From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 24 07:00:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA1A828D for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 07:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from o3.email.wpengine.com (o3.email.wpengine.com [198.37.148.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0813A3E5E for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 07:00:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=email.wpengine.com; h=to:subject:from:reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=YaQWtQMGYxgVoZekapcc1/vKCOU=; b=zfh7/MJvmTQDhsqr+E vY7bOh5yQTTtShinE0UQjjRDkbu0vSTLZNLt7jw/HfC8LA/hFClm4lFF7ib6/SaS RW2FzZWfy8cT17fjanYuGrXJZXHNNtQLo7cqFXh8d6zjmPHq9MnlPiPf9GSckt+7 M17DLDcu8Y7Gx2h0bbi7quib8= Received: by mf187.sendgrid.net with SMTP id mf187.20695.53F98D9C9 2014-08-24 07:00:44.189879415 +0000 UTC Received: from pod-2745 (li170-216.members.linode.com [173.230.130.216]) by ismtpd-025.iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 14806d1299b.66bc.4df8ce for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 07:00:44 +0000 (GMT) X-SendGrid-User: wpengine-pod-2745 Received: by pod-2745 (Postfix, from userid 33) id DB94655038; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 07:00:43 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Account_Blocked?= X-PHP-Originating-Script: 33:index.php Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 07:00:43 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Support?= Message-ID: <52fbf90cac99b6d511b0ef88413a182a@souhail.wpengine.com> X-Priority: 1 X-Mailer: PHPMailer (phpmailer.sourceforge.net) [version ] X-SG-EID: RUbAm5H8PjswBj/QH+sYVehaJogg3iBnZcyVi1bw/Iz/eaMUOmkZtFRCLa91sQftTQb0e5qWlCgP0SQxS1m6NnyaAHV/o214PrtgkmtAyaucsoWxz/EJbGypgo3jiixw5Wo2FO2/z0uJPNEn0oIgQEeuT6hZeXj7Vi6tadcvtIw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 07:00:52 -0000 Dear costumer, You have received this email because our system has noticed some suspicious activities with AÏÏle ID. All what you need to keep enjoying all the benefits of your id is to confirm your identity , follow the link below to start this process . [1]Confirm Now > Wondering why you got this email? Some massive failed login attempts were been made from unknown location that didnt match with your usual one , as a result we decided to suspend your account temporarily in order to protect it . This is an automated message. Please do not reply to this email. Thanks,  Customer. TM and copyright © 2014  Inc. 1 Infinite Loop, MS 96-DM, Cupertino, CA 95014. All Rights Reserved / Keep Informed / Privacy Policy / My ID References 1. http://goo.gl/IsbNDo From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 24 07:39:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07ABFE for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 07:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x242.google.com (mail-ob0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BF1731B6 for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 07:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f194.google.com with SMTP id wp18so2846569obc.5 for ; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:39:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QfPGopuMY1UCJjVnewOxCLkrm7Ajuh6WLR1lcL9Ek5I=; b=WKsBs5rs2ohQytS5vq5kUx9VOT4D6p9/u4R0ujVUu67bQ3EHit2PpdgglFP/M3OgWB +wPw8fZwGERugfyKCAQXNu2jxKZKN9Fler8v0BiO5QxlgQo+xrqf/fKfX7qt12h04Co6 aCQHEjoQmLV7eoGDzIElmzfWAoZhpl6NK9BeOK8dOB8BlDR2CqZfAeriO6+yCRgnHOvr /sh2lIqK+q4S4vqDT4ec1bymvcjTsIjg2AVugXUD15E1DbM1iH8RKUF4WtSpRZMfNAcJ h2+Zu0ykd7kJQerEwq/PIFFUWcyT8Tlh5le6KdMYSUhmAUkHxHXZBIkz38G3C6WIa5PK VIDQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.134.76 with SMTP id pi12mr1191235oeb.0.1408865951522; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.150.225 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:39:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52fbf90cac99b6d511b0ef88413a182a@souhail.wpengine.com> References: <52fbf90cac99b6d511b0ef88413a182a@souhail.wpengine.com> Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 19:39:11 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Account Blocked From: Ben Russell To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 07:39:12 -0000 The "Account Blocked" email is a phishing email. Whatever you do, don't click that goo.gl link. I don't know what it contains, but there's a chance they might nab your IP. On 24 August 2014 19:00, Support wrote: > > Dear costumer, > You have received this email because our system has noticed some > suspicious activities with A=C3=8F=C3=8Fle=C3=82 ID.= =C3=82 > All what you need to keep enjoying all the benefits of your id is to > confirm your identity , follow the link below to start this process . > [1]Confirm Now > > Wondering why you got this email? > Some massive failed login attempts were been made from unknown locatio= n > that didnt match with your usual one , as a result we decided to > suspend your account temporarily in order to protect it . > This is an automated message.=C3=82 Please do not reply to this ema= il. > Thanks, > =C3=82 Customer.=C3=82 > > TM and copyright =C3=82=C2=A9 2014=C3=82 =C3=82 Inc.=C3=82 1 Infinite = Loop, MS 96-DM, Cupertino, > CA 95014. > > All Rights Reserved=C3=82 /=C3=82 Keep Informed=C3=82 /=C3=82 Privac= y Policy=C3=82 /=C3=82 My=C3=82 ID > > References > > 1. http://goo.gl/IsbNDo > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 26 15:21:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D9B81E for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565693379 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7QFLcuw041163 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:21:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 183397] [xen] [panic] Kernel panic at first incoming ssh under Xen 4.2 with NetBSD Dom0 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:21:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: miguelmclara@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:21:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183397 miguelmclara@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |miguelmclara@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from miguelmclara@gmail.com --- I wonder since there's been work on FreeBSD as a Dom0 if this issue will ever be addressed? I've reported this also in another pr: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 I would be glad if we at least get a "NO! FreeBSD 10 will never be supported in NetBSD dom0s" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 29 09:21:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6286A926 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.claresco.hr (zid.claresco.hr [89.201.163.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FD51E5E for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.claresco.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.claresco.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5F82ADFC4 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:16:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from arch.perpetuum.hr.claresco.hr (unknown [213.191.141.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.claresco.hr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AFB82ADFB8 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:16:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Marko Lerota To: FreeBSD XEN Subject: Poor disk IO on Xenserver 6.2 Organization: *BSD Users - Fanatics Dept. User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWgnbRLVpRNVY9jMRPh s21jSlEyNVX45Mv4zI+sbUclFAtMVpT8V0lFAAACZ0lEQVR4nG3Tv2vbQBQHcFMogWyeNeVK BLXGl5j6xnABOaNTuXFGmWpwtw519yj4soW6AatT4GKD3+aDZrl/rt/Tr9qlGiz7Pn7v3bsf HVc/NrIiSfElqH53GgijcCqzk/+AmBF5cN0DsFlIRGMh/oHuqxkTM6VlzB4EoZEs2aSZOASb EQJYZpweQshE697GTDndBXtgp9LIT9+OpDGHEfb9knk+nx+jfN1JCVZMCl6XwFm0a2EXztZD 3s4fj47ZbKI2VeBmJImeEfGLJ+M9sDPilX7IB5rN6sdfcGhuoHU+LC4nxfnI7YOJtdb95Gb+ fbgJ2uJ2ZgaA++f5ZzBqNCCYfMTd5q0BfBVNqm7I8gUjQ+YtXotRW6PH9AEj+dKs/KuNQAl5 o/NY+QkonW8aQAl0oXMYPvRiXIM4pRJifbXytnhTA8alBx/jefG2ar3DBlt34/PXz9M+nMVN iNaPUdCApJc2ItejOmLGoK1qQLV9pJmXBnL10DYoBA5aHNfj8ZNwZa5O4CzgTJeilKJmrQJs IHIt1/7/Sg2p3iq/Hz0/5W05rq4M9aN2B5FLohUP4ylVyfxhEIjAs8J4PhIJ9U+CEroogib5 BXAf7bB4vkfAzgPFt1tM9sJZAOH+lCexhwswuNtim4QTZdokqo4o89LkH7V6iFxICeqfp+Wh fmUuGPunLj2Meti6Cn4DjJ/UReROqR+aqawAi/JkfgKE64rrfkhjU8MtT8ivR4S5n6Yo08A7 HvgAlHDWRSGlNSDxwK9HtXy4FS2I60EdUIJM+Ut9OZNJG4CpbEQW1VBQoQoPuBw2EVa4P0u0 TgzQF+VoAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:16:28 +0200 Message-ID: <86lhq7odub.fsf@arch.perpetuum.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:21:55 -0000 I have installed FreeBSD 10 release, stable and current on Xenserver 6.2 with latest patches. All of them have poor disk write speed. Performance from 12MBps - 25MBps. I tried it on other servers but the performance is the same. Latest Debian stable on the same machine have 300MBps disk speed. Am I missing something after installation or this is the default speed? -- Marko Lerota Sent from my GNU Emacs/Gnus Mailer From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 29 17:08:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F9F4BCD for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.citrix.com", Issuer "Cybertrust Public SureServer SV CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3641931 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:08:50 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,425,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="166471877" Received: from [IPv6:::1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.181.6; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:08:46 -0400 Message-ID: <5400B39E.3090904@citrix.com> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 19:08:46 +0200 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marko Lerota , FreeBSD XEN Subject: Re: Poor disk IO on Xenserver 6.2 References: <86lhq7odub.fsf@arch.perpetuum.hr> In-Reply-To: <86lhq7odub.fsf@arch.perpetuum.hr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:08:51 -0000 El 29/08/14 a les 11.16, Marko Lerota ha escrit: > I have installed FreeBSD 10 release, stable and current on > Xenserver 6.2 with latest patches. All of them have poor disk > write speed. Performance from 12MBps - 25MBps. I tried it on > other servers but the performance is the same. Latest Debian > stable on the same machine have 300MBps disk speed. Am I missing > something after installation or this is the default speed? > I've certainly seen higher speeds, around 25-35MB/s on my box, which is the same speed I can get with a Linux guest. Could you describe how you are running your tests? Roger. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 29 22:11:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F196CB for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 22:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.claresco.hr (zid.claresco.hr [89.201.163.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0281FCF for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 22:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.claresco.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.claresco.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86E92ADFBE; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 00:11:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cosmos.claresco.hr.claresco.hr (unknown [192.168.1.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.claresco.hr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A59CA2ADFBD; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 00:11:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Marko Lerota To: Roger Pau =?utf-8?Q?Monn=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: Poor disk IO on Xenserver 6.2 In-Reply-To: <5400B39E.3090904@citrix.com> ("Roger Pau \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Monn\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=C3\=A9\=22's\?\= message of "Fri, 29 Aug 2014 19:08:46 +0200") Organization: *BSD Users - Fanatics Dept. References: <86lhq7odub.fsf@arch.perpetuum.hr> <5400B39E.3090904@citrix.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWgnbRLVpRNVY9jMRPh s21jSlEyNVX45Mv4zI+sbUclFAtMVpT8V0lFAAACZ0lEQVR4nG3Tv2vbQBQHcFMogWyeNeVK BLXGl5j6xnABOaNTuXFGmWpwtw519yj4soW6AatT4GKD3+aDZrl/rt/Tr9qlGiz7Pn7v3bsf HVc/NrIiSfElqH53GgijcCqzk/+AmBF5cN0DsFlIRGMh/oHuqxkTM6VlzB4EoZEs2aSZOASb EQJYZpweQshE697GTDndBXtgp9LIT9+OpDGHEfb9knk+nx+jfN1JCVZMCl6XwFm0a2EXztZD 3s4fj47ZbKI2VeBmJImeEfGLJ+M9sDPilX7IB5rN6sdfcGhuoHU+LC4nxfnI7YOJtdb95Gb+ fbgJ2uJ2ZgaA++f5ZzBqNCCYfMTd5q0BfBVNqm7I8gUjQ+YtXotRW6PH9AEj+dKs/KuNQAl5 o/NY+QkonW8aQAl0oXMYPvRiXIM4pRJifbXytnhTA8alBx/jefG2ar3DBlt34/PXz9M+nMVN iNaPUdCApJc2ItejOmLGoK1qQLV9pJmXBnL10DYoBA5aHNfj8ZNwZa5O4CzgTJeilKJmrQJs IHIt1/7/Sg2p3iq/Hz0/5W05rq4M9aN2B5FLohUP4ylVyfxhEIjAs8J4PhIJ9U+CEroogib5 BXAf7bB4vkfAzgPFt1tM9sJZAOH+lCexhwswuNtim4QTZdokqo4o89LkH7V6iFxICeqfp+Wh fmUuGPunLj2Meti6Cn4DjJ/UReROqR+aqawAi/JkfgKE64rrfkhjU8MtT8ivR4S5n6Yo08A7 HvgAlHDWRSGlNSDxwK9HtXy4FS2I60EdUIJM+Ut9OZNJG4CpbEQW1VBQoQoPuBw2EVa4P0u0 TgzQF+VoAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 00:13:26 +0000 Message-ID: <86tx4un8bd.fsf@cosmos.claresco.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: FreeBSD XEN X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 22:11:21 -0000 Roger Pau Monn=C3=A9 writes: > El 29/08/14 a les 11.16, Marko Lerota ha escrit: >> I have installed FreeBSD 10 release, stable and current on=20 >> Xenserver 6.2 with latest patches. All of them have poor disk=20 >> write speed. Performance from 12MBps - 25MBps. I tried it on >> other servers but the performance is the same. Latest Debian >> stable on the same machine have 300MBps disk speed. Am I missing >> something after installation or this is the default speed? >>=20 > > I've certainly seen higher speeds, around 25-35MB/s on my box, which is > the same speed I can get with a Linux guest. Could you describe how you > are running your tests? You copy some *.tar.gz or *.iso file that have 600 MB. If it finish=20 in 2-3 seconds than it's fine. If it runs 40 seconds than it's very,=20 very bad. You can see current disk speed with 'iostat 1'. Today I have=20 installed FreeBSD 10-Release on KVM and it runs smooth. Files are copied at 150-300MB per second. That's how it should be. Suppose that=20 you need to copy or sync files with another disk/partition very often.=20 It would be very painful and long process. There is definitely something=20 wrong here.=20 --=20 Marko Lerota Sent from my GNU Emacs/Gnus Mailer