From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 26 23:41:26 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274DC106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 May 2009 23:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-ew0-f164.google.com (mail-ew0-f164.google.com
	[209.85.219.164])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F018FC18
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 May 2009 23:41:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com)
Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so701557ewy.43
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 May 2009 16:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject
	:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=VlD8sODwWSnm3NbyXp5QNNVzxLxNGI2TEnWMSRLUT4g=;
	b=lcJ4HLBJUN1mjx4lA4gl0X/p9l0RbFXVXCQAqH7wHKS5tPBtShKmiE44of/cwUNJNA
	XzTaH6XUDOKnp4UEVubexY+ZmlFbQh3RUxjHsIJT938dPc587xaDU43gc+nrGARBZlf+
	MWZmvlJmhXnyfQ0YIo31n2juPwZJaCW2EZsQ8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=wmu7w+U8IvYMFvRoHwuLcdbXHOFbzJwFSH6i76XrQbTBSxiY1YaXCqHjgmswrDSFp+
	WwPugzqr6FuoxiKHfR41lVoFZco/KFa9u9Ct1zY+byLOJ9xm/Ei31Fpjp4tRp7F+A+1E
	3dIk4EC2x0Kh7YC7Dq67ny/rDgIBqh/C+D8Cw=
Received: by 10.210.42.13 with SMTP id p13mr894413ebp.48.1243381283354;
	Tue, 26 May 2009 16:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk
	[87.81.140.128])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm4808859eyg.17.2009.05.26.16.41.22
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 26 May 2009 16:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:41:19 +0100
From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20090527004119.62822b41@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090526170210.GB75202@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
References: <26face530905242257m7030933cy4a1171de7a06ee59@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090525190039.GA39139@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
	<43F89C0B-370E-4E29-9214-E447768C97A3@goldmark.org>
	<20090526170210.GB75202@slackbox.xs4all.nl>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Secure unsalted or fixed salt symmetric encryption?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:41:26 -0000

On Tue, 26 May 2009 19:02:10 +0200
Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> wrote:


> Or if you have the case of a 'known-plaintext' attack. It happens
> more often than you would think: 
> [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Known-plaintext_attack] 
> Note that using a random salt would be a good protection against such
> an attack!

Only if the passphrase is weak. If you don't use salt you can
pre-compute a table that maps weak passphrases to a few bytes of
of the ciphertext of a known plaintext first block. But if that
passphrase contains sufficient entropy it's no cheaper than a
brute-force attack against the cipher. A cipher that can't withstand
that isn't worth using.