From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 14 00:57:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3842637B401 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 00:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2CA43F93 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 00:57:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5E7vHOc047574; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 00:57:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5E7vC1X047573; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 00:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 00:57:11 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20030614075711.GA47533@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200306132154.h5DLsL4t018474@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030614072512.GA47263@dragon.nuxi.com> <200306140246.04412.linimon@lonesome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200306140246.04412.linimon@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-BETA Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.sys.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 07:57:37 -0000 On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 02:46:04AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > > (*shrug*) There were other intentions you knew about and derailed, > > so your knob got used to realize that stated agenda. > > To the general FreeBSD community, the various "agendas" that > seem so important to you two take a far distant back seat to the > recent dilemmas of: "parts of the tree no longer work". When given reproduceable and demonstratable problems they get fixed. Purity of code and ahearing more strictly to standards makes our code base more portable across all our architectures. > Speaking for myself, I am rapidly getting to the point where I really > don't care whoever shot which bullet into my foot, but I am starting > to resent the fact that the bullets are there in service of someone's > personal agenda, rather than what's good for the wider community. > > I suggest that whatever needs to be worked out here, needs to > be worked out in some other forum than the source tree. Where else should source changes happen except in the source tree. This is -CURRENT. RELENG_4 is at "cvs up -r RELENG_4". -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)