From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:50:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6CE16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D911243D49 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:50:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k09Io8Sq011508 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:50:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k09Io8XJ011507; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:50:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:50:08 GMT Message-Id: <200601091850.k09Io8XJ011507@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Dominic Mitchell Cc: Subject: Re: ports/91563: fix port sysutils/ucspi-tcp X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dominic Mitchell List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:50:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/91563; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dominic Mitchell To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/91563: fix port sysutils/ucspi-tcp Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:46:20 +0000 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Maintainer of sysutils/ucspi-tcp, > > Please note that PR ports/91563 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/91563 Yes, the patch looks good. Please commit. -Dom