From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 00:09:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8E516A401 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pneumann@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E82113C441 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pneumann@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so1564659wxc for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:09:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=JLp1BYrWZHV9H+p7QZom/UBudwYOCBTTnjHerWZ8cgA3yvdMdMiXuBgpOJ4GY4pX1VDB8g0RnEmTwlhOsEaGixtRLd78N7X15TG10H6WpuZBX6K4CJGKpE8cC8Diswasab29K6phm0d4uXWf1eyFgXIkffW0jifzldhvhvpCxF4= Received: by 10.70.29.14 with SMTP id c14mr8326049wxc.1171755737651; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:42:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.0.124? ( [201.215.221.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h37sm10071815wxd.2007.02.17.15.42.16; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:42:17 -0800 (PST) From: "Phillip N." To: Tom McLaughlin In-Reply-To: <1171751641.1714.27.camel@localhost> References: <20070213010559.ae84dd0d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <1171751641.1714.27.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:42:08 -0300 Message-Id: <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:09:23 -0000 Hey Nork Do you get the same (port)upgrade problem if you add the following in mono port's Makefile? MAKE_ARGS= EXTERNAL_MCS=false bye! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 09:29:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B2716A400 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xxjack12xx@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D39C13C461 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xxjack12xx@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so1576622nzh for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:29:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DCDpzyEINZfCPaRnYlRwW5lcC90ctGKIMt/kIVmhwpIEdk2c1zzALgkOqlLvakL6UCGTV4Z7czS0sW8Oph2iCY42QzUTChu8on/rCNuwLSQKAXcZvTeYQqF9l08cQvVhDUIaUYjidohdKV5I7MOS2fvyYiI/NlKjMYoQaxttWOo= Received: by 10.114.155.1 with SMTP id c1mr2516172wae.1171789448050; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:04:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.76.11 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:04:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:04:07 -0800 From: "Jack L." To: "Andy Fawcett" In-Reply-To: <200702172132.18072.andy@athame.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200702172132.18072.andy@athame.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent libxine update seems to cause ICE on 6-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:29:35 -0000 It fails to compile with the gcc version that comes with FreeBSD 6 and 7, but it compiles fine on gcc 4.1 when I tried. It's probably a compiler bug that's been fixed on the 4.x series. On 2/17/07, Andy Fawcett wrote: > On Thursday, libxine was updated in the ports collection to version 1.1.4 > > Unfortunately, this seems to cause some kind of compiler-suite error on > 6.2-STABLE/amd64. > > dsputil.c:3826: error: unrecognizable insn: > (insn 62 10 12 0 (set (reg:SI 0 ax [61]) > (subreg:SI (plus:DI (subreg:DI (reg:SI 7 sp) 0) > (const_int -4 [0xfffffffffffffffc])) 0)) -1 (nil) > (nil)) > dsputil.c:3826: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2083 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions. > gmake[5]: *** [dsputil.lo] Error 1 > gmake[5]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/multimedia/libxine/work/xine-lib-1.1.4/src/libffmpeg/libavcodec' > > Please see PR ports/109213 (raised by another person) for slightly more > context to the error. It's bitten two of us so far, apparently in identical > way. > > I'm not sure this should be a ports PR, maybe it should go to the compiler > suite? > > Andy > > -- > Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk > | tap@kde.org > "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org > we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 11:50:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9BA16A400 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC7C13C474 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m19so2093011nfc for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:50:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DDBPSse8wPSpMYgR+s+JsyTz4U6QPh3jjM+Ieo2KveZ+cjJ2kC+SBApv5jauwFb5aWJ9PHgoaHSq07cFrbStf0htKiOfmCyUi3sy9pAPv58NleZ93Tjix/tOksYhukU5GYK4K9mo1rd6QWTuURdVYHyvqz1jt55BDN+6QbPZYQU= Received: by 10.49.75.2 with SMTP id c2mr4570541nfl.1171799406160; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:50:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.123.202? ( [195.241.221.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y24sm21797158nfb.2007.02.18.03.50.05; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:50:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45D83D6C.9000402@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:50:04 +0100 From: Rene Ladan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: portscout check not restrictable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:50:07 -0000 Hi, I recently started to use ports-mgmt/portscout. Although it is possible to restrict the database building (e.g. by maintainer), the check for new port versions itself isn't: it just seems to check all ports. Is this a bug? I have 'restrict maintainer = r.c.ladan@gmail.com' in portscout.conf Regards, Rene -- GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) "It won't fit on the line." -- me, 2001 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 12:28:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC7D16A402; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (salama58.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.207.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F8013C4BE; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.15] by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HIl9v-0001RB-3l; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:28:51 +0200 From: Andy Fawcett To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:28:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200702172132.18072.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702181428.55734.andy@athame.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Jack L." Subject: Re: Recent libxine update seems to cause ICE on 6-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:28:53 -0000 On Sunday 18 February 2007 11:04, Jack L. wrote: > It fails to compile with the gcc version that comes with FreeBSD 6 and > 7, but it compiles fine on gcc 4.1 when I tried. It's probably a > compiler bug that's been fixed on the 4.x series. Yes, I agree it builds fine on 6.2/amd64 when gcc 4.1 is used. I guess a simple fix for the port would be to update the USE_GCC version to a value known to work (4.1 and 4.2 from ports are ok, no idea about 4.0). Hopefully someone more familiar with the compiler suites would be able to fix the system compilers. Andy > On 2/17/07, Andy Fawcett wrote: > > On Thursday, libxine was updated in the ports collection to version 1.1.4 > > > > Unfortunately, this seems to cause some kind of compiler-suite error on > > 6.2-STABLE/amd64. > > > > dsputil.c:3826: error: unrecognizable insn: > > (insn 62 10 12 0 (set (reg:SI 0 ax [61]) > > (subreg:SI (plus:DI (subreg:DI (reg:SI 7 sp) 0) > > (const_int -4 [0xfffffffffffffffc])) 0)) -1 (nil) > > (nil)) > > dsputil.c:3826: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2083 > > Please submit a full bug report, > > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > > See for instructions. > > gmake[5]: *** [dsputil.lo] Error 1 > > gmake[5]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/multimedia/libxine/work/xine-lib-1.1.4/src/libffmpeg/libavcod > >ec' > > > > Please see PR ports/109213 (raised by another person) for slightly more > > context to the error. It's bitten two of us so far, apparently in > > identical way. > > > > I'm not sure this should be a ports PR, maybe it should go to the > > compiler suite? > > > > Andy > > > > -- > > Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk > > > > | tap@kde.org > > > > "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org > > we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk | tap@kde.org "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 13:40:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3B716A401 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from cp65.agava.net (cp65.agava.net [89.108.66.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6193813C481 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from clamav by cp65.agava.net with drweb-scanned (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1HImHF-0004Iv-Dw for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:40:29 +0300 Received: from [213.148.29.33] (helo=nexii.panopticon) by cp65.agava.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1HImHF-0004Il-AK for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:40:29 +0300 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.2]) by nexii.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253E71703B for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:42:03 +0300 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C01D40A8; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:42:07 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:42:07 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070218134207.GF1138@hades.panopticon> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp65.agava.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [106 106] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - amdmi3.ru X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: qt4 designer: cannot create/move widgets X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:40:32 -0000 Hi! I've just installed qt4 designer from ports, but I'm unable to create any widgets (i.e. I can drag widget from a widget box, but when I release mouse button it does appear on the form). Also I'm unable to move any widgets in existing forms (though I can resize them). Does anyone experience this problem? Qt3 designer does work without any problems... -- Best regards, Dmitry Marakasov mailto:amdmi3@amdmi3.ru From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 14:06:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACD516A408; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:06:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmD772@yandex.ru) Received: from webmail18.mail.yandex.net (webmail18.mail.yandex.net [213.180.200.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC3B13C4B6; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:06:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmD772@yandex.ru) Received: from YAMAIL (webmail18.yandex.ru) by mail.yandex.ru id ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:50:57 +0300 Received: from [83.234.150.1] ([83.234.150.1]) by mail.yandex.ru with HTTP; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:50:55 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:50:55 +0300 (MSK) From: "wmD772" Sender: wmD772@yandex.ru Message-Id: <45D859BF.00000B.07093@webmail18.yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] Errors-To: wmD772@yandex.ru To: gnome@FreeBSD.org X-MsgDayCount: 2 X-BornDate: 1138654800 X-Source-Ip: 83.234.150.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: gnome-mount-0.4_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: wmD772@yandex.ru List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:06:44 -0000 Hi *@FreeBSD.org. I installed gnome2-2.16.3 and gnome-mount-0.4_2, hal-0.5.8.20070210. All device and media mounting but not without errors. But most of the errors I wonder conversion of charset. Earlier fstab file, I have the following lines: /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto,-CKOI8-R 0 0 /dev/ad2s1 /dos ntfs ro,noauto,-CKOI8-R 0 0 /dev/fd0 /floppy msdosfs rw,noauto,-DCP866,-Lru_RU.KOI8-R 0 0 What can i do to convert charset now? I have been told that the 0.5 version of this issue has been resolved. Once it is ported? P.S. Floppy disk is not mounted. --- Sincerely, Eugene Nujdin. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 14:33:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from misaki (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB38616A400; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:33:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ariff@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:32:30 +0800 From: Ariff Abdullah To: Andy Fawcett Message-Id: <20070218223230.0699a2f1.ariff@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200702181428.55734.andy@athame.co.uk> References: <200702172132.18072.andy@athame.co.uk> <200702181428.55734.andy@athame.co.uk> Organization: FreeBSD X-Mailer: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/net/smtp.rb Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__18_Feb_2007_22_32_30_+0800_tZKqEBF5WyufWa3a" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, xxjack12xx@gmail.com Subject: Re: Recent libxine update seems to cause ICE on 6-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:33:38 -0000 --Signature=_Sun__18_Feb_2007_22_32_30_+0800_tZKqEBF5WyufWa3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:28:54 +0200 Andy Fawcett wrote: > On Sunday 18 February 2007 11:04, Jack L. wrote: > > It fails to compile with the gcc version that comes with FreeBSD 6 > > and 7, but it compiles fine on gcc 4.1 when I tried. It's probably > > a compiler bug that's been fixed on the 4.x series. >=20 > Yes, I agree it builds fine on 6.2/amd64 when gcc 4.1 is used. I > guess a simple fix for the port would be to update the USE_GCC > version to a value known to work (4.1 and 4.2 from ports are ok, no > idea about 4.0). >=20 > Hopefully someone more familiar with the compiler suites would be > able to fix the system compilers. >=20 How about using default compiler + this patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/ports/multimedia_libxine/patch-xzz -- Ariff Abdullah FreeBSD ... Recording in stereo is obviously too advanced and confusing for us idiot ***** users :P ........ --Signature=_Sun__18_Feb_2007_22_32_30_+0800_tZKqEBF5WyufWa3a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF2GOBlr+deMUwTNoRAhAbAKDA3p0bzwZEJJNSuaO+w1LSVC3cpACgvBlv 7/CNTl/zTw5U7f9UKb8Rh4s= =768c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__18_Feb_2007_22_32_30_+0800_tZKqEBF5WyufWa3a-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 14:46:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2843416A400; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:46:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (salama58.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.207.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D652A13C481; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.15] by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HInJ7-0003O6-SP; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:46:29 +0200 From: Andy Fawcett To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:46:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200702172132.18072.andy@athame.co.uk> <200702181428.55734.andy@athame.co.uk> <20070218223230.0699a2f1.ariff@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20070218223230.0699a2f1.ariff@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702181646.35408.andy@athame.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ariff Abdullah , xxjack12xx@gmail.com Subject: Re: Recent libxine update seems to cause ICE on 6-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:46:32 -0000 On Sunday 18 February 2007 16:32, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:28:54 +0200 > > Andy Fawcett wrote: > > On Sunday 18 February 2007 11:04, Jack L. wrote: > > > It fails to compile with the gcc version that comes with FreeBSD 6 > > > and 7, but it compiles fine on gcc 4.1 when I tried. It's probably > > > a compiler bug that's been fixed on the 4.x series. > > > > Yes, I agree it builds fine on 6.2/amd64 when gcc 4.1 is used. I > > guess a simple fix for the port would be to update the USE_GCC > > version to a value known to work (4.1 and 4.2 from ports are ok, no > > idea about 4.0). > > > > Hopefully someone more familiar with the compiler suites would be > > able to fix the system compilers. > > How about using default compiler + this patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/ports/multimedia_libxine/patch-xzz This patch allows libxine to build on my system. Thanks, Andy -- Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk | tap@kde.org "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 15:16:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3097D16A400 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 15:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfredoj69@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB1913C441 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 15:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfredoj69@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i22so1335534wra for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:16:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=n2tk8D03l1gnMjJOx2L/bHGW5wfSUCBPhkWbq2RcSj8EXZ8kX0bUjzagrLkL2wlNAs/tSBHbR4OUoE4sswoSO/eOlf+AzxTEXlI2vL7Y+eTutF8hir2k+q81NbYEH/iwQJ4PfpTsKsdmk9tEkVJcrZMWfAvlm0I4O19tP1nLgiQ= Received: by 10.114.78.1 with SMTP id a1mr2575237wab.1171810124898; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 06:48:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.120.5 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 06:48:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:48:44 -0500 From: "Alfredo Perez" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Error trying to create tmp directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 15:16:46 -0000 I am in the process of creating the pkg-plist of my port imgseek I issue this command: "mkdir /var/tmp/$(make -V imgseek) and I get the following error: "Illegal variable name" Does anybody know why and where is my mistake? Thanks From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 15:43:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from misaki (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9AB216A400; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 15:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ariff@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:42:00 +0800 From: Ariff Abdullah To: nobutaka@FreeBSD.org, Andy Fawcett Message-Id: <20070218234200.61cf017a.ariff@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200702181646.35408.andy@athame.co.uk> References: <200702172132.18072.andy@athame.co.uk> <200702181428.55734.andy@athame.co.uk> <20070218223230.0699a2f1.ariff@FreeBSD.org> <200702181646.35408.andy@athame.co.uk> Organization: FreeBSD X-Mailer: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/net/smtp.rb Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__18_Feb_2007_23_42_00_+0800_+i4x4MTHV0Y6OBV+" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, xxjack12xx@gmail.com Subject: Re: Recent libxine update seems to cause ICE on 6-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 15:43:07 -0000 --Signature=_Sun__18_Feb_2007_23_42_00_+0800_+i4x4MTHV0Y6OBV+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [removing -stable] On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:46:33 +0200 Andy Fawcett wrote: > On Sunday 18 February 2007 16:32, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:28:54 +0200 > > > > Andy Fawcett wrote: > > > On Sunday 18 February 2007 11:04, Jack L. wrote: > > > > It fails to compile with the gcc version that comes with > > > > FreeBSD 6 and 7, but it compiles fine on gcc 4.1 when I tried. > > > > It's probably a compiler bug that's been fixed on the 4.x > > > > series. > > > > > > Yes, I agree it builds fine on 6.2/amd64 when gcc 4.1 is used. I > > > guess a simple fix for the port would be to update the USE_GCC > > > version to a value known to work (4.1 and 4.2 from ports are > > > ok, no idea about 4.0). > > > > > > Hopefully someone more familiar with the compiler suites would > > > be able to fix the system compilers. > > > > How about using default compiler + this patch: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/ports/multimedia_libxine/patch-xzz >=20 > This patch allows libxine to build on my system. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Andy >=20 Er.. USE_GCC is kind of overkill for such trivial source fix. Nobutaka-san, could you revert the recent libxine commit and instead commit the above patch? -- Ariff Abdullah FreeBSD ... Recording in stereo is obviously too advanced and confusing for us idiot ***** users :P ........ --Signature=_Sun__18_Feb_2007_23_42_00_+0800_+i4x4MTHV0Y6OBV+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF2HPKlr+deMUwTNoRAkn7AKDeQDNuA++QnwBSe2hP0LhfvdyBNQCeLYF9 mwcWnj1ab4i/wRsemO0ziNQ= =5/9r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__18_Feb_2007_23_42_00_+0800_+i4x4MTHV0Y6OBV+-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 16:30:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A0B16A400; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobutaka@nobutaka.org) Received: from media-w.com (media-w.com [204.202.15.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A45713C491; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobutaka@nobutaka.org) Received: from bullet.internal.nobutaka.org (j069090.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [61.213.69.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by media-w.com (8.13.6.20060614/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1IFvboB021539; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:57:40 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:57:36 +0900 Message-ID: <867iufe9vz.wl%nobutaka@nobutaka.org> From: MANTANI Nobutaka To: Ariff Abdullah In-Reply-To: <20070218234200.61cf017a.ariff@FreeBSD.org> References: <200702172132.18072.andy@athame.co.uk> <200702181428.55734.andy@athame.co.uk> <20070218223230.0699a2f1.ariff@FreeBSD.org> <200702181646.35408.andy@athame.co.uk> <20070218234200.61cf017a.ariff@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.0.93 (i386-pc-freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (media-w.com [204.202.15.129]); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:57:41 +0900 (JST) Cc: Andy Fawcett , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, xxjack12xx@gmail.com Subject: Re: Recent libxine update seems to cause ICE on 6-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:30:35 -0000 At Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:42:00 +0800, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > > [removing -stable] > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:46:33 +0200 > Andy Fawcett wrote: > > On Sunday 18 February 2007 16:32, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:28:54 +0200 > > > > > > Andy Fawcett wrote: > > > > On Sunday 18 February 2007 11:04, Jack L. wrote: > > > > > It fails to compile with the gcc version that comes with > > > > > FreeBSD 6 and 7, but it compiles fine on gcc 4.1 when I tried. > > > > > It's probably a compiler bug that's been fixed on the 4.x > > > > > series. > > > > > > > > Yes, I agree it builds fine on 6.2/amd64 when gcc 4.1 is used. I > > > > guess a simple fix for the port would be to update the USE_GCC > > > > version to a value known to work (4.1 and 4.2 from ports are > > > > ok, no idea about 4.0). > > > > > > > > Hopefully someone more familiar with the compiler suites would > > > > be able to fix the system compilers. > > > > > > How about using default compiler + this patch: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/ports/multimedia_libxine/patch-xzz > > > > This patch allows libxine to build on my system. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andy > > > > Er.. USE_GCC is kind of overkill for such trivial source fix. > Nobutaka-san, could you revert the recent libxine commit and instead > commit the above patch? Sorry, I have read your mail about the patch after the commit. I'm going to remove the workaround and add your patch. -- MANTANI Nobutaka nobutaka@nobutaka.org, nobutaka@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 16:58:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C8316A401 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shaun@FreeBSD.org) Received: from dione.picobyte.net (81-86-230-94.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.230.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57D5C13C442 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shaun@FreeBSD.org) Received: from charon.picobyte.net (charon.picobyte.net [IPv6:2001:4bd0:201e::fe03]) by dione.picobyte.net (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:58:18 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:58:09 +0000 From: Shaun Amott To: Rene Ladan Message-ID: <20070218165809.GA44236@charon.picobyte.net> References: <45D83D6C.9000402@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45D83D6C.9000402@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 (FreeBSD i386) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portscout check not restrictable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:58:31 -0000 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:50:04PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I recently started to use ports-mgmt/portscout. Although it is possible > to restrict the database building (e.g. by maintainer), the check for > new port versions itself isn't: it just seems to check all ports. >=20 > Is this a bug? >=20 > I have 'restrict maintainer =3D r.c.ladan@gmail.com' in portscout.conf >=20 Yes, I'm sorry - it's a known bug. I was putting off fixing it until I had some other improvements. This patch will fix the problem until I get around to updating the port: http://people.freebsd.org/~shaun/patches/portscout-fix.diff --=20 Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF2IWhkmhdCGs4epoRAtW8AJ41jE9C6QuUlesQ+4PHPAHkpmwPwgCcDNov /ccCcXUOTCGRwMCIJBfP0dA= =3diV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 16:59:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from misaki (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60C4616A409; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:59:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ariff@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:58:44 +0800 From: Ariff Abdullah To: MANTANI Nobutaka Message-Id: <20070219005844.388c50f3.ariff@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <867iufe9vz.wl%nobutaka@nobutaka.org> References: <200702172132.18072.andy@athame.co.uk> <200702181428.55734.andy@athame.co.uk> <20070218223230.0699a2f1.ariff@FreeBSD.org> <200702181646.35408.andy@athame.co.uk> <20070218234200.61cf017a.ariff@FreeBSD.org> <867iufe9vz.wl%nobutaka@nobutaka.org> Organization: FreeBSD X-Mailer: /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/net/smtp.rb Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__19_Feb_2007_00_58_44_+0800_5evvj7wijIYp_6a8" Cc: andy@athame.co.uk, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, xxjack12xx@gmail.com Subject: Re: Recent libxine update seems to cause ICE on 6-STABLE/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:59:52 -0000 --Signature=_Mon__19_Feb_2007_00_58_44_+0800_5evvj7wijIYp_6a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:57:36 +0900 MANTANI Nobutaka wrote: > At Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:42:00 +0800, > Ariff Abdullah wrote: > >=20 > > [removing -stable] > >=20 > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:46:33 +0200 > > Andy Fawcett wrote: > > > On Sunday 18 February 2007 16:32, Ariff Abdullah wrote: > > > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:28:54 +0200 > > > > > > > > Andy Fawcett wrote: > > > > > On Sunday 18 February 2007 11:04, Jack L. wrote: > > > > > > It fails to compile with the gcc version that comes with > > > > > > FreeBSD 6 and 7, but it compiles fine on gcc 4.1 when I > > > > > > tried. It's probably a compiler bug that's been fixed on > > > > > > the 4.x series. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I agree it builds fine on 6.2/amd64 when gcc 4.1 is > > > > > used. I guess a simple fix for the port would be to update > > > > > the USE_GCC version to a value known to work (4.1 and 4.2 > > > > > from ports are ok, no idea about 4.0). > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully someone more familiar with the compiler suites > > > > > would be able to fix the system compilers. > > > > > > > > How about using default compiler + this patch: > > > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/ports/multimedia_libxine/patch-xzz > > >=20 > > > This patch allows libxine to build on my system. > > >=20 > > > Thanks, > > >=20 > > > Andy > > >=20 > >=20 > > Er.. USE_GCC is kind of overkill for such trivial source fix. > > Nobutaka-san, could you revert the recent libxine commit and > > instead commit the above patch? >=20 > Sorry, I have read your mail about the patch after the commit. > I'm going to remove the workaround and add your patch. >=20 Thanks :) -- Ariff Abdullah FreeBSD ... Recording in stereo is obviously too advanced and confusing for us idiot ***** users :P ........ --Signature=_Mon__19_Feb_2007_00_58_44_+0800_5evvj7wijIYp_6a8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF2IXHlr+deMUwTNoRAiDqAKDOaPjEbTzifOc9Qw3HY4FnsP5C1QCdFe87 VjljEHdq/tbc4+Ot6Z/EEU4= =bwD1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__19_Feb_2007_00_58_44_+0800_5evvj7wijIYp_6a8-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 18:53:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8BD16A402 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xride@x12.dk) Received: from swip.net (mailfe05.tele2.dk [212.247.154.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522A713C442 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xride@x12.dk) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from x12.dk (account mu12272@get2net.dk [83.72.97.231] verified) by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.12) with ESMTPA id 315789189; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:52:58 +0100 Received: by x12.dk (Postfix, from userid 666) id CB03050845; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:52:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:52:57 +0100 From: Soeren Straarup To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Message-ID: <20070218185257.GE66059@x12.dk> References: <20070201013401.GF53956@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070201013401.GF53956@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removing linphone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:53:02 -0000 On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:04:01PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > I've just tried to reinstall the linphone port and see that it's > marked broken and deprecated. Does anybody know of an alternative > which supplies a command-line SIP client? > > Greg > -- I would like some help on it, to unbreak it so if your up for a help then let me know. I have been hacking on it now for some time without any results. /Soeren -- Soeren Straarup | aka OZ2DAK aka Xride FreeBSD committer | FreeBSD since 2.2.6-R If a program is not working right, then send a patch From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 18 22:11:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF8C16A401 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7827F13C4A3 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D825F1BFC for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:52:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcneil.com Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1D7Cv1pgJDBQ for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:52:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [24.199.45.54] (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EEEF1865 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:52:43 -0800 (PST) From: Sean McNeil To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:52:43 -0800 Message-Id: <1171835563.87276.14.camel@triton.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: WITH_DEBUG too restrictive on CFLAGS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:11:12 -0000 I have found recently that the following ports will not compile on amd64 when WITH_DEBUG is set to "YES": converters/recode devel/pwlib searching for all ports that set CFLAGS with -fPIC, I find: archivers/p7zip archivers/rpm4 archivers/grzip audio/anthem audio/bmp-wma audio/liba52 audio/libworkman audio/osalp audio/swhplugins audio/xmms-a52dec ... You get the idea - it is used pervasively. The problem is, when WITH_DEBUG is YES, /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk will strip out all flags from CFLAGS of the type -O* and -f*. I don't think this is a good idea. First, the debugger can handle optimized code pretty well and I can't build ports with debug introduced yet have ports run optimized. Second, -f* is a little over-aggressive when the one flag that really must be removed is -fomit-frame-pointer. Would it be possible to have this reviewed and, hopefully, changed to allow -O and -f switches and just eliminate -fomit-frame-pointer? Cheers, Sean From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 00:38:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EF216A407 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao04.cox.net (eastrmmtao04.cox.net [68.230.240.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7808513C4B2 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070219003850.EOPX27968.eastrmmtao04.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:38:50 -0500 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id RCep1W00d4iy4EG0000000; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:38:50 -0500 Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:40:47 -0600 To: "Sean McNeil" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1171835563.87276.14.camel@triton.mcneil.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1171835563.87276.14.camel@triton.mcneil.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Linux) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITH_DEBUG too restrictive on CFLAGS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:38:53 -0000 On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 15:52:43 -0600, Sean McNeil wrote: > I have found recently that the following ports will not compile on amd64 > when WITH_DEBUG is set to "YES": > > converters/recode > devel/pwlib > > searching for all ports that set CFLAGS with -fPIC, I find: > > archivers/p7zip > archivers/rpm4 > archivers/grzip > audio/anthem > audio/bmp-wma > audio/liba52 > audio/libworkman > audio/osalp > audio/swhplugins > audio/xmms-a52dec > ... > > You get the idea - it is used pervasively. > > The problem is, when WITH_DEBUG is YES, /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk will > strip out all flags from CFLAGS of the type -O* and -f*. I don't think > this is a good idea. First, the debugger can handle optimized code > pretty well and I can't build ports with debug introduced yet have ports > run optimized. Second, -f* is a little over-aggressive when the one > flag that really must be removed is -fomit-frame-pointer. > > Would it be possible to have this reviewed and, hopefully, changed to > allow -O and -f switches and just eliminate -fomit-frame-pointer? I am not happy with the current WITH_DEBUG either. The strip out all flags from CFLAGS destroy everything. I think we should not strip and leave it alone by just add '-g'. We can always just tell to the users to rebuild if they add something wrong in CFLAGS. Cheers, Mezz > Cheers, > Sean -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 05:16:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA6616A400; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from straycat.dhs.org (c-24-63-86-11.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.86.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7878113C491; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from [192.168.1.127] (bofh.straycat.dhs.org [192.168.1.127]) by straycat.dhs.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1J5GIxp018421; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:16:18 -0500 (EST) From: Tom McLaughlin To: "Phillip N." In-Reply-To: <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> References: <20070213010559.ae84dd0d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <1171751641.1714.27.camel@localhost> <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:16:18 -0500 Message-Id: <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:16:28 -0000 On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 20:42 -0300, Phillip N. wrote: > Hey Nork > > Do you get the same (port)upgrade problem if you add the following in > mono port's Makefile? > > MAKE_ARGS= EXTERNAL_MCS=false > > bye! I just committed the fix to the FreeBSD tree so all builds attempt to use the bundled mcs and not an already installed mcs. Thanks Phillip. tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | | BSD# http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:FreeBSD | From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 11:06:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299D516A402 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E24F13C48E for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1JB6SjK020424 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:06:28 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l1JB6QWK020420 for PORTS; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:06:26 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:06:26 GMT Message-Id: <200702191106.l1JB6QWK020420@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: linimon set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Cc: Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:06:29 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has been submitted, no sanity checking performed. a - analyzed The problem is understood and a solution is being sought. f - feedback Further work requires additional information from the originator or the community - possibly confirmation of the effectiveness of a proposed solution. p - patched A patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or confirmation from originator) are still open. r - repocopy The resolution of the problem report is dependent on a repocopy operation within the CVS repository which is awaiting completion. s - suspended The problem is not being worked on, due to lack of information or resources. This is a prime candidate for somebody who is looking for a project to do. If the problem cannot be solved at all, it will be closed, rather than suspended. c - closed A problem report is closed when any changes have been integrated, documented, and tested -- or when fixing the problem is abandoned. Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/90777 textproc/xmlto fails to produce most formats o ports/107229 sysutils/coreutils: gcp fails to set default ACL which o ports/107536 editors/scite: Can't write on SciTE text editor o ports/107990 net-mgmt/zabbix agentd not running in a jail f ports/108077 www/linux-flashplugin9 crashes linux-firefox f ports/108149 dar 2.3.2 port install failure f ports/108413 net/vnc does not works. f ports/108537 print/hplip: Build failure f ports/108543 math/R (R-2.4.0/R-2.4.1) won't upgrade/install on f ports/108606 Courier MTA terminates abnormaly after installation f ports/108748 mod_fcgid 1.10 does not work inside jail f ports/109107 R 2.4.1 does not compile properly on FreeBSD 7.0/AMD64 f ports/109109 samba-3.0.24,1 build error f ports/109160 samba crashes freebsd when accessing a share residing f ports/109248 havp does not build with latest clamav 0.90 o ports/109273 dns/powerdns: update opendbx patch & fix compilation u 16 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- s ports/59254 ports that write something after bsd.port.mk f ports/95990 New Port: emulators/xjoypad s ports/96731 textproc/docbook-utils doesn`t build f ports/100650 audio/moc dumps core when detach/quit o ports/100896 [new ports] emulators/vmware-server-guestd1 emulators/ f ports/102093 new port (restoring from Attic): fix games/myth2_demo o ports/103395 security/gnome-ssh-askpass interferes with gnome-scree s ports/104725 request new port: x11/nvidia-driver-devel o ports/105473 ports/sysutils/cpdup -o doesn't work as advertised f ports/105716 textproc/lemmatizer: Update to version 1.2 o ports/107354 net/icmpinfo: icmpinfo -vvv does not recocnize any ICM f ports/107675 security/vpnc suggest rc.d script f ports/107832 upgrading sysutils/dar fails because of library search f ports/107874 port databases/freetds: fix for MSSQL 7 f ports/107937 jailed net/isc-dhcp3-server wouldn't run with an immut f ports/108176 graphics/gnash: change ${PREFIX} to ${LOCALBASE} f ports/108519 mail/squirrelmail-devel sets incorrect From in return f ports/108521 mail/squirrelmail-devel returns an error while reading f ports/108723 kxgenerator never worked for me f ports/108788 [patch] sysutils/fusefs-kmod: Add BASE option f ports/108801 Apache-2.0.59 / mod_perl-2-2.0.3_1 frequently dump cor f ports/108853 Contradiction of CONFLICTSĦĦ f ports/109041 security/tinyca doesn't allow for user installed OpenS f ports/109045 security/xca compile fails: x509rev.cpp:63: error: inv f ports/109148 [games/pydance] sdl_ttf font.render problem; patch app f ports/109176 editors/emacs-devel: fix plist and build process f ports/109231 update sysutils/fusefs-wdfs to new version f ports/109261 /usr/ports/www/rubygem-actionpack/distinfo hash values f ports/109297 [PATCH] Update port: dns/updatedd version 2.6 o ports/109303 [maintainer update] games/sampsvr: update to 0.1b r2 30 problems total. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 12:05:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9596116A400; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2713513C428; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HJ4nV-000KUS-9n; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:27:09 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1J9LhNx095499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:21:43 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1J9LhCI059373; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:21:43 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1J9Lgtv059372; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:21:42 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:21:42 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Tom McLaughlin Message-ID: <20070219092142.GR39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20070213010559.ae84dd0d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <1171751641.1714.27.camel@localhost> <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FNX2SHge3qdlDajY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: 6b1fe774000d6db3abd5da5b6f3bf0a8 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 785 [Feb 18 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Phillip N." , Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:05:34 -0000 --FNX2SHge3qdlDajY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:16:18AM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 20:42 -0300, Phillip N. wrote: > > Hey Nork > >=20 > > Do you get the same (port)upgrade problem if you add the following in > > mono port's Makefile? > >=20 > > MAKE_ARGS=3D EXTERNAL_MCS=3Dfalse > >=20 > > bye! >=20 > I just committed the fix to the FreeBSD tree so all builds attempt to > use the bundled mcs and not an already installed mcs. Thanks Phillip. >=20 With rev. 1.63 of lang/mono/Makefile, I got the following error doing portupgrade: MONO_PATH=3D"../../class/lib/net_2_0_bootstrap:$MONO_PATH" /usr/home/buddha= /portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/runtime/mono-wrapper .= ./../class/lib/net_2_0_bootstrap/mcs.exe /codepage:65001 -d:NET_1_1 -d:BO= OTSTRAP_NET_2_0 -debug /noconfig -r:System.dll -unsafe -target:library -out= :Mono.Security.dll @Mono.Security.dll.sources ** (../../class/lib/net_2_0_bootstrap/mcs.exe:59072): WARNING **: Missing m= ethod .ctor in assembly /usr/local/lib/mono/gac/I18N/2.0.0.0__0738eb9f132ed= 756/I18N.dll, type System.Runtime.CompilerServices.RuntimeCompatibilityAttr= ibute ** ERROR **: Can't find custom attr constructor image: /usr/local/lib/mono/= gac/I18N/2.0.0.0__0738eb9f132ed756/I18N.dll mtoken: 0x0a000048 aborting... Stacktrace: at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.AppDomain.LoadAssembly (string,Syst= em.Security.Policy.Evidence,bool) <0x00004> at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.AppDomain.LoadAssembly (string,Syst= em.Security.Policy.Evidence,bool) <0xffffffff> at System.AppDomain.Load (string) <0x00018> at (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check) System.AppDomain.Load (string) <0= xffffffff> at System.Reflection.Assembly.Load (string) <0x0001b> at System.Text.Encoding.InvokeI18N (string,object[]) <0x0007c> at System.Text.Encoding.GetEncoding (string) <0x0015d> at System.Text.Encoding.get_Default () <0x0006b> at System.Console..cctor () <0x000e0> at (wrapper runtime-invoke) System.Object.runtime_invoke_void (object,int= ptr,intptr,intptr) <0xffffffff> at Mono.CSharp.Report..cctor () <0xffffffff> at Mono.CSharp.Report..cctor () <0x0000a> at (wrapper runtime-invoke) System.Object.runtime_invoke_void (object,int= ptr,intptr,intptr) <0xffffffff> Abort trap (core dumped) gmake[8]: *** [../../class/lib/net_2_0_bootstrap/Mono.Security.dll] Error 1= 34 gmake[8]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/m= ono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs/class/Mono.Security' gmake[7]: *** [do-all] Error 2 gmake[7]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/m= ono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs/class/Mono.Security' gmake[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[6]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/m= ono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs/class' gmake[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/m= ono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs' gmake[4]: *** [profile-do--net_2_0_bootstrap--all] Error 2 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/m= ono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs' gmake[3]: *** [profiles-do--all] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/m= ono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs' gmake[2]: *** [all-local] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/m= ono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/runtime' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/m= ono/work/mono-1.2.2.1' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/mono. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.80766= .0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=3Dportupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=3Dmono-1.2.2.1_1 UPGRADE_POR= T_VER=3D1.2.2.1_1 make WANT_OPENLDAP_VER=3D23 WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL=3Dyes WANT= _FAM_SYSTEM=3Dfam WITH_BDB_VER=3D44 WITH_GECKO=3Dfirefox WITH_GHOSTSCRIPT_A= FPL=3Dyes WITH_UNIXODBC=3Dyes DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=3Dyes NO_IGNORE=3Dyes ** Fix the problem and try again. --FNX2SHge3qdlDajY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF2WwmC3+MBN1Mb4gRAnJRAJ9us4BtZ0mDhaDzwANg2EtDswQWXACgrPwg cBX1IyQORu/6NEeATfCYmsc= =WE2u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FNX2SHge3qdlDajY-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 13:44:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8F716A408; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:44:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from defoe@mail.bg) Received: from mx1.mail.bg (mx1.mail.bg [193.201.172.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA3313C474; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from defoe@mail.bg) Received: from mx-balancer.mail.bg (unknown [10.0.0.116]) by mx1.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513758013119; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:23:49 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.193]) by mx-balancer.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FECE17C20; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:23:49 +0200 (EET) From: defoe@mail.bg To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: 83.228.65.22 Message-Id: <20070219132349.C3FECE17C20@mx-balancer.mail.bg> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:23:49 +0200 (EET) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Port of DJabberd X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: defoe@mail.bg List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:44:44 -0000 DJabberd is a Jabber/XMPP server framework.[1] Most of its dependencies[2] are available as FreeBSD ports, usually as p5-*= . I have successfully installed it on FreeBSD 6.2R. Has anyone else tried to run it on FreeBSD and is there someone interested = in porting it? The possible problems at first sight are in p5-Sys-Syscall/p5-Danga-Socket = and the usage of epoll functions (I\'m not familiar how it is ported to Fre= eBSD, anyone?). [1] http://danga.com/djabberd/ [2] http://brad.livejournal.com/2225369.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 14:59:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE20516A401 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rabe@p-i-n.com) Received: from aposerv.p-i-n.com (aposerv.p-i-n.com [62.156.172.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244ED13C4A6 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rabe@p-i-n.com) Received: from p-i-n.com (pinserv2.p-i-n.com [10.101.240.52]) by aposerv.p-i-n.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1JBE8Fb053779 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:14:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rabe@p-i-n.com) Received: from pinserv2.p-i-n.com (localhost.p-i-n.com [127.0.0.1]) by p-i-n.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1JBE3Ew027878 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:14:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rabe@pinserv2.p-i-n.com) Received: (from rabe@localhost) by pinserv2.p-i-n.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l1JBE3Sr027877 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:14:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rabe) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:14:03 +0100 From: "Raphael H. Becker" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070219111403.GA27069@p-i-n.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: PHOENIX Pharmahandel AG & Co KG, Mannheim, Deutschland Subject: Re: rsync with --flags patch: unable to rsync hardlinks to files w/ schg X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:59:00 -0000 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi *, i've contacted Rolf Grossmann, the maintainer of net/rsync/work/rsync-2.6.9/patches/flags.diff He enhanced this patch to handle hardlinks to schg-files gracefully. This patch is expected to get into 2.6.10. I've attached the patch to this mail, it works for me. Just copy it over work/rsync-2.6.9/patches/flags.diff after "make extract" and before "make patch" and "make". Regards Raphael Becker On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:24:22PM +0100, Raphael H. Becker wrote: > > Hi *, > > we're running two jail-hosts with some jails in it. The two hosts (will) > replicate the active jails to each other to have a fallback. > > On the backup-host I run the following command: > > rsync -avHWx -e ssh --flags --delete root@jailhost1.dmz:/data/jails/ /data/jails > > Doing so brings me the following errors for each jail: > > rsync: link "/data/jails/jail4711/usr/bin/chfn" => jail4711/usr/bin/ypchsh failed: Operation not permitted (1) > rsync: link "/data/jails/jail4711/usr/bin/chpass" => jail4711/usr/bin/ypchsh failed: Operation not permitted (1) > rsync: link "/data/jails/jail4711/usr/bin/chsh" => jail4711/usr/bin/ypchsh failed: Operation not permitted (1) > rsync: link "/data/jails/jail4711/usr/bin/ypchfn" => jail4711/usr/bin/ypchsh failed: Operation not permitted (1) > rsync: link "/data/jails/jail4711/usr/bin/ypchpass" => jail4711/usr/bin/ypchsh failed: Operation not permitted (1) > rsync: link "/data/jails/jail4711/usr/bin/passwd" => jail4711/usr/bin/yppasswd failed: Operation not permitted (1) > > These files have the "schg" flag on jailhost1, which get rsynced to > jailhost2. Theese files are not present on jailhost2 after this: > > ls: /data/jails/jail4711/usr/bin/passwd: No such file or directory > > Any idea how to get rid of this? > > Regards > Raphael Becker --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rsync-2.6.9.flags.diff" diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/backup.c rsync-2.6.9.chflags/backup.c --- rsync-2.6.9/backup.c Wed Apr 26 01:51:12 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/backup.c Mon Jan 29 16:09:26 2007 @@ -61,7 +61,17 @@ return 0; while (1) { - if (do_rename(fname, fnamebak) == 0) { +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + STRUCT_STAT st2; + + link_stat(fname, &st2, 0); + make_mutable(fname, st2.st_mode, st2.st_flags); +#endif + if (do_rename(fname, fnamebak) == 0) + { +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + undo_make_mutable(fnamebak, st2.st_mode, st2.st_flags); +#endif if (verbose > 1) { rprintf(FINFO, "backed up %s to %s\n", fname, fnamebak); diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/config.h.in rsync-2.6.9.chflags/config.h.in --- rsync-2.6.9/config.h.in Tue Nov 7 05:39:47 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/config.h.in Tue Jan 9 15:25:04 2007 @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ /* Define to 1 if vsprintf has a C99-compatible return value */ #undef HAVE_C99_VSNPRINTF +/* Define if you have the `chflags' function. */ +#undef HAVE_CHFLAGS + /* Define to 1 if you have the `chmod' function. */ #undef HAVE_CHMOD diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/configure rsync-2.6.9.chflags/configure --- rsync-2.6.9/configure Tue Nov 7 05:39:47 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/configure Sat Dec 9 01:28:24 2006 @@ -13474,7 +13474,7 @@ -for ac_func in waitpid wait4 getcwd strdup chown chmod lchmod mknod mkfifo \ +for ac_func in waitpid wait4 getcwd strdup chown chflags chmod lchmod mknod mkfifo \ fchmod fstat ftruncate strchr readlink link utime utimes lutimes strftime \ memmove lchown vsnprintf snprintf vasprintf asprintf setsid glob strpbrk \ strlcat strlcpy strtol mallinfo getgroups setgroups geteuid getegid \ diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/configure.in rsync-2.6.9.chflags/configure.in --- rsync-2.6.9/configure.in Tue Nov 7 05:39:47 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/configure.in Sat Dec 9 01:29:17 2006 @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ AC_FUNC_UTIME_NULL AC_FUNC_ALLOCA -AC_CHECK_FUNCS(waitpid wait4 getcwd strdup chown chmod lchmod mknod mkfifo \ +AC_CHECK_FUNCS(waitpid wait4 getcwd strdup chown chflags chmod lchmod mknod mkfifo \ fchmod fstat ftruncate strchr readlink link utime utimes lutimes strftime \ memmove lchown vsnprintf snprintf vasprintf asprintf setsid glob strpbrk \ strlcat strlcpy strtol mallinfo getgroups setgroups geteuid getegid \ diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/flist.c rsync-2.6.9.chflags/flist.c --- rsync-2.6.9/flist.c Sat Oct 14 03:17:36 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/flist.c Mon Jan 29 16:24:16 2007 @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ extern int preserve_hard_links; extern int preserve_devices; extern int preserve_specials; +extern int preserve_flags; extern int preserve_uid; extern int preserve_gid; extern int relative_paths; @@ -303,6 +304,9 @@ unsigned short flags; static time_t modtime; static mode_t mode; +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + static uint32 fileflags; +#endif static int64 dev; static dev_t rdev; static uint32 rdev_major; @@ -321,6 +325,9 @@ dev = 0, rdev = MAKEDEV(0, 0); rdev_major = 0; uid = 0, gid = 0; +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + fileflags = 0; +#endif *lastname = '\0'; return; } @@ -333,6 +340,12 @@ flags |= XMIT_SAME_MODE; else mode = file->mode; +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + if (file->fileflags == fileflags) + flags |= XMIT_SAME_FLAGS; + else + fileflags = file->fileflags; +#endif if ((preserve_devices && IS_DEVICE(mode)) || (preserve_specials && IS_SPECIAL(mode))) { if (protocol_version < 28) { @@ -416,6 +429,10 @@ write_int(f, modtime); if (!(flags & XMIT_SAME_MODE)) write_int(f, to_wire_mode(mode)); +#if SUPPORT_FLAGS + if (preserve_flags && !(flags & XMIT_SAME_FLAGS)) + write_int(f, fileflags); +#endif if (preserve_uid && !(flags & XMIT_SAME_UID)) { if (!numeric_ids) add_uid(uid); @@ -483,6 +500,9 @@ { static time_t modtime; static mode_t mode; +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + static uint32 fileflags; +#endif static int64 dev; static dev_t rdev; static uint32 rdev_major; @@ -501,6 +521,9 @@ if (!flist) { modtime = 0, mode = 0; +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + fileflags = 0; +#endif dev = 0, rdev = MAKEDEV(0, 0); rdev_major = 0; uid = 0, gid = 0; @@ -560,6 +583,11 @@ if (chmod_modes && !S_ISLNK(mode)) mode = tweak_mode(mode, chmod_modes); +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + if (preserve_flags && !(flags & XMIT_SAME_FLAGS)) + fileflags = (uint32)read_int(f); +#endif + if (preserve_uid && !(flags & XMIT_SAME_UID)) uid = (uid_t)read_int(f); if (preserve_gid && !(flags & XMIT_SAME_GID)) @@ -609,6 +637,9 @@ file->modtime = modtime; file->length = file_length; file->mode = mode; +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + file->fileflags = fileflags; +#endif file->uid = uid; file->gid = gid; @@ -862,6 +893,9 @@ file->modtime = st.st_mtime; file->length = st.st_size; file->mode = st.st_mode; +#if SUPPORT_FLAGS + file->fileflags = st.st_flags; +#endif file->uid = st.st_uid; file->gid = st.st_gid; diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/hlink.c rsync-2.6.9.chflags/hlink.c --- rsync-2.6.9/hlink.c Tue Oct 17 20:49:04 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/hlink.c Tue Jan 9 23:53:43 2007 @@ -253,6 +253,12 @@ int statret, STRUCT_STAT *st, char *toname, int terse, int itemizing, enum logcode code) { +#if SUPPORT_FLAGS + STRUCT_STAT st2; + + link_stat(toname, &st2, 0); + make_mutable(toname, st2.st_mode, st2.st_flags); +#endif if (do_link(toname, fname)) { if (terse) { if (!verbose) @@ -264,6 +270,9 @@ full_fname(fname), toname); return -1; } +#if SUPPORT_FLAGS + undo_make_mutable(toname, st2.st_mode, st2.st_flags); +#endif if (itemizing) { itemize(file, ndx, statret, st, diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/options.c rsync-2.6.9.chflags/options.c --- rsync-2.6.9/options.c Tue Oct 24 02:36:38 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/options.c Tue Jan 9 17:46:57 2007 @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int preserve_links = 0; int preserve_hard_links = 0; int preserve_perms = 0; +int preserve_flags = 0; int preserve_executability = 0; int preserve_devices = 0; int preserve_specials = 0; @@ -201,6 +202,7 @@ char const *hardlinks = "no "; char const *links = "no "; char const *ipv6 = "no "; + char const *fflags = "no "; STRUCT_STAT *dumstat; #ifdef HAVE_SOCKETPAIR @@ -223,6 +225,10 @@ ipv6 = ""; #endif +#if SUPPORT_FLAGS + fflags = ""; +#endif + rprintf(f, "%s version %s protocol version %d\n", RSYNC_NAME, RSYNC_VERSION, PROTOCOL_VERSION); rprintf(f, "Copyright (C) 1996-2006 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.\n"); @@ -235,9 +241,9 @@ /* Note that this field may not have type ino_t. It depends * on the complicated interaction between largefile feature * macros. */ - rprintf(f, " %sinplace, %sIPv6, " + rprintf(f, " %sinplace, %sIPv6, %sfile flags, " "%d-bit system inums, %d-bit internal inums\n", - have_inplace, ipv6, + have_inplace, ipv6, fflags, (int) (sizeof dumstat->st_ino * 8), (int) (sizeof (int64) * 8)); #ifdef MAINTAINER_MODE @@ -304,6 +310,7 @@ rprintf(F," -K, --keep-dirlinks treat symlinked dir on receiver as dir\n"); rprintf(F," -H, --hard-links preserve hard links\n"); rprintf(F," -p, --perms preserve permissions\n"); + rprintf(F," --flags preserve file flags\n"); rprintf(F," -E, --executability preserve the file's executability\n"); rprintf(F," --chmod=CHMOD affect file and/or directory permissions\n"); rprintf(F," -o, --owner preserve owner (super-user only)\n"); @@ -424,6 +431,8 @@ {"perms", 'p', POPT_ARG_VAL, &preserve_perms, 1, 0, 0 }, {"no-perms", 0, POPT_ARG_VAL, &preserve_perms, 0, 0, 0 }, {"no-p", 0, POPT_ARG_VAL, &preserve_perms, 0, 0, 0 }, + {"flags", 0, POPT_ARG_VAL, &preserve_flags, 1, 0, 0 }, + {"no-flags", 0, POPT_ARG_VAL, &preserve_flags, 0, 0, 0 }, {"executability", 'E', POPT_ARG_NONE, &preserve_executability, 0, 0, 0 }, {"times", 't', POPT_ARG_VAL, &preserve_times, 1, 0, 0 }, {"no-times", 0, POPT_ARG_VAL, &preserve_times, 0, 0, 0 }, @@ -943,6 +952,9 @@ preserve_uid = 1; preserve_devices = 1; preserve_specials = 1; +#if 0 && SUPPORT_FLAGS /* XXX maybe with the next major release */ + preserve_flags=1; +#endif break; case 'D': @@ -1128,6 +1140,15 @@ } #endif +#ifndef SUPPORT_FLAGS + if (preserve_flags) { + snprintf(err_buf,sizeof err_buf, + "file flags are not supported on this %s\n", + am_server ? "server" : "client"); + return 0; + } +#endif + if (write_batch && read_batch) { snprintf(err_buf, sizeof err_buf, "--write-batch and --read-batch can not be used together\n"); @@ -1580,6 +1601,9 @@ * sans -r because the --no-r option was added at the same time. */ if (xfer_dirs && !recurse && delete_mode && am_sender) args[ac++] = "--no-r"; + + if (preserve_flags) + args[ac++] = "--flags"; if (do_compression && def_compress_level != Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION) { if (asprintf(&arg, "--compress-level=%d", def_compress_level) < 0) diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/proto.h rsync-2.6.9.chflags/proto.h --- rsync-2.6.9/proto.h Tue Nov 7 05:39:47 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/proto.h Tue Jan 9 23:51:45 2007 @@ -224,6 +224,8 @@ void setup_iconv(); void free_sums(struct sum_struct *s); mode_t dest_mode(mode_t flist_mode, mode_t stat_mode, int exists); +void make_mutable(const char *fname, mode_t mode, uint32 fileflags); +void undo_make_mutable(const char *fname, mode_t mode, uint32 fileflags); int set_file_attrs(char *fname, struct file_struct *file, STRUCT_STAT *st, int flags); RETSIGTYPE sig_int(UNUSED(int val)); @@ -254,6 +256,7 @@ int do_rmdir(const char *pathname); int do_open(const char *pathname, int flags, mode_t mode); int do_chmod(const char *path, mode_t mode); +int do_chflags(const char *path, uint32 flags); int do_rename(const char *fname1, const char *fname2); void trim_trailing_slashes(char *name); int do_mkdir(char *fname, mode_t mode); diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/rsync.1 rsync-2.6.9.chflags/rsync.1 --- rsync-2.6.9/rsync.1 Tue Nov 7 05:39:51 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/rsync.1 Tue Jan 9 18:22:24 2007 @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ \-K, \-\-keep\-dirlinks treat symlinked dir on receiver as dir \-H, \-\-hard\-links preserve hard links \-p, \-\-perms preserve permissions + \-\-flags preserve file flags \-E, \-\-executability preserve executability \-\-chmod=CHMOD affect file and/or directory permissions \-o, \-\-owner preserve owner (super-user only) @@ -591,7 +592,9 @@ .IP Note that \fB\-a\fP \fBdoes not preserve hardlinks\fP, because finding multiply-linked files is expensive\&. You must separately -specify \fB\-H\fP\&. +specify \fB\-H\fP\&. Note also that for compatibility, \fB\-a\fP +currently \fBdoes not include \-\-flags\fP (see there) to include preserving +change file flags (if supported by the OS)\&. .IP .IP "\-\-no\-OPTION" You may turn off one or more implied options by prefixing @@ -931,6 +934,14 @@ .IP If \fB\-\-perms\fP is enabled, this option is ignored\&. +.IP +.IP "\fB\-\-flags\fP" +This option causes rsync to update the change file flags +to be the same as the source file, if your OS supports the \fBchflags\fP(2) +system call\&. In any case, an attempt is made to remove flags that would +prevent a file to be altered\&. Some flags can only be altered by the +super-user and can only be unset below a certain secure-level (usually +single-user mode)\&. .IP .IP "\fB\-\-chmod\fP" This option tells rsync to apply one or more diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/rsync.c rsync-2.6.9.chflags/rsync.c --- rsync-2.6.9/rsync.c Mon Oct 9 00:02:13 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/rsync.c Mon Jan 29 17:15:23 2007 @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ extern int verbose; extern int dry_run; extern int preserve_perms; +extern int preserve_flags; extern int preserve_executability; extern int preserve_times; extern int omit_dir_times; @@ -123,6 +124,41 @@ return new_mode; } +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS +/* Set a file's st_flags. */ +static int set_fileflags(const char *fname, uint32 fileflags) +{ + if (do_chflags(fname, fileflags) != 0) { + rsyserr(FERROR, errno, "failed to set file flags on %s", + full_fname(fname)); + return 0; + } + + return 1; +} + +#define NOCHANGE_FLAGS (UF_IMMUTABLE | UF_APPEND | UF_NOUNLINK | SF_IMMUTABLE | SF_APPEND | SF_NOUNLINK) +/* Remove immutable flags from an object, so it can be altered. */ +void make_mutable(const char *fname, mode_t mode, uint32 fileflags) +{ + if (!preserve_flags || S_ISLNK(mode)) + return; + + if (fileflags & NOCHANGE_FLAGS) + do_chflags(fname, fileflags & ~NOCHANGE_FLAGS); +} + +/* Undo a prior make_mutable() call. */ +void undo_make_mutable(const char *fname, mode_t mode, uint32 fileflags) +{ + if (!preserve_flags || S_ISLNK(mode)) + return; + + if (fileflags & NOCHANGE_FLAGS) + set_fileflags(fname, fileflags); +} +#endif + int set_file_attrs(char *fname, struct file_struct *file, STRUCT_STAT *st, int flags) { @@ -152,6 +188,9 @@ flags |= ATTRS_SKIP_MTIME; if (!(flags & ATTRS_SKIP_MTIME) && cmp_time(st->st_mtime, file->modtime) != 0) { +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + make_mutable(fname, st->st_mode, st->st_flags); +#endif int ret = set_modtime(fname, file->modtime, st->st_mode); if (ret < 0) { rsyserr(FERROR, errno, "failed to set times on %s", @@ -185,6 +224,9 @@ (long)st->st_gid, (long)file->gid); } } +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + make_mutable(fname, st->st_mode, st->st_flags); +#endif if (do_lchown(fname, change_uid ? file->uid : st->st_uid, change_gid ? file->gid : st->st_gid) != 0) { @@ -209,6 +251,9 @@ new_mode = tweak_mode(new_mode, daemon_chmod_modes); #ifdef HAVE_CHMOD if ((st->st_mode & CHMOD_BITS) != (new_mode & CHMOD_BITS)) { +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + make_mutable(fname, st->st_mode, st->st_flags); +#endif int ret = do_chmod(fname, new_mode); if (ret < 0) { rsyserr(FERROR, errno, @@ -221,6 +266,18 @@ } #endif +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + /* must be last change, because flags can forbid other changes */ + if (preserve_flags && !S_ISLNK(st->st_mode) && + (st->st_flags != file->fileflags || file->fileflags != 0)) { + if (set_fileflags(fname, file->fileflags) != 0) { + return 0; + } + if (st->st_flags != file->fileflags) + updated = 1; + } +#endif + if (verbose > 1 && flags & ATTRS_REPORT) { if (updated) rprintf(FCLIENT, "%s\n", fname); @@ -268,6 +325,9 @@ set_file_attrs(fnametmp, file, NULL, ok_to_set_time ? 0 : ATTRS_SKIP_MTIME); +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + make_mutable(fnametmp, file->mode, file->fileflags); +#endif /* move tmp file over real file */ if (verbose > 2) rprintf(FINFO, "renaming %s to %s\n", fnametmp, fname); @@ -282,6 +342,9 @@ } if (ret == 0) { /* The file was moved into place (not copied), so it's done. */ +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + undo_make_mutable(fname, file->mode, file->fileflags); +#endif return; } /* The file was copied, so tweak the perms of the copied file. If it diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/rsync.h rsync-2.6.9.chflags/rsync.h --- rsync-2.6.9/rsync.h Tue Oct 24 05:31:30 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/rsync.h Mon Jan 29 17:15:57 2007 @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ #define XMIT_HAS_IDEV_DATA (1<<9) #define XMIT_SAME_DEV (1<<10) #define XMIT_RDEV_MINOR_IS_SMALL (1<<11) +#define XMIT_SAME_FLAGS (1<<12) /* These flags are used in the live flist data. */ @@ -344,6 +345,10 @@ #define schar char #endif +#ifdef HAVE_CHFLAGS +#define SUPPORT_FLAGS 1 +#endif + /* Find a variable that is either exactly 32-bits or longer. * If some code depends on 32-bit truncation, it will need to * take special action in a "#if SIZEOF_INT32 > 4" section. */ @@ -530,6 +535,9 @@ uid_t uid; gid_t gid; mode_t mode; +#ifdef SUPPORT_FLAGS + uint32 fileflags; +#endif uchar flags; /* this item MUST remain last */ }; diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/rsync.yo rsync-2.6.9.chflags/rsync.yo --- rsync-2.6.9/rsync.yo Tue Nov 7 05:39:47 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/rsync.yo Tue Jan 9 18:17:13 2007 @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ -K, --keep-dirlinks treat symlinked dir on receiver as dir -H, --hard-links preserve hard links -p, --perms preserve permissions + --flags preserve file flags -E, --executability preserve executability --chmod=CHMOD affect file and/or directory permissions -o, --owner preserve owner (super-user only) @@ -509,7 +510,9 @@ Note that bf(-a) bf(does not preserve hardlinks), because finding multiply-linked files is expensive. You must separately -specify bf(-H). +specify bf(-H). Note also that for compatibility, bf(-a) +currently bf(does not include --flags) (see there) to include preserving +change file flags (if supported by the OS). dit(--no-OPTION) You may turn off one or more implied options by prefixing the option name with "no-". Not all options may be prefixed with a "no-": @@ -804,6 +807,13 @@ If bf(--perms) is enabled, this option is ignored. +dit(bf(--flags)) This option causes rsync to update the change file flags +to be the same as the source file, if your OS supports the chflags(2) +system call. In any case, an attempt is made to remove flags that would +prevent a file to be altered. Some flags can only be altered by the +super-user and can only be unset below a certain securelevel (usually +single-user mode). + dit(bf(--chmod)) This option tells rsync to apply one or more comma-separated "chmod" strings to the permission of the files in the transfer. The resulting value is treated as though it was the permissions diff -bru rsync-2.6.9/syscall.c rsync-2.6.9.chflags/syscall.c --- rsync-2.6.9/syscall.c Wed Apr 26 01:51:15 2006 +++ rsync-2.6.9.chflags/syscall.c Sat Dec 9 03:07:15 2006 @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ { if (dry_run) return 0; RETURN_ERROR_IF_RO_OR_LO; +#if SUPPORT_FLAGS + chflags(fname, 0); +#endif return unlink(fname); } @@ -119,6 +122,9 @@ { if (dry_run) return 0; RETURN_ERROR_IF_RO_OR_LO; +#if SUPPORT_FLAGS + chflags(pathname, 0); +#endif return rmdir(pathname); } @@ -152,10 +158,22 @@ } #endif +#if SUPPORT_FLAGS +int do_chflags(const char *path, uint32 flags) +{ + if (dry_run) return 0; + RETURN_ERROR_IF_RO_OR_LO; + return chflags(path, flags); +} +#endif + int do_rename(const char *fname1, const char *fname2) { if (dry_run) return 0; RETURN_ERROR_IF_RO_OR_LO; +#if SUPPORT_FLAGS + chflags(fname2, 0); +#endif return rename(fname1, fname2); } --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 15:23:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB2616A41F for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:23:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cristiano.panvel@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC1513C471 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cristiano.panvel@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i22so1575357wra for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:23:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Iq7JwrRtQdOQbMvTousurpMjixebX6XDAo7JYNR3Z4SydJKfUKXPQ5nC8c580PCVTa2XawHNjmX33lmJqb7wKvn+h20hjD/50cfwXkzDZfhBmYxKglyB4V06e9xSljMrm2iPQ4FTX1wBl1d4bK37EJIBOmm/pKNtyCmYcKxA6Q0= Received: by 10.114.194.1 with SMTP id r1mr2941089waf.1171898606056; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.210.5 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:23:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8e8b996b0702190723l3c8b3508k412f904535a91d47@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:23:26 -0200 From: "Cristiano Panvel" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Qt4 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:23:28 -0000 Hello, I installed the Qt4 of ports, and am trying to compile my codes more I am getting error. using shell csh setenv QTDIR /usr/X11R6 setenv PATH ${PATH}:${QTDIR}/bin setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH ${QTDIR}/lib setenv QMAKESPEC freebsd-g++ when I go to compile it remains this error and it is in Loop. % qmake -project % qmake % make QFile::open: No file name specified QFile::open: No file name specified QFile::open: No file name specified Cris. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 18:03:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAB616B11A; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from straycat.dhs.org (c-24-63-86-11.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.86.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9D013C4A3; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from [192.168.1.127] (bofh.straycat.dhs.org [192.168.1.127]) by straycat.dhs.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1JI3jgP005587; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:03:45 -0500 (EST) From: Tom McLaughlin To: Kostik Belousov In-Reply-To: <20070219092142.GR39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20070213010559.ae84dd0d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <1171751641.1714.27.camel@localhost> <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> <20070219092142.GR39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:03:45 -0500 Message-Id: <1171908225.1714.160.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Phillip N." , Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:03:48 -0000 On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 11:21 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:16:18AM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 20:42 -0300, Phillip N. wrote: > > > Hey Nork > > > > > > Do you get the same (port)upgrade problem if you add the following in > > > mono port's Makefile? > > > > > > MAKE_ARGS= EXTERNAL_MCS=false > > > > > > bye! > > > > I just committed the fix to the FreeBSD tree so all builds attempt to > > use the bundled mcs and not an already installed mcs. Thanks Phillip. > > > > With rev. 1.63 of lang/mono/Makefile, I got the following error doing > portupgrade: > Can you email me the full build log? What version of Mono do you have installed currently and was it installed via ports or packages? The build is using the bundled compiler now but it's still using previously installed system libraries. tom > MONO_PATH="../../class/lib/net_2_0_bootstrap:$MONO_PATH" /usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/runtime/mono-wrapper ../../class/lib/net_2_0_bootstrap/mcs.exe /codepage:65001 -d:NET_1_1 -d:BOOTSTRAP_NET_2_0 -debug /noconfig -r:System.dll -unsafe -target:library -out:Mono.Security.dll @Mono.Security.dll.sources > > ** (../../class/lib/net_2_0_bootstrap/mcs.exe:59072): WARNING **: Missing method .ctor in assembly /usr/local/lib/mono/gac/I18N/2.0.0.0__0738eb9f132ed756/I18N.dll, type System.Runtime.CompilerServices.RuntimeCompatibilityAttribute > > ** ERROR **: Can't find custom attr constructor image: /usr/local/lib/mono/gac/I18N/2.0.0.0__0738eb9f132ed756/I18N.dll mtoken: 0x0a000048 > aborting... > Stacktrace: > > at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.AppDomain.LoadAssembly (string,System.Security.Policy.Evidence,bool) <0x00004> > at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.AppDomain.LoadAssembly (string,System.Security.Policy.Evidence,bool) <0xffffffff> > at System.AppDomain.Load (string) <0x00018> > at (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check) System.AppDomain.Load (string) <0xffffffff> > at System.Reflection.Assembly.Load (string) <0x0001b> > at System.Text.Encoding.InvokeI18N (string,object[]) <0x0007c> > at System.Text.Encoding.GetEncoding (string) <0x0015d> > at System.Text.Encoding.get_Default () <0x0006b> > at System.Console..cctor () <0x000e0> > at (wrapper runtime-invoke) System.Object.runtime_invoke_void (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) <0xffffffff> > at Mono.CSharp.Report..cctor () <0xffffffff> > at Mono.CSharp.Report..cctor () <0x0000a> > at (wrapper runtime-invoke) System.Object.runtime_invoke_void (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) <0xffffffff> > Abort trap (core dumped) > gmake[8]: *** [../../class/lib/net_2_0_bootstrap/Mono.Security.dll] Error 134 > gmake[8]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs/class/Mono.Security' > gmake[7]: *** [do-all] Error 2 > gmake[7]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs/class/Mono.Security' > gmake[6]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[6]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs/class' > gmake[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs' > gmake[4]: *** [profile-do--net_2_0_bootstrap--all] Error 2 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs' > gmake[3]: *** [profiles-do--all] Error 2 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/mcs' > gmake[2]: *** [all-local] Error 2 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-1.2.2.1/runtime' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/buddha/portsworkdir/usr/ports/lang/mono/work/mono-1.2.2.1' > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/mono. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.80766.0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=mono-1.2.2.1_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.2.2.1_1 make WANT_OPENLDAP_VER=23 WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL=yes WANT_FAM_SYSTEM=fam WITH_BDB_VER=44 WITH_GECKO=firefox WITH_GHOSTSCRIPT_AFPL=yes WITH_UNIXODBC=yes DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes NO_IGNORE=yes > ** Fix the problem and try again. > -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | | BSD# http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:FreeBSD | From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 22:40:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF51B16E88D for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from larse@larseighner.com) Received: from mail.team1internet.com (216-110-13-10.static.twtelecom.net [216.110.13.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4718913C494 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from larse@larseighner.com) Received: by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix, from userid 12346) id BCDF316B592; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:40:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from larseighner.com (unknown [216.110.13.70]) by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 68ED516B587 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:40:19 -0600 (CST) Received: by larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1003 larse@larseighner.com; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:41:38 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:41:37 -0600 (CST) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: larse@goodwill.6dollardialup.com To: freebsd-ports Message-ID: <20070219103713.W86293@tbbqjvyy.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sanitizer: Anomy and SpamAssassin mail filter - see http://www.6dollardialup.com/support/spaminfo.html X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=J_CHICKENPOX_56,OACYS_SINGLE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL version=2.43 X-Spam-Level: Subject: How to turn off Firefox upgrade tab X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:40:36 -0000 Since I upgraded, Firefox seems to call home and load it's homepage in a tab on top every time it fires up, not matter what I do. Preferences still say to open firefox with my home page. I tried blanking every url in about:config that has the mozilla url, but that won't stop the behavior. Also, is there a way to disable both new tabs and new windows (i.e. force reuse the same window always)? -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 11:02:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0F717BBEE; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C9513C428; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HJSkq-000L2F-LK; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:02:01 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1KB1e3U016829 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:01:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1KB1eX7099942; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:01:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1KB1ctS099941; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:01:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:01:38 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Tom McLaughlin Message-ID: <20070220110138.GV39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20070213010559.ae84dd0d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <1171751641.1714.27.camel@localhost> <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> <20070219092142.GR39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171908225.1714.160.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CSNFvL6ilyiKL/Hs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1171908225.1714.160.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: f2683d8df775da069012ccac6e6e6321 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 792 [Feb 20 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Phillip N." , Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:02:03 -0000 --CSNFvL6ilyiKL/Hs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 01:03:45PM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 11:21 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:16:18AM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > > > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 20:42 -0300, Phillip N. wrote: > > > > Hey Nork > > > >=20 > > > > Do you get the same (port)upgrade problem if you add the following = in > > > > mono port's Makefile? > > > >=20 > > > > MAKE_ARGS=3D EXTERNAL_MCS=3Dfalse > > > >=20 > > > > bye! > > >=20 > > > I just committed the fix to the FreeBSD tree so all builds attempt to > > > use the bundled mcs and not an already installed mcs. Thanks Phillip. > > >=20 > >=20 > > With rev. 1.63 of lang/mono/Makefile, I got the following error doing > > portupgrade: > >=20 >=20 > Can you email me the full build log? What version of Mono do you have > installed currently and was it installed via ports or packages? The > build is using the bundled compiler now but it's still using previously > installed system libraries. mono-1.2.2.1_1, installed from ports. Full build log and config.log are available at http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/mono-20070220 --CSNFvL6ilyiKL/Hs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF2tURC3+MBN1Mb4gRAhmkAJ0VwSzl3q3nIyyE2o/n1h0xkfP3qwCg8O2D YOeOtitFLoTl7T1h0bEIaZ4= =tiA4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CSNFvL6ilyiKL/Hs-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 13:32:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080C316AAC8; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from straycat.dhs.org (c-24-63-86-11.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.86.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B01513C48D; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from [192.168.1.127] (bofh.straycat.dhs.org [192.168.1.127]) by straycat.dhs.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1KDNIwb015158; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:23:18 -0500 (EST) From: Tom McLaughlin To: Kostik Belousov In-Reply-To: <20070220110138.GV39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20070213010559.ae84dd0d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <1171751641.1714.27.camel@localhost> <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> <20070219092142.GR39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171908225.1714.160.camel@localhost> <20070220110138.GV39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:23:17 -0500 Message-Id: <1171977798.1729.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Phillip N." , Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:32:20 -0000 On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 13:01 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 01:03:45PM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 11:21 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:16:18AM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 20:42 -0300, Phillip N. wrote: > > > > > Hey Nork > > > > > > > > > > Do you get the same (port)upgrade problem if you add the following in > > > > > mono port's Makefile? > > > > > > > > > > MAKE_ARGS= EXTERNAL_MCS=false > > > > > > > > > > bye! > > > > > > > > I just committed the fix to the FreeBSD tree so all builds attempt to > > > > use the bundled mcs and not an already installed mcs. Thanks Phillip. > > > > > > > > > > With rev. 1.63 of lang/mono/Makefile, I got the following error doing > > > portupgrade: > > > > > > > Can you email me the full build log? What version of Mono do you have > > installed currently and was it installed via ports or packages? The > > build is using the bundled compiler now but it's still using previously > > installed system libraries. > mono-1.2.2.1_1, installed from ports. > > Full build log and config.log are available at > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/mono-20070220 Mind trying the patch below? This is the recomendation I go from the Mono folks but i want someone who can reproduce the problem to test it. Thanks. tom --- Makefile 19 Feb 2007 04:41:07 -0000 1.63 +++ Makefile 20 Feb 2007 13:21:03 -0000 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ --with-gc=included \ --with-tls=pthread MAKE_ARGS= EXTERNAL_MCS=false +MAKE_ENV= MONO_PATH="" MAN1= al.1 cert2spc.1 certmgr.1 chktrust.1 cilc.1 disco.1 dtd2xsd.1 \ gacutil.1 genxs.1 ilasm.1 jay.1 macpack.1 makecert.1 mcs.1 \ -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | | BSD# http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:FreeBSD | From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 14:23:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0747A16FC82; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay01.kiev.sovam.com (relay01.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A772313C99A; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:43:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay01.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HJVHS-0005wX-Dx; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:43:51 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1KDhTTB021905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:43:29 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1KDhTNm009646; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:43:29 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1KDhQ1D009645; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:43:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:43:26 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Tom McLaughlin Message-ID: <20070220134326.GW39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20070213010559.ae84dd0d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <1171751641.1714.27.camel@localhost> <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> <20070219092142.GR39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171908225.1714.160.camel@localhost> <20070220110138.GV39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171977798.1729.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yPlaimQd/TpiYx8R" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1171977798.1729.1.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: ca614d1e091d53a46adb2ef7a730c6a6 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 793 [Feb 20 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Phillip N." , Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:23:17 -0000 --yPlaimQd/TpiYx8R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 08:23:17AM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 13:01 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 01:03:45PM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 11:21 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:16:18AM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 20:42 -0300, Phillip N. wrote: > > > > > > Hey Nork > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Do you get the same (port)upgrade problem if you add the follow= ing in > > > > > > mono port's Makefile? > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > MAKE_ARGS=3D EXTERNAL_MCS=3Dfalse > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > bye! > > > > >=20 > > > > > I just committed the fix to the FreeBSD tree so all builds attemp= t to > > > > > use the bundled mcs and not an already installed mcs. Thanks Phi= llip. > > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > With rev. 1.63 of lang/mono/Makefile, I got the following error doi= ng > > > > portupgrade: > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Can you email me the full build log? What version of Mono do you have > > > installed currently and was it installed via ports or packages? The > > > build is using the bundled compiler now but it's still using previous= ly > > > installed system libraries. > > mono-1.2.2.1_1, installed from ports. > >=20 > > Full build log and config.log are available at > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/mono-20070220 >=20 > Mind trying the patch below? This is the recomendation I go from the > Mono folks but i want someone who can reproduce the problem to test it. > Thanks. >=20 > tom >=20 > --- Makefile 19 Feb 2007 04:41:07 -0000 1.63 > +++ Makefile 20 Feb 2007 13:21:03 -0000 > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > --with-gc=3Dincluded \ > --with-tls=3Dpthread > MAKE_ARGS=3D EXTERNAL_MCS=3Dfalse > +MAKE_ENV=3D MONO_PATH=3D"" > =20 > MAN1=3D al.1 cert2spc.1 certmgr.1 chktrust.1 cilc.1 disco.1 dtd= 2xsd.1 \ > gacutil.1 genxs.1 ilasm.1 jay.1 macpack.1 makecert.1 mcs.= 1 \ >=20 >=20 >=20 It seems it ended up with the same (or similar) failure: http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/mono-20070220/mono.1.log --yPlaimQd/TpiYx8R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF2vr+C3+MBN1Mb4gRAsVQAKDeYWKdNSfp0iEPfKwG94FkmCoYmwCfdqpM T45L84vDfKPGKD5tF/HCVz4= =WMzm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yPlaimQd/TpiYx8R-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 15:08:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3FE16AF14 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexkupferthaler@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C5F713C491 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexkupferthaler@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2007 13:59:13 -0000 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19RnudbBDdRuss/z+84bA9YMZD7puSEu15S5Sqi/M D2lw== From: "Alexander Kupferthaler" To: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:59:12 +0100 Message-ID: <013101c754f7$4d3dcea0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcdU90xts3yWviSzTWqXlq0YWpX0xQ== X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Port: net/nylon X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:08:59 -0000 Hi! The Port net/nylon is currently at version 1.2. The latest version available is 1.21. I successfully installed version 1.21 on FBSD 6.2 by changing PORTVERSION to 1.21 (and changing PORTREVISION, make makesum or course). Installs and runs fine so far... If anyone could update it that would be very nice. Thanks, Atz From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 15:12:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3DA16D041 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from surija@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B812113C48E for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:06:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from surija@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m19so2776802nfc for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:06:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=t+wJkRLmqOblk7Dj4ueSb8mp/R6Ye+p6Syxss+I+a9A2KlHGksrvCjwtvUX60pJbLmhWVYr3LTc5AQiMnMnfcQOdWm5M1+CntxlhICLB2Q017zgVeCo666P6wx9gsKp7fEeGTUwe6SSuR9uMXkyBVi8nB3AQuFn/vyxKBlcTWWc= Received: by 10.82.155.10 with SMTP id c10mr13249029bue.1171982468428; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:41:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.184.12 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:41:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <21bc91010702200641v5588d486jdc42e3cb4a9db319@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:41:08 -0500 From: "Ranko Sredojevic" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: libgpg-error version mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:12:41 -0000 Hi all; I'm not really sure if this belongs exactly here, but here we go: I was way careless... managed to forget that GNOME (2.14 to 2.16, and I track RELENG_6) should be upgraded through the upgrade script and had run portupgrade, which failed. After that I fetched the upgrade script and tried it. It finished successfully but after reboot GDM was not there (and I was greeted with login prompt in a console). I don't even remember all that I did, and I decided to fresh start: - CVSUP-ed and tried installing GNOME2 port which failed - deleted /usr/ports and CVSUP-ed again (eventually) and GNOME2 still fails - did 20060926 from UPGRADING and it still fails (in short: portupgrade -rf libgpg-error-\*) - rebuilt kernel and world (at which point I got rid of the ULE scheduler --- but for the record couldn't see too much difference from 4BSD in day-to-day desktop use, and it had run for >250 days without a reboot) So, now I'm out of "shots" :) The problem is: \begin{quote} /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgpg-error.so.2" not found, required by "xsltproc" gmake[3]: *** [fdl-C.omf] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-desktop/work/gnome- desktop-2.16.3/desktop-docs/fdl' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-desktop/work/gnome- desktop-2.16.3/desktop-docs' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-desktop/work/gnome- desktop-2.16.3' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome-desktop. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/eel. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/gnome-control-center. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome-applets. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome2. \end{quote} while \begin{quote} sumadinac# ls -al /libexec | grep ld-elf -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 201312 Feb 14 15:58 ld-elf.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 172232 Dec 24 2005 ld-elf.so.1.old -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 175800 Feb 14 16:00 ld-elf32.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 149312 Dec 24 2005 ld-elf32.so.1.old \end{quote} So the library was rebuilt, and installed (I guess this happens when I do buildworld since it's not in the ports). Yet, it still doesn't recognize libgpg-error.so.3 which is there, I guess instead libgpg-error.so.2. I saw that some people have a hack: make a symbolic link named .so.2 to point to .so.3 but since I'm upgrading, I thought it'd make sense to do it properly... What (apart from doing portupgrade in the beginning :) ) did I do wrong here? Didn't discover too much googling about this, except of couple port problems but not something like this... Thanks, rasha From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 16:30:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCFA16A795 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pj@smo.de) Received: from ilk.de (mx-out09.ilk.de [194.121.104.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9891013C4B4 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pj@smo.de) Received: from bologna.intern.smo.de (pool33.ka.ilk.net [212.86.194.33]) by ilk.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/ilk-relay) with ESMTP id l1KGUMnQ027500; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:30:22 +0100 Received: from [192.168.153.208] (herdubreid.intern.smo.de [192.168.153.208]) by bologna.intern.smo.de (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1KGSneR025494; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:28:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45DB21EC.1050206@smo.de> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:29:32 +0100 From: Philipp Ost User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20070120 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars Eighner References: <20070219103713.W86293@tbbqjvyy.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> In-Reply-To: <20070219103713.W86293@tbbqjvyy.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: How to turn off Firefox upgrade tab X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:30:25 -0000 Lars Eighner wrote: > Since I upgraded, Firefox seems to call home and load it's homepage > in a tab on top every time it fires up, not matter what I do. Preferences > still say to open firefox with my home page. I tried blanking every > url in about:config that has the mozilla url, but that won't stop the > behavior. Close that tab and it should be done. > Also, is there a way to disable both new tabs and new windows (i.e. force > reuse the same window always)? You mean if you click on a link? If yes, you can configure that in Preferences -> Tabs; or the appropriate entry in about:config of course ;) HTH, Philipp -- www.familie-ost.info/~pj From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 17:15:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EF616AF25 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dbrewer@pixelfish.com) Received: from mail01.vmatrixmail.com (mail01.vmatrixmail.com [216.219.244.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A6C13C467 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dbrewer@pixelfish.com) Received: (vmatrix@mail01.vmatrixmail.com) by vmatrixmail.com id S6073303AbXBTQkn for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:40:43 -0800 To: ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Rich Media Mail V4. Vmatrix, (C) 2003 From: "David Brewer" Sender: "David Brewer" Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:40:43 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Your Recent Trade Show Results X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dbrewer@pixelfish.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:15:30 -0000 Greetings!

Are you happy with your results from Social Linux Expo 2007? Did you have what it takes to make the difference between creating excitement and blending in with the competition, between lots of hot leads and a few hard sells ... between success and failure?

Did you have video?

Why video? Video vividly demonstrates the features and benefits of your products. Video captures the praises of your most enthusiastic customers. Video instills interest, reaction and trust. Video sells.

In just 45 days, PixelFish creates marketing videos that become an integral part of your marketing and sales efforts when it streams from your Web site, launches from multimedia email newsletters, plays from CD video brochures and loops from a DVD at your tradeshow booth.

We are PixelFish. We deliver “The Evolution of Video”. And we guarantee results. Click on the videos to the right to see samples of our work.

Contact us today for a free evaluation of your video marketing needs.

David Brewer
PixelFish, Inc.
800.503.3020 x102
dbrewer@pixelfish.com
http://www.pixelfish.com
RedMan Video
Pentax Video
JEM Video
------------------------------------------------ Unsubscribe to safely remove yourself from this email list, please send email to info@pixelfish.com. Powered by Pixelfish http://www.pixelfish.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 18:13:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503D116A819 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: from neo.samodelkin.net (samodelkin.net [195.62.0.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0056613C4A3 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@neo.samodelkin.net) Received: by neo.samodelkin.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BDF7917053; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:53:47 +0600 (NOVT) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:53:47 +0600 From: Max Khon To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Message-ID: <20070220175347.GB89282@samodelkin.net> References: <499c70c0702070837tf0c87cev6fa479ff60c2c6f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <499c70c0702070837tf0c87cev6fa479ff60c2c6f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port:sysutils/fusefs-ntfs broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:13:03 -0000 Hi! On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 04:37:51PM +0000, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > => ntfs-3g-0.20070118-BETA.tgz doesn't seem to exist in > /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch from http://www.ntfs-3g.org/. > fetch: http://www.ntfs-3g.org/ntfs-3g-0.20070118-BETA.tgz: Not Found > => Attempting to fetch from > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > fetch: > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/ntfs-3g-0.20070118-BETA.tgz: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > The file isn't in the master site and not in the FreeBSD ftp server as well. > > RC1 released as well. I updated port to RC1 about a week ago. /fjoe From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 18:48:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D6416A511 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C647513C474 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 12074 invoked by uid 399); 20 Feb 2007 18:48:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2007 18:48:33 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <45DB4280.8070204@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:48:32 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ranko Sredojevic References: <21bc91010702200641v5588d486jdc42e3cb4a9db319@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <21bc91010702200641v5588d486jdc42e3cb4a9db319@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libgpg-error version mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:48:34 -0000 Ranko Sredojevic wrote: > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgpg-error.so.2" not found, required > by "xsltproc" I think you misunderstand the problem. ld-elf.so.1 doesn't need libgpg-error.so.2, whatever xsltproc is needs it. You can do: grep xsltproc /var/db/pkg/*/* and that should tell you what port to rebuild. Or you could do 'portupgrade -r' and specify whatever version of libgpg-error you have installed currently. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 19:14:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808C416A498 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:14:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from surija@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187C613C428 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:14:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from surija@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so844017muf for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:14:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JKN6XxErOJMPs6Cl8XfYHM/lmVyySmzYKTRJ2lTrI0rllVELGraOJF/Z5OIaPTay+Dyjq+dYbH7Fh2RvMWV2v+oVjmc2Po6dWZmnmac0YDIOXoXIi7Ke8503mAKFJnQIgrnMOWYDOJWO2xzg1j+cKnspL/1L0I9rJYgJI2oq6FQ= Received: by 10.82.187.16 with SMTP id k16mr13728451buf.1171998883478; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:14:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.184.12 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:14:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <21bc91010702201114n2148234eo7f4e9466aee8211@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:14:43 -0500 From: "Ranko Sredojevic" To: "Doug Barton" In-Reply-To: <45DB4280.8070204@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <21bc91010702200641v5588d486jdc42e3cb4a9db319@mail.gmail.com> <45DB4280.8070204@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libgpg-error version mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:14:45 -0000 Thanks, that did it. I was completely on the wrong track... Though, one would think that portupgrade -rf libgpg-error-\* would do the same thing? (rebuild xsltproc?) Cheers, rasha On 2/20/07, Doug Barton wrote: > > Ranko Sredojevic wrote: > > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgpg-error.so.2" not found, > required > > by "xsltproc" > > I think you misunderstand the problem. ld-elf.so.1 doesn't need > libgpg-error.so.2, whatever xsltproc is needs it. You can do: > > grep xsltproc /var/db/pkg/*/* > > and that should tell you what port to rebuild. Or you could do > 'portupgrade -r' and specify whatever version of libgpg-error you have > installed currently. > > hth, > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 19:18:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5C716ABC2 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29CB713C478 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 15067 invoked by uid 399); 20 Feb 2007 19:18:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2007 19:18:29 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <45DB4985.70401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:18:29 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jay Chandler References: <45D0B1CD.20707@chapman.edu> In-Reply-To: <45D0B1CD.20707@chapman.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmanager Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:18:30 -0000 Jay Chandler wrote: > Just came over to the portmanager boat from portupgrade. > I attempt to update, and portmanager keeps getting upset that apache 1.3 > isn't installed (as a dependancy for a few ports, such as > mailscanner-mrtg), yet apache22 is running just fine. > > Is this a problem in the ports dependencies, or is this a portmanager > problem? Portupgrade never said much about it... You might want to try portmaster. As long as each port properly registers CONFLICTS (which I believe the apache ports do) then you won't have this issue. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 19:36:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7E916A498 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:36:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@hedges.com) Received: from server.hedges.com (server.hedges.com [199.201.175.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C4813C442 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:36:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@hedges.com) Received: from [199.201.175.113] (ip113.hedges.com [199.201.175.113]) by server.hedges.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1KJPgpj030703 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:25:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@hedges.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:25:43 -0800 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Tom Hedges Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (server.hedges.com [199.201.175.2]); Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:25:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: graphics/netpbm and mail/p5-FuzzyOcr-devel ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:36:31 -0000 I'm running a mail server on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE amd64 and want to use all the cool latest spamassassin stuff, in particular FuzzyOcr (does OCR on image spam). I have been doing cvsup on my ports tree to get the latest port updates. The netpbm devel version is 10.31 dated 05.12.23, not really very new! They are up to 10.37.0 dated 06.12.31 on SourceForge. In version 10.34 a new command pamthreshold was added, and fixed through 10.36 FuzzyOcr needs pamthreshold in its latest version 3.5.1, which newer than mail/p5-FuzzyOcr-devel which is 3.4.2. It was a major rewrite, but easy to manually update since it's written in Perl. I want to request that p5-FuzzyOcr-devel be updated to 3.5.1 (fairly major Makefile redo for port), and that netpbm be updated to at least 10.36. This is a biggee for spamassassin users, the new version of FuzzyOcr is very well written and works very well. Thanks, Tom netpbm: http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/netpbm/trunk/doc/HISTORY?view=markup FuzzyOcr: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Installation-3.5.x From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 23:02:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F296416AABA for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:02:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E15113C48E for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:02:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([85.172.12.192]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id l1KN1sKF004268; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:02:04 +0300 (MSK) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HJdyU-0000Rr-EB; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:00:42 +0300 To: "Alexander Kupferthaler" References: <013101c754f7$4d3dcea0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:00:42 +0300 In-Reply-To: <013101c754f7$4d3dcea0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> (Alexander Kupferthaler's message of "Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:59:12 +0100") Message-ID: <56849093@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: net/nylon X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:02:17 -0000 On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:59:12 +0100 Alexander Kupferthaler wrote: > The Port net/nylon is currently at version 1.2. The latest version available > is 1.21. > I successfully installed version 1.21 on FBSD 6.2 by changing PORTVERSION to > 1.21 (and changing PORTREVISION, make makesum or course). Installs and runs > fine so far... > If anyone could update it that would be very nice. Done, thanks! WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 03:31:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F275416A419; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:31:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from straycat.dhs.org (c-24-63-86-11.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.63.86.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4300213C4A6; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from [192.168.1.127] (bofh.straycat.dhs.org [192.168.1.127]) by straycat.dhs.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1L3UgBr010063; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:30:42 -0500 (EST) From: Tom McLaughlin To: Kostik Belousov In-Reply-To: <20070220134326.GW39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20070213010559.ae84dd0d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <1171751641.1714.27.camel@localhost> <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> <20070219092142.GR39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171908225.1714.160.camel@localhost> <20070220110138.GV39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171977798.1729.1.camel@localhost> <20070220134326.GW39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:30:42 -0500 Message-Id: <1172028642.14456.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Phillip N." , Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:31:10 -0000 On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 15:43 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 08:23:17AM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 13:01 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 01:03:45PM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 11:21 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:16:18AM -0500, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 20:42 -0300, Phillip N. wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Nork > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you get the same (port)upgrade problem if you add the following in > > > > > > > mono port's Makefile? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MAKE_ARGS= EXTERNAL_MCS=false > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bye! > > > > > > > > > > > > I just committed the fix to the FreeBSD tree so all builds attempt to > > > > > > use the bundled mcs and not an already installed mcs. Thanks Phillip. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With rev. 1.63 of lang/mono/Makefile, I got the following error doing > > > > > portupgrade: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you email me the full build log? What version of Mono do you have > > > > installed currently and was it installed via ports or packages? The > > > > build is using the bundled compiler now but it's still using previously > > > > installed system libraries. > > > mono-1.2.2.1_1, installed from ports. > > > > > > Full build log and config.log are available at > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/mono-20070220 > > > > Mind trying the patch below? This is the recomendation I go from the > > Mono folks but i want someone who can reproduce the problem to test it. > > Thanks. > > > > tom > > > > --- Makefile 19 Feb 2007 04:41:07 -0000 1.63 > > +++ Makefile 20 Feb 2007 13:21:03 -0000 > > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > > --with-gc=included \ > > --with-tls=pthread > > MAKE_ARGS= EXTERNAL_MCS=false > > +MAKE_ENV= MONO_PATH="" > > > > MAN1= al.1 cert2spc.1 certmgr.1 chktrust.1 cilc.1 disco.1 dtd2xsd.1 \ > > gacutil.1 genxs.1 ilasm.1 jay.1 macpack.1 makecert.1 mcs.1 \ > > > > > > > It seems it ended up with the same (or similar) failure: > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/mono-20070220/mono.1.log Since that doesn't work I'll have access to a box where this is occurring in order to try some things soon. tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | | BSD# http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:FreeBSD | From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 05:40:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DBC16DEE9 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6272D13C48E for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from almarrie@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so2493693wra for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:40:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n3fOQaK65+G2BOglc5SuTwMvLr7Thu8o8xF9eSCTpDxk1U1wt4Uzy8VUH2L4oOGdFCKKndICHT0oWUEc4/Zfi3kecrRxdYd55QT5hoCPcgjTADnjQGyNapXydNbLRKUZXTvMiU7d5wsB/AoOs4e8T465KsQpJ+uahqPvIGzdbs0= Received: by 10.115.106.7 with SMTP id i7mr3645037wam.1172036422636; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.91.7 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:40:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499c70c0702202140w7c2abc0es514da2c956316022@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:40:22 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" To: "Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu" In-Reply-To: <20070107113628.252b61f5@it.buh.tecnik93.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <499c70c0701070026v717c68e0r8b0f1b75f5d934af@mail.gmail.com> <20070107113628.252b61f5@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Adding a nice kde port "Kwlan" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:40:24 -0000 On 1/7/07, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:26:43 +0300 > "Abdullah Al-Marrie" wrote: > > > Hello Guys, > > > > Could someone please make a port for Kwlan which is a great app and > > nice addition for FreeBSD? > > > > It make FreeBSD more friendly for desktop/laptop users :) > > > > http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=37041 > > Either I'm missing something very obvious or the tarball misses files: > > In file included from main.cpp:3: > kwlanmainwin.h:11:19: kwlan.h: No such file or directory > > Also from what he author writes, at least on Suse, it won't build with > automake-1.9, only 1.7 Greetings Ion-Mihai, I got this msg from the author last night. :) quote "Re: some issues Does the problem still exist with 0.6.0? If so, can you send be the output of your configure / make? It should work with automake 1.9 now, I need to change this in the documentation. Regards, Tom." So could you please check it out now?:) -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 05:50:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D4416DD42 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [83.136.81.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A84E13C441 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:50:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: (qmail 46888 invoked by uid 89); 21 Feb 2007 05:50:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kartoffel.salatschuessel.net) (83.136.81.185) by avocado.salatschuessel.net with SMTP; 21 Feb 2007 05:50:12 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:50:24 +0100 From: Oliver Lehmann To: Maho NAKATA Message-Id: <20070221065024.a5968314.lehmann@ans-netz.de> In-Reply-To: <20070214.150930.78785228.chat95@mac.com> References: <20070214060149.b76e56a6.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20070214.150930.78785228.chat95@mac.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openoffice 2 (RC, devel) broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:50:15 -0000 Maho NAKATA wrote: > Hmm, I don't know. Recently I'm verifying the build with 6.2-RELEASE/amd64. > Does anybody have same error? Hm... still not works - are you sure you verified it with the latest gcc 4.1 port installed? -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 06:14:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9AD16D042 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamlsd@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDC613C47E for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamlsd@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c24so561123ana for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:14:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:to:message-id:content-type:cc:subject:from:date:x-mailer:sender; b=EZgNVsgldNPXM9531RoN+aKHR4KQGWdtmLKc9CdgTdtWFYgyrn6UIsSv0SljalCG2jlX83xwSUlhusvPX+haq4qYiTIN8DPzronCOcMGD/Ty+E5pgK9OtKTTyHQXUCUduOf5Hb/1BW/BBTO4HbpbvjSYcFTF93gMnm2mL8SM4P0= Received: by 10.100.124.5 with SMTP id w5mr3320188anc.1172036863363; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:47:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.123.216? ( [24.190.113.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c2sm3947811ana.2007.02.20.21.47.42; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:47:42 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <130A582E-0AAE-4BEB-A00A-C7E485AA1711@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-456132600 From: Adam Martin Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:47:40 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: Adam Martin Cc: Subject: Patch to add package-smart target X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:14:27 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1-456132600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Hello, I wasn't sure who to send this to, but Benno Rice suggested ports@ and kris@, so I've done both. I've created a patch for a target that I've added to bsd.ports.mk (in /usr/ports/Mk/) a while back, to fix what I consider a "problem" in package-recursive. package-recursive always re-builds a tarball for every package in the dependancy chain, even if said tarball exists. package-smart will skip that step for all tarballs that already exist. (It's not perfect, but I thought somebody should look at it, and see what they can do with it.) The patch is attached. Regards, -- ADAM David Alan Martin --Apple-Mail-1-456132600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: application/octet-stream; x-unix-mode=0644; name=adam.patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=adam.patch --- bsd.port.orig Wed Feb 21 00:37:56 2007 +++ bsd.port.mk Fri Jan 26 19:58:07 2007 @@ -5199,6 +5211,23 @@ (cd $$dir; ${MAKE} package-noinstall); \ done +#Changes to add the package-smart target by ADAM David Alan Martin, +#2006.10.17 +.if exists(${PACKAGES}) +package-smart: package + @for dir in $$(${ALL-DEPENDS-LIST}); do \ + (cd $$dir; ${MAKE} package-smart-dependancy); \ + done + +package-smart-dependancy: + @if [ ! -e ${PKGFILE} ]; then \ + ${MAKE} package-noinstall; \ + else\ + ${ECHO} "Package ${PKGFILE} exists... skipping.";\ + fi;\ + +.endif + --Apple-Mail-1-456132600-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 07:11:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C755916B055; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F46A13C461; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A5DB60.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.219.96]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9892E164; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:11:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9926E5B480D; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:11:00 +0100 (CET) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1L7B0aM055808; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:11:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:11:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20070221081100.ubrz4jki40o8sk8g@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:11:00 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Lockless References: <45DB5A5B.6070007@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <45DB5A5B.6070007@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3) / FreeBSD-7.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.864, required 8, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -15.00, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to contribute to the pkg_* tools project ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:11:09 -0000 Quoting Lockless (from Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:30:19 +0100= ): > We (Lucas H. and Alexandre C.) are two young students > from France. We have a quite good theoretical knowledge of C > programing, but we would like to improve our experience in real > projects. So we looked at the Projects Ideas on the FreeBSD website, > and finally found out that contributing to the pkg_* tools could be > great, but there was no e-mail to contact on the page. > So who could we contact to get more informations about this project ? It is ports related, so the mailinglist dealing with ports (CCed, =20 please strip hackers@ on reply) would be the most appropriate, as =20 there are the most people which may be able to contribute with =20 improvement ideas. Basically the entry on the ideas list says to have a look at the code =20 and find stuff which can be improved. Be creative. Profile the tools =20 and try to make them faster. Have a look at the code and try to make =20 it better (maybe there's stuff which should be put into a library and =20 used in all pkg tools). Google around for stuff other people may have =20 done or may want to see. Don't let people lurk you into making a replacement for portupgrade =20 (it may be a goal for the second or third project you want to tackle). =20 For what you want to do this may be a little bit too early. First get =20 a grasp at the existing features and improve them. An upcomming entry on the ideas list talks about the use of berkeley =20 db in the pkg tools (where it makes sense). This was submitted by =20 kris@ (a member of portmgr@), so feel free to talk with him (but he =20 reads ports@, so talking about it on ports@ will not only give you =20 input from Kris, but also from other people). Bye, Alexander. --=20 Hideously disfigured by an ancient Indian curse? =09=09WE CAN HELP! Call (511) 338-0959 for an immediate appointment. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 10:01:55 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E6B16EA33 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:01:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fenner@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE5113C4A6 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fenner@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1LA1sVA040301 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:01:54 GMT (envelope-from fenner@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l1LA1sVi040300 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:01:54 GMT (envelope-from fenner) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:01:54 GMT From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <200702211001.l1LA1sVi040300@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Unfetchable distfiles reminder X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:01:55 -0000 Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ . In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile problems, which currently has 212 bad ports, is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ports@freebsd.org.html Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative. In addition, the list of all ports with any unfetchable distfile is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/bad.html if you don't mind coordinating your fixes with the port MAINTAINER. Thanks for your help! Bill "distfiles" Fenner From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 10:59:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FFC16DF35 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Hans.F.Nordhaug@hiMolde.no) Received: from sil.himolde.no (sil.hiMolde.no [158.38.83.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB45613C441 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Hans.F.Nordhaug@hiMolde.no) Received: from malle.himolde.no ([158.38.68.22]) by sil.himolde.no with InterScan Message Security Suite; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:29:52 +0100 Received: from harr.himolde.no (harr.hiMolde.no [158.38.68.20])by malle.himolde.no (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l1LATqCZ017154for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:29:52 +0100 Received: from harr.himolde.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])by harr.himolde.no (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1LATqis022971for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:29:52 +0100 Received: (from nordhaug@localhost)by harr.himolde.no (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l1LATqp0022970for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:29:52 +0100 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:29:52 +0100 From: "Hans F. Nordhaug" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070221102952.GB22899@hiMolde.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-imss-version: 2.046 X-imss-result: Passed X-imss-approveListMatch: *@*.no Subject: Remove outdated StarOffice ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:59:57 -0000 I have decided (and started) to make a minor contribution to FreeBSD by looking at broken ports - in particular those with ports@freebsd.org as maintainer - and fixing them. (I guess I do it just because I like FreeBSD and I want stuff to be tidy.) Enough said. I started looking at the broken staroffice ports (listed at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ports@freebsd.org.html) but gave up because the patches no longer are distributed - which makes sense since this is very old software. I suggest removing editors/staroffice52/ editors/staroffice60/ editors/staroffice70/ If there aren't any objections, I hope someone with commit permission can remove them. Regards, Hans PS! There is probably a procedure for stuff like this - should I have submitted a PR? (I didn't find any info about this when browsing quickly through the porter's handbook.) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 11:13:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0585116EEBA; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFD213C4AA; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (lawrance@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1LBDfOs045645; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:13:41 GMT (envelope-from lawrance@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from lawrance@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l1LBDf7k045641; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:13:41 GMT (envelope-from lawrance) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:13:41 GMT From: Sam Lawrance Message-Id: <200702211113.l1LBDf7k045641@freefall.freebsd.org> To: waldeck@gmx.de, lawrance@FreeBSD.org, lawrance@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/102058: arping has INconsistent versioning X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:13:42 -0000 Synopsis: arping has INconsistent versioning State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open State-Changed-By: lawrance State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:13:03 UTC 2007 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout for the second time, it's a free for all. Responsible-Changed-From-To: lawrance->ports Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:13:03 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: But not for me :-) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=102058 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 11:15:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB6A16EBF1; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CFE13C4B3; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (lawrance@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1LBF3rZ045701; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:15:03 GMT (envelope-from lawrance@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from lawrance@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l1LBF3Zb045697; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:15:03 GMT (envelope-from lawrance) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:15:03 GMT From: Sam Lawrance Message-Id: <200702211115.l1LBF3Zb045697@freefall.freebsd.org> To: lawrance@FreeBSD.org, lawrance@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/80944: [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP frontend X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:15:03 -0000 Synopsis: [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP frontend Responsible-Changed-From-To: lawrance->ports Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:13:52 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Release it; I was never sure about this one. Maybe a mnogosearch/php user could recommend whether the additional port is useful. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80944 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 11:20:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6FA16D7A3; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B194F13C474; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (lawrance@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1LBKaKX046115; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:20:36 GMT (envelope-from lawrance@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from lawrance@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l1LBKaaD046111; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:20:36 GMT (envelope-from lawrance) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:20:36 GMT From: Sam Lawrance Message-Id: <200702211120.l1LBKaaD046111@freefall.freebsd.org> To: lawrance@FreeBSD.org, lawrance@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/93216: [PATCH] finance/gnucash-devel: Add development release 1.9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:20:36 -0000 Synopsis: [PATCH] finance/gnucash-devel: Add development release 1.9.0 Responsible-Changed-From-To: lawrance->ports Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:17:37 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Back to pool. A lot of people are interested in an updated version of gnucash. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=93216 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 11:51:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9594A16E10D for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atz@atz-soft.com) Received: from smtpout08-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout08-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E16313C428 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atz@atz-soft.com) Received: (qmail 28260 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2007 11:25:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (85.124.49.66) by smtpout08-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.12) with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2007 11:25:09 -0000 From: "Atz-Soft" To: Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:25:06 +0100 Message-ID: <013f01c755aa$f18476e0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcdVqvAge7RxeXBfS6uiUffpjGvQWw== Cc: Subject: Policy on new ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:51:51 -0000 Hello! I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situation: The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system but can be compiled on FreeBSD without problems with approx. 5 commands. And because of that the author may not want his program in the ports collection. So will the program be added even if the author may disagree with that? Regards, atz From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 11:53:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBD616D085; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Vikash.Badal@is.co.za) Received: from morpheus.is.co.za (morpheus.is.co.za [196.35.45.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C5C13C428; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Vikash.Badal@is.co.za) Received: from morpheus.is.co.za (localhost.is.co.za [127.0.0.1]) by morpheus.is.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF89EF215A; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:31:23 +0200 (SAST) Received: from ZABRYSVISMFW (zajnbisit.mfw.is.co.za [196.26.2.106]) by morpheus.is.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF123F2151; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:31:23 +0200 (SAST) Received: from ZABRYSVISEX05.af.didata.local (Not Verified[10.1.8.14]) by ZABRYSVISMFW with MailMarshal (v6, 1, 8, 2172) id ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:30:31 +0200 Received: from ZABRYSVISEX04.af.didata.local ([10.1.8.148]) by ZABRYSVISEX05.af.didata.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:31:23 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:31:22 +0200 Message-ID: <740109F1ED7BA14EB02307DEF26487AB080A2093@ZABRYSVISEX04.af.didata.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: nntpcache ( news/nntpcache ) on AMD 64 (6.2-RELEASE) Thread-Index: AcdVq9B/7s3RN0G7THKVse3Dfwq7JQ== From: "Vikash Badal" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2007 11:31:23.0628 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0EC8AC0:01C755AB] X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: nntpcache ( news/nntpcache ) on AMD 64 (6.2-RELEASE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:53:13 -0000 Greetings, Has anyone been able to get nntpcache working on AMD64 (6.2-RELEASE) The same ports tree compiles on 6.2-RELEASE i386 and work 100% Compiling on AMD64 results in : connected to NNTP server vasbyt.local.net as DEFAULT =3D> [vasbyt.local.net] list overview.fmt refused list overview.fmt on vasbyt.local.net: '430 Dont have it' checking server vasbyt.local.net for 'active' =3D> [vasbyt.isdsl.net] list refused list active on vasbyt.local.net: '500 Syntax error or bad command' checking server vasbyt.local.net for 'active.times' =3D> [vasbyt.isdsl.net] list active.times parsing 'active.times' from vasbyt.local.net page error please advise Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as = displayed at the following link http://www.is.co.za/legal/E-mail+Confiden= tiality+Notice+and+Disclaimer.htm. Should you not have Web access, send a= =20mail to disclaimers@is.co.za and a copy will be emailed to you. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 12:07:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A57816DAEF for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:07:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C960813C46B for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:07:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from localhost (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF339EB5530; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:07:18 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geekcn.org Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org ([210.51.165.229]) by localhost (mail.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hPR79rqN-PwM; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:07:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from [192.168.1.32] (unknown [221.217.209.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28CCEB53E9; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:07:11 +0800 (CST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=Q9HvWSisKxUbUocay7MIw+/JO9u/NEtfUEegCw/AYDY8rqKTLk1gbxeTcuMc9XhuC n58aNg6zsBd0KzOmI9iNw== Message-ID: <45DC35EE.8060300@delphij.net> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:07:10 +0800 From: LI Xin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Atz-Soft References: <013f01c755aa$f18476e0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> In-Reply-To: <013f01c755aa$f18476e0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5CF8E4B90AB67699B08F3EED" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Policy on new ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:07:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5CF8E4B90AB67699B08F3EED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Atz-Soft wrote: > Hello! >=20 > I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situat= ion: >=20 > The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free= > Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your optio= n) > any later version. > The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system but can be compiled on > FreeBSD without problems with approx. 5 commands. > And because of that the author may not want his program in the ports > collection. >=20 > So will the program be added even if the author may disagree with that?= My understanding is that the build skeleton (we call it "ports") is not a "derived" work of the original application and therefore you own the port itself, and it's up to you to decide whether it can be included in the ports collection. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! --------------enig5CF8E4B90AB67699B08F3EED Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF3DXuOfuToMruuMARA4wcAJ9357Du/owjz0XGXdg6T9SxV+j59QCfdzAH lM8b5+aAOZ3dLx4X4ldqTSs= =9eB3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5CF8E4B90AB67699B08F3EED-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 12:31:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150BC16AABE for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atz@atz-soft.com) Received: from smtpout10-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout10-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D156E13C46B for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:30:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atz@atz-soft.com) Received: (qmail 21673 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2007 12:30:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (85.124.49.66) by smtpout10-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.238) with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2007 12:30:58 -0000 From: "Atz-Soft" To: Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:30:55 +0100 Message-ID: <014b01c755b4$2370fcb0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: <20070221131833.50b537fb@localhost> Thread-Index: AcdVsmy594VuYY7FT6uLH3xqVc9M+wAAMh9g Cc: Subject: Re: Policy on new ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:31:00 -0000 "Fabian Keil" wrote: > Is that an assumption or do you really know someone who > first uses a free license and then objects to people > distributing his program in compliance with that license? Just an assumption. I didn't want to spend time and effort creating a port and then not be able to add it. Thanks, atz From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 12:53:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4B116F61C for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC5113C4AC for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:52:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 23907 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2007 12:18:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (775067@[217.50.167.15]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Feb 2007 12:18:40 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:18:33 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: "Atz-Soft" Message-ID: <20070221131833.50b537fb@localhost> In-Reply-To: <013f01c755aa$f18476e0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> References: <013f01c755aa$f18476e0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.6.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2008-08-18.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_rrmnGjW68.Iga9a3bMyGKuC; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Policy on new ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:53:00 -0000 --Sig_rrmnGjW68.Iga9a3bMyGKuC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Atz-Soft" wrote: > I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situatio= n: >=20 > The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free > Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) > any later version. > The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system but can be compiled on > FreeBSD without problems with approx. 5 commands. > And because of that the author may not want his program in the ports > collection. Is that an assumption or do you really know someone who first uses a free license and then objects to people distributing his program in compliance with that license? I would assume that most authors are either glad that someone considers their program worthy enough to create a port for it, or just don't care. > So will the program be added even if the author may disagree with that? Usually the author isn't asked for his opinion, if the license allows distribution, it's assumed that the author is ok with it. I don't know if there ever was a situation where the author of a GPL'ed program asked to remove it from the ports collection again, but in my opinion such requests should be ignored. If the author doesn't want distribution he shouldn't use a license that allows it. Fabian --Sig_rrmnGjW68.Iga9a3bMyGKuC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF3DieBYqIVf93VJ0RAnzMAJ4lmp1qdHskKdcYZKxluwMFZAsDKgCff+ky aRf3z55YnGRXaR1gfyRABwc= =FzN+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_rrmnGjW68.Iga9a3bMyGKuC-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 13:33:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226B216C0BC for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:33:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@it.ca) Received: from mail.it.ca (mail.it.ca [216.235.7.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE11513C461 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:33:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@it.ca) Received: from mail.it.ca (paul@mail [216.235.7.67]) by mail.it.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l1LDKARS031535; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:20:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from paul@it.ca) Received: (from paul@localhost) by mail.it.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id l1LDKAPU031534; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:20:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from paul@it.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.it.ca: paul set sender to paul@it.ca using -f Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:20:09 -0500 From: Paul Chvostek To: Atz-Soft Message-ID: <20070221132009.GA92892@it.ca> References: <013f01c755aa$f18476e0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <013f01c755aa$f18476e0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Policy on new ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:33:38 -0000 On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:25:06PM +0100, Atz-Soft wrote: > > The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free > Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) > any later version. > The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system but can be compiled on > FreeBSD without problems with approx. 5 commands. > And because of that the author may not want his program in the ports > collection. If that's the author's reason for not wanting a FreeBSD point, I suspect he can be safely ignored. If you want to engage him in further conversation about this, points to remember (or perhaps to make) are: 1) The port is not the software, it's effectively a database entry implemented in a Makefile, and the license on the port is completely independent of the license of the software. (That said, USING the port could potentially violate a license if the software wasn't GPL'd.) In the absense of a blanket policy that ports in the FreeBSD ports tree are covered by the same license as FreeBSD, I believe that YOU as the author of the port determine the license. (Note: IANAL. I don't even play one on TV.) 2) The five commands required to compile the software comprise only ONE requirement addressed by a port. Others include upgrade management, security vulnerability tracking and dependencies. We use the ports system to address ALL these requirements, not just the compile process. > So will the program be added even if the author may disagree with that? The port is not the software. If the author wants to limit the availability of the software, he needs to use a license that allows this. GPL is not that license. And the effect of such a license will be to limit the ACTIVITY of the port, not the existence of it, since the port is not a derived work. -- Paul Chvostek Operations / Abuse / Whatever it.canada, hosting and development http://www.it.ca/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 13:53:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2F516AA93; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F9713C442; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1LDrL2E055825; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:53:21 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l1LDrL37055821; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:53:21 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:53:21 GMT From: Mark Linimon Message-Id: <200702211353.l1LDrL37055821@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/80944: [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP frontend X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:53:21 -0000 Synopsis: [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP frontend Responsible-Changed-From-To: ports->freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 13:53:01 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Canonicalize assignment. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80944 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 14:03:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C086516C95E for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A549713C461 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 5CC596D0; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:03:09 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:03:09 -0600 To: Fabian Keil Message-ID: <20070221140309.GA11293@soaustin.net> References: <013f01c755aa$f18476e0$1e00a8c0@AlexMobileComp> <20070221131833.50b537fb@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070221131833.50b537fb@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Atz-Soft Subject: Re: Policy on new ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:03:10 -0000 On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:18:33PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote: > Is that an assumption or do you really know someone who > first uses a free license and then objects to people > distributing his program in compliance with that license? We have, in the past, had to remove ports because the author objected, despite our (portmgr's) own belief that having the port exist was reasonable according to the license. In one case the author threatened legal action. Whether it is from not wanting to support the port on FreeBSD (despite our assurances, in some cases people will indeed contact authors directly), or not wanting to support FreeBSD, or something else, I really can't say. However, our policy is to remove a port if an author objects. Fortunately, this is an extremely rare situation (maybe once a year), so in general you don't have to worry about it. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 15:28:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B006F16FB0C; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:28:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA7413C442; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:28:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HJtOX-000I4z-B1; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:28:46 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1LFSOx8065574 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:28:24 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1LFSNcr030828; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:28:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1LFSNn1030810; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:28:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:28:23 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Phillip Neumann Message-ID: <20070221152823.GA39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20070213010559.ae84dd0d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <1171751641.1714.27.camel@localhost> <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> <20070219092142.GR39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171908225.1714.160.camel@localhost> <20070220110138.GV39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171977798.1729.1.camel@localhost> <20070220134326.GW39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1172070377.1335.9.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="72pTQ1Q5L511SwPT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1172070377.1335.9.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: 5bcd58edb95cdacf596e852bfe0375ec X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 795 [Feb 21 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Tom McLaughlin , Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:28:47 -0000 --72pTQ1Q5L511SwPT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:06:17PM -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote: > Oh.. =20 >=20 > and maybe this helps too >=20 > MONO_GAC_PREFIX=3Dfalse (in MAKE_ENV) Could you, please, give me the full patch (against CVS Makefile) ? Thanks. --72pTQ1Q5L511SwPT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF3GUWC3+MBN1Mb4gRArQfAKDAoYpfNJuxsUr9wScGg7VfMFlG0wCeKprN uuhoO71LWq+wmPwBWj/QJto= =ksV1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --72pTQ1Q5L511SwPT-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 15:48:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CDA16EE81 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drewjenkinsjr@yahoo.com) Received: from web62206.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web62206.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.75.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A94FE13C428 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drewjenkinsjr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 63107 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Feb 2007 15:48:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=mq68N91I+URNTkszcCxUtHqvnObhRbJd5QvZ7QieZuOyHQBJExvcqnX4lcS3Jpf1RPzkZ5qeVgE+7hDTP+dHc7JVeuHUOuGl/eztrdNW2rZUcYKxLcgZkRSCM2KkzsVvllOjs+daW5pM7ezsgx8TYkrvQOAmG9LY5sXvjxrI1NY=; X-YMail-OSG: su91ilMVM1nUvB8tisydxjXVCpenPd8tjqoUSLcAoHtsdpsq51Q7chdvKmAuh5UCtCrbKWPpuQLw.WV0AoTOeYbYGqKwXzb3eaNYFpZUnoendzGB4vG4bqZLiA-- Received: from [67.46.93.3] by web62206.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:48:10 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/368.8 YahooMailWebService/0.6.132.8 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:48:10 -0800 (PST) From: Drew Jenkins To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <29968.62653.qm@web62206.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Question About Python Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:48:11 -0000 Hi;=0AI'm rebuilding a server because of a hardware failure that has corrup= ted various s/w, including the OS. The server I'm rebuilding was built by s= omeone else. That person spent a lot of time developing a certain s/w packa= ge that I haven't had time to study enough to claim any expertise. So, I ne= ed to rebuild similar to how he built. However, he didn't understand FBSD's= port system. He built everything from source...including python. He has so= me links in his s/w to the python dirs he built. I can easily put symlinks = where his links are and build from ports...obviously my preference. However= , I can't figure out *where* the ports build! That is, in a standard built-= from-source python, one enters the dir, issues an "ls" and sees dirs like "= lib", "etc", etc. Where are these dirs in a built-from-port python?=0ATIA,= =0ADrew=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A_________________________________________________= ___________________________________=0ABored stiff? Loosen up... =0ADownload= and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.=0Ahttp://games.yahoo.= com/games/front From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 16:48:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2AB16FBA2 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:48:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fcash@ocis.net) Received: from smtp.sd73.bc.ca (smtp.sd73.bc.ca [142.24.13.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7F013C428 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:48:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fcash@ocis.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12321A000B1B for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:22:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at smtp.sd73.bc.ca Received: from smtp.sd73.bc.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.sd73.bc.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id pLMBu868Qd4A for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:22:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from coal (s10.sbo [192.168.0.10]) by smtp.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA001A000B19 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:22:28 -0800 (PST) From: Freddie Cash To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:22:27 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <29968.62653.qm@web62206.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <29968.62653.qm@web62206.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702210822.28123.fcash@ocis.net> Subject: Re: Question About Python Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:48:43 -0000 On Wednesday 21 February 2007 07:48 am, Drew Jenkins wrote: > I'm rebuilding a server because of a hardware failure that has > corrupted various s/w, including the OS. The server I'm rebuilding was > built by someone else. That person spent a lot of time developing a > certain s/w package that I haven't had time to study enough to claim > any expertise. So, I need to rebuild similar to how he built. However, > he didn't understand FBSD's port system. He built everything from > source...including python. He has some links in his s/w to the python > dirs he built. I can easily put symlinks where his links are and build > from ports...obviously my preference. However, I can't figure out > *where* the ports build! That is, in a standard built-from-source > python, one enters the dir, issues an "ls" and sees dirs like "lib", > "etc", etc. Where are these dirs in a built-from-port python? TIA, Ports install under /usr/local/. If you do an ls under there, you'll find lib/ bin/ libexec/ share/ man/ and so on. Read through the hier(7) man page for more information on the directory layout used. -- Freddie Cash fcash@ocis.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 17:10:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A393E170161 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mva@sysfault.org) Received: from webmailv3.ispgateway.de (webmailv3.ispgateway.de [80.67.16.113]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5CF13C48E for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:10:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mva@sysfault.org) Received: from webmailv3.ispgateway.de (webmailv3.ispgateway.de [127.0.0.1]) by webmailv3.ispgateway.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l1LGjABi032764 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:45:10 +0100 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by webmailv3.ispgateway.de (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id l1LGj9ME032740 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:45:09 +0100 Received: from a81-14-218-8.net-htp.de (a81-14-218-8.net-htp.de [81.14.218.8]) by webmail.df.eu (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:45:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20070221174509.ivash6pczkg84k0g@webmail.df.eu> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:45:09 +0100 From: mva@sysfault.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <29968.62653.qm@web62206.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <29968.62653.qm@web62206.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: domainFACTORY X-Originating-IP: 81.14.218.8 Subject: Re: Question About Python Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:10:27 -0000 Drew Jenkins : > Hi; [...] > links are and build from ports...obviously my preference. However, I > can't figure out *where* the ports build! That is, in a standard > built-from-source python, one enters the dir, issues an "ls" and > sees dirs like "lib", "etc", etc. Where are these dirs in a > built-from-port python? They are relative paths to the PREFIX set by the make system. This is by default /usr/local. For more details take a look at the great handbook (section ports using) and the porter's handbook. It also might help to take a look at man ports(1) :-) Regards Marcus From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 17:17:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4658716AD9A; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D974313C474; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HJv62-000DdF-1P; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:17:46 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1LHHMmI069392 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:17:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1LHHMbq035362; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:17:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1LHHL8a035361; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:17:21 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:17:21 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Phillip Neumann Message-ID: <20070221171721.GC39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> <20070219092142.GR39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171908225.1714.160.camel@localhost> <20070220110138.GV39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171977798.1729.1.camel@localhost> <20070220134326.GW39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1172070377.1335.9.camel@localhost> <20070221152823.GA39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1172076524.1335.19.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wl4gXchqb9PBRcq/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1172076524.1335.19.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: 3140350ce96b4815fe22a3a842dc7b15 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 799 [Feb 21 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Tom McLaughlin , Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:17:48 -0000 --wl4gXchqb9PBRcq/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:48:44PM -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote: > El mi??, 21-02-2007 a las 17:28 +0200, Kostik Belousov escribi??: > > Could you, please, give me the full patch (against CVS Makefile) ? >=20 >=20 > Sure. sorry for not doing it .. >=20 > thanks >=20 Patch helped, thanks. I successfully did portupgrade -f mono-1.2.2.1_2. --wl4gXchqb9PBRcq/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF3H6gC3+MBN1Mb4gRAtXDAKCKnQQjO2qMuvMJLVTzvCb7OiTX+ACgmq9G /+V4LYEA69W8TnPzWNUsWZU= =r3wf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wl4gXchqb9PBRcq/-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 17:55:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F159716F80E; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.freeshell.ORG [192.94.73.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B82713C474; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from webmail.freeshell.org (IDENT:nobody@mx.freeshell.org [192.94.73.18]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1LHflLY024599; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:41:47 GMT Received: from w.meditech.com ([192.216.27.32]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user tmclaugh) by webmail.freeshell.org with HTTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:41:47 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <39159.192.216.27.32.1172079707.squirrel@webmail.freeshell.org> In-Reply-To: <20070221171721.GC39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <1171755728.1247.2.camel@localhost> <1171862178.1714.155.camel@localhost> <20070219092142.GR39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171908225.1714.160.camel@localhost> <20070220110138.GV39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1171977798.1729.1.camel@localhost> <20070220134326.GW39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1172070377.1335.9.camel@localhost> <20070221152823.GA39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <1172076524.1335.19.camel@localhost> <20070221171721.GC39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:41:47 -0000 (UTC) From: tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org To: "Kostik Belousov" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Phillip Neumann , Norikatsu Shigemura , bsd-sharp-list@forge.novell.com Subject: Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:55:25 -0000 > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:48:44PM -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote: >> El mi??, 21-02-2007 a las 17:28 +0200, Kostik Belousov escribi??: >> > Could you, please, give me the full patch (against CVS Makefile) ? >> >> >> Sure. sorry for not doing it .. >> >> thanks >> > > Patch helped, thanks. I successfully did portupgrade -f mono-1.2.2.1_2. > Gah, I didn't realize in my earlier patch that MAKE_ENV was redefined a little further below in the port's Makefile. I'm still curious to know what the exact change was that fixed things. (It may be that while one change fixed your problem we should be using all the changes so we don't get bitten again later.) I'll commit Philip's patch later when I have access. tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 18:11:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E664170468; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA22513C4A6; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1LI1E0L087685; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:01:14 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1LI1ErC087684; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:01:14 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:01:14 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070221180114.GA87637@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , ports@freebsd.org, x11@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: xorg-server is broken due to objformat in -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:11:35 -0000 X server can't load any module (undefined symbols) because modules are not linked properly (due to objformat check). Does somebody work on this? -- http://ache.pp.ru/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 18:40:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2DA170016; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from mail.ijs.si (mail4.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D99713C4B3; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (mailman.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED6219296B; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:21:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=ijs.si; s=ja-200610; t=1172082063; bh=Xynif+lX7t89ElmyP6Cr0VSytMA=; h=DomainKey-Signature: X-Virus-Scanned:Received:Received:Received:Received:From: Organization:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=ZXIZQwKClJowVedgKvgnCnwHdNrkUhwGR dnHmWBXu5sXY3+L4o6qHV8xUxx1CIS8WYexhdxIaAa0vBLVMud3HpjFMEoEmvZc5gcN YYiR93MFYt7KyKAfGYafLpM1cCci DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=ja-200610; d=ijs.si; c=nofws; q=dns; h=x-virus-scanned:received:from:organization:to:subject:date: user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=DZNGQow0rjl4E+Ye3EIUsbqWG2zrHIfy+d91yzLIE8XtbkpwT/rxAXwI+8Bqr3x1r MzgWGeh0eLskyz9v+Yk1VO+HDsbDv+WyTycaIHClShe8tTDV7We3gMliRVMLzfR X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Received: from mail.ijs.si ([193.2.4.66]) by localhost (mail.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 7FoJ0M55XIEu; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:21:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from edina.ijs.si (edina.ijs.si [193.2.4.3]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA38192F49; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:21:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from radagast.ijs.si (radagast.ijs.si [193.2.4.168]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by edina.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7827050FDD; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:21:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.ijs.si (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by radagast.ijs.si (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1LIKx5e031939; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:21:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) From: Dejan Lesjak Organization: IJS To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:20:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20070221180114.GA87637@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070221180114.GA87637@nagual.pp.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702211920.59177.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xorg-server is broken due to objformat in -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:40:40 -0000 On Wednesday 21 February 2007 19:01, Andrey Chernov wrote: > X server can't load any module (undefined symbols) because modules are not > linked properly (due to objformat check). Does somebody work on this? ports/109091 (imake.c patch) shoul fix that. I'll hopefully have time to test and commit today/tomorrow. Dejan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 20:28:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B3E16A401 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from aibo1.runbox.com (aibo1.runbox.com [193.71.199.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDAF13C48E for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [10.9.9.162] (helo=pepper.runbox.com ident=Debian-exim) by greyhound.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HJxkF-0008LR-7O for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:07:19 +0100 Received: from [208.206.151.59] (helo=[208.206.151.59]) by pepper.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:650175 ) (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1HJxkE-0006tu-RV for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:07:19 +0100 Message-ID: <45DCA670.2030604@computer.org> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:07:12 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070127) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: wireshark build problem.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:28:06 -0000 Hello, Anyone seeing the following while building the latest wireshark? Previously had it installed, this was just a portupgrade from: wireshark-0.99.4_1 < needs updating (port has 0.99.5) -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC831' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC834' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC830' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC832' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC835' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC833' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC829' gmake[2]: *** [wireshark] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99.5' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99.5' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 If so... any workarounds? -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 20:28:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E9816A418 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yurtesen-dated-1172951940.934a4c@ispro.net) Received: from smtp.ispro.net.tr (smtp.ispro.net.tr [62.244.220.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77F1C13C481 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yurtesen-dated-1172951940.934a4c@ispro.net) Received: (qmail 69066 invoked by uid 89); 21 Feb 2007 19:59:00 -0000 Received: from [80.223.252.33] (dsl-aur-fefcdf00-33.dhcp.inet.fi [80.223.252.33]) by localhost.my.domain (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:58:55 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <45DCA524.6020303@ispro.net> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:01:40 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: krion@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: Evren Yurtesen X-Primary-Address: yurtesen@ispro.net.tr Cc: Subject: exim WITH_SRS problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:28:35 -0000 Hi, I have compiled exim with WITH_SRS however I am not able to use any srs commands. 2007-02-21 13:57:47 Exim configuration error in line 18 of /usr/local/etc/exim/configure: main option "srs_alwaysrewrite" unknown I wanted to be sure that it was compiled in by uninstalling libsrs2 and when I uninstall it exim complains that it cant find the libsrs2...so file. Is this a problem with FreeBSD ports or am I doing something wrong? I got spf working the same way and I have been using exim from ports for years. This is the first time something like this is happening. #exim -bV Exim version 4.66 #0 (FreeBSD 6.2) built 21-Feb-2007 13:42:28 Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 2006 Probably Berkeley DB version 1.8x (native mode) Support for: crypteq iconv() use_setclassresources Perl OpenSSL Content_Scanning Experimental_SPF Lookups: dbm dbmnz mysql Authenticators: plaintext Routers: accept dnslookup ipliteral manualroute queryprogram redirect Transports: appendfile autoreply pipe smtp Fixed never_users: 0 Size of off_t: 8 2007-02-21 13:57:47 Exim configuration error in line 18 of /usr/local/etc/exim/configure: main option "srs_alwaysrewrite" unknown Here are the options I used at compile time. 'mail/exim*' => [ 'WITH_CONTENT_SCAN=yes', 'WITHOUT_OLD_DEMIME=yes', 'WITH_MYSQL=yes', 'WITHOUT_IPV6=yes', 'WITHOUT_PAM=yes', 'WITHOUT_AUTH_CRAM_MD5=yes', 'WITHOUT_AUTH_SPA=yes', 'WITHOUT_MAILDIR=yes', 'WITHOUT_MAILSTORE=yes', 'WITHOUT_MBX=yes', 'WITHOUT_CDB=yes', 'WITHOUT_DNSDB=yes', 'WITHOUT_DSEARCH=yes', 'WITHOUT_LSEARCH=yes', 'WITHOUT_NIS=yes', 'WITHOUT_PASSWD=yes', 'WITHOUT_LMTP=yes', 'WITHOUT_ALT_CONFIG_PREFIX=yes', 'WITH_SPF=yes', 'WITH_SRS=yes', ], Thanks, Evren From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 21:22:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C053C16A403; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from skip.ford@verizon.net) Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net (vms048pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B7F13C4BB; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from skip.ford@verizon.net) Received: from pool-71-168-248-177.cmdnnj.east.verizon.net ([71.168.244.241]) by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JDU00JC50PHKXB1@vms048.mailsrvcs.net>; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:22:30 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:22:05 -0500 From: Skip Ford In-reply-to: <20070221180114.GA87637@nagual.pp.ru> To: Andrey Chernov , ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070221212205.GB859@heather.menantico.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <20070221180114.GA87637@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: xorg-server is broken due to objformat in -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:22:35 -0000 Andrey Chernov wrote: > X server can't load any module (undefined symbols) because modules are not > linked properly (due to objformat check). Does somebody work on this? I just created a shell script named /usr/bin/objformat that spits out "elf" when invoked. A step backwards but it works here until things are fixed. -- Skip From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 21:57:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E327D16A404 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jumper99@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E6FE13C441 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jumper99@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2007 21:31:05 -0000 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/zplQAjBfzgqrCe1FDr4rKQEtoEqM8I+i+85AwPi 7v7g== Message-ID: <004001c755ff$97bcc220$0d7ca8c0@helmutlaptop> From: "Helmut Schneider" To: Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:31:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: mod_auth_kerb X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:57:48 -0000 Hi, does anyone maintain that port? Or is there something adequate for Apache 2.0? Thanks, Helmut From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 21:59:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0553B16A401 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drewjenkinsjr@yahoo.com) Received: from web62211.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web62211.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.75.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C069E13C4A8 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:59:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drewjenkinsjr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 27234 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Feb 2007 21:59:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=tPSA9FJo3T3+khaz1VC91Mysf2TIxZ4eoEkBcuD60MxQlTPK2YbbXc6a3Vh1Y1jNUJV4QsAC5WXuvsKPalp/YLoA5rcb+QN4GKmesZo4kUFtFtdiR8sCfMWlKcSL5juKtLJMeMGv3seBwJZtAohZAOzpvDuflbMet+BFq4zf5pQ=; X-YMail-OSG: 7nDNIUwVM1kc_FpAn_Bt4khgzdoVc7hPEwjhrNaUtwp42aMbQkB5btMFqDk32tYqN_RUONcZHkdUATNzLraciQ6eshBzSFU.Ws_K6MtdVcYKhNC3cIUPzEHNhg-- Received: from [67.46.93.3] by web62211.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:59:40 EST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/368.8 YahooMailWebService/0.6.132.8 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:59:40 +1100 (EST) From: Drew Jenkins To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <714642.26553.qm@web62211.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Question About Python Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:59:42 -0000 ----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: "mva@sysfault.org" = =0A...and Freddie Cash=0A=0A=0AThanks. This has led me to a few other quest= ions:=0A* There are apparently a number of s/w packages the previous sysadm= in built out in this box. However, the version of Zope upon which we are de= pendent requires python 2.3, and these packages build automatically with py= thon 2.4. How do I change that? Here are the packages:=0A codeville= =0A epydoc=0A py-xml=0A* I also need to download/check out a = cvs, and I've forgotten how to do that <:-) I thought the line of code was = this:=0Acvs co http://cvs.zope.org/Packages/tadaa=0Abut it didn't work. Aft= er a frustrating search on Yahoo, I'm hoping someone can clue me in ;)=0A= =0AThanks,=0ADrew=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A_______________________________________= _____________________________________________=0AExpecting? Get great news r= ight away with email Auto-Check. =0ATry the Yahoo! Mail Beta.=0Ahttp://advi= sion.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 23:15:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1633716A400 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:15:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from JGretz@Angstman.com) Received: from angstman.com (customer-66-213-129-218.velocitus.net [66.213.129.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FB413C48D for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:15:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from JGretz@Angstman.com) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:20:51 -0700 Message-ID: <150E08CEC4094342AB141E7D7F15E31E612FC6@hades.dynasty.angstman.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: NTFS-3G install errors Thread-Index: AcdWDjELQE3jQNOJQSCacvAtjr6IQg== From: "Jason Gretz" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: NTFS-3G install errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:15:54 -0000 Hey guys, I got a prob here, I am trying to install the new NTFS-3G = driver, which just went 1.0, and This is what the output of =93make = install && make clean=94 got me: =20 =3D=3D=3D> Installing for fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1 =3D=3D=3D> fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1 depends on file: = /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko - not found =3D=3D=3D> Verifying reinstall for /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko in = /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod =3D=3D=3D> fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_4 requires the Kernel source to be = installed. Set SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src. =20 I=92m new to UNIX/FreeBSD and I dunno how to check the kernel source, = but it is a stock FreeBSD kernel. =20 FreeBSD 6.1 =20 Thanks! =20 Jason=20 =20 --=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date: = 2/21/2007 3:19 PM =20 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 23:29:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF5416A402 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:29:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C9713C467 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:29:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B4E3C639; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:29:32 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:29:32 -0600 To: Helmut Schneider Message-ID: <20070221232932.GA21450@soaustin.net> References: <004001c755ff$97bcc220$0d7ca8c0@helmutlaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004001c755ff$97bcc220$0d7ca8c0@helmutlaptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mod_auth_kerb X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:29:33 -0000 On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:31:04PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote: > does anyone maintain that port? Or is there something adequate for Apache > 2.0? $ cd ports/www/mod_auth_kerb $ make maintainer apache@FreeBSD.org So, you should post this question to the freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.org mailing list. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 23:29:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F9416A401 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from doppler.zen.co.uk (doppler.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D46E13C48E for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [212.23.3.141] (helo=heisenberg.zen.co.uk) by doppler.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HJymV-0000C9-Vh for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:13:44 +0000 Received: from [82.68.31.182] (helo=Demon.vickiandstacey.com) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HJymG-0008LU-4o; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:13:28 +0000 Received: from crom.vickiandstacey.com (crom [192.168.1.10]) by Demon.vickiandstacey.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1LLDXbw098732; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:13:33 GMT (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from crom.vickiandstacey.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crom.vickiandstacey.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1LLCpV8022828; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:13:22 GMT (envelope-from stacey@crom.vickiandstacey.com) Received: (from stacey@localhost) by crom.vickiandstacey.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1LLCpk2022827; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:12:51 GMT (envelope-from stacey) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:12:51 +0000 From: Stacey Roberts To: Eric Schuele Message-ID: <20070221211251.GE4990@crom.vickiandstacey.com> References: <45DCA670.2030604@computer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KdquIMZPjGJQvRdI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45DCA670.2030604@computer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.68.31.182] Cc: ports Subject: Re: wireshark build problem.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:29:55 -0000 --KdquIMZPjGJQvRdI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Eric, On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Eric Schuele wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Anyone seeing the following while building the latest wireshark?=20 Yep. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D108892 Can't say much for the responses though :-/ Regards, Stacey > Previously had it installed, this was just a portupgrade from: >=20 > wireshark-0.99.4_1 < needs updating (port has 0.99.5) >=20 > -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC831' > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC834' > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC830' > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC832' > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC835' > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC833' > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC829' > gmake[2]: *** [wireshark] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99= .5' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99= .5' > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 >=20 > If so... any workarounds? >=20 > --=20 > Regards, > Eric > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --KdquIMZPjGJQvRdI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQEVAwUBRdy1ztetyy/wI4UpAQGHAgf/QiwuGHBt1OcYCnYEqJ7QBdphnAm4NNMT HnM1V7GkJHct5nkioyAFokeJ5L08BR0TjIzoD2x+/9Z/qqVTZ/UIxq0C2OVygPrF fEUpn6vQ3uZ3cN/qVOyKPtcGBxflopobW2qy71vkk5z4g0fan1cLeiSPAU6n58NS jos4PTgYLf+n3hb3cmug/UTMtXN8CC2v9F/bXZv/DSb6GcygfkpvN5KMsRcnWvzX Dtznr7+uiIvFAgvVcDW71CtQv3sc2cM365EsGfP2mrBsQKPZUxcNJ6oCubwmUNIs 6r3641/M3wovd9E7sMtVXGRT3KxZqF7EPGAMRbNmlCYGg0+VFt3JFQ== =qUtn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KdquIMZPjGJQvRdI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 21 23:39:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A92516A402 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D152F13C428 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dthomas53@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so2695077nzh for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:39:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZzN1tiMMSBu/bWFsThlCqNPIY85JXFyY+MsUEuXBpB8ACWbIbu6bDlT25vdYTrfV6ZAV3GVrSaZMYtlruglNY3Omdosapb4KtMFVWXqUnkQ+9J1koCM/sxGtQE62oOQcb7MvULqiwELDPENjfXR2otelV7tQGET8CUsggTgigWI= Received: by 10.35.110.13 with SMTP id n13mr20515569pym.1172101188649; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.113.13 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:39:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:39:48 -0500 From: "David Stanford" To: "Jason Gretz" In-Reply-To: <150E08CEC4094342AB141E7D7F15E31E612FC6@hades.dynasty.angstman.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <150E08CEC4094342AB141E7D7F15E31E612FC6@hades.dynasty.angstman.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NTFS-3G install errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:39:50 -0000 On 2/21/07, Jason Gretz < JGretz@angstman.com> wrote: > > Hey guys, I got a prob here, I am trying to install the new NTFS-3G > driver, which just went 1.0, and This is what the output of "make install > && make clean" got me: > > > > ===> Installing for fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1 > > ===> fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1 depends on file: > /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko - not found > > ===> Verifying reinstall for /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko in > /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod > > ===> fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_4 requires the Kernel source to be installed. Set > SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src. > > > > I'm new to UNIX/FreeBSD and I dunno how to check the kernel source, but it > is a stock FreeBSD kernel. > Hi Jason, First, I would suggest sending posts like this to the freebsd-questions@ list rather than freebsd-ports@. Second, try installing sysutils/fusefs-kmod and sysutils/fusefs-libs from the ports tree, and then try installing the NTFS-3G source again: # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-libs # make install clean # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod # make install clean Good luck! -David -- [root@fbsd ~]# fortune Happiness is just an illusion, filled with sadness and confusion. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 02:17:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C228C16A402 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gdinolt@pacbell.net) Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A6E713C474 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gdinolt@pacbell.net) Received: (qmail 11444 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2007 01:50:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rwrGWF3zu97HtpNTcLWWqP2TFACUNSnT1iLMiDEnLk58ArjOg98getz77lQN0mZtztDqSys0NuncPsRuNc44GfbiFI12O5JUxSL+Nb1v2gTV2oigestChsE0YRrbfs8lsnqi9iLaEuY6pwgOhmf89ZfdUPhbt1Ch4zLm3l+aP+o= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (gdinolt@pacbell.net@71.141.226.247 with plain) by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2007 01:50:47 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: V.0G0gIVM1mByL0QAy6VpbuY_Lz8Nm3NYbY0JI9xdlVX.O5T6NJ3wcWvq_2rk.i_2xD7xGSBRL40BeJW1TeVdVYcqcXxnl1OCrXCXkkMA8Q2dhHSqB0B8bm0YKO.x_VhT7Moa355yPY3EBc- Message-ID: <45DCF6F4.9060408@pacbell.net> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:50:44 -0800 From: "George W. Dinolt" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: e.schuele@computer.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, stacey@vickiandstacey.com Subject: Re: wireshark build problem... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:17:28 -0000 Eric: I too saw the same problem on both 6.2 and current. If one searches the PR's one can find a reference to this problem. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/108776 Unfortunately, the PR is "closed" because it is "not reproducible". At the bottom of the PR I found the following information: > "I rebuild net-snmp with "-O2" optimization and then build wireshark > with "-O2" or "-O", and both succeeded." I did this with "-O2" and both net-snmp and wireshare 0.99.5 built without errors and wireshark seems to work. I hope this helps. G. Dinolt. > Hello Eric, > > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Eric Schuele wrote: > > > Hello, > >=20 > > Anyone seeing the following while building the latest wireshark?=20 > > Yep. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D108892 > > Can't say much for the responses though :-/ > > Regards, > > Stacey > > > Previously had it installed, this was just a portupgrade from: > >=20 > > wireshark-0.99.4_1 < needs updating (port has 0.99.5) > >=20 > > -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib > > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC831' > > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC834' > > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC830' > > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC832' > > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC835' > > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC833' > > epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC829' > > gmake[2]: *** [wireshark] Error 1 > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99= > .5' > > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99= > .5' > > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > > *** Error code 2 > >=20 > > If so... any workarounds? > >=20 > > --=20 > > Regards, > > Eric > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 06:17:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0429316A404; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7F913C4A8; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (lawrance@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1M6Hfaj071318; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:17:41 GMT (envelope-from lawrance@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from lawrance@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l1M6HfL0071314; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:17:41 GMT (envelope-from lawrance) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:17:41 GMT From: Sam Lawrance Message-Id: <200702220617.l1M6HfL0071314@freefall.freebsd.org> To: lawrance@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/93216: [PATCH] finance/gnucash-devel: Add development release 1.9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:17:42 -0000 Synopsis: [PATCH] finance/gnucash-devel: Add development release 1.9.0 Responsible-Changed-From-To: ports->freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Feb 22 06:16:36 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Reassign to the correct group http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=93216 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 08:42:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5BA16A401 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jumper99@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51C6913C48D for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:42:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jumper99@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2007 08:42:36 -0000 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19O9OpcixJOUAfStwLGJz9GH9lKD8cHlZAyi7D2Bf JKhA== Message-ID: <01a001c7565d$675e0270$609b65c1@vpe.de> From: "Helmut Schneider" To: "Mark Linimon" References: <004001c755ff$97bcc220$0d7ca8c0@helmutlaptop> <20070221232932.GA21450@soaustin.net> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:42:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mod_auth_kerb X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:42:39 -0000 From: "Mark Linimon" > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:31:04PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote: >> does anyone maintain that port? Or is there something adequate for >> Apache 2.0? > > $ cd ports/www/mod_auth_kerb > $ make maintainer > apache@FreeBSD.org > > So, you should post this question to the freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.org > mailing list. OK, thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 13:13:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328BF16A400 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B5F13C467 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 21212 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2007 13:13:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (775067@[217.50.167.15]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Feb 2007 13:13:12 -0000 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:13:01 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20070222141301.007fee4f@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.6.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2008-08-18.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_bIM.Cr/MiMTD+w_0CYl5roD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: Subject: Optionally depending on one of two ports (or none of them) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:13:16 -0000 --Sig_bIM.Cr/MiMTD+w_0CYl5roD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I maintain the ports security/dns-proxy-tor and security/trans-proxy-tor which both require a Tor control port being available somewhere to do their job. They can work with both Tor versions in the ports collection (security/tor and security/tor-devel), and I originally wanted to register a dependency on the one that is already installed, or use tor-devel if no version is installed. To do that I added the RUN_DEPENDS line: ${LOCALBASE}/bin/tor:${PORTSDIR}/security/tor-devel which mostly works as expected, but fails if the tor port is installed, in which case a dependency on tor-devel is registered. I'm aware that my RUN_DEPENDS line is incorrect, but I'm unaware of a better way. Also by now my goal has been slightly changed and I want to give the user the choice to either use one of the Tor ports, or on none (if Tor is running on a remote system or in another jail). The easiest solution is to not register any dependencies and to simply print a pkg-message to inform the user about his choices, but I was wondering if there is a better way (that doesn't involve shell scripts)? Simply adding OPTIONS is not an option (harhar) because it wouldn't prevent the user from choosing the wrong Tor port (the Tor ports use identical pkg-plists). Fabian --Sig_bIM.Cr/MiMTD+w_0CYl5roD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF3ZbnBYqIVf93VJ0RAgaJAJ42eW08Q4HPXDkq3sPbymPafgW3KQCdGd2a uSoMVyXCoSiR3hfxbYBCcaA= =+OeM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_bIM.Cr/MiMTD+w_0CYl5roD-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 14:19:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8417916A401 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3908613C481 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2647B9EEA8F; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:56:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VMW-P8frdrK4; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:56:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.186] (catv-50635cb6.catv.broadband.hu [80.99.92.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74199EEA85; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:56:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45DDA117.3050508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:56:39 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fabian Keil References: <20070222141301.007fee4f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070222141301.007fee4f@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Optionally depending on one of two ports (or none of them) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:19:15 -0000 Fabian Keil schrieb: > I maintain the ports security/dns-proxy-tor and > security/trans-proxy-tor which both require a Tor > control port being available somewhere to do their job. > > They can work with both Tor versions in the ports collection > (security/tor and security/tor-devel), and I originally wanted > to register a dependency on the one that is already installed, > or use tor-devel if no version is installed. > > To do that I added the RUN_DEPENDS line: > > ${LOCALBASE}/bin/tor:${PORTSDIR}/security/tor-devel > > which mostly works as expected, but fails if the tor > port is installed, in which case a dependency on tor-devel > is registered. > > I'm aware that my RUN_DEPENDS line is incorrect, > but I'm unaware of a better way. > > Also by now my goal has been slightly changed and I want > to give the user the choice to either use one of the Tor > ports, or on none (if Tor is running on a remote system or > in another jail). > > The easiest solution is to not register any > dependencies and to simply print a pkg-message > to inform the user about his choices, but I was > wondering if there is a better way (that doesn't > involve shell scripts)? > > Simply adding OPTIONS is not an option (harhar) because > it wouldn't prevent the user from choosing the > wrong Tor port (the Tor ports use identical pkg-plists). > > What about grepping in the output of pkg_info? Or even better just grepping in ls ${PKG_DBDIR} to determine which one is installed and adding the appropriate dependency. Gabor From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 18:10:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA8C16A402 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@pop.zerowait.com) Received: from shenton.org (static-71-246-241-106.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.246.241.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A59F13C49D for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@pop.zerowait.com) Received: (qmail 1350 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Feb 2007 17:42:37 -0000 From: Chris Shenton To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:42:37 -0500 Message-ID: <86zm7684xe.fsf@Bacalao.shenton.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.93 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Thunar hangs on start (worked briefly before) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:10:19 -0000 I asked about a non-geek-friendly filemanager for my S.O. and a couple folks recommended Thunar. I installed it, and got the requisite hald and dbus running. After a few tries I got it to come up -- very nice, easy to use, found the USB drive we attached... good stuff. Later I tried again, and it started to come up, put a File Manager window on the screen but never populated it -- just 2 white blocks on a gray background. I've since cvsupped to 6.2-STABLE, made sure my ports were up to date, blah blah, and see the same thing. Top and ps show: 1010 chris 3 20 0 31056K 11076K kserel 0:01 0.00% Thunar chris@Bacalao:~<123> ps -auxlwww | grep thun chris 1010 0.0 2.2 31056 11076 p1 S+ 12:00PM 0:00.65 thunar (Thunar) 1001 1005 0 20 0 kserel Oddly, I can't ^C or ^Z it to kill and background. Even a kill -9 on its PID doesn't kill it, even with sudo: chris@Bacalao:~<126> ps -auxlwww | grep thun chris 1010 0.0 2.2 31056 11068 p1 T+ 12:00PM 0:00.65 thunar (Thunar) 1001 1005 0 96 0 - After killing it, I can try and start up a new thunar but it does the same thing: gray background with white blocks. Any ideas how I can track down the problem here? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 18:20:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1B416A404 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@pop.zerowait.com) Received: from shenton.org (static-71-246-241-106.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.246.241.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3767313C4A8 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@pop.zerowait.com) Received: (qmail 1397 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Feb 2007 17:53:01 -0000 From: Chris Shenton To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:53:01 -0500 Message-ID: <86vehu84g2.fsf@Bacalao.shenton.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.93 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: SANE Linux 'brother2' backend for MFC-7820N scanner? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:20:44 -0000 I picked up a Brother MFC-7820N print/fax/scan/copy, seems like a good device for US$250 or so. My Mac can print and scan over the net to it fine. I've got FreeBSD printing to it with lpd and apsfilter. I'd like to be able to use its scan features from FreeBSD too. The Sane project shows this device with "good" support: http://www.sane-project.org/lists/sane-backends-external.html#S-BROTHER2 but this is using a closed-source binary driver from Brother: http://solutions.brother.com/linux/sol/printer/linux/sane_drivers.html which is built for RedHat, mandriva/Mandrake, SuSE, FedoraCore, Debian. Anyone tried to get this working on FreeBSD? If not, any suggestions? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 19:11:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E9716A403 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B7CD13C4A6 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 25424 invoked by uid 399); 22 Feb 2007 19:11:57 -0000 Received: from pool-71-160-100-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@71.160.100.253) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2007 19:11:57 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 71.160.100.253 Message-ID: <45DDEAFC.8060406@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:11:56 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: New portmaster with -o and other fixes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:11:58 -0000 Howdy, Based on discussion on this list, and some user problem reports and suggestions, I've updated portmaster as follows. As always, thanks to those who've shown an interest in improving this tool. Enjoy, Doug -------- Original Message -------- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Log: New Feature =========== --clean-distfiles[-all] options to check /usr/ports/distfiles for stale stuff, and either offer to delete them or delete them all without prompting. Bug Fix ======= Fix brain-o that broke the -o option. Usability Improvements ====================== 1. If a port skeleton is missing, but the pkg db has an +IGNOREME file, skip the update check, but issue a warning for it. 2. If there is no +IGNOREME file, and no version information is present, fail with a helpful error message. 3. Clean up any trailing / character on directory names input at the command line. 4. Allow user to specify just category/portname on the command line without -p. 5. Work around a missing +REQUIRED_BY file for a -r port. Minor cleanup ============= Make case consistent for all usage() items Revision Changes Path 1.13 +79 -10 ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files/portmaster.sh.in http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files/portmaster.sh.in.diff?&r1=1.12&r2=1.13&f=h From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 18:28:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1973816A403 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clarity256@yahoo.com) Received: from web33811.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33811.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.69.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E263413C461 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clarity256@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 53735 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Feb 2007 18:02:02 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ppooPh9ly76E2ImyqoZSwf9s6yZmeNmfFmiDfFebjFiAErXjBb5BC5Bi+c5eOxxRtgoIBgh4UnH2kWFWz3MizUJb0mASd83UHDQLA1CapF/e7rpcxfqGpRAy0LJouhtA3MkGkIuUn/Z1QTbsWq6NJA13Gzyi/dbQmfX8ySdF2X4=; X-YMail-OSG: tXqfdh0VM1kVnRzzag9E_E6.TC0AKiuUls3tC2yGg1bSGdS8n.y7V1VPH.I4UiHDPmkXGrZRHj7RraHibOirFOJEEiwxFltfcNyF0ZkCvV1Nv9oUU.S4rFAvLBUOHcwKEV8Opo1CqLjC7QY- Received: from [69.179.181.233] by web33811.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:02:02 PST Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:02:02 -0800 (PST) From: Bring Joy To: ports@FreeBSD.org, ahze@ahze.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <706550.42536.qm@web33811.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:03:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD port graphics/lphoto ERROR X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:28:43 -0000 Hi, After installing lphoto I get the following error when running it. Any suggestions, please? Thanks. %lphoto Reading Library failed open Creating Default Empty Library QObject::connect: No such signal QDateTimeEdit::lostFocus() QObject::connect: (sender name: 'unnamed') QObject::connect: (receiver name: 'unnamed') Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local//lib/python2.4/site-packages/Lphoto/lphoto.py", line 720, in ? mw = LMainPhoto(app) File "/usr/local//lib/python2.4/site-packages/Lphoto/lphoto.py", line 49, in __init__ self.initModePanel(self.mainView) File "/usr/local//lib/python2.4/site-packages/Lphoto/lphoto.py", line 344, in initModePanel self.newAlbumButton = self.createToolBarButton(None, "buttonadd.png", hb, "add a new album") File "/usr/local//lib/python2.4/site-packages/Lphoto/lphoto.py", line 303, in createToolBarButton b = QPushButton(label, vb) TypeError: argument 2 of QPushButton() has an invalid type lphoto: ERROR: Communication problem with lphoto, it probably crashed. --------------------------------- Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 22 23:43:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354A116A401; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ericnk@esreco.net) Received: from srecows.esreco.net (srecows.esreco.net [67.139.146.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC62513C428; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ericnk@esreco.net) Received: from infotech.esreco.net ([10.0.0.186] helo=infotech) by srecows.esreco.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HKN8D-000Bl1-Nb; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:13:46 -0700 From: "Eric Kingston" To: Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:13:20 -0700 Message-ID: <00fa01c756d7$0b1918e0$ba00000a@infotech> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AcdW1wr3wR+hYwJPSQCjd6zpSnK6Aw== X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "srecows.esreco.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. Content preview: There is a newer version of this application (0.8.3). How come the FreeBSD port hasn't been updated to it? It's still only at 0.8.1. I'm running into an error... conversion from: UTF8 to: WCHAR_T hk_string smallstringconversion: Conversion not possible [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 3.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org 1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST RBL: Envelope sender in postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: hk_classes-0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:43:11 -0000 There is a newer version of this application (0.8.3). How come the FreeBSD port hasn't been updated to it? It's still only at 0.8.1. I'm running into an error... conversion from: UTF8 to: WCHAR_T hk_string smallstringconversion: Conversion not possible . happens when I try to run a report in knoda. Does the newer version fix this, or is it just something I'm missing and have misconfigured. Any ideas are appreciated. Thanks. Eric From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 23 04:25:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBD916A401; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C7413C48D; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1N3uILQ064193; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:56:18 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l1N3uHmn064192; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:56:17 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:56:17 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070223035617.GA18955@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <20070220182113.GC853@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200702211113.l1LBDbQn006859@lurza.secnetix.de> <5f67a8c40702220937h21dc6963r77637ba369549e25@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5f67a8c40702220937h21dc6963r77637ba369549e25@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Abyssmal dump cache efficiency X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:25:01 -0000 On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:37:00PM -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > >Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> I've found that you do get a worthwhile improvement in dump|restore > >> performance by introducing a large (10's of MB) fifo between them. > >> This helps reduce synchronisation between dump and restore (so that > >> dump can continue to read whilst restore is busy writing a batch of > >> small files and vice versa). There's a suitable port but I can't > >> recall the name because I wrote my own. > > > >There are several. The most popular ones are probably > >misc/team and misc/buffer. > > I can certainly vouch for that , too. I generally use "team 1m 32" (total > of 32meg of buffer). Team seems to not want to buffer more than 1m per > process and I think 32 is the max # of processes. Someone, please take a look at trivial patch for team's buffer size here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/106806 The maintainer timeout for the PR has occured long time ago. Eugene Grosbein From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 23 08:18:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617EC16A400 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:18:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@hedges.com) Received: from server.hedges.com (server.hedges.com [199.201.175.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAF813C49D for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:18:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@hedges.com) Received: from [199.201.175.113] (ip113.hedges.com [199.201.175.113]) by server.hedges.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1N8I8C4045009 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:18:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@hedges.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:18:07 -0800 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Tom Hedges Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (server.hedges.com [199.201.175.2]); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:18:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: Netpbm and p5-FuzzyOcr-devel ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:18:09 -0000 I'm running a mail server on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE amd64 and want to use all the cool latest spamassassin stuff, in particular FuzzyOcr (does OCR on image spam). I have been doing cvsup on my ports tree to get the latest port updates. The netpbm devel version is 10.31 dated 05.12.23, not really very new! They are up to 10.37.0 dated 06.12.31 on SourceForge. In version 10.34 a new command pamthreshold was added, and fixed through 10.36 FuzzyOcr needs pamthreshold in its latest version 3.5.1, which newer than mail/p5-FuzzyOcr-devel which is 3.4.2. It was a major rewrite, but easy to manually update since it's written in Perl. I want to request that p5-FuzzyOcr-devel be updated to 3.5.1 (fairly major Makefile redo for port), and that netpbm be updated to at least 10.36. This is a biggee for spamassassin users, the new version of FuzzyOcr is very well written and works very well. Thanks, Tom netpbm: http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/netpbm/trunk/doc/HISTORY?view=markup FuzzyOcr: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Installation-3.5.x From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 23 08:50:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE1B16A400 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:50:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [195.131.4.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC1F13C442 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:50:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from desktop.home.serebryakov.spb.ru ([89.163.10.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by ftp.translate.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1N8LkEV006044 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:21:46 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:21:31 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.11.02) Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <8010670026.20070223112131@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on ftp.translate.ru Cc: Subject: How to depends on perl conditionally? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lev Serebryakov List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:50:37 -0000 Hello ports, If I use OPTIONS, I can check WITH_