From nobody Mon May 27 22:59:08 2024 X-Original-To: wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VpB0d3w36z5M8pH for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 22:59:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VpB0d3QHzz45v3 for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 22:59:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1716850753; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=dGjdoFJVR96CPUBtGnWBYDvzqN9T0S7/nDSMOfohciY=; b=iz5SbgCtM+wHs7O+alHqBbH2bS5ca9JgH8NuC7XsuPH4/zc/QPzOfCulxJo+MiQpezd+Iw nva6/8B3bGK0tXj+IuQiXNlqTB6xCa4J9v2MeiyHGv+W8Qo4cYCY3rOC6vCRPhureZVRpk 6Luk2NbDBqk1giYfPfEzLuvqUwldmw4kENPhBajTUx+egOZUUC5ffIeAOPHC71mHQ5swzR fZdt7/0v7ujXY80rKnXQCu9wA8NOAd4xeifFFvPUAbDqcIzGeFdXtRvTUtiMLrwyi/btB7 /wcYv6iNu+cNhSwhXbZ0CfMXPoPvt1DUbUfzZ0BQ9gTsRuj3tr4aAd98V5ZZJQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1716850753; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mZEZ2vLGo/BJzQzEMzKayuhKcBIXbE1ibAqc+9i4REwR1UiskxndgdqIbjREXnh1y8fgNx q2nAYHpKKs5SNse5AO6qH/iyAjHOyE6lkywsA1/kGqrAT4TNvN366kq6ZGrbMk4ytfYfem SVltdlQstRU/RMNMKDJPn39WvvSn2Oq4Za2BsClq5UaDGCWyDN/EHP4azsoL2M30+PAdrW c3HGqitFHF980meZG3kmfp7/HSwVRQidMrLpffGM5s1bvFU0KUkRNcPrl9PSazadIGtT5G 2DhIGE8V+u4UHWU2b6mLUhkpVl4YFZEVDIB/4a9y9ulTulz514PSWBRHXd8THw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1716850753; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=dGjdoFJVR96CPUBtGnWBYDvzqN9T0S7/nDSMOfohciY=; b=U7OVd0V9e1wVajGEaj+tU5HP1GOOe8MOEwsW7fqfTVauBN0NavkyWnHDefUy4y9IFWEAKn p4SuycCaEx+3r78Yx27feAHrwkfzfFNjvC1sACMs7EQMFvtHH60Q6kbvBGYDZkVOdyyq8P L7dyagZpo7aEn6PZNH/h7hHHqALWTGQchTSV1oc9ojMPc6ZtZMxHRDgUdXHaDFNjmcFITj 9RyxdDDId2ATFxMNzv1hv3r70kBnhKSO8U2/7tglKpi8ij+Ux+OHBXgL9UsJd2ldIJ745S txa9JSiA3NsNNs6UrkNcVY4PcZLiJkFtgaPIDfznMDXRKSn24qUZXFKAvW3RgA== Received: from mx1.sbone.de (cross.sbone.de [195.201.62.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE Root Certificate Authority" (not verified)) (Authenticated sender: bz/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VpB0d1j87zPfp for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 22:59:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:1025]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110B48D4A126 for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 22:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de (content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:2742]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110412D029D8 for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 22:59:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:1025]) by content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de (content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OmYDSu1ai5sX for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 22:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from strong-iwl0.sbone.de (strong-iwl0.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:b66b:fcff:fef3:e3d2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9E782D029D2 for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 22:59:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 22:59:08 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: FreeBSD wireless mailing list Subject: wireless porject status report Message-ID: <4rq46736-pnp2-nrp2-r3q9-3r3s3256os84@SerrOFQ.bet> X-OpenPGP-Key-Id: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Hi, as indicated last week I somehow worked my way backwards. The fix for pre-22000 chipsets (PR 275255) went in as 5a4d24610fc6143ac1d570fe2b5160e8ae893c2c . Thanks Bakul for testing! I have not had any further feedback on that so I'll MFC it the next days to stable/14 and stable/13. Some other (older) Reviews went in or were updated. In case you see more warnings now like lkpi_iv_newstate: error 95 during state transition 2 (AUTH) -> 2 (AUTH) this is just another side effect/closing race of the long-standing 13+ years net80211 problem which we worked around in LinuxKPI beginning of the years and which LinuxKPI does log and assert. We hope we'll work on that during the year as well and fix all that and it'll go away. If you have a moment, D43967 (updated comments) and D45358 (LinuxKPI PM bits needed to get D3 code) would welcome any review currently. The wifi-firmware-*kmod ports changes went in and cause some disruption (INDEX and non-default options). Thank to jrm@ for helping (and also the ongoing follow-up cleanup). If more ports committers are interested in WiFi please let us know. I would appreciate more "ports" help. Likewise the fwget(8) change went in and should now support all recent drivers (even for bits where no public hardware/firmware exists yet but the iwlwifi driver already supports, so that in future releases adding the firmware will be the only thing needed). On the vendor import side nothing has happened and likely at the end of this week (given stabilisation week was just announced) I'll put the updates in as-are and we'll deal with it otherwise. On the busdma problems on arm64, jhb pointed out that some of the *alloc*/free routines in LinuxKPI are not implemented to the expectations of Linux. I've started to work down his suggestions. As a start I had made changes to the skbuff allocator and kern_malloc.c and the last days extended those well into LinuxKPI *alloc*. I also found my reproducer of the old problem in a driver again (as more things started to work) and worked around that in iwlwifi for now. while this is not directly related to wireless but the general "fixes" hopefully will give LinuxKPI consumers more stability. I also kept working a bit on my 11n branch; hopefully more news to talk about there also soon. Last I got fed up by SCAN problems this afternoon and started investigating. Have other people (with iwn/iwm/iwlwifi or others) noticed the fact that once you are associated with a channel in a band (say Channel 6) you will not get scan results for 11a/5Ghz anymore? Or that sometimes scanning will "just stop" (way beyond scanvalid interval) and triggering a manual scan (or from wpa_cli) you either just get the old cache or EINPROGRESS? (checking ddb on-off I noticed that the scan got stuck in ACTIVE or BGSCAN was on suddenly despite IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD is set given iwlwifi does hw_scan and we never enable background scanning). I know this has bugged me in the past a lot on iwm(4) on 8xxx chipsets and ifconfig down/ifconifg mode auto/ifconfig up fixed it again. In case more people have observed similar things, please let me know so we can properly track this. Lots of health, Bjoern -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7 From nobody Mon May 27 23:31:08 2024 X-Original-To: wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VpBjl5vTCz5Kyc8 for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 23:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VpBjl44Wnz485c; Mon, 27 May 2024 23:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5238b7d0494so294093e87.3; Mon, 27 May 2024 16:31:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716852681; x=1717457481; darn=freebsd.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4QP3078IaFgOtsRPrUyKXbNnc4kHvKdktY6JADq8now=; b=ieEtyvNtSX9RlmewPGkD3AVWrTlbaYOieDhdjhG2Dzh/SqnWioEV4oQ5Qtrotr9eK1 vFZBg+FnwsDy1p4mHmpBHO2MW2HHA28nCSYdLqMF/oHFUgjviWeWXQsCEubFZMR3xcJ/ aaB+syCrYWcOuZy+tlDhiXpEQ9P8rPgEjCaR+S58TvSNM+4MLgdidk9WFlUxGcGRHftK 4xcPqUA8z2fqsXrjnF02oi4pOmMxw0qmwbGCP7grYbIWxOsTW9kXeUV6hPZyk6HibN05 Pns+FQWvBvWBK+KtCZ5xjXZpJWG4n9fM+egYtFTZnQlHZPa8QTvNHy+YnauuL4m0kOPO UwdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716852681; x=1717457481; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=4QP3078IaFgOtsRPrUyKXbNnc4kHvKdktY6JADq8now=; b=qRTFoFseZK2RxmdFeWWMPhwasspr7HGbbEvBukJIXBrTmEZLjE645JD77uF+0oJHni RqDwEkiXwAkHy65d/zauQpdyGuvOYniG2S15diUwXsS1FfOc8eYJhG5VIQMIWo+YTvfZ rTzvn0sfBtzJ7bHp3FUvD3+5HXTVGSWv1KwoMRo2uOrjan5p/lct6xaehaaY7beX1CmK v5qhkm4P9z/YJe/GuCHqejtio4G1s0hQOQy/jSvDJ1Eoc9a5ZPkibDmarU9pYeWwNAWt 3Uoy+N4jBoirTywqhRKtaDqYNi72Q/Ir2hUcf0hQ+NE0BrxiRRrXwlIK+CeoyExv5uFr P9/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzGdr9eni4QDMtbqFH0Rw/xZikTM7exkcbM/wrIkJhDXG6P3qpk TfNixdhRdWyioVIxuEvpxdqOCAojpbCuFu/9UtQzSNYF1uhI95iIiGwoXK2vdQjLEJp0yPlJopW ynmOMbs0emKGCeHnLD6MLokDl2lwocA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFh6DhRC8pAGfqY0TbPCI3UxHabGIKTBKovJ8KHDlWA8kaWb57iI39eCgfYWZwBfQ57sDmtECniZO6RhqANQwA= X-Received: by 2002:a19:6902:0:b0:51b:6366:3459 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5296746417emr7632160e87.67.1716852680825; Mon, 27 May 2024 16:31:20 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4rq46736-pnp2-nrp2-r3q9-3r3s3256os84@SerrOFQ.bet> In-Reply-To: <4rq46736-pnp2-nrp2-r3q9-3r3s3256os84@SerrOFQ.bet> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 16:31:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wireless porject status report To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Cc: FreeBSD wireless mailing list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002c2338061977eac5" X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VpBjl44Wnz485c --0000000000002c2338061977eac5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Last I got fed up by SCAN problems this afternoon and started > investigating. Have other people (with iwn/iwm/iwlwifi or others) noticed > the fact that once you are associated with a channel in a band (say Channel > 6) you will not get scan results for 11a/5Ghz anymore? Or that > sometimes scanning will "just stop" (way beyond scanvalid interval) and > triggering a manual scan (or from wpa_cli) you either just get the old > cache > or EINPROGRESS? (checking ddb on-off I noticed that the scan got stuck > in ACTIVE or BGSCAN was on suddenly despite IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD > is set given iwlwifi does hw_scan and we never enable background > scanning). > I know this has bugged me in the past a lot on iwm(4) on 8xxx chipsets > and ifconfig down/ifconifg mode auto/ifconfig up fixed it again. > In case more people have observed similar things, please let me know > so we can properly track this. > Oh, wow, this is still a problem? Aiee. I remember fixing a WHOLE lot of races in the non scan offload and the then-new scan full offload paths. I'll see if I can reproduce it on iwn(4) (which supports full scan offload) and see what happens. A lot of this stuff originally used flags in multiple threads without actually using atomics + barriers and it was just super easy to get stuck :( -adrian --0000000000002c2338061977eac5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 15:59, Bjoern = A. Zeeb <bz@freebsd.org> wrote:=

Last I got fed up by SCAN problems this afternoon and started
investigating.=C2=A0 Have other people (with iwn/iwm/iwlwifi or others) not= iced
the fact that once you are associated with a channel in a band (say Channel=
6) you will not get scan results for 11a/5Ghz anymore?=C2=A0 Or that
sometimes scanning will "just stop" (way beyond scanvalid interva= l) and
triggering a manual scan (or from wpa_cli) you either just get the old cach= e
or EINPROGRESS?=C2=A0 (checking ddb on-off I noticed that the scan got stuc= k
in ACTIVE or BGSCAN was on suddenly despite IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD
is set given iwlwifi does hw_scan and we never enable background
scanning).
I know this has bugged me in the past a lot on iwm(4) on 8xxx chipsets
and ifconfig down/ifconifg mode auto/ifconfig up fixed it again.
In case more people have observed similar things, please let me know
so we can properly track this.

Oh, wow,= this is still a problem? Aiee. I remember fixing a WHOLE lot of races
in the non scan offload and the then-new scan full offload paths.

I'll see if I can reproduce it on iwn(4) (which supports ful= l scan offload) and
see what happens. A lot of this stuff origina= lly used flags in multiple threads without
actually using atomics= =C2=A0+ barriers and it was just super easy to get stuck :(

<= /div>


-adrian

<= /div> --0000000000002c2338061977eac5-- From nobody Tue May 28 06:54:55 2024 X-Original-To: wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VpNZs3SH6z5LpK0 for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert@rrbrussell.com) Received: from fhigh3-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh3-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.154]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VpNZr1rS1z52yn for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 06:56:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert@rrbrussell.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=rrbrussell.com header.s=fm3 header.b=D50S4JsL; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=IujK7HEs; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=rrbrussell.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of robert@rrbrussell.com designates 103.168.172.154 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=robert@rrbrussell.com Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65E71140085 for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 02:56:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap52 ([10.202.2.102]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 28 May 2024 02:56:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rrbrussell.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1716879363; x=1716965763; bh=DoDm0mcnDr E9zRXL3bjjqXRFLj7Hpr+q6GlORslTUIQ=; b=D50S4JsLd18SAo32rUz7N/iQUq dlgiJcF93SeMgM4LYM3+xgDIy87bqhXt7lv70Hgw970R038YBeT+zcjNbWfY5QE0 jPewhpxq6e11wzeki2TXXoFGaoqIW+JPc5hL2qCeDqIF4DxHb7KcQBLW7qO16yLI 4pyNWhMrXaJjjsHWqGYsoHIFDXqloVZOxssKbyBs8VApUSNhIJdKRXQaa3Pa0yOh fiRSMx2v8wgy0QDGfPcoQSN/T+s2X9utwU+q/ELkwf3t7qdO/Apz3PSLWfFKJEen qf3ypevwVkhuoxpctmtFaAYbPHP96kDftJ+OXfi6XJGHlDAgjsWJX+YGItbg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1716879363; x=1716965763; bh=DoDm0mcnDrE9zRXL3bjjqXRFLj7H pr+q6GlORslTUIQ=; b=IujK7HEsx02INsVbhOk/uo+Lmdq6YXmcUFQDnIolljjh z8ZzRooxo6VC0vzRTJs4DxoIB/eNmHsU2i+0nG9BApo6sYpDquQOqVxRq1CoEXX4 oQKqs0ZYlx8AITZd0JILXfjOgqNmVzA2Kxc/c+EDC8H88czqIP2rtWtzIk2hwW3x fRHBAYdaAHIAynFiWp5alD8a2NNEw+3RsGbLKAdvqsrmIHVyDS2FvNchRKgiv5mm VJfquD7xLy4prWYGiFixqRfbvURVw07YTi05oMJn8OOQ31SPIhoG+s41ROEzYarD gj6TA4WpqzE/vsi/mXQQ4cKElp4wdeffKIsb4OGNCg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdejhedgudduudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreertdenucfhrhhomheprhhosggvrhhtsehrrhgsrhhushhsvghllhdrtghomhen ucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekhfffveevuefgteetgeeugeelvdeivdffvedvtdeihedvke ekleevhffhveegtdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehrohgsvghrthesrhhrsghruhhsshgvlhhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ie421460a:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 71AEDC60097; Tue, 28 May 2024 02:56:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-491-g033e30d24-fm-20240520.001-g033e30d2 List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4rq46736-pnp2-nrp2-r3q9-3r3s3256os84@SerrOFQ.bet> References: <4rq46736-pnp2-nrp2-r3q9-3r3s3256os84@SerrOFQ.bet> Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 01:54:55 -0500 From: robert@rrbrussell.com To: wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wireless porject status report Content-Type: text/plain X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.09 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.996]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[rrbrussell.com,quarantine]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[rrbrussell.com:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm1]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.154:from]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209242, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:US]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[robert]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[wireless@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[wireless@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[rrbrussell.com:+,messagingengine.com:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VpNZr1rS1z52yn Just out of curiosity what is the blocker for the built in radio chip on the Raspberry Pi 3/3+? From nobody Tue May 28 10:06:30 2024 X-Original-To: wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VpSpf56hnz5Lw9x for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 10:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VpSpf4fl7z4Dwd; Tue, 28 May 2024 10:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1716890794; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J7Qcs9k5SJd8cPRwoCz5ITcDJrBm4gH0KtdrX7mXkYI=; b=eiZoOyvcyh73pbeTLSvHk97b5GXaB0PdTQRDfKZQa8tQwabn7SNuO4n911f7GAxKLxz9bQ Xw+AEUEHrOfTwiGiHHgHxRwwBPEs6hLY8rcPx0FK/NCbwIaOdT1KRb0PnuKrZr1x8zOv4K oP+pnYwN+5dgMrVC8xPC5X7XgccRMBmZlYQmerywMku40Qr0LiX5IVMGOVOLWreaELpUPw BS32B4YCJeVcEaUMVeqYq2Mbge0yc1TWsbHheoP1aXmeCv8TfaDe8vlKcCF5FCw9IXtsXF uMrlfY1Z/A35eoKggyJZlRrp5XSQbM6JcaaLjRQthd4PhDbrGrInu7pM9p/CjA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1716890794; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=yXdB3psAIrkIW/eya6KL96ocm7Btg/rP9rLuQUwPoi4aZKNigLIE0GeCKw1yedDQCx1mvB ZjAipzpDpbDeh1FKgkGhzv7s2w9RT1KREq1fhSmBEWo6aghcPh3cMQ8NJKDNN+U5rrBLUF ZyxXshXCxNcr5jf+5y3XO6ynbyIPGJYbuzkb+p30Ck/UFGBMOO8Z4l3Pl5Q65MQhReLVAH yf1GPBiN+BDxCSfVJrYTljIz8wVOSoTFl0idnlNAy6tKSk5+u09+w2cQhqCUxaYnBPsA5M iiMnLSRkfOOJxEq8ihBBmYC/apzwviBxGoWZkHGuMYz9HGxQAHOQL2TCRx6xvQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1716890794; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J7Qcs9k5SJd8cPRwoCz5ITcDJrBm4gH0KtdrX7mXkYI=; b=hWXxYnEZgf5RWxnAHb4sifKhAuxSF+9yJl2IkmZAOP1fCnEcDVEgSBXb6GHkQkVm+PV44G zB140BeOrlEJSoCqt9hLl8eM4nXqphKy+papqa6ygo4vRoB5nSDdBkJAqNQgEWPBPXjDUo +ukKPiQraAIKT759z240+QhJu2TS9vIw2d11H8B8VpMb+3VrV7nnwgkb3qAEWnyb4kgI8z Vfyj9AXOSwgMf0LciFG4OLPzWOnWgPhhHBZT7cvXX941whHe7hWBTRYtjqCcvkYDARrGbg 9YXmnVchVSoj6rS0dJmXtTCB4ZXSxg5/5FTy5mgmCZpUsybvghWo8C5nrmQG6A== Received: from mx1.sbone.de (cross.sbone.de [195.201.62.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE Root Certificate Authority" (not verified)) (Authenticated sender: bz/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VpSpf3WPWzd45; Tue, 28 May 2024 10:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:1025]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 705778D4A126; Tue, 28 May 2024 10:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de (content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:2742]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B80F82D029D8; Tue, 28 May 2024 10:06:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:1025]) by content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de (content-filter.t4-02.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:0:7404:2:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5-rnZMsaiZYu; Tue, 28 May 2024 10:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from strong-iwl0.sbone.de (strong-iwl0.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:4902:b66b:fcff:fef3:e3d2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 861AD2D029D2; Tue, 28 May 2024 10:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 10:06:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: Adrian Chadd cc: FreeBSD wireless mailing list Subject: Re: wireless porject status report In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <040s62p3-93o1-9nq2-60q3-qp6p02norro4@serrofq.bet> References: <4rq46736-pnp2-nrp2-r3q9-3r3s3256os84@SerrOFQ.bet> X-OpenPGP-Key-Id: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Mon, 27 May 2024, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > Last I got fed up by SCAN problems this afternoon and started >> investigating. Have other people (with iwn/iwm/iwlwifi or others) noticed >> the fact that once you are associated with a channel in a band (say Channel >> 6) you will not get scan results for 11a/5Ghz anymore? Or that >> sometimes scanning will "just stop" (way beyond scanvalid interval) and >> triggering a manual scan (or from wpa_cli) you either just get the old >> cache >> or EINPROGRESS? (checking ddb on-off I noticed that the scan got stuck >> in ACTIVE or BGSCAN was on suddenly despite IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD >> is set given iwlwifi does hw_scan and we never enable background >> scanning). >> I know this has bugged me in the past a lot on iwm(4) on 8xxx chipsets >> and ifconfig down/ifconifg mode auto/ifconfig up fixed it again. >> In case more people have observed similar things, please let me know >> so we can properly track this. >> > > Oh, wow, this is still a problem? Aiee. I remember fixing a WHOLE lot of > races > in the non scan offload and the then-new scan full offload paths. > > I'll see if I can reproduce it on iwn(4) (which supports full scan offload) You should know better given you introduced this .. Reproducing on iwn(4) will be hard unless you change the driver... supports (in theory) and "supports" (is implemented and working) .... just saying ... % grep -r IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD sys/dev/ sys/dev/iwm/if_iwm.c: ic->ic_flags_ext = IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD; sys/dev/usb/wlan/if_rsu.c: ic->ic_flags_ext |= IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD; It's a hacked up solution and scrolling through I found at least two places where the logic seems wrong (and it's only what--8 checks in total?). I think atomics are the least of my concerns here... -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7 From nobody Tue May 28 19:25:39 2024 X-Original-To: wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VpjD40TgYz5KybT for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 19:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VpjD36dWPz4V4W; Tue, 28 May 2024 19:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5296232e00bso1553200e87.3; Tue, 28 May 2024 12:25:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1716924353; x=1717529153; darn=freebsd.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uMrXAW8InF3N9B9vYCWrK3UWFbMDCJzjzDYN3HHvwSc=; b=lx2X38BMD4IyT8ge8Rsv8XP8SuIPxrullKq7tG0fGfJXnXKxuUiAZrPRS0zRnNMDEN QHj75zZjTEVFc95MB0YdloNOB9ORJyzS0VMXd74wEFRFODH4Z9nxY//CrWJW5ga8JH4d NE3eZXA8Y1YGo1M88mgdH/fz6d9JprXPFzzYjG4vJd00U3sp1gIITvg8E+z1yRx1fG6Q B1s/lKEzGpQbi0vR4hh0nqqJ/ksOe82mgId0lZfQzn8TN2krZuGBsF+JuNEiW97l6lgx e4StK1uGzAHxJ6d46yd/MyB15lnPwh7m1XX+rk738Q8zN6Ni1VhEMX+8FVmsAfmrg+Je ZBwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716924353; x=1717529153; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=uMrXAW8InF3N9B9vYCWrK3UWFbMDCJzjzDYN3HHvwSc=; b=P3UYOOHWTR2sjK13o+8ciYTO2L57OaFX+GbV9PST1SiQ1xcSbN+R0CsPXBGtwL/w07 j//95kQ7IPe67uzLYuT1gs4UitfVK3cZFK+pNStUJDnBg1H9gAtiN+e8XuyPpk1D8NKx S2k8aJw74f9Wuim9K9oqu0iqSfpNxeR1UMETbR4C0B4kohjUA9pQFqhiCYKnl4tplCEv 00MzhT0IMKey14Ww+llhEcw5hB1OAY27NMkb/MjxqHycfVSrFAOIaq0pDNFyCKjU6fnQ drwmXTsU++woeuJ6jWWR2fAPa/kl/scNOMM3kBICvQazvi5cChrls3GrGzt+bF+IX2h3 Mr4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyTj451RfyonxoKC4y83n74zetTkvGQst4Rti0HKRxjy2yM7Cb6 5R1YwKU14/kOgL2VnCAzW7W9DfTfDC2C1MnHvZmyEDqJevS2G9ewOhsq4H0BPf+rHZ4cWdizrSc JJOXqJWNk9QAG3484rjfo34O8ge52Ag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHU7QQSboudJ6p60RSkrTCQN99dFHCDUT0xzU9YcwVIz156N0ZMfUuGQnyr1/75h3mLuLQlYqa8T8xS6wXT+9Y= X-Received: by 2002:a19:6b1a:0:b0:51e:bc4f:ed2a with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52964d9f718mr7732958e87.37.1716924353132; Tue, 28 May 2024 12:25:53 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4rq46736-pnp2-nrp2-r3q9-3r3s3256os84@SerrOFQ.bet> <040s62p3-93o1-9nq2-60q3-qp6p02norro4@serrofq.bet> In-Reply-To: <040s62p3-93o1-9nq2-60q3-qp6p02norro4@serrofq.bet> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 12:25:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wireless porject status report To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Cc: FreeBSD wireless mailing list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002cc0420619889a4f" X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VpjD36dWPz4V4W --0000000000002cc0420619889a4f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 03:06, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Mon, 27 May 2024, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > > Last I got fed up by SCAN problems this afternoon and started > >> investigating. Have other people (with iwn/iwm/iwlwifi or others) > noticed > >> the fact that once you are associated with a channel in a band (say > Channel > >> 6) you will not get scan results for 11a/5Ghz anymore? Or that > >> sometimes scanning will "just stop" (way beyond scanvalid interval) and > >> triggering a manual scan (or from wpa_cli) you either just get the old > >> cache > >> or EINPROGRESS? (checking ddb on-off I noticed that the scan got stuck > >> in ACTIVE or BGSCAN was on suddenly despite IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD > >> is set given iwlwifi does hw_scan and we never enable background > >> scanning). > >> I know this has bugged me in the past a lot on iwm(4) on 8xxx chipsets > >> and ifconfig down/ifconifg mode auto/ifconfig up fixed it again. > >> In case more people have observed similar things, please let me know > >> so we can properly track this. > >> > > > > Oh, wow, this is still a problem? Aiee. I remember fixing a WHOLE lot of > > races > > in the non scan offload and the then-new scan full offload paths. > > > > I'll see if I can reproduce it on iwn(4) (which supports full scan > offload) > > You should know better given you introduced this .. > > Reproducing on iwn(4) will be hard unless you change the driver... > supports > (in theory) and "supports" (is implemented and working) .... just saying > ... > oh iwm, not iwn. Yeah, iwn supports it too, but i never got to that. Anyway. > > % grep -r IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD sys/dev/ > sys/dev/iwm/if_iwm.c: ic->ic_flags_ext = IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD; > sys/dev/usb/wlan/if_rsu.c: ic->ic_flags_ext |= > IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD; > > It's a hacked up solution and scrolling through I found at least two > places where the logic seems wrong (and it's only what--8 checks in > total?). I think atomics are the least of my concerns here... > Oh yeah, the checks aren't all that great. A large part of the problem with the scan stuff is how it used to literally /sleep/ in the middle of doing it, rather than defer it into a state machine with callbacks. I'm unsurprised there are still bugs. :( -adrian --0000000000002cc0420619889a4f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 03:06, Bjoern = A. Zeeb <bz@freebsd.org> wrote:=
On Mon, 27 May = 2024, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> Last I got fed up by SCAN problems this afternoon and started
>> investigating.=C2=A0 Have other people (with iwn/iwm/iwlwifi or ot= hers) noticed
>> the fact that once you are associated with a channel in a band (sa= y Channel
>> 6) you will not get scan results for 11a/5Ghz anymore?=C2=A0 Or th= at
>> sometimes scanning will "just stop" (way beyond scanvali= d interval) and
>> triggering a manual scan (or from wpa_cli) you either just get the= old
>> cache
>> or EINPROGRESS?=C2=A0 (checking ddb on-off I noticed that the scan= got stuck
>> in ACTIVE or BGSCAN was on suddenly despite IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OF= FLOAD
>> is set given iwlwifi does hw_scan and we never enable background >> scanning).
>> I know this has bugged me in the past a lot on iwm(4) on 8xxx chip= sets
>> and ifconfig down/ifconifg mode auto/ifconfig up fixed it again. >> In case more people have observed similar things, please let me kn= ow
>> so we can properly track this.
>>
>
> Oh, wow, this is still a problem? Aiee. I remember fixing a WHOLE lot = of
> races
> in the non scan offload and the then-new scan full offload paths.
>
> I'll see if I can reproduce it on iwn(4) (which supports full scan= offload)

You should know better given you introduced this ..

Reproducing on iwn(4) will be hard unless you change the driver...=C2=A0 su= pports
(in theory) and "supports" (is implemented and working) ....=C2= =A0 just saying ...

oh iwm, not iwn. Ye= ah, iwn supports it too, but i never got to that. Anyway.
=C2=A0<= /div>

% grep -r IEEE80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD sys/dev/
sys/dev/iwm/if_iwm.c:=C2=A0 =C2=A0ic->ic_flags_ext =3D IEEE80211_FEXT_SC= AN_OFFLOAD;
sys/dev/usb/wlan/if_rsu.c:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ic->ic_flags_ext |=3D IEE= E80211_FEXT_SCAN_OFFLOAD;

It's a hacked up solution and scrolling through I found at least two places where the logic seems wrong (and it's only what--8 checks in
total?).=C2=A0 I think atomics are the least of my concerns here...
=C2=A0
Oh yeah, the checks aren't all that grea= t. A large part of the problem with the scan
stuff is how it used= to literally /sleep/ in the middle of doing it, rather than defer
it into a state machine with callbacks.

I'm = unsurprised there are still bugs. :(



-adrian

--0000000000002cc0420619889a4f-- From nobody Tue May 28 21:41:46 2024 X-Original-To: wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VpmDr5Qgfz5LFNQ for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 21:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VpmDr1j8Pz4thP for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 21:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1716932508; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=LnPsBnixVACRUlYSLzG45lXqEBvJ8E/7KCt3OMNgxc62R+AjWhuTz2y4/9fKAlhSlxvefS wacF3pwv+pcT0HpEe4iGimBPx8DHIerl5U5S0913lbo9yJoYjMrgvKpKDAql94sliYATGz 4d3YULjIN9S48V/vkM+O8Q5dFy7pcPUl+mekNp3uPdwWp6Y4r7sZ4X1WFYtpUc5KYQPgJ8 4QLFnvupOGNFs4r/OQuwfDVWcbMOrojUdA8jM9kMBvKm1QnJupl2VCJfcjfLJuJn0LMGZW oqvKq1CfbiP8ZX6plZOKTaU+x/hAJSJF/KHTByHLyf1Q58TrLVGXtS3XsfyEVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1716932508; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sfjDsagfcr1PDhxFkaRwlosOXjvfCyma/kaDrT3vVJo=; b=EmDAw1xu4ikbNELPcGTi+vJGKXlnCkg2xdVZntTPH2GBrKTenIiEwXXe2KXBaR3Ui/nc2/ g6PPm4PrL1xWNe2aS34i6PdlVg4Q1Vs+NwNKiA6o8pocc2YXVAevWhoxruJ4iqwFKorf0s PLAvKrWv9Jr/idCI876RO/KD71S0i3LxC75VxP9vre9fNsI1hjLovZtAXCagATw1HRShTO qwgQgfSHS9oBiz46ZG33pzog+zkBH7ssDfjnYobySdEYqiTfSQ8iTmDPOzzITpQPOYN+A0 QlUstj3QgVldVGSLcepep2Ch49wU1mSpEsivfLtTGVZ9gBPTkts/0/p/ypsOSw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VpmDr1Js1zTPG for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 21:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 44SLfmrK073002 for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 21:41:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 44SLfmB6073001 for wireless@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 28 May 2024 21:41:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 274382] iwlwifi Invalid TXQ id Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 21:41:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: tracking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rkoberman@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bz@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D274382 --- Comment #64 from rkoberman@gmail.com --- (In reply to Bjoern A. Zeeb from comment #62) While I am not certain, I suspect that this issue was the result of a typo = in /etc/wpa_supplicant. I will be unable to test this until I try to connect a= gain from a hotel, probably not until September. If it does not turn out to be my fat-fingering, I'll open a new ticket ad attempt to collect more details by adding debugging to the wpa_supplicant. Since "list aps" does show a long l= ists of SSIDs, I really suspect either a typo on my part or a wps_supplicant iss= ue. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 31 07:27:18 2024 X-Original-To: wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VrF7V3CFQz5MN03 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 07:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VrF7V07W5z4M95 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 07:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1717140438; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EZacBwVkEMTR/T6TwZ1EJ8wjDMeZK7IKSkVYMYY4F0YgSQxDrYsMusqryyJTUn4s/I0RjS zinKcxW2uq6k3cU2Qa62Mau8D80CG8rTHyH/LTmplRzWQ1mmugGg+kGv+BXK97zJdwG/w1 sw5idvguglDZFwrWLTu2GQJw4rTVXOlfr7YW4zEdK9gHhQcO7b8mDg+G4ZmRBtbSwUOMsB tx5dpjtncA42EvyTS9QiWe+Hqa7xy78WG41aNNXs3+0DfcWSuQCWo8R0oYyEGXgREd0mjD Clu40iUKcdIvSOWBoKTKT0HLyYSFcupY3sImr3k9UFkHGwDYWWYvf2Ga/vCSqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1717140438; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nsVFFrs3dgSXRGG07Z40134CbMtpgseWaynztbn4BEk=; b=UIyO3oAqH70fKBFnzEEYYDvJ4R7K9n0RxCuuzz8lfdkBscar7gpBBrNQUurN5s+TxSD1Nr SR3RGZgxGItRD+mbyT1z7hJOg5pGDXV9LZwh1rxz8hn3T/AMX2sF7r7fMzhOs8UUEhYjQg Sv9GyDMRAKxNoF1zy+2iQwMYJ2CZGORz8tDc0TlYrTdYTzFr76VZsp1LIbbldrKenM+FAT IejEOz8nkpwi378HFiHgukgk0r9aH7dyQ1/rG7iIx5j1iMceu1YK5yyvZ6T4tP2Rvqt/sI Qlt33XE0hHzL4SlyfZ/yTwAiM1xo78dZPGyKzbmsAUvxPLGROirXcWUyDwTmGg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VrF7T6dxjzFNB for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 07:27:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 44V7RHJT033962 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 07:27:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 44V7RHSo033957 for wireless@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 31 May 2024 07:27:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 279421] indianivfcenter Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 07:27:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: indianivfcenter@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: wireless@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279421 Bug ID: 279421 Summary: indianivfcenter Product: Base System Version: Unspecified Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: wireless Assignee: wireless@FreeBSD.org Reporter: indianivfcenter@gmail.com Hello friends, welcome to indianivfcenter here you get best ivf and surrog= acy treatments through our best doctors, and if you are connected with our web= site we will give you a discount. So contact us and fulfill your family.=20 https://indianivfcenter.in/ --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 31 09:00:02 2024 X-Original-To: wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VrHBW2TCrz5MVy9 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 09:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VrHBV6bSFz4T0c for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 09:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1717146002; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=A7D4zBQ8tLzt2ogcmYXjPEKKWKc2xchyDY15BMkHRPDU5HMuFEkzVhha+IwVAARrk+aAP3 cyXjWJPovjdAYvB4dQiJtbmFfJZvxZhgPsnFdMqUDp4nK4BstrYpPFtEwX697sZXRqcXj9 rHs29aAKa/U036ov3NT0wLaGLQ97FCl8TLO0NssGCrgH1DQZciZOuR2LBSevIBTiMIRXhz bVhzXG+1i31TY2SN15DzN5C/UY1eNDZF19Iv43EQ6vpYXwKcnKUVC3qz9bihPAN0b0v4U2 FpJF0DIjPKR3/78YBZXpssMuJEcD/gsXz9e3xAuwbT+ejleVz5rfQt5QdqWjgg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1717146002; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dfdTCPRp1zktGNaFgHhgZj1YjB+gaCZgQj6nPKXQe4Y=; b=iCO1GVK0LyC/Kn/Gk0fR3d+vLHm/SornVrUNoVxwu1AWe+JD/lWEU8y4y4K5tih/hn5Ks+ hpsZ0l04bR0v6wbcLz/zhwtTom9PoZqnr28suQnhRZyzDEaqqSXLjS0TF2q9doUsga+AyO J4L+SHhhEkwIiO9tAbd+C9cYgQ/u6AzHj3Lr5/54rVJ9KLI0cnWsybU+sgOSQRBCdzj7rM S2k7z8usX7n74IGug8X6ACcEUMJiDAStMgeVOpS3r2GN5ndgnG470yUAXdnL/uYXykQ8+s vgGLRSu3VmXKHTZ4VkKrWbYQx5poW3Bb7XWz2JB9YoPYDyXZk8DRU+prRKAsmg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VrHBV69B9zHJf for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 09:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 44V9021G060133 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 09:00:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 44V9027a060122 for wireless@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 31 May 2024 09:00:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 279421] indianivfcenter Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 09:00:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: joneum@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugmaster@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279421 Jochen Neumeister changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|wireless@FreeBSD.org |bugmaster@FreeBSD.org CC| |joneum@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From nobody Fri May 31 20:20:05 2024 X-Original-To: wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VrZHD2LHCz5LJyJ for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 20:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VrZHD1B5jz4SmY for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 20:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1717186808; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QUEcK3Lbq/swcucN6mcKj+LzgyLcDrAtyacqpd/2p6uCfpdwaAs31szvXSIKMU+Nt4Dzhr lVtJ6wYBmjkvAHTbO7CdThYTjrzQmHSPorn9zpv21eTjjfEEGoI2uvQ5EkGnN7siZYN6zb Caf0XvJCoYFwRN9+u66IDexFtC4/fndSdKZlcY1RqiIrArA5YWXkCM1f4lJ6hJ/sOyJlVi gA2Yq/JitSghtrxuA9IKj6RW46rcwjI/0TGMgWGS9iTSQ1cYsmpirAiNz+Yqm5WT84xSdZ R5AAaRrLX7bW0ZolAl3WG9gPYuaweYxekjQ3mcA8cG8v46KXjDyQAnvaNgzkmQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1717186808; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Kbtousyq8Pyg+sbxo7EW0MwjHSI6pg96ymuwV4sAwgo=; b=Xv/Zq/CO0Igw+aNqwvHUaLKbwa0CTIhUGqDZSvGW3vWzvORqYH7scg22OIH4M/jXoplkI8 PTMS140EDVfYQjJHzjXZinabzlNGWGrTlQDVRZ2MyDCSaNAOBPtXtB8jKhsmtZsJz/YXhT rUbcl33oMCuUIysC4lREurjfTC4ArMJb/x5LPv5Slxj4ax6fn87k/YJoXvR7Fs/ykU3SH9 oP00cVgjKZba7tJkQOYCbpMomHmkZsnatOjcfpvTZRzUwMDY6ZGu7Y2EA9VZwE+fTQcZ6i PVs2UdlndppCTcGvZU3IiqEAYLO4ul03uOdvnUoR1ev2IPGAL0xDBEhtVbLD+Q== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VrZHD0pK2zf2y for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 20:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 44VKK8OE091487 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 20:20:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 44VKK8Nw091486 for wireless@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 31 May 2024 20:20:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 274382] iwlwifi Invalid TXQ id Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 20:20:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: wireless X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: tracking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: olce@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bz@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D274382 Olivier Certner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |olce@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #65 from Olivier Certner --- Just got: May 31 14:47:05 host kernel: iwl_mvm_tx_mpdu:1204: fc 000000 tid 8 txq_id 6= 5535 mvm 0xfffffe00dc0f94c8 skb 0xfffff80219365000 { len 60 } info 0xfffffe00c67bdcb8 sta 0xfffff80051578080 (if you see this please report to= PR 274382) May 31 14:47:06 host kernel: iwlwifi0: Not associated and the session protection is over already... May 31 14:47:06 host kernel: iwlwifi0: linuxkpi_ieee80211_connection_loss: = vif 0xfffffe011d5e2e80 vap 0xfffffe011d5e2010 state AUTH on a recent 14-STABLE (9a8a26aefb36, May 12th). It's connecting to an open network (so, no WPA/wpa_supplicant at all). I had had several "iwlwifi0: linuxkpi_ieee80211_connection_loss: (snip)" on this network at some point, but it seems it was rather the network, and tho= se were gone for a while before I got the above. Searching in 'messages', I see it's the second time that I get "(if you see this please report to PR 274382)". Before the first occurence, there is a = line "Invalid TXQ id" with same timestamp, but there's nothing before the second one. Let me know if you need more info, or if I could help debugging (only one d= ay left accessing this network). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=