From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 18 17:48:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2B01065671; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:48:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C500E8FC21; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:48:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A63646CB4; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:30:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:30:35 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Alexander Leidinger In-Reply-To: <20080318182407.7ou5yg93tw80wkco@webmail.leidinger.net> Message-ID: <20080318172602.E34016@fledge.watson.org> References: <200803180012.m2I0CCkj044917@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080318182407.7ou5yg93tw80wkco@webmail.leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/ideas ideas.xml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:48:28 -0000 On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Robert Watson (from Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:12:12 > +0000 (UTC)): > >> rwatson 2008-03-18 00:12:12 UTC >> >> FreeBSD doc repository >> >> Modified files: >> en/projects/ideas ideas.xml >> Log: >> Tag a number of project ideas as SoC-friendly. > > I already told Murray about those, as I've seen his SoC mail first, but here > again (short): > > - dtrace is scheduled to be committed, if there are outstanding things to do > for the SoC, they should be listed there I agree, and am currently chatting with John Birrell about this. He's working on writing up one or two ideas currently. > - AFAIR geninput is handled by someone already, if he applies for the SoC > himself it's fine, if not we should talk with him if is is actively working > on this or if a SoC student would be welcome (no need to reinvent the wheel) OK. When I chatted with Philip he didn't mention this, but he did ponder combining the syscons and generic input stuff. Has the person contacted Philip, or did Philip just forget to mention this? :-) > - wi: Isn't Sam doing parts of this in his vap p4 branch? When I asked Sam about this task yesterday, he felt the current description was fine, but advised me to add him as the contact. > - performancetracking: As can be seen in this entry, there's a promising > WIP, have you contacted Erik about it? Kris may know more about this. Kris seemed to like the current description and felt we should leave it up/open, as there's an opportunity here for people with specific benchmark interests to get involved, I believe. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge