From owner-freebsd-tinderbox@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 10 14:30:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: tinderbox@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A497828 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A8AFEA for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6696710; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 06B58852B; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:30:06 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: d@delphij.net Subject: Re: Is tinderbox using the right source tree? References: <5115CB3D.8030201@delphij.net> X-Draft-From: ("nnimap+imap.des.no:INBOX" 50513) Gcc: nnimap+imap.des.no:INBOX.sent MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20130210143007.06B58852B@ds4.des.no> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:30:06 +0100 (CET) Cc: tinderbox@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-tinderbox@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Tinderbox reports, responses, and meta-comments" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:30:14 -0000 Xin Li writes: > I wonder why tinderbox didn't catch various changes happen in the last > few days that breaks LINT build? Is it possible that the source tree > is not being updated? Not at all. See for yourself - the revision number is included in the log, a few lines down from the top. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no