From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Oct 22 9:56:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from rnocserv.urc.ac.ru (rnocserv.urc.ac.ru [193.233.85.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2259537B4E5 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 09:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from belle.RNOC-dialup.urc.ac.ru (belle.RNOC-dialup.urc.ac.ru [193.233.85.126]) by rnocserv.urc.ac.ru (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9MGuY512725 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:56:34 +0600 (YEKST) (envelope-from anton@urc.ac.ru) Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:56:33 +0600 (YEKST) From: Anton Voronin X-Sender: anton@belle.rnoc-dialup.urc.ac.ru To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: HAVE_GTK and HAVE_GNOME Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Greetings! I've noticed the funny thing: if I build Gnome and don't have HAVE_GNOME make variable defined (because I build it the first time and don't have it on the system), but have HAVE_GTK=yes in my /etc/make.conf, then all the gnome packages are named with -gtk suffix instead of -gnome. This looks incorrect because after I've built gnome, I've added HAVE_GNOME=yes to /etc/make.conf, and then all the gnome-dependant packages (like gnomeicu) began to reister their dependencies for gnome components with -gnome suffix, while those are named with -gtk... Wouldn't it be better to make an exception for packages that have USE_GNOME=yes and which the gnome package is depending on, to name them with -gnome suffix even if HAVE_GNOME is not defined? Regards, Anton Anton Voronin Ural Regional Center of FREEnet, Southern Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message