From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 17 03:26:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6868716A47B for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 03:26:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: from web60116.mail.yahoo.com (web60116.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3CB943CA6 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 03:26:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petermatulis@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 1372 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Dec 2006 03:26:00 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cxm8Z+6W/okRTolLYykvCdjoYef/cYGSmeRzLyviWgGixjNzb8AIdLX9chchmT5bND5oSuvsDr+1ruoJT1XE+G3+2+0RNGgUpl0EfS202HsP4lVANemcsfeZNIGnFfm8G3QGOIBZOWwDvhCFAwGRWFV5uWV3r9dKAvAfG6IONYY= ; Message-ID: <20061217032600.1363.qmail@web60116.mail.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: F8M2Sd4VM1k8lSV33d2q9e2DBCphmtzrojc41U3iWw0X0bE0ytoxIDquvPWEPIz94.ANncnLLvwFbY4TGP750Yx8P4ZuO0rung4UafNH_pVTmVJXvQBHe.hcFsboWctqAVN4WOP5qbjgUzg_ Received: from [70.53.153.132] by web60116.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:26:00 EST Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:26:00 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Matulis To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <45844912.7070103@vindaloo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: OpenBSD's spamd. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 03:26:04 -0000 --- Christopher Hilton wrote: > Has anyone gotten a newer version of OpenBSD's spamd than the one in > ports going? I'm cvsupping my ports tree now but since I didn't see > an > update on the cvs server I'm assuming 3.7 is the latest version. > > Between OpenBSD 3.7 and 3.8 spamd gained the ability to tarpit or > stutter at all connections for a configurable period of time. I > understand that stuttering for the first few seconds of the SMTP > dialog > causes many spammers to go away before even generating a greylisting > tuple. It's something I'd like to try and see for myself and it will > be > fairly easy since my primary MX is behind an OpenBSD firewall. > However, > my secondary MX is a FreeBSD box with no such protection and I fear > that > the spammers will just take advantage of the fact that my secondary > MX > has weaker protections than my primary. Yes, best practice is to configure all MX servers in the same way. Especially so if you plan to give spam servers a punch in the face (stuttering, greylisting, etc). I am also interested in spamd but will not use it because I do not have control of the other mailservers. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com