From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jun 3 14:40: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD09F37B41C for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 14:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f53Le3x67543; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 14:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 14:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200106032140.f53Le3x67543@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: ports/27836: New port: Trafcount is loadable module for freebsd lets admin see how much amount of data was transfered by eac Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/27836; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: .@babolo.ru Cc: FreeBSD GNATS DB Subject: Re: ports/27836: New port: Trafcount is loadable module for freebsd lets admin see how much amount of data was transfered by eac Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 16:35:37 -0500 On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 01:27:34AM +0400, .@babolo.ru (.@babolo.ru) wrote: > Why ${PREFIX}/share ? Does kernel module can be shared > beetween different architectures? Good point. Perhaps someone else can suggest a better way for us to be installing kernel modules, but putting them under ${PREFIX}/modules is more wrong than the current ${PREFIX}/share/whatever/ convention. > Is it better to include modules/ to mtree files? Yes, because it's directly under /usr/local. Ports cannot make new directories by themselves directly under /usr/local, or $PREFIX for that matter. It's against the rules. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message