From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 16 8: 9:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958C137B4CF; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 08:09:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA17643; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:09:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA04489; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:09:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:09:06 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200011161609.JAA04489@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Subject: Re: libc shlib version In-Reply-To: <48719.974354306@winston.osd.bsdi.com> References: <200011152253.PAA00534@nomad.yogotech.com> <48719.974354306@winston.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > It's not just the library that's change, so bumping the libc bersion > > will not solve the kernel incompatability problems. > > That depends on what value of "solve" you're shooting for, and you > know that well enough. I know that well enough, and the folks working on the problem are also bright enough to know that as well. If it was a simple solution, it would have been solved already. A manager saying 'solve it already' won't make it happen any faster. :) :) :) :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message