From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Thu Feb 18 17:42:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFDEAAD9B0 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9D4F9B for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AA5C8AAD9AF; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901E0AAD9AE for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22d.google.com (mail-ob0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5282DF99; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id jq7so77640382obb.0; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:42:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jLu/cAP5iNIlN50dwg6o4FHqGKjeiMc/m/1DbneHTM0=; b=Wbh556iIwc+PgmirIUNv+JDD/zvkCcgE9lCBxV1kVr3VarOGCIkyLJQFW30stJrU5/ QMd+mSBpdDzNQTuZsU3PsAbnFnV8peK/Sl3xUbB0zFlqNqwbErxAlESd5pLbCeVmi4dU /f80dG1C5EWwGJbVCKKSDp23wiabFIsK5c804/u+nF76vjemTPFr3JEzDQHbs/8IJ0y+ AA4fDHXpv6hR25F2T7cVCnRWdr/55Tz5lxRpQnIrDwExfc9KI2+sfKOMTDZaT2rWUib9 7X7YomdktoyObHwVjREBnvMA2uRB+mKc+dPvK3U/eOCrdBrf/wINF/YM8B+/PpCOcbkv lBbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jLu/cAP5iNIlN50dwg6o4FHqGKjeiMc/m/1DbneHTM0=; b=Ur5FSKO91I2AN7G57DE2iRSpHr1ruINcZnHs8BeTvyIHyIVX/pnDbQJx+fu1fm3hQ+ +5BUkwQZt8lNtlL5YEQY4P/rOteE1C1Q6glQRG2WMTHchEnp66iEzjHqczYNBYMVRU3n b4OMd4Oo5ULNiSLwu8ELkgsyZp0Q8sfithQLbKS58IMqETNpK3lqzCgsHiXGqRLQhHGY 60dBhCLBQF4JbxBXJTnYGIEcp6KyqivU6oU9hsfmRRkd+Lqx32OefgZIbTS8yLhVMUKK R4eFUFZfe0x2MYtWvKmzVW0trE2ehMs4SUQbBa9IUZpeK1jiG81m8l0KacFlIJ5uQuGY pP5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQmi5lip4rthtWgUHBN7574syMekbXhG/phBbIWIbAUvPL+IfUt1Go9/f7l3XXptGGKhTymREa8A5d9pg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.24.197 with SMTP id w5mr7430541obf.31.1455817361299; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:42:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: r.c.ladan@gmail.com Received: by 10.60.6.202 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:42:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.6.202 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:42:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86d1rumdxy.fsf@desk.des.no> References: <86d1rumdxy.fsf@desk.des.no> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:42:41 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gUf0R-HcGRnNJytkb4TnZLXXWIg Message-ID: Subject: Re: CVE-2015-7547 and linux-f10-* ports? From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Ladan?= To: =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= Cc: Bapt , emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:42:43 -0000 Op 18 feb. 2016 12:54 schreef "Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav" : > > Ren=C3=A9 Ladan writes: > > in light of CVE-2015-7547 and various other security vulnerabilities, > > is there any desire to keep the linux-f10-* ports? > > Fedora 10 was released 7 years ago and was end-of-lifed 6 years ago. I > can practically guarantee, without even looking at the ports, that they > are chock full of serious security vulnerabilities. > I know that ;) I included you for a security point of view, as you committed the patches for linux-c6-* Ren=C3=A9