From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun  2 13:24:20 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654281065694;
	Sat,  2 Jun 2012 13:24:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14D58FC14;
	Sat,  2 Jun 2012 13:24:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3331754bkv.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=Cv+7ZZbeOJN7XXS752Wm/W51jkXu7+6edGoEBvV8pKY=;
	b=ut3Smk3jFLzOZBaMhrCDcvSgF2K07lnvOwP9BqVnSTU2JvNmU8M9UegxF5UVeLYP7O
	Zxd7qHqHTph71sJnNJDahF41anSqnnyE/O0xs6UNLduRc2uJ4EVjOXRqDnXjIlTkkT7F
	JiNcZB1OAHnJ48x55YwEyph9p5acZyVh9XbmVL6HzVY+0D6yFZhyVx8vJBmqbHuqQnhu
	joOFvCN9HqKnjf71iUj8BwoLfoL1EDxJ5JNqXzxRQRfLanusQJie2upwoN0aKJqQ/6Xk
	4diZc/CgP3v/UpOYJKmE8OuL2fEALSFNJ9d3TpoADOHyVdz+njCG8ltZekLJYBZmWMiG
	Q5jQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.156.69 with SMTP id v5mr3553106bkw.133.1338643458517; Sat,
	02 Jun 2012 06:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 06:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 06:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FCA0DA6.7070502@acsalaska.net>
References: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org>
	<4FCA0DA6.7070502@acsalaska.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 14:24:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CADLo8381J2U1bc8MmehFLvnGko3E4E2YsxhW+VQ8dcxCXSmBjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To: Mel Flynn <rflynn@acsalaska.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>,
	FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:24:20 -0000

On Jun 2, 2012 1:57 PM, "Mel Flynn" <rflynn@acsalaska.net> wrote:
>
> On 12-5-2012 5:41, Erwin Lansing wrote:
>
> > All the details has been documented and written down on the wiki:
> > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG
>
> Sorry to jump in late, but it just occurred to me that I have a valid
> case for "zero or 1" multi options or implemented slightly different, a
> case for "if single is on, multigroup needs one, else multigroup must be
0"
> The specific case is this:
> - User can opt to force runtime dependency on a web server by selecting
> one of 4 or none.
>

Just put a dummy option NOWEBSERVER or something in the singlegroup.

Chris