From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 18 04:10:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448E916A417 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:10:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@freebsd.org) Received: from heff.fud.org.nz (203-109-251-39.static.bliink.ihug.co.nz [203.109.251.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5B713C45D for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@freebsd.org) Received: by heff.fud.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 067B61CC55; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:57:49 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:57:48 +1300 From: Andrew Thompson To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070118035748.GE12548@heff.fud.org.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: MFC rstp X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 04:10:57 -0000 Hi, I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree version to change from stp to rstp. Is it ok to change the protocol version for the STABLE users (rstp is backwards compatable with stp) or should it still default to stp and require the OP to enable rstp. Any opinions? Andrew http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/mfc_rstp.diff