From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 01:00:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789D51065676; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5109C8FC14; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9H10ZB4086405; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:00:35 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9H10ZRW086398; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:00:35 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:00:35 GMT Message-Id: <201110170100.p9H10ZRW086398@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/161724: [PATCH] graphics/p5-Cairo: update to 1.081 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:00:35 -0000 Synopsis: [PATCH] graphics/p5-Cairo: update to 1.081 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->gnome Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Oct 17 01:00:34 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161724 From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 01:13:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04E0106564A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunpoet@sunpoet.net) Received: from sunpoet.net (sunpoet.net [220.133.12.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7086B8FC0A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sunpoet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0FE5C34C6; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:53:32 +0800 (CST) To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org From: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh X-send-pr-version: 3.113 X-GNATS-Notify: Message-Id: <20111017005332.0FE5C34C6@sunpoet.net> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:53:32 +0800 (CST) Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [PATCH] graphics/p5-Cairo: update to 1.081 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:13:19 -0000 >Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh >Organization: The FreeBSD Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [PATCH] graphics/p5-Cairo: update to 1.081 >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: update >Release: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 >Environment: System: FreeBSD bonjour.sunpoet.net 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed Sep 28 22:36:13 CST 2011 >Description: - Update to 1.081 - Add CPAN to MASTER_SITES - Move p5-Test-Number-Delta to TEST_DEPENDS - Pet portlint Port maintainer (gnome@FreeBSD.org) is cc'd. Generated with FreeBSD Port Tools 0.99 >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: --- p5-Cairo-1.081.patch begins here --- Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/graphics/p5-Cairo/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -u -r1.22 Makefile --- Makefile 25 Jul 2010 23:03:46 -0000 1.22 +++ Makefile 17 Oct 2011 00:51:58 -0000 @@ -7,20 +7,22 @@ # PORTNAME= Cairo -PORTVERSION= 1.061 -PORTREVISION= 1 +PORTVERSION= 1.081 CATEGORIES= graphics perl5 -MASTER_SITES= SF/gtk2-perl/${PORTNAME}/${PORTVERSION} +MASTER_SITES= SF/gtk2-perl/${PORTNAME}/${PORTVERSION} \ + CPAN +MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= CPAN:TSCH PKGNAMEPREFIX= p5- MAINTAINER= gnome@FreeBSD.org COMMENT= Perl bindings to the cairo graphics library -BUILD_DEPENDS= ${SITE_PERL}/ExtUtils/Depends.pm:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-ExtUtils-Depends \ - ${SITE_PERL}/ExtUtils/PkgConfig.pm:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-ExtUtils-PkgConfig \ - ${SITE_PERL}/Test/Number/Delta.pm:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Test-Number-Delta +BUILD_DEPENDS= p5-ExtUtils-Depends>=0.200:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-ExtUtils-Depends \ + p5-ExtUtils-PkgConfig>=1:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-ExtUtils-PkgConfig LIB_DEPENDS= cairo.2:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/cairo -RUN_DEPENDS= ${BUILD_DEPENDS} +RUN_DEPENDS:= ${BUILD_DEPENDS} + +TEST_DEPENDS= p5-Test-Number-Delta>=1:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Test-Number-Delta PERL_CONFIGURE= yes Index: distinfo =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/graphics/p5-Cairo/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -u -r1.18 distinfo --- distinfo 3 Jul 2011 14:11:45 -0000 1.18 +++ distinfo 17 Oct 2011 00:51:58 -0000 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -SHA256 (Cairo-1.061.tar.gz) = 1d253f9d48bd36efdd4b962c169659182126baac9a6c6bb820406b48de9367a0 -SIZE (Cairo-1.061.tar.gz) = 90604 +SHA256 (Cairo-1.081.tar.gz) = 2ef23a32ecd16c0b4b383accd2452ec324c54fa3498d870e083523ef60871582 +SIZE (Cairo-1.081.tar.gz) = 106643 --- p5-Cairo-1.081.patch ends here --- From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 11:07:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6321065678 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A288FC18 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9HB7S8Y099580 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:07:28 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9HB7ReC099578 for gnome@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:07:27 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:07:27 GMT Message-Id: <201110171107.p9HB7ReC099578@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to gnome@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:07:28 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/161724 gnome [PATCH] graphics/p5-Cairo: update to 1.081 o ports/161676 gnome databases/libgda4: [UPDATE] to 4.2.9; improvements o ports/161585 gnome [UPDATE] devel/goffice to 0.8.17, math/gnumeric to 1.1 o ports/161567 gnome [PATCH] audio/pulseaudio: fix pkg-plist o ports/161494 gnome devel/anjuta: gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports o ports/161185 gnome [patch] Remove unnecessary graphics/cairo dependency f o ports/161180 gnome [UPDATE] sysutils/gnome-schedule: update to 2.1.5 o ports/161164 gnome [PATCH] devel/glade3: update to 3.10.0 o ports/160764 gnome If libinotify is installed, net/avahi-app doesn't buil o ports/160685 gnome graphics/gimp-app included gnome-libtool fails to loca s ports/160670 gnome [patch] devel/pkg-config: upgrade to version 0.26 o ports/160563 gnome portupgrade of sysutils/tracker-client fails o ports/160506 gnome [update] deskutils/gnote: update to 0.7.5 o ports/160490 gnome [PATCH] x11-toolkits/gtk20: drag and drop broken in vn o ports/160485 gnome [UPDATE] deskutils/ontv: update to 3.2.0 o ports/160471 gnome www/webkit-gtk2 fails to build/link o ports/160268 gnome www/webkit-gtk2 build process bails: unable to mmap er o ports/160224 gnome building x11-toolkits/gtk30 fails o ports/159938 gnome graphics/shotwell received an X Window System error. p ports/159928 gnome Updates graphics/clutter to 1.6.16 f ports/159721 gnome x11/gdm: Usernames that are too long get logged onto G o ports/159687 gnome devel/gvfs fails to compile o ports/159613 gnome [PATCH] misc/gnomehier: use dirrmtry for PREFIX/share/ o ports/159512 gnome x11/gnome-panel causes high load with opacity settings o ports/159391 gnome x11/gdm needs hal dep, rc.d fixes o ports/159347 gnome cannot portupgrade net-im/telepathy-glib to version 0. o ports/159336 gnome graphics/evince fails to build o ports/159012 gnome multimedia/totem cannot be build o ports/158966 gnome graphics/libchamplain: broken build after GnuTLS updat o ports/158722 gnome [patch] devel/gobject-introspection does not build if o ports/158708 gnome x11/gdm doesn't build o ports/158693 gnome x11-wm/nautilus 2.32.2.1_1 fails to build o ports/158684 gnome graphics/evince can not be build o ports/158680 gnome devel/gvfs doesn't build o ports/158639 gnome ports-mgmt/packagekit cannot be build s ports/155461 gnome [UPDATE] editors/abiword-docs to 2.9.0 s ports/155460 gnome [UPDATE] editors/abiword to 2.9.0 o ports/148244 gnome x11/gnome2: gnome desktop and HAL prevent umount witho s ports/145301 gnome [patch] sysutils/hal: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald startup 39 problems total. From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 11:14:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13149106566C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sidetripping@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB778FC0C for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyg14 with SMTP id 14so2010935qyg.13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:14:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VUeVK8BFEpFiWwfZmOC01+3cu0s6ets12osrEcTpiVU=; b=qeFpajZHK7/1SoiGNmFZ3rRJBOd9nFVaWM9TQ++/Qx8JWXcErnmwGj2E658fU/1PUO afL8yA/UCLu7kl2pGux8L+5ScoeEUrj9FdMMKrzqgDYLEhG2Ntxob+Iqk7WSoAHZBldB FPUeHmIjhg10261moYuPhyrurIY265c2fYQpA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.66.5 with SMTP id l5mr4023232qci.214.1318848427869; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 03:47:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.38.80 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 03:47:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:47:07 +0200 Message-ID: From: ian ivy To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: GNOME2 - avahi daemons and various ports. X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:14:14 -0000 Hi, a couple days ago I decided to test GNOME2, because I have one stand-alone machine with FreeBSD 8.2 for testing various things. Lite* version was installed from the 8 Stable branch. My questions is: A) do I need enable avahi daemon to properly run GNOME2? The same question goes for avahi mDNS daemon B) it is normal that some services (?) are listening on various ports? Couple examples (skip some info such as FD, PID etc.); # sockstat -46 ian gnome-sess tcp6 *:30226 *:* ===> ** ian gnome-sess tcp4 *:25308 *:* avahi avahi-daem udp4 *:5353 *:* avahi avahi-daem udp4 *:31702 *:* # sockstat -4l ian gnome-sess tcp4 *:25308 *:* avahi avahi-daem udp4 *:5353 *:* avahi avahi-daem udp4 *:31702 *:* # netstat -an |grep LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.44164 *.* LISTEN tcp6 0 0 *.56629 *.* LISTEN It is normal behaviour? If I can close/disable these ports, how do this? Best regards! Ian. _____________ * gnome2-lite-2.32.1 ** - I do not use IPv6. It is normal (tcp6)? From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 11:52:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD16D106564A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D4B8FC13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so3723594eyd.13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:52:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oQQgJttSZcrIZsubBLZde2n1/Msnr7el2gvQuksuC4Q=; b=CQ1Ghf6/4HtqcMPfxE15Bedtgr9l+wD73BwzRf2W1njv8/7mJW4U4UY81AjhekGSh8 4Uf29yXADd4bfAYDbVGP6HxNFkmxxPtFRVo7/jqS758oPu7b5IJYVt18iWSBAaYzGRtr 9M5jbhyAGMvTrTrOQzn2jJnl7VaAZkN4PuFcw= Received: by 10.14.11.38 with SMTP id 38mr1209168eew.156.1318852366090; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.101.2] (hotel.grandberoun.cz. [90.182.105.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q50sm28654535eef.9.2011.10.17.04.52.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:52:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Michal Varga To: ian ivy In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Stonehenge Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:52:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1318852362.48910.13.camel@xenon> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GNOME2 - avahi daemons and various ports. X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:52:47 -0000 On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 12:47 +0200, ian ivy wrote: > Hi, a couple days ago I decided to test GNOME2, > because I have one stand-alone machine with > FreeBSD 8.2 for testing various things. Lite* version > was installed from the 8 Stable branch. My questions is: > > A) do I need enable avahi daemon to properly > run GNOME2? The same question goes for avahi > mDNS daemon No, not at all. Only thing you need to be running is dbus, and optionally HAL for a few additional features (CD insertion autodetection and such), but that's somewhat controversial subject, as HAL is crap and basically abandoned. > B) it is normal that some services (?) are listening > on various ports? > Probably not, I don't have gnome-session listening in both Gnome 2, nor Gnome 3. But no idea where your behavior might come from. > It is normal behaviour? If I can close/disable these ports, > how do this? I'd go for pf in case you're concerned about external connections. See man pf, man pfctl, and the Handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/firewalls-pf.html > * gnome2-lite-2.32.1 > ** - I do not use IPv6. It is normal (tcp6)? Yes, even if you don't use ipv6 in practical sense, as long as it's there, services binding on *.* will bind to your ipv6 addresses too (usually loopback). It's harmless, but in case you want to block ipv6 completely, just use a quick rule in pf and nothing will get through: block quick inet6 (No further pf rules will get evaluated for inet6.) m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account) From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 13:59:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F601065670 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sidetripping@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2D18FC0A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qadz30 with SMTP id z30so2642644qad.13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:59:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vpxRrffT3FbjDkeXaxqMB2hxuaF6BTn5Qe98o2Gx1KQ=; b=FOpGKFfo9u99u++EvBSLtmAv4OBAgYLwSlchrvYjwXAJEkaiOSktHwpygeIbpjilx0 qpmNOwm2QGws8g5RWnVddO4aIFs6iVjQp98MIZLSXT519zCf18MT+oxzHfM79+ZIxEQ/ fzf/Nl9zzGcCh7cOlFaydTPYbi5nL+tW/fBdA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.68.137 with SMTP id v9mr4213331qci.252.1318859940594; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:59:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.38.80 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:58:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1318852362.48910.13.camel@xenon> References: <1318852362.48910.13.camel@xenon> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:58:58 +0200 Message-ID: From: ian ivy To: Michal Varga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GNOME2 - avahi daemons and various ports. X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:59:01 -0000 Hi, yes you are right - HAL is crap. On my other machine with FreeBSD, I'm using Xfce4 without HAL and Dbus. It is only a few lines in xorg.conf file to get rid of these things. > I don't have gnome-session listening in both Gnome 2, > nor Gnome 3. But no idea where your behavior might come from. It is quite strange. Especially when you are saying that you don't have gnome-session listening. Maybe someone else will knew solution? > I'd go for pf in case you're concerned about external connections. Thanks. When I saw these results of sockstat and netstat, I immediately created a PF rules. One more thing. For now, I starting GNOME with startx command, so I must added to the .xinitrc file something like; /usr/local/bin/gnome-session Can you write, which login manager you are using? This may be related to gnome-session listening. From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 15:46:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4D11065676 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277398FC0A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so4066827eyd.13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:46:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mbUhC5kZK6zTQSnNcJCdR/spAQH7HApQpUvl7Jsxw2k=; b=jUwwFag1Gxr19brTtMGDY/INzSPqEp/scNBNqZ7zpVFxMDNB4XC6/LYd+s1Pb6SsuE 9HtBvsw8o06pxnG+07NFCVp7qvjViNCtFIDQZNRNTozAXrpqhkMdvraWuUYceDt9L1yZ 6eQilVyYNKtRxFEvGZsJVI3NaQ11p7hdDUqFY= Received: by 10.223.77.69 with SMTP id f5mr25201701fak.3.1318866389042; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.101.2] (85.58.broadband12.iol.cz. [90.179.58.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l8sm24116588fai.16.2011.10.17.08.46.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:46:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Michal Varga To: ian ivy In-Reply-To: References: <1318852362.48910.13.camel@xenon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Stonehenge Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:46:25 +0200 Message-ID: <1318866385.48910.29.camel@xenon> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GNOME2 - avahi daemons and various ports. X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:46:30 -0000 On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:58 +0200, ian ivy wrote: > Hi, yes you are right - HAL is crap. On my other machine > with FreeBSD, I'm using Xfce4 without HAL and Dbus. > It is only a few lines in xorg.conf file to get rid of these things. > dbus isn't much of an issue, it's just a lightweight process communicator: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-Bus Many applications nowadays use dbus regardless of Gnome (or KDE) and lose some functionality without it (or won't run at all). Gnome itself won't start without dbus running. > > I don't have gnome-session listening in both Gnome 2, > > nor Gnome 3. But no idea where your behavior might come from. > > It is quite strange. Especially when you are saying that you don't have > gnome-session listening. Maybe someone else will knew solution? > > > I'd go for pf in case you're concerned about external connections. > > Thanks. When I saw these results of sockstat and netstat, I immediately > created a PF rules. > One more thing. For now, I starting GNOME with startx command, so I > must added to the .xinitrc file something like; > > /usr/local/bin/gnome-session > > Can you write, which login manager you are using? This may be related > to gnome-session listening. GDM, the Gnome's default display manager. Some Gnome features like multiple user switching are tied to GDM, as they integrate directly into it. Basically, the two dbus_enable="YES" gdm_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf is all I use for launching Gnome, without HAL and rest of the pointless stuff. I even had avahi enabled for like a year or two once, "in case I maybe find out some use for it one day"... Guess what. I never did. m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account) From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 12:54:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DA91065675; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EE18FC18; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [81.181.146.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAE0D22C5486; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:35:52 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:35:51 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20111017153551.23281532@tetcu.info> In-Reply-To: <20111011063602.GO68552@droso.net> References: <20111011063602.GO68552@droso.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:06:27 +0000 Cc: dinoex@FreeBSD.org, naddy@FreeBSD.org, autotools@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, kuriyama@FreeBSD.org, stas@FreeBSD.org, skv@FreeBSD.org, python@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, roam@FreeBSD.org, Erwin Lansing , mm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [UPDATE] Re: Update on ports on 10.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:54:46 -0000 On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:36:03 +0200 Erwin Lansing wrote: > Since the release has been pushed back some more since the last mail, > we do have some time to test a possible fix for the issues we're > seeing with libtool on FreeBSD 10.0. However, fixing libtool is only > part of the problem as hundreds, if not thousands, of ports roll > their own detection and need to be fixed individually. We are > currently running a fixed libtool (ports/161404) to assess how many > ports are fixed by this patch and how many need to be patches > manually before deciding how to move forward. Other options include > the big find/grep/awk solution that has been posted several times and > fiddling with uname to go to FreeBSD 9.99 for a while, while ports > can be fixed. > > Hopefully, we can move forward in a day or two, but needless to say > this needs a lot of testing both on 10.0 and earlier releases so we > are sure we don't break backwards compatability, especially on 9.0 > that is soon to be released. For those that cannot wait a few days, > several patches have been proposed on the lists, of which dougb's > seems most complete, so I recommend applying one of those locally. > Please note that these are not tested widely and may break when the > final fix is committed. > > To conclude with some "fun" facts, only 232 ports break on HEAD > currently. Unfortunately, some of these are pretty high profile and > prevent almost 19.000 other ports from building, leaving only slighty > more than 3000 ports to build successfully. Here's a little status update: We iterated through a few -exp runs (basically for ports/161404 -- committed and ports/161431 -- skv@ any problem with it?). With those two we can build around 7k packages. The majority of the rest can't be built because of a few high profile ports that don't package: expat (6581), curl (975), jpeg(5057), lcms(1080), libiconv(11180), libltdl(1187), libogg(1947), pcre(5737), python27(5935). http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-10-latest/ What we'd like to do next is see how many ports we can package after individually fixing those above. This will require a few other -exps since undoubtedly we'll find other highly-depended-on ports broken that weren't tried because of the blockers above. Depending on this number and how long the whole process will take, we can decide what solution to adopt. If possible we'd like to avoid the big hammer of an uname fiddle or find/grep/sed/... (which most probably won't work for all ports anyway, irrespective of how smart it will be). If we need to adopt one of these hacks, it will be via some conditional KNOB in each port Makefile, in order to have an easy way to know which ports are fixed and which not, and an easy way to turn it off for test builds without it in the future. Basically we do not want to shove the dirt under the carpet, were it will rot for years. YOU can help by sending portmgr@ patches for above ports (or any other you know is broken) for the next -exp run. And PLEASE, pretty please once you have a patch that fixes this problem submit it upstream and bug upstream about it. (committers: please check this is the case when committing a patch from a PR). Thanks! -- IOnut From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 20:14:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E291065680 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:14:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yurkie@gmail.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412E28FC13 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RFtK3-0003Hy-Jg for freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:58:07 -0700 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT) From: a33e To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1318881487604-4911341.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Gnome keyboard shortcuts equivalent to Windows keyboard shortcuts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:14:33 -0000 That windows keyboard shortcut profile should be implemented if it does not exist. I have been waiting for that for years already and its the thing that keeps me away from Linux world. I am totally used to Win shortcuts, they are tattooed to my spine. I'm BTW. MCSE and MCITP: EA. I say that just to give a hint how total MS nerd i am. :P I remember KDE had that Win shortcut profile in some of their earlier versions but when i checked it out last time i couldn't find those settings anymore. Nothing pisses me off more than inability to open menu or RUN command promt etc. because those same key shortcuts wont do anything -or do "wrong" things. Still i would like to be more familiar with Linux stuff but i can't concentrate to "real" stuff because all efforts goes to those "obvious" things.. . . Programming own shortcuts one by one ain't perfect solution. What if i need to use more than one linux install? Or use one just for a while? Actually i would like to have kb shortcut to call that Win shortcut profile aswell. :D Win key + W would be nice. Or if using Win key in official distros is prohibited, CTRL-ALT-W. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Gnome-keyboard-shortcuts-equivalent-to-Windows-keyboard-shortcuts-tp4821711p4911341.html Sent from the freebsd-gnome mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 20:52:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279D4106566B; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:52:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (cl-414.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:19d::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79BE8FC08; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (207.47.0.2.static.nextweb.net [207.47.0.2]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5F43D8FC2D; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:52:19 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 11DD25C36; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:51:30 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Message-Id: <20111017135130.d9caa4f1.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111017153551.23281532@tetcu.info> References: <20111011063602.GO68552@droso.net> <20111017153551.23281532@tetcu.info> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:05:45 +0000 Cc: dinoex@FreeBSD.org, naddy@FreeBSD.org, autotools@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, kuriyama@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, skv@FreeBSD.org, python@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, roam@FreeBSD.org, Erwin Lansing , mm@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [UPDATE] Re: Update on ports on 10.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:52:28 -0000 On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:35:51 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu mentioned: > > > Here's a little status update: > We iterated through a few -exp runs (basically for ports/161404 -- > committed and ports/161431 -- skv@ any problem with it?). With those two > we can build around 7k packages. The majority of the rest can't be built > because of a few high profile ports that don't package: expat (6581), > curl (975), jpeg(5057), lcms(1080), libiconv(11180), libltdl(1187), > libogg(1947), pcre(5737), python27(5935). > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-10-latest/ > > What we'd like to do next is see how many ports we can package after > individually fixing those above. This will require a few other -exps > since undoubtedly we'll find other highly-depended-on ports broken that > weren't tried because of the blockers above. > It doesn't require an exp-run to understand that you won't move much further with just fixinng these ports. If you want, I and other people can tell you exactly what will break next (libX* being some of them). There's no way you can work this aroun by fixing few ports by hand: virtually any ports using libtool (and I mean using libtool, not having it in depends list) contains an embedded version of it inside "configure" and thus requires patching similar to the patch Ed, Doug and other people proposed. Actually, that sed one-liner fixed like 99% of the ports in tree, excluding some complex ones (like GCC). So why not commit that patch as a KNOB to bsd.port.mk like it was initially proposed and let people use it in individual ports makefiles to fix them (and portmgr@ can commit the initial bunch of these knobs)? This is the easiest thing you can do now, and you will be able to abandon it when the better solution is available (which is unlikely). WRT your "submit upstream" comment, personanlly, I'd argue against this: this is not the upstream maintainer's problem, it the buggy tools they use to generate the configure scripts, so until the fixed version of libtool is available in all major distributions and widely installed, they're not going to replace it or patch locally. Given the debian/ubuntu release schedule, this is not going to happen earlier that 1-2 years from now, and your patches/requests sent could potentially cause them to abandon FreeBSD support altogether requiring a lot of work to maintain which will be totally understandable. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 04:59:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E81106566B; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:59:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunpoet@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEF68FC19; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9I4xmRj007126; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:59:48 GMT (envelope-from sunpoet@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from sunpoet@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9I4xm67007122; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:59:48 GMT (envelope-from sunpoet) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:59:48 GMT Message-Id: <201110180459.p9I4xm67007122@freefall.freebsd.org> To: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, sunpoet@FreeBSD.org From: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/161724: [PATCH] graphics/p5-Cairo: update to 1.081 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 04:59:48 -0000 Synopsis: [PATCH] graphics/p5-Cairo: update to 1.081 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: sunpoet State-Changed-When: Tue Oct 18 04:58:55 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Committed. Thanks! Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnome->sunpoet Responsible-Changed-By: sunpoet Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Oct 18 04:58:55 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Committed. Thanks! http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161724 From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 19:29:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1288A106566B for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98F58FC17 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so1359527iak.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:29:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5Axd9GxurWQm3XLoW3EkfffPnzEe834bqCzdgk7Te7I=; b=e2aHvvF4R74byxbDwTMpqwG1F1hjQfaC05v8xETuEkui8+uXPLpT16cYxzslUFDmDy K/DhFjoE8vj3k3jsSXV/vs2bwzsFdZXj+nfVVHXCnZRJhOqusgiQX1Qy69eg2EyUIKR3 qR95uIPRIgYnr+leYdgJVBr7vQ2aoiNHROTac= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.46.68 with SMTP id i4mr1646108ibf.24.1318966160335; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.153.73 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:29:20 +0200 Message-ID: From: Olivier Duchateau To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Problem with gtk20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:29:21 -0000 Hi, I wonder, if it's my fault, or problem from gtk20 package. I try to update ristretto (image viewer), but I've got bug (image is flickering). So I decided to compile with debug support, and compilation failed, because one directory is missing, /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/include Usually, include/ must not be located in lib/ directory. I try this command: pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0 and result: -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -- olivier From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 21:00:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212851065670; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA0D8FC17; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9IL0pNo047404; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:00:51 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9IL0pGE047395; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:00:51 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:00:51 GMT Message-Id: <201110182100.p9IL0pGE047395@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/161784: [PATCH] editors/abiword: Fix build with gcc46 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:00:52 -0000 Synopsis: [PATCH] editors/abiword: Fix build with gcc46 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->gnome Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Oct 18 21:00:51 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161784 From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 19 03:22:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551881065670 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raon.judyann@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148818FC13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn16 with SMTP id 16so1584603yxn.13 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:22:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:mime-version:from:to:subject:date:x-bounce-tracking-info :content-type; bh=JpwaqoTGtNlZBzmoBebSCIHvxsLBW3JBTRPsAyu5ibc=; b=V5I5wSRZ7n2UlC3fwUdc9tyqyUHqkcAZUH12tHTlCi0PxAZivfmP02gejiBP7sj9+F /sFG6qIVEwydRQm9jGSUlNRFmTtI+6WMKhm2I1yV0mZXZQ92LOip1cKZwn/o3oKdtlj5 Iw2OvSW5f/kUORJhtGcr54j0Yk46pookw14Sc= Received: by 10.68.33.101 with SMTP id q5mr9225869pbi.121.1318993211763; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.108] ([112.202.186.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jm5sm2309373pbc.1.2011.10.18.20.00.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Judy To: gnome@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:00:13 +0800 X-Bounce-Tracking-Info: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: PCI Compliance Training X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:22:54 -0000 Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliance=A0is a complex and ever evolving sub= ject=A0affecting millions of businesses - acquiring=A0banks, Independent Sa= les Organizations=A0(ISOs), processors, hosts, shopping carts,=A0e-commerce= and retail merchants and=A0other merchant services providers=2E Learn PCI Compliance from a distinguished international PCI DSS Consultant!!! Meet Mr=2E GILBERT CHU=2E=2E=2E =B7 Lead PCI DSS Implementer =B7 Security Consultant =B7 Certified Ethical Hacker =B7 ISO/IEC 27001 Specialist in this one-time training=2E PCI Compliance Training Course Overview: All entities that transmit, process, or store payment card data must be com= pliant with=A0Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS)= =2E Working proactively to protect sensitive payment card data is essential= to all lodging operations=2E The=A0Compliance: PCI DSS training course=A0is designed to educate=A0manage= rs, compliance officers and security-concerned individuals on what security= measures must be taken to protect the private information of individuals d= uring any transaction occurring through the use of a credit or payment card= =2E In this 1-day training you will learn: =B7 The history of the PCI DSS standard =B7 The common payment card features =B7 The requirements and process =B7 The problems surrounding payment card fraud and identity theft =B7 The best practices for payment card transactions Who Should Attend: The PCI Compliance Training is for anyone interested in learning more about= PCI and how to secure the identity of the credit and debit card holders, w= ith a focus on those individuals working for organizations that must meet c= ompliance with PCI DSS=2E =B7 Anybody accepting credit card payments =B7 Merchants =B7 Third party service providers =B7 Acquirers =B7 Anybody processing, storing or transmitting credit card data =B7 Finance, internal audit, IT, sales department staff Course Outline: Module 1 -- PCI DSS Program Overview Module 2 -- Payment Industry Terminology and Relationships Module 3 -- Compliance Validation, Requirements and Process Module 4 -- Roles and Responsibilities, ASV & QSA Overview and Quality Assu= rance Module 5 -- General Requirements for Scanning and Compliance Audit =0BCourse Fee: Regular price is P 10,000 per person inclusive of AM/PM snacks, lunch, trai= ning materials and certificate of completion=2E Early bird rate P 7,000 if you pay on or before October 31, 2011=2E Pay only P 6,500 for Bitshield's returning client if you pay on or before O= ctober 31, 2011=2E Speaker Profile: Mr=2E Gilbert Chu Backed by strong knowledge of Information Security Management System (ISMS)= implementation and technical risk analysis background, Mr=2E Gilbert Chu (= Malaysian) is currently the Lead ISO 27001 Auditor and the Lead PCI DSS Imp= lementer for LE Global Services=2E Mr=2E Chu is an expert in Payment Card I= ndustry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) implementation and PCI DSS Vulnera= bility Scanning and Penetration Testing=2E To register, please call: (63 2) 840=2E2612 (63 2) 893=2E8527 Look for Judy =0BE-Mail:=A0 judy@bitshieldsecurity=2Ecom sales@bitshieldsecurity=2Ecom www=2Ebitshieldsecurity=2Ecom Duration: =A0=A0=A0 1 day Date:=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A025 November 2011 Location: =A0=A0=A0 One Corporate Centre =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Julia Vargas Avenue corner =A0 Meralco Avenue, Ortigas, Pasig City Hurry, register now! Limited slots available! =0BThis is a first-come first-served basis=2E =A0Your payment serves as the= confirmation of your seat=2E We practice ethical email distribution=2E Please accept our sincere apologi= es if you have received this e-mail in an unsolicited manner=2E If you don'= t want to receive from us, kindly reply with the subject "Unsubscribe" to= =A0sales@bitshieldsecurity=2Ecom From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 01:55:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E616D106564A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7FE8FC08 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D487BDC47 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:39:12 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:39:12 -0700 Message-ID: <97114.1319074752@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:55:48 -0000 Can anyone here help me to resolve this? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2011-October/221242.html What am I doing wrong? From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 02:19:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588CC106566B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F948FC08 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so3122677eyd.13 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:19:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vCOVR66U5OLmCEPJ8sYD7AYq/gtbOxeF0ojmiSNoCnU=; b=HjepVFPxMSug1L5TMFQTCXqFdb/Z8cxbtRPhj+j5PGR4hrbYMFds+yWB/+2U0WWObT c+94g87f/5oKdMl4GT3m94lrKMnQv3U00UEKl00lAZAKn8kHKLUP32oTQYxjuD96Z+XT OTZiedNQe2RBLVB2QQttTdNguc5urmJxrnxKU= Received: by 10.223.14.3 with SMTP id e3mr11904969faa.25.1319077157084; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.101.2] (85.58.broadband12.iol.cz. [90.179.58.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l8sm12926099fai.16.2011.10.19.19.19.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:19:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Michal Varga To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" In-Reply-To: <97114.1319074752@tristatelogic.com> References: <97114.1319074752@tristatelogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Stonehenge Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 04:19:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1319077151.1767.4.camel@xenon> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:19:19 -0000 On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 18:39 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > Can anyone here help me to resolve this? > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2011-October/221242.html > > What am I doing wrong? Something is wrong with your dependencies. Try force-rebuilding (or properly upgrading, if you ever omitted that) all gtk20 dependencies, especially devel/gobject-introspection See if that helps. m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account) From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 03:13:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929CD106566B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B4B8FC12 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0114FBDC34 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:13:18 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <97114.1319074752@tristatelogic.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:13:17 -0700 Message-ID: <97965.1319080397@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:13:18 -0000 In message <97114.1319074752@tristatelogic.com>, I wrote: >Can anyone here help me to resolve this? > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2011-October/221242.html > >What am I doing wrong? NEVERMIND! After googling around a bit I found that (a) no, I am _not_ the only one who has run into this same build bug and also (b) installing the latest and greatest gobject-introspection apparently fixes the problem. Still, to whoever the maintainer of gtk is... Shouldn't you, ya know, fix up the port dependencies? You know, so that gtk depends on having gobject-introspection-0.10.x installed? From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 03:57:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE5D106566B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C4A1518F8; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E9F9C2B.40808@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:57:31 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" References: <97965.1319080397@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <97965.1319080397@tristatelogic.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:57:39 -0000 On 10/19/2011 20:13, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > Still, to whoever the maintainer of gtk is... Shouldn't you, ya know, fix up > the port dependencies? You know, so that gtk depends on having > gobject-introspection-0.10.x installed? I don't know enough about the specifics to answer that question. However in general the FreeBSD ports in general don't support partial updates. The assumption is that all of your ports are up to date. We do our best to support as much backwards compatibility as we can, but you're going to have less trouble generally if you keep everything up to date. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 07:51:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F0C1065675; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:51:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE8D8FC13; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9K7pgcn071736; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:51:42 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9K7pgHk071708; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:51:42 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:51:38 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Kris Moore Message-ID: <20111020075138.GC89701@azathoth.lan> References: <4E984AB7.1090507@pcbsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E984AB7.1090507@pcbsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org, gecko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.org, kde-freebsd@kde.org, office@FreeBSD.org, erwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Working together for Desktop Integration X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:51:42 -0000 --Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:44:07AM -0400, Kris Moore wrote: >=20 > Greetings all FreeBSD desktop users/porters/enthusiasts! >=20 > At the developers summit / EuroBSDCon this last week, one of the things > which came up was the idea of trying to unify some of our efforts for > FreeBSD on the Desktop. Erwin Lansing asked me to send over some mail to > the various porting projects inquiring about this, and also setting up a > wiki page: >=20 > http://wiki.freebsd.org/DesktopIntegration >=20 > The wiki is just some of the things we discussed at the Dev Summit, but > I'm sure you can all think of plenty of other areas where we can improve > FreeBSD's desktop support. Feel free to add to it with your ideas / > projects. In addition I'm thinking we might benefit from setting up a > freebsd-desktop mailing list and using it to discuss these types of > improvements. (Not sure who I have to ping about that, hopefully it's > somebody reading this mail) >=20 > If you are interested in being apart of this effort, please let both > Erwin and I know. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > --=20 > Kris Moore > PC-BSD Software > iXsystems >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thanks, I think we should create a new list (I'll ask for it next week if noone as = done it at that time) Maybe we also should create a DesktopIntegrationWIP wiki page have http://wiki.freebsd.org/DesktopIntegration for what has to be done and best practice, and the WIP for the brainstorming, ideas and stuff like that. I also CCed office@ and gecko@. regards, Bapt --Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk6f0woACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwFoACgultid705S9hgN8dB4/SIA6vx YPsAoJFEoYYXq4aKR1q87BqjT/gh/EGd =TK/E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY-- From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 10:39:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8F51065670 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5B88FC0C for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F06BDC34 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:39:47 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4E9F9C2B.40808@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:39:47 -0700 Message-ID: <4361.1319107187@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:39:49 -0000 In message <4E9F9C2B.40808@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton wrote: >On 10/19/2011 20:13, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> Still, to whoever the maintainer of gtk is... Shouldn't you, ya know, fix up >> the port dependencies? You know, so that gtk depends on having >> gobject-introspection-0.10.x installed? > >I don't know enough about the specifics to answer that question. However >in general the FreeBSD ports in general don't support partial updates. >The assumption is that all of your ports are up to date. We do our best >to support as much backwards compatibility as we can, but you're going >to have less trouble generally if you keep everything up to date. Thank you for your response, but it is clear that you dont' understand how the problem I reported came about. So please allow me to explain. I am just simply trying to bring up a fresh new 8.2-RELEASE system and trying to get a bunch of ports I need to have installed on it installed. To do this, I have run either portinstall or portupgrade on something like 30-40 different ports of things I need. And no, I actually _did not_ watch carefully every line of output as these things were all being built and installed, so I have no idea how the OLDER version of gobject-introspection (0.9.12) even came to be installed on this system AT ALL. I can assure you however that *I* never explicitly ASKED for the old version of that specific thing to be installed. In fact, up until I had to try to solve the gtk build problem, I did not explicitly do ANYTHING that obviously would have led to the build and/or installation of ANY version of the gobject-introspection thingy. In fact, even now I have no idea what the bleedin' thing even is, and almost zero desire to know. I just wanted to build & install ImageMagick, gthumb, an some other tools I use frequently. It would seem that one of those, or perhaps something I installed from pre- built packages off the distribution CD stealthily installed a stale and unusable version of this gobject-introspection thing when I wasn't looking... rather like some naughty child. (Sigh.) In short, it is all well and good for you to admonish me to keep all of my installed packages up-to-date[1], but in this case, the failure of the GTK build, and specifically the rather entirely unhelpful and uninformative way that it died (a) was not in any sense my fault and (b) was, I think, more a symptom of bad engineering in the port that it was a symptom of any person or group of people not having run around and made sure that everything was spic and span and ready for military inspection prior to even trying to build the port. If I was the only person on the planet who had ever run into this gtk build problem, or the only one who had ever been baffled by it, then I'd say that you might have a point, and that maybe I fell down in my responsibilities to do everything letter perfect before even starting the gtk build. But googling around for some of the same cryptic failure messages that I got reveals that I'm far from the only person who has been bitten by this cock-up. So, you know, I'll just say again what I already said... Maybe the gtk port maintainer could do the world a favor and create a proper and complete list of dependenceis for the gtk port. If one engineer (i.e. the gtk maintainer) can spend ten minutes and fix this problem so that fifty or a hundred other people don't stub their toe on it and each waste a hour searching for the proper work-around, then isn't it a more efficient use of human manpower generally to have the one gtk maintainer fix the problem? You wrote: >The assumption is that all of your ports are up to date. What's that they always say about ass-uming? If this port needs 0.10.x of something else to build... well... isn't that why ports have dependency lists? If not for cases exactly like this, then why even have such things as dependences in the ports system? Regards, rfg -=-=-=-=-=-= [1] There is a certain chicken-and-egg dilemma about your casual admonish- ment that I should keep all my ports up-to-date. I was actually TRYING to update a port... the gtk port... when this cryptic build failure occured. How exactly does one ``keep all of one's ports always up-to-date'' if the process of updating ports itself fails? From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 20:59:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1691065701 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:59:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@s113.loopia.se) Received: from s87.loopia.se (s87.loopia.se [194.9.95.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5908FC1B for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s101.loopia.se (s101.loopia.se [194.9.95.47]) by s87.loopia.se (Postfix) with SMTP id 43CAD46536F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:40:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 37653 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2011 20:40:22 -0000 Received: from s113.loopia.se (HELO s113.loopia.se) (194.9.94.207) by s101.loopia.se (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:40:22 +0200 Received: from s113.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s113.loopia.se (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9KKeOmt007967 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:40:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from www@s113.loopia.se) Received: (from www@localhost) by s113.loopia.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9KKeOF6007966; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:40:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from www) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <201110202040.p9KKeOF6007966@s113.loopia.se> To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org From: Security Center Paypal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Security Center Paypal X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:59:20 -0000 [1]PayPal [pixel.gif] Information Regarding Your account: Dear PayPal Member: Attention! Your PayPal account has been limited! As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in the PayPal system.We recently contacted you after noticing an issue on your account.We requested information from you for the following reason: Our system detected unusual charges to a credit card linked to your PayPal account. Reference Number: PP-259-187-991 This is the Last reminder to log in to PayPal as soon as possible. Once you log in, you will be provided with steps to restore your account access. Once you log in, you will be provided with steps to restore your account access. We appreciate your understanding as we work to ensure account safety. [2]Click here to activate your account We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please understand that this is a security measure intended to help protect you and your account. We apologise for any inconvenience.. Sincerely, PayPal Account Review Department _________________________________________________________________ Copyright © 1999-2011 PayPal. All rights reserved. PayPal Ltd. PayPal FSA Register Number: 226056. [pixel.gif] PayPal Email ID PP059 Protect Your Account Info Make sure you never provide your password to fraudulent websites. To safely and securely access the PayPal website or your account, open a new web browser (e.g. Internet Explorer or Netscape) and type in the PayPal login page (http://paypal.com/) to be sure you are on the real PayPal site. For more information on protecting yourself from fraud, please review our Security Tips at https://www.paypal.com/us/securitytips Protect Your Password You should never give your PayPal password to anyone. References 1. https://www.paypal.com/us 2. http://paypalupdate.com.security.online.unlimited.conceptec.net/paypal.com/ From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 22:27:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDE4106564A; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluid_poetry@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc1-s33.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s33.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1B28FC1B; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP316 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s33.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:15:38 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [96.50.12.231] X-Originating-Email: [fluid_poetry@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([96.50.12.231]) by BLU0-SMTP316.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:15:37 -0700 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:15:32 -0700 From: Fluid Poetry User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Oct 2011 22:15:37.0499 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB7FAEB0:01CC8F75] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:46:39 +0000 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: gnome-applets-2.32.1.1_3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fluid_poetry@hotmail.com List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:27:41 -0000 I appologize if this isn't the correct place to report this. I am brand-new to freeBSD and currently installing my third instance of the OS on my laptop, this time in a virtual machine (vmware). Anyway, I have tried installing gnome twice today with the same error. ERROR: found saved configuration for gnome-applets-2.32.1.1_3 SHA256 Checksum mismatch for gnome2/gnome-applets-2.32.1.1.tar.bz2 I am installing with FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-amd64-disk1.iso. I updated the ports as soon as I installed the system. I have successfully installed X11. {no errors and tested} I tried and failed to install gnome2 using: cd /usr/ports/x11/gnome 2 make install clean I then updated the ports, using portupdate -a {I think} and/or portmaster ___. I then tried again to install gnome2 and failed, receiving the same error. I will try again tomorrow in case something just needs to be updated, but in case the tarball has been corrupted or hacked, I thought you should know. thanks herb From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 22:52:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272571065673; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:52:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward17.mail.yandex.net (forward17.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D0C8FC08; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp17.mail.yandex.net (smtp17.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.17]) by forward17.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 00E631063DB7; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:52:27 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1319151148; bh=CsZLIE858+Cbgp1LnvX71HKlRDvC27qDFkq7qfX375Y=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=B0PWSYUwZa+4nny86hwkb7llKRJwAOEVsOhQ8BrQG+MgJop0nQ+vNl/OYSAEFzUl7 /esx946t3Pws3Cz3hiBBfrz+mH4DfllpGuTlysFORRHEdYYChwQUWIGOH6Mof/dHGA k/FRQwe49y5WjI06JnZu3hIK+bSu03otvcOFRHJo= Received: from smtp17.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp17.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id CA33419002F7; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:52:27 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1319151147; bh=CsZLIE858+Cbgp1LnvX71HKlRDvC27qDFkq7qfX375Y=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wOdqr4/TBsm56g6wtWH6h9RXYuQ+W0C5BTMgKYbyr6ZfVhNnxzQ1HhH1NORiyr+pn WvgzxmD1v3XqG8i7q9bRq5QT+YG3d54XeqZjyXWaiYPgz0rSalcuiR76NO+1h1t1/c BScRKLIbqZDGHO0+qXi6g+REpOn+DH4t8+jEXf+Q= Received: from unknown (unknown [213.138.88.133]) by smtp17.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id qQwOk5Ej-qRwiUkwR; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:52:27 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4EA0A626.3050602@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:52:22 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fluid_poetry@hotmail.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: gnome-applets-2.32.1.1_3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:52:30 -0000 Fluid Poetry wrote on 21.10.2011 02:15: > I appologize if this isn't the correct place to report this. > > I am brand-new to freeBSD and currently installing my third instance of > the OS on my laptop, this time in a virtual machine (vmware). > > Anyway, I have tried installing gnome twice today with the same error. > > ERROR: > found saved configuration for gnome-applets-2.32.1.1_3 > SHA256 Checksum mismatch for gnome2/gnome-applets-2.32.1.1.tar.bz2 > > I am installing with FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-amd64-disk1.iso. > I updated the ports as soon as I installed the system. > I have successfully installed X11. {no errors and tested} > I tried and failed to install gnome2 using: > cd /usr/ports/x11/gnome 2 > make install clean > > I then updated the ports, using portupdate -a {I think} and/or > portmaster ___. > > I then tried again to install gnome2 and failed, receiving the same error. > > I will try again tomorrow in case something just needs to be updated, > but in case the tarball has been corrupted or hacked, I thought you > should know. > > thanks > herb All is fine to me: => gnome-applets-2.32.1.1.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2. => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.belnet.be/mirror/ftp.gnome.org/sources/gnome-applets/2.32/gnome-applets-2.32.1.1.tar.bz2 gnome-applets-2.32.1.1.tar.bz2 100% of 9847 kB 323 kBps 00m00s ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Found saved configuration for gnome-applets-2.32.1.1_3 ===> Extracting for gnome-applets-2.32.1.1_3 => SHA256 Checksum OK for gnome2/gnome-applets-2.32.1.1.tar.bz2. try this: cd /usr/ports/x11/gnome-applets && make distclean fetch It looks like interrupted fetching. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 06:28:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E715B106564A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from koala.droso.net (koala.droso.net [IPv6:2001:6c8:130:400::6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704B08FC27 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from koala.droso.net (localhost.droso.net [127.0.0.1]) by koala.droso.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9L6SKcG039207 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:28:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:28:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <201110210628.p9L6SKcG039207@koala.droso.net> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:28:22 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common problem is that recent versions of -CURRENT include gcc4.2, which is much stricter than older versions. The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386 architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth. In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different errors in different build environments. The script that runs on the build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide. One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen on the build farm. Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at this kind of thing.) The errors are listed below. In the case where the same problem exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the latest errorlog for that type. (By 'build environment' here we mean 'combination of 6.x/7.x/-current with target architecture'.) (Note: the dates are included to help you to gauge whether or not the error still applies to the latest version. The program that generates this report is not yet able to determine this automatically.) portname: graphics/clutter-qt broken because: Doesn't build with Glib-2.26 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=clutter-qt portname: x11/gnome-shell broken because: Doesn't build build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=x11&portname=gnome-shell If these errors are ones that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Every effort has been made to make sure that these error reports really do correspond to a port that you maintain. However, due to the fact that this is an automated process, it may indeed generate false matches. If one of these errors fits that description, please forward this email to the author of this software, Mark Linimon , so that he can attempt to fix the problem in the future. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 06:30:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B73D1065700 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from koala.droso.net (koala.droso.net [IPv6:2001:6c8:130:400::6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C998FC21 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from koala.droso.net (localhost.droso.net [127.0.0.1]) by koala.droso.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9L6Ueeq049560 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:30:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:30:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <201110210630.p9L6Ueeq049560@koala.droso.net> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:30:41 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on the existing port. In some cases, ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation. The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR), the ports will be deleted. portname: devel/soup description: A SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) implementation in C maintainer: gnome@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Unmaintain, use devel/libsoup expiration date: 2011-11-06 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=soup portname: graphics/clutter-qt description: QT+ Integration library for Clutter maintainer: gnome@FreeBSD.org status: BROKEN deprecated because: upstream distfile and doesn't build, and doesn't seem to be developed anymore expiration date: 2011-11-06 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=clutter-qt portname: graphics/librsvg description: Library for parsing and rendering SVG vector-graphic files maintainer: gnome@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: unmaintained and not used anymore expiration date: 2011-11-06 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=librsvg portname: graphics/p5-clutter description: Perl bindings to the Clutter OpenGL canvas maintainer: gnome@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: upstream distfile disappeard, and doesn't seem to be developed anymore expiration date: 2011-11-06 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=p5-clutter If this problem is one that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 13:02:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F533106566B; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from villa.alberto@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720A88FC08; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi40 with SMTP id 40so5128518wyi.13 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:02:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=0FuTgyq+Uxv8whbWfq1TClKVTtOfZBnLmoN5aVYJD8g=; b=BkbDmorb8KRX8ZIAABuQyVpKi9I/AcrDmQFvlewTz/Cp/bV0JPoQMDJ2X0+V/6yeJW uLNqTWplAgzRMV5WlT2OT+pctzdWFZD/kox1XZimbdpGyDIQiOlcvVeyOovsr4rjwHET 4YhqBHMIEAtQiiIAuQbf6qDYf/c6qqbNAB/08= Received: by 10.227.129.77 with SMTP id n13mr5489815wbs.37.1319200789150; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:39:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: villa.alberto@gmail.com Received: by 10.227.9.6 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:39:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111020075138.GC89701@azathoth.lan> References: <4E984AB7.1090507@pcbsd.org> <20111020075138.GC89701@azathoth.lan> From: Alberto Villa Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:39:29 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Hm6GTUQxHLAw14AyxiwsySGdWjE Message-ID: To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org, gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org, kde-freebsd@kde.org, office@freebsd.org, erwin@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Working together for Desktop Integration X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:02:56 -0000 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > I think we should create a new list (I'll ask for it next week if noone as done > it at that time) > > Maybe we also should create a DesktopIntegrationWIP wiki page have > http://wiki.freebsd.org/DesktopIntegration for what has to be done and best > practice, and the WIP for the brainstorming, ideas and stuff like that. > > I also CCed office@ and gecko@. Sounds good to me! And I agree about the mailing list... Count me in! -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 14:23:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDECC106566C; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@pcbsd.org) Received: from mail.iXsystems.com (newknight.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640038FC08; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ixsystems.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.iXsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA35491; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.iXsystems.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ixsystems.com (mail.ixsystems.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56948-03; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.186] (75-130-56-30.static.kgpt.tn.charter.com [75.130.56.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.iXsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B23248E; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA18079.5030308@pcbsd.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:23:53 -0400 From: Kris Moore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alberto Villa References: <4E984AB7.1090507@pcbsd.org> <20111020075138.GC89701@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org, gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org, kde-freebsd@kde.org, office@freebsd.org, erwin@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Working together for Desktop Integration X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:23:56 -0000 On 10/21/11 08:39, Alberto Villa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> I think we should create a new list (I'll ask for it next week if noone as done >> it at that time) >> >> Maybe we also should create a DesktopIntegrationWIP wiki page have >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/DesktopIntegration for what has to be done and best >> practice, and the WIP for the brainstorming, ideas and stuff like that. >> >> I also CCed office@ and gecko@. > Sounds good to me! And I agree about the mailing list... > > Count me in! The mailing list is now active! Please signup and we can continue the discussion there. http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-desktop -- Kris Moore PC-BSD Software iXsystems From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 15:30:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E29106566B; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.bybee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7068FC15; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so5860258wwi.31 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=T+d4qQ481fmnfgb11TLo6QqTKk+tZOb71H7FMkFSs6s=; b=lCk5mdfaSgJ22Eizb8httxAD2O9ZTdLEqVyZwYldOE4DS9yqO65yvK9OCzmZys+aA0 JkVun79q3SyRR88DJ5fXB9VcgkEVxhuhnJoZcMJCx8FhDGnWQqmsita0Gpy5CEejbWcD x0+Yw+tOAyARrGLCqz5nA9Um3IP0Zf/CxR/Fo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.179.69 with SMTP id g47mr10215119wem.73.1319209136792; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.178.205 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:58:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4EA18079.5030308@pcbsd.org> References: <4E984AB7.1090507@pcbsd.org> <20111020075138.GC89701@azathoth.lan> <4EA18079.5030308@pcbsd.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:58:56 -0700 Message-ID: From: Mike Bybee To: Kris Moore Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org, gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org, kde-freebsd@kde.org, office@freebsd.org, erwin@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Working together for Desktop Integration X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:30:27 -0000 On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Kris Moore wrote: > On 10/21/11 08:39, Alberto Villa wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> I think we should create a new list (I'll ask for it next week if noone as done >>> it at that time) >>> >>> Maybe we also should create a DesktopIntegrationWIP wiki page have >>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/DesktopIntegration for what has to be done and best >>> practice, and the WIP for the brainstorming, ideas and stuff like that. >>> >>> I also CCed office@ and gecko@. >> Sounds good to me! And I agree about the mailing list... >> >> Count me in! > > The mailing list is now active! Please signup and we can continue the > discussion there. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-desktop > > -- > Kris Moore > PC-BSD Software > iXsystems > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Very excited about this - I hope that we can move into a new direction and put a fully BSD desktop out there and show the Linux guys how it's done :) -- Thanks, Mike Bybee From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 02:37:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6289106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 02:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F887156295; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 02:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EA22C60.8080207@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:37:20 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" References: <4361.1319107187@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <4361.1319107187@tristatelogic.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 02:37:51 -0000 On 10/20/2011 03:39, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message <4E9F9C2B.40808@FreeBSD.org>, > Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 10/19/2011 20:13, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >>> Still, to whoever the maintainer of gtk is... Shouldn't you, ya know, fix up >>> the port dependencies? You know, so that gtk depends on having >>> gobject-introspection-0.10.x installed? >> >> I don't know enough about the specifics to answer that question. However >> in general the FreeBSD ports in general don't support partial updates. >> The assumption is that all of your ports are up to date. We do our best >> to support as much backwards compatibility as we can, but you're going >> to have less trouble generally if you keep everything up to date. > > > Thank you for your response, but it is clear that you dont' understand how > the problem I reported came about. So please allow me to explain. > > I am just simply trying to bring up a fresh new 8.2-RELEASE system and trying > to get a bunch of ports I need to have installed on it installed. > > To do this, I have run either portinstall or portupgrade on something like > 30-40 different ports of things I need. You left out portmaster. :) But seriously, you didn't mention 'update your ports tree' in that list of things to do. It's far more likely that a stale ports tree would have caused this problem than the specific tool you used to do your installation. > ... > It would seem that one of those, or perhaps something I installed from pre- > built packages off the distribution CD stealthily installed a stale and > unusable version of this gobject-introspection thing when I wasn't looking... Yeah, that could do it too. > In short, it is all well and good for you to admonish me You used the word "admonish" in your message several times, as if you believe I'm somehow telling you that you did something wrong. I assure you that's not the case. I was simply trying to help you understand how to improve the situation for the future. > to keep all of my > installed packages up-to-date[1], but in this case, the failure of the GTK > build, and specifically the rather entirely unhelpful and uninformative > way that it died (a) was not in any sense my fault and (b) was, I think, > more a symptom of bad engineering in the port that it was a symptom of > any person or group of people not having run around and made sure that > everything was spic and span and ready for military inspection prior to > even trying to build the port. I snipped the rest of your message since it's more of the same. I specifically said that I wasn't disagreeing with you on the specifics, you could very well be right. That said, tools like portupgrade or portmaster will help you make sure that the lower-level dependencies are up to date before building the things that depend on them. You might consider using one of them. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 03:15:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EBE106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA2C8FC13 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70094BDC34 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:15:17 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4EA22C60.8080207@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:15:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20974.1319253317@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:15:18 -0000 In message <4EA22C60.8080207@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton wrote: >> I am just simply trying to bring up a fresh new 8.2-RELEASE system and trying >> to get a bunch of ports I need to have installed on it installed. >> >> To do this, I have run either portinstall or portupgrade on something like >> 30-40 different ports of things I need. > >You left out portmaster. :) But seriously, you didn't mention 'update >your ports tree' in that list of things to do. Well, so this time _I_ must plead guilty of ass-uming. I assumed that people would implicitly understand that I wouldn't be asking the kind of question I was asking unless I had just recent done a "portsnap fetch extract", which in fact I did do within 18 hours prior to posting about the gtk build failure. In short, yes, my ports tree was and is reasonably up-to-date. >It's far more likely that >a stale ports tree would have caused this problem than the specific tool >you used to do your installation. In general, yes. But in this specific case, no. >> ... >> It would seem that one of those, or perhaps something I installed from pre- >> built packages off the distribution CD stealthily installed a stale and >> unusable version of this gobject-introspection thing when I wasn't looking.. > >Yeah, that could do it too. I am glad we agree, >> In short, it is all well and good for you to admonish me > >You used the word "admonish" in your message several times, as if you >believe I'm somehow telling you that you did something wrong. You said something like "Make sure all of you ports are up to date", and it did sound a bit dismissive... sort of like something that somebody would say to a newbie to make him just go away quitely with his head down. I may be dumb. I may often make mistakes. But I'm not a newbie. >I assure >you that's not the case. I was simply trying to help you understand how >to improve the situation for the future. Well, then I'm sorry if _I_ seemed to be flying off. But then again, as I said, even taken as something well-meaning, your advice was not altogether helpful due to its circular nature. I mean in effect the the essence of your final bit of advice seemed to be ``Keep all of your ports up to date at all times and then you won't ever have any build problems while attempting to keep your ports up to date.'' I assume that by now you have grasped the circularity. >I snipped the rest of your message since it's more of the same. I >specifically said that I wasn't disagreeing with you on the specifics, >you could very well be right. That said, tools like portupgrade or >portmaster will help you make sure that the lower-level dependencies are >up to date before building the things that depend on them. Yes, they will, at least in those cases where the port maintainer has properly listed _all_ of the actual dependencies (which seems not to be the case, at present, for gtk). >You might consider using one of them. I _was_ in fact using portinstall at the time the build failure I first wrote about occured. As I understand it, portinstall performs all of the same auto- matic forced pre-builds of dependences as portupgrade does. Are you asserting that that is NOT the case? From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 03:31:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D7F1065670 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1930156054; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EA23925.4020501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:31:49 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" References: <20974.1319253317@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <20974.1319253317@tristatelogic.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 03:31:50 -0000 On 10/21/2011 20:15, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message <4EA22C60.8080207@FreeBSD.org>, > Doug Barton wrote: > >>> I am just simply trying to bring up a fresh new 8.2-RELEASE system and trying >>> to get a bunch of ports I need to have installed on it installed. >>> >>> To do this, I have run either portinstall or portupgrade on something like >>> 30-40 different ports of things I need. >> >> You left out portmaster. :) But seriously, you didn't mention 'update >> your ports tree' in that list of things to do. > > Well, so this time _I_ must plead guilty of ass-uming. > > I assumed that people would implicitly understand that I wouldn't be asking > the kind of question I was asking unless I had just recent done a "portsnap > fetch extract", which in fact I did do within 18 hours prior to posting about > the gtk build failure. 18 hours is still really old. Your best bet is always to do an update of your ports tree right before trying to update your installed ports. >> You used the word "admonish" in your message several times, as if you >> believe I'm somehow telling you that you did something wrong. > > You said something like "Make sure all of you ports are up to date", and it > did sound a bit dismissive... sort of like something that somebody would say > to a newbie to make him just go away quitely with his head down. I re-read what I wrote, and I'm still confused about how you'd think that. In any case, it wasn't my intention, and if you felt that way I'm sorry. >> I assure >> you that's not the case. I was simply trying to help you understand how >> to improve the situation for the future. > > Well, then I'm sorry if _I_ seemed to be flying off. But then again, as I > said, even taken as something well-meaning, your advice was not altogether > helpful due to its circular nature. I mean in effect the the essence of > your final bit of advice seemed to be ``Keep all of your ports up to date > at all times and then you won't ever have any build problems while attempting > to keep your ports up to date.'' > > I assume that by now you have grasped the circularity. What I said specifically was that we don't support partial updates. Since your message indicated that you were already using a tool to keep your ports up to date I assumed (there I go again) that I didn't need to be more explicit. >> I snipped the rest of your message since it's more of the same. I >> specifically said that I wasn't disagreeing with you on the specifics, >> you could very well be right. That said, tools like portupgrade or >> portmaster will help you make sure that the lower-level dependencies are >> up to date before building the things that depend on them. > > Yes, they will, at least in those cases where the port maintainer has properly > listed _all_ of the actual dependencies (which seems not to be the case, at > present, for gtk). As you pointed out in your post, devel/gobject-introspection is already listed as a BUILD_DEPENDS. The fact that sometimes dependencies do get missed is an area that we are always looking to improve. >> You might consider using one of them. > > I _was_ in fact using portinstall at the time the build failure I first wrote > about occured. As I understand it, portinstall performs all of the same auto- > matic forced pre-builds of dependences as portupgrade does. Are you asserting > that that is NOT the case? I've never used it, so I can't say authoritatively one way or the other. Given your experience my guess is that it does not. I specifically listed portupgrade, which I'm told does a thorough job; and portmaster which I'm quite sure does a thorough job (although admittedly I'm biased). You might consider giving one of those a try instead. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 04:15:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AEF106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:15:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05DA8FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39180BDC34 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:15:50 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4EA23925.4020501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:15:50 -0700 Message-ID: <21281.1319256950@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:15:51 -0000 In message <4EA23925.4020501@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton wrote: >As you pointed out in your post, devel/gobject-introspection is already >listed as a BUILD_DEPENDS. Yes, it is. However as I've noted, that apparently isn't quite good enough, as the build for gtk20 fails (in a rather entirely cryptic way) when the installed version of gobject-introspection is 0.9.12, but it does appear to complete successfully when the installed version is the latest, 0.10.8. So BUILD_DEPENDS for x11-toolkits/gtk20 needs some adjusting. >The fact that sometimes dependencies do get >missed is an area that we are always looking to improve. Good. >> I _was_ in fact using portinstall at the time the build failure I first wrote >> about occured. As I understand it, portinstall performs all of the same auto- >> matic forced pre-builds of dependences as portupgrade does. Are you asserting >> that that is NOT the case? > >I've never used it, so I can't say authoritatively one way or the other. >Given your experience my guess is that it does not. I don't believe that is a correct assumption. As I understand it, portinstall and portupgrade are just two faces of the same coin, the only difference being that portinstall does nothing if the specified port is already installed whereas portupgrade does nothing if the specifioed port is NOT already installed. But also, as I understand it, both will properly arrange for things that the specified port needs (as specified in BUILD_DEPENDS) to be built and installed before any attempt is made to build or install the specified port itself. In short, the problem isn't with the specific port maintenance tools I'm using. Rather, the problem is, as I've been saying, an imperfection in the actual dependencies list for the x11-toolkits/gtk20 port. (The de- pendencies need to force a build & install of some specific version of gobject-introspection which is more recent than 0.9.12... probably 0.10.x. Otherwise, cryptic build failure of gtk may ensue, and has, apparently, for myself and numerous other people.) From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 04:24:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8B11065674 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:24:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D52415480D; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EA2458E.5040707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:24:46 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111001 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" References: <21281.1319256950@tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <21281.1319256950@tristatelogic.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:24:48 -0000 On 10/21/2011 21:15, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message <4EA23925.4020501@FreeBSD.org>, > Doug Barton wrote: > >> As you pointed out in your post, devel/gobject-introspection is already >> listed as a BUILD_DEPENDS. > > Yes, it is. However as I've noted, that apparently isn't quite good enough, > as the build for gtk20 fails (in a rather entirely cryptic way) when the > installed version of gobject-introspection is 0.9.12, but it does appear > to complete successfully when the installed version is the latest, 0.10.8. > > So BUILD_DEPENDS for x11-toolkits/gtk20 needs some adjusting. I understand what you've said several times now, and as I've said several times now I'm leaving that up to the maintainers. >> The fact that sometimes dependencies do get >> missed is an area that we are always looking to improve. > > Good. > >>> I _was_ in fact using portinstall at the time the build failure I first wrote >>> about occured. As I understand it, portinstall performs all of the same auto- >>> matic forced pre-builds of dependences as portupgrade does. Are you asserting >>> that that is NOT the case? >> >> I've never used it, so I can't say authoritatively one way or the other. >> Given your experience my guess is that it does not. > > I don't believe that is a correct assumption. > > As I understand it, portinstall and portupgrade are just two faces of the > same coin, the only difference being that portinstall does nothing if the > specified port is already installed whereas portupgrade does nothing if > the specifioed port is NOT already installed. Ah, I wasn't aware that portinstall was part of portupgrade. In any case I think your assumption about what portupgrade does is wrong. My understanding is that by default it will upgrade ports that are dependencies of the ports that you are upgrading or installing. > But also, as I understand it, both will properly arrange for things that > the specified port needs (as specified in BUILD_DEPENDS) to be built and > installed before any attempt is made to build or install the specified > port itself. > > In short, the problem isn't with the specific port maintenance tools I'm > using. Rather, the problem is, as I've been saying, an imperfection in > the actual dependencies list for the x11-toolkits/gtk20 port. (The de- > pendencies need to force a build & install of some specific version of > gobject-introspection which is more recent than 0.9.12... probably 0.10.x. > Otherwise, cryptic build failure of gtk may ensue, and has, apparently, > for myself and numerous other people.) I'm not sure you're right about that. I think that if you had used portupgrade you probably would have seen the result we're looking for (upgrading gobject-introspection first). In any case, I'm *certain* that you would have seen the proper results if you had used portmaster, so perhaps you should consider giving it a try. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 13:34:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32221065674 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1D18FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzu17 with SMTP id zu17so7816835bkb.13 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 06:34:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YhMkawaqk9tv74J43FcuxsvQHOTj6HSK1Yl469zC/3g=; b=e5IesBy1VhP5iXRt/0YjyJK2kOtNNlb+K4/7wTgBnnm71dKkj4sr1gVfGxa1V9I10p EXBGHjxZyIep/Ubrd/luv1xJeV5NfeeJwVq9Dyk+6fx1FqsXTynX5Rg82Dg95N3bGgkL qtXIUj/E8B/sKpAqglXay/g1pwt8WnR9C7yOo= Received: by 10.223.76.27 with SMTP id a27mr31376559fak.26.1319288795514; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 06:06:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (93-127-96-97.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.96.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a8sm19152459faa.11.2011.10.22.06.06.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Oct 2011 06:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EA2BFD9.6040200@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:06:33 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111014 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: re: thefish-0.6.6_5 is marked as broken: does not build [FreeBSD9.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:34:02 -0000 howdy, when attempting to build x11/gnome2-power-tools from ports on my FreeBSD9.0 desktop, the package failed to build spitting out the error message below: gnome2-power-tools-2.32.1_2 depends on executable: thefish - not found ===> Verifying install for thefish in /usr/ports/sysutils/thefish ===> thefish-0.6.6_5 is marked as broken: does not build. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/thefish. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome2-power-tools :; uname -a FreeBSD localhost 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #0: Sat Sep 24 20:46:57 UTC 2011 root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 is there a fix for this? thanks. Alexander Kapshuk From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 21:47:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E9C106566C for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CF88FC0A for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200CABDC34 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:47:43 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4EA2458E.5040707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:47:43 -0700 Message-ID: <28760.1319320063@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: Build problem - help wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:47:44 -0000 In message <4EA2458E.5040707@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton wrote: >> As I understand it, portinstall and portupgrade are just two faces of the >> same coin, the only difference being that portinstall does nothing if the >> specified port is already installed whereas portupgrade does nothing if >> the specifioed port is NOT already installed. > >Ah, I wasn't aware that portinstall was part of portupgrade. In any case >I think your assumption about what portupgrade does is wrong. My >understanding is that by default it will upgrade ports that are >dependencies of the ports that you are upgrading or installing. If by that you mean that portupgrade normally unpgades things that depend upon the port mentioned in the command line when portupgrade is invoked, then all I can say is that in my experience this is not correct, and that although portupgrade _can_ be made to do that, one has to use the special -r option to make it do that (which I have not used). >> In short, the problem isn't with the specific port maintenance tools I'm >> using. Rather, the problem is, as I've been saying, an imperfection in >> the actual dependencies list for the x11-toolkits/gtk20 port. (The de- >> pendencies need to force a build & install of some specific version of >> gobject-introspection which is more recent than 0.9.12... probably 0.10.x. >> Otherwise, cryptic build failure of gtk may ensue, and has, apparently, >> for myself and numerous other people.) > >I'm not sure you're right about that. I think that if you had used >portupgrade you probably would have seen the result we're looking for >(upgrading gobject-introspection first). > >In any case, I'm *certain* that you would have seen the proper results >if you had used portmaster, so perhaps you should consider giving it a try. I'm sorry, but I have neither the time nor the inclination to not de-install all fo the ports that I've so tediously built & installed, overe several days, just to perform this experiment. From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 22:24:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF43106566B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2F68FC15 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaky10 with SMTP id y10so7843270iak.13 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:24:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=91lnCK7YZEHtZyOHf4/LGTBKAQuBZCFkmoMVDXKSsn8=; b=Kg26Fd7zehILavtPThH10ZnyepVyPjUfDL7EqrZsWr8Vhal3GVp0NsVImT4ZK58faB snkUfa1ik2hg5yO9sj/LLu5tKootyvqvJ8Cv6k/gMKPeZ6DScoejM6VxA8jaE11614+x 9Xp4EV+Qjo+2p7azstSAYqaWMGbi1/IhlN9io= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.69.80 with SMTP id y16mr7744086ibi.34.1319320728159; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.166.15 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.166.15 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:58:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4EA2BFD9.6040200@gmail.com> References: <4EA2BFD9.6040200@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:58:48 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Alexander Kapshuk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: re: thefish-0.6.6_5 is marked as broken: does not build [FreeBSD9.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:24:54 -0000 On Oct 22, 2011 6:34 AM, "Alexander Kapshuk" wrote: > > howdy, > > when attempting to build x11/gnome2-power-tools from ports on my FreeBSD9.0 desktop, the package failed to build spitting out the error message below: > > gnome2-power-tools-2.32.1_2 depends on executable: thefish - not found > ===> Verifying install for thefish in /usr/ports/sysutils/thefish > ===> thefish-0.6.6_5 is marked as broken: does not build. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/thefish. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome2-power-tools > > :; uname -a > FreeBSD localhost 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #0: Sat Sep 24 20:46:57 UTC 2011 root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > is there a fix for this? Until either thefish is fixed or it is removed, edit ports/x11/gnome2-powertools/Makefile. Delete the line listing fish and the trailing '\' from th prior line. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Retired kob6558@gmail.com