From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 18 09:25:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D4616A4CE; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:25:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F14B43D4C; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:25:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4451F007; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:25:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 3D63F6746; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:25:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:25:50 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman Message-ID: <20050418092550.GA97539@stack.nl> References: <20050415050821.GO981@green.homeunix.org> <20050415132108.GC85922@stack.nl> <20050415150708.GP981@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050415150708.GP981@green.homeunix.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i cc: Marc Olzheim cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS client/buffer cache deadlock X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:25:52 -0000 --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:07:08AM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > Is this supposed to fix kern/79208 ? >=20 > Yes, it does; would you like to try a more recent version of the patch? > It's actually against -STABLE, but it needs to be tested in -CURRENT if > it's going ot try to make it into 5.x (or hopefully 5.4-RELEASE). >=20 > See: Ok, I'll try it out on -CURRENT then. Marc --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCY30eezjnobFOgrERAqU3AJ99ygotgVaNgz9dOdxZGbmKTpVdigCfT+4V ytpYZ0f+780gZb7pm0lhnoM= =2N4b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK--