From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 23 00:49:20 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B63B106566C;
	Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:49:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gshapiro@gshapiro.net)
Received: from zim.gshapiro.net (zim.gshapiro.net [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:36::224])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89F68FC16;
	Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:49:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rugsucker.local (natted.sendmail.com [63.211.143.38])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by zim.gshapiro.net (8.14.4.Alpha1/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8N0nGAM071126
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gshapiro@gshapiro.net)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gshapiro.net;
	s=gatsby.dkim; t=1253666959;
	bh=OUNm3VRfhZe93kThzyDp21O669soYW9TmQ6GiP08TJY=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	Content-Type:In-Reply-To;
	b=Yd9WyCRtZwLAY4RLtf/cICeq6aKd2kTpXLJr0vuPNw5jGYnckB6oZ8BuUmQVt/NK2
	z3xcvbIUX+fGRhv0re91qdbMG4OUs7Pivcx6lyE/8TJY0VWJmiF7e8d+rGc2uEbv4u
	bAWVirmIVZmVwWKNfMiHy1x0mzby1DEpoCpKQQUk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=gatsby; d=gshapiro.net; c=nofws; q=dns;
	h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:
	mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	b=BsfudCehcSex49FK9UkFgaP/v2la4sUrHUvvGTOcamup7GwGR/pvh4Y1HcU6JIrsO
	uFD7VCn9Ut8EfhW3DawQULglABr7bqHr2c/yS+wDMQXW8k5rFeUC1kafszk3jGJXw7C
	dt9zrhyUJ+RUV8kGrXG4crvtAqfs+bKUE2aD92k=
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:49:15 -0700
From: Gregory Shapiro <gshapiro@gshapiro.net>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <20090923004915.GQ19207@rugsucker.local>
References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl>
	<20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org>
	<4AB90448.9020706@FreeBSD.org>
	<19e9a5dc0909221014o14e88c96ubf32142b85d781d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090922173517.GB63149@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20090922200449.GL19207@rugsucker.local>
	<19e9a5dc0909221329j5757c3f7kc23e94ea8f26a05@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090922204356.GM19207@rugsucker.local>
	<20090922213451.GC84817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090922213451.GC84817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:18:24 +0000
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BIND in the base (Was: Re: tmux(1) in base)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:49:20 -0000

> If sendmail is replaced by dma, will it receive the same level of
> care?  I guess this is considered to be a dubious concern by some.

It is a valid concern, but not one I can comment on (i.e., I would not
be able to maintain it).