From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 8 05:33:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F0641C0 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 05:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from quine.pinyon.org (quine.pinyon.org [65.101.5.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15A9ACE4 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 05:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 122) id 35030160282; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 22:28:03 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on quine.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org (feyerabend.n1.pinyon.org [10.0.10.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by quine.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 437A016014C for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 22:28:00 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <54FBDDE0.6090806@pinyon.org> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 22:28:00 -0700 From: "Russell L. Carter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Single worst bug for ports: lang/gcc* doesn't support c++11 References: <54FB8656.8060502@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <54FB8656.8060502@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 05:33:58 -0000 On 03/07/15 16:14, Yuri wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193528 > > Many packages still don't build with clang (in part because Linux didn't > adopt it as much as FreeBSD did), and at the same time they are changing > code to be c++11. > As a result, many such packages can't be updated any more. > In two days I hit this problem twice. I would like to understand better the problem here, because I use c++11 features heavily with lang/gcc49 on a daily basis with zero problems. gcc5 is still buggy, but gcc49 is a pleasure to work with. I must be missing something, because if you want to support c++11, why wouldn't you require gcc49? What am I missing? I'm just trying to learn the ports philosophy here better. Best, Russell > Yuri > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"