From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 23:09:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AE516A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DD2513C455 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 24769 invoked by uid 399); 26 Jan 2008 23:09:32 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2008 23:09:32 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <479BBDAA.6000008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:09:30 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Attilio Rao References: <790a9fff0801150552l542a4238ofc12efe5fdb45fc2@mail.gmail.com> <20080115143924.GB57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080124122808.GA15600@freefall.freebsd.org> <3bbf2fe10801240518i6e18b2f5w84de652d4170c95b@mail.gmail.com> <20080124145811.GB78114@comp.chem.msu.su> <3bbf2fe10801240707o72b927cg74dbf9b7bbcd88fc@mail.gmail.com> <20080125075551.GB21633@comp.chem.msu.su> <3bbf2fe10801250000k5852c2f2j5d1897c900096818@mail.gmail.com> <20080126142901.GD49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <479B6303.6000401@FreeBSD.org> <3bbf2fe10801260918k56c1a73hf28ff154eca0b74c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10801260918k56c1a73hf28ff154eca0b74c@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kostik Belousov , Yar Tikhiy , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: System call lstat returning with 1 locks held X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:09:33 -0000 Attilio Rao wrote: > 2008/1/26, Doug Barton : >> Yar Tikhiy wrote: >> >>> No doubt. :-) But the urgency of this problem appears much lower >>> than that I estimated in the first place--fortunately. Broken UFS >>> would be a nightmare. >> IMO if we're going to ship NTFS support in the base it should actually >> function, or at minimum not panic the box. As I reported earlier, I can >> panic my -current system with 100% reliability with fairly light access >> to an NTFS volume, which I consider to be a fairly large problem, at >> least for my personal usage pattern. > > I'm not sure now, are you referring to some problems introduced by my > patches or not? Not sure of the timeline. I think this is the most relevant post on the matter, let me know if there is anything I can do to help diagnose this. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=644445+0+archive/2008/freebsd-current/20080113.freebsd-current -- This .signature sanitized for your protection