From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Dec 18 12:42: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.cdrom.com (castles522.castles.com [208.214.165.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E4714D59; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:42:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Received: from mass.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA00760; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:45:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199912182045.MAA00760@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Mike Smith Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Parallelport Problems In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:41:24 PST." <199912182041.MAA00736@mass.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 12:45:43 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Both ports are using IRQs and DMA, port 1 has IRQ 7, dirq 1, port 2 has > > IRQ 5, dirq 7. The additional card is capable of EPP 1.9 and I set the > > flag for this in kernel config file. So far all things seems to be all > > right. But why is the usage of any IO card, especially the parallel port > > on additional cards blocking the PCI bus? I should have noted that it's also possible that you haven't routed the IRQ for the second port correctly, so you're not getting any interrupts for the port. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message