From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 11 22:30:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F601065672 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:30:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cryx-freebsd@h3q.com) Received: from mail.h3q.com (mail.h3q.com [213.73.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E868FC08 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cryx-freebsd@h3q.com) Received: (qmail 99607 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2008 22:30:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO goa.local) (smtpsend@85.179.28.10) by mail.h3q.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Dec 2008 22:30:27 -0000 Message-ID: <49419482.2040502@h3q.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:30:26 +0100 From: Philipp Wuensche User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> <20081211221113.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20081211221113.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:30:29 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: > > Hi, > >> Brian A. Seklecki wrote: >>> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >>>> The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new >>>> functionality? >>> >>> The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the >>> latter. >> >> Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and >> breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. > > This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use > single-IPv4 jails as before there should be absoultely no change in the > output format. Why do I get the new jls output then when I only use one ipaddr. for a jail and none of the new features at all? > PS: I trimmed the CC: list as noone was able to adhere to Reply-To. freebsd-current should be in the CC as the discussion is if it is MFCd and let loose to 7.2R greetings, Philipp