From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 17:10:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3E516A4CE; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:10:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E202C43D45; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DD71FFDC1; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:10:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 8BE8F1FF931; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:10:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 201D71559A; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15424154E5; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:06:14 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Andrea Campi In-Reply-To: <20040622155429.GB82977@webcom.it> Message-ID: References: <20040622151128.GA82977@webcom.it> <40D851FA.1030103@FreeBSD.org> <20040622155429.GB82977@webcom.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: Wes Peters cc: FreeBSD current mailing list cc: Alex Dupre Subject: Re: Is NO_YP_LIBC working? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:10:38 -0000 On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Andrea Campi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > > >in the process of setting up a nanobsd-based system I've stumbled on so > > >many issues during a make buildworld that I've started wondering whether > > >NO_YP_LIBC is meant to work. Is anybody using it, and do you need local > > >changes? > > > > Currently it's broken. Try this patch: > > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/10039-no-yp-libc.diff hopefully it still applies cleanly; if not please let me know and I will update the patch. > Oh, I hadn't noticed a previous discussion (or possibly I've forgotten > about it). I'm trying a buildworld with the patch; it looks definitely > good. In fact, although I had only gotten about halfway, my patch was > practically identical (modulo whitespaces). > > Any hope to get somebody to commit it? Wes Peters has volunteered to do this in April ... I added him to Cc: -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT