From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 2 02:30:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7109E16A415; Tue, 2 May 2006 02:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F52343D45; Tue, 2 May 2006 02:30:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k422U7h6035935; Mon, 1 May 2006 20:30:07 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <4456C439.1070500@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 20:30:17 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051230 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Allen References: <200605011604.26507.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20060501212539.GA24193@regurgitate.ugcs.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <20060501212539.GA24193@regurgitate.ugcs.caltech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Mikhail Teterin , stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cc can't build 32-bit executables on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 02:30:19 -0000 Paul Allen wrote: > This was originally mentioned in amd64/76224 which was closed by obrien with the > terse remark: "We don't yet support building 32-bit apps on a 64-bit system. We > only barely support *running* them at this point." > > Really this deserves an errata mention at the very least. It just simply > isn't intuitive that this functionality would be missing from a tier-1 release. > > Paul Sorry, I'm not going to allow the toolchain to get hacked up the week before the release. If this is a feature that you want for FreeBSD 6.2, then please work with the architects of the FreeBSD/amd64 platform to make it happen. Saying at the very very last minute before a release that a pet feature is a requirement for tier-1 only falls on deaf ears. Scott