From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 1 11:08:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA4716A5DA for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADBC613C43E for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l01B8pga048953 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:08:51 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l01B8o05048948 for freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:08:50 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 11:08:50 GMT Message-Id: <200701011108.l01B8o05048948@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: linimon set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:08:51 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/82271 pf [pf] cbq scheduler cause bad latency o kern/92949 pf [pf] PF + ALTQ problems with latency o sparc/93530 pf Incorrect checksums when using pf's route-to on sparc6 3 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f conf/81042 pf [pf] [patch] /etc/pf.os doesn't match FreeBSD 5.3->5.4 o kern/93825 pf [pf] pf reply-to doesn't work o kern/103304 pf pf accepts nonexistent queue in rules o kern/106400 pf fatal trap 12 at restart of PF with ALTQ if ng0 device 4 problems total. From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 2 13:36:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F29316A403 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A206E13C45B for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:36:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so4336037uge for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:36:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=EaQsjDiECgrGw7n1e+A/F5mhpREaQH53BwfWls5WJUA6uDJ7VXmEoxrRGK5Y6NbTaBPx0UhqZW5KLBXw60EEa6rGXqzvZz9pG70VJsON38Y7I0NBRrgEzatLFQKDQ42y9itGFOXRpXAbd/PANF3FrPYDN+UzC8eLlZ3ZL2DVDhU= Received: by 10.67.99.1 with SMTP id b1mr26834754ugm.1167745008687; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:36:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.27.15 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 05:36:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0701020536g9220429s21442e1809a2f8bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:36:48 +0300 From: "Abdullah Al-Marrie" To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: pf.os out of date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:36:50 -0000 Hello, Max, could you please update the pf.os since it's out of date, it doesn't cover FreeBSD 6.1, 6.2, 7.0 ..etc. Maybe other linux and Vista as well needed to be updated? -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 2 15:03:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2874816A5AC for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7843813C44B for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from localhost (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33240EB5513; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 22:35:01 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geekcn.org Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org ([210.51.165.229]) by localhost (mail.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tF+c9nzfZJhs; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 22:34:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from [192.168.1.32] (unknown [221.222.203.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C09AEB390F; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 22:34:53 +0800 (CST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=khiTCSd6qaUSHd+jWHebpCX9JMZHhKWSB7nrTIXXBZWsYUNybjDGUjr1GUWZoP4i3 RRdn7soqWX/5MfFwr8wZQ== Message-ID: <459A6D4A.5070408@delphij.net> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:33:46 +0800 From: LI Xin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Abdullah Al-Marrie References: <499c70c0701020536g9220429s21442e1809a2f8bf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0701020536g9220429s21442e1809a2f8bf@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9B5195B9153CEA2C5534AA35" Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf.os out of date? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:03:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9B5195B9153CEA2C5534AA35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Max, could you please update the pf.os since it's out of date, it > doesn't cover FreeBSD 6.1, 6.2, 7.0 ..etc. >=20 > Maybe other linux and Vista as well needed to be updated? Since I did the previous update so I'd like to try to explain the thing. The pf.os file is derived from OpenBSD, which in turn is derived from p0f project. Therefore, it would be a good idea to request update from the upstream, especially p0f to update their data, so we don't diverge too much. BTW. We need to test the data before adopting changes like this, and I guess andre@'s recent changes might have some influence to the fingerprin= t. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! --------------enig9B5195B9153CEA2C5534AA35 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFmm1KOfuToMruuMARA/zOAJ93qmhf2eQUHTdakTo0Wd8manVWxgCdGj2P ixNWz2hGP+6AJSZ+UM8PjHo= =AP6J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9B5195B9153CEA2C5534AA35-- From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 2 21:02:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D50216A40F for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040B213C441 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so3273770pyh for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:02:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bDanMiC4D26+xdHlw6CtaweGO6Bgu3XFqY/E2TlcqGTQI0kIQ0PCzAdqjOwKOvoCrhAKvkwq5zDwgzHTeHt7DNvFOwgNcPvnCDAag9z+7t+1+XLlSp4yHL2DMl5QadS1cmgRpfZBvDosrXpro4idYFFPIa6QcNhJa8vBChqbkhA= Received: by 10.35.49.15 with SMTP id b15mr4982877pyk.1167770141725; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:35:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.52.7 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:35:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <59e2ee810701021235l4bfeada5h192cc4701bf5cf79@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 22:35:41 +0200 From: "Rostislav Krasny" To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20061222101752.b068b95c.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061222101752.b068b95c.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Long ICMP echo through NAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:02:43 -0000 This problem seems to be a result of misconfiguration at my Internet provider. I should talk with them. Sorry about the noise.