From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 18 01:58:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: acpi@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00D116A400; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:58:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex.kovalenko@verizon.net) Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49C013C44B; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:58:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex.kovalenko@verizon.net) Received: from [10.0.3.231] ([141.150.95.47]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JF20072FTHR7GQ3@vms040.mailsrvcs.net>; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:58:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 21:58:34 -0400 From: "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" In-reply-to: <200703161256.23996.jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: Jung-uk Kim Message-id: <1174183114.1027.2.camel@RabbitsDen> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <200703161256.23996.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: acpi@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] ACPI-CA 20070126 import X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:58:58 -0000 On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 12:56 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > I will import ACPI-CA 20070126 from Intel some time next week. > Current mega-patch against -CURRENT is here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica-import-20070126.diff.gz > > (Note: Sorry, I had to gzip(1) it because it was too big.) > > This patch should fix many ACPI issues in -CURRENT (ACPI-CA 20051021), > most notably memory leak. Full change log for ACPI-CA from the last > import is here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica_changes_20051021_20070126.txt > > I believe it is quite stable because I have been using this patch on > my primary desktop and laptop for a while and it was tested on amd64, > i386, and ia64. However, since the patch is huge, I may have missed > something. If you find something wrong, please let me know before it > is too late. ;-) > Works well here (ThinkPad X60 1709-73U). Intermittent message about battery charge being critically low at boot time seems to disappear. Thank you, Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko.