From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 21 12:19:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A4216A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:19:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB92043D58 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:19:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6LCJ3Hl082976; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:19:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Xin LI From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:12:06 +0800." <20040721121206.GA746@frontfree.net> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:19:03 +0200 Message-ID: <82975.1090412343@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any idea why timespec* is _KERNEL stuff only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:19:06 -0000 In message <20040721121206.GA746@frontfree.net>, Xin LI writes: >Oh... Shall I ask for a review for a change of the current behavior, or hav= >e my >own version of timespec* macros in my program, for compability reasons? I belive this is a question for our standards people... I belive they have a mail-list of their own, probably standards@freebsd.org -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.