From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 17:30:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C386F106566C for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29328FC08 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1RHUDju024145 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:30:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p1RHUDrf024142; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:30:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:30:13 GMT Message-Id: <201102271730.p1RHUDrf024142@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org From: Jeff Kletsky Cc: Subject: Re: kern/143653: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw nat redirect_port "buf is too small" error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jeff Kletsky List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:30:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/143653; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jeff Kletsky To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, dima_bsd@inbox.lv Cc: Subject: Re: kern/143653: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw nat redirect_port "buf is too small" error Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:08:58 -0800 Confirmed to be a problem on RELEASE-8.2 as well. 17 redirect_port lines are too many, reducing to 10 allowed firewall to load. Machine is a firewall and redirects ssh to several internal hosts, as well as other services for several domains. This is *exactly* the kind of host I would like to be able to maintain solely with freebsd-update without having sources and compilers on the filesystem.