From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Aug 12 02:15:52 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA10252
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 02:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.crl.com (mail.crl.com [165.113.1.22])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA10235
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 02:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jabber.paco.odessa.ua by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA19994
  (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>); Mon, 12 Aug 1996 02:12:20 -0700
Received: (from igor@localhost) by jabber.paco.odessa.ua (8.7.1/8.6.10/01) id MAA21710 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 12:00:11 +0300 (UKD)
From: Igor Khasilev <igor@jabber.paco.odessa.ua>
Message-Id: <199608120900.MAA21710@jabber.paco.odessa.ua>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. NT Stability
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 12:00:10 +0300 (UKD)
In-Reply-To: <199608120747.AAA00372@rah.star-gate.com> from "Amancio Hasty" at Aug 12, 96 00:47:26 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> >From The Desk Of "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" :
> 
> We don't have kernel level support for threads that means that the
> processes context switching for threads is handle by the threads package.
> 
> 2.2-current has support for *user* level threads and it shouldn't be that
> hard to convert the test program from using fork/exec to threads.
> 

BTW, is there any person who coordinate works on threads for freebds kernel?


				Igor