienub.org. Waiting for welcome message... Response:=09220 m00h.dienub.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. Command:=09USER ************** Response:=09331 Password required for alive. Command:=09PASS ************** Response:=09230 User alive logged in. Command:=09FEAT Response:=09500 FEAT: command not understood. Command:=09SYST Response:=09215 UNIX Type: L8 Version: BSD-199506 Status:=09Connected Status:=09Retrieving directory listing... Command:=09PWD Response:=09257 "/usr/home/alive" is current directory. Command:=09TYPE A Response:=09200 Type set to A. Command:=09PASV Response:=09227 Entering Passive Mode (87,49,144,133,237,45) Command:=09LIST Error:=09Transfer channel can't be opened. Reason: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. Error:=09Could not retrieve directory listing Command:=09TYPE A _______SNIP_______ /etc/ipf.rules: _______SNIP_______ # Let clients behind the firewall send out to the internet, and replies to # come back in by keeping state. pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp all keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto udp all keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto icmp all keep state # Since nothing should be coming from these address ranges, block them block in quick on rl0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any block in quick on rl0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any block in quick on rl0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick on rl0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick on rl0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any # Let's let people access the services running behind this system # Let's let people access the services running on this system pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 30000 >< 50000 flags S keep state #PASV FTP pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 21 #FTP pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 22 #SSH pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 80 #WWW pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 113 #oidentd # Steam Dedicated Server #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 1200 # Friends net= work #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port 26999 >< 27016 # Gamep= ort #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 27020 #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 27029 >< 27040 #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 27015 # SRCDS Rcon # Block everything else block in quick on rl0 all _______SNIP_______ /etc/ipnat.rules _______SNIP_______ map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp 1025:65000 map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 _______SNIP_______ Might the problem be anywhere else besides my ipf and ipnat configs? Could it be the remote client that's the problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 12:58:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A514A16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:58:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3690443D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:58:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214125810.IYUC25152.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:58:10 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Daniel A." , Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:58:09 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550602140441o2ee7e458j689000550fb87198@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Cant login to FTP server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:58:11 -0000 Daniel You did not say where you were running ftp from. like from LAN box to gateway server or from gateway box to public internet remote ftp site or from public internet remote user to your gateway ftp server. I am guessing its from gateway box to public internet remote ftp site. Your nat rules need to look like this example. You are missing the second rule. map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp map dc0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 The first rule handles all FTP traffic for the private LAN. The second rule handles all FTP traffic from the gateway. The third rule handles all non-FTP traffic for the private LAN. All the non-FTP gateway traffic is using the public IP address by default so there is no ipnat rule needed. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Daniel A. Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:42 AM To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Cant login to FTP server. Hi, I have some FTP login problems. I run FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE, and I have ipf and ipnat enabled. _______SNIP_______ Status: Connecting to dienub.org ... Status: Connected with dienub.org. Waiting for welcome message... Response: 220 m00h.dienub.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. Command: USER ************** Response: 331 Password required for alive. Command: PASS ************** Response: 230 User alive logged in. Command: FEAT Response: 500 FEAT: command not understood. Command: SYST Response: 215 UNIX Type: L8 Version: BSD-199506 Status: Connected Status: Retrieving directory listing... Command: PWD Response: 257 "/usr/home/alive" is current directory. Command: TYPE A Response: 200 Type set to A. Command: PASV Response: 227 Entering Passive Mode (87,49,144,133,237,45) Command: LIST Error: Transfer channel can't be opened. Reason: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. Error: Could not retrieve directory listing Command: TYPE A _______SNIP_______ /etc/ipf.rules: _______SNIP_______ # Let clients behind the firewall send out to the internet, and replies to # come back in by keeping state. pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp all keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto udp all keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto icmp all keep state # Since nothing should be coming from these address ranges, block them block in quick on rl0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any block in quick on rl0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any block in quick on rl0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick on rl0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick on rl0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any # Let's let people access the services running behind this system # Let's let people access the services running on this system pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 30000 >< 50000 flags S keep state #PASV FTP pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 21 #FTP pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 #SSH pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 #WWW pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 113 #oidentd # Steam Dedicated Server #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port = 1200 # Friends network #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port 26999 >< 27016 # Gameport #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port = 27020 #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 27029 >< 27040 #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 27015 # SRCDS Rcon # Block everything else block in quick on rl0 all _______SNIP_______ /etc/ipnat.rules _______SNIP_______ map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp 1025:65000 map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 _______SNIP_______ Might the problem be anywhere else besides my ipf and ipnat configs? Could it be the remote client that's the problem? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 13:44:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1988E16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:44:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@douville.net) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A517B43D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:44:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@douville.net) Received: (qmail 31849 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 13:44:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sdouvilnonq1) (sns536@rogers.com@70.29.116.42 with login) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 13:44:51 -0000 Message-ID: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1> From: "Steve Douville" To: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:44:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:44:57 -0000 I'm trying to set up the routing table to force requests to certain IP = addresses to use a particular ethernet card. I've used the route command = in a number of ways, but still can't come up with how to force to use = em1 instead of em0, with the right gateway. em0 is aaa.bbb.ccc.207 em1 is aaa.bbb.ccc.200 Both have netmask of 255.255.255.0 em0 goes to the main port, gateway aaa.bbb.ccc.195. em1 goes to a = switch, which is aaa.bbb.ccc.196, the gateway to other ip's on the = switch. What I want to end up with is: aaa.bbb.ccc.196 link#2 em1 aaa.bbb.ccc.209 link#2 em1 I've tried lots of combinations, using the -ifp flag to force em1, but = the only way I can get the gateway to say link#2 is to ping the ip = first, whereas it gets put in the table even though it's not found, and = then doing a route change. I need some way to put this in rc.local so = that it's set up when booted. Any ideas? Let me know if more info is needed. TIA, Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 13:48:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD1E16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:48:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kumarrrr@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C9743D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:48:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kumarrrr@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s18so1302622nze for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:48:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=miP45jv8oBmzzITiF8LQne5BcH1zfPTpn4XQmlTu9cmZAFdOixoxdPtIy4fMbps/Y1Zhv5aQmQ6JvJD5eNn1thbm38RiWc+I35VTd5sGmH8rSq8wh3yuIFaRHXXrMyyo7naBHJpHIr2LxTsX3W47HEIITEkJHz+o7cD6ecs6YTk= Received: by 10.64.220.13 with SMTP id s13mr1780463qbg; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:48:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.203.2 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:48:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5d214e6f0602140548p34d3d330xba6d0a471df36ef5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:48:33 +0800 From: Kumar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Setting Up A Home Network ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:48:34 -0000 SXMgaXQgcG9zc2libGUgdG8gc2V0IHVwIGludGVybmV0IGNvbm5lY3Rpb24sIGJldHdlZW4gYSBY UCBQcm8gYm94LCBhbmQgYQpGcmVlQlNELWN1cnJlbnQgYm94LCB3aXRob3V0IHRoZSB1c2Ugb2Yg YSByb3V0ZXIsIEkgaGF2ZSBnb3QgdHdvIGV0aGVybmV0CmNhcmRzIG9uIHRoZSBib3ggcnVubmlu ZyBYUCBQcm8sIGFuZCBvbmUgZXRoZXJuZXQgY2FyZCBvbiB0aGUgYm94IHJ1bm5pbmcKRnJlZUJT RC1jdXJyZW50LCBhbmQgYSBjcm9zcyBvdmVyIGNhYmxlLgoKSXMgaXQgdGhlb3JldGljYWxseSBw b3NzaWJsZSA/Ci0tClRoYW5rcyAmIFJlZ2FyZHMKCkt1bWFyCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 13:49:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD82716A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:49:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD3043D5E for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:49:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1EDlnb1078838; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:48:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43F1DF7A.7000504@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:47:38 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200602092036.k19KaIhn086956@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <20060209220123.GA4751@flame.pc> <43EBE2F8.8000501@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <43EBE2F8.8000501@daleco.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: Using dd to Make a Clone of a Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:49:49 -0000 Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> On 2006-02-09 14:36, Martin McCormick wrote: >> >> >>> After installing FreeBSD5.4, the ISC dhcp server and ISC bind >>> on a hard drive, I wanted to clone that drive to a second drive so as >>> to generate a second server, using what I had already installed as a >>> template. I used the following command: >>> >>> dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/da1 bs=512 >>> >>> It turns out that dd defaults to 512-byte blocks so I didn't >>> really need the bs=512, but I am not sure I haven't made some other >>> type of mistake. The dd command has been running for about 4 hours on >>> a very fast system, with a 1-gig processor, 1 gig of RAM and two 31-GB >>> drives. One would think it should have finished by now, but it is >>> still running. Is this a valid method of copying the entire contents >>> of one drive to another? Thank you. >>> >> >> >> Bah! That's too slow for my taste. I would usually go for a newfs, >> dump, and restore option. For instance, to create a copy of /usr on a >> second disk: >> >> newfs -U /dev/ad1s1a >> mount /dev/ad1s1a /mnt >> dump -0 -a -L /usr | ( cd /mnt ; restore ruvf - ) >> >> Copying with dd(1) is not as fast :) >> >> > Sorry to butt in --- but I'm needing to start cloning too. Looks > like a winner to me ... wouldn't this have the added advantage > of making "same size and geometry" (cf. Erik Trulsson, 4 hours ago, > this thread) less relevant? > > As long as the "new" slice had enough space, geometry shouldn't > matter to dump|restore .... > > Kevin Kinsey Just for the archives: Giorgios' solution is very nice, but needs the "-f" option and another "-" to work properly AFAICT, both from experience and from reading dump(8): dump -0 -a -L -f - /usr | (cd /mnt ; restore ruvf - ) If you don't include "-f" (for "file") and "-" (for "stdout"), then your command will fail with: DUMP: Cannot open output "/dev/sa0" unless you actually have a tape drive, as, of course, any experienced user could have told you would happen, if not when they read the incorrect command line, then when they saw, previously: DUMP: Dumping snapshot of /dev/$somedisk to /dev/sa0 I used the strategy above to clone a working installation of Wine and a rather obscure Win32 program from a 20 GB IDE HDD to an 8GB drive with good success after attempts to "re-create" a similar installation manually had failed, presumably because something in re: Wine had changed in the interim, though we've been unable to establish this as fact. So, I've adopted dump(8) and restore(8) for disk cloning as a result of this experience. Next step: moving to dump|restore for my home-brew backup routines.... HTH Someone, Kevin Kinsey -- Heisenberg may have slept here From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 13:56:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CE816A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:56:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5635C43D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:56:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:9884 helo=assata.aseed.net) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F90fN-000D2s-6O; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:56:29 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by assata.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD88B2A08A0; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:03:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (a78172.upc-a.chello.nl [62.163.78.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0104A58C7E2; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:02:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:56:12 +0100 From: albi To: Kumar Message-Id: <20060214145612.c789a97a.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <5d214e6f0602140548p34d3d330xba6d0a471df36ef5@mail.gmail.com> References: <5d214e6f0602140548p34d3d330xba6d0a471df36ef5@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting Up A Home Network ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:56:30 -0000 On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:48:33 +0800 Kumar wrote: > Is it possible to set up internet connection, between a XP Pro box, > and a FreeBSD-current box, without the use of a router, I have got > two ethernet cards on the box running XP Pro, and one ethernet card > on the box running FreeBSD-current, and a cross over cable. > > Is it theoretically possible ? if you put 2 nics in the FreeBSD-box with the cross-cable it's possible yes, follow the firewall-instructions : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls.html if you want to keep the 2 nics in the ms-windows-machine, i would suggest to ask in a ms-windows-forum/list etc. -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 13:59:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7928116A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:59:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B9D43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:59:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m18so423499nfc for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:59:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NAS/sR4QBNenzV6W21qLxdQ3M6MH0uqhFXiyJBF/9M5x7ANe/sG2l/+b8JKW2Ss4wqHpRRz0JYSF/ihQTQIy3RkG4/+b//GOEFrSjD9mC2OW8c0pEf5AzJaTGWtvsQ8GiGyMEgc2Z7WhObtUt3P0vc6sbEdjyyiq5YGCoSwXZkc= Received: by 10.49.75.15 with SMTP id c15mr1271228nfl; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:59:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.108.10 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:59:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550602140559s7687b600k26a76f5d6b2a7973@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:59:29 +0100 From: "Daniel A." To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5ceb5d550602140441o2ee7e458j689000550fb87198@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cant login to FTP server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:59:32 -0000 Hi, the server is connected directly to "the wild", and I'm connecting from a remote non-local host. Are you sure that those are ipf rules? They look a lot like ipnat rules. On 2/14/06, fbsd_user wrote: > Daniel > You did not say where you were running ftp from. > like from LAN box to gateway server or > from gateway box to public internet remote ftp site or > from public internet remote user to your gateway ftp server. > > I am guessing its from gateway box to public internet remote ftp > site. > Your nat rules need to look like this example. You are missing the > second rule. > > map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp > map dc0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp > map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 > > The first rule handles all FTP traffic for the private LAN. > The second rule handles all FTP traffic from the gateway. > The third rule handles all non-FTP traffic for the private LAN. > All the non-FTP gateway traffic is using the public IP address by > default so > there is no ipnat rule needed. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Daniel A. > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:42 AM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Cant login to FTP server. > > > Hi, I have some FTP login problems. > I run FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE, and I have ipf and ipnat enabled. > > _______SNIP_______ > Status: Connecting to dienub.org ... > Status: Connected with dienub.org. Waiting for welcome message... > Response: 220 m00h.dienub.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. > Command: USER ************** > Response: 331 Password required for alive. > Command: PASS ************** > Response: 230 User alive logged in. > Command: FEAT > Response: 500 FEAT: command not understood. > Command: SYST > Response: 215 UNIX Type: L8 Version: BSD-199506 > Status: Connected > Status: Retrieving directory listing... > Command: PWD > Response: 257 "/usr/home/alive" is current directory. > Command: TYPE A > Response: 200 Type set to A. > Command: PASV > Response: 227 Entering Passive Mode (87,49,144,133,237,45) > Command: LIST > Error: Transfer channel can't be opened. Reason: A connection > attempt > failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a > period of time, or established connection failed because connected > host has failed to respond. > Error: Could not retrieve directory listing > Command: TYPE A > _______SNIP_______ > > > /etc/ipf.rules: > _______SNIP_______ > # Let clients behind the firewall send out to the internet, and > replies to > # come back in by keeping state. > pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp all keep state > pass out quick on rl0 proto udp all keep state > pass out quick on rl0 proto icmp all keep state > > # Since nothing should be coming from these address ranges, block > them > block in quick on rl0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any > > # Let's let people access the services running behind this system > > # Let's let people access the services running on this system > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 30000 >< 50000 > flags S keep state #PASV FTP > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 21 #FTP > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 22 #SSH > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 80 #WWW > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 113 #oidentd > > # Steam Dedicated Server > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 1200 # > Friends network > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port 26999 >< 27016 > # Gameport > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 27020 > #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 27029 >< 27040 > #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 27015 # SRCDS > Rcon > > # Block everything else > block in quick on rl0 all > _______SNIP_______ > > > /etc/ipnat.rules > _______SNIP_______ > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp 1025:65000 > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 > _______SNIP_______ > > > Might the problem be anywhere else besides my ipf and ipnat configs? > Could it be the remote client that's the problem? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:03:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D76016A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:03:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8AE43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:03:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 30539 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 14:03:05 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Feb 2006 14:03:05 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8D35E28439; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:03:04 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Alessandro Buono References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 14 Feb 2006 09:03:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <447j7yavhj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: video/x-ms-asf-plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:03:06 -0000 Alessandro Buono writes: > Hi did you had an answer on this plug in? > I am getting crazy and can find no answer... I don't know about a plugin, but mplayer (and probably other video applications, but that's the first one I checked) claims to be able to play it, so you should be able to set it as an external helper application for firefox. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:05:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECDD16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:05:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDC543D55 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c29so424660nfb for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:05:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PQlGEgbt17GbTh8xlHtyGAdVi2vAdHKHbaQjqTPbqQffEeOX66McHCDca/YpGS0qDCjhFv+XQcI9rdfJqpc8gGjNKcMhJHu3oR7mNw7k1A5iITpZxNTEFGxa6G+dallP9jmIbbV9hBis25emd05OOMebe49cjAqP3loYluwFAl4= Received: by 10.49.68.10 with SMTP id v10mr600172nfk; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:05:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.108.10 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:05:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550602140605y243d9fbdydb1a6300e509970b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:05:56 +0100 From: "Daniel A." To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5ceb5d550602140441o2ee7e458j689000550fb87198@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cant login to FTP server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:05:59 -0000 I have now changed my ipnat.rules to this: _____SNIP_____ map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp map rl0 0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp 1025:65000 map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 _____SNIP_____ And then I did "ipnat -FC -f /etc/ipnat.rules". I still get the same error. On 2/14/06, fbsd_user wrote: > Daniel > You did not say where you were running ftp from. > like from LAN box to gateway server or > from gateway box to public internet remote ftp site or > from public internet remote user to your gateway ftp server. > > I am guessing its from gateway box to public internet remote ftp > site. > Your nat rules need to look like this example. You are missing the > second rule. > > map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp > map dc0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp > map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 > > The first rule handles all FTP traffic for the private LAN. > The second rule handles all FTP traffic from the gateway. > The third rule handles all non-FTP traffic for the private LAN. > All the non-FTP gateway traffic is using the public IP address by > default so > there is no ipnat rule needed. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Daniel A. > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:42 AM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Cant login to FTP server. > > > Hi, I have some FTP login problems. > I run FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE, and I have ipf and ipnat enabled. > > _______SNIP_______ > Status: Connecting to dienub.org ... > Status: Connected with dienub.org. Waiting for welcome message... > Response: 220 m00h.dienub.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. > Command: USER ************** > Response: 331 Password required for alive. > Command: PASS ************** > Response: 230 User alive logged in. > Command: FEAT > Response: 500 FEAT: command not understood. > Command: SYST > Response: 215 UNIX Type: L8 Version: BSD-199506 > Status: Connected > Status: Retrieving directory listing... > Command: PWD > Response: 257 "/usr/home/alive" is current directory. > Command: TYPE A > Response: 200 Type set to A. > Command: PASV > Response: 227 Entering Passive Mode (87,49,144,133,237,45) > Command: LIST > Error: Transfer channel can't be opened. Reason: A connection > attempt > failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a > period of time, or established connection failed because connected > host has failed to respond. > Error: Could not retrieve directory listing > Command: TYPE A > _______SNIP_______ > > > /etc/ipf.rules: > _______SNIP_______ > # Let clients behind the firewall send out to the internet, and > replies to > # come back in by keeping state. > pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp all keep state > pass out quick on rl0 proto udp all keep state > pass out quick on rl0 proto icmp all keep state > > # Since nothing should be coming from these address ranges, block > them > block in quick on rl0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any > > # Let's let people access the services running behind this system > > # Let's let people access the services running on this system > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 30000 >< 50000 > flags S keep state #PASV FTP > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 21 #FTP > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 22 #SSH > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 80 #WWW > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 113 #oidentd > > # Steam Dedicated Server > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 1200 # > Friends network > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port 26999 >< 27016 > # Gameport > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 27020 > #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 27029 >< 27040 > #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 27015 # SRCDS > Rcon > > # Block everything else > block in quick on rl0 all > _______SNIP_______ > > > /etc/ipnat.rules > _______SNIP_______ > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp 1025:65000 > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 > _______SNIP_______ > > > Might the problem be anywhere else besides my ipf and ipnat configs? > Could it be the remote client that's the problem? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:06:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7233216A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:06:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A205E43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:06:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1EE60VZ011602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:06:03 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1EE5md9020227; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:05:48 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1EE5mdJ020203; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:05:48 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:05:48 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Kevin Kinsey Message-ID: <20060214140548.GA9915@flame.pc> References: <200602092036.k19KaIhn086956@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <20060209220123.GA4751@flame.pc> <43EBE2F8.8000501@daleco.biz> <43F1DF7A.7000504@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F1DF7A.7000504@daleco.biz> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.337, required 5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL -0.15, BAYES_00 -2.60, BIZ_TLD 2.01, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using dd to Make a Clone of a Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:06:52 -0000 On 2006-02-14 07:47, Kevin Kinsey wrote: >Kevin Kinsey wrote: >>Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>> Bah! That's too slow for my taste. I would usually go for a newfs, >>> dump, and restore option. For instance, to create a copy of /usr on a >>> second disk: >>> >>> newfs -U /dev/ad1s1a >>> mount /dev/ad1s1a /mnt >>> dump -0 -a -L /usr | ( cd /mnt ; restore ruvf - ) >>> >>> Copying with dd(1) is not as fast :) >> >> Sorry to butt in --- but I'm needing to start cloning too. Looks >> like a winner to me ... wouldn't this have the added advantage >> of making "same size and geometry" (cf. Erik Trulsson, 4 hours ago, >> this thread) less relevant? >> >> As long as the "new" slice had enough space, geometry shouldn't >> matter to dump|restore .... > > Just for the archives: > > Giorgios' solution is very nice, but needs the "-f" option and another > "-" to work properly AFAICT, both from experience and from reading > dump(8): > > dump -0 -a -L -f - /usr | (cd /mnt ; restore ruvf - ) > > If you don't include "-f" (for "file") and "-" (for "stdout"), then your > command will fail with: > > DUMP: Cannot open output "/dev/sa0" Oops! Yes, good catch :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:08:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B8716A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:08:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61DE43D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:08:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from localhost (terrapin.inter-sonic.com [172.16.1.12]) by neonpark.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31D3818E52 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:08:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F1E45B.9010207@intersonic.se> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:08:27 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Subject: recommendation on graphical ftp client for fbsd/kde X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:08:33 -0000 So far tried: konqueror shipped with kde: odd behaviour with authentication kbear: crashes kasablanca; crashes would prefer one that handles tls as well command line works nicely as always... anyone? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:09:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5C816A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:09:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9593943D4C for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:09:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 22571 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 14:09:00 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Feb 2006 14:09:00 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 122BD28441; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:09:00 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Joe Auty References: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 14 Feb 2006 09:08:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> Message-ID: <443bimav7o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: core dump with dump command in single user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:09:02 -0000 Joe Auty writes: > Hello, > > Following the instructions here: http://www.unixcities.com/howto/ > index.html I did a: > Those directions are a little outdated, but the problem is really just that you didn't follow the directions closely enough: > dump -0f - /usr | restore -rf - /backup/usr should have been more like dump -0f - /usr | (cd /backup/usr;restore -xf - ) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:09:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7571E16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:09:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB83A43D4C for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:09:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214140943.XTZF18877.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:09:43 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Daniel A." Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:09:41 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550602140559s7687b600k26a76f5d6b2a7973@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Cant login to FTP server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:09:46 -0000 There taken right from the ipfilter section of the handbook. Maybe you should read that section in the handbook. Post the complete contents of your ipf rules and nat rules for review -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Daniel A. Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:59 AM To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cant login to FTP server. Hi, the server is connected directly to "the wild", and I'm connecting from a remote non-local host. Are you sure that those are ipf rules? They look a lot like ipnat rules. On 2/14/06, fbsd_user wrote: > Daniel > You did not say where you were running ftp from. > like from LAN box to gateway server or > from gateway box to public internet remote ftp site or > from public internet remote user to your gateway ftp server. > > I am guessing its from gateway box to public internet remote ftp > site. > Your nat rules need to look like this example. You are missing the > second rule. > > map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp > map dc0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp > map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 > > The first rule handles all FTP traffic for the private LAN. > The second rule handles all FTP traffic from the gateway. > The third rule handles all non-FTP traffic for the private LAN. > All the non-FTP gateway traffic is using the public IP address by > default so > there is no ipnat rule needed. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Daniel A. > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:42 AM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Cant login to FTP server. > > > Hi, I have some FTP login problems. > I run FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE, and I have ipf and ipnat enabled. > > _______SNIP_______ > Status: Connecting to dienub.org ... > Status: Connected with dienub.org. Waiting for welcome message... > Response: 220 m00h.dienub.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) ready. > Command: USER ************** > Response: 331 Password required for alive. > Command: PASS ************** > Response: 230 User alive logged in. > Command: FEAT > Response: 500 FEAT: command not understood. > Command: SYST > Response: 215 UNIX Type: L8 Version: BSD-199506 > Status: Connected > Status: Retrieving directory listing... > Command: PWD > Response: 257 "/usr/home/alive" is current directory. > Command: TYPE A > Response: 200 Type set to A. > Command: PASV > Response: 227 Entering Passive Mode (87,49,144,133,237,45) > Command: LIST > Error: Transfer channel can't be opened. Reason: A connection > attempt > failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a > period of time, or established connection failed because connected > host has failed to respond. > Error: Could not retrieve directory listing > Command: TYPE A > _______SNIP_______ > > > /etc/ipf.rules: > _______SNIP_______ > # Let clients behind the firewall send out to the internet, and > replies to > # come back in by keeping state. > pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp all keep state > pass out quick on rl0 proto udp all keep state > pass out quick on rl0 proto icmp all keep state > > # Since nothing should be coming from these address ranges, block > them > block in quick on rl0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > block in quick on rl0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any > > # Let's let people access the services running behind this system > > # Let's let people access the services running on this system > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 30000 >< 50000 > flags S keep state #PASV FTP > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 21 #FTP > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 #SSH > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 #WWW > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 113 #oidentd > > # Steam Dedicated Server > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port = 1200 # > Friends network > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port 26999 >< 27016 > # Gameport > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port = 27020 > #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 27029 >< 27040 > #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 27015 # SRCDS > Rcon > > # Block everything else > block in quick on rl0 all > _______SNIP_______ > > > /etc/ipnat.rules > _______SNIP_______ > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp 1025:65000 > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 > _______SNIP_______ > > > Might the problem be anywhere else besides my ipf and ipnat configs? > Could it be the remote client that's the problem? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 13:59:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1455A16A444 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:59:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster5.tls.net (ecluster5.tls.net [65.196.224.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F97143D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:59:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 86322 invoked by uid 89); 14 Feb 2006 13:59:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.101?) (ldg%tls.net@204.8.12.135) by auth-ecluster5.tls.net with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 13:59:48 -0000 Message-ID: <43F1E250.1070705@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:59:44 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: undisclosed-recipients:; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:11:33 +0000 Subject: NAS advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:59:50 -0000 (I am cross posting to FreeBSD questions and Bacula Users, I will not be cross posting replies) I've been crying for four years that we needed a decent backup system and I always got put off. "It's on order", "can you resubmit an updated equipment list". Yea, checks in the mail. So yesterday I am told that we have some equipment we got in another deal and I can have it to backup my NOC. I plan to run Bacula which I already have on some individual machines. I want to have Bacula clients on all my machines talking to a single machine running the Bacula director, hopefully using the NAS machines for storage. This is the equipment they threw at me, it is old, but amazingly, unused. One Dell Poweredge 750, 2.8ghz CPU, 1gb ram, 2 500gb SATA Maxtor drives(yuk!), CERC SATA controller. Two Dell Powervault 725N, 2.0ghz CPU, 512mb ram, 2 480gb Drives. One of these machines has a SATA controller. I would really rather have SCSI, I've changed a deskdrawer full of SATA drives in the past 12 months(literally). But, we use what we can get, beats nothing. My questions! I will install FreeBSD on the Poweredge. Should I, could I, install FreeBSD on the Powervaults? I've no experience with them. If they are stable, I would just as soon plug them in and let them go. They will be behind the PIX and on a seperate network (1gb) connected to the backside of each server. The Powervaults will do nothing but export NFS mounts for the Bacula director to write backup files to. Any thoughts are welcome. DAve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:14:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF1D16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:14:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6129043D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from localhost (terrapin.inter-sonic.com [172.16.1.12]) by neonpark.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F130818E23; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:14:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F1E5B2.3090308@intersonic.se> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:14:10 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Cummins" References: <000801c63120$1a730d60$0202a8c0@http192.168.2.3> In-Reply-To: <000801c63120$1a730d60$0202a8c0@http192.168.2.3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: General Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:14:17 -0000 M. Cummins wrote: > Hi. Sorry about the HTML formatted email. > > I'm extremely interested in installation of a FreeBSD build on a Dell Dimension XPS P133s 133 MHz / 16 MB RAM, with a S3 Trio 64+ PCI (765) and D-Link DFE 530-TX PCI adapter. I've noted the HCL for version 5 (or maybe it was 6?) but I figure I would do better to simply ask - what version do I need to run with my current hardware, and what is the highest version I can run on the machine that I plan to install on? Before you get too far on the reply, please also consider that I primarily want to use the computer for a webserver (for my LAN) in console mode (I doubt a GUI is a good idea considering the hardware I'm using. > > Oh, and sorry if this is inapproprite, but I have no experience with UNIX and really need to learn it. I figured FreeBSD was my best shot at it, based on what I've seen. I've been looking at 2.2.8 and it seems to be a decent choice, but I do consider that you probably know more about this than I do. We've all been there. Why don't you start with something like http://www.google.se/search?num=100&hl=en&q=freebsd+%22minimum+requirements%22+install+site%3Afreebsd.org&btnG=Search to see what others did and experienced From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:26:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BA416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:26:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B7E43D58 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:25:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:9891 helo=assata.aseed.net) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1F917t-0000HP-Rr; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:25:58 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by assata.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DD12A08A0; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:33:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (a78172.upc-a.chello.nl [62.163.78.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F275858C6BE; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:32:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F1E866.9070404@scii.nl> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:25:42 +0100 From: albi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Per olof Ljungmark References: <43F1E45B.9010207@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <43F1E45B.9010207@intersonic.se> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendation on graphical ftp client for fbsd/kde X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:26:07 -0000 Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > So far tried: > konqueror shipped with kde: odd behaviour with authentication > kbear: crashes > kasablanca; crashes > would prefer one that handles tls as well did you try gftp ? -> /usr/ports/ftp/gftp (it can do ftp and sftp) -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:29:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE1216A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:29:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggroth99@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-f24.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.49.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EC243D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:29:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggroth99@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 06:29:18 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 66.238.149.124 by by14fd.bay14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:29:18 GMT X-Originating-IP: [66.238.149.124] X-Originating-Email: [ggroth99@hotmail.com] X-Sender: ggroth99@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <04C71268DFDAA8499EC1A248A44B6A2B019E50B6@Exchange21.EDU.epsb.ca> From: "Greg Groth" To: Kirk.Davis@epsb.ca Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:29:18 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2006 14:29:18.0409 (UTC) FILETIME=[09EBDB90:01C63173] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:29:19 -0000 >From: "Kirk Davis" >To: "Greg Groth" >CC: >Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems >Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:25:04 -0700 > >Hi Greg, > > > I'm trying to set up a FreeBSD 6.0 box as a mail server, and while > > everything seems to be working OK for the most part, I have > > run into two > > issues that I cannot resolve (I'm new to BSD, please bear > > with me). Install > > went as follows: Installed via FTP last night along with > > "src - Sources for > > everything", > > > > IMAP-UW was compiled via ports with WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT > > enabled (same for > > cclient), OpenSSL, Cyrus-SASL2 & Cyrus-SASL2-saslauthd were > > compiled via > > ports with no flags. > > > > Sendmail was installed with the base install and recompiled > > (after SASL2 was > > up and running) with the following options added to make.conf: > > > > # SASL (cyrus-sasl v2) sendmail build flags... > > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 > > SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib > > SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 > > # Adding to enable alternate port (smtps) for sendmail... > > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -D_FFR_SMTP_SSL > > > > I followed the instructions I found at > > http://www.bsdconspiracy.net/howto/sendmail.html, and had no > > problems with > > the install except for Sendmail. After recompiling sendmail, > > I added the > > following lines to the mail.server.mc file: > > > > define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS',`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl > > TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl > > define(`CERT_DIR', `/etc/mail/certs')dnl > > define(`confCACERT_PATH', `CERT_DIR')dnl > > define(`confCACERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl > > define(`confSERVER_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl > > define(`confSERVER_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl > > define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl > > define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl > > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl > >This is your problem. The above line sets up the Sendmail daemon to >listen on port 25 but the standard mc file distributed with FreeBSD also >sets up a DAEMON port (it's at the end of the MC file). > >Here is what my DAEMON_OPTIONS lines look like. These should be the >only DAEMON_OPTIONS lines in the mc file. >dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) >DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet') >DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') >DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl That is what I was guessing, however I couldn't find a Sendmail for Dummies book that could explain The DAEMON_OPTIONS in language I understand. It's very easy to get lost in the online docs and the O'Reilly book, for me anyway. > > > > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl > > > > After running (in /etc/mail) "make clean", "make cf", "make > > install", "make > > restart", SMTP no longer works, and I find the following in > > maillog and > > messages > > > > Feb 12 20:25:55 mail sm-mta[1213]: daemon IPv4: problem > > creating SMTP socket > > Feb 12 20:26:00 mail sm-mta[1213]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): > > opendaemonsocket: > > daemon IPv4: cannot bind: Address already in use > > > > When I try and stop sendmail, I get a message that the pid > > for Sendmail > > cannot be found. I end up killing the missing Sendmail daemon using > > KSysGuard > > > > If I remove this line - "DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, > > Name=MTA')dnl" from the > > mail.server.mc file, make cf, make install, make restart, > > sendmail starts > > normally. When trying to access from another machine on my > > network, I can > > only connect on port 25 without a secure connection (I'm > > using Thunderbird > > for this), although SMTP-AUTH is working correctly. > >Have you tried to setup your mail client to connect to port 465? This >is the smtps (SMTP SSL) port. Yes I have. The above mentioned How-To states to have MS products connect on port 25, which didn't make a whole lot of sense to me, so I tried both 25 and 465 using Thunderbird. Thunderbird returned with a message that the SMTP server was not accepting connections. Now that I know what's wrong with my MC file, I'm guessing I havge to take a stronger look at my certificates and make sure that they're working correctly. I might have a path screwed up somewhere. Seems that if it's listening on 465, everything should be OK with Sendmail, but there might be a problem with SSL. > > > > Any ideas on what I might need to do to get SSL / SMTP-AUTH > > working on SMTP? > > I took a look at the instructions in the handbook, but they > > were written > > for SASL1. Running netstat shows smtps listening on 465, but > > when I try to > > telnet to that port, the server drops the connection. > >Hmm... It should connect but you will not see anything since it is >expecting an SSL connection. > > > My second problem is rather simple, after I create an IMAP > > folder, I am > > unable to delete it using a remote client. Thunderbird > > responds with "The > > mail server responded: RENAME failed: Can't create mailbox node > > /home/User/Trash/: File exists. Nothing shows up in any of > > the server logs > > though. > >I have not seen this problem although I have it setup for an office of >Outlook users. I would check the permissions on the folders in the user >home directory. This is where the IMAP user forlders are by default. I >usually setup the clients to use the base imap if Mail and then create a >Mail directory in the user home directory. That way the mail folders >don't get messed up with the user stuff. I'm going to have to play around with this a bit more. After thinking about it, I have not tested deleting a directory through an IMAP connection, only an IMAPS connection. It's possible that I'm experiencing some kind of problem there as well. I will also take a look at the permissions, which I have not done yet since I assumed that if I could create it, I should be able to delete it, but we all know what happens when we assume things. > > > > > Hopefully this is the right list for these questions, if not, > > could someone > > please direct me to the correct one? Any advice anyone can > > give me on > > either of these problems would be greatly appreciated. > > > >---- Kirk >Kirk Davis >Senior Network Analyst, ITS >Edmonton Public Schools >1-780-429-8308 Many, many thanks on clearing up the Sendmail issue. Greg Groth _________________________________________________________________ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:36:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B6016A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D6043D55 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214143657.QQTK25152.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:36:57 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "albi" , "Kumar" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:36:55 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060214145612.c789a97a.albi@scii.nl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Setting Up A Home Network ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:36:59 -0000 yes xp pro can run as gateway with lan behind it -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of albi Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:56 AM To: Kumar Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting Up A Home Network ... On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:48:33 +0800 Kumar wrote: > Is it possible to set up internet connection, between a XP Pro box, > and a FreeBSD-current box, without the use of a router, I have got > two ethernet cards on the box running XP Pro, and one ethernet card > on the box running FreeBSD-current, and a cross over cable. > > Is it theoretically possible ? if you put 2 nics in the FreeBSD-box with the cross-cable it's possible yes, follow the firewall-instructions : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls. html if you want to keep the 2 nics in the ms-windows-machine, i would suggest to ask in a ms-windows-forum/list etc. -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:44:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D7416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:44:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu) Received: from afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu [147.91.1.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5B643D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:44:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu) Received: from afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1EEiHTu011772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:44:17 +0100 Received: from localhost (ggajic@localhost) by afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k1EEiFLV011769; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:44:16 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:44:15 +0100 (CET) From: Goran Gajic To: fbsd@douville.net Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-RCUB-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the RCUB if you have problem with mail X-RCUB-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-RCUB-MailScanner-From: ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:44:29 -0000 Hi, You can try using ipf filter to impose source-policy routing: cat > ipf.example pass in quick on em1 to em1:192.168.1.2 from 10.1.0.0/16 to a.b.c.d/32 ^d ipf -f ipf.example This way you will re-route all packets coming from source 10.1/16 to destination a.b.c.d to go to address 192.168.1.2 not to a.b.c.d Note that you have to rebuild your kernel in order to have options IPFILTER enabled. Regards, gg. >I'm trying to set up the routing table to force requests to certain IP >addresses to use a particular ethernet card. I've used the route command >in a number of >ways, but still can't come up with how to force to use em1 instead of >em0, >with the right gateway. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:46:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF8A16A47A for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:46:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD4943D53 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:46:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187FC730B7; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:46:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99454-10; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:46:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (12-223-193-72.client.insightbb.com [12.223.193.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F298D730AD; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:46:44 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <443bimav7o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> <443bimav7o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <039BD206-0592-4F99-BE9B-CB49310E5BDC@netmusician.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:46:42 -0500 To: FreeBSD Questions , Lowell Gilbert X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: Subject: Re: core dump with dump command in single user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:46:47 -0000 On Feb 14, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Joe Auty writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Following the instructions here: http://www.unixcities.com/howto/ >> index.html I did a: >> > Those directions are a little outdated, but the problem is really just > that you didn't follow the directions closely enough: > >> dump -0f - /usr | restore -rf - /backup/usr > > should have been more like > > dump -0f - /usr | (cd /backup/usr;restore -xf - ) Okay, I'm still getting: no space left in string table abort? If I say "n", it just core dumps.... Any other suggestions? Would using "dd" be a valid workaround to cloning my disk? My disk is over a 100 gigabytes, could this be what is causing dump to crap out? ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:54:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A7F16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:54:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9451E43D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from localhost (terrapin.inter-sonic.com [172.16.1.12]) by neonpark.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66385818E52; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:54:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F1EF0F.7030205@intersonic.se> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:54:07 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: albi References: <43F1E45B.9010207@intersonic.se> <43F1E866.9070404@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <43F1E866.9070404@scii.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: recommendation on graphical ftp client for fbsd/kde X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:54:12 -0000 albi wrote: > Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > >> So far tried: >> konqueror shipped with kde: odd behaviour with authentication >> kbear: crashes >> kasablanca; crashes >> would prefer one that handles tls as well > > did you try gftp ? -> /usr/ports/ftp/gftp > > (it can do ftp and sftp) > looks good. thanks a lot! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:55:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB3D16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:55:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7D643D5D for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:55:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214145545.SJXY25152.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:55:45 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Goran Gajic" , Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:55:43 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:55:52 -0000 You are not correct in that last statement. ipfilter does not have to be compiled into kernel to work. You should read the handbook ipfilter firewall section where it clearly states that is not necessary and tells you how to do it. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Goran Gajic Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:44 AM To: fbsd@douville.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP Routing Question Hi, You can try using ipf filter to impose source-policy routing: cat > ipf.example pass in quick on em1 to em1:192.168.1.2 from 10.1.0.0/16 to a.b.c.d/32 ^d ipf -f ipf.example This way you will re-route all packets coming from source 10.1/16 to destination a.b.c.d to go to address 192.168.1.2 not to a.b.c.d Note that you have to rebuild your kernel in order to have options IPFILTER enabled. Regards, gg. >I'm trying to set up the routing table to force requests to certain IP >addresses to use a particular ethernet card. I've used the route command >in a number of >ways, but still can't come up with how to force to use em1 instead of >em0, >with the right gateway. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 14:58:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4A416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from mx5.mail.ru (mx5.mail.ru [194.67.23.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07DD43D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:58:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from [80.243.64.197] (port=43032 helo=[10.0.1.5]) by mx5.mail.ru with asmtp id 1F91dg-0000Yb-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:58:48 +0300 Message-ID: <43F27C4D.9010904@mail.ru> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:56:45 +1000 From: Maxim Vetrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <43F11FB2.7000105@mail.ru> <20060213141706.GA94131@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20060213141706.GA94131@flame.pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: IPFILTER rule error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:58:50 -0000 Hi, Sorry, I really do not want you to guess! Here is what you asked: kernel conf: ------------------------------------------------------- ... options IPFILTER options IPFILTER_LOG #options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #options IPSTEALTH ... ------------------------------------------------------- rc.conf: ------------------------------------------------------- ... ifconfig_rl0="inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.248" ... ipnat_enable="YES" ipfilter_enable="YES" ipmon_enable="YES" ... ------------------------------------------------------- services: ------------------------------------------------------- ... sunrpc 111/tcp rpcbind #SUN Remote Procedure Call sunrpc 111/udp rpcbind #SUN Remote Procedure Call ... ------------------------------------------------------- ipf.rules: ------------------------------------------------------- block in log on rl0 all head 20 block out log on rl0 all head 25 pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 717 keep state group 20 pass out quick on rl0 \ proto udp from any to any port = 111 keep state group 20 -------------------------------------------------------- Steps to load the rules: >ipf -Fa >ipf -f /etc/ipf.rules 1:ioctl (add/insert rule): No such process And there is one more problem - despite that I have packet logging enabled by default (-Ds) through syslogd, log is empty! syslog.conf: -------------------------------------------------------- ... security.* /var/log/security ... -------------------------------------------------------- That file exists and have root rw permissions. If this help: after I'd moved to 6.0 from 5.4 (backup-format-install-restore), this config stopped to work. I know that I'm doing something wrong but what exactly? Regards, Muxas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 15:14:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A4C16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:14:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E35443D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:14:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.ATOSORIGIN.ES [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B962E041; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:14:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F1F3BC.6020209@locolomo.org> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:14:04 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060118) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Vetrov References: <43F11FB2.7000105@mail.ru> <20060213141706.GA94131@flame.pc> <43F27C4D.9010904@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <43F27C4D.9010904@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER rule error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:14:09 -0000 Maxim Vetrov wrote: > Hi, > kernel conf: > ------------------------------------------------------- > ... > options IPFILTER > options IPFILTER_LOG > #options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK > #options IPSTEALTH > ... > ------------------------------------------------------- The rc scripts should load these modules if they are not compiled with the kernel, in that case they would show up with kldstat. Try use kldstat and sysctl -a to see what's in your kernel, grep for ipf. > services: > ------------------------------------------------------- > ... > sunrpc 111/tcp rpcbind #SUN Remote Procedure Call > sunrpc 111/udp rpcbind #SUN Remote Procedure Call > ... > ------------------------------------------------------- > > ipf.rules: > ------------------------------------------------------- > block in log on rl0 all head 20 > block out log on rl0 all head 25 > > > pass in quick on rl0 \ > proto tcp/udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 > pass in quick on rl0 \ > proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 717 keep state group 20 > pass out quick on rl0 \ > proto udp from any to any port = 111 keep state group 20 > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Steps to load the rules: >> ipf -Fa >> ipf -f /etc/ipf.rules > 1:ioctl (add/insert rule): No such process 1st: IIRC, the number in the error line indicates the line the error occurred in - not sure though. That would be your first rule. I don't know if you posted the whole ruleset or if you cut out what seemed irrelevant to keep the post short. 2nd: Reading the ipf-howto I see no examples where port names are used, try using the port number to eliminate that posibility. > And there is one more problem - despite that I have packet logging > enabled by default (-Ds) through syslogd, log is empty! > > syslog.conf: > -------------------------------------------------------- > ... > security.* /var/log/security > ... > -------------------------------------------------------- > That file exists and have root rw permissions. If you want to log to a separate file, why not let ipmon do that directly? # ipmon -D /var/log/security Secondly, the empty log may not be that surprising in the first place if your ruleset is not loaded correctly. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 15:16:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B8C16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:16:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josefsen@wasd.dk) Received: from swip.net (mailfe04.swip.net [212.247.154.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4520A43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:16:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josefsen@wasd.dk) X-T2-Posting-ID: KGmt/d/wOu6Babj+G0YSeg== X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from tycho.ique.dk ([83.72.135.6] verified) by mailfe04.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.2) with ESMTP id 120574164 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:16:14 +0100 Received: by tycho.ique.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 256399B451; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:18:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:18:39 +0100 From: Brian Josefsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060214151839.GC55006@wasd.dk> References: <43F1E250.1070705@pixelhammer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F1E250.1070705@pixelhammer.com> X-Value-Of-Pi: 3.1428571428571428 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: NAS advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:16:19 -0000 On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:59:44AM -0500, DAve wrote: > > My questions! I will install FreeBSD on the Poweredge. Should I, could > I, install FreeBSD on the Powervaults? I've no experience with them. If > they are stable, I would just as soon plug them in and let them go. > The Dell's are great with FreeBSD, but pay attention if it has one of those Dell DRAC controllers for remote management that it will appear to FreeBSD as an usb keyboard + mouse and therefore take precedence over an ps/2 keyboard or an usb keyboard which will be handled as an extra keyboard. Therefore, before you reboot after installation from the shell prompt make sure you add keyboard=/dev/kbd0 to your rc.conf _before_ rebooting. Good luck with your project -- Med venlig hilsen / Best regards Brian Josefsen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 15:36:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BC916A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:36:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B54F43D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:36:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214153640.MKCJ22902.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:36:40 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Maxim Vetrov" , Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:36:39 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <43F27C4D.9010904@mail.ru> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: IPFILTER rule error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:36:41 -0000 First of all you really need to read the ipfilter section of the FreeBSD handbook. The correct solution is exampled in the handbook. You do not need to compile ipfilter in to the kernel to work. >From your rules I see no need for that head/group stuff so remove it. I see rl0 being assigned to private ip address which means that Nic is facing your LAN which is behind your gateway box. That ip address range is not routable on the public internet. You have something mess up big time. Your firewall rules is suppose to be on the Nic facing the public internet. You nat the public ip address to you private LAN ip address. The reason you have no log records is because your firewall rules have syntax error and are never loaded. Only rules with log keyword will generate log records. Only use rules with quick option. Do not mix quick and non quick rules. You need pass in rules for you ISP's dns and dhcp servers to access your box. Explain in detail your network layout. Do you have LAN? How are you connected to the public internet? Again I strongly recommend you read the ipfilter section of the handbook your answers are there. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Maxim Vetrov Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:57 PM To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER rule error Hi, Sorry, I really do not want you to guess! Here is what you asked: kernel conf: ------------------------------------------------------- ... options IPFILTER options IPFILTER_LOG #options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #options IPSTEALTH ... ------------------------------------------------------- rc.conf: ------------------------------------------------------- ... ifconfig_rl0="inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.248" ... ipnat_enable="YES" ipfilter_enable="YES" ipmon_enable="YES" ... ------------------------------------------------------- services: ------------------------------------------------------- ... sunrpc 111/tcp rpcbind #SUN Remote Procedure Call sunrpc 111/udp rpcbind #SUN Remote Procedure Call ... ------------------------------------------------------- ipf.rules: ------------------------------------------------------- block in log on rl0 all head 20 block out log on rl0 all head 25 pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 717 keep state group 20 pass out quick on rl0 \ proto udp from any to any port = 111 keep state group 20 -------------------------------------------------------- Steps to load the rules: >ipf -Fa >ipf -f /etc/ipf.rules 1:ioctl (add/insert rule): No such process And there is one more problem - despite that I have packet logging enabled by default (-Ds) through syslogd, log is empty! syslog.conf: -------------------------------------------------------- ... security.* /var/log/security ... -------------------------------------------------------- That file exists and have root rw permissions. If this help: after I'd moved to 6.0 from 5.4 (backup-format-install-restore), this config stopped to work. I know that I'm doing something wrong but what exactly? Regards, Muxas _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 15:43:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F9016A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:43:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E81B143D62 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:43:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 28426 invoked by uid 0); 14 Feb 2006 15:43:08 -0000 Received: from user-69-73-60-132.knology.net (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (69.73.60.132) by smtp2.knology.net with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 15:43:08 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id CCCC26295; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:43:06 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:43:06 -0600 From: David Kelly To: "M. Cummins" Message-ID: <20060214154306.GB95069@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <000801c63120$1a730d60$0202a8c0@http192.168.2.3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000801c63120$1a730d60$0202a8c0@http192.168.2.3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: General Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:43:15 -0000 On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:35:37PM -0700, M. Cummins wrote: > Hi. Sorry about the HTML formatted email. > > I'm extremely interested in installation of a FreeBSD build on a Dell > Dimension XPS P133s 133 MHz / 16 MB RAM, with a S3 Trio 64+ PCI (765) > and D-Link DFE 530-TX PCI adapter. I've noted the HCL for version 5 > (or maybe it was 6?) but I figure I would do better to simply ask - > what version do I need to run with my current hardware, and what is > the highest version I can run on the machine that I plan to install > on? Before you get too far on the reply, please also consider that I > primarily want to use the computer for a webserver (for my LAN) in > console mode (I doubt a GUI is a good idea considering the hardware > I'm using. I don't believe there is anything which has been done to the latest versions to *prevent* it from running on your machine. Since you mentioned FreeBSD 2.2.8, I have fond memories of abusing almost exactly the same machine you describe but with a whopping 24 MB of RAM. Ran Apache, NetAtalk, Samba, the basic X11 system with practically no window manager. Netscape Navigator for http client and exmh2 for email. Also burned a lot of CD's on that machine, and wrote a lot of DAT tapes. Built another machine around a PII-233 with (4) DAT3 drives. Would run all 4 DAT drives at once. No problems. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 16:01:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D5E16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:01:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from boxxla@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay18-f22.bay18.hotmail.com [65.54.187.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8672043D75 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:01:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from boxxla@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:01:12 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 85.96.27.220 by by18fd.bay18.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:01:10 GMT X-Originating-IP: [85.96.27.220] X-Originating-Email: [boxxla@hotmail.com] X-Sender: boxxla@hotmail.com From: "B _" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:01:10 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2006 16:01:12.0344 (UTC) FILETIME=[E07B9180:01C6317F] Cc: Subject: boot problems with FreeBSD, WindowsXP (and Linux) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:01:17 -0000 Hello, I've been having some problems with my computer arising out of an install of FreeBSD 5.4 which I can't seem to solve. First of all, I started with an 80 GB HD partitioned as such: c: 20 GB NTFS d: 20 GB NTFS e: 40 GB FAT I first installed a copy of Ubuntu Linux 4.1 onto the Windows "d:". This worked fine, but it was only to get a look at it before putting FreeBSD onto the same partition. My 5.4 installation works fine and I can mount both /dev/ad0s1 and /dev/ad0s3 (NTFS and MSDOS respectively). The problem is that Windows XP not fails to boot. It appears to start but then flashes blue and restarts the computer. Repairing with the Windows disk also causes a reboot and a reinstall would mean overwriting both FreeBSD (which I could reinstall) but more importantly the 40 GB FAT partition which I'd rather not loose. I don't need Windows in fact but my FreeBSD is a work in progress so I'd like to have a copy of Linux to tide me over until everything is up and working. The problem is that all of the Linux distros that I've tried (Fedora 4, SUSE, Mandirva, Ubuntu) have complained about the current partitioning scheme and want to use the entire disk. FreeBSD's fdisk gives the following: Disk name: ad0 FDISK Partition Editor DISK Geometry: 9729 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 156296385 sectors (76316MB) Offset Size(ST) End Name PType Desc Subtype Flags 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 63 40965687 40965749 ad0s1 4 NTFS/HPFS/QNX 7 40965750 39230730 80196479 ad0s4 8 freebsd 165 80196480 1 80196480 - 12 unused 0 80196481 1735019 81931499 ad0s2 4 extended DOS 5 81931500 74364885 156296384 ad0s3 4 extended DOS 5 56296385 5103 156301487 - 12 unused 0 Fdisk also complains about incorrect geometry but uses what it considers probably correct. And it says that ad0s2 does not begin on a track boundary. I cannot mount ad0s2 and I feel that it is somehow the problem. What can I do to either correct Windows or install Linux without destroying my 40GB FAT partition (ad0s3)? _________________________________________________________________ MSN Hotmail : crez votre adresse e-mail gratuite & vie ! http://www.imagine-msn.com/hotmail/default.aspx?locale=fr-FR From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 16:14:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5183116A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:14:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggroth99@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-f21.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.49.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE5043D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:14:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggroth99@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:14:14 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 66.238.149.124 by by14fd.bay14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:14:14 GMT X-Originating-IP: [66.238.149.124] X-Originating-Email: [ggroth99@hotmail.com] X-Sender: ggroth99@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Greg Groth" To: tedm@toybox.placo.com, joe@netmusician.org Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:14:14 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2006 16:14:14.0847 (UTC) FILETIME=[B2E40CF0:01C63181] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:14:15 -0000 >From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" >To: "Joe Auty" , "Kirk Davis" >CC: "Greg Groth" , >Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems >Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:34:28 -0800 > > >I'm sure glad that this message didn't pass through my work mailserver >so that it's didn't see it, since my work e-mail inbox has 16383 messages >in it (the limit that Outlook can display in IMAP mode) and is 412 >megabytes >in size, and performance is perfectly fine both with Outlook and >Horde/IMP. > >I wouldn't want my mailserver reading it and thinking that it's OK to >slack off. > > And yes I know I need to delete >some messages, speak to the hand if your going to make that crack. > >This is imap-uw/sendmail. > >Perhaps you might consider that since you haven't run imap-uw in >a while that your no longer qualified to make claims about it? Or >perhaps >you never had it setup properly? Or perhaps your hardware was slow? > >Nothing is wrong with Postfix / Courier-IMAP but nothing is wrong either >with sendmail / uw-imap. > >Ted > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Auty > >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:53 PM > >To: Kirk Davis > >Cc: Greg Groth; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Re: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems > > > > > >Hey Greg, > > > >Sorry if this completely throws a monkey wrench into your plans, but > >I feel inspired to interject since I once had a nearly identical > >setup as you... > > > >I switched to Postfix and Courier-IMAP since I found that performance > >of large mailboxes in IMAP-UW was pretty poor, especially over web- > >based email where messages are not cached. I switched to Postfix > >because it is so much more simple and straight forward than Sendmail. > >You should have no problems switching to Postfix, since it is > >basically Sendmail with a nicer wrapper/configuration. > > > >Just food for thought. I appreciate both of your comments, as I have stated I am new to BSD. Part of my problem is the huge amount of software available, and no good way to determine what will work better for my situation. Perhaps if I explain my situation, it would help some. We've been running Sendmail and a POP-Before-SMTP script for the last 6 years on a Redhat box. I think it started out on 5.2, and was up to 7.3 when it crashed 3 weeks ago. I had been planning to upgrade the server, and had a new box ready to go, but I had stalled on the OS. I didn't want to go down the Redhat route because of strictly personal issues that are more opinions than fact, and a friend suggest FreeBSD. The server crash pretty much forced my hand, and my goal was to replicate what we had in place ASAP. Because of my (limited) knowledge of Sendmail, I went that route as I know nothing of the alternatives. I went with IMAP-UW because not because of anything I had read, but because I was attempting to get the POP-Before-SMTP port to work (which it didn't - long story), and IMAP-UW seemed a good alternative as it is a POP and IMAP server and was easily configured in POP-Before-SMTP. Since I could not find a POP-Before-SMTP solution that I could get to operate (I had problems with POP-Before-SMTP, and DRAC before throwing in the towel), I decided to switch to SMTP-AUTH. So here's my situation, we have about 25 users on the server. I need POP and IMAP that will operate with and without SSL, and SMTP that can handle SMTP-AUTH with and without SSL. Out of the 25 users, I have 3 that are email packrats, and have between 2-4 gigs of email apiece. They are currently using POP on Outlook Express, but will be switching over to IMAP on Thunderbird in the near future (I also have 5 users that I'm not sure what client they are using, we're hosting their domain - long story). Our office peronnel will be migrating to IMAP, using SSL when out of the office, and plain text when in. The five users in which we are hosting their email will remain on POP, and although SSL would be nice, I want the ability to offer plain text in case I run into client issues. Similar circumstances for SMTP, I can relay by domain for users on our network, and would like to use SMTP-AUTH for off-ste users. SSL preferred, but offer plain text in case of client issues. Last issue would be something that will play nice with SquirrelMail. Although I'm very familiar with administering Sendmail (starting, stopping, backing up, running makemaps), configuring is another story. While SMTP is pretty much running as stable as it ever has, I still have issues from time to time. For instance I am sending this from Hotmail as this list is currently bouncing email from my server because of some error I have not investigated yet. At this moment I am pretty much open to anything, but I don't have a good way of evaluating different options other than trial and error (and I'm kind of short on time). I know that a lot of times it comes down to peronal taste (my reason for dumping Redhat), but sometimes there are specific issues that will make a certain solution better than others. Based off of my stated needs and my current issues (Sendmail configuration), is there a better solution, or is what I have now pretty much the same as other alternatives for my specfic needs? Thank you both for your attention to this matter. Greg Groth >From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" >To: "Joe Auty" , "Kirk Davis" >CC: "Greg Groth" , >Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems >Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:34:28 -0800 > > >I'm sure glad that this message didn't pass through my work mailserver >so that it's didn't see it, since my work e-mail inbox has 16383 messages >in it (the limit that Outlook can display in IMAP mode) and is 412 >megabytes >in size, and performance is perfectly fine both with Outlook and >Horde/IMP. > >I wouldn't want my mailserver reading it and thinking that it's OK to >slack off. > > And yes I know I need to delete >some messages, speak to the hand if your going to make that crack. > >This is imap-uw/sendmail. > >Perhaps you might consider that since you haven't run imap-uw in >a while that your no longer qualified to make claims about it? Or >perhaps >you never had it setup properly? Or perhaps your hardware was slow? > >Nothing is wrong with Postfix / Courier-IMAP but nothing is wrong either >with sendmail / uw-imap. > >Ted > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Auty > >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:53 PM > >To: Kirk Davis > >Cc: Greg Groth; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Re: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems > > > > > >Hey Greg, > > > >Sorry if this completely throws a monkey wrench into your plans, but > >I feel inspired to interject since I once had a nearly identical > >setup as you... > > > >I switched to Postfix and Courier-IMAP since I found that performance > >of large mailboxes in IMAP-UW was pretty poor, especially over web- > >based email where messages are not cached. I switched to Postfix > >because it is so much more simple and straight forward than Sendmail. > >You should have no problems switching to Postfix, since it is > >basically Sendmail with a nicer wrapper/configuration. > > > >Just food for thought. > > > > > >On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Kirk Davis wrote: > > > >> Hi Greg, > >> > >>> I'm trying to set up a FreeBSD 6.0 box as a mail server, and while > >>> everything seems to be working OK for the most part, I have > >>> run into two > >>> issues that I cannot resolve (I'm new to BSD, please bear > >>> with me). Install > >>> went as follows: Installed via FTP last night along with > >>> "src - Sources for > >>> everything", > >>> > >>> IMAP-UW was compiled via ports with WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT > >>> enabled (same for > >>> cclient), OpenSSL, Cyrus-SASL2 & Cyrus-SASL2-saslauthd were > >>> compiled via > >>> ports with no flags. > >>> > >>> Sendmail was installed with the base install and recompiled > >>> (after SASL2 was > >>> up and running) with the following options added to make.conf: > >>> > >>> # SASL (cyrus-sasl v2) sendmail build flags... > >>> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 > >>> SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib > >>> SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 > >>> # Adding to enable alternate port (smtps) for sendmail... > >>> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -D_FFR_SMTP_SSL > >>> > >>> I followed the instructions I found at > >>> http://www.bsdconspiracy.net/howto/sendmail.html, and had no > >>> problems with > >>> the install except for Sendmail. After recompiling sendmail, > >>> I added the > >>> following lines to the mail.server.mc file: > >>> > >>> define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS',`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl > >>> TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl > >>> define(`CERT_DIR', `/etc/mail/certs')dnl > >>> define(`confCACERT_PATH', `CERT_DIR')dnl > >>> define(`confCACERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl > >>> define(`confSERVER_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl > >>> define(`confSERVER_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl > >>> define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl > >>> define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl > >>> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl > >> > >> This is your problem. The above line sets up the Sendmail daemon to > >> listen on port 25 but the standard mc file distributed with FreeBSD > >> also > >> sets up a DAEMON port (it's at the end of the MC file). > >> > >> Here is what my DAEMON_OPTIONS lines look like. These should be the > >> only DAEMON_OPTIONS lines in the mc file. > >> dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) > >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet') > >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') > >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl > >> > >> > >>> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl > >>> > >>> After running (in /etc/mail) "make clean", "make cf", "make > >>> install", "make > >>> restart", SMTP no longer works, and I find the following in > >>> maillog and > >>> messages > >>> > >>> Feb 12 20:25:55 mail sm-mta[1213]: daemon IPv4: problem > >>> creating SMTP socket > >>> Feb 12 20:26:00 mail sm-mta[1213]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): > >>> opendaemonsocket: > >>> daemon IPv4: cannot bind: Address already in use > >>> > >>> When I try and stop sendmail, I get a message that the pid > >>> for Sendmail > >>> cannot be found. I end up killing the missing Sendmail daemon using > >>> KSysGuard > >>> > >>> If I remove this line - "DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, > >>> Name=MTA')dnl" from the > >>> mail.server.mc file, make cf, make install, make restart, > >>> sendmail starts > >>> normally. When trying to access from another machine on my > >>> network, I can > >>> only connect on port 25 without a secure connection (I'm > >>> using Thunderbird > >>> for this), although SMTP-AUTH is working correctly. > >> > >> Have you tried to setup your mail client to connect to port 465? This > >> is the smtps (SMTP SSL) port. > >> > >> > >>> Any ideas on what I might need to do to get SSL / SMTP-AUTH > >>> working on SMTP? > >>> I took a look at the instructions in the handbook, but they > >>> were written > >>> for SASL1. Running netstat shows smtps listening on 465, but > >>> when I try to > >>> telnet to that port, the server drops the connection. > >> > >> Hmm... It should connect but you will not see anything since it is > >> expecting an SSL connection. > >> > >>> My second problem is rather simple, after I create an IMAP > >>> folder, I am > >>> unable to delete it using a remote client. Thunderbird > >>> responds with "The > >>> mail server responded: RENAME failed: Can't create mailbox node > >>> /home/User/Trash/: File exists. Nothing shows up in any of > >>> the server logs > >>> though. > >> > >> I have not seen this problem although I have it setup for an office of > >> Outlook users. I would check the permissions on the folders in the > >> user > >> home directory. This is where the IMAP user forlders are by > >> default. I > >> usually setup the clients to use the base imap if Mail and then > >> create a > >> Mail directory in the user home directory. That way the mail folders > >> don't get messed up with the user stuff. > >> > >>> > >>> Hopefully this is the right list for these questions, if not, > >>> could someone > >>> please direct me to the correct one? Any advice anyone can > >>> give me on > >>> either of these problems would be greatly appreciated. > >>> > >> > >> ---- Kirk > >> Kirk Davis > >> Senior Network Analyst, ITS > >> Edmonton Public Schools > >> 1-780-429-8308 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >-- > >No virus found in this incoming message. > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/258 - Release Date: > >2/13/2006 > > > _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 16:16:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C840216A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:16:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggroth99@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-f11.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.49.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7866C43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:16:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggroth99@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:16:06 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 66.238.149.124 by by14fd.bay14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:16:06 GMT X-Originating-IP: [66.238.149.124] X-Originating-Email: [ggroth99@hotmail.com] X-Sender: ggroth99@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: From: "Greg Groth" To: tedm@toybox.placo.com, joe@netmusician.org Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:16:06 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2006 16:16:06.0735 (UTC) FILETIME=[F594CDF0:01C63181] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:16:07 -0000 Sorry for the double submission, I totally screwed up. I have added my response this time... >From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" >To: "Joe Auty" , "Kirk Davis" >CC: "Greg Groth" , >Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems >Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:34:28 -0800 > > >I'm sure glad that this message didn't pass through my work mailserver >so that it's didn't see it, since my work e-mail inbox has 16383 messages >in it (the limit that Outlook can display in IMAP mode) and is 412 >megabytes >in size, and performance is perfectly fine both with Outlook and >Horde/IMP. > >I wouldn't want my mailserver reading it and thinking that it's OK to >slack off. > > And yes I know I need to delete >some messages, speak to the hand if your going to make that crack. > >This is imap-uw/sendmail. > >Perhaps you might consider that since you haven't run imap-uw in >a while that your no longer qualified to make claims about it? Or >perhaps >you never had it setup properly? Or perhaps your hardware was slow? > >Nothing is wrong with Postfix / Courier-IMAP but nothing is wrong either >with sendmail / uw-imap. > >Ted > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Auty > >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:53 PM > >To: Kirk Davis > >Cc: Greg Groth; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Re: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems > > > > > >Hey Greg, > > > >Sorry if this completely throws a monkey wrench into your plans, but > >I feel inspired to interject since I once had a nearly identical > >setup as you... > > > >I switched to Postfix and Courier-IMAP since I found that performance > >of large mailboxes in IMAP-UW was pretty poor, especially over web- > >based email where messages are not cached. I switched to Postfix > >because it is so much more simple and straight forward than Sendmail. > >You should have no problems switching to Postfix, since it is > >basically Sendmail with a nicer wrapper/configuration. > > > >Just food for thought. I appreciate both of your comments, as I have stated I am new to BSD. Part of my problem is the huge amount of software available, and no good way to determine what will work better for my situation. Perhaps if I explain my situation, it would help some. We've been running Sendmail and a POP-Before-SMTP script for the last 6 years on a Redhat box. I think it started out on 5.2, and was up to 7.3 when it crashed 3 weeks ago. I had been planning to upgrade the server, and had a new box ready to go, but I had stalled on the OS. I didn't want to go down the Redhat route because of strictly personal issues that are more opinions than fact, and a friend suggest FreeBSD. The server crash pretty much forced my hand, and my goal was to replicate what we had in place ASAP. Because of my (limited) knowledge of Sendmail, I went that route as I know nothing of the alternatives. I went with IMAP-UW because not because of anything I had read, but because I was attempting to get the POP-Before-SMTP port to work (which it didn't - long story), and IMAP-UW seemed a good alternative as it is a POP and IMAP server and was easily configured in POP-Before-SMTP. Since I could not find a POP-Before-SMTP solution that I could get to operate (I had problems with POP-Before-SMTP, and DRAC before throwing in the towel), I decided to switch to SMTP-AUTH. So here's my situation, we have about 25 users on the server. I need POP and IMAP that will operate with and without SSL, and SMTP that can handle SMTP-AUTH with and without SSL. Out of the 25 users, I have 3 that are email packrats, and have between 2-4 gigs of email apiece. They are currently using POP on Outlook Express, but will be switching over to IMAP on Thunderbird in the near future (I also have 5 users that I'm not sure what client they are using, we're hosting their domain - long story). Our office peronnel will be migrating to IMAP, using SSL when out of the office, and plain text when in. The five users in which we are hosting their email will remain on POP, and although SSL would be nice, I want the ability to offer plain text in case I run into client issues. Similar circumstances for SMTP, I can relay by domain for users on our network, and would like to use SMTP-AUTH for off-ste users. SSL preferred, but offer plain text in case of client issues. Last issue would be something that will play nice with SquirrelMail. Although I'm very familiar with administering Sendmail (starting, stopping, backing up, running makemaps), configuring is another story. While SMTP is pretty much running as stable as it ever has, I still have issues from time to time. For instance I am sending this from Hotmail as this list is currently bouncing email from my server because of some error I have not investigated yet. At this moment I am pretty much open to anything, but I don't have a good way of evaluating different options other than trial and error (and I'm kind of short on time). I know that a lot of times it comes down to peronal taste (my reason for dumping Redhat), but sometimes there are specific issues that will make a certain solution better than others. Based off of my stated needs and my current issues (Sendmail configuration), is there a better solution, or is what I have now pretty much the same as other alternatives for my specfic needs? Thank you both for your attention to this matter. Greg Groth _________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 16:38:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF00916A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:38:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E0743D5E for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:38:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370ED7309B for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:38:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00381-05 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:38:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E66A7303E for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:38:00 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <6269CB0A-D78A-4CD2-A385-C14BA859522A@netmusician.org> From: Joe Auty Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:37:59 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: re: dump core dump, now emergency boot CD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:38:06 -0000 Hello, Since the dump command has been producing core dumps for me, I'm thinking of running dump from an emergency boot CD. Is this possible? Wise? How would I do this? The 5.4 Release CD #1 just boots into the installer. Thanks in advance for your help! ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 16:49:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6270616A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:49:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0177943D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:49:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8914D7309B for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:49:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00381-07 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:49:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75097303E for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:49:06 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> From: Joe Auty Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:49:05 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:49:08 -0000 Okay, In taking the advice of an earlier poster in suggesting that the instructions located here: http://www.unixcities.com/howto/ Are rather old, allow me to make my question a little broader in scope: What is the best way to clone a disk in FreeBSD? Do you have any step- by-step instructions? The instructions I used above (even replacing the restore -r flag with a -x) produced a core dump. Can I use DD on two disks of different size? Do you recommend Ghost for Unix? Any other suggestions or recommendations should the dump command just not work for me? Thanks in advance! ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 17:04:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3830616A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:04:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don.hinton@vanderbilt.edu) Received: from smtp01.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (smtp01.smtp.Vanderbilt.Edu [129.59.1.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DCC43D64 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:04:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don.hinton@vanderbilt.edu) Received: from smtp01.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp01.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/VU-3.7.9C+d3.7.9) with ESMTP id k1EH4B5u006741; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:04:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from smtp09.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (smtp09.smtp.Vanderbilt.Edu [129.59.1.239]) by smtp01.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/VU-3.7.9.3B+d3.7.9) with ESMTP id k1EH49ED006712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:04:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from smtp09.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp09.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/VU-3.7.9C+d3.7.9) with ESMTP id k1EH49xb021829; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:04:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from a129103.n1.vanderbilt.edu (A129103.N1.Vanderbilt.Edu [129.59.129.103]) by smtp09.smtp.vanderbilt.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/VU-3.7.9.3B+d3.7.9) with ESMTP id k1EH49w7021826 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:04:09 -0600 (CST) From: Don Hinton Organization: ISIS To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:04:08 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> In-Reply-To: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602141104.08683.don.hinton@vanderbilt.edu> Cc: Joe Auty Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:04:17 -0000 Hi Joe: On Tuesday 14 February 2006 10:49, Joe Auty wrote: > Okay, > > In taking the advice of an earlier poster in suggesting that the > instructions located here: > > http://www.unixcities.com/howto/ > > Are rather old, allow me to make my question a little broader in scope: > > What is the best way to clone a disk in FreeBSD? Do you have any step- > by-step instructions? The instructions I used above (even replacing > the restore -r flag with a -x) produced a core dump. > > Can I use DD on two disks of different size? Do you recommend Ghost > for Unix? Any other suggestions or recommendations should the dump > command just not work for me? One of our grad students recently posted a how to on using Frisbee here at ISIS. The only difference is that you'll need another server somewhere with imagezip install instead of ours. You can find the how to here: https://research.isis.vanderbilt.edu/ir_wiki/Using_Frisbee_to_take_an_image_of_a_hard_drive Please let us know if it contains any omissions or errors and we'll fix the page. Btw, I've been told that this will only image a partition, not the master boot record, so you'll need that on the destination as well. This is what emulab uses to image drives, and works for several OS's, including FreeBSD, Linux, and Windows. hth... don > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > ----------- > Joe Auty > NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians > http://www.netmusician.org > joe@netmusician.org > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Don Hinton tel: 615.480.5667 ISIS, Vanderbilt University skype: donhinton http://people.vanderbilt.edu/~don.hinton/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 17:07:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E9616A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:07:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from empmail.bowdoin.edu (empmail.bowdoin.edu [139.140.14.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441AB43D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:07:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from shredder.bowdoin.edu ([139.140.181.133]) by empmail.bowdoin.edu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004)) with ESMTPP id <0IUO003SLSWP6H00@empmail.bowdoin.edu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:07:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by shredder.bowdoin.edu (Postfix, from userid 12008) id 61B00CA7B; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:07:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:07:37 +0000 From: Alec Berryman In-reply-to: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060214170737.GA23816@thened.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-disposition: inline X-Ned-Wuz-Here: Yes X-GPG-Fingerprint: 3DB5 8785 53D9 8BF4 5049 B6B9 02E7 7FD9 881C 85C4 X-GPG-Key-ID: 881C85C4 References: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:07:39 -0000 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe Auty on 2006-02-14 11:49:05 -0500: > What is the best way to clone a disk in FreeBSD? [...] > Can I use DD on two disks of different size? Do you recommend Ghost =20 > for Unix? g4u is a very nice wrapper for dd. I've had great success with it for identically-sized disks; there shouldn't be a problem if the target disk is larger than the source disk, because you can edit the partitions around and then growfs. Don't overlook tar, though - it doesn't care about disk sizes as long as you have enough free space, doesn't care about partitions, and is simpler in many cases. If you boot up to the fixit image from an install CD you can partition and newfs to however you like and then untar. --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD8g5ZAud/2YgchcQRAjHiAKCp6dEDU4HsfEFi0Abf02Fn4uywaQCg1oK0 dcHp65xs4juqg/5KlL8GY/E= =2yJW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 17:11:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1247416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:11:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: from mailhub.ihlas.net.tr (mailhub.ihlas.net.tr [213.238.128.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA8143D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:11:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: (qmail 49273 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 17:11:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ihlasnetym) (maslak@213.238.150.220) by 0 with ESMTPA; 14 Feb 2006 17:11:20 -0000 Message-ID: <01c801c63189$912094f0$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> From: "Halid Faith" To: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:10:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Why myserver be locked ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:11:04 -0000 Hello I have a Dell1600SC server. The server has 4 CPU and 2 Gbyte Ram. I had = been using it based Redhat9 till a month ago. The server was working without problem. After that, I installed = FreeBSD6 Release on it. The server started to run be locked. When it is locked, it becomes as = freeze.I am not able to do anything on it. I don't believe in any hardware error. I have to push the reset button = to reboot it. When I rebooted by the reset button, the machine has not = given me any error message in dmesg and /var/log/messages.=20 When the machine rebooted, it works normaly with all of it's services. What should I do ? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 17:14:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B81116A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (koyukuk.teamcool.net [209.161.34.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74F943D4C for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:14:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kgunders@teamcool.net) Received: from koyukuk.teamcool.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 766EDF822 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:14:10 -0700 (MST) Received: from cochise.teamcool.net (unknown [192.168.1.57]) by koyukuk.teamcool.net (TeamCool Rocks) with ESMTP id 52EE2F805 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:14:10 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:14:09 -0700 From: Ken Gunderson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060214101409.46d2dfa5.kgunders@teamcool.net> Organization: Teamcool Networks X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: acl inherit and protected access control flags X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:14:16 -0000 Greetings People: In setting up a Samba server w/ACL support I note the following from Samba docs regarding map acl inherit: "This boolean parameter controls whether smbd(8) will attempt to map the 'inherit' and 'protected' access control entry flags stored in Windows ACLs into an extended attribute called user.SAMBA_PAI. This parameter only takes effect if Samba is being run on a platform that supports extended attributes (Linux and IRIX so far) and allows the Windows 2000 ACL editor to correctly use inheritance with the Samba POSIX ACL mapping code." >From what I garner from the FBSD man pages on ACL FreeBSD does not implement the inherit and protected flags. Can someone please confirm? Please cc as I'm not subscribed to fbsd-questions. TIA- -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 17:16:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3445416A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:16:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC7343D66 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:16:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AC6730B7; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:16:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00643-05; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:16:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A4F730A4; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:16:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200602141104.08683.don.hinton@vanderbilt.edu> References: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> <200602141104.08683.don.hinton@vanderbilt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Message-Id: <906E967F-B5A7-46FF-AD22-1B1F44A90C70@netmusician.org> From: Joe Auty Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:16:34 -0500 To: Don Hinton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:16:41 -0000 On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:04 PM, Don Hinton wrote: > Hi Joe: > > On Tuesday 14 February 2006 10:49, Joe Auty wrote: >> Okay, >> >> In taking the advice of an earlier poster in suggesting that the >> instructions located here: >> >> http://www.unixcities.com/howto/ >> >> Are rather old, allow me to make my question a little broader in >> scope: >> >> What is the best way to clone a disk in FreeBSD? Do you have any >> step- >> by-step instructions? The instructions I used above (even replacing >> the restore -r flag with a -x) produced a core dump. >> >> Can I use DD on two disks of different size? Do you recommend Ghost >> for Unix? Any other suggestions or recommendations should the dump >> command just not work for me? > > One of our grad students recently posted a how to on using Frisbee > here at > ISIS. The only difference is that you'll need another server > somewhere with > imagezip install instead of ours. You can find the how to here: > > https://research.isis.vanderbilt.edu/ir_wiki/ > Using_Frisbee_to_take_an_image_of_a_hard_drive > > Please let us know if it contains any omissions or errors and we'll > fix the > page. Btw, I've been told that this will only image a partition, > not the > master boot record, so you'll need that on the destination as well. > > This is what emulab uses to image drives, and works for several OS's, > including FreeBSD, Linux, and Windows. > > hth... > don Thanks Don! However, I'm not completely sure that I have the disk space available to create an image. I was actually looking to do a complete copy of one local disk to another local disk, not create an image of the disk for deployment. Do these instructions still apply? ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 17:26:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2DB16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:26:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF3743D55 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:26:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176AE730B7; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:26:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00651-06; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:26:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD967303F; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:26:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060214170737.GA23816@thened.net> References: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> <20060214170737.GA23816@thened.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <04548C63-4825-45B6-A9F9-5F44D4F17E8C@netmusician.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:26:11 -0500 To: Alec Berryman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:26:18 -0000 On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Alec Berryman wrote: > Joe Auty on 2006-02-14 11:49:05 -0500: > >> What is the best way to clone a disk in FreeBSD? > > [...] > >> Can I use DD on two disks of different size? Do you recommend Ghost >> for Unix? > > g4u is a very nice wrapper for dd. I've had great success with it for > identically-sized disks; there shouldn't be a problem if the target > disk is larger than the source disk, because you can edit the > partitions around and then growfs. > > Don't overlook tar, though - it doesn't care about disk sizes as long > as you have enough free space, doesn't care about partitions, and is > simpler in many cases. If you boot up to the fixit image from an > install CD you can partition and newfs to however you like and then > untar. Hmmm... Could you tell me more about how the fixit images work? I've never had to do that... basically, I just need something that will allow me to boot up into single user mode. I've been using the source disk in single user mode, and doing a mount -u / to make sure that it is mounted read only. Before I go this route, I'm thinking it might be wise to give "dump" another try from a working boot CD. What is the best way to create myself a boot CD that I can use to boot up in single user mode? As far as your tar idea, the idea seems great, although I'm not sure whether I have enough space to store both the tarball and the space needed to extract the tarball to. We are talking over a 100 gig here. Thanks for your advice! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 17:29:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D598816A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:29:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E064243D53 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:29:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.atosorigin.es [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007842E041; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:29:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F21364.4070108@locolomo.org> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:29:08 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060118) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Halid Faith References: <01c801c63189$912094f0$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> In-Reply-To: <01c801c63189$912094f0$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why myserver be locked ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:29:12 -0000 Halid Faith wrote: > Hello > > I have a Dell1600SC server. The server has 4 CPU and 2 Gbyte Ram. I had been using it based Redhat9 till a month ago. > The server was working without problem. After that, I installed FreeBSD6 Release on it. > > The server started to run be locked. When it is locked, it becomes as freeze.I am not able to do anything on it. > I don't believe in any hardware error. I have to push the reset button to reboot it. When I rebooted by the reset button, the machine has not given me any error message in dmesg and /var/log/messages. > When the machine rebooted, it works normaly with all of it's services. > > What should I do ? Can you reproduce the problem? Have you made any observations up till the system freezes up? Check logfiles for error messages, you may set loglevel up so all debugging is also logged. If you don't find any error messages in the log files then try to disable ALL services and see if it runs stable. Enable one service at the time and let it run for a while to check that the system is still stable. First enable services included in base like syslog, ssh and named. Then go on to enable other services. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 17:30:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A7E16A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:30:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA2943D5C for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:30:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB86B730BE; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:30:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00643-09; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:30:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9707303F; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:30:37 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060214170737.GA23816@thened.net> References: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> <20060214170737.GA23816@thened.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Message-Id: <58DC282B-7890-4C04-8D89-AB17CC3FF19F@netmusician.org> From: Joe Auty Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:30:36 -0500 To: Alec Berryman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:30:57 -0000 On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Alec Berryman wrote: > Joe Auty on 2006-02-14 11:49:05 -0500: > >> What is the best way to clone a disk in FreeBSD? > > [...] > >> Can I use DD on two disks of different size? Do you recommend Ghost >> for Unix? > > g4u is a very nice wrapper for dd. I've had great success with it for > identically-sized disks; there shouldn't be a problem if the target > disk is larger than the source disk, because you can edit the > partitions around and then growfs. > > Don't overlook tar, though - it doesn't care about disk sizes as long > as you have enough free space, doesn't care about partitions, and is > simpler in many cases. If you boot up to the fixit image from an > install CD you can partition and newfs to however you like and then > untar. Also, I see that growfs operates off of free sectors. If I were to use dd/g4u, how would I know how many sectors are available for me to grow the partition to? The "df" command only seems to operate in blocksizes, not sectors. This is rather new to me... ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 17:51:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D8D16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:51:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C21A43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:50:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214175057.RESK18877.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:50:57 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Joe Auty" , Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:50:52 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:51:00 -0000 I use the Norton ghost program. You have to first install ghost on a window box and then create a ms/dos bootable floppy with ghost on it. Them boot your FreeBSD box with that floppy and ghost image the hard drive with mbr to cdrom or dvd. You can then boot the target box with that same floppy and restore the cdrom/dvd even if the hd is bigger than the source one. Using 2003 version of ghost I first zero out all the free space on FreeBSD so ghost will compress it in the backup image which makes ghost run faster on bkup and restore. dd if=/dev/zero of=/filler bs=1m ; rm /filler dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/filler bs=1m ; rm /tmp/filler dd if=/dev/zero of=/usr/filler bs=1m ; rm /usr/filler dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/filler bs=1m ; rm /var/filler Of course this is a hands on method. You have to have physical access to the source and target pc's to do this. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Auty Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:49 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: best approach to clone a disk? Okay, In taking the advice of an earlier poster in suggesting that the instructions located here: http://www.unixcities.com/howto/ Are rather old, allow me to make my question a little broader in scope: What is the best way to clone a disk in FreeBSD? Do you have any step- by-step instructions? The instructions I used above (even replacing the restore -r flag with a -x) produced a core dump. Can I use DD on two disks of different size? Do you recommend Ghost for Unix? Any other suggestions or recommendations should the dump command just not work for me? Thanks in advance! ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 18:01:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3835F16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:01:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44FC43D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:01:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214180152.ZDQT22902.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:01:52 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Joe Auty" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:01:51 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <04548C63-4825-45B6-A9F9-5F44D4F17E8C@netmusician.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:01:55 -0000 Cloning a complete HD mbr and all to second HD in same FreeBSD box is a snap using ghost. That's the way I make additional FreeBSD workstation pc'a. I take the HD from the target and plug it into the FreeBSD box, then boot ghost from floppy, do ghost hd to hd copy, remove cloned HD and put it into target box and boot it up and it runs just like the original. This is not the Freebsd way. But its quick and can also be used for my window boxs on my LAN. You get double the bang for your buck. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Auty Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:26 PM To: Alec Berryman Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Alec Berryman wrote: > Joe Auty on 2006-02-14 11:49:05 -0500: > >> What is the best way to clone a disk in FreeBSD? > > [...] > >> Can I use DD on two disks of different size? Do you recommend Ghost >> for Unix? > > g4u is a very nice wrapper for dd. I've had great success with it for > identically-sized disks; there shouldn't be a problem if the target > disk is larger than the source disk, because you can edit the > partitions around and then growfs. > > Don't overlook tar, though - it doesn't care about disk sizes as long > as you have enough free space, doesn't care about partitions, and is > simpler in many cases. If you boot up to the fixit image from an > install CD you can partition and newfs to however you like and then > untar. Hmmm... Could you tell me more about how the fixit images work? I've never had to do that... basically, I just need something that will allow me to boot up into single user mode. I've been using the source disk in single user mode, and doing a mount -u / to make sure that it is mounted read only. Before I go this route, I'm thinking it might be wise to give "dump" another try from a working boot CD. What is the best way to create myself a boot CD that I can use to boot up in single user mode? As far as your tar idea, the idea seems great, although I'm not sure whether I have enough space to store both the tarball and the space needed to extract the tarball to. We are talking over a 100 gig here. Thanks for your advice! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 18:04:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA81016A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:04:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from empmail.bowdoin.edu (empmail.bowdoin.edu [139.140.14.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4608043D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from shredder.bowdoin.edu ([139.140.181.133]) by empmail.bowdoin.edu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004)) with ESMTPP id <0IUO003ZFVIY6H40@empmail.bowdoin.edu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:04:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by shredder.bowdoin.edu (Postfix, from userid 12008) id A03DACAA4; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:04:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:04:10 +0000 From: Alec Berryman In-reply-to: <58DC282B-7890-4C04-8D89-AB17CC3FF19F@netmusician.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060214180410.GA43579@thened.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-disposition: inline X-Ned-Wuz-Here: Yes X-GPG-Fingerprint: 3DB5 8785 53D9 8BF4 5049 B6B9 02E7 7FD9 881C 85C4 X-GPG-Key-ID: 881C85C4 References: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> <20060214170737.GA23816@thened.net> <58DC282B-7890-4C04-8D89-AB17CC3FF19F@netmusician.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:04:12 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Joe Auty on 2006-02-14 12:30:36 -0500: > Also, I see that growfs operates off of free sectors. If I were to > use dd/g4u, how would I know how many sectors are available for me > to grow the partition to? The "df" command only seems to operate in > blocksizes, not sectors. This is rather new to me... You'd find out the number of additional disk sectors during the fdisk or bsdlabel portion of your resizing adventure. --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD8huaAud/2YgchcQRAn9wAJ40oCohsmo/HC4agmB7jni+N5aRegCg4fwS aMAUWDcDjRaErVNNBvceP2M= =c0oS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 18:06:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84AB16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from empmail.bowdoin.edu (empmail.bowdoin.edu [139.140.14.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E355F43D5F for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:06:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alec@thened.net) Received: from shredder.bowdoin.edu ([139.140.181.133]) by empmail.bowdoin.edu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.01 (built Jun 24 2004)) with ESMTPP id <0IUO003GOVNJ6I50@empmail.bowdoin.edu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:06:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by shredder.bowdoin.edu (Postfix, from userid 12008) id D13B4CAA4; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:06:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:06:55 +0000 From: Alec Berryman In-reply-to: <04548C63-4825-45B6-A9F9-5F44D4F17E8C@netmusician.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060214180655.GB43579@thened.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-disposition: inline X-Ned-Wuz-Here: Yes X-GPG-Fingerprint: 3DB5 8785 53D9 8BF4 5049 B6B9 02E7 7FD9 881C 85C4 X-GPG-Key-ID: 881C85C4 References: <39D18F08-5443-4642-AE0B-636415239F6B@netmusician.org> <20060214170737.GA23816@thened.net> <04548C63-4825-45B6-A9F9-5F44D4F17E8C@netmusician.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:07:00 -0000 --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe Auty on 2006-02-14 12:26:11 -0500: > Hmmm... Could you tell me more about how the fixit images work?=20 Boot up your FreeBSD install media, select the 'Fixit' option (it's most of the way down, keyboard shortcut 'f'), and then choose 'CDROM/DVD'. You'll have a basic FreeBSD install in memory and you can mount whatever partitions you like. --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD8hw/Aud/2YgchcQRAqEpAJ9WyjA9uhIcCZb6qY2KFeARpcuVBgCfRqAH 4SzEssnw7XdrWoMq8qu0k+c= =hnFf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 18:18:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E468716A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:18:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885A943D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:18:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038A9730AD; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:18:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01256-05; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:18:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17917303E; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:18:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:18:17 -0500 To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:18:21 -0000 Thanks for this! Unfortunately, I don't really have access to a Windows PC, and I'm also not sure I have enough space to both store an image, and extract the files from the image to the same hard drive... I'm thinking of trying the instructions here: http://www.feyrer.de/g4u/#copydisk and using growfs to grow the partition size. I'm just not sure how to determine how many sectors I should grow the disk to, but perhaps I can cross that bridge when it comes... any ideas? On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:50 PM, fbsd_user wrote: > I use the Norton ghost program. You have to first install ghost on a > window box and then create a ms/dos bootable floppy with ghost on > it. Them boot your FreeBSD box with that floppy and ghost image the > hard drive with mbr to cdrom or dvd. You can then boot the target > box with that same floppy and restore the cdrom/dvd even if the hd > is bigger than the source one. > > Using 2003 version of ghost I first zero out all the free space on > FreeBSD so ghost will compress it in the backup image which makes > ghost run faster on bkup and restore. > > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/filler bs=1m ; rm /filler > dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/filler bs=1m ; rm /tmp/filler > dd if=/dev/zero of=/usr/filler bs=1m ; rm /usr/filler > dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/filler bs=1m ; rm /var/filler > > Of course this is a hands on method. You have to have physical > access to the source and target pc's to do this. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Auty > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:49 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: best approach to clone a disk? > > > Okay, > > In taking the advice of an earlier poster in suggesting that the > instructions located here: > > http://www.unixcities.com/howto/ > > Are rather old, allow me to make my question a little broader in > scope: > > What is the best way to clone a disk in FreeBSD? Do you have any > step- > by-step instructions? The instructions I used above (even replacing > the restore -r flag with a -x) produced a core dump. > > Can I use DD on two disks of different size? Do you recommend Ghost > for Unix? Any other suggestions or recommendations should the dump > command just not work for me? > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > ----------- > Joe Auty > NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians > http://www.netmusician.org > joe@netmusician.org > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 18:19:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4F816A423 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:19:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E47743D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:19:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B06F730B7; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:19:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01156-07; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:19:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759D17303E; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:19:01 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:19:00 -0500 To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:19:03 -0000 What is your strategy for dealing with disks of different sizes, like mine are? On Feb 14, 2006, at 1:01 PM, fbsd_user wrote: > Cloning a complete HD mbr and all to second HD > in same FreeBSD box is a snap using ghost. > > That's the way I make additional FreeBSD workstation pc'a. > > I take the HD from the target and plug it into the FreeBSD box, then > boot ghost from floppy, do ghost hd to hd copy, remove cloned HD and > put it into target box and boot it up and it runs just like the > original. > > This is not the Freebsd way. > But its quick and can also be used for my window boxs on my LAN. > You get double the bang for your buck. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Auty > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:26 PM > To: Alec Berryman > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? > > > > On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Alec Berryman wrote: > >> Joe Auty on 2006-02-14 11:49:05 -0500: >> >>> What is the best way to clone a disk in FreeBSD? >> >> [...] >> >>> Can I use DD on two disks of different size? Do you recommend > Ghost >>> for Unix? >> >> g4u is a very nice wrapper for dd. I've had great success with it > for >> identically-sized disks; there shouldn't be a problem if the > target >> disk is larger than the source disk, because you can edit the >> partitions around and then growfs. >> >> Don't overlook tar, though - it doesn't care about disk sizes as > long >> as you have enough free space, doesn't care about partitions, and > is >> simpler in many cases. If you boot up to the fixit image from an >> install CD you can partition and newfs to however you like and > then >> untar. > > > Hmmm... Could you tell me more about how the fixit images work? I've > never had to do that... basically, I just need something that will > allow me to boot up into single user mode. I've been using the > source > disk in single user mode, and doing a mount -u / to make sure that > it is mounted read only. Before I go this route, I'm thinking it > might be wise to give "dump" another try from a working boot CD. > What > is the best way to create myself a boot CD that I can use to boot up > in single user mode? > > As far as your tar idea, the idea seems great, although I'm not sure > whether I have enough space to store both the tarball and the space > needed to extract the tarball to. We are talking over a 100 gig > here. > > > Thanks for your advice! > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 18:26:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D6316A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:26:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B70F043D5C for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2006 18:26:50 -0000 Received: from 170.61.78.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [83.78.61.170] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 19:26:50 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F220ED.5030408@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:26:53 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: RELENG_6 and a Razer Copperhead mouse don't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars@gmx.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:26:53 -0000 Hi all I run FreeBSD RELENG_6 on an A8N32-SLI Deluxe motherboard http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?l1=3&l2=15&l3=0&model=744&modelmenu=1 with a Razer Copperhead (www.razerzone.com) mouse connected via USB. The OS boots without error and also recognizes my USB keyboard. But when I try to configure my mouse with sysinstall the mouse cursor flickers for a split second and then disappears. An entry /dev/ums0 in rc.conf doesn't help either. It also doesn't work in X, of course. A Logitech MX300 USB mouse works however. Has anyone managed to get this Razer mouse (which is quite comfy) to run correctly with FreeBSD? Or can anyone recommend a "gamer-class/high-precision mouse" that works correctly? I like my FPS, so that's important to me. Thanks in advance, lars. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 18:45:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB0416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:45:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.182.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2731543D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:45:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (70-97-209-135.dsl2.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [70.97.209.135]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E0B3707AD; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.30] (unknown [192.168.1.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7B61648B7; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:45:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F2252D.8060605@mykitchentable.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:45:01 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Douville References: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1> In-Reply-To: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter10.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:45:07 -0000 On 2/14/2006 5:44 AM Steve Douville wrote: > I'm trying to set up the routing table to force requests to certain IP addresses to use a particular ethernet card. I've used the route command in a number of ways, but still can't come up with how to force to use em1 instead of em0, with the right gateway. > > em0 is aaa.bbb.ccc.207 > em1 is aaa.bbb.ccc.200 > Both have netmask of 255.255.255.0 > em0 goes to the main port, gateway aaa.bbb.ccc.195. em1 goes to a switch, which is aaa.bbb.ccc.196, the gateway to other ip's on the switch. > > What I want to end up with is: > aaa.bbb.ccc.196 link#2 em1 > aaa.bbb.ccc.209 link#2 em1 > > I've tried lots of combinations, using the -ifp flag to force em1, but the only way I can get the gateway to say link#2 is to ping the ip first, whereas it gets put in the table even though it's not found, and then doing a route change. I need some way to put this in rc.local so that it's set up when booted. > What happens with a simple 'route add aaa.bbb.ccc.196? Or am I misinterpreting what you wish to achieve? HTH, Drew -- Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 18:45:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBD916A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: from mailhub.ihlas.net.tr (mailhub.ihlas.net.tr [213.238.128.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8F843D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:45:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: (qmail 3542 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 18:45:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ihlasnetym) (maslak@213.238.150.220) by 0 with ESMTPA; 14 Feb 2006 18:45:39 -0000 Message-ID: <000901c63196$bdeb55d0$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> From: "Halid Faith" To: "Erik Norgaard" References: <01c801c63189$912094f0$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> <43F21364.4070108@locolomo.org> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:44:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why myserver be locked ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:45:20 -0000 Hello On the machine, qmail , pop3,smtp,imap,http,htps,openssl,secureimap,securepop3 and clamav-antivirus run. Do these services cause be locked the machine ? Also my sysctl.conf is below; kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=2097152 kern.ipc.somaxconn=8192 kern.maxfiles=24656 kern.maxfilesperproc=22190 kern.ipc.nmbclusters=51200 net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65535 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65535 net.inet.udp.recvspace=65535 net.inet.udp.maxdgram=65535 net.local.stream.recvspace=65535 net.local.stream.sendspace=65535 net.inet.icmp.bmcastecho=0 net.inet.icmp.maskrepl=0 net.inet.ip.accept_sourceroute=0 net.inet.ip.sourceroute=0 net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 Do above sysctl settings cause be locked the machine ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Norgaard" To: "Halid Faith" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:29 PM Subject: Re: Why myserver be locked ? > Halid Faith wrote: > > Hello > > > > I have a Dell1600SC server. The server has 4 CPU and 2 Gbyte Ram. I had been using it based Redhat9 till a month ago. > > The server was working without problem. After that, I installed FreeBSD6 Release on it. > > > > The server started to run be locked. When it is locked, it becomes as freeze.I am not able to do anything on it. > > I don't believe in any hardware error. I have to push the reset button to reboot it. When I rebooted by the reset button, the machine has not given me any error message in dmesg and /var/log/messages. > > When the machine rebooted, it works normaly with all of it's services. > > > > What should I do ? > > Can you reproduce the problem? Have you made any observations up till > the system freezes up? > > Check logfiles for error messages, you may set loglevel up so all > debugging is also logged. > > If you don't find any error messages in the log files then try to > disable ALL services and see if it runs stable. > > Enable one service at the time and let it run for a while to check that > the system is still stable. First enable services included in base like > syslog, ssh and named. Then go on to enable other services. > > Cheers, Erik > > -- > Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org > S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt > Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 > Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 18:55:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80C416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:55:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6139A43D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:55:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 6333 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 18:55:29 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Feb 2006 18:55:29 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E7C7E28439; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:55:27 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Rob References: <20060214035019.36178.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 14 Feb 2006 13:55:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060214035019.36178.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <44pslplqhs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: dhclient and bootpd on same system OK? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:55:31 -0000 Rob writes: > I have a home network with a router connected to the > external internet, and four PCs on the home network. > The router provides IPs with its DHCP server. > (The router is a small commercial box skrewed to > the wall). > > One of the PCs on the home network is a FreeBSD > (6-Stable). This FreeBSD PC runs dhclient to get its > IP configuration. So far so good. > > All other PCs on the network are Windows PCs, > but have a BIOS that allow Network boots. > Therefore I would like to set up the possibility to > boot these PCs as diskless boxes from the > FreeBSD PC, using the bootpd server. > > Hence, I'd like to make this FreeBSD PC a > bootpd server. But it is already running dhclient. > Would such a setup cause conflicts? It should be fine. Client and server use different UDP ports. But you'd have to try it to be sure. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 18:56:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC84816A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:56:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.182.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F52543D6A for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:56:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (70-97-209-135.dsl2.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [70.97.209.135]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAE0370E96 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.30] (unknown [192.168.1.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BBA1648B7 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:56:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F227CA.60603@mykitchentable.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:56:10 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter07.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Subject: General Guidance Using Snort Inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:56:17 -0000 I've installed snort 2.4.3 on a 6.0 machine and have it logging successfully to a MySQL database on another machine in my home network. I also have BASE installed on that machine to view the alerts. Now I'd like to move forward and do things like "block an IP address for 1 hour that has generated 5 alerts on the same rule in the past minute". I've Googled and read about snort inline. But what I've read suggests that snort works with ipfilter. I'm running ipfw2 for my firewall on the same box that's running snort. To use snort inline, do I have to covert my entire firewall to ipfilter? Or will snort use ipfilter to do its "inline" stuff and ipfw2 can continue to work on its own? I'm confused about how this should work and would appreciate any nudges to guides regarding this setup. Thanks, Drew -- Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 19:03:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AC716A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:03:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CF443D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:03:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214190356.NNLU25152.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:03:56 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Halid Faith" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:03:55 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <000901c63196$bdeb55d0$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Why myserver be locked ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:03:58 -0000 I would stop over riding all those sysctl knobs and see what happens when using the defaults. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Halid Faith Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:45 PM To: Erik Norgaard Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why myserver be locked ? Hello On the machine, qmail , pop3,smtp,imap,http,htps,openssl,secureimap,securepop3 and clamav-antivirus run. Do these services cause be locked the machine ? Also my sysctl.conf is below; kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=2097152 kern.ipc.somaxconn=8192 kern.maxfiles=24656 kern.maxfilesperproc=22190 kern.ipc.nmbclusters=51200 net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1 net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65535 net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65535 net.inet.udp.recvspace=65535 net.inet.udp.maxdgram=65535 net.local.stream.recvspace=65535 net.local.stream.sendspace=65535 net.inet.icmp.bmcastecho=0 net.inet.icmp.maskrepl=0 net.inet.ip.accept_sourceroute=0 net.inet.ip.sourceroute=0 net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 Do above sysctl settings cause be locked the machine ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Norgaard" To: "Halid Faith" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:29 PM Subject: Re: Why myserver be locked ? > Halid Faith wrote: > > Hello > > > > I have a Dell1600SC server. The server has 4 CPU and 2 Gbyte Ram. I had been using it based Redhat9 till a month ago. > > The server was working without problem. After that, I installed FreeBSD6 Release on it. > > > > The server started to run be locked. When it is locked, it becomes as freeze.I am not able to do anything on it. > > I don't believe in any hardware error. I have to push the reset button to reboot it. When I rebooted by the reset button, the machine has not given me any error message in dmesg and /var/log/messages. > > When the machine rebooted, it works normaly with all of it's services. > > > > What should I do ? > > Can you reproduce the problem? Have you made any observations up till > the system freezes up? > > Check logfiles for error messages, you may set loglevel up so all > debugging is also logged. > > If you don't find any error messages in the log files then try to > disable ALL services and see if it runs stable. > > Enable one service at the time and let it run for a while to check that > the system is still stable. First enable services included in base like > syslog, ssh and named. Then go on to enable other services. > > Cheers, Erik > > -- > Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org > S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt > Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 > Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 19:33:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B89F16A520 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:33:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFB743D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:33:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x29so486113nfb for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:33:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=iPaypdnxF78nCRxlniJQnjrjU1ZnEZcYar9pAzbpbSgFF6xSAocI6tuY7H0yV6X4nV6rPb8UwKkNT1oYe+PFmXM1z2Sbi19C2TPcXvcB1VXFu173lJW+ykwOEzIusQuyTpjIW/sOjShaAd/ew4BQ/MiGY2lFBN292jD9eaZKQOU= Received: by 10.49.34.11 with SMTP id m11mr1426041nfj; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:33:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.216.11 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:33:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:33:15 -0500 From: Xn Nooby To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: What doesn't work on desktop FreeBSD ? (ex Webcams) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:33:19 -0000 I bought a QuickCam Orbit MP, which I apparently must use under Windows (or Linux). From what I've seen online, not many (if any), people are using webcams under FreeBSD. I was curious if there were other things that also were not realistic to do (I'm not complaining). Some of the things that do work are my soundcard, nVidia card, gigabit NIC, opengl games, wine, accelerated qemu, hp inkjet printer, and lots of wonderful free software. Qemu nullified my need for VMWare (though I own 5.5 for win and linux). OpenOffice, Abiword, and Firefox with flash and jav= a works. Lots of stuff works. I'm just curious if I am going to hit any roadblocks down the road. (Maybe there is a way to get my Quickcam to work using the RH 8.0compatibilty layer) thank! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 19:40:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3476F16A438 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:40:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.182.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC1C43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:40:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (70-97-209-135.dsl2.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [70.97.209.135]) by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C723587A8; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.30] (unknown [192.168.1.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A501648B7; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:40:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F2323D.4040601@mykitchentable.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:40:45 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Douville References: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2252D.8060605@mykitchentable.net> <000a01c6319b$56bf5730$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> In-Reply-To: <000a01c6319b$56bf5730$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter06.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:40:51 -0000 On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote: > Weird stuff... > route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.196 -ifp em1 > What happens if you leave off the "-ifp em1"? Cheers, Drew > doesn't work even if i've already set > aaa.bbb.ccc.196 link#2 em1 > > The only way things work well is if the gateway is set to link#2. The only > way I can set it to link#2 is if the address was accessed, unsuccessfully, > creating a record with link#1 as the gateway and then issuing a route change > command to move it to link#2. > > it'd be much easier if i could just type > route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.xxx link#2 -ifp em1 > but it doesn't recognize link#2 as a valid address, even though it uses it > in the table by default!! > > Haven't tried the ipfilter yet. Maybe i'll give that a whirl, too. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Drew Tomlinson" > To: "Steve Douville" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:45 PM > Subject: Re: IP Routing Question > > > > What happens with a simple 'route add > aaa.bbb.ccc.196? Or am I misinterpreting what you wish to achieve? > > HTH, > > Drew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 19:43:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4E216A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:43:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@douville.net) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF24943D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:43:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@douville.net) Received: (qmail 18378 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 19:43:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sdouvilnonq1) (sns536@rogers.com@70.29.116.42 with login) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 19:43:53 -0000 Message-ID: <001701c6319e$ed94bee0$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> From: "Steve Douville" To: "Drew Tomlinson" References: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2252D.8060605@mykitchentable.net> <000a01c6319b$56bf5730$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2323D.4040601@mykitchentable.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:43:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:43:55 -0000 By default, it sets the netif to em0 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Drew Tomlinson" To: "Steve Douville" Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:40 PM Subject: Re: IP Routing Question On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote: > Weird stuff... > route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.196 -ifp em1 > What happens if you leave off the "-ifp em1"? Cheers, Drew > doesn't work even if i've already set > aaa.bbb.ccc.196 link#2 em1 > > The only way things work well is if the gateway is set to link#2. The only > way I can set it to link#2 is if the address was accessed, unsuccessfully, > creating a record with link#1 as the gateway and then issuing a route > change > command to move it to link#2. > > it'd be much easier if i could just type > route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.xxx link#2 -ifp em1 > but it doesn't recognize link#2 as a valid address, even though it uses it > in the table by default!! > > Haven't tried the ipfilter yet. Maybe i'll give that a whirl, too. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Drew Tomlinson" > To: "Steve Douville" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:45 PM > Subject: Re: IP Routing Question > > > > What happens with a simple 'route add > aaa.bbb.ccc.196? Or am I misinterpreting what you wish to achieve? > > HTH, > > Drew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 19:56:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F9216A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:56:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sequethin@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD9843D69 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:55:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sequethin@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s17so884743wxc for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:55:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:sent-from-pda:user-agent; b=UwQGtRwYuKisRasS84J0/i1FusxiNtMuVeytmxRLaAx1g3y4spJB55/h3oUp2dihlVl5rLd8BTo4KofWs1NrV1UXv+CJSg++3lhKXEbraBm3XnMDBPSBk3yOrrRTU2XAQ2oqOJgnxcxwfMWao5uWD70fq3IQZchrBPHmolLTM+4= Received: by 10.70.129.10 with SMTP id b10mr2717535wxd; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:55:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ( [65.211.29.191]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i38sm1131756wxd.2006.02.14.11.55.18; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:55:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:55:17 -0500 From: Mike Hernandez To: Xn Nooby Message-ID: <20060214195516.GP29462@dementia.beyondnormal.net> Mail-Followup-To: Xn Nooby , questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sent-From-PDA: Yes User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What doesn't work on desktop FreeBSD ? (ex Webcams) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:56:06 -0000 On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:33:15PM -0500, Xn Nooby wrote: > I bought a QuickCam Orbit MP, which I apparently must use under Windows (or > Linux). From what I've seen online, not many (if any), people are using > webcams under FreeBSD. I was curious if there were other things that also > were not realistic to do (I'm not complaining). > > Some of the things that do work are my soundcard, nVidia card, gigabit NIC, > opengl games, wine, accelerated qemu, hp inkjet printer, and lots of > wonderful free software. Qemu nullified my need for VMWare (though I own > 5.5 for win and linux). OpenOffice, Abiword, and Firefox with flash and java > works. Lots of stuff works. > > I'm just curious if I am going to hit any roadblocks down the road. > My printer works, but the scanner portion requires a reboot to windows or I have plug it into my powerbook. It's an HP PSC something or other. Midi - well... most open source operating systems aren't great in that area My nvidia card works except that gtk2 applications get this very strange text decay pretty often. It's very strange that the text gets very blurry and distorted sometimes. Only happens with the nvidia driver and composite & render accel. I posted to the nvidia freebsd forum about it, one other person verified the issue... doesn't look like it's going to get fixed any time soon. (note - never had that problem with linux) My quickcam pro doesn't work, but I never expected it to really. My ipod video is recognized but I can't access the device. I hear this may be fixed now, I have to cvsup my tree and see if it works now. I have a couple of logitech dual action joypad things, they "kinda" work, but they don't fully work. Luckily I have 2 other operating systems to choose from if I really need to use one of the non-working things I mentioned above ;) Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 19:57:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3109C16A422 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:57:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.182.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6471A43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:57:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (70-97-209-135.dsl2.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [70.97.209.135]) by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129ED36436B; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.30] (unknown [192.168.1.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C131648B7; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:57:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F2361C.7080400@mykitchentable.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:57:16 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Douville References: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2252D.8060605@mykitchentable.net> <000a01c6319b$56bf5730$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2323D.4040601@mykitchentable.net> <001701c6319e$ed94bee0$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> In-Reply-To: <001701c6319e$ed94bee0$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:57:21 -0000 On 2/14/2006 11:43 AM Steve Douville wrote: > By default, it sets the netif to em0 > OK, then what about 'route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.200'? And if that doesn't work, can I please see 'netstat -rn'? You can obfuscate the IPs if you wish. Cheers, Drew > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Drew Tomlinson" > To: "Steve Douville" > Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:40 PM > Subject: Re: IP Routing Question > > > On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote: > >> Weird stuff... >> route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.196 -ifp em1 >> >> > > What happens if you leave off the "-ifp em1"? > > Cheers, > > Drew > > >> doesn't work even if i've already set >> aaa.bbb.ccc.196 link#2 em1 >> >> The only way things work well is if the gateway is set to link#2. The only >> way I can set it to link#2 is if the address was accessed, unsuccessfully, >> creating a record with link#1 as the gateway and then issuing a route >> change >> command to move it to link#2. >> >> it'd be much easier if i could just type >> route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.xxx link#2 -ifp em1 >> but it doesn't recognize link#2 as a valid address, even though it uses it >> in the table by default!! >> >> Haven't tried the ipfilter yet. Maybe i'll give that a whirl, too. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Drew Tomlinson" >> To: "Steve Douville" >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:45 PM >> Subject: Re: IP Routing Question >> >> >> >> What happens with a simple 'route add >> aaa.bbb.ccc.196? Or am I misinterpreting what you wish to achieve? >> >> HTH, >> >> Drew >> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 20:00:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD77A16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:00:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikko@whitecortex.net) Received: from whitecortex.net (whitecortex.net [62.142.244.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BF043D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:00:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikko@whitecortex.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitecortex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D241BE6DF for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:57:59 +0200 (EET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: Mikko Heiskanen Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:57:58 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) Cc: Subject: Bootstrapping usb flash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:00:12 -0000 I have a Lacie Orange 7Gb usb flash drive, into which I've tried to install FreeBSD 6-RELEASE a couple of times. I've had no luck booting it, only a "invalid diskslice" -message after normal installation and boot. However, netbsd3 boots nicely with default install off the drive, as does archlinux after modifying the mkinitrd.conf a little. I was wondering if there is something I could do to make FreeBSD boot off it too, since it is the OS I would prefer. TIA ps. I'm not subscribed atm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 20:06:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADA116A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:06:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@douville.net) Received: from smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73A7543D5A for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:06:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@douville.net) Received: (qmail 32949 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 20:06:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sdouvilnonq1) (sns536@rogers.com@70.29.116.42 with login) by smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 20:06:04 -0000 Message-ID: <003f01c631a2$05ae2680$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> From: "Steve Douville" To: "Drew Tomlinson" References: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1><43F2252D.8060605@mykitchentable.net><000a01c6319b$56bf5730$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1><43F2323D.4040601@mykitchentable.net><001701c6319e$ed94bee0$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2361C.7080400@mykitchentable.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:05:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:06:10 -0000 aaa.bbb.ccc.196 aaa.bbb.ccc.200 em0 ping results in "no path to host" route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.196 aaa.bbb.ccc.200 -ifp em1 results in aaa.bbb.ccc.196 aaa.bbb.ccc.200 em1 also results in "no path to host" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Drew Tomlinson" To: "Steve Douville" Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:57 PM Subject: Re: IP Routing Question On 2/14/2006 11:43 AM Steve Douville wrote: > By default, it sets the netif to em0 > OK, then what about 'route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.200'? And if that doesn't work, can I please see 'netstat -rn'? You can obfuscate the IPs if you wish. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 20:28:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BCB16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:28:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1747143D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:28:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (dialup16.ach.sch.gr [81.186.70.16]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1EKSH4P031313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:28:21 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1EKSCcF001155; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:28:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1EKSCI1001154; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:28:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:28:12 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Joe Auty Message-ID: <20060214202812.GB1071@flame.pc> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.394, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.81, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:28:32 -0000 On 2006-02-14 13:19, Joe Auty wrote: > What is your strategy for dealing with disks of different sizes, like > mine are? See a very similar thread which started a few days back: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-February/112498.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 20:31:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21FD16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:31:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46C743D6A for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:31:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F96pa-0007sM-3I for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:26 +0100 Received: from n250.camo-route.com ([216.113.24.250]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:26 +0100 Received: from ugob by n250.camo-route.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ugo Bellavance Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:31:02 -0500 Lines: 16 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: n250.camo-route.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Samba port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:31:56 -0000 Hi, I'm rather new to FreeBSD (I usually use linux and I'm trying Fbsd. I upgraded my samba port yesterday, but after, I couldn't reconnect to it. I found out that the upgrade (using cvsup/portupgrade) removed smb.conf and stopped smb and cups? Why is it this way? It is not the only port that gets stopped on an upgrade. Is that normal? Shouldn't it at least try to restart? Regards, -- Ugo -> Please don't send a copy of your reply by e-mail. I read the list. -> Please avoid top-posting, long signatures and HTML, and cut the irrelevant parts in your replies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:05:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAA416A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7997C43D58 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:05:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix, from userid 1022) id CF31218198; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:06:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE10518184; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:06:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:06:01 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: DAve In-Reply-To: <43F1E250.1070705@pixelhammer.com> Message-ID: <20060214092426.M60946@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <43F1E250.1070705@pixelhammer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NAS advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:05:57 -0000 On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, DAve wrote: > (I am cross posting to FreeBSD questions and Bacula Users, I will not be > cross posting replies) > > I've been crying for four years that we needed a decent backup system and I > always got put off. "It's on order", "can you resubmit an updated equipment > list". Yea, checks in the mail. > > So yesterday I am told that we have some equipment we got in another deal and > I can have it to backup my NOC. I plan to run Bacula which I already have on > some individual machines. I want to have Bacula clients on all my machines > talking to a single machine running the Bacula director, hopefully using the > NAS machines for storage. > > This is the equipment they threw at me, it is old, but amazingly, unused. > > One Dell Poweredge 750, 2.8ghz CPU, 1gb ram, 2 500gb SATA Maxtor > drives(yuk!), CERC SATA controller. Be very careful here. I run OpenBSD with CMU RAIDFrame RAID-1 mirrors and FreeBSD 5.3 with GEOM/GMirror RAID-1 on this platform for embeded devices. It's rock-solid, except Dell phased the 750 for the 850 and went from ICH6 to ICH7 Intel Chipsets? Also, they're now OEM'ing Broadcom bge(4) based NICs instead of Intel em(4), so consider yourself lucky in a sense >:}. The point is that the 850 will only run the very latest FreeBSD 6.1-BETA1 snapshots contain support for the newer chips. ~lava From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:08:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A785316A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:08:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from webster@es.net) Received: from postal4.es.net (postal4.es.net [198.124.252.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B6943D46 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:08:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from webster@es.net) Received: from vortex.es.net ([198.128.1.16]) by postal4.es.net (Postal Node 4) with ASMTP (SSL) id IBA74465; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:08:17 -0800 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:08:16 -0800 From: John Webster To: Drew Tomlinson Message-ID: <43AFFE86294A7278C251E584@vortex.es.net> In-Reply-To: <43F2323D.4040601@mykitchentable.net> References: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2252D.8060605@mykitchentable.net> <000a01c6319b$56bf5730$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2323D.4040601@mykitchentable.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========CD461DC99DB9A6526CBF==========" Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Steve Douville Subject: Re: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Webster List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:08:21 -0000 --==========CD461DC99DB9A6526CBF========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --On Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:40:45 -0800 Drew Tomlinson wrote: > On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote: >> Weird stuff... >> route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.196 -ifp em1 >> Shouldn't this be: route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd aaa.bbb.ccc.209 Where aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd is not the other gateway (aaa.bbb.ccc.196) I.e, aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd should be an address on the switch aaa.bbb.ccc.209 Maybe even adding ' -interface ' at the end of the command. [man route] jw > > What happens if you leave off the "-ifp em1"? > > Cheers, > > Drew --==========CD461DC99DB9A6526CBF========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD8kbABf+aYL5/Y60RAuHSAJ44XtrEO+TYUsFQMx/kqar1+SfQsgCbB73Z DT/3rJPd9277lhOvVP7Fn5k= =t/vQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========CD461DC99DB9A6526CBF==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:16:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8DB16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:16:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from playnet@mail333.com) Received: from smtp1.pochta.ru (smtp1.pochta.ru [81.211.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0D843D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:16:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from playnet@mail333.com) Received: from pl (ip88.170.adsl.wplus.ru [195.131.170.88]) (author=playnet@mail333.com authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.pochta.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP daemon=POCHTA.RU id k1ELFqbr042384 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:15:54 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from playnet@mail333.com) Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:15:52 +0300 (MSK) Resent-Message-Id: <200602142115.k1ELFqbr042384@smtp1.pochta.ru> X-Author: playnet@mail333.com from pl (ip88.170.adsl.wplus.ru [195.131.170.88]) via Free Mail POCHTA.RU Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:19:59 +0300 From: Playnet X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1776773801.20060215001959@mail333.com> To: FreeBSD Questions Resent-from: Playnet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: choosing a UPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: playnet List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:16:20 -0000 Hello Peter, Saturday, February 4, 2006, 1:44:57 AM, you wrote: P> I am in the market for a UPS to effect automatic shutdown (via DB9) of a P> file server (which will run FreeBSD 6.0). I have noticed some large price P> fluctuations and I don't understand why. I am comparing units of equal P> strength, say 750 VA. Any comments on what I should be looking for? I use UNELT Smart Double 1000 (1000 VA, AVR, works good with NUT (protocol megatec), etc), up to 3 workstations. As UPS it's works without problems, but his soft for windows full shit! But with NUT all works fine. -- Best regards, Playnet mailto:playnet@mail333.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:19:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC3A16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:19:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beowulf@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B4743D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:19:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beowulf@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so1186228wra for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:19:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ABQ0xzxKckEZrcmPcRVzKTo/vsZPDqyticl6eOalzNz+0Xu7JGclW38JzUnd7Ikj/nSv5E7BxFL2lR3nFoW7gs5DU36WWsnVt52kNX7mu0K2IKwgrKCc/jcakgZNqo6S/pwGicHGhBMnIw+6aulDnZMQEB1SEsbkzL7ZKnlTuNw= Received: by 10.54.96.4 with SMTP id t4mr3330169wrb; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.102.16 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:19:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20f8f4550602141319s1e9867c9nf3231fdc8b518919@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:19:31 -0500 From: j m g To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060214092426.M60946@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43F1E250.1070705@pixelhammer.com> <20060214092426.M60946@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> Subject: Re: NAS advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:19:32 -0000 Has anyone used the freenas.org distro? On what equipment? Thanks. On 2/14/06, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, DAve wrote: > > > (I am cross posting to FreeBSD questions and Bacula Users, I will not b= e > > cross posting replies) > > > > I've been crying for four years that we needed a decent backup system a= nd I > > always got put off. "It's on order", "can you resubmit an updated equip= ment > > list". Yea, checks in the mail. > > > > So yesterday I am told that we have some equipment we got in another de= al and > > I can have it to backup my NOC. I plan to run Bacula which I already ha= ve on > > some individual machines. I want to have Bacula clients on all my machi= nes > > talking to a single machine running the Bacula director, hopefully usin= g the > > NAS machines for storage. > > > > This is the equipment they threw at me, it is old, but amazingly, unuse= d. > > > > One Dell Poweredge 750, 2.8ghz CPU, 1gb ram, 2 500gb SATA Maxtor > > drives(yuk!), CERC SATA controller. > > Be very careful here. I run OpenBSD with CMU RAIDFrame RAID-1 mirrors an= d > FreeBSD 5.3 with GEOM/GMirror RAID-1 on this platform for embeded devices= . > It's rock-solid, except Dell phased the 750 for the 850 and went from ICH= 6 > to ICH7 Intel Chipsets? Also, they're now OEM'ing Broadcom bge(4) based > NICs instead of Intel em(4), so consider yourself lucky in a sense >:}. > The point is that the 850 will only run the very latest FreeBSD 6.1-BETA1 > snapshots contain support for the newer chips. > > ~lava > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > -- -jmg -sapere aude From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:31:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9521D16A423 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B5343D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from 35st-server.simplicato.com (static-71-249-233-130.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.249.233.130]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A627D90; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:31:22 -0500 (EST) References: <20060207222202.GA8604@math.jussieu.fr> <43E9B39B.2070507@locolomo.org> <20060208170851.GA90120@alexis.mi.celestial.com> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: freebsd@celestial.com Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:33:50 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large imap server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:24 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:24 -0000 Bill Campbell writes: > Cyrus scaling? We currently user Courier and so far I am far from impressed with it's scalability. We have NFS servers for the storage and then front end machines for the POP/IMAP connections. The footprint per connection is about 3MB to 5MB on the client. On a machine with 2GB that means about 600 connections... but the machines usually are dying around 400 connections. > Perhaps on one mongo server. I have read totally the opposity that the only way to scale a mail setup beyond 10s of thousands is with Cyrus .. or some other propietary system. Have note read of any truly large Courier installation. > imap from a central server housing home directories, and have > seen essentially linear performance as servers are added. How many connections can you handle per "front-end" machine? What type of configuration? I inheritted the setup I am working with and little by little we are building things "right".. including better mail store machines. Also as part of the initial question was which sysctl/kernel settings are usefull in dedicated mail clients/servers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:31:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811A816A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imbg11@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CD443D58 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imbg11@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t13so880432wxc for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:31:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Zf2iKcD8PvyoqRImzl4SYLRcExPA8nqjQPnQSdlVDGMNRIhg9Ksyj0ebMjxz70JEDIF/RSypRmUpH/BMLsjJWl5cBHUBigJF3Y1X5G3HY17iijLIk2Kip3NnwW4DIoT3We0AbKMRGMsi/EcWn/EfSFchb1eEnYhCXbHzjP9ej+c= Received: by 10.70.94.6 with SMTP id r6mr2965899wxb; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?172.16.120.163? ( [208.254.3.3]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h18sm78478wxd.2006.02.14.13.31.53; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:31:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F24C48.9040702@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:31:52 -0500 From: Tom Nguyen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 15 digit HEX string in /var/log/messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: imbg11@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:56 -0000 Greetings all, Running FreeBSD 5.4 stable on intel x86 platform. Need help in deciphering /figuring out what is the cause of strange 15 character HEX strings that is logging in /var/log/messages: [...] Feb 14 13:11:39 hostx kernel: 3E0D0A3C6172656 Feb 14 13:14:12 hostx kernel: 4163636570742D4 Feb 14 13:14:19 hostx kernel: 69742532464C697 Feb 14 13:14:26 hostx kernel: 4163636570742D4 Feb 14 13:31:44 hostx kernel: 732E616861696E7 Feb 14 13:32:31 hostx kernel: 415577426F41475 Feb 14 13:32:31 hostx kernel: 415577426F41475 Feb 14 13:33:40 hostx kernel: 2A0D0A416363657 Feb 14 13:33:48 hostx kernel: 2E616861696E746 Feb 14 13:33:49 hostx kernel: 736573736D656E7 Feb 14 13:43:22 hostx kernel: 45414141412F2F2 Feb 14 14:00:38 hostx kernel: 780D0A416363657 Feb 14 14:02:45 hostx kernel: 0A200D0A09626F7 Feb 14 14:13:19 hostx kernel: 70616765732F686 Feb 14 14:39:10 hostx kernel: 64066FF3ED39E31 Feb 14 14:47:57 hostx kernel: 414141414141414 [...] This has been occurring for several weeks now. First thought was some type of attack but our IDS doesn't pick up anything unusual. Google searches doesn't give any clues. Can anyone shed some light on this? TIA. --T From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:31:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAB116A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster4.tls.net (ecluster4.tls.net [65.196.224.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22B0343D5A for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 48164 invoked by uid 89); 14 Feb 2006 21:31:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.101?) (ldg%tls.net@204.8.12.135) by auth-ecluster4.tls.net with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 21:31:56 -0000 Message-ID: <43F24C47.20405@pixelhammer.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:31:51 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43F1E250.1070705@pixelhammer.com> <20060214092426.M60946@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> In-Reply-To: <20060214092426.M60946@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: NAS advice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:31:59 -0000 Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, DAve wrote: > >> (I am cross posting to FreeBSD questions and Bacula Users, I will not >> be cross posting replies) >> >> I've been crying for four years that we needed a decent backup system >> and I always got put off. "It's on order", "can you resubmit an >> updated equipment list". Yea, checks in the mail. >> >> So yesterday I am told that we have some equipment we got in another >> deal and I can have it to backup my NOC. I plan to run Bacula which I >> already have on some individual machines. I want to have Bacula >> clients on all my machines talking to a single machine running the >> Bacula director, hopefully using the NAS machines for storage. >> >> This is the equipment they threw at me, it is old, but amazingly, unused. >> >> One Dell Poweredge 750, 2.8ghz CPU, 1gb ram, 2 500gb SATA Maxtor >> drives(yuk!), CERC SATA controller. > > > Be very careful here. I run OpenBSD with CMU RAIDFrame RAID-1 mirrors > and FreeBSD 5.3 with GEOM/GMirror RAID-1 on this platform for embeded > devices. It's rock-solid, except Dell phased the 750 for the 850 and > went from ICH6 to ICH7 Intel Chipsets? Also, they're now OEM'ing > Broadcom bge(4) based NICs instead of Intel em(4), so consider yourself > lucky in a sense >:}. The point is that the 850 will only run the very > latest FreeBSD 6.1-BETA1 snapshots contain support for the newer chips. > > ~lava Ahh, so they will be fully supported chipsets and on the way to legacy by them time I am allowed to purchase new equipment again ;^). Thanks for the heads up, good to know if I come by an 850 for a client's colo box. I've been getting PE2650's, at least the last two I converted to FreeBSD webservers were. They work beautifully BTW. DAve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:32:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40DB16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:32:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc1-cmbg1-3-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [62.253.132.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB91C43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:32:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.60 #0) id 1F97mE-0006vj-Rg by authid for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:32:02 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:32:02 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060214213202.GA69337@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Samba port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:32:06 -0000 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 03:31:02PM -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm rather new to FreeBSD (I usually use linux and I'm trying Fbsd. I > upgraded my samba port yesterday, but after, I couldn't reconnect to it. > I found out that the upgrade (using cvsup/portupgrade) removed smb.conf > and stopped smb and cups? Why is it this way? It is not the only port > that gets stopped on an upgrade. Is that normal? Shouldn't it at least > try to restart? portupgrade (and portmanager) will try to restart upgraded daemons (smbd, exim, or whatever) in order that they run the new code. As far as I am aware, an upgraded port should not touch an existing config file. Did you upgrade from version 2 to version 3? This might account for it, but I can't remeber if I had similar problems making that particular journey. Anyway, for clues, you can try starting samba directly: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba.sh start and see what debuggibg you get. Welcome to FreeBSD, btw. Hope you stick around! HTH, Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: 3B9D 8BBB EB03 BA83 5DB4 3B88 86FC F03A 90A1 BE8F _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD8kxShvzwOpChvo8RAm0MAKChcImyU0T1hfb/6aMXoO6R52cQjgCgpSHG /hwtsjKYiT1LXUa1kKFHPIs= =i4ND -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:33:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33E216A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:33:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D10C43D49 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:33:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from 35st-server.simplicato.com (static-71-249-233-130.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.249.233.130]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9618802A; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:33:17 -0500 (EST) References: <20060207222202.GA8604@math.jussieu.fr> <20060208002642.GA7618@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <20060208201321.GA23773@math.jussieu.fr> <20060208202207.GA22164@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <004c01c62d25$1d893910$c801a8c0@nexpc> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Foo Ji-Haw Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:35:45 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd@celestial.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large imap server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:33:18 -0000 Foo Ji-Haw writes: > I've been using FreeBSD + courier IMAP + MySQL (for user authentication). > It's hardly a load issue for more than 200,000 users, and that was years > ago. Would you mind sharing some info on the setup? First time I read about a courier setup of that size. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:33:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5598B16A425 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:33:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D720743D72 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:33:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y25so501279nfb for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:33:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=HfAphip+nA2G3wFjF3BRfcLWU1bj+C+W/TftDmlN2LIwOwzGqo3ix+5aprdjs9BzueoyRdLsMic+8MEehv+nhU32RKGwdi+q87l6z4kklcLdbAw0gDRDZue/kNx6bP3WhHh282z1U86mOdN6WkcvN2XjfUq+rUc3uAMwj7lwd5g= Received: by 10.48.247.2 with SMTP id u2mr1477292nfh; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:33:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.26.12 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:33:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18e02bd30602141333x2de7e694wf7034bcca984538a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:33:19 +0200 From: Iantcho Vassilev To: playnet In-Reply-To: <1776773801.20060215001959@mail333.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1776773801.20060215001959@mail333.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: choosing a UPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:33:33 -0000 Could you tell how do you configure the ups? Thanks On 2/14/06, Playnet wrote: > > Hello Peter, > > Saturday, February 4, 2006, 1:44:57 AM, you wrote: > > P> I am in the market for a UPS to effect automatic shutdown (via DB9) of > a > P> file server (which will run FreeBSD 6.0). I have noticed some large > price > P> fluctuations and I don't understand why. I am comparing units of equa= l > P> strength, say 750 VA. Any comments on what I should be looking for? > I use UNELT Smart Double 1000 (1000 VA, AVR, works good with NUT > (protocol megatec), etc), up to 3 workstations. > > As UPS it's works without problems, but his soft for windows full > shit! But with NUT all works fine. > > -- > Best regards, > Playnet mailto:playnet@mail333.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 21:35:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC8A16A423 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:35:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FDE43D5A for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:34:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o25so502351nfa for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:34:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=cc3juRmdfAMsink4MJap4fI4kHeObVuyuzNxaNmaMn95Ufwrmaib4y7OS7RDI3MD+/M6CLj9uQm9/uhkwdB5ABSOdbNBQmECibkmDJk4SKpRC87YrnraskkclEqvumr0Ze6jpoJHhkzMTbfLufG7LXU0iNPR4dKivluhAvz5n4c= Received: by 10.48.248.6 with SMTP id v6mr1475845nfh; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:34:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.26.12 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:34:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18e02bd30602141334yef90c40t14fd6d2ce6175ef9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:34:55 +0200 From: Iantcho Vassilev To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <43F227CA.60603@mykitchentable.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <43F227CA.60603@mykitchentable.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: General Guidance Using Snort Inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:35:16 -0000 I am pretty sure there are modules for PF(so i guess IPFW2 should have also). Try google and the snort mail list On 2/14/06, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > > I've installed snort 2.4.3 on a 6.0 machine and have it logging > successfully to a MySQL database on another machine in my home network. > I also have BASE installed on that machine to view the alerts. > > Now I'd like to move forward and do things like "block an IP address for > 1 hour that has generated 5 alerts on the same rule in the past > minute". I've Googled and read about snort inline. But what I've read > suggests that snort works with ipfilter. I'm running ipfw2 for my > firewall on the same box that's running snort. To use snort inline, do > I have to covert my entire firewall to ipfilter? Or will snort use > ipfilter to do its "inline" stuff and ipfw2 can continue to work on its > own? > > I'm confused about how this should work and would appreciate any nudges > to guides regarding this setup. > > Thanks, > > Drew > > -- > Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse > Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! > > http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 22:02:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767EB16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:02:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@douville.net) Received: from smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E309C43D4C for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:02:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@douville.net) Received: (qmail 17799 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 22:02:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sdouvilnonq1) (sns536@rogers.com@70.29.116.42 with login) by smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2006 22:02:52 -0000 Message-ID: <006901c631b2$62dcb910$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> From: "Steve Douville" To: "John Webster" , "Drew Tomlinson" References: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2252D.8060605@mykitchentable.net> <000a01c6319b$56bf5730$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2323D.4040601@mykitchentable.net> <43AFFE86294A7278C251E584@vortex.es.net> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:02:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:02:53 -0000 196 is the switch... 209 is a port on the switch ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Webster" To: "Drew Tomlinson" Cc: "Steve Douville" ; "FreeBSD Questions" Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 4:08 PM Subject: Re: IP Routing Question From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 22:27:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15A616A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA9C43D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:27:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F98e0-0000xu-Mb for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:27:37 +0100 Received: from n250.camo-route.com ([216.113.24.250]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:27:36 +0100 Received: from ugob by n250.camo-route.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:27:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ugo Bellavance Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:27:24 -0500 Lines: 55 Message-ID: References: <20060214213202.GA69337@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: n250.camo-route.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <20060214213202.GA69337@catflap.slightlystrange.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Samba port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:27:41 -0000 Daniel Bye wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 03:31:02PM -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm rather new to FreeBSD (I usually use linux and I'm trying Fbsd. I >> upgraded my samba port yesterday, but after, I couldn't reconnect to it. >> I found out that the upgrade (using cvsup/portupgrade) removed smb.conf >> and stopped smb and cups? Why is it this way? It is not the only port >> that gets stopped on an upgrade. Is that normal? Shouldn't it at least >> try to restart? > > portupgrade (and portmanager) will try to restart upgraded daemons > (smbd, exim, or whatever) in order that they run the new code. Maybe it tried, but the config for samba disappeared. I don't know why it didn't restart cups though. > As far > as I am aware, an upgraded port should not touch an existing config > file. Did you upgrade from version 2 to version 3? This might account > for it, but I can't remeber if I had similar problems making that > particular journey. No, it was just a security upgrade. > > Anyway, for clues, you can try starting samba directly: > > # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba.sh start > > and see what debuggibg you get. I got it now, I copied the samba conf file, restarted cups, then samba. > > Welcome to FreeBSD, btw. Hope you stick around! Hard to tell. Very different from linux. I try to learn FreeBSD since it seems interesting, but I'm meeting many problems that I don't get in linux. For example, with yum, up2date or apt, such an upgrade would have been w/o issue. > > HTH, > > Dan > -- Ugo -> Please don't send a copy of your reply by e-mail. I read the list. -> Please avoid top-posting, long signatures and HTML, and cut the irrelevant parts in your replies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 22:36:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2F316A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:36:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2558843D7B for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:36:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m18so512449nfc for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:36:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IZuCNmc40vtCWInpo7J+Sm62IfCJ5ahMu2kfsTjjA1K9emn/XtaLuMEylXUC9vQMZi8Seos/+xAQH7IfsuAyX7cyYuDap5O5MdLCaQSLT3rv5KsA1BOCEqfKuWkD5FSkRcmoj8BrZMSOA8M8OzCV7n51NvNXROqK+RPodVHfIVY= Received: by 10.48.3.10 with SMTP id 10mr1499385nfc; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:36:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.108.10 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:36:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550602141436p6c416ct13e6a57099cb05dd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:36:43 +0100 From: "Daniel A." To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5ceb5d550602140559s7687b600k26a76f5d6b2a7973@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cant login to FTP server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:36:53 -0000 Hi, I've been looking at the FreeBSD handbook's section about ipnat and ipf for a few hours now, but I cannot seem to make this work. Outgoing FTP'ing works just fine. In fact, I have absolutely no problems making outgoing FTP connections from my workstation (Which is behind my server) Also, I have absolutely no problem with making connections to my server from inside my LAN. The problem is when someone tries to connect to my servers FTP server. It just doesnt work! In addition to the rules and log I pasted below, here are my tweaked rulese= ts: /etc/ipf.rules: ___________IPF___________ # Let clients behind the firewall send out to the internet, and replies to # come back in by keeping state. pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp all keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto udp all keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto icmp all keep state # Allow everything on local net pass in on sis0 all pass out on sis0 all # loopback stuff pass in quick on lo0 all pass out quick on lo0 all # Since nothing should be coming from these address ranges, block them block in quick on rl0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any block in quick on rl0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any block in quick on rl0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick on rl0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick on rl0 from 169.254.0.0/16 to any block in quick on rl0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any block in quick on rl0 from 204.152.64.0/23 to any block in quick on rl0 from 224.0.0.0/3 to any # Let's let people access the services running behind this system # Let's let people access the services running on this system pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 21 #FTP pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 22 #SSH pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 80 #WWW pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 113 #oidentd # Steam Dedicated Server (Commented out... the Steam Dedicated Server blows) #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 1200 # Friends net= work #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port 26999 >< 27016 # Gamep= ort #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 27020 #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 27029 >< 27040 #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 27015 # SRCDS Rcon # Block everything else block in quick on rl0 all ___________IPF___________ /etc/ipnat.rules __________IPNAT__________ map rl0 192.168.0.0/29 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp map rl0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp map rl0 192.168.0.0/29 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp 1025:65000 map rl0 192.168.0.0/29 -> 0/32 __________IPNAT__________ On 2/14/06, fbsd_user wrote: > There taken right from the ipfilter section of the handbook. > Maybe you should read that section in the handbook. > > Post the complete contents of your ipf rules and nat rules for > review > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Daniel A. > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:59 AM > To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Cant login to FTP server. > > > Hi, > the server is connected directly to "the wild", and I'm connecting > from a remote non-local host. > Are you sure that those are ipf rules? They look a lot like ipnat > rules. > > On 2/14/06, fbsd_user wrote: > > Daniel > > You did not say where you were running ftp from. > > like from LAN box to gateway server or > > from gateway box to public internet remote ftp site or > > from public internet remote user to your gateway ftp server. > > > > I am guessing its from gateway box to public internet remote ftp > > site. > > Your nat rules need to look like this example. You are missing the > > second rule. > > > > map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp > > map dc0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp > > map dc0 10.0.10.0/29 -> 0/32 > > > > The first rule handles all FTP traffic for the private LAN. > > The second rule handles all FTP traffic from the gateway. > > The third rule handles all non-FTP traffic for the private LAN. > > All the non-FTP gateway traffic is using the public IP address by > > default so > > there is no ipnat rule needed. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Daniel A. > > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:42 AM > > To: questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Cant login to FTP server. > > > > > > Hi, I have some FTP login problems. > > I run FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE, and I have ipf and ipnat enabled. > > > > _______SNIP_______ > > Status: Connecting to dienub.org ... > > Status: Connected with dienub.org. Waiting for welcome message... > > Response: 220 m00h.dienub.org FTP server (Version 6.00LS) > ready. > > Command: USER ************** > > Response: 331 Password required for alive. > > Command: PASS ************** > > Response: 230 User alive logged in. > > Command: FEAT > > Response: 500 FEAT: command not understood. > > Command: SYST > > Response: 215 UNIX Type: L8 Version: BSD-199506 > > Status: Connected > > Status: Retrieving directory listing... > > Command: PWD > > Response: 257 "/usr/home/alive" is current directory. > > Command: TYPE A > > Response: 200 Type set to A. > > Command: PASV > > Response: 227 Entering Passive Mode (87,49,144,133,237,45) > > Command: LIST > > Error: Transfer channel can't be opened. Reason: A connection > > attempt > > failed because the connected party did not properly respond after > a > > period of time, or established connection failed because connected > > host has failed to respond. > > Error: Could not retrieve directory listing > > Command: TYPE A > > _______SNIP_______ > > > > > > /etc/ipf.rules: > > _______SNIP_______ > > # Let clients behind the firewall send out to the internet, and > > replies to > > # come back in by keeping state. > > pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp all keep state > > pass out quick on rl0 proto udp all keep state > > pass out quick on rl0 proto icmp all keep state > > > > # Since nothing should be coming from these address ranges, block > > them > > block in quick on rl0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any > > block in quick on rl0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any > > block in quick on rl0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any > > block in quick on rl0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > > block in quick on rl0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any > > > > # Let's let people access the services running behind this system > > > > # Let's let people access the services running on this system > > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 30000 >< 50000 > > flags S keep state #PASV FTP > > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 21 #FTP > > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 22 #SSH > > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 80 #WWW > > pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 113 #oidentd > > > > # Steam Dedicated Server > > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 1200 # > > Friends network > > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port 26999 >< > 27016 > > # Gameport > > #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port =3D 27020 > > #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 27029 >< > 27040 > > #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 27015 # > SRCDS > > Rcon > > > > # Block everything else > > block in quick on rl0 all > > _______SNIP_______ > > > > > > /etc/ipnat.rules > > _______SNIP_______ > > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp > > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 portmap tcp/udp 1025:65000 > > map rl0 192.168.0.0/16 -> 0.0.0.0/32 > > _______SNIP_______ > > > > > > Might the problem be anywhere else besides my ipf and ipnat > configs? > > Could it be the remote client that's the problem? > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 22:46:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4A816A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:46:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1250B43D75 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:46:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 346 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2006 22:46:37 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Feb 2006 22:46:37 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1A44A28439; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:46:36 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Joe Auty References: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> <443bimav7o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <039BD206-0592-4F99-BE9B-CB49310E5BDC@netmusician.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 14 Feb 2006 17:46:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <039BD206-0592-4F99-BE9B-CB49310E5BDC@netmusician.org> Message-ID: <44oe19ftis.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 54 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: core dump with dump command in single user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:46:46 -0000 Joe Auty writes: > On Feb 14, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > Joe Auty writes: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> Following the instructions here: http://www.unixcities.com/howto/ > >> index.html I did a: > >> > > Those directions are a little outdated, but the problem is really just > > that you didn't follow the directions closely enough: > > > >> dump -0f - /usr | restore -rf - /backup/usr > > > > should have been more like > > > > dump -0f - /usr | (cd /backup/usr;restore -xf - ) > > > Okay, I'm still getting: > > > no space left in string table > abort? > > If I say "n", it just core dumps.... Funny, I can't find that message in the source for dump at all. The message, in -STABLE, is "Do you want to abort dump?". I also can't seem to find the string table error message, but I may just have failed to search the right library so far. Are you running something before 5.2? > Any other suggestions? Plenty. If there are no special files (fifos, etc.) on the disk, any archiver will do it. e.g., tar(1) > Would using "dd" be a valid workaround to > cloning my disk? Sure. If you really want a *clone* of the disk, it's a good option. If having the same data files in the same filestructure would do, then copying other attributes is overkill. > My disk is over a 100 gigabytes, could this be what > is causing dump to crap out? Could be. Check your memory statistics while you're doing it, and see if you run out of VM. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 23:25:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6957B16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:25:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0337643D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:25:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1ENO3Qc081969; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:24:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43F26689.5010007@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:23:53 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas References: <20060214202812.GB1071@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20060214202812.GB1071@flame.pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Joe Auty , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:25:58 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2006-02-14 13:19, Joe Auty wrote: > > >>What is your strategy for dealing with disks of different sizes, like >>mine are? >> >> > >See a very similar thread which started a few days back: > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-February/112498.html > > Yes, and I just posted a brief report on my experience with this today, with the same thread subject line. Other than the fact that Giorgos had forgotten three keystrokes, which I corrected in my "one for the archives" post this morning, I have a feeling my 12-year-old son, or at least my college age "apprentice" could have cloned a FreeBSD installation in a relatively short period of time with dump | restore. Or maybe a trained monkey. Nah, nevermind.... Kevin Kinsey -- Trying to define yourself is like trying to bite your own teeth. -- Alan Watts From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 23:50:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACDB16A420 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:50:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0BE43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:50:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060214235025.FTKH22902.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:50:25 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Daniel A." Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:50:23 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550602141436p6c416ct13e6a57099cb05dd@mail.gmail.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Cant login to FTP server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:50:26 -0000 Daniel change this # Allow everything on local net pass in on sis0 all pass out on sis0 all to this # Allow everything on local net pass in quick on sis0 all pass out quick on sis0 all change this pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp all keep state to pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp all flags S keep state change this # Let's let people access the services running on this system pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 21 #FTP pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 #SSH pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 #WWW pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 113 #oidentd to this # Let's let people access the services running on this system pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 21 flags S keep state #FTP pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 flags S keep state #SSH pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S keep state #WWW pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 113 flags S keep state #oidentd Next you say that remote users on the public internet can not ftp into your gateway firewall/ftp box. The way your firewall is configured only passive ftp can pass through. Your public internet remote user has to tell his ftp login request to use passive mode. To allow active native ftp from remote users add this # To allow remote active ftp data channel pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 20 flags S keep state Your local LAN users can use either passive or active ftp because you have no restrictions as shown by there rules. # Allow everything on local net pass in on sis0 all pass out on sis0 all Here's an very important security point about ftp. FTP passes the login id/pw and data in the clear and it can be captured by a sniffer any place between the remote and host site. Once the valid login id/pw is captured the attacker can gain access to your box as authorized user and then start trying to gain root access after which your box is compromised. Think very hard about allowing native ftp access to you box, it's a very big security risk. You should not be making native ftp available to public login unless you are running a anonymous ftp server within a jail. You should use SSH's sftp which first creates a tunnel between remote and host and then encrypts the login id/pw and the complete data stream. Check the archives for the last few days for thread about seting up ssh. There is a complete step by step how to posted in the thread. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Daniel A. Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 5:37 PM To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cant login to FTP server. Hi, I've been looking at the FreeBSD handbook's section about ipnat and ipf for a few hours now, but I cannot seem to make this work. Outgoing FTP'ing works just fine. In fact, I have absolutely no problems making outgoing FTP connections from my workstation (Which is behind my server) Also, I have absolutely no problem with making connections to my server from inside my LAN. The problem is when someone tries to connect to my servers FTP server. It just doesnt work! In addition to the rules and log I pasted below, here are my tweaked rulesets: /etc/ipf.rules: ___________IPF___________ # Let clients behind the firewall send out to the internet, and replies to # come back in by keeping state. pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp all keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto udp all keep state pass out quick on rl0 proto icmp all keep state # Allow everything on local net pass in on sis0 all pass out on sis0 all # loopback stuff pass in quick on lo0 all pass out quick on lo0 all # Since nothing should be coming from these address ranges, block them block in quick on rl0 from 192.168.0.0/16 to any block in quick on rl0 from 172.16.0.0/12 to any block in quick on rl0 from 127.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick on rl0 from 10.0.0.0/8 to any block in quick on rl0 from 169.254.0.0/16 to any block in quick on rl0 from 192.0.2.0/24 to any block in quick on rl0 from 204.152.64.0/23 to any block in quick on rl0 from 224.0.0.0/3 to any # Let's let people access the services running behind this system # Let's let people access the services running on this system pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 21 #FTP pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 22 #SSH pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 #WWW pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 113 #oidentd # Steam Dedicated Server (Commented out... the Steam Dedicated Server blows) #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port = 1200 # Friends network #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port 26999 >< 27016 # Gameport #pass in quick on rl0 proto udp from any to any port = 27020 #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port 27029 >< 27040 #pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 27015 # SRCDS Rcon # Block everything else block in quick on rl0 all ___________IPF___________ /etc/ipnat.rules __________IPNAT__________ map rl0 192.168.0.0/29 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp map rl0 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp map rl0 192.168.0.0/29 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp 1025:65000 map rl0 192.168.0.0/29 -> 0/32 __________IPNAT__________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 23:51:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2492D16A423 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:51:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from muse2.calarts.edu (muse2.calarts.edu [198.182.157.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BBE43D45 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:50:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from [198.182.157.9] (smurphy.calarts.edu [198.182.157.9]) (authenticated bits=0) by muse2.calarts.edu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1ENosZA064682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:50:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Message-ID: <43F26CD9.8030203@calarts.edu> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:50:49 -0800 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 198.182.157.28 Subject: Questions about FreeBSD arp table X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:51:03 -0000 I have a few questions with arp on FreeBSD Does the FreeBSD maintain its arp information in a File? Does rebooting FreeBSD clear the arp table? am I correct with arp -d * should clear all arp information? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 00:04:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B245216A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:04:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@sf-net.com) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A3743D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:04:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@sf-net.com) Received: from [195.238.136.66] (helo=[192.168.130.51]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2Dk-1F9A9N3EwG-0000iP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:04:06 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7FB23998-5C83-4F4D-A1D3-67CBBF6FC85D@sf-net.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:04:03 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:0525cf9cbe16c6d3d153baa8ed291ac7 Subject: IPv6 and a local network behind a gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:04:07 -0000 Hi all, I saw some time ago a similiar question on the mailinglist but the relevant config files were on a temporarly server, so I can't reconstruct the situation. So I hope someone could say the things a second time ;-) Here is my setup: I'm running a FreeBSD server behind a DSL-Box (NAT) with one network interface. This server is connected with two other workstation through a switch. I register by sixxs (a IPv6 service provider). After some installation I got my IPv6 connection between the sixxs provider and my FreeBSD server running! I can ping www.kame.net and when I go to ww.kame.net with lynx I "can see" the dancing kame. So the setup should be fine. I setup rtadvd for the workstations and it seems to be ok. The workstations get their IPv6 addresses but I can't ping anything outside my LAN. Summary: Connecting to the IPv6-world from the FreeBSD-server is OK but I don't get any connection from the clients. Here are the configs: /etc/rc.conf ipv6_enable="YES" ipv6_defaultrouter="2001:6f8:900:612::1%em0" ipv6_default_interface="gif0" gif_interfaces="gif0" gifconfig_gif0="192.168.130.2 212.224.0.189" ipv6_ifconfig_gif0="2001:6f8:900:612::2 2001:6f8:900:612::1 prefixlen 128" ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" ipv6_ifconfig_em0="2001:6f8:900:612::3 prefixlen 64" rtadvd_enable="YES" rtadvd_interfaces="em0" /etc/rtadvd.conf em0:\ :addrs#1:addr="2001:6f8:900:612::":prefixlen#64:tc=ether: Hardware (FreeBSD server): one network interface card: em0 Software (FreeBSD server): default installation with the latest updates tcpdump from the FreeBSD server when I try to ping6 www.kame.net from a client # tcpdump -ni gif0 icmp6 00:59:36.917672 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 0, length 16 00:59:37.922935 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 1, length 16 00:59:38.930710 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 2, length 16 00:59:39.933212 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 3, length 16 00:59:40.938355 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 4, length 16 00:59:41.943378 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 5, length 16 00:59:42.948514 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 6, length 16 00:59:43.953657 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 7, length 16 00:59:44.958794 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 8, length 16 00:59:45.963937 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 9, length 16 00:59:46.969333 IP6 2001:6f8:900:612:211:24ff:fee1:776c > 2001:200:0:8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085: ICMP6, echo request, seq 10, length 16 I don't have an more ideas! I always thought the problem is the server behind the NAT but the surfen and ping'ing from the server itself is no problem, so I think the problem must be somewhere else?! Best regards, Stefan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 00:15:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D76E16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:15:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A9F43D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:15:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (dialup91.ach.sch.gr [81.186.70.91]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1F0Es9D006280 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:14:59 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1F0ElrU077288; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:14:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1F0EleD077278; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:14:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:14:47 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Sean Murphy Message-ID: <20060215001447.GA68647@flame.pc> References: <43F26CD9.8030203@calarts.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F26CD9.8030203@calarts.edu> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.396, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions about FreeBSD arp table X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:15:22 -0000 On 2006-02-14 15:50, Sean Murphy wrote: > I have a few questions with arp on FreeBSD > > Does the FreeBSD maintain its arp information in a File? No. It's not really necessary, the way arp works now. > Does rebooting FreeBSD clear the arp table? Yes. It would be silly to keep an arp table from a previous run of the system and then mess things up when, for instance, a laptop moves from one network to another, right? :) > am I correct with arp -d * should clear all arp information? No. But you can use ``arp -d -a'' for this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 00:20:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3283C16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:20:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dfarmour@myrealbox.com) Received: from pd3mo1so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB43D43D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:20:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dfarmour@myrealbox.com) Received: from pd5mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr5so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.181]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUP00GELCXFHCF0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:20:03 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml5so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.149]) by pd5mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUP00J2NCXFN1B0@pd5mr5so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:20:03 -0700 (MST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([24.108.158.26]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUP00KX0CXESTE0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:20:03 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:20:02 -0800 From: David Armour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <43F273B2.6070502@myrealbox.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0607-1, 02/14/2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Subject: sysinstall 6.1 b1 input/output error "unable to transfer" from both CD or FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:20:37 -0000 hello list in the middle of installing freebsd [6.1 b1] over an earlier ubuntu trial during transfer from CD to hard drive, i began to see "unable to transfer ... from acd0" error messages for first the doc, manpages, dict, and base distributions. i switched the install media to ftp and successfully installed the doc, manpages and dict distributions (i think!) before again encountering the "write failure on transfer" error for the base distribution. i burned the install cds at a 16x speed and 'verified' them with nero, if that makes any difference. my archive searches with the errors above pasted in produced conflicting or dated results. is there a way to easily narrow down the list of culprits? any help greatly appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 00:35:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EAD16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:35:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alan@fromorbit.com) Received: from thing1.auspcmarket.com.au (mail.fromorbit.com [203.31.169.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118F243D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:35:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alan@fromorbit.com) Received: from [192.168.1.99] (unknown [192.168.1.99]) by thing1.auspcmarket.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4AE713F for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:04:17 +1100 (EST) From: Alan Garfield To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:04:16 +1100 Message-Id: <1139961856.2781.59.camel@random.fromorbit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Weird ipf redirected traffic with WCCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:35:29 -0000 Hey guys, I wonder if you can help me figure out why my squid proxy never sees any traffic on the loopback,3128 I've setup ipf to log everything and it appears after the redirection it immediately gets spat out the ethernet interface to be lost in the ether. Why on earth would the routing table / ipf doing that?? Squid sees nothing and nothing appears on the loopback interface. ====== Feb 15 10:57:24 thing3 ipmon[296]: 10:57:24.071776 fxp0 @-1:-1 p 204.21.169.1 -> 204.21.169.66 PR gre len 20 (72) IN Feb 15 10:57:24 thing3 ipmon[296]: 10:57:24.071791 gre0 @-1:-1 p 192.168.1.28,2147 -> 127.0.0.1,3128 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN NAT Feb 15 10:57:24 thing3 ipmon[296]: 10:57:24.071824 fxp0 @-1:-1 p 127.0.0.1,3128 -> 192.168.1.28,2147 PR tcp len 20 48 -AS OUT ====== Any ideas? Thanks, Alan. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 01:01:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2126E16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:01:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60018.mail.yahoo.com (web60018.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95E8D43D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:01:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 99362 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Feb 2006 01:01:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mzzKYzafVw9Q/yrBbt4tMsyUlF72KbXYy4Ww1YUVixxXqMU8ujVT5TypRtn8HPAty1iCM99NBMtFvlV+SxVzJQ3vIIULoyoQmv55trr/1TCpAUIOgjLoj+T77QqgJhlDUdXq0GH8kxdq+YEWkVlujstWE+q1WrynoyL2sOq6C0c= ; Message-ID: <20060215010144.99360.qmail@web60018.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.252.84.239] by web60018.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:01:44 EST Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:01:44 -0500 (EST) From: Peter To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: automount external usb hard drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:01:46 -0000 Hi, is it possible to have an external USB hard drive automounted once connected? I am designing a backup solution for some non-technical folks and this would help greatly. I will be running FreeBSD 6.0. Thanks in advance. -- Peter __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 01:02:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01DA16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:02:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@celestial.com) Received: from mail.mi.celestial.com (dagney.celestial.com [192.136.111.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577D943D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:02:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@celestial.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A041E919; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:02:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alexis.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 53762-02-2; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:02:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 1378E1E918; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:02:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:02:11 -0800 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd@celestial.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060215010211.GB51548@alexis.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd@celestial.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060207222202.GA8604@math.jussieu.fr> <43E9B39B.2070507@locolomo.org> <20060208170851.GA90120@alexis.mi.celestial.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Cc: Subject: Re: Large imap server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:02:13 -0000 On Tue, Feb 14, 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote: >Bill Campbell writes: > >>Cyrus scaling? > > >We currently user Courier and so far I am far from impressed with it's >scalability. > >We have NFS servers for the storage and then front end machines for the >POP/IMAP connections. The footprint per connection is about 3MB to 5MB on >the client. On a machine with 2GB that means about 600 connections... but >the machines usually are dying around 400 connections. I'm looking at an ISP's server now with about 7,500 mailboxes with a load average about 0.29 using courier-imap to serve POP and IMAP clients. This server is answering about 4,800 courier connections per hour (mostly POP3). Granted that POP3 connections are typically very short duration compared to IMAP which may be open for extended periods of time. This server is the primary NFS server with 2GB of RAM, with dual 3GhZ Pentium IVs. While not a truly low-end box, it probably cost about $1,500USD. This system as one publically accessible MX server that handles all incoming messages, rejecting about a million connections using a combination of DNSRBLs and postfix rules. It runs all the incoming mail through with postfix, amavisd, and clamav, then passes messages that get through without virii or phishing to one of four boxes that use spamassassin to route spam into spam folders. We chose to run a single incoming MX server since the spammers would simply cycle amongst backup MX servers when rejected. These four boxes run with a load average about 3.0 or less, and have 1GB RAM on 2.66GhZ Celerons -- not exactly high-end boxes these days. The hardware cost of these machines is probably about $600USD each. Any or all of these machines could serve POP and IMAP as well, but we prefer to let them concentrate on spamassassin which is a true RAM hog. Adding capacity in this type of system is trivial, relatively inexpensive, and, other than the central NFS user store, not vulnerable to a single point of failure (each machine has its own openldap server for authentication which can be rebuilt from the master very easily, which can be required as the openldap doesn't respond well to unclean shutdowns). Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 http://www.celestial.com/ You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. -- Charles A. Beard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 01:46:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095FE16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:46:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@eyede.com) Received: from ransack.eyede.com (ransack.eyede.com [202.21.136.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F9043D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:46:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@eyede.com) Message-ID: <43F287E0.4000403@eyede.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:46:08 +1300 From: Lists User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew References: <1139589051.2185.8.camel@netvista.network> <17388.49778.982280.245532@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <1139602596.58491.8.camel@netvista.network> In-Reply-To: <1139602596.58491.8.camel@netvista.network> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by eyede.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stale dependencies in pkgdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:46:18 -0000 Andrew wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 11:42 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: >> Andrew writes: >> >>> I've run "pkgdb -F" as portupgrade suggests, deleting stale >>> dependencies, but they seem to keep reappearing. >> I'm not an expert on pkgdb, but I'm pretty sure that's the way >> it works. >> You need to fix, not delete, the stale dependencies. This may >> take some effort the first time around. >> Beyond that, I question the wisdom of any "automatic" >> solution. There are definitely times when I do _not_ want to accept >> the fixes proposed by pkgdb -F. > > My apologies; I re-read the man pages for portupgrade and pkgdb and I > think I understand what's going on now. Thanks anyway... > > -Andrew A good solution in the long term, rather than fixing dependencies every time you do an upgrade, is to look at the ALT_PKGDEP section of pkgtools.conf. Here is how i addressed the cdrtools dependency you mentioned. ALT_PKGDEP = { 'cdr-tools*' => 'cjk-cdrtools*', 'pcre-*' => 'pcre-utf8', } > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 01:59:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A180D16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:59:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc1-cmbg1-3-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [62.253.132.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D41243D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:59:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.60 #0) id 1F9Bwv-000L8r-8t by authid for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:59:21 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:59:21 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20060215015920.GB69337@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions References: <20060215010144.99360.qmail@web60018.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060215010144.99360.qmail@web60018.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: automount external usb hard drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:59:23 -0000 --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:01:44PM -0500, Peter wrote: > Hi, is it possible to have an external USB hard drive automounted once > connected? =20 It certainly is - you need to create a hook for for your device in /etc/usbd.conf. To find out the required details, run usbd from the command line: # /etc/rc.d/usbd stop # usbd -dv Connect your device, and take a note of the values for the device-attach event. For example, this is what I get when connecting a Disgo Lite USB key drive. usbd: device-attach event at 1139967116.311696000, disgo, vendor 0x08ec: vndr=3D0x08ec prdct=3D0x0008 rlse=3D0x0100 clss=3D0x0000 subclss=3D0x0000= prtcl=3D0x0000 device names: umass0 This is what the corresponding entry in /etc/usbd.conf looks like: device "Disgo Lite USB Key" devname "umass[0-9]+" vendor 0x08ec product 0x0008 release 0x0100 attach "sleep 3; mount -t msdosfs /dev/`camcontrol devlist | awk '/disgo/ {print $NF}' | sed -e 's/(\(.*\))/\1s1/'` /mnt/disgo" Note the "attach" command must be one continuous line - you can't break up long commands to prettify the file. The attach command here works for= =20 me - you might need something else, depending on your specific=20 requirements. For example, if you regularly attach more than one storage device, you will certainly want a smarter way of handling them! Of course, you will need to make sure you explicitly unmount the file system before detaching the device. man usbd, man usbd.conf and man camcontrol for more details. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: 3B9D 8BBB EB03 BA83 5DB4 3B88 86FC F03A 90A1 BE8F _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD8or4hvzwOpChvo8RAtvTAJ0Ydn/Ua+mFA7l80x5zSLFE8CLCeACgyuQH rH24odc3X8vxrfTU2pCDgzI= =UHyo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 02:32:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7374316A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:32:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from tin.colossus.net (tin.colossus.net [216.121.224.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0E943D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:32:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from nexpc (63.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg [210.193.15.63]) by tin.colossus.net (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA12774; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:30:38 -0800 Message-ID: <05c201c631d9$2ab950d0$c801a8c0@nexpc> From: "Foo Ji-Haw" To: "Francisco Reyes" References: <20060207222202.GA8604@math.jussieu.fr> <20060208002642.GA7618@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <20060208201321.GA23773@math.jussieu.fr> <20060208202207.GA22164@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <004c01c62d25$1d893910$c801a8c0@nexpc> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:40:15 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: freebsd@celestial.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large imap server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:32:46 -0000 Specifically my mail server combo was: FreeBSD 4.1 + Qmail + Courier IMAP + MySQL 3.22 Qmail handles all incoming mails. With a simple Perl script using Mail::Audit, incoming mails are dropped to whatever directory is specified by a lookup on the MySQL table. Courier IMAP uses the same table to respond to IMAP connections. Since Maildir is used, we have experienced 0 mail corruptions since we moved away from Sendmail. Hope this helps. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "Foo Ji-Haw" Cc: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:35 AM Subject: Re: Large imap server. > Foo Ji-Haw writes: > > > I've been using FreeBSD + courier IMAP + MySQL (for user authentication). > > It's hardly a load issue for more than 200,000 users, and that was years > > ago. > > Would you mind sharing some info on the setup? > First time I read about a courier setup of that size. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 03:01:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8D816A422 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:01:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FC343D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:01:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54207DB8; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:01:25 -0500 (EST) References: <20060207222202.GA8604@math.jussieu.fr> <20060208002642.GA7618@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <20060208201321.GA23773@math.jussieu.fr> <20060208202207.GA22164@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <004c01c62d25$1d893910$c801a8c0@nexpc> <05c201c631d9$2ab950d0$c801a8c0@nexpc> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Foo Ji-Haw Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:01:25 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd@celestial.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large imap server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:01:27 -0000 Foo Ji-Haw writes: > Specifically my mail server combo was: > FreeBSD 4.1 + Qmail + Courier IMAP + MySQL 3.22 How many clients did each front end machine handled? What was the hardware of the front-end machines? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 03:26:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A673316A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:26:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296EF43D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:26:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAE7730A4; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:26:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06974-06; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:26:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (12-223-193-72.client.insightbb.com [12.223.193.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB187303E; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:26:37 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060215031225.37872.qmail@web51411.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060215031225.37872.qmail@web51411.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:26:35 -0500 To: Steve Quinn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:32:07 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:26:39 -0000 Thanks Steve, These were the exact instructions I started with, only on a different page.... The problem with these for me is that dump caused a core dump. I've been trying to run dump while booted up from a Freesbie CD, but I was getting "unknown file system" errors I didn't know how to deal with. I'm going to try g4u next, but I'm surprised that what I originally thought would be a simple task has turned out to be such an amazing chore =( On Feb 14, 2006, at 10:12 PM, Steve Quinn wrote: > --- Joe Auty wrote: > >> What is your strategy for dealing with disks of different sizes, like >> mine are? >> >> > > Hi Joe > > Sorry dude, this will be a long read > > I use Ghost for Windows cloning mostly since it understands Fat and > NTFS filesystems and I don't > have to worry about empty blocks > > I used to use Partimage quite a bit but that was during my Linux > days :-) > > Now that I've discovered FreeBSD, I prefer to use Ghost for Unix > (G4U) for cloning my FreeBSD > boxen > > If you are cloning to an identical drive, G4U rocks. As a client/ > server based solution or even > locally it is really slick. > > If cloning to a bigger disk, G4U will work but will waste space on > your new disk requiring growfs > or other methods to use it up. (I have not dared to used growfs yet) > > I often want to clone a FreeBSD installation to a new larger drive > and don't want to fuss with > post cloning thingys > > Here's an excellent dump/restore prodecure that I've successfully > used on many production clones > > http://community.unixcities.com/node/5 > > It may seem like a lot but trust me, it's really worth learning > this process > > It's surprisingly fast as dump/restore understands the native > filesystems it copies and thus > ignores empty blocks > > I've got it down to a single simple script if you would like a copy > > Good luck and take care > > Steve > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 04:45:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE2C16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmiejaz@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3721A43D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmiejaz@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s16so1021342wxc for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:45:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=W/P7jzt/TaKiAWgoaGIPW/h+1Sg3q6rJSzjXIPC6PYWRvHG9TYj/h5LwSWEnCqIRfiLxdW1PVn5kS7riKi95lixxeSKByFx0D+LwOklSyyFsqCjr8FuKF5q5woFYn13dcNXTkiIrCp0EgYrmiu4QACh3zxOYCf7q66LQxVowBk8= Received: by 10.70.9.19 with SMTP id 19mr196855wxi; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:45:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.7.14 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:45:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7e148fb90602142045v71cc7c06p7054210693c03653@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:45:19 -0500 From: Jimmie James To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Odd daily run output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:45:20 -0000 [23:38:01] jimmie@fortytwo <143> [0] ~>uname -a FreeBSD fortytwo.zapto.org 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Feb 2 08:01:49 EST 2006 =20 root@fortytwo.zapto.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FORTYTWO i386 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:04:29 -0500 (EST) Subject: fortytwo.zapto.org daily run output Disk status: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 253678 53922 179462 23% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/ad0s1e 253678 -1358 234742 -1% /tmp /dev/ad0s1f 111776478 17198238 85636122 17% /usr /dev/ad0s1d 253678 25808 207576 11% /var procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc fdescfs 1 1 0 100% /dev/fd [23:38:02] jimmie@fortytwo <144> [0] ~>mount /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, acls) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) /dev/ad0s1e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates, acls) /dev/ad0s1f on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates, acls) /dev/ad0s1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates, acls) procfs on /proc (procfs, local) fdescfs on /dev/fd (fdescfs) [22:39:32] jimmie@fortytwo <120> [0] ~#du -sh /tmp/ 16K /tmp/ I know there's 8% reserved for softupdates, but how is it possible that there's _extra_ space on /tmp ? What am I missing? This is the first time I've seen this. The only issue I've had was a hardlockup (not reproducable, nothing in logs) doing a kldunload msdosfs.ko the other day. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 05:38:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0320716A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:38:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F55443D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:38:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 336 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 16:38:08 +1100 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO ?10.168.101.24?) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 16:38:08 +1100 Message-ID: <43F2BE37.5020606@meijome.net> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:37:59 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Norgaard References: <01c801c63189$912094f0$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> <43F21364.4070108@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <43F21364.4070108@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why myserver be locked ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@meijome.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:38:10 -0000 Erik Norgaard wrote: > Halid Faith wrote: > > Check logfiles for error messages, you may set loglevel up so all > debugging is also logged. > Hi , how do you do that system wide? i guess u can do it for each service....but is there a system wide knob for kernel related issue? cheers, Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 06:09:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCEA16A423 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:09:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121CF43D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:09:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from alpha.home (ppp222-1.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net [203.122.222.1]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1F697Ow028682 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:39:08 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:39:06 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602151639.06855.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Identity for HELO in sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:09:11 -0000 I have set sendmail for masquerading with the lines: FEATURE(masquerade_envelope) MASQUERADE_AS(`internode.on.net') FEATURE(`genericstable') GENERICS_DOMAIN(`alpha.home') in the .mc configuration file (alpha.home.mc). I can now send e-mails using the standard 'mail' utility to most destinations but apparently 'alpha.home' is still used as the source domain in the HELO command and as this just my private hostname for the machine it is not known at the receiving end in spite of the FEATURE(masquerade_envelope) which I naively expected to be applied here. Some sites not finding a valid host name here will reject the mail, EG when using send-pr I get the following: ... while talking to mx1.freebsd.org.: >>> DATA <<< 450 : Helo command rejected: Host not found ... Deferred: 450 : Helo command rejected: Host not found <<< 554 Error: no valid recipients How do I get sendmail to use a valid host name such as "internode.on.net"? Help would be much appreciated, Malcolm Kay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 07:02:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE1C16A422 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:02:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from tin.colossus.net (tin.colossus.net [216.121.224.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B9243D58 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:02:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from nexpc (63.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg [210.193.15.63]) by tin.colossus.net (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA20284; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:01:03 -0800 Message-ID: <064101c631fe$f02971e0$c801a8c0@nexpc> From: "Foo Ji-Haw" To: "Francisco Reyes" References: <20060207222202.GA8604@math.jussieu.fr> <20060208002642.GA7618@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <20060208201321.GA23773@math.jussieu.fr> <20060208202207.GA22164@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <004c01c62d25$1d893910$c801a8c0@nexpc> <05c201c631d9$2ab950d0$c801a8c0@nexpc> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:10:41 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: freebsd@celestial.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large imap server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:02:16 -0000 I'm not sure what's the peak traffic like, but we were using a standard P3 800Mhz server h/w w/ 1GB RAM, and SCSI drives. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "Foo Ji-Haw" Cc: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:01 AM Subject: Re: Large imap server. > Foo Ji-Haw writes: > > > Specifically my mail server combo was: > > FreeBSD 4.1 + Qmail + Courier IMAP + MySQL 3.22 > > How many clients did each front end machine handled? > What was the hardware of the front-end machines? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 07:22:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB4416A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:22:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (smtp.thilelli.net [213.41.129.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2931843D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:22:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A0D564A8; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:22:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 86218-05; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:22:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.thilelli.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363F75647E; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:22:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.168.1.20 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jgabel) by webmail.thilelli.net with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:22:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <56635.192.168.1.20.1139988139.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <7e148fb90602142045v71cc7c06p7054210693c03653@mail.gmail.com> References: <7e148fb90602142045v71cc7c06p7054210693c03653@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:22:19 +0100 (CET) From: "Julien Gabel" To: "Jimmie James" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at thilelli.net Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd daily run output. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jpeg@thilelli.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:22:23 -0000 > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1e 253678 -1358 234742 -1% /tmp > I know there's 8% reserved for softupdates, but how is it possible ^^^^^^^^^^^ Not for soft updates, but generally for root to be able to work in case of a problem, i think. > that there's _extra_ space on /tmp ? What am I missing? This is the > first time I've seen this. Run fsck(8) on this file system must solve this. -- -jpeg. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 08:31:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2F216A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:31:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D445243D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:31:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.atosorigin.es [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8DB2E041; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:31:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F2E6CA.4060401@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:31:06 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060118) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Murphy References: <43F26CD9.8030203@calarts.edu> In-Reply-To: <43F26CD9.8030203@calarts.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions about FreeBSD arp table X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:31:18 -0000 Sean Murphy wrote: > Does rebooting FreeBSD clear the arp table? The arp table is continuously cleaned up, dynamic entries expire after about one minute. > am I correct with arp -d * should clear all arp information? Yes Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 08:45:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8466616A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:45:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE67943D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:45:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1F8jWCA018059; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:45:32 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43F2EA25.1000108@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:45:25 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: imbg11@gmail.com References: <43F24C48.9040702@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43F24C48.9040702@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBE1F6C35CA3B58B1961704ED" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:45:32 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1289/Tue Feb 14 14:36:44 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 15 digit HEX string in /var/log/messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:45:48 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBE1F6C35CA3B58B1961704ED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom Nguyen wrote: > Greetings all, >=20 > Running FreeBSD 5.4 stable on intel x86 platform. Need help in > deciphering /figuring out what is the cause of strange 15 character HEX= > strings that is logging in /var/log/messages: >=20 > [...] > Feb 14 13:11:39 hostx kernel: 3E0D0A3C6172656 > Feb 14 13:14:12 hostx kernel: 4163636570742D4 > Feb 14 13:14:19 hostx kernel: 69742532464C697 > Feb 14 13:14:26 hostx kernel: 4163636570742D4 > Feb 14 13:31:44 hostx kernel: 732E616861696E7 > Feb 14 13:32:31 hostx kernel: 415577426F41475 > Feb 14 13:32:31 hostx kernel: 415577426F41475 > Feb 14 13:33:40 hostx kernel: 2A0D0A416363657 > Feb 14 13:33:48 hostx kernel: 2E616861696E746 > Feb 14 13:33:49 hostx kernel: 736573736D656E7 > Feb 14 13:43:22 hostx kernel: 45414141412F2F2 > Feb 14 14:00:38 hostx kernel: 780D0A416363657 > Feb 14 14:02:45 hostx kernel: 0A200D0A09626F7 > Feb 14 14:13:19 hostx kernel: 70616765732F686 > Feb 14 14:39:10 hostx kernel: 64066FF3ED39E31 > Feb 14 14:47:57 hostx kernel: 414141414141414 > [...] >=20 > This has been occurring for several weeks now. First thought was some > type of attack but our IDS doesn't pick up anything unusual. > Google searches doesn't give any clues. Can anyone shed some light on t= his? Those strings look like the hex encoded byte values of mostly ascii text.= You can convert them into something potentially readable by: % perl -le 'print pack ("C7", ("414141414141414" =3D~ m/../g ) ) ;' ))))))) However what comes out is not anything recognisable. You might be able t= o spot something within the larger quantities of data in your log files tho= ugh. I would hazard a guess here that what you are seeing is some one trying t= o exploit a buffer overflow in some way. The '4141414141' pattern is often= used as a marker to show what bits of the stack have been overwritten dur= ing the initial attempts to develop an overflow. The next stage would be to inject shell code and together with something like overwriting part of th= e stack frame so that a function call jumps to executing that code. Voila,= machine hacked. Of course, I could be wrong, and this all might have a completely innocen= t explanation. An in depth review of security would certainly be indicate= d here though. Check all of the software you're running against databases = of exploits such as VuXML (http://vuxml.freebsd.org/), Secunia (http://secun= ia.org/), CVE (http://www.cve.mitre.org/). Make sure all software is up to date. T= urn off anything you don't actually need to be running, and configure other services not to listen on internet facing network ports if they don't nee= d to do that. Use tcpdump or similar programs like ethereal to try and spot unexpected network traffic. Look for core files from daemon processes, a= nd examine them in a debugger -- sometimes you can tell that a process was c= rashed by an overflow attempt.=20 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigBE1F6C35CA3B58B1961704ED Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD8uos8Mjk52CukIwRA+xeAJ9gdxEpmTsoLY8fGnFnVX5wvSCKsACfXfJv pzkPgtDxkllb94PLy7bCSe4= =jaBa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBE1F6C35CA3B58B1961704ED-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 08:56:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC2116A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:56:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (imap.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6840E43D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:56:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1F8uBrb018097; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:56:12 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43F2ECAB.7020300@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:56:11 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Malcolm Kay References: <200602151639.06855.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <200602151639.06855.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9CA57A2B88214607345DD2A3" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:56:13 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1289/Tue Feb 14 14:36:44 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Identity for HELO in sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:56:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9CA57A2B88214607345DD2A3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Malcolm Kay wrote: > I can now send e-mails using the standard 'mail' utility > to most destinations but apparently 'alpha.home' is still used as=20 > the source domain in the HELO command and as this just my=20 > private hostname for the machine it is not known at the=20 > receiving end in spite of the FEATURE(masquerade_envelope) > which I naively expected to be applied here. define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `smtp.internode.on.net')dnl Note that the name presented in the HELO line should be resolvable as a valid 'A' record in the DNS. It doesn't have to be anything to do with the domain names used in the e-mail headers. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig9CA57A2B88214607345DD2A3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD8uyr8Mjk52CukIwRA9csAJsHyMBlgTkhozLqQVfvcIRXbk2ETACeMj6D ygYDNvU5TwSN0eR+AZHrCk4= =yXpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9CA57A2B88214607345DD2A3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 09:26:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3C916A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:26:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [195.115.46.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FD843D4C for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:26:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAAC29D10; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:26:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 88617-09; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:26:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.1.201] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BA22934F; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:26:39 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <61560.207.70.139.52.1139628926.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> References: <61560.207.70.139.52.1139628926.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6C543300-579C-4313-A355-0F26181B3FA7@todoo.biz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: bsd Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:26:25 +0100 To: Robert Uzzi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at rmm.fr Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: SATA Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:26:46 -0000 =46rom a little 1U server I am using : Promise PDC20371 SATA150 =20 controller All the best : driver are setup in the card so you can upgrade your =20 system without any problem. You'll probably have to compile driver before uploading them to the =20 card... Or http://www.lsilogic.com/products/megaraid/sata_150_4.html Drivers are available for FreeBSD. Le 11 f=E9vr. 06 =E0 04:35, Robert Uzzi a =E9crit : > Anyone know of any of the cheaper SATA raid cards that work well under > FreeBSD. I'd love to go get a 3ware but they are fairly pricey. ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?= =BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 09:50:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE6E16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:50:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from tin.colossus.net (tin.colossus.net [216.121.224.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FDD43D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:50:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from nexpc (63.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg [210.193.15.63]) by tin.colossus.net (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA09627; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:50:49 -0800 Message-ID: <067101c63216$a7682f10$c801a8c0@nexpc> From: "Foo Ji-Haw" To: "bsd" , "Robert Uzzi" References: <61560.207.70.139.52.1139628926.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> <6C543300-579C-4313-A355-0F26181B3FA7@todoo.biz> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:00:27 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: SATA Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:50:56 -0000 Do note that cheap SATA raid controllers are in fact 'software' raid cards; much of the load is on the cpu rather than the asic. ----- Original Message ----- From: "bsd" To: "Robert Uzzi" Cc: "Liste FreeBSD" Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: SATA Raid > From a little 1U server I am using : Promise PDC20371 SATA150 > controller > > All the best : driver are setup in the card so you can upgrade your > system without any problem. > You'll probably have to compile driver before uploading them to the > card... > > Or http://www.lsilogic.com/products/megaraid/sata_150_4.html > > Drivers are available for FreeBSD. > > > Le 11 fvr. 06 04:35, Robert Uzzi a crit : > > > Anyone know of any of the cheaper SATA raid cards that work well under > > FreeBSD. I'd love to go get a 3ware but they are fairly pricey. > > > > ________________________________________________ > ???????????? > > Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD > bsd @at@ todoo.biz > ________________________________________________ > ???????????? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 10:20:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B37416A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:20:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from mail.compedgeracing.com (dsl-katy-207-70-139-52.consolidated.net [207.70.139.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB7C43D75 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from www.compedgeracing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.compedgeracing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6341B5C3A; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:20:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from 207.70.139.52 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ruzzi) by www.compedgeracing.com with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:20:57 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <65260.207.70.139.52.1139998857.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> In-Reply-To: <067101c63216$a7682f10$c801a8c0@nexpc> References: <61560.207.70.139.52.1139628926.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> <6C543300-579C-4313-A355-0F26181B3FA7@todoo.biz> <067101c63216$a7682f10$c801a8c0@nexpc> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:20:57 -0600 (CST) From: "Robert Uzzi" To: "Foo Ji-Haw" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: SATA Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:20:59 -0000 For my purposes that is fine. I and looking to build a 1T nfs server to service my dual 3G Xeon box and another Solaris box. > Do note that cheap SATA raid controllers are in fact 'software' raid > cards; > much of the load is on the cpu rather than the asic. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "bsd" > To: "Robert Uzzi" > Cc: "Liste FreeBSD" > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:26 PM > Subject: Re: SATA Raid > > >> From a little 1U server I am using : Promise PDC20371 SATA150 >> controller >> >> All the best : driver are setup in the card so you can upgrade your >> system without any problem. >> You'll probably have to compile driver before uploading them to the >> card... >> >> Or http://www.lsilogic.com/products/megaraid/sata_150_4.html >> >> Drivers are available for FreeBSD. >> >> >> Le 11 fvr. 06 04:35, Robert Uzzi a crit : >> >> > Anyone know of any of the cheaper SATA raid cards that work well under >> > FreeBSD. I'd love to go get a 3ware but they are fairly pricey. >> >> >> >> ________________________________________________ >> ???????????? >> >> Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD >> bsd @at@ todoo.biz >> ________________________________________________ >> ???????????? >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 10:59:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4DF16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:59:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from tin.colossus.net (tin.colossus.net [216.121.224.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311AE43D4C for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:59:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from nexpc (63.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg [210.193.15.63]) by tin.colossus.net (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with SMTP id CAA15660; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:59:20 -0800 Message-ID: <06b901c63220$3a849eb0$c801a8c0@nexpc> From: "Foo Ji-Haw" To: "Robert Uzzi" References: <61560.207.70.139.52.1139628926.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> <6C543300-579C-4313-A355-0F26181B3FA7@todoo.biz> <067101c63216$a7682f10$c801a8c0@nexpc> <65260.207.70.139.52.1139998857.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:08:58 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: SATA Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:59:27 -0000 In that case maybe you want to consider software raid on freebsd. It's dead easy to install and configure. http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Uzzi" To: "Foo Ji-Haw" Cc: "bsd" ; "Robert Uzzi" ; "Liste FreeBSD" Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 6:20 PM Subject: Re: SATA Raid > For my purposes that is fine. I and looking to build a 1T nfs server to > service my dual 3G Xeon box and another Solaris box. > > > > Do note that cheap SATA raid controllers are in fact 'software' raid > > cards; > > much of the load is on the cpu rather than the asic. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "bsd" > > To: "Robert Uzzi" > > Cc: "Liste FreeBSD" > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:26 PM > > Subject: Re: SATA Raid > > > > > >> From a little 1U server I am using : Promise PDC20371 SATA150 > >> controller > >> > >> All the best : driver are setup in the card so you can upgrade your > >> system without any problem. > >> You'll probably have to compile driver before uploading them to the > >> card... > >> > >> Or http://www.lsilogic.com/products/megaraid/sata_150_4.html > >> > >> Drivers are available for FreeBSD. > >> > >> > >> Le 11 fvr. 06 04:35, Robert Uzzi a crit : > >> > >> > Anyone know of any of the cheaper SATA raid cards that work well under > >> > FreeBSD. I'd love to go get a 3ware but they are fairly pricey. > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________________________ > >> ???????????? > >> > >> Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD > >> bsd @at@ todoo.biz > >> ________________________________________________ > >> ???????????? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 11:17:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A06516A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:17:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from mail.compedgeracing.com (dsl-katy-207-70-139-52.consolidated.net [207.70.139.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08D243D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from www.compedgeracing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.compedgeracing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4A05C0B; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:17:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from 207.70.139.52 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ruzzi) by www.compedgeracing.com with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:17:33 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <50778.207.70.139.52.1140002253.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> In-Reply-To: <06b901c63220$3a849eb0$c801a8c0@nexpc> References: <61560.207.70.139.52.1139628926.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> <6C543300-579C-4313-A355-0F26181B3FA7@todoo.biz> <067101c63216$a7682f10$c801a8c0@nexpc> <65260.207.70.139.52.1139998857.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> <06b901c63220$3a849eb0$c801a8c0@nexpc> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:17:33 -0600 (CST) From: "Robert Uzzi" To: "Foo Ji-Haw" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: SATA Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:17:32 -0000 That still dosen't connedt SATA to a non sata board though. That's my situation I have 6 SATA drives but no SATA native board. Looking for a cheap addin card to build this upon. > In that case maybe you want to consider software raid on freebsd. It's > dead > easy to install and configure. > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 12:07:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8763616A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:07:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from shadow.sixcompanies.com (shadow.sixcompanies.com [65.43.82.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7C843D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:07:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from dakota.wixb.com (shadow.sixcompanies.com [10.43.82.173]) by shadow.sixcompanies.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1FC7uXn043057 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:07:57 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060215060625.01176c88@sixcompanies.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:08:10 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "J.D. Bronson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: pop3 server recommendation (APOP/TLS) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:07:58 -0000 I am looking for a recommendation for a pop3 server that can do APOP and TLS on port 110. Qpopper was a disaster and I am not interested in cyrus (and dealing with maildirs)... Is there any other option? Qpopper worked with some of the clients (like eudora) but then had issues with Thunderbird or Pegasus...... Thanks, -JD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 12:29:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE73316A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:29:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@douville.net) Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE02343D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:29:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@douville.net) Received: (qmail 43243 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 12:29:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sdouvilnonq1) (sns536@rogers.com@70.29.116.42 with login) by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 12:29:56 -0000 Message-ID: <006a01c6322b$862bfc90$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> From: "Steve Douville" To: References: <02ca01c6316c$ce4b2ce0$c5eb020a@sdouvilnonq1><43F2252D.8060605@mykitchentable.net><000a01c6319b$56bf5730$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1><43F2323D.4040601@mykitchentable.net><001701c6319e$ed94bee0$6501a8c0@sdouvilnonq1> <43F2361C.7080400@mykitchentable.net> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:29:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Subject: Re: IP Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:29:57 -0000 Well, the solution ended up just setting up the rule for the subnet, not the host... route add aaa.bbb.ccc.200/29 aaa.bbb.ccc.200 -interface Had to move some IP addresses, but at least the traffic is going to the right ethernet controller now. Thanks for the help! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Drew Tomlinson" To: "Steve Douville" Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:57 PM Subject: Re: IP Routing Question On 2/14/2006 11:43 AM Steve Douville wrote: > By default, it sets the netif to em0 > OK, then what about 'route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.200'? And if that doesn't work, can I please see 'netstat -rn'? You can obfuscate the IPs if you wish. Cheers, Drew > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Drew Tomlinson" > To: "Steve Douville" > Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:40 PM > Subject: Re: IP Routing Question > > > On 2/14/2006 11:17 AM Steve Douville wrote: > >> Weird stuff... >> route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.209 aaa.bbb.ccc.196 -ifp em1 >> >> > > What happens if you leave off the "-ifp em1"? > > Cheers, > > Drew > > >> doesn't work even if i've already set >> aaa.bbb.ccc.196 link#2 em1 >> >> The only way things work well is if the gateway is set to link#2. The >> only >> way I can set it to link#2 is if the address was accessed, >> unsuccessfully, >> creating a record with link#1 as the gateway and then issuing a route >> change >> command to move it to link#2. >> >> it'd be much easier if i could just type >> route add -host aaa.bbb.ccc.xxx link#2 -ifp em1 >> but it doesn't recognize link#2 as a valid address, even though it uses >> it >> in the table by default!! >> >> Haven't tried the ipfilter yet. Maybe i'll give that a whirl, too. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Drew Tomlinson" >> To: "Steve Douville" >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:45 PM >> Subject: Re: IP Routing Question >> >> >> >> What happens with a simple 'route add >> aaa.bbb.ccc.196? Or am I misinterpreting what you wish to achieve? >> >> HTH, >> >> Drew >> _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 12:41:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA7F16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:41:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmiejaz@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7728D43D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:41:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmiejaz@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h28so1101787wxd for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:41:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type; b=lwJbykihnPJGAyb6dYIn1Y+INumzI4s+x7NnPvs/ypO8g7s9i1tdDEJjtV5mLRYEZPJVEKKcCbcIoN+L0Q3VKCPcCWBH1eWdC1gBX88P6m2sWMXxjgpsPi0YAWBp1xI4xnliL3itKaFOpz63McGOkZxhiYmTpt//iL9uNX5E6Sc= Received: by 10.70.48.3 with SMTP id v3mr4884054wxv; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.7.14 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 04:41:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7e148fb90602150441r5af1c42bv9c10ab56f847761f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:41:14 -0500 From: Jimmie James To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Odd daily run output. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:41:16 -0000 >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/ad0s1e 253678 -1358 234742 -1% /tmp > >I know there's 8% reserved for softupdates, but how is it possible ^^^^^^^^^^^ >Not for soft updates, but generally for root to be able to work in case >of a problem, i think. >> that there's _extra_ space on /tmp ? What am I missing? This is the > >first time I've seen this. >Run fsck(8) on this file system must solve this. fsck(8) seems to have cleared it: /dev/ad0s1e 253678 16 233368 0% /tmp What I find out, is that fsck ran at boot in the background, I was under th= e assumption, the reason for that, was to fix any problems, so your machine would come back up in a usable state, and not need any intervention. /me goes back to the man pages. Thanks! Jimmie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 12:45:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F6D16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:45:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from mx1.gluon.se (a326.cust.prq.se [194.145.249.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C3C43D4C for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:45:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@pean.org) Received: from localhost (Emil3 [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.gluon.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980ED32BB4 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:50:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx1.gluon.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Emil3 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26250-05 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:50:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.41] (h-217-75-99-60.ip.cust.port80.se [217.75.99.60]) by mx1.gluon.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EBB33294C for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:50:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F32271.2010803@pean.org> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:45:37 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Syslog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:45:43 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to get syslog to log on a remote host. This part is really not a problem, but when I try to define at the "loghost" to which files i want to log my incoming logs I don't get anything to work. I cant find anything in the manual either. I've tried this: +sphere *.* /var/log/sphere/messages From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 12:48:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AACF16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:48:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from ash25e.internode.on.net (ash25e.internode.on.net [203.16.214.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97E843D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:48:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from alpha.home (ppp222-1.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net [203.122.222.1]) by ash25e.internode.on.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1FCmfrc004692; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:18:42 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Matthew Seaman Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:18:41 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200602151639.06855.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> <43F2ECAB.7020300@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <43F2ECAB.7020300@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602152318.41440.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Identity for HELO in sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:48:45 -0000 On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:26 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Malcolm Kay wrote: > > I can now send e-mails using the standard 'mail' utility > > to most destinations but apparently 'alpha.home' is still > > used as the source domain in the HELO command and as this > > just my private hostname for the machine it is not known at > > the receiving end in spite of the > > FEATURE(masquerade_envelope) which I naively expected to be > > applied here. > > define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `smtp.internode.on.net')dnl > Thanks Matthew; I think the most appropriate name for me may be `mail.internode.on.net'. At least 'dig' reparts it as an 'A' record. > Note that the name presented in the HELO line should be > resolvable as a valid 'A' record in the DNS. It doesn't have > to be anything to do with the domain names used in the e-mail > headers. > > Cheers, > > Matthew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 13:05:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9234416A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:05:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0173E43D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:05:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from [80.243.73.109] (port=63004 helo=[10.0.1.5]) by mx1.mail.ru with asmtp id 1F9MLj-000JWl-00; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:05:40 +0300 Message-ID: <43F3B343.5070802@mail.ru> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:03:31 +1000 From: Maxim Vetrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040501090001030503090708" Cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com, chris@i13i.com Subject: Re: IPFILTER rule error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:05:43 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040501090001030503090708 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! Thahks for your attention! >> First of all you really need to read the ipfilter section of the FreeBSD handbook... >> fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com I've read the handbook. Good starting point! :-) Given that I just _TEST_ ipf config ported from 5.4 to 6.0 on local LAN, I do not violate theoretical background of firewalling. Grouping is used to differentiate inbound\outbound traffic, probably I will use it to diff interfaces. >> I don't know if you posted the whole ruleset or if you cut out what seemed irrelevant to keep the post short... >> Erik Norgaard Yes, I do not show you the whole story about ipf.rules, only the skeleton and the problematic lines. The reason for that is that ipfilter works with basic ipf.rules, and ipfstat confirms that. But no logs as expected (but eventually I've found where log info went: it appeared at /var/log/messages, and not in /var/log/security as configured!). By the way, I prefer to use syslogd because it allows for log rotation, which is goooood! :-) Problem with "no such process" appeared when I added to ipf.rules line **** pass out quick on rl0 \ **** proto udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 It doesn't matter whether port parameter is expressed as a name or a number. I have other lines written both types and all of that works! Again, the error is presented only when I insert the above line in ipf.rules. This is an outbound rule; I've had the inbound rule in basic setup (you can see it in my previous post) and it ran just well! Ok, in the attachment there is the whole story about ipf.rules as it is. As I've found from the handbook this way of firewalling is called "inclusive" %-). Regards, Muxas P.S. I apologize for my message timing, it's the second question i'll ask after ipf :-) --------------040501090001030503090708 Content-Type: text/plain; name="ipf.rules" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="ipf.rules" ################################################################################ # External interface - ppp0 # ################################################################################ #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Block-and-log everything that is not allowed explicitly %%%% #block in log on ppp0 all head 10 #block out log on ppp0 all head 15 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow DNS requests %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% #pass out quick on ppp0 \ # proto tcp/udp from any to any port = domain keep state group 15 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow outbound HTTP packets %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% #pass out quick on ppp0 \ # proto tcp from any to any port = 80 keep state keep frags group 15 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow outbound FTP packets %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% #pass out quick on ppp0 \ # proto tcp from any to any port = 21 keep state group 15 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow inbound FTP-data packets %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% #pass in quick on ppp0 \ # proto tcp/udp from any port = 20 to any port > 1024 keep state group 10 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow outbound Jabber connections %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% #pass out quick on ppp0 \ # proto tcp from any to any port = 5222 keep state group 15 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow POP3 outgoing connections %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% #pass out quick on ppp0 \ # proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 110 keep state group 15 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow SMTP outgoing connections %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% #pass out quick on ppp0 \ # proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 25 keep state group 15 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow outgoing CVS connections %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% #pass out quick on ppp0 \ # proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 5999 keep state group 15 ################################################################################ # Internal interface #1 - rl0 (10.0.1.0/29) # ################################################################################ #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Block-and-log everything that is not allowed explicitly %%%%% block in log on rl0 all head 20 block out log on rl0 all head 25 #pass in on rl0 from 10.0.1.1/29 to any group 20 #pass out on rl0 from any to 10.0.1.1/29 group 25 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow ping %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto icmp all keep state group 20 pass out quick on rl0 \ proto icmp all keep state group 25 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow DNS requests %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = domain keep state group 20 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow DHCP requests %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any port = 68 to any port = 67 group 20 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow HTTP requests from local network %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp from any to any port = 80 keep state keep frags group 20 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow FTP requests from local network %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 21 keep state group 20 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow inbound FTP-data packets %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass out quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any port = 20 to any port > 1024 keep state group 25 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow inbound Jabber connections %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp from any to any port = 5222 keep state group 20 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow Sun RPC incoming calls %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 717 keep state group 20 # the next line raise the error when uncommented #pass out quick on rl0 \ # proto udp from any to any port = 111 keep state group 20 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow NFS incoming requests %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 2049 keep state group 20 # mountd fixed port=1041 pass in quick on rl0 \ proto udp from any to any port = 1041 keep state group 20 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow POP3 connections %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 110 keep state group 20 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow SMTP connections %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 25 keep state group 20 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow NetBIOS Naming System service %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 137 keep state group 20 pass out quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 137 keep state group 25 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow NetBIOS Datagram Service %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 138 keep state group 20 pass out quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 138 keep state group 25 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow SMB over NetBIOS over TCP %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 139 keep state group 20 pass out quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 139 keep state group 25 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow SMB Session service %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 445 keep state group 20 pass out quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 445 keep state group 25 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow PostgreSQL connections on default port %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 5432 keep state group 20 pass out quick on rl0 \ proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 5432 keep state group 25 #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow FireBird connections on default port %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% pass in quick on rl0 \ proto tcp from any to any port = 5030 keep state group 20 pass out quick on rl0 \ proto tcp from any to any port = 5030 keep state group 25 ################################################################################ # Internal interface #2 - vr0 (10.0.2.0/29) # ################################################################################ pass in quick on vr0 all pass out quick on vr0 all --------------040501090001030503090708-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 13:21:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B12D16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:21:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from yggdrasil.interstroom.nl (yggdrasil.interstroom.nl [80.85.129.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9D643D4C for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:21:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from ip127-180.introweb.nl ([80.65.127.180] helo=[192.168.1.42]) by yggdrasil with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1F9Maz-0001vE-00; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:21:25 +0100 Message-ID: <43F32AD4.1090103@axis.nl> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:21:24 +0100 From: Olaf Greve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1.centos4 (X11/20051007) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Interstroom virusscan, please e-mail helpdesk@interstroom.nl for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: Subject: Help! Apache 2.2 gives segmentation fault errors with PHP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:21:36 -0000 Hi guys, Alright, after having been stuck with this for an hour or two now, I'm going to call upon your infinite wisdom regarding the following: On a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0 (so says dmesg) machine, I'm trying to set-up Subversion, Trac and our regular PHP4 and MySQL stuff. The main issue is that Apache 2.2 blows up (with a segmentation fault) when calling various PHP scripts, which I think is due to a dodgy way of having set-up PHP4 under Apache. This message works towards the issue, providing relevant(?) details, as I type along: Here we go: Previously the machine was running Apache 1.3.34 and that went just swell with PHP and all, but apparently for Subversion and/or Trac, Apache 2 is desired such that it can be used with WebDav. No problem so far. I made sure the ports tree was up to date and then from the ports I built (always via a 'make' 'make install' sequence, and where necessary removing earlier versions as the process went along) Apache 2.2, and Subversion. Upon configuring Apache 2.2 for PHP, however, I'm now running into trouble. In order to make PHP4 work under Apache 2.2 I built /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 and installed it. Then I added the following to Apache's httpd.conf file: [...] LoadModule php4_module libexec/apache22/libphp4.so [...] [...] AddType application/x-httpd-php .php AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps Also, some other stuff was tweaked in httpd.conf (though very mildly), like enabling SSL etc. Now, upon starting Apache, using 'apachectl start' the following warning is printed twice: [Wed Feb 15 15:12:41 2006] [warn] (2)No such file or directory: Failed to enable the 'httpready' Accept Filter And the /var/log/httpd-error.log file mentions the following (at the end): [...] [Wed Feb 15 15:12:38 2006] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down [Wed Feb 15 15:12:41 2006] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?) [Wed Feb 15 15:12:41 2006] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `Olaf Greve' does NOT match server name!? [Wed Feb 15 15:12:42 2006] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?) [Wed Feb 15 15:12:42 2006] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `Olaf Greve' does NOT match server name!? PHP Warning: Function registration failed - duplicate name - bzopen in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: Function registration failed - duplicate name - bzread in Unknown on line 0 [...] ..............many more similar messages............... [...] PHP Warning: Function registration failed - duplicate name - ob_gzhandler in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: Function registration failed - duplicate name - zlib_get_coding_type in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: zlib: Unable to register functions, unable to load in Unknown on line 0 [Wed Feb 15 15:12:42 2006] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Wed Feb 15 15:12:42 2006] [notice] Digest: done [Wed Feb 15 15:12:43 2006] [notice] Apache/2.2.0 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.2.0 OpenSSL/0.9.7c DAV/2 PHP/4.4.2 configured -- resuming normal operations So it starts, but it seems pretty much all PHP extensions are doubly declared! When calling phpinfo, the modules do show up as expected, but as soon as one tries to use e.g. the 'header()' function in PHP (or quite a few other PHP functions for that matter), nothing seems to happen in the browser, and the /var/log/httpd-error.log file mentions the following: [...] [Wed Feb 15 15:19:29 2006] [notice] child pid 27728 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) And a similar message is written to /var/log/messages, being: [...] Feb 15 15:19:28 aceshuttle kernel: pid 27728 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 I suspect something went wrong in the way I try to use PHP. Basically, I first removed the installed /usr/ports/lang/php4 port, then built and installed the /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 port, and then added various php4-extensions, using the /usr/ports/lang/php4-extensions port (I suspect the extensions to cause the problem). Does anyone know what could be going on and/or how to properly set up PHP 4 under Apache 2.2? Tnx a lot in advance, and cheers! Olafo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 13:25:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F1916A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:25:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yance_kowara@yahoo.com) Received: from web30315.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30315.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CFF243D5A for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:25:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yance_kowara@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 68042 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Feb 2006 13:25:51 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=zR+8kMggSD/OXDH+HXJWacZWooHa1dJHtMKDaCC93sIgKI7doqr0w24RNEjz0w0KZDrLj0QTG3BYWywj5MMKR3Qae3T/i3/YKl7jYJAwqS82jMe5RC6tbg1njUtnuI2XTFCsR0ItAz0CmkgQ3xrtAF7+/CwgE08udGR+02ADNY0= ; Message-ID: <20060215132551.68040.qmail@web30315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [61.94.18.170] by web30315.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:25:51 PST Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:25:51 -0800 (PST) From: Yance Kowara To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: daemontools - djbdns X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:25:52 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "RW" To: ; "Cristian Mijea" Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 1:31 AM Subject: Re: daemontools - djbdns > On Thursday 09 February 2006 18:56, Cristian Mijea wrote: >> Ok. trying to follow Matt Simenson's DJBDNS on FreeBSD how-to from here: >> http://matt.simerson.net/computing/dns/djbdns-freebsd.shtml >> Now it writes that I must get the start up script from here: >> http://matt.simerson.net/computing/mail/toaster/services.txt >> All OK, just that the .txt file is missing. Can anyone please email it to >> me? > > That how-to is pretty-old, there is a local rc.d script now. > > You just need turn it on in /etc/rc.conf > > svscan_enable=YES > > and optionally set svscan_servicedir if you don't want to use > /var/service. > > Some of the how-tos for DJBDNS use some really odd paths. It doesn't > really > matter where the service directory goes, since it should only contain > links, > but some people have the real dnscache directory under /etc which is a bad > place to put it under FreeBSD. > Hi RW, Why is it bad to put it under /etc ... is this specific for FreeBSD or any Unix OS? Where is the proper place? Kind regards, Yance Kowara __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 13:26:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D1B16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:26:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67F343D55 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:26:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 19101 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 13:26:48 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Feb 2006 13:26:48 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 204C328439; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:26:47 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Jimmie James References: <7e148fb90602142045v71cc7c06p7054210693c03653@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 15 Feb 2006 08:26:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7e148fb90602142045v71cc7c06p7054210693c03653@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <44zmkseors.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd daily run output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:26:49 -0000 Jimmie James writes: > I know there's 8% reserved for softupdates, but how is it possible > that there's _extra_ space on /tmp ? What am I missing? This is the > first time I've seen this. This is a FAQ. In fact, it's listed in the FAQ list. "How is it possible for a partition to be more than 100% full?" http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#DISK-MORE-THAN-FULL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 13:29:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F7516A422 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:29:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: from mailhub.ihlas.net.tr (mailhub.ihlas.net.tr [213.238.128.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D260243D5A for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:29:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: (qmail 34720 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 13:29:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ihlasnetym) (maslak@213.238.150.220) by 0 with ESMTPA; 15 Feb 2006 13:29:34 -0000 Message-ID: <001301c63233$b9eac6d0$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> From: "Halid Faith" To: References: Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:28:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Subject: Re: Why myserver be locked ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:29:10 -0000 Hello I think, I found my problem. I suspect the ethernet card so I disabled em0 ethernet card and I put fxp0 intel ethernet card. Meanwhile I went through my problem and I relooked at messages. After the changing ethernet card the machine has not given the same error . But the time has not enough passed for a conclude. I saw an error as below kernel: usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting in fact I don't use usb port therefore I had removed mykernel usb options during the installation freebsd. Do I have to inactive from BIOS ? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "fbsd_user" To: "Halid Faith" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:03 PM Subject: RE: Why myserver be locked ? > > I would stop over riding all those sysctl knobs and > see what happens when using the defaults. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Halid Faith > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:45 PM > To: Erik Norgaard > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Why myserver be locked ? > > > Hello > On the machine, qmail , > pop3,smtp,imap,http,htps,openssl,secureimap,securepop3 and > clamav-antivirus > run. > Do these services cause be locked the machine ? > > Also my sysctl.conf is below; > > kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=2097152 > kern.ipc.somaxconn=8192 > kern.maxfiles=24656 > kern.maxfilesperproc=22190 > kern.ipc.nmbclusters=51200 > net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1 > net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65535 > net.inet.tcp.recvspace=65535 > net.inet.udp.recvspace=65535 > net.inet.udp.maxdgram=65535 > net.local.stream.recvspace=65535 > net.local.stream.sendspace=65535 > net.inet.icmp.bmcastecho=0 > net.inet.icmp.maskrepl=0 > net.inet.ip.accept_sourceroute=0 > net.inet.ip.sourceroute=0 > net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 > net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 > net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 > > Do above sysctl settings cause be locked the machine ? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Erik Norgaard" > To: "Halid Faith" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:29 PM > Subject: Re: Why myserver be locked ? > > > > Halid Faith wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > I have a Dell1600SC server. The server has 4 CPU and 2 Gbyte > Ram. I had > been using it based Redhat9 till a month ago. > > > The server was working without problem. After that, I installed > FreeBSD6 Release on it. > > > > > > The server started to run be locked. When it is locked, it > becomes as > freeze.I am not able to do anything on it. > > > I don't believe in any hardware error. I have to push the reset > button > to reboot it. When I rebooted by the reset button, the machine has > not given > me any error message in dmesg and /var/log/messages. > > > When the machine rebooted, it works normaly with all of it's > services. > > > > > > What should I do ? > > > > Can you reproduce the problem? Have you made any observations up > till > > the system freezes up? > > > > Check logfiles for error messages, you may set loglevel up so all > > debugging is also logged. > > > > If you don't find any error messages in the log files then try to > > disable ALL services and see if it runs stable. > > > > Enable one service at the time and let it run for a while to check > that > > the system is still stable. First enable services included in base > like > > syslog, ssh and named. Then go on to enable other services. > > > > Cheers, Erik > > > > -- > > Ph: +34.666334818 web: > www.locolomo.org > > S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt > > Subject ID: > 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 > > Fingerprint: > 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 14:03:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0404916A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:03:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from ecluster6.tls.net (ecluster6.tls.net [65.196.224.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D9D643D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:03:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 29641 invoked by uid 89); 15 Feb 2006 14:03:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.101?) (ldg%tls.net@204.8.12.135) by auth-ecluster6.tls.net with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 14:03:14 -0000 Message-ID: <43F33498.7020608@pixelhammer.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:03:04 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060215132551.68040.qmail@web30315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060215132551.68040.qmail@web30315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: daemontools - djbdns X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:03:16 -0000 Yance Kowara wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "RW" > To: ; "Cristian Mijea" > > Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 1:31 AM > Subject: Re: daemontools - djbdns > > > >>On Thursday 09 February 2006 18:56, Cristian Mijea > > wrote: > >>>Ok. trying to follow Matt Simenson's DJBDNS on > > FreeBSD how-to from here: > > http://matt.simerson.net/computing/dns/djbdns-freebsd.shtml > >>>Now it writes that I must get the start up script > > from here: > > http://matt.simerson.net/computing/mail/toaster/services.txt > >>>All OK, just that the .txt file is missing. Can > > anyone please email it to > >>>me? >> >>That how-to is pretty-old, there is a local rc.d > > script now. > >>You just need turn it on in /etc/rc.conf >> >> svscan_enable=YES >> >>and optionally set svscan_servicedir if you don't > > want to use > >>/var/service. >> >>Some of the how-tos for DJBDNS use some really odd > > paths. It doesn't > >>really >>matter where the service directory goes, since it > > should only contain > >>links, >>but some people have the real dnscache directory > > under /etc which is a bad > >>place to put it under FreeBSD. >> > > > Hi RW, > Why is it bad to put it under /etc ... is this > specific for FreeBSD or any > Unix OS? > > Where is the proper place? > > Kind regards, > > Yance Kowara Try Matt's new version of the HowTo, it is at http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/dns/djbdns-freebsd.shtml and the links work fine. He moved everything to his new domain some time ago. I've installed daemontools on lots of servers, many heavily loaded, running FreeBSD / NetBSD / Solaris. I have always followed Dan's suggested install paths and I have never had a single issue. I don't even use the start script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d, I still edit /etc/rc.local. Mainly because I have three OSs, and three versions of FreeBSD, two of which handle startup differently (4.10 and 5.4). While I agree it may be bad "form" to use Dan's paths. I do not believe it is bad in general, as in harmful. So while Matt's HowTo may not be in sync with current FreeBSD thinking it is a well documented, working procedure. A new user will have a successful install following it. DAve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 14:28:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C01416A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:28:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B063D43D55 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:28:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 22282 invoked by uid 0); 15 Feb 2006 14:28:46 -0000 Received: from user-69-73-60-132.knology.net (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (69.73.60.132) by smtp2.knology.net with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 14:28:46 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 0B1A36295; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:28:45 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:28:45 -0600 From: David Kelly To: Julien Gabel Message-ID: <20060215142844.GA471@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <7e148fb90602142045v71cc7c06p7054210693c03653@mail.gmail.com> <56635.192.168.1.20.1139988139.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56635.192.168.1.20.1139988139.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Jimmie James Subject: Re: Odd daily run output. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:28:49 -0000 On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:22:19AM +0100, Julien Gabel wrote: > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > /dev/ad0s1e 253678 -1358 234742 -1% /tmp > > > I know there's 8% reserved for softupdates, but how is it possible > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > Not for soft updates, but generally for root to be able to work in case > of a problem, i think. > > > that there's _extra_ space on /tmp ? What am I missing? This is the > > first time I've seen this. > > Run fsck(8) on this file system must solve this. Yes, there is 8% (tunable) reserved for root on filesystems. Root has used 1% of that on /tmp. Its not an fsck problem at all. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 14:35:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CD716A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:35:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D3043D64 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:35:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F9Nkj-0004fp-J2 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:35:35 +0100 Received: from blueice1n1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.163]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:35:33 +0100 Received: from element by blueice1n1.de.ibm.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:35:33 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Pavel Duda Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:34:51 +0100 Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <1139754356.19498.5.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <20060213192609.GC6003@sysadm.stc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: blueice1n1.de.ibm.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041103 Thunderbird/0.9 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20060213192609.GC6003@sysadm.stc> Sender: news Subject: Re: LDAP authentication problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:35:58 -0000 Igor Robul wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Pavel Duda wrote: > >>Now I have tried to do >>'id testuser' > > You need nss_ldap too. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Yes that was problem at beginig. Unfortunately I had few typos in my .conf files :-/ so that caused problems. I have refreshed my test jail and it seems that now everything works just fine (I've not tested only samba yet). When I have time I'm going to write it all down and make some mini-howto for Samba-LDAP(-PDC) on FreeBSD. It was not so hard to get LDAP working but some steps could be confusing for LDAP novices like me. Have a Nice Day Pavel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 14:46:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2736416A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:46:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (smtp.thilelli.net [213.41.129.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C1643D60 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:46:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523F9564A8; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 98056-08; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.thilelli.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88D8564A7; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.168.1.20 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jgabel) by webmail.thilelli.net with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <63374.192.168.1.20.1140014805.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <20060215142844.GA471@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <7e148fb90602142045v71cc7c06p7054210693c03653@mail.gmail.com> <56635.192.168.1.20.1139988139.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> <20060215142844.GA471@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:46:45 +0100 (CET) From: "Julien Gabel" To: "David Kelly" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at thilelli.net Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Jimmie James Subject: Re: Odd daily run output. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jpeg@thilelli.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:46:52 -0000 >>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >>> /dev/ad0s1e 253678 -1358 234742 -1% /tmp >>> >>> I know there's 8% reserved for softupdates, but how is it possible ^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Not for soft updates, but generally for root to be able to work in case >> of a problem, i think. >>> that there's _extra_ space on /tmp ? What am I missing? This is the >>> first time I've seen this. >> Run fsck(8) on this file system must solve this. > Yes, there is 8% (tunable) reserved for root on filesystems. Root has > used 1% of that on /tmp. Its not an fsck problem at all. Certainly it is. Search the questions@ and stable@ archives for similar problem reports and answers. -- -jpeg. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 14:48:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4137A16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:48:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8408D43D53 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:48:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3219D730CB for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:48:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19818-08 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:48:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (12-223-193-72.client.insightbb.com [12.223.193.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F039730BE for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:48:15 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <80680D80-3BCB-4626-807F-EA937AFBEF10@netmusician.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD Questions From: Joe Auty Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:48:10 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Subject: more questions about disk cloning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:48:17 -0000 Hi, Thanks to all help I've received thus far, I seem to be getting closer to my goal of backing up a small hard disk to a large one. Remember that the "dump" command is causing core dumps on the source volume. The two paths I'm working within are: 1) Using g4u to clone disk (this has worked fine), using growfs to grow partitions 2) Trying dump/restore from a Freesbie CD. Problems: Approach 1: To use growfs apparently you have to edit the disk labels first. I'm doing this through /stand/sysinstall, but I'm not seeing all of my available space - just the available space with what was in the smaller drive. How do I work around this? Approach 2: Doing a dump from /mnt/ufs.x to /mnt/ufs.y from the Freesbie CD produces the error "unsupported file system". How do i work around this error? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 14:48:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E20F16A42A for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:48:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay106-f20.bay106.hotmail.com [65.54.161.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165E843D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:48:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antennex@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:48:37 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.161.200 by by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:48:37 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.68.247.73] X-Originating-Email: [antennex@hotmail.com] X-Sender: antennex@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <43F1DF7A.7000504@daleco.biz> From: "Jack Stone" To: kdk@daleco.biz, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:48:37 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2006 14:48:37.0574 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7402660:01C6323E] Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Subject: Re: Using dd to Make a Clone of a Drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:48:42 -0000 I have used dump/restore and dd as well. For a block size, I chose 102400 which was the fastest -- but still slow compared to dump/restore. Dump/restore is not limited to making a whole image, blanks and all like dd. Once upon a time, I used this as the best: dd if=/dev/ad0 of=/dev/ad1 bs=102400 The obvious intention is to minimize the number of transfers, so theoretically the larger the transfer, the better. The maximum I/O transfer size is limited to the value of MAXPHYS, which is defined in sys/param.h: #ifndef MAXPHYS #define MAXPHYS (128 * 1024) /* max raw I/O transfer size */ #endif The ATA subsystem uses this value. SCSI drives were limited to 60 kB transfers, though this could have changed. I don't currently have any machine with SCSI disks connected, so I can't confirm that. A way to find is to run a command like will show the I/O: #dd if=/dev/ad0c of=/dev/null bs=128k & and in the background do an 'iostat ad0 1'. Here's an example with an IDE drive: #iostat ad0 1 tty ad0 cpu tin tout KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id 0 3 5.19 7 0.03 11 0 4 1 84 0 126 127.36 183 22.74 0 0 6 2 92 0 44 128.00 190 23.76 0 0 2 0 98 0 44 128.00 191 23.89 0 0 5 0 95 0 44 128.00 191 23.88 0 0 7 1 92 As you can see, it's really doing 128 kB transfers, for an average transfer rate of almost 24 MB/s. ============================================================= I do all of my backups every night by scripts by using dump/restore to a dedicated separate HD. It is bootable and ready to go in case of a problem with my master HD. Just shutdown, switch HDs and reboot -- voila! Back on line within a minute and the data is always only a few hours old at the most. Once you master dump/restore, it is indispensable for handling file systems. Best regards, Jack _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 14:48:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8478B16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:48:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60016.mail.yahoo.com (web60016.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 649CB43D4C for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:48:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 41631 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Feb 2006 14:48:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=N/C4hUPpQ9K0C0Gf0MCLC0+yHWxpHfl2Qm57p45lqeiwr/5jsweiRcn4BRoh5SfO5oxcS8E/qv2VPJIHi0mvW9STEAGNmn2zs2dljyOWxp0jkGd8ZKZcVnCZgpkOF6+WWFYmeY4RfLKzUH9kZuE9ur0BjHwEnGDnLyB55VZ94+0= ; Message-ID: <20060215144853.41629.qmail@web60016.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.252.85.231] by web60016.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:48:53 EST Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:48:53 -0500 (EST) From: Peter To: John Levine , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060203205844.50458.qmail@simone.iecc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: petermatulis@yahoo.ca Subject: Re: any issues with usb hard drives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:48:55 -0000 --- John Levine wrote: > >I'm wondering whether USB hard drives will work out of the box with > >FreeBSD. Anything I should be concerned about? > > I've been using them for backup and they're great. Support was flaky > in 5.3 but it's been very reliable in 5.4 and 6.0. > > I would suggest using GEOM to label them so they have the same device > name in /dev regardless of what USB port they're plugged into. Any hints on how to get started? I am reading the GEOM section in the manual and it focuses on setting up RAID. -- Peter __________________________________________________________ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 14:53:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A35816A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:53:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5196043D6D for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:53:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F8B730CB for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:53:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20003-03 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:53:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (12-223-193-72.client.insightbb.com [12.223.193.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B95F730BE for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:53:32 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <44oe19ftis.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> <443bimav7o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <039BD206-0592-4F99-BE9B-CB49310E5BDC@netmusician.org> <44oe19ftis.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5681BB6E-A511-4790-A8D9-33FBCBA3B800@netmusician.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:53:29 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Subject: Re: core dump with dump command in single user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:53:37 -0000 On Feb 14, 2006, at 5:46 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Joe Auty writes: > >> On Feb 14, 2006, at 9:08 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> >>> Joe Auty writes: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Following the instructions here: http://www.unixcities.com/howto/ >>>> index.html I did a: >>>> >>> Those directions are a little outdated, but the problem is really >>> just >>> that you didn't follow the directions closely enough: >>> >>>> dump -0f - /usr | restore -rf - /backup/usr >>> >>> should have been more like >>> >>> dump -0f - /usr | (cd /backup/usr;restore -xf - ) >> >> >> Okay, I'm still getting: >> >> >> no space left in string table >> abort? >> >> If I say "n", it just core dumps.... > > Funny, I can't find that message in the source for dump at all. > The message, in -STABLE, is "Do you want to abort dump?". > > I also can't seem to find the string table error message, but I may > just have failed to search the right library so far. > > Are you running something before 5.2? > I'm running 5.4. Perhaps restore is generating this particular error message? I don't know. >> Any other suggestions? > > Plenty. If there are no special files (fifos, etc.) on the disk, any > archiver will do it. e.g., tar(1) > >> Would using "dd" be a valid workaround to >> cloning my disk? > > Sure. If you really want a *clone* of the disk, it's a good option. > If having the same data files in the same filestructure would do, then > copying other attributes is overkill. I may have to go this route, see if I can put together the disk space to manage this. Is there a way to get tar to just extract directly to a destination directory so I don't have to contend with a single large tarball I need to create disk space for? > >> My disk is over a 100 gigabytes, could this be what >> is causing dump to crap out? > > Could be. Check your memory statistics while you're doing it, and see > if you run out of VM. What is a good strategy for dealing with this possibility, should I go down that path? ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 15:06:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0724516A422 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:06:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=0194494d06@iecc.com) Received: from tom.iecc.com (tom.iecc.com [208.31.42.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C4FC43D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:06:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=0194494d06@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 24275 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 15:06:07 -0000 Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 15 Feb 2006 15:05:45 -0000 Date: 15 Feb 2006 10:06:07 -0500 Message-ID: From: "John R Levine" To: "Peter" In-Reply-To: <20060215144853.41629.qmail@web60016.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060215144853.41629.qmail@web60016.mail.yahoo.com> Cleverness: None detected MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: any issues with usb hard drives? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:06:09 -0000 > Any hints on how to get started? I am reading the GEOM section in the > manual and it focuses on setting up RAID. Just label the drives, so they'll show up as /dev/ufs/ when you plug them in. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 15:07:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585BD16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:07:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from techlist@bnetmd.net) Received: from ns1.bnetmd.net (ns1.BNETMD.NET [216.133.66.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C0843D5A for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:07:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from techlist@bnetmd.net) Received: from glenn (c-68-34-37-204.hsd1.md.comcast.net [68.34.37.204]) by ns1.bnetmd.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id k1FF6hpZ055947 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:06:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from techlist@bnetmd.net) Message-ID: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> From: "Glenn McCalley" To: Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:09:42 -0500 Organization: Business.Net LLC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: how to tell what ran what X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Glenn McCalley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:07:22 -0000 Hi there, Is there a way to find out -which- -process- calls another process? OK, for instance, I know that user "userid" called sendmail 3 times because sa or lastcomm or whatever tells me so, but what -program- issued the call. Something like: user called called from nobody sendmail /usr/local/apache/cgi-bin/ Failed attempts would be nice to know as well. Thanks! Glenn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 15:09:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9D716A484 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:09:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nenad@venturis.hu) Received: from venturis.hu (venturis.hu [195.56.77.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDAB43D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:09:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nenad@venturis.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by venturis.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0B311F839 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:08:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by venturis.hu (Postfix, from userid 80) id D1ADB11F83C; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:08:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from 195.56.135.174 ([195.56.135.174]) by mail.venturis.hu (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:08:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20060215160858.b91dv467b4skg8wo@mail.venturis.hu> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:08:58 +0100 From: Nenad Mihajlovic To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Subject: mount_smbfs performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:09:13 -0000 Hello all, I have the smbfs performance problem while connecting to the Windows (w2k3) share in the AD environment, wint 6.1-PRERELEASE - with the filesystem mounted through mount_smbfs i get 300-350 kBps (kiloBytes per sec) speed, while through the smbclient i get the speeds in excess of 8MB/s. Is this possible bug in mount_smbfs or just the simple misconfiguration? I have configured the /etc/nsmb.conf file as per manual and it really gets connected nicely but afterwards it presents me with catastrophic results. With respect Nenad Mihajlovic From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 15:23:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51A216A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:23:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D46D43D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:23:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.ATOSORIGIN.ES [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7D62E041; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:23:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F34782.60300@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:23:46 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060118) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Vetrov References: <43F3B343.5070802@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <43F3B343.5070802@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, chris@i13i.com Subject: Re: IPFILTER rule error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:23:49 -0000 Maxim Vetrov wrote: > ################################################################################ > # Internal interface #1 - rl0 (10.0.1.0/29) # > ################################################################################ > > #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Block-and-log everything that is not allowed explicitly %%%%% > block in log on rl0 all head 20 > block out log on rl0 all head 25 > #%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow Sun RPC incoming calls %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > pass in quick on rl0 \ > proto tcp/udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 > pass in quick on rl0 \ > proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 717 keep state group 20 > # the next line raise the error when uncommented > #pass out quick on rl0 \ > # proto udp from any to any port = 111 keep state group 20 I think someone else already pointed at this: You try to add a rule for outbound traffic to the inbound group in the offending line. Try correct to group 25. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: www.daemonsecurity.com/ca/8D03551FFCE04F06.crt Subject ID: 9E:AA:18:E6:94:7A:91:44:0A:E4:DD:87:73:7F:4E:82:E7:08:9C:72 Fingerprint: 5B:D5:1E:3E:47:E7:EC:1C:4C:C8:3A:19:CC:AE:14:F5:DF:18:0F:B9 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 15:30:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D42116A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:30:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (h-66-167-151-186.mclnva23.covad.net [66.167.151.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F8143D4C for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:30:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from jimcsoka ([192.168.7.46]) by mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id k1FFWUkY021906 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:32:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Message-ID: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> From: "James Csoka" To: Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:52:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-DFMC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DFMC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:30:53 -0000 I am running a FreeBSD 5.4p10 machine at my office. It functions as our = firewall and mailserver. I am running Mailscanner, which invokes = sendmail when necessary to process mail. Sendmail is not started by = default....Mailscanner invokes individual instances of it when it needs = to. Here is my problem. I have an employee at my office that is sending = work email to her home email address. I need to find a way to block her = email address, whether To, From, Cc, Bcc, or whatever, from passing = through my mailserver. I have already added a line to /etc/mail/access = (in the format email@address.com REJECT), and have run makemap = hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access. I tested this with my = personal email address (external to my network), and it had the effect = of blocking any email orginating from my personal email to any address = at my work, however it does not prevent me from sending emails to this = address from a work address, which is the whole point. Does anyone have any ideas? I could tag the address as spam, but I = would rather not. There has to be a way to block anyone from sending to = a certain email address, I would think. Any help would be appreciated. -Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 15:32:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA1716A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:32:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6BA43D77 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:32:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4BA5C73; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:31:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09911-05; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:31:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-67-103.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.67.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52605C16; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:31:57 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F3496D.2060003@mac.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:31:57 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fabian Keil References: <20060213154956.058ccd65@localhost> <43F0A70F.2090006@mac.com> <20060214180705.4d4ba682@localhost> <43F2200F.60204@mac.com> <20060215160725.0b6f4d40@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20060215160725.0b6f4d40@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Concerns about wording of man blackhole X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:32:08 -0000 Fabian Keil wrote: > I set Followup-To freebsd-questions. OK. [ ... ] >>>>> In which way does this protect against stealth port scans? >>>> Returning a RST tells the scanner that the port is definitely >>>> closed. Returning nothing gives less information. >>> As open ports still show up as open I don't see the protection. >>> If some port are open, the attacker can assume that all the >>> "filtered" ports are closed. >> Most people use a firewall because they are running services (and >> thus have open ports) which they do not want the rest of the Internet >> to be able to connect to. > > What does this have to do with "blackhole". The "blackhole" sysctl makes it somewhat harder for an intruder to figure out which ports are really closed versus which ports are being filtered, and how/where that filtering is being done. Firewalls are used to make open ports appear "filtered" to external connection attempts. Someone who assumes that all filtered ports are really closed is not making a correct assumption. >> If there exists someone who assumes all "filtered" ports are closed, >> well, wouldn't that fact demonstrate that the blackhole mechanism >> does help...? > > Help with what? From the attacker's point of view it makes little > difference if a port appears as filtered or closed. A knowledgeable security analyst or a blackhat trying to crack the network would certainly not assume "closed" and "filtered" are the same thing. Many networks have been compromised by poorly configured proxies which let skillful intruders leapfrog around the firewall by abusing the HTTP CONNECT method, including some high-profile examples at the NYTimes and other big-name companies. Other techniques include using the IP option for explicit source routing and can fool poorly designed firewall configurations into thinking the connection comes from the firewall itself, or some other trusted IP. [ ... ] >>>> These reconnection attempts will greatly slow down attempts to scan >>>> ports rapidly. >>> Which shouldn't result in a DOS anyway. The reconnection attempts >>> will even increase the inbound traffic. >> Yes, but to ports that aren't actually open. >> >> It's relatively cheap and easy to process such packets by just >> dropping them, compared with processing them in a userland daemon. > > What userland daemon? The canonical example is inetd, but any process which listen()s on a port and accept()s incoming connections would qualify as a "userland daemon". >> And I'd much rather have malicious traffic heading towards a closed >> port than towards a critical service. > > Sure, but "blackhole behaviour" alone doesn't prevent malicious traffic > from reaching critical services. True. Like the manpage said, "blackhole" isn't a substitute for a firewall. >> [ ... ] >>> Again I don't see the gain. Eventually the port scan will be >>> finished and open ports found. >> If you can flip a sysctl which increases the time it takes for >> Slammer or Nimda or some other worm to scan through all of the IP's >> on your network, the admins there have more time to respond, and >> there is a better chance that AV software will get updates to block >> the malware before too many systems get infected. > > If you already have the firewall to drop those unwanted connections > you might as well just reset them. Unfortunately, a firewall can only affect traffic which passes by it. There are plenty of cases where someone opens an attachment in a malicious email, which infects their system and causes it to scan/probe LAN IPs. Having a firewall won't do a thing to protect you from local scans. Using "blackhole" on internal machines can help this scenario somewhat. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 15:49:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2169716A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:49:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A62843D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:49:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1F9OuM-0007FG-IC; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:49:34 +0000 In-Reply-To: <44zmkseors.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <7e148fb90602142045v71cc7c06p7054210693c03653@mail.gmail.com> <44zmkseors.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-17-650098578" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:49:31 +0000 To: Lowell Gilbert X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Jimmie James Subject: Re: Odd daily run output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:49:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-17-650098578 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 15 Feb 2006, at 13:26, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Jimmie James writes: > >> I know there's 8% reserved for softupdates, but how is it possible >> that there's _extra_ space on /tmp ? What am I missing? This is the >> first time I've seen this. > > This is a FAQ. > In fact, it's listed in the FAQ list. > "How is it possible for a partition to be more than 100% full?" > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/ > disks.html#DISK-MORE-THAN-FULL Except that it isn't, and you should read the questions more carefully. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --Apple-Mail-17-650098578 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD802Qme8yCsQvJJ0RAmHjAJoCnpNgxSmdEWLJiL08RWiP7XiNcQCgmU1F l0pFWrE+Z71YN6HHG7Pltdk= =C2Ay -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-17-650098578-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 15:53:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C13416A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (h-66-167-151-186.mclnva23.covad.net [66.167.151.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B17443D77 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:53:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from jimcsoka ([192.168.7.46]) by mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id k1FFt1UW023291 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:55:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Message-ID: <040a01c6324a$f6dac920$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> From: "James Csoka" To: "Freebsd - Questions" References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:14:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-DFMC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DFMC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:53:31 -0000 Okay...I think I answered part of my question. /etc/mail/access only governs mail relaying. Which would mean that of course, it wouldn't accept mail from that address, but would have no problem sending mail to it. So....any ideas on how I can simply block 1 particular email address, without marking it as spam? ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Csoka" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 10:52 AM Subject: Blocking an individual email address > I am running a FreeBSD 5.4p10 machine at my office. It functions as our firewall and mailserver. I am running Mailscanner, which invokes sendmail when necessary to process mail. Sendmail is not started by default....Mailscanner invokes individual instances of it when it needs to. > > Here is my problem. I have an employee at my office that is sending work email to her home email address. I need to find a way to block her email address, whether To, From, Cc, Bcc, or whatever, from passing through my mailserver. I have already added a line to /etc/mail/access (in the format email@address.com REJECT), and have run makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access. I tested this with my personal email address (external to my network), and it had the effect of blocking any email orginating from my personal email to any address at my work, however it does not prevent me from sending emails to this address from a work address, which is the whole point. > > Does anyone have any ideas? I could tag the address as spam, but I would rather not. There has to be a way to block anyone from sending to a certain email address, I would think. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > -Jim > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 15:56:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E2816A422 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:56:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.200.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F19643D6E for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:56:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([68.80.195.248]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2006021515563701400ort9re>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:56:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAC1B843; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:56:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bserver.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50397-09; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:56:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.214.102] (kbuilt.transpack.com [192.168.214.102]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3729B842; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:56:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F34F30.80702@allenmyland.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:56:32 -0500 From: Ken Stevenson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Csoka References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> In-Reply-To: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at transpack.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:56:47 -0000 James Csoka wrote: > I am running a FreeBSD 5.4p10 machine at my office. It functions as our firewall and mailserver. I am running Mailscanner, which invokes sendmail when necessary to process mail. Sendmail is not started by default....Mailscanner invokes individual instances of it when it needs to. > > Here is my problem. I have an employee at my office that is sending work email to her home email address. I need to find a way to block her email address, whether To, From, Cc, Bcc, or whatever, from passing through my mailserver. I have already added a line to /etc/mail/access (in the format email@address.com REJECT), and have run makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access. I tested this with my personal email address (external to my network), and it had the effect of blocking any email orginating from my personal email to any address at my work, however it does not prevent me from sending emails to this address from a work address, which is the whole point. > > Does anyone have any ideas? I could tag the address as spam, but I would rather not. There has to be a way to block anyone from sending to a certain email address, I would think. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > -Jim I don't mean to be a wise ass but this sounds wrong on so many levels. Why can't she send email to her home email address? If there's a good reason, can't you firmly explain the company policy to her, tell her all mail is logged and that she'll be fired if she continues to violate company policy? Bottom line, if she doesn't care about following company policy, she'll get around any countermeasures you try to employ, one way or the other. -- Ken Stevenson Allen-Myland Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 16:09:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5183916A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:09:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CD443D55 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:09:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834B1730A4; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:09:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20400-01; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:09:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52E67303F; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:09:26 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060215155130.12023.qmail@web51409.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060215155130.12023.qmail@web51409.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Message-Id: <6117CB59-04AF-4AA1-8BD1-A2F0BCAD744F@netmusician.org> From: Joe Auty Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:09:25 -0500 To: Steve Quinn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:09:41 -0000 On Feb 15, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Steve Quinn wrote: > --- Joe Auty wrote: > >> Thanks Steve, >> >> These were the exact instructions I started with, only on a different >> page.... >> >> The problem with these for me is that dump caused a core dump. I've >> been trying to run dump while booted up from a Freesbie CD, but I was >> getting "unknown file system" errors I didn't know how to deal with. >> >> I'm going to try g4u next, but I'm surprised that what I originally >> thought would be a simple task has turned out to be such an amazing >> chore =( >> >> > > Hi Joe > > Have you tried booting the system you want to clone into single > user mode and running dump fron > that file system? This would guarantee that dump understands the > file system > > Attached is my script if you want to give it a go > > Before you do anything though, I suggest making a full disk G4U backup > > Dont forget to zero out any empty blocks > > I do this under the operating system prior to G4U to guarantee any > unused blocks are zero'd > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/zerobits bs=1024k > rm /zerobits > dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/zerobits bs=1024k > rm /tmp/zerobits > dd if=/dev/zero of=/usr/zerobits bs=1024k > rm /usr/zerobits > dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/zerobits bs=1024k > rm /var/zerobits > > I hope this helps > Thanks Steve, but this is exactly the same script I've been using all along, while in Single User Mode. However, could you explain the zeroing of blocks, and what its purpose is for? Does this solve the problem of space being lost when cloning a disk to a larger disk? ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 16:12:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7550D16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:12:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro@varnet.biz) Received: from relay03.pair.com (relay03.pair.com [209.68.5.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DCCF43D75 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:12:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro@varnet.biz) Received: (qmail 92116 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 16:12:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO phobos.mars.bsd) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 16:12:44 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 200.115.214.28 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:12:41 -0300 From: Alejandro Pulver To: Alex Zbyslaw Message-ID: <20060215131241.6dc50af5@phobos.mars.bsd> In-Reply-To: <20060202113919.233c1adc@phobos.mars.bsd> References: <20060201150621.11234c17@phobos.mars.bsd> <20060201151953.2ef2f011@phobos.mars.bsd> <43E1F57A.80804@dial.pipex.com> <20060202113919.233c1adc@phobos.mars.bsd> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.11; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NVidia GeForce 6600 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:12:52 -0000 On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:39:19 -0300 Alejandro Pulver wrote: > On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:05:14 +0000 > Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > > > Alejandro Pulver wrote: > > > > >On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:06:21 -0300 > > >Alejandro Pulver wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>Hello, > > >> > > >>I have recently bought a GeForce 6600 video card, and sometimes > > >>(not very often) I experience the following problem: > > >> > > >>A little after starting X11 (for example when I start downloading > > >>e-mails), the screen freezes a few seconds, after that the screen > > >>looks like if widgets (buttons, text, etc.) aren't drawn, and the > > >>white background of Sylpheed-Claws covers the screen. Then I am > > >>forced to switch to the 1st console (Ctrl+Alt+F1), which takes > > >>around 30 seconds, and then kill X11. > > >> > > >>I have FreeBSD 5.4 release, Xorg 6.8.2 and nvidia-driver 1.0.8178. > > >> > > >> > > I have a 6600 with FreeBSD 5.4 XOrg 6.8.2 but still > > nvidia-driver-1.0.7676_1. I have an occasional problem where the > > whole screen is shifted left on startup, but exiting and restarting > > X fixes it. You could try downgrading to an older nvidia-driver and > > see if it helps. Portdowngrade should do that, but I've never used > > it myself. > > > > You may have more luck if you try the nvidia support forum. > > Definitely slower than this mailing list but someone from nvidia was > > reading it, last time I used it. > > > > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=47 > > > > --Alex > > > > Hello, > > Thank you for your reply. > > I have recently (started yesterday, and finishing yoday) upgraded my > ports (including Xorg -> 6.9). If the problems persist I will try the > old dirver and post information about the error in the NVidia forums. > > Best Regards, > Ale Hello again, I have discovered the problem: the lock of the AGP slot wasn't on (when I changed the video card I forgot the lock isn't automatic as the one in the memory slots). I noticed this when the card was disconnected completely (it has a cooler, so I guess the vibration did it). Once I rebooted and the screen was black (the integrated video card was used instead of the NVidia). Other time I saw the kernel message indicating the card was detached and instantly detected again. Best Regards, Ale From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 16:13:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810B916A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:13:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6875143D5E for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:13:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id k1FGCtMT062457; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:12:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:12:55 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: James Csoka Message-ID: <20060215161255.GB70956@dan.emsphone.com> References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <040a01c6324a$f6dac920$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <040a01c6324a$f6dac920$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Freebsd - Questions Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:13:17 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 15), James Csoka said: > Okay...I think I answered part of my question. /etc/mail/access only > governs mail relaying. Which would mean that of course, it wouldn't accept > mail from that address, but would have no problem sending mail to it. It covers local and outgoing delivery as well. If you add To:user@example.com REJECT then no-one will be able to send mail to that user from your site. See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/anti_spam.html#access_db_fine . -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 16:13:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D29916A436 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:13:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D21943D73 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:13:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-169-72.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.169.72]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A424CA15; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:22:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666095285D; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:11:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F3531E.8080205@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:13:18 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn McCalley References: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> In-Reply-To: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:13:24 -0000 Glenn McCalley schrieb: > Is there a way to find out -which- -process- calls another process? Each process is associated with a parent; look at the ppid column: ps axo user,pid,ppid,command Bjrn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 16:23:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263AB16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:23:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F1B43D53 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:23:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1FGND4h010024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:23:14 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FGN8tm023578; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:23:08 GMT (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1FGN70C023577; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:23:08 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Resent-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:23:07 +0200 Resent-Message-ID: <20060215162307.GA23575@flame.pc> Resent-To: Erik Norgaard , Maxim Vetrov , fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, chris@i13i.com Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:12:57 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Erik Norgaard Message-ID: <20060215161257.GC23414@flame.pc> References: <43F3B343.5070802@mail.ru> <43F34782.60300@locolomo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F34782.60300@locolomo.org> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.343, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.86, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com, Maxim Vetrov , chris@i13i.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER rule error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:23:40 -0000 On 2006-02-15 16:23, Erik Norgaard wrote: > Maxim Vetrov wrote: > >################################################################################ > ># Internal interface #1 - rl0 (10.0.1.0/29) > ># > >################################################################################ > > > >#%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Block-and-log everything that is not allowed explicitly > >%%%%% > >block in log on rl0 all head 20 > >block out log on rl0 all head 25 > >#%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Allow Sun RPC incoming calls > >%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > >pass in quick on rl0 \ > > proto tcp/udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 > >pass in quick on rl0 \ > > proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 717 keep state group 20 > ># the next line raise the error when uncommented > >#pass out quick on rl0 \ > ># proto udp from any to any port = 111 keep state group 20 > > I think someone else already pointed at this: You try to add a rule for > outbound traffic to the inbound group in the offending line. Try correct > to group 25. That's true. I did post the relevant message: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:13:33 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: IPFILTER rule error To: Maxim Vetrov Cc: norgaard@locolomo.org, chris@i13i.com [...] Note that you have only set up a group numbered '25' for outgoing traffic, but then attempt to add a rule to an outgoing group of '20'. This is the cause of the error you're seeing. This ruleset should work fine: # block in log on rl0 all head 20 # block out log on rl0 all head 25 # # pass in quick on rl0 \ # proto tcp/udp from any to any port = sunrpc keep state group 20 # pass in quick on rl0 \ # proto tcp/udp from any to any port = 717 keep state group 20 # pass out quick on rl0 \ # proto udp from any to any port = 111 keep state group 25 [...] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 16:24:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A60D16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:24:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB6443D5A for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 4174 invoked by uid 510); 15 Feb 2006 16:26:36 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.88/1261. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.5/5.0):. Processed in 2.351378 secs); 15 Feb 2006 16:26:36 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.5/5.0):. Processed in 2.351378 secs Process 4167) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 16:26:33 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: James Csoka In-Reply-To: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1140020793.3572.9.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:26:33 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:24:37 -0000 On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:52, James Csoka wrote: > I am running a FreeBSD 5.4p10 machine at my office. It functions as our firewall and mailserver. I am running Mailscanner, which invokes sendmail when necessary to process mail. Sendmail is not started by default....Mailscanner invokes individual instances of it when it needs to. > > Here is my problem. I have an employee at my office that is sending work email to her home email address. I need to find a way to block her email address, whether To, From, Cc, Bcc, or whatever, from passing through my mailserver. I have already added a line to /etc/mail/access (in the format email@address.com REJECT), and have run makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access. I tested this with my personal email address (external to my network), and it had the effect of blocking any email orginating from my personal email to any address at my work, however it does not prevent me from sending emails to this address from a work address, which is the whole point. > > Does anyone have any ideas? I could tag the address as spam, but I would rather not. There has to be a way to block anyone from sending to a certain email address, I would think. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > -Jim Jim, Just a thought have you tired adding the address to /etc/aliases and sending the mail to a different address or a back hole? Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 16:27:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AA216A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:27:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87F543D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:27:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C488D13C7C4; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:28:08 -0600 (CST) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 51A2F13C7C0; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:28:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A0513C7BE; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:28:08 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:28:08 -0600 (CST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: James Csoka In-Reply-To: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Message-ID: <20060215102656.A63014@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:27:25 -0000 > I am running a FreeBSD 5.4p10 machine at my office. It functions as our > firewall and mailserver. I am running Mailscanner, which invokes > sendmail when necessary to process mail. Sendmail is not started by > default....Mailscanner invokes individual instances of it when it needs > to. > > Here is my problem. I have an employee at my office that is sending > work email to her home email address. I need to find a way to block her > email address, whether To, From, Cc, Bcc, or whatever, from passing > through my mailserver. I have already added a line to /etc/mail/access > (in the format email@address.com REJECT), and have run makemap hash > /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access. I tested this with my personal > email address (external to my network), and it had the effect of > blocking any email orginating from my personal email to any address at > my work, however it does not prevent me from sending emails to this > address from a work address, which is the whole point. I doubt we know the whole story, but even if you do find a way to make this work what stops her from... - emailing her work to her gmail/hotmail/yahoo account? - copying her email and putting it on a thumb drive? - printing it out and taking it home? If you are trying to stop her from taking "work material" home then you've got a much bigger problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 17:11:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA99B16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:11:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (ns1.internetinsite.com [208.179.97.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BD743D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:11:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.internetinsite.com [IPv6:::1]) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FHBWSV042084 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:11:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <43F360C4.6070201@chrismaness.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:11:32 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Stale Dependancy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:11:34 -0000 This might be Newbie question: What is the cleanest way to resolve stale dependency with gamin-0.1.5_3. I think I remember seeing a message that it merged into fam. I did a portupgrade -a, and it's still there. I was surprised this was not self cleansing because I used CVSUP to sync my port tree. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 17:27:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FA816A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:27:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michel.dicroci@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8870843D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:26:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michel.dicroci@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i12so163131wra for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:26:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qypDzyd65DBFPosDFjtH1mO9/AL5wnwQ9mLJ4K1T+nAdc2LPtECPUWo6SrgcPtZ9g6WzCfBFK06JXkDTNPk5SX65VKc+70TpTkr+z/hhziAz9FM71a7+4TPegmg2bqKaiXHybIV/I4Yu9Zj/dE9+j+wmxmEs/MbKEnpeAN61yPw= Received: by 10.65.22.15 with SMTP id z15mr2737106qbi; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:26:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.35.17 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:26:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:26:56 -0500 From: Michel Di Croci To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060215102656.A63014@bravo.pjkh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <20060215102656.A63014@bravo.pjkh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:27:00 -0000 MjAwNi8yLzE1LCBQaGlsaXAgSGFsbHN0cm9tIDxmcmVlYnNkQHBoaWxpcC5wamtoLmNvbT46Cj4K PiA+IEkgYW0gcnVubmluZyBhIEZyZWVCU0QgNS40cDEwIG1hY2hpbmUgYXQgbXkgb2ZmaWNlLiAg SXQgZnVuY3Rpb25zIGFzIG91cgo+ID4gZmlyZXdhbGwgYW5kIG1haWxzZXJ2ZXIuICBJIGFtIHJ1 bm5pbmcgTWFpbHNjYW5uZXIsIHdoaWNoIGludm9rZXMKPiA+IHNlbmRtYWlsIHdoZW4gbmVjZXNz YXJ5IHRvIHByb2Nlc3MgbWFpbC4gIFNlbmRtYWlsIGlzIG5vdCBzdGFydGVkIGJ5Cj4gPiBkZWZh dWx0Li4uLk1haWxzY2FubmVyIGludm9rZXMgaW5kaXZpZHVhbCBpbnN0YW5jZXMgb2YgaXQgd2hl biBpdCBuZWVkcwo+ID4gdG8uCj4gPgo+ID4gSGVyZSBpcyBteSBwcm9ibGVtLiAgSSBoYXZlIGFu IGVtcGxveWVlIGF0IG15IG9mZmljZSB0aGF0IGlzIHNlbmRpbmcKPiA+IHdvcmsgZW1haWwgdG8g aGVyIGhvbWUgZW1haWwgYWRkcmVzcy4gIEkgbmVlZCB0byBmaW5kIGEgd2F5IHRvIGJsb2NrIGhl cgo+Cj4gPiBlbWFpbCBhZGRyZXNzLCB3aGV0aGVyIFRvLCBGcm9tLCBDYywgQmNjLCBvciB3aGF0 ZXZlciwgZnJvbSBwYXNzaW5nCj4gPiB0aHJvdWdoIG15IG1haWxzZXJ2ZXIuICBJIGhhdmUgYWxy ZWFkeSBhZGRlZCBhIGxpbmUgdG8gL2V0Yy9tYWlsL2FjY2Vzcwo+ID4gKGluIHRoZSBmb3JtYXQg ZW1haWxAYWRkcmVzcy5jb20gUkVKRUNUKSwgYW5kIGhhdmUgcnVuIG1ha2VtYXAgaGFzaAo+ID4g L2V0Yy9tYWlsL2FjY2Vzcy5kYiA8IC9ldGMvbWFpbC9hY2Nlc3MuICBJIHRlc3RlZCB0aGlzIHdp dGggbXkgcGVyc29uYWwKPiA+IGVtYWlsIGFkZHJlc3MgKGV4dGVybmFsIHRvIG15IG5ldHdvcmsp LCBhbmQgaXQgaGFkIHRoZSBlZmZlY3Qgb2YKPiA+IGJsb2NraW5nIGFueSBlbWFpbCBvcmdpbmF0 aW5nIGZyb20gbXkgcGVyc29uYWwgZW1haWwgdG8gYW55IGFkZHJlc3MgYXQKPiA+IG15IHdvcmss IGhvd2V2ZXIgaXQgZG9lcyBub3QgcHJldmVudCBtZSBmcm9tIHNlbmRpbmcgZW1haWxzIHRvIHRo aXMKPiA+IGFkZHJlc3MgZnJvbSBhIHdvcmsgYWRkcmVzcywgd2hpY2ggaXMgdGhlIHdob2xlIHBv aW50Lgo+Cj4gSSBkb3VidCB3ZSBrbm93IHRoZSB3aG9sZSBzdG9yeSwgYnV0IGV2ZW4gaWYgeW91 IGRvIGZpbmQgYSB3YXkgdG8gbWFrZQo+IHRoaXMgd29yayB3aGF0IHN0b3BzIGhlciBmcm9tLi4u Cj4KPiAtIGVtYWlsaW5nIGhlciB3b3JrIHRvIGhlciBnbWFpbC9ob3RtYWlsL3lhaG9vIGFjY291 bnQ/Cj4gLSBjb3B5aW5nIGhlciBlbWFpbCBhbmQgcHV0dGluZyBpdCBvbiBhIHRodW1iIGRyaXZl Pwo+IC0gcHJpbnRpbmcgaXQgb3V0IGFuZCB0YWtpbmcgaXQgaG9tZT8KPgo+IElmIHlvdSBhcmUg dHJ5aW5nIHRvIHN0b3AgaGVyIGZyb20gdGFraW5nICJ3b3JrIG1hdGVyaWFsIiBob21lIHRoZW4g eW91J3ZlCj4KPiBnb3QgYSBtdWNoIGJpZ2dlciBwcm9ibGVtLgo+CgoKVGhlcmUncyBhbHNvIHRo ZSBpc3N1ZSB0aGF0IHNoZSBjYW4gdXNlIGEgd2VibWFpbCB0byBzZW5kIG1haWwgdG8gaGVyIGhv dXNlCmFjY291bnQgYW5kIGpvaW5pbmcgZG9jdW1lbnQgdGhlcmUK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 18:15:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5C916A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:15:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fj@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4897F43D4C for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fj@panix.com) Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8748C9D9CD; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:15:10 -0500 (EST) Received: (from fj@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id k1FIFAd09335; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:15:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:15:10 -0500 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060215181510.GA18198@panix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, lars References: <20060214195709.AA60116A420@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060214195709.AA60116A420@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: lars Subject: Re: RELENG_6 and a Razer Copperhead mouse don't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:15:11 -0000 On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:57:09PM +0000, freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org wrote: > > 19. RELENG_6 and a Razer Copperhead mouse don't work (lars) > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 19 > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:26:53 +0100 > From: lars > Subject: RELENG_6 and a Razer Copperhead mouse don't work > > Hi all > > I run FreeBSD RELENG_6 on an A8N32-SLI Deluxe motherboard > http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?l1=3&l2=15&l3=0&model=744&modelmenu=1 > with a Razer Copperhead (www.razerzone.com) mouse connected via USB. > > The OS boots without error and also recognizes my USB keyboard. > > But when I try to configure my mouse with sysinstall the mouse > cursor flickers for a split second and then disappears. > > An entry /dev/ums0 in rc.conf doesn't help either. > > It also doesn't work in X, of course. A Logitech MX300 USB mouse > works however. > > Has anyone managed to get this Razer mouse (which is quite comfy) It's like a glove, yes, it is. > to run correctly with FreeBSD? I have a Diamondback that works well under Xorg and console: ums0: Razer Razer Diamondback Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1 Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "Buttons" "5" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection I think that enabling usdb in /etc/rc.conf will kickstart moused, giving you console access to the mouse; and this even though moused is disabled by default in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. -- In my country there is problem; and that problem is GOP; it take everybody's money; and it never give it back...throw GOP down the well; so my country can be free... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 18:57:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9305E16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:57:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C54D543D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:57:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2006 18:57:21 -0000 Received: from 181.85.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [83.76.85.181] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 15 Feb 2006 19:57:21 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F37995.4060809@gmx.at> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:57:25 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060203) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, lars References: <20060214195709.AA60116A420@hub.freebsd.org> <20060215181510.GA18198@panix.com> In-Reply-To: <20060215181510.GA18198@panix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: RELENG_6 and a Razer Copperhead mouse don't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:57:23 -0000 > I have a Diamondback that works well under Xorg and console: > > ums0: Razer Razer Diamondback Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2, > iclass 3/1 > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > Option "Buttons" "5" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" > EndSection > > I think that enabling usdb in /etc/rc.conf will kickstart moused, > giving you console access to the mouse; and this even though moused is > disabled by default in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Thanks, it was the entry in /etc/rc.conf which I changed to: usbd_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" moused_type="auto" moused_port="/dev/sysmouse" Before, it was with moused_port="/dev/ums0" It's a bit jumpy, not to say erratic, and selects things by itself, but maybe I need to twiddle with some settings in KDE. But it works now, neat. Thanks a lot for the pointer, Joe. Regards, lars. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 19:06:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43B216A422 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:06:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C49D43D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:06:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1F9RzB-000M2F-FJ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:06:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: <50778.207.70.139.52.1140002253.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> References: <61560.207.70.139.52.1139628926.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> <6C543300-579C-4313-A355-0F26181B3FA7@todoo.biz> <067101c63216$a7682f10$c801a8c0@nexpc> <65260.207.70.139.52.1139998857.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> <06b901c63220$3a849eb0$c801a8c0@nexpc> <50778.207.70.139.52.1140002253.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <466E8897-8572-4901-B255-CF1A6DD428B7@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:06:45 -0700 To: Robert Uzzi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: SATA Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:06:46 -0000 On Feb 15, 2006, at 4:17 AM, Robert Uzzi wrote: > That still dosen't connedt SATA to a non sata board though. That's my > situation I have 6 SATA drives but no SATA native board. Looking for a > cheap addin card to build this upon. define "cheap" LSI MegaRaid SATA-150 6 (or some comination of those words and numbers) are in the upper $200 range and support 6 SATA drives, have FreeBSD tools and drivers, and are not simple sw raid type cards. monarchcomputer.com has had the best LSI SATA card price I have found. I use the 4 -port version successfully under FreeBSD and Solaris 10 (Solaris had to be slightly hacked as they had the driver but not the right PCI ids) Chad > >> In that case maybe you want to consider software raid on freebsd. >> It's >> dead >> easy to install and configure. >> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2005/11/10/FreeBSD_Basics.html >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 19:07:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F7516A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:07:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from panter@as.ro) Received: from h10.rohost.com (h10.rohost.com [69.9.169.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B908C43D5D for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:07:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from panter@as.ro) Received: from [81.196.30.213] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by h10.rohost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1F9Rzn-0006Of-Cv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:07:23 +0200 Message-ID: <43F37BBA.10708@as.ro> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:06:34 +0200 From: "Panter V." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - h10.rohost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - as.ro X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: i386 or amd64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:07:28 -0000 Hello, I have a AMD Sempron 2600+ 64 bit processor running on a soket 754 ECS motherboard (http://www.ecs.com.tw/ECSWeb/Products/ProductsDetail.aspx?DetailID=555&MenuID=21&LanID=9__) _ _Computer has 256 DDRAM and I also want to connect 2 USB printers to it (a laser Xerox 3116 and an inkjet HP PSC 1110) I want to use this computer as a development server and firewall. I will run Apache 2, PHP 5, MySQL, Samba, an FTP server ... At a later time I would like to use this computer as a workstation as well and I will need KDE, OpenOffice 2, Thunderbird, Firefox, Eclipse ... I have a few questions: Can I use the amd64 version for this configuration? If I use i386 does this mean performances will be visibly lower than using amd64? Are the software and drivers I need 64 bit ready or will their 32 bit versions run at least as good as they would do on i386? Which version do you recommend me to use i386 or amd64? Thank you very much for your answers. Panter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 19:40:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D5216A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:40:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from letter2steve@yahoo.com) Received: from web51413.mail.yahoo.com (web51413.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F84743D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:40:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from letter2steve@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 6273 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Feb 2006 19:40:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=lP4ziZcGxsdQUOx173wfxUKSv0JpGqVvjEurLv3A1jjC+cvC/h3dNSHu8MZ394HEUTf7vJfsWIcm7u2wV3aCOvTCd2QQ7jyEZLSmySUf3SzKKlpPYPyfDhxOIqityGXSmJ1CEiJz6w21aSWkqEFKQFscTn/OraUDBfu0zBj7C6s= ; Message-ID: <20060215194046.6271.qmail@web51413.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [199.243.104.196] by web51413.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:40:46 PST Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:40:46 -0800 (PST) From: Steve Quinn To: joe@netmusician.org In-Reply-To: <6117CB59-04AF-4AA1-8BD1-A2F0BCAD744F@netmusician.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:40:48 -0000 --- Joe Auty wrote: > Thanks Steve, but this is exactly the same script I've been using all > along, while in Single User Mode. > > However, could you explain the zeroing of blocks, and what its > purpose is for? Does this solve the problem of space being lost when > cloning a disk to a larger disk? Hi Joe Sorry, you mentioned Freesbie and I assumed you had not used dump under your FreeBSD install Now that I think about it, I was getting errors like yours when I was first learning this script I remember having to adjust it to taste Have a look at your fstab (cat /etc/fstab) and ensure the scripts references to your FreeBSD slices match your system. In the script I sent you, my clone destination disk was ad2 so you will need to look at that as well Don't worry Joe, you are very very close Regarding zeroing empty or unused blocks, have a look at this http://www.digitalissues.co.uk/html/os/misc/partimage.html#22 Regarding space lost cloning to a larger disk, zeroing unused blocks wont help that. Imagine your 10GB FreeBSD hard disk is cloned with G4U to a 20GB hard disk. It will probably work great but your 20GB disk is only half full. You will have to use growfs to expand a slice or create a new partition to reclaim the empty space. Sorry, I have not tried this yet and have no experience. In cloning to a bigger disk, I prefer the dump/restore script method as I get to fully utilize the larger disk capacity I hope this helps Take care Steve __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 19:46:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFA116A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:46:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (h-66-167-151-186.mclnva23.covad.net [66.167.151.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C4543D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:46:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from jimcsoka ([192.168.7.46]) by mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id k1FJlxXw010904; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:47:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Message-ID: <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> From: "James Csoka" To: "Dan Nelson" References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local><040a01c6324a$f6dac920$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <20060215161255.GB70956@dan.emsphone.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:04:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-DFMC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DFMC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com Cc: Freebsd - Questions Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:46:31 -0000 After reading the page you linked to, and looking at the examples, I added the line To:user@example.com REJECT (using my personal email), and it had no effect. I can't find any good reason it didn't work, but it fails to prevent me from sending mail from inside my work network to my home address. any ideas? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Nelson" To: "James Csoka" Cc: "Freebsd - Questions" Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address > In the last episode (Feb 15), James Csoka said: > > Okay...I think I answered part of my question. /etc/mail/access only > > governs mail relaying. Which would mean that of course, it wouldn't accept > > mail from that address, but would have no problem sending mail to it. > > It covers local and outgoing delivery as well. If you add > > To:user@example.com REJECT > > then no-one will be able to send mail to that user from your site. See > http://www.sendmail.org/m4/anti_spam.html#access_db_fine . > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 19:58:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACD816A422; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from mailhost.frm2.tum.de (mailhost.frm2.tum.de [129.187.179.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061EF43D5F; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:58:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from localhost (mailhost.frm2.tum.de [129.187.179.12]) by mailhost.frm2.tum.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FJwa1J009275; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:58:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from hades.admin.frm2 (hades.admin.frm2 [172.25.1.10]) by mailhost.frm2.tum.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FJwVlK009272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:58:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from hades.admin.frm2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hades.admin.frm2 (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FJwVeH084398; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:58:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: (from jpulz@localhost) by hades.admin.frm2 (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1FJwVxG084397; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:58:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:58:29 +0100 (CET) From: Joerg Pulz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060215204610.H887@hades.admin.frm2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: at mailhost.frm2.tum.de Cc: kris@freebsd.org Subject: bsd.port.mk broken since last commit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:58:50 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, i recently found out, that the OPENLDAP part of ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk is broken since the last commit. I think it was only by accident, because the commit message says: - - Update the OpenLDAP default version. [8] Unfortunately, not the default version of OpenLDAP was changes but the OpenLDAP shared library version was bumped. I think the commit should change WANT_OPENLDAP_VER?= 22 to WANT_OPENLDAP_VER?= 23 and not LIB_DEPENDS+= ldap-2.3.1:${PORTSDIR}/net/openldap23${_OPENLDAP_FLAVOUR}-client to LIB_DEPENDS+= ldap-2.3.2:${PORTSDIR}/net/openldap23${_OPENLDAP_FLAVOUR}-client Can someone please take a look at this and fix it. Thanks a lot Joerg - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. -Plato -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD84fnSPOsGF+KA+MRAgMdAKCqi1W5D2Jr4pVnxx6FFw6+L8Mk8wCfWBEZ vBn6XZrMqZ3GmY0HsEGi1oc= =Nz6o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:13:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F3016A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:13:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D685B43D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:13:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id e2so15810ugf for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:13:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mJtjJKqyI/GZkatfhLSQ6rE9wnhGvA31p89X5hmsoST270yY/NCYjPE3fckLh28aMPfV41Ml7Ezu+3+teCXhLbc6i2dDsP1L7WGkX1VNYUhIC+VFSngfVhvrm6iNWSglu8iDOsEueHREUpLg/YAayd0VDwnUzEUEpev+ms+2TSA= Received: by 10.49.63.8 with SMTP id q8mr31189nfk; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:13:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.9.1 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:13:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:13:52 -0600 From: Noel Jones To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <43F32271.2010803@pean.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43F32271.2010803@pean.org> Subject: Re: Syslog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:13:54 -0000 On 2/15/06, Peter Ankerst=E5l wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to get syslog to log on a remote host. This part is really > not a problem, but when I try to define at the "loghost" to which files > i want to log my incoming logs I don't get anything to work. I cant find > anything in the manual either. > > I've tried this: > +sphere > *.* /var/log/sphere/messages > Read the syslog.conf and syslogd man pages carefully, they contain all the info you need. You probably need to adjust the syslogd entry in /etc/rc.conf to remove the -s option, and add -a RemoteIP. Then stop and restart syslogd before continuing your test. You also likely need to clear the "program specification" in syslog.conf by using: !* +sphere *.* /var/log/sphere/messages -- Noel Jones From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:26:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9704316A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:26:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@cerebellum.za.net) Received: from elektra.opteqint.net (elektra.opteqint.net [209.25.178.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EFF43D6D for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:26:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@cerebellum.za.net) Received: from [165.146.104.8] (helo=ianb) by elektra.opteqint.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1F9TDJ-0009I0-JR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:25:31 -0800 From: "Ian Barnes" To: Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:25:53 +0200 Message-ID: <005b01c6326e$0881e640$6400000a@ianb> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYybgSRkM0d08VHQIe1J6zjOvrEVQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: PPPoE question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:26:09 -0000 Hi, I am trying to setup my pppoe connection and I keep getting the following error: Gateway ppp[526]: tun0: Error: ipcp_InterfaceUP: unable to set ip address My ppp.conf looks something like this: default: nat enable yes nat same_ports yes nat use_sockets yes nat unregistered_only yes dsl1: set log Phase Chat tun command set mru 1492 set mtu 1492 set device PPPoE:dc0 # Where xl0 is your NIC code set authname online321996@domain.com set authkey password set dial set login set timeout 120 set ifaddr 10.10.0.1/0 10.10.0.2/0 add default HISADDR I have the following options compiled into my kernel: #PPPOE stuff options NETGRAPH options NETGRAPH_SOCKET options NETGRAPH_PPPOE options NETGRAPH_ETHER options PPP_DEFLATE I run ppp: ppp -nat -ddial dsl1. It tries to connect, but I keep getting that error. Any ideas ? Cheers Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:29:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC5D16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from techlist@bnetmd.net) Received: from ns1.bnetmd.net (ns1.BNETMD.NET [216.133.66.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E42243D53 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from techlist@bnetmd.net) Received: from glenn (c-68-34-37-204.hsd1.md.comcast.net [68.34.37.204]) by ns1.bnetmd.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id k1FKSl9O045469 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:29:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from techlist@bnetmd.net) Message-ID: <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> From: "Glenn McCalley" To: References: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <43F3531E.8080205@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:31:46 -0500 Organization: Business.Net LLC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Glenn McCalley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:29:33 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bjrn Knig" To: "Glenn McCalley" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:13 AM Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what > Glenn McCalley schrieb: > > > Is there a way to find out -which- -process- calls another process? > > Each process is associated with a parent; look at the ppid column: > > ps axo user,pid,ppid,command > > Bjrn > > Thanks, I stated the question poorly. My fault. Is historical info available and is it available by file name? I trying to find out (for example) what (unknown) program ran another (known) program between 0900 and 1000 yesterday - something like that. I've got a customer sending our emails that he shouldn't - I don't know which customer it is. The program that sends the mail is running as a cgi so it all shows up as user "nobody". If I can get a list of what programs, path and file name, called sendmail over (say) the last 24 hours, one of them should jump off the page with an unreasonable level of activitiy. Thanks! Glenn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:29:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E4816A422 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:29:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342BB43D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:29:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o37so13014nzf for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:29:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YnIO9e4maySIIV8YYdVlXBsbBLkV576NLZGe6eKErzmTHe0gRGzDCXyLZ1DOdwhhslgn5hwT+K/qyVLViKZo04hI+LLrJ1NMFhD7Na/zOtVuJGzOl5U+PXLRm12Rc/n2LoAsQ3mk+XTEu7lcWryWTCMViYUjR2JPOkikVq/imFs= Received: by 10.36.140.6 with SMTP id n6mr171582nzd; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:29:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.11 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:29:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:29:04 +0300 From: Andrew Pantyukhin To: "Panter V." In-Reply-To: <43F37BBA.10708@as.ro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43F37BBA.10708@as.ro> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 or amd64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:29:55 -0000 On 2/15/06, Panter V. wrote: > I want to use this computer as a development server and firewall. I will > run Apache 2, PHP 5, MySQL, Samba, an FTP server ... You'll have no problems with these programs on amd64. Printer drivers are probably platform-independent > At a later time I would like to use this computer as a workstation as > well and I will need KDE, OpenOffice 2, Thunderbird, Firefox, Eclipse ... You'll probably want to use i386 on a workstation for various compatibility issues. Difference in speed is close to unmeasurable. Give amd64 a shot, but you might find a show-stopper and will have to switch to i386. So if you have some time to experiment, try amd64 anyway. If you need to set up a box that you don't want to mess with once again, you'll have to stick to i386. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:34:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B88516A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:34:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64DD43D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:34:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k1FKYYMd020600; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:34:34 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:34:33 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: James Csoka Message-ID: <20060215203433.GG70956@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20060215161255.GB70956@dan.emsphone.com> <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Freebsd - Questions Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:34:41 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 15), James Csoka said: > After reading the page you linked to, and looking at the examples, I > added the line To:user@example.com REJECT (using my personal email), > and it had no effect. I can't find any good reason it didn't work, > but it fails to prevent me from sending mail from inside my work > network to my home address. I thought To: checks would work on outgoing mail, but it looks like that's not the case. From http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#blacklist_recipients : blacklist_recipients Turns on the ability to block incoming mail for certain recipient usernames, hostnames, or addresses. For example, you can block incoming mail to user nobody, host foo.mydomain.com, or guest@bar.mydomain.com. These specifications are put in the access db as described in the Anti-Spam Configuration Control section later in this document. > any ideas? Try posting your question to the comp.mail.sendmail newsgroup; search the archives at http://groups.google.com/group/comp.mail.sendmail first, though. Someone must have wanted to do what you're trying before. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:36:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766CB16A420; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:36:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3949143D4C; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:36:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088571A3C2A; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:36:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A8A5A52913; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:36:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:36:33 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Joerg Pulz Message-ID: <20060215203633.GA54070@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060215204610.H887@hades.admin.frm2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060215204610.H887@hades.admin.frm2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: kris@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk broken since last commit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:36:36 -0000 --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:58:29PM +0100, Joerg Pulz wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > i recently found out, that the OPENLDAP part of ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk is= =20 > broken since the last commit. > I think it was only by accident, because the commit message says: > - Update the OpenLDAP default version. [8] >=20 > Unfortunately, not the default version of OpenLDAP was changes but the=20 > OpenLDAP shared library version was bumped. >=20 > I think the commit should change > WANT_OPENLDAP_VER?=3D 22 > to > WANT_OPENLDAP_VER?=3D 23 >=20 > and not >=20 > LIB_DEPENDS+=3D ldap-2.3.1:${PORTSDIR}/net/openldap23${_OPENLDAP_FLAVOUR}= -client > to > LIB_DEPENDS+=3D ldap-2.3.2:${PORTSDIR}/net/openldap23${_OPENLDAP_FLAVOUR}= -client >=20 > Can someone please take a look at this and fix it. Please raise this on ports@ and/or with the person who submitted the change I committed. Kris --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD85DOWry0BWjoQKURArGzAJwKbzfkF+x7eCE7yalQCQ2SsIwWcACgrYu1 pv8LbzI9SXEmggv7Op347eY= =B+Ee -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:40:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2606016A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:40:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mamaj1979@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay19-f20.bay19.hotmail.com [64.4.53.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AC743D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:40:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mamaj1979@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:40:41 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 62.90.33.240 by by19fd.bay19.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:40:41 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.90.33.240] X-Originating-Email: [mamaj1979@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mamaj1979@hotmail.com From: "mamaj m" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:40:41 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2006 20:40:41.0313 (UTC) FILETIME=[15FAED10:01C63270] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:44:30 +0000 Subject: Malibox is full X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:40:43 -0000 Please Help Me I have FreeBSD mail server but I have a problem that some emails I cant receive them because when they send the mail to me they receive a mail written on it mailbox is full but when they send to me an email from yahoo or hotmail I receive the mail Thank _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:44:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5EB16A424 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:44:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@planetshwoop.com) Received: from albright.psys.org (albright.psys.org [64.81.145.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684B943D5A for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:44:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@planetshwoop.com) Received: from psys.org ([209.242.32.214] helo=webmail.psys.org ident=807f9df0070a8c419a320b9262440d9d) by albright.psys.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F9TVq-0006wk-P1; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:44:34 -0600 Received: from 4.17.250.5 (SquirrelMail authenticated user brian) by webmail.psys.org with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:44:34 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <46981.4.17.250.5.1140036274.squirrel@webmail.psys.org> In-Reply-To: <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> References: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <43F3531E.8080205@cs.tu-berlin.de> <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:44:34 -0600 (CST) From: "Brian Sobolak" To: "Glenn McCalley" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: brian@planetshwoop.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:44:37 -0000 Glenn McCalley wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bjrn Knig" > To: "Glenn McCalley" > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:13 AM > Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what > > >> Glenn McCalley schrieb: >> >> > Is there a way to find out -which- -process- calls another process? >> >> Each process is associated with a parent; look at the ppid column: >> >> ps axo user,pid,ppid,command >> >> Bjrn >> >> > Thanks, I stated the question poorly. My fault. > Is historical info available and is it available by file name? > > I trying to find out (for example) what (unknown) program ran another > (known) program between 0900 and 1000 yesterday - something like that. > > I've got a customer sending our emails that he shouldn't - I don't know > which customer it is. The program that sends the mail is running as a cgi > so it all shows up as user "nobody". > > If I can get a list of what programs, path and file name, called sendmail > over (say) the last 24 hours, one of them should jump off the page with an > unreasonable level of activitiy. > The web server logs don't tell you anything in the URL data? A CGI script usually has some parameters which might provide some assistance. brian -- Brian Sobolak http://www.planetshwoop.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:45:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0AA16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:45:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56A243D82 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:45:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so14905nzf for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:45:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=nFVKczb8Gixn5E2/MDMjDFigALe1yXhD/f2ACwXVWkUUZIz5fFzrVhOigneHsIPn0zLpKfaB5YsfDe7wEMFbZRczPp8321/LOgZtEpdWGqYIwJl43j9rQVyusrYe7RKV4a4TbcIO9CMdlTG8GQ4U8or5eggKW2q0ac1HqFPyhvY= Received: by 10.36.140.6 with SMTP id n6mr194225nzd; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:45:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.11 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:45:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:45:20 +0300 From: Andrew Pantyukhin To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: natd with several alias IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:45:57 -0000 I wonder, what tricks do you use to use more than one alias IP? I mean, if you have hundreds of hosts behind your firewall, what can you do to alias some of them to one ip, others to another and so on. I know pf can probably do it in a better fashion, I just wonder how we can do it with natd. Several natd processes? Some other tricks? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:46:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4C816A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:46:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from ylpvm12.prodigy.net (ylpvm12-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CDD43D53 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:45:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from pimout4-ext.prodigy.net (pimout4-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.203]) by ylpvm12.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1FKjkVT009040 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:45:47 -0500 X-ORBL: [68.90.147.20] Received: from [192.168.1.25] (adsl-68-90-147-20.dsl.spfdmo.swbell.net [68.90.147.20]) by pimout4-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FKjcAY098108; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:45:43 -0500 Message-ID: <43F392EF.3070706@mkproductions.org> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:45:35 -0600 From: Mark Kane User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Pantyukhin References: <43F37BBA.10708@as.ro> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE5147C4727C9808BC002DE49" Cc: "Panter V." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 or amd64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:46:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE5147C4727C9808BC002DE49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 2/15/06, Panter V. wrote: >> I want to use this computer as a development server and firewall. I wi= ll >> run Apache 2, PHP 5, MySQL, Samba, an FTP server ... >=20 > You'll have no problems with these programs on amd64. Printer > drivers are probably platform-independent >=20 >> At a later time I would like to use this computer as a workstation as >> well and I will need KDE, OpenOffice 2, Thunderbird, Firefox, Eclipse = =2E.. >=20 > You'll probably want to use i386 on a workstation for > various compatibility issues. Difference in speed is close > to unmeasurable. Give amd64 a shot, but you might > find a show-stopper and will have to switch to i386. >=20 > So if you have some time to experiment, try amd64 > anyway. If you need to set up a box that you don't > want to mess with once again, you'll have to stick to > i386. I use amd64 on my main workstation. There are a few things that I wish worked, such as Flash (without using the Linux versions) and the nVidia display drivers. Generally though everything else works great. Xorg, Xfce, Firefox, Thunderbird, XChat, XMMS, mplayer, VLC, rTorrent, irssi, klibido, K3b, Audacity, GIMP, etc are all programs that I use quite a bit and have no problems with. OpenOffice might be a little problem as I have not figured out Java yet on amd64. I believe I have seen people do it but I have not had the need to use it. I know it's a hassle even on i386 with getting all the files manually from Sun's site and logging in and all that, so I just have not bothered. I'd try amd64 and see how it works for you. If it doesn't, you can always switch. -Mark --=20 GnuPG Public Key: http://www.mkproductions.org/mk_pubkey.asc Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) - http://www.rock1019.net IRC: MIXXnet IRC Network - irc.mixxnet.net (Nick: MIXX941) --------------enigE5147C4727C9808BC002DE49 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD85LylH2ybcmj7I8RAmtFAJ0bZcliXzvh/Qrayhqx6+cTmO1UcQCeOq+y mOKFCoel1gSEnch1ugwo+BY= =y4g1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE5147C4727C9808BC002DE49-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:47:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E14C16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:47:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57C743D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:47:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0E3730AD; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:47:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23795-05; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:47:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from [129.79.115.14] (jauty.journalism.indiana.edu [129.79.115.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA287303F; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:47:15 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060215194046.6271.qmail@web51413.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060215194046.6271.qmail@web51413.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Message-Id: <2DEE7242-F283-4C35-85B4-99847DE989A6@netmusician.org> From: Joe Auty Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:47:13 -0500 To: Steve Quinn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:47:33 -0000 On Feb 15, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Steve Quinn wrote: > --- Joe Auty wrote: > >> Thanks Steve, but this is exactly the same script I've been using all >> along, while in Single User Mode. >> >> However, could you explain the zeroing of blocks, and what its >> purpose is for? Does this solve the problem of space being lost when >> cloning a disk to a larger disk? > > Hi Joe > > Sorry, you mentioned Freesbie and I assumed you had not used dump > under your FreeBSD install > > Now that I think about it, I was getting errors like yours when I > was first learning this script > I remember having to adjust it to taste > > Have a look at your fstab (cat /etc/fstab) and ensure the scripts > references to your FreeBSD > slices match your system. > > In the script I sent you, my clone destination disk was ad2 so you > will need to look at that as > well > > Don't worry Joe, you are very very close > > Regarding zeroing empty or unused blocks, have a look at this > > http://www.digitalissues.co.uk/html/os/misc/partimage.html#22 > > Regarding space lost cloning to a larger disk, zeroing unused > blocks wont help that. Imagine your > 10GB FreeBSD hard disk is cloned with G4U to a 20GB hard disk. It > will probably work great but > your 20GB disk is only half full. You will have to use growfs to > expand a slice or create a new > partition to reclaim the empty space. Sorry, I have not tried this > yet and have no experience. > > In cloning to a bigger disk, I prefer the dump/restore script > method as I get to fully utilize the > larger disk capacity > It sort of helps, but sort of doesn't at the same time. I've tried the dump command from the script using the correct slices, and still had that kernel panic. I figured that using the Freesbie CD might be a way of testing whether my install on my master/source drive was somehow messed up, but I haven't gone very far with that (dump reports "unsupported file system" errors). I've also looked at growfs, but I'm not entirely sure how to handle the prequisite to using it which is using bsdlabel. It seems that running bsdlabel within /stand/sysinstall doesn't recognize the free space, so I can't create a new partition map that reflects this free space. I'll keep working at it though... Thanks for your help! ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 20:57:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CF716A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3C143D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k1FKvFiU005087; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:57:15 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k1FKvFVv005086; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:57:15 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200602152057.k1FKvFVv005086@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: mamaj1979@hotmail.com (mamaj m) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:57:15 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Malibox is full X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:57:16 -0000 > > Please Help Me > > I have FreeBSD mail server but I have a problem that some emails I cant > receive them because when they send the mail to me they receive a mail > written on it mailbox is full but when they send to me an email from yahoo > or hotmail I receive the mail Do you have quotas turned on? How full is the disk where the incoming mail actually resides? If they send it from one place does it send it in multiple versions such as plain text plus html plus some other graphic-ish code, but their yahoo account sends it in only one way. Are they including attachments some of the time, but not others? Do you have a message size limit set somewhere? Lots of things to check. Probably there are others too. ////jerry > > Thank > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 21:06:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D581B16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:06:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C1943D4C for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:06:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-169-72.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.169.72]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8994CA6C; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:15:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA5D5285D; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:04:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F397D4.5000008@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:06:28 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Barnes References: <005b01c6326e$0881e640$6400000a@ianb> In-Reply-To: <005b01c6326e$0881e640$6400000a@ianb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPPoE question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:06:23 -0000 My ppp.conf looks like this: default: qdsl: nat enable yes set device PPPoE:fxp1 add! default HISADDR set authname set authkey Maybe the missing "!" after the "add" keyword is the solution to your problem. Bjrn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 21:09:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB67616A422 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:09:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from techlist@bnetmd.net) Received: from ns1.bnetmd.net (ns1.BNETMD.NET [216.133.66.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560BD43D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:09:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from techlist@bnetmd.net) Received: from glenn (c-68-34-37-204.hsd1.md.comcast.net [68.34.37.204]) by ns1.bnetmd.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id k1FL8PwW055668 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:08:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from techlist@bnetmd.net) Message-ID: <002d01c63274$639f0980$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> From: "Glenn McCalley" To: References: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <43F3531E.8080205@cs.tu-berlin.de> <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <46981.4.17.250.5.1140036274.squirrel@webmail.psys.org> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:11:25 -0500 Organization: Business.Net LLC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Glenn McCalley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:09:03 -0000 > > > > > >> Glenn McCalley schrieb: > >> > >> > Is there a way to find out -which- -process- calls another process? > >> > >> Each process is associated with a parent; look at the ppid column: > >> > >> ps axo user,pid,ppid,command > >> > >> Bjrn > >> > >> > > Thanks, I stated the question poorly. My fault. > > Is historical info available and is it available by file name? > > > > I trying to find out (for example) what (unknown) program ran another > > (known) program between 0900 and 1000 yesterday - something like that. > > > > I've got a customer sending our emails that he shouldn't - I don't know > > which customer it is. The program that sends the mail is running as a cgi > > so it all shows up as user "nobody". > > > > If I can get a list of what programs, path and file name, called sendmail > > over (say) the last 24 hours, one of them should jump off the page with an > > unreasonable level of activitiy. > > > > The web server logs don't tell you anything in the URL data? A CGI script > usually has some parameters which might provide some assistance. > > brian > > > -- > Brian Sobolak > http://www.planetshwoop.com/ > > Thanks Brian, that's already tonights project to run through those logs and see if anything jumps out there. What I think he might be doing is either POSTing the parameters (which won't show up) or he's loaded a file of email addresses and just triggers the mailer with a simple cgi request. Either way he's got to be calling sendmail or mail to get it out the door I believe. Thanks! Glenn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 21:10:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE00016A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5AC43D55 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:10:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k1FLA4iU005134; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:10:04 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k1FLA4A5005133; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:10:04 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200602152110.k1FLA4A5005133@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: letter2steve@yahoo.com (Steve Quinn) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:10:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060215194046.6271.qmail@web51413.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: joe@netmusician.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:10:07 -0000 > > > Thanks Steve, but this is exactly the same script I've been using all > > along, while in Single User Mode. > > > > However, could you explain the zeroing of blocks, and what its > > purpose is for? Does this solve the problem of space being lost when > > cloning a disk to a larger disk? > > Hi Joe > > > Don't worry Joe, you are very very close > > Regarding zeroing empty or unused blocks, have a look at this > > http://www.digitalissues.co.uk/html/os/misc/partimage.html#22 If you use dump/restore, this does not apply at all. Dump/restore goes by file nodes and uses only the existing files starting with the base of the file system directory structure and will not write out anything that is not in the current file tree. Unless you are doing some experiment with sector mapping or some such, you don't really want to do a binary clone of a disk or file system. You want an functionally exact copy of the file system regardless of the size or geometry of the receiving disk. Dump/restore will give you that and the other cloning utilities such as thag G4... or even dd will not do that. ////jerry > > Regarding space lost cloning to a larger disk, zeroing unused blocks wont help that. Imagine your > 10GB FreeBSD hard disk is cloned with G4U to a 20GB hard disk. It will probably work great but > your 20GB disk is only half full. You will have to use growfs to expand a slice or create a new > partition to reclaim the empty space. Sorry, I have not tried this yet and have no experience. > > In cloning to a bigger disk, I prefer the dump/restore script method as I get to fully utilize the > larger disk capacity > > I hope this helps > > Take care > > Steve > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 21:19:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0147916A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:19:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA2743D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:19:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FLJaHw061093; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:19:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <43F39B57.3000405@wmptl.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:21:27 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn McCalley References: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <43F3531E.8080205@cs.tu-berlin.de> <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <46981.4.17.250.5.1140036274.squirrel@webmail.psys.org> <002d01c63274$639f0980$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> In-Reply-To: <002d01c63274$639f0980$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:19:43 -0000 Glenn McCalley wrote: >>> >>>>Glenn McCalley schrieb: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Is there a way to find out -which- -process- calls another process? >>>> >>>>Each process is associated with a parent; look at the ppid column: >>>> >>>> ps axo user,pid,ppid,command >>>> >>>>Bjrn >>>> >>>> >>> >>>Thanks, I stated the question poorly. My fault. >>>Is historical info available and is it available by file name? >>> >>>I trying to find out (for example) what (unknown) program ran another >>>(known) program between 0900 and 1000 yesterday - something like that. >>> >>>I've got a customer sending our emails that he shouldn't - I don't know >>>which customer it is. The program that sends the mail is running as a > > cgi > >>>so it all shows up as user "nobody". >>> >>>If I can get a list of what programs, path and file name, called > > sendmail > >>>over (say) the last 24 hours, one of them should jump off the page with > > an > >>>unreasonable level of activitiy. >>> >> >>The web server logs don't tell you anything in the URL data? A CGI script >>usually has some parameters which might provide some assistance. >> >>brian >> >> >>-- >>Brian Sobolak >>http://www.planetshwoop.com/ >> >> > > Thanks Brian, that's already tonights project to run through those logs and > see if anything jumps out there. What I think he might be doing is either > POSTing the parameters (which won't show up) or he's loaded a file of email > addresses and just triggers the mailer with a simple cgi request. Either > way he's got to be calling sendmail or mail to get it out the door I > believe. > Thanks! > Glenn. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Another option would be to search CGI directories and grep files for 'sendmail'.. if the CGI script calls sendmail externally and it's written in any non-compiled binary (usually are) - you should be able to grep 'sendmail' * in each cgi-enabled dir and find the cuplrit. I've had this happen quite often with my hosting customers, where they put up a simple Perl script that pipe's it's output to sendmail, and abusers (not customers), and someone embeds an email in the 'comments' field or similar by adding header fields. There are of course numerous ways to get around this. I find human-readable images are amongst the best way and are very easily implemented (took me a whole 20mins to write the code to do it generically accross all system for all hosting customers). (ie: http://www.wmptl.com/cgi-bin/contact.pl) - other ways include stripping colons from all fields returned via forms, etc. Just bear in mind, it may be a customer's script causing spam/etc... but may not be their intention nor fault either. You'll always do better to approach them with a solution than a complaint. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 21:32:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B49016A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:32:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lloyd.peterson@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A04443D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:32:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lloyd.peterson@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s19so1057853wxc for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:32:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uExOVib7MUJQomBgPAutEz58z35o5YYhGerOxlJ30h+liJ4w7YhQKn87Vj+m2K66+14pkfc0tS4s+E/zqxv0akWwUkNgX2hrkfbOfAO9ZEgS/H8e46IewyYnvevYJZ1ZjvgAtSyC6UvxwSjZ9cBhGOZTQ5XkKCyhNDl3gvq1aaM= Received: by 10.70.126.3 with SMTP id y3mr173436wxc; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:32:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.62.11 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:32:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <95550eab0602151332n20ff5e27w1ae17e9e114515b6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:32:36 -0500 From: Aaron Peterson To: Glenn McCalley In-Reply-To: <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <43F3531E.8080205@cs.tu-berlin.de> <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:32:38 -0000 On 2/15/06, Glenn McCalley wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bj=F6rn K=F6nig" > To: "Glenn McCalley" > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:13 AM > Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what > > > > Glenn McCalley schrieb: > > > > > Is there a way to find out -which- -process- calls another process? > > > > Each process is associated with a parent; look at the ppid column: > > > > ps axo user,pid,ppid,command > > > > Bj=F6rn > > > > > Thanks, I stated the question poorly. My fault. > Is historical info available and is it available by file name? > > I trying to find out (for example) what (unknown) program ran another > (known) program between 0900 and 1000 yesterday - something like that. > > I've got a customer sending our emails that he shouldn't - I don't know > which customer it is. The program that sends the mail is running as a cg= i > so it all shows up as user "nobody". > > If I can get a list of what programs, path and file name, called sendmail > over (say) the last 24 hours, one of them should jump off the page with a= n > unreasonable level of activitiy. > > Thanks! > Glenn. Perhaps I'm missing something, but if a script is being called via CGI it would need to be called by a process running as user "nobody" in your case (like a web server). In which case, you probably will never know who called it, but you might get their IP address from the web server access logs as has already been mentioned... If you have a server with multiple accounts for say, shared web hosting, you should definitely grep through their scripts for something like "mail" to look for the person who installed scripts with mailing functions...=20 anyhow, wish you luck :-) Aaron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 21:33:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF3616A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:33:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9062243D53 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:33:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 6336 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2006 21:33:55 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Feb 2006 21:33:55 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5AD9B28441; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:33:54 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "James Csoka" References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <040a01c6324a$f6dac920$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <20060215161255.GB70956@dan.emsphone.com> <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 15 Feb 2006 16:33:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Message-ID: <44hd702tod.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 8 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:33:57 -0000 "James Csoka" writes: > After reading the page you linked to, and looking at the examples, I added > the line To:user@example.com REJECT (using my personal email), and it had no > effect. I can't find any good reason it didn't work, but it fails to > prevent me from sending mail from inside my work network to my home address. Maybe putting an alias on the home address? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 21:37:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE1B16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:37:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from rader.servnow.com (rader.servnow.com [69.93.129.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC1043D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:37:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from 12-210-115-238.client.insightbb.com ([12.210.115.238]) by rader.servnow.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52) id 1F9UKx-0007AF-7K; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:37:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:37:27 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael L. Squires" X-X-Sender: mikes@familysquires.net To: Anthony Philipp In-Reply-To: <20060208085424.GT2679@zeus.itg.uiuc.edu> Message-ID: <20060215160953.L17196@familysquires.net> References: <20060208085424.GT2679@zeus.itg.uiuc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - rader.servnow.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - siralan.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: math/lapack (lapack-3.0) (unknown build error) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:37:38 -0000 On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Anthony Philipp wrote: > Hello, > > I was doing an upgrade today and one of the ports failed. I have > since checked /usr/ports/UPDATING, the mailing list and then > updated my ports tree again, all to no avail. Here is the error: > > --- > f77 -O -c ssyr2k.f > f77 -O -c strmm.f > f77 -O -c strsm.f > i386 cr ../../BLAS/SRC/libblas.a isamax.o sasum.o saxpy.o scopy.o sdot.o snrm2.o srot.o srotg.o sscal.o sswap.o lsame.o xerbla.o sgemv.o sgbmv.o ssymv.o ssbmv.o sspmv.o strmv.o stbmv.o stpmv.o strsv.o stbsv.o stpsv.o sger.o ssyr.o sspr.o ssyr2.o sspr2.o sgemm.o ssymm.o ssyrk.o ssyr2k.o strmm.o strsm.o > i386:No such file or directory > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/math/lapack/work/LAPACK/BLAS/SRC. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/math/lapack/work/LAPACK. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/math/lapack. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade78155.12 make > ** Fix the problem and try again. > ** Detected a package name change: libmikmod (audio/libmikmod) -> 'libmikmod-esound' (audio/libmikmod) > ** No need to upgrade 'libmikmod-3.1.11' (>= libmikmod-esound-3.1.11). (specify -f to force) > ** Detected a package name change: mpg123 (audio/mpg123) -> 'mpg123-esound' (audio/mpg123) > ** No need to upgrade 'mpg123-0.59r_17' (>= mpg123-esound-0.59r_17). (specify -f to force) > ** Detected a package name change: libao (audio/libao) -> 'libao-esound' (audio/libao) > ** No need to upgrade 'libao-0.8.5' (>= libao-esound-0.8.5). (specify -f to force) > ---> Skipping 'math/scilab' (scilab-3.1.1_1) because a requisite package 'lapack-3.0' (math/lapack) failed (specify -k to force) > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! math/lapack (lapack-3.0) (unknown build error) > * math/scilab (scilab-3.1.1_1) > ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 561 ignored, 1 skipped and 1 failed > --- > I have the same problem with 5.5-PRERELEASE. It's obvious that "i386" is being used instead of "ar" - the routine that creates libraries - but the problem is not in the source directory since using "make" there uses "ar" correctly. I suspect it has something to do with a patch that was reversed today, so you may want to re-cvsup your ports sources and try again - I am. Mike Squires From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 21:46:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AFB16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:46:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev02@kvanix.com) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FF843D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:46:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dev02@kvanix.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (83.250.224.223) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.070) id 43EC882100154D32 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:46:48 +0100 Message-ID: <43F3A151.9010108@kvanix.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:46:57 +0100 From: John S User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Help with the disappearing keys X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:46:50 -0000 When I start the system and get to the lines: Sun Feb 12 14:17:52 CET 2006 FreeBSD/i386 (jfs000) (ttyv0) login: I can type my login which is john, but I can also type the letters or . But as soon as I log in as john (or root) and see the message of the day and the prompt: $ I can no longer type or - all I get is beep for each key press for those keys. Note also that my /etc/rc.conf has the lines font8X8="iso-8x8" font8x14="iso-8x14" font8x16="iso-8x16" keymap="swedish.iso" Also I set up the login classes as per the handbook and that appearently went well. I use only USB mouse and keyboard and not AT keyboard or mouse. What is the difference in the keyboard (or console or terminal) before and after the logon? Grateful for any tips! Thanks! /John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 21:53:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6C516A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:53:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E51643D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:53:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from 35st-server.simplicato.com (static-71-249-233-130.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.249.233.130]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291BE808E; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:53:37 -0500 (EST) References: <20060207222202.GA8604@math.jussieu.fr> <20060208002642.GA7618@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <20060208201321.GA23773@math.jussieu.fr> <20060208202207.GA22164@alexis.mi.celestial.com> <004c01c62d25$1d893910$c801a8c0@nexpc> <05c201c631d9$2ab950d0$c801a8c0@nexpc> <064101c631fe$f02971e0$c801a8c0@nexpc> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Foo Ji-Haw Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:53:37 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd@celestial.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large imap server. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:53:38 -0000 Foo Ji-Haw writes: > I'm not sure what's the peak traffic like, but we were using a standard P3 > 800Mhz server h/w w/ 1GB RAM, and SCSI drives. How many of those? Also is that your front-end (ie POP/IMAP) machine or your storage (NFS server) machine? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 21:58:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C486B16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:58:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CCF43D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:58:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FLwAll062158; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:58:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <43F3A461.6090700@wmptl.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:00:01 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <040a01c6324a$f6dac920$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <20060215161255.GB70956@dan.emsphone.com> <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <44hd702tod.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44hd702tod.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:58:13 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "James Csoka" writes: > > >>After reading the page you linked to, and looking at the examples, I added >>the line To:user@example.com REJECT (using my personal email), and it had no >>effect. I can't find any good reason it didn't work, but it fails to >>prevent me from sending mail from inside my work network to my home address. > > > Maybe putting an alias on the home address? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > cd /etc/mail vi access make maps You probably forgot to 'make maps'. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 22:23:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED31F16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:23:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from letter2steve@yahoo.com) Received: from web51406.mail.yahoo.com (web51406.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3784843D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:23:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from letter2steve@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 6719 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Feb 2006 22:23:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=uHs2d/IArWwA7NvyosQVH7GVDIytm7sbz9gMcAVPDIot26AkgYY9u6Ess9+SBjgVT5lIO+lBJKo6wKW7g08U8UeDe7uS6fkqU324ghg6bm1SIOMQdJPsS10BxZGQqnSjBNUW9myUuy52+mWv3HNEVvtjWvsHosGqiClMuRii8dY= ; Message-ID: <20060215222337.6717.qmail@web51406.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [199.243.104.196] by web51406.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:23:37 PST Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:23:37 -0800 (PST) From: Steve Quinn To: Joe Auty In-Reply-To: <2DEE7242-F283-4C35-85B4-99847DE989A6@netmusician.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best approach to clone a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:23:41 -0000 --- Joe Auty wrote: > > It sort of helps, but sort of doesn't at the same time. I've tried > the dump command from the script using the correct slices, and still > had that kernel panic. I figured that using the Freesbie CD might be > a way of testing whether my install on my master/source drive was > somehow messed up, but I haven't gone very far with that (dump > reports "unsupported file system" errors). > > I've also looked at growfs, but I'm not entirely sure how to handle > the prequisite to using it which is using bsdlabel. It seems that > running bsdlabel within /stand/sysinstall doesn't recognize the free > space, so I can't create a new partition map that reflects this free > space. I'll keep working at it though... > > > Thanks for your help! > Hi Joe I didnt want to confuse you by adding the fact that dump/restore also eliminated the need to worry about empty blocks but I'm glad Jerry mentioned it. Thanks Jerry I hope that you have a better handle on this now Joe I'd be interested in seeing your /etc/fstab and script just to see if it's a simple typo or something. Take care Steve __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 22:30:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE4916A423 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:30:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james_mapson@umpquanet.com) Received: from ns.museum.rain.com (gw-ipinc.museum.rain.com [65.75.192.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA13A43D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:30:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james_mapson@umpquanet.com) Received: from ns.museum.rain.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.museum.rain.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1FMUAFr053322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:30:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@umpquanet.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.museum.rain.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1FMUA7c053321; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:30:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:30:10 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, James Csoka Message-ID: <20060215223010.GA53246@ns.museum.rain.com> References: <20060215162403.2494C16A422@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060215162403.2494C16A422@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on ns.museum.rain.com Cc: Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:30:26 -0000 > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:52:26 -0500 > From: "James Csoka" > Subject: Blocking an individual email address > To: > Message-ID: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I am running a FreeBSD 5.4p10 machine at my office. It functions as our firewall and mailserver. I am running Mailscanner, which invokes sendmail when necessary to process mail. Sendmail is not started by default....Mailscanner invokes individual instances of it when it needs to. > > Here is my problem. I have an employee at my office that is sending work email to her home email address. I need to find a way to block her email address, whether To, From, Cc, Bcc, or whatever, from passing through my mailserver. I have already added a line to /etc/mail/access (in the format email@address.com REJECT), and have run makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access. I tested this with my personal email address (external to my network), and it had the effect of blocking any email orginating from my personal email to any address at my work, however it does not prevent me from sending emails to this address from a work address, which is the whole point. > > Does anyone have any ideas? I could tag the address as spam, but I would rather not. There has to be a way to block anyone from sending to a certain email address, I would think. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > -Jim I am not a sendmail expert, but try adding this line to your sendmail.mc: FEATURE(blacklist_recipients) My understanding is that this causes blacklisted email addresses to be applied to both sender (which you verified, sending from your home personal address) and recipients (which you're trying to accomplish, blocking the employee's address when designated as a To:/Cc:/Bcc: recipient). Add that line, remembering to re-create your sendmail.cf, restart sendmail, and try again. Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 22:46:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9090F16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:46:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@cerebellum.za.net) Received: from elektra.opteqint.net (elektra.opteqint.net [209.25.178.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A44143D49 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:46:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@cerebellum.za.net) Received: from [165.146.68.18] (helo=ianb) by elektra.opteqint.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1F9VPR-0009YQ-Jy for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:46:07 -0800 From: "Ian Barnes" To: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:46:33 +0200 Message-ID: <007b01c63281$aebcb310$6400000a@ianb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYygas6zYGZmvvdTqOvi3BZevBttQ== Subject: Ethernet Stopping Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:46:41 -0000 Hi, I have a freebsd 5.2 box setup as my gateway for my home network. The network is layed out as follows: FreeBSD Gateway - 10.0.0.1/16 ADSL Router - 10.0.0.2/16 DHCP Network - 10.0.1.0 - 10.0.1.254 all /16 with default gateway as .1 I have ppp enabled on the freebsd unit, and it connects fine and then everything works perfectly for anything between 5 and 10 minutes. At this stage, the freebsd machine cant get to the 10.0.1.0 network anymore. It can still ping 10.0.0.2 fine and its connection to the internet remains perfect. It just wont let anyone else come in from anywhere else on the network. It kills all SSH sessions, web sessions etc. I replaced the ifac card with an ed0 card, and also replaced cables and the switch in between. The card in question is both a dc0 and an ed0 card which I have swapped into another PCI port and it still does the same thing there. Below is an ifconfig: ed0: flags=108843 mtu 1500 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.0.255.255 ether 00:c0:df:fa:b8:74 plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 tun0: flags=8051 mtu 1492 inet 165.x.x.x --> 165.x.x.x netmask 0xffffffff Opened by PID 218 [root@gateway] ~ # Here is a rc.conf: [root@gateway] ~ # cat /etc/rc.conf defaultrouter="10.0.0.2" hostname="gateway.domain.local" ifconfig_ed0="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0" saver="logo" sshd_enable="NO" usbd_enable="YES" blanktime="3600" apache2_enable="YES" mysql_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="NONE" gateway_enable="YES" inetd_enable="NO" kern_securelevel_enable="NO" ppp_enable="YES" ppp_nat="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_profile="dsl1" dhcpd_enable="YES" dhcpd_flags="-q" dhcpd_conf="/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf" dhcpd_ifaces="ed0" [root@gateway] ~ # I don't have any sysctl rules in place, and everything else about this unit is standard. I am not running a firewall at this stage and was just wondering what the cause of this problem could be? Cheers Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 23:05:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F2016A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:05:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AF143D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:05:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from localhost (terrapin.inter-sonic.com [172.16.1.12]) by neonpark.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF94818E23 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:05:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F3B3BC.2070109@intersonic.se> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:05:32 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Subject: Weird KDE error - nss_ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:05:41 -0000 Running 6.1-STABLE, KDE 3.5.1, xorg 6.9.0. cvsupped and portupgraded this morning just to be sure. When in konqueror using the "root file system" view, if I click on /home, nothing happens. All other directories are displayed ok. In the terminal that started X I note the following cryptic message: Assertion failed: (cfg->ldc_uris[__session.ls_current_uri] != NULL), function do_init, file ldap-nss.c, line 1245. kioslave: ####### CRASH ###### protocol = file pid = 93413 signal = 6 The file ldap-nss.c is part of the nss_ldap port. This is my workstation at home, and it uses LDAP through PAM for authentication. If I take out the references to ldap in nsswitch.conf, the problem goes away. It may be just me who misconfigured the system but it did start after a major system/ports upgrade round about a week ago. Could someone shed some light please? Per olof -- nsswitch.conf: passwd: files [NOTFOUND=continue] ldap group: files [NOTFOUND=continue] ldap shells: files [NOTFOUND=continue] ldap hosts: files dns From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 23:28:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D049416A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:28:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664F143D46 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:28:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060215232810.RYOU13051.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:28:10 -0500 From: To: "Ian Barnes" , Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:28:05 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: <005b01c6326e$0881e640$6400000a@ianb> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: PPPoE question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:28:12 -0000 Ian, This is what works for most people. Doing nat in pppoe is not normally done. Doing nat as part of your firewall process is the accepted place. And I see no reason to have compiled NETGRAPH in your kernel. PPPoE, ppp.conf statements for DSL connection #################### start of DSL ppp.conf ################### default: set log Phase tun #use to avoid excessive log sizes set timeout 0 # no idle time out, will not disconnect dialisp: set device PPPoE:XXX # replace xxx with your NIC device name set authname YOURLOGINNAME # Replace with your ISP account username set authkey YOURPASSWORD # Replace with your ISP account password add default HISADDR # Add a (sticky) default route (Mandatory) enable dns # Gets the ISP's DNS IP address & places them # in resolv.conf for reference by FBSD box. ############### End of DSL ppp.conf ################################# Replace the XXX in the [set device PPPoE:XXX] statement with the NIC's FBSD interface name. Sometimes it will be necessary to use a service tag to establish your connection depending on how your ISP and/or the phone company has its DSL network configured. Service tags are used to distinguish between different PPPoE servers attached to a given network. You should have been given any required service tag information in the documentation provided by your ISP. If you cannot locate it there, ask your ISP's tech support personnel. This is the format of the command with the service tag added: set device PPPoE:xxxx:service_tag The xxxx is the FBSD interface name used by PPPoE. The interface must be UP (IE: enabled). It is only used as a transport, and does not need to be assigned an IP address. This can be done automatically at boot time by updating the /etc/rc.conf file. The format of the statement to add is ifconfig_xxxx=up where xxxx is the NIC's FBSD interface name used by PPPoE that you specified in the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file. ee /etc/rc.conf # add following statements ifconfig_xxxx=up ifconfig_tun0="DHCP" # get your ISP assigned IP address To setup user ppp to dial your ISP automatically at FBSD boot time, you have to add the following statements to the rc.conf file. The ddial option means to redial every time the connection to the ISP gets dropped. ee /etc/rc.conf # Activate user ppp auto start at boot time ppp_enable="YES" # Start User PPP task ppp_mode="ddial" # ddial, auto, background ppp_profile="dialisp" # section in ppp.conf to exec -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ian Barnes Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:26 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: PPPoE question Hi, I am trying to setup my pppoe connection and I keep getting the following error: Gateway ppp[526]: tun0: Error: ipcp_InterfaceUP: unable to set ip address My ppp.conf looks something like this: default: nat enable yes nat same_ports yes nat use_sockets yes nat unregistered_only yes dsl1: set log Phase Chat tun command set mru 1492 set mtu 1492 set device PPPoE:dc0 # Where xl0 is your NIC code set authname online321996@domain.com set authkey password set dial set login set timeout 120 set ifaddr 10.10.0.1/0 10.10.0.2/0 add default HISADDR I have the following options compiled into my kernel: #PPPOE stuff options NETGRAPH options NETGRAPH_SOCKET options NETGRAPH_PPPOE options NETGRAPH_ETHER options PPP_DEFLATE I run ppp: ppp -nat -ddial dsl1. It tries to connect, but I keep getting that error. Any ideas ? Cheers Ian _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 23:40:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6986A16A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:40:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AA543D45 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:40:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060215234052.YHIT25152.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:40:52 -0500 From: To: "Andrew Pantyukhin" , "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:40:52 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: natd with several alias IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:40:54 -0000 I am not sure just what you are asking about. Are you saying that you have 4 static public ip address assigned to you by your ISP and you want to round robin those 4 in the NATing process to your hundreds of LAN users? If that's what you are after then any of FreeBSD's 3 built in firewall can do that by how you code the NAT statements. Read the handbook firewall ipfilter section for details. There is no special tricks or need for several NATed process. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Andrew Pantyukhin Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:45 PM To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: natd with several alias IPs I wonder, what tricks do you use to use more than one alias IP? I mean, if you have hundreds of hosts behind your firewall, what can you do to alias some of them to one ip, others to another and so on. I know pf can probably do it in a better fashion, I just wonder how we can do it with natd. Several natd processes? Some other tricks? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 23:52:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF28716A420 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:52:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A35043D48 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:52:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060215235236.ZFHZ25152.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:52:36 -0500 From: To: "Ian Barnes" , Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:52:35 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: <007b01c63281$aebcb310$6400000a@ianb> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Ethernet Stopping Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:52:38 -0000 Need more background info. Explain where you are getting the public non-routable 10.0.0.0 ip address from. You say the ADSL router is using them. Did you edit your real ip address to hide then from this public post? Also you have to post your ppp.conf file. Are you trying to configure PPPoe? -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ian Barnes Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:47 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Ethernet Stopping Problem Hi, I have a freebsd 5.2 box setup as my gateway for my home network. The network is layed out as follows: FreeBSD Gateway - 10.0.0.1/16 ADSL Router - 10.0.0.2/16 DHCP Network - 10.0.1.0 - 10.0.1.254 all /16 with default gateway as .1 I have ppp enabled on the freebsd unit, and it connects fine and then everything works perfectly for anything between 5 and 10 minutes. At this stage, the freebsd machine cant get to the 10.0.1.0 network anymore. It can still ping 10.0.0.2 fine and its connection to the internet remains perfect. It just wont let anyone else come in from anywhere else on the network. It kills all SSH sessions, web sessions etc. I replaced the ifac card with an ed0 card, and also replaced cables and the switch in between. The card in question is both a dc0 and an ed0 card which I have swapped into another PCI port and it still does the same thing there. Below is an ifconfig: ed0: flags=108843 mtu 1500 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.0.255.255 ether 00:c0:df:fa:b8:74 plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 tun0: flags=8051 mtu 1492 inet 165.x.x.x --> 165.x.x.x netmask 0xffffffff Opened by PID 218 [root@gateway] ~ # Here is a rc.conf: [root@gateway] ~ # cat /etc/rc.conf defaultrouter="10.0.0.2" hostname="gateway.domain.local" ifconfig_ed0="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0" saver="logo" sshd_enable="NO" usbd_enable="YES" blanktime="3600" apache2_enable="YES" mysql_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="NONE" gateway_enable="YES" inetd_enable="NO" kern_securelevel_enable="NO" ppp_enable="YES" ppp_nat="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_profile="dsl1" dhcpd_enable="YES" dhcpd_flags="-q" dhcpd_conf="/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf" dhcpd_ifaces="ed0" [root@gateway] ~ # I don't have any sysctl rules in place, and everything else about this unit is standard. I am not running a firewall at this stage and was just wondering what the cause of this problem could be? Cheers Ian _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 00:11:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E85516A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:11:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brent@jeneral.com) Received: from jeneral.com (216-19-202-150.getnet.net [216.19.202.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE86243D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:11:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brent@jeneral.com) Received: (qmail 49121 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 00:11:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mickey.jensenet.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.localdomain with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 00:11:16 -0000 Received: (from vpopmail@localhost) by mickey.jensenet.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k1G0B04O049104; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:11:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from brent@jeneral.com) Message-Id: <200602160011.k1G0B04O049104@mickey.jensenet.com> X-Authentication-Warning: mickey.jensenet.com: vpopmail set sender to brent@jeneral.com using -f From: "brent" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:11:00 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: ethernet Interface haywire ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:11:17 -0000 Has anyone run into this scenario where a BSD Box (RELENG_5_4) takes down= the whole subnet for only FreeBSD boxes. Here=E2=80=99s the scenario: One= of my web servers goes into a crazy state which kills all traffic on the networ= k for only FreeBSD boxes. Linux boxes can talk to other linux boxes, but FreeBSD boxes are dead. You can ping a FreeBSD box (from linux) but servi= ces such as SSH go half-way and never completely connect. Other services such= as http don=E2=80=99t work either. Rebooting that offending box fixes the p= roblem. I=E2=80=99ve seen this once it a great moon; however, it recently happene= d two days in a row. Any suggestions would be appreciated. I have other RELENG_5_4 and RELENG_6_0 boxes that don=E2=80=99t seem to be the culprit= , as well as an identical hardware box running RELENG_6_0. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 00:16:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C0716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:16:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C7A43D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:16:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z3so51357nzf for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:16:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nfVUaCmxXJhzp8B831YTSg6kO8pyGoiPR4KgEDhJX1Vhyqjxt2z5eYERYejqHS05Lg5wcYPEsmhF8heAcOY/faKKSaRVhudEcLonF+Zf4AcpcfacnnkfjBgBTbkcKGBZYgC4HayUhOO/yv/yKYxBLvt1uC7EhZXX0VpIIenOzQI= Received: by 10.36.251.68 with SMTP id y68mr456505nzh; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:16:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.11 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:16:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:16:21 +0300 From: Andrew Pantyukhin To: bob@a1poweruser.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: natd with several alias IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:16:23 -0000 On 2/16/06, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > I am not sure just what you are asking about. > > Are you saying that you have 4 static public ip address assigned to > you by your ISP and you want to round robin those 4 in the NATing > process to your hundreds of LAN users? > > If that's what you are after then any of FreeBSD's 3 built in > firewall can do that by how you code the NAT statements. Read the > handbook firewall ipfilter section for details. There is no special > tricks or need for several NATed process. I'm quite aware of the fact that both pf and ipf have mature nat frameworks. The question is, how to do that with natd (and ipfw). Could you be so kind and throw an example of a round-robin setup without several natd processes, 'cuz I can hardly imagine that? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 00:20:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0D116A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:20:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net (smtp2.suscom.net [64.78.83.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F91A43D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:20:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp2.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06811CD578 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:16:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31698-09 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:16:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 320251CD490 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:16:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss [192.168.0.4]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1G0KMLG004935 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:20:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:20:25 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom In-Reply-To: <20060215223010.GA53246@ns.museum.rain.com> References: <20060215162403.2494C16A422@hub.freebsd.org> <20060215223010.GA53246@ns.museum.rain.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060215191757.EF95.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1289/Tue Feb 14 09:36:44 2006 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:20:38 -0000 James Long wrote: > > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:52:26 -0500 > > From: "James Csoka" > > Subject: Blocking an individual email address > > To: > > Message-ID: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > I am running a FreeBSD 5.4p10 machine at my office. It functions as our firewall and mailserver. I am running Mailscanner, which invokes sendmail when necessary to process mail. Sendmail is not started by default....Mailscanner invokes individual instances of it when it needs to. > > > > Here is my problem. I have an employee at my office that is sending work email to her home email address. I need to find a way to block her email address, whether To, From, Cc, Bcc, or whatever, from passing through my mailserver. I have already added a line to /etc/mail/access (in the format email@address.com REJECT), and have run makemap hash /etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access. I tested this with my personal email address (external to my network), and it had the effect of blocking any email orginating from my personal email to any address at my work, however it does not prevent me from sending emails to this address from a work address, which is the whole point. > > > > Does anyone have any ideas? I could tag the address as spam, but I would rather not. There has to be a way to block anyone from sending to a certain email address, I would think. > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > -Jim > > I am not a sendmail expert, but try adding this line to your sendmail.mc: > > FEATURE(blacklist_recipients) > > My understanding is that this causes blacklisted email addresses to be > applied to both sender (which you verified, sending from your home personal > address) and recipients (which you're trying to accomplish, blocking the > employee's address when designated as a To:/Cc:/Bcc: recipient). > > Add that line, remembering to re-create your sendmail.cf, restart sendmail, > and try again. > > Jim Well, if you want a positive solution, you could just dismiss her. It would seem that you have good cause. Simply document that you have instructed her to cease abusing the email system. Then when she does violate your orders, terminate her. -- Gerard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 00:25:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B66816A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFEC43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:25:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1G0OxL0039844; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:24:59 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060215182336.02670aa8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:24:52 -0600 To: "James Csoka" , From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:25:21 -0000 If you installed MailScanner from the ports, look to change: /usr/local/etc/MailScanner/rules/spam.blacklist.rules You can specify To, and From rules, there, maybe more. I am no expert. Hope this helps, -Derek At 09:52 AM 2/15/2006, James Csoka wrote: >I am running a FreeBSD 5.4p10 machine at my office. It functions as our >firewall and mailserver. I am running Mailscanner, which invokes sendmail >when necessary to process mail. Sendmail is not started by >default....Mailscanner invokes individual instances of it when it needs to. > >Here is my problem. I have an employee at my office that is sending work >email to her home email address. I need to find a way to block her email >address, whether To, From, Cc, Bcc, or whatever, from passing through my >mailserver. I have already added a line to /etc/mail/access (in the >format email@address.com REJECT), and have run makemap hash >/etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access. I tested this with my personal >email address (external to my network), and it had the effect of blocking >any email orginating from my personal email to any address at my work, >however it does not prevent me from sending emails to this address from a >work address, which is the whole point. > >Does anyone have any ideas? I could tag the address as spam, but I would >rather not. There has to be a way to block anyone from sending to a >certain email address, I would think. > >Any help would be appreciated. > >-Jim >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 00:26:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D63C16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:26:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfalconer@puc.edu) Received: from ecf.puc.edu (ecf2.puc.edu [12.16.216.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A4E43D4C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:26:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfalconer@puc.edu) Received: from localhost (jfalconer@localhost) by ecf.puc.edu (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id k1G0QEC15138 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:26:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:26:12 -0800 (PST) From: Jon Falconer To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: slapd and bdb-4.2.52 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:26:20 -0000 Knowledgeable Ones, I'm setting up a FreeBSD 6.0 RELEASE system. I've installed from ports: courier-authlib-0.58_1 courier-imap-4.0.6_1,1 cyrus-sasl-2.1.21_2 db42-4.2.52_4 openldap-sasl-client-2.2.30 openldap-sasl-server-2.2.30 openssl-stable-0.9.7i postfix-2.2.8_2,1 and other related ports. While starting slapd I get the following log entries: Feb 15 15:24:38 ecf3 slapd[23761]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.2.30 (Feb 2 2006 17:42:01) $ sysadmin@ecf3.puc.edu:/usr/ports/net/openldap22-sasl-server/work/openldap-2.2.30/servers/slapd Feb 15 15:24:38 ecf3 slapd[23761]: bdb_db_init: Initializing BDB database Feb 15 15:24:38 ecf3 slapd[23762]: slapd starting Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 fd=10 ACCEPT from IP=127.0.0.1:55323 (IP=0.0.0.0:389) Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=0 BIND dn="cn=admin,dc=ds,dc=puc,dc=edu" method=128 Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=0 BIND dn="cn=admin,dc=ds,dc=puc,dc=edu" mech=SIMPLE ssf=0 Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=1 SRCH base="dc=ds,dc=puc,dc=edu" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: bdb(dc=ds,dc=puc,dc=edu): illegal flag specified to txn_begin Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: bdb_txn_get: BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 library needs TXN patch! Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=7 text= Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=2 UNBIND Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 fd=10 closed Note the complaint about needing a TXN patch. I looked at the four available patched for db-4.2.52 on sleepycat.com and none seemed related to TXN. Can this error be ignored? does anyone know how to fix it? TIA Jon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 00:26:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF8716A43D for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:26:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEA743D75 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:26:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B01E62C9BC for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:26:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64518-04 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:26:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4231A62C9B9 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:26:33 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B21F13B466; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:26:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CBF374C0 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:26:36 -0400 (AST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:26:36 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060215202527.E60635@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: devfs ruleset appropriate for jail'd environment ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:26:35 -0000 I had thought there used to be a sample one in /etc/devfs.conf, but its either no longer there, or my memory is failing me ... Does anyone have one that is appropriate for mounting devfs into a jail where ppl have shell access? thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 00:33:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEDE16A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:33:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7264643D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:33:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 84266 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Feb 2006 00:33:27 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=k+r3ksQ10NnpzqQhWzG1vH35kZtcn8YoBW9iO5XHhd4lohusB7ff3n+7sqg/Nmuiv9jUQ+qNSk0PYTy2rV0r/bf26H8YldiuoYR69KUFuYE9ko3bSweqCPhNuAVm1o3xSWq0rA4v3odgmT6Zv7LU+K1MqbM6mKnF2laacQD1yxE= ; Message-ID: <20060216003327.84264.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [207.252.75.232] by web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:33:27 PST Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:33:27 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: brent , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <200602160011.k1G0B04O049104@mickey.jensenet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: ethernet Interface haywire ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:33:29 -0000 I've seen it happen when the ethernet device gets a bus error and throws it into some strange state. I've seen it mostly with on-board intel devices (fxp), but thats what we use mostly so it may not be part specific. DT --- brent wrote: > Has anyone run into this scenario where a BSD > Box (RELENG_5_4) takes down > the whole subnet for only FreeBSD boxes. > Here’s the scenario: One of my > web servers goes into a crazy state which kills > all traffic on the network > for only FreeBSD boxes. Linux boxes can talk > to other linux boxes, but > FreeBSD boxes are dead. You can ping a FreeBSD > box (from linux) but services > such as SSH go half-way and never completely > connect. Other services such as > http don’t work either. Rebooting that > offending box fixes the problem. > I’ve seen this once it a great moon; however, > it recently happened two > days in a row. Any suggestions would be > appreciated. I have other > RELENG_5_4 and RELENG_6_0 boxes that don’t > seem to be the culprit, as well > as an identical hardware box running > RELENG_6_0. Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 00:36:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9744216A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:36:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35F9943D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:36:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 1556 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Feb 2006 00:36:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OGa/cZxtXpEU/2on+Q9ZbmyNFk/hUOO72Iakhb+Pa/hdmQoy5DoVnXLjWHuV9IllD+PCOf84ekDqXe6cO2iuH+gYjFQtOCFkU9OctUxybx0YT+jZHlAZ33JdYn7Qcxd4mJJgY4ebp3HNe8xNnXUSeBXfYTGK2YrDM2hlRRE7tsk= ; Message-ID: <20060216003629.1554.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [207.252.75.232] by web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:36:29 PST Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:36:29 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: bob@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: RE: Ethernet Stopping Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:36:30 -0000 Things that stop after 5-10 minutes are usually ARP related, but I can't be certain. --- bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > Need more background info. > Explain where you are getting the public > non-routable 10.0.0.0 ip > address from. > You say the ADSL router is using them. > Did you edit your real ip address to hide then > from this public > post? > Also you have to post your ppp.conf file. > Are you trying to configure PPPoe? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On > Behalf Of Ian Barnes > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:47 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Ethernet Stopping Problem > > > Hi, > > I have a freebsd 5.2 box setup as my gateway > for my home network. > The > network is layed out as follows: > > FreeBSD Gateway - 10.0.0.1/16 > ADSL Router - 10.0.0.2/16 > > DHCP Network - 10.0.1.0 - 10.0.1.254 all /16 > with default gateway as > .1 > > I have ppp enabled on the freebsd unit, and it > connects fine and > then > everything works perfectly for anything between > 5 and 10 minutes. At > this > stage, the freebsd machine cant get to the > 10.0.1.0 network anymore. > It can > still ping 10.0.0.2 fine and its connection to > the internet remains > perfect. > It just wont let anyone else come in from > anywhere else on the > network. It > kills all SSH sessions, web sessions etc. I > replaced the ifac card > with an > ed0 card, and also replaced cables and the > switch in between. > > The card in question is both a dc0 and an ed0 > card which I have > swapped into > another PCI port and it still does the same > thing there. Below is an > ifconfig: > > ed0: > flags=108843 > mtu 1500 > inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffff0000 > broadcast 10.0.255.255 > ether 00:c0:df:fa:b8:74 > plip0: > flags=108810 mtu > 1500 > lo0: flags=8049 > mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > tun0: > flags=8051 > mtu 1492 > inet 165.x.x.x --> 165.x.x.x netmask > 0xffffffff > Opened by PID 218 > [root@gateway] ~ # > > > Here is a rc.conf: > [root@gateway] ~ # cat /etc/rc.conf > defaultrouter="10.0.0.2" > hostname="gateway.domain.local" > ifconfig_ed0="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask > 255.255.0.0" > saver="logo" > sshd_enable="NO" > usbd_enable="YES" > blanktime="3600" > apache2_enable="YES" > mysql_enable="YES" > sendmail_enable="NONE" > gateway_enable="YES" > inetd_enable="NO" > kern_securelevel_enable="NO" > ppp_enable="YES" > ppp_nat="YES" > ppp_mode="ddial" > ppp_profile="dsl1" > dhcpd_enable="YES" > dhcpd_flags="-q" > dhcpd_conf="/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf" > dhcpd_ifaces="ed0" > [root@gateway] ~ # > > > I don't have any sysctl rules in place, and > everything else about > this unit > is standard. > > I am not running a firewall at this stage and > was just wondering > what the > cause of this problem could be? > > Cheers > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 00:49:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D298216A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:49:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7760D43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:49:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k1G0muR4066441; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:48:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43F3CBF8.2070703@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:48:56 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn McCalley References: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <43F3531E.8080205@cs.tu-berlin.de> <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <46981.4.17.250.5.1140036274.squirrel@webmail.psys.org> <002d01c63274$639f0980$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> In-Reply-To: <002d01c63274$639f0980$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:49:00 -0000 Glenn McCalley wrote: > Thanks Brian, that's already tonights project to run through those logs and > see if anything jumps out there. What I think he might be doing is either > POSTing the parameters (which won't show up) or he's loaded a file of email > addresses and just triggers the mailer with a simple cgi request. Either > way he's got to be calling sendmail or mail to get it out the door I > believe. Actually, they can use a number of other ways to create the outbound SMTP connections. Perl, for instance, offers the Net::SMTP module (and numerous others that'd do the trick). They don't need to call on binaries outside of their own cgi-bin or leave any tracks for you other than a web access log entry. You might consider putting your customers in jails with unique IP numbers as a way to better strain out whose CGI is the source of what packets on your network. Probably not a trivial change to your working environment, but maybe worth it in the long run. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 00:50:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0161716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:50:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D32643D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:50:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060216005001.YRMN13051.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:50:01 -0500 From: To: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:49:59 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: RE: natd with several alias IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:50:02 -0000 I am not a ipfw expert. The truth of it is I was a ipfw user before I added a LAN behind my gateway box. Ipfw does it's nating from within ipfw and that it what makes ipfw nating so hard to get right. It's even harder if you use keep state processing. Ipfilter and PF do the nating separate from the firewall so the firewall always sees the true LAN packets. For that reason I now use ipfilter. Your ipfw question may get better answers from the ipfw questions list. In reading your original post it was not clear to me that you had to do this using ipfw. I read it as you were asking if it could be done at all. Using alias ip's is not the correct term I believe. Good luck finding a ipfw solution. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Andrew Pantyukhin Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:16 PM To: bob@a1poweruser.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: natd with several alias IPs On 2/16/06, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > I am not sure just what you are asking about. > > Are you saying that you have 4 static public ip address assigned to > you by your ISP and you want to round robin those 4 in the NATing > process to your hundreds of LAN users? > > If that's what you are after then any of FreeBSD's 3 built in > firewall can do that by how you code the NAT statements. Read the > handbook firewall ipfilter section for details. There is no special > tricks or need for several NATed process. I'm quite aware of the fact that both pf and ipf have mature nat frameworks. The question is, how to do that with natd (and ipfw). Could you be so kind and throw an example of a round-robin setup without several natd processes, 'cuz I can hardly imagine that? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 01:11:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0666316A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:11:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1B943D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:11:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z31so28392nzd for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:11:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tw2J0RmlbLqUL2M88tzM10wzEi/58XxE1bXkdn1FVVuvlytv6Nl8FUywW0p9CMOo3Cxl2b6Mc6EHt+aPta/HUe9PjV2m2dZje0tNYev9nJKXr9JK//6BqNXjDe4wqQtkLeuI85kPARvvqRV0P7VQdnrVNdl7zWJInPGibZF9y0w= Received: by 10.36.65.9 with SMTP id n9mr465352nza; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:11:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.11 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:11:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:11:37 +0300 From: Andrew Pantyukhin To: bob@a1poweruser.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: natd with several alias IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:11:42 -0000 On 2/16/06, bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > I am not a ipfw expert. The truth of it is I was a ipfw user before > I added a LAN behind my gateway box. Ipfw does it's nating from > within ipfw and that it what makes ipfw nating so hard to get right. > It's even harder if you use keep state processing. Ipfilter and PF > do the nating separate from the firewall so the firewall always sees > the true LAN packets. For that reason I now use ipfilter. Your ipfw > question may get better answers from the ipfw questions list. In > reading your original post it was not clear to me that you had to do > this using ipfw. I read it as you were asking if it could be done at > all. Using alias ip's is not the correct term I believe. > Good luck finding a ipfw solution. I'm afraid you've got it all a little bit wrong. It's pf and ipf that have built-in nat facilites. ipfw uses divert sockets and an external natd process (so when one says natd, it's clear that he's dealing with ipfw). Alias ip is a natd term. Thanks anyway From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 01:58:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276FF16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:58:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brent@jeneral.com) Received: from jeneral.com (216-19-202-150.getnet.net [216.19.202.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADBC143D49 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:58:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brent@jeneral.com) Received: (qmail 62044 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 01:58:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mickey.jensenet.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.localdomain with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 01:58:22 -0000 Received: (from vpopmail@localhost) by mickey.jensenet.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k1G1w6Td062022; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:58:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from brent@jeneral.com) Message-Id: <200602160158.k1G1w6Td062022@mickey.jensenet.com> X-Authentication-Warning: mickey.jensenet.com: vpopmail set sender to brent@jeneral.com using -f References: <20060216003327.84264.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060216003327.84264.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: "brent" To: danial_thom@yahoo.com Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:58:06 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ethernet Interface haywire ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:58:23 -0000 Thanks--the server has em (intel gigabit) nics. Have you seen this on any= specific version of FreeBSD and *hopefully* not on others (e.g. RELENG_6_= 0)? Brent Danial Thom writes: > I've seen it happen when the ethernet device gets > a bus error and throws it into some strange > state. I've seen it mostly with on-board intel > devices (fxp), but thats what we use mostly so it > may not be part specific. > > DT > > --- brent wrote: > >> Has anyone run into this scenario where a BSD >> Box (RELENG_5_4) takes down >> the whole subnet for only FreeBSD boxes. >> Here=C3=A2=C2=80=C2=99s the scenario: One of my >> web servers goes into a crazy state which kills >> all traffic on the network >> for only FreeBSD boxes. Linux boxes can talk >> to other linux boxes, but >> FreeBSD boxes are dead. You can ping a FreeBSD >> box (from linux) but services >> such as SSH go half-way and never completely >> connect. Other services such as >> http don=C3=A2=C2=80=C2=99t work either. Rebooting that >> offending box fixes the problem. >> I=C3=A2=C2=80=C2=99ve seen this once it a great moon; however, >> it recently happened two >> days in a row. Any suggestions would be >> appreciated. I have other >> RELENG_5_4 and RELENG_6_0 boxes that don=C3=A2=C2=80=C2=99t >> seem to be the culprit, as well >> as an identical hardware box running >> RELENG_6_0. Thanks. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 02:03:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B39E16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:03:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2BB43D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:03:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix, from userid 1022) id 8AF7E1768E; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:03:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8997017128 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:03:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:03:26 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060215210248.P47621@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: ng_one2many v.s. AFT (NIC Fault Tolerance/Fail Over/Redundancy Revisited) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:03:20 -0000 FYI, to bring this thread back to the list ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:53:59 -0500 (EST) From: Brian A. Seklecki To: Jonathan Donaldson , glebius@freebsd.org, glebius@cell.sick.ru Cc: jks@clickcom.com, Brian J. Creasy , Chad Ziccardi , Danny Howard , Brad Bendy Subject: Re: ng_one2many v.s. AFT (NIC Fault Tolerance/Fail Over/Redundancy Revisited) (fwd) On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Jonathan Donaldson wrote: > Take a look here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=607312+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2004/cvs-all/20041128.cvs-all > Yea, I see it now. Sorry. I'm CC'ing the developer who commited the changes, and the the MFC. The man page needs to be updated, and it should mention your caveat. I got caught by your caveat with the one-link-down-at-boot. However, the code begins to work after bringing up the down link, as if it would if they were both active at boot, which is good. Where I got tripped up was that I thought that quote: "The node listens to flow control message from many hooks, and considers link failed if NGM_LINK_IS_DOWN is received.", Where "Flow Control Messages" I interrpted that as something on the wire like a STP/802.1q BPDU. Apparently, it's really an In-Kernel event related to the new ethernet link-state code in 6.x, or maybe just glorrified poll()'ing. Either way, it works well. Sorry for jumping the gun. ~lava P.S., in 7.0-CURRENT, there appears to be an import of the OpenBSD bridge(4) to relate the old-school "options BRIDGE" code. This one being 802.1q STP aware. When 7.x becomes release production, I suspect I'll end up using that instead since it works so well with NetBSD/OpenBSD for HA ethernet, plus I'd rather have a PVST+ Cisco switch make the packet forwarding the decisions >:} ~lava > and then look here: > > http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/netgraph/ng_one2many.h?v=RELENG6 > > > 65 /* Algorithms for detecting link failure (XXX only one so far) */ > 66 #define NG_ONE2MANY_FAIL_MANUAL 1 /* use enabledLinks[] > array */ > 67 #define NG_ONE2MANY_FAIL_NOTIFY 2 /* listen to flow control > msgs */ > > > so set your fail alg to 2 and see if you see the messages and failover... > > > > On Feb 15, 2006, at 8:11 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > >> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Brian J. Creasy wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Brian A. Seklecki wrote: >>> | >>> | Johnathan's comments suggest that we may need to move to 6.x on the >>> | production cluster. >>> | >>> | 6.x has been upgraded from a technology release to stable, and our goal >>> | is stability. >>> | >>> | Brian: What are you thoughts so far on the 6.x experience? >>> >>> no complaints here.. though, i have it running only on my laptop and >> >> ....Okay. >> >> | As of Freebsd 6_0 (which is at RC1 now), the NG_ONE2MANY does >> | support the failure of a link which does not end up with 50% packet >> | loss. There is new code in the One2Many module that xmits a layer 2 "I'm >> | alive" broadcast out all links, as long as this is picked up on the >> | other links, then all interfaces are considered alive. If one of the >> | packets is not received, then after 2 x heartbeat duration that link is >> | considered "down". I have tested this in the 6.0 code and it works with >> | one caveat. When the server is brought up, both interfaces must be >> | connected and live, or for some reason, the failure algorithm never >> | seems to kick in. I saw exactly what you saw in 5.4 and newer with >> | regards to the 50% packet loss. >> >> Jonathan: >> >> I'm not sure where you got the info about this. Accoring to the >> NG_ONE2MANY(4) page in CVS -rHEAD (-CURRENT): >> >> "Currently, the valid settings for the xmitAlg field are >> NG_ONE2MANY_XMIT_ROUNDROBIN (default) or NG_ONE2MANY_XMIT_ALL. The only >> valid setting for failAlg is NG_ONE2MANY_FAIL_MANUAL; this is also the >> default setting." >> >> I have 6.1-BETA1 on a box right now and I've got my config setup for >> NG_ONE2MANY_XMIT_ROUNDROBIN + NG_ONE2MANY_FAIL_NOTIFY and I don't see any >> layer2 heartbeat related traffic (watching via tcpdump(8) on another >> machine in the same segment) >> >> Can you share what you saw? >> >> ~lava >> >>> |> mission critical environment). >>> |> - Xmit-All causes twice as much load on to be placed on the switch >>> |> /fabric and switch CPU. >>> |> >>> | >>> | As of Freebsd 6_0 (which is at RC1 now), the NG_ONE2MANY does >>> | support the failure of a link which does not end up with 50% packet >>> | loss. There is new code in the One2Many module that xmits a layer 2 "I'm >>> | alive" broadcast out all links, as long as this is picked up on the >>> | other links, then all interfaces are considered alive. If one of the >>> | packets is not received, then after 2 x heartbeat duration that link is >>> | considered "down". I have tested this in the 6.0 code and it works with >>> | one caveat. When the server is brought up, both interfaces must be >>> | connected and live, or for some reason, the failure algorithm never >>> | seems to kick in. I saw exactly what you saw in 5.4 and newer with >>> | regards to the 50% packet loss. >>> | >>> | >>> |> What ng_one2many needs is a "Active-Standy" XMIT algorithm (STP BOFH's >>> |> will think BLOCKING/FORWARDING). It could even be used on top of >>> |> other NetGraph nodes like ng_fec or possibly (hopefully) ng_802.3ad >:} >>> |> >>> | >>> >>> - -- >>> Brian J. Creasy >>> Collaborative Fusion, Inc. >>> 412.422.3463 x4020 bcreasy@collaborativefusion.com >>> >>> pgp public key: >>> ~ http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5F94E004 >>> >>> **************************************************************** >>> IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information >>> and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of >>> this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual >>> responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended >>> recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, >>> distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please >>> notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received >>> this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. >>> E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or >>> error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The >>> sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or >>> omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a >>> result of e-mail transmission. >>> **************************************************************** >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >>> >>> iD8DBQFDxmXvDgwDm1+U4AQRAr3GAJ42+HcJFO595aZvljztWCkd+NWgvACeMQiu >>> ILXLchBGR90TZTZHjn6DVCY= >>> =68DY >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >> >> l8* >> -lava >> >> x.25 - minix - bitnet - plan9 - 110 bps - ASR 33 - base8 >> > > Thanks, > Jonathan > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Jonathan Donaldson > Technical Lead > > Cisco Systems - CV2BU > 4690 E. Fulton St C-210 > Ada, MI 49301 > > Office: +1-972-813-5251 > Cell: +1-616-301-4277 > eMail: donaldson@cisco.com > > l8* -lava x.25 - minix - bitnet - plan9 - 110 bps - ASR 33 - base8 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 02:03:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA2A16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BBA43D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix, from userid 1022) id BF20918198; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:03:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF5D18197 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:03:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:03:55 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060215210335.U47621@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: ng_one2many v.s. AFT (NIC Fault Tolerance/Fail Over/Redundancy Revisited) (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:03:49 -0000 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:11:49 -0500 (EST) From: Brian A. Seklecki To: jks@clickcom.com, Jonathan Donaldson , Brian J. Creasy Cc: Chad Ziccardi , Danny Howard , Brad Bendy Subject: Re: ng_one2many v.s. AFT (NIC Fault Tolerance/Fail Over/Redundancy Revisited) (fwd) On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Brian J. Creasy wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > | > | Johnathan's comments suggest that we may need to move to 6.x on the > | production cluster. > | > | 6.x has been upgraded from a technology release to stable, and our goal > | is stability. > | > | Brian: What are you thoughts so far on the 6.x experience? > > no complaints here.. though, i have it running only on my laptop and ....Okay. | As of Freebsd 6_0 (which is at RC1 now), the NG_ONE2MANY does | support the failure of a link which does not end up with 50% packet | loss. There is new code in the One2Many module that xmits a layer 2 "I'm | alive" broadcast out all links, as long as this is picked up on the | other links, then all interfaces are considered alive. If one of the | packets is not received, then after 2 x heartbeat duration that link is | considered "down". I have tested this in the 6.0 code and it works with | one caveat. When the server is brought up, both interfaces must be | connected and live, or for some reason, the failure algorithm never | seems to kick in. I saw exactly what you saw in 5.4 and newer with | regards to the 50% packet loss. Jonathan: I'm not sure where you got the info about this. Accoring to the NG_ONE2MANY(4) page in CVS -rHEAD (-CURRENT): "Currently, the valid settings for the xmitAlg field are NG_ONE2MANY_XMIT_ROUNDROBIN (default) or NG_ONE2MANY_XMIT_ALL. The only valid setting for failAlg is NG_ONE2MANY_FAIL_MANUAL; this is also the default setting." I have 6.1-BETA1 on a box right now and I've got my config setup for NG_ONE2MANY_XMIT_ROUNDROBIN + NG_ONE2MANY_FAIL_NOTIFY and I don't see any layer2 heartbeat related traffic (watching via tcpdump(8) on another machine in the same segment) Can you share what you saw? ~lava > |> mission critical environment). > |> - Xmit-All causes twice as much load on to be placed on the switch > |> /fabric and switch CPU. > |> > | > | As of Freebsd 6_0 (which is at RC1 now), the NG_ONE2MANY does > | support the failure of a link which does not end up with 50% packet > | loss. There is new code in the One2Many module that xmits a layer 2 "I'm > | alive" broadcast out all links, as long as this is picked up on the > | other links, then all interfaces are considered alive. If one of the > | packets is not received, then after 2 x heartbeat duration that link is > | considered "down". I have tested this in the 6.0 code and it works with > | one caveat. When the server is brought up, both interfaces must be > | connected and live, or for some reason, the failure algorithm never > | seems to kick in. I saw exactly what you saw in 5.4 and newer with > | regards to the 50% packet loss. > | > | > |> What ng_one2many needs is a "Active-Standy" XMIT algorithm (STP BOFH's > |> will think BLOCKING/FORWARDING). It could even be used on top of > |> other NetGraph nodes like ng_fec or possibly (hopefully) ng_802.3ad >:} > |> > | > > - -- > Brian J. Creasy > Collaborative Fusion, Inc. > 412.422.3463 x4020 bcreasy@collaborativefusion.com > > pgp public key: > ~ http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5F94E004 > > **************************************************************** > IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information > and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of > this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual > responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended > recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, > distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please > notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received > this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. > E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or > error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, > destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The > sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or > omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a > result of e-mail transmission. > **************************************************************** > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFDxmXvDgwDm1+U4AQRAr3GAJ42+HcJFO595aZvljztWCkd+NWgvACeMQiu > ILXLchBGR90TZTZHjn6DVCY= > =68DY > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 02:08:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77CC16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:08:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B38943D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:08:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahilliya@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i24so68153wra for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:08:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XO4ubQeezDD0fMbgfI2B/JrqJXuLZyXstjYqKhokOE9YS74tNFbG3Lops4EKHCxRdCOWjGAGR0SCTDOOuEQ4rgGHduaeO/DWoLn4GQ1jKlBVKpthxvOBv2jgxYgT/LZMR9444R0BCDwJ5Pm6grTv71TBgDpNdGu/TnjkRyG8NnY= Received: by 10.65.212.13 with SMTP id o13mr364629qbq; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:08:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.184.6 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:08:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:08:23 +0800 From: Daniel To: Greg Barniskis In-Reply-To: <43F3CBF8.2070703@scls.lib.wi.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <43F3531E.8080205@cs.tu-berlin.de> <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <46981.4.17.250.5.1140036274.squirrel@webmail.psys.org> <002d01c63274$639f0980$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <43F3CBF8.2070703@scls.lib.wi.us> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:08:27 -0000 On 2/16/06, Greg Barniskis wrote: > Glenn McCalley wrote: > > > Thanks Brian, that's already tonights project to run through those logs= and > > see if anything jumps out there. What I think he might be doing is eit= her > > POSTing the parameters (which won't show up) or he's loaded a file of e= mail > > addresses and just triggers the mailer with a simple cgi request. Eith= er > > way he's got to be calling sendmail or mail to get it out the door I > > believe. > > Actually, they can use a number of other ways to create the outbound > SMTP connections. Perl, for instance, offers the Net::SMTP module > (and numerous others that'd do the trick). They don't need to call > on binaries outside of their own cgi-bin or leave any tracks for you > other than a web access log entry. > > You might consider putting your customers in jails with unique IP > numbers as a way to better strain out whose CGI is the source of > what packets on your network. Probably not a trivial change to your > working environment, but maybe worth it in the long run. > You might want to consider setting up named virtualhosts with suexec so each host runs as it's own user. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 02:12:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBB516A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:12:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from email@demonlord.de) Received: from alpha-labs.net (alpha-labs.net [81.169.185.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3246943D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:12:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from email@demonlord.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpha-labs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C9D228033 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:12:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from alpha-labs.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alpha-labs.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97028-08 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:12:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.5] (i538790D7.versanet.de [83.135.144.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alpha-labs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3146E22802C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:12:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F3DF91.9010606@demonlord.de> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:12:33 +0100 From: Christian Reiss User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alpha-labs.net Subject: Radeon x1600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:12:39 -0000 Greetings people! I am using FreeBSD for quiet some years now, and I just recently upgraded my PC. Along came a Radeon x1600 (PCIE). Before that I was a happy-happy joy-joy nvidia (-module) user - it just worked. ;) Now I am having a dickens of a time to get the Radeon x1600 working under Xorg (latest) to work - even 2D would suffice. But google'ing around just yielded my own questions in several forums. The ati and radeon drivers (native from xorg, which i am using out of a currents ports tree) did not work with that card. Unless, of course, some magic incantations are required. Just to be on the safe side, I am hording virgin blood right now. Using the vesa driver my screen yells "input not supported", and forcing the vesa driver didnt work out. I got a TFT that can, and should do 1280x1024. Using FreeBSD 6.0 Patch 4. Any help would be more than welcome. Kind regards, Christian Reiss. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 02:32:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBCD16A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:32:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@tetro.net) Received: from uts.tetro.net (uts.tetro.net [192.83.249.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6DB43D49 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:32:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@tetro.net) Received: from tim by uts.tetro.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F9YwR-0003rt-Ci; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:32:23 -0800 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:32:23 -0800 To: Glenn McCalley Message-ID: <20060216023223.GA14425@tetro.net> References: <005701c63241$dbb3e220$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> <43F3531E.8080205@cs.tu-berlin.de> <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002601c6326e$da0fd5a0$6601a8c0@bnetmd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Tim Utschig Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to tell what ran what X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:32:22 -0000 On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:31:46PM -0500, Glenn McCalley wrote: > If I can get a list of what programs, path and file name, called > sendmail over (say) the last 24 hours, one of them should jump off the > page with an unreasonable level of activitiy. A dirty hack would be to replace the sendmail binary with a script (or program) which records info about the parent process to some world- writable file or directory (perhaps create a unique file under a dir with perms 1773 owned by root:staff) before exec'ing the "real" sendmail binary. -- - Tim Utschig From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 02:47:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03AFC16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:47:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com (mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9F643D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:47:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from girgen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from palle.girgensohn.se ([85.226.194.149] [85.226.194.149]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20060216024738.UEHG12400.mxfep01.bredband.com@palle.girgensohn.se> for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:47:38 +0100 Received: from palle.girgensohn.se (palle.girgensohn.se [127.0.0.1]) by palle.girgensohn.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78E917B9F for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:47:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:47:55 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: using an amd64 machine to cross compile apps for ia32? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:47:40 -0000 Hi! I need a simple step-by-step guide to use an amd64-machine (FreeBSD-6.0) to compile an app for both amd64 and ia32 (aka i386) versions of FreeBSD-6.0. Do I need to build a cross compiling gcc binary? The app uses some shared libraries, do I need to maintain them in ia32-versions somewhere on the amd64 machine? Any tips appreciated, thanks, Palle From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 02:57:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF5A16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:57:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E881C43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:57:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout15/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1G2vicc009820; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:57:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-67-103.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.67.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1G2vd2I026157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:57:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F3EA23.4000304@mac.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:57:39 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Panter V." References: <43F37BBA.10708@as.ro> In-Reply-To: <43F37BBA.10708@as.ro> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 or amd64 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:57:47 -0000 Panter V. wrote: [ ... ] > I have a few questions: > > Can I use the amd64 version for this configuration? Yes. > If I use i386 does this mean performances will be visibly lower than > using amd64? No, if anything, most software will run faster in 32-bit mode. YMMV. If you have a really big database, MySQL might be happier in 64-bit mode. But you'd need to obtain more than 4 GB of RAM for that to actually matter. Speaking of which, if you're going to run GUI development tools and a database, you should get more RAM. Pick up 2 * 1GB sticks for $200 or so and be happy. > Are the software and drivers I need 64 bit ready or will their 32 bit > versions run at least as good as they would do on i386? Many of the drivers are 64-bit ready, but I'm not so sure about how well USB is doing these days. You should figure out what you're doing in terms of printing software and obtain printers which are known to work with CUPS/ghostscript/FreeBSD, rather than hoping than any random printer will work. Be warned that HP color InkJets are very expensive to maintain in terms of ink and printheads. > Which version do you recommend me to use i386 or amd64? Probably i386 until you get more experience with FreeBSD, at which point you can re-evaluate for yourself based on what you actually need. > Thank you very much for your answers. Sure. PS: > I want to use this computer as a development server and firewall. These goals contradict. If you can't set up two separate machines, try getting a broadband router/firewall 4-port or 8-port jobby like a Linksys, which can double as a 8-port 10/100 switch if you don't need it for something more complex. The one I've got (model # BEFS-8 something?) lets me do this OK: 11-sec# ping -s 1492 -f prime PING prime.local (192.168.1.3): 1492 data bytes .^C --- prime.local ping statistics --- 138530 packets transmitted, 138529 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.589/0.600/1.557/0.021 ms 97.89s real 0.86s user 9.66s system 10% It's not going to substitute for a smart HP Procurve or a 3com SuperStack in a rack-oriented situation, but they'll do just fine for most other situations. Heck, they'll do just fine in a rack, too, if needs must. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 03:05:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDF316A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:05:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1A043D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:05:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout04/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1G35BQj026936; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:05:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-67-103.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.67.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1G357pN023510 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:05:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F3EBE3.7060309@mac.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:05:07 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Csoka References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <040a01c6324a$f6dac920$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <20060215161255.GB70956@dan.emsphone.com> <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> In-Reply-To: <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Freebsd - Questions Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:05:17 -0000 James Csoka wrote: > After reading the page you linked to, and looking at the examples, I added > the line To:user@example.com REJECT (using my personal email), and it had no > effect. I can't find any good reason it didn't work, but it fails to > prevent me from sending mail from inside my work network to my home address. Do you do a "make access.db" or "make all" afterwards to rebuild the database? Maybe try restarting sendmail ("make restart") and see whether /var/log/maillog says something interesting about that file or something else that might be helpful? (Does a logfile that no-one reads make any noise? :-) -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 03:16:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541CD16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:16:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DAD43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:16:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1G3GL5K008112; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:16:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-67-103.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.67.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1G3GIlg027252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:16:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F3EE83.6060702@mac.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:16:19 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Pantyukhin References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: natd with several alias IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:16:22 -0000 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > I wonder, what tricks do you use to use more than > one alias IP? I mean, if you have hundreds of > hosts behind your firewall, what can you do to alias > some of them to one ip, others to another and so on. See "man natd" about the following options for 1-to-1 NAT translation, which can be put into /etc/natd.conf and processed automagicly when the machine boots: -redirect_address localIP publicIP Redirect traffic for public IP address to a machine on the local network. This function is known as static NAT. Nor- mally static NAT is useful if your ISP has allocated a small block of IP addresses to you, but it can even be used in the case of single address: redirect_address 10.0.0.8 0.0.0.0 The above command would redirect all incoming traffic to machine 10.0.0.8. If several address aliases specify the same public address as follows redirect_address 192.168.0.2 public_addr redirect_address 192.168.0.3 public_addr redirect_address 192.168.0.4 public_addr the incoming traffic will be directed to the last translated local address (192.168.0.4), but outgoing traffic from the first two addresses will still be aliased to appear from the specified public_addr. -redirect_address localIP[,localIP[,...]] publicIP These forms of -redirect_port and -redirect_address are used to transparently offload network load on a single server and distribute the load across a pool of servers. This function is known as LSNAT (RFC 2391). For example, the argument tcp www1:http,www2:http,www3:http www:http means that incoming HTTP requests for host www will be trans- parently redirected to one of the www1, www2 or www3, where a host is selected simply on a round-robin basis, without regard to load on the net. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 03:19:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E243D16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:19:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from awebster@connectalk.com) Received: from esafe.connectalk.com (esafe.connectalk.com [204.19.165.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEB5C43D70 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:19:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from awebster@connectalk.com) Received: from connectalk.com ([10.125.204.14]) by eSafe SMTP Relay 1139685285; Wed Feb 15 22:15:31 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:19:31 -0500 Message-ID: <9D61D69E3C1F7F459C5513AD830EE2192BC2C2@mtlex01.connectalk.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: CARP question (interpretation clarification) Thread-Index: AcYyp82fCLn0t9VES9eVzUeZDJkshA== From: "Webster, Andrew" To: X-ESAFE-STATUS: Mail clean X-ESAFE-DETAILS: Clean Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: CARP question (interpretation clarification) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:19:42 -0000 On FreeBSD 5.4-p8, the man page for CARP(4), has a paragraph about net.inet.carp.preempt which reads : =20 net.inet.carp.preempt Allow virtual hosts to preempt each other. It is also used to failover carp interfaces as a group. When the option is enabled and one of the carp enabled physical interfaces goes down, advskew is changed to 240 on all carp inter- faces. See also the first example. Disabled by default. =20 If I understand this correctly, a system having multiple carp interfaces would either see all carp interfaces as all MASTER or all BACKUP, but not a combination of both? On my system, I've got preempt turned on, but as shown below on my "backup" machine, two carp interfaces are in BACKUP config, and one is MASTER. On the "master" machine of this pair, I have the reverse, two MASTER, and one BACKUP corresponding to the appropriate subnets. =20 Am I misinterpreting the documentation, or does the preempt function not work the way I expected it to?=20 =20 r2# sysctl -a | grep preempt net.inet.carp.preempt: 1 r2# ifconfig -a =2E.. carp0: flags=3D41 mtu 1500 inet 172.16.0.230 netmask 0xfffffc00=20 carp: BACKUP vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 100 carp1: flags=3D41 mtu 1500 inet 172.16.20.230 netmask 0xfffffc00=20 carp: BACKUP vhid 20 advbase 1 advskew 100 carp2: flags=3D41 mtu 1500 inet 10.10.88.1 netmask 0xffffffe0=20 carp: MASTER vhid 88 advbase 1 advskew 100 =20 =20 Thanks! =20 Andrew=20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 03:20:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939D116A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:20:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yontege@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: from rescomp.berkeley.edu (keyserver.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6503743D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:20:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yontege@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1032) id 3EF185B766; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:20:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:20:39 -0800 From: "Ian A. Tegebo" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216032039.GA688@rescomp.berkeley.edu> References: <20060211043906.GB27755@rescomp.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060211043906.GB27755@rescomp.berkeley.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Subject: Re: Strange problem with user account X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:20:41 -0000 On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 08:39:06PM -0800, Ian A. Tegebo wrote: > Somehow I've foobarred a user account. The account turned out not to have been foobared. The account had had 18 groups and this exceeded the kern.ngroups default of 16. Reducing the number of groups solved the problem. > # su USER > su: setusercontext: Invalid argument A better ktrace as root is: # ktrace -di su yontege # kdump -f ktrace.out ... 1080 su CALL setgroups(0x11,0xbfbfe5b0) 1080 su RET setgroups -1 errno 22 Invalid argument ... # man setgroups --------------------------------------------------------------------- ERRORS The setgroups() system call will fail if: [EPERM] The caller is not the super-user. [EINVAL] The number specified in the ngroups argument is larger than the NGROUPS limit. [EFAULT] The address specified for gidset is outside the process address space. --------------------------------------------------------------------- and then it was elementary. > I suspect that something funny has happened to the account before the > migration; something like having been removed from /etc/passwd but > nowhere else. And this was an incorrect suspicion which was confirmed by investigating all of the pwd.db related files. Hope this helps someone someday. -- ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 03:52:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C18D16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:52:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from mail.compedgeracing.com (dsl-katy-207-70-139-52.consolidated.net [207.70.139.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6FF43D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:52:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from www.compedgeracing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.compedgeracing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437F45C0B for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:52:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from 207.70.139.52 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ruzzi) by www.compedgeracing.com with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:52:31 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <63622.207.70.139.52.1140061951.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:52:31 -0600 (CST) From: "Robert Uzzi" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: PAE kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:52:35 -0000 What is the secret to compiling a PAE kernel? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 03:53:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157D216A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:53:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from stelesys.com (web3.stelesys.com [63.175.100.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB31943D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:53:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbell@stelesys.com) Received: from c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([71.199.184.251] helo=[192.168.0.148]) by stelesys.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F9aCJ-0003PC-Hc; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:52:51 -0500 Message-ID: <43F3F70F.6040205@stelesys.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:52:47 -0500 From: Jerry Bell User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:53:05 -0000 Path MTU problem? >> > > That would be my vote also. > > Ted > > I've done some more troubleshooting and some strange things have appeared. First, the colo says there is NO proxy, and NO firewall in front of this server. I captured a misfire on both the server and on my freebsd gateway. The two traffic flows don't seem to quite line up. First, here is the view from the server: www# tcpdump -tttt -vvv -A port 80 tcpdump: listening on em0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 2006-02-15 22:18:11.014600 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 110, id 10713, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 48) c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net.3945 > www.musiclodge.com.http: S [tcp sum ok] 1671172334:1671172334(0) win 64512 E..0).@.n.>QG...?.d,.i.Pc.......p..._........... 2006-02-15 22:18:11.014650 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 34040, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 48) www.musiclodge.com.http > c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net.3945: S [bad tcp cksum a4c0 (->9a1f)!] 1547658190:1547658190(0) ack 1671172335 win 65535 E..0..@.@..2?.d,G....P.i\?c.c...p............... 2006-02-15 22:18:11.060824 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 110, id 10715, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 40) c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net.3945 > www.musiclodge.com.http: . [tcp sum ok] 1:1(0) ack 1086692403 win 64856 E..().@.n.>WG...?.d,.i.Pc.......P..X.......... 2006-02-15 22:18:11.060837 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 60576, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 40) www.musiclodge.com.http > c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net.3945: R [bad tcp cksum a4b8 (->5e83)!] 2634350593:2634350593(0) win 0 E..(..@.@...?.d,G....P.i........P....... 2006-02-15 22:18:11.065196 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 110, id 10716, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 40) c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net.3945 > www.musiclodge.com.http: . [tcp sum ok] 387:387(0) ack 1086692403 win 64856 E..().@.n.>VG...?.d,.i.Pc..q....P..X.......... 2006-02-15 22:18:11.065208 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 4488, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 40) www.musiclodge.com.http > c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net.3945: R [bad tcp cksum a4b8 (->5e83)!] 2634350593:2634350593(0) win 0 E..(..@.@...?.d,G....P.i........P....... 2006-02-15 22:18:11.069569 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 110, id 10717, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 426) c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net.3945 > www.musiclodge.com.http: P 1:387(386) ack 1086692403 win 64856 E...).@.n.<.G...?.d,.i.Pc.......P..X'1..GET / HTTP/1.1 Accept: image/gif, image/x 2006-02-15 22:18:11.069579 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 40159, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 40) www.musiclodge.com.http > c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net.3945: R [bad tcp cksum a4b8 (->5e83)!] 2634350593:2634350593(0) win 0 E..(..@.@..R?.d,G....P.i........P....... 2006-02-15 22:18:14.014594 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 12734, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 48) www.musiclodge.com.http > c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net.3945: S [bad tcp cksum a4c0 (->9a1f)!] 1547658190:1547658190(0) ack 1671172335 win 65535 E..01.@.@.dl?.d,G....P.i\?c.c...p............... 2006-02-15 22:18:14.073367 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 110, id 10734, offset 0, flags [none], length: 40) c-71-199-184-251.hsd1.ga.comcast.net.3945 > www.musiclodge.com.http: R [tcp sum ok] 1671172335:1671172335(0) win 0 Next, here is the view from the gateway (time is off on that one): beta# tcpdump -tttt -vvv -A port 80 and host 63.175.100.44 tcpdump: listening on xl0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 2006-02-16 03:29:02.970756 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 128, id 10713, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 48) atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945 > www.musiclodge.com.http: S [tcp sum ok] 1671172334:1671172334(0) win 64512 E..0).@...k.....?.d,.i.Pc.......p............... 2006-02-16 03:29:03.016989 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 32, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 40) www.musiclodge.com.http > atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945: S [tcp sum ok] 2634350592:2634350592(0) ack 1671172335 win 64512 E..(..@. ...?.d,.....P.i....c...P...-p.. 2006-02-16 03:29:03.017099 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 45, id 34040, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 48) www.musiclodge.com.http > atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945: S [tcp sum ok] 1547658190:1547658190(0) ack 1671172335 win 65535 E..0..@.-.c.?.d,.....P.i\?c.c...p............... 2006-02-16 03:29:03.017963 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 128, id 10715, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 40) atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945 > www.musiclodge.com.http: . [tcp sum o k] 1:1(0) ack 1086692403 win 64856 E..().@...k.....?.d,.i.Pc.......P..X,......... 2006-02-16 03:29:03.018308 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 128, id 10716, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 40) atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945 > www.musiclodge.com.http: . [tcp sum o k] 387:387(0) ack 1086692403 win 64856 E..().@...k.....?.d,.i.Pc..q....P..X*......... 2006-02-16 03:29:03.018794 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 128, id 10717, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 426) atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945 > www.musiclodge.com.http: P 1:387(386 ) ack 1086692403 win 64856 E...).@...jY....?.d,.i.Pc.......P..Xf...GET / HTTP/1.1 Accept: image/gif, image/x 2006-02-16 03:29:03.062898 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 45, id 60576, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 40) www.musiclodge.com.http > atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945: R [tcp sum ok] 2634350593:2634350593(0) win 0 E..(..@.-...?.d,.....P.i........P.... .. 2006-02-16 03:29:03.066481 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 45, id 4488, offset 0, flags [DF],length: 40) www.musiclodge.com.http > atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945: R [tcp sum ok ] 2634350593:2634350593(0) win 0 E..(..@.-..0?.d,.....P.i........P.... .. 2006-02-16 03:29:03.071491 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 45, id 40159, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 40) www.musiclodge.com.http > atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945: R [tcp sum ok] 2634350593:2634350593(0) win 0 E..(..@.-.K.?.d,.....P.i........P.... .. 2006-02-16 03:29:06.017452 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 45, id 12734, offset 0, flags [DF], length: 48) www.musiclodge.com.http > atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945: S [tcp sum ok] 1547658190:1547658190(0) ack 1671172335 win 65535 E..01.@.-...?.d,.....P.i\?c.c...p............... 2006-02-16 03:29:06.019108 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 128, id 10734, offset 0, flags [none], length: 40) atllapjbell1.iss.local.3945 > www.musiclodge.com.http: R [tcp sum ok] 1671172335:1671172335(0) win 0 E..()...........?.d,.i.Pc...c...P...Q.....p..t This is the very same transaction. I'm not an expert at TCP/IP, but it looks like the server and the client are seeing things quite differently. Any additional help in tracking down what is happening is greatly appreciated. Thanks much! Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 03:57:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5251116A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id (mx3.mra.co.id [202.51.30.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F4143D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:57:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from localhost (localhost.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54F330FA0; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:48:33 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx3.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57307-25; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:48:33 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mailbox.mra.co.id (unknown [172.16.0.225]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1DD30F99; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:48:33 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [172.16.0.228] (unknown [172.16.0.228]) by mailbox.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF258FF1B; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:50:47 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <43F3EDD6.80707@mra.co.id> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:13:26 +0700 From: Beastie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051229 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Uzzi References: <61560.207.70.139.52.1139628926.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> <6C543300-579C-4313-A355-0F26181B3FA7@todoo.biz> <067101c63216$a7682f10$c801a8c0@nexpc> <65260.207.70.139.52.1139998857.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> <06b901c63220$3a849eb0$c801a8c0@nexpc> <50778.207.70.139.52.1140002253.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> In-Reply-To: <50778.207.70.139.52.1140002253.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mra.co.id Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: SATA Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:57:29 -0000 Robert Uzzi wrote: >That still dosen't connedt SATA to a non sata board though. That's my >situation I have 6 SATA drives but no SATA native board. Looking for a >cheap addin card to build this upon. > > > > > I'll buy Intel SRCS16 (500$) this week, will talk to u later about it's compatibility and performance for RAID 5 with 4 SATA drive. regards reza From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 04:08:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD02E16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:08:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A3B43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:08:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from [208.216.126.164] (ts5m-pool0-164.gti.net [208.216.126.164]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id 724CB3642F; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:04:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F3FAF1.3060706@gti.net> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:09:21 -0500 From: Bob Perry User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Maness References: <43F360C4.6070201@chrismaness.com> In-Reply-To: <43F360C4.6070201@chrismaness.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stale Dependancy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:08:23 -0000 Chris Maness wrote: > This might be Newbie question: > > What is the cleanest way to resolve stale dependency with > gamin-0.1.5_3. I think I remember seeing a message that it merged into > fam. I did a portupgrade -a, and it's still there. I was surprised > this was not self cleansing because I used CVSUP to sync my port tree. Hi Chris, I ran into a stale dependency situation where I thought gamin-0.1.5_3 was replacing fam. I posted the issue and received the following command which replaced fam: "You can only have one (fam or gamin) installed. The following command will replace fam with gamin: > > > > portupgrade -o devel/gamin -f fam" I posted my message around 1/31. You may want to review archives and determine if this may apply to your situation. Bob Perry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 04:13:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B646116A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:13:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F87743D49 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:13:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout01/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1G4Dj40000291; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:13:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-67-103.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.67.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1G4DgRC015186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:13:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F3FBF6.1020501@mac.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:13:42 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry Bell References: <43F3F70F.6040205@stelesys.com> In-Reply-To: <43F3F70F.6040205@stelesys.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with strange web server problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:13:45 -0000 Jerry Bell wrote: [ ... ] > I've done some more troubleshooting and some strange things have > appeared. First, the colo says there is NO proxy, and NO firewall in > front of this server. That's believable too, perhaps you simply have a NIC which is failing or is screwing up the packet checksums in some odd case. You would have to sniff the traffic from another machine (perhaps a sysadmin's laptop?) and grab the full packets ("-s 0" to tcpdump to be sure. Have you tried swapping NICs or adding a PCI NIC card? BTW: > 1671172334:1671172334(0) win 64512 This is not quite enough data to tell, but this looks like maybe you're seeing the IPv6 MSS of 1260 rather than what I get by default (1460?) under FreeBSD? Of course, it could just be a Windows client machine or something going through something like a VPN/PPTP tunnel which reduces the MTU...? What happens if you reduce your interface MTU to 1260? You ought to be looking for all traffic between your server and a test host, BTW, sometimes the ICMP traffic, if any, is important to understanding the issue. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 04:19:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FC416A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:19:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A212D43D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:19:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout04/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1G4JkaI027813; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-67-103.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.67.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1G4JhmY022353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:19:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F3FD5F.8000208@mac.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:19:43 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Uzzi References: <63622.207.70.139.52.1140061951.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> In-Reply-To: <63622.207.70.139.52.1140061951.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAE kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:19:53 -0000 Robert Uzzi wrote: > What is the secret to compiling a PAE kernel? 42? No, no, that's not it. [1] Try: cd /usr/src && make buildkernel KERNCONF="PAE" Look at and perhaps modify /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/PAE first, if you like. -- -Chuck [1]: I'm in a whimsical humor, sorry. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 04:25:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5D916A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:25:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1516B43D49 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:25:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 93744 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Feb 2006 04:25:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HtVYKbnig0oBftRsutV9mwytWcQTtiNWiaJ4MaMvR12D28/vuoXGDWBdTs3So6a/D+6I1xZFwOgQVgCyU+MA/WkboFaPg5ERyFMNbdbv0HUeDU4l2yTERM5fTJQtsKGxyGbPfpQCjDs62mf6kLwktCPMHJI49kMkURcuFQyVNyk= ; Message-ID: <20060216042554.93742.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:25:54 PST Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:25:54 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: brent In-Reply-To: <200602160158.k1G1w6Td062022@mickey.jensenet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ethernet Interface haywire ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:25:55 -0000 I wouldn't think that a bus error would have anything to do with the version of the OS. If the hardware gets hosed, its likely to do almost anything. --- brent wrote: > Thanks--the server has em (intel gigabit) nics. > Have you seen this on any > specific version of FreeBSD and *hopefully* not > on others (e.g. RELENG_6_0)? > > Brent > > Danial Thom writes: > > > I've seen it happen when the ethernet device > gets > > a bus error and throws it into some strange > > state. I've seen it mostly with on-board > intel > > devices (fxp), but thats what we use mostly > so it > > may not be part specific. > > > > DT > > > > --- brent wrote: > > > >> Has anyone run into this scenario where a > BSD > >> Box (RELENG_5_4) takes down > >> the whole subnet for only FreeBSD boxes. > >> Here’s the scenario: One of my > >> web servers goes into a crazy state which > kills > >> all traffic on the network > >> for only FreeBSD boxes. Linux boxes can > talk > >> to other linux boxes, but > >> FreeBSD boxes are dead. You can ping a > FreeBSD > >> box (from linux) but services > >> such as SSH go half-way and never completely > >> connect. Other services such as > >> http don’t work either. Rebooting that > >> offending box fixes the problem. > >> I’ve seen this once it a great moon; > however, > >> it recently happened two > >> days in a row. Any suggestions would be > >> appreciated. I have other > >> RELENG_5_4 and RELENG_6_0 boxes that don’t > >> seem to be the culprit, as well > >> as an identical hardware box running > >> RELENG_6_0. Thanks. > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 05:01:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B5016A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:01:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA62543D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:01:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B01962C8E5 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:01:35 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16699-08 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:01:34 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B923762C7D1 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:01:34 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BF72B3EA9E; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:01:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5763B478 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:01:33 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:01:33 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:01:37 -0000 Always trying to find new tools to monitor our servers, I came across the following a little while ago: http://www.mreriksson.net/uptimes/intro FreeBSD is showing 4th place right now behind Linux, SunOS and Netware for Average Uptimes ... with ours being an average of 120 days ... so, figured I'd send out a note to the list, since few ppl probably know about it ... It installs via ports: /usr/ports/sysutils/uptimec ... add your hosts to the stats, help push our numbers higher ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 05:08:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E09816A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:08:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (h-66-167-151-186.mclnva23.covad.net [66.167.151.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0655643D62 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:08:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from EXFELON (c-68-49-126-199.hsd1.va.comcast.net [68.49.126.199]) by mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id k1G59kMv027126 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:09:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Message-ID: <00a101c632b6$fa8896d0$c77e3144@home.com> From: "Jim Csoka" To: References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <040a01c6324a$f6dac920$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <20060215161255.GB70956@dan.emsphone.com> <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local><44hd702tod.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <43F3A461.6090700@wmptl.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:08:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-DFMC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DFMC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DFMC-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss X-MailScanner-From: jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:08:16 -0000 No...I ran make maps, as well as make install for the blacklist feature, and make restart. However, here is something interesting. When I access my corporate email via openwebmail, it functions as I would expect....you cannot send or receive to the given address. However, when using Outlook Express (internal mail client at work), you can still send mail to the address I am trying to block. Why should this be so? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Vidican" To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:00 PM Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address > Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> "James Csoka" writes: >> >> >>>After reading the page you linked to, and looking at the examples, I >>>added >>>the line To:user@example.com REJECT (using my personal email), and it had >>>no >>>effect. I can't find any good reason it didn't work, but it fails to >>>prevent me from sending mail from inside my work network to my home >>>address. >> >> >> Maybe putting an alias on the home address? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > cd /etc/mail > vi access > make maps > > You probably forgot to 'make maps'. > > -- > Nathan Vidican > nvidican@wmptl.com > Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. > http://www.wmptl.com/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 05:23:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FD016A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:23:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@cerebellum.za.net) Received: from elektra.opteqint.net (elektra.opteqint.net [209.25.178.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD2B43D49 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:23:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@cerebellum.za.net) Received: from [165.146.124.241] (helo=ianb) by elektra.opteqint.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1F9bbV-000AMZ-MK; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:22:59 -0800 From: "Ian Barnes" To: , Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:23:22 +0200 Message-ID: <00a701c632b9$1e5540c0$6400000a@ianb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYyitP7tbEZxq4JSBuuiC12okaO9QALYUxA Cc: Subject: RE: Ethernet Stopping Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:23:32 -0000 Hi, Here might be a better drawing (possibly) Router (10.0.0.2) | | FreeBSD Gateway (10.0.0.1) | | Switch (10/100) | ------------------------- (10.0.1.0/24) | | | Laptop Desktop Wireless AP The router is in bridge mode and my FreeBSD box gets its tun0 IP from DHCP from the ISP through pppoe. The 10.0.0.1 is a static address and all the machines (excluding the wireless), are dhcp in the 10.0.1.0/24 range. I removed the read IP addresses from the post, I replaced them with x.x.x. I howevere don't feel that the PPP is the problem because it is working for about 5-10 minutes. Then everything stops working. Like an ARP problem. Cant explain why I would have an arp problem though. I am not trying to configure ppp as that works fine, its just that the network stops working after 5-10 minutes that its already working. Cheers Ian -----Original Message----- From: bob@a1poweruser.com [mailto:bob@a1poweruser.com] Sent: 16 February 2006 01:53 AM To: Ian Barnes; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Ethernet Stopping Problem Need more background info. Explain where you are getting the public non-routable 10.0.0.0 ip address from. You say the ADSL router is using them. Did you edit your real ip address to hide then from this public post? Also you have to post your ppp.conf file. Are you trying to configure PPPoe? -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ian Barnes Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:47 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Ethernet Stopping Problem Hi, I have a freebsd 5.2 box setup as my gateway for my home network. The network is layed out as follows: FreeBSD Gateway - 10.0.0.1/16 ADSL Router - 10.0.0.2/16 DHCP Network - 10.0.1.0 - 10.0.1.254 all /16 with default gateway as .1 I have ppp enabled on the freebsd unit, and it connects fine and then everything works perfectly for anything between 5 and 10 minutes. At this stage, the freebsd machine cant get to the 10.0.1.0 network anymore. It can still ping 10.0.0.2 fine and its connection to the internet remains perfect. It just wont let anyone else come in from anywhere else on the network. It kills all SSH sessions, web sessions etc. I replaced the ifac card with an ed0 card, and also replaced cables and the switch in between. The card in question is both a dc0 and an ed0 card which I have swapped into another PCI port and it still does the same thing there. Below is an ifconfig: ed0: flags=108843 mtu 1500 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.0.255.255 ether 00:c0:df:fa:b8:74 plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 tun0: flags=8051 mtu 1492 inet 165.x.x.x --> 165.x.x.x netmask 0xffffffff Opened by PID 218 [root@gateway] ~ # Here is a rc.conf: [root@gateway] ~ # cat /etc/rc.conf defaultrouter="10.0.0.2" hostname="gateway.domain.local" ifconfig_ed0="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0" saver="logo" sshd_enable="NO" usbd_enable="YES" blanktime="3600" apache2_enable="YES" mysql_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="NONE" gateway_enable="YES" inetd_enable="NO" kern_securelevel_enable="NO" ppp_enable="YES" ppp_nat="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_profile="dsl1" dhcpd_enable="YES" dhcpd_flags="-q" dhcpd_conf="/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf" dhcpd_ifaces="ed0" [root@gateway] ~ # I don't have any sysctl rules in place, and everything else about this unit is standard. I am not running a firewall at this stage and was just wondering what the cause of this problem could be? Cheers Ian _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 05:25:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79AA16A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:25:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@cerebellum.za.net) Received: from elektra.opteqint.net (elektra.opteqint.net [209.25.178.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF26343D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:25:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@cerebellum.za.net) Received: from [165.146.124.241] (helo=ianb) by elektra.opteqint.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1F9bd9-000AMx-Kq; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:24:41 -0800 From: "Ian Barnes" To: , Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:25:04 +0200 Message-ID: <00a801c632b9$5b18fa60$6400000a@ianb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20060216003629.1554.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYykQhycmyawGMxTuOKHNtYb3JszAAKBR6w Cc: Subject: RE: Ethernet Stopping Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:25:11 -0000 Hi Danial, Any ideas as to how I would be able to find out more if it was an arp problem. I don't see how it could be because I have only 3 machines on the network at the time that it died. The three where the router, the freebsd gateway, and my notebook. Is there something I could enable on the sysctl side of things? Or syslogd side of things to try and see if it is an arp problem, and if it is, how can I rectify it ? Cheers Ian -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Danial Thom Sent: 16 February 2006 02:36 AM To: bob@a1poweruser.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Ethernet Stopping Problem Things that stop after 5-10 minutes are usually ARP related, but I can't be certain. --- bob@a1poweruser.com wrote: > Need more background info. > Explain where you are getting the public > non-routable 10.0.0.0 ip > address from. > You say the ADSL router is using them. > Did you edit your real ip address to hide then > from this public > post? > Also you have to post your ppp.conf file. > Are you trying to configure PPPoe? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On > Behalf Of Ian Barnes > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:47 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Ethernet Stopping Problem > > > Hi, > > I have a freebsd 5.2 box setup as my gateway > for my home network. > The > network is layed out as follows: > > FreeBSD Gateway - 10.0.0.1/16 > ADSL Router - 10.0.0.2/16 > > DHCP Network - 10.0.1.0 - 10.0.1.254 all /16 > with default gateway as > .1 > > I have ppp enabled on the freebsd unit, and it > connects fine and > then > everything works perfectly for anything between > 5 and 10 minutes. At > this > stage, the freebsd machine cant get to the > 10.0.1.0 network anymore. > It can > still ping 10.0.0.2 fine and its connection to > the internet remains > perfect. > It just wont let anyone else come in from > anywhere else on the > network. It > kills all SSH sessions, web sessions etc. I > replaced the ifac card > with an > ed0 card, and also replaced cables and the > switch in between. > > The card in question is both a dc0 and an ed0 > card which I have > swapped into > another PCI port and it still does the same > thing there. Below is an > ifconfig: > > ed0: > flags=108843 > mtu 1500 > inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffff0000 > broadcast 10.0.255.255 > ether 00:c0:df:fa:b8:74 > plip0: > flags=108810 mtu > 1500 > lo0: flags=8049 > mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > tun0: > flags=8051 > mtu 1492 > inet 165.x.x.x --> 165.x.x.x netmask > 0xffffffff > Opened by PID 218 > [root@gateway] ~ # > > > Here is a rc.conf: > [root@gateway] ~ # cat /etc/rc.conf > defaultrouter="10.0.0.2" > hostname="gateway.domain.local" > ifconfig_ed0="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask > 255.255.0.0" > saver="logo" > sshd_enable="NO" > usbd_enable="YES" > blanktime="3600" > apache2_enable="YES" > mysql_enable="YES" > sendmail_enable="NONE" > gateway_enable="YES" > inetd_enable="NO" > kern_securelevel_enable="NO" > ppp_enable="YES" > ppp_nat="YES" > ppp_mode="ddial" > ppp_profile="dsl1" > dhcpd_enable="YES" > dhcpd_flags="-q" > dhcpd_conf="/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf" > dhcpd_ifaces="ed0" > [root@gateway] ~ # > > > I don't have any sysctl rules in place, and > everything else about > this unit > is standard. > > I am not running a firewall at this stage and > was just wondering > what the > cause of this problem could be? > > Cheers > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 05:33:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC03116A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:33:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrsicon@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C05D43D66 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:32:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrsicon@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so101063wri for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:32:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=REzCBvZ/zGD6wWuwSmLa5yjfEAkSUFIkF2II73NvEKqNzgqton4WZDy2Jmq9z5fgMsNpWdDZVaKL/IMKMdzHYE7c4+itA0JzhzBNuvXnDKYxPENq+brgUperIe4zZmr8e8sC4rEOTIaF29fvAicqhO8PTjoIzp9uNYK09E5SsgE= Received: by 10.65.243.1 with SMTP id v1mr8551qbr; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:32:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.211.15 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:32:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <12fe76180602152132i7511585ch3595cb3020501f3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:32:56 -0800 From: mr sicon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD-6 + Jail + MultipleIP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:33:02 -0000 Anyone have a patch or know if and when it will be implemented into the bas= e jail system? thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 05:37:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A0716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:37:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: from parts-unknown.org (37.sub-70-198-227.myvzw.com [70.198.227.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F31ED43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:37:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: (qmail 16201 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 05:37:25 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:37:25 -0800 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> X-stardate: [-29]5326.14 X-moon: The Moon is Waning Gibbous (92% of Full) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:37:27 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:01:33 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > FreeBSD is showing 4th place right now behind Linux, SunOS and Netware for > Average Uptimes ... with ours being an average of 120 days > Which shows yet again how utterly worthless this kind of rating is. So here's the problem as *I* see it: Do you participate in such silliness for dubious PR value at the risk of supporting the use of invalid methodology, or do you refuse at the risk of appearing to have something to hide? Now, the way I frame this makes pretty clear *my* preference, but possibly others have other ways to frame it. -- David Benfell, LCP benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 05:38:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD40016A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:38:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luck@computerking.ca) Received: from shoemasters.com (shoemasters.com [68.144.188.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B49543D5C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:38:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luck@computerking.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by shoemasters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FD97DC034 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:35:25 -0700 (MST) Received: from shoemasters.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (shoemasters.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23314-09 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:35:25 -0700 (MST) Received: from shoemasters.com (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by shoemasters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC907DC031 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:35:25 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <1321368.31140068125121.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:35:25 -0700 (MST) From: "RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: kdm and fluxbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:38:59 -0000 I am tring to get kdm to log me into fluxbox i have followed the handbook to the letter and can login to gnome kde and enlightnment also options for defaut and failsafe and some others none of which i have tried yet. However flux box is not there and i cannot seem to find where kde is getting these sessions from. There does not seem to be any option in kcontrol for session like mentioned in the freebsd handbook i did go into usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xsession and added some lines but nothing happened failsafe) exec /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -geometry 80x24-0-0 ;; kde) exec /usr/local/bin/startkde ;; GNOME) exec /usr/X11R6/bin/gnome-session ;; FluxBox) exec /usr/X11R6/bin/fluxbox ;; esac esac WHERE IS KDM GETTING ITS SESSION INFO FROM AND HOW DO I TELL IT TO ADD FLUXBOX -- Computer King/CaNMail http://www.computerking.ca http://www.canmail.org Sales, Service, and Hosting Email, Data, and Web Packages Ask about web design specials Affiliates http://www.computerking.ca/pages/links/affiliates/affiliates.htm Maybe Computer Science should be in the College of Theology. -- R. S. Barton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 05:44:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB2716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:44:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (ns1.internetinsite.com [208.179.97.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEBE43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:44:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (localhost.internetinsite.com [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1G5iOBa052850; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:44:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k1G5iNCQ052847; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:44:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.internetinsite.com: chris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:44:23 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Maness X-X-Sender: chris@ns1.internetinsite.com To: Bob Perry In-Reply-To: <43F3FAF1.3060706@gti.net> Message-ID: <20060215213936.X45984@ns1.internetinsite.com> References: <43F360C4.6070201@chrismaness.com> <43F3FAF1.3060706@gti.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stale Dependancy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:44:25 -0000 On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Bob Perry wrote: > Chris Maness wrote: >> This might be Newbie question: >> >> What is the cleanest way to resolve stale dependency with gamin-0.1.5_3. I >> think I remember seeing a message that it merged into fam. I did a >> portupgrade -a, and it's still there. I was surprised this was not self >> cleansing because I used CVSUP to sync my port tree. > > Hi Chris, > I ran into a stale dependency situation where I thought gamin-0.1.5_3 was > replacing fam. I posted the issue and received the following command which > replaced fam: > > "You can only have one (fam or gamin) installed. The following command will > replace fam with gamin: >> > >> > portupgrade -o devel/gamin -f fam" > > I posted my message around 1/31. You may want to review archives and > determine if this may apply to your situation. > > Bob Perry > > That fixed the stale dependency problem, but didn't fam merge into gamin. Isn't that what caused the issue in the first place? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 06:04:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3800016A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:04:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50B443D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:04:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 24054 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 17:04:13 +1100 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO ?10.168.101.24?) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 17:04:12 +1100 Message-ID: <43F415D1.7000103@meijome.net> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:04:01 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Igor Robul References: <20060210222422.19070.qmail@web34603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1139643367.8911.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <20060213193945.GD6003@sysadm.stc> In-Reply-To: <20060213193945.GD6003@sysadm.stc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help Installing FreeBSD 6.0 with GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@meijome.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:04:14 -0000 Igor Robul wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:36:08AM +0000, Robert Slade wrote: > >> There are some minor issues with nvida video 3d cards but there are >> nvida drivers for BSD. ATI cards are a bit more of a problem. In both >> cases search the mailing list archives the info is there. >> > I dont see any problems with ATI Radeon 9200 on my home PC, except I > cant play linux-enemyterritory with it :-). X.org driver "just work", > also you can have good 3D performance (at least with glxgears :-) ) if > you'll install graphics/dri port. > Hi there, Intel i855GM here. 1) once you installed the graphics/dri , how do you enable them in xorg.conf? 2) can you define what is 'good performance with glxgears'? I get about 200 fps... but GL-based xscreensaver modules push very low fps. thanks!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 06:07:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4486416A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:07:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA6843D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:07:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from [208.216.126.201] (ts5m-pool0-201.gti.net [208.216.126.201]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id 2109C35ADF; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:03:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F416D8.8060207@gti.net> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:08:24 -0500 From: Bob Perry User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Maness References: <43F360C4.6070201@chrismaness.com> <43F3FAF1.3060706@gti.net> <20060215213936.X45984@ns1.internetinsite.com> In-Reply-To: <20060215213936.X45984@ns1.internetinsite.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stale Dependancy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:07:25 -0000 Chris Maness wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Bob Perry wrote: > >> Chris Maness wrote: >>> This might be Newbie question: >>> >>> What is the cleanest way to resolve stale dependency with >>> gamin-0.1.5_3. I think I remember seeing a message that it merged >>> into fam. I did a portupgrade -a, and it's still there. I was >>> surprised this was not self cleansing because I used CVSUP to sync my >>> port tree. >> >> Hi Chris, >> I ran into a stale dependency situation where I thought gamin-0.1.5_3 >> was replacing fam. I posted the issue and received the following >> command which replaced fam: >> >> "You can only have one (fam or gamin) installed. The following >> command will replace fam with gamin: >>> > >>> > portupgrade -o devel/gamin -f fam" >> >> I posted my message around 1/31. You may want to review archives and >> determine if this may apply to your situation. >> >> Bob Perry >> >> > > That fixed the stale dependency problem, but didn't fam merge into > gamin. Isn't that what caused the issue in the first place? > > Not sure Chris. However, I did not see fam, or gamin mentioned in /usr/ports/UDATING. Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 06:11:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6A116A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:11:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F2943D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:11:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1F9cMu-0006TT-JZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:11:56 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1F9cMn-000987-Ie for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:11:49 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k1G6BnpY035098 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:11:49 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:11:49 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216061149.GA35058@sysadm.stc> References: <20060210222422.19070.qmail@web34603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1139643367.8911.14.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <20060213193945.GD6003@sysadm.stc> <43F415D1.7000103@meijome.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F415D1.7000103@meijome.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: Help Installing FreeBSD 6.0 with GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:11:59 -0000 On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 05:04:01PM +1100, Norberto Meijome wrote: > 1) once you installed the graphics/dri , how do you enable them in > xorg.conf? Unfortunately I cannot tell you about configuration you need for 855G, but at least you need load kernel module for 855G, and place Load "dri" Load "glx" to "Module" section of xorg.cfg > > 2) can you define what is 'good performance with glxgears'? I get about > 200 fps... but GL-based xscreensaver modules push very low fps. I have about 750 fps on Radeon 9200 at home with installed graphics/dri, and I have same fps with native nVidia drivers at work on GeForce MX440. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 06:14:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACB616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:14:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (ns1.internetinsite.com [208.179.97.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F3643D49 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:14:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (localhost.internetinsite.com [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1G6EdXp052991; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:14:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k1G6Eckt052988; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:14:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.internetinsite.com: chris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:14:38 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Maness X-X-Sender: chris@ns1.internetinsite.com To: Bob Perry In-Reply-To: <43F416D8.8060207@gti.net> Message-ID: <20060215221342.L52979@ns1.internetinsite.com> References: <43F360C4.6070201@chrismaness.com> <43F3FAF1.3060706@gti.net> <20060215213936.X45984@ns1.internetinsite.com> <43F416D8.8060207@gti.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stale Dependancy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:14:40 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Bob Perry wrote: > Chris Maness wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Bob Perry wrote: >> >>> Chris Maness wrote: >>>> This might be Newbie question: >>>> >>>> What is the cleanest way to resolve stale dependency with gamin-0.1.5_3. >>>> I think I remember seeing a message that it merged into fam. I did a >>>> portupgrade -a, and it's still there. I was surprised this was not self >>>> cleansing because I used CVSUP to sync my port tree. >>> >>> Hi Chris, >>> I ran into a stale dependency situation where I thought gamin-0.1.5_3 was >>> replacing fam. I posted the issue and received the following command >>> which replaced fam: >>> >>> "You can only have one (fam or gamin) installed. The following command >>> will replace fam with gamin: >>>> > >>>> > portupgrade -o devel/gamin -f fam" >>> >>> I posted my message around 1/31. You may want to review archives and >>> determine if this may apply to your situation. >>> >>> Bob Perry >>> >>> >> >> That fixed the stale dependency problem, but didn't fam merge into gamin. >> Isn't that what caused the issue in the first place? >> >> > Not sure Chris. However, I did not see fam, or gamin mentioned in > /usr/ports/UDATING. > > Bob > Thanks, maybe I had it mistaken for another port that merged. Chris Maness From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 06:15:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CCC16A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:15:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeramey@jeramey.com) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [217.160.230.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E43C43D72 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:15:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeramey@jeramey.com) Received: from [216.254.25.46] (helo=hedorah.dootplex.com) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrelayus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKp2t-1F9cQY2lev-0002tF; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:15:48 -0500 Received: by hedorah.dootplex.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:15:57 -0800 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:15:57 -0800 From: Jeramey Crawford To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216061557.GA39302@hedorah.dootplex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Provags-ID: perfora.net abuse@perfora.net login:d6865874376fe600ddf639a6e87bbafa Subject: UTF-8 locales and display corruption X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:15:50 -0000 If I should set my LANG environment variable to "en_US.UTF-8", many terminal applications which link to and use ncurses begin to have various degrees of display corruption. Does anyone know how to fix this, or what the cause is? The applications I have noticed it the most in are mutt (including mutt-devel) and ncmpc, both from ports, and I am running FreeBSD-STABLE as of just a couple of days ago. Thanks! Jeramey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 06:38:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C1516A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:38:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BED43D55 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:38:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1F9cmK-00073q-6F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:38:12 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1F9cmD-000990-DR for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:38:05 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k1G6c5Jc035153 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:38:05 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:38:05 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216063805.GC35058@sysadm.stc> References: <20060215010144.99360.qmail@web60018.mail.yahoo.com> <20060215015920.GB69337@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060215015920.GB69337@catflap.slightlystrange.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: automount external usb hard drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:38:14 -0000 On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 01:59:21AM +0000, Daniel Bye wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 08:01:44PM -0500, Peter wrote: > > Hi, is it possible to have an external USB hard drive automounted once > > connected? Also you'll need to umount it manually if you dont wish lose data. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 07:23:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890D916A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:23:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C9443D4C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:23:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1F9dUE-0008W0-HA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:23:34 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1F9dU7-0009BG-Hi for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:23:27 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k1G7NRHj035293 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:23:27 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:23:27 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216072327.GD35058@sysadm.stc> References: <20060215202527.E60635@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060215202527.E60635@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: devfs ruleset appropriate for jail'd environment ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:23:36 -0000 On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:26:36PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > I had thought there used to be a sample one in /etc/devfs.conf, but its > either no longer there, or my memory is failing me ... > > Does anyone have one that is appropriate for mounting devfs into a jail > where ppl have shell access? put jail_YOUR-JAIL-NAME_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" to /etc/rc.conf You can look at rules in /etc/defaults/devfs.rules From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 07:45:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1CB16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:45:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C9943D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:45:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id d42so100665pyd for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:45:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bydzWD11OFRrXlhpdivf38D+aBsFA5dOsMHYx275HPyZ9A1ELdrdreYrtmKtVdRfPrMfPM9qTKgdY7gKkxS4xQVQKqnjBjUl2JrSjLpk8ysWNisWzQzWZxWhO3fZ2aTmtf0d4Pwr1TwW38dPhYhcbwPG7rMlUrluItLZDZ+LpYk= Received: by 10.35.8.1 with SMTP id l1mr177215pyi; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:19:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.5.63? ( [216.202.42.5]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id f19sm948196pyf.2006.02.14.17.19.28; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:19:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F28058.8000701@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:14:00 -0800 From: Kurt Buff User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Arpwatch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kurt.buff@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:45:41 -0000 All, I've installed arpwatch-2.1.a13_2 on FBSD 6.0 (6.0-RELEASE #0 GENERIC I386), and it looks like it installed just fine. However, when I run the rc.d script (/usr/local/etc/rc.d/arpwatch.sh start) to start it, nothing happens, except that it echoes 'meuh' and then dies - I found that string in the script, so that seems to be working, as far as that goes. I'm wanting to accept defaults for the startup, so haven't edited the script, nor am I passing any arguments on the command line. Man arpwatch doesn't reveal anything to me - it's kinda terse, per usual. However, I am running ntop on the same box, if that makes a difference. Anyone out there knowledgable about this, and can tell me what goof I'm making? Thanks, Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 07:46:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A9716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:46:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [63.240.77.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BBB43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:46:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from eisenhower.ascendency.net ([67.173.128.145]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20060216074620011000e6t8e>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:46:20 +0000 Received: from Mike8500 (ipcop.localdomain [192.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by eisenhower.ascendency.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1G7kJQJ000811 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:46:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) From: "Mike Loiterman" To: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:46:19 -0600 Message-ID: <01eb01c632cd$1365c900$0401a8c0@Mike8500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYyzRKffeoI+AU0SAuoF2xT79GLkg== X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (eisenhower.ascendency.net [192.168.1.22]); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:46:20 -0600 (CST) Subject: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mike@ascendency.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:46:22 -0000 Afte being up for more than two months, I just noticed that my ver reliable and stable server mysteriously rebooted. I've had the same hardware and system setup for more than a year and haven't ever experienced anything like this before. I haven't added any new hardware in a very long time. I did upgrade mysql this morning via portupgrade, however. The system appears to have crashed, as dmesg shows that the various filesystems weren't unmounted correctly upon reboot, but aside from that single error, nothing else points to what the problem was. /var/log/messages just shows a user connectig via pop, and then the next line is the machine booting. We are having a pretty good rainstorm, but nothing else seems to have lost power and I have several other machines in this space that did not go down (servers, TVs, XBOX, laptops, etc). The machine seems to have gone down around 11:23 PM, so I checked /etc/cron to see if I had scheduled a job to be run at that time, but there are no jobs scheduled to be run on or near this time. Where can I begin to look for more clues as to why this machine seems to have crashed? Where would a kernel core dump be or a mysql core dump? ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: mike@ascendency.net PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 07:55:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228AE16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:55:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E17243D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:55:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1G7tHOX085630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:55:17 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id k1G7tFTE006409; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:55:15 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:55:15 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200602160755.k1G7tFTE006409@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: mike@ascendency.net In-reply-to: <01eb01c632cd$1365c900$0401a8c0@Mike8500> References: <01eb01c632cd$1365c900$0401a8c0@Mike8500> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:55:39 -0000 > /var/log/messages just shows a user connectig via pop, and then the next > line is the machine booting. Does the reboot correspond to the rainstorm? Do you have UPS? If time matches and no UPS I'd highly suspect a micro power faillure, that other machines could over go, but that this specific machine could not handle. It could be enough that a capacitor in the power supply of the machine is drying out and the micro cut could not be filtered as well as it used to be. I'd not expect laptopn of TV to be affected by such micro shortage. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 08:10:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C4816A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:10:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A0943D55 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:10:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1G8Adfu010420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:10:39 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:07:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602161007.47212.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Subject: last known 4-.x-RELEASE where PicoBSD can be built X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:10:43 -0000 Hi, I tried to build PicoBSD using sources from RELENG_4 on a 4.10-RELEASE-p5 system and it failed. I (think|know) it's working again on RELENG_6, but I want to use 4.x branch. So, which sources should I get to build it? Thanks a lot in advance Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 08:19:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C72016A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:19:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkerian@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC6A43D4C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:19:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkerian@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n15so63151nfc for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:19:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=k4t97azDI8XEnCkZyr6Nf8DhW7Ib1R8ocF90FbxCiK6k/Srccp3jB/xiefaEtPNLbludzGGdatYztT4L8I8WbYWmY+2i3WwmEQzRFP3Ic4OEFzpVycuELELwYqK7VfLUvj9IzZbovkejHS7HxJqnbAEFIEw5xzWgznVS8W0XKMQ= Received: by 10.48.202.15 with SMTP id z15mr114928nff; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:19:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.65.15 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:19:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <282b2dd90602160019t25fb8eanf5ff693dbd867385@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:19:44 +0900 From: Joseph Kerian To: Robert Leftwich , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1139661724.10713.254124058@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1139660347.9558.254123183@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1139661724.10713.254124058@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0, amd64, A8N-SLI and 4gb ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:19:47 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:19:47 -0000 On 2/11/06, Robert Leftwich wrote: > > > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:19:07 +1100, "Robert Leftwich" > said: > > I've been running FreeBSD 6.0 stable on an A8N-SLI Premium amd64 box > > with 2gb of ram for a few weeks now and it has been running well, > ...[snip] > > Forgot to mention, I'm running a kernel with 'options SMP' + GENERIC > minus one or two of the non-applicable options. > > Robert I was planning on purchasing one of these boards in the near future, so I'm rather interested if you have solved this particular problem. In no particular order, my suggestions are: -The A8N-SLI's are extremely picky about the RAM you give them; have you double checked with a memtest run to verify that it's not the problem? Also= , what happens if the new RAM is the only RAM in the system? -Does anything change if you compile for a single processor? FreeBSD should run fine even if it's not taking advantage of the dual cored nature of the processor. -There appears to have been a bios problem with using exactly 4 gigs of ram in the A8N Deluxe boards at one point, not sure if this also showed up on the Premiums or not. You may want to verify that you are running the most recent bios. I found the cause of the invalid option error. From the handbook section o= n the PAE option: "*Note:* The PAE support in FreeBSD is only available for Intel IA-32 processors." Note that it appears that PAE is a system for addressing _more= _ than 4 gigs of RAM (handbook section 8). Since your board only supports up to 4 gigs ( http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelmenu=3D2&model=3D539&l1=3D3&l2=3D15= &l3=3D148), I guess I'm curious why the PAE options exist in the bios. Regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 08:42:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D97C16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:42:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [216.148.227.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B351343D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:42:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from eisenhower.ascendency.net ([67.173.128.145]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20060216084224m1100pk90ue>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:42:25 +0000 Received: from Mike8500 (ipcop.localdomain [192.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by eisenhower.ascendency.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1G8gNnj001408 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:42:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) From: "Mike Loiterman" To: "'Olivier Nicole'" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:42:23 -0600 Message-ID: <01ec01c632d4$e83f83d0$0401a8c0@Mike8500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYy0Imd98CUoPcmTrq31aJALVbMzAAABCWQ In-Reply-To: <200602160755.k1G7tFTE006409@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (eisenhower.ascendency.net [192.168.1.22]); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:42:23 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mike@ascendency.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:42:26 -0000 Olivier Nicole wrote: >> /var/log/messages just shows a user connectig via pop, and then the >> next line is the machine booting. > > Does the reboot correspond to the rainstorm? > > Do you have UPS? > > If time matches and no UPS I'd highly suspect a micro power faillure, > that other machines could over go, but that this specific machine > could not handle. It could be enough that a capacitor in the power > supply of the machine is drying out and the micro cut could not be > filtered as well as it used to be. > > I'd not expect laptopn of TV to be affected by such micro shortage. > > Olivier I suppose the power could be an issue, but there is another machine plugged into the same surgeprotector that is EXTERMELY sensitive to power flucuations and it didn't go down and neither did anything else in my whole house. I don't think it was a power issue, but could be wrong. Looking through debug.log, it looks like right before the machine rebooted, I was hit with some sort of mini-DOS mail attack. At 23:27:54 my grey-list milter processed exactly 801 messages fom a variety of different ips, by 23:28:09 the machine had rebooted. Something similar happened around 01:34:46 when I got 796 messages from a variety of ips. I have throttling enabled in my mail config, and the machine is quite robust in terms of memory and specs, so I'm not sure why this happened. I also use a milter-greylist. I think the milter kicks in before the sendmail throttling, so that maybe why it crashed. Any ideas how to harden against more attacks? ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: mike@ascendency.net PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 08:53:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699D316A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:53:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76A6443D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:53:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 08:53:19 -0000 Received: from 234.241.203.62.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO storage.mine.nu) [62.203.241.234] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 09:53:19 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Received: from storage.mine.nu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storage.mine.nu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1G8r4ab052839 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:53:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@storage.mine.nu) Received: (from lars@localhost) by storage.mine.nu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1G8r4dc052838 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:53:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:53:04 +0100 From: lars To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:53:21 -0000 David Benfell wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:01:33 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > FreeBSD is showing 4th place right now behind Linux, SunOS and Netware for > > Average Uptimes ... with ours being an average of 120 days > > > Which shows yet again how utterly worthless this kind of rating is. > > So here's the problem as *I* see it: Do you participate in such > silliness for dubious PR value at the risk of supporting the use of > invalid methodology, or do you refuse at the risk of appearing to have > something to hide? Now, the way I frame this makes pretty clear *my* > preference, but possibly others have other ways to frame it. I agree with your assessment. A long uptime means that the machine hasn't been rebooted for a long time. If that time's longer than the time to the last patch that required a kernel recompilation and a reboot, it means the server is not patched. Where's the point in advertising an unpatched machine? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 09:01:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F5016A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:01:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from yggdrasil.interstroom.nl (yggdrasil.interstroom.nl [80.85.129.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0209B43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:01:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from ip127-180.introweb.nl ([80.65.127.180] helo=[192.168.1.42]) by yggdrasil with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1F9f1I-0004Cv-00; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:01:48 +0100 Message-ID: <43F43F7B.4010900@axis.nl> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:01:47 +0100 From: Olaf Greve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1.centos4 (X11/20051007) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olaf Greve References: <43F32AD4.1090103@axis.nl> In-Reply-To: <43F32AD4.1090103@axis.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Interstroom virusscan, please e-mail helpdesk@interstroom.nl for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help! Apache 2.2 gives segmentation fault errors with PHP. - Solved! :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:01:58 -0000 Hi all, Yesterday I had trouble when configuring Apache 2.2 with PHP 4.4.2, which caused Apache to crash (segmentation fault) when calling various PHP functions. The hint to the answer resided in the /var/log/httpd-error.log file: > And the /var/log/httpd-error.log file mentions the following (at the end): > [...] > PHP Warning: Function registration failed - duplicate name - bzopen in > Unknown on line 0 > PHP Warning: Function registration failed - duplicate name - bzread in > Unknown on line 0 > [...] > ..............many more similar messages............... This obviously hinted at these functions (i.e php4-extensions) somehow being doubly present and called. Issuing a 'pkg_info | grep php' command was most illustrative, and showed over a screen full of output like this: mod_php4-4.4.2_1,1 PHP Apache Module php4-bcmath-4.4.2_1 The bcmath shared extension for php php4-bz2-4.3.10 The bz2 shared extension for php php4-bz2-4.4.2_1 The bz2 shared extension for php php4-calendar-4.4.2_1 The calendar shared extension for php php4-crack-4.4.2_1 The crack shared extension for php php4-ctype-4.4.2_1 The ctype shared extension for php php4-dio-4.4.2_1 The dio shared extension for php php4-domxml-4.4.2_1 The domxml shared extension for php php4-exif-4.4.2_1 The exif shared extension for php php4-extensions-1.0 A "meta-port" to install PHP extensions php4-gd-4.3.10 The gd shared extension for php php4-gd-4.4.2_1 The gd shared extension for php [...more lines where those came from...] Tadaaaah!! there we go: indeed several extensions were somehow not removed properly when a previous upgrade to PHP 4.4.2 (from v4.3.10) was performed! As to the reason for this, go figure, I always install from the ports by doing a 'make' 'make deinstall' 'make reinstall' sequence when upgrading... Anyway, manually removing all PHP extensions using the various individual 'make deinstall' sequences (and bluntly pkg_delete for pear). Then, I cleanly redid the process for installing mod_php4 and the extensions, and now all is working fine! Tnx for thinking along with me, and beware of this potential pitfall! :) Cheers! Olafo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 10:47:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810B116A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:47:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE1B43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:47:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from valerio.daelli@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c29so80359nfb for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:47:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eaaKqwTBVo9DQFlckg7f/yWIyEug9WoJTQACkN/GbrpOH78WaXFL+3wN9Op7q6d8vWOEbXguAlzvpynwZDTJE2BLCTbpoDpbobZanqPaOCf+tKaOY1B0xR4wk2U8fZwXzePQ1nY+OpJ46UW2w+k8elVabteUdh2aiMFpSfN693Y= Received: by 10.49.8.11 with SMTP id l11mr144510nfi; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:47:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.43.12 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:47:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27dbfc8c0602160247n2bc841d0jb04f74a335959c39@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:47:08 +0100 From: Valerio daelli To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <12fe76180602152132i7511585ch3595cb3020501f3@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <12fe76180602152132i7511585ch3595cb3020501f3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD-6 + Jail + MultipleIP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:47:10 -0000 I think somebody already spoke about that in this mailing list, anyway take a look at http://garage.freebsd.pl/ Bye Valerio Daelli On 2/16/06, mr sicon wrote: > Anyone have a patch or know if and when it will be implemented into the b= ase > jail system? > > thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 10:50:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF63616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:50:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from mx3.mail.ru (mx3.mail.ru [194.67.23.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B6343D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:50:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from [80.243.73.15] (port=60295 helo=[10.0.1.5]) by mx3.mail.ru with asmtp id 1F9giD-000PeE-00; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:50:13 +0300 Message-ID: <43F4E503.3000004@mail.ru> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:48:03 +1000 From: Maxim Vetrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, Giorgos Keramidas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fbsd_user , chris@i13i.com Subject: [was Re: IPFILTER rule error] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:50:16 -0000 Yes, that's it! Thanks! I've managed to miss somehow your message, Giorgos, and flooded a bit :-) Regards, Muxas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 10:53:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE31616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:53:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E2643D5C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:53:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o37so138177nzf for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:53:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=m9gTNRdTy9RD3UsscEvHX7CzvwALDeJZvSQMsFbT/s2RdrHfChVA512hZEZzAPitDRtC4q5XLG+mt4/3dgTu2UvWChhXcikUxyk2vYiV2qDKa61/Pnl0i78J6in+pPaCnFBRutKt4JsB2kxoqkch1QlJdkiWnJvQkd1AaehPHvg= Received: by 10.36.12.7 with SMTP id 7mr799068nzl; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:53:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.11 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:53:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:53:10 +0300 From: Andrew Pantyukhin To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <43F3EE83.6060702@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43F3EE83.6060702@mac.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: natd with several alias IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:53:14 -0000 On 2/16/06, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > I wonder, what tricks do you use to use more than > > one alias IP? I mean, if you have hundreds of > > hosts behind your firewall, what can you do to alias > > some of them to one ip, others to another and so on. > > See "man natd" about the following options for 1-to-1 NAT translation, wh= ich can > be put into /etc/natd.conf and processed automagicly when the machine boo= ts: > > -redirect_address localIP publicIP That's one trick. Do you use it in production? How many hosts do you have mapped this way? How do you get incoming traffic translated to the address it is meant for, not the last address? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 11:20:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788A216A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FA543D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:20:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 30048 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 11:20:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.50.128.59]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Feb 2006 11:20:50 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:20:49 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20060216122049.5beb1c33@localhost> In-Reply-To: <43F3496D.2060003@mac.com> References: <20060213154956.058ccd65@localhost> <43F0A70F.2090006@mac.com> <20060214180705.4d4ba682@localhost> <43F2200F.60204@mac.com> <20060215160725.0b6f4d40@localhost> <43F3496D.2060003@mac.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_sRT4BcuAkyngWTNsVCz5kkj; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Concerns about wording of man blackhole X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:20:53 -0000 --Sig_sRT4BcuAkyngWTNsVCz5kkj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chuck Swiger wrote: > Fabian Keil wrote: > >> Most people use a firewall because they are running services (and > >> thus have open ports) which they do not want the rest of the > >> Internet to be able to connect to. > >=20 > > What does this have to do with "blackhole". =20 >=20 > The "blackhole" sysctl makes it somewhat harder for an intruder to > figure out which ports are really closed versus which ports are being > filtered, and how/where that filtering is being done. >=20 > Firewalls are used to make open ports appear "filtered" to external > connection attempts. Someone who assumes that all filtered ports are > really closed is not making a correct assumption. OK I didn't think about the problem that the firewall can't reset the connection on behalf of a system behind it (at least I don't know if there is a firewall which sends resets with faked IPs) and dropping is the only way to go. While reading man blackhole I was configuring PF on my laptop, and with the possibility to let ports appear as closed, blackhole doesn't look that good.=20 =20 > >> If there exists someone who assumes all "filtered" ports are > >> closed, well, wouldn't that fact demonstrate that the blackhole > >> mechanism does help...? > > =20 > > Help with what? From the attacker's point of view it makes little > > difference if a port appears as filtered or closed. >=20 > A knowledgeable security analyst or a blackhat trying to crack the > network would certainly not assume "closed" and "filtered" are the > same thing. You're right again, I was only thinking of the case where the firewall is running on the target system and faking closed ports is as easy as letting them appear as filtered. =20 > [ ... ] > >>>> These reconnection attempts will greatly slow down attempts to > >>>> scan ports rapidly. > >>> Which shouldn't result in a DOS anyway. The reconnection attempts > >>> will even increase the inbound traffic. > >> Yes, but to ports that aren't actually open. > >> > >> It's relatively cheap and easy to process such packets by just > >> dropping them, compared with processing them in a userland daemon. > >=20 > > What userland daemon? >=20 > The canonical example is inetd, but any process which listen()s on a > port and accept()s incoming connections would qualify as a "userland > daemon". I know what a userland daemon is, but on a closed port there shouldn't be one. =20 > >> [ ... ] > >>> Again I don't see the gain. Eventually the port scan will be > >>> finished and open ports found. > >> If you can flip a sysctl which increases the time it takes for > >> Slammer or Nimda or some other worm to scan through all of the IP's > >> on your network, the admins there have more time to respond, and > >> there is a better chance that AV software will get updates to block > >> the malware before too many systems get infected. > >=20 > > If you already have the firewall to drop those unwanted connections > > you might as well just reset them. >=20 > Unfortunately, a firewall can only affect traffic which passes by > it. There are plenty of cases where someone opens an attachment in a > malicious email, which infects their system and causes it to > scan/probe LAN IPs. >=20 > Having a firewall won't do a thing to protect you from local scans. > Using "blackhole" on internal machines can help this scenario > somewhat. You mean just by slowing the scan down, or is there another effect I didn't think of? Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_sRT4BcuAkyngWTNsVCz5kkj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD9GAbjV8GA4rMKUQRAgMjAKDham8Lqh2I+GVcFP3qYY7t2eoQsACfQbgk kN20jXnfjcenrOBXaGVZuX4= =2gI1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_sRT4BcuAkyngWTNsVCz5kkj-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 11:47:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121E216A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:47:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5B0543D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:47:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 68097 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Feb 2006 11:46:58 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gcFsCsCJXZ4CEupxpXS74wxgvWOxVmm4IrOE+pj/GHEBNxUlAnevLivhinTRNWX9cIRP9I9kXCRZjjLyyk/Ruyst4qX2H5aDDIAXLb//XyvBDRgp2iYterwjwXEPVwevhEzo2/VcXLGJuee8XGVovapo7ec1DmlsfOw9D8OeSoM= ; Message-ID: <20060216114653.68094.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:46:53 PST Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:46:53 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ian Barnes , bob@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <00a701c632b9$1e5540c0$6400000a@ianb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: RE: Ethernet Stopping Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:47:02 -0000 could also be a ppp keepalive problem. As they say in the open source world "you have the source, so trace it out". You're just wasting time blabbering about it. --- Ian Barnes wrote: > Hi, > > Here might be a better drawing (possibly) > > Router (10.0.0.2) > | > | > FreeBSD Gateway (10.0.0.1) > | > | > Switch (10/100) > | > ------------------------- (10.0.1.0/24) > | | | > Laptop Desktop Wireless AP > > > The router is in bridge mode and my FreeBSD box > gets its tun0 IP from DHCP > from the ISP through pppoe. The 10.0.0.1 is a > static address and all the > machines (excluding the wireless), are dhcp in > the 10.0.1.0/24 range. > > I removed the read IP addresses from the post, > I replaced them with x.x.x. I > howevere don't feel that the PPP is the problem > because it is working for > about 5-10 minutes. Then everything stops > working. Like an ARP problem. Cant > explain why I would have an arp problem though. > I am not trying to configure > ppp as that works fine, its just that the > network stops working after 5-10 > minutes that its already working. > > Cheers > Ian > > -----Original Message----- > From: bob@a1poweruser.com > [mailto:bob@a1poweruser.com] > Sent: 16 February 2006 01:53 AM > To: Ian Barnes; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: Ethernet Stopping Problem > > Need more background info. > Explain where you are getting the public > non-routable 10.0.0.0 ip > address from. > You say the ADSL router is using them. > Did you edit your real ip address to hide then > from this public > post? > Also you have to post your ppp.conf file. > Are you trying to configure PPPoe? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On > Behalf Of Ian Barnes > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:47 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Ethernet Stopping Problem > > > Hi, > > I have a freebsd 5.2 box setup as my gateway > for my home network. > The > network is layed out as follows: > > FreeBSD Gateway - 10.0.0.1/16 > ADSL Router - 10.0.0.2/16 > > DHCP Network - 10.0.1.0 - 10.0.1.254 all /16 > with default gateway as > .1 > > I have ppp enabled on the freebsd unit, and it > connects fine and > then > everything works perfectly for anything between > 5 and 10 minutes. At > this > stage, the freebsd machine cant get to the > 10.0.1.0 network anymore. > It can > still ping 10.0.0.2 fine and its connection to > the internet remains > perfect. > It just wont let anyone else come in from > anywhere else on the > network. It > kills all SSH sessions, web sessions etc. I > replaced the ifac card > with an > ed0 card, and also replaced cables and the > switch in between. > > The card in question is both a dc0 and an ed0 > card which I have > swapped into > another PCI port and it still does the same > thing there. Below is an > ifconfig: > > ed0: > flags=108843 > mtu 1500 > inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffff0000 > broadcast 10.0.255.255 > ether 00:c0:df:fa:b8:74 > plip0: > flags=108810 mtu > 1500 > lo0: flags=8049 > mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > tun0: > flags=8051 > mtu 1492 > inet 165.x.x.x --> 165.x.x.x netmask > 0xffffffff > Opened by PID 218 > [root@gateway] ~ # > > > Here is a rc.conf: > [root@gateway] ~ # cat /etc/rc.conf > defaultrouter="10.0.0.2" > hostname="gateway.domain.local" > ifconfig_ed0="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask > 255.255.0.0" > saver="logo" > sshd_enable="NO" > usbd_enable="YES" > blanktime="3600" > apache2_enable="YES" > mysql_enable="YES" > sendmail_enable="NONE" > gateway_enable="YES" > inetd_enable="NO" > kern_securelevel_enable="NO" > ppp_enable="YES" > ppp_nat="YES" > ppp_mode="ddial" > ppp_profile="dsl1" > dhcpd_enable="YES" > dhcpd_flags="-q" > dhcpd_conf="/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf" > dhcpd_ifaces="ed0" > [root@gateway] ~ # > > > I don't have any sysctl rules in place, and > everything else about > this unit > is standard. > > I am not running a firewall at this stage and > was just wondering > what the > cause of this problem could be? > > Cheers > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 11:51:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E1B16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:51:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7228443D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:51:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 30827 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 22:51:48 +1100 Received: from 203-214-128-237.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO ?192.168.13.3?) (203.214.128.237) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 22:51:48 +1100 Message-ID: <43F4674F.3080907@meijome.net> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:51:43 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN" References: <1321368.31140068125121.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> In-Reply-To: <1321368.31140068125121.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kdm and fluxbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@meijome.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:51:50 -0000 RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote: > usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xsession > > notice this file is for XDM, not KDM. try searching in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/kdm :) > WHERE IS KDM GETTING ITS SESSION INFO FROM AND HOW DO I TELL IT TO ADD FLUXBOX > > not sure, probably from its config file. Or just set it to custom, and use ~/.xsession to launch your stuff at will. Just curious, why use kdm with all it's KDE dependencies, when you can use xdm, or wdm (what I use). Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 09:13:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6420216A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:13:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaroonsaka@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-dav4.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.48.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2155143D53 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:13:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaroonsaka@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:13:09 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 202.28.2.24 by BAY14-DAV4.phx.gbl with DAV; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:13:09 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [202.28.2.24] X-Originating-Email: [jaroonsaka@hotmail.com] X-Sender: jaroonsaka@hotmail.com From: "jaroonsak paokeaw" To: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:12:56 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2006 09:13:09.0894 (UTC) FILETIME=[34A1AA60:01C632D9] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:50:46 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-874" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: sip server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:13:10 -0000 Dear. Hey! I want your OS work with sip server. Can you suggest some sip = poxy server. And it must easy to configure and setup because i's very = baby adminitrator in linux and freebsd. =20 Thx. Good man From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 10:25:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB5F16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:25:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chronic_extremist@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay20-f7.bay20.hotmail.com [64.4.54.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D62643D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:25:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chronic_extremist@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:25:42 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 193.251.135.125 by by20fd.bay20.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:25:41 GMT X-Originating-IP: [193.251.135.125] X-Originating-Email: [chronic_extremist@hotmail.com] X-Sender: chronic_extremist@hotmail.com From: "waqas babar" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:25:41 +0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2006 10:25:42.0112 (UTC) FILETIME=[56C16E00:01C632E3] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:51:46 +0000 Cc: Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:25:42 -0000 hello ppl i am a windows user and i am trying to get rid of it .............(u knoe its clumsy and unstable) i found about freebsd now i want to know waht is free bsd for......................................... i am not a networking or server that kind of a user i am a multimedia user i.e games and music and movies is free bsd good for that stuff and if not is there any good os u knoe i can get instead of windows ..................pd do u know if i can install MAC os X tiger on my amd athlon pc........................plz do reply............ _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 13:05:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5540916A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:05:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [63.240.77.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A0B43D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:05:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([68.80.195.248]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2006021613052701200s9vt9e>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:05:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA8AB843; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:05:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bserver.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59302-05; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:05:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.214.102] (kbuilt.transpack.com [192.168.214.102]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E446B842; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:05:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F47890.5050704@allenmyland.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:05:20 -0500 From: Ken Stevenson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jaroonsak paokeaw References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-874; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at transpack.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sip server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:05:29 -0000 jaroonsak paokeaw wrote: > Dear. > > Hey! I want your OS work with sip server. Can you suggest some sip poxy server. And it must easy to configure and setup because i's very baby adminitrator in linux and freebsd. > > Thx. Good man Look at /usr/ports/net/asterisk /usr/ports/net/ser http://www.voip-info.org -- Ken Stevenson Allen-Myland Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 13:13:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C065616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4645043D73 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:13:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 71899 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 13:13:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bk+Uup2DTykBmW5KP5ETvoKHWIticST1Tkl9mVu9bmwIb8ohYf10U7qp5K7mJD4Mz/TB/iYPhSiwxm1Jay4OfmSAElVrS8Z5DViR6uWBeGT4tLMby2F3J2VBEmAN9QS2nAHhq2zT5wzAoubVh8hAqWzyw2rsyK16TiIs9BgoHNg= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mj001@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 13:13:03 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: "RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN" In-Reply-To: <1321368.31140068125121.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> References: <1321368.31140068125121.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:13:01 -0500 Message-Id: <1140095581.11019.28.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kdm and fluxbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:13:08 -0000 On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 22:35 -0700, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote: > I am tring to get kdm to log me into fluxbox i have followed the handbook to the letter and can login to gnome kde and enlightnment also options for defaut and failsafe and some others none of which i have tried yet. However flux box is not there and i cannot seem to find where kde is getting these sessions from. There does not seem to be any option in kcontrol for session like mentioned in the freebsd handbook i did go into > > usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xsession > > and added some lines but nothing happened > > failsafe) > exec /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -geometry 80x24-0-0 > ;; > kde) > exec /usr/local/bin/startkde > ;; > GNOME) > exec /usr/X11R6/bin/gnome-session > ;; > FluxBox) > exec /usr/X11R6/bin/fluxbox > ;; > esac > esac > > > WHERE IS KDM GETTING ITS SESSION INFO FROM AND HOW DO I TELL IT TO ADD FLUXBOX > > Look in /usr/local/share/config/kdm -- Mike Jeays http://ca.geocities.com/mike.jeays@rogers.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 13:43:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E4B16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:43:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from psmtp03.wxs.nl (psmtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.247.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE39343D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:43:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from smtp.planet.nl (ip51cc8423.speed.planet.nl [81.204.132.35]) by psmtp03.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.07 (built Jun 24 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUS006C08T8PK@psmtp03.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:43:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from Alex1.kruijff.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.planet.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GDhuTv002682; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:43:56 +0100 Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by Alex1.kruijff.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1GDhtB2002681; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:43:55 +0100 Content-return: prohibited Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:43:55 +0100 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <01eb01c632cd$1365c900$0401a8c0@Mike8500> To: Mike Loiterman Message-id: <20060216134355.GA778@Alex1.kruijff.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i References: <01eb01c632cd$1365c900$0401a8c0@Mike8500> X-Authentication-warning: Alex1.kruijff.org: akruijff set sender to freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl using -f Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:43:59 -0000 On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:46:19AM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: > Afte being up for more than two months, I just noticed that my ver reliable > and stable server mysteriously rebooted. I've had the same hardware and > system setup for more than a year and haven't ever experienced anything like > this before. I haven't added any new hardware in a very long time. I did > upgrade mysql this morning via portupgrade, however. > > The system appears to have crashed, as dmesg shows that the various > filesystems weren't unmounted correctly upon reboot, but aside from that > single error, nothing else points to what the problem was. > > /var/log/messages just shows a user connectig via pop, and then the next > line is the machine booting. > > We are having a pretty good rainstorm, but nothing else seems to have lost > power and I have several other machines in this space that did not go down > (servers, TVs, XBOX, laptops, etc). > > The machine seems to have gone down around 11:23 PM, so I checked /etc/cron > to see if I had scheduled a job to be run at that time, but there are no > jobs scheduled to be run on or near this time. > > Where can I begin to look for more clues as to why this machine seems to > have crashed? Where would a kernel core dump be or a mysql core dump? You can look at /var/log/messages and find core files with 'find / -name \*.core' I suspect the cause lies with your hardware. There might be something broken that causes your computer to reboot spontaneous when it gets busy or hot and other times it just goes oke. -- Alex Please copy the original recipients, otherwise I may not read your reply. Howto's based on my ppersonal use, including information about setting up a firewall and creating traffic graphs with MRTG http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 13:55:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAB916A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:55:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE9643D6B for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:55:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-22-247.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.247]) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2006 08:55:51 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.02,120,1139202000"; d="scan'208"; a="206069585:sNHT26417884" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17396.33848.576954.756348@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:55:04 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060216061557.GA39302@hedorah.dootplex.com> References: <20060216061557.GA39302@hedorah.dootplex.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta24) "dandelion" XEmacs Lucid Cc: Subject: UTF-8 locales and display corruption X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:55:53 -0000 Jeramey Crawford writes: > If I should set my LANG environment variable to "en_US.UTF-8", > many terminal applications which link to and use ncurses begin to > have various degrees of display corruption. Does anyone know how > to fix this, or what the cause is? Not familiar with the details, but have you recompiled the offenders? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 13:57:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E1816A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:57:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from matrix.teledomenet.gr (dns1.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D9A43D86 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris ([192.168.1.71]) by matrix.teledomenet.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1GDvCuq019044; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:57:12 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kurt.buff@gmail.com Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:54:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <43F28058.8000701@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43F28058.8000701@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602161554.18788.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Subject: Re: Arpwatch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:57:26 -0000 On Wednesday 15 February 2006 03:14, Kurt Buff wrote: > All, > > I've installed arpwatch-2.1.a13_2 on FBSD 6.0 (6.0-RELEASE #0 GENERIC > I386), and it looks like it installed just fine. > > However, when I run the rc.d script (/usr/local/etc/rc.d/arpwatch.sh > start) to start it, nothing happens, except that it echoes 'meuh' and > then dies - I found that string in the script, so that seems to be > working, as far as that goes. > > I'm wanting to accept defaults for the startup, so haven't edited the > script, nor am I passing any arguments on the command line. > > Man arpwatch doesn't reveal anything to me - it's kinda terse, per usual. > > However, I am running ntop on the same box, if that makes a difference. > > Anyone out there knowledgable about this, and can tell me what goof I'm > making? Many packages use the ng startup scripts. # Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf to enable arpwatch: # #arpwatch_enable="YES" from here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-mgmt/arpwatch/files/arpwatch.sh.in?rev=1.2&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup HTH, Nikos > > Thanks, > > Kurt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 14:20:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED8C16A423 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:20:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from AshleyMoran@codeweavers.net) Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B6A43D4C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:20:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from AshleyMoran@codeweavers.net) Received: from aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060216142007.UADA29066.mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:20:07 +0000 Received: from jigsaw-sbs02.jigsawhq.com ([213.106.224.113]) by aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060216142007.BOY20737.aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@jigsaw-sbs02.jigsawhq.com> for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:20:07 +0000 X-Filtered-With-Copfilter: Version 0.81.6 (ProxSMTP 1.2.1) X-Copfilter-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87/1290 - Thu Feb 16 09:14:53 2006 X-Copfilter: Client is part of our network, skipped SpamAssassin Received: from alfie.jigsawhq.com ([192.168.0.181]) by jigsaw-sbs02.jigsawhq.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:18:57 +0000 From: Ashley Moran Organization: Codeweavers Ltd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:18:32 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602161418.32982.ashley.moran@codeweavers.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2006 14:18:58.0037 (UTC) FILETIME=[ECFA1A50:01C63303] Subject: Log analysis server suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:20:09 -0000 Until recently I had a server running syslog-ng set to archive all logs into server/year/month/day/ directories. Now the server is running in amd64, we've lost our hi-res scrolling display so I want to look at a better log watching system. I've read about logging to a database. I quite like the idea of storing our logs in PostgreSQL (I don't like MySQL and don't want to get involved in administering a second database). I know I can log to a PG database quite easily, but I don't know how I can get the data back out without writing manual queries. Here is what I need: - Logs stored for the last 6 months or so, and easily searchable - Live log watching - Log analysis I might try swatch for the live log watching as this is not affected by the choice of log storage and seems the best tool for the job. As for searching / analysis, I've seen php-syslog-ng ( http://www.vermeer.org/projects/php-syslog-ng ), which looks very basic, and phpLogCon ( http://www.phplogcon.com/ ), which does not support PG anyway. Is there anything better GUI-wise? Maybe I am best keeping the logs in text files for now, and spending more time on swatch. Any thoughts? Cheers Ashley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 14:25:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5CB16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:25:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B49143D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:25:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 23696 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 14:25:25 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Feb 2006 14:25:25 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2704D28439; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:25:24 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Joe Auty References: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> <443bimav7o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <039BD206-0592-4F99-BE9B-CB49310E5BDC@netmusician.org> <44oe19ftis.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <5681BB6E-A511-4790-A8D9-33FBCBA3B800@netmusician.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 16 Feb 2006 09:25:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5681BB6E-A511-4790-A8D9-33FBCBA3B800@netmusician.org> Message-ID: <44d5hnqt2k.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 35 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: core dump with dump command in single user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:25:35 -0000 Joe Auty writes: > I'm running 5.4. Perhaps restore is generating this particular error > message? I don't know. It would be hard to tell, without an intermediate disk to write the data to so you can separate the dump from the restore. You might be able to trace one of the processes to see, but that requires a bit of technical knowledge. > I may have to go this route, see if I can put together the disk space > to manage this. Is there a way to get tar to just extract directly to > a destination directory so I don't have to contend with a single > large tarball I need to create disk space for? Sure. As far as I'm concerned, that's the normal way to copy directory trees. You just pipe the output of the tar process into another tar process that un-tars it in another place. E.g.: tar -C ~/work/debugger -cf - . | tar -C temp -xf - > > > >> My disk is over a 100 gigabytes, could this be what > >> is causing dump to crap out? > > > > Could be. Check your memory statistics while you're doing it, and see > > if you run out of VM. > > What is a good strategy for dealing with this possibility, should I > go down that path? Start by watching top(1) while it's running... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 14:25:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F9B16A43D for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:25:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B093343D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:25:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from localhost (terrapin.inter-sonic.com [172.16.1.12]) by neonpark.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1753818E23; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:25:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F48B67.70204@intersonic.se> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:25:43 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Falconer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: slapd and bdb-4.2.52 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:25:50 -0000 Jon Falconer wrote: --snip > > Feb 15 15:24:38 ecf3 slapd[23761]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.2.30 (Feb 2 2006 17:42:01) $ > sysadmin@ecf3.puc.edu:/usr/ports/net/openldap22-sasl-server/work/openldap-2.2.30/servers/slapd > Feb 15 15:24:38 ecf3 slapd[23761]: bdb_db_init: Initializing BDB database > Feb 15 15:24:38 ecf3 slapd[23762]: slapd starting > Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 fd=10 ACCEPT from IP=127.0.0.1:55323 (IP=0.0.0.0:389) > Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=0 BIND dn="cn=admin,dc=ds,dc=puc,dc=edu" method=128 > Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=0 BIND dn="cn=admin,dc=ds,dc=puc,dc=edu" mech=SIMPLE ssf=0 > Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text= > Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=1 SRCH base="dc=ds,dc=puc,dc=edu" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" > Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: bdb(dc=ds,dc=puc,dc=edu): illegal flag specified to txn_begin > Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: bdb_txn_get: BerkeleyDB 4.2.52 library needs TXN patch! > Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 nentries=7 text= > Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 op=2 UNBIND > Feb 15 15:25:06 ecf3 slapd[23762]: conn=0 fd=10 closed > > Note the complaint about needing a TXN patch. I looked at the four > available patched for db-4.2.52 on sleepycat.com and none seemed related > to TXN. Can this error be ignored? does anyone know how to fix it? > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" AFAIK you can run without the patch but one of the db's will grow forever. I have patched all our slapd's as follows: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd.sh stop cd /usr/ports/databases/db42 make clean make patch cd work/db-4.2.52/ --- fetch the BerkeleyDB42.patch patch -p0 < BerkeleyDB42.patch cd ../../ make deinstall make reinstall /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd.sh start http://www.google.se/search?num=100&hl=en&q=BerkeleyDB42.patch+site%3Aopenldap.org&btnG=Search From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 14:29:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30A416A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE60D43D62 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE60730A4; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:29:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41423-03; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:29:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (12-223-193-72.client.insightbb.com [12.223.193.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244EB7309B; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:29:15 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <44d5hnqt2k.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> <443bimav7o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <039BD206-0592-4F99-BE9B-CB49310E5BDC@netmusician.org> <44oe19ftis.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <5681BB6E-A511-4790-A8D9-33FBCBA3B800@netmusician.org> <44d5hnqt2k.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:29:12 -0500 To: Lowell Gilbert X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: core dump with dump command SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:22 -0000 Thanks everybody for their help. As it turns out, I guess dump was being starved for memory, as running it while booted into FreeBSD normally using -L to indicate a live filesystem worked just fine. I believe this is because there is an extra swap file available from a normal FreeBSD boot, as specified in my /etc/rc.conf. I'm not sure if my theory completely holds up, but there you have it. Thanks again! I'm up and running... On Feb 16, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Joe Auty writes: > >> I'm running 5.4. Perhaps restore is generating this particular error >> message? I don't know. > > It would be hard to tell, without an intermediate disk to write the > data to so you can separate the dump from the restore. You might be > able to trace one of the processes to see, but that requires a bit of > technical knowledge. > >> I may have to go this route, see if I can put together the disk space >> to manage this. Is there a way to get tar to just extract directly to >> a destination directory so I don't have to contend with a single >> large tarball I need to create disk space for? > > Sure. As far as I'm concerned, that's the normal way to copy > directory trees. You just pipe the output of the tar process into > another tar process that un-tars it in another place. > > E.g.: > tar -C ~/work/debugger -cf - . | tar -C temp -xf - > > > >>> >>>> My disk is over a 100 gigabytes, could this be >>>> what >>>> is causing dump to crap out? >>> >>> Could be. Check your memory statistics while you're doing it, >>> and see >>> if you run out of VM. >> >> What is a good strategy for dealing with this possibility, should I >> go down that path? > > Start by watching top(1) while it's running... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 14:52:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0EB16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:52:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7617843D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:52:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1GEqKYx008241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:52:30 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GEqCRW034673; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:52:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1GEq9WC034667; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:52:10 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:52:09 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Joe Auty Message-ID: <20060216145209.GA34657@flame.pc> References: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> <443bimav7o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <039BD206-0592-4F99-BE9B-CB49310E5BDC@netmusician.org> <44oe19ftis.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <5681BB6E-A511-4790-A8D9-33FBCBA3B800@netmusician.org> <44d5hnqt2k.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.346, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.85, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: core dump with dump command SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:52:51 -0000 On 2006-02-16 09:29, Joe Auty wrote: > Thanks everybody for their help. > > As it turns out, I guess dump was being starved for memory, as > running it while booted into FreeBSD normally using -L to indicate a > live filesystem worked just fine. I believe this is because there is > an extra swap file available from a normal FreeBSD boot, as specified > in my /etc/rc.conf. I'm not sure if my theory completely holds up, > but there you have it. > > Thanks again! I'm up and running... That's very likely. I usually start single user mode with something like the following: # adjkerntz -i # swapon -a # fsck -p # mount -u / # mount -va Having a swap partition enabled definitely helps to avoid ending up without any free memory ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 14:56:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031AB16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:56:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from netmusician.org (netmusician.org [209.67.223.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906CA43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:56:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@netmusician.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094DD730B7; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:56:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41461-10; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:56:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (12-223-193-72.client.insightbb.com [12.223.193.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452F2730AD; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:56:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060216145209.GA34657@flame.pc> References: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> <443bimav7o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <039BD206-0592-4F99-BE9B-CB49310E5BDC@netmusician.org> <44oe19ftis.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <5681BB6E-A511-4790-A8D9-33FBCBA3B800@netmusician.org> <44d5hnqt2k.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20060216145209.GA34657@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Auty Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:56:55 -0500 To: Giorgos Keramidas X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at netmusician.org Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: core dump with dump command SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:56:59 -0000 On Feb 16, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-02-16 09:29, Joe Auty wrote: >> Thanks everybody for their help. >> >> As it turns out, I guess dump was being starved for memory, as >> running it while booted into FreeBSD normally using -L to indicate a >> live filesystem worked just fine. I believe this is because there is >> an extra swap file available from a normal FreeBSD boot, as specified >> in my /etc/rc.conf. I'm not sure if my theory completely holds up, >> but there you have it. >> >> Thanks again! I'm up and running... > > That's very likely. I usually start single user mode with something > like the following: > > # adjkerntz -i > # swapon -a > # fsck -p > # mount -u / > # mount -va > > Having a swap partition enabled definitely helps to avoid ending up > without any free memory ;) > I was doing swapon -a too, but perhaps this command does not enable swap directories that have been attached to /etc/rc.conf? ----------- Joe Auty NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians http://www.netmusician.org joe@netmusician.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 14:57:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB36716A425 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:57:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from enigma@lztech.com.br) Received: from cwbgk1.k1.com.br (customer-200195196249.onda.com.br [200.195.196.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3029243D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:57:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from enigma@lztech.com.br) Received: from webpratico.com.br (M199.28.cwbgk [172.16.199.28] (may be forged)) by cwbgk1.k1.com.br (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1GEvFDt028086 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:57:16 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from enigma@lztech.com.br) Received: from cwb.lztech.com.br (server [192.168.1.6]) by webpratico.com.br (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1GF0trN005669 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:00:55 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from enigma@lztech.com.br) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cwb.lztech.com.br (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1GEvDbu007278 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:57:14 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from enigma@lztech.com.br) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: lztech Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:57:11 -0200 Message-Id: <1140101831.6824.14.camel@server> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: CD problem solved..... a possible bug found... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lenzi@lztech.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:57:19 -0000 Hello all I wish to thank for all people who helped me in particular the one that points me to the "man release" really helped... some days ago I posted a message about building the CDbtoot of FreeBSD version 6.0 release the problem happens when (logged in the 6.0...) I mount the CDrom and did a tar cf - /cdrom | tar xvf - -C /usr the idea is to copy all the directories to the /usr/cdrom... the CD has 580Mb... but the copy have more than 1013 MB... (amost twice.. the size...) The same command on a FreeBSD 5.4 produces the coorect image of 580MB... Tracking down the problem to a directory in the CDROM (rescue) that have an executable build from crunch... of 131 files hard linked to the same executale ... On FreeBSD version 5.4 it correct reads ONE executable (300k) and than builds the same structure on the copy directory (/usr/cdro/rescue)... On FreeBSD 6.0 Release, it reads the same executable 131 times, giving about 412MB ... that ... of course does not fit in the 680MB limit of the CDROM... The same file structure (131 hard links) with the same command (tar...) copies fine when they are outside if the ISO9660 My question is: is this a bug in the ISO9660 in the FreeBSD 6.0 or just a new "behavior" ???? I am using FreeBSd 6.0 Release... Thanks for any attention.... -- Sergio de Almeida Lenzi lztech From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 15:00:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77B616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:00:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [63.240.77.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7150543D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:00:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from eisenhower.ascendency.net ([67.173.128.145]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060216150005013004g5gke>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:00:06 +0000 Received: from Mike8500 (ipcop.localdomain [192.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by eisenhower.ascendency.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GExvmW028265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:00:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) From: "Mike Loiterman" To: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:59:57 -0600 Message-ID: <021b01c63309$ab353130$0401a8c0@Mike8500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYzB3eK1zvJPVaHSGO6Z/K5fLXAhwAAIg4A In-Reply-To: <20060216134355.GA778@Alex1.kruijff.org> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (eisenhower.ascendency.net [192.168.1.22]); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:00:04 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mike@ascendency.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:00:13 -0000 Alex de Kruijff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:46:19AM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: >> Afte being up for more than two months, I just noticed that my ver >> reliable and stable server mysteriously rebooted. I've had the same >> hardware and system setup for more than a year and haven't ever >> experienced anything like this before. I haven't added any new >> hardware in a very long time. I did upgrade mysql this morning via >> portupgrade, however. >> >> The system appears to have crashed, as dmesg shows that the various >> filesystems weren't unmounted correctly upon reboot, but aside from >> that single error, nothing else points to what the problem was. >> >> /var/log/messages just shows a user connectig via pop, and then the >> next line is the machine booting. >> >> We are having a pretty good rainstorm, but nothing else seems to >> have lost power and I have several other machines in this space that >> did not go down (servers, TVs, XBOX, laptops, etc). >> >> The machine seems to have gone down around 11:23 PM, so I checked >> /etc/cron to see if I had scheduled a job to be run at that time, >> but there are no jobs scheduled to be run on or near this time. >> >> Where can I begin to look for more clues as to why this machine >> seems to have crashed? Where would a kernel core dump be or a mysql >> core dump? > > You can look at /var/log/messages and find core files with 'find / > -name \*.core' > > I suspect the cause lies with your hardware. There might be something > broken that causes your computer to reboot spontaneous when > it gets busy > or hot and other times it just goes oke. I just ran (/usr/ports/sysutils/stress/) stress -c 2 which floored the CPU for the last five hours, while compiling emacs over and over. No crashes. No problems. CPU load was over 8 at some points. No files found in the search for *.core. I've also been observing my system...even when mail load from these mini-attacks is heaviest, maybe 800 messages a second, the system load barly goes over idle. There appeas to have been two such attacks. It's a 2.8 ghz machine with 3 gigs of RAM, it should be well able to handle that load even for sustained periods of time. The only real explanation was some sort of power fluctuation. I'll continue to monitor it carefully, but there doesn't seem to be anyway to definitivly identify the cause, but the machine crashing under load is looking less and less likely. If there is a problem, I suspect it will show up again within the next week or so, otherwise I'll chalk it up to a random event in the unverse. ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: mike@ascendency.net PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 15:05:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4971F16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:05:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (mail.wmptl.com [216.8.159.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1E543D58 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:05:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GF5Gh3084519; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:05:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <43F4951E.5090203@wmptl.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:07:10 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ashley Moran References: <200602161418.32982.ashley.moran@codeweavers.net> In-Reply-To: <200602161418.32982.ashley.moran@codeweavers.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 10.0.0.80 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Log analysis server suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:05:51 -0000 Ashley Moran wrote: > Until recently I had a server running syslog-ng set to archive all logs into > server/year/month/day/ directories. Now the server is running in amd64, > we've lost our hi-res scrolling display so I want to look at a better log > watching system. > > I've read about logging to a database. I quite like the idea of storing our > logs in PostgreSQL (I don't like MySQL and don't want to get involved in > administering a second database). I know I can log to a PG database quite > easily, but I don't know how I can get the data back out without writing > manual queries. > > Here is what I need: > > - Logs stored for the last 6 months or so, and easily searchable > - Live log watching > - Log analysis > > I might try swatch for the live log watching as this is not affected by the > choice of log storage and seems the best tool for the job. > > As for searching / analysis, I've seen php-syslog-ng > ( http://www.vermeer.org/projects/php-syslog-ng ), which looks very basic, > and phpLogCon ( http://www.phplogcon.com/ ), which does not support PG > anyway. Is there anything better GUI-wise? > > Maybe I am best keeping the logs in text files for now, and spending more time > on swatch. > > Any thoughts? > > Cheers > Ashley > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > In my experience, logfiles are best NOT in SQL, flat-files are easy to deal with, and through a few simple Perl scripts you could accomplish all you need to. You can run a tail -f and dump output to stdout, or even pipe it to a socket and monitor remotely. Also, various programs have great open-source analysers, for specific logs, (ie Apache, sendmail, etc). I would advise against trying to log everything into SQL records, aside from the performance hit on translating log/write outputs to SQL inserts/queries then having the SQL server write to disk anyway, it just complicates things uneccessarily. My advice would be to take a step back and look at what's important to you. Decide which logs need to be monitored in real-time, are there certain criteria that require immediate attention? What about alhpa-numeric pager systems, or emailed warnings? Are customers going to require reports/information (ie web server stats, sendmail relay stats or spam logs, bandwidth usage, etc). It of course depends on your overall system, and your users more than anything... but in the end I find it's best to work with a mixture of things and hack your own scripts to fill in the gaps. Just my two cents, hope it helps. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 15:06:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D2216A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:06:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59D843D88 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:06:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1GF5ke4008610 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:05:52 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GF5cY9034751; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:05:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1GF5cY4034750; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:05:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:05:38 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Joe Auty Message-ID: <20060216150538.GA34735@flame.pc> References: <1CFD830B-2CAC-44A9-9120-6CF351FD3EB9@netmusician.org> <443bimav7o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <039BD206-0592-4F99-BE9B-CB49310E5BDC@netmusician.org> <44oe19ftis.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <5681BB6E-A511-4790-A8D9-33FBCBA3B800@netmusician.org> <44d5hnqt2k.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20060216145209.GA34657@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.346, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.85, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: core dump with dump command SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:06:26 -0000 On 2006-02-16 09:56, Joe Auty wrote: >On Feb 16, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2006-02-16 09:29, Joe Auty wrote: >>> Thanks everybody for their help. >>> >>> As it turns out, I guess dump was being starved for memory, >>> as running it while booted into FreeBSD normally using -L to >>> indicate a live filesystem worked just fine. I believe this >>> is because there is an extra swap file available from a >>> normal FreeBSD boot, as specified in my /etc/rc.conf. I'm not >>> sure if my theory completely holds up, but there you have it. >>> >>> Thanks again! I'm up and running... >> >> That's very likely. I usually start single user mode with >> something like the following: >> >> # adjkerntz -i >> # swapon -a >> # fsck -p >> # mount -u / >> # mount -va >> >> Having a swap partition enabled definitely helps to avoid >> ending up without any free memory ;) > > I was doing swapon -a too, but perhaps this command does not enable > swap directories that have been attached to /etc/rc.conf? It enables all partitions listed as 'swap' in /etc/fstab. You are probably using a `swapfile', instead of a swap partition, so that wouldn't enable it, because the relevant file system may not be mounted at the time you run 'swapon'. This is one of the reasons behind my tendency to use a separate swap partition instead of swapfile="foo" in `/etc/rc.conf' :-/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 15:21:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B444416A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:21:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (h-66-167-151-186.mclnva23.covad.net [66.167.151.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E04443D49 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:21:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from jimcsoka ([192.168.7.46]) by mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id k1GFMxU2040086 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:22:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Message-ID: <013b01c6330f$2e411120$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> From: "James Csoka" To: References: <20060215162403.2494C16A422@hub.freebsd.org> <20060215223010.GA53246@ns.museum.rain.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:39:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-DFMC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DFMC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com Subject: Blocking an individual email address....again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:21:21 -0000 I'm reposting this with some more info.....any help would be greatly appreciated. I have a mail server (it also functions as a firewall) running freebsd5.4, with mailscanner, openwebmail, and sendmail. I wish to block an individual email address, but I do not want to mark it as spam. My first solution was to add the blacklist feature to the sendmail.mc file, and recreate the .cf file, which I did. I then added the line To:user@example.com REJECT to the /etc/mail/access file, and ran make maps. I also had added the line user@example.com REJECT. This then blocked that address from sending email to people on my internal network. When I tested it from outside my network I used openwebmail as a web interface to send email to that address, and it failed. Which was what I wanted. However, from inside my network, using Outlook, you can send email to that address without a problem. It seems as if the access.db is doing it's job. When using openwebmail, the smtp server rejects any attempt to send mail to that address. however, locally, it does not. When i'm sitting in front of my windows client, I can use Outlook and send email to that address without a problem. Does anyone know why via a web interface, the access file rules would apply, yet they would be ignored when sending mail from inside the network using Outlook to send external email? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 15:28:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B59E16A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:28:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E343D43D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:28:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 15667 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 15:28:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index; b=nlqnEkZWxgdw6fpM9pw1qdjCqwl8fUFi9YKIS4vbmMoPaZXghe5SuTCWOHXVOe5G/x8U073ckUwTLWWU9bpE185Nhr3f/7xnOrjLvW45iarwjMgUXSdF7xptDHx177ZwDLM/9BfHo9LgTuaoJKyh7mVWH4wjx2V0IW1SdOVp/Ic= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login) by smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 15:28:22 -0000 From: "Tamouh H." To: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:27:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <021b01c63309$ab353130$0401a8c0@Mike8500> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcYzB3eK1zvJPVaHSGO6Z/K5fLXAhwAAIg4AAAFVqiA= Message-Id: <20060216152822.E343D43D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:28:23 -0000 >=20 > Alex de Kruijff wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:46:19AM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: > >> Afte being up for more than two months, I just noticed that my ver=20 > >> reliable and stable server mysteriously rebooted. I've > had the same > >> hardware and system setup for more than a year and haven't ever=20 > >> experienced anything like this before. I haven't added any new=20 > >> hardware in a very long time. I did upgrade mysql this > morning via > >> portupgrade, however. > >>=20 > >> The system appears to have crashed, as dmesg shows that > the various > >> filesystems weren't unmounted correctly upon reboot, but > aside from > >> that single error, nothing else points to what the problem was. > >>=20 > >> /var/log/messages just shows a user connectig via pop, and > then the > >> next line is the machine booting. > >>=20 > >> We are having a pretty good rainstorm, but nothing else > seems to have > >> lost power and I have several other machines in this space > that did > >> not go down (servers, TVs, XBOX, laptops, etc). > >>=20 > >> The machine seems to have gone down around 11:23 PM, so I checked=20 > >> /etc/cron to see if I had scheduled a job to be run at > that time, but > >> there are no jobs scheduled to be run on or near this time. > >>=20 > >> Where can I begin to look for more clues as to why this > machine seems > >> to have crashed? Where would a kernel core dump be or a > mysql core > >> dump? > >=20 > > You can look at /var/log/messages and find core files with 'find /=20 > > -name \*.core' > >=20 >=20 > The only real explanation was some sort of power fluctuation.=20 > I'll continue to monitor it carefully, but there doesn't seem to be=20 > anyway to definitivly identify the cause, but the machine crashing=20 > under load is looking less and less likely. >=20 > If there is a problem, I suspect it will show up again within the next = > week or so, otherwise I'll chalk it up to a random event in the=20 > unverse. I have had the exact issue with a dual xeon and FreeBSD 5.4 with 4GB = RAM. It was working perfectly fine and after a month or two all the = sudden the machine rebooted by itself. Well, I shouldn't say all the = sudden, one of the circuit breakers blow up taking the server down, but = since that time , the server would do sudden reboots. No errors, no dumps, no panics. Just a simple reboot. Then it started = becoming more often (it reboots every 15 days, then 10 days, then 5 = days). So I began to suspect it is a power issue. We use a remote reboot power switch, so I moved it to another socket, = and so far 20 days, no reboots. Not sure if it will go crazy again, but = I hope it doesn't. The power supply is 500W so should be more than sufficient for 4 SCSI = drives and dual xeons. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 15:30:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE6716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:30:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473A343D73 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:30:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1GFUCvb012163; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:30:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-67-103.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.67.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin01/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1GFU82D017366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:30:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F49A81.4090203@mac.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:30:09 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ashley Moran References: <200602161418.32982.ashley.moran@codeweavers.net> <43F4951E.5090203@wmptl.com> In-Reply-To: <43F4951E.5090203@wmptl.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Log analysis server suggestions? [long] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:30:37 -0000 Ashley Moran wrote: [ ... ] I'm not sure who the original poster was, but whoever is interested in this topic might benefit by reading a thread from the firewall-wizards mailing list: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [fw-wiz] parsing logs ultra-fast inline Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:03:38 -0500 From: Marcus J. Ranum To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com OK, based on some offline discussion with a few people, about doing "large amounts" of system log processing inline at high speeds, I thought I'd post a few code fragments and some ideas that have worked for me in the past. First off, if you want to handle truly ginormous amounts of log data quickly, you need to build a structure wherein you're making decisions quickly at a broad level, then "drilling down" based on the results of the decision. This allows you to parallelize infinitely because all you do is make the first branch in your decision tree "stripe" across all your analysis engines. So, hypothetically, let's say we were handling typical UNIX syslogs at a ginormous volume, we might have one engine (CPU/process or even a separate box/bus/backplane/CPU/drive array) responsible for (sendmail | named) and another one responsible for (apache | imapd) etc. If you put some simple counters in your analysis routines (hits versus misses) you can "load balance" your first tree-branch appropriately using a flat percentage. Also, remember, if you standardize your processing, it doesn't matter where it happens; it can happen at the edge/source or back in a central location or any combination of the two. Simply design your analysis as an always 3-stage process consisting of: - weeding out and counting instances of uninteresting events - selecting, parsing sub-fields of, and processing interesting events - retaining events that fell through the first two steps as "unusual" The results of these 3 stages are - a set of event-IDs and counts - a set of event-IDs and interesting fields and counts - residual data in raw form back-haul the event-IDS and counts and fields and graph them or stuff them into a database, and bring the residual data to the attention of a human being. I suppose if you needed to you could implement a "log load balancer" in the form of a box that had N interfaces that collected a fat stream of log data, ran a simple program that sorted the stream into 1/N sub-streams and forwarded them to backend engines for more involved processing. You could scale your logging architecture to very very large loads this way. It works for Google and it'd work for you, too. The first phase of processing is to stripe across engines if necessary, then inside each engine you stripe the processing into functional sub-parsers that deal with a given message format. The implementation is language-irrelevant though your language choice will affect performance. Typically you write a main loop that looks like: while ( get a message ) { if(message is a sendmail message) parse sendmail message if(message is an imap message) parse imap message ... } Once your system has run on a sample dataset you will be able to determine which messages come most frequently and you can put that test at the top of the loop. This can result in an enormous performance boost. Each sub-parse routine follows the same structure as the main loop, performing a sorted series of checks to sub-parse the fields of the message-specific formats. I.e.: parse sendmail message( ) { if(message is a stat=sent message) { pull out recipient; pull out sender; increment message sent count; add message size to sender score; done } if(message is a stat=retry message) { ignore; //done } if(message is a whatever) { whatever; done } // if we fell through to here we have a new message structure // we have never seen before!! vector message to interesting folder; } Variant messages are a massive pain in the butt; you need to decide whether to deal with variants as separate cases or to make the sub-parser smarter in order to deal with them. This is one of the reasons I keep saying that system log analysis is highly site specific! If your site doesn't get system logs from a DECStation 5000 running ULTRIX 3.1D then you don't need to parse that data. Indeed, if you build your parse tree around that notion then, if you suddenly start getting ULTRIX format log records in your data stream, that'd be - shall we say - interesting and you want to know about it. I remember when I was looking at some log data at one site (Hi Abe!) we found one log message that was about 400K long on a single line. It appeared that a fairly crucial piece of software decided to spew a chunk of its memory in a log message, for no apparent reason. This is what I mean by "interesting." A philosophical digression: Why not use regexps? Other than the fact that they look like modem line noise (kids these days probably don't even know what that looks like, I bet... arrgh!) it's hard to look quickly at a regexp and a string and tell if it'll match. So most of the log processing approaches that I've seen resort to having a loop like: while( get a message) { if(regexp #1 matches) { sub_parse format #1; } else if(regexp #2 matches) { ... } What you wind up doing is parsing the string twice or, worse, having loads of regexps in the main loop, which makes your parse tree too broad to execute quickly. The worst case of this is really really ugly because you wind up executing every regexp in your pattern-set against every line of the input, which can suck quite badly if your pattern-set is large. If you have to use regexps for this, use a pre-parse switch, i.e.: while( get a message) { if(message begins with "sendmail") if(regexp #1 matches) { sub_parse format #1; } else ... } ... } I think that's pretty pointless, though, since by the time you've done the first match you can just jump straight into the sub-parse and forget the regexp entirely. So here's a code-fragment of evil that demonstrates this kind of technique. ------------------------ #include #define B_DATEOFF 16 /* the end of the date/time stamp */ main() { char in[BUFSIZ * 8]; /* hypothetical fields we want to skin out of the messages */ char b_ho[256]; /* hostname */ char b_prog[256]; /* program name */ int b_nstore1; /* stash a number */ char b_cstore1[256]; /* stash a char */ int p; /* offset */ int r; while(fgets(in,sizeof(in),stdin)!= NULL) { /* pluck the program name from the message */ /* magic here is that p stores the match offset into the string */ if((r = sscanf(in + B_DATEOFF,"%s %s%n",b_ho,b_prog,&p)) != 2) continue; /* branch on the program name */ if(strcmp(b_prog,"/bsd:")) continue; /* ------------------------------------------------------- from here on demux on next term(s) with individual matches you should match with the case that is most likely to occur first, then the second most likely, etc. */ /* RESIDUAL: dkcsum: wd0 matched BIOS disk 80 */ r = sscanf(in + B_DATEOFF + p," dkcsum: %s matched BIOS disk %d",b_cstore1,&b_nstore1); if(r == 2) { printf("found BIOS disk b_cstore1=%s b_nstore1=%d\n",b_cstore1,b_nstore1); continue; } /* RESIDUAL: root on wd0a */ r = sscanf(in + B_DATEOFF + p," root on %s",b_cstore1); if(r == 1) { printf("found root on b_cstore1=%s\n",b_cstore1); continue; } } } You can see how this structure could be nested a bit deeper - in fact, the more you nest it, in terms of logical tokens left-to-right the faster it will run because you have to perform fewer tests. So in the example above you could branch on ("root" | "dkcsum") if there were more than a few cases. This approach runs faster than hell on even low-end hardware and can crunch through a lot of logs extremely rapidly. It has the disadvantage that it's hard-coded, but the fact that it's a hand-constructed hard-coded parse tree is what makes it so fast. So suppose you were getting 8 squadjillion firewall permit/deny log messages and wanted to do something with them - filtering in this manner you could pretty easily rip statistics into memory, and periodically checkpoint counts to a BSD DB b-tree or even (if you like slow!) an SQL database. Just don't do the updates in-line; collect statistics in-line and checkpoint them to the SQL every minute or something like that. If your logging system crashes the fact that you lost a minute's worth of your log data is kind of irrelevant because you'll lose several minutes' worth by the time it's down and back up. With something like a firewall that's spewing out scads of permit/deny your parse routine is very small, right? It's about the size of that little program I posted up above. And if you get something other than permit/deny - well, that's interesting, so bounce it out to a human's attention. The "gotcha" with this approach is that it is data-centric and the level of work expands linearly with the number of different types of data that you want to deal with. So if you want to rapidly parse 400 different kinds of log messages, you're going to write some code. Maybe a thousands lines, by the time you're done. That's not scary!! What _is_ scary is if you wanted to handle _all_ the variant forms of log messages. My summer project 2 summers ago ("what I did on my summer vacation", by Marcus Ranum) was going out to San Diego Supercomputer Center and plowing around in SDSC's syslogs with Abe and a couple bottles of tequila and a ton of gummi bears. The goal of the project was to attempt to automatically generate a parse tree engine that could recognize all the variants of syslog messages seen. So first I wrote something that attempted to enumerate the total # of variants seen. After it ran for a day (much data, but the computer I was using was fast!) my analysis program concluded there were 50,000+ different forms of syslog messages in 10 years of syslog data. Arrrgh. That's a lot. What the hell impels programmers to keep changing the structure of their log messages? There were lots of variants of sendmail messages (dang it!) - the biggest culprit. Anyhow, you might only want a few of them so it's not like you'd need parse rules for all 50,000+ forms of message. The important part of the process is the sitting down and seeing what you've got and deciding what you want to do with it. It comes back to what I was saying in my last few postings on this topic: - look at your data - then decide what you want to collect from it - then collect it - count the stuff you throw away - vector the rest to a human's attention mjr. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] parsing logs ultra-fast inline Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:00:14 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: CodeFab To: Marcus J. Ranum CC: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com References: <6.2.0.14.2.20060201142844.06e4c5a8@ranum.com> Marcus J. Ranum wrote: > OK, based on some offline discussion with a few people, about > doing "large amounts" of system log processing inline at high > speeds, I thought I'd post a few code fragments and some ideas > that have worked for me in the past. Thank you, there is good stuff lurking here for those who spend the time to think about your posting carefully. One of the most important points you've made is that you need to pay attention and handle the common cases efficiently, but you should also look for and notice exceptional events which are not expected. Those should stand out from the routine information even if they only happen once. Perhaps especially if the event only happens once, uniqueness can be quite interesting. I have one analysis tool to offer which can do histograms: http://www.pkix.net/~chuck/histogram.py This makes a really good tool to point at a large mass of logdata and see what kind of patterns appear how often. If you've got, say, an httpd logfile in combined format, try the following: histogram.py -F\" -f 2 -n 20 httpd-access.log histogram.py -F\" -f 6 -n 20 httpd-access.log histogram.py -F\" -f 2 -n 20 -P jpg httpd-access.log histogram.py -F\" -f 2 -n 20 -X HTTP/1.0 httpd-access.log histogram.py -F\" -f 2 -n 20 -X HTTP/1.1 httpd-access.log Well, I'm sure you get the idea. Add the -r flag, and you can see the least common events instead. > [... ] If you put some simple counters in your analysis routines > (hits versus misses) you can "load balance" your first tree-branch > appropriately using a flat percentage. Also, remember, if you > standardize your processing, it doesn't matter where it happens; > it can happen at the edge/source or back in a central location > or any combination of the two. Simply design your analysis as > an always 3-stage process consisting of: > - weeding out and counting instances of uninteresting events > - selecting, parsing sub-fields of, and processing interesting events > - retaining events that fell through the first two steps as "unusual" This is a fine explanation of event parsing. Note that the order is not necessarily best done in sequential fashion: ie, while you want to weed out common uninteresting events quickly, do the most common matches first and have tests matching common interesting events, before you test for and discard uncommon uninteresting events. [ ... ] > // if we fell through to here we have a new message structure > // we have never seen before!! > vector message to interesting folder; > } ...and then you go back a week later and add matching cases for the messages you've never seen before. Lather, rinse, repeat, until you're done for the moment, or until a new version of the software comes out, or someone decides to make syslogd format the date field differently. > Variant messages are a massive pain in the butt; you need to decide > whether to deal with variants as separate cases or to make the > sub-parser smarter in order to deal with them. This is one of the > reasons I keep saying that system log analysis is highly site > specific! I think I can tell which software has been written by people who have had to update log analysis tools, and which has not: the former never change logging output, especially of important messages, between minor program versions. Other software seems to fiddle with the output details from line to line and from version to version. Add fields at the end or add new log lines instead. Please! [ ... ] > A philosophical digression: Why not use regexps? Other than the > fact that they look like modem line noise (kids these days probably > don't even know what that looks like, I bet... arrgh!) it's hard to look > quickly at a regexp and a string and tell if it'll match. So most of > the log processing approaches that I've seen resort to having a > loop like: > while( get a message) { > if(regexp #1 matches) { > sub_parse format #1; > } else > if(regexp #2 matches) { > ... > } > > What you wind up doing is parsing the string twice or, worse, > having loads of regexps in the main loop, which makes your > parse tree too broad to execute quickly. The worst case of this > is really really ugly because you wind up executing every > regexp in your pattern-set against every line of the input, > which can suck quite badly if your pattern-set is large. Absolutely, you should try to use static string matching instead of regex'es for your most common test cases if at all possible. You can make life easy for your own log analysis to do this if your program log messages of something like: EVENTTYPE: ...message... ...where "...message..." is either a human-readable string, or perhaps a set of key-value pairs. Most of your logging messages should correspond to the stuff the program is supposed to be doing. An individual log line should provide enough context to be understandable or at least integratable with related log messages if the logfile is truncated or rotated, or if the log data is processed in a non-sequential fashion. Sendmail queue IDs or PIDs in general logfiles are common examples of data which can be used to make such correlations. The closer your events are to the significant real things or changes in state that are happening in your program, the more effective your logging will be towards the people using the software. (I only repeat the obvious because there is a vast amount of software which misses this point.) If you need to add debugging code to figure out what's going on in some weird or exceptional case that you don't understand, use an event type of "DEBUG", "INFO", "FATAL" or whatever is appropriate followed by a human-oriented message. Once you understand the situation better, classify it and change the event type to the message and add it to your parser. If you use this consistently, you can easily process the messages your code generates into discrete events, and you can easily separate out "normal" logging output from the stuff that a human should review out-of-band. [ ... ] > What _is_ scary is if you wanted to handle _all_ the variant > forms of log messages. My summer project 2 summers ago > ("what I did on my summer vacation, by Marcus Ranum) > was going out to San Diego Supercomputer Center and > plowing around in SDSC's syslogs with Abe and a couple > bottles of tequila and a ton of gummi bears. The goal of the > project was to attempt to automatically generate a parse > tree engine that could recognize all the variants of syslog > messages seen. So first I wrote something that attempted > to enumerate the total # of variants seen. After it ran for a > day (much data, but the computer I was using was fast!) > my analysis program concluded there were 50,000+ different > forms of syslog messages in 10 years of syslog data. > Arrrgh. That's a lot. What the hell impels programmers to > keep changing the structure of their log messages? There > were lots of variants of sendmail messages (dang it!) - the > biggest culprit. Anyhow, you might only want a few of them > so it's not like you'd need parse rules for all 50,000+ > forms of message. The important part of the process is > the sitting down and seeing what you've got and deciding > what you want to do with it. Agreed, agreed. But it's never too late to try to become more consistent. (Starting with not breaking things which work now.) -- -Chuck _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards -- -Chuck PS: And you should review the usage of the code with regard to security. You might even induce Marcus to buy you a Guinness Stout. :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 15:31:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B7716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:31:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.200.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CC243D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:31:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([68.80.195.248]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2006021615313501200sekeue>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:31:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B847B843; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:31:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bserver.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59302-09; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:31:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.214.102] (kbuilt.transpack.com [192.168.214.102]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07730B842; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:31:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F49AD0.2000908@allenmyland.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:31:28 -0500 From: Ken Stevenson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Csoka References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <040a01c6324a$f6dac920$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <20060215161255.GB70956@dan.emsphone.com> <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local><44hd702tod.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <43F3A461.6090700@wmptl.com> <00a101c632b6$fa8896d0$c77e3144@home.com> In-Reply-To: <00a101c632b6$fa8896d0$c77e3144@home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at transpack.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:31:40 -0000 Jim Csoka wrote: > No...I ran make maps, as well as make install for the blacklist feature, > and make restart. > > However, here is something interesting. When I access my corporate > email via openwebmail, it functions as I would expect....you cannot send > or receive to the given address. However, when using Outlook Express > (internal mail client at work), you can still send mail to the address I > am trying to block. > > Why should this be so? > Are you sure Outlook Express is configured to use your FreeBSD server for SMTP? Send an email to yourself using Outlook Express then look at the message source and check the headers to verify which SMTP server is sending the message. -- Ken Stevenson Allen-Myland Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 15:34:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645E216A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:34:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (h-66-167-151-186.mclnva23.covad.net [66.167.151.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230C343D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:33:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from jimcsoka ([192.168.7.46]) by mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id k1GFZWVi041055; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:35:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Message-ID: <01ab01c63310$ef0fa0f0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> From: "James Csoka" To: "Ken Stevenson" References: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <040a01c6324a$f6dac920$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <20060215161255.GB70956@dan.emsphone.com> <010f01c6326b$051094a0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local><44hd702tod.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <43F3A461.6090700@wmptl.com> <00a101c632b6$fa8896d0$c77e3144@home.com> <43F49AD0.2000908@allenmyland.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:52:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-DFMC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DFMC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:34:04 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Stevenson" To: "Jim Csoka" Cc: Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 10:31 AM Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address > Jim Csoka wrote: > > No...I ran make maps, as well as make install for the blacklist feature, > > and make restart. > > > > However, here is something interesting. When I access my corporate > > email via openwebmail, it functions as I would expect....you cannot send > > or receive to the given address. However, when using Outlook Express > > (internal mail client at work), you can still send mail to the address I > > am trying to block. > > > > Why should this be so? > > > Are you sure Outlook Express is configured to use your FreeBSD server > for SMTP? Send an email to yourself using Outlook Express then look at > the message source and check the headers to verify which SMTP server > is sending the message. > > -- > Ken Stevenson > Allen-Myland Inc. > Yes, I'm sure. It is the incoming and outgoing SMTP server. It's the only one we have. -Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 15:55:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D087116A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:55:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEDE43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:55:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060216155520.YTFT13051.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:55:20 -0500 From: To: "James Csoka" , "Ken Stevenson" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:55:15 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <01ab01c63310$ef0fa0f0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:55:21 -0000 > Jim Csoka wrote: > > No...I ran make maps, as well as make install for the blacklist feature, > > and make restart. > > > > However, here is something interesting. When I access my corporate > > email via openwebmail, it functions as I would expect....you cannot send > > or receive to the given address. However, when using Outlook Express > > (internal mail client at work), you can still send mail to the address I > > am trying to block. > > > > Why should this be so? > > > Are you sure Outlook Express is configured to use your FreeBSD server > for SMTP? Send an email to yourself using Outlook Express then look at > the message source and check the headers to verify which SMTP server > is sending the message. > > -- > Ken Stevenson > Allen-Myland Inc. > Yes, I'm sure. It is the incoming and outgoing SMTP server. It's the only one we have. -Jim _______________________________________________ Yes that may be the only one you have, but that does not stop the user from configuring their outlook express from using their personal email account at their ISP. To stop this you can add firewall rules to deny all LAN traffic out to ports 25 & 110 by coding the private LAN ip address range in the rule "from" option. Since your SMTP service is on the gateway box where the firewall is your outbound port 25 will pass because your using the public ip address or if that is not the case then just add a rule before the deny rule to pass your SMTP LAN ip address. o unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 16:00:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0793816A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:00:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (h-66-167-151-186.mclnva23.covad.net [66.167.151.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD5F43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from jimcsoka ([192.168.7.46]) by mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id k1GG2ChF042790 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:02:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Message-ID: <01f001c63314$a8c01180$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> From: "James Csoka" To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:18:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-DFMC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DFMC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:00:36 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "James Csoka" ; "Ken Stevenson" Cc: Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 10:55 AM Subject: RE: Blocking an individual email address > > > Jim Csoka wrote: > > > No...I ran make maps, as well as make install for the blacklist > feature, > > > and make restart. > > > > > > However, here is something interesting. When I access my > corporate > > > email via openwebmail, it functions as I would expect....you > cannot send > > > or receive to the given address. However, when using Outlook > Express > > > (internal mail client at work), you can still send mail to the > address I > > > am trying to block. > > > > > > Why should this be so? > > > > > Are you sure Outlook Express is configured to use your FreeBSD > server > > for SMTP? Send an email to yourself using Outlook Express then > look at > > the message source and check the headers to verify which SMTP > server > > is sending the message. > > > > -- > > Ken Stevenson > > Allen-Myland Inc. > > > > Yes, I'm sure. It is the incoming and outgoing SMTP server. It's > the only > one we have. > > -Jim > > _______________________________________________ > > Yes that may be the only one you have, but that does not stop the > user from configuring their outlook express from using their > personal email account at their ISP. To stop this you can add > firewall rules to deny all LAN traffic out to ports 25 & 110 by > coding the private LAN ip address range in the rule "from" option. > Since your SMTP service is on the gateway box where the firewall is > your outbound port 25 will pass because your using the public ip > address or if that is not the case then just add a rule before the > deny rule to pass your SMTP LAN ip address. > > > > Understood. However, most everyone here in my office (a mortgage company of about 25 people) can barely even spell the word computer much less use one effectively. And, aside from that, I am running these tests from my windows client, so I can verify that it is configured correctly for the purpose of running these tests. Although I wish it were as simple as someone using a different SMTP server....it would make my life easier :P From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 16:14:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C7A16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:14:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F47943D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:14:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C1662C93B; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:14:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24413-09; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:14:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1625E62C917; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:14:13 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D6E1737008; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:14:10 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C222F34D12; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:14:10 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:14:10 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Igor Robul In-Reply-To: <20060216072327.GD35058@sysadm.stc> Message-ID: <20060216121353.Y60635@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060215202527.E60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216072327.GD35058@sysadm.stc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devfs ruleset appropriate for jail'd environment ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:14:15 -0000 Perfect, thanks ... I *knew* I had seen it somewhere, but was looking in /etc/devfs.conf :( On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Igor Robul wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:26:36PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> I had thought there used to be a sample one in /etc/devfs.conf, but its >> either no longer there, or my memory is failing me ... >> >> Does anyone have one that is appropriate for mounting devfs into a jail >> where ppl have shell access? > put > jail_YOUR-JAIL-NAME_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" > to /etc/rc.conf > > You can look at rules in /etc/defaults/devfs.rules > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 16:16:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308C316A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:16:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44F343D4C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:16:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0ED062C93B; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:16:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27006-06; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:16:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EBE62C90D; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:16:39 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F49B3A56E; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:16:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3F634D12; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:16:38 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:16:37 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: lars In-Reply-To: <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20060216121442.X60635@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:16:41 -0000 Actually, in my case, I'm more interested in % uptime then long uptimes, something that this site does keep track of ... On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, lars wrote: > David Benfell wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:01:33 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> >>> FreeBSD is showing 4th place right now behind Linux, SunOS and Netware for >>> Average Uptimes ... with ours being an average of 120 days >>> >> Which shows yet again how utterly worthless this kind of rating is. >> >> So here's the problem as *I* see it: Do you participate in such >> silliness for dubious PR value at the risk of supporting the use of >> invalid methodology, or do you refuse at the risk of appearing to have >> something to hide? Now, the way I frame this makes pretty clear *my* >> preference, but possibly others have other ways to frame it. > I agree with your assessment. > > A long uptime means that the machine hasn't been rebooted for a long > time. If that time's longer than the time to the last patch that > required a kernel recompilation and a reboot, it means the server is not > patched. > Where's the point in advertising an unpatched machine? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 16:21:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7944616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:21:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0496D43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:21:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7357613808C; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:21:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp02.kuleuven.be (lepidus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.72]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3718C137E12; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:20:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [10.4.42.180]) by smtp02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F082CAAE2; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:20:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GGKjmD002536; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:20:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: "RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:20:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1321368.31140068125121.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> In-Reply-To: <1321368.31140068125121.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602161720.45336.tijl@ulyssis.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kdm and fluxbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:21:03 -0000 On Thursday 16 February 2006 06:35, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote: > I am tring to get kdm to log me into fluxbox i have followed the > handbook to the letter and can login to gnome kde and enlightnment > also options for defaut and failsafe and some others none of which i > have tried yet. However flux box is not there and i cannot seem to > find where kde is getting these sessions from. There does not seem > to be any option in kcontrol for session like mentioned in the > freebsd handbook i did go into > > usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xsession > > and added some lines but nothing happened > > failsafe) > exec /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -geometry 80x24-0-0 > ;; > kde) > exec /usr/local/bin/startkde > ;; > GNOME) > exec /usr/X11R6/bin/gnome-session > ;; > FluxBox) > exec /usr/X11R6/bin/fluxbox > ;; > esac > esac > > > WHERE IS KDM GETTING ITS SESSION INFO FROM AND HOW DO I TELL IT TO > ADD FLUXBOX Normally you shouldn't have to touch any file at all, but I think there's an error in /usr/local/share/apps/kdm/sessions/fluxbox.desktop In that file change lines 4-5 to Exec=fluxbox TryExec=fluxbox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 16:23:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CB316A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:23:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0920743D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:23:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060216162314.FLFL7811.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish> for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:23:14 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:23:13 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: midnight commander and ssh sftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:23:16 -0000 The midnight commander, command line GUI can access remote FTP by entering this command, cd ftp://user:pw@url in midnight commander's command line. I really like this function, but for security reasons I have to use SSH to remote login to my ftp server. Using client SSH I am forced to use ftp native line commands. I would really like to use midnight commander's GUI panel with sftp in SSH. Entering "cd ssh url" into midnight commander's command line just generates an error. Is there some way to be able to use midnight commander through a SSH tunnel? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 16:27:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7908E16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:27:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E1143D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060216162740.DVXY25152.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:27:40 -0500 From: To: "James Csoka" , Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:27:40 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <01f001c63314$a8c01180$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:27:42 -0000 > > > Jim Csoka wrote: > > > No...I ran make maps, as well as make install for the blacklist > feature, > > > and make restart. > > > > > > However, here is something interesting. When I access my > corporate > > > email via openwebmail, it functions as I would expect....you > cannot send > > > or receive to the given address. However, when using Outlook > Express > > > (internal mail client at work), you can still send mail to the > address I > > > am trying to block. > > > > > > Why should this be so? > > > > > Are you sure Outlook Express is configured to use your FreeBSD > server > > for SMTP? Send an email to yourself using Outlook Express then > look at > > the message source and check the headers to verify which SMTP > server > > is sending the message. > > > > -- > > Ken Stevenson > > Allen-Myland Inc. > > > > Yes, I'm sure. It is the incoming and outgoing SMTP server. It's > the only > one we have. > > -Jim > > _______________________________________________ > > Yes that may be the only one you have, but that does not stop the > user from configuring their outlook express from using their > personal email account at their ISP. To stop this you can add > firewall rules to deny all LAN traffic out to ports 25 & 110 by > coding the private LAN ip address range in the rule "from" option. > Since your SMTP service is on the gateway box where the firewall is > your outbound port 25 will pass because your using the public ip > address or if that is not the case then just add a rule before the > deny rule to pass your SMTP LAN ip address. > > > > ************************************ Understood. However, most everyone here in my office (a mortgage company of about 25 people) can barely even spell the word computer much less use one effectively. And, aside from that, I am running these tests from my windows client, so I can verify that it is configured correctly for the purpose of running these tests. Although I wish it were as simple as someone using a different SMTP server....it would make my life easier :P ************************************** Have you physically used this offending persons work PC during off hours and investigated just how they have their outlook explorer configured??? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 16:45:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF28D16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:45:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yontege@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: from rescomp.berkeley.edu (keyserver.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CDB43D55 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:45:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yontege@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: by rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1032) id 127E35B764; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:45:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:45:06 -0800 From: "Ian A. Tegebo" To: Per olof Ljungmark Message-ID: <20060216164506.GA29954@rescomp.berkeley.edu> References: <43F48B67.70204@intersonic.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F48B67.70204@intersonic.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Jon Falconer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: slapd and bdb-4.2.52 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:45:08 -0000 On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 03:25:43PM +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > AFAIK you can run without the patch but one of the db's will grow > forever. I have patched all our slapd's as follows: > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd.sh stop > cd /usr/ports/databases/db42 > make clean > make patch > cd work/db-4.2.52/ > --- fetch the BerkeleyDB42.patch > patch -p0 < BerkeleyDB42.patch > cd ../../ > make deinstall > make reinstall > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/slapd.sh start > > http://www.google.se/search?num=100&hl=en&q=BerkeleyDB42.patch+site%3Aopenldap.org&btnG=Search Would this be a case where a problem report should be filed? I did a query and I didn't see any that were open for "TXN" and db42: http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html http://www.freshports.org/databases/db42/ -- Ian Tegebo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 16:48:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E3616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35A8143D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:48:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 16:47:58 -0000 Received: from 234.241.203.62.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [62.203.241.234] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 17:47:58 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F4ACC5.1040200@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:48:05 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <20060216121442.X60635@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060216121442.X60635@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars@gmx.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:48:01 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Actually, in my case, I'm more interested in % uptime then long uptimes, > something that this site does keep track of ... > Ok, it's not entirely silly then ;-) I'm not convinced though that "uptime" is a useful metric. At a time when Windows NT was so useless and unstable the uptime of any OS other than Windows NT may have been a "metric" if only a bragging-metric. But we should be over that now. I think "availability", which needs to be defined and measured precisely, is more useful. Who cares how long a machine has been up, if it was only up that long because it's a complete nuisance to update and installing and upgrading and testing takes so long it eats the uptime and the admins are scared to reboot it? ;-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 17:05:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA5F16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:05:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeramey@jeramey.com) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [217.160.230.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEF643D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:05:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeramey@jeramey.com) Received: from [216.254.25.46] (helo=hedorah.dootplex.com) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrelayus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKp2t-1F9mZf1BQG-0002zQ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:05:50 -0500 Received: by hedorah.dootplex.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:06:04 -0800 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:06:04 -0800 From: Jeramey Crawford To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216170604.GA49643@hedorah.dootplex.com> References: <20060216061557.GA39302@hedorah.dootplex.com> <17396.33848.576954.756348@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17396.33848.576954.756348@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Provags-ID: perfora.net abuse@perfora.net login:d6865874376fe600ddf639a6e87bbafa Subject: Re: UTF-8 locales and display corruption X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:05:51 -0000 On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:55:04AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: > > If I should set my LANG environment variable to "en_US.UTF-8", > > many terminal applications which link to and use ncurses begin to > > have various degrees of display corruption. Does anyone know how > > to fix this, or what the cause is? > > Not familiar with the details, but have you recompiled the > offenders? Yes, several times. I've tried compiling mutt-devel from the port using each of the WITH_MUTT_SLANG and WITH_MUTT_NCURSES options, and both suffer from similar display problems. Typically the display problem in all apps is that any line which contains a multibyte character will have any colors or highlighting misapplied, with either the painted area being too short or too long. In the first case, this will typically lead to parts of the display not being redrawn properly if the app scrolls the text it is displaying since the app will generally try to be lazy and repaint only the parts of the display that need it. In the second case, the highlighted area will often spill into the next line, corrupting it and making it unreadable. It looks kind of like FreeBSD's libncurses doesn't support multibyte characters properly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 17:26:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BECB16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CF343D69 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:26:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96F599887F for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:26:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 89250-06-2 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:26:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-5062e7e3.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.231.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74228998871 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:26:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F4B5D2.6020303@t-hosting.hu> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:26:42 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Subject: Setting up VPN+IPSec+Racoon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:26:51 -0000 Hello, it is the first time I have to set up such configuration. Could you tell me some guidelines? What should I care about? I see there's a chapter in the Handbook about VPN. It mentions the FAST_IPSEC kernel option in >5.X. Should I use this implemetation or the KAME implementation? What are the differencies, and what are the advantages, disadvantages of each? If you know some other good tutorial or howto, please let me know. Thanks in advance, Gabor Kovesdan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 17:29:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDF616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D48043D49 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:29:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1F9mwF-0000Cw-Ga; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:29:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:29:36 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: bob@a1poweruser.com Message-ID: <20060216112936.734bfcf2@grokwell.org> In-Reply-To: References: <01f001c63314$a8c01180$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bcebc40e4557db2d11313a093ef610a215350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Cc: James Csoka , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:29:14 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:27:40 -0500 wrote: > > > > > > Jim Csoka wrote: > > > > No...I ran make maps, as well as make install for the > blacklist > > feature, > > > > and make restart. > > > > > > > > However, here is something interesting. When I access my > > corporate > > > > email via openwebmail, it functions as I would expect....you > > cannot send > > > > or receive to the given address. However, when using Outlook > > Express > > > > (internal mail client at work), you can still send mail to the > > address I > > > > am trying to block. > > > > > > > > Why should this be so? > > > > > > > Are you sure Outlook Express is configured to use your FreeBSD > > server > > > for SMTP? Send an email to yourself using Outlook Express then > > look at > > > the message source and check the headers to verify which SMTP > > server > > > is sending the message. > > > > > > -- > > > Ken Stevenson > > > Allen-Myland Inc. > > > > > > > Yes, I'm sure. It is the incoming and outgoing SMTP server. It's > > the only > > one we have. > > > > -Jim > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Yes that may be the only one you have, but that does not stop the > > user from configuring their outlook express from using their > > personal email account at their ISP. To stop this you can add > > firewall rules to deny all LAN traffic out to ports 25 & 110 by > > coding the private LAN ip address range in the rule "from" option. > > Since your SMTP service is on the gateway box where the firewall > is > > your outbound port 25 will pass because your using the public ip > > address or if that is not the case then just add a rule before the > > deny rule to pass your SMTP LAN ip address. > > > ************************************ > > Understood. However, most everyone here in my office (a mortgage > company of > about 25 people) can barely even spell the word computer much less > use one > effectively. And, aside from that, I am running these tests from my > windows > client, so I can verify that it is configured correctly for the > purpose of > running these tests. Although I wish it were as simple as someone > using a > different SMTP server....it would make my life easier :P > > ************************************** > > Have you physically used this offending persons work PC during off > hours > and investigated just how they have their outlook explorer > configured??? At what point does this stop being an IS issue and start being a Human Resources issue? (I realize that a company of 25 people probably does not have a Human Resources Department.) A mortgage company handles a lot of private information. The employees need to be trustworthy; and the information needs to be protected. However, the responsibility for protecting company information does not fall solely upon IS. If an employee is sending sensitive information home against company policy, the policy needs to be enforced. The employee should be counseled/educated/corrected and, if necessary, fired. Whereas I think there should be strong IS policies in place, and I applaud the original poster's diligence, a defacto policy of playing cat-and-mouse can be horribly inefficient. Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 17:32:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2683A16A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:32:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A9543D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:32:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i5so247410wra for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:32:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ecCGn0s7WfGZEiPfis/bWqtD7nKTHZT3cHnoJAbjTV09PrEUiLzVbNm3S0MWSfWkKGZrB3l1VK2KHXvxCVQ+XW6I7iAh8ixixFlGYIGM2gb+qJkGgBBLsHA3bp7rbTGVANq1Y8DEdKQ18Rz3CKsbsWZGOjGIoMNw+5z87zW902s= Received: by 10.54.133.1 with SMTP id g1mr1234037wrd; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:49:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.5.63? ( [216.202.42.5]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id g9sm1084417wra.2006.02.16.08.49.50; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:49:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F4ABDB.7090009@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:44:11 -0800 From: Kurt Buff User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ashley Moran References: <200602161418.32982.ashley.moran@codeweavers.net> In-Reply-To: <200602161418.32982.ashley.moran@codeweavers.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Log analysis server suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kurt.buff@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:32:43 -0000 Ashley Moran wrote: > Until recently I had a server running syslog-ng set to archive all logs into > server/year/month/day/ directories. Now the server is running in amd64, > we've lost our hi-res scrolling display so I want to look at a better log > watching system. > > I've read about logging to a database. I quite like the idea of storing our > logs in PostgreSQL (I don't like MySQL and don't want to get involved in > administering a second database). I know I can log to a PG database quite > easily, but I don't know how I can get the data back out without writing > manual queries. > > Here is what I need: > > - Logs stored for the last 6 months or so, and easily searchable > - Live log watching > - Log analysis > > I might try swatch for the live log watching as this is not affected by the > choice of log storage and seems the best tool for the job. > > As for searching / analysis, I've seen php-syslog-ng > ( http://www.vermeer.org/projects/php-syslog-ng ), which looks very basic, > and phpLogCon ( http://www.phplogcon.com/ ), which does not support PG > anyway. Is there anything better GUI-wise? > > Maybe I am best keeping the logs in text files for now, and spending more time > on swatch. > > Any thoughts? > > Cheers > Ashley http://www.loganalysis.org, and the related listserv might be well worth your time... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 17:51:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657CD16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:51:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from mail.compedgeracing.com (dsl-katy-207-70-139-52.consolidated.net [207.70.139.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1560843D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:51:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from www.compedgeracing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.compedgeracing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8334A5C0B for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:51:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from 63.97.49.74 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ruzzi) by www.compedgeracing.com with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:51:41 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <1612.63.97.49.74.1140112301.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:51:41 -0600 (CST) From: "Robert Uzzi" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: make depend error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:51:34 -0000 Any clues to this error? root@www CUSTOM-SMP # make depend cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/dev/acpica -I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -I../../../contrib/pf -I../../../contrib/dev/ath -I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I../../../contrib/ngatm -I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding ../../../i386/i386/genassym.c NM='nm' sh ../../../kern/genassym.sh genassym.o > assym.s awk -f ../../../tools/vnode_if.awk ../../../kern/vnode_if.src -h awk -f ../../../tools/vnode_if.awk ../../../kern/vnode_if.src -p awk -f ../../../tools/vnode_if.awk ../../../kern/vnode_if.src -q CC=cc make -f ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/Makefile MAKESRCPATH=../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/CUSTOM-SMP cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -nostdinc -I/usr/include -I. -I../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm -c ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/aicasm.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -nostdinc -I/usr/include -I. -I../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm -c ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/aicasm_symbol.c yacc -b aicasm_gram -d -o aicasm_gram.c ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/aicasm_gram.y cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -nostdinc -I/usr/include -I. -I../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm -c aicasm_gram.c ../../../dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/aicasm_gram.y:1933: error: conflicting types for 'yyerror' aicasm_gram.c:3133: error: previous implicit declaration of 'yyerror' was here *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/CUSTOM-SMP. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/CUSTOM-SMP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 18:22:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADA716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:22:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from troyborg@troyborg.com) Received: from cpanel.liquidexploit.com (ns1.liquidexploit.com [64.246.11.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115F843D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:22:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from troyborg@troyborg.com) Received: from cpanel by cpanel.liquidexploit.com with local (Exim 4.52) id 1F9nlx-00036D-VM for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:22:33 +1100 Received: from 12.217.95.9 ([12.217.95.9]) by www.troyborg.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:22:33 +1100 Message-ID: <20060217052233.hxn8xvwripk0kw0g@www.troyborg.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:22:33 +1100 From: troyborg@troyborg.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel.liquidexploit.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [32001 502] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - troyborg.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: Subject: AMD Turion 64 with ATI-Xpress Chipset.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:22:35 -0000 I was wanting to buy this laptop: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16834115218 And I was trying to find a good Linux Distro to use on it. I asked on the Fourms and people kept pointing me to FreeBSD. But they said it has issues with ATI. Do you know if it will work? Or will I have issues. If I will have issues is there any that would be good that suppost 64bit? I don't want to Win64 right now cause of all its driver issues. So I was wanting to try out a linux 64bit on it for a while. Then i can switch if I don't like it. I want something that works good on Laptops. That can use 64bit. And can suppost wireless. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 18:39:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AF016A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D013543D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:39:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1GIcw01055245; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:38:58 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060216123512.0263d1c8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:38:54 -0600 To: "James Csoka" , From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <013b01c6330f$2e411120$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> References: <20060215162403.2494C16A422@hub.freebsd.org> <20060215223010.GA53246@ns.museum.rain.com> <013b01c6330f$2e411120$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Blocking an individual email address....again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:39:22 -0000 To debug this you need to kick up the logging on sendmail, add the loglevel option to your sendmail options in rc.conf: -O LogLevel=80 You will need a loglevel value fairly high, like 80. You can then watch or just look at the sendmail log file: /var/log/maillog And see what is actually happening. You should be aware that there are typically 2 to 3 separate instances of sendmail running passing the mail around. Hope this helps. -Derek At 09:39 AM 2/16/2006, James Csoka wrote: >I'm reposting this with some more info.....any help would be greatly >appreciated. > >I have a mail server (it also functions as a firewall) running freebsd5.4, >with mailscanner, openwebmail, and sendmail. I wish to block an individual >email address, but I do not want to mark it as spam. My first solution was >to add the blacklist feature to the sendmail.mc file, and recreate the .cf >file, which I did. I then added the line To:user@example.com REJECT to the >/etc/mail/access file, and ran make maps. I also had added the line >user@example.com REJECT. > >This then blocked that address from sending email to people on my internal >network. When I tested it from outside my network I used openwebmail as a >web interface to send email to that address, and it failed. Which was what >I wanted. However, from inside my network, using Outlook, you can send >email to that address without a problem. > >It seems as if the access.db is doing it's job. When using openwebmail, the >smtp server rejects any attempt to send mail to that address. however, >locally, it does not. When i'm sitting in front of my windows client, I can >use Outlook and send email to that address without a problem. > >Does anyone know why via a web interface, the access file rules would apply, >yet they would be ignored when sending mail from inside the network using >Outlook to send external email? > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 18:52:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6409916A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:52:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mirya@matrix.ua) Received: from gw.matrix.kiev.ua (gw.matrix.kiev.ua [213.159.235.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD4E43D4C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:52:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mirya@matrix.ua) Received: by gw.matrix.kiev.ua (Postfix, from userid 426) id 2D5A214BC4E; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:52:48 +0200 (EET) Received: from miryahost.matrix.local (unknown [192.168.1.27]) by gw.matrix.kiev.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6674A14BC4B; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:52:47 +0200 (EET) From: Kyryll A Mirnenko aka Mirya Organization: MATIX.ua To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:52:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20060216162342.4CB5A16A420@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060216162342.4CB5A16A420@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602162052.45028.mirya@matrix.ua> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on gw.matrix.kiev.ua X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 Cc: Subject: Re: midnight commander and ssh sftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:52:50 -0000 > Is there some way to be able to use midnight commander through a SSH > tunnel? 1) Use scp/sftp: it's called "Shell link..." is mc menu (the problem is Password: prompt is displayed somewhere on the mc command line as it seems to be unable to parse it for some reason. So when see it, simply enter the password there & refresh the mc panels w/ C-O,C-O) 2) More general solution: if u run 6.0 use sysutils/fusefs-sshfs (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/), it provides an scp/sftp link within filesystem layer, so you can use it not only from mc but from any app. The problem it seems to be much slower than plain scp (though uses the same transport), dunno why -- Regards, Mirya ICQ #313898202 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 18:55:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E91716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:55:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@schultznet.ca) Received: from dfw002.8inet.com (dfw002.8inet.com [72.232.12.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED00943D6A for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:55:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@schultznet.ca) Received: from [206.162.187.199] (helo=[172.22.100.67]) by dfw002.8inet.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1F9oHy-0001GR-HZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:55:38 -0500 Message-ID: <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:55:31 -0500 From: Eric Schultz Organization: SchultzNet.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - dfw002.8inet.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - schultznet.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:55:43 -0000 lars wrote: > A long uptime means that the machine hasn't been rebooted for a long > time. If that time's longer than the time to the last patch that > required a kernel recompilation and a reboot, it means the server is not > patched. > Where's the point in advertising an unpatched machine? Good afternoon... Perhaps it means the OS doesn't need to be patched that frequently or has a patch mechanism that avoids reboots? That's certainly worth advertising (if only were true). The top machine has been running for almost 6 years on FreeBSD 3.3 which means the admin probably believes that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." I would also want to advertise the longevity of an OS. (You might not like that last one if you're a hardware vendor :) Also, a lot of work-arounds for security patches amount to "lock the front door." So perhaps some systems don't need to be patched because they're administered so as not to require immediate patching/upgrading. I had trouble finding any relative numbers on the website. Individual machines had an Availability % figure; but I couldn't find anything by OS. Also, I didn't see any pivots that broke-down OSes by usage or other crosstabs that would have been cool. -- Headed for the second star to the right and straight on 'til morning... Eric Schultz (aka Storkman) Photos: http://community.webshots.com/user/schultznet Homepage: http://www.schultznet.ca Blog: http://schultznet.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 19:07:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F1316A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:07:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sequethin@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA2343D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:07:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sequethin@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 57so224702wri for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:07:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:sent-from-pda:user-agent; b=eS1bdUCC/VM5iKhx3NK8fQ8nOqCp9uy26o8Taqd2/IXh/6QwaOGuxIJ6ND9i4+GakY62urF9NHJi14mwnGtc/2QLyjYl6kv25oGBMOA+YgGFXVGJw3TFTrG8jA3xsQ4uXPm05/NqXkS/DJsK+xrsKtMpZpz9btYu57puhiWyry0= Received: by 10.54.122.6 with SMTP id u6mr973153wrc; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:56:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ( [204.107.76.238]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 66sm740911wra.2006.02.16.09.56.09; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:56:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:56:08 -0500 From: Mike Hernandez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216175607.GB17557@dementia.beyondnormal.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1321368.31140068125121.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> <200602161720.45336.tijl@ulyssis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602161720.45336.tijl@ulyssis.org> Sent-From-PDA: Yes User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: kdm and fluxbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:07:05 -0000 > > FluxBox) > > exec /usr/X11R6/bin/fluxbox > > ;; I lost the original email so rather that misquote I'm not quoting at all. Just thought I'd mention you should probably use the command startfluxbox as opposed to fluxbox, to start your fluxbox session. Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 19:24:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE29C16A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:24:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew.chace@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5AD43D53 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:24:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew.chace@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i1so247553nzh for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:24:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=on3dhbSatM+fU8nyny3A7UaMc1inrtb0h2Qpj/VcEBAF0URA8BexvfrJ/PmDDqTbNaiiLgl1Ehe/wR/5sSIoyrhAlsFtLjuH0JaLCmVjxOQf38t5hBvUs4rU2VfnjpgfqrOmgsXydsF/9mCkRLpae4uDd3ScLFWdBIiXY/gy2uM= Received: by 10.36.100.6 with SMTP id x6mr1297125nzb; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:24:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from netvista.network ( [71.214.204.80]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id r15sm663018nza.2006.02.16.11.24.49; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:24:50 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:23:50 -0600 Message-Id: <1140117830.602.19.camel@netvista.network> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: newly built kernel fails to boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:24:54 -0000 Hello, I've just had a go at configuring and rebuilding a kernel for my desktop machine. I read the section in handbook, and skimmed over NOTES and the GENERIC config. I then copied GENERIC to NETVISTA and commented out drivers/devices that I didn't think were relevant to my hardware. config(8) is happy with my file, and 'make buildkernel' and 'make installkernel' proceed without any errors. So, I ran nextboot(8) and rebooted, but the new kernel hangs right after the first line printed to the console; the first portion of which is 'acpi.ko'. Below are the output from dmesg on GENERIC and my kernel config: ============================ start of dmesg ============================ Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.80GHz (1794.19-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf24 Stepping = 4 Features=0x3febfbff real memory = 259522560 (247 MB) avail memory = 244412416 (233 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 9 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link4: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link5: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link6: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link7: irq 9 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0x88000000-0x8fffffff,0x80000000-0x8007ffff irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 agp0: detected 8060k stolen memory agp0: aperture size is 128M uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x1820-0x183f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xc0080000-0xc00803ff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: EHCI version 1.0 usb3: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3: on ehci0 usb3: USB revision 2.0 uhub3: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered pcib1: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib1 fxp0: port 0x2000-0x203f mem 0xc0100000-0xc0100fff irq 20 at device 8.0 on pci2 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:09:6b:62:4b:99 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x1860-0x186f at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) pcm0: port 0x1c00-0x1cff,0x18c0-0x18ff mem 0xc0080c00-0xc0080dff,0xc0080800-0xc00808ff irq 17 at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: acpi_tz0: on acpi0 acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (6280.3C) acpi_button0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse Explorer, device ID 4 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xcb000-0xcbfff,0xcc000-0xccfff,0xe0000-0xeffff on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 8250 or not responding sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1794187328 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 76319MB at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master UDMA40 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ============================ end of dmesg ============================== ======================== start of kernel config ======================== # NETVISTA Kernel Config # An exhaustive list of options and more detailed explanations of the # device lines is also present in the ../../conf/NOTES and NOTES files. # If you are in doubt as to the purpose or necessity of a line, check first # in NOTES. machine i386 cpu I686_CPU ident NetVista #options CPU_SUSP_HLT options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler #options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption options INET # InterNETworking options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options LINPROCFS # Enable the linux-like proc filesystem support options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options COMPAT_43 # Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 options COMPAT_LINUX # Enable Linux ABI emulation options SCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev #options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~128k to driver. #options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~215k to driver. options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive. device apic # I/O APIC device npx # The Numeric Processing eXtension driver, npx(4) # Bus support. device pci device isa # Required by npx(4) # Floppy drives device fdc # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device ataraid # ATA RAID drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) device ch # SCSI media changers device da # Direct Access (disks) device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console #device sc # Enable this for the pcvt (VT220 compatible) console driver device vt options XSERVER # support for X server on a vt console device agp # support several AGP chipsets # Direct Rendering modules for 3D acceleration. device drm # DRM core module required by DRM drivers device i915drm # Intel i830 through i915 # Power management support (see NOTES for more options) #device apm # Add suspend/resume support for the i8254. device pmtimer # ACPI Video Extensions (LCD backlight/brightness, video output, etc.) device acpi_video # Serial (COM) ports device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports # Parallel port device ppc device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device ppi # Parallel port interface device # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. device miibus # MII bus support device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') # Pseudo devices. device loop # Network loopback device random # Entropy device device ether # Ethernet support device sl # Kernel SLIP device ppp # Kernel PPP device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) device md # Memory "disks" device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! # Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. device bpf # Berkeley packet filter # USB support device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device ehci # EHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 2.0) device usb # USB Bus (required) device ugen # Generic device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd # Keyboard device ulpt # Printer device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da device ums # Mouse ======================== end of kernel config ========================= Thanks to anyone willing to take a look at this :-)! -Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 19:27:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AE516A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:27:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfm@shell.reiteration.net) Received: from asmtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (asmtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3BA43D5A for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:27:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfm@shell.reiteration.net) Received: from [82.34.179.228] (helo=shell.reiteration.net) by asmtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F9omo-0004OS-NQ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:27:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=shell.reiteration.net ident=jfm) by shell.reiteration.net with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F9omo-0006Zv-Nf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:27:30 +0000 Received: (from jfm@localhost) by shell.reiteration.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1GJRUQn025290 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:27:30 GMT (envelope-from jfm) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:27:30 +0000 From: John To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20060216192730.GA25224@reiteration.net> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060215060625.01176c88@sixcompanies.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060215060625.01176c88@sixcompanies.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jfm@shell.reiteration.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shell.reiteration.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: pop3 server recommendation (APOP/TLS) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:27:36 -0000 On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:08:10AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > I am looking for a recommendation for a pop3 server > that can do APOP and TLS on port 110. > > Qpopper was a disaster and I am not interested in cyrus (and dealing > with maildirs)... > > Is there any other option? > > Qpopper worked with some of the clients (like eudora) but then had > issues with Thunderbird or Pegasus...... What issues did you have? Has been working fine here with thunderbird for a long time. -- John - lists@reiteration.net - https://www.reiteration.net/~jfm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 19:40:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D9516A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:40:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from lexi.sixcompanies.com (lexi.sixcompanies.com [65.43.82.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CB743D55 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:40:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Received: from [10.43.82.5] (coors.sixcompanies.com [10.43.82.5]) by lexi.sixcompanies.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1GJeXvp027843; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:40:34 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <43F4D531.9020307@wixb.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:40:33 -0600 From: "J.D. Bronson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060215060625.01176c88@sixcompanies.com> <20060216192730.GA25224@reiteration.net> In-Reply-To: <20060216192730.GA25224@reiteration.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: pop3 server recommendation (APOP/TLS) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:40:38 -0000 John wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:08:10AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: >> I am looking for a recommendation for a pop3 server >> that can do APOP and TLS on port 110. >> >> Qpopper was a disaster and I am not interested in cyrus (and dealing >> with maildirs)... >> >> Is there any other option? >> >> Qpopper worked with some of the clients (like eudora) but then had >> issues with Thunderbird or Pegasus...... > > What issues did you have? Has been working fine here with thunderbird > for a long time. humm. I can get APOP to work....but when I enable SSL I then see issues. It seems to me that thunderbird tried some different auth than I was allowing. I dont recall as I tried so many different POP3 servers. I will try it again someday and post more concrete answers. I had trouble getting pegasus/eudora/thunderbird mail all to work with qpopper (APOP/TLS) over port 110. -JD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 19:45:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E5716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:45:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9169543D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:45:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060216194527.RDCP13051.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:45:27 -0500 From: To: "Kyryll A Mirnenko aka Mirya" , Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:45:26 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200602162052.45028.mirya@matrix.ua> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: midnight commander and ssh sftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:45:29 -0000 The mc installed 2 weeks ago on Freebsd 6.0 is mc 4.6.0 and there is no "shell link" in the mc internal menu. What version of mc are you using that it has that in the menu? -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kyryll A Mirnenko aka Mirya Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 1:53 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Subject: Re: midnight commander and ssh sftp > Is there some way to be able to use midnight commander through a SSH > tunnel? 1) Use scp/sftp: it's called "Shell link..." is mc menu (the problem is Password: prompt is displayed somewhere on the mc command line as it seems to be unable to parse it for some reason. So when see it, simply enter the password there & refresh the mc panels w/ C-O,C-O) 2) More general solution: if u run 6.0 use sysutils/fusefs-sshfs (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs/) , it provides an scp/sftp link within filesystem layer, so you can use it not only from mc but from any app. The problem it seems to be much slower than plain scp (though uses the same transport), dunno why -- Regards, Mirya ICQ #313898202 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 19:45:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AD016A43B for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:45:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EE443D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:45:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 5869 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 19:45:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.50.145.200]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Feb 2006 19:45:44 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:45:35 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: Andrew Message-ID: <20060216204535.3c4e7d9c@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1140117830.602.19.camel@netvista.network> References: <1140117830.602.19.camel@netvista.network> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_QhKXRyq1.IOhpIMtEFCRGsv; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newly built kernel fails to boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:45:47 -0000 --Sig_QhKXRyq1.IOhpIMtEFCRGsv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andrew wrote: > I've just had a go at configuring and rebuilding a kernel for my > desktop machine. I read the section in handbook, and skimmed over > NOTES and the GENERIC config. I then copied GENERIC to NETVISTA and > commented out drivers/devices that I didn't think were relevant to my > hardware. config(8) is happy with my file, and 'make buildkernel' and > 'make installkernel' proceed without any errors. So, I ran > nextboot(8) and rebooted, but the new kernel hangs right after the > first line printed to the console; the first portion of which is > 'acpi.ko'.=20 =20 > # NETVISTA Kernel Config > # ACPI Video Extensions (LCD backlight/brightness, video output, etc.) > device acpi_video Just guessing, but man acpi says: |BUGS | If the acpi driver is loaded as a module when it is already linked as | part of the kernel, odd things may happen. Maybe having acpi_video in the kernel and then loading acpi as module triggers "odd things" as well. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_QhKXRyq1.IOhpIMtEFCRGsv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD9NZwjV8GA4rMKUQRAiIEAJwLNX/I96/ODJXUUDwE0CL1Tzv46wCfQJVy KK3p9z7KFnFif5dSxXYQuzo= =N2YX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_QhKXRyq1.IOhpIMtEFCRGsv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 19:52:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C33B16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:52:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF0A43D53 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:52:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D96E62C855; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:52:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69093-06; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:52:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26BB62C87F; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:52:37 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26E7B3E1DE; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:52:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200FA3950D; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:52:38 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:52:37 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: lars In-Reply-To: <43F4ACC5.1040200@gmx.at> Message-ID: <20060216154733.D60635@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <20060216121442.X60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F4ACC5.1040200@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:52:39 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, lars wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> Actually, in my case, I'm more interested in % uptime then long uptimes, >> something that this site does keep track of ... >> > Ok, it's not entirely silly then ;-) > > I'm not convinced though that "uptime" is a useful metric. > > At a time when Windows NT was so useless and unstable > the uptime of any OS other than Windows NT may have been a "metric" > if only a bragging-metric. But we should be over that now. > > I think "availability", which needs to be defined and measured precisely, is > more useful. > > Who cares how long a machine has been up, if it was only up > that long because it's a complete nuisance to update and installing > and upgrading and testing takes so long it eats the uptime and the > admins are scared to reboot it? ;-) Wait, I think we are talking about two different things ... I'm not looking at 'how long its been up', I'm looking at % of time its been up ... rebooting a server once a month to upgrade it, even if its down for 5min, is about 99.989% uptime, which is a good number, but the OS is still up to date ... The 'metric' one should be looking at is how *much* the server is up, not how *long* ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 20:01:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6CF16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:01:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4799043D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:01:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326E013C7C5; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:02:05 -0600 (CST) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 017B113C7C0; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:02:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006AF13C7BF; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:02:04 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:02:04 -0600 (CST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: "J.D. Bronson" In-Reply-To: <43F4D531.9020307@wixb.com> Message-ID: <20060216140102.W14725@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060215060625.01176c88@sixcompanies.com> <20060216192730.GA25224@reiteration.net> <43F4D531.9020307@wixb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: pop3 server recommendation (APOP/TLS) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:01:19 -0000 > John wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:08:10AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: >>> I am looking for a recommendation for a pop3 server >>> that can do APOP and TLS on port 110. >>> >>> Qpopper was a disaster and I am not interested in cyrus (and dealing with >>> maildirs)... >>> >>> Is there any other option? >>> >>> Qpopper worked with some of the clients (like eudora) but then had issues >>> with Thunderbird or Pegasus...... Coming in a bit late... I use uw-imap with TSL and have Outlook and Thunderbird clients. Works fine. Not sure what APOP is so can't comment there... There's also dovecot which I'm looking at moving too (mostly for virtual user support)... -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 20:08:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFEC16A4EF for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:08:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfm@shell.reiteration.net) Received: from smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CFE43D69 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:08:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfm@shell.reiteration.net) Received: from shell.reiteration.net ([82.34.179.228]) by smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:09:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=shell.reiteration.net ident=jfm) by shell.reiteration.net with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F9pQo-0006hn-A8; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:08:50 +0000 Received: (from jfm@localhost) by shell.reiteration.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1GK8o9Y025778; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:08:50 GMT (envelope-from jfm) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:08:50 +0000 From: John To: "J.D. Bronson" Message-ID: <20060216200850.GA25751@reiteration.net> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060215060625.01176c88@sixcompanies.com> <20060216192730.GA25224@reiteration.net> <43F4D531.9020307@wixb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F4D531.9020307@wixb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jfm@shell.reiteration.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shell.reiteration.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2006 20:09:54.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3D498B0:01C63334] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pop3 server recommendation (APOP/TLS) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:08:57 -0000 On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:40:33PM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > John wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 06:08:10AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > >>I am looking for a recommendation for a pop3 server > >>that can do APOP and TLS on port 110. > >> > >>Qpopper was a disaster and I am not interested in cyrus (and dealing > >>with maildirs)... > >> > >>Is there any other option? > >> > >>Qpopper worked with some of the clients (like eudora) but then had > >>issues with Thunderbird or Pegasus...... > > > >What issues did you have? Has been working fine here with thunderbird > >for a long time. > > humm. > > I can get APOP to work....but when I enable SSL I then see issues. > It seems to me that thunderbird tried some different auth than I was > allowing. I dont recall as I tried so many different POP3 servers. > > I will try it again someday and post more concrete answers. > > I had trouble getting pegasus/eudora/thunderbird mail all to work with > qpopper (APOP/TLS) over port 110. > > -JD Doesn't APOP/TLS run over port 998? -- John - lists@reiteration.net - https://www.reiteration.net/~jfm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 20:11:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E2816A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:11:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from idmc_vivr@intgdev.com) Received: from mail.networksolutionsemail.com (omr4.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8677743D5C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:11:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from idmc_vivr@intgdev.com) Received: (qmail 3918 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 20:10:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail15) (205.178.146.50) by omr4.mgt.bos.netsol.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 20:10:30 -0000 Received: from 208.40.29.234 (unverified [208.40.29.234]) by webmail15 (VisualOffice 4.01) with WEBMAIL id 19226; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:10:31 +0000 From: "V.I.Victor" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Message-ID: X-Mailer: Mintersoft VisualOffice, Build 4.01.1003 X-Originating-IP: [208.40.29.234] Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:10:31 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Every 12-hrs -- "ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE DMA" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:11:31 -0000 For the last 4-days, our (otherwise OK) 5.4-RELEASE machine has been reporting: Feb 12 12:08:05 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2701279 Feb 13 00:08:51 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2701279 Feb 13 12:09:38 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2963331 Feb 14 00:10:24 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2705947 Feb 14 12:11:09 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2706335 Feb 15 00:12:02 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2832383 Feb 15 12:12:57 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=139839 Feb 16 00:13:50 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=131391 Feb 16 12:14:36 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=131391 The system was created Jan 08 and, prior to the above, the ad0: timeout had only been reported twice: Jan 25 11:43:34 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=17920255 Feb 6 11:59:42 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2832383 Before to asking here, I did several searches for possible causes. I think I've eliminated disk spin-down and bad-block-mapping -- just before the Feb 15, 12:12 period a 2-gig file was created; leaving the disk 'spinning' and bad-blocks presumably bypassed. Another found item said that some IBM drives recalibrate every 25-hours. Interesting concept, but a different period and without previous history. Lastly, several items referred to changing PREEMPTION but never seemed to reach a final conclusion. I also checked the cron log and found nothing running at the timeout times. So -- can anyone help track this down? Final note: the hardware is an old, resurrected Win98 machine running 24/7 and is used only for email processing. I installed it primarily as a proof of concept, so it can be replaced if necessary. Some specifics: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Sun May 8 10:21:06 UTC 2005 CPU: AMD-K7(tm) Processor (598.84-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x612 Stepping = 2 Features=0x81f9ff AMD Features=0xc0400000 real memory = 134152192 (127 MB) avail memory = 121630720 (115 MB) ACPI disabled by blacklist. Contact your BIOS vendor. ad0: 14664MB [29795/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 Thanks for any help! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 20:14:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7BA16A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:14:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from rader.servnow.com (rader.servnow.com [69.93.129.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1CB43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:14:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from 12-210-115-238.client.insightbb.com ([12.210.115.238]) by rader.servnow.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52) id 1F9pWL-0005VD-3A; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:14:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:14:37 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael L. Squires" X-X-Sender: mikes@familysquires.net To: Anthony Philipp In-Reply-To: <20060215160953.L17196@familysquires.net> Message-ID: <20060216151305.B20140@familysquires.net> References: <20060208085424.GT2679@zeus.itg.uiuc.edu> <20060215160953.L17196@familysquires.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - rader.servnow.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - siralan.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: math/lapack (lapack-3.0) (unknown build error) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:14:40 -0000 The build error vanished after cvsup'ing on 2/15. Mike Squires From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 20:32:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536CF16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:32:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [63.240.77.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F9443D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:32:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from eisenhower.ascendency.net ([67.173.128.145]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2006021620323301400omshie>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:32:33 +0000 Received: from Mike8500 (ipcop.localdomain [192.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by eisenhower.ascendency.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GKWW1d057558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:32:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) From: "Mike Loiterman" To: "'Wouter Spierenburg'" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:32:29 -0600 Message-ID: <022a01c63338$1ba87d90$0401a8c0@Mike8500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYy0Imd98CUoPcmTrq31aJALVbMzAAABCWQAAF6GqAAAXgL0AADhoVwABMkugA= In-Reply-To: <200602161126.k1GBQoaH040934@smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (eisenhower.ascendency.net [192.168.1.22]); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:32:32 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mike@ascendency.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:32:35 -0000 Wouter Spierenburg wrote: > Try adding the following to /etc/sysctl.conf: > > kern.maxfiles=65535 > kern.maxfilesperproc=20000 > net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 > net.inet.ip.maxfragpackets=10 > kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048 > > then 'cd' to /usr/src/sys/i386/conf > cp GENERIC SERVER > vi SERVER > > and add the following lines at the bottom of the file: > options TCPDEBUG > options RANDOM_IP_ID > options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN > options NMBCLUSTERS=65535 > options NMBUFS=40960 > > save the file, and follow these steps: > > /usr/sbin/config -g SERVER > cd ../../compile/SERVER > make depend > make > make install > #if all went well: > reboot > > The system will then come back up with tuned parameters, allowing more > in/outbound connections and better packethandling. Before I make these changes, I would like to just get a second opinion from the list about their value and what impact, if any, they might have on system stability, compatibility, etc. Wouter, please do not take offense to this! I sincerely appreciate your advice, but this is a production system, so I'm careful about what changes I make when I don't explicitly understand what is going on. I'm not familure with a few of those options. I also noticed that that you used the old (traditional) way of recompiling the kernel. Is that necessary or can I use the newer `make buildkernel KERNCONF=x && make installkernel KERNCONF=x'. I'm simply more comfortable with that way... Thanks to all ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: mike@ascendency.net PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 20:38:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006E516A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:38:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rfg@monkeys.com) Received: from segfault-outgoing-helo.monkeys.com (segfault.monkeys.com [66.60.159.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7856343D5C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:38:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rfg@monkeys.com) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.monkeys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.monkeys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD6454A9 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:38:45 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:38:45 -0800 Message-ID: <63910.1140122325@monkeys.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Mounting data DVDs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:38:51 -0000 I know that I'm very late to the party, but I just recently bought and installed my first ever DVD burner. The burner is installed on a system that I have set up to dual boot to either FreeBSD 5.2.1 (yea, I know, that's ancient) or else to Windoze ME. So anyway, yesterday I followed all of the instructions located at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-dvds.html in order to create and install a fresh kernel that would have all of the required stuff in it to be able to burn data DVDs. I then burned my first ever data DVD... made from some data I had that I wanted to make a backup of. All went smoothly. So far, so good. The tricky part came when I then went to _mount_ my freshly burned DVD onto FreeBSD. (I wanted to do this just in order to verify that the data had in fact successfully been burned onto the DVD.) Unfortunately, try as I might, I couldn't fingure out how to just simply mount the burned DVD onto the FreeBSD system. I tried both: mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /mnt which yielded only the error message: cd9660: /dev/cd0: Device not configured and I also tried: mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt which yielded the error: cd9660: /dev/acd0: Input/output error OK, so what am I doing wrong? Note that I have attached the relevant portion of my dmesg output at the end of this message... just in case that might be useful in diagnosing this problem. The REALLY funny thing about all this is that I am 100% sure that the DVD in question *did* get properly burned, because I can reboot this same system into Windows ME, and then, Windows ME has no trouble at all seeing either the DVD or all of the files that I burned onto it. So basically, I can _burn_ a DVD under FreeBSD... I just can't figure out how to use it on FreeBSD, once it has been successfully burned. Sound I just ungrade to something a bit fresher than 5.2.1, or does that make any difference at all? Any help appreciated. dmesg stuff: ========================================================================== ... ata1-master: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 GEOM: create disk cd0 dp=0xc2d81e00 cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 20:47:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD5216A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:47:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5324843D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:47:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1F9q2a-0007PX-Ra for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:47:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:48:23 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060216144823.5a4e5aba@grokwell.org> In-Reply-To: <63910.1140122325@monkeys.com> References: <63910.1140122325@monkeys.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bcd01e2b234d305d645665447d2c0ff7ed350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Subject: Re: Mounting data DVDs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:47:53 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:38:45 -0800 "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: > > I know that I'm very late to the party, but I just recently bought and > installed my first ever DVD burner. > > The burner is installed on a system that I have set up to dual boot > to either FreeBSD 5.2.1 (yea, I know, that's ancient) or else to > Windoze ME. > > So anyway, yesterday I followed all of the instructions located at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-dvds.html > > in order to create and install a fresh kernel that would have all of > the required stuff in it to be able to burn data DVDs. > > I then burned my first ever data DVD... made from some data I had > that I wanted to make a backup of. > > All went smoothly. So far, so good. > > The tricky part came when I then went to _mount_ my freshly burned DVD > onto FreeBSD. (I wanted to do this just in order to verify that the > data had in fact successfully been burned onto the DVD.) > > Unfortunately, try as I might, I couldn't fingure out how to just > simply mount the burned DVD onto the FreeBSD system. I tried both: > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /mnt > > which yielded only the error message: > > cd9660: /dev/cd0: Device not configured > > and I also tried: > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt > > which yielded the error: > > cd9660: /dev/acd0: Input/output error > > OK, so what am I doing wrong? > > Note that I have attached the relevant portion of my dmesg output at > the end of this message... just in case that might be useful in > diagnosing this problem. > > The REALLY funny thing about all this is that I am 100% sure that the > DVD in question *did* get properly burned, because I can reboot this > same system into Windows ME, and then, Windows ME has no trouble at > all seeing either the DVD or all of the files that I burned onto it. > > So basically, I can _burn_ a DVD under FreeBSD... I just can't figure > out how to use it on FreeBSD, once it has been successfully burned. > > Sound I just ungrade to something a bit fresher than 5.2.1, or does > that make any difference at all? > > Any help appreciated. > > > > > dmesg stuff: > ========================================================================== > ... > ata1-master: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device > acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 > GEOM: create disk cd0 dp=0xc2d81e00 > cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers > cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not > present _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Can you mount CD's? If so, pretend it's a CD. If you have an entry in /etc/fstab to mount a CD to /cdrom, then execute: mount /cdrom Best of luck, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 20:58:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B76E16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:58:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801A143D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:58:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1GKvRPH021971 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:57:30 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GKvIis002489; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:57:18 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1GKvHx4002488; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:57:17 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:57:15 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Mike Loiterman Message-ID: <20060216205715.GA2465@flame.pc> References: <200602161126.k1GBQoaH040934@smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl> <022a01c63338$1ba87d90$0401a8c0@Mike8500> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <022a01c63338$1ba87d90$0401a8c0@Mike8500> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.347, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.85, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: 'Wouter Spierenburg' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:58:16 -0000 On 2006-02-16 14:32, Mike Loiterman wrote: > Wouter Spierenburg wrote: > > Try adding the following to /etc/sysctl.conf: > > > > kern.maxfiles=65535 > > kern.maxfilesperproc=20000 > > net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 > > net.inet.ip.maxfragpackets=10 > > kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048 > > > > then 'cd' to /usr/src/sys/i386/conf > > cp GENERIC SERVER > > vi SERVER > > > > and add the following lines at the bottom of the file: > > options TCPDEBUG > > options RANDOM_IP_ID > > options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN > > options NMBCLUSTERS=65535 > > options NMBUFS=40960 > > > > save the file, and follow these steps: > > > > /usr/sbin/config -g SERVER > > cd ../../compile/SERVER > > make depend > > make > > make install > > #if all went well: > > reboot > > > > The system will then come back up with tuned parameters, allowing more > > in/outbound connections and better packethandling. > > Before I make these changes, I would like to just get a second opinion from > the list about their value and what impact, if any, they might have on > system stability, compatibility, etc. > > Wouter, please do not take offense to this! I sincerely appreciate your > advice, but this is a production system, so I'm careful about what changes I > make when I don't explicitly understand what is going on. I'm not familure > with a few of those options. I'm not sure if the options are useful for your setup, so I'm not going to comment for or against them. > I also noticed that that you used the old (traditional) way of recompiling > the kernel. Is that necessary or can I use the newer `make buildkernel > KERNCONF=x && make installkernel KERNCONF=x'. I'm simply more comfortable > with that way... If you have the original object tree around, you should definitely use the new way: # cd /usr/src/ # make KERNCONF=SERVER buildkernel This uses the build tools from /usr/obj, which is more appropriate. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:02:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A940A16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:02:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xuchen66@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D52343D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:02:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xuchen66@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id u40so148541ugc for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:02:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=FBQ8niHSw1tPlST1PI1fBo14UFu3LFOq9mCVZEMW1xXugimfTY1MBwBVDMUlqA2VIrTRqEAR1QlTepykOswkuhgAdOdrJB894Lyphj6yWd5HMCbJZzPgsZ6WjfjuO7PZwJNT6WaSge0n0/kQch/qFceorKmqaNxEJMvpsZyvIs8= Received: by 10.66.245.14 with SMTP id s14mr79200ugh; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:11:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.243.16 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:11:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <184b087c0602161211q21bcd6dr3553a04becd81249@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:11:12 -0700 From: Chen Xu Sender: xuchen66@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: fftw static library X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:02:54 -0000 Dear all, I installed fftw from port, that was fine. However, I could not see the libsfftw.so or libsrfftw.so anywhere. In SuSE, at least, there are two packages fftw and fftw-dev. Those header files and static link library files are installed from the second package. How can I get them for my FreeBSD box? Thanks, Chen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:10:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D24D16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:10:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from viper@fx-services.com) Received: from mamata.fx-services.com (mamata.fx-services.com [193.238.27.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD0243D53 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:10:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from viper@fx-services.com) Received: from c83-250-235-77.bredband.comhem.se ([83.250.235.77] helo=[192.168.2.160]) by mamata.fx-services.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1F9qOd-00076K-FY for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:10:40 +0100 Message-ID: <43F4EA85.7060703@fx-services.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:11:33 +0100 From: Robin Vley User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <022a01c63338$1ba87d90$0401a8c0@Mike8500> In-Reply-To: <022a01c63338$1ba87d90$0401a8c0@Mike8500> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus-Scanner: Mail is Virus Free, FXS MailGateway X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mamata.fx-services.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - fx-services.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:10:28 -0000 Mike Loiterman wrote: Mike, Wouter, > Before I make these changes, I would like to just get a second opinion from > the list about their value and what impact, if any, they might have on > system stability, compatibility, etc. I don't know really how to set the maxfiles parameter (mine is at 32000 for now on a web/mail server). However, as far as I understand the net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack is not something you want to set at 0 normally. This is part of the TCP system of flow control. By not delaying ACKs high speed connections will not be fully utilized. However, like someone else already answered: it's kind of hard to say if this is a good idea for YOUR setup. Maybe Wouter can explain why he came with the tip about that one? Maybe there is a good reason to it. :) My machine also has trouble with sudden reboots. Much quicker than weeks though, I barely hold out for 5 days. So I'm reading up on this sort of cases now, hence my interest in this thread. So far I've looked at the maxfiles (increased it a little), and kern.maxvnodes (increased it to 100.000, my vfs.vnodes was at 91000 at the time). My trouble is kind of exactly the same as I read in the original messaage: the result is like someone pulls the plug and puts it back in. No logs, no dumps, no nothing. And completely normal operation right before the reboot. Pretty annoying. I've had it on 2 machines, different hardware so far. First I expected hardware, but now I moved everything to a freshly installed machine with hardware that I'm 100% sure of it's OK. So it must be something else then, right? :) /Robin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:11:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E835D16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:11:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (smtp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114E743D5E for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:11:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.140] (tui75-2-82-229-178-102.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.178.102]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036A31831A for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:11:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:11:22 +0100 From: Mathieu CHATEAU X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.12) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1893863940.20060216221122@free.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Mysql 5 Cluster & FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:11:23 -0000 Hello, Mysql Cluster is now part of Mysql 5. Does someone successfully set up a Mysql 5 cluster on FreeBSD 5.4 ? thanks in advance, Mathieu CHATEAU From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:16:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6255316A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:16:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D38643D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:16:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 21:16:16 -0000 Received: from 43.85.77.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [83.77.85.43] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 22:16:16 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F4EBA7.9070804@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:16:23 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <20060216121442.X60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F4ACC5.1040200@gmx.at> <20060216154733.D60635@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060216154733.D60635@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ...s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars@gmx.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:16:23 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Wait, I think we are talking about two different things ... I'm not > looking at 'how long its been up', I'm looking at % of time its been up > ... rebooting a server once a month to upgrade it, even if its down for > 5min, is about 99.989% uptime, which is a good number, but the OS is > still up to date ... > > The 'metric' one should be looking at is how *much* the server is up, > not how *long* ... Ok, I see what you're getting at. "Uptime since first start-up ever", right? IMHO this should be changed from uptime in days|hours|minutes|seconds to availability in percent. And here "availability" is defined as ports/sysutils/uptimec being able to send it's status to some recipient. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:18:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696BC16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:18:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [216.148.227.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122A743D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:18:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from eisenhower.ascendency.net ([67.173.128.145]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060216211817m1300fk0hre>; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:18:17 +0000 Received: from Mike8500 (ipcop.localdomain [192.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by eisenhower.ascendency.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GLIFiB058953 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:18:15 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) From: "Mike Loiterman" To: "'Giorgos Keramidas'" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:18:14 -0600 Message-ID: <022b01c6333e$8058ccd0$0401a8c0@Mike8500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYzPQNqLsNILQSnReuqDTrDEl51ZAAAV/bg In-Reply-To: <20060216205715.GA2465@flame.pc> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (eisenhower.ascendency.net [192.168.1.22]); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:18:16 -0600 (CST) Cc: 'Wouter Spierenburg' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mike@ascendency.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:18:19 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-02-16 14:32, Mike Loiterman wrote: >> Wouter Spierenburg wrote: >>> Try adding the following to /etc/sysctl.conf: >>> >>> kern.maxfiles=65535 >>> kern.maxfilesperproc=20000 >>> net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 >>> net.inet.ip.maxfragpackets=10 >>> kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048 >>> >>> then 'cd' to /usr/src/sys/i386/conf >>> cp GENERIC SERVER >>> vi SERVER >>> >>> and add the following lines at the bottom of the file: options >>> TCPDEBUG options RANDOM_IP_ID >>> options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN >>> options NMBCLUSTERS=65535 >>> options NMBUFS=40960 >>> >>> save the file, and follow these steps: >>> >>> /usr/sbin/config -g SERVER >>> cd ../../compile/SERVER >>> make depend >>> make >>> make install >>> #if all went well: >>> reboot >>> >>> The system will then come back up with tuned parameters, allowing >>> more in/outbound connections and better packethandling. >> >> Before I make these changes, I would like to just get a second >> opinion from the list about their value and what impact, if any, >> they might have on system stability, compatibility, etc. >> >> Wouter, please do not take offense to this! I sincerely appreciate >> your advice, but this is a production system, so I'm careful about >> what changes I make when I don't explicitly understand what is going >> on. I'm not familure with a few of those options. > > I'm not sure if the options are useful for your setup, so I'm > not going > to comment for or against them. Well, the server is an email/web server primarily. Not a huge load, but I want to be hardened against DOS attacks...would these help? ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: mike@ascendency.net PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:23:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2B616A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:23:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from buhnux@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9F643D49 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:23:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from buhnux@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c2so170709nfe for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:23:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=gP0PLNQR6K7CYWSkqlArOCLGxQc30eFncac6P0EMsUhXI2K7KsC/vwfSdSKc0wZ3sgtDl8DAIg0aCcnlhZeghuk7Hb/v3/07eEKUoVik4pfrrRYMmmuWRYmEmByff7OiJhonZQzGRPJVRWNnF4dCz/MPDgehak5rvQbhfyEC3Jw= Received: by 10.48.238.20 with SMTP id l20mr272048nfh; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:23:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.11.5 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:23:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:23:06 -0500 From: michael johnson To: Chen Xu In-Reply-To: <184b087c0602161211q21bcd6dr3553a04becd81249@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <184b087c0602161211q21bcd6dr3553a04becd81249@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fftw static library X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ahze@ahze.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:23:09 -0000 On 2/16/06, Chen Xu wrote: > > Dear all, > > I installed fftw from port, that was fine. However, > I could not see the libsfftw.so or libsrfftw.so anywhere. > In SuSE, at least, there are two packages fftw and fftw-dev. > Those header files and static link library files are installed > from the second package. > > How can I get them for my FreeBSD box? install ports/math/fftw-float Cheers, Michael Thanks, > Chen > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:28:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3804216A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:28:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D1AF43D53 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:28:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 22818 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2006 21:28:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index; b=QGeRh7h4lSnogjyYbmsexvoDWu7wyJa6JUiUGZwDSMJMgmBJH+E0/lBAalxbN66QubNsoP5y2D+lkyIUzJM2gHeH2xQUP9Nap1HxSfEQ9mE3g/cbTcjAfRuS6T5zRMyEtEJUEvW6q38pLLloctiylRccUrmQxFz2fb2EZ/tbej8= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login) by smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 21:28:16 -0000 From: "Tamouh H." To: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:27:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <022b01c6333e$8058ccd0$0401a8c0@Mike8500> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcYzPQNqLsNILQSnReuqDTrDEl51ZAAAV/bgAABPJSA= Message-Id: <20060216212817.7D1AF43D53@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:28:18 -0000 >=20 > Well, the server is an email/web server primarily. Not a=20 > huge load, but I want to be hardened against DOS=20 > attacks...would these help? >=20 If you are looking to harden your server, this might be helpful. Though = a bit outdates, it still holds true for most part: http://www.dal.net/admin/vote/seceval.php3 p.s. why the topic named 'mysterious reboots' if we're talking about = hardening against DoS!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:33:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D99716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:33:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E0F43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:33:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1GLX3nP023355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:33:04 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GLWsvA002753; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:32:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1GLWsWW002752; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:32:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:32:54 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Mike Loiterman Message-ID: <20060216213253.GA2693@flame.pc> References: <20060216205715.GA2465@flame.pc> <022b01c6333e$8058ccd0$0401a8c0@Mike8500> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <022b01c6333e$8058ccd0$0401a8c0@Mike8500> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.348, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.85, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:33:31 -0000 On 2006-02-16 15:18, Mike Loiterman wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> On 2006-02-16 14:32, Mike Loiterman wrote: >>> Wouter Spierenburg wrote: >>>> Try adding the following to /etc/sysctl.conf: >>>> >>>> kern.maxfiles=65535 >>>> kern.maxfilesperproc=20000 >>>> net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 >>>> net.inet.ip.maxfragpackets=10 >>>> kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048 >>>> >>>> then 'cd' to /usr/src/sys/i386/conf >>>> cp GENERIC SERVER >>>> vi SERVER >>>> >>>> and add the following lines at the bottom of the file: options >>>> TCPDEBUG options RANDOM_IP_ID >>>> options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN >>>> options NMBCLUSTERS=65535 >>>> options NMBUFS=40960 >>>> [...] >> I'm not sure if the options are useful for your setup, so I'm >> not going to comment for or against them. > > Well, the server is an email/web server primarily. Not a huge > load, but I want to be hardened against DOS attacks...would > these help? kern.maxfiles and kern.masfilesperproc may need some tuning, but you would have to look at other related sysctls to be sure that you really need all those sizes, i.e.: # sysctl kern.openfiles will provide a measure of how many files your system keeps open. If this is too close to kern.maxfiles, you should definitely increase kern.maxfiles a bit, to be able to handle a bigger load. net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack may actually help for bulk transfers, by sending a smaller amount of packets for TCP acknowledgements. Reducing net.inet.ip.maxfragpackets so much will decrease the memory amount used for keeping around fragments of packets, but it also has the potential of increasing the number of fragments that are dropped & retransmitted. You should first look at: # sysctl net.inet.ip.fragpackets to see how many fragments your system usually keeps around. Increasing kern.ipc.somaxconn to 2048 will also require a bit more memory, for keeping the state of 'sockets pending a connection' around. But it will also decrease the amount of sockets that drop connections, potentially allowing more clients to connect at about the same time without having their connection being reset immediately. TCPDEBUG is not really a good option for a production machine, as it will probably slow things down a bit. RANDOM_IP_ID is more secure than not having it, but it also puts a bit more strain on the system by making frequent calls to the random IP id generator. TCP_DROP_SYNFIN has interesting comments in the `NOTES' files, so use it with care. NMBCLUSTERS and NMBUS can be probably optimized a bit, but first you should take a look at the statistics of: # netstat -m 258/387/645 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 256/134/390/17024 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 576K/364K/941K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 calls to protocol drain routines If the 'current' values are very close to 'total' or 'max', you probably need to bump these a bit. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:35:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38EC16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:35:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C64D43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:35:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEDD62C8B3; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:35:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98080-09; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:35:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACF262C892; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:35:01 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 671EA371CF; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:35:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635D835263; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:35:02 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:35:02 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: lars In-Reply-To: <43F4EBA7.9070804@gmx.at> Message-ID: <20060216173425.T60635@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <20060216121442.X60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F4ACC5.1040200@gmx.at> <20060216154733.D60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F4EBA7.9070804@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ...s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:35:03 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, lars wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> Wait, I think we are talking about two different things ... I'm not looking >> at 'how long its been up', I'm looking at % of time its been up ... >> rebooting a server once a month to upgrade it, even if its down for 5min, >> is about 99.989% uptime, which is a good number, but the OS is still up to >> date ... >> >> The 'metric' one should be looking at is how *much* the server is up, not >> how *long* ... > Ok, I see what you're getting at. > "Uptime since first start-up ever", right? > > IMHO this should be changed from > uptime in days|hours|minutes|seconds to > availability in percent. http://www.mreriksson.net/uptimes/viewhost/?1465 : Availability: 99.853% ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:48:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6915616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:48:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44D543D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:48:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62209D342C1 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:48:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:48:13 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: o7H4MmeTdnxbTE++PyIiMxKvs9AaAfSh5VBjFiZ1EM0V 1140126489 Received: from [192.168.1.51] (cwpp-p-144-139-3-63.prem.tmns.net.au [144.139.3.63]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FF957146F for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:48:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F4F31F.7060705@rtl.fmailbox.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:48:15 +1100 From: Robert Leftwich User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1139660347.9558.254123183@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1139661724.10713.254124058@webmail.messagingengine.com> <282b2dd90602160019t25fb8eanf5ff693dbd867385@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <282b2dd90602160019t25fb8eanf5ff693dbd867385@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0, amd64, A8N-SLI and 4gb ram X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:48:15 -0000 Joseph Kerian wrote: > > I was planning on purchasing one of these boards in the near future, so I'm > rather interested if you have solved this particular problem. In no > particular order, my suggestions are: > -The A8N-SLI's are extremely picky about the RAM you give them; have you > double checked with a memtest run to verify that it's not the problem? No, but I think it is purely down to the bios to enable the last 1gb or not. If I disable both the h/w and s/w PAE options in the bios then the bios only reports 3gb available and FreeBSD the same and it runs ok (sans the memory leak problem I've also emailed the question list about - with little response). If I enable *only* the h/w PAE option in the bios, both it and FreeBSD report 4gb available, but FreeBSD is visibly slower on startup, the nic doesn't appear to work correctly (DHCP fails) and it is very flaky after login. If I enable *only* the s/w PA option in the bios, both it and FreeBSD report 4gb available, but FreeBSD fails to complete startup, spewing 'entry of nVidia Mediashield metadata is NOT supported' on the console until manually rebooted. > Also, > what happens if the new RAM is the only RAM in the system? Everything works as expected (2gb available/used), no problems encountered. > -Does anything change if you compile for a single processor? FreeBSD should > run fine even if it's not taking advantage of the dual cored nature of the > processor. Haven't tried that, but I have the original kernel on the box, so I will. > -There appears to have been a bios problem with using exactly 4 gigs of ram > in the A8N Deluxe boards at one point, not sure if this also showed up on > the Premiums or not. You may want to verify that you are running the most > recent bios. Yep, I'm running 1009 which is the latest non-beta version. > > I found the cause of the invalid option error. From the handbook section on > the PAE option: > "*Note:* The PAE support in FreeBSD is only available for Intel IA-32 > processors." Note that it appears that PAE is a system for addressing _more_ > than 4 gigs of RAM (handbook section 8). Since your board only supports up > to 4 gigs ( > http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelmenu=2&model=539&l1=3&l2=15&l3=148), > I guess I'm curious why the PAE options exist in the bios. The bios help(!) says '4gb or more' and it appears to be the only way to get it to enable the last 1gb. After some discussion on the Ubuntu 64 forum I'm going to try the Live CD 64 bit to see if it boots up ok with the 4gb turned on in the bios and if so, it looks like I will have to move to that distro to get this box working properly. Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:49:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFCB16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:49:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FBA843D6E for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:49:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 21:49:53 -0000 Received: from 43.85.77.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [83.77.85.43] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 22:49:53 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F4F387.3010908@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:49:59 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <20060216121442.X60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F4ACC5.1040200@gmx.at> <20060216154733.D60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F4EBA7.9070804@gmx.at> <20060216173425.T60635@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060216173425.T60635@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ...s X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars@gmx.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:49:59 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, lars wrote: > >> Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> Wait, I think we are talking about two different things ... I'm not >>> looking at 'how long its been up', I'm looking at % of time its been >>> up ... rebooting a server once a month to upgrade it, even if its >>> down for 5min, is about 99.989% uptime, which is a good number, but >>> the OS is still up to date ... >>> >>> The 'metric' one should be looking at is how *much* the server is up, >>> not how *long* ... >> Ok, I see what you're getting at. >> "Uptime since first start-up ever", right? >> >> IMHO this should be changed from >> uptime in days|hours|minutes|seconds to >> availability in percent. > > http://www.mreriksson.net/uptimes/viewhost/?1465 : > > Availability: 99.853% Best Uptime: 52d 15h 1min Total Uptime: 74d 10h 39min Average Uptime: 37d 5h 19min Total Downtime: 2h 37min Availability: 99.853% So we're back at availability :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:52:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB61C16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:52:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B77643D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:52:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2006 21:52:54 -0000 Received: from 43.85.77.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [83.77.85.43] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 22:52:54 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:53:01 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> In-Reply-To: <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lars@gmx.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:52:56 -0000 Eric Schultz wrote: > lars wrote: >> A long uptime means that the machine hasn't been rebooted for a long >> time. If that time's longer than the time to the last patch that >> required a kernel recompilation and a reboot, it means the server is not >> patched. Where's the point in advertising an unpatched machine? > > Good afternoon... > > Perhaps it means the OS doesn't need to be patched that frequently Possibly. But patch frequency means what exactly? > or has a patch mechanism that avoids reboots? Exactly, that doesn't exist (yet). Although there was something in a Usenix proceeding or somewhere else, about "micro-reboots" where, to use FreeBSD wordage, Base and Ports' programs where so modularised to allow this. Thus making only, say, a driver or some kernel component reboot, but the majority of the system stays up. Of course a reboot of the NIC's driver kills that component's "uptime". > That's certainly worth advertising (if only were true). Actually it (this website) means advertising an unpatched machine running unpatched services not available to the outside. > The top machine has been running for almost 6 years on FreeBSD 3.3 which > means the admin probably believes that "if it ain't broke, don't fix > it." Which is not necessarily the best strategy. But may be right in this case. > I would also want to advertise the longevity of an OS. You mean the ability of that OS to run so long without requiring a reboot? I'm not sure that's that relevant nowadays. How many OS aren't capable of staying up long? Even Windows doesn't need too much Viagra to keep it up. > (You might not like that last one if you're a hardware vendor :) > > Also, a lot of work-arounds for security patches amount to "lock the > front door." What do you mean by that? > So perhaps some systems don't need to be patched because > they're administered so as not to require immediate patching/upgrading. If your machine only runs an NFS daemon and is behind a firewall, ok, you don't need to patch it asap when an NFS SA and patch is issued, if all clients connecting to the machine are benign. I could also run a machine in some private net protected by firewalls and whatnot running only this uptime program. Unless I lose power or some hardware failure occurs I'll have a long uptime. A bit useless though. I think that 'uptime' and this website fail to define precisely enough what the point of the exercise is to be able to make useful conclusions about something about some OS. What exactly do you want to measure to make what decision? Do you want to find out how much [%] your OS is available whithout load just patching it with the latest SA recommended patches? Do you want to find out how much [%] your OS is available [can serve 100 FTP users simultaneously at wire speed with this NIC] just patching it with the latest SA recommended patches? Do you want see how long an unpatched OS version can keep it up without any patches or interaction whatsoever? etc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:57:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A4316A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:57:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C3043D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:57:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ianchov@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so181363nfc for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:57:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=tOEt/0ywZGnA43rF//bQ3Tq0lOp07pgwX3XFO3FQ8/+LtrFL9K9Mj5Qp7CsiVlcnP8Wh0Z+MnlqW5mWpOHxfDqTKD+DsohmBFkVtwk3fY67Le/oPC4nS76JUF4BIaS9/c/lMEy4hRCJ9+HXLRYwYKHOY7690sBY6iVkZ8UzUAOk= Received: by 10.48.3.15 with SMTP id 15mr280318nfc; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:57:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.26.9 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:57:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18e02bd30602161357p30dacd80tc03151a8d31fc87a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:57:18 +0200 From: Iantcho Vassilev To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <43F3EE83.6060702@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: natd with several alias IPs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:57:20 -0000 That`s how i do it with PF!!! nat on ed0 proto {tcp udp icmp} from 10.10.xx.xx to any -> 172.16.xx.xx # Rule 2 (NAT) # # nat on ed0 proto {tcp udp icmp} from 10.10.xx.xx to any -> 172.16.xx.xx # # Rule 3 (NAT) # # nat on ed0 proto {tcp udp icmp} from 10.10.xx.xx to any -> 172.16.xx.xx # # Rule 4 (NAT) # # nat on ed0 proto {tcp udp icmp} from 10.10.xx.xx to any -> 172.16.xx.xx ------> Where ed0 is the interface with the alias.. As performace i can say that`s its scalling very well. Because of the natur= e of PF and the options you can set(to be more aggressive or not ) i don`t have problems with overheat. On 2/16/06, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 2/16/06, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > > I wonder, what tricks do you use to use more than > > > one alias IP? I mean, if you have hundreds of > > > hosts behind your firewall, what can you do to alias > > > some of them to one ip, others to another and so on. > > > > See "man natd" about the following options for 1-to-1 NAT translation, > which can > > be put into /etc/natd.conf and processed automagicly when the machine > boots: > > > > -redirect_address localIP publicIP > > That's one trick. Do you use it in production? How many > hosts do you have mapped this way? How do you get > incoming traffic translated to the address it is meant > for, not the last address? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 21:59:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D06616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:59:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F9843D5C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:59:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-22-247.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.247]) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2006 16:59:08 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.02,121,1139202000"; d="scan'208"; a="206234757:sNHT133081684" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17396.62826.839924.94289@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:58:02 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <43F4EA85.7060703@fx-services.com> References: <022a01c63338$1ba87d90$0401a8c0@Mike8500> <43F4EA85.7060703@fx-services.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta24) "dandelion" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Re: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:59:19 -0000 Robin Vley writes: > My machine also has trouble with sudden reboots. Much quicker > than weeks though, I barely hold out for 5 days. "And three shall be the number of the counting ...." I have a -CURRENT machine - P4, 512mb RAM, SCSI disks, de-driver ethernet, all mainstream hardware - that has this problem. Since early last year (maybe longer) it will occasionally reboot. No warning, no panic, no core-dump, just - bang. If I was lucky it would - sometimes - freeze or degrade X a few seconds before the reboot. The shortest period between events was less than an hour, the longest several weeks, the average 4-5 days. After an update in October (??), things slowly got better; several further updates and I haven't seen it in weeks. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 22:09:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EE716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:09:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from mail.compedgeracing.com (dsl-katy-207-70-139-52.consolidated.net [207.70.139.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613C043D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:09:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from www.compedgeracing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.compedgeracing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A4F5C2C; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:09:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from 63.97.49.74 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ruzzi) by www.compedgeracing.com with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:09:45 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4514.63.97.49.74.1140127785.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> In-Reply-To: <1893863940.20060216221122@free.fr> References: <1893863940.20060216221122@free.fr> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:09:45 -0600 (CST) From: "Robert Uzzi" To: "Mathieu CHATEAU" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysql 5 Cluster & FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:09:34 -0000 Add this to /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf in your MAKE_ARGS statement. It's the WITH_NDB=1 switch that will enable building with cluster support, the rest is up to you. Then use the portinstall command to build the port. >From there on it is like any other OS to build the MySQL cluster. MAKE_ARGS = { 'databases/mysql*' => 'WITH_NDB=1 WITH_ARCHIVE=1 BUILD_OPTIMIZED=1 WITH_OPENSSL=1', } > Hello, > > Mysql Cluster is now part of Mysql 5. > > Does someone successfully set up a Mysql 5 cluster on FreeBSD 5.4 ? > > thanks in advance, > Mathieu CHATEAU > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 22:11:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2254216A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:11:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E11343D6D for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:11:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de) Received: from [145.254.224.90] (dialin-145-254-224-090.pools.arcor-ip.net [145.254.224.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AE130000BF for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:11:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F4F887.9000308@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:11:19 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-mainz.de Subject: FreeBSD 6.1-PRE/AMD64, Thunderbird, Enigmail (64Bit) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:11:31 -0000 Hello. I ran into trouble using Enigmail 0.94.0 with the lates Thunderbird 1.5-client compiled natively from ports collection on a FreeBSD 6.1-PRE box running a pure amd64 OS. PGP backend is the latest GNUpg backend found in ports. It is impossible to me encrypting a test email to myself or configure keys out of the keyring. As often as I try to send an encrypted mail, I receive 'Enigmail: Failed to access Enigmail service". It seems the service Enigmail doesn't respond or is existent on the box, but I got all the buttons in Thunderbird. The only thing not tested yet is to make GNUpg behave like OpenPGP. Any ideas? Is that a 64Bit issue or simply a FreeBSD-non-working or simply a stupid confi issue? Thanks in advance, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 22:14:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D45116A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:14:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA6343D7E for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:14:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-169-72.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.169.72]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1F94CB29; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:23:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EEB5285E; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:12:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F4F92E.7050301@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:14:06 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" References: <63910.1140122325@monkeys.com> In-Reply-To: <63910.1140122325@monkeys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting data DVDs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:14:11 -0000 Ronald F. Guilmette schrieb: > I know that I'm very late to the party, but I just recently bought and > installed my first ever DVD burner. > > The burner is installed on a system that I have set up to dual boot > to either FreeBSD 5.2.1 (yea, I know, that's ancient) or else to > Windoze ME. > > So anyway, yesterday I followed all of the instructions located at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-dvds.html > > in order to create and install a fresh kernel that would have all of the > required stuff in it to be able to burn data DVDs. > > I then burned my first ever data DVD... made from some data I had that I > wanted to make a backup of. > > All went smoothly. So far, so good. > > The tricky part came when I then went to _mount_ my freshly burned DVD > onto FreeBSD. (I wanted to do this just in order to verify that the > data had in fact successfully been burned onto the DVD.) > > Unfortunately, try as I might, I couldn't fingure out how to just simply > mount the burned DVD onto the FreeBSD system. I tried both: > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /mnt > > which yielded only the error message: > > cd9660: /dev/cd0: Device not configured > > and I also tried: > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt > > which yielded the error: > > cd9660: /dev/acd0: Input/output error > > OK, so what am I doing wrong? > [...] Maybe /var/log/messages gives you a hint what's happening. Bjrn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 22:20:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED89E16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rfg@monkeys.com) Received: from segfault-outgoing-helo.monkeys.com (segfault.monkeys.com [66.60.159.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19E643D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:20:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rfg@monkeys.com) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.monkeys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.monkeys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30ECE54A9; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:20:27 -0800 (PST) To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:14:06 +0100. <43F4F92E.7050301@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:20:27 -0800 Message-ID: <65199.1140128427@monkeys.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting data DVDs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:20:30 -0000 In message <43F4F92E.7050301@cs.tu-berlin.de>, you wrote: >> and I also tried: >> >> mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt >> >> which yielded the error: >> >> cd9660: /dev/acd0: Input/output error >> >> OK, so what am I doing wrong? >> [...] > >Maybe /var/log/messages gives you a hint what's happening. Maybe, but I can't make any clear sense out of what I see in there: ... Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ TOC/PMA/ATIP {MMC Proposed}. CDB: 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Invalid field in CDB Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Unretryable error Feb 16 14:04:44 shiny kernel: cd9660: RockRidge Extension Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ TOC/PMA/ATIP {MMC Proposed}. CDB: 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Invalid field in CDB Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Unretryable error From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 22:32:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FB716A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA83A43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l35so188570nfa for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:32:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jRZOhjGZ90sdBzAQfd0cMNtZZI1IxEyR/Lnk+hZ6aT5rf8Taz8LeoHf/y+Eb19Cv5XczPfr0DJxHSmH4MYxImZJfkxvpnk2Y/jSTe18+hn5/7O6/y2TuPYWT4gjZnJ8s+51ttJf/5UMbl3/Y3b96/WeujsT3kF7YwTp6yJLj770= Received: by 10.48.255.10 with SMTP id c10mr280881nfi; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:32:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.108.10 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:32:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550602161432r18ac6b1bgaa57d315e01ea564@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:32:31 +0100 From: "Daniel A." To: lars@gmx.at In-Reply-To: <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:34 -0000 On 2/16/06, lars wrote: > Eric Schultz wrote: > > lars wrote: > >> A long uptime means that the machine hasn't been rebooted for a long > >> time. If that time's longer than the time to the last patch that > >> required a kernel recompilation and a reboot, it means the server is n= ot > >> patched. Where's the point in advertising an unpatched machine? > > > > Good afternoon... > > > > Perhaps it means the OS doesn't need to be patched that frequently > Possibly. But patch frequency means what exactly? > > > or has a patch mechanism that avoids reboots? > Exactly, that doesn't exist (yet). > > Although there was something in a Usenix proceeding or somewhere else, > about "micro-reboots" where, to use FreeBSD wordage, > Base and Ports' programs where so modularised to allow this. > Thus making only, say, a driver or some kernel component reboot, > but the majority of the system stays up. > Of course a reboot of the NIC's driver kills that component's "uptime". > > > That's certainly worth advertising (if only were true). > Actually it (this website) means advertising an unpatched machine > running unpatched services not available to the outside. > > > The top machine has been running for almost 6 years on FreeBSD 3.3 whic= h > > means the admin probably believes that "if it ain't broke, don't fix > > it." > Which is not necessarily the best strategy. > But may be right in this case. > > > I would also want to advertise the longevity of an OS. > You mean the ability of that OS to run so long without requiring a reboot= ? > I'm not sure that's that relevant nowadays. > How many OS aren't capable of staying up long? > Even Windows doesn't need too much Viagra to keep it up. > > > (You might not like that last one if you're a hardware vendor :) > > > > Also, a lot of work-arounds for security patches amount to "lock the > > front door." > What do you mean by that? > > > So perhaps some systems don't need to be patched because > > they're administered so as not to require immediate patching/upgrading. > If your machine only runs an NFS daemon and is behind a firewall, > ok, you don't need to patch it asap when an NFS SA and patch is issued, > if all clients connecting to the machine are benign. > > I could also run a machine in some private net protected by firewalls > and whatnot running only this uptime program. > Unless I lose power or some hardware failure occurs I'll have a long > uptime. A bit useless though. > > > > I think that 'uptime' and this website fail to define precisely enough > what the point of the exercise is to be able to make useful conclusions > about something about some OS. > > What exactly do you want to measure to make what decision? > > Do you want to find out how much [%] your OS is available > whithout load just patching it with the latest SA recommended = patches? > > Do you want to find out how much [%] your OS is available > [can serve 100 FTP users simultaneously at wire speed > with this NIC] > just patching it with the latest SA recommended patches? > > Do you want see how long an unpatched OS version can keep it up > without any patches or interaction whatsoever? > > etc. None of the above. It measures your internet-penis. The guy who has had his FreeBSD 3.3 box up running since the dawn of times, has the longest internet-penis in the world. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 22:33:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95B816A422 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:33:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (smtp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E75E43D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:33:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.140] (tui75-2-82-229-178-102.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.178.102]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8564E18242; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:33:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:33:04 +0100 From: Mathieu CHATEAU X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.12) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <608748442.20060216233304@free.fr> To: "Robert Uzzi" In-Reply-To: <4514.63.97.49.74.1140127785.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> References: <1893863940.20060216221122@free.fr> <4514.63.97.49.74.1140127785.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Mysql 5 Cluster & FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:33:03 -0000 Hello Robert, thank you for your support ! do you have a mysql cluster on FreeBSD in production ? do you think it can run on a 2 nodes cluster ? I am willing fault tolerant system, not high performance (but the standard replication master/slave isn't enough fault tolerant for me) thanks! Thursday, February 16, 2006, 11:09:45 PM, you wrote: RU> Add this to /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf in your MAKE_ARGS statement. It's RU> the WITH_NDB=1 switch that will enable building with cluster support, the RU> rest is up to you. Then use the portinstall command to build the port. RU> From there on it is like any other OS to build the MySQL cluster. RU> MAKE_ARGS = { RU> 'databases/mysql*' => 'WITH_NDB=1 WITH_ARCHIVE=1 BUILD_OPTIMIZED=1 RU> WITH_OPENSSL=1', RU> } >> Hello, >> >> Mysql Cluster is now part of Mysql 5. >> >> Does someone successfully set up a Mysql 5 cluster on FreeBSD 5.4 ? >> >> thanks in advance, >> Mathieu CHATEAU >> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 22:45:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1AE16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:45:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [64.2.229.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1258F43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:45:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GMjDRS070687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:45:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <43F50074.8060205@tundraware.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:45:08 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com Subject: /bin/sh Madness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:45:19 -0000 Here is a shell function that behaves quite strangely: #!/bin/sh ##### # Execute A Command, Noting Start/Stop Time, & Logging Output # Args: # $1 Command Name # $2 Log Directory # $3 Command String To Execute ##### runupd() { log=$2/$1.log timestamp $log touch $2/.$1-begin && eval $3 2>&1 >> $log && touch $2/.$1-end & } # End of 'runupd()' So, you might do something like: runupd freespace /var/log/ "df -k" Now, for the weirdness. This function works fine in my script so long as one of two conditions is met: 1) I run it interactively from the command line (bash) OR 2) I run it from 'cron' AND $3 is *not* another script If I try to run it from 'cron' and point $3 to a script, everything gets run as planned, however, the ending timestamp (touch $2/.$1-end) never runs. That is, the initial time stamp (.$1-begin) and the command itself are executed, and output is properly written to the logfile, but the final timestamp never happens. I have been fiddling with this on- and off and cannot seem to explain the behavior. I',m guessing that something about the combination of 'cron'and the 2>&1 >> $log business is causing the last touch to never get invoked, but for the life of me, I cannot figure this one out. Interestingly, this works fine in Linux (SuSE 10.0). In Linux, both 'sh' and 'bash' are the same binary (bash is running as sh). So .. I went back to FreeBSD (4.x in this case, though the problem is also noted in 6.x) and changed the SHELL variable in the crontabs file to use 'bash' - same problem. This is starting to feel like a problem with file handles getting clobbered in the FreeBSD exec logic. Other explanations welcome... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 22:46:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB09016A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:46:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-01@jeremykister.com) Received: from qmail-01.nntx.net (qmail-01.nntx.net [204.9.96.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43A1D43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:46:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-01@jeremykister.com) Received: (qmail 28485 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Feb 2006 17:46:29 -0500 Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 28457, pid: 28484, t: 0.0793s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO ?64.115.0.169?) (smtpauth-01@jeremykister.com@64.115.0.169) by qmail-01.nntx.net with SMTP; 16 Feb 2006 17:46:29 -0500 Message-ID: <43F500BE.3070903@jeremykister.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:46:22 -0500 From: Jeremy Kister User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Crashing with FreeBSD 6.0R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:46:31 -0000 I've got four brand new identical HP DL360 systems, each with Dual Xeon 2.8ghz (with Hyperthreading on). All four of them are randomly crashing in the same manner. Each server is running FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE, running identical software and is set up in an identical manner (besides hostname, ip, etc). The only difference is that one of the four acts as a NFS server for /usr/ports, while the other three use AMD to access the volume, on rare occasion. Each of the four servers primary purpose is to deal with incoming mail. Each runs an identical flavor of daemontools, ucspi-tcp, and qmail. each kernel dump says that "tcpserver" was the process running during a page fault, but I would bet that the problem has nothing to do with tcpserver. I've tried disabling hyperthreading in the operating system (via removing /boot/loader.conf:machdep.hyperthreading_allowed=1)... No changes. I could try disabling hyperthreading in the BIOS to see if the crashing stops. I could also upgrade to 6.1beta if there was any reason to. for the output of "kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.2", see: http://jeremy.kister.net./tmp/freebsd-crash.txt Any suggestions on where to go from here? -- Jeremy Kister http://jeremy.kister.net./ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 22:52:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDFF16A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:52:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mbullock@5square.com) Received: from mailserv.5square.com (mailserv.5square.com [207.178.171.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35F343D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:52:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mbullock@5square.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:52:49 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: daily cron messages Thread-Index: AcYzS7YCQ4Mb+XHXTH29cBl7ieomPw== From: "Matthew Bullock" To: Subject: daily cron messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:52:51 -0000 FreeBSD secure.venturanetworks.com 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Sun May 8 10:21:06 UTC 2005 root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 I ran portupgrade -a to update all my packages a couple weeks ago, and since then I stopped receiving daily emails from the built-in cron jobs. There is no mail in root's mailbox and no mail sitting in the queue. /var/log/maillog doesnt show any messages trying to be sent. Is there a setting somewhere I can check that controls those daily emails? I've checked here /etc/defaults/periodic.conf: daily_output=3D"root" Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 22:59:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0D316A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:59:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6752A43D46 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:59:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1GMxX8d059967; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:59:34 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060216165906.02641e30@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:59:29 -0600 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?_K=F6nig?= From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <65199.1140128427@monkeys.com> References: <65199.1140128427@monkeys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting data DVDs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:59:54 -0000 It is possible your DVD is not cd9660 standard format. The cd9660 pre-dates DVD's and is for CD-ROMS. Can you mount a standard CD-ROM? You may also need to add the -r flag to mount to specify it is a read-only filesystem. Hope this helps. -Derek At 04:20 PM 2/16/2006, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >In message <43F4F92E.7050301@cs.tu-berlin.de>, you wrote: > > >> and I also tried: > >> > >> mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt > >> > >> which yielded the error: > >> > >> cd9660: /dev/acd0: Input/output error > >> > >> OK, so what am I doing wrong? > >> [...] > > > >Maybe /var/log/messages gives you a hint what's happening. > >Maybe, but I can't make any clear sense out of what I see in there: > > >... >Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ TOC/PMA/ATIP {MMC >Proposed}. CDB: 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 >Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error >Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition >Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 >Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Invalid field in CDB >Feb 16 13:35:10 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Unretryable error >Feb 16 14:04:44 shiny kernel: cd9660: RockRidge Extension >Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ TOC/PMA/ATIP {MMC >Proposed}. CDB: 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 >Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error >Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition >Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 >Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Invalid field in CDB >Feb 16 14:06:17 shiny kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Unretryable error > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 23:13:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4F116A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:13:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (ns1.internetinsite.com [208.179.97.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7745143D72 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:13:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [192.168.4.100] (68-190-198-174.dhcp.ccmn.ca.charter.com [68.190.198.174]) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1GNDBIH068189 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:13:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <43F50707.5050108@chrismaness.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:13:11 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Windows XP and FreeBSD boot Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:13:20 -0000 I have had a bad time trying to get Windows XP to boot using the FreeBSD boot manager. Is there a way I can use the XP boot manager to boot FreeBSD. I use it to boot my Slackware partition, and it works like a charm. (i.e. dd if=/dev/hda2 of=Slack.lnx count=1 bs=512, then adding a line for Slack.lnx in boot.ini) Thanks Chris Maness From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 23:49:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41E016A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:49:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F5343D45 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:49:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D0E62C855; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:49:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60784-09; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:49:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B890B62C7E2; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:49:14 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C1A8A3D545; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:49:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC7C3A93E; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:49:17 -0400 (AST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:49:17 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: lars In-Reply-To: <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> Message-ID: <20060216194336.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:49:16 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, lars wrote: > If your machine only runs an NFS daemon and is behind a firewall, > ok, you don't need to patch it asap when an NFS SA and patch is issued, if > all clients connecting to the machine are benign. Actually, there are alot of situations where this sort of thing is possible ... hell, I could probably get away with running a FreeBSD 3.3 server since day one, that has all ports closed except for sshd, imap/pop3/smtp, and be 100% secury ... sshd can be easily upgraded without a reboot, with the same applying to imap/pop3/smtp if I use a port instead of what comes with the OS itself ... You can say you are losing out on 'stability fixes', else the server itself wouldn't stay up that long ... so about the only thing you lose would be performance related improvements and/or stuff like memory leakage ... And I could do this all *without* any firewalls protecting it ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 00:16:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CA716A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:16:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew.chace@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C54D43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:16:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew.chace@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so294031nzc for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:16:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=uHS0ssHnahK1vZhtJ0QDIrw6epIb6Ugveq97n2rj6OCBCSvAhrKtVvbMWm1XqoiSiTqEva3cbU8vcRCeC0KfQ/32xBSYxyqLfo0ua+7ru+U1E0wW3f4PNTNexiecCDku8uYO5IpEiv1ZUqG/BGoNAieFXqbArjlZpSAJrNETiv8= Received: by 10.36.251.4 with SMTP id y4mr1652818nzh; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:16:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from netvista.network ( [71.214.204.80]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 24sm845394nzn.2006.02.16.16.16.47; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:16:48 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew To: Fabian Keil In-Reply-To: <20060216204535.3c4e7d9c@localhost> References: <1140117830.602.19.camel@netvista.network> <20060216204535.3c4e7d9c@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:15:50 -0600 Message-Id: <1140135350.602.21.camel@netvista.network> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newly built kernel fails to boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:16:50 -0000 On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 20:45 +0100, Fabian Keil wrote: > Andrew wrote: > > > I've just had a go at configuring and rebuilding a kernel for my > > desktop machine. I read the section in handbook, and skimmed over > > NOTES and the GENERIC config. I then copied GENERIC to NETVISTA and > > commented out drivers/devices that I didn't think were relevant to my > > hardware. config(8) is happy with my file, and 'make buildkernel' and > > 'make installkernel' proceed without any errors. So, I ran > > nextboot(8) and rebooted, but the new kernel hangs right after the > > first line printed to the console; the first portion of which is > > 'acpi.ko'. > > > # NETVISTA Kernel Config > > # ACPI Video Extensions (LCD backlight/brightness, video output, etc.) > > > device acpi_video > > Just guessing, but man acpi says: > > |BUGS > | If the acpi driver is loaded as a module when it is already linked as > | part of the kernel, odd things may happen. > > Maybe having acpi_video in the kernel and then loading acpi as > module triggers "odd things" as well. > > Fabian Thank you; I'll remove that device and see what happens... -Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 01:10:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA32616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:10:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F23A43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:10:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1H1AcYF096732; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:10:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:10:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <43F4B5D2.6020303@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: <43F4B5D2.6020303@t-hosting.hu> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting up VPN+IPSec+Racoon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:10:40 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:26:42 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >Hello, > >it is the first time I have to set up such configuration. Could you tell= =20 >me some guidelines? What should I care about? I see there's a chapter in= =20 >the Handbook about VPN. It mentions the FAST_IPSEC kernel option in=20 > >5.X. Should I use this implemetation or the KAME implementation? What=20 >are the differencies, and what are the advantages, disadvantages of = each? >If you know some other good tutorial or howto, please let me know. > =46AST_IPSEC allows for hardware crypto offloading (see man 4 crypto). Even without it, the author claims its faster than KAME. However, its important to note FAST_IPSEC cannot work with INET6 in the kernel. Also, you want to use it mostly with RELENG_6 if possible. Also, dont use racoon, better to use ipsec-tools. Its also in the ports. As for tutorials, google around and read through various posts. There is lots of good info out there. Perhaps if you describe what you want to do, people can make specific suggestions. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 01:12:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D458F16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:12:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D77E43D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:12:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1H1CCi0096824; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:12:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: "V.I.Victor" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:12:21 -0500 Message-ID: <0m8av15mf69poggbn2l028np6d5cptlsic@4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Every 12-hrs -- "ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE DMA" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:12:13 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:10:31 +0000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >For the last 4-days, our (otherwise OK) 5.4-RELEASE machine has been >reporting: > >Feb 12 12:08:05 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) = LBA=3D2701279 >Feb 13 00:08:51 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) = LBA=3D2701279 >Feb 13 12:09:38 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) = LBA=3D2963331 >Feb 14 00:10:24 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) = LBA=3D2705947 > >So -- can anyone help track this down? It sounds like a hardware issue. Install /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools and "ask" the drive to see whats up. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 01:19:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA1316A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:19:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A9543D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:19:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k1H1JO8N087050; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:19:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:19:24 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Tim Daneliuk Message-ID: <20060217011923.GA87403@dan.emsphone.com> References: <43F50074.8060205@tundraware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F50074.8060205@tundraware.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /bin/sh Madness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:19:28 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 16), Tim Daneliuk said: > Here is a shell function that behaves quite strangely: > > #!/bin/sh > ##### > # Execute A Command, Noting Start/Stop Time, & Logging Output > # Args: > # $1 Command Name > # $2 Log Directory > # $3 Command String To Execute > ##### > > runupd() > { > log=$2/$1.log > timestamp $log > touch $2/.$1-begin && eval $3 2>&1 >> $log && touch $2/.$1-end & > } > # End of 'runupd()' > > So, you might do something like: > > runupd freespace /var/log/ "df -k" > > Now, for the weirdness. This function works fine in my script > so long as one of two conditions is met: > > 1) I run it interactively from the command line (bash) > OR > 2) I run it from 'cron' AND $3 is *not* another script > > If I try to run it from 'cron' and point $3 to a script, everything gets > run as planned, however, the ending timestamp (touch $2/.$1-end) never > runs. That is, the initial time stamp (.$1-begin) and the command itself > are executed, and output is properly written to the logfile, > but the final timestamp never happens. Could your $3 command be returning a nonzero exit code? You probably want something more like touch $2/.$1-begin && { eval $3 2>&1 >> $log ; touch $2/.$1-end } & so your end timestamp always gets created whether or not $3 succeeds. Also note that in your original script, you only backgrounded "touch $2/.$1-end", which is probably not what you wanted. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 02:10:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5548A16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:10:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D5043F94 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:10:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1H2AICm023184 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:10:18 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id k1H2AF4B036441; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:10:15 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:10:15 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200602170210.k1H2AF4B036441@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: mike@ascendency.net In-reply-to: <021b01c63309$ab353130$0401a8c0@Mike8500> References: <021b01c63309$ab353130$0401a8c0@Mike8500> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:10:56 -0000 > I've also been observing my system...even when mail load from these > mini-attacks is heaviest, maybe 800 messages a second, the system load barly > goes over idle. There appeas to have been two such attacks. It's a 2.8 ghz > machine with 3 gigs of RAM, it should be well able to handle that load even > for sustained periods of time. Did you do some disk stress test? The hardware problem could be somwhere else than the MB. Or network if your anti-spam rely on some network check? It would be nice that you set-up your system (how?) so that it does not reboot in case of failure, so you'd have some information on the screen. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 02:25:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2024616A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:25:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.192.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB8643D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:24:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from eisenhower.ascendency.net ([67.173.128.145]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20060217022457m1400qj3ube>; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:24:58 +0000 Received: from Mike8500 (ipcop.localdomain [192.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by eisenhower.ascendency.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1H2OuRg067543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:24:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) From: "Mike Loiterman" To: "'Olivier Nicole'" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:24:56 -0600 Message-ID: <025801c63369$5809ae90$0401a8c0@Mike8500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYzZ1qFST20t/A0SFmcroGnPuqHCQAAbyHg In-Reply-To: <200602170210.k1H2AF4B036441@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (eisenhower.ascendency.net [192.168.1.22]); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:24:56 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Mysterious reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mike@ascendency.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:25:00 -0000 Olivier Nicole wrote: >> I've also been observing my system...even when mail load from these >> mini-attacks is heaviest, maybe 800 messages a second, the system >> load barly goes over idle. There appeas to have been two such >> attacks. It's a 2.8 ghz machine with 3 gigs of RAM, it should be >> well able to handle that load even for sustained periods of time. > > Did you do some disk stress test? The hardware problem could be > somwhere else than the MB. > > Or network if your anti-spam rely on some network check? > > It would be nice that you set-up your system (how?) so that it does > not reboot in case of failure, so you'd have some information on the > screen. > > Olivier Yes, I ran the unixbench port (2 instances of it) as well as the stress port for about 4 hours. I think the hardware is fine, I believe, at least at this point, that it was simply a micro-power failure. Its been up now around 20 hours. I'll continue to monitor it closely, but it looks like a fluke. ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: mike@ascendency.net PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 02:51:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FE816A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:51:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FA643D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:51:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1H2mnq4024376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:48:49 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id k1H2mhKn041207; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:48:43 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:48:43 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200602170248.k1H2mhKn041207@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: ashley.moran@codeweavers.net In-reply-to: <200602161418.32982.ashley.moran@codeweavers.net> (message from Ashley Moran on Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:18:32 +0000) References: <200602161418.32982.ashley.moran@codeweavers.net> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Log analysis server suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:51:57 -0000 > As for searching / analysis, I've seen php-syslog-ng > ( http://www.vermeer.org/projects/php-syslog-ng ), which looks very basic, > and phpLogCon ( http://www.phplogcon.com/ ), which does not support PG > anyway. Is there anything better GUI-wise? As for the log analysis, I remember attending a security seminar where the conclusion was that a good log analysis system should let you define what events are unimportant and could be ignored so that all other events, including the unexepected ones are shown as important and requiring action. Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 03:11:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6118316A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:11:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from access.inet.co.th (access.inet.co.th [203.151.127.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6D043D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:11:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([203.113.33.6]) by access.inet.co.th (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k1H3A2rl096204 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:10:04 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Message-ID: <43F53ED3.1090607@access.inet.co.th> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:11:15 +0700 From: Pirat SRIYOTHA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: sos: boot fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:11:33 -0000 hi sirs, i have many problem with gnome2 2.12 once i upgraded to 6.0. i finally re cvsup to 5.4 release and did a sery of make {build,install}world and make kernel to 5.4 generic kernel. while in 5.4 generic kernel i did pkg_delete -fa and start from nill making xorg, teTeX, docproj-jade, xemacs, gnome2 without any problem at the same time i did a customized kernel with many problem. i had to disable sio, parallel port and so on. after finished making gnome2, i startx i got a black text screen in a few second. so my instink told me that may be because of kernel so that i did reboot to a new kernel and i got this staring at me instruction poiter = 0x0:0xa00 stack poiter =0x0:0xffe frame pointer = 0x0:0x0 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0x0, type 0x0 = DPL 0, pres 0, def32 0, gran 0 processor eflags = interrup enable, vm86, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 () trap number = 30 panic: unknown/reserved trap Uptime: 1s i can not boot into single user mode or safe mode. please help me. and cc to me too. thanks in advance for any helps and hints with best regards, psr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 03:32:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D6916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:32:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pm940@yahoo.com) Received: from web54009.mail.yahoo.com (web54009.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76E9C43D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:32:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pm940@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 51053 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Feb 2006 03:32:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=L84pEWBbThbkuGItQR7o3MFoBos3mgkUTEW2gDg6SwzlGO2HLxwKLUOu/6zxwhYWBXxq6GsCF/iCBVf7Z26Na/AnDCa6qjmn9ZhqutV2keaPusnuvYOdeXcTDT/FkPABv2liTgBZmpJpTV49cdQrMFfyD6mfkWhtPNtYdrKVDW0= ; Message-ID: <20060217033223.51051.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [71.140.186.33] by web54009.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:32:23 PST Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:32:23 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Marciano To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Looking for a USB Compact Flash card reader. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:32:25 -0000 Hi, On 5.4-RELEASE I'm having problems with my AVB card reader: I often get "Synchronize Cache" and "CSW Tag" errors. Does anyone have a solid recommendation for a USB Compact Flash card reader? Thanks, Paul. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 04:00:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F09416A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:00:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3401A43D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:00:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from foo.antimatter.net (cpe-72-132-244-217.san.res.rr.com [72.132.244.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1H40DU6018681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:00:14 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060216195816.076b7190@antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:59:59 -0800 To: "Daniel A." , lars@gmx.at From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <5ceb5d550602161432r18ac6b1bgaa57d315e01ea564@mail.gmail.co m> References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> <5ceb5d550602161432r18ac6b1bgaa57d315e01ea564@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:00:16 -0000 At 02:32 PM 2/16/2006, Daniel A. wrote: > > What exactly do you want to measure to make what decision? > > > > Do you want to find out how much [%] your OS is available > > whithout load just patching it with the latest SA > recommended patches? > > > > Do you want to find out how much [%] your OS is available > > [can serve 100 FTP users simultaneously at wire speed > > with this NIC] > > just patching it with the latest SA recommended patches? > > > > Do you want see how long an unpatched OS version can keep it up > > without any patches or interaction whatsoever? > > > > etc. > >None of the above. >It measures your internet-penis. >The guy who has had his FreeBSD 3.3 box up running since the dawn of >times, has the longest internet-penis in the world. And all this time I thought IP stood for Internet Protocol... > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 04:29:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F0916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:29:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from relay0.av-mx.com (relay0.av-mx.com [137.118.16.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67F643D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:29:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) X-Virus-Scan-Time: 0 Received: from [137.118.16.61] (HELO mx0.av-mx.com) by relay0.av-mx.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 172434786 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:29:52 -0500 Received: (qmail 19916 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 04:29:52 -0000 Received: from dsl29039.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.116.39) by 0 with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 04:29:52 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.116.39 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl29039.ywave.com Message-ID: <43F5513E.9000403@ywave.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:29:50 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Marciano References: <20060217033223.51051.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060217033223.51051.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a USB Compact Flash card reader. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:29:56 -0000 Paul Marciano wrote: > Hi, > > On 5.4-RELEASE I'm having problems with my AVB card > reader: I often get "Synchronize Cache" and "CSW Tag" > errors. > > Does anyone have a solid recommendation for a USB > Compact Flash card reader? > > Thanks, > Paul. I have a SanDisk ImageMate that's always worked for me from 5.2 to 5.4 (haven't really used it since the upgrade to 6.0). HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 05:32:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDDD16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:32:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luck@computerking.ca) Received: from shoemasters.com (shoemasters.com [68.144.188.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F13043D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:32:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luck@computerking.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by shoemasters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957A77DC034; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:28:30 -0700 (MST) Received: from shoemasters.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (shoemasters.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06023-07; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:28:29 -0700 (MST) Received: from shoemasters.com (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by shoemasters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEDB7DC031; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:28:29 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <12061052.211140154109342.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:28:29 -0700 (MST) From: "RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN" To: Norberto Meijome MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kdm and fluxbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:32:07 -0000 Thanks to all and i will take your advice Norberto as i do not really like kde that much anyway. If i wanted window i would just install windowsxp or maybe vista would be more like Kde any how i digress. I am tiring to set up wdm and added this line to my /etc/ttys ttyv8 "/usr/X11R6/bin/wdm -nodaemon" xterm on secure followed the instructions below found on the fulxbox site but it does not quite work http://fluxbox-wiki.org/index.php/Howto_add_fluxbox_to_wdm I get the wdm ok beasty is there, very cool backgound i might add, seen it used in a theme somewhere. No matter what i pick for a windows manager i get the stock Freebsd one wmaker i think? u know the one with the terminal and green menu bars very vanilla. An exception to this kde still works and failsafe gives me control of the terminal window bottom right. Also i removed a bunch of managers out of the wdm-config file as i was not using them like this. DisplayManager*wdmWm: wmaker:enlightenment:gnome:kde:fluxbox I still get failsafe and wmaker where do us suppose these come from. Kde still works but not enlightenment gnome or flux box please help ----- Original Message ----- From: Norberto Meijome To: RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:51:43 AM Subject: Re: kdm and fluxbox RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote: > usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xsession > > notice this file is for XDM, not KDM. try searching in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/kdm :) > WHERE IS KDM GETTING ITS SESSION INFO FROM AND HOW DO I TELL IT TO ADD FLUXBOX > > not sure, probably from its config file. Or just set it to custom, and use ~/.xsession to launch your stuff at will. Just curious, why use kdm with all it's KDE dependencies, when you can use xdm, or wdm (what I use). Beto _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Computer King/CaNMail http://www.computerking.ca http://www.canmail.org Sales, Service, and Hosting Email, Data, and Web Packages Ask about web design specials Affiliates http://www.computerking.ca/pages/links/affiliates/affiliates.htm Maybe Computer Science should be in the College of Theology. -- R. S. Barton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 05:49:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC9F16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C1A43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s7so213253wxc for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:49:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F2tj9ZA/rHhB+mR+EjBPr39BUaAF7ZldVQHrRF3q2MkSbm27QuTBE4q8utGYVEz8+zBKyy46YiG2bPCoMEAZJoM7O1dskcIM+NL99D/EGdKa6u8o+rdH12LaJ8azJ9meGgiU5aWY9Sk+PV3ZpOBhAmKdLGUhfIMee95hSQPodYI= Received: by 10.70.66.2 with SMTP id o2mr635107wxa; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.65.9 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:49:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:49:51 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton To: Chris Maness In-Reply-To: <43F50707.5050108@chrismaness.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43F50707.5050108@chrismaness.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Windows XP and FreeBSD boot Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:49:52 -0000 http://groups.google.com/groups?q=3Dgroup%3A*.freebsd.*+boot.ini+dual&qt_s= =3DSearch On 2/16/06, Chris Maness wrote: > I have had a bad time trying to get Windows XP to boot using the FreeBSD > boot manager. Is there a way I can use the XP boot manager to boot > FreeBSD. I use it to boot my Slackware partition, and it works like a > charm. (i.e. dd if=3D/dev/hda2 of=3DSlack.lnx count=3D1 bs=3D512, then a= dding a > line for Slack.lnx in boot.ini) > > Thanks > Chris Maness > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > -- Please sign the native Flash player for FreeBSD petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/flash4me/petition.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 06:14:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C83316A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:14:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (ns1.internetinsite.com [208.179.97.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE5143D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:14:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.internetinsite.com [IPv6:::1]) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1H6E0Vo069910; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:14:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <43F569A8.9060700@chrismaness.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:14:00 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikolas Britton References: <43F50707.5050108@chrismaness.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Windows XP and FreeBSD boot Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:14:02 -0000 Nikolas Britton wrote: > http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3A*.freebsd.*+boot.ini+dual&qt_s=Search > > On 2/16/06, Chris Maness wrote: > >> I have had a bad time trying to get Windows XP to boot using the FreeBSD >> boot manager. Is there a way I can use the XP boot manager to boot >> FreeBSD. I use it to boot my Slackware partition, and it works like a >> charm. (i.e. dd if=/dev/hda2 of=Slack.lnx count=1 bs=512, then adding a >> line for Slack.lnx in boot.ini) >> >> Thanks >> Chris Maness >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > > -- > Please sign the native Flash player for FreeBSD petition: > http://www.petitiononline.com/flash4me/petition.html > > Thanks, that worked perfect. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 06:17:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E1016A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:17:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: from smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B54E043D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:17:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: (qmail 98758 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 06:17:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.6?) (jekillen@prodigy.net@69.235.2.68 with plain) by smtp104.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 06:17:04 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <6df90bd8ec5acf426223a43b79dfac6b@prodigy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: je killen Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:17:02 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Subject: font library on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:17:06 -0000 Hello; I'm looking to build a true type and postscript type one font collection for use with php and gd. Can anyone point me in a direction for font resources compatible with FreeBSD (v6, if it makes a difference). Thank you in advance: Jeff K. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 06:37:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C505016A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:37:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rglenw@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A1143D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:37:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rglenw@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so341966nzp for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:37:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=aKJ0MPGudfMjfwZw8WNx2sE4oQSyA90UuUmEr3qHAgHHdSaFxgcnfcQyNjqayMMPdoI5NA/bD/Z/zsIaxJ8C6jTd3sXekr7G5r9VVJuEbd3OqjW421UOJGZlSXl4hIXBAA9Upfih0z5RG/w4sk0QLxd+chlxRxVgxlmCUfBIn0U= Received: by 10.37.15.47 with SMTP id s47mr1931080nzi; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:37:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.68.18 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:37:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3b5a01e80602162237mc3641ccsa012ffc1a74a105c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:37:27 -0500 From: Ron Whyte To: FreeBSD questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: no boot or boot loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:37:28 -0000 hello FreeBSD, I have tried several versions of FreeBSD and have not been able to get any of them to run on my system. Linux and M$ runs fines - I hate M$ But every BSD either hangs on splash screen or - it enters a continuous splash screen- reboot loop. I have tried every option I can find to no reward. I get no error messages I have tried 3 different hard drives thinking it might be a messed MBR but even a fresh drive makes no difference What is missing? please help my system is running an AMD Duron at 1.3 MHz with 380megs ram R Glen Whyte From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 07:07:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B4B16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:07:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BBD43D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:07:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-41-159.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.41.159]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1H77CUu008729 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:07:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <006301c6338f$7eff2c70$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:58:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: getty repeating to quickly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:07:14 -0000 Hello, I've got a box running 6.0-RELEASE. I'm trying to hook serial consoles in to it, and have set up /etc/ttys and /boot/device.hints to allow me to do this. Yet, in /var/log/messages i keep seeing this error: "Init: getty repeating to quickly on port /dev/ttyd0, sleeping 30 secs" This is a repeating msg and i never get my serial console. I've confirmed that the port is showing up via dmesg, the system's bios has it on the correct i/o address and irq, and the pnp option is turned off. Any ideas? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 07:16:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3276D16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:16:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B399A43D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:16:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-41-159.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.41.159]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1H7GtGv019943 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:16:55 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <006701c63390$da822fb0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:07:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: samba port error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:16:57 -0000 Hello, I've got the latest samba3 port running on a FreeBSD6 machine. I'm now seeing a warning that is becoming annoying: warning: passdb expand explicit = yes is depricated I am not using this option in my smb.conf file any help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 07:26:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C02E16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:26:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF4343D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:26:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from foo.antimatter.net (cpe-72-132-244-217.san.res.rr.com [72.132.244.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1H7Qels025483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:26:41 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060216232340.05c94108@antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:26:25 -0800 To: Ron Whyte , FreeBSD questions From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <3b5a01e80602162237mc3641ccsa012ffc1a74a105c@mail.gmail.com > References: <3b5a01e80602162237mc3641ccsa012ffc1a74a105c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: no boot or boot loop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:26:42 -0000 At 10:37 PM 2/16/2006, Ron Whyte wrote: >hello FreeBSD, > >I have tried several versions of FreeBSD and have not been able to get any >of them to run on my system. >Linux and M$ runs fines - I hate M$ >But every BSD either hangs on splash screen or - it enters a continuous >splash screen- reboot loop. >I have tried every option I can find to no reward. A little more info regarding what you tried would help. No way for us to know what you can find :) Model numbers are good too. What Motherboard do you have? what BIOS? etc.. Having said that, the first thing I would suggest is disable ACPI and see if that makes a difference. -Glenn >I get no error messages >I have tried 3 different hard drives thinking it might be a messed MBR but >even a fresh drive makes no difference >What is missing? >please help > >my system is running an AMD Duron at 1.3 MHz with 380megs ram > >R Glen Whyte >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 08:26:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1E916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:26:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E7443D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:26:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbentley@uk2.net) Received: from [81.174.174.115] (helo=admin) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1FA0wc-00041A-CH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:26:26 +0000 Message-ID: <001f01c6339b$cedc9d70$0807a8c0@admin> From: "Graham Bentley" To: References: <20060207120037.88ECF16A424@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:26:10 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Subject: Anyone interpret this ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:26:28 -0000 security run output +++ /tmp/security.QSnlQzck Fri Feb 17 03:02:01 2006 +Limiting closed port RST response from 216 to 200 packets/sec +Limiting closed port RST response from 241 to 200 packets/sec +Limiting closed port RST response from 261 to 200 packets/sec From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 08:30:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A915516A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:30:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA80D43D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1H8UG6N036925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:30:16 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id k1H8UFhn084778; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:30:15 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:30:15 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200602170830.k1H8UFhn084778@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: gbentley@uk2.net In-reply-to: <001f01c6339b$cedc9d70$0807a8c0@admin> (gbentley@uk2.net) References: <20060207120037.88ECF16A424@hub.freebsd.org> <001f01c6339b$cedc9d70$0807a8c0@admin> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone interpret this ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:30:19 -0000 > +Limiting closed port RST response from 216 to 200 packets/sec By analogy with the rate limiting on icmp echo (ping) I'd say that someone try to access to a closed service 216 times per second and that the reset (RST) response is limited to 200. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 09:07:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2CC16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:07:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from vs3.bgnett.no (vs3.bgnett.no [194.54.96.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE95943D5E for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:07:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no (amidala.datadok.no [194.54.103.98]) by vs3.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k1H97T0E091903 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:07:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060209084833.GA26877@ozzmosis.com> From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:05:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060209084833.GA26877@ozzmosis.com> (andrew clarke's message of "Thu, 9 Feb 2006 19:48:33 +1100") Message-ID: <86k6bul5ix.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fine grained firewall? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:07:39 -0000 andrew clarke writes: > Is it possible to configure the FreeBSD firewall to block ports on a > per-user or per-executable basis? If your firewall is PF, you can use authpf(8) to configure per user rule sets. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" 20:11:56 delilah spamd[26905]: 146.151.48.74: disconnected after 36099 seconds. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 09:42:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135C716A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:42:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailings.freebsd@o0l0o.org) Received: from smartmx-01.inode.at (smartmx-01.inode.at [213.229.60.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94A943D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:42:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailings.freebsd@o0l0o.org) Received: from [81.223.62.146] (port=1847 helo=masternotebo.mhr.lan) by smartmx-01.inode.at with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1FA27o-0001p1-Js for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:42:04 +0100 From: FreeBSD Prospect To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:41:33 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602171041.33508.mailings.freebsd@o0l0o.org> Subject: devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_SAPPLY: No such process (???) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:42:06 -0000 Hi! I am trying to get the OSS soundsystem working for my nforce2 mainboard since yesterday, but with mixed success. The OSS driver is generally setup correctly and working, which means osstest outputs the demosound. My problem now seems to be the devfs, because I am trying to apply the ruleset to the audio devices in /dev, so that a normal user can access the sound in KDE. I used the following code for /etc/devfs.rules (which are given in this forum thread: http://www.4front-tech.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=710): [oss_rules=200] add path 'dsp*' mode 666 add path 'mixer*' mode 666 add path 'audio*' mode 666 add path 'midi*' mode 666 add path sequencer mode 666 add path music mode 666 add path dmfm0 mode 666 The ruleset should be processed by the oss.sh startscript by calling: /sbin/devfs rule -s 200 applyset but this command only outputs: devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_SAPPLY: No such process and nothing happens to the device nodes in /dev. I already tried to play around with devfs & devfs.rules, but whatever I tried, either it only gives the above error message, or simply gives no feedback and does nothing. If I run "/etc/rc.d/devfs restart", nothing happens. If I run "devfs ruleset 200 && devfs rule applyset" no feedback, and no change in /dev. I tried a similar approach for changing ownership and perms for /dev/acd* with another ruleset, I found on this mailinglist, but exactly the same result. For some reason unknown to me, devfs seems not be working on my system. I did nothing special on this installation. Installed from the 6.0-RELEASE install-cd, updated world to 6.1-PRERELEASE, installed the latest OSS driver package, configured it for nforce2, osstest OK, installed KDE by ports, and now I am stuck to get sound working in KDE... Any comments? -- Sincerely, Michael A FreeBSD Prospect, who is actually using Gentoo Linux From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 10:05:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A168D16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:05:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E07243D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:05:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUT00C2PTDE1S10@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:05:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([213.187.181.70]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUT00AVZTDDPU80@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:05:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:05:43 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060217105855.0218b5f0@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cc: Subject: How would you improve FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:05:39 -0000 Hello. Yes, how would you improve FreeBSD? I am trying to paint a gloomy picture of where FreeBSD is headed. Therefore I am asking all of you to share your thoughts and ideas of how you would like to see FreeBSD improve. Chances are that's where our operating system is headed. 1. Would you restructure FreeBSD somehow? 2. What features would you add? 3. What features would you remove? 4. What features would you simplify? 5. What features would you further develop? If I've left out some questions that you feel would contribute to the future well being of FreeBSD, don't hesitate to comment! Thanks guys, Vaaf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 10:38:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0234C16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:38:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A7943D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:38:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 74000 invoked by uid 1008); 17 Feb 2006 10:38:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 10:38:58 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:38:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <61221.24.90.33.115.1140172738.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:38:58 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="----=_20060217053858_24123" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: marcus@FreeBSD.org Subject: mplayer-plugin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:38:57 -0000 ------=_20060217053858_24123 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit hi all... mplayer-plugin build failure. here is where it stops and the log is attached. what to do? thanks.... configure: Determining mozilla/firefox packages to link against checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config checking for firefox-plugin... gnome-config: not found gnome-config: not found configure: WARNING: firefox-plugin not found checking for firefox-plugin... gnome-config: not found gnome-config: not found configure: WARNING: firefox-plugin not found checking for seamonkey-plugin... gnome-config: not found gnome-config: not found configure: WARNING: seamonkey-plugin not found configure: error: Unable to find mozilla or firefox development files ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. ------=_20060217053858_24123-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 10:50:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FB216A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:50:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E353043D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:50:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ldrada@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a4so251637nfc for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:50:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dzsxV/xJzNxUM/hIakA+pFPh5H07Xz1d8WWw4gT2tECKffj4ZWYzSfB63LLNp8taRsJyIk1x0UVUs+AI3j7nyKvnd4TcHqbUzSbAS5AScmvdu4XTb1HhnczQdpGfrzkSs4IdZ8vaoXrkO9MGX48eYbv7oSDH4rjG8WYuDV6lNC0= Received: by 10.49.8.13 with SMTP id l13mr137103nfi; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:50:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.108.10 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:50:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5ceb5d550602170250m6e6cc412h5e3105112d4f1057@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:50:32 +0100 From: "Daniel A." To: "Glenn Dawson" In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060216195816.076b7190@antimatter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> <5ceb5d550602161432r18ac6b1bgaa57d315e01ea564@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060216195816.076b7190@antimatter.net> Cc: lars@gmx.at, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:50:34 -0000 (Oops, sorry, forgot to cc) Nope... the IP "number" are the measures of your penis. Like this: [length].[width].[height].[Unidentified value of fourth dimensio= n] With IPv6, we now measure our IP with a whole four extra dimensions. Yeah, it's rather complicated. On 2/17/06, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 02:32 PM 2/16/2006, Daniel A. wrote: > > > What exactly do you want to measure to make what decision? > > > > > > Do you want to find out how much [%] your OS is available > > > whithout load just patching it with the latest SA > > recommended patches? > > > > > > Do you want to find out how much [%] your OS is available > > > [can serve 100 FTP users simultaneously at wire speed > > > with this NIC] > > > just patching it with the latest SA recommended patches? > > > > > > Do you want see how long an unpatched OS version can keep it = up > > > without any patches or interaction whatsoever? > > > > > > etc. > > > >None of the above. > >It measures your internet-penis. > >The guy who has had his FreeBSD 3.3 box up running since the dawn of > >times, has the longest internet-penis in the world. > > > And all this time I thought IP stood for Internet Protocol... > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 11:05:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1291B16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:05:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738B443D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:05:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 78589 invoked by uid 1008); 17 Feb 2006 11:05:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 11:05:35 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:05:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <60167.24.90.33.115.1140174335.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <20060217124658.6d5cf6c7@apircalabu.dsd.ro> References: <61221.24.90.33.115.1140172738.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20060217124658.6d5cf6c7@apircalabu.dsd.ro> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:05:35 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: "Adi Pircalabu" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mplayer-plugin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:05:33 -0000 > How exactly are you trying to build mplayer-plugin? Did you use FreeBSD > port (www/mplayer-plugin)? hi Adi... yes, i used the port... > Please be more specific there is a lot of information in the log attached to the first message. updatetd the www ports. the plugin version is 3.20... on a 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD what else? thanks.... > -- > Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) > > > -- > This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. > For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 11:13:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29B216A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:13:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9407E43D4C for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:13:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k1HBDjC6030390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:13:46 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.40] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k1HBDj4b023071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:13:45 -0800 In-Reply-To: <61221.24.90.33.115.1140172738.squirrel@mail.el.net> References: <61221.24.90.33.115.1140172738.squirrel@mail.el.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:15:14 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: mplayer-plugin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:13:47 -0000 On Feb 17, 2006, at 2:38 AM, kalin mintchev wrote: > hi all... > > mplayer-plugin build failure. here is where it stops and the log is > attached. > what to do? thanks.... > > configure: Determining mozilla/firefox packages to link against > checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config > checking for firefox-plugin... gnome-config: not found > gnome-config: not found > configure: WARNING: firefox-plugin not found > checking for firefox-plugin... gnome-config: not found > gnome-config: not found > configure: WARNING: firefox-plugin not found > checking for seamonkey-plugin... gnome-config: not found > gnome-config: not found > configure: WARNING: seamonkey-plugin not found > configure: error: Unable to find mozilla or firefox development files > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. You need to install a mozilla browser and have the headers available for mplayerplug-in. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 11:14:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF0616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:14:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50CE43D79 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:14:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 80002 invoked by uid 1008); 17 Feb 2006 11:14:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 11:14:37 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:14:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <62035.24.90.33.115.1140174877.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <60167.24.90.33.115.1140174335.squirrel@mail.el.net> References: <61221.24.90.33.115.1140172738.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20060217124658.6d5cf6c7@apircalabu.dsd.ro> <60167.24.90.33.115.1140174335.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:14:37 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Adi Pircalabu Subject: Re: mplayer-plugin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:14:36 -0000 i just realized that the attached log might not have been received by anybody... i didn't it gets filtered.. awesome... here is the end of it: ## ----------- ## ## confdefs.h. ## ## ----------- ## #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "mplayerplug-in-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" #define PACKAGE_NAME "mplayerplug-in" #define PACKAGE_STRING "mplayerplug-in 3.20" #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "mplayerplug-in" #define PACKAGE_VERSION "3.20" #endif #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" void std::exit (int) throw (); using std::exit; configure: exit 1 > >> How exactly are you trying to build mplayer-plugin? Did you use FreeBSD >> port (www/mplayer-plugin)? > > hi Adi... yes, i used the port... > >> Please be more specific > > there is a lot of information in the log attached to the first message. > updatetd the www ports. the plugin version is 3.20... on a 6.0-RELEASE > FreeBSD > what else? > > thanks.... > >> -- >> Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) >> >> >> -- >> This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. >> For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 11:35:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C4A16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:35:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro@varnet.biz) Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C32743D53 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:35:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alejandro@varnet.biz) Received: (qmail 35226 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 11:35:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO phobos.mars.bsd) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 11:35:53 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 200.115.214.28 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:35:53 -0300 From: Alejandro Pulver To: Alex Zbyslaw Message-ID: <20060217083553.377940db@phobos.mars.bsd> In-Reply-To: <20060215131241.6dc50af5@phobos.mars.bsd> References: <20060201150621.11234c17@phobos.mars.bsd> <20060201151953.2ef2f011@phobos.mars.bsd> <43E1F57A.80804@dial.pipex.com> <20060202113919.233c1adc@phobos.mars.bsd> <20060215131241.6dc50af5@phobos.mars.bsd> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.11; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NVidia GeForce 6600 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:35:55 -0000 On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:12:41 -0300 Alejandro Pulver wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:39:19 -0300 > Alejandro Pulver wrote: > > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:05:14 +0000 > > Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > > > > > Alejandro Pulver wrote: > > > > > > >On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:06:21 -0300 > > > >Alejandro Pulver wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Hello, > > > >> > > > >>I have recently bought a GeForce 6600 video card, and sometimes > > > >>(not very often) I experience the following problem: > > > >> > > > >>A little after starting X11 (for example when I start > > > >>downloading e-mails), the screen freezes a few seconds, after > > > >>that the screen looks like if widgets (buttons, text, etc.) > > > >>aren't drawn, and the white background of Sylpheed-Claws covers > > > >>the screen. Then I am forced to switch to the 1st console > > > >>(Ctrl+Alt+F1), which takes around 30 seconds, and then kill X11. > > > >> > > > >>I have FreeBSD 5.4 release, Xorg 6.8.2 and nvidia-driver > > > >>1.0.8178. > > > >> > > > >> > > > I have a 6600 with FreeBSD 5.4 XOrg 6.8.2 but still > > > nvidia-driver-1.0.7676_1. I have an occasional problem where the > > > whole screen is shifted left on startup, but exiting and > > > restarting X fixes it. You could try downgrading to an older > > > nvidia-driver and see if it helps. Portdowngrade should do that, > > > but I've never used it myself. > > > > > > You may have more luck if you try the nvidia support forum. > > > Definitely slower than this mailing list but someone from nvidia > > > was reading it, last time I used it. > > > > > > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=47 > > > > > > --Alex > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Thank you for your reply. > > > > I have recently (started yesterday, and finishing yoday) upgraded my > > ports (including Xorg -> 6.9). If the problems persist I will try > > the old dirver and post information about the error in the NVidia > > forums. > > > > Best Regards, > > Ale > > Hello again, > > I have discovered the problem: the lock of the AGP slot wasn't on > (when I changed the video card I forgot the lock isn't automatic as > the one in the memory slots). > > I noticed this when the card was disconnected completely (it has a > cooler, so I guess the vibration did it). Once I rebooted and the > screen was black (the integrated video card was used instead of the > NVidia). Other time I saw the kernel message indicating the card was > detached and instantly detected again. > > Best Regards, > Ale Well, that was part of the problem, but I still have errors with one OpenGL application (I have tested others like Doom III and Enemy Territory and didn't cause this): a Quake II engine called QuDos. Sometimes I get the following: Program output (QuDos): Received signal 11, exiting... X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 135 (XFree86-VidModeExtension) Minor opcode of failed request: 10 (XF86VidModeSwitchToMode) Value in failed request: 0x1200002 Serial number of failed request: 35768 Current serial number in output stream: 35771 NVidia kernel module output: NVRM: Xid: 8, Channel 00000002 NVRM: Xid: 27, L1 -> L0 Best Regards, Ale From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 11:50:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AFF16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:50:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84D543D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:50:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 29929 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 11:50:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.50.149.145]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 17 Feb 2006 11:50:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:50:30 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: "V.I.Victor" Message-ID: <20060217125030.35bd54a6@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_oEm.qLG4c2byP=VR1wxy9sQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Every 12-hrs -- "ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE DMA" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:50:39 -0000 --Sig_oEm.qLG4c2byP=VR1wxy9sQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "V.I.Victor" wrote: > For the last 4-days, our (otherwise OK) 5.4-RELEASE machine has been > reporting: >=20 > Feb 12 12:08:05 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D2701279 > Feb 13 00:08:51 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D2701279 > Feb 13 12:09:38 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D2963331 > Feb 14 00:10:24 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D2705947 > Feb 14 12:11:09 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D2706335 > Feb 15 00:12:02 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D2832383 > Feb 15 12:12:57 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D139839 > Feb 16 00:13:50 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D131391 > Feb 16 12:14:36 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D131391 >=20 > The system was created Jan 08 and, prior to the above, the ad0: timeout h= ad > only been reported twice: >=20 > Jan 25 11:43:34 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D17920255 > Feb 6 11:59:42 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA= =3D2832383 If smartd doesn't report any problems try changing the ATA cable. Worked for me once, although my messages didn't come every 12 hours and would later result in an disconnected system disk leading to a crash. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_oEm.qLG4c2byP=VR1wxy9sQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD9biWjV8GA4rMKUQRAuLsAJ9K+c9KlGwVlTSw5u6kduQNN2dJIwCfU3U7 0CkLvAbKdzYyv0FutQEE0VE= =qoto -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_oEm.qLG4c2byP=VR1wxy9sQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 12:11:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78C616A425 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6663543D5F for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HCBIu19566; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:11:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Xn Nooby" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:11:18 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: What doesn't work on desktop FreeBSD ? (ex Webcams) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:42 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:42 -0000 As a general rule, (although there are many exceptions) there's less support for peripherals that depend on the processor to do their jobs. The famous example are the winmodems, but many printers are starting to get that way also. While a lot of help has come from Ghostscript, your going to have a tough time getting a Canon-anything inkjet printer to print a color image under FreeBSD. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Xn Nooby >Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:33 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: What doesn't work on desktop FreeBSD ? (ex Webcams) > > >I bought a QuickCam Orbit MP, which I apparently must use under >Windows (or >Linux). From what I've seen online, not many (if any), people are using >webcams under FreeBSD. I was curious if there were other >things that also >were not realistic to do (I'm not complaining). > >Some of the things that do work are my soundcard, nVidia card, >gigabit NIC, >opengl games, wine, accelerated qemu, hp inkjet printer, and lots of >wonderful free software. Qemu nullified my need for VMWare >(though I own >5.5 for win and linux). OpenOffice, Abiword, and Firefox with >flash and java >works. Lots of stuff works. > >I'm just curious if I am going to hit any roadblocks down the road. > >(Maybe there is a way to get my Quickcam to work using the RH >8.0compatibilty layer) > >thank! >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/262 - Release >Date: 2/16/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 12:11:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221A416A42C for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8046F43D88 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HCBSu19587; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:11:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Kristian Vaaf" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:11:27 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060217105855.0218b5f0@broadpark.no> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: How would you improve FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:43 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kristian Vaaf >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:06 AM >To: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: How would you improve FreeBSD? > > > >Hello. > >Yes, how would you improve FreeBSD? > I would start by making a rule that anyone asking how would you improve FreeBSD on the mailing list be sentenced to write: "I will not post silly questions to the mailing list that are answered on the website" several hundred times. See: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >I am trying to paint a gloomy picture of where FreeBSD is headed. > >Therefore I am asking all of you to share your thoughts and ideas of how >you would like to see FreeBSD improve. Chances are that's where our >operating system is headed. > >1. Would you restructure FreeBSD somehow? http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >2. What features would you add? http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >3. What features would you remove? http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >4. What features would you simplify? http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >5. What features would you further develop? > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >If I've left out some questions that you feel would contribute to the >future well being of FreeBSD, don't hesitate to comment! > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 12:11:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1A816A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C719843D6E for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HCBJu19572; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:11:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "James Csoka" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:11:19 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <03bf01c63247$d1c78ae0$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Blocking an individual email address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:44 -0000 Jim, I would suggest you put an IP number block into your router to deny outgoing SMTP destined to the mailserver she is using. But, frankly your really on legal thin ice here. I'm guessing her manager asked you to do this rather than confronting her directly. Probably because he's a bad manager who is scared of confrontation. The legal problem is that the second you do anything you have just established that your company knew about the mail diversion and chose not to confront her. I can tell you what happens in many of these cases. The employee gets around the block and continues to send mail home. Eventually the lame-brained manager is forced to confront her and tell her to knock it off or she will be fired. She won't stop doing it and she will get fired. Then she will file a wrongful termination lawsuit against you, and in it she will say that she was being singled out because the company knew she was doing this for months and since they didn't confront her directly, they approved what she was doing. You guys will end up losing and your going to pay her a lot of money. The best way to handle the problem is for the company to have clear written guidelines that apply equally to all employees that prohibit this. You have your HR department release a set of these to all employees. Your lamebrained manager then shows the employee the guidelines and says these are the new guidelines, and henceforth if you violate them the penalties are spelled out. Without guidelines a court is going to say that since the company didn't explicitly forbid it, and it wasn't illegal, that the employee had a right to do it. Good luck! I hope you end up figuring out how to block her because nothing teaches better than doing it wrong and getting burned. This will be a good learning experience for you. Just remember that when these lawsuits blow up, that everyone involved in a peripheral way within the company gets terminated, I hope you don't get caught in it. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of James Csoka >Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:52 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Blocking an individual email address > > >I am running a FreeBSD 5.4p10 machine at my office. It >functions as our firewall and mailserver. I am running >Mailscanner, which invokes sendmail when necessary to process >mail. Sendmail is not started by default....Mailscanner >invokes individual instances of it when it needs to. > >Here is my problem. I have an employee at my office that is >sending work email to her home email address. I need to find a >way to block her email address, whether To, From, Cc, Bcc, or >whatever, from passing through my mailserver. I have already >added a line to /etc/mail/access (in the format >email@address.com REJECT), and have run makemap hash >/etc/mail/access.db < /etc/mail/access. I tested this with >my personal email address (external to my network), and it had >the effect of blocking any email orginating from my personal >email to any address at my work, however it does not prevent me >from sending emails to this address from a work address, which >is the whole point. > >Does anyone have any ideas? I could tag the address as spam, >but I would rather not. There has to be a way to block anyone >from sending to a certain email address, I would think. > >Any help would be appreciated. > >-Jim >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/262 - Release >Date: 2/16/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 12:11:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D568516A423 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264A643D6B for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HCBFu19563; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:11:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Greg Groth" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:11:15 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:44 -0000 Hi Greg, It is true there's a lot of software available but I have found over the years that a lot of the packages are good, and will work equally well on the back end. Most of the older ones have matured to the point that a rather common selection criteria is "I chose that because that's what all my friends are running" You really won't know what works the best unless you try all of the packages, and nobody has the time for that. So what you have to do is just pick one based on whatever sketchy research you turn up and spend some time on it, after a few months you will know if it's going to work for you or not. Most times it will work OK for you so your choice becomes one of which is better: knowing a few packages well, or a lot of packages not very well. A hobbiest/amateur is better off knowing a lot of packages not very well, because their fun is in trying out new things and learning how different things are done. But a manager of a production system is in the other boat, they need to know a few packages very, very well. You need to be aware of which kind of person your taking advice from. IMHO RedHat isn't much good unless you go the full meal deal and buy a support contract from RedHat. If you are upgrading from old 7/9 RH and you want to keep the RH universe, and you don't want to buy into support, then go to CentOS. Frankly I feel that one of the big problems with Linux right now is they are missing the boat on SATA RAID big time, and I mean really, really big time. Most server-quality motherboards these days come with RAID0/1 SATA chipsets, and disk drives are so cheap now that even people putting together little crummy servers are going mirrored SATA disks. But Linux has ignored this, claiming it's the responsibility of the manufacturers to write drivers, and most of them haven't. The Linux people all seem to think it's perfectly OK to go buy an Intel motherboard with onboard ICH7R RAID and disable that and drop $200 into a 3ware RAID card and plug that into the motherboard if you have the nerve to run RAID on anything other than a Real SCSI RAID array. Fine, let them delude themselves, it just puts Linux further and further away from the server arena. Most Linux distros have terrible or nonexistent support for Promise RAID cards as well, once again, really short-sighted. Anyway, getting back to your situation. We run SSL imap and pop3, with uw-imap. I recommend this route since it allows people to hit their maibox with both pop3 and imap and not get a lot of funny messages about popping down the placeholder message. uw-imap used to have a problem with really big e-mails years ago, it would swap itself to death building the tempfiles, this was fixed years ago. We run SMTP AUTH but we don't run SSL SMTP. Why? Because way too many customers out there still run elderly versions of e-mail clients that can't handle SSL SMTP. If I was doing up a mailserver for a corporation I might consider SSL SMTP, but frankly, I think the idea that someone's going to sniff your password is highly overrated. Most people set their e-mail clients up to permanently save the password so there goes your security right out the window. And your foolish if you let people use the same userID and password for the mailserver. What I'm doing these days is setting up the users with full name userIDs. For example userID ted.mittelstaedt, password goglafrich. Or some such. e-mail addy then becomes ted.mittelstaedt@example.com Needless to say this userID is only present on the mailserver and nowhere else, same with the password. A cracker already can get the targets full name by calling the companies directory assistance line or off their business card, so they gain no new information item by breaking this userID. And these userIDs and passwords are too long to be suceptable to a spammers dictionary attack. Particularly if the employee is popping the mail off the server, if the attacker gets the userID and password they are generally going to only be able to get a few pieces of mail out of the server. You can argue it however you want but today with ethernet switches being as cheap as they are, even a malevolent employee on a corporate network is going to have a hard time sniffing passwords on a decent net. Anything they do to convince the switches to stop being switches is going to bring the network to it's knees and attract a lot of attention quick. I discount most of those scenarios as provable in the lab, but useless in real life. In real life the preferred attack vector is to insert a keyboard logger on the users desktop, which is rediculously easy, all you have to do is wait for Microsoft's patch tuesday, reverse engineer the patches to see what they patched, and write a worm to take advantage of that hole, and drop a keyboard logger when it infects. That buypasses all the SSL horseshit and if you want to get fancy you can scan the users system for the outlook files and extract the saved password from outlooks ini files, it's not like Microsoft encrypts it or anything. The worm leaves a back door and you scan the internet looking for the back doors. You will find plenty to keep yourself busy. We see customers that have had this done to them almost every day. By contrast I've never once seen a customer with an employee who wasn't a network administrator that knew what a packet sniffer was and how to use it. As far as WEP is concerned the trade rags constantly claim how insecure it is and how easy it is to brute force crack and obtain keys - once again, this is laboratory stuff, it's not visible in the real world. In the real world there are so many unsecured wireless networks in the average city that a cracker that turns on a wireless promiscious sniffer is going to see 3-4 networks, 3/4 of which are wide open, no matter where they go. What incentive is there to crack? And that's just the people dumb enough to leave SSID broadcasting turned on. Anyway, one last note for you. No matter what you use, just about all the instructions out there tell you to create a self-signed certificate for imap/ssl smtp/etc. do not do this! The Microsoft e-mail clients can't handle this. What you want to do is create a root certificate, then create certificates for all your https servers, your secure imap and pop servers, your ssl smtp, you name it. Sign all of them with the root CA. Then, insert the root CA into the list of trusted root CA's in the Microsoft browser on the client, and from that point on the Microsoft clients don't think you are running self-signed certificates anymore and do not whine, bitch and complain and you don't have to fumble around inserting a bunch of self-signed certificates for every little service you run into all your clients. That is for example how you get Outlook to speak SSL without paying Verisign. A lot of people fooling with self-signed certs have discovered to their dismay that only outlook express can have a self-signed cert installed, regular outlook from ms office cannot. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: Greg Groth [mailto:ggroth99@hotmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:14 AM >To: tedm@toybox.placo.com; joe@netmusician.org >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems > > > > >>From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" >>To: "Joe Auty" , "Kirk Davis" >>CC: "Greg Groth" , > >>Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems >>Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:34:28 -0800 >> >> >>I'm sure glad that this message didn't pass through my work mailserver >>so that it's didn't see it, since my work e-mail inbox has >16383 messages >>in it (the limit that Outlook can display in IMAP mode) and is 412 >>megabytes >>in size, and performance is perfectly fine both with Outlook and >>Horde/IMP. >> >>I wouldn't want my mailserver reading it and thinking that it's OK to >>slack off. >> >> And yes I know I need to delete >>some messages, speak to the hand if your going to make that crack. >> >>This is imap-uw/sendmail. >> >>Perhaps you might consider that since you haven't run imap-uw in >>a while that your no longer qualified to make claims about it? Or >>perhaps >>you never had it setup properly? Or perhaps your hardware was slow? >> >>Nothing is wrong with Postfix / Courier-IMAP but nothing is >wrong either >>with sendmail / uw-imap. >> >>Ted >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Auty >> >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:53 PM >> >To: Kirk Davis >> >Cc: Greg Groth; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: Re: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems >> > >> > >> >Hey Greg, >> > >> >Sorry if this completely throws a monkey wrench into your plans, but >> >I feel inspired to interject since I once had a nearly identical >> >setup as you... >> > >> >I switched to Postfix and Courier-IMAP since I found that performance >> >of large mailboxes in IMAP-UW was pretty poor, especially over web- >> >based email where messages are not cached. I switched to Postfix >> >because it is so much more simple and straight forward than Sendmail. >> >You should have no problems switching to Postfix, since it is >> >basically Sendmail with a nicer wrapper/configuration. >> > >> >Just food for thought. > >I appreciate both of your comments, as I have stated I am new >to BSD. Part >of my problem is the huge amount of software available, and no >good way to >determine what will work better for my situation. Perhaps if I >explain my >situation, it would help some. We've been running Sendmail and a >POP-Before-SMTP script for the last 6 years on a Redhat box. I >think it >started out on 5.2, and was up to 7.3 when it crashed 3 weeks >ago. I had >been planning to upgrade the server, and had a new box ready to >go, but I >had stalled on the OS. I didn't want to go down the Redhat >route because of >strictly personal issues that are more opinions than fact, and a friend >suggest FreeBSD. > >The server crash pretty much forced my hand, and my goal was to >replicate >what we had in place ASAP. Because of my (limited) knowledge >of Sendmail, I >went that route as I know nothing of the alternatives. I went >with IMAP-UW >because not because of anything I had read, but because I was >attempting to >get the POP-Before-SMTP port to work (which it didn't - long >story), and >IMAP-UW seemed a good alternative as it is a POP and IMAP >server and was >easily configured in POP-Before-SMTP. > >Since I could not find a POP-Before-SMTP solution that I could get to >operate (I had problems with POP-Before-SMTP, and DRAC before >throwing in >the towel), I decided to switch to SMTP-AUTH. So here's my >situation, we >have about 25 users on the server. I need POP and IMAP that >will operate >with and without SSL, and SMTP that can handle SMTP-AUTH with >and without >SSL. Out of the 25 users, I have 3 that are email packrats, and have >between 2-4 gigs of email apiece. They are currently using POP >on Outlook >Express, but will be switching over to IMAP on Thunderbird in the near >future (I also have 5 users that I'm not sure what client they >are using, >we're hosting their domain - long story). Our office peronnel will be >migrating to IMAP, using SSL when out of the office, and plain >text when in. > The five users in which we are hosting their email will >remain on POP, and >although SSL would be nice, I want the ability to offer plain >text in case I >run into client issues. Similar circumstances for SMTP, I can relay by >domain for users on our network, and would like to use >SMTP-AUTH for off-ste >users. SSL preferred, but offer plain text in case of client >issues. Last >issue would be something that will play nice with SquirrelMail. > >Although I'm very familiar with administering Sendmail >(starting, stopping, >backing up, running makemaps), configuring is another story. >While SMTP is >pretty much running as stable as it ever has, I still have >issues from time >to time. For instance I am sending this from Hotmail as this list is >currently bouncing email from my server because of some error I >have not >investigated yet. At this moment I am pretty much open to >anything, but I >don't have a good way of evaluating different options other >than trial and >error (and I'm kind of short on time). I know that a lot of >times it comes >down to peronal taste (my reason for dumping Redhat), but >sometimes there >are specific issues that will make a certain solution better >than others. >Based off of my stated needs and my current issues (Sendmail >configuration), >is there a better solution, or is what I have now pretty much >the same as >other alternatives for my specfic needs? > >Thank you both for your attention to this matter. > >Greg Groth > > >>From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" >>To: "Joe Auty" , "Kirk Davis" >>CC: "Greg Groth" , > >>Subject: RE: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems >>Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:34:28 -0800 >> >> >>I'm sure glad that this message didn't pass through my work mailserver >>so that it's didn't see it, since my work e-mail inbox has >16383 messages >>in it (the limit that Outlook can display in IMAP mode) and is 412 >>megabytes >>in size, and performance is perfectly fine both with Outlook and >>Horde/IMP. >> >>I wouldn't want my mailserver reading it and thinking that it's OK to >>slack off. >> >> And yes I know I need to delete >>some messages, speak to the hand if your going to make that crack. >> >>This is imap-uw/sendmail. >> >>Perhaps you might consider that since you haven't run imap-uw in >>a while that your no longer qualified to make claims about it? Or >>perhaps >>you never had it setup properly? Or perhaps your hardware was slow? >> >>Nothing is wrong with Postfix / Courier-IMAP but nothing is >wrong either >>with sendmail / uw-imap. >> >>Ted >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Joe Auty >> >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:53 PM >> >To: Kirk Davis >> >Cc: Greg Groth; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: Re: Sendmail - IMAP-UW - Cyrus-SASL2 - SMTPAUTH problems >> > >> > >> >Hey Greg, >> > >> >Sorry if this completely throws a monkey wrench into your plans, but >> >I feel inspired to interject since I once had a nearly identical >> >setup as you... >> > >> >I switched to Postfix and Courier-IMAP since I found that performance >> >of large mailboxes in IMAP-UW was pretty poor, especially over web- >> >based email where messages are not cached. I switched to Postfix >> >because it is so much more simple and straight forward than Sendmail. >> >You should have no problems switching to Postfix, since it is >> >basically Sendmail with a nicer wrapper/configuration. >> > >> >Just food for thought. >> > >> > >> >On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Kirk Davis wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> >> >>> I'm trying to set up a FreeBSD 6.0 box as a mail server, and while >> >>> everything seems to be working OK for the most part, I have >> >>> run into two >> >>> issues that I cannot resolve (I'm new to BSD, please bear >> >>> with me). Install >> >>> went as follows: Installed via FTP last night along with >> >>> "src - Sources for >> >>> everything", >> >>> >> >>> IMAP-UW was compiled via ports with WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT >> >>> enabled (same for >> >>> cclient), OpenSSL, Cyrus-SASL2 & Cyrus-SASL2-saslauthd were >> >>> compiled via >> >>> ports with no flags. >> >>> >> >>> Sendmail was installed with the base install and recompiled >> >>> (after SASL2 was >> >>> up and running) with the following options added to make.conf: >> >>> >> >>> # SASL (cyrus-sasl v2) sendmail build flags... >> >>> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 >> >>> SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib >> >>> SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 >> >>> # Adding to enable alternate port (smtps) for sendmail... >> >>> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -D_FFR_SMTP_SSL >> >>> >> >>> I followed the instructions I found at >> >>> http://www.bsdconspiracy.net/howto/sendmail.html, and had no >> >>> problems with >> >>> the install except for Sendmail. After recompiling sendmail, >> >>> I added the >> >>> following lines to the mail.server.mc file: >> >>> >> >>> define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS',`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl >> >>> TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`PLAIN LOGIN')dnl >> >>> define(`CERT_DIR', `/etc/mail/certs')dnl >> >>> define(`confCACERT_PATH', `CERT_DIR')dnl >> >>> define(`confCACERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl >> >>> define(`confSERVER_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl >> >>> define(`confSERVER_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl >> >>> define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `CERT_DIR/mycert.pem')dnl >> >>> define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `CERT_DIR/mykey.pem')dnl >> >>> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Name=MTA')dnl >> >> >> >> This is your problem. The above line sets up the Sendmail >daemon to >> >> listen on port 25 but the standard mc file distributed with FreeBSD >> >> also >> >> sets up a DAEMON port (it's at the end of the MC file). >> >> >> >> Here is what my DAEMON_OPTIONS lines look like. These >should be the >> >> only DAEMON_OPTIONS lines in the mc file. >> >> dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) >> >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet') >> >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') >> >> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl >> >> >> >> >> >>> DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtps, Name=TLSMTA, M=s')dnl >> >>> >> >>> After running (in /etc/mail) "make clean", "make cf", "make >> >>> install", "make >> >>> restart", SMTP no longer works, and I find the following in >> >>> maillog and >> >>> messages >> >>> >> >>> Feb 12 20:25:55 mail sm-mta[1213]: daemon IPv4: problem >> >>> creating SMTP socket >> >>> Feb 12 20:26:00 mail sm-mta[1213]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): >> >>> opendaemonsocket: >> >>> daemon IPv4: cannot bind: Address already in use >> >>> >> >>> When I try and stop sendmail, I get a message that the pid >> >>> for Sendmail >> >>> cannot be found. I end up killing the missing Sendmail >daemon using >> >>> KSysGuard >> >>> >> >>> If I remove this line - "DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, >> >>> Name=MTA')dnl" from the >> >>> mail.server.mc file, make cf, make install, make restart, >> >>> sendmail starts >> >>> normally. When trying to access from another machine on my >> >>> network, I can >> >>> only connect on port 25 without a secure connection (I'm >> >>> using Thunderbird >> >>> for this), although SMTP-AUTH is working correctly. >> >> >> >> Have you tried to setup your mail client to connect to >port 465? This >> >> is the smtps (SMTP SSL) port. >> >> >> >> >> >>> Any ideas on what I might need to do to get SSL / SMTP-AUTH >> >>> working on SMTP? >> >>> I took a look at the instructions in the handbook, but they >> >>> were written >> >>> for SASL1. Running netstat shows smtps listening on 465, but >> >>> when I try to >> >>> telnet to that port, the server drops the connection. >> >> >> >> Hmm... It should connect but you will not see anything since it is >> >> expecting an SSL connection. >> >> >> >>> My second problem is rather simple, after I create an IMAP >> >>> folder, I am >> >>> unable to delete it using a remote client. Thunderbird >> >>> responds with "The >> >>> mail server responded: RENAME failed: Can't create mailbox node >> >>> /home/User/Trash/: File exists. Nothing shows up in any of >> >>> the server logs >> >>> though. >> >> >> >> I have not seen this problem although I have it setup for >an office of >> >> Outlook users. I would check the permissions on the folders in the >> >> user >> >> home directory. This is where the IMAP user forlders are by >> >> default. I >> >> usually setup the clients to use the base imap if Mail and then >> >> create a >> >> Mail directory in the user home directory. That way the >mail folders >> >> don't get messed up with the user stuff. >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Hopefully this is the right list for these questions, if not, >> >>> could someone >> >>> please direct me to the correct one? Any advice anyone can >> >>> give me on >> >>> either of these problems would be greatly appreciated. >> >>> >> >> >> >> ---- Kirk >> >> Kirk Davis >> >> Senior Network Analyst, ITS >> >> Edmonton Public Schools >> >> 1-780-429-8308 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> >-- >> >No virus found in this incoming message. >> >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/258 - Release Date: >> >2/13/2006 >> > >> > >_________________________________________________________________ >Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - >it's FREE! >http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/262 - Release >Date: 2/16/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 12:11:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FC616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5F943D62 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HCBKu19575; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:11:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Foo Ji-Haw" , "bsd" , "Robert Uzzi" Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:11:20 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <067101c63216$a7682f10$c801a8c0@nexpc> Importance: Normal Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: RE: SATA Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:11:51 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Foo Ji-Haw >Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 2:00 AM >To: bsd; Robert Uzzi >Cc: Liste FreeBSD >Subject: Re: SATA Raid > > >Do note that cheap SATA raid controllers are in fact 'software' >raid cards; >much of the load is on the cpu rather than the asic. > This does not matter when your just doing mirroring or striping, no parity calculations. It only matters with RAID5 which most of the cheap raid controllers don't do. With the size of disks today and cost, if your looking primariarly for reliability, just mirror 2 large disks. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 12:12:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AA716A446 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:12:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E69243D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:12:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 90061 invoked by uid 1008); 17 Feb 2006 12:12:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 12:12:21 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:12:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <65280.24.90.33.115.1140178341.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: References: <61221.24.90.33.115.1140172738.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:12:21 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: "Garrett Cooper" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mplayer-plugin build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:12:39 -0000 > > You need to install a mozilla browser and have the headers available > for mplayerplug-in. i know. but i'm using the port. and have 2 mozilla browsers installed... i'll get the src later and i gess look for gecko libraries... > -Garrett > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 12:17:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A341416A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:17:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 070E043D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:17:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 17576 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 12:17:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Xn7pAm+nRXBKNq5VlYvoEkpwbkKjdqvDKpEstERNaAUUAUFzkjeWcLdE2L0oyQj1437IlC45oUqrXO1cmRpCVmLx9Aj98x66fO1YHdxePJvkONXBlcWrr2j7SF8PgAoXcKE5HNlQ8iaE30oBO+H5jwNW2A1EnqLVOlriONcu+OQ= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mj001@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 12:17:40 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: Micah In-Reply-To: <43F5513E.9000403@ywave.com> References: <20060217033223.51051.qmail@web54009.mail.yahoo.com> <43F5513E.9000403@ywave.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:17:39 -0500 Message-Id: <1140178659.5709.8.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paul Marciano , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a USB Compact Flash card reader. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:17:42 -0000 On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 20:29 -0800, Micah wrote: > Paul Marciano wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 5.4-RELEASE I'm having problems with my AVB card > > reader: I often get "Synchronize Cache" and "CSW Tag" > > errors. > > > > Does anyone have a solid recommendation for a USB > > Compact Flash card reader? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul. > > I have a SanDisk ImageMate that's always worked for me from 5.2 to 5.4 > (haven't really used it since the upgrade to 6.0). > > HTH, > Micah > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I have a similar good experience with the same card reader, including success with 4.9 and 6.0. -- Mike Jeays http://ca.geocities.com/mike.jeays@rogers.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 12:18:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B91516A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:18:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from asmtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (asmtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFD943D8E for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:18:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.229.193] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FA4Z5-0006fm-Ho; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:18:23 +0000 Message-ID: <43F5BF0E.4050507@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:18:22 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alejandro Pulver References: <20060201150621.11234c17@phobos.mars.bsd> <20060201151953.2ef2f011@phobos.mars.bsd> <43E1F57A.80804@dial.pipex.com> <20060202113919.233c1adc@phobos.mars.bsd> <20060215131241.6dc50af5@phobos.mars.bsd> <20060217083553.377940db@phobos.mars.bsd> In-Reply-To: <20060217083553.377940db@phobos.mars.bsd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NVidia GeForce 6600 problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:18:32 -0000 Alejandro Pulver wrote: >>>On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:05:14 +0000 >>>Alex Zbyslaw wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I have a 6600 with FreeBSD 5.4 XOrg 6.8.2 but still >>>>nvidia-driver-1.0.7676_1. I have an occasional problem where the >>>>whole screen is shifted left on startup, but exiting and >>>>restarting X fixes it. You could try downgrading to an older >>>>nvidia-driver and see if it helps. Portdowngrade should do that, >>>>but I've never used it myself. >>>> >>>>You may have more luck if you try the nvidia support forum. >>>>Definitely slower than this mailing list but someone from nvidia >>>>was reading it, last time I used it. >>>> >>>>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=47 >>>> >>>> >>>> >Well, that was part of the problem, but I still have errors with one >OpenGL application (I have tested others like Doom III and Enemy >Territory and didn't cause this): a Quake II engine called QuDos. >Sometimes I get the following: > >Program output (QuDos): > >Received signal 11, exiting... >X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range >for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 135 >(XFree86-VidModeExtension) Minor opcode of failed request: 10 >(XF86VidModeSwitchToMode) Value in failed request: 0x1200002 > Serial number of failed request: 35768 > Current serial number in output stream: 35771 > >NVidia kernel module output: > >NVRM: Xid: 8, Channel 00000002 >NVRM: Xid: 27, L1 -> L0 > > I don't play OpenGL games under FreeBSD so I can't tell if I have the same problems with my card/driver/Xorg version, sorry. But I think my original advice still holds. Try searching the NVidia forum for your new error and if nothing found try posting a question there. And you can *try* downgrading the driver, which may or may not help, but must be worth a shot. You could always run WinXP for games --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 13:09:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64B116A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:09:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from mail.compedgeracing.com (dsl-katy-207-70-139-52.consolidated.net [207.70.139.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DE743D6A for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:09:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from www.compedgeracing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.compedgeracing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FECF5C0B; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:09:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from 207.70.139.52 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ruzzi) by www.compedgeracing.com with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:09:57 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <57580.207.70.139.52.1140181797.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> In-Reply-To: <200602170830.k1H8UFhn084778@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <20060207120037.88ECF16A424@hub.freebsd.org> <001f01c6339b$cedc9d70$0807a8c0@admin> <200602170830.k1H8UFhn084778@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:09:57 -0600 (CST) From: "Robert Uzzi" To: "Olivier Nicole" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: gbentley@uk2.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone interpret this ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:09:50 -0000 You got port scanned. >> +Limiting closed port RST response from 216 to 200 packets/sec > > By analogy with the rate limiting on icmp echo (ping) I'd say that > someone try to access to a closed service 216 times per second and > that the reset (RST) response is limited to 200. > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 13:23:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B913716A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:23:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AAE43D53 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUU00EB22JL6KD0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:23:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from urban.broadpark.no ([213.187.181.70]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IUU00EGU2JLDQ00@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:23:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:23:51 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf In-reply-to: To: Ted Mittelstaedt , questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060217142314.021fe9f0@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060217105855.0218b5f0@broadpark.no> Cc: Subject: RE: How would you improve FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:23:47 -0000 At 13:11 17.02.2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kristian Vaaf > >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:06 AM > >To: questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: How would you improve FreeBSD? > > > > > > > >Hello. > > > >Yes, how would you improve FreeBSD? > > > >I would start by making a rule that anyone asking how would you >improve FreeBSD on the mailing list be sentenced to write: > >"I will not post silly questions to the mailing list that are answered on >the website" > >several hundred times. See: > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ > > >I am trying to paint a gloomy picture of where FreeBSD is headed. > > > >Therefore I am asking all of you to share your thoughts and ideas of how > >you would like to see FreeBSD improve. Chances are that's where our > >operating system is headed. > > > >1. Would you restructure FreeBSD somehow? > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ > > >2. What features would you add? > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ > > >3. What features would you remove? > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ > > >4. What features would you simplify? > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ > > >5. What features would you further develop? > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ > > >If I've left out some questions that you feel would contribute to the > >future well being of FreeBSD, don't hesitate to comment! > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > >Ted No need to be so FUCKING arrogant. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 13:47:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADBB16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:47:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from trans-warp.net (hyperion.trans-warp.net [216.37.208.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF43D43D58 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:47:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unverified [65.193.73.208]) by trans-warp.net (SurgeMail 3.7a) with ESMTP id 42999860 for multiple; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:47:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060217142314.021fe9f0@broadpark.no> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060217105855.0218b5f0@broadpark.no> <7.0.1.0.2.20060217142314.021fe9f0@broadpark.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:47:32 -0500 To: Kristian Vaaf X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com r=-1980812739 X-Authenticated-User: bsilver@chrononomicon.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: How would you improve FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:47:30 -0000 On Feb 17, 2006, at 8:23 AM, Kristian Vaaf wrote: > At 13:11 17.02.2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kristian >> Vaaf >> >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:06 AM >> >To: questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: How would you improve FreeBSD? >> > >> > >> > >> >Hello. >> > >> >Yes, how would you improve FreeBSD? >> > >> >> I would start by making a rule that anyone asking how would you >> improve FreeBSD on the mailing list be sentenced to write: >> >> "I will not post silly questions to the mailing list that are >> answered on >> the website" >> >> several hundred times. See: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >I am trying to paint a gloomy picture of where FreeBSD is headed. >> > >> >Therefore I am asking all of you to share your thoughts and ideas of >> how >> >you would like to see FreeBSD improve. Chances are that's where our >> >operating system is headed. >> > >> >1. Would you restructure FreeBSD somehow? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >2. What features would you add? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >3. What features would you remove? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >4. What features would you simplify? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >5. What features would you further develop? >> > >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >If I've left out some questions that you feel would contribute to the >> >future well being of FreeBSD, don't hesitate to comment! >> > >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >> >> Ted > > No need to be so FUCKING arrogant. First, please tone down the language. He didn't swear at you. Don't escalate it. Second, while Ted doesn't get the Medal of Subtlety award, he is a regular poster on the mailing list and does offer help to a number of people much of the time. Sure, he's crotchety and curmudgeonly at times, but after being on these lists long enough he probably gets tired of seeing the same recycled questions and the same types of issues crop up over and over that are clearly written out in other resources if someone managed to open a browser and google with a couple keywords before belching out a quick email to a few thousand human list members to once again answer a question that has been covered in FAQs and handbooks. I don't think it's been actively advertised that ideas are submitted through the website, though, Ted...you could have at least tried for a little more guidance and less ridicule on this one :-) If there's a particular aspect you'd want to ask about, you could probably take that approach, or ask about something in ideas. Until a listmom pokes in to tell you it should be in a discussion group, not questions group. Just my two cents. Not that it counts for anything. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 14:01:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3229216A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:01:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.200.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FF143D4C for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:01:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([68.80.195.248]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060217140121013004g8p2e>; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:01:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D6DB843; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:01:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bserver.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68844-01; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:01:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.214.102] (kbuilt.transpack.com [192.168.214.102]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E9CB842; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:01:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F5D725.1000608@allenmyland.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:01:09 -0500 From: Ken Stevenson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave References: <006301c6338f$7eff2c70$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <006301c6338f$7eff2c70$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at transpack.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getty repeating to quickly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:01:26 -0000 Dave wrote: > Hello, > I've got a box running 6.0-RELEASE. I'm trying to hook serial > consoles in to it, and have set up /etc/ttys and /boot/device.hints to > allow me to do this. Yet, in /var/log/messages i keep seeing this error: > > "Init: getty repeating to quickly on port /dev/ttyd0, sleeping 30 secs" > > This is a repeating msg and i never get my serial console. I've > confirmed that the port is showing up via dmesg, the system's bios has > it on the correct i/o address and irq, and the pnp option is turned off. > Any ideas? > Thanks. > Dave. > I'm not sure what the problem is, but I believe the message means that getty is starting, immediately crashing, and then respawning, over and over. The OS then throttles that process to avoid consuming too many resources. I got the same error when I was trying to get mgetty to work with PPP. After I fixed my configuration problems, the problem went away. -- Ken Stevenson Allen-Myland Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 14:03:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D1B16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:03:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from enigma@lztech.com.br) Received: from cwbgk1.k1.com.br (customer-200195196249.onda.com.br [200.195.196.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F89543D73 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:03:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from enigma@lztech.com.br) Received: from webpratico.com.br (M199.28.cwbgk [172.16.199.28] (may be forged)) by cwbgk1.k1.com.br (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1HE3N79067457 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:03:23 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from enigma@lztech.com.br) Received: from cwb.lztech.com.br (server [192.168.1.6]) by webpratico.com.br (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1HE71cb025520 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:07:01 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from enigma@lztech.com.br) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cwb.lztech.com.br (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1HE3MGb015479 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:03:22 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from enigma@lztech.com.br) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: lztech Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:03:21 -0200 Message-Id: <1140185001.11107.2.camel@server> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Wrong list post???? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lenzi@lztech.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:03:26 -0000 Hello Alll.... Please... I posted a question about the ISO9660 and the hard links in the ISO filesystem... some days ago... and no one answer... I am not complaining about missing answers, but may be I am in the wrong list.... Can someone please tell me what is the correct list for this kind of questions???? Thanks for any answer..... Sergio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 14:28:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBAE16A451 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:28:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from smtpout.eastlink.ca (smtpout.eastlink.ca [24.222.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C476543D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:28:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duane@greenmeadow.ca) Received: from ip04.eastlink.ca ([24.222.10.20]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUU00IF05JEWVJ0@mta01.eastlink.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:28:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from blk-224-199-230.eastlink.ca (HELO [192.168.0.103]) ([24.224.199.230]) by ip04.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:28:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:27:49 -0400 From: Duane Whitty In-reply-to: <20060217125030.35bd54a6@localhost> To: FreeBSD Questions Message-id: <43F5DD65.8090409@greenmeadow.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAgAAA+kAAAPq References: <20060217125030.35bd54a6@localhost> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060205) Subject: Re: Every 12-hrs -- "ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE DMA" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:28:08 -0000 Fabian Keil wrote: > "V.I.Victor" wrote: > >> For the last 4-days, our (otherwise OK) 5.4-RELEASE machine has been >> reporting: >> >> Feb 12 12:08:05 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2701279 >> Feb 13 00:08:51 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2701279 >> Feb 13 12:09:38 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2963331 >> Feb 14 00:10:24 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2705947 >> Feb 14 12:11:09 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2706335 >> Feb 15 00:12:02 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2832383 >> Feb 15 12:12:57 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=139839 >> Feb 16 00:13:50 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=131391 >> Feb 16 12:14:36 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=131391 >> >> The system was created Jan 08 and, prior to the above, the ad0: timeout had >> only been reported twice: >> >> Jan 25 11:43:34 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=17920255 >> Feb 6 11:59:42 : ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=2832383 > Hi, I hate sending out a "me too" message but yet here we are. It's not a production machine so I was going to let it run its course. The messages stopped appearing after a couple of days. I reviewed my logs and couldn't find anything more revealing and my system appeared to be functioning well. Likely unrelated but my new activities at the time were experimenting with some new SAMBA shares and setting-up the CAM driver. There is likely no correlation but I thought I'd mention it. --Duane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 14:37:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0736516A420; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:37:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lk@tempest.sk) Received: from proxy.dgrp.sk (proxy.dgrp.sk [195.28.127.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B8143D46; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:37:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lk@tempest.sk) Received: by proxy.dgrp.sk (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 8370C8008; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:37:54 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on proxy.dgrp.sk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=4.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from webmail.tempest.sk (domino1.tempest.sk [195.28.100.38]) by proxy.dgrp.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E568007; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:37:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from lk.tempest.sk ([195.28.109.47]) by webmail.tempest.sk (Lotus Domino Release 6.5.4) with ESMTP id 2006021715375057-4280 ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:37:50 +0100 Received: from lk.tempest.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lk.tempest.sk (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k1HEbjWN049513; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:37:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lk@lk.tempest.sk) Received: (from koren@localhost) by lk.tempest.sk (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id k1HEbjeD049510; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:37:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lk) X-Authentication-Warning: lk.tempest.sk: koren set sender to lk using -f Sender: lk@tempest.sk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ludo Koren Date: 17 Feb 2006 15:37:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87r762dpaf.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> Lines: 35 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Domino1/DGRP(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 17.02.2006 15:37:50, Serialize by Router on Domino1/DGRP(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 17.02.2006 15:37:52, Serialize complete at 17.02.2006 15:37:52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: AVerMedia AVerTV Hybrid+FM Cardbus X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:37:57 -0000 Hello, I am using FreeBSD RELENG_5 and decided to give a try to video capture device. From the friend, I've got AVerMedia AVerTV Hybrid+FM Cardbus. When I plug it to my notebook I get the following to the log: cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=800 cardbus0: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) and after kldload bktr.ko: bktr_mem: memory holder loaded Here is the pciconf -lv output: ..... none3@pci3:0:0: class=0x048000 card=0xf4361461 chip=0x71331131 rev=0xd1 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Philips Semiconductors' device = 'SAA7135HL Multi Media Capture Device' class = multimedia Is anybody running this card? Am I doing something wrong? Is there another driver for the card? I did not find anything useful searching the archives. Regards, lk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 14:56:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1B516A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:56:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from email@demonlord.de) Received: from alpha-labs.net (alpha-labs.net [81.169.185.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69AB43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:56:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from email@demonlord.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpha-labs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227B4228055 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:56:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from alpha-labs.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alpha-labs.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41245-10 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:56:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.5] (i5387AEAE.versanet.de [83.135.174.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alpha-labs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A8D22803A for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:56:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F5E42F.8010807@demonlord.de> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:56:47 +0100 From: Christian Reiss User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alpha-labs.net Subject: Radeon x1600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:56:45 -0000 Hello all, So I fear there is no solution to get this card working in any way with BSD? No well-kept secret moves? Oh well. Thanks anyway! -Christian Reiss. --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- Greetings people! I am using FreeBSD for quiet some years now, and I just recently upgraded my PC. Along came a Radeon x1600 (PCIE). Before that I was a happy-happy joy-joy nvidia (-module) user - it just worked. ;) Now I am having a dickens of a time to get the Radeon x1600 working under Xorg (latest) to work - even 2D would suffice. But google'ing around just yielded my own questions in several forums. The ati and radeon drivers (native from xorg, which i am using out of a currents ports tree) did not work with that card. Unless, of course, some magic incantations are required. Just to be on the safe side, I am hording virgin blood right now. Using the vesa driver my screen yells "input not supported", and forcing the vesa driver didnt work out. I got a TFT that can, and should do 1280x1024. Using FreeBSD 6.0 Patch 4. Any help would be more than welcome. Kind regards, Christian Reiss. --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 15:03:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5562316A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:03:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3184343D53 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:03:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 9092 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 15:03:26 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 17 Feb 2006 15:03:26 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 21E6428439; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:03:25 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: lenzi@lztech.com.br References: <1140185001.11107.2.camel@server> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 17 Feb 2006 10:03:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1140185001.11107.2.camel@server> Message-ID: <44oe16ni2r.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wrong list post???? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:03:28 -0000 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi writes: > I posted a question about the ISO9660 and the hard links > in the ISO filesystem... some days ago... A bit under 1 day ago, actually. > and no one answer... It was still in my incoming queue, but first I was planning to take care of the work that I actually get paid for. I tried to duplicate the problem (on -STABLE) with: mkdir temp; cd temp;(tar -C /rescue -cf - . |tar -xf -);du -h . /rescue but I got the links copied properly (original and copy the same size). You'll need to show precisely what you did for anyone to figure out what is wrong. > I am not complaining about missing answers, but > may be I am in the wrong list.... No, this is the right place. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 15:15:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2825316A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:15:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5813143D58 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:15:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FA7Jj-0003v6-Tg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:14:43 +0100 Received: from 65.213.7.6 ([65.213.7.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:14:43 +0100 Received: from scott by 65.213.7.6 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:14:43 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Scott I. Remick" Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:13:54 -0500 Lines: 44 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.213.7.6 User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Archive: encrypt Sender: news Subject: VNC forwarding over sshd issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: scott@sremick.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:15:23 -0000 I'm having a weird problem that surfaces sometimes and I am having trouble pinning down the cause. What I do is use VNC to remote-control my home FreeBSD box remotely. Most of the time, this works fine. My home router forwards the external port to my FreeBSD (6.0R) box. I use PuTTY as a Windows ssh client, and have a saved session that does the VNC port-forwarding (local port 7000 forwards over ssh to remote port 5900). I run Gnome (2.12.2) and vino as my VNC server and connect to my home desktop. Sshd is OpenSSH 2.6.1, PuTTY 0.53b, TightVNC 1.2.9 But every now and then (like right now), the VNC side of things fails. I can still connect via SSH just fine. The PuTTY logs show the port is successfully being forwarded with no error: 2006-02-17 09:38:58 Local port 7000 forwarding to localhost:5900 But when I try to launch a VNC client on the remote PC (in this case, TightVNC) I get a "Connection closed" error. The PuTTY logs show: 2006-02-17 09:52:42 Opening forwarded connection to localhost:5900 2006-02-17 09:52:42 Forwarded port closed On the FreeBSD box, no log files seem to get changed after the attempt. In particular, I check messages and auth.log but doing a listing sorted by time, I see nothing logged. What I DO know is if I went home and restarted the FreeBSD box, it'd work. I've tried -HUP on both sshd and vino-server to no avail. I cannot find any docs for vino-server to determine additional params I could pass it for more-detailed logging. Enabling additional debugging info on sshd with the -d option seems to not be an option remotely since it prevents it from going into daemon mode and it'll only handle one connection, and I can't make the problem surface on-request in order to test it while at home. The problem is particularly annoying because I can't MAKE it happen. It just sometimes does, with no settings changes, and will work again after rebooting the FreeBSD system, again with no settings changes. SSH never stops working... it's always the VNC-port-forwarding side of things. Any suggestions? Somewhere else to look for info? Some way to get more debug info from sshd or vino-server? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 15:16:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5062516A423 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:16:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D29443D55 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:16:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 29906 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 15:16:47 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 17 Feb 2006 15:16:47 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CBF6928439; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:16:46 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: questions@freebsd.org References: <1140185001.11107.2.camel@server> <44oe16ni2r.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 17 Feb 2006 10:16:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <44oe16ni2r.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: <44k6bunhgh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: lenzi@lztech.com.br Subject: Re: Wrong list post???? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:16:54 -0000 Lowell Gilbert writes: > Sergio de Almeida Lenzi writes: > > > I posted a question about the ISO9660 and the hard links > > in the ISO filesystem... some days ago... > > A bit under 1 day ago, actually. And my mail to you bounced, anyway. > I tried to duplicate the problem (on -STABLE) with: > mkdir temp; cd temp;(tar -C /rescue -cf - . |tar -xf -);du -h . /rescue > > but I got the links copied properly (original and copy the same size). > You'll need to show precisely what you did for anyone to figure out > what is wrong. Oh, and the original question was about copying from the CDROM. I didn't know that any version of tar would recognize the "hard links" from a 9660 filesystem. I suppose it's possible that the filesystem support changed, but grehan@ would know better than I. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 15:29:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D6416A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:29:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net (pih-relay06.plus.net [212.159.14.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8853443D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:29:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from [80.229.231.20] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1FA7Y7-0002lY-N0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:29:35 +0000 Message-ID: <43F5EBE5.9000904@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:29:41 +0000 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mail/News 1.6a1 (X11/20060123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5063f1f750386be6ff253bc614ac096f@prodigy.net> <200601170337.57112.alfredofnl@tiscali.it> In-Reply-To: <200601170337.57112.alfredofnl@tiscali.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 80 pin SCSI hard drives. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:29:39 -0000 Alfredo Finelli wrote: > I have 80 pin SCSI discs mounted in hot-swappable trays on a SCSI > backplane which takes care also of powering them up and of SCSI > termination. This is one way of using them. > > I also have the same drives in a different system connected to normal SCSI > LVD cable using small adaptors which have an 80 pin receptacle on one > side and a 68 pin SCSI connector plus 4 pin molex power connector on the > other, as well as jumpers to define SCSI id. In this second case you > have to provide the required termination of the SCSI bus (e.g. using the > right terminated SCSI cable). > So you can confirm that using these adaptors works OK? When I bought my SCSI drive (off eBay) there were more SCA drives for sale than 68-pin but doing some research about 80->68 pin adaptors I found a lot of people saying not to use them, including Adaptec: This from Adaptec's ASK knowledgebase http://tinyurl.com/b3ofa "Although there are adapters on the market converting 80 pin to 68 pin they are not supported by Adaptec or the hard drive manufacturers. These convertors can cause loss of signal integrity that may result in connectivity issues and data loss." This put me off getting a SCA drive. Now I'm looking for a another drive and SCA ones seem to be cheaper on eBay. Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 15:52:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A179D16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:52:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF56D43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:52:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 15:52:35 -0000 Received: from 66.86.62.81.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [81.62.86.66] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 16:52:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F5F149.1040001@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:52:41 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060203) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> <20060216194336.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060216194336.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:52:36 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, lars wrote: > >> If your machine only runs an NFS daemon and is behind a firewall, >> ok, you don't need to patch it asap when an NFS SA and patch is >> issued, if all clients connecting to the machine are benign. > > Actually, there are alot of situations where this sort of thing is > possible ... hell, I could probably get away with running a FreeBSD 3.3 > server since day one, that has all ports closed except for sshd, > imap/pop3/smtp, and be 100% secury ... sshd can be easily upgraded > without a reboot, with the same applying to imap/pop3/smtp if I use a > port instead of what comes with the OS itself ... > > You can say you are losing out on 'stability fixes', else the server > itself wouldn't stay up that long ... so about the only thing you lose > would be performance related improvements and/or stuff like memory > leakage ... > > And I could do this all *without* any firewalls protecting it ... Even if you managed to maintain an old version of a particular OS's uptime for so long, what did you prove? At a time where some OS couldn't even keep it up longer than a day, having a long uptime may have been a 'feature'. IMHO 'uptime' as a 'feature' is overrated, not to say obsolete. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 15:54:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E1E16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:54:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@sf-net.com) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0247843D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:54:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@sf-net.com) Received: from [195.238.136.66] (helo=[192.168.130.99]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu9) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2xA-1FA7wR0jAM-0000dn; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:43 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <5A0111C5-E4BC-440A-9BFA-B4B96B70DA89@sf-net.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-1-823201560" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Stefan Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:35 +0100 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:0525cf9cbe16c6d3d153baa8ed291ac7 Subject: daily security output usr/src should be gid = 9 = man X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:54:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-1-823201560 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Hi, is this the right behaviour that /usr/src should be labeled with gid 9 which is the group man? When I label /usr/src with the group wheel I get a daily security output like this: Checking special files and directories. Output format is: filename: criteria (shouldbe, reallyis) usr/src: gid (9, 0) When I label it with gid 9 which is the group man I don't get a security hint. But why would or should I label /usr/src with group- privilegies man? Is this the default behaviour? I'm running FreeBSD RELENG_6_0 Best regards, Stefan --Apple-Mail-1-823201560 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD9fHBUEn3BeoPvtwRAiiGAJ42o8L5cqozNUjCa8j9VIvS3abUPQCeN1kt Hunw/4bYMgsDGHpfhzQG6NU= =66QR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-1-823201560-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:06:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB75D16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:06:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140624411.1fb9f0@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9BE43D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:06:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140624411.1fb9f0@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HG6qV0025909 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:06:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140624411.1fb9f0@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HG6qPW025908 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:06:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140624411.1fb9f0@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140624411.1fb9f0@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:06:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:06:51 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: David Banning X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:06:54 -0000 I have a strange problem where port 8025 is blocked on my server. Trying to connect with telnet, here is the response; david$ telnet banning.ca 8025 Trying 127.0.0.1... telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Yet I host 6 other domains on the same server, and all the others seems to be fine; david$ telnet optexstaging.com 8025 Trying 209.161.205.12... Connected to optexstaging.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 3s1.com ESMTP tmda-ofmipd quit It makes no difference whether I enable the firewall or not. Strangely I -can- connect to banning.ca via port 25 or 110; david$ telnet banning.ca 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to banning.ca. Escape character is '^]'. 220 3s1.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.8p1/8.12.8; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:06:04 -0500 (EST) To my knowledge, there is nothing that stops a connection to a specific The only change to my system is that I registered -all- 7 of the domain names with a new outside DNS server. It could be that there is some stale DNS going on, but DNS would be the same for all ports, would it not? Looking at the erroneous message, I see that banning.ca is being directed to 127.0.0.1 - why would that happen? Any direction would be helpful. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:13:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472D516A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:13:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB26F43D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:13:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-22-247.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.247]) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2006 11:13:06 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.02,124,1139202000"; d="scan'208"; a="206428946:sNHT30483692" From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17397.62909.437370.108864@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:11:41 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <43F5EBE5.9000904@freebsd.org> References: <5063f1f750386be6ff253bc614ac096f@prodigy.net> <200601170337.57112.alfredofnl@tiscali.it> <43F5EBE5.9000904@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta24) "dandelion" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Re: 80 pin SCSI hard drives. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:13:06 -0000 Mark Ovens writes: > > I also have the same drives in a different system connected to > > normal SCSI LVD cable using small adaptors which have an 80 pin > > receptacle on one side and a 68 pin SCSI connector plus 4 pin > > molex power connector on the other, as well as jumpers to > > define SCSI id. > > So you can confirm that using these adaptors works OK? I have a AHA-2940U2W whose connection to a SEAGATE SX150176LC involves a third party adapter. Running over a year, zero observed problems. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:13:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7744016A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:13:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD29743D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k1HGD8iU012892; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k1HGD8nT012891; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:13:08 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200602171613.k1HGD8nT012891@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: stefan@sf-net.com (Stefan) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:13:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <5A0111C5-E4BC-440A-9BFA-B4B96B70DA89@sf-net.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: daily security output usr/src should be gid = 9 = man X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:13:09 -0000 > > Hi, > > is this the right behaviour that /usr/src should be labeled with gid > 9 which is the group man? When I label /usr/src with the group wheel > I get a daily security output like this: When you say 'label' do you mean using chown or chgrp? > > Checking special files and directories. > Output format is: > filename: > criteria (shouldbe, reallyis) > usr/src: > gid (9, 0) > > When I label it with gid 9 which is the group man I don't get a > security hint. But why would or should I label /usr/src with group- > privilegies man? > > Is this the default behaviour? I'm running FreeBSD RELENG_6_0 My /usr/src directory is root:wheel - eg UID root, GID wheel on each of the FreeBSD versions I have handy to look at which includes 6.0. Your daily security output may just be telling you that it changed to something from the GID of 9 that it was the last time it checked. I don't know of any other reason it would point that out. ////jerry > > Best regards, > Stefan > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:13:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F5D16A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:13:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Erin@Fortenberry.net) Received: from intake.emails-are.us (intake.emails-are.us [66.240.197.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A415F43D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:13:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Erin@Fortenberry.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.webs-are.us [127.0.0.1]) by intake.emails-are.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AC3DA843; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:14:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from intake.emails-are.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vhost.methodent.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72778-05; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:14:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from snkxwefortenbe (chfw02.scripps.com [207.203.254.110]) by intake.emails-are.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5562DA83F; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:14:46 -0800 (PST) From: "Erin Fortenberry" To: "'David Banning'" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:13:34 -0500 Message-ID: <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYz3GjBPgukXBiCQTS8W3bADxvI7wAAJZ1g In-Reply-To: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> X-Virus-Scanned: by emails-are.us anti-virus X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.543, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] X-Spam-Score: -102.056 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: RE: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:13:37 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > David Banning > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 11:07 AM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: mail port 8025 conundrum > > I have a strange problem where port 8025 is blocked on my server. > > Trying to connect with telnet, here is the response; > > david$ telnet banning.ca 8025 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > Yet I host 6 other domains on the same server, and all the > others seems > to be fine; > > david$ telnet optexstaging.com 8025 > Trying 209.161.205.12... > Connected to optexstaging.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 3s1.com ESMTP tmda-ofmipd > quit > > It makes no difference whether I enable the firewall or not. > Strangely I -can- connect to banning.ca via port 25 or 110; > > david$ telnet banning.ca 25 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to banning.ca. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 3s1.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.8p1/8.12.8; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 > 11:06:04 -0500 (EST) > > To my knowledge, there is nothing that stops a connection to > a specific > > The only change to my system is that I registered -all- 7 of > the domain > names with a new outside DNS server. It could be that there is some > stale DNS going on, but DNS would be the same for all ports, would > it not? > > Looking at the erroneous message, I see that banning.ca is > being directed > to 127.0.0.1 - why would that happen? > > Any direction would be helpful. It looks like nothing is bound to port 8025 on 127.0.0.1 (localhost). You can do a sockstat and verify. -Erin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:18:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6814816A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:18:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD40543D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:18:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:18:12 +0100 id 0003982E.43F5F744.00009BE6 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:18:12 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20060217161812.GA39770@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <43F381A5.9090204@protected-networks.net> <43F39A0B.3040609@samsco.org> <20060215230908.831354cf.dick@nagual.st> <43F4FC63.3090601@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F4FC63.3090601@samsco.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: VMware host on stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:18:17 -0000 On 16 Feb Scott Long wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: > >On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:15:55 -0700 > >Scott Long wrote: > > > >>Michael Butler wrote: > >> > >>>What is the most recent version of VMware known to work on 6.x in > >>>host mode so as to be able to run windoze as a guest? > >>> > >>>Anyone tried 5.5 on 6.x yet? .. or the time-limited beta (expires > >>>~July) of VMware server (free! at > >>>http://www.vmware.com/products/server)? > >>> > >>> Michael > >> > >>I have the same question. I've been looking at porting the 5.5 vmmon > >>module, but haven't had time yet to start. All I really need is the > >>ability to run an existing vmware image. And no, qemu and xen and > >>all that is not an option. > > > >You're entitled to your POV, of course. But I dare say that *on FreeBSD* > >Qemu (w/ kqemu) is far better than any build of vmware I've ever seen. > >Any reason why qemu is "not an option"? > > > > Can qemu run the vmware image that I have? If it can, great! It's > not a matter of opinion or open source vs closed source, it's a simple > matter of using appropriate tools for my particular needs. > > Scott The vmware filesystem is supported and my vmware images run great. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 +++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:24:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0B616A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [216.148.227.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E5143D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:24:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([68.80.195.248]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060217162425m1300fq0e9e>; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:24:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6163B843; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:24:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bserver.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69349-01; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:24:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.214.102] (kbuilt.transpack.com [192.168.214.102]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197A6B842; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:24:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F5F8AD.50109@allenmyland.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:24:13 -0500 From: Ken Stevenson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Banning References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> In-Reply-To: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at transpack.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:24:27 -0000 David Banning wrote: > I have a strange problem where port 8025 is blocked on my server. > > Trying to connect with telnet, here is the response; > > david$ telnet banning.ca 8025 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > Yet I host 6 other domains on the same server, and all the others seems > to be fine; > > david$ telnet optexstaging.com 8025 > Trying 209.161.205.12... > Connected to optexstaging.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 3s1.com ESMTP tmda-ofmipd > quit > > It makes no difference whether I enable the firewall or not. > Strangely I -can- connect to banning.ca via port 25 or 110; > > david$ telnet banning.ca 25 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to banning.ca. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 3s1.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.8p1/8.12.8; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:06:04 -0500 (EST) > > To my knowledge, there is nothing that stops a connection to a specific > > The only change to my system is that I registered -all- 7 of the domain > names with a new outside DNS server. It could be that there is some > stale DNS going on, but DNS would be the same for all ports, would > it not? > > Looking at the erroneous message, I see that banning.ca is being directed > to 127.0.0.1 - why would that happen? > It works from the outside world: ken@abbott2 > telnet optexstaging.com 8025 Trying 209.161.205.12... Connected to optexstaging.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220 3s1.com ESMTP tmda-ofmipd quit 221 Bye Connection closed by foreign host. ken@abbott2 > telnet banning.ca 8025 Trying 209.161.205.12... Connected to banning.ca. Escape character is '^]'. 220 3s1.com ESMTP tmda-ofmipd quit 221 Bye Connection closed by foreign host. -- Ken Stevenson Allen-Myland Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:26:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE65C16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:26:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC7743D8A for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:26:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9759981B9; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:26:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31576-03-2; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:26:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-5062e7e3.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.231.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844E99983E1; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:26:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F5F91E.5020005@t-hosting.hu> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:26:06 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa References: <43F4B5D2.6020303@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting up VPN+IPSec+Racoon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:26:30 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: >On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:26:42 +0100, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions >you wrote: > > > >>Hello, >> >>it is the first time I have to set up such configuration. Could you tell >>me some guidelines? What should I care about? I see there's a chapter in >>the Handbook about VPN. It mentions the FAST_IPSEC kernel option in >> >> >>>5.X. Should I use this implemetation or the KAME implementation? What >>> >>> >>are the differencies, and what are the advantages, disadvantages of each? >>If you know some other good tutorial or howto, please let me know. >> >> >> > > >FAST_IPSEC allows for hardware crypto offloading (see man 4 crypto). >Even without it, the author claims its faster than KAME. However, its >important to note FAST_IPSEC cannot work with INET6 in the kernel. >Also, you want to use it mostly with RELENG_6 if possible. Also, dont >use racoon, better to use ipsec-tools. Its also in the ports. > > > I meant that port, the binary called racoon there, too. >As for tutorials, google around and read through various posts. There >is lots of good info out there. Perhaps if you describe what you want >to do, people can make specific suggestions. > > ---Mike > > > Unfortunately, I haven't found a good howto. The situation is the following: This project will be some kind of SMS service. The serv will connect to the SMS server and get the received SMSes, but the connection to the SMS server is only allowed via VPN. Here are two IP addresses, one of them is the VPN peers address. I have to set up a VPN connection to this host with 3DES SHA IPsec and a DH pre-shared key. The other IP address is the SMS servers adress but that is only accessible via VPN. I've installed ipsec-tools, and tried to configure it, but I can't start racoon and I get a configuration file parse error. I couldn't found out which line is wrong. I just got this: racoon: failed to parse configuration file. Here is the racoon.conf: # $KAME: racoon.conf.in,v 1.18 2001/08/16 06:33:40 itojun Exp $ path include "@sysconfdir_x@/racoon"; #include "remote.conf"; path pre_shared_key "@sysconfdir_x@/racoon/vodafone.psk"; path certificate "@sysconfdir_x@/cert"; log debug2; # "padding" defines some padding parameters. You should not touch these. padding { maximum_length 20; # maximum padding length. randomize off; # enable randomize length. strict_check off; # enable strict check. exclusive_tail off; # extract last one octet. } # if no listen directive is specified, racoon will listen on all # available interface addresses. listen { #isakmp ::1 [7000]; #isakmp 202.249.11.124 [500]; #admin [7002]; # administrative port for racoonctl. #strict_address; # requires that all addresses must be bound. } # Specify various default timers. timer { # These value can be changed per remote node. counter 5; # maximum trying count to send. interval 20 sec; # maximum interval to resend. persend 1; # the number of packets per send. # maximum time to wait for completing each phase. phase1 30 sec; phase2 15 sec; } remote 80.244.96.229 { exchange_mode main,aggressive; doi ipsec_doi; situation identity_only; my_identifier asn1dn; certificate_type x509 "my.cert.pem" "my.key.pem"; nonce_size 16; initial_contact on; proposal_check obey; # obey, strict, or claim proposal { encryption_algorithm 3des; hash_algorithm sha1; authentication_method pre_shared_key; dh_group 2; } } sainfo 80.244.96.229 { pfs_group 2; encryption_algorithm 3des; authentication_algorithm hmac_sha1; compression_algorithm deflate; } I've just modified what I considered necessary. I haven't found anything useful with google. Please help me fixing this. Thanks in advance, Gabor Kovesdan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:29:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C848916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:29:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140625793.a7a286@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F0943D70 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:29:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140625793.a7a286@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HGTrV0033644 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:29:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140625793.a7a286@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HGTr6q033643 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:29:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140625793.a7a286@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140625793.a7a286@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:29:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:29:52 -0500 To: Erin Fortenberry , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: David Banning X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:29:59 -0000 > It looks like nothing is bound to port 8025 on 127.0.0.1 (localhost). > > You can do a sockstat and verify. root# sockstat -l | grep 8025 tofmipd python 238 5 tcp4 209.161.205.12:8025 *:* root# sockstat verifies that I have 8025 open on port 209.161.205.12 which is the IP address for all 7 domains. I don't understand why 8025 -should- be bound to 127.0.0.1 >From my persective, the fact that telnet banning.ca 8025 -looks- to 127.0.0.1 is a problem. I would expect it to go to the DNS server, find the IP address and connect. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:33:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A6916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:33:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-04-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-04-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB0543D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:33:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-41-159.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.41.159]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1HGXr2J000616 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:33:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000501c633de$a7d5f0d0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:24:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: sendmail autoresponder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:33:55 -0000 Hello, I've got a box that i took over that runs sendmail, mailscanner, and sa for antispam. There's an email address at one of the domains that the owner has indicated he would like an autoresponder hooked to it. THe objective is whenever someone sends to that address it won't be delivered to a mailbox, but dropped and the autoresponder msg will be sent back. I'm a sendmail newbie in the extreme and would appreciate any advice. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:34:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B24916A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:34:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC51B43D6B for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:34:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1HGXxaa001031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:34:00 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HGXlTG013076; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:33:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1HGXls2013075; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:33:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:33:47 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: David Banning Message-ID: <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.353, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.85, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: Erin Fortenberry , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:34:51 -0000 On 2006-02-17 11:29, David Banning wrote: > > It looks like nothing is bound to port 8025 on 127.0.0.1 (localhost). > > > > You can do a sockstat and verify. > > root# sockstat -l | grep 8025 > tofmipd python 238 5 tcp4 209.161.205.12:8025 *:* > root# > > sockstat verifies that I have 8025 open on port 209.161.205.12 which > is the IP address for all 7 domains. I don't understand why 8025 > -should- be bound to 127.0.0.1 > > >From my persective, the fact that telnet banning.ca 8025 -looks- to > 127.0.0.1 is a problem. I would expect it to go to the DNS server, > find the IP address and connect. That depends, of course, on what your nsswitch.conf or hosts.conf file has been set up for :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:37:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA70416A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626233.f2607c@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DA743D5D for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:37:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626233.f2607c@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HGbDV0036118 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:37:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626233.f2607c@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HGbD1c036117 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:37:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626233.f2607c@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140626233.f2607c@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:37:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:37:13 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217163713.GC31165@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <43F5F8AD.50109@allenmyland.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F5F8AD.50109@allenmyland.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: David Banning X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:37:16 -0000 > It works from the outside world: Well that is good news. OK, so why would my server be looking internally for the banning.ca IP address? Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:38:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E985816A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:38:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626325.16e75d@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499E043D76 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:38:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626325.16e75d@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HGckV0036660 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:38:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626325.16e75d@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HGckLj036659 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:38:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626325.16e75d@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140626325.16e75d@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:38:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:38:44 -0500 To: Giorgos Keramidas , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: David Banning X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:38:54 -0000 > That depends, of course, on what your nsswitch.conf or hosts.conf file > has been set up for :) Nothing to speak of there; root# locate nsswitch.conf /usr/compat/linux/etc/nsswitch.conf /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base/work/linux_base-rh-7.3/etc/nsswitch.conf /usr/ports/emulators/svr4_base/files/nsswitch.conf root# root# locate hosts.conf root# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:39:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF5716A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:39:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558EB43D6B for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:39:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k1HGdScq086654; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:39:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:39:28 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Robert Huff Message-ID: <20060217163928.GA52817@dan.emsphone.com> References: <5063f1f750386be6ff253bc614ac096f@prodigy.net> <200601170337.57112.alfredofnl@tiscali.it> <43F5EBE5.9000904@freebsd.org> <17397.62909.437370.108864@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17397.62909.437370.108864@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 80 pin SCSI hard drives. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:39:32 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 17), Robert Huff said: > Mark Ovens writes: > > > I also have the same drives in a different system connected to > > > normal SCSI LVD cable using small adaptors which have an 80 pin > > > receptacle on one side and a 68 pin SCSI connector plus 4 pin > > > molex power connector on the other, as well as jumpers to define > > > SCSI id. > > > > So you can confirm that using these adaptors works OK? > > I have a AHA-2940U2W whose connection to a SEAGATE SX150176LC > involves a third party adapter. Running over a year, zero observed > problems. Same here. I think we've used SCA adapters from three different vendors and never had problems. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:42:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922C716A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gablebarber@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2799743D73 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gablebarber@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n29so439293nzf for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:42:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=eRIcTE5kesuUy+X4PSw7YbLYI5wExJELn0kPJE5eYh0/lZXXQmQrbL1N/+OdcM3wIzQhsTUD82/3grQJda2PPtFDE4aTrC0fW/iSV28tNW/diZujjmBYqrTMn1KopkennMUmQ/uNn6BXS3r0inZOf6lSi1uZ6SM99a4/y27K1/0= Received: by 10.65.188.20 with SMTP id q20mr1517209qbp; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:42:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.156.10 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:41:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:41:59 -0600 From: Gable Barber To: David Banning In-Reply-To: <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:07 -0000 On 2/17/06, David Banning wrote: > > > That depends, of course, on what your nsswitch.conf or hosts.conf file > > has been set up for :) > > Nothing to speak of there; > > root# locate nsswitch.conf > /usr/compat/linux/etc/nsswitch.conf > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base/work/linux_base-rh-7.3/etc/nsswitch.conf > /usr/ports/emulators/svr4_base/files/nsswitch.conf > root# > root# locate hosts.conf > root# > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I think you want to look for /etc/hosts ..:) Gable From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:42:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E009116A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [64.2.229.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2A443D6B for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HGfwIc059593 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:41:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <43F5FCCC.5050409@tundraware.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:41:48 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <43F50074.8060205@tundraware.com> <20060217011923.GA87403@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20060217011923.GA87403@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /bin/sh Madness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:13 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Feb 16), Tim Daneliuk said: > >>Here is a shell function that behaves quite strangely: >> >>#!/bin/sh >>##### >># Execute A Command, Noting Start/Stop Time, & Logging Output >># Args: >># $1 Command Name >># $2 Log Directory >># $3 Command String To Execute >>##### >> >>runupd() >>{ >> log=$2/$1.log >> timestamp $log >> touch $2/.$1-begin && eval $3 2>&1 >> $log && touch $2/.$1-end & >>} >># End of 'runupd()' >> >>So, you might do something like: >> >> runupd freespace /var/log/ "df -k" >> >>Now, for the weirdness. This function works fine in my script >>so long as one of two conditions is met: >> >> 1) I run it interactively from the command line (bash) >> OR >> 2) I run it from 'cron' AND $3 is *not* another script >> >>If I try to run it from 'cron' and point $3 to a script, everything gets >>run as planned, however, the ending timestamp (touch $2/.$1-end) never >>runs. That is, the initial time stamp (.$1-begin) and the command itself >>are executed, and output is properly written to the logfile, >>but the final timestamp never happens. > > > Could your $3 command be returning a nonzero exit code? You probably > want something more like > > touch $2/.$1-begin && { eval $3 2>&1 >> $log ; touch $2/.$1-end } & I am looking into this. > > so your end timestamp always gets created whether or not $3 succeeds. > Also note that in your original script, you only backgrounded "touch > $2/.$1-end", which is probably not what you wanted. Hmmmm - I have invoked the script that uses this function a variety of ways and the command being evaled *is* being backgrounded in every case with the syntax shown above ... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:42:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A9916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D830343D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k1HGgSNP089708; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:42:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:42:28 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Dave Message-ID: <20060217164228.GB52817@dan.emsphone.com> References: <000501c633de$a7d5f0d0$0200a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000501c633de$a7d5f0d0$0200a8c0@satellite> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail autoresponder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:31 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 17), Dave said: > I've got a box that i took over that runs sendmail, mailscanner, > and sa for antispam. There's an email address at one of the domains > that the owner has indicated he would like an autoresponder hooked to > it. THe objective is whenever someone sends to that address it won't > be delivered to a mailbox, but dropped and the autoresponder msg will > be sent back. I'm a sendmail newbie in the extreme and would > appreciate any advice. Maybe /usr/bin/vacation will do what you want? Autoresponding isn't really the MTA's job, so if you have used some other tool with another MTA, use it here. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:42:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5829416A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregb@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B5B43D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregb@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k1HGghR4023053 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:42:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from gregb@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43F5FD03.4080500@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:42:43 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: question on NAT for multiple subnets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:56 -0000 I'm sure I could figure this out from scrutinizing Google, the FreeBSD documentation, and testing in a lab, but I'm particularly pressed for time on finding the right answer to this. For a long time we've been quite happy coalescing all private IP client requests onto a single public IP address through NAT. Management now wants more granularity, at least one unique public IP per private subnet. Can I set up a single ipfw box that examines client source ip addrs and provides different public NAT addrs for each private client subnet? Any pointers to the best way to think about this issue much appreciated. If the answer is ipfw doesn't handle this, but some other fw does, fine, I just need to know which. Thanks! -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:44:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E729216A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:44:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD78F43DCB for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:43:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1HGhYRf001665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:43:38 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HGhNRV013132; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:43:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1HGhNEb013131; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:43:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:43:22 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Dave Message-ID: <20060217164322.GC13036@flame.pc> References: <000501c633de$a7d5f0d0$0200a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000501c633de$a7d5f0d0$0200a8c0@satellite> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.354, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.84, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail autoresponder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:44:17 -0000 On 2006-02-17 11:24, Dave wrote: > Hello, > I've got a box that i took over that runs sendmail, mailscanner, and sa > for antispam. There's an email address at one of the domains that the owner > has indicated he would like an autoresponder hooked to it. THe objective is > whenever someone sends to that address it won't be delivered to a mailbox, > but dropped and the autoresponder msg will be sent back. I'm a sendmail > newbie in the extreme and would appreciate any advice. You can enable the `blacklist_recipients' feature, by adding this to your sendmail.mc file: FEATURE(`access_db', `hash -T -o /etc/mail/access') FEATURE(`blacklist_recipients') Then, adding entries like this to /etc/mail/access and rebuilding the access.db map will block email for the particular address: To:user@host.domain REJECT or even the more descriptive: To:user@host.domain ERROR:550 Mailbox disabled for this recipient If you need more help for making the `access.db' map work and updating the configuration files in `/etc/mail', feel free to ask. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:44:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070F316A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:44:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626642.135e16@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF0143D73 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:44:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626642.135e16@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HGi3V0038600 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:44:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626642.135e16@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HGi3gG038599 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:44:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140626642.135e16@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140626642.135e16@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:44:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:44:01 -0500 To: Gable Barber , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217164401.GE31165@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: David Banning X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:44:48 -0000 > I think you want to look for /etc/hosts ..:) > Gable That was my first guess, but I couldn't see anything in there; root# grep -i banning /etc/hosts root# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:45:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8C816A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:45:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEE243D67 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:45:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1HGixNe001730 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:45:00 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HGils6013159; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:44:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1HGil2K013158; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:44:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:44:47 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: David Banning Message-ID: <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.354, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.84, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:45:24 -0000 On 2006-02-17 11:38, David Banning wrote: > > That depends, of course, on what your nsswitch.conf or hosts.conf file > > has been set up for :) > > Nothing to speak of there; > > root# locate nsswitch.conf > /usr/compat/linux/etc/nsswitch.conf > /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base/work/linux_base-rh-7.3/etc/nsswitch.conf > /usr/ports/emulators/svr4_base/files/nsswitch.conf > root# > root# locate hosts.conf > root# Look under /etc for hosts.conf or nsswitch.conf: keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ ls -l /etc/hosts* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 655 Feb 15 15:00 /etc/hosts -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 1484 Feb 15 15:00 /etc/hosts.allow -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 111 Feb 15 14:45 /etc/hosts.equiv -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 99 Feb 15 14:45 /etc/hosts.lpd keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ ls -l /etc/nss* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 18 Feb 15 17:03 /etc/nsswitch.conf keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ grep hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf hosts: files dns keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ The locate database may not always be very up to date. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:48:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716DE16A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (h-66-167-151-186.mclnva23.covad.net [66.167.151.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0511C43D60 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:47:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Received: from jimcsoka ([192.168.7.46]) by mail.dominionfirstmortgage.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id k1HGnKhE025894; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:49:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com) Message-ID: <01aa01c633e4$6eda5400$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> From: "James Csoka" To: "Dave" , References: <000501c633de$a7d5f0d0$0200a8c0@satellite> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:06:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-DFMC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DFMC-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jimcsoka@dominionfirstmortgage.com Cc: Subject: Re: sendmail autoresponder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:48:01 -0000 This isn't a sendmail solution, but I use openwebmail for my company's webmail interface, and it has an autoresponder option. It'll send back an email response, and you can simply set up filtering to dump the incoming mail to the trash folder. -jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave" To: Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 11:24 AM Subject: sendmail autoresponder > Hello, > I've got a box that i took over that runs sendmail, mailscanner, and sa > for antispam. There's an email address at one of the domains that the owner > has indicated he would like an autoresponder hooked to it. THe objective is > whenever someone sends to that address it won't be delivered to a mailbox, > but dropped and the autoresponder msg will be sent back. I'm a sendmail > newbie in the extreme and would appreciate any advice. > Thanks. > Dave. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:49:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE5E16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A92143D7E for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:49:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HGnXAA059911; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:49:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1HGnWqu021454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:49:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.0.20060217113503.087c1580@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:49:29 -0500 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?_G=E1bor?= From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <43F5F91E.5020005@t-hosting.hu> References: <43F4B5D2.6020303@t-hosting.hu> <43F5F91E.5020005@t-hosting.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting up VPN+IPSec+Racoon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:49:38 -0000 At 11:26 AM 17/02/2006, K=F6vesd=E1n G=E1bor wrote: >Mike Tancsa wrote: > >>As for tutorials, google around and read through various posts. There >>is lots of good info out there. Perhaps if you describe what you want >>to do, people can make specific suggestions. >> >> ---Mike >> >> >Unfortunately, I haven't found a good howto. The situation is the= following: freebsd ipsec tutorial in google comes up with a number of starting points including http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/12/26/FreeBSD_Basics.html >This project will be some kind of SMS service.=20 >The serv will connect to the SMS server and get=20 >the received SMSes, but the connection to the=20 >SMS server is only allowed via VPN. Here are two=20 >IP addresses, one of them is the VPN peers=20 >address. I have to set up a VPN connection to=20 >this host with 3DES SHA IPsec and a DH=20 >pre-shared key. The other IP address is the SMS=20 >servers adress but that is only accessible via VPN. First, you need to show what your policy is. typical setup described is internalNet_A----externalIP_A-------internet-----externalIP_B----internalNet= _B Where internalNet_A needs to talk to internalNet_B in a safe and secure way. So, identify what those parts of the policy are. Put it in a shell script like Bsubnet=3D172.24.0.17/29 BexternalIP=3D80.244.96.229 Asubnet=3D192.168.2.186/32 AexternalIP=3D80.98.231.227 setkey -F setkey -FP /usr/sbin/setkey -c <I've installed ipsec-tools, and tried to=20 >configure it, but I can't start racoon and I get=20 >a configuration file parse error. I couldn't=20 >found out which line is wrong. I just got this: >racoon: failed to parse configuration file. IPSEC Tools is fussy about where the config=20 is. Its saying it cant find the config. Try racoon -d -f /usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf Also, make sure for your sainfo config, it must=20 match your policies, otherwise it will hit the=20 anonymous config. For your initial setup, try it=20 with an anonymous config for now and then work on=20 getting only a specific config. e.g. sainfo address 172.24.0.17/29 any address 192.168.2.186/24 any >Here is the racoon.conf: > ># $KAME: racoon.conf.in,v 1.18 2001/08/16 06:33:40 itojun Exp $ > >path include "@sysconfdir_x@/racoon"; >#include "remote.conf"; ---Mike=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:50:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA47616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:50:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9152B43D78 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:50:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 16:50:47 -0000 Received: from 66.86.62.81.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [81.62.86.66] by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 17:50:47 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F5FEE4.8010405@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:50:44 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060203) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060217105855.0218b5f0@broadpark.no> <7.0.1.0.2.20060217142314.021fe9f0@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060217142314.021fe9f0@broadpark.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How would you improve FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:50:59 -0000 Kristian Vaaf wrote: > At 13:11 17.02.2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kristian Vaaf >> >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:06 AM >> >To: questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: How would you improve FreeBSD? >> > >> > >> > >> >Hello. >> > >> >Yes, how would you improve FreeBSD? >> > >> >> I would start by making a rule that anyone asking how would you >> improve FreeBSD on the mailing list be sentenced to write: >> >> "I will not post silly questions to the mailing list that are answered on >> the website" >> >> several hundred times. See: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >I am trying to paint a gloomy picture of where FreeBSD is headed. >> > >> >Therefore I am asking all of you to share your thoughts and ideas of how >> >you would like to see FreeBSD improve. Chances are that's where our >> >operating system is headed. >> > >> >1. Would you restructure FreeBSD somehow? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >2. What features would you add? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >3. What features would you remove? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >4. What features would you simplify? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >5. What features would you further develop? >> > >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> >> >If I've left out some questions that you feel would contribute to the >> >future well being of FreeBSD, don't hesitate to comment! >> > >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ >> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >> >> Ted > > No need to be so FUCKING arrogant. Thanks Ted and Kristian, had to chuckle there :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:51:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FF616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:51:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627043.fc6535@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395B543D8E for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:50:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627043.fc6535@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HGoiV0040949 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:50:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627043.fc6535@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HGoiNn040948 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:50:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627043.fc6535@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140627043.fc6535@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:50:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:50:42 -0500 To: Giorgos Keramidas , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217165042.GA40072@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: David Banning X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:51:05 -0000 > Look under /etc for hosts.conf or nsswitch.conf: > > keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ ls -l /etc/hosts* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 655 Feb 15 15:00 /etc/hosts > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 1484 Feb 15 15:00 /etc/hosts.allow > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 111 Feb 15 14:45 /etc/hosts.equiv > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 99 Feb 15 14:45 /etc/hosts.lpd > keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ ls -l /etc/nss* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 18 Feb 15 17:03 /etc/nsswitch.conf > keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ grep hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf > hosts: files dns > keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ root# ls -l /etc/hosts* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1694 May 13 2005 /etc/hosts -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3027 Mar 27 2005 /etc/hosts.allow -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 421 Mar 27 2005 /etc/hosts.equiv -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 99 Apr 3 2003 /etc/hosts.lpd root# ls -tl /etc/nss* ls: /etc/nss*: No such file or directory root# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:54:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D1916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 480C943D6D for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 16:54:11 -0000 Received: from 66.86.62.81.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [81.62.86.66] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 17:54:11 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F5FFBA.6030007@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:54:18 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060203) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060214195709.AA60116A420@hub.freebsd.org> <20060215181510.GA18198@panix.com> <43F37995.4060809@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <43F37995.4060809@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: RELENG_6 and a Razer Copperhead mouse don't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:26 -0000 lars wrote: >> I have a Diamondback that works well under Xorg and console: >> >> ums0: Razer Razer Diamondback Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2, >> iclass 3/1 >> >> Section "InputDevice" >> Identifier "Mouse0" >> Driver "mouse" >> Option "Protocol" "auto" >> Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" >> Option "Buttons" "5" >> Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" >> EndSection >> >> I think that enabling usdb in /etc/rc.conf will kickstart moused, >> giving you console access to the mouse; and this even though moused is >> disabled by default in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > Thanks, it was the entry in /etc/rc.conf which I changed to: > > > > usbd_enable="YES" > > moused_enable="YES" > moused_type="auto" > moused_port="/dev/sysmouse" > > > > Before, it was with > moused_port="/dev/ums0" > > It's a bit jumpy, not to say erratic, and selects things by itself, > but maybe I need to twiddle with some settings in KDE. > But it works now, neat. > > Thanks a lot for the pointer, Joe. > > Regards, > lars. Unfortunately I couldn't solve the problem with the erratic auto-selecting mouse, so I exchanged it for a different laser mouse. A Microsoft mouse ironically, works flawlessly and costs 30% less. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:54:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7371716A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607C443D66 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1HGs5ZH002149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:54:08 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HGrsvL013244; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:53:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1HGrs2j013243; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:53:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:53:54 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: David Banning Message-ID: <20060217165354.GA13227@flame.pc> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> <20060217165042.GA40072@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217165042.GA40072@skytracker.ca> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.355, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.84, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:33 -0000 On 2006-02-17 11:50, David Banning wrote: >> Look under /etc for hosts.conf or nsswitch.conf: >> >> keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ ls -l /etc/hosts* >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 655 Feb 15 15:00 /etc/hosts >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 1484 Feb 15 15:00 /etc/hosts.allow >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 111 Feb 15 14:45 /etc/hosts.equiv >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 99 Feb 15 14:45 /etc/hosts.lpd >> keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ ls -l /etc/nss* >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 18 Feb 15 17:03 /etc/nsswitch.conf >> keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ grep hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf >> hosts: files dns >> keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ > > root# ls -l /etc/hosts* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1694 May 13 2005 /etc/hosts > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3027 Mar 27 2005 /etc/hosts.allow > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 421 Mar 27 2005 /etc/hosts.equiv > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 99 Apr 3 2003 /etc/hosts.lpd > root# ls -tl /etc/nss* > ls: /etc/nss*: No such file or directory > root# What version of FreeBSD is this? You may have to create hosts.conf or nsswitch.conf yourself to change the default order of lookup for host names (from "files dns" to "dns files" if that works better for your setup). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 16:54:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346C216A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [63.240.77.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D4543D77 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([68.80.195.248]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2006021716543101400ol34se>; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC4AB843; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:54:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bserver.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68844-06; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:54:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.214.102] (kbuilt.transpack.com [192.168.214.102]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CA7B842; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:54:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F5FFBE.2030703@allenmyland.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:54:22 -0500 From: Ken Stevenson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Banning References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <43F5F8AD.50109@allenmyland.com> <20060217163713.GC31165@skytracker.ca> In-Reply-To: <20060217163713.GC31165@skytracker.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at transpack.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:42 -0000 David Banning wrote: >> It works from the outside world: > > Well that is good news. OK, so why would my server be looking > internally for the banning.ca IP address? > > Any ideas? Do you have an entry in /etc/hosts for banning.ca ? -- Ken Stevenson Allen-Myland Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:00:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AE016A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:00:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627600.cba43d@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C677E43D4C for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:00:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627600.cba43d@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HH00V0044082 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:00:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627600.cba43d@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HH00Bv044081 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:00:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627600.cba43d@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140627600.cba43d@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:59:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:59:59 -0500 To: Giorgos Keramidas , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217165959.GA42330@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: David Banning X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: What about this solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:00:02 -0000 I just put 209.161.205.12 banning.ca in my /etc/hosts and it solved the problem. Can I have multiple lines, each line with the same IP number in /etc/hosts, with different virtual hosts on the right? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:02:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 2B15716A423; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20060217170201.2B15716A423@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:02:01 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:02:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 3616E16A424; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20060217170201.3616E16A424@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:02:01 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm constantly updating it. Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:02:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3765616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:02:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627743.aa71b2@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EF243D68 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:02:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627743.aa71b2@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HH2NV0044907 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:02:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627743.aa71b2@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HH2NPc044890 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:02:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627743.aa71b2@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140627743.aa71b2@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:02:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:02:22 -0500 To: Giorgos Keramidas , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217170222.GA44146@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> <20060217165042.GA40072@skytracker.ca> <20060217165354.GA13227@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217165354.GA13227@flame.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: David Banning X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:02:31 -0000 > What version of FreeBSD is this? You may have to create hosts.conf or > nsswitch.conf yourself to change the default order of lookup for host > names (from "files dns" to "dns files" if that works better for your > setup). root# uname -a FreeBSD 3s1.com 4.8-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #6: Tue May 31 23:58:57 EDT 2005 david@3s1.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/tracker i386 root# I am not sure what hosts.conf or nsswitch.conf are about. I have never needed them before. I will have to google them; root# man hosts.conf No manual entry for hosts.conf root# man nsswitch.conf No manual entry for nsswitch.conf root# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:03:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E796716A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:03:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@sf-net.com) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B4B43D55 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:03:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@sf-net.com) Received: from [195.238.136.66] (helo=[192.168.130.99]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwtQ-1FA9100iQq-0000jL; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:03:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200602171613.k1HGD8nT012891@clunix.cl.msu.edu> References: <200602171613.k1HGD8nT012891@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-2-827327241" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:03:20 +0100 To: Jerry McAllister X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:0525cf9cbe16c6d3d153baa8ed291ac7 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: daily security output usr/src should be gid = 9 = man X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:03:42 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-2-827327241 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > When you say 'label' do you mean using chown or chgrp? > I mean: chgrp wheel /usr/src > Your daily security output may just be telling you that it > changed to something from the GID of 9 that it was the last > time it checked. I don't know of any other reason it would > point that out. >> Damn your right ;-) I did a second run and everything went fine. Now I know what went wrong. Everytime I saw this message I changed the group and that was the reason why I became every day this message. Thanks for your quick response. Best regards, Stefan --Apple-Mail-2-827327241 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD9gHgUEn3BeoPvtwRAgGcAKCDLpB+ugVsbVQI6KY+V/KOewn3vwCfTWqj Mki0YSVsagiGW4+ukvm2jEA= =GrAY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-2-827327241-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:04:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6564916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:04:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627863.403f35@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B464943D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:04:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627863.403f35@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HH4NV0045619 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:04:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627863.403f35@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HH4NXr045618 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:04:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140627863.403f35@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140627863.403f35@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:04:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:04:22 -0500 To: Ken Stevenson , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217170422.GB44146@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <43F5F8AD.50109@allenmyland.com> <20060217163713.GC31165@skytracker.ca> <43F5FFBE.2030703@allenmyland.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F5FFBE.2030703@allenmyland.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: David Banning X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:04:25 -0000 > Do you have an entry in /etc/hosts for banning.ca ? I put it in, and it cured the problem. I just don't know if I can have more than one entry in /etc/hosts representing all virtual hosts, each one with the same IP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:07:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFD216A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:07:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennyboy@cableone.net) Received: from S4.cableone.net (s4.cableone.net [24.116.0.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A40943D7B for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:07:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennyboy@cableone.net) Received: from badboybox.cableone.net (unverified [69.92.7.117]) by S4.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S4) with ESMTP id 46678696 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:41:17 -0700 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:09:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Denny White To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http//wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii; X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 24, in=11, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 69.92.7.117 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Subject: apsfilter question/problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:07:20 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I read the article at Onlamp about printing for the impatient. Installed apsfilter and samba on my old hp netserver so I'd be able to print to an hp 722c deskjet printer connected to an xp box. Gimp-print was also installed. Ghostscript was already installed. I ran /usr/local/share/apsfilter/./SETUP & thought I had it whipped. That's where the fun started. Apparently I've missed something along the way, since the print job never gets sent to the xp box. I also found out at linuxprinting.org that the recommended hp 722c driver is pnm2ppa. There was only one section in the install script that mentioned that driver, 10) PPA printer, so I chose that. It plugs it into the setup, but when I try to print a test page, I get ERROR: additional filter 'pnm2ppa' not found. I found the driver at linuxprinting.org & downloaded it. How do I go about using it? Is there a way to compile it into ghostscript? I have ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_14 & the apsfilter setup script found it & didn't complain. Do I need to install another more complete version? I know if I install ghostscript-afpl, I'll also have to recompile & reinstall apsfilter with the proper make options. When I choose the more generic just plain deskjet printer driver, the script accepts it, and when I try to print a test page, there's no complaining about the driver like when I try the ppa driver. Test page is created, supposedly sent to the xp printer with even a speed, average around 950 kb/s, but I see where it only goes to stdin. I'm definitely not a programmer, but another filter, ghostscript, something, has to relay it to stdout, is that correct? So, I could use some pointers on this. If anyone interested in answering needs more info, I'll be glad to plug it in to a reply. Like smb.conf, apsfilterrc, & so forth. Thanks. Denny White GnuPG key : 0x1644E79A | http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD) iD8DBQFD9a7dy0Ty5RZE55oRAg/8AKCaidZVu40OrIvmGeLm/Zw40RDAqgCaAggH YmKpizvD6o7ihgZM8MmQKn0= =wm8n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:16:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E99D16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:16:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from asmtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (asmtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A741C43D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:16:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.229.193] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FA9DK-0008Qr-AN; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:16:14 +0000 Message-ID: <43F604DE.1010101@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:16:14 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Banning References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> <20060217165042.GA40072@skytracker.ca> In-Reply-To: <20060217165042.GA40072@skytracker.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:16:18 -0000 David Banning wrote: >>Look under /etc for hosts.conf or nsswitch.conf: >> >> keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ ls -l /etc/hosts* >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 655 Feb 15 15:00 /etc/hosts >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 1484 Feb 15 15:00 /etc/hosts.allow >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 111 Feb 15 14:45 /etc/hosts.equiv >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 99 Feb 15 14:45 /etc/hosts.lpd >> keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ ls -l /etc/nss* >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 18 Feb 15 17:03 /etc/nsswitch.conf >> keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ grep hosts /etc/nsswitch.conf >> hosts: files dns >> keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ >> >> > >root# ls -l /etc/hosts* >-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1694 May 13 2005 /etc/hosts >-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3027 Mar 27 2005 /etc/hosts.allow >-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 421 Mar 27 2005 /etc/hosts.equiv >-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 99 Apr 3 2003 /etc/hosts.lpd >root# ls -tl /etc/nss* >ls: /etc/nss*: No such file or directory >root# > > Er, I'm pretty sure it's /etc/host.conf (no "s"). But if your /etc/hosts doesn't contain the hostname you are after, that only leaves DNS, NIS and LDAP (I think) for the host.conf file to order. For DNS, what does "host whatever.your.hostname.was" show from the machine where you seem to be getting the wrong answer? --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:21:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C7616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:21:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140628917.fbd5d8@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EE243D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:21:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140628917.fbd5d8@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HHLvV0051656 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:21:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140628917.fbd5d8@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HHLv9X051655 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:21:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140628917.fbd5d8@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140628917.fbd5d8@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:21:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:21:55 -0500 To: Alex Zbyslaw , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217172155.GA49851@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> <20060217165042.GA40072@skytracker.ca> <43F604DE.1010101@dial.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F604DE.1010101@dial.pipex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: David Banning X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:21:59 -0000 > Er, I'm pretty sure it's /etc/host.conf (no "s"). > > But if your /etc/hosts doesn't contain the hostname you are after, that > only leaves DNS, NIS and LDAP (I think) for the host.conf file to > order. For DNS, what does "host whatever.your.hostname.was" show from > the machine where you seem to be getting the wrong answer? Originally there was no banning.ca entry. 127.0.0.1 points simply to localhost My actual server name is 3s1.com, which points to 209.161.205.12 (my static IP) in /etc/hosts You are right about host.conf, but it is almost empty; root# cat /etc/host.conf # $FreeBSD: src/etc/host.conf,v 1.6 1999/08/27 23:23:41 peter Exp $ # First try the /etc/hosts file hosts # Now try the nameserver next. bind # If you have YP/NIS configured, uncomment the next line # nis root# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:29:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8212816A420; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:29:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE0A43D45; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:29:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HHT6u21140; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:29:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Mark Ovens" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:29:06 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <43F5EBE5.9000904@freebsd.org> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: 80 pin SCSI hard drives. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:29:07 -0000 Mark, The problem you have with the 80-pin to 68-pin adapters is this. A lot of the el-cheapo adapters do not terminate the unconnected data lines, that is when you get instability. The better quality adapters do terminate them and don't have instability problems. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mark Ovens >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 7:30 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: 80 pin SCSI hard drives. > > >Alfredo Finelli wrote: >> I have 80 pin SCSI discs mounted in hot-swappable trays on a SCSI >> backplane which takes care also of powering them up and of SCSI >> termination. This is one way of using them. >> >> I also have the same drives in a different system connected >to normal SCSI >> LVD cable using small adaptors which have an 80 pin receptacle on one >> side and a 68 pin SCSI connector plus 4 pin molex power >connector on the >> other, as well as jumpers to define SCSI id. In this second case you >> have to provide the required termination of the SCSI bus >(e.g. using the >> right terminated SCSI cable). >> > >So you can confirm that using these adaptors works OK? When I bought my >SCSI drive (off eBay) there were more SCA drives for sale than 68-pin >but doing some research about 80->68 pin adaptors I found a lot of >people saying not to use them, including Adaptec: > >This from Adaptec's ASK knowledgebase http://tinyurl.com/b3ofa > >"Although there are adapters on the market converting 80 pin to 68 pin >they are not supported by Adaptec or the hard drive >manufacturers. These >convertors can cause loss of signal integrity that may result in >connectivity issues and data loss." > >This put me off getting a SCA drive. Now I'm looking for a >another drive >and SCA ones seem to be cheaper on eBay. > >Regards, > >Mark >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/263 - Release >Date: 2/16/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:29:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03CD16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:29:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD1E43D5F for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:29:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HHT9u21149; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:29:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "James Csoka" , "Dave" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:29:09 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <01aa01c633e4$6eda5400$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: sendmail autoresponder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:29:15 -0000 You do NOT want to setup an autoresponder like vacation! The FEATURE method that Giorgos explained is the correct way to do it. If your not using sendmail and your MTA cannot issue an error in this fashion, you do not want to mess around with this. What happens with autoresponders is that spammers inadvertantly trigger them. As a result the autoresponses get sent to thousands of victims who had their names forged to the spammers message. Some of those victim addresses are spamtrap addesses. With the result that if you setup an autoresponder and a spammer hits it, your site will get blacklisted. The Sendmail method does not have this problem because the error message is returned during the transmission phase, to the sending mailserver, it is not e-mailed to the envelope address. An autoresponder that only sends autoresponses to a defined list of senders is OK. But one that sends to anyone is a Bad Thing! Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of James Csoka >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 9:06 AM >To: Dave; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: sendmail autoresponder > > >This isn't a sendmail solution, but I use openwebmail for my company's >webmail interface, and it has an autoresponder option. It'll >send back an >email response, and you can simply set up filtering to dump the incoming >mail to the trash folder. > >-jim > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Dave" >To: >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 11:24 AM >Subject: sendmail autoresponder > > >> Hello, >> I've got a box that i took over that runs sendmail, >mailscanner, and >sa >> for antispam. There's an email address at one of the domains that the >owner >> has indicated he would like an autoresponder hooked to it. >THe objective >is >> whenever someone sends to that address it won't be delivered >to a mailbox, >> but dropped and the autoresponder msg will be sent back. I'm >a sendmail >> newbie in the extreme and would appreciate any advice. >> Thanks. >> Dave. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/263 - Release >Date: 2/16/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:29:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCB616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:29:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29A143D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:29:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HHT9u21146; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:29:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Greg Barniskis" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:29:09 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <43F5FD03.4080500@scls.lib.wi.us> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: question on NAT for multiple subnets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:29:17 -0000 I've never done it but I think you can run multiple nat instances and multiple divert sockets, you will have to specify them in the config file to natd, though. If it were me, though, I would try to setup multiple FreeBSD boxes, not only does that give you some redundancy, but it makes troubleshooting a lot easier. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Greg Barniskis >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 8:43 AM >To: freebsd-questions >Subject: question on NAT for multiple subnets > > >I'm sure I could figure this out from scrutinizing Google, the >FreeBSD documentation, and testing in a lab, but I'm particularly >pressed for time on finding the right answer to this. > >For a long time we've been quite happy coalescing all private IP >client requests onto a single public IP address through NAT. >Management now wants more granularity, at least one unique public IP >per private subnet. > >Can I set up a single ipfw box that examines client source ip addrs >and provides different public NAT addrs for each private client subnet? > >Any pointers to the best way to think about this issue much >appreciated. If the answer is ipfw doesn't handle this, but some >other fw does, fine, I just need to know which. Thanks! > > >-- >Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator >South Central Library System (SCLS) >Library Interchange Network (LINK) >, (608) 266-6348 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/263 - Release >Date: 2/16/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:38:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E91116A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:38:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C05843D69 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:38:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from a1poweruser.com ([69.172.31.117]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060217173817.IVBT22902.mta9.adelphia.net@a1poweruser.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:38:17 -0500 Received: from barbish (lanwinme [10.0.10.6]) by a1poweruser.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1HHc3A9014408; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:38:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) From: "Bob" To: "Kyryll A Mirnenko aka Mirya" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:38:01 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200602162052.45028.mirya@matrix.ua> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: midnight commander and ssh sftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:38:44 -0000 > Is there some way to be able to use midnight commander through a SSH > tunnel? 1) Use scp/sftp: it's called "Shell link..." is mc menu (the problem is Password: prompt is displayed somewhere on the mc command line as it seems to be unable to parse it for some reason. So when see it, simply enter the password there & refresh the mc panels w/ C-O,C-O) 2) More general solution: if u run 6.0 use sysutils/fusefs-sshfs (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/f usefs-sshfs/), it provides an scp/sftp link within filesystem layer, so you can use it not only from mc but from any app. The problem it seems to be much slower than plain scp (though uses the same transport), dunno why -- Regards, Mirya ICQ #313898202 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kyryll A Mirnenko aka Mirya Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 1:53 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Subject: Re: midnight commander and ssh sftp Mirya; After spending some time playing around with MC, I finally figured out the meaning of your post. When you said MC menu I took that to mean the F2 (ie: function 2 key) which is displayed at the bottom of the MC panel. What you really meant was the F9 pull down function from the bottom of the MC panel which activates the menu "Left file command options right" at the top of the MC panel. The left & right pull down menu option do have the FTP link & SH link option you talked about. Selecting the SH link opens a window where I entered /#sh:[user@remote Host] then clicking on OK button lanched an SSH login. Also entering cd /#sh:[user@remote Host] on the MC command line does the same thing. MC returns to it's 2 up panel and the MC command lines at the bottom of the panel asks for the SSH pass phrase. After entering the pass phrase I do get the remote hosts directory tree displayed with a heading of the /#sh: command used to launched it. This all behaves the same way as native FTP using MC. But after entering the pass phrase the MC command line does not clear at all and ends up containing some left over SSH message. Holding down the CTL key while pressing the keyboard letter C and O at the same time 2 times in a role does clear the MC command line like you said. When completed doing SSH sftp through MC I termate the MC SSH session with the remote host by hitting F10 key. For testing, I changes my firewall rules on port 22 to log all packets to verify that MC was really initating a SSH session with the host. The host log records did verify that MC did indeed initate a SSH session with the host. This is exastily what I wanted to do. Now I have an Freebsd command line launched GUI for sftp SSHing into the remote host system. Thanks for the pointer that got me started looking in the correct direction. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 17:41:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF12616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:41:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B567E43D69 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:41:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HHfRu21440; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:41:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Kristian Vaaf" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:41:27 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060217142314.021fe9f0@broadpark.no> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: How would you improve FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:41:34 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Kristian Vaaf [mailto:vaaf@broadpark.no] >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 5:24 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: How would you improve FreeBSD? > > > >No need to be so FUCKING arrogant. > Hey, I was not trying to be arrogant, I was trying to be a smartass. Please keep in mind that your posting to a mailing list that is pretty well populated by FreeBSD proponents and when you say things like: "I am trying to paint a gloomy picture of where FreeBSD is headed." your asking for trouble. If you had said you were trying to paint a bright hopeful future for FreeBSD I would have been a lot gentler. But the language your using is pretty unambigious, in my opinion, you are basically saying point blank your here to cause trouble, well you got trouble, so why are you complaining? People don't come here to read gloom about FreeBSD, they can go to the Linux groups for as much of that as they want. I'm not exactly sure how painting a gloomy picture of anything is supposed to help matters. When I paint gloomy pictures of the GPL and of Linux's lack of support for SATA I am certainly not out to -help- them! :-) Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:05:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4395316A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:05:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEEB43D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:05:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1HI54Mf005466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:05:05 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HI4rA1013782; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:04:53 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1HI4pMV013781; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:04:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:04:51 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Alex Zbyslaw , David Banning Message-ID: <20060217180451.GA13775@flame.pc> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> <20060217165042.GA40072@skytracker.ca> <43F604DE.1010101@dial.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F604DE.1010101@dial.pipex.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.355, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.84, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:05:23 -0000 On 2006-02-17 17:16, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: >David Banning wrote: >>>Look under /etc for hosts.conf or nsswitch.conf: >>> >>> [...] >> >> root# ls -l /etc/hosts* >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1694 May 13 2005 /etc/hosts >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3027 Mar 27 2005 /etc/hosts.allow >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 421 Mar 27 2005 /etc/hosts.equiv >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 99 Apr 3 2003 /etc/hosts.lpd >> root# ls -tl /etc/nss* >> ls: /etc/nss*: No such file or directory >> root# > > Er, I'm pretty sure it's /etc/host.conf (no "s"). You're absolutely right, of course. Sorry for the confusion :-) > But if your /etc/hosts doesn't contain the hostname you are after, > that only leaves DNS, NIS and LDAP (I think) for the host.conf file to > order. For DNS, what does "host whatever.your.hostname.was" show from > the machine where you seem to be getting the wrong answer? Good question :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:09:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F364E16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:09:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAB943D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:09:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1HI9JMa005650 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:09:20 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HI97m3013797; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:09:07 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1HI97LC013796; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:09:07 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:09:07 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: David Banning Message-ID: <20060217180907.GB13775@flame.pc> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> <20060217165959.GA42330@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217165959.GA42330@skytracker.ca> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.356, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.84, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about this solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:09:36 -0000 On 2006-02-17 11:59, David Banning wrote: > I just put > > 209.161.205.12 banning.ca > > in my /etc/hosts and it solved the problem. > > Can I have multiple lines, each line with the same IP number in > /etc/hosts, with different virtual hosts on the right? I think it's ok to have multiple lines, but I'm not sure. If that solves your immediate problem, then that's ok :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:09:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632DF16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:09:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D6A43D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:09:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B7562C900; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:09:56 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87547-07; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:09:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F1262C883; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:09:55 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4D333399B5; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:09:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19388394D1; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:09:55 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:09:54 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: lars In-Reply-To: <43F5F149.1040001@gmx.at> Message-ID: <20060217140638.B60635@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> <20060216194336.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F5F149.1040001@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:09:57 -0000 On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, lars wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, lars wrote: >> >>> If your machine only runs an NFS daemon and is behind a firewall, >>> ok, you don't need to patch it asap when an NFS SA and patch is issued, if >>> all clients connecting to the machine are benign. >> >> Actually, there are alot of situations where this sort of thing is possible >> ... hell, I could probably get away with running a FreeBSD 3.3 server since >> day one, that has all ports closed except for sshd, imap/pop3/smtp, and be >> 100% secury ... sshd can be easily upgraded without a reboot, with the same >> applying to imap/pop3/smtp if I use a port instead of what comes with the >> OS itself ... >> >> You can say you are losing out on 'stability fixes', else the server itself >> wouldn't stay up that long ... so about the only thing you lose would be >> performance related improvements and/or stuff like memory leakage ... >> >> And I could do this all *without* any firewalls protecting it ... > Even if you managed to maintain an old version of a particular OS's > uptime for so long, what did you prove? Wasn't arguing that I "proved" anything, only that a long uptime could be achieved *without* any security implications :) > IMHO 'uptime' as a 'feature' is overrated, not to say obsolete. Agreed 100% ... Availability is the useful metric, not how long a stretch of time the OS can remain running ... not necessarily worded the best way, but our uptime policy (http://www.hub.org/uptime_policy.php) was such that we tried to upgrade our servers once every 30 days or so ... not always possible, and lately less so, but it was our aim ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:11:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35E916A423 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:11:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678F943D76 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:10:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1HIAfTL005695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:10:44 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HIAUbd013812; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:10:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1HIAUS3013811; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:10:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:10:30 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: David Banning , Alex Zbyslaw Message-ID: <20060217181030.GC13775@flame.pc> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> <20060217165042.GA40072@skytracker.ca> <43F604DE.1010101@dial.pipex.com> <20060217172155.GA49851@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217172155.GA49851@skytracker.ca> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.356, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.84, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:11:15 -0000 On 2006-02-17 12:21, David Banning wrote: > > Er, I'm pretty sure it's /etc/host.conf (no "s"). > > > > But if your /etc/hosts doesn't contain the hostname you are after, that > > only leaves DNS, NIS and LDAP (I think) for the host.conf file to > > order. For DNS, what does "host whatever.your.hostname.was" show from > > the machine where you seem to be getting the wrong answer? > > Originally there was no banning.ca entry. > 127.0.0.1 points simply to localhost > > My actual server name is 3s1.com, which points to 209.161.205.12 > (my static IP) in /etc/hosts > > You are right about host.conf, but it is almost empty; That's a perfectly normal host.conf file though :) > root# cat /etc/host.conf > # $FreeBSD: src/etc/host.conf,v 1.6 1999/08/27 23:23:41 peter Exp $ > # First try the /etc/hosts file > hosts > # Now try the nameserver next. > bind > # If you have YP/NIS configured, uncomment the next line > # nis > root# So if you add something to /etc/hosts it will override DNS :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:12:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B2A16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:12:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6FB43D5D for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:12:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1HIBkeL005730 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:11:47 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HIBZQc013837; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:11:35 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1HIBZNx013836; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:11:35 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:11:35 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: David Banning Message-ID: <20060217181135.GD13775@flame.pc> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <43F5F8AD.50109@allenmyland.com> <20060217163713.GC31165@skytracker.ca> <43F5FFBE.2030703@allenmyland.com> <20060217170422.GB44146@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217170422.GB44146@skytracker.ca> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.356, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.84, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: Ken Stevenson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:12:19 -0000 On 2006-02-17 12:04, David Banning wrote: > > Do you have an entry in /etc/hosts for banning.ca ? > > I put it in, and it cured the problem. I just don't know if I can have > more than one entry in /etc/hosts representing all virtual hosts, > each one with the same IP. You don't have to add multiple lines for this. Adding more than one name in the same IP address line should work too: 1.2.3.4 hostname1 hostname2 hostname3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:13:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B743C16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:13:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregb@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC0443D6A for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:13:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregb@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k1HIDiR4027077; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:13:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from gregb@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43F61258.6000604@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:13:44 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: question on NAT for multiple subnets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:13:46 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > I've never done it but I think you can run multiple nat instances > and multiple divert sockets, you will have to specify them in the > config file to natd, though. Excellent. That's what I was hoping for. So instead of one "divert natd" rule in ipfw, I simply need "divert N", "divert N+1", "divert N+2", etc. where N is a port number where I bound my first natd, N+1 the next natd instance, etc. I think I can manage that. > If it were me, though, I would try to > setup multiple FreeBSD boxes, not only does that give you some > redundancy, but it makes troubleshooting a lot easier. Thanks, but we're talking about a need for somewhere between 54 and 216 distinct NAT<->subnet instances, maybe more. I really need a solution for one host, two NICs, that compares favorably to providing this functionality with a PIX. > Ted > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Greg Barniskis >> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 8:43 AM >> To: freebsd-questions >> Subject: question on NAT for multiple subnets >> >> >> I'm sure I could figure this out from scrutinizing Google, the >> FreeBSD documentation, and testing in a lab, but I'm particularly >> pressed for time on finding the right answer to this. >> >> For a long time we've been quite happy coalescing all private IP >> client requests onto a single public IP address through NAT. >> Management now wants more granularity, at least one unique public IP >> per private subnet. >> >> Can I set up a single ipfw box that examines client source ip addrs >> and provides different public NAT addrs for each private client subnet? >> >> Any pointers to the best way to think about this issue much >> appreciated. If the answer is ipfw doesn't handle this, but some >> other fw does, fine, I just need to know which. Thanks! >> >> >> -- >> Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator >> South Central Library System (SCLS) >> Library Interchange Network (LINK) >> , (608) 266-6348 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/263 - Release >> Date: 2/16/2006 >> > > -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:14:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B709616A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:14:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D622643D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:14:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1HIE3gj005809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:14:05 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HIDqfk013849; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:13:52 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1HIDoRk013848; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:13:50 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:13:50 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20060217181350.GE13775@flame.pc> References: <01aa01c633e4$6eda5400$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.357, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.84, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Cc: Dave , James Csoka , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail autoresponder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:14:23 -0000 On 2006-02-17 09:29, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > You do NOT want to setup an autoresponder like vacation! The > FEATURE method that Giorgos explained is the correct way to do it. > If your not using sendmail and your MTA cannot issue an error in > this fashion, you do not want to mess around with this. > > What happens with autoresponders is that spammers inadvertantly > trigger them. As a result the autoresponses get sent to thousands of > victims who had their names forged to the spammers message. Some > of those victim addresses are spamtrap addesses. Oh, crap! I hadn't thought of that. Good thinking there Ted :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:19:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913B216A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:19:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939B843D53 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:19:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A1B998428 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:19:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 33035-05-2 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:19:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-5062e7e3.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.231.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B75C9983E9 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:19:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F613B3.1080105@t-hosting.hu> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:19:31 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Subject: Set up routing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:19:44 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to set up an additional routing for a host via a VPN tunnel with IPsec. The tunnel is working now, I see tcp packages going out with tcpdump, but IMCP host unreachable packages coming in from the VPN peer. What I did: route add A.B.C.D W.X.Y.Z Where A.B.C.D is the target machine and W.X.Y.Z is the VPN peer. Now when I type netstat -rn, I see in these first two entries: server# netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default P.Q.R.S UGS 3 5369402848 sk0 A.B.C.D W.X.Y.Z UGHS 0 667 gre0 It seems good to me, but it doesn't work. Am I doung something wrong? I can reach the VPN peer with traceroute, but not the A.B.C.D machine. Thanks in advance, Gabor Kovesdan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:35:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC8116A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:35:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DE843D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:35:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6970399842A; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:35:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 33035-06; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:34:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-5062e7e3.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.231.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8C99983CD; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:34:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F6174E.5030400@t-hosting.hu> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:34:54 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa References: <43F4B5D2.6020303@t-hosting.hu> <43F5F91E.5020005@t-hosting.hu> <6.2.3.4.0.20060217113503.087c1580@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.0.20060217113503.087c1580@64.7.153.2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting up VPN+IPSec+Racoon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:35:02 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 11:26 AM 17/02/2006, Kvesdn Gbor wrote: > >> Mike Tancsa wrote: >> >>> As for tutorials, google around and read through various posts. There >>> is lots of good info out there. Perhaps if you describe what you want >>> to do, people can make specific suggestions. >>> >>> ---Mike >>> >>> >> Unfortunately, I haven't found a good howto. The situation is the >> following: > > > > freebsd ipsec tutorial > > in google comes up with a number of starting points including > > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/12/26/FreeBSD_Basics.html > > > > >> This project will be some kind of SMS service. The serv will connect >> to the SMS server and get the received SMSes, but the connection to >> the SMS server is only allowed via VPN. Here are two IP addresses, >> one of them is the VPN peers address. I have to set up a VPN >> connection to this host with 3DES SHA IPsec and a DH pre-shared key. >> The other IP address is the SMS servers adress but that is only >> accessible via VPN. > > > > First, you need to show what your policy is. > > typical setup described is > > internalNet_A----externalIP_A-------internet-----externalIP_B----internalNet_B > > > Where internalNet_A needs to talk to internalNet_B in a safe and > secure way. > > > So, identify what those parts of the policy are. > > Put it in a shell script like > > Bsubnet=172.24.0.17/29 > BexternalIP=80.244.96.229 > Asubnet=192.168.2.186/32 > AexternalIP=80.98.231.227 > setkey -F > setkey -FP > > /usr/sbin/setkey -c < spdadd $Asubnet $Bsubnet any -P out ipsec > esp/tunnel/$AexternalIP-$Bsubnet/unique; > spdadd $Bsubnet $Asubnet any -P in ipsec > esp/tunnel/$Bsubnet-$AexternalIP/unique; > EOF1 > > This sets up the policy. > > Type > setkey -DP > > It will show you the installed policies. Once you try and send some > traffic across with PhaseI and PhaseII negotiated, you will see the > associations with > setkey -D > > > > >> I've installed ipsec-tools, and tried to configure it, but I can't >> start racoon and I get a configuration file parse error. I couldn't >> found out which line is wrong. I just got this: >> racoon: failed to parse configuration file. > > > IPSEC Tools is fussy about where the config is. Its saying it cant > find the config. > Try racoon -d -f /usr/local/etc/racoon/racoon.conf > > > Also, make sure for your sainfo config, it must match your policies, > otherwise it will hit the anonymous config. For your initial setup, > try it with an anonymous config for now and then work on getting only > a specific config. > e.g. > sainfo address 172.24.0.17/29 any address 192.168.2.186/24 any > Thanks, it seems to be okay now, racoon is running, and I see tcp packages going out via the VPN, but icmp host unreachable packets are coming from the VPN peer. I think there's some problem with the routing here, I started a new thread about this. Thanks in advance, Gabor Kovesdan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:35:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7059A16A424 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:35:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from relay1.av-mx.com (relay1.av-mx.com [137.118.16.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE89D43D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:35:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) X-Virus-Scan-Time: 0 Received: from [137.118.16.61] (HELO mx0.av-mx.com) by relay1.av-mx.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 174440652 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:35:04 -0500 Received: (qmail 18650 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 18:35:04 -0000 Received: from dsl13176.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@66.243.212.176) by 0 with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 18:35:04 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 66.243.212.176 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl13176.ywave.com Message-ID: <43F61756.4060005@ywave.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:35:02 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scott@sremick.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VNC forwarding over sshd issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:35:06 -0000 Scott I. Remick wrote: > I'm having a weird problem that surfaces sometimes and I am having trouble > pinning down the cause. > > What I do is use VNC to remote-control my home FreeBSD box remotely. Most > of the time, this works fine. My home router forwards the external port to > my FreeBSD (6.0R) box. I use PuTTY as a Windows ssh client, and have a > saved session that does the VNC port-forwarding (local port 7000 forwards > over ssh to remote port 5900). I run Gnome (2.12.2) and vino as my VNC > server and connect to my home desktop. Sshd is OpenSSH 2.6.1, PuTTY 0.53b, > TightVNC 1.2.9 > > But every now and then (like right now), the VNC side of things fails. I > can still connect via SSH just fine. The PuTTY logs show the port is > successfully being forwarded with no error: > > 2006-02-17 09:38:58 Local port 7000 forwarding to localhost:5900 > > But when I try to launch a VNC client on the remote PC (in this case, > TightVNC) I get a "Connection closed" error. The PuTTY logs show: > > 2006-02-17 09:52:42 Opening forwarded connection to localhost:5900 > 2006-02-17 09:52:42 Forwarded port closed > > On the FreeBSD box, no log files seem to get changed after the attempt. In > particular, I check messages and auth.log but doing a listing sorted by > time, I see nothing logged. > > What I DO know is if I went home and restarted the FreeBSD box, it'd work. > I've tried -HUP on both sshd and vino-server to no avail. > > I cannot find any docs for vino-server to determine additional params I > could pass it for more-detailed logging. Enabling additional debugging info > on sshd with the -d option seems to not be an option remotely since it > prevents it from going into daemon mode and it'll only handle one > connection, and I can't make the problem surface on-request in order to > test it while at home. > > The problem is particularly annoying because I can't MAKE it happen. It > just sometimes does, with no settings changes, and will work again after > rebooting the FreeBSD system, again with no settings changes. SSH never > stops working... it's always the VNC-port-forwarding side of things. > > Any suggestions? Somewhere else to look for info? Some way to get more > debug info from sshd or vino-server? Thanks > I'm assuming you try to connect several times and it fails each time. I use TightVNC to connect to KDE's desktop sharing and it gives the same error sometimes (not through SSH though). If I keep trying it will eventually get through. Some basic troubleshooting ideas: Eliminate SSH port forwarding as a suspect by connecting directly to the VNC port from your LAN the next time the error comes up. Eliminate TightVNC as a suspect by trying another VNC client, such as RealVNC. Eliminate Vino as a suspect trying another VNC server. A -HUP wont necessarily do anything to a daemon that is responding oddly. You can try restarting sshd completely by doing /etc/rc.d/sshd restart. This can be done remotely, just don't close your existing connection until you know the daemon came back up. Close your connection and reconnect. You can probably do the same to vino by killing it and then bringing it back up (not familiar with vino). Once you know where the problem originates maybe you can figure out how to fix it, or at least how to work around it. HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:36:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E727E16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7625B43D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 73489 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 18:36:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=aAGeL4p3NceWmQAVjEVl/SD0E1tr1MQmGXSjWzcUh+5KjppMrgE5K7JHrgB8YZy2uKPSHadl0xXjQ2HIKFunkCj7RfntzJcjKLEwKhwTA2CyqyhOtjcx9rl4f8PflkyjY48oOZFHRDi84zIRmPKt9Rlypdi/YG4+XOz8AkJmn4U= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mj001@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 18:36:27 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: Denny White In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:36:26 -0500 Message-Id: <1140201386.5709.23.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: apsfilter question/problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:36:30 -0000 On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 11:09 +0000, Denny White wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > I read the article at Onlamp about printing for the impatient. > Installed apsfilter and samba on my old hp netserver so I'd > be able to print to an hp 722c deskjet printer connected to > an xp box. Gimp-print was also installed. Ghostscript was > already installed. I ran /usr/local/share/apsfilter/./SETUP > & thought I had it whipped. That's where the fun started. > Apparently I've missed something along the way, since the > print job never gets sent to the xp box. I also found out > at linuxprinting.org that the recommended hp 722c driver > is pnm2ppa. There was only one section in the install script > that mentioned that driver, 10) PPA printer, so I chose that. > It plugs it into the setup, but when I try to print a test > page, I get ERROR: additional filter 'pnm2ppa' not found. > I found the driver at linuxprinting.org & downloaded it. > How do I go about using it? Is there a way to compile it > into ghostscript? I have ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_14 & > the apsfilter setup script found it & didn't complain. > Do I need to install another more complete version? I know > if I install ghostscript-afpl, I'll also have to recompile > & reinstall apsfilter with the proper make options. When > I choose the more generic just plain deskjet printer driver, > the script accepts it, and when I try to print a test page, > there's no complaining about the driver like when I try the > ppa driver. Test page is created, supposedly sent to the > xp printer with even a speed, average around 950 kb/s, but > I see where it only goes to stdin. I'm definitely not a > programmer, but another filter, ghostscript, something, has > to relay it to stdout, is that correct? > So, I could use some pointers on this. If anyone interested > in answering needs more info, I'll be glad to plug it in to > a reply. Like smb.conf, apsfilterrc, & so forth. Thanks. > Denny White > > GnuPG key : 0x1644E79A | http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net > Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD) > > iD8DBQFD9a7dy0Ty5RZE55oRAg/8AKCaidZVu40OrIvmGeLm/Zw40RDAqgCaAggH > YmKpizvD6o7ihgZM8MmQKn0= > =wm8n > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" This combination worked fine for me. ------------------------------------------------------------- # Printcap file: Added 2005-04-25 based on pnm2ppa suggestions. lp|ascii|unix:\ :lp=/dev/lpt0:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd:\ :if=/home/mike/bin/pnm2ppa-filter:\ :mx#0:\ :sh: ------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh # printcap-filter TMP=/tmp/pnm2ppa.tmp cat >$TMP ch1=`head -1 $TMP | cut -c 1` if [ "$ch1" = '%' ] then cat $TMP | /usr/local/bin/gs -sDEVICE=ppmraw -q -dNOPAUSE -r600 \ -sOutputFile=- - | \ /usr/local/bin/pnm2ppa -i - -o - else cat $TMP | /usr/local/bin/enscript -B -q -p - | \ /usr/local/bin/gs -sDEVICE=ppmraw -q -dNOPAUSE -r600 \ -sOutputFile=- - | \ /usr/local/bin/pnm2ppa -i - -o - fi rm $TMP -- Mike Jeays http://ca.geocities.com/mike.jeays@rogers.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 18:52:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8577E16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:52:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C825F43D58 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:52:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 18:52:40 -0000 Received: from 66.86.62.81.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [81.62.86.66] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 19:52:40 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43F61B7F.2080207@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:52:47 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060203) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> <20060216194336.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F5F149.1040001@gmx.at> <20060217140638.B60635@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060217140638.B60635@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:52:41 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> You can say you are losing out on 'stability fixes', else the server >>> itself wouldn't stay up that long ... so about the only thing you >>> lose would be performance related improvements and/or stuff like >>> memory leakage ... >>> >>> And I could do this all *without* any firewalls protecting it ... > >> Even if you managed to maintain an old version of a particular OS's >> uptime for so long, what did you prove? > > Wasn't arguing that I "proved" anything, only that a long uptime could > be achieved *without* any security implications :) Point taken :-) >> IMHO 'uptime' as a 'feature' is overrated, not to say obsolete. > > Agreed 100% ... Availability is the useful metric, not how long a > stretch of time the OS can remain running ... not necessarily worded the > best way, but our uptime policy (http://www.hub.org/uptime_policy.php) > was such that we tried to upgrade our servers once every 30 days or so > ... not always possible, and lately less so, but it was our aim ... Actually it sounds quite reasonable. I used to work for a major IT corporation and their SLA didn't amount to much more than that in that particular class of service (i.e. not highly available and/or clustered machines). But they needed a lot more words, to spread the wealth to the legal departments of all parties involved. I'm not entirely against such efforts of long uptimes. I strongly believe in efforts to back up rumor with fact, as in the rumor 'FreeBSD is rock-solid'. Actually I believe it is, but I can't prove it beyond talking of my own experience with it. IMHO a lot of so-called fact is actually hear-say or anecdotal, either because the people spreading these 'facts' don't bother to update their info, the info is purely from each sysadmins personal experience and/or because there's a lack of info that is standardised and repeatable. So this web-site's effort, although similar to the Netcraft uptime stats, is quite alright since it's a first step towards getting some numbers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 19:03:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8E916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DDD43D4C for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D311C62C8C3; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:03:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04145-10; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:03:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C5362C85E; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:03:41 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 993463C5DA; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:03:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9496639A74; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:03:41 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:03:40 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: lars In-Reply-To: <43F61B7F.2080207@gmx.at> Message-ID: <20060217150132.G60635@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060216005036.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <20060216053725.GB15586@parts-unknown.org> <20060216085304.GA52806@storage.mine.nu> <43F4CAA3.1020501@schultznet.ca> <43F4F43D.2090304@gmx.at> <20060216194336.L60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F5F149.1040001@gmx.at> <20060217140638.B60635@ganymede.hub.org> <43F61B7F.2080207@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Total OT] Trying to improve some numbers ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:03:43 -0000 On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, lars wrote: > > I'm not entirely against such efforts of long uptimes. > I strongly believe in efforts to back up rumor with fact, as in > the rumor 'FreeBSD is rock-solid'. > Actually I believe it is, but I can't prove it beyond talking > of my own experience with it. > > IMHO a lot of so-called fact is actually hear-say or anecdotal, > either because the people spreading these 'facts' don't bother to > update their info, the info is purely from each sysadmins personal > experience and/or because there's a lack of info that is standardised > and repeatable. > > So this web-site's effort, although similar to the Netcraft uptime stats, is > quite alright since it's a first step towards getting some numbers. > towards this goal, I'd almost like to see something that the Linux folks did brought over to FreeBSD ... the ability to span uptime across reboots ... not crashes, but if its a 'schedualed reboot', and clean, then the uptime could be extended through that reboot ... maybe even have some sort of 'timer' ... if the reboot takes X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA5B16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:08:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365CD43D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:08:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y25so327264nfb for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:08:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=HY9LJ5SOK+lEGQpX8bShhserAV7e4gnOFyETqj04L6nIg0XA/1v/LeAOaXVGa1U7QvL8dGu3mSCXJnYFuVmGKpTnG7C+9EENTxGQjKsuBDOCob1/YBPFcx0jNs/vRNpcom1mZ0rsKKf1KJsmFcUqkdbijP/l2etwXZOHAiaaxgk= Received: by 10.49.80.12 with SMTP id h12mr524043nfl; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:08:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.211.7 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:08:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:08:42 -0500 From: "Xn Nooby" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: small freebsd laptop suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:08:48 -0000 I would like to get a small laptop dedicated to (desktop) FreeBSD 6.x, ideally one that could run Win2000 inside QEMU and has an nVidia chip so I can do OpenGL stuff. Any suggestions? It doesnt have to be superfast, though I would prolly want to drop a 100GB 2.5" drive in it later. 2 years ago I foolishly bought a HP Pavillion, and I have to use an externa= l keyboard with it for FreebSD (or else it wont boot). The HP laptop is now = a dedicated Windows machine (and I'd return it if I could). Is anyone using a laptop that they are happy with? Maybe a refurbished Thinkpad? (though I prefer to buy lapotops new, in case they are duds). I dont particularly trust the online lists of "laptops that work with FreeBSD", since my other laptop is on one of them. I plan to carry the laptop around a lot, so I'm looking for something a little smaller than average. My HP Pavillion is about 7lbs, which is too big. Maybe a small Thinkpad, if they still make them? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 19:22:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591BA16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:22:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852A043D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:22:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([82.41.229.193]) by smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:23:43 +0000 Message-ID: <43F6227D.90302@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:22:37 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Banning References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> <20060217165959.GA42330@skytracker.ca> <20060217180907.GB13775@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20060217180907.GB13775@flame.pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Feb 2006 19:23:43.0796 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA8D3F40:01C633F7] Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about this solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:22:41 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2006-02-17 11:59, David Banning wrote: > > >>I just put >> >>209.161.205.12 banning.ca >> >>in my /etc/hosts and it solved the problem. >> >>Can I have multiple lines, each line with the same IP number in >>/etc/hosts, with different virtual hosts on the right? >> >> > >I think it's ok to have multiple lines, but I'm not sure. > > I think it works, but I don't think it's what the man page says and personally I wouldn't rely on it. I don't know if there is any line length limit, which matters if you have 50 or 60 host names on the line. Again the man page doesn't *say* there is a limit, but without checking source code I wouldn't bet on anything. My longest line is 247 chars without issues I have seen. From man 5 hosts > For each host a single line should be present with the following > informa- > tion: > > Internet address > official host name > aliases It's not clear to me what that means. If it means "for each official host name", then IP lines should be duplicatable. If it means "For each IP address" then multiple lines should not be used. FWIW, a Linux distro says: > This file > is a simple text file that associates IP addresses with > hostnames, one > line per IP address but actually seems to work fine with multiple lines with the same IP address. Go figure. >If that solves your immediate problem, then that's ok :) > > I didn't follow the thread that closely, but I understood that the wrong IP (127.0.0.1) was apparently being returned for a host name that should have had proper IP. Personally, I would want to find and fix that problem rather than hacking round it, otherwise it may come and bite you in the bum at some later date. Just my $0.02. --Alex PS At one point I thought you tried and failed to find a man page for nsswitch.conf. You might want to try again and check your typing as I can find one just fine of FreeBSD 5.4. host.conf probably doesn't have one any more because it is superceded by nsswitch.conf. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 19:34:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD03816A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:34:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk (asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C99E43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:34:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.229.193] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FABNH-00079e-GP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:34:39 +0000 Message-ID: <43F6254F.8090706@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:34:39 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xn Nooby References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small freebsd laptop suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:34:41 -0000 Xn Nooby wrote: > I >dont particularly trust the online lists of "laptops that work with >FreeBSD", since my other laptop is on one of them. > > > No specific laptop advice but I would have thought of that laptop list as a starting point. I wouldn't trust any single occurrence of "this laptop works" without verifying it with a google for "laptop model freebsd". (There are exceptions; I'd trust a review from some I "knew" - hi Giorgos :-)). The trouble is that laptop models fast outpace the laptop list. I'd find one that had all the features I wanted, appeared to work with FreeBSD, and find that it wasn't made any more. Or I'd find one that seemed to have all I wanted and then find next to nothing about it working with FreeBSD, other than other people asking the same question (e.g. the new IBM/Lenovo widescreen titanium thing, just before Xmas). Also, are you aware that there's a whole freebsd-mobile mailing list? A trawl through recent archives might at least get you some starting points, and if there are regular problems, some things to exclude. hth, --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 19:37:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECADA16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tech.junk@verizon.net) Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5FF43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tech.junk@verizon.net) Received: from [192.168.0.11] ([71.255.112.213]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0IUU000N8JTA29G3@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:36:46 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:36:46 -0500 From: Sean To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <43F625CE.5090605@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060126) Subject: DVD Burners X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tech.junk@verizon.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:37:21 -0000 I would like to add a DVD burner to my system. Anyone have recommendations on which ones play nice with FreeBSD? With so many formats I am trying to decide which one will be my best option. Thanks Sean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 19:49:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D9016A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:49:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lenzi@lztech.com.br) Received: from cwbgk1.k1.com.br (customer-200195196249.onda.com.br [200.195.196.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E5843D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:49:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lenzi@lztech.com.br) Received: from webpratico.com.br (M199.28.cwbgk [172.16.199.28] (may be forged)) by cwbgk1.k1.com.br (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1HJnTfP076683 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:49:29 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from lenzi@lztech.com.br) Received: from cwb.lztech.com.br (server [192.168.1.6]) by webpratico.com.br (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1HJr1kN030787 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:53:07 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from lenzi@lztech.com.br) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cwb.lztech.com.br (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1HJnM5b018757 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:49:23 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from lenzi@lztech.com.br) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44oe16ni2r.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <1140185001.11107.2.camel@server> <44oe16ni2r.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:49:21 -0200 Message-Id: <1140205761.11107.13.camel@server> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: about the ISO9660 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:49:32 -0000 Em Sex, 2006-02-17 s 10:03 -0500, Lowell Gilbert escreveu: > Sergio de Almeida Lenzi writes: > > > I posted a question about the ISO9660 and the hard links > > in the ISO filesystem... some days ago... > > A bit under 1 day ago, actually. > > > and no one answer... > > It was still in my incoming queue, but first I was planning to take > care of the work that I actually get paid for. > > I tried to duplicate the problem (on -STABLE) with: > mkdir temp; cd temp;(tar -C /rescue -cf - . |tar -xf -);du -h . /rescue > > but I got the links copied properly (original and copy the same size). > You'll need to show precisely what you did for anyone to figure out > what is wrong. > Ok thanks for the help... if you did the test and worked, for you for sure I am using a wrong version of the 6.0 I will upgrade to the 6.0 stable .... thanks for the help.... Sergio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 20:25:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD24116A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:25:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tech.junk@verizon.net) Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6F743D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:25:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tech.junk@verizon.net) Received: from [192.168.0.106] ([71.255.112.213]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0IUU004R1M1RGL63@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:25:21 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:25:04 -0500 From: Sean To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <43F63120.50806@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Subject: DVD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tech.junk@verizon.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:25:24 -0000 I would like to add a DVD Burner to my system. Any recommendations on which models are friendly with FreeBSD? I want to try to get one that will give me the best options. Also, what interface types would you recommend? I am leaning on SCSI. Thanks Sean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 20:28:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F7016A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:28:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@sarc.com) Received: from motgate3.mot.com (motgate3.mot.com [144.189.100.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4275F43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:28:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@sarc.com) Received: from az33exr04.mot.com (az33exr04.mot.com [10.64.251.234]) by motgate3.mot.com (8.12.11/Motgate3) with ESMTP id k1HKmV7o023507 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:48:31 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (motorola-q3s4mx.am.mot.com [10.5.8.146]) by az33exr04.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with SMTP id k1HKcYe8002107 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:38:35 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:38:35 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200602172038.k1HKcYe8002107@az33exr04.mot.com> FROM: admin@sarc.com TO: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priotity: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--------looool--" Cc: Subject: Fax Message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:28:40 -0000 ----------looool-- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Check attached file. ----------looool---- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 20:34:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B3916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:34:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3108343D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:34:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so335737wxd for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:34:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qqFZr5D2uO7nCMnZlF1P5Kp7m1m697NpInwdsUiA81qJSPzAHMFWgrXpO1xB4a8vA8neSnZBIAMCgw+8yu3/2ua/maosIXITvoiJJBTzR+t7x0QXZteUXDx3TYTekJzKCI3kIdsRgx8cr2pBxxOvqWtH0WRTfE1yrAHLUTDWQ1o= Received: by 10.70.75.1 with SMTP id x1mr1418058wxa; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:34:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.65.9 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:34:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:34:48 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton To: Xn Nooby In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small freebsd laptop suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:34:49 -0000 On 2/17/06, Xn Nooby wrote: > I would like to get a small laptop dedicated to (desktop) FreeBSD 6.x, > ideally one that could run Win2000 inside QEMU and has an nVidia chip so = I > can do OpenGL stuff. Any suggestions? It doesnt have to be superfast, > though I would prolly want to drop a 100GB 2.5" drive in it later. > > 2 years ago I foolishly bought a HP Pavillion, and I have to use an exter= nal > keyboard with it for FreebSD (or else it wont boot). The HP laptop is no= w a > dedicated Windows machine (and I'd return it if I could). > > Is anyone using a laptop that they are happy with? Maybe a refurbished > Thinkpad? (though I prefer to buy lapotops new, in case they are duds). = I > dont particularly trust the online lists of "laptops that work with > FreeBSD", since my other laptop is on one of them. > > I plan to carry the laptop around a lot, so I'm looking for something a > little smaller than average. My HP Pavillion is about 7lbs, which is too > big. Maybe a small Thinkpad, if they still make them? You want a Apple PowerBook err... MacBook Pro. I have a G4 model and it's sweet... anyways, if you don't want a Mac then look for corporate / large business orientated notebooks. They normally don't have all the stupid whiz-bang features found on home notebooks and are modular across product lines. For example I had and HP OmniBook 6000 (700Mhz) and desided I wanted a faster book so I found a striped out OmniBook 6100 (1.13Ghz PIII-M) on eBay. It used the same batteries, drive trays, PowerBrick, etc. so I just used the ones from the old notebook. As for the OB6100 I have, I've never tried FreeBSD on it but SuSE 9.3 Pro worked perfect. I Have Win2K on it now so I can run Multisim, Mathematica, Maple, and other proprietary software I need for college. (Going back to school for computer engineering degree.) You can pickup used notebooks at RetroBox. "RetroBox clients are Fortune 500 companies. When a Fortune 500 company upgrades to leading edge technology, they leave behind a trail of some of the best maintained previously-owned desktop computer equipment available. Well, we're all over it!" http://www.retrobox.com/rbwww/home/search_results_pc_laptops.asp?bin_id=3Dw= orld From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 20:48:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689CE16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:48:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennyboy@cableone.net) Received: from S1.cableone.net (s1.cableone.net [24.116.0.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDADE43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:48:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennyboy@cableone.net) Received: from badboybox.cableone.net (unverified [69.92.7.117]) by S1.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S1) with ESMTP id 47098742 for multiple; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:48:51 -0700 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:50:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Denny White To: Mike Jeays In-Reply-To: <1140201386.5709.23.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Message-ID: References: <1140201386.5709.23.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http//wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SpamDetect: ***: 3.000000 Aspam=3.0 X-Aspam: Words 0.0 -clique -visual -costa -final X-Aspam: URLS scored 3.0 geocities.com X-Aspam: Best match was sample d:\bad\2072813937.tmp X-Aspam: Total 3.0 X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii; X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 5, First 120, in=54, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 69.92.7.117 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: apsfilter question/problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:48:19 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Today Mike Jeays spake forth boldly: > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 11:09 +0000, Denny White wrote: >> >> I read the article at Onlamp about printing for the impatient. >> Installed apsfilter and samba on my old hp netserver so I'd >> be able to print to an hp 722c deskjet printer connected to >> an xp box. Gimp-print was also installed. Ghostscript was >> already installed. I ran /usr/local/share/apsfilter/./SETUP >> & thought I had it whipped. That's where the fun started. >> Apparently I've missed something along the way, since the >> print job never gets sent to the xp box. I also found out >> at linuxprinting.org that the recommended hp 722c driver >> is pnm2ppa. There was only one section in the install script >> that mentioned that driver, 10) PPA printer, so I chose that. >> It plugs it into the setup, but when I try to print a test >> page, I get ERROR: additional filter 'pnm2ppa' not found. >> I found the driver at linuxprinting.org & downloaded it. >> How do I go about using it? Is there a way to compile it >> into ghostscript? I have ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_14 & >> the apsfilter setup script found it & didn't complain. >> Do I need to install another more complete version? I know >> if I install ghostscript-afpl, I'll also have to recompile >> & reinstall apsfilter with the proper make options. When >> I choose the more generic just plain deskjet printer driver, >> the script accepts it, and when I try to print a test page, >> there's no complaining about the driver like when I try the >> ppa driver. Test page is created, supposedly sent to the >> xp printer with even a speed, average around 950 kb/s, but >> I see where it only goes to stdin. I'm definitely not a >> programmer, but another filter, ghostscript, something, has >> to relay it to stdout, is that correct? >> So, I could use some pointers on this. If anyone interested >> in answering needs more info, I'll be glad to plug it in to >> a reply. Like smb.conf, apsfilterrc, & so forth. Thanks. >> Denny White > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > # Printcap file: Added 2005-04-25 based on pnm2ppa suggestions. > > lp|ascii|unix:\ > :lp=/dev/lpt0:\ > :sd=/var/spool/lpd:\ > :if=/home/mike/bin/pnm2ppa-filter:\ > :mx#0:\ > :sh: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh > # printcap-filter > TMP=/tmp/pnm2ppa.tmp > cat >$TMP > ch1=`head -1 $TMP | cut -c 1` > if [ "$ch1" = '%' ] > then > cat $TMP | /usr/local/bin/gs -sDEVICE=ppmraw -q -dNOPAUSE -r600 \ > -sOutputFile=- - | \ > /usr/local/bin/pnm2ppa -i - -o - > else > cat $TMP | /usr/local/bin/enscript -B -q -p - | \ > /usr/local/bin/gs -sDEVICE=ppmraw -q -dNOPAUSE -r600 \ > -sOutputFile=- - | \ > /usr/local/bin/pnm2ppa -i - -o - > fi > rm $TMP > -- > Mike Jeays > http://ca.geocities.com/mike.jeays@rogers.com > Thanks for the answer, Mike. Will have to try working with this when I get off work in the a.m. Have no idea how to incorporate it with the smb stuff. I know that there's a basic apsfilterrc in /usr/local/etc/apsfilter & then separate apsfilterrc's for each individual printer in separate subdirs, along with smbclient.conf. I've tried reading samba logs, & /var/log/messages to try & figure out what I'm doing wrong. This whole thing started because of me not wanting to have to scp files to the xp box & then having to go there to physically enter printer commands. Laziness prevailed. If I ever get this working, it'll be worth it. In the meantime, I think it took less energy walking. :) Denny White GnuPG key : 0x1644E79A | http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD) iD8DBQFD9eKty0Ty5RZE55oRAnlFAKCrLWKTU/rz9BWQm1jzOwmDh64hZwCgp2yD nMPdRVZ23gkvU4IQAHzaoQg= =eYru -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 20:53:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725A316A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:53:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1878A43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:53:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k1HKrksG009068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:53:46 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.40] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k1HKrixX010227 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:53:46 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <43F63120.50806@verizon.net> References: <43F63120.50806@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <407EC711-1537-4609-902D-0487AAD88C1D@u.washington.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:55:12 -0800 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: DVD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:53:47 -0000 On Feb 17, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Sean wrote: > I would like to add a DVD Burner to my system. > > Any recommendations on which models are friendly with FreeBSD? > I want to try to get one that will give me the best options. > > Also, what interface types would you recommend? > I am leaning on SCSI. > > Thanks > Sean Many internal EIDE burners work perfectly fine with Unix. Also, it's not whether or not it works with FreeBSD I think, but rather whether or not it's supported with dvd+rw-tools. If you are concerned about hardware support still though, try to find one which was not released just recently as the probability of it being supported is lower than some other slightly older burners. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 20:54:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFA116A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:54:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from relay3.av-mx.com (relay3.av-mx.com [137.118.16.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D790A43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) X-Virus-Scan-Time: 0 Received: from [137.118.16.61] (HELO mx0.av-mx.com) by relay3.av-mx.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 182375869 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:53:58 -0500 Received: (qmail 9310 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 20:39:47 -0000 Received: from dsl13176.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@66.243.212.176) by 0 with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 20:39:47 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 66.243.212.176 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl13176.ywave.com Message-ID: <43F63491.5020707@ywave.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:39:45 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xn Nooby References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small freebsd laptop suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:54:12 -0000 Xn Nooby wrote: > I would like to get a small laptop dedicated to (desktop) FreeBSD 6.x, > ideally one that could run Win2000 inside QEMU and has an nVidia chip so I > can do OpenGL stuff. Any suggestions? It doesnt have to be superfast, > though I would prolly want to drop a 100GB 2.5" drive in it later. > > 2 years ago I foolishly bought a HP Pavillion, and I have to use an external > keyboard with it for FreebSD (or else it wont boot). The HP laptop is now a > dedicated Windows machine (and I'd return it if I could). > > Is anyone using a laptop that they are happy with? Maybe a refurbished > Thinkpad? (though I prefer to buy lapotops new, in case they are duds). I > dont particularly trust the online lists of "laptops that work with > FreeBSD", since my other laptop is on one of them. > > I plan to carry the laptop around a lot, so I'm looking for something a > little smaller than average. My HP Pavillion is about 7lbs, which is too > big. Maybe a small Thinkpad, if they still make them? No specific suggestion, just curious if you tried your pavillion with the settings that were recommended on this list a couple of months back? Search for Pavillion laptop in the questions list. Quick recap: interrupt the kernel loading process, then set hint.sio.0.disabled=1 set hint.sio.1.disabled=1 set hint.atkbd.0.flags=0x9 boot Works on my Presario (I know, not a Pavillion, but it's worth a try). Use the FreeBSD install disk to test it. As for specific laptops, find one you like, search Google to see if anyone has gotten it to work with FreeBSD, repeat until you find one that works. freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org might be a good place to ask too. The archives of that list usually has several recommendations. HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 21:05:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED67D16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C52F943D49 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 17031 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2006 21:05:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=p5w+wcp+i0H9GCkTnSQmv+flDGm7VKDh57K5BBNLPutfJa3/a8l3ZGM1aaWKdLgiZ8LsxEdtov336RrUx1EF021jgQipb2GFbys7FcaAzM/Y8syJc6O/+VIKJyZnJV1njsN/yy06DVJGlZDa3S7m3yWGi/MFvHC+Z7v69xmGkNk= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mj001@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 21:05:53 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: tech.junk@verizon.net In-Reply-To: <43F625CE.5090605@verizon.net> References: <43F625CE.5090605@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:05:52 -0500 Message-Id: <1140210352.982.4.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DVD Burners X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:57 -0000 On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:36 -0500, Sean wrote: > I would like to add a DVD burner to my system. > > Anyone have recommendations on which ones play nice with FreeBSD? > With so many formats I am trying to decide which one will be my best option. > > Thanks > Sean > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I have an LG DVD burner, which has worked perfectly with FreeBSD from the day it was installed. There isn't a model number on the front, but the dmesg output may help identify it. acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 -- Mike Jeays http://ca.geocities.com/mike.jeays@rogers.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 21:18:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4704816A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:18:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140643113.e2805e@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9841A43D5D for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:18:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140643113.e2805e@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HLIXV0031852 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:18:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140643113.e2805e@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HLIXLR031851 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:18:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140643113.e2805e@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140643113.e2805e@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:18:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:18:31 -0500 To: Giorgos Keramidas , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217211831.GA30802@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <002601c633dd$1a7349f0$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> <20060217162952.GA31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217163347.GB13036@flame.pc> <20060217163844.GD31165@skytracker.ca> <20060217164447.GD13036@flame.pc> <20060217165959.GA42330@skytracker.ca> <20060217180907.GB13775@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217180907.GB13775@flame.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: David Banning X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: Re: What about this solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:18:35 -0000 On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:09:07PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-02-17 11:59, David Banning wrote: > > I just put > > > > 209.161.205.12 banning.ca > > > > in my /etc/hosts and it solved the problem. > > > > Can I have multiple lines, each line with the same IP number in > > /etc/hosts, with different virtual hosts on the right? > > I think it's ok to have multiple lines, but I'm not sure. > > If that solves your immediate problem, then that's ok :) I think I have actually discovered what happened and it seems to be stale DNS. The transfer of my DNS servers will take a couple of days I imagine. Thanks for your help - From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 21:19:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F98B16A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:19:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140643193.4b9cd1@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457BE43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:19:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1140643193.4b9cd1@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1HLJrV0032369 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:19:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140643193.4b9cd1@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id k1HLJrHn032368 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:19:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from david+dated+1140643193.4b9cd1@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1140643193.4b9cd1@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:19:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:19:51 -0500 To: Giorgos Keramidas , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060217211951.GC30802@skytracker.ca> References: <20060217160651.GA22179@skytracker.ca> <43F5F8AD.50109@allenmyland.com> <20060217163713.GC31165@skytracker.ca> <43F5FFBE.2030703@allenmyland.com> <20060217170422.GB44146@skytracker.ca> <20060217181135.GD13775@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060217181135.GD13775@flame.pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: David Banning X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: Re: mail port 8025 conundrum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:19:55 -0000 On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 08:11:35PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-02-17 12:04, David Banning wrote: > > > Do you have an entry in /etc/hosts for banning.ca ? > > > > I put it in, and it cured the problem. I just don't know if I can have > > more than one entry in /etc/hosts representing all virtual hosts, > > each one with the same IP. > > You don't have to add multiple lines for this. Adding more than one > name in the same IP address line should work too: > > 1.2.3.4 hostname1 hostname2 hostname3 Good to know - Thanks - From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 21:42:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFB016A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:42:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from lon-mail-4.gradwell.net (lon-mail-4.gradwell.net [193.111.201.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB23743D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:42:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from 82-39-194-120.stb.ubr02.jarr.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.39.194.120] helo=webmaker ident=dave*pop3&dgmm&net) by lon-mail-4.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.208) id 43f6432e.15cce.143 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:42:06 +0000 (envelope-sender ) From: dgmm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:41:54 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <43F625CE.5090605@verizon.net> <1140210352.982.4.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> In-Reply-To: <1140210352.982.4.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602172141.54806.freebsd01@dgmm.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: DVD Burners X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:42:14 -0000 On Friday 17 February 2006 21:05, Mike Jeays wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:36 -0500, Sean wrote: > > I would like to add a DVD burner to my system. > > > > Anyone have recommendations on which ones play nice with FreeBSD? > > With so many formats I am trying to decide which one will be my best > > option. > > > > Thanks > > Sean > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I have an LG DVD burner, which has worked perfectly with FreeBSD from > the day it was installed. There isn't a model number on the front, but > the dmesg output may help identify it. > > acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 Ditto on a similar model. acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 -- Dave -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 21:44:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7CF16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:44:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.murphy@cogeco.ca) Received: from fep1.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB41543D58 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:44:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.murphy@cogeco.ca) Received: from mercury.upton.net (d141-24-210.home.cgocable.net [24.141.24.210]) by fep1.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31114F560; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:44:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.upton.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32CA60EB; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:44:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from mercury.upton.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.upton.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92464-04; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:42:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from earth (earth.upton.net [192.168.0.3]) by mercury.upton.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C10D60FC; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:41:29 -0500 (EST) From: "Paul Murphy" To: "'Christian Reiss'" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:41:21 -0500 Message-ID: <008901c6340a$e6a1ab70$0300a8c0@earth> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <43F5E42F.8010807@demonlord.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at upton.net Cc: Subject: RE: Radeon x1600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:44:21 -0000 Christian Reiss wrote: > Hello all, > > So I fear there is no solution to get this card working in any > way with BSD? No well-kept secret moves? > > Oh well. > > Thanks anyway! > -Christian Reiss. > > > --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- > > Greetings people! > > I am using FreeBSD for quiet some years now, and I just recently > upgraded my PC. Along came a Radeon x1600 (PCIE). Before that I > was a happy-happy joy-joy nvidia (-module) user - it just worked. ;) > > Now I am having a dickens of a time to get the Radeon x1600 working > under Xorg (latest) to work - even 2D would suffice. But google'ing > around just yielded my own questions in several forums. > > The ati and radeon drivers (native from xorg, which i am using > out of a currents ports tree) did not work with that card. > Unless, of course, some magic incantations are required. > Just to be on the safe side, I am hording virgin blood right now. > > Using the vesa driver my screen yells "input not supported", and > forcing the vesa driver didnt work out. I got a TFT that can, and > should do 1280x1024. > > Using FreeBSD 6.0 Patch 4. > > Any help would be more than welcome. > > Kind regards, > Christian Reiss. > > --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- --- 8< --- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I asked a similar question earlier and got the response...X1600's are unsupported. Does your X1600 show up in dmesg, mine doesn't. I would think that whether or nor Xwindow System supports it doesn't matter until FreeBSD actually detects the card. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 21:48:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A0F16A42C for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:48:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6B743DBC for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:47:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from clk01a ([66.130.198.54]) by VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IUU007RZPUD42X0@VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:47:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:46:44 -0500 From: Nicolas Blais In-reply-to: <200602172141.54806.freebsd01@dgmm.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <200602171646.55977.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1474446.gM1SnDgVJx; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <43F625CE.5090605@verizon.net> <1140210352.982.4.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <200602172141.54806.freebsd01@dgmm.net> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Subject: Re: DVD Burners X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:48:09 -0000 --nextPart1474446.gM1SnDgVJx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 17 February 2006 16:41, dgmm wrote: > On Friday 17 February 2006 21:05, Mike Jeays wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:36 -0500, Sean wrote: > > > I would like to add a DVD burner to my system. > > > > > > Anyone have recommendations on which ones play nice with FreeBSD? > > > With so many formats I am trying to decide which one will be my best > > > option. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Sean > > I have an LG DVD burner, which has worked perfectly with FreeBSD from > > the day it was installed. There isn't a model number on the front, but > > the dmesg output may help identify it. > > > > acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 > > Ditto on a similar model. > > acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 > -- > Dave +1 acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 Works great with k3b and dvdrw-tools. =2D-=20 =46reeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #7: Sat Feb 11 16:57:40 EST 2006 =20 root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A=20 PGP? (updated 16 Nov 05) : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc --nextPart1474446.gM1SnDgVJx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD9kRP4wTBlvcsbJURAiIjAJkBPD8qldne3kEpkVb6ccTwrKw9qQCffh78 SnApcuvW78/qhZlw8D9uWCA= =80fO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1474446.gM1SnDgVJx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 21:48:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3252C16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:48:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A655343DD2 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:47:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by smtpauth04.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1FADSH-0003SH-Vi; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:47:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:48:28 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: dgmm Message-ID: <20060217154828.0d702c89@grokwell.org> In-Reply-To: <200602172141.54806.freebsd01@dgmm.net> References: <43F625CE.5090605@verizon.net> <1140210352.982.4.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <200602172141.54806.freebsd01@dgmm.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc96518d35b1b0a3ca7a426e2e04e9d988350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DVD Burners X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:48:20 -0000 On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:41:54 +0000 dgmm wrote: > On Friday 17 February 2006 21:05, Mike Jeays wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:36 -0500, Sean wrote: > > > I would like to add a DVD burner to my system. > > > > > > Anyone have recommendations on which ones play nice with FreeBSD? > > > With so many formats I am trying to decide which one will be my > > > best option. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Sean > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > I have an LG DVD burner, which has worked perfectly with FreeBSD > > from the day it was installed. There isn't a model number on the > > front, but the dmesg output may help identify it. > > > > acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 > > Ditto on a similar model. > > acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 > -- > Dave > > -- > Dave I've good luck with Lite-On: acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 21:52:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B933A16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:52:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DD243D64 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:52:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a4so349703nfc for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:52:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kVZz0+Qfjn52U9qF8gudatAA0o8/JPkGtzciDHGiku9KyXI+JUAoT4rMeOJiCki+jHWIAF2Gv3nKPsl+vxuQj1rWGE+r/7k1J7WWdejqSgS3AEvyCcHZxiIANPbViyzV3FTbwZZadXij1SfrYu7tsGDtKqkx587kesHZm6TQgm4= Received: by 10.49.2.4 with SMTP id e4mr556385nfi; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:52:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.211.7 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:52:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:52:13 -0500 From: "Xn Nooby" To: Micah In-Reply-To: <43F63491.5020707@ywave.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <43F63491.5020707@ywave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small freebsd laptop suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:52:22 -0000 I forget exactly what I tried a few months ago, I thought I tried everythin= g everyone said. The hints you mentioned look different, so maybe I better try them. Maybe the hints came from another thread, after I had given up. If my existing laptop can be made to run FreeBSD without having to attach a= n external USB keyboard, I will be very happy. thanks! On 2/17/06, Micah wrote: > > Xn Nooby wrote: > > I would like to get a small laptop dedicated to (desktop) FreeBSD 6.x, > > ideally one that could run Win2000 inside QEMU and has an nVidia chip s= o > I > > can do OpenGL stuff. Any suggestions? It doesnt have to be superfast= , > > though I would prolly want to drop a 100GB 2.5" drive in it later. > > > > 2 years ago I foolishly bought a HP Pavillion, and I have to use an > external > > keyboard with it for FreebSD (or else it wont boot). The HP laptop is > now a > > dedicated Windows machine (and I'd return it if I could). > > > > Is anyone using a laptop that they are happy with? Maybe a refurbished > > Thinkpad? (though I prefer to buy lapotops new, in case they are > duds). I > > dont particularly trust the online lists of "laptops that work with > > FreeBSD", since my other laptop is on one of them. > > > > I plan to carry the laptop around a lot, so I'm looking for something a > > little smaller than average. My HP Pavillion is about 7lbs, which is > too > > big. Maybe a small Thinkpad, if they still make them? > > No specific suggestion, just curious if you tried your pavillion with > the settings that were recommended on this list a couple of months back? > Search for Pavillion laptop in the questions list. > > Quick recap: interrupt the kernel loading process, then > set hint.sio.0.disabled=3D1 > set hint.sio.1.disabled=3D1 > set hint.atkbd.0.flags=3D0x9 > boot > > Works on my Presario (I know, not a Pavillion, but it's worth a try). > Use the FreeBSD install disk to test it. > > As for specific laptops, find one you like, search Google to see if > anyone has gotten it to work with FreeBSD, repeat until you find one > that works. freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org might be a good place to ask > too. The archives of that list usually has several recommendations. > > HTH, > Micah > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 21:54:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E06216A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:54:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE9C43DA9 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:53:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l35so353459nfa for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:53:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kzVp3lIOKzzdrVG0z/xIG3SuooUTWpPwHfVnDIher1Oka+1Cld1AMxWpAG1+m2ghK+uT4/Otg25e3Sc2Lt1Vse81CFD+hBXGBIyI1NkC+FuBS4hZNjT5lcmqZOC8mxkfkwsXTrsJpN0/LLG7wJkqFRRAbVNiXdYsnX0GaKc4yWs= Received: by 10.48.49.13 with SMTP id w13mr554757nfw; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:53:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.211.7 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:53:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:53:39 -0500 From: "Xn Nooby" To: "Nikolas Britton" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: small freebsd laptop suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:54:16 -0000 thats an awesome website! I will check it out more thoroughly over the weekend, they had a lot of used thinkpads thanks! On 2/17/06, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > On 2/17/06, Xn Nooby wrote: > > I would like to get a small laptop dedicated to (desktop) FreeBSD 6.x, > > ideally one that could run Win2000 inside QEMU and has an nVidia chip s= o > I > > can do OpenGL stuff. Any suggestions? It doesnt have to be superfast= , > > though I would prolly want to drop a 100GB 2.5" drive in it later. > > > > 2 years ago I foolishly bought a HP Pavillion, and I have to use an > external > > keyboard with it for FreebSD (or else it wont boot). The HP laptop is > now a > > dedicated Windows machine (and I'd return it if I could). > > > > Is anyone using a laptop that they are happy with? Maybe a refurbished > > Thinkpad? (though I prefer to buy lapotops new, in case they are > duds). I > > dont particularly trust the online lists of "laptops that work with > > FreeBSD", since my other laptop is on one of them. > > > > I plan to carry the laptop around a lot, so I'm looking for something a > > little smaller than average. My HP Pavillion is about 7lbs, which is > too > > big. Maybe a small Thinkpad, if they still make them? > > You want a Apple PowerBook err... MacBook Pro. I have a G4 model and > it's sweet... anyways, if you don't want a Mac then look for corporate > / large business orientated notebooks. They normally don't have all > the stupid whiz-bang features found on home notebooks and are modular > across product lines. For example I had and HP OmniBook 6000 (700Mhz) > and desided I wanted a faster book so I found a striped out OmniBook > 6100 (1.13Ghz PIII-M) on eBay. It used the same batteries, drive > trays, PowerBrick, etc. so I just used the ones from the old notebook. > As for the OB6100 I have, I've never tried FreeBSD on it but SuSE 9.3 > Pro worked perfect. I Have Win2K on it now so I can run Multisim, > Mathematica, Maple, and other proprietary software I need for college. > (Going back to school for computer engineering degree.) > > You can pickup used notebooks at RetroBox. > "RetroBox clients are Fortune 500 companies. When a Fortune 500 > company upgrades to leading edge technology, they leave behind a trail > of some of the best maintained previously-owned desktop computer > equipment available. Well, we're all over it!" > > http://www.retrobox.com/rbwww/home/search_results_pc_laptops.asp?bin_id= =3Dworld > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 22:12:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E3416A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:12:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skye@f4.ca) Received: from seattle.f4.ca (seattle.f4.ca [216.127.61.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C83443D68 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:12:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skye@f4.ca) Received: from c-67-168-115-129.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([67.168.115.129] helo=[192.168.0.39]) by seattle.f4.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.42) id 1FADqD-000Ajp-FG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:12:42 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Skye Poier Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:13:08 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-Antivirus-Scanner: Cleared by Exiscan & ClamAV X-Spam-Score: -- Subject: Quota high watermark? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:12:43 -0000 Hi, is there anyway to query for users' max disk usage with the quota system? (and reset the high water mark after reading?) If not, I can just write a daemon script that polls quota(1) every couple of minutes and stores the max value for each user in some file.... just leaves a hole between polls where they could upload a file and then delete it quickly. Thanks, Skye From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 22:26:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258EC16A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B480943D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:26:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=gffBURmUKWiv1VlxomLvynjcsM+sEZFIELoszSGbxdplX/9lJ1AMy2F64pNcWryZ; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.116.164.67] (helo=oddball) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FAE3u-0003cd-09 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:26:50 -0500 Message-ID: <043601c63411$3ed54350$0225a8c0@oddball> From: "jdow" To: References: <01aa01c633e4$6eda5400$2e07a8c0@domfirst.local> <20060217181350.GE13775@flame.pc> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:26:48 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-ELNK-Trace: bb89ecdb26a8f9f24d2b10475b571120b0c3f889a803a7a388ddcfe322bc7501013dd4f87349f05a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.164.67 Subject: Re: sendmail autoresponder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:26:51 -0000 From: "Giorgos Keramidas" > On 2006-02-17 09:29, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> You do NOT want to setup an autoresponder like vacation! The >> FEATURE method that Giorgos explained is the correct way to do it. >> If your not using sendmail and your MTA cannot issue an error in >> this fashion, you do not want to mess around with this. >> >> What happens with autoresponders is that spammers inadvertantly >> trigger them. As a result the autoresponses get sent to thousands of >> victims who had their names forged to the spammers message. Some >> of those victim addresses are spamtrap addesses. > > Oh, crap! I hadn't thought of that. Good thinking there Ted :) There is no "inadvertantly" about it. If spammers find an open relay or an open bounce they exploit it. And you get blacklisted. {o.o} Joanne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 22:41:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE9216A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:41:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from divs_83@yahoo.com) Received: from web31010.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31010.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0767643D48 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:41:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from divs_83@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 15861 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Feb 2006 22:41:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DQWxsqgf/+ocOjcO3EHmTW5Svx7klpOkfnjDfANt79GJWIl7uiOsRF1QMDUjYPQdkFJ0dGjJ0vg6T/GS3qsmi9elrt6ROl3cCNUj4CQiVhgjxlchYI0st+UePOljUV2jlcyDszVuQLVvuhIV8zaQudtoHFRqANkGNFgBkxKtdA0= ; Message-ID: <20060217224153.15856.qmail@web31010.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.162.203.163] by web31010.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:41:53 PST Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:41:53 -0800 (PST) From: divyesh shah To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: debugging kernel code.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:41:55 -0000 I have added a system call and a somple program which uses that call. However, I need to debug my system call code. gdb doesn't help as it doesnt allow me to step into kernel level code from my user test program. Is there any way I can write debug information(say like printf statements)? I have seen some kernel code using printf's but I wonder where would they be printed out. Is there some kind of kernel log file?? Please help -Divyesh Shah. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 22:47:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265E716A422 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:47:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED43A43D58 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:47:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HMlUu23005; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:47:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Greg Barniskis" Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:47:29 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <43F61258.6000604@scls.lib.wi.us> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: RE: question on NAT for multiple subnets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:47:37 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Greg Barniskis [mailto:gregb@scls.lib.wi.us] >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:14 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: freebsd-questions >Subject: Re: question on NAT for multiple subnets > > >Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> I've never done it but I think you can run multiple nat instances >> and multiple divert sockets, you will have to specify them in the >> config file to natd, though. > >Excellent. That's what I was hoping for. So instead of one "divert >natd" rule in ipfw, I simply need "divert N", "divert N+1", "divert >N+2", etc. where N is a port number where I bound my first natd, N+1 >the next natd instance, etc. I think I can manage that. > I looked at the man page for natd and they specify the divert port with -port, and alias address with -alias_address Your going to have a bit of trial and error to work this config out but it shouldn't be that bad. I would love to see it posted here once you get it working. Ted PS: A firewall with a shell that you can actually initiate a telnet session from knocks a PIX into a cocked hat. And I just love dealing with a PIX on a network that has multiple gateways on it. Nothing like the lack of icmp redirects to get you swearing. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 23:06:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF2316A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:06:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A98C43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:06:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k1HN6Hu23102; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:06:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "jdow" , Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:06:16 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <043601c63411$3ed54350$0225a8c0@oddball> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: sendmail autoresponder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:06:23 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of jdow >Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:27 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: sendmail autoresponder > > >From: "Giorgos Keramidas" > >> On 2006-02-17 09:29, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >>> You do NOT want to setup an autoresponder like vacation! The >>> FEATURE method that Giorgos explained is the correct way to do it. >>> If your not using sendmail and your MTA cannot issue an error in >>> this fashion, you do not want to mess around with this. >>> >>> What happens with autoresponders is that spammers inadvertantly >>> trigger them. As a result the autoresponses get sent to thousands of >>> victims who had their names forged to the spammers message. Some >>> of those victim addresses are spamtrap addesses. >> >> Oh, crap! I hadn't thought of that. Good thinking there Ted :) > >There is no "inadvertantly" about it. If spammers find an open relay >or an open bounce they exploit it. And you get blacklisted. But, in this case the server isn't relaying or bouncing the spam, it is spitting back the canned vacation or whatever message, which is probably not what the spammer wants. The spam is going into the hapless vacationers inbox. The problem is that the blacklist servers on the Internet can't tell the difference between real live spam in their dozen or so spamtraps, and someone's "out of office" e-mail message in their dozen or so spamtraps. The situation is of course compounded when people pull shenanigans like wildcarding every incoming message for a domain name into an autoresponder, this used to be common when people renamed domains. But even a normal spam run can do it. For example sally@example.com goes on vacation. Spammer decides sally@example.com would be a good name to forge on a spam. Spammer transmits spam and thousands of bounces and many complaints bounce back to sally@example.com. Sally's vacation program then spits out thousands of vacation notices to mailer-daemon@yucketyyuck.com etc. domains, plus hundreds of vacation notices to idiot people who were complaining to Sally because they didn't bother looking at the header of the initial spam and seeing that it came from some other machine than example.com. Those people get the vacation notice in response to their complaint to Sally to stop spamming them, which causes some of them to forward those to spamcop, which initiates a blacklist. The same issue applies to those "click on my URL website to validate your e-mail message" autoresponding things. Those get people blacklisted for the same reason. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 23:40:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027D916A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:40:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [64.2.229.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E6B43D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:39:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1HNdv3j065528 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:39:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <43F65EC4.8000703@tundraware.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:39:48 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43F50074.8060205@tundraware.com> <20060217011923.GA87403@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20060217011923.GA87403@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com Subject: Re: /bin/sh Madness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:40:03 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Feb 16), Tim Daneliuk said: > >>Here is a shell function that behaves quite strangely: >> >>#!/bin/sh >>##### >># Execute A Command, Noting Start/Stop Time, & Logging Output >># Args: >># $1 Command Name >># $2 Log Directory >># $3 Command String To Execute >>##### >> >>runupd() >>{ >> log=$2/$1.log >> timestamp $log >> touch $2/.$1-begin && eval $3 2>&1 >> $log && touch $2/.$1-end & >>} >># End of 'runupd()' >> >>So, you might do something like: >> >> runupd freespace /var/log/ "df -k" >> >>Now, for the weirdness. This function works fine in my script >>so long as one of two conditions is met: >> >> 1) I run it interactively from the command line (bash) >> OR >> 2) I run it from 'cron' AND $3 is *not* another script >> >>If I try to run it from 'cron' and point $3 to a script, everything gets >>run as planned, however, the ending timestamp (touch $2/.$1-end) never >>runs. That is, the initial time stamp (.$1-begin) and the command itself >>are executed, and output is properly written to the logfile, >>but the final timestamp never happens. > > > Could your $3 command be returning a nonzero exit code? You probably > want something more like > > touch $2/.$1-begin && { eval $3 2>&1 >> $log ; touch $2/.$1-end } & > > so your end timestamp always gets created whether or not $3 succeeds. > Also note that in your original script, you only backgrounded "touch > $2/.$1-end", which is probably not what you wanted. > This seems not to work - I don't think 'sh' likes nested function braces - recall that this command appears inside a shell function. In any case, I think I have nailed the problem. It seems that the external script being called made reference to 'chown' without explicitly naming the program's path. Under 'cron' control, there is no path to /usr/sbin by default so the script was exiting with a non-zero exit status as several here suggested. . Many thanks to all who took time to answer. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 23:56:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3B116A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:56:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5C143D46 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:56:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k1HNuRRL024008; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:56:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:56:27 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Tim Daneliuk Message-ID: <20060217235627.GF52817@dan.emsphone.com> References: <43F50074.8060205@tundraware.com> <20060217011923.GA87403@dan.emsphone.com> <43F65EC4.8000703@tundraware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43F65EC4.8000703@tundraware.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /bin/sh Madness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:56:29 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 17), Tim Daneliuk said: > Dan Nelson wrote: > >Could your $3 command be returning a nonzero exit code? You probably > >want something more like > > > >touch $2/.$1-begin && { eval $3 2>&1 >> $log ; touch $2/.$1-end } & > > > >so your end timestamp always gets created whether or not $3 succeeds. > >Also note that in your original script, you only backgrounded "touch > >$2/.$1-end", which is probably not what you wanted. > > This seems not to work - I don't think 'sh' likes nested function > braces - recall that this command appears inside a shell function. Oops. Braces aren't bourne syntax, and in this case they're the wrong choice anyway. parens (i.e. a subshell) are what's needed. touch $2/.$1-begin && ( eval $3 2>&1 >> $log ; touch $2/.$1-end ) & I actually tested this one :) > In any case, I think I have nailed the problem. It seems that the > external script being called made reference to 'chown' without explicitly > naming the program's path. Under 'cron' control, there is no path to > /usr/sbin by default so the script was exiting with a non-zero exit > status as several here suggested. red face>. > > Many thanks to all who took time to answer. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 00:54:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A83E16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:54:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pranavpeshwe@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C39743D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:54:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pranavpeshwe@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i27so527522wra for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rZ/xpKKGXOQO5b1+fHDQBmFn+vf0aD0BlBxsgnz6xEWPxwijol0vCDX+aYTu9LOw4kqnOWzVER9OsTKutLFv7n6N0HGCI6gEI6BYodzzALaOTbg1884Lxd7FD7uIkUr4U3mEm08F/o5GoYs3x+bQa9dSrEN+ucRop7DpYjS3j84= Received: by 10.54.66.14 with SMTP id o14mr1783363wra; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.101.5 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:54:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:24:26 +0530 From: "Pranav Peshwe" To: "divyesh shah" In-Reply-To: <20060217224153.15856.qmail@web31010.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060217224153.15856.qmail@web31010.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: debugging kernel code.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:54:27 -0000 On 2/18/06, divyesh shah wrote: > I have added a system call and a somple program which > uses that call. However, I need to debug my system > call code. gdb doesn't help as it doesnt allow me to > step into kernel level code from my user test program. > Is there any way I can write debug information(say > like printf statements)? I have seen some kernel code > using printf's but I wonder where would they be > printed out. Is there some kind of kernel log file?? > Hello, You can use printfs in your module.You will be able to see whatever you have printfed on the console,also it is logged in the ASCII text file - /var/log/messages. You can use uprintf if you do not want to log the messages in the file but want to see them on console.You can configure DDB and remote GDB (using a serial line) for debugging kernel code/modules. HTH. Regards, Pranav --------------------------------------------------------------------------- "There is no such thing as a foe. There is no such thing in existence as a friend. It is force of circumstances that creates friends and foes." =09=09=09- The Mahabharata From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 01:36:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F8716A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:36:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rshakin@unixfreak.org) Received: from mail5.dslextreme.com (mail5.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2EAB43D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:36:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rshakin@unixfreak.org) Received: (qmail 30718 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 01:36:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.146]) (rshakin@69.181.39.133) by mail5.dslextreme.com with SMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:36:47 -0800 Message-ID: <43F67A50.6040702@unixfreak.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:37:20 -0800 From: Roman Shakin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Remving All of MySQL Database X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:36:49 -0000 hello i need to remove all of the mysql databases... i messed it up... and now cant log in? please help. I tried deleting the /var/dg/mysql and running mysql_install_sh --roman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 01:40:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFCA16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:40:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from mail.compedgeracing.com (dsl-katy-207-70-139-52.consolidated.net [207.70.139.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7836E43D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:40:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ruzzi@compedgeracing.com) Received: from www.compedgeracing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.compedgeracing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6855C3B; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:41:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from 207.70.139.52 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ruzzi) by www.compedgeracing.com with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:41:12 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <50973.207.70.139.52.1140226872.squirrel@www.compedgeracing.com> In-Reply-To: <43F67A50.6040702@unixfreak.org> References: <43F67A50.6040702@unixfreak.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:41:12 -0600 (CST) From: "Robert Uzzi" To: "Roman Shakin" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-rc1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remving All of MySQL Database X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:40:57 -0000 > hello i need to remove all of the mysql databases... i messed it up... > and now cant log in? please help. I tried deleting the /var/dg/mysql and > running mysql_install_sh > Try looking at the MySQL manual. http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/resetting-permissions.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 01:54:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C8016A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328A343D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1I1sS91004975; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:54:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: Pirat SRIYOTHA Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:54:39 -0500 Message-ID: <0gvcv1lbce9qcv8di4nm7m8uhdm17cb6ch@4ax.com> References: <43F53ED3.1090607@access.inet.co.th> In-Reply-To: <43F53ED3.1090607@access.inet.co.th> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sos: boot fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:54:42 -0000 On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:11:15 +0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: > >i can not boot into single user mode or safe mode. > >please help me. and cc to me too. Try and boot to your previous kernel. If that is broken for some reason as well, boot with something like Fresbie and install a generic kernel on your disk and boot with it. To boot an older kernel, in the boot menu, escape to the loader prompt type unload load /boot/kernel.old/kernel load /boot/kernel.old/acpi.ko boot ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 02:05:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E38F16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:05:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FCD43D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:05:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id k1I257Ys006237; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:18 -0500 Message-ID: <1svcv1lhcpfmq9m2t4uic5lsgjhl02itrk@4ax.com> References: <43F625CE.5090605@verizon.net> <1140210352.982.4.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <200602172141.54806.freebsd01@dgmm.net> <200602171646.55977.nb_root@videotron.ca> In-Reply-To: <200602171646.55977.nb_root@videotron.ca> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: tech.junk@verizon.net Subject: Re: DVD Burners X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:05:09 -0000 On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:46:44 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >On Friday 17 February 2006 16:41, dgmm wrote: >> On Friday 17 February 2006 21:05, Mike Jeays wrote: >> > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:36 -0500, Sean wrote: >> > > I would like to add a DVD burner to my system. >> > > >> > > Anyone have recommendations on which ones play nice with FreeBSD? >> > > With so many formats I am trying to decide which one will be my = best >> > > option. >> > > >> > > Thanks >> > > Sean >> > I have an LG DVD burner, which has worked perfectly with FreeBSD = from >> > the day it was installed. There isn't a model number on the front, = but >> > the dmesg output may help identify it. >> > >> > acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 >> >> Ditto on a similar model. >> >> acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 >> -- >> Dave > >+1 > >acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 > >Works great with k3b and dvdrw-tools. Same here. Works great and I tested it a few weeks ago with actual dual layer media. Burnt a 8G disk just fine as expected with growisofs ! acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device=20 cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: cd present [2295104 x 2048 byte records] ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications http://www.sentex.net Providing Internet Access since 1994 mike@sentex.net, (http://www.tancsa.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 02:14:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FC816A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:14:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from qmail0.ifxnetworks.com (qmail0.ifxnetworks.com [200.110.128.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D5743D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:14:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 11544 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 02:14:16 -0000 X-Spam-DCC: Misty: qmail0.ifxnetworks.com 1170; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on qmail0.ifxnetworks.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.5 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO dmw.hopto.org) (dmw@unete.cl@[200.73.29.49]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail0.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Feb 2006 02:14:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:14:29 -0300 From: Daniel Molina Wegener To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20060218021428.GA68955@dmw.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: message Content-Disposition: inline Organization: DMW Subject: Firefox 1.5.0.1 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Molina Wegener List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:14:18 -0000 Hello, I have installed the firefox 1.5.0.1 browser port -- the latest version -- but everytime uses the pc speaker and I get a constant "beep!, beep!, beep!". Anyone knows the solution to this problem?. I've searched in preferences and about:config url, but nothing seems to be the right option to disable the constant beep. Also, google doesn't have information about this problem. Best regards, -- . 0 . | Daniel Molina Wegener . . 0 | dmw at unete dot cl 0 0 0 | FreeBSD Power User From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 02:14:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8E316A422 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:14:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from qmail0.ifxnetworks.com (qmail0.ifxnetworks.com [200.110.128.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EEB43D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:14:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 11544 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 02:14:16 -0000 X-Spam-DCC: Misty: qmail0.ifxnetworks.com 1170; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on qmail0.ifxnetworks.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.5 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO dmw.hopto.org) (dmw@unete.cl@[200.73.29.49]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail0.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Feb 2006 02:14:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:14:29 -0300 From: Daniel Molina Wegener To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20060218021428.GA68955@dmw.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: message Content-Disposition: inline Organization: DMW Subject: Firefox 1.5.0.1 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Molina Wegener List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:14:18 -0000 Hello, I have installed the firefox 1.5.0.1 browser port -- the latest version -- but everytime uses the pc speaker and I get a constant "beep!, beep!, beep!". Anyone knows the solution to this problem?. I've searched in preferences and about:config url, but nothing seems to be the right option to disable the constant beep. Also, google doesn't have information about this problem. Best regards, -- . 0 . | Daniel Molina Wegener . . 0 | dmw at unete dot cl 0 0 0 | FreeBSD Power User From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 02:30:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20FC16A42D for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:30:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (ns1.ecoms.com [207.44.130.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AC343D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:30:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mv@roq.com) Received: from p4.roq.com (localhost.roq.com [127.0.0.1]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4AD4E11A for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:31:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (ppp157-158.static.internode.on.net [150.101.157.158]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1184E4E06F for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:31:11 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <43F686CC.6090609@roq.com> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:30:36 +1100 From: Michael Vince User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions References: <43F4B5D2.6020303@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: <43F4B5D2.6020303@t-hosting.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Setting up VPN+IPSec+Racoon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:30:29 -0000 Kvesdn Gbor wrote: > Hello, > > it is the first time I have to set up such configuration. Could you > tell me some guidelines? What should I care about? I see there's a > chapter in the Handbook about VPN. It mentions the FAST_IPSEC kernel > option in >5.X. Should I use this implemetation or the KAME > implementation? What are the differencies, and what are the > advantages, disadvantages of each? > If you know some other good tutorial or howto, please let me know. > > Thanks in advance, > > Gabor Kovesdan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" You can try my VPN setup script, I created it largely just for my self so I could easily remember all the knobs of VPN with out needing any notes. But thought it would be nice to try and make it easier on other people as well, and thought it would be good to try and make it comparable easy to all the super easy and cheap SOHO equipment you can get these days. http://roq.com/projects/vpnsetup/index.html http://www.roq.com/projects/vpnsetup/vpnsetup.pl It does the racoon(ipsec-tools) configuration the ipsec.conf and the needed routes. Everything you should need excluding ip configuration in /etc/rc.conf and firewall rules I haven't had that much feed back on it except the slack code :P Regards, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 02:50:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0AE16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:50:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (aun200.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.21.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E40443D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:50:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1I2o1dK047251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 03:50:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <43F68B51.70407@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 03:49:53 +0100 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Molina Wegener References: <20060218021428.GA68955@dmw.hopto.org> In-Reply-To: <20060218021428.GA68955@dmw.hopto.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4386E94EB5DA36B7FE9F8FE8" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Firefox 1.5.0.1 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:50:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4386E94EB5DA36B7FE9F8FE8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Daniel Molina Wegener wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I have installed the firefox 1.5.0.1 browser port -- the > latest version -- but everytime uses the pc speaker and I > get a constant "beep!, beep!, beep!". >=20 > Anyone knows the solution to this problem?. >=20 > I've searched in preferences and about:config url, but > nothing seems to be the right option to disable the constant > beep. Also, google doesn't have information about this problem. >=20 > Best regards, Hello Daniel, did you compile the port with debug option enabled? It may explain that. Have a look at this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-May/086951.html= HTH, Karol --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski GPGKey: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enig4386E94EB5DA36B7FE9F8FE8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD9oteezeoPAwGIYsRAojfAJ0Spm5WZkFmHCJzXOrTg1VZUb3cewCfe282 yyokFYGIrCM6GqgGFuZl/tc= =9bHQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4386E94EB5DA36B7FE9F8FE8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 02:52:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D238216A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:52:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vayu@sklinks.com) Received: from smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79E1143D69 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:52:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vayu@sklinks.com) Received: (qmail 23572 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 02:52:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Santosha) (varuna@sbcglobal.net@69.229.158.197 with login) by smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 02:52:41 -0000 Message-ID: <008b01c63436$958186d0$1b00000a@Santosha> From: "Joseph Vella" To: "Daniel Molina Wegener" , "FreeBSD Questions" References: <20060218021428.GA68955@dmw.hopto.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:54:05 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Cc: Subject: Re: Firefox 1.5.0.1 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:52:46 -0000 > Hello, > I have installed the firefox 1.5.0.1 browser port -- the > latest version -- but everytime uses the pc speaker and I > get a constant "beep!, beep!, beep!". > Anyone knows the solution to this problem?. > I've searched in preferences and about:config url, but > nothing seems to be the right option to disable the constant > beep. Also, google doesn't have information about this problem. A google search with "firefox beep" returned this: http://www.plogue.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=8462& Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:25 am Post subject: RANT [OT] turning Firefox's find 'beep' sound OFF -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tired of stepping in your chair everytime you use the firefox find toolbar? type: about:config in your address bar and set accessibility.typeaheadfind.enablesound to false. there ya go, stupid built in sounds should be banned from all apps. I forgot, i have a terrible headache From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 02:55:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759A916A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:55:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from pgh.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E8443D49 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:55:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from [192.168.1.108] (monrovll-cuda1-69-164-173-96.pittpa.adelphia.net [69.164.173.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by pgh.nepinc.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1I2tFw5090713 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:55:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:54:53 -0500 From: Tom Grove Organization: VoidMain.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@voidmain.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:55:18 -0000 Is there anyone who can compile a program using the getline() function? Here is a really simple program to recreate the following error: ##Error## /var/tmp//ccvYIi4C.o(.text+0x26): In function `main': : undefined reference to `getline' ##Error## ##Source File## #include int main() { char line[10]; getline(&line, 10); printf("%s", line); return 0; } ## Source File## -Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 03:37:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CA116A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 03:37:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: from smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0F9943D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 03:37:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 81156 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 03:37:24 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=m5kJVWLJ2xX+vg7FBEaWA+XsZkYMPwS38tPPbEvTH/hZvWN/AsDe7A4hMKYNBLjrhpxWO5kXYZeFZTwB0iGsVIx+kdBbX8TuyNjcMcpi5GjfDAfM1VohSOT1xW/9Q9gU7HaOnIrEJ2HIFqb3ic61LOIgmjDgiMEJNNckbiZFaBk= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mj001@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 03:37:24 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd@voidmain.net In-Reply-To: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> References: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:37:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 03:37:26 -0000 On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 21:54 -0500, Tom Grove wrote: > Is there anyone who can compile a program using the getline() function? > Here is a really simple program to recreate the following error: > > ##Error## > /var/tmp//ccvYIi4C.o(.text+0x26): In function `main': > : undefined reference to `getline' > ##Error## > > ##Source File## > #include > > int main() { > char line[10]; > > getline(&line, 10); > printf("%s", line); > > return 0; > } > ## Source File## > > -Tom > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I got a bit further by installing the port for getline (/usr/ports/devel/libgetline), and changed the code slightly to provide a single parameter. (Look at man getline) #include #include int main() { char line[10]="test"; getline(line); printf("%s", line); return 0; } chaucer 29 ~/c $ cc -o getline -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib getline.c -lgetline chaucer 30 ~/c $ getline testnow testchaucer 31 ~/c $ -- Mike Jeays http://ca.geocities.com/mike.jeays@rogers.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 07:12:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789E816A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:12:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bhouse@unifiednetworkservices.ca) Received: from tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts5.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE50C43D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:12:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bhouse@unifiednetworkservices.ca) Received: from mail.unifiednetworkservices.ca ([67.68.36.51]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060218071245.FKJR18394.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@mail.unifiednetworkservices.ca> for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:12:45 -0500 Received: (qmail 94051 invoked by uid 1009); 18 Feb 2006 02:18:26 -0000 Received: from toronto-hse-ppp3733052.sympatico.ca (HELO NOTEBOOK) (bhouse@unifiednetworkservices.ca@67.68.36.51) by mail.unifiednetworkservices.ca with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 02:18:26 -0000 From: "Ben House" To: Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:12:44 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal Subject: Asus P5MT-M and FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:12:47 -0000 I am attempting to install 6.0 Stable on an Asus P5MT-M motherboard (Intel ICH7R), which contains onboard SATA RAID bios (LSI MegaRAID). Standard sysinstall in call cases. I am noticing several inconsistencies: 1) When SATA is in Enhanced mode, no drives are detected. 5.4 detects both drives just fine 2) When SATA is in RAID mode, no drives are detected, 5.4 yields the same results. 3) When SATA is in Compatible mode, *one* drive is detected, AND a raid volume is also detected (but in degraded status). 5.4 detects these just fine. Ideally, installing 6.0 (or even 5.4) using the RAID function would be preferred. Any suggestions? Ben House Unified Network Services Inc. (519)624-9405 Ext. 33 bhouse@unifiednetworkservices.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 08:50:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C94A16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:50:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mathieu.prevot@etu.upmc.fr) Received: from delay-1m.club-internet.fr (delay-1m.club-internet.fr [194.158.104.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A4B43D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:50:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mathieu.prevot@etu.upmc.fr) Received: from relay-dm.club-internet.fr (relay-dm.cs.clubint.net [172.16.20.40]) by delay-1m.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A32253204 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:05:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (l01v-212-195-193-30.d4.club-internet.fr [212.195.193.30]) by relay-dm.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D206A25612; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:05:25 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20060218021428.GA68955@dmw.hopto.org> References: <20060218021428.GA68955@dmw.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <98063781-C08D-4C14-BD0A-4898311519F1@etu.upmc.fr> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Mathieu Prevot Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:07:00 +0100 To: Daniel Molina Wegener X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Firefox 1.5.0.1 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:50:34 -0000 Le 18 f=E9vr. 06 =E0 03:14, Daniel Molina Wegener a =E9crit : > Hello, > > I have installed the firefox 1.5.0.1 browser port -- the > latest version -- but everytime uses the pc speaker and I > get a constant "beep!, beep!, beep!". > > Anyone knows the solution to this problem?. > > I've searched in preferences and about:config url, but > nothing seems to be the right option to disable the constant > beep. Also, google doesn't have information about this problem. > > Best regards, > -- =20 > . 0 . | Daniel Molina Wegener > . . 0 | dmw at unete dot cl > 0 0 0 | FreeBSD Power User You can first do sysctl hw.syscons.bell=3D0 in a terminal, or: echo "hw.syscons.bell=3D0">>/etc/sysctl.conf But obviously, the origin of the problem is elsewhere. Try freebsd-=20 stable@ Mathieu -- http://scienceclue.ath.cx= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 10:09:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2E316A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:09:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE75243D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:09:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 41476 invoked by uid 1008); 18 Feb 2006 10:09:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 10:09:41 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 05:09:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <60698.24.90.33.115.1140257381.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 05:09:41 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: gnome-config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:09:35 -0000 hi... i have gnome installed but gnome-config is missing.... which port is gnome-config part of? somewhere underl devel?! thanks... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 10:27:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D8716A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:27:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.200.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9A943D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:27:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from eisenhower.ascendency.net ([67.173.128.145]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060218102746013001g71ie>; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:27:47 +0000 Received: from Mike8500 (ipcop.localdomain [192.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by eisenhower.ascendency.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1IARjb1087361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 04:27:46 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) From: "Mike Loiterman" To: Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 04:27:45 -0600 Message-ID: <032b01c63475$f5950580$0401a8c0@Mike8500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcY0dfTxdlLiHcfESaG9nO7XVBa4NA== X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (eisenhower.ascendency.net [192.168.1.22]); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 04:27:46 -0600 (CST) Subject: Odd file created in / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mike@ascendency.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:27:48 -0000 I have a file in / called -P. It is a socket file I believe I created by mistake while trying to get mysql, spamassassin, or something similar to work. How can I check for sure to make sure it isn't something important? ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: mike@ascendency.net PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 11:01:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C6E16A423 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:01:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4279143D5F for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:01:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 49786 invoked by uid 1008); 18 Feb 2006 11:01:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 11:01:31 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:01:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <64612.24.90.33.115.1140260491.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <60698.24.90.33.115.1140257381.squirrel@mail.el.net> References: <60698.24.90.33.115.1140257381.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:01:31 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: Re: gnome-config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:01:28 -0000 > which port is gnome-config part of? somewhere underl devel?! nevermind..... now if i installed firefox 1.5 where firefox-plugin?! what do i need to get it? > thanks... > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 12:19:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D597D16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:19:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A91543D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:19:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FAR40-000M4W-Ud; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:19:53 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:13:40 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Odd file created in / Thread-Index: AcY0dfTxdlLiHcfESaG9nO7XVBa4NAADsvCB In-Reply-To: <032b01c63475$f5950580$0401a8c0@Mike8500> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Odd file created in / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:19:55 -0000 On 18/2/06 10:27, "Mike Loiterman" wrote: > I have a file in / called -P. It is a socket file I believe I created by > mistake while trying to get mysql, spamassassin, or something similar to > work. > > How can I check for sure to make sure it isn't something important? Check to see if anything has it open currently. "netstat -a -f unix" will do that for you. Then rename it. Then wait a week before unlinking it. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 13:04:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD86D16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:04:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6E243D55 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:04:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-169-72.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.169.72]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F3A4C821; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:13:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292BA5285E; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:02:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F71B67.5010603@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:04:39 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Shakin References: <43F67A50.6040702@unixfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <43F67A50.6040702@unixfreak.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remving All of MySQL Database X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:04:30 -0000 Roman Shakin schrieb: > hello i need to remove all of the mysql databases... i messed it up... > and now cant log in? please help. I tried deleting the /var/dg/mysql and > running mysql_install_sh just start mysql after removing the database, i.e. /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server.sh stop rm -R /var/db/mysql /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server.sh start That's it. Now you have a fresh clean database. The password of the root account is "" (without quotes ;-) Bjrn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 06:37:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843A716A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:37:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaroonsaka@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-f12.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.49.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5419743D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:37:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaroonsaka@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:37:45 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.200.201.19 by by14fd.bay14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:37:44 GMT X-Originating-IP: [202.28.2.5] X-Originating-Email: [jaroonsaka@hotmail.com] X-Sender: jaroonsaka@hotmail.com From: "jaroonsak A" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:37:44 +0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2006 06:37:45.0104 (UTC) FILETIME=[D3732100:01C63455] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:12:17 +0000 Cc: Subject: mutri-user conference X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:37:45 -0000 dear friend Hey !. i have problem about mutri user for contact between mutri user. Can you guilde to me about something like MCU . Yes now i can build sip server but it work for peer to peer, 2 person and i want to contract more than 2 person in sametime. look like they are live in same room. Can you guild for knowledge. I's very basic man in freebsd,linux,unix because i use window along time thank good man _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 14:42:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9C516A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:42:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net (gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net [213.41.240.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2407143D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:42:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (misato.ptitoliv.lan [192.168.1.1]) by gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1IFhjaI001146 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:43:45 +0100 Message-ID: <43F73267.6010807@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:42:47 +0100 From: ptitoliv User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:42:08 -0000 Hello everybody, I am writing here because I have a problem with network on freebsd 5.3 and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100 Mbit/s with via rhine network cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge computer. When I try to transferts big files beetween the FreeBSD and the Debian, I see that I have an assymetric bandwith : >From Debian to BSD : No problem. The bandwitdh is OK : About 8 MBytes/s which is normal for a LAN I guess. >From BSD to Debian : The bandwidth is quite awful => Beetween 300 KBytes/s to 1Mbyte/s. Network have been changed and the problem is still the same. So I thought it was a network problem. Then I installed an other FreeBSD on a different computer and plugged it in a completely different network and the problem is still here. That's why I think there is a thing to configure on the BSD system but I don't know why. That's why I am looking here for someone who knows this problem and who will be able to help me. Thank you for your answers Best Regards, ptitoliv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 15:06:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7F716A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:06:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C947743D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:06:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from foo.antimatter.net (cpe-72-132-244-217.san.res.rr.com [72.132.244.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1IF6MYc001488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:06:23 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060218070451.041f81b0@antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:06:04 -0800 To: ptitoliv , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <43F73267.6010807@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> References: <43F73267.6010807@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:06:29 -0000 At 06:42 AM 2/18/2006, ptitoliv wrote: >Hello everybody, > >I am writing here because I have a problem with network on freebsd 5.3 >and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100 Mbit/s with via rhine network >cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge computer. When I try to >transferts big files beetween the FreeBSD and the Debian, I see that I >have an assymetric bandwith : > > >From Debian to BSD : No problem. The bandwitdh is OK : About 8 MBytes/s >which is normal for a LAN I guess. > >From BSD to Debian : The bandwidth is quite awful => Beetween 300 >KBytes/s to 1Mbyte/s. What are you using to transfer the files? ftp, scp, nfs, something else? -Glenn >Network have been changed and the problem is still the same. So I >thought it was a network problem. Then I installed an other FreeBSD on a >different computer and plugged it in a completely different network and >the problem is still here. That's why I think there is a thing to >configure on the BSD system but I don't know why. > >That's why I am looking here for someone who knows this problem and who >will be able to help me. > >Thank you for your answers > >Best Regards, >ptitoliv >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 15:09:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E272E16A422 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:09:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net (gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net [213.41.240.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3349C43D49 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:09:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (misato.ptitoliv.lan [192.168.1.1]) by gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1IGB3VR001184; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:11:04 +0100 Message-ID: <43F738D7.1090502@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:10:15 +0100 From: ptitoliv User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Dawson References: <43F73267.6010807@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20060218070451.041f81b0@antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060218070451.041f81b0@antimatter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:09:39 -0000 Glenn Dawson a crit : > What are you using to transfer the files? ftp, scp, nfs, something else? I am using ftp. Regards, Ptitoliv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 15:23:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E86D16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:23:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [63.240.77.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF2843D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:23:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.216] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060218152340013001ul5fe>; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:23:40 +0000 Message-ID: <43F73BFD.3080702@computer.org> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:23:41 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denny White References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: apsfilter question/problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:23:42 -0000 Denny White wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > I read the article at Onlamp about printing for the impatient. > Installed apsfilter and samba on my old hp netserver so I'd > be able to print to an hp 722c deskjet printer connected to > an xp box. I don't have a fix to your apsfilter issue, but if you you are interested in another possible printing solution... try: http://www.lanside.net/article.php?story=20031007161002250 It works well for me. And is simple to setup. > Gimp-print was also installed. Ghostscript was > already installed. I ran /usr/local/share/apsfilter/./SETUP > & thought I had it whipped. That's where the fun started. > Apparently I've missed something along the way, since the > print job never gets sent to the xp box. I also found out > at linuxprinting.org that the recommended hp 722c driver > is pnm2ppa. There was only one section in the install script > that mentioned that driver, 10) PPA printer, so I chose that. > It plugs it into the setup, but when I try to print a test > page, I get ERROR: additional filter 'pnm2ppa' not found. > I found the driver at linuxprinting.org & downloaded it. > How do I go about using it? Is there a way to compile it > into ghostscript? I have ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_14 & > the apsfilter setup script found it & didn't complain. > Do I need to install another more complete version? I know > if I install ghostscript-afpl, I'll also have to recompile > & reinstall apsfilter with the proper make options. When > I choose the more generic just plain deskjet printer driver, > the script accepts it, and when I try to print a test page, > there's no complaining about the driver like when I try the > ppa driver. Test page is created, supposedly sent to the > xp printer with even a speed, average around 950 kb/s, but > I see where it only goes to stdin. I'm definitely not a > programmer, but another filter, ghostscript, something, has > to relay it to stdout, is that correct? > So, I could use some pointers on this. If anyone interested > in answering needs more info, I'll be glad to plug it in to > a reply. Like smb.conf, apsfilterrc, & so forth. Thanks. > Denny White > > GnuPG key : 0x1644E79A | http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net > Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD) > > iD8DBQFD9a7dy0Ty5RZE55oRAg/8AKCaidZVu40OrIvmGeLm/Zw40RDAqgCaAggH > YmKpizvD6o7ihgZM8MmQKn0= > =wm8n > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 15:30:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D032A16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:30:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.192.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886CD43D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:30:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ken@allenmyland.com) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([68.80.195.248]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20060218153053m13002eni6e>; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:30:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B69B843; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:30:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from bserver.transpack.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bserver.transpack.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76736-09; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:30:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.214.102] (kbuilt.transpack.com [192.168.214.102]) by bserver.transpack.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FA5B842; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:30:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43F73D9F.1040901@allenmyland.com> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:30:39 -0500 From: Ken Stevenson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jaroonsak A References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at transpack.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mutri-user conference X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:30:56 -0000 jaroonsak A wrote: > > dear friend > > Hey !. i have problem about mutri user for > contact between mutri user. Can you guilde to me > about something like MCU . Yes now i can build sip server but it work > for peer to peer, 2 person and i want to contract more than 2 person in > sametime. look like they are live in same room. Can you guild for > knowledge. I's very basic man in freebsd,linux,unix because i use window > along time > > > thank good man > > _________________________________________________________________ Does this have to be SIP based? If you're looking for the simplest solution for IP based conferencing, what about skype? www.skype.com -- Ken Stevenson Allen-Myland Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 15:55:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB7916A4E1 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:55:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from pgh.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6298343D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:55:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from [192.168.1.108] (monrovll-cuda1-69-164-173-96.pittpa.adelphia.net [69.164.173.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by pgh.nepinc.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1IFtVql094690; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:55:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <43F74361.90109@voidmain.net> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:55:13 -0500 From: Tom Grove Organization: VoidMain.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jeays References: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> In-Reply-To: <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@voidmain.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:55:34 -0000 Mike Jeays wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 21:54 -0500, Tom Grove wrote: > >> Is there anyone who can compile a program using the getline() function? >> Here is a really simple program to recreate the following error: >> >> ##Error## >> /var/tmp//ccvYIi4C.o(.text+0x26): In function `main': >> : undefined reference to `getline' >> ##Error## >> >> ##Source File## >> #include >> >> int main() { >> char line[10]; >> >> getline(&line, 10); >> printf("%s", line); >> >> return 0; >> } >> ## Source File## >> >> -Tom >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > I got a bit further by installing the port for getline > (/usr/ports/devel/libgetline), and changed the code slightly to provide > a single parameter. (Look at man getline) > > #include > #include > > int main() { > char line[10]="test"; > > getline(line); > printf("%s", line); > > return 0; > } > > chaucer 29 ~/c $ cc -o getline -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib > getline.c -lgetline > chaucer 30 ~/c $ getline > testnow > testchaucer 31 ~/c $ > > > > That works and I had looked into that earlier...it seems like it does a lot more than just one function from the man page. I guess I can use that for now but I wonder why getline() is broken in gcc on FreeBSD? -Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 15:55:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D285916A436 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:55:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.200.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611D243D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:55:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from eisenhower.ascendency.net ([67.173.128.145]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2006021815553301400e460ke>; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:55:33 +0000 Received: from Mike8500 (ipcop.localdomain [192.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by eisenhower.ascendency.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1IFtS1r095788 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:55:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) From: "Mike Loiterman" To: "'Ceri Davies'" , Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:55:28 -0600 Message-ID: <032f01c634a3$bf9ed950$0401a8c0@Mike8500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcY0dfTxdlLiHcfESaG9nO7XVBa4NAADsvCBAAe11/A= In-Reply-To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (eisenhower.ascendency.net [192.168.1.22]); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:55:32 -0600 (CST) Cc: Subject: RE: Odd file created in / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mike@ascendency.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:55:35 -0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > On 18/2/06 10:27, "Mike Loiterman" wrote: > >> I have a file in / called -P. It is a socket file I believe I >> created by mistake while trying to get mysql, spamassassin, or >> something similar to work. >> >> How can I check for sure to make sure it isn't something important? > > Check to see if anything has it open currently. "netstat -a -f unix" > will do that for you. Then rename it. Then wait a week before > unlinking it. > > Ceri Nothing had it open. Took me a second to figure out the "--" option so that mv would rename it. :) How do I unlink it? ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: mike@ascendency.net PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 16:28:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F87D16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:28:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp1.suscom.net (smtp1.suscom.net [64.78.119.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839AB43D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:28:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F451D0009 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:31:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp1.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17314-05 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:31:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp1.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 14B241D0002 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:31:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss [192.168.0.4]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1IGSFGh029749 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:28:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:28:18 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060218111849.15E6.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Removing BOM from UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:28:19 -0000 I have a large number of text files created in MS Word and saved in UTF-8 format. Unfortunately, MS Word adds the BOM to each file. I need to remove the BOM. Information regarding BOM and UTF-8 can be found here: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-utf8-bom A brief excerpt: It has also been suggested to use the UTF-8 encoded BOM (0xEF 0xBB 0xBF) as a signature to mark the beginning of a UTF-8 file. This practice should definitely not be used on POSIX systems for several reasons: * On POSIX systems, the locale and not magic file type codes define the encoding of plain text files. Mixing the two concepts would add a lot of complexity and break existing functionality. * Adding a UTF-8 signature at the start of a file would interfere with many established conventions such as the kernel looking for “#!” at the beginning of a plaintext executable to locate the appropriate interpreter. * Handling BOMs properly would add undesirable complexity even to simple programs like cat or grep that mix contents of several files into one. It has been suggested that a script could be written to eliminate the BOM from a file(s). My script writing skills suck. I have been unable to locate one using Google, so I was hoping that someone might know where I could either locate such a program, or perhaps give me an idea on how to script one. Thanks! -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more likely he is to have extreme prejudice. Clint Eastwood From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 16:40:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AAD16A422 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:40:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216E643D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:40:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from bravo.pjkh.com (bravo.pjkh.com [72.36.232.219]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3056713C7C5; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:41:44 -0600 (CST) Received: by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A234813C7C0; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:41:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bravo.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E82F13C7BF; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:41:43 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:41:43 -0600 (CST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Mike Loiterman In-Reply-To: <032f01c634a3$bf9ed950$0401a8c0@Mike8500> Message-ID: <20060218104122.G50583@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <032f01c634a3$bf9ed950$0401a8c0@Mike8500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: 'Ceri Davies' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Odd file created in / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:40:55 -0000 >> Check to see if anything has it open currently. "netstat -a -f unix" >> will do that for you. Then rename it. Then wait a week before >> unlinking it. >> >> Ceri > > Nothing had it open. Took me a second to figure out the "--" option so that > mv would rename it. :) > > How do I unlink it? unlink is another way of saying remove... rm -- ./-P -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 17:25:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E905C16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:25:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@benalee.co.uk) Received: from ariadne.benalee.co.uk (82-45-24-36.cable.ubr13.newt.blueyonder.co.uk [82.45.24.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A86F43D5A for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:25:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@benalee.co.uk) Received: by ariadne.benalee.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7EEA746A63D; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:24:30 +0000 (GMT) From: Benjamin A'Lee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060218111849.15E6.GERARD@seibercom.net> References: <20060218111849.15E6.GERARD@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:24:30 +0000 Message-Id: <1140283470.17023.7.camel@ariadne.benalee.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.91 Subject: Re: Removing BOM from UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:26:00 -0000 On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 11:28 -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > It has been suggested that a script could be written to eliminate the > BOM from a file(s). My script writing skills suck. I have been unable to > locate one using Google, so I was hoping that someone might know where I > could either locate such a program, or perhaps give me an idea on how to > script one. #!/usr/bin/perl @file=3D<>; $file[0] =3D~ s/^\xEF\xBB\xBF//; print(@file); That'll read a file from stdin, remove the BOM from the beginning of the first line if it's present, and print it to stdout. Hope it helps. Ben --=20 Termisoc Tech Officer: My Homepage: "People demand freedom of speech as compensation for the freedom of thought which they have but seldom use." -- S=C3=B8ren Kierkegaard=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 17:41:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4A16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:41:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FE543D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:41:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A988EB8EA; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:41:12 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:41:09 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: tech.junk@verizon.net Message-ID: <20060218194109.30aebf9e@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <43F63120.50806@verizon.net> References: <43F63120.50806@verizon.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DVD Burner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:41:17 -0000 On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:25:04 -0500 Sean wrote: > I would like to add a DVD Burner to my system. > > Any recommendations on which models are friendly with FreeBSD? > I want to try to get one that will give me the best options. > > Also, what interface types would you recommend? > I am leaning on SCSI. Plextors genarally work w/o problems We use Asus DRW-1608 for about 2 years now problems. -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 17:48:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8B616A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:48:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C909243D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:48:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1IHmftr017773; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:48:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-251-207.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.251.207]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1IHmcgW003003 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:48:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F75DF6.3050903@mac.com> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:48:38 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd@voidmain.net References: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <43F74361.90109@voidmain.net> In-Reply-To: <43F74361.90109@voidmain.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:48:42 -0000 Tom Grove wrote: > Mike Jeays wrote: [ ... ] > That works and I had looked into that earlier...it seems like it does a > lot more than just one function from the man page. I guess I can use > that for now but I wonder why getline() is broken in gcc on FreeBSD? getline() is not part of the standard C library. What makes you think gcc is broken...? -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 17:54:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9C816A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:54:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from pgh.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C2143D6E for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:54:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from [192.168.1.108] (monrovll-cuda1-68-170-0-189.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.170.0.189]) (authenticated bits=0) by pgh.nepinc.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1IHsMB1095022; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:54:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <43F75F3C.7080903@voidmain.net> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:54:04 -0500 From: Tom Grove Organization: VoidMain.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <43F74361.90109@voidmain.net> <43F75DF6.3050903@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <43F75DF6.3050903@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@voidmain.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:54:27 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > Tom Grove wrote: > >> Mike Jeays wrote: >> > [ ... ] > >> That works and I had looked into that earlier...it seems like it does a >> lot more than just one function from the man page. I guess I can use >> that for now but I wonder why getline() is broken in gcc on FreeBSD? >> > > getline() is not part of the standard C library. > What makes you think gcc is broken...? > > Yeah...I see that after some more research. So, now I guess my question is being that it's not standard and gets() is not safe to use what should I use to grab lines? My gut tells me to copy the getline() function from the K&R book but I'm not totally sure that's a great idea either. Stupid strings always causing problems! -Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 18:01:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E2616A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:01:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from pgh.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779EE43D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:01:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from [192.168.1.108] (monrovll-cuda1-69-164-173-96.pittpa.adelphia.net [69.164.173.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by pgh.nepinc.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1II1E61095048; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:01:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <43F760D8.6000506@voidmain.net> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:00:56 -0500 From: Tom Grove Organization: VoidMain.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jeays References: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> In-Reply-To: <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@voidmain.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:01:16 -0000 Mike Jeays wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 21:54 -0500, Tom Grove wrote: > >> Is there anyone who can compile a program using the getline() function? >> Here is a really simple program to recreate the following error: >> >> ##Error## >> /var/tmp//ccvYIi4C.o(.text+0x26): In function `main': >> : undefined reference to `getline' >> ##Error## >> >> ##Source File## >> #include >> >> int main() { >> char line[10]; >> >> getline(&line, 10); >> printf("%s", line); >> >> return 0; >> } >> ## Source File## >> >> -Tom >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > I got a bit further by installing the port for getline > (/usr/ports/devel/libgetline), and changed the code slightly to provide > a single parameter. (Look at man getline) > > #include > #include > > int main() { > char line[10]="test"; > > getline(line); > printf("%s", line); > > return 0; > } > > chaucer 29 ~/c $ cc -o getline -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib > getline.c -lgetline > chaucer 30 ~/c $ getline > testnow > testchaucer 31 ~/c $ I also noticed that this code actually doesn't work...I'm not sure why either but it doesn't output what gets typed. Notice that the 'now' that gets typed isn't echoed below. -Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 18:08:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C274E16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:08:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A9443D49 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:08:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout12/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1II8P7m023168; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:08:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-251-207.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.251.207]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin02/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k1II8Mq4007858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:08:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43F76296.4010407@mac.com> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:08:22 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd@voidmain.net References: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <43F74361.90109@voidmain.net> <43F75DF6.3050903@mac.com> <43F75F3C.7080903@voidmain.net> In-Reply-To: <43F75F3C.7080903@voidmain.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:08:30 -0000 Tom Grove wrote: > Chuck Swiger wrote: [ ... ] >> getline() is not part of the standard C library. >> What makes you think gcc is broken...? > > Yeah...I see that after some more research. So, now I guess my question > is being that it's not standard and gets() is not safe to use what > should I use to grab lines? My gut tells me to copy the getline() > function from the K&R book but I'm not totally sure that's a great idea > either. Stupid strings always causing problems! Depending on what you'd like to do, GNU readline may be a fine solution to your situation. Otherwise, getch(stdin) with a bit of code to "cook" DEL/BS/CR/NL, or just use the getline port as you've already done. :-) -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 18:20:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDB216A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AF6B43D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 8064 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Feb 2006 18:20:27 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BPZ6dO4S+UB1oGUagQcXk8ingS664fKKNjLgxAmwis0B53Fq/+FG2s9cyODai0RQ2dbspZFk2Gny0Jo3bbxhWeA4WeYNAsOiaBrL8049wutqLzoNfzhed+VgcFCEDc36WdA6CIqKenbb1G85jKz1dRNa+HpfsCDiqG5SOuY419I= ; Message-ID: <20060218182027.8061.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:20:27 PST Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:20:27 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: ptitoliv , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <43F73267.6010807@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:20:30 -0000 --- ptitoliv wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am writing here because I have a problem with > network on freebsd 5.3 > and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100 > Mbit/s with via rhine network > cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge > computer. When I try to > transferts big files beetween the FreeBSD and > the Debian, I see that I > have an assymetric bandwith : > > >From Debian to BSD : No problem. The bandwitdh > is OK : About 8 MBytes/s > which is normal for a LAN I guess. > >From BSD to Debian : The bandwidth is quite > awful => Beetween 300 > KBytes/s to 1Mbyte/s. > > Network have been changed and the problem is > still the same. So I > thought it was a network problem. Then I > installed an other FreeBSD on a > different computer and plugged it in a > completely different network and > the problem is still here. That's why I think > there is a thing to > configure on the BSD system but I don't know > why. > > That's why I am looking here for someone who > knows this problem and who > will be able to help me. > > Thank you for your answers > > Best Regards, > ptitoliv Are you doing "GET" from each machine, or comparing GET to PUT? Get has always been a lot faster then PUT. Put a monitor on the LAN and look for weird sending patterns. The 4.x FTP servers will stop altogether if you set the window under 1500 bytes. I don't know if its the server app or the stack, but its probably the specific application, as HTTPD seems not to have such problems. I think ftp was originally written by a chimp and no-one has really bothered to ever fix it (much like nfs). Its quite possible that socket changes in 5.x made a kludgy implementation not work as well as it used to. DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 18:32:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AA116A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:32:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (smtp1-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EF443D49 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:32:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.140] (tui75-2-82-229-178-102.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.178.102]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306546E4BE; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:32:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:32:12 +0100 From: Mathieu CHATEAU X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.12) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1989705175.20060218193212@free.fr> To: ptitoliv In-Reply-To: <43F73267.6010807@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> References: <43F73267.6010807@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:32:12 -0000 Saturday, February 18, 2006, 3:42:47 PM, you wrote: p> Hello everybody, p> I am writing here because I have a problem with network on freebsd 5.3 p> and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100 Mbit/s with via rhine network p> cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge computer. When I try to p> transferts big files beetween the FreeBSD and the Debian, I see that I p> have an assymetric bandwith : >>From Debian to BSD : No problem. The bandwitdh is OK : About 8 MBytes/s p> which is normal for a LAN I guess. >>From BSD to Debian : The bandwidth is quite awful => Beetween 300 p> KBytes/s to 1Mbyte/s. p> Network have been changed and the problem is still the same. So I p> thought it was a network problem. Then I installed an other FreeBSD on a p> different computer and plugged it in a completely different network and p> the problem is still here. That's why I think there is a thing to p> configure on the BSD system but I don't know why. p> That's why I am looking here for someone who knows this problem and who p> will be able to help me. p> Thank you for your answers p> Best Regards, p> ptitoliv p> _______________________________________________ p> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list p> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions p> To unsubscribe, send any mail to p> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" what about netstat -e on each host ? (looking for errors) are you on swicthes ? Are the switches port on auto or forced ? when doing an ifconfig -a, are you in 100 full duplex ? Are you using proftpd /wuftpd ? Mathieu CHATEAU From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 18:33:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4630516A422 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:33:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slitbit@fastmail.fm) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4CB43D7D for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:33:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slitbit@fastmail.fm) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78156D34C0E for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:33:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from web2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.211]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:33:36 -0500 Received: by web2.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id E7C5AD5FF; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:33:29 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1140287609.26596.254703432@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: dbLW7WHq0K363J/BOUFrp378tppHpBCJpMKAA7nY+lkN 1140287609 From: "ph rhole oper" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-7" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 5022 (F2.73; T1.15; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:33:29 +0200 Subject: SATA RAID0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:33:55 -0000 What should i use to setup a RAID-0 array using 2 SATA drives and a VIA software-raid controller (pseudo)? vinum ? ccd? or atacontrol? PS: suppose the metadata format of my "raid" controller is recognized by the ata driver --=20 http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different=85 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 18:46:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE46C16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:46:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net (LNeuilly-152-22-79-125.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.19.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBC843D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:46:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (misato.ptitoliv.lan [192.168.1.1]) by gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1IJm01i003268; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:48:01 +0100 Message-ID: <43F76BA9.1000300@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:47:05 +0100 From: ptitoliv User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu CHATEAU References: <43F73267.6010807@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> <1989705175.20060218193212@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <1989705175.20060218193212@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:46:26 -0000 Mathieu CHATEAU a crit : >what about netstat -e on each host ? >(looking for errors) > > no errors detected >are you on swicthes ? >Are the switches port on auto or forced ? > > I don't know exactly : the servers are hosted by a company. So I think they are in autoselect mode. >when doing an ifconfig -a, are you in 100 full duplex ? > > Yeah and I tried to forced in all possibles modes. (10/100 and half/full duplex) >Are you using proftpd /wuftpd ? > > Proftpd but I made some new tests with HTTP and SCP and it is the same problem. Regards, ptitoliv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 18:48:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6173C16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:48:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net (LNeuilly-152-22-79-125.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.19.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A813743D53 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:48:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (misato.ptitoliv.lan [192.168.1.1]) by gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1IJoDfZ003275; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:50:13 +0100 Message-ID: <43F76C2E.7080404@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:49:18 +0100 From: ptitoliv User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: danial_thom@yahoo.com References: <20060218182027.8061.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060218182027.8061.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on gatekeeper.ptitoliv.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:48:34 -0000 Danial Thom a crit : >--- ptitoliv >wrote: > > > >>Hello everybody, >> >>I am writing here because I have a problem with >>network on freebsd 5.3 >>and 5.4. The machines are pluged in a 100 >>Mbit/s with via rhine network >>cards. On this same LAN I have a Debian Sarge >>computer. When I try to >>transferts big files beetween the FreeBSD and >>the Debian, I see that I >>have an assymetric bandwith : >> >>>From Debian to BSD : No problem. The bandwitdh >>is OK : About 8 MBytes/s >>which is normal for a LAN I guess. >>>From BSD to Debian : The bandwidth is quite >>awful => Beetween 300 >>KBytes/s to 1Mbyte/s. >> >>Network have been changed and the problem is >>still the same. So I >>thought it was a network problem. Then I >>installed an other FreeBSD on a >>different computer and plugged it in a >>completely different network and >>the problem is still here. That's why I think >>there is a thing to >>configure on the BSD system but I don't know >>why. >> >>That's why I am looking here for someone who >>knows this problem and who >>will be able to help me. >> >>Thank you for your answers >> >>Best Regards, >>ptitoliv >> >> > >Are you doing "GET" from each machine, or >comparing GET to PUT? Get has always been a lot >faster then PUT. > I tried GET and PUT from the two servers and the problem is still the same. >Put a monitor on the LAN and >look for weird sending patterns. The 4.x FTP >servers will stop altogether if you set the >window under 1500 bytes. I don't know if its the >server app or the stack, but its probably the >specific application, as HTTPD seems not to have >such problems. > The problem still exists with HTTP and SCP requests. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 19:35:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FB416A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:35:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp1.suscom.net (smtp1.suscom.net [64.78.119.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EEF43D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:35:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD161D0007 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:38:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp1.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22712-07 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:38:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp1.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 35CD51D0005 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:38:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1IJZ7F2083243 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:35:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1IJZ764083242 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:35:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) From: Gerard Seibert Organization: Seibercom,net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:34:44 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060218111849.15E6.GERARD@seibercom.net> <1140283470.17023.7.camel@ariadne.benalee.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1140283470.17023.7.camel@ariadne.benalee.co.uk> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(=?utf-8?q?gxJxxc=0A=09RnSNPNr*/=5E=7EStawWU9KDJ-CT0k=24f=23?=@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6599138.EOb0c16ySJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602181435.07066.gerard@seibercom.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Removing BOM from UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard@seibercom.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:35:10 -0000 --nextPart6599138.EOb0c16ySJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Benjamin A'Lee wrote: > On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 11:28 -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > It has been suggested that a script could be written to eliminate > > the BOM from a file(s). My script writing skills suck. I have been > > unable to locate one using Google, so I was hoping that someone > > might know where I could either locate such a program, or perhaps > > give me an idea on how to script one. > > #!/usr/bin/perl > @file=3D<>; > $file[0] =3D~ s/^\xEF\xBB\xBF//; > print(@file); > > That'll read a file from stdin, remove the BOM from the beginning of > the first line if it's present, and print it to stdout. > > Hope it helps. > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ben > > -- > Termisoc Tech Officer: > My Homepage: > "People demand freedom of speech as compensation for the freedom of > thought which they have but seldom use." -- S=C3=B8ren Kierkegaard Maybe I am doing something wrong, but it does not appear to be working=20 correctly. I named the file nobom.sh and put it in the same directory=20 as the files I want to convert. I also set the program permission to=20 0755. typing the p[program name does nothing; I have to precede it with=20 'perl'. Even then, it does not appear to work correctly. In the=20 following example, the file is parsed, but not converted. perl nobom.sh testfile Am I doing something incorrectly here? Thanks! =2D-=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net PGP: http://www.seibercom.net/sig/gerard.asc --nextPart6599138.EOb0c16ySJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD93bqchM2dIO+3uMRArDTAJ45txd1ts0k2YaguTrxVGfC9eG1uwCfdgUj DiJq15exHgDmjK6Wj4rQvnE= =Nprd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6599138.EOb0c16ySJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 19:58:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016D116A422 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:58:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xkodi@bofh.bg) Received: from smtp.orbitel.bg (smtp.orbitel.bg [195.24.32.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF28843D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:58:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xkodi@bofh.bg) Received: (qmail 20917 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 19:58:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (10.0.0.4) by smtp.orbitel.bg with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 19:58:43 -0000 Received: from smtp.orbitel.bg ([10.0.0.3]) by localhost (sof-rv2.orbitel.bg [10.0.0.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29422-22; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:58:42 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (smtp.orbitel.bg [195.24.32.22]) by smtp.orbitel.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FD4A5CAE6; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:58:42 +0200 (EET) Received: from courage.orbitel.bg (courage.orbitel.bg [195.24.32.35]) by mail.orbitel.bg (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:58:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1140292722.43f77c7219992@mail.orbitel.bg> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:58:42 +0200 From: xkodi@bofh.bg To: Ludo Koren References: <87r762dpaf.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> In-Reply-To: <87r762dpaf.fsf@lk.tempest.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8 X-Originating-IP: 195.24.32.35 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at orbitel.bg Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AVerMedia AVerTV Hybrid+FM Cardbus X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:58:47 -0000 bktr.ko is for Conexant (formerly Rockwell) Booktree (Fussion) 8x8/8x9 based cards and you have Philips saa713x based, so you should try with the correct driver and applications. You can download them from here: http://download.purpe.com/ I don't know why the driver from the link above is not included, like bktr.ko, into the FreeBSD, and if it will work with your device, but with my saa7134 based ECS EZ-TV (TVP3XP) TV&FM Tuner card, everything works great and I am able to watch analog TV and capture under FreeBSD 5.x : saa0@pci1:11:0: class=0x048000 card=0x4cb41019 chip=0x71341131 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Philips Semiconductors' device = 'SAA7134HL Multi Media Capture Device' class = multimedia Quoting Ludo Koren : > > Hello, > > I am using FreeBSD RELENG_5 and decided to give a try to video capture > device. From the friend, I've got AVerMedia AVerTV Hybrid+FM > Cardbus. When I plug it to my notebook I get the following to the log: > > > > cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=800 > cardbus0: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > > and after kldload bktr.ko: > > bktr_mem: memory holder loaded > > Here is the pciconf -lv output: > > ..... > > > none3@pci3:0:0: class=0x048000 card=0xf4361461 chip=0x71331131 rev=0xd1 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Philips Semiconductors' > device = 'SAA7135HL Multi Media Capture Device' > class = multimedia > > > Is anybody running this card? Am I doing something wrong? Is there > another driver for the card? > > I did not find anything useful searching the archives. > > Regards, > > lk > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-multimedia > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-multimedia-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 20:09:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A4E16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:09:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF8F43D55 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:08:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y25so449791nfb for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:08:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=HGTN67GUCa+flS0ZHiXBOGVp0rZ+Ffm3wrpVgpjWXUXb3DBk62sGnwmo3+ilyqjsF7wGLBNVYX9xATer91puS35dcMOaQVvWxBV8txt5F9tj1u5H4VlW6BXsDp3EE44jLzribomSV+4DQr1rkrQTKJkZECpjpO+TJjW1G5nOyCY= Received: by 10.49.8.11 with SMTP id l11mr776125nfi; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:08:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.211.7 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:08:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:08:58 -0500 From: "Xn Nooby" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: fresh install, portupgrade fails on xterm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:09:00 -0000 its depressing when a fresh install fails i followed my normal fail-proof slow method of updating a fresh install, an= d it fails to update xterm, some of the messages are: =3D=3D> xterm-206_1 conflicts with installed packages: xorg-clients-6.8.2 *** Error code 1 .... ** Listing the failed packages ! x11/xterm (xterm-203) (install error) * x11/xorg-clients (xorg-clients-6.8.2) I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.1. I hadnt even gotten to configuring with X, so I was surprised there was a problem there. the command tat generated the error was: portpgrade -arR I'm guessing other people will also be getting this error soon. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 20:29:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37CE16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:29:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@benalee.co.uk) Received: from ariadne.benalee.co.uk (82-45-24-36.cable.ubr13.newt.blueyonder.co.uk [82.45.24.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B046743D49 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:29:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@benalee.co.uk) Received: by ariadne.benalee.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3097646A14A; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:29:35 +0000 (GMT) From: Benjamin A'Lee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200602181435.07066.gerard@seibercom.net> References: <20060218111849.15E6.GERARD@seibercom.net> <1140283470.17023.7.camel@ariadne.benalee.co.uk> <200602181435.07066.gerard@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:29:34 +0000 Message-Id: <1140294574.8388.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.91 Subject: Re: Removing BOM from UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:29:39 -0000 On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 14:34 -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > Maybe I am doing something wrong, but it does not appear to be working=20 > correctly. I named the file nobom.sh and put it in the same directory=20 > as the files I want to convert. I also set the program permission to=20 > 0755. >=20 > typing the p[program name does nothing; I have to precede it with=20 > 'perl'. Even then, it does not appear to work correctly. In the=20 > following example, the file is parsed, but not converted. Sorry; try changing the first line to #!/usr/local/bin/perl > perl nobom.sh testfile >=20 > Am I doing something incorrectly here? Try: cat testfile | nobom.sh Though the way you describe appears to work here: $ cat bom-testfile | hd 00000000 ef bb bf 23 20 42 4f 4d 20 74 65 73 74 20 66 69 |...# BOM test = fi| 00000010 6c 65 0a |le.| 00000013 $ bomkill.pl bom-testfile | hd 00000000 23 20 42 4f 4d 20 74 65 73 74 20 66 69 6c 65 0a |# BOM test fil= e.| 00000010 Ben --=20 Termisoc Tech Officer: My Homepage: "People demand freedom of speech as compensation for the freedom of thought which they have but seldom use." -- S=C3=B8ren Kierkegaard=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 20:34:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9C416A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:34:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from pgh.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153E343D4C for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:34:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Received: from [192.168.1.108] (monrovll-cuda1-69-164-173-96.pittpa.adelphia.net [69.164.173.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by pgh.nepinc.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1IKY4Gr095454; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:34:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from freebsd@voidmain.net) Message-ID: <43F784AA.50206@voidmain.net> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:33:46 -0500 From: Tom Grove Organization: VoidMain.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <43F74361.90109@voidmain.net> <43F75DF6.3050903@mac.com> <43F75F3C.7080903@voidmain.net> <43F76296.4010407@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <43F76296.4010407@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@voidmain.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:34:07 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > Tom Grove wrote: > >> Chuck Swiger wrote: >> > [ ... ] > >>> getline() is not part of the standard C library. >>> What makes you think gcc is broken...? >>> >> Yeah...I see that after some more research. So, now I guess my question >> is being that it's not standard and gets() is not safe to use what >> should I use to grab lines? My gut tells me to copy the getline() >> function from the K&R book but I'm not totally sure that's a great idea >> either. Stupid strings always causing problems! >> > > Depending on what you'd like to do, GNU readline may be a fine solution to your > situation. Otherwise, getch(stdin) with a bit of code to "cook" DEL/BS/CR/NL, > or just use the getline port as you've already done. :-) > > Okay...I think I'm either an idiot or going slowly insane. I'll admit I'm not the most savvy C programmer but the following code gives me an error: ## Source File## #include #include #include int main() { char *line; line = readline("Test: "); return 0; } ##Source File## ##Error## /var/tmp//ccqxIZxQ.o(.text+0x25): In function `main': : undefined reference to `readline' ##Error## What sucks is that readline() seems like it would be the perfect solution. I'm not doing anything special but my I don't want to start getting into bad habits like using gets(). -Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 20:39:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E4016A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:39:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brenthostetler@gmail.com) Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1467B43D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brenthostetler@gmail.com) Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f25so741760pyf for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:39:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=L8eMdhV8eJGrt0Q7e4xm0X09slL+rx/Oqq1eK9d9zSriY3ZkJJgLfwv3HS5UiftH2L3sOnqfHHIVx8XwIlsVkd41x/q4S2PACnCxrTYRp5IHfYMDhzniJEkFhypxVNlBc389hx2bicMxvFkyvrCSg8sOv2j0C4cYvZ0B1r3nnc8= Received: by 10.35.107.20 with SMTP id j20mr1989017pym; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:11:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.74.17 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:11:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:11:29 -0800 From: "Brent Hostetler" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Linksys EG1032 -- couldn't map ports/memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:39:17 -0000 Hello, I am trying to get a linksys EG1032 working with freebsd 6.0. The driver appears to not be loading properly giving error that it could not map ports/memory and attach returned 6. Not sure what is wrong, or what needs to be done to fix. Please advise, Brent Relevant data: # uname -a FreeBSD files 6.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Sun Jan 29 05:17:11 PST 2006 =3D20 root@files.hostetler.ws:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 # pciconf -v -l | grep -A 3 -B 3 Linksys vendor =3D3D 'Promise Technology Inc' class =3D3D mass storage skc0@pci1:12:0: class=3D3D0x020000 card=3D3D0x00241737 chip=3D3D0x10321737 = rev=3D3D=3D 0x10 hdr=3D3D0x00 vendor =3D3D 'Linksys' device =3D3D 'EG1032 Gigabit Ethernet' class =3D3D network subclass =3D3D ethernet # dmesg | grep sk skc0: port 0xb000-0xb0ff mem 0xeb0a5000-0xeb0a50ff irq 16 at device 12.0 on pci1 sk0: couldn't map ports/memory device_attach: skc0 attach returned 6 # dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Sun Jan 29 05:17:11 PST 2006 root@files.hostetler.ws:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC module_register: module pci/nge already exists! Module pci/nge failed to register: 17 module_register: module nge/miibus already exists! Module nge/miibus failed to register: 17 mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature: 4 C ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Unknown CPU Type (1603.64-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D3D "AuthenticAMD" Id =3D3D 0x681 Stepping =3D3D 1 Features=3D3D0x383fbff AMD Features=3D3D0xc0400800 real memory =3D3D 268369920 (255 MB) avail memory =3D3D 253128704 (241 MB) ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 12 on acpi0 pci_link4: on acpi0 pci_link5: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link6: on acpi0 pci_link7: on acpi0 pci_link8: irq 12 on acpi0 pci_link9: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link10: on acpi0 pci_link11: on acpi0 pci_link12: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link13: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link14: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link15: on acpi0 pci_link16: irq 16 on acpi0 pci_link17: irq 17 on acpi0 pci_link18: irq 18 on acpi0 pci_link19: irq 19 on acpi0 pci_link20: irq 16 on acpi0 pci_link21: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link22: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link23: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link24: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link25: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link26: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link27: irq 23 on acpi0 pci_link28: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link29: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link30: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link31: irq 0 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe8000000-0xe9ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.4 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.5 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xee080000-0xee080fff irq 20 at device 2.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xee083000-0xee083fff at device 2.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xee084000-0xee0840ff irq 21 at device 2.2 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 4 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: nVidia EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) pcib1: at device 8.0 on pci0 pci_link17: BIOS IRQ 21 for 0.13.INTA is invalid pci1: on pcib1 atapci0: port 0x8000-0x8007,0x8400-0x8403,0x8800-0x8807,0x8c00-0x8c03,0x9000-0x900f mem 0xeb0a0000-0xeb0a3fff irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci1 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 pci1: at device 9.0 (no driver attached) atapci1: port 0x9400-0x9407,0x9800-0x9803,0x9c00-0x9c07,0xa000-0xa003,0xa400-0xa40f irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci1 ata4: on atapci1 ata5: on atapci1 atapci2: port 0xa800-0xa87f,0xac00-0xacff mem 0xeb0a4000-0xeb0a4fff,0xeb080000-0xeb09ffff irq 19 at device 11.0 on pci1 ata6: on atapci2 ata7: on atapci2 ata8: on atapci2 ata9: on atapci2 skc0: port 0xb000-0xb0ff mem 0xeb0a5000-0xeb0a50ff irq 16 at device 12.0 on pci1 sk0: couldn't map ports/memory device_attach: skc0 attach returned 6 atapci3: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 9.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci3 ata1: on atapci3 pcib2: at device 12.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 xl0: <3Com 3c920B-EMB Integrated Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xc000-0xc07f mem 0xed000000-0xed00007f irq 20 at device 1.0 on pci2 miibus0: on xl0 acphy0: on miibus0 acphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:26:54:0b:50:df fwohci0: <1394 Open Host Controller Interface> mem 0xee086000-0xee0867ff,0xee087000-0xee08703f irq 21 at device 13.0 on pci0 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=3D3D0) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:40:ca:07:01:03:77:bd fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:40:ca:03:77:bd fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:40:ca:03:77:bd fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant sbp0: on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: node_id=3D3D0xc800ffc0, gen=3D3D1, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <=3D3D 0, cable IRM =3D3D 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) pcib3: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acp= =3D i0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcefff,0xd0000-0xd3fff,0xd4000-0xd67ff,0xd7000-0xd97ff,0xda000-0xd= =3D efff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D3D0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1603642871 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 114473MB at ata0-master UDMA100 ad2: 114473MB at ata1-master UDMA100 GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot created (id=3D3D2015974814). GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot: provider ad0s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1 created (id=3D3D3042561125). GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1: provider ad0s2 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot: provider ad2s1 detected. ad4: 152627MB at ata2-master UDMA100 GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot: provider ad2s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot: provider ad0s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot: provider mirror/gmroot launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1: provider ad2s2 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1: provider ad2s2 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1: provider ad0s2 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1: provider mirror/M1 launched. GEOM_CONCAT: Device data created (id=3D3D1076297974). GEOM_CONCAT: Disk mirror/M1 attached to data. ad6: 152627MB at ata3-master UDMA100 ad8: 117246MB at ata4-master UDMA100 ad10: 114473MB at ata5-master UDMA100 ad14: 194481MB at ata7-master SATA300 ad18: 194481MB at ata9-master SATA300 GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2 created (id=3D3D2605455482). GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2: provider ad4s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2: provider ad6s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2: provider ad6s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2: provider ad4s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2: provider mirror/M2 launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3 created (id=3D3D851282727). GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3: provider ad8s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3: provider ad10s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3: provider ad10s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3: provider ad8s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3: provider mirror/M3 launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4 created (id=3D3D2767130626). GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4: provider ad14s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4: provider ad18s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4: provider ad18s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4: provider ad14s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4: provider mirror/M4 launched. GEOM_CONCAT: Disk mirror/M2 attached to data. GEOM_CONCAT: Disk mirror/M3 attached to data. GEOM_CONCAT: Disk mirror/M4 attached to data. GEOM_CONCAT: Device data activated. Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/mirror/gmroota From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 20:50:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA84D16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:50:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp1.suscom.net (smtp1.suscom.net [64.78.119.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FBD043D49 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:50:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D691D0004 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:53:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp1.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24772-01 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:53:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp1.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F7991D0002 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:53:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1IKoEE8084498 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:50:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1IKoDYR084497 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:50:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) From: Gerard Seibert Organization: Seibercom,net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:50:04 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060218111849.15E6.GERARD@seibercom.net> <200602181435.07066.gerard@seibercom.net> <1140294574.8388.8.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1140294574.8388.8.camel@localhost> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(=?utf-8?q?gxJxxc=0A=09RnSNPNr*/=5E=7EStawWU9KDJ-CT0k=24f=23?=@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7635913.jlODiEy3dC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602181550.13252.gerard@seibercom.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Removing BOM from UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard@seibercom.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:50:18 -0000 --nextPart7635913.jlODiEy3dC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline enjamin A'Lee wrote: > From: > "Benjamin A'Lee" > To: > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: > Today 03:29:34 pm > =C2=A0 > > On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 14:34 -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > Maybe I am doing something wrong, but it does not appear to be > > working correctly. I named the file nobom.sh and put it in the same > > directory as the files I want to convert. I also set the program > > permission to 0755. > > > > typing the p[program name does nothing; I have to precede it with > > 'perl'. Even then, it does not appear to work correctly. In the > > following example, the file is parsed, but not converted. > > Sorry; try changing the first line to #!/usr/local/bin/perl > > > perl nobom.sh testfile > > > > Am I doing something incorrectly here? > > Try: > > cat testfile | nobom.sh > > Though the way you describe appears to work here: > > $ cat bom-testfile | hd > 00000000 =C2=A0ef bb bf 23 20 42 4f 4d =C2=A020 74 65 73 74 20 66 69 =C2= =A0|...# BOM > test fi| 00000010 =C2=A06c 65 0a =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 > =C2=A0|le.| 00000013 > $ bomkill.pl bom-testfile | hd > 00000000 =C2=A023 20 42 4f 4d 20 74 65 =C2=A073 74 20 66 69 6c 65 0a =C2= =A0|# BOM > test file.| 00000010 > > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ben Something appears to be wrong here. First, the file will not run unless=20 I precede it with 'perl'. I have another perl script in the same=20 directory that runs just fine without any special prefixes. Also, the=20 script does not seem to remove the BOM entity. This is the script as I have it entered: #!/usr/local/bin/perl use warnings; use diagnostics -verbose; @file=3D<>; $file[0] =3D~ s/^\xEF\xBB\xBF//; print(@file); I have the file permissions set to 0755. Is there anything else that=20 could be causing this to fail? This is the first line of the file I am attempting to fix (well one of=20 them). =C3=AF=C2=BB=C2=BFSubject: That is what appears when I use pico to view the file. =2D-=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net PGP: http://www.seibercom.net/sig/gerard.asc --nextPart7635913.jlODiEy3dC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD94iFchM2dIO+3uMRAhyaAKCQbknYMo5eckbi4U/8kvTS/dAg1QCfe96i tLot4w2vyF53LChQhJVg/Yw= =Wz3m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7635913.jlODiEy3dC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 20:51:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D22D16A422 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:51:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmy@jamesbailie.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43D8D43D53 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:51:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmy@jamesbailie.com) Received: (qmail 5404 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 20:51:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.29.126.205?) (jazzturk@rogers.com@70.29.126.205 with plain) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 20:51:26 -0000 Message-ID: <43F788CD.9050100@jamesbailie.com> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:51:25 -0500 From: James Bailie User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051218) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd@voidmain.net References: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <43F74361.90109@voidmain.net> <43F75DF6.3050903@mac.com> <43F75F3C.7080903@voidmain.net> <43F76296.4010407@mac.com> <43F784AA.50206@voidmain.net> In-Reply-To: <43F784AA.50206@voidmain.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:51:29 -0000 Tom Grove wrote: > ##Error## > /var/tmp//ccqxIZxQ.o(.text+0x25): In function `main': > : undefined reference to `readline' > ##Error## You forgot to pass -lreadline to the compiler. -- James Bailie http://www.jamesbailie.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 20:54:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9C116A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:54:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: from smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1B1343D75 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:53:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 14101 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 20:53:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=V9QH7aXQpdOIkVtNeXlkQsnnzU/NZgWRVuQRG0vwIcpVEnJlrOSiYlZZcKNzQTxodMzFOEjE+/3sXvVZBFY92+17/GMLO+MemGVwcm0bwTwfBrBXVjdmbuoUOTwIaebkli/OS/oUMSVyYg3cJ8vOPE3lRt+1cQ/zH+qbnUZwtOc= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mj001@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 20:53:52 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd@voidmain.net In-Reply-To: <43F760D8.6000506@voidmain.net> References: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <43F760D8.6000506@voidmain.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:53:50 -0500 Message-Id: <1140296030.24729.1.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:54:02 -0000 On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 13:00 -0500, Tom Grove wrote: > Mike Jeays wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 21:54 -0500, Tom Grove wrote: > > > >> Is there anyone who can compile a program using the getline() function? > >> Here is a really simple program to recreate the following error: > >> > >> ##Error## > >> /var/tmp//ccvYIi4C.o(.text+0x26): In function `main': > >> : undefined reference to `getline' > >> ##Error## > >> > >> ##Source File## > >> #include > >> > >> int main() { > >> char line[10]; > >> > >> getline(&line, 10); > >> printf("%s", line); > >> > >> return 0; > >> } > >> ## Source File## > >> > >> -Tom > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > I got a bit further by installing the port for getline > > (/usr/ports/devel/libgetline), and changed the code slightly to provide > > a single parameter. (Look at man getline) > > > > #include > > #include > > > > int main() { > > char line[10]="test"; > > > > getline(line); > > printf("%s", line); > > > > return 0; > > } > > > > chaucer 29 ~/c $ cc -o getline -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib > > getline.c -lgetline > > chaucer 30 ~/c $ getline > > testnow > > testchaucer 31 ~/c $ > I also noticed that this code actually doesn't work...I'm not sure why > either but it doesn't output what gets typed. Notice that the 'now' > that gets typed isn't echoed below. > > -Tom > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Yes - that's why I said I "got a bit further", not that I had made it work. I have never tried to use it before, and would have to experiment more. -- Mike Jeays http://ca.geocities.com/mike.jeays@rogers.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 21:00:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9200B16A441 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: from smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA26243D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:00:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 19423 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2006 21:00:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=j6IPfNp0bvfiZSRL9h4LMvKzdIY1OGLBM78j7kwxovdJMgLYUES5vXu4+Oesc3fB0jlgJuboTsHZvqza6BmXx8CQTxtZC3WYUCCux5Cn/I6OLZOjt0dVwKZ3XAh7cUwaZKJaV9zco4HMALEiaV2jnAI2Gk9Ng1K6maIixkvjtv8= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mj001@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2006 21:00:46 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd@voidmain.net In-Reply-To: <43F784AA.50206@voidmain.net> References: <43F68C7D.9010403@voidmain.net> <1140233843.982.21.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <43F74361.90109@voidmain.net> <43F75DF6.3050903@mac.com> <43F75F3C.7080903@voidmain.net> <43F76296.4010407@mac.com> <43F784AA.50206@voidmain.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:00:44 -0500 Message-Id: <1140296444.24729.4.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getline function X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:00:47 -0000 On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 15:33 -0500, Tom Grove wrote: > #include > #include > #include > > int main() { > char *line; > > line = readline("Test: "); > > return 0; > } It compiles and works with "gcc -o readline readline.c -l readline". You need to tell the loader about the library. -- Mike Jeays http://ca.geocities.com/mike.jeays@rogers.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 21:14:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32BC16A422 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:14:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp5.suscom.net (smtp5.suscom.net [64.78.83.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656C343D66 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:14:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0255100F5 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:14:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp5.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp5 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21446-01-75 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:14:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp5.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A52075100F4 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:14:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss [192.168.0.4]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1ILEh0b084667 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:14:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:14:46 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom In-Reply-To: <200602181550.13252.gerard@seibercom.net> References: <1140294574.8388.8.camel@localhost> <200602181550.13252.gerard@seibercom.net> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060218161226.A611.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new .250 at suscom.net Subject: Re: Removing BOM from UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:14:56 -0000 Gerard Seibert wrote: > enjamin A'Lee wrote: > > > From: > > "Benjamin A'Lee" > > To: > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Date: > > Today 03:29:34 pm > >   > > > > On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 14:34 -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > > Maybe I am doing something wrong, but it does not appear to be > > > working correctly. I named the file nobom.sh and put it in the same > > > directory as the files I want to convert. I also set the program > > > permission to 0755. > > > > > > typing the p[program name does nothing; I have to precede it with > > > 'perl'. Even then, it does not appear to work correctly. In the > > > following example, the file is parsed, but not converted. > > > > Sorry; try changing the first line to #!/usr/local/bin/perl > > > > > perl nobom.sh testfile > > > > > > Am I doing something incorrectly here? > > > > Try: > > > > cat testfile | nobom.sh > > > > Though the way you describe appears to work here: > > > > $ cat bom-testfile | hd > > 00000000  ef bb bf 23 20 42 4f 4d  20 74 65 73 74 20 66 69  |...# BOM > > test fi| 00000010  6c 65 0a                                         > >  |le.| 00000013 > > $ bomkill.pl bom-testfile | hd > > 00000000  23 20 42 4f 4d 20 74 65  73 74 20 66 69 6c 65 0a  |# BOM > > test file.| 00000010 > > > > > >     Ben > > Something appears to be wrong here. First, the file will not run unless > I precede it with 'perl'. I have another perl script in the same > directory that runs just fine without any special prefixes. Also, the > script does not seem to remove the BOM entity. > > This is the script as I have it entered: > > #!/usr/local/bin/perl > use warnings; > use diagnostics -verbose; > @file=<>; > $file[0] =~ s/^\xEF\xBB\xBF//; > print(@file); > > I have the file permissions set to 0755. Is there anything else that > could be causing this to fail? > > This is the first line of the file I am attempting to fix (well one of > them). > > Subject: > > That is what appears when I use pico to view the file. > As I continue to play with this, it has become apparent that the new file is not being written, or at least I cannot locate it. Since I do not know perl, I have no idea where to look for answers. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 21:34:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D6816A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:34:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@benalee.co.uk) Received: from ariadne.benalee.co.uk (82-45-24-36.cable.ubr13.newt.blueyonder.co.uk [82.45.24.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363B943D48 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:34:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@benalee.co.uk) Received: by ariadne.benalee.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D874246A523; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:34:53 +0000 (GMT) From: Benjamin A'Lee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060218161226.A611.GERARD@seibercom.net> References: <1140294574.8388.8.camel@localhost> <200602181550.13252.gerard@seibercom.net> <20060218161226.A611.GERARD@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:34:53 +0000 Message-Id: <1140298493.8388.12.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.91 Subject: Re: Removing BOM from UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:34:55 -0000 On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 16:14 -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > As I continue to play with this, it has become apparent that the new > file is not being written, or at least I cannot locate it. Since I do > not know perl, I have no idea where to look for answers. It shouldn't be writing any new files; it prints the filtered text to stdout. Ben --=20 Termisoc Tech Officer: My Homepage: "People demand freedom of speech as compensation for the freedom of thought which they have but seldom use." -- S=C3=B8ren Kierkegaard=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 21:40:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5C316A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:40:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C4143D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:40:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1ILdcrj014284; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:39:39 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:40:01 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602181340.02062.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Xn Nooby Subject: Re: fresh install, portupgrade fails on xterm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:40:05 -0000 On Saturday 18 February 2006 12:08, Xn Nooby wrote: > its depressing when a fresh install fails > > i followed my normal fail-proof slow method of updating a fresh > install, and it fails to update xterm, some of the messages are: > > ==> xterm-206_1 conflicts with installed packages: > xorg-clients-6.8.2 > *** Error code 1 > > .... > > ** Listing the failed packages > ! x11/xterm (xterm-203) (install error) > * x11/xorg-clients (xorg-clients-6.8.2) > > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.1. I hadnt even gotten to > configuring with X, so I was surprised there was a problem there. > the command tat generated the error was: > > portpgrade -arR > > > I'm guessing other people will also be getting this error soon. Maybe they read /usr/ports/UPDATING where 20051113: AFFECTS: users of x11/xterm, x11/xorg-clients, x11/XFree86-4-clients AUTHOR: x11@FreeBSD.org Xterm no longer installs with '-static' prefix. Users should upgrade XFree86-clients to 4.5.0_1 or xorg-clients to 6.8.2_1 or newer before attempting upgrade of xterm to 206_1 or newer. Previous versions remove xterm on deinstall so CONFLICTS have been set accordingly. It worked for me back in November :). Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://www.soyandina.com/ "I am Andean project". http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 21:49:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84D216A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:49:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob.info@vfs.com) Received: from mail.packetsafe.net (hercules.packetsafe.net [208.181.60.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C077C43D53 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:49:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob.info@vfs.com) Received: from s01060011950ac729.vc.shawcable.net ([24.82.241.86] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by mail.packetsafe.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FAZx3-000LP6-Pd; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:49:15 -0800 Message-ID: <43F79656.7090309@vfs.com> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:49:10 -0800 From: "Rob Connon (Info)" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Barniskis References: <43F61258.6000604@scls.lib.wi.us> In-Reply-To: <43F61258.6000604@scls.lib.wi.us> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms070606050905020708040504" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "hercules.packetsafe.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Look at PF if your running FreeBSD 5/6. - You can do this easily and it's well documented. IMO it's alot more functional and usable over ipfw and definetly better documentation. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html - *most* of the features in the OpenBSD faq cover the freebsd port. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP Cc: freebsd-questions , Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: question on NAT for multiple subnets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:49:22 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070606050905020708040504 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Look at PF if your running FreeBSD 5/6. - You can do this easily and it's well documented. IMO it's alot more functional and usable over ipfw and definetly better documentation. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html - *most* of the features in the OpenBSD faq cover the freebsd port. Greg Barniskis wrote: > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> I've never done it but I think you can run multiple nat instances >> and multiple divert sockets, you will have to specify them in the >> config file to natd, though. > > > Excellent. That's what I was hoping for. So instead of one "divert > natd" rule in ipfw, I simply need "divert N", "divert N+1", "divert > N+2", etc. where N is a port number where I bound my first natd, N+1 > the next natd instance, etc. I think I can manage that. > >> If it were me, though, I would try to >> setup multiple FreeBSD boxes, not only does that give you some >> redundancy, but it makes troubleshooting a lot easier. > > > Thanks, but we're talking about a need for somewhere between 54 and > 216 distinct NAT<->subnet instances, maybe more. I really need a > solution for one host, two NICs, that compares favorably to providing > this functionality with a PIX. > > >> Ted >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Greg Barniskis >>> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 8:43 AM >>> To: freebsd-questions >>> Subject: question on NAT for multiple subnets >>> >>> >>> I'm sure I could figure this out from scrutinizing Google, the >>> FreeBSD documentation, and testing in a lab, but I'm particularly >>> pressed for time on finding the right answer to this. >>> >>> For a long time we've been quite happy coalescing all private IP >>> client requests onto a single public IP address through NAT. >>> Management now wants more granularity, at least one unique public IP >>> per private subnet. >>> >>> Can I set up a single ipfw box that examines client source ip addrs >>> and provides different public NAT addrs for each private client subnet? >>> >>> Any pointers to the best way to think about this issue much >>> appreciated. If the answer is ipfw doesn't handle this, but some >>> other fw does, fine, I just need to know which. Thanks! >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator >>> South Central Library System (SCLS) >>> Library Interchange Network (LINK) >>> , (608) 266-6348 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/263 - Release Date: >>> 2/16/2006 >>> >> >> > > --------------ms070606050905020708040504 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIH3TCC AkkwggGyoAMCAQICAw+1/DANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UE ChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNv bmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDUxMDIwMTgxNjU3WhcNMDYxMDIwMTgxNjU3 WjBCMR8wHQYDVQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMR8wHQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhBy b2IuaW5mb0B2ZnMuY29tMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQCrrgaqYmutxRyB j7lOloc8vvKxBMXxBoX6ZPH4izXz7mYxe2aZhTXgvyO6anUcxdF7Cc4dv87zp/HnBHdteiMg NCiHmlB5qOmkVdlScMnmSHAyirWSpO+N5DeO74Rjs+c8icizMPIWP1Acx/P9IZt+DcOv5m/4 gXQi7k+lASj78QIDAQABoy0wKzAbBgNVHREEFDASgRByb2IuaW5mb0B2ZnMuY29tMAwGA1Ud EwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAet3R0PmERIg0JAuBvOPKIy+ao/6Pr2/+5N3w /cCpDJjuNQHVJamNt/yySEF1vtAlDcAn0uaoRwLwDlcRX9/Nn6+x1xIIszEhWJCJHBzlfTpu QpCxGuwhWoPWPwcUym070ODTFHSnx9PEzG/3LxxRplH5lqK3c/Bs4aJhDOb7zjcwggJJMIIB sqADAgECAgMPtfwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA1MTAyMDE4MTY1N1oXDTA2MTAyMDE4MTY1N1owQjEf MB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEfMB0GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYQcm9iLmlu Zm9AdmZzLmNvbTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAq64GqmJrrcUcgY+5TpaH PL7ysQTF8QaF+mTx+Is18+5mMXtmmYU14L8jump1HMXRewnOHb/O86fx5wR3bXojIDQoh5pQ eajppFXZUnDJ5khwMoq1kqTvjeQ3ju+EY7PnPInIszDyFj9QHMfz/SGbfg3Dr+Zv+IF0Iu5P pQEo+/ECAwEAAaMtMCswGwYDVR0RBBQwEoEQcm9iLmluZm9AdmZzLmNvbTAMBgNVHRMBAf8E AjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAHrd0dD5hESINCQLgbzjyiMvmqP+j69v/uTd8P3AqQyY 7jUB1SWpjbf8skhBdb7QJQ3AJ9LmqEcC8A5XEV/fzZ+vsdcSCLMxIViQiRwc5X06bkKQsRrs IVqD1j8HFMptO9Dg0xR0p8fTxMxv9y8cUaZR+Zait3PwbOGiYQzm+843MIIDPzCCAqigAwIB AgIBDTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4g Q2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEo MCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhh d3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVl bWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTAzMDcxNzAwMDAwMFoXDTEzMDcxNjIzNTk1OVowYjELMAkG A1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNV BAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDEpjxVc1X7TrnKmVoeaMB1BHCd3+n/ox7svc31W/Iadr1/DDph8r9R zgHU5VAKMNcCY1osiRVwjt3J8CuFWqo/cVbLrzwLB+fxH5E2JCoTzyvV84J3PQO+K/67GD4H v0CAAmTXp6a7n2XRxSpUhQ9IBH+nttE8YQRAHmQZcmC3+wIDAQABo4GUMIGRMBIGA1UdEwEB /wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwQwYDVR0fBDwwOjA4oDagNIYyaHR0cDovL2NybC50aGF3dGUuY29tL1Ro YXd0ZVBlcnNvbmFsRnJlZW1haWxDQS5jcmwwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAc MRowGAYDVQQDExFQcml2YXRlTGFiZWwyLTEzODANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBIjNFQg+oL LswNo2asZw9/r6y+whehQ5aUnX9MIbj4Nh+qLZ82L8D0HFAgk3A8/a3hYWLD2ToZfoSxmRsA xRoLgnSeJVCUYsfbJ3FXJY3dqZw5jowgT2Vfldr394fWxghOrvbqNOUQGls1TXfjViF4gtwh GTXeJLHTHUb/XV9lTzGCArowggK2AgEBMGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMPtfwwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAacwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsG CSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwMjE4MjE0OTEwWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQx FgQUNwJ5Kup2WK2CjyTmSg/YLsR7q7YwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAO BggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgw eAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMWswaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1 bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElz c3VpbmcgQ0ECAw+1/DB6BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFroGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNV BAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMPtfwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYBqmBG6GBHf SuPglOg9XL49Ztm7P4sRDqj4GOS0sHRPDV+bTXf0UOg50Jxn0r/Mxn/+fkDTTv548FrmdV+Y MdIpsdgurD3FA/RolVaYxnVxtO/1vn5AKKCzHuFl3NFyGUKNJU3x7Lfp1nciEtmiv/+//Gu3 Dm3SD7yzCyKkMnwlKQAAAAAAAA== --------------ms070606050905020708040504-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 21:55:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE12F16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:55:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136F043D68 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:55:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so627938nzp for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:55:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CTbl4YSPHU4bTL/5UofAM03oSgmlG0bkoei64sO9mdl6QgIRlFZcyLIi+2PWSHR9qwyDNhx1i9cGG5phY4nFSmTExYYWYcS55UsJKsQLk2QU4KzTv588gbOUNFvvm7unIH/QN3vAt/ZwHE8lTvGYaLbHIwU2w+XnRWb4GVWrBLE= Received: by 10.36.139.7 with SMTP id m7mr865514nzd; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:55:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.11 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:55:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:55:43 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" To: "Benjamin A'Lee" In-Reply-To: <1140298493.8388.12.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1140294574.8388.8.camel@localhost> <200602181550.13252.gerard@seibercom.net> <20060218161226.A611.GERARD@seibercom.net> <1140298493.8388.12.camel@localhost> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing BOM from UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:55:48 -0000 I use this to add BOM: http://search.cpan.org/~lyokato/UTF8BOM-1.01/lib/UTF8BOM.pm You shouldn't be so fixed on eliminating BOMs, it's quite a nice concept. It causes less trouble than you think. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 21:57:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ED516A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp1.suscom.net (smtp1.suscom.net [64.78.119.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617F743D49 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:57:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCED1D0004 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:59:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp1.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26612-08 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:59:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp1.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 21A011D0002 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:59:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (boss [192.168.0.4]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1ILv2lE084837 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:57:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:57:05 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom In-Reply-To: <1140298493.8388.12.camel@localhost> References: <20060218161226.A611.GERARD@seibercom.net> <1140298493.8388.12.camel@localhost> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060218165306.C5D2.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Removing BOM from UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 21:57:05 -0000 Benjamin A'Lee wrote: > It shouldn't be writing any new files; it prints the filtered text to > stdout. > > Ben OK, then that is the problem. I need it to actually write the file. It could either rename the old file and then rewrite it which would be nice, or just over write the old file. The BOM is just the first three characters in the file. I am assuming that it would not be removing anything else in the file. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 22:03:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FBA16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:03:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch [213.160.32.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797EE43D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:03:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876502E03D; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:03:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlantis.intranet [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66960-01; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:03:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from mini.intranet (mini.intranet [10.0.0.17]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477CB2E01D; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:03:23 +0100 (CET) From: Benjamin Lutz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:03:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4529942.r4n6CkaO2t"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602182303.19803.benlutz@datacomm.ch> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at atlantis.intranet Cc: Brent Hostetler Subject: Re: Linksys EG1032 -- couldn't map ports/memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:03:27 -0000 --nextPart4529942.r4n6CkaO2t Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 18 February 2006 21:11, Brent Hostetler wrote: > Hello, > I am trying to get a linksys EG1032 working with freebsd 6.0. The > driver appears to not be loading properly giving error that it could > not map ports/memory and attach returned 6. Not sure what is wrong, or > what needs to be done to fix. I've had the same issue a few months ago. This will probably help you: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-current&m=112851499907268&w=2 Cheers Benjamin --nextPart4529942.r4n6CkaO2t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD95mngShs4qbRdeQRAtoAAJ9orKeocdVEv/TJSFSt3/1oJhXavwCeOGVt L7rM0CXVJTb32IrOeMcjr04= =EsOG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4529942.r4n6CkaO2t-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 22:17:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B30416A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jr.vitor@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8332843D6D for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:17:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jr.vitor@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so381071wri for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:17:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AwLJ2JAL61lMJmGWdVR4t0DJ+RLe9vitPfQ+2BnVYdkx3GpQigdLXP4rQfQ1inU7jzPInXJbyqMlWD+U5OT/sbdxZlVGWgkKvKKIDDFuy9BhV5LZQo5OahXqH6w2lwfhSnvmhN91HnJALjJZoaky8IJ0oyq7CpgYTotMq9XXC9k= Received: by 10.54.136.15 with SMTP id j15mr2714153wrd; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:17:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.160.11 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:17:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57d0f60f0602181417h285db870v@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:17:27 -0300 From: vitor To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: certificates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:17:31 -0000 it would like to know if emits certification for a professional FreeBSD or if voc=EAs they homologate entities for emission of certificates? -- vitor www.insoniaprodutiva.com "quando a =FAltima =E1rvore tiver ca=EDdo, ...quando o =FAltimo rio tiver secado, ...quando o =FAltimo peixe for pescado, ...voc=EAs v=E3o entender que dinheiro n=E3o se come." SAVE GAYA (greenpeace) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 22:26:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8839B16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:26:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BF643D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:26:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from localhost (terrapin.inter-sonic.com [172.16.1.12]) by neonpark.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10517818E22; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:26:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43F79F24.7000907@intersonic.se> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:26:44 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vitor References: <57d0f60f0602181417h285db870v@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <57d0f60f0602181417h285db870v@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: certificates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:26:50 -0000 vitor wrote: > it would like to know if emits certification for a professional FreeBSD or > if vocs they homologate entities for emission of certificates? > perhaps http://www.bsdcertification.org/ is what you are looking for? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 23:04:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF8416A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from divs_83@yahoo.com) Received: from web31009.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31009.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED91D43D45 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:04:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from divs_83@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 153 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Feb 2006 23:04:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=XN7i7ueNM/8ikeT6PCJsnViwSKu9GcQ1zdhWTrM8WW/3Csfow9ssvYr00CRaEr2PLNIfUR6JwsjN4VG3t6igRZnyMwi87QG/4wYJ9ZoDglBQt5cwnAUxipydZ70OTDBWZrkh7YkTFNV5y1lzRv76qqLtCZeMIvDW/h0oQc7QLvw= ; Message-ID: <20060218230429.151.qmail@web31009.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.162.203.163] by web31009.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:04:29 PST Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:04:29 -0800 (PST) From: divyesh shah To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: reg a process's ruid and euid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:04:30 -0000 I have a system call which should kill all processes for a given uid. Now, I am confused about which uid to use(real or effecctive) of the processes when killing them. Example scenario: userids A, B, C A is super-user(root) so using my system call he can kill processes of any other user. Also, user C is running a process with ruid C but euid B(giving him possibly higher privilege). Now if A calls my system call asking to kill all processes of uid B, should my system call also kill the process started by C but running as B. Thanks, Divyesh Shah. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 23:43:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1720616A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:43:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F5A43D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:43:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060218234319.TMBI13051.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:43:19 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Per olof Ljungmark" , "vitor" Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:43:15 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <43F79F24.7000907@intersonic.se> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: certificates X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:43:21 -0000 Check the questions archives. There was a post from a east coast college (NJ) that has a internet education program for FreeBSD certificate. The director posted some facts about his program. That's all I can remember of it. The http://www.bsdcertification.org/ just completed incorporating in Oct 2005. The don't have a certificate program yet. They are just looking for donations to fund the development of the their certificate program. Maybe in 5 years they may have something. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Per olof Ljungmark Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 5:27 PM To: vitor Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: certificates vitor wrote: > it would like to know if emits certification for a professional FreeBSD or > if vocs they homologate entities for emission of certificates? > perhaps http://www.bsdcertification.org/ is what you are looking for? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 23:46:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F3E16A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:46:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luck@computerking.ca) Received: from shoemasters.com (shoemasters.com [68.144.188.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603C643D46 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:46:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luck@computerking.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by shoemasters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35D67DC1E2 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:42:49 -0700 (MST) Received: from shoemasters.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (shoemasters.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11823-07 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:42:48 -0700 (MST) Received: from shoemasters.com (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by shoemasters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0C27DC1D9 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:42:48 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <14518522.01140306167507.JavaMail.root@shoemasters.com> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:42:47 -0700 (MST) From: "RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.899 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 autolearn=ham tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-3.3, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Level: Subject: wdm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:46:33 -0000 Anyone been able to get wdm working with flux box and gnome? I seem to be able to login to kde and wmaker but that is all. I have the options in the session menu but when i choose fluxbox or gnome either nothing happens or i get wmaker. I followed the instructions here. http://fluxbox-wiki.org/index.php/Howto_add_fluxbox_to_wdm here is some of my /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/wdm/Xclients fluxbox*|FluxBox) # startup fluxbox FLUXBOX_PATH=/usr/X11r6/bin/fluxbox if ! test -x $FLUXBOX_PATH ; then FindInPath $FLUXBOX_PATH if test -n "$result" -a -x "$result"; then $FLUXBOX_PATH="$result"; fi fi if [ -x $FLUXBOX_PATH ] ; then echo Starting FluxBox >$HOME/.xwm.msgs exec $FLUXBOX_PATH >>$HOME/.xwm.msgs 2>&1 fi ;; gnome*|GNome) # startup gnome GNOME_PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin/gnome-wm if ! test -x $GNOME_PATH ; then FindInPath $GNOME_PATH if test -n "$result" -a -x "$result"; then $GNOME_PATH="$result"; fi fi if [ -x $GNOME_PATH ] ; then echo Starting GNome >$HOME/.xwm.msgs exec $GNOME_PATH >>$HOME/.xwm.msgs 2>&1 fi ;; icewm*|IceWm) # startup icewm ICEWM_PATH=icewm if ! test -x $ICEWM_PATH ; then FindInPath $ICEWM_PATH if test -n "$result" -a -x "$result"; then here is the line from wdm-config DisplayManager*wdmWm: wmaker:enlightenment:gnome:kde:fluxbox please help -- Computer King/CaNMail http://www.computerking.ca http://www.canmail.org Sales, Service, and Hosting Email, Data, and Web Packages Ask about web design specials Affiliates http://www.computerking.ca/pages/links/affiliates/affiliates.htm Maybe Computer Science should be in the College of Theology. -- R. S. Barton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 23:47:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C79216A420 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:47:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brenthostetler@gmail.com) Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8383C43D5E for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:47:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brenthostetler@gmail.com) Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i49so755566pyi for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:47:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=DgSQJm4svbn20+qxlDbymawDxx4qhqvpwuH4BCj4kXxsJ+/9Wutsz4JOqK44YAPDXdTzp3Xpef2Zfg/uR/GaRp2v65G15NV+ECHmkwjRqtJEAhQRomUl3sqaGOGsvmjgyDikl8vAqQAo2btVUuY8cn9VRy59pPmXcdYT4KJZFBc= Received: by 10.35.14.1 with SMTP id r1mr1493480pyi; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:23:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.74.17 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:23:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:23:24 -0800 From: "Brent Hostetler" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Linksys EG1032 -- couldn't map ports/memory; skc0 attach returned 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:47:57 -0000 Hello, I am trying to get a linksys EG1032 working with freebsd 6.0. The driver appears to not be loading properly giving error that it could not map ports/memory and attach returned 6. Not sure what is wrong, or what needs to be done to fix. Please advise, Brent Relevant data: # uname -a FreeBSD files 6.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Sun Jan 29 05:17:11 PST 2006 =20 root@files.hostetler.ws:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 # pciconf -v -l | grep -A 3 -B 3 Linksys vendor =3D 'Promise Technology Inc' class =3D mass storage skc0@pci1:12:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x00241737 chip=3D0x10321737 rev=3D= 0x10 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Linksys' device =3D 'EG1032 Gigabit Ethernet' class =3D network subclass =3D ethernet # dmesg | grep sk skc0: port 0xb000-0xb0ff mem 0xeb0a5000-0xeb0a50ff irq 16 at device 12.0 on pci1 sk0: couldn't map ports/memory device_attach: skc0 attach returned 6 # dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Sun Jan 29 05:17:11 PST 2006 root@files.hostetler.ws:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC module_register: module pci/nge already exists! Module pci/nge failed to register: 17 module_register: module nge/miibus already exists! Module nge/miibus failed to register: 17 mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature: 4 C ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Unknown CPU Type (1603.64-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D "AuthenticAMD" Id =3D 0x681 Stepping =3D 1 Features=3D0x383fbff AMD Features=3D0xc0400800 real memory =3D 268369920 (255 MB) avail memory =3D 253128704 (241 MB) ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 12 on acpi0 pci_link4: on acpi0 pci_link5: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link6: on acpi0 pci_link7: on acpi0 pci_link8: irq 12 on acpi0 pci_link9: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link10: on acpi0 pci_link11: on acpi0 pci_link12: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link13: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link14: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link15: on acpi0 pci_link16: irq 16 on acpi0 pci_link17: irq 17 on acpi0 pci_link18: irq 18 on acpi0 pci_link19: irq 19 on acpi0 pci_link20: irq 16 on acpi0 pci_link21: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link22: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link23: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link24: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link25: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link26: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link27: irq 23 on acpi0 pci_link28: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link29: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link30: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link31: irq 0 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe8000000-0xe9ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.4 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.5 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xee080000-0xee080fff irq 20 at device 2.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xee083000-0xee083fff at device 2.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xee084000-0xee0840ff irq 21 at device 2.2 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 4 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: nVidia EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) pcib1: at device 8.0 on pci0 pci_link17: BIOS IRQ 21 for 0.13.INTA is invalid pci1: on pcib1 atapci0: port 0x8000-0x8007,0x8400-0x8403,0x8800-0x8807,0x8c00-0x8c03,0x9000-0x900f mem 0xeb0a0000-0xeb0a3fff irq 16 at device 8.0 on pci1 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 pci1: at device 9.0 (no driver attached) atapci1: port 0x9400-0x9407,0x9800-0x9803,0x9c00-0x9c07,0xa000-0xa003,0xa400-0xa40f irq 18 at device 10.0 on pci1 ata4: on atapci1 ata5: on atapci1 atapci2: port 0xa800-0xa87f,0xac00-0xacff mem 0xeb0a4000-0xeb0a4fff,0xeb080000-0xeb09ffff irq 19 at device 11.0 on pci1 ata6: on atapci2 ata7: on atapci2 ata8: on atapci2 ata9: on atapci2 skc0: port 0xb000-0xb0ff mem 0xeb0a5000-0xeb0a50ff irq 16 at device 12.0 on pci1 sk0: couldn't map ports/memory device_attach: skc0 attach returned 6 atapci3: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 9.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci3 ata1: on atapci3 pcib2: at device 12.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 xl0: <3Com 3c920B-EMB Integrated Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xc000-0xc07f mem 0xed000000-0xed00007f irq 20 at device 1.0 on pci2 miibus0: on xl0 acphy0: on miibus0 acphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:26:54:0b:50:df fwohci0: <1394 Open Host Controller Interface> mem 0xee086000-0xee0867ff,0xee087000-0xee08703f irq 21 at device 13.0 on pci0 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=3D0) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:40:ca:07:01:03:77:bd fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:40:ca:03:77:bd fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:40:ca:03:77:bd fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant sbp0: on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: node_id=3D0xc800ffc0, gen=3D1, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <=3D 0, cable IRM =3D 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) pcib3: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acp= i0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcefff,0xd0000-0xd3fff,0xd4000-0xd67ff,0xd7000-0xd97ff,0xda000-0xd= efff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1603642871 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 114473MB at ata0-master UDMA100 ad2: 114473MB at ata1-master UDMA100 GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot created (id=3D2015974814). GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot: provider ad0s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1 created (id=3D3042561125). GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1: provider ad0s2 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot: provider ad2s1 detected. ad4: 152627MB at ata2-master UDMA100 GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot: provider ad2s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot: provider ad0s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device gmroot: provider mirror/gmroot launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1: provider ad2s2 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1: provider ad2s2 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1: provider ad0s2 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M1: provider mirror/M1 launched. GEOM_CONCAT: Device data created (id=3D1076297974). GEOM_CONCAT: Disk mirror/M1 attached to data. ad6: 152627MB at ata3-master UDMA100 ad8: 117246MB at ata4-master UDMA100 ad10: 114473MB at ata5-master UDMA100 ad14: 194481MB at ata7-master SATA300 ad18: 194481MB at ata9-master SATA300 GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2 created (id=3D2605455482). GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2: provider ad4s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2: provider ad6s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2: provider ad6s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2: provider ad4s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M2: provider mirror/M2 launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3 created (id=3D851282727). GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3: provider ad8s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3: provider ad10s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3: provider ad10s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3: provider ad8s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M3: provider mirror/M3 launched. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4 created (id=3D2767130626). GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4: provider ad14s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4: provider ad18s1 detected. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4: provider ad18s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4: provider ad14s1 activated. GEOM_MIRROR: Device M4: provider mirror/M4 launched. GEOM_CONCAT: Disk mirror/M2 attached to data. GEOM_CONCAT: Disk mirror/M3 attached to data. GEOM_CONCAT: Disk mirror/M4 attached to data. GEOM_CONCAT: Device data activated. Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/mirror/gmroota