From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 28 10:48:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63B703B7 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 10:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aucluster6.american.edu (aucluster6.american.edu [147.9.1.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3A119A8 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 10:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from KSBIT ([147.9.7.53]) by aucluster6.american.edu (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3FP6 HF1020) with ESMTP id 2014122805394158-131774 ; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 05:39:41 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 05:39:41 -0500 (EST) From: GE Money Bank To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Message-ID: <516753676.10773.1419763181564.JavaMail.KSBIT$@mailout.american.edu> Subject: 3D Secure Aktualisiert X-Mailer: ColdFusion 9 Application Server X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on AUCluster6/AmericanU(Release 8.5.3FP6 HF1020|October 31, 2014) at 12/28/2014 05:39:41 AM, Serialize by Router on AUCluster6/AmericanU(Release 8.5.3FP6 HF1020|October 31, 2014) at 12/28/2014 05:48:54 AM, Serialize complete at 12/28/2014 05:48:54 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 10:48:54 -0000 - Guten Tag - Bitte klicken Sie auf folgende URL, um die Anmeldung zu aktivieren. Dies muss innerhalb der nдchsten 2 Tage erfolgen. [1]http://www.gemoneybank.ch/de/faq/3d-secure-reactive/ Copyright 2014 Cembra Money Bank AG References 1. http://martialartsfanatic.com/css/ From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 28 21:00:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 379D7206 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC3412EF for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBSL00LA072091 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:00:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201412282100.sBSL00LA072091@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org that need special attention X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:00:00 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 21:00:01 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- Open | 194884 | [acpi] Asus UX31E USB hangs during suspend, due t 1 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 31 18:01:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1621BC95 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F2627A7 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70F74B941; Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:01:31 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:15:24 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> In-Reply-To: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201412311115.24212.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 31 Dec 2014 13:01:31 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:01:33 -0000 On Friday, December 26, 2014 11:57:31 am Bigby James wrote: > Howdy-ha, folks, > > Please forgive my ignorance if my question is rather mundane and/or inane. I'm > pretty new to FreeBSD and its development cycle. Here's my situation: I've > recently migrated my laptop (Levovo Thinkpad T520) to FreeBSD using the > 10.1-STABLE snapshot, and most everything works pretty well. The only > exceptions are some of the hardware keys, including the LCD brightness control > keys, which is something I'd really like to have. > > Before going ahead with that install, though, on a lark I decided to try out the > 11-CURRENT snapshot to see how it worked out. As it turns out, everything > presently missing from 10-STABLE worked out of the box on -CURRENT. So I know > that full support for my machine is in the source tree now and, barring any > fundamental changes in the development branch, will be in the next -RELEASE. I > don't really have the time, know-how or guts to maintain a -CURRENT install on > this machine, so for the time being I'm sticking with 10-STABLE. So I'm > wondering just how often ACPI functionality gets moved from the -CURRENT branch > into the most recent release's -STABLE branch. In other words, what are the > chances that the features I'm waiting for will get moved into the 10-STABLE > branch in the near future? Are the ACPI devs pretty conservative with this? For > the time being I can control screen brightness using xrandr, and as fond as I am > with the convenience it is just a convenince all the same, so I can always > remain patient. But I'm wondering if there's a way to know if and when ACPI > functionality will get backported to -STABLE. I currently follow this list and > the SVN mailing list for 10-STABLE, so I can also just keep an eye on them if > that's the answer. Thanks in advance. In the case of brightness hotkeys, please try MFC'ing 270516 to your stable/10 tree. If that fixes it (it fixed brightness for my X220) then you know the specific change to ask someone (in this case Adrian) to MFC. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 1 17:44:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFE24B19 for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 17:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AA3E6609E for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 17:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workbox.Home (184-100-71-241.mpls.qwest.net [184.100.71.241]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1420134249703349.48774282207967; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 09:44:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:44:07 -0600 From: Bigby James To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support Message-ID: <20150101174407.GA12835@workbox.Home> References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> <201412311115.24212.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201412311115.24212.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 Cc: John Baldwin X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:44:20 -0000 On 12/31, John Baldwin wrote: > In the case of brightness hotkeys, please try MFC'ing 270516 to your stable/10 > tree. If that fixes it (it fixed brightness for my X220) then you know the specific > change to ask someone (in this case Adrian) to MFC. Thanks for the response. Forgive my ignorance, but how would I go about doing that? I'm pretty new to Subversion, and I'm guessing I'd be deviating my local -STABLE source tree by merging two code branches (creating my own local SVN branch) to do it. If you wouldn't mind sharing the general steps, or if there's a guide you could point me toward, I'd appreciate it. If MFC'ing this myself isn't an option (what with my noobishness), I'd be content to just whip up a basic script and bind it to the brightness keys instead of putting you folks through the trouble. - Bigby -- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 1 17:52:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3858F; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 17:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [74.201.84.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C76F661ED; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 17:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workbox.Home (184-100-71-241.mpls.qwest.net [184.100.71.241]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1420134754750478.719383680643; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 09:52:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:52:32 -0600 From: Bigby James To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support Message-ID: <20150101175232.GB12835@workbox.Home> References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> <201412311115.24212.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201412311115.24212.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:52:38 -0000 ADDENDUM: I just found the 'Subversion Primer' chapter in the FreeBSD Committer's Guide. Looks like this might be a good place to start. -- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 04:45:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A6343E; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 04:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7FBFF1; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 04:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id y20so16590483ier.28; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 20:45:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4+/YSTV3W73Ejuz/ye1s5YwUDegx9hDqRB+bRmNgQWk=; b=GNU5JyaAiKkJCWxOz+VMWxQQxIbpHi3VcplgYGYuNcKcdDQkdk0Qc4RjQykF0PhT0h 6mZRfPyu6/29VKJBhsoHeXccGQYiPcmV0CcwcmTqRW2adGwnyzKo71DZT2LGvlzUiQ6p KKIpv11ziDSQ0y6+J0cnr4i1w9rfNfeVbYe0gCOi92KpYZxRwtoHwO76g1OprkpRYCd5 BRB2tWFyFlHh1q00jF+4ELiyty+ummsreZSUnIeTYWgfhwswdVsmKylVjbHQCQkuoeVn Mw+665AYrv/MYaJp/hA8NK5Oa533v5HfqtcmqH20GXi3dUGhqzU0lBNAHpcSmovy+QMP TzuQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.4.201 with SMTP id 9mr56074459ict.23.1420173911872; Thu, 01 Jan 2015 20:45:11 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.52.19 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jan 2015 20:45:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150101175232.GB12835@workbox.Home> References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> <201412311115.24212.jhb@freebsd.org> <20150101175232.GB12835@workbox.Home> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 20:45:11 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0-veXAUJKAfkRuMkE7KizORBQQ8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support From: Kevin Oberman To: Bigby James , Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 04:45:13 -0000 On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Bigby James wrote: > ADDENDUM: I just found the 'Subversion Primer' chapter in the FreeBSD > Committer's Guide. Looks like this might be a good place to start. > I just tried it on my T520 and it works just fine! Adrian, any chance of MFH to 10-Stable. Probably works for supported 8 and 9 versions support, but I can't confirm. It should work on any version supporting i915kms. The main patch (intel_opregion.c) applies cleanly. There are fairly large offsets for the other two, but that is it. Thanks to Henry Hu who wrote the fix and all who helped fix this long term annoyance! -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 3 11:45:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 834673E4 for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AB0316DF for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t03Bj5PX057954 for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 11:45:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 162859] [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working (switching) Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 11:45:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: juris.kaminskis@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 11:45:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162859 --- Comment #14 from juris --- Problem on /head/ branch is introduced with revision 216942. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.