From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 30 13:57:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from florence.pavilion.net (florence.pavilion.net [212.74.0.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE5114C15; Sun, 30 Jan 2000 13:56:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@florence.pavilion.net) Received: (from joe@localhost) by florence.pavilion.net (8.9.3/8.8.8) id VAA89970; Sun, 30 Jan 2000 21:56:50 GMT (envelope-from joe) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 21:56:50 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser To: John Baldwin Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, committers@FreeBSD.org, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven , Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: More world breakage Message-ID: <20000130215650.A83543@florence.pavilion.net> References: <20000130203936.A74352@florence.pavilion.net> <200001302151.QAA61702@server.baldwin.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <200001302151.QAA61702@server.baldwin.cx> X-NCC-RegID: uk.pavilion Organisation: Pavilion Internet plc, Lees House, 21-23 Dyke Road, Brighton, England Phone: +44-845-333-5000 Fax: +44-845-333-5001 Mobile: +44-403-596893 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 04:51:44PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: [cut] > With that in mind, the upgrade path is only going > to be broken for a few people who should be reading -current and thus > know how to work around the problem, so I repeal my request for the > changes to be backed out. My apologies. Great :) So, has anyone any strong ideas on both the "correct" function names to use and what the correct API should be for the functions. Joe -- Josef Karthauser FreeBSD: Take the red pill and we'll show you just how Technical Manager deep the rabbit hole goes. (http://www.uk.freebsd.org) Pavilion Internet plc. [joe@pavilion.net, joe@freebsd.org, joe@tao.org.uk] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message