From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 11:06:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7171D106567B for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0D28FC28 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB8B6wJ7014306 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:06:58 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mB8B6vId014302 for freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:06:57 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:06:57 GMT Message-Id: <200812081106.mB8B6vId014302@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:06:58 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/119842 jail [smbfs] [jail] "Bad address" with smbfs inside a jail o bin/99566 jail [jail] [patch] fstat(1) according to specified jid s kern/89528 jail [jail] [patch] impossible to kill a jail o kern/72498 jail [libc] [jail] timestamp code on jailed SMP machine gen o kern/68192 jail [quotas] [jail] Cannot use quotas on jailed systems o bin/32828 jail [jail] w(1) incorrectly handles stale utmp slots with 6 problems total. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:15:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68A31065677 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F6E8FC13 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D99141C678; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:15:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZCmohIgqA1y; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:15:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id DEA1041C677; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:15:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC844448DD; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:14:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Philipp Wuensche In-Reply-To: <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> Message-ID: <20081211221113.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-734655037-1229033570=:97918" Content-ID: <20081211221255.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:15:07 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-734655037-1229033570=:97918 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1; FORMAT=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-ID: <20081211221255.P97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: Hi, > Brian A. Seklecki wrote: >> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >>> The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new >>> functionality? >> >> The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the >> latter. > > Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and > breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use single-IPv4 jails as before there should be absoultely no change in the output format. /bz PS: I trimmed the CC: list as noone was able to adhere to Reply-To. --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one. --0-734655037-1229033570=:97918-- From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:20:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422061065673 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cryx-freebsd@h3q.com) Received: from mail.h3q.com (mail.h3q.com [213.73.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F82C8FC12 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cryx-freebsd@h3q.com) Received: (qmail 86756 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2008 21:53:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO goa.local) (smtpsend@85.179.28.10) by mail.h3q.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Dec 2008 21:53:29 -0000 Message-ID: <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:53:29 +0100 From: Philipp Wuensche User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list , Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:20:12 -0000 Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new >> functionality? > > The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the > latter. Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. It is uneasy to parse too. greetings, Philipp From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:30:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F601065672 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:30:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cryx-freebsd@h3q.com) Received: from mail.h3q.com (mail.h3q.com [213.73.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E868FC08 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cryx-freebsd@h3q.com) Received: (qmail 99607 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2008 22:30:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO goa.local) (smtpsend@85.179.28.10) by mail.h3q.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Dec 2008 22:30:27 -0000 Message-ID: <49419482.2040502@h3q.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:30:26 +0100 From: Philipp Wuensche User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> <20081211221113.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20081211221113.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:30:29 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: > > Hi, > >> Brian A. Seklecki wrote: >>> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >>>> The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new >>>> functionality? >>> >>> The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the >>> latter. >> >> Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and >> breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. > > This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use > single-IPv4 jails as before there should be absoultely no change in the > output format. Why do I get the new jls output then when I only use one ipaddr. for a jail and none of the new features at all? > PS: I trimmed the CC: list as noone was able to adhere to Reply-To. freebsd-current should be in the CC as the discussion is if it is MFCd and let loose to 7.2R greetings, Philipp From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:32:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C78A1065676; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0497A8FC18; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D2E6D43F; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id ADCA7844C0; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:32:52 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Philipp Wuensche References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:32:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> (Philipp Wuensche's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:53:29 +0100") Message-ID: <867i66s5pn.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:32:54 -0000 Philipp Wuensche writes: > Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and > breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. > > It is uneasy to parse too. jls | tail +3 | while read line ; do set $line if [ $# =3D 3 ] ; then echo "jail $1 (name $2 root $3) IPs:" elif [ $# =3D 1 ] ; then echo " $1" else echo "huh?" fi done DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:50:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D23C1065675; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51E68FC1F; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D8E41C6DB; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:50:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EI8oZSwdLL14; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:50:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id ABCE941C6BB; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:50:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29ACD4448DD; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:48:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Philipp Wuensche In-Reply-To: <49419482.2040502@h3q.com> Message-ID: <20081211224737.B97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> <20081211221113.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <49419482.2040502@h3q.com> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:50:07 -0000 On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: Hi, >>> Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and >>> breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. >> >> This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use >> single-IPv4 jails as before there should be absoultely no change in the >> output format. > > Why do I get the new jls output then when I only use one ipaddr. for a > jail and none of the new features at all? What are you using? The version from HEAD or are you running a patch on either HEAD or 7 and if so from when? /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:52:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19EE1065678 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cryx-freebsd@h3q.com) Received: from mail.h3q.com (mail.h3q.com [213.73.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50758FC17 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:52:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cryx-freebsd@h3q.com) Received: (qmail 5962 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2008 22:52:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO goa.local) (smtpsend@85.179.28.10) by mail.h3q.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Dec 2008 22:52:29 -0000 Message-ID: <494199AD.2060404@h3q.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:52:29 +0100 From: Philipp Wuensche User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> <20081211221113.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <49419482.2040502@h3q.com> <20081211224737.B97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20081211224737.B97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:52:31 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: > > Hi, > >>>> Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and >>>> breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. >>> >>> This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use >>> single-IPv4 jails as before there should be absoultely no change in the >>> output format. >> >> Why do I get the new jls output then when I only use one ipaddr. for a >> jail and none of the new features at all? > > What are you using? The version from HEAD or are you running a patch > on either HEAD or 7 and if so from when? The version from HEAD without any patches. * $FreeBSD: src/usr.sbin/jls/jls.c,v 1.7 2008/12/11 01:04:25 bz Exp $ greetings, philipp From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:53:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F96D1065673 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@modulus.org) Received: from email.octopus.com.au (email.octopus.com.au [122.100.2.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E588FC1B for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@modulus.org) Received: by email.octopus.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1002) id DC99B17265; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:36:45 +1100 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on email.octopus.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.3 Received: from [10.1.50.60] (ppp121-44-18-158.lns10.syd7.internode.on.net [121.44.18.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: admin@email.octopus.com.au) by email.octopus.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A3A17CFE; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:36:33 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <494195E6.8000409@modulus.org> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:36:22 +1100 From: Andrew Snow User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080523) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> <867i66s5pn.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <867i66s5pn.fsf@ds4.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:53:56 -0000 I patched my jls to output the list of jails in XML & CSV format. makes things alot nicer to script with. Might be worth doing for everyone. - Andrew From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 23:20:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010131065688; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A820F8FC19; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:20:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC93841C749; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:20:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dsVzb+S87Qc8; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:20:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 61C6B41C736; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:20:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEC94448DD; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:16:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:16:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Philipp Wuensche In-Reply-To: <494199AD.2060404@h3q.com> Message-ID: <20081211231422.T97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> <20081211221113.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <49419482.2040502@h3q.com> <20081211224737.B97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <494199AD.2060404@h3q.com> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:20:08 -0000 On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: Hi, ok, after another round of private mails I got it; I had been living with jail patches for too long; the jls output (without -v) should be on one line and not on two. That wasn't intended. Unfortunately noone had complained the months before.. I'll look at this. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.