From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 00:12:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11209106566B; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (mx0.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6EC8FC0C; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q0LNbvHH087641 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:37:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0LNbvwK008279; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:37:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0LNbvnu008278; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:37:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:37:57 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" Message-ID: <20120121233757.GB31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <4F14F4FF.902@erdgeist.org> <20120120230300.GE87357@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XHgFapH+pGmRGlpQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua Cc: Brooks Davis , freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bumping a pet bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:12:29 -0000 --XHgFapH+pGmRGlpQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:43:06PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > I think in most cases if devfs mount fails you will likely not end up=20 > with a jail where you can do much... rather many things expect /dev/null= =20 > etc. >=20 > It is possible to just disable the devfs mount completely for a jail if= =20 > you want the jail to start up anyway without devfs so I think it would=20 > be OK to simply skip the jail if we cannot mount devfs - and complain=20 > loudly. >=20 > Anybody have any cases where this would be a problem? Just curious. Why devfs mounts can fail ? --XHgFapH+pGmRGlpQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8bTFUACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jXygCg4H+XU/s+Caq2FL9thNBbpmZd jBEAoIBhE2+LKAqn7646Y/EtvV310phX =Y7/U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XHgFapH+pGmRGlpQ--